WEBVTT - Office Leasing Won't Recover For Five Yrs: Cushman & Wakefield

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney. Along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news kind the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. Well as more and more

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:25.279
<v Speaker 1>people work from home for longer and longer period the

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>question is what does that mean for corporate real estate

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>office space in some major urban cities. To get a

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 1>sense of kind of the future, here, uh, we welcome

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:38.559
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Rocky, global head of forecasting for Cushman and Wakefield

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>located in New York City. Rebecca, thanks so much for

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>joining us. You know, I was in the city a

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago, back in the office for day,

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I was, you know, kind of shocked

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to see the the fewer people on the street, and

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>that suggested to me fewer people, uh in the office buildings.

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Give us a sense of kind of where we are

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of in the global work worse in the office space,

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:04.839
<v Speaker 1>and how you guys are thinking about it. Sure well,

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>first of all, thank you so much for having me today. UM.

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, clearly we have a number of things going

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>on in the office sector, in particular, not the least

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of which is dealing with the damage that's been done

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>in the economy and the labor market. UM. As it

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:23.680
<v Speaker 1>relates to the return to the office, there are also

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>a number of trends emerging and most offices are operating

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>well below capacity right all over the country and really

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>in most of the parts of the world. We're seeing

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that office utilization is below where it was and in

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 1>some cases significantly. UM. And you know, fortunately office companies

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>have been more resilient when you think about the damage

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that's been done to different industries. Office employment has fared

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>disproportionately better, and there is somewhat of a an ability

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to work remotely, to get through the times, to continue

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to work, just not in the office right now. So

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that's really what we're seeing take place, and are some

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of the things that we talk about in this report. Yeah, Rebecca,

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you did a global office impact study and found that

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>office leasing will stay below pre COVID levels until twenty five, which,

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 1>when you think about it, sort of makes sense. What

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>does that mean for the likes of Cashman and Wakefield

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and others like you. Well, I think it was a

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of opportunity to add value to our clients and

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>helping them think about this new world that we're facing. Right. So,

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>we believe that the office is a critical part of

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>how companies do business, how they create value in particular,

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and so we fundamentally think there's intrinsic value to the

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>office place. Really, the question is what are the kinds

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of things we're doing in the office and how does

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>behavior change from a leasing perspective as we go into

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>this new normal. Um. The fact that we're finding that

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>despite some of the structural changes we anticipate, such as

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>work from home to emerge, that the office sector does

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>recover from a demand perspective, to me was a really

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>strong finding and indicative of the fact that many companies

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>view office as part of the broader ecosystem that will

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>allow them to achieve the goals that they have as company.

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>But it's interesting, you know, we've we've heard a lot

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of corporate leaders in New York City calling for companies

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that bring their employers back, open up the city again.

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Yet it just seems like, you know, just the people

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I talked to, they say Okay, maybe I'll go back

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>into the city, but it ain't gonna be five days

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>a week. This work at home from thing works just fine.

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>So is it going to be a sense that there

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>will be some permanent change. Absolutely absolutely. And you know,

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>in the right now we're in what I call the

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>adrenaline Russias COVID nineteen right, so we're dealing with competing

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>forces of trying to figure out what's going on with

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>schools and folks who need to maybe take care of

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>their their parents. Right. A huge concern is I need

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to go take um groceries on the weekend and I

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be exposed and put purt risk. So

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of that going on. And this

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>report really looked at different scenarios where we do find

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>ourselves in a post COVID world, defined as a world

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>where we have a medical solution such that we can

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>really subside in terms of the level of fear of

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the virus. But to your point, we absolutely believe there

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>will be long term changes and a majority of those

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>are in the evolution of what we call agile working

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>or part time at home, part time in third places,

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and part time in the office. We we think a

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>minority of the folks who work from home will ultimately

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:58.679
<v Speaker 1>be permanently there. Most people want to be in the office.

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Most people want to be in the office a few

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>days a week. So it's really that evolution that we

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:07.479
<v Speaker 1>expect to be long lasting in nature, and which we

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>tried to quantify in this report. Here are two statistics

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that really jumped out at me. Rebecca, US office vacancy

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>is expected to rise steadily and peak at seventeen point

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>six percent. But get this by mid twenty two, so

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:24.239
<v Speaker 1>not even next year, but presumably well after we already

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>have a vaccine. And you also found that asking rents

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 1>are expected to decline by nine point three peak to twelve. First,

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't seem like that big of a decline if

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at nearly a fifth of office space going

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>away until mid two. Are these in the major urban

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>centers and so on? Sure? Well, I think from the

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>vacancy rate perspective, it's important to note that we were

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>really at a low point for the cycle at just

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>under thirteen percent, So the increase is really relative to

0:05:55.920 --> 0:06:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that which was consistent with prior sort of peas of

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 1>expansions in terms of the pre COVID level of vacancy.

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>So we are expecting this shift upwards by about four

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:12.479
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty four HERD sixty basis points. And that's really

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:16.239
<v Speaker 1>that is the increase that is putting the downward pressure

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:21.280
<v Speaker 1>on rental rates um so that that effect is something

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that we expect to play out differently across cities. One

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:27.479
<v Speaker 1>of the things we do find is that, and this

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:31.840
<v Speaker 1>is consistent with history as well, suburban market the rents

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:35.359
<v Speaker 1>there be less elastic, they tend to move less during

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>down cycles, and our our city central city rents do

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>tend to move by a little bit more in our

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>findings were consistent with that as well. Rebecca, thank you.

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Presumably there'll be more studies like this and we will

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>continue to keep in touch with you and here more.

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Rocky is Global ahead of Forecasting for Kushman and Wakefield,

0:06:54.440 --> 0:07:00.040
<v Speaker 1>joining us today. As we approach the elections, there's in

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the plomban discussion on the Wall Street don't what a

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>possible Joe Biden presidency would mean for economic policy for

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>financial markets. To get some answers to those questions, we

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>welcome Edmund Phelps. Edmund is a Nobel laureate and director

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Center on Capitalism in Society at Columbia University,

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Professor Phelps, Thanks so much for joining us. What do

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you What are your thoughts here? Should former Vice President

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden win the election, Well, certainly hope you will

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>win the election. I think the economy really depends on it.

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I've just been um very disturbed over over these past

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>years to see uh Trump's attempts to to guide to

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>guide the economy, to intervene right and left. This creates

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>enormous uncertainty. That's very bad for investment, and it's very

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>bad for innovation. And innovation has already been suffering for

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>quite a few decades. But with innovators won't get a

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>chance to breathe. So I think I think it's very

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>important that we vote out the Trump administration and give

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>a new group a chance. So that I first saw

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>your article in The Guardian, the editorial and the Guardian

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and then later on a sort of a paper almost

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>if you like, in Project to Syndicate, and you basically

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>start off by excoriating President Trump's policy, you know, quote

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 1>unquote economic policy, because, as you say, he practices Mussolini's

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>doctrine of corporatism, the government as poppet master pulling the

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>strings of poppet companies. You also go on to talk

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>about as populist rhetoric not translating into better pay for

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>less advantage workers or victims of discrimination. And you have

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a whole sort of takedown of President's Trump's economic plans

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>or actions. But why aren't we hearing more from Biden

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>about what he would do? So, yes, we know that

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 1>he's offering pell grounds to everybody and so on, but

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>we're not getting a really developed economic platform as far

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>as I can see. Well, I think that Biden has

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>h shown an interest in, um doing something about the

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>wages at the bottom in this country, which have been

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a have continued to be a terrible problem for decades.

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I think he has shown interest in addressing

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 1>the poor, core rewards going to to the least advantage

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>in the country. And um, I think maybe your question

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>is pointed to what do we hear from Biden about

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>investment and innovation? Well, I think I think he's I

0:09:54.040 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>think he's shown some definitely shown some awareness of the

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>need for picking up innovation. And of course, in the

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>long term, you can't have sustained high investment if you

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>don't have underlying innovation going on. So I think it's

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 1>fair to say that Biden grown up in his his

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>seventy something years. He's grown up in the economy, and

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 1>he understands what's going on. He understands the weakness of

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the economy, he understand slow growth, and uh, you know,

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>there have been a hundred things that he's had to

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about, and maybe he's not not talked enough about

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>investment innovation, but he has done some talking on economic justice,

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>which is the other grand theme of mine. Yes, and

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I understand that, and I appreciate that you say that

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>he displays an awareness. But the month has been a

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 1>politician his entire life, and surely he has ideas for

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>what he would do to redirect funds in the economy,

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 1>and not just on the corporate innovation side, but also,

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>as you say, to translate you know, current politics in

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:19.199
<v Speaker 1>the situation into better pay for less advantage workers, victims, discrimination,

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>erase economic justice injustices and so on. He's not coming

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>out with any of that. Is he too scared that

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that will alienate some of the demographics that he might need. Uh,

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:35.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a politician. I'm not even a political scientist.

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I really wouldn't venture. I wouldn't want to venture a

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>guest on that at all. All right, So so Edmund,

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>give us the thoughts just real quickly here. On trade,

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that's been a big issue for President Trump. How do

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 1>you see a Biden prenency as it relates to economic trade? Oh? Well,

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it. The Trump's position towards trade has been

0:11:54.800 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>another contributor to um poor economic performance. Being able to

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:04.479
<v Speaker 1>trade with the rest of the world is awfully helpful

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in developing new products, in finding markets for new investment.

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to imagine high prosperity in the American economy

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>without without very considerable amounts of international trade, foreign trade.

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 1>And of course another thing is that Trump has gotten

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>in the way of bringing in highly qualified people to

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>engage in uh innovation in the American economy. Silicon Valley

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>is being starved of of the of of much of

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the talent that it needs. UM. I saw the other

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>day that about trade and immigration, I saw that three

0:12:56.120 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand companies are now suing the White House over the

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>tariffs that have been instituted by the Trump administration. So

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:13.079
<v Speaker 1>that just that just is an indication of how oppressive

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and how retarding uh Trump's influence has been on the economy. Well, professor,

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:22.559
<v Speaker 1>thank you for that. We definitely hope to hear more

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>from Joe Biden. Of course, the first debate is next Tuesday,

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and I imagine that there will be a portion on

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>economic plans and for anybody who's interested in this, the

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>economic case for Biden by Professor edmund S. Phelps, Nobel

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Laureate and of course from Columbia University as well, Legended

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Our Lifetimes really is both on Project Syndicate and in

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the Guardian and Paul, I think it's important. I think

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>we need some details. Were fewer than fourty days away

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>from the selection, and both candidates need to step it

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>up with the actual concrete proposals. Well, Vonnie, we are

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 1>so fortunate to have on a regular basis of good

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>folks of Johns Hopkins University come on and help us

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>get a little bit smarter about this virus and potential therapy,

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.719
<v Speaker 1>potential vaccines. Today we're joined by Lauren Sauer at the

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine at Johns Hopkins University. H Lauren,

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. You know, the

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>new story I guess I heard today is something called

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>interfere on as a possible new treatment. To educate us

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>on kind of what you think this might mean. Yeah,

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the two studies that came out recently on interfere on,

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>we're really exciting to see. And I think, um, what

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I had seen, what I've seen briefly is that this

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>may The scientists who did the studies feel that this

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>may um account for nearly fifteen fourteen or fifteen percent

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of the severe COVID cases. Um. What they're seeing is

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that this sort of lack of interfere on and the

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>body is helping to facilitate severe disease. So people are

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>getting sicker. Um. The good thing about it is that

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>we have used interference, especially synthetic interference, for a long

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>time for other diseases, and so UM, if we can

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>target these at risk patients and use some of this

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>research to identify them early, um, we may be able

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to treat them quickly with therapies that we already have

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>in our tool kit for other diseases. And it's particularly

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>amazing if it ends up being all true and the

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>research proves itself out, because it's the type of thing

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that hits young people. And also it means that it

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>might save you from going on respirator, which we all know.

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Then you know, it is a whole other stage in

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>this illness. When might we know something about the effectiveness

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of of an interfere on you know, rehabilitation scheme if

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you like. Yeah, so, and the studies that came out

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>are already telling us that interfe treatment may be an

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>effective option. UM. The new arm of the NIH Adaptive

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Trial Act is also an interfere on study. And I

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>would imagine that there's lots of interfere on UM studies

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>across the country and possibly across the globe. UM, there's

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm just too doing interfere on specific studies, especially when

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking these studies may target or only enroll people

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>with severe disease. UM. We are seeing more outpatients with

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>COVID and peer severe disease at least where I am UM,

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and so focusing on enrolling those patients into the clinical

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>trials quickly and efficiently, both to hopefully save lives but

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 1>also to really better understand the mechanism is critical right now. So, Lauren,

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it appears the data remains stupornly high in terms of

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>new cases. UM, yet perhaps the death rate is declining.

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Is that kind of your understanding some of the data

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to see more recently. Yeah. I think one

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of the things we're seeing is that, UM, we're we

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>are getting patients out of the hospital quicker, which is great, UM,

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and that may be I think we're gonna need a

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of long term studies to understand why that's happening.

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>But a big piece of it maybe that we're getting

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 1>better at managing these patients because we're learning more about

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the course of illness and the course of disease. So UM,

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>we're keeping people from entering into that severe disease state,

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, off of ventilator, UM, off of those high

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:22.879
<v Speaker 1>flow oxygen needs, because we're managing their earlier or or

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 1>we're identifying them earlier and we're managing them better in

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 1>the hospital and getting them not quicker. So, Lauren, we

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:34.199
<v Speaker 1>were talking yesterday about people in the UK proactively getting

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>injected or or infected with coronavirus in order to try

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and help studies these people, I mean, are they risking

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:46.959
<v Speaker 1>long term consequences? I think they absolutely are. The challenge

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 1>study model that UM talking about that we're seeing in

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the UK. UM is a model that we've used in

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:57.199
<v Speaker 1>other diseases to better understand UM how vaccines work, so

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that it's a controlled environment and we understand the exposure,

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>We understand the course of the disease and exactly where

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>in the disease process of patients or the participants get

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine UM and what their exposure level is after

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>getting the vaccine. The hard part in this situation is

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 1>that we don't have a really good therapeutic toolkit, so

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>if something goes wrong with these patients UM, we don't

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>have a great a series of great options to treat them,

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>so that that is a higher risk than than you

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 1>would want in a challenge study. And there's a lot

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of ongoing community transmission in many places across the globe,

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 1>so there are opportunities to do vaccine trials the right

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>way in a well controlled environment, understanding community transmission without

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>putting people deliberately at risk and exposing them to to

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus. So it's a risk that we're taking unnecessarily.

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>So Lauren, again I'm just going to ask us to

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:01.919
<v Speaker 1>try to triangulate around timing. Is it still fair to

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.400
<v Speaker 1>suspect that we will that some series of vaccines will

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>be available sometime early next year, maybe late this year,

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:10.199
<v Speaker 1>but it will take time after that to kind of

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>figure out what's most effective. Is that's still the way

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to think about it. Yeah, I think that early next

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 1>year is probably on target for a few of these vaccines. UM.

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:22.360
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing the Phase three trials happen right now, We're

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing good data come in. I think the challenges that

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>scale up piece so UM. Once a vaccine can it

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.360
<v Speaker 1>goes through the process, we still have the regulatory environment

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>for getting that approval from the FDA. For example. UM.

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.880
<v Speaker 1>There is discussion of you of using the Emergency used

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>authorization in the interim space between UM or preliminary data

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 1>from the Phase three trials and getting approval from the

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.439
<v Speaker 1>UM for the vaccine to roll out more broadly. But

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:53.360
<v Speaker 1>we also have to consider scale up of manufacturing, distribution plans,

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>prioritizing the people who will receive it, what are the

0:19:56.760 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>most important populations UM, And so there's a lot of

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 1>things that have to happen between now and a massive

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>rollout of the vaccine trial. And I think mid to

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>late and mid to the end of next year is

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:12.160
<v Speaker 1>probably reasonable for large scale rollout. Lawrence, thank you as

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>always absolutely love getting your updates straight from you know,

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the epicenter of where all the research is happening. Lawrence

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Hower is the system Professor of Emergency Medicine at Johns

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins School of Medicine and of course the Bloomberg School

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 1>of Public Health. Is supported by MICHAELAR Bloomberg, founder of

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg LP and Bloomberg Philanthropies and Bloomberg Markets. Is brought

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>team by with him forward thinking advisory and accounting firm

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>helping hiens to be in a position of strength and

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 1>the new reality of business learn about their innovative solutions

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 1>by visiting with them dot com. So it's time to

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 1>talk commodities. Some are seeing good news, some are not

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:52.360
<v Speaker 1>seeing so much good news. Let's bring in Mike McGlone,

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>who knows all about the precious metals and also precious

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>metals and every other commodity out there. He's commodity strategist

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence. Mike, we haven't talked too much about

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>China recently, mainly because apart from TikTok and ouricle and

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 1>so on, there haven't been many trade developments. But at

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the same time, underlying commodities are moving still because of this.

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 1>For example, China went on a buying spree and so

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that seems to have revived export profits for some top

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:22.400
<v Speaker 1>crop traders. So that's good news, right, Are we seeing

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>prices reflect that? Oh? Certainly in soybeans tiganium, Yes, so

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 1>I means that ten dollars a bush, so they're up

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>about five percent in the year they got about ten thirty.

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:32.719
<v Speaker 1>That's been a good sign. It's almost completely on exports

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's a big crop this year, not really swabeans,

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 1>but corn, so that's a big deal. And also the

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 1>market's anticipating the potential peak in the dollar, and the

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 1>US now exports about swabeans, so the value of the dollar,

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the value of the Brazilian real is a big thing.

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Just the fact that the China has been back in

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>has been good in crops, it's really better take taking

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>them off the bottom. But for new highs to really

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 1>go up for more strength, eggs need a peak dollar,

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 1>all right. So but also look at the dollar index

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:05.199
<v Speaker 1>here at ninety four. That's not peaked. Dollar isn't no

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>hit all um, And it's really and from from the

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>egg standpoint, we watched the trade weighted broad dollar because

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the dollar index is six almost two thirds Euro trade

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>weighted broad is mostly China's China. It doesn't take every day,

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>but gives you a good indication. The key thing is

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:22.160
<v Speaker 1>what's been really driving that strong dollar the last ten

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>years ago, so is the out performance the US stock market.

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>So we're seeing lately is a bit of a divergence.

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 1>There's been flows into commanities. Commanies are outperforming during this

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>last little sloon correction in the stock markets. The key

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>is Greggs and Eggs aren't really going to really matter

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to the stock market so much. But in copper, that's

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 1>been a key thing I've been watching. Copper is the

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>highest correlation to the stock market ever in a fifty

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>two weeks twelve one basis and it's really not and

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>it's still hanging around three dollars a pound versus the

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 1>ten percent correction in nansect. That's a good sign that

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe we're seeing some divergence. I think people are looking

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>more for the physical assets, not just gold, silver, platinum plate,

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:59.439
<v Speaker 1>and not just sup precious but more the base metals

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 1>like copper. Well, I was going to say, with the

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>exception actually of gold, which seems to really have just

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>gone and got its cold and left the room, right Mike.

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>In the short term, gold still up in the year.

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>In the unchanged Bitcoin is up in there. So my

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 1>bias at the beginning here was the quasi currencies gold

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 1>and bitcoin should continue to outperform. I don't see why

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I should change that. The gold just got a little

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 1>bit extended. You know, it was fifty it was well

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>above is fifty two eight me and the highest and

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a long time. It's it's it's consolidating the bull market

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that way I see it. Right now. It's going to

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:33.640
<v Speaker 1>back up in the good sport around eighteen hundred dollars

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and ounced. But if you look at the foundation for

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>gold rapidly rise in US debt to the GDP and

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 1>increase in CHEWI on a global SCS scale, it's unprecedented

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>goal has a very solid foundation for the next five

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>ten years. And just help us revisit the bull case

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:52.159
<v Speaker 1>for bitcoin. We can talk bitcoin. Vannie doesn't have a

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>no bitcoin policy like Tom peen Um. So give us

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that bull case for bitcoin again, Mike. Bottom line very

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and supply actually less potentially less supply than gold. Higher

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>prices will not bring on more supply, and then it's

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 1>about demand. So all my indications for demand are higher,

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and bitcoin has been becoming adopted in the space. There's

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>more and more people getting in there. The main indications

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>are quite positive. Futures open, interest um, exchange traded products

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>coming on for and and addresses used and things like that.

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>So bitcoins is getting there. The cool thing about bitcoins

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>has had a significant correction and it's had a period

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>of disdain, and so that's us you a good foundation

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>for higher prices. And the correlation between bitcoin and gold

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 1>is the highest ever depending on how you measure it.

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>So I see bitcoin is becoming a digital version of gold.

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>It's just more of a kind of a baby and

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>it's catching up. It's taking baby steps now at the moment. Well,

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I on that note, would like to compare Etherium with bitcoin,

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and so if you look at returns over the last year,

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:56.160
<v Speaker 1>ethereum is up on Bitcoin, up versus the US dollar.

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 1>Does that just suggest that bitcoin is a little more

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:01.679
<v Speaker 1>mature as a cryptocurrency. It is, and there's a big difference.

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Ethereum kind of part of the whole other crypto space,

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and there's seven thousand of them Ethereum is the number

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>two cryptocurrency, but if you look at the current trends,

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:11.959
<v Speaker 1>a theorem will be surpassed next year by the stable

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>coin tether. So ethereum has got good and things that

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>has going for it is defied decentralized finances finance, and

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the dex is decentralized exchanges. Theorems like the first platform

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>for that, but it has a lot of competition. Theorium

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>got a little bit expensive around five hundred. It's meeting

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:30.479
<v Speaker 1>good support around three hundred. But I think their overall

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>bias is towards and continued to increase. But Bitcoin should

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>continue to outperform the overall broad market. And the problem

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>is there's just too much supply in the broad crypto market.

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 1>So Mike, we can't let you go without talking the

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:45.920
<v Speaker 1>soft commodities, agricultural. Do we have evidence? I mean, is

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>this market now just completely driven by China on? China off?

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 1>Is that kind of the only thing we need to

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 1>focus on. It's right now, it is China has really

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>helped bring it out of the dull drums, and we

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>had multi year lows, lows and corns just a few

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:01.120
<v Speaker 1>months ago, and soybeans are getting pretty beat up. Yet

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 1>we have a you know, have a pretty good crop.

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 1>But this year, actually the revisions for the U s

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 1>productions actually come down since that August report, so it's

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a good sign it's going that way. But I don't

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>see US sauce i e. Corn soy means really having

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>a good bullmark until the dollar peaks, because the US

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>now exports more than of its soy it means and

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:24.880
<v Speaker 1>over its wheat. So the dollar really matters there. Well,

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean just on the US. You know, how can

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the dollar peak again or even get much stronger when

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese have the yuan trading around you know, six

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>eight at this point and looking to go even lower

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>i e. Stronger. Well, so the the un has actually

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>been strengthening recently because it's six eight used to be

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>seven recently. But the key thing you remember from the

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 1>dollar standpoint is the dollars measured against other other other currencies,

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>which are all paper currencies, and that's where you come

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to the physical assets like most notably the medals, the gold,

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoins of the world. They're rising versus all paper currencies.

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's that race for cheaper currencies. Everybody's queueing everybody's

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>at zero rates, which means physical assets like copper and

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>gold and bitcoin are gaining that value. And that's what

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I see going forward, and hopefully that'll trickle down to

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the other commodities. It's just probably not going to trickle

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>up to crude oil because there's too much supply and

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>we all know the trend in decarbonization. Really quick, I'm

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:21.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna slip in a discussion about cattle. What's going on?

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 1>How's the herd look? Yes, sorry, that's one thing I

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>don't watch much of cattle, Paul, I'm sorry about that one.

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Just the one thing I've never been able to figure

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 1>out is a good high robust correlations to the price

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of cattle. Alright, I see it's possible to stump Mike mcgloan,

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Michael don't. Thanks so much for joining US commodity strategists

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligences all over the commodity complex. For ut Vonnie,

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it's great to have my gun. Cattle features don't seem

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to be shifting around much Pole. Of course I looked

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>it up. It's LC one. If you want the genericat

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure every farmer out there would say that no

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>cattle is generic they're all individual. Thanks for listening to

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets podcast asked. You can subscribe and listen to

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bonnie Quinn, I'm on Twitter at Bonnie Quinn. And

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Radio