WEBVTT - Week 12 preview

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Da Around the NFL Podcast give zero about the News

0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Star Wars. Welcome back to another edition of the Around

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the NFL Podcast. My name is Dan Hansis, and I

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:16.920
<v Speaker 1>am joined by a room filled with heroes, Mark Sessler,

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Chris Westling, and Greg Rosatal. What's up, boys, Hey, dam

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 1>That definitely wasn't Mark's opinion. I can tell you that, Yeah,

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that was my favorite drop yet. But Mark produced a

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>sour face. Well, the the new Star Wars number one,

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not not the name of it, but like anyone

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>knows the name or we don't know that, yeah, normal people,

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the Force awakens. But I'm not some TD like sci

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:42.840
<v Speaker 1>fi nerd. But it's the first movie that I saw

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>with my dad, as I've stated before, and so it

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>has a meaning to apologize. No, no, but I can

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>see that something was absolutely missing from the childhoods of

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>others I said downstairs, you know, I've I sometimes draw

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>criticism in certain circles, whether it be in the newsroom

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>where on Twitter for being a hater of the Star

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Wars franchise. I'm not I just can't avoid it, and

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that gets little annoying, but at the same time, which

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>makes you a hater. Yeah, I guess I wouldn't call

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you an advocate a kind advocate of the franchise, right,

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>But I don't judge people for it. I do. I

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>want to make that yes, you do, not really And

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you know the the new Rocky movie coming out, Creed.

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I will be at that theatre by myself on Friday.

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of like my Star Wars. Uh, something I'm

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>really excited about. So I get it. And what There's

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of difference we can create in the

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>new Star Wars when you think about it, too. Dormant

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 1>franchise that are trying to relaunch to a new generation

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and make a ton more money. I want to see

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>create that looks good. Well, one is taking place in

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the world where humans exist, and the other has you know,

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>men dressed up funny robot outfits and like animal you

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>know skins and what. Well, Greg, I realized that you

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>were like basically born to Earth at age thirty three,

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that you had no childhood that we can detect, So

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not surprised by your commentary. Both movies came out

0:01:55.600 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>originally forty years ago. A terrible Ones came out about

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>um Welcome Back to Another around the NFL podcast, our

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:08.359
<v Speaker 1>second in two days. I love it. Uh, this will

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 1>be our big preview show of the rest of the week.

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Eleven game week, twelve games excuse me, that are not

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>being played on Thanksgiving Day, so we previewed on Tuesday's show.

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you check that out. You haven't yet the

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:29.519
<v Speaker 1>three games on Thanksgiving Eagles, Lions, Panthers, Cowboys, Bears, Packers.

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>But guess what thirty two teams. No teams. I'm buying

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>three games played on Thursday, which means thirteen games to

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>be played on Sunday and Monday. So check out. The

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>accident kind of went away like like, uh, what's that movie? Now,

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm blowing up your affection affectation change. That was more childlike, Okay,

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you really blew. You're not gonna come up with it.

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna hot me for the rest of the show.

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a uh, you know, it's some actors where they

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>have the Boston accent. They'll kind of come and go

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>during the Oh, I know you, I know where you're going. Uh,

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Jack Nicholson and uh came and went an Oscar Award

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:17.679
<v Speaker 1>winning actor Kevin Costner and uh playing one of the

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy users. There you go Costner Nicholson, Hansas. It happens

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to all of us. Uh. Sometimes you don't like holding

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>against him and just keep moving on with their brilliant careers. Uh. So, yes,

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of games to get to, uh, and we're

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna do that. We also a little later in the show. Uh,

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>we have stopping by Michael Berger, who was a producer

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>for NFL Network. He's a huge fan of the podcast.

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>From what I understand, is that correct, right, former guest

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>of the podcast. They're not not just any producer. He's

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the producer of our TV arm of of the show

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>around the NFL. Right. Well, but we'll get into a

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit when Burger gets in here. How he came

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to be on the show for a second time, which

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>will be today on the eve of Thanksgiving. Uh, And

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>then we'll talk about some games with Burger is a

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>big Cincinnati Bengals fan, So West and Burger have a

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>little connection there. Well, I'm not a fan, We're both

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>from Cincinnati now, he he likes the Bengals for some reason. Uh. So, yes,

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:19.919
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into all the games uh to be played

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday Monday. And I think we should get right

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 1>into it because we got a lot to talk about,

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>So why don't we uh start right away, gentlemen, with

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the one o'clock games on Sunday. Yes, the Minnesota Vikings

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>coming off a tough loss uh to the Packers at home.

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>They wanted it to be, yes, Greg, a statement game

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>against Green Bay. Instead, they fell into a tie the

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:46.559
<v Speaker 1>top the NFC North, but still all good. At seven

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and three, they get the Atlanta Falcons, who once upon

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 1>a time were they five and Oh that's correct. Wow,

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>So now they're six and four. Uh, you know, the

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>division is long gone, the four games behind the undefeated Panthers,

0:04:58.440 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and now they're just trying to hold on for a

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>playoff spot. Um, Greg, I'll start with you on this one. Uh.

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Your thoughts on this matchup? The Falcons are hard team

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>to get behind, no matter the opponent, and now they

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>have an NFC team that's won seven of its first

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>ten games. Well, I think this is the biggest game

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of the entire rest of the season for the NFC

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Wildcard race. It's not. It's not the game I'm most

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 1>excited about, certainly for the rest of the season, or

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>even this Sunday, even this Sunday at one o'clock but

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>it is the biggest game there. I don't think there's

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:31.839
<v Speaker 1>really any argument because the winner of this game, especially

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>if it's Minnesota, is in great position for that by

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>But if Atlanta wins it there seven and four, they

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>have a much i would say, an easier schedule than

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota the rest of the way, and suddenly that second

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>spot is a lot more up for grabs. Atlanta will

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>have a good chance for it will be a little

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>tougher for teams like Seattle and Tampa to catch up.

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 1>So even though Atlanta has been in a bit of

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 1>a free father losing close games, I don't think Minnesota

0:05:57.760 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>is a team that I trust to go on the

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>road and blow any one out. I think this should

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>be a close game. And Lanta's offense against the Cults

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>last week, you know, a lot to be desired, both

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>the passing game and the running game, especially when DeVonta

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Freeman went out and he's not gonna play this week. Minnesota,

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>You're right, Greg, they had the second toughest schedule of

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 1>any team in the league down the stretch after this game,

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>they played the Seahawks and the Cardinals. So you got

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to take this game. And I think this is this

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 1>is This is a winnable game for the second best

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>defense in the league, and Matt Ryan has had a

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 1>bad season, or what you would call mediocre season by

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>his standards. This was the week after they blew that

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>game against the Cults where it started to bubble up,

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 1>where the criticism criticism started to really come out, and

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>there are questions is this guy healthy? How is he?

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 1>You know? Because he missed a lot of throws in

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that game in addition to a terrible pick six um,

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>so that Ryan will be facing more scrutiny in this game.

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>He cannot lay another egg at home or he's going

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to be primarily responsible for this team's free fall at

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a playoff contention? What do the Falcons do well? Get

0:06:57.440 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the ball? A Julio Jones? Other than that, I can't

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 1>think of anything. They were running the ball well. I

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>would have said that, you know, you could have said

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that's been a month. I don't know. I know what

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings do well. They run the ball, and they

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>have a good defense, and Taddy Bridgewater makes a pretty

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>throw or two every game in theory they rallied to

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the ball, you know they did in September. Decent team

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>defense now I think you're right. I think this is

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>a game that Minnesota should take care of. And you're

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>right there. And that's the first time I can remember,

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>even during Atlanta struggles the last couple of years, there

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a lot of coaches and players coming out saying

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>we still believe in Matt Ryan. That that's a fairly

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>new phenomenon really for the And he's a thirty year old,

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's right in the middle of his career

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>just having I don't know what it is. Well, I

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>think they're not having that bad of a year. What

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the heck is going on here? Well, that's what this

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>week has been like in Atlanta, though people have been

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of fans look at he had

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>three interceptions. One of them wasn't his fault. It's the

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>end of the game, but they brought Oswiler and Den

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>when he can finally run the rollout offense that is

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Kubiak's signature moment, That is the same offense in many

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>ways as this Atlanta offense. And suddenly Matt Ryan's having

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to do that himself from really the first time in

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>his career to that degree. And I just think it's

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>next year We're gonna get a better version of Matt Ryan.

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Of Kyle Shanahan's still around, he seems to be having

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>trouble adjusting to this offense. Absolutely. Look at the top

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>m VP candidates this year, Tom Brady, Cam Newton, Carson Palmer,

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers, Andy Dalton. They have all been in their

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>offense is for what five years? At least it takes

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a while. I want to see Teddy Bridgewater bounce back

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>from a perform I thought he played really well last week.

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>This is a defense that he shouldn't face much of

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a pass thrush at all, and I think the weapons

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>around him are kind of coming around, with Gayle Rudolphs

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>playing pretty well. Stefon Diggs light it up. We all

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>picked the vikings of this game, which tells you a

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>lot about what's happened with the Falcons the last six

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>weeks or so, so we'll see how that shakes out.

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Moving on to UH the next one PM game to

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about. This game will be on Fox and will

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>be in New Orleans Saints at four and six and

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>now with a new defensive coordinator UH, Dennis Allen replacing

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>UH the jettisoned Rob Bryan, who had an eventful um

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>stop by at NFL Network this past Sunday. Believe it

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>made a Katrina reference, made a lot of jokes, and

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a tucking his shirt. It was a you know, a

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>classic Rob Bryan appearance. But now the Saints gotta move

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>on and try to save a season that's on the

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>brink of slipping away. Has been too many of these

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>in recent years. For New Orleans. They get the Texans,

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>who are playing, uh, excellent defense right now. They just

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 1>beat the Jets. Uh, they are a top of the

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>AFC South at five and five. Chris Westling, We've been

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about them this week a lot. I mean, this

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>is a team that, uh, we can't assume they're gonna

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>beat anybody, but they're starting to look like a real

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>playoff team potentially. Yeah. When I look at this matchup,

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, if this was two or three weeks ago,

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I would have said the Saints offense is the best

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>unit in this game. But I don't think it is.

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the Texans defense is the way they're playing.

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:05.439
<v Speaker 1>It was right around this time last year when J. J.

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Watt just you know exploded. He was sitting on eight

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>at eight and a half sacks and then he had

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>what twelve over his final six or seven games, and

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna do the same thing this year.

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:19.439
<v Speaker 1>I think Whitney merciless, who's really flown under the radar,

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>is in the top eight this year in the NFL

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and tackles behind the line of scrimmage. And you know

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Mark mentioned the rookie cornerback Kevin Johnson playing well, Jadevin Clown,

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>he's playing really well, and uh their second round pick.

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>But Argic McKinney is really coming alive and inside lab

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>backer two. They're the best thurned down defense in the NFL.

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>And the worst unit in this game is the Saints defense. Specifically,

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>they're passing defense. Four more touchdowns and loud and three

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:47.439
<v Speaker 1>straight games through the air. That's a disaster. This is

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity again for DeAndre Hopkins to blow up, because

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>what we're not seeing with Sammy Watkins and what's getting

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pressing Buffalo is he's just not getting targets.

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 1>But in Houston, they're, dude, doing the right thing. This

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>is your star player and they're going to him over

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and over and over and he could have a big

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 1>day here. I don't want to hear the Sammy Watkins

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:05.959
<v Speaker 1>stuff too. It's not all in the Bill's scheme in

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 1>the quarterbacks like that. Guy's always hurt. So he's been

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>getting to any flow in his NFL career through two years.

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins is on the field and he makes the most

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of his targets. No ma out of the quarterback. I

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>think West and I think you you know, um, maybe

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a rankings list to come up, whether it's this season

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>in the off season. I think you could make a

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>case that he's the number one wide receiver now because

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 1>and you all set the factor in his production. He

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>is better production than anybody Hopkins and he's got no quarterbacks. Really,

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I think he might be the best now. I have

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>made a wide receiver rankings. Thanks for reading it, Dan, Yeah,

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you're welcome. When it was about I would say four

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:41.959
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, said okay, well, I can't read every I

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Maybe six weeks ago. It was before everyone

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:48.199
<v Speaker 1>realized that DeAndre Hopkins was possible. But I would have

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a hard time putting him over Antonio Brown and Juldio Jones.

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:55.559
<v Speaker 1>I'd consider I can. I would put Brown number one.

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>To me, that's easy. I think he is playing at

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a level right now, I can't really remember seeing anyone

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>or at least as high level. Hopkins is right there though,

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>And well, the one thing he does have with Brian Hoyer,

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>which Brian Horror is not a great quarterback. Brian Horge

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>is just gonna throw the bottom him fourteen times. Well,

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:14.319
<v Speaker 1>are you sure because t J. Yates would throw t

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>J Yates is gonna throw it to him too. Ryan

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Mawt's gonna throw it to him too. I mean, his

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 1>his targets for this season are absolutely outrageous, and they're right.

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't need to happen and he usually is. Back

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:26.559
<v Speaker 1>to Antonio Brown, what happened when he took one of

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the best quarterbacks in the NFL. When you gave him

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 1>the caliber quarterbacks that DeAndre Hopkins has been catching passes

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>from all year, he disappeared. They didn't throw the ball.

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't care. The things that he does with the

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>ball and on his routes are just are just exceptional.

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:43.439
<v Speaker 1>But we're picking between you know, the great as best

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>player I hold in my hands. Get excited. Everybody in

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand fifteen season Week twelve research notes, it's

0:12:56.760 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>just getting distasteful. It is Brian Hoyer's win though. Yeah,

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>there you go, very good, Mark, Yes, Ed Koal check

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of Live. Don't pretend that was intentional. That nailed it. Uh,

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>it was in my mind the whole time. Matt money

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Smith gave me some guff a couple of weeks ago

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that I had sent out a tweet last year at

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 1>some point naming the top five live songs. In my defense,

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I was almost certainly drunk. Yeah, I'm sure that happened

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>in a nearby tavern after about three games of pool

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and more beers than that. All right? From the research notes,

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:29.839
<v Speaker 1>the Texans oh their current three game winning streak to

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>their defense. Opponents are scoring just nine point seven points

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a game over three three game streak, and the Texans

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 1>have a plus five turnover differential and that's spin. Uh yeah,

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>so Hopkins has been great, and uh you know, g J.

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Yates has done the job, But it's the defense. The

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>defense could take them all the way to the playoffs.

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:50.199
<v Speaker 1>Where's the red flags from Damna sex show? Poor use

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of the research back repeating the same stuff I already said. Wait,

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>why are you being so cantankerous with me today? Wes?

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I am. I think that was the

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>first time, wasn't it? No? Was like I wrote about that, Dan,

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for reading my material. I feel like you've been

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>undermining everything I've said about me. This is great. We

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of different types of heat on what

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>is going on. That's why I'm so shocked these attacks.

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:18.199
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've been you know, hot and quote on

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>your research packet usage right all year. You've been using

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it pretty well. But today you just repeated what already said.

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I would like you to keep your opinions to yourself.

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Whoa it comes to my research packet. If you're gonna

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>have this attitude positive opinions only about the research packet

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>going forward, I'm gonna I have my own research packet.

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>It's right inside my brain and shuffled. And there's Gregg

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>pointing to his head while he says and it tells me,

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>uh to tell Sean Payton out there, hey, and key

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>spots of the game. Let's maybe not give short yardage

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>carries to Tim hi Tower. What's going on to my terrorism?

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Been in the league for four years? They give him

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>big carries against the Redskins? What was that c J?

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Spiller to feed mark Ingram? What's so under you? We

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>um All picked the Texans. I was just waiting for

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Greg to finish this point so I could get back

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>to undermining West's career. I have a lot to get

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to destroy West. That's why I'm here moving on the

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay Buccaneers playing very well. UH, West stopped me

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>if I step on any of your points for the

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>rest of the show. With Jamis Winston playing at a

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Pro Bowl level five touchdowns in UH Sunday's win. Now

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>they traveled to Indianapolis. And here's the problem for Jameis

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Winston and the Bucks, who are putting their season back

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>together five and five, but now Mark Sessler Matt Hasselbeck,

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>who literally cannot be defeated in the NFL. Coming off

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of watching last week's Cults game, I would say if

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you made a list of the teams you thought would

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>be exciting before the year and where they are now,

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the Cults would be the number one team for me.

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>That is bore boring than I thought. And the Bucks

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>are the exact opposite where I thought they were gonna

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>be a possible watch and they were one of the

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>more exciting teams in league. I think Tampa Bay sounds

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>like a column maybe so after the break, not today,

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>but I'll tell you something. Tampa Bay, who waxed the

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>floor last week with the Redskins, I think they're going

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to go and do it again. Excellent points, Mark, I

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>would not dream of I would not dream of undermining

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>anything done out there because less siding with a Sessler points.

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was well said considering what we thought

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of these teams earlier in the year entering the season,

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks are the much stronger team right now between

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>these two teams room the old Fogies. It's it's not

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>like the Bucks are just doing it once. I mean

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the first half that they had against the Redskins, there's

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean it. They explode fast. Three fifty five yards

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>in the first half last week against Philadelphia is outrageous.

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>And Jamis Winston he's not playing at a pro Bowl level,

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>by the way, that that's a little much. I mean

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>that means you're one of the top league. Okay, last

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks, that's fair. I think he is doing

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>something that quarterbacks that have been making a lot of

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>money for a lot of time don't do. Jake Cutler

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>never anticipates throws. Ryan Tannehill never anticipates, throws Jamis Winston

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>throws passes two spots. DJ Daniel Jeremiah on the Move

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>The Sticks podcast kind of pointed this out. You know,

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 1>he's anticipating, he throws balls in the tight window. He's

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun to watch, really good stuff. Really,

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought you did great work there. Yeah, this this

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>is unnatural alliance, but I love it. I like it.

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Also feels it is a largely phony union. But I'll

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>tell you on no good points. We all, by the way,

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>took the Bucks in this game, except for the renegade

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:51.479
<v Speaker 1>connor Or, who is staking the Cults. His renegade way

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>as I passed him in the pick standings. But I

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>still feel like he could be someone to watch, just

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>because he's fearless. He's interesting. Well, this is a rare case.

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>He's picking the favorite, and he's the Colts are favorite. Well,

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 1>fan consensus as well. They're they're in Indianapolis. Did just

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>win a game. I know you don't want to count it.

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 1>They did just win a game in Atlanta. They've they've

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>they're five and five. They've had the same record as

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a Bucks bad team. All right, let's quickly get through

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 1>this next game because it's the San Diego Chargers, who

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>are very a tough watch. It's like watching like a

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Greek tragedy unfolding before your very eyes for four quarters.

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>They head to Jacksonville to face the Jaguars. The four

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and six Jaguars, you know, barely beat the Tennessee Titans,

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:37.120
<v Speaker 1>uh in prime time. They did get a win, though,

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's enough to keep you in the mix in

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the a f C South. Ironically, the only team our

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>fork exercise, the only team that we didn't fork besides

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the Colts, was the Titans, and they are done there

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>two and eight most likely, but Houston and Jackson will

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>still in good shape here. Um, Jackson's gotta win this game. West.

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's put our differences behind us now and move forward

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>together as a unit. Jacksonvill's got to win this game, absolutely,

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>And they picked the right opponent because San Diego is

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>terrible and it seems like, I don't know, Greg referenced

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland scenario. This team is running on fumes, doesn't

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>seem particularly interested in playing football right now, and yet

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I would be surprised if the Jaguars won a game convincingly.

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>They are four and six, and yeah, they've lost a

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of close games too, but they could easily be

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>one and nine. I think in terms of what they've

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>done on the field. I I root for this team.

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I love Bordles, I love the receivers. But I think

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're just watching the team on a week to

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>week basis, they're one of the worst teams in the NFL,

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 1>and they're they're lucky to have four wins, and some

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of these are crazy endings and very flukey ending and

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.120
<v Speaker 1>one of them shouldn't they shouldn't have won. So you're right.

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>But I go back to the game against the Bills

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 1>in London where there was a quarter and I guess

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:53.879
<v Speaker 1>I realized they were playing a Jay Ma annual. But

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I thought that the story of that game was going

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to be that the vision of what this team was

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 1>going to be. That was the turning point where they

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 1>suddenly got hot and we're hard to beat, and that

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't happen. You're right, they're still struggling. But I would say,

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>right now, let me ask you a question. If you

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>could take the Charger your coach, you can start a

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>team with the Chargers roster or the Jaguars, And I

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>think this answer would have been easy a year ago,

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:17.880
<v Speaker 1>two years ago. Who's would you take? It's a good question.

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:20.919
<v Speaker 1>I know what I do. I would go Jaguars without

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:24.719
<v Speaker 1>even thinking about it. It's a tough one because Philip

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:28.679
<v Speaker 1>Rivers is a franchise quarterback. I think Bordles will be too.

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I love Boardles. There's also what ten years younger than Rivers. Yeah,

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I would take the Chargers. I don't think

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the roster isn't that bad. I don't think there's put

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>it this way, there's definitely not much difference in terms

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of talent between these two teams right now. I think

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the Charges are probably a little more talented. They've lost

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of close games. It's close though, I mean

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the the Jaguars on offense with the receivers are certainly

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>more exciting. Um, we took the Jaguars across the board

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in that game. So how often is Xonville It's probably

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 1>you can count to one hand in the history of

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. So don't let us down, guys. By the way,

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the the a lot of good feedback on Twitter. Our

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Spotify playlist, which I believe is now up to songs.

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people excited about it. I think originally

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>had eighteen, but the listeners came through, you know, pinging

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 1>us with different songs that we've overlooked. Uh so it's

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>up to it's a hit machine, so the next thriller.

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>That's how I look at it. We can't make any

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>money off it. I was gonna say, could it be

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the next thriller? For the minor fact that it's not.

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not us producing the songs or singing, right, I guess,

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of how it can grab the culture. Okay, God,

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>just not let go for a period as a phenomenon. Yeah,

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>not just months but years. Well, it feels a good

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>modern day thriller where really we did nothing artistically other

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 1>than pick songs. That's kind of how things blow up

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 1>versus back then. It was handcrafted Alban album Wire to

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Wire hit by Michael Jacks. It's taken. It's really catching on.

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I was doing it. I was over at NFL Now

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and the researcher over there, Colleen. They were listening to Corona,

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>which is really the song of the around the NFL

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>podcast every Man. Does the researcher have a name mark?

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 1>Just testing testing every man status? Okay, I don't know

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>if you had a no eye contact policy with the

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>research Well, I didn't know if our listeners would really have,

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, know who Mark was. Plus it's confusing. I

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's that confusing. But there's Mark, the research

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>guy that you were talking to, Sessler, the common man.

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>He has a last name Mark, It's Mulari. Yeah, I

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>thought it was dulgar. There you go. And he is

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the one who suffered through about a thousand now hits

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>last year when we were in the studio one on

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:50.919
<v Speaker 1>one with host. He had to sit in the corner

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 1>and listen to all that nonsense. So he's done a

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>lot of hard work. Alright. I like Dan trying to

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>come at me with the common man rankings. Give me

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a break, Get back in your stright and you put

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:06.439
<v Speaker 1>on your fancy back in the truck, go drive up

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:08.479
<v Speaker 1>and down the Eastern Sea. We are less than twenty

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:11.359
<v Speaker 1>four hours from Thanksgiving, and all there isn't here is

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 1>heat and controversy. Yeah, that's like a lot of families,

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>four guys, four different cars after they should have seen

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>some of the Thanksgivings with my family. Grow moving on

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in a big a f C game here between the

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Bills at five and five and the Kansas City

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs at five and five. Uh, you know, two different situations.

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Though the Bills continue to be an up and down team.

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>They you know, listen, in my opinion, kicked away a

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>chance to knock off the Patriots on Monday night. Um,

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and they now face the Chiefs team that is now

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 1>five and five after winning four straight games, and they've

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>looked damn good doing it. They're kicking butt in these

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:51.920
<v Speaker 1>games as well, so it's hard to win Mark in Arrowhead.

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>It's even harder to win when that team, the home team,

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is playing as well as the Chiefs right now. This

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>may be one of the better matchups because you've got

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City's defense, which is creating turnovers, stopping the run,

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>shutting teams down, hurting quarterbacks. And you've got the Bills, which,

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>despite what we just talked about with Sammy Watkins, lead

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the league and big play touchdowns which are plays of

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 1>over yards with sixteen and six of them on the ground.

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.639
<v Speaker 1>They they remain one of the more electric offenses in

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 1>the league when they are healthy, and they are healthy

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>right now for the most part, so this should be fun.

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>But they haven't been that offense for what three weeks

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and they've been healthy. I mean, since Tyrod Taylor is back,

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks has been as his worst two

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>games of the entire season. And it feels a little

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 1>bit like Ryan Fitzpatrick maybe even you know, worse that

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that the early excitement in the bloom is kind of

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>coming off the roads. And you see this with a

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of quarterbacks. You have five or six good games

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and then teams figure out what to do. I think

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the Jets put sent a lot of pressure towards Tyrod

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Taylor and the Bills offensive line, and they didn't know

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 1>what to do with it. They kept Taylor in the pocket.

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly what the Patriots did. They blitz a lot

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.159
<v Speaker 1>more than they usually do, and Taylor really struggled. Have

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>we found a way to put the bloom back on

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the Rose yet, No, because it's off. It's off. We

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>rode off Alex Smith earlier in the year and he's

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 1>been playing pretty well. But this defense, they have an

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>average margin of victory of twenty three points over the

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 1>last four games. They haven't allowed more than eighteen points

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>since October four in a game. The Chiefs are the

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>better team in this game. They're one of the best

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>teams in the NFL over the last month. Well, one

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>thing that helps, they have not turned the ball over

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>four weeks. I don't know how they did it, but

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs managed with their one in five start to

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of make themselves interesting. Well, they would have been

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 1>ranked about thirty one two on my least interesting, you know,

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.640
<v Speaker 1>on the most interesting teams. But just because they started

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>one in five and they lose Charles and then they

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>just start blowing teams out, I'm in. I'm intrigued by them. Well,

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>they'll be the first team since the playoffs if they're

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>one in five, but they feel like they have a

0:25:57.400 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>good chance because of how crappy the a f C

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>is in general. This is the a f C equivalent

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of the Falcons Vikings. I don't think it's quite that

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 1>big game, but whoever was really? You think so bigger

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:10.119
<v Speaker 1>because these two teams are actually pretty good and the

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Falcon stink about a loser goes home match. Right here,

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:16.400
<v Speaker 1>it's got the tiebreaker involved. Now with this game, well,

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo will go home to Buffalo, oh like in jent

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>like physically, yeah, we'll get on. They'll probably packed after

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the game, get on a plane. Flights. That's not like

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>exactly what I was getting at. But you're not wrong. Well,

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 1>you're probably not wrong either. This is how we have

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:36.159
<v Speaker 1>an alliance. This is the two the two teams that

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>are most likely to make us donate to a local

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>charity by the way, the Chiefs and the Bills. There

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 1>there are many teams out there, but I would put

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>these two at the top of the list. Also, two

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>teams that have been letting down their fan base consistently

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 1>for thirty years almost So yeah, I'm not quite ready

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to see one of them surge into the spotlight. Uh

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>we Uh where we go with that game? Uh? That

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>was the buff Low Bills contest against the Chiefs. We

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:04.199
<v Speaker 1>were just talking about. Wow, we all took the Chiefs.

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>We're in lockstep this week. Yeah, moving on. The Miami

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins are four and six. That's the bottom of the

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:16.679
<v Speaker 1>AFC East, but again in the muddled wild card picture,

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.120
<v Speaker 1>they're still in the mix. But they gotta win on

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Sunday and guess what they got a matchup that could

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>be to their advantage. The New York Jets playing awful

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>football for a month now. Uh, not a great home team,

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:31.400
<v Speaker 1>never really have been, so this is not a game

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 1>where you should look at the Dolphins as heavy underdogs

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:36.959
<v Speaker 1>by any stretch. Uh, this is a coin flip game. Again.

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm I I picked the Jets every week. I just

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:43.719
<v Speaker 1>can't help myself. I always do um. But doesn't mean

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I started think they're gonna win. The only thing I

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>have going for me is Ryan fitz Patrick keeping his

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>job over Gino, which was absolutely the right move, and

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>trimming his beard a little mojo shift. Yeah, I gotta

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>do something. You also have the fact that Coples too,

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, shake things up a little bit. Yeah, that

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>was the That was the juice needed to change in

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>New York. And this is the Quentin Copal's Bowls. Did

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:11.479
<v Speaker 1>you see the report that Rex tried to claim him

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.120
<v Speaker 1>on waivers too. I am the least surprised person ever.

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>But he wasn't awful in his first three years with Rex.

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>He I mean, he had sixteen and a half sacks.

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 1>He had between five and six sacks every season, so

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:26.439
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't, you know, a total bust. But he just

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a fit with Bowls And I really, yeah, I

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>think he sent the message by dumping a former first

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>round pick. This was the hardest game for me to

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>pick this week just because of how bad the Jets

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 1>have been lately and I don't trust the Dolphins offense.

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I do think the Dolphins defense is playing pretty well.

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Rashad Jones, I think it's been the best safety in

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the NFL this season. Tim used to play well. I

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>end up picking the Dolphins in this game. Um, I

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>just don't know what the Jets are right now? What

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 1>are they? Dan? I used to think I knew what

0:28:57.200 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>they are, but now all that stuff is out the

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>window because they're running the ball consistently and there defense

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 1>isn't creating turnovers anymore. In the secondary isn't shutting down

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>passing games. And we don't even know if the Jets

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>led to roll revs. Uh. He's not practicing as of

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>this taping. He has a concussion, and Todd Bowles seemed

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to indicate there's a real chance he's gonna miss this

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>game on Monday when he said that he hadn't made

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 1>any progress at all from Sunday to Monday. So that

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is something to watch. Fryan Tannehill can take advantage of anything,

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>which I'm not certain he might have a chance to

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 1>go against a secondary without revs especially against a team

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>that has one receiver. Jarvis Landry isn't a top five

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>NFL receiver, but he's having a great season. And the

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>fall off from Landry to the next guy, who, I

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>guess is what Kenny Stills, Kenny Shard Matthews has not

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>been in the mix lately, Kenny Steals is sneakily having

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a horrible season. Yes, uh, they're frustrating lye boring all around.

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Sue is playing well, Vernon's playing well or he played

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 1>well last week. Jones is playing well. Grimes is a

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>good player, but other than that, not much. Might be

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>surprised Greg to know that Richard Matthews has more yardage

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>than Landry and and he's averaging fifteen point four, so

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>he's basically better across the board, has twenty less catches,

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>but every other statistic he's who do you think is

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a better player and is having a better better But

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you are overstating how good he is. You said not

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>even top five, He's not even a top probably fifteen

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>or twenty receivers. I think he's their clear number two.

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 1>And as we know, with the Jet secondary, if you

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>can get beyond Revas, even rivas wasn't a guarantee against Houston,

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 1>but I look at that as an anomaly. Uh, you

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>can have some fun against Antonio Crimardi and company. I mean,

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the best quarterbacks do their best work in inside the division.

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>And Tannehill hasn't been an an f C East team

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>all year. And it's not just him, it's what's around him.

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess on offense, but for me, the key You

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>look at New York's you said it, Dan like you

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 1>look at New York's run totals from game to game.

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>They were dominant, dominant early in the season, putting a

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>huge totals, which was a great formula for their quarterback situation.

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Now they're it's completely dried up. One thing to keep

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 1>an eye on. The last It was actually Joe Philman's

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 1>last game as an NFL head coach. It was the

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>last time these two teams met, and Chris Ivory went

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 1>nuts in London, just ran all over this team. They

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>need Ivory to get back to being that guy, or

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>they have shots like he's not healthy and he's almost

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>never been healthy. Shouldn't be a surprise. He can't count

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>on him to be healthy. That's on the Jets. He

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 1>has not been healthy since. Uh, that first carry against

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots since high school has never been the same.

0:31:32.480 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>If the Dolphins though in this game, I mean, this

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>is Dan. I don't not that we think Dan Campbell's

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna keep but Dan Campbell has to win a division

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>game or else there's absolutely no chance he keeps the

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 1>job next year. There are only other division game left

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>on the schedule is against the Patriots. Do you really

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>think there's a chance he's keeping his job anyway? If

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>he won nine games, so he'd have to go on

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a run. Yeah, I think if he got if he

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>went four games over five as a coach, he came in,

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna go get a Shanny new Well, he's that does.

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Fergie is one of the owners. I know that's uh,

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Serena Williams, Fergie, Serena, Mark Anthony. This is an organism.

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Remember they thought that was gonna bring them like a

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:17.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of buzz and attention. That'll get the South Florida

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>crowd to go to the games. This is an organization

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that firmly believes in entertainment over football skill. Fabio Ricky Martin, Well,

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you know what, they got a new guy right on

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the show. His name is mikey t Mike Tannenbaum fan

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of the program, and he bring in Quentin Copel. So

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 1>we drafted that's gonna turn the whole friend he's been

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>on the program? Was that sane Hill contract? Looking right now,

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say friend of the program. Maybe I don't

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 1>think he's listening regularly. Well, friend not in his current

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 1>role he was on, not anymore now we like Mike

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 1>te tweets though nice guy, he was good. Yeah to

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>lte grad No. I meant to mention that that's why

0:32:57.160 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Greg get into that ulture of yours. Two lane Underworld

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 1>is so concerning. Uh. Next up the Oakland Raiders, who uh,

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you know society was once excited about. Now society no

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>longer believes them to be exciting on some level. Uh

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 1>now four and six Uh fading from contention. Now they

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>get a gift from the football gods. You would think

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the scheduling gods the Tennessee Titans on the road, but

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 1>who knows? Who knows what the Raiders anymore? You never

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 1>know who's gonna show up. And on the other side

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of the bout Marcus Mariotta. He's a guy that you know,

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 1>he could take any team for a ride. He's proven

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that this season, so you can't assume that they're just

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be terrible every week. West this seems to be

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>a game that I'm gonna call coin flip. Yeah, they've

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of switched places here. Last year, Derek Carr had

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the worst weapons in the NFL, to the point where

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 1>we couldn't even accurately judge him as a quarterback because

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:52.680
<v Speaker 1>his receivers were so slow. He didn't have a running game,

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and now Marcus Mariotta has. In last week's game, y'all

0:33:57.000 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 1>was doing the next Gen stets article and the Titans

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a single receiver who ran a faster speed

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 1>than Anthony Fasano. Wow, they're slow moving tight end ran

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 1>faster than all of their wide receivers here. So Anthony

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Fasano you could describe as sneaky athletic. You could, although

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody would consider him one of the

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 1>league's fastest tight end. I think it's a statement on

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 1>their offense more than it is. And the running back

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:22.320
<v Speaker 1>is one of the slowest running backs in the NFL.

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 1>There's no speed in this offense beyond their fast tight end,

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Delaney Walker. This is one of those games where like

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the world's gonna swallow itself up because the Titans, one

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of the worst running teams bottom ten easily against the

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Raiders defense that has given up five hundred and sixty

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>seven yards over the last three games on the ground

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 1>almost I'd run Mariota, get that guy going. They do

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:46.880
<v Speaker 1>need to run him. Well, that's that's the thing with Mariota.

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't go deep and he doesn't really use his

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 1>legs that much. So you're saying he's Alex Smith. No.

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I I think he's doing the things that can help

0:34:57.080 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 1>them win the best and right now, being crazy he

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and being aggressive, he doesn't have the receivers for it,

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and so he's just a solid C plus B minus

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:08.760
<v Speaker 1>every week he is. He's about as consistent a rookie

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:11.279
<v Speaker 1>as as you'll ever see. He's pretty much the same guy.

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 1>But he gets in a matchup like against the Jaguars

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:16.319
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday night, and he makes a few plays and

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:18.279
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't make any mistakes, but he's not gonna do

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 1>enough with that that talent surrounding him to win the game.

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I had the dumbest By the way, this your your

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 1>whole argument about the Titans skill position talent. The dumbest

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 1>argument on the couch at NFL now on on a

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Sunday all year was they were trying to but they

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:38.439
<v Speaker 1>were trying. There's more people than not. We're saying that

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Mariota had better weapons than Jamis Winston. No, it was

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:45.919
<v Speaker 1>the most insane thing I ever heard, based on what

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:48.399
<v Speaker 1>player were they even pointing to? And don't I don't

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 1>know who was this I was on, I don't even remember.

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:58.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a good answer. Uh uh not enough for the

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Patrick and uh the old Zeuser took the Raiders

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 1>in this game. The rest took the Titans, and I

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 1>didn't mention it, but West had said that he took

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins, so did Patrick. The rest took the Jets.

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Moving forward, gentleman, the New York Giants are five and

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:18.799
<v Speaker 1>five and in the NFC East. That means you are

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>on your way to a division title. They have one

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 1>game lead over both the Redskins and Eagles, and a

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 1>two game lead over the three and seven Cowboys. Oh

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:31.920
<v Speaker 1>my god, what a bad division. Now they travel to Washington, UH,

0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 1>looking to bury the Redskins a big game. Obviously, with

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:39.439
<v Speaker 1>a big playoff ramifications, there will be no wild card

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>team coming out of this division, So you gotta win

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>these division games. Uh, mark your thoughts on this grid

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>on old school NFC East battle between two It's it's

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the most confusing game of the week for me because

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:56.319
<v Speaker 1>both of them have flip flopped wins and losses. The

0:36:56.360 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Giants for the last six, the Redskins for the last five,

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:00.919
<v Speaker 1>and that's what they are are both eight and eight

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:04.279
<v Speaker 1>type teams. New York's the best I think maybe the

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:06.919
<v Speaker 1>best unit is New York's offense in this and they

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 1>probably have a chance, a better chance than Washington because Washington,

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to me, when they're good. We've had fun watching them.

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I love what they thought they could be early in

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the season, and they're just too inconsistent. But at the

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 1>flip side, I don't know, I'm gonna be all of

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the map because the flip side this defense and Kirk Cousins.

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:25.759
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's a good Kirk Cousins game. I I don't know.

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't even I'm not even gonna watch it. They

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 1>made like two plays all of last week, Andre Johnson

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:34.800
<v Speaker 1>or Andre Roberts kickoff return into Shawan Jackson's long touchdown pass.

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>But that's against Carolina's defense. Now you get to play

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:40.879
<v Speaker 1>against the Giants defense, which is a whole different story either.

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:43.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm picking the Redskins to win this game. It's kind

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of a coin flip game. But I think the Redskins

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 1>are better than people think, so I'm going with it.

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Mark's mood, uh goes up wildly up and down with

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 1>based on what the Browns they're doing. But I've noticed

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:57.839
<v Speaker 1>that would just have me it goes That's true. It's

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:00.319
<v Speaker 1>pretty much just down. I've noticed the Redskins off, Like,

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:03.000
<v Speaker 1>if they're coming off a loss, then you'll be really

0:38:03.040 --> 0:38:04.839
<v Speaker 1>down on them. If they're coming off a win, then

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 1>oh it's back. It's back to the Cousins corner over here, Kirk,

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 1>because Kirk Cousins for m v P. These teams aren't

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that equal. I think the Jobs might build on their

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:17.439
<v Speaker 1>loss to the Patriots, they are get a little better.

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought Cousins corner is okay, kissing Cousins. Yeah, well

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 1>all right. The Giants have outscored opponents by twenty points

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:30.760
<v Speaker 1>this year. The Redskins have been outscored by thirty two.

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 1>That's a fifty point difference the Redskins, Right, the Redskins

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 1>offense has been injured all you're now they're healthy. They

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:39.319
<v Speaker 1>have had in their winds. There is a lot of

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:41.720
<v Speaker 1>reason to get excited about the Redskins, but their losses

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:44.880
<v Speaker 1>have been terrible in some cases. So you're right if

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:46.879
<v Speaker 1>you're going to follow that team. You were all over

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the map this season. The Redskins de Sean Jackson said

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:52.799
<v Speaker 1>this week this game is for all the marbles, which

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I like that. I was like, no, you don't know,

0:38:55.080 --> 0:38:59.280
<v Speaker 1>it's you don't know what that phrase Giants. The Giants

0:38:59.280 --> 0:39:02.880
<v Speaker 1>have had the Redskins number. They apparently there's some beef

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:05.799
<v Speaker 1>between him and Mukamara. I can't remember some of there's

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:07.799
<v Speaker 1>always beat between the times they asked Hi about him.

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:10.360
<v Speaker 1>He's like, he's just another guy in the field I

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:12.440
<v Speaker 1>wanted to play. You know who's having a great season

0:39:12.520 --> 0:39:16.439
<v Speaker 1>is Dominique Rodgers Crmarties. He's having a Pro Bowl one

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of the best, what six or seven cornerbacks in the

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 1>league type of season. He he is something that defense

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:24.359
<v Speaker 1>can get by. He's another one of those guys who

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:27.720
<v Speaker 1>does it like every other year. Yeah, him and Antonio Carmarti,

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 1>it's a uh Patra and myself again on the same

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 1>island with the Giants, the rest with the Redskins. West,

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll like this one better. This is what

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the week twelve research notes. And I know, and I

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:51.760
<v Speaker 1>think one thing I know will always uh tickle West,

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 1>little Teddy Bear giggle as I tickle him. Is a

0:39:56.120 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 1>little trivia where you can prove yourself to be a

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 1>maven on NFL history and knowledge. So I'm gonna give

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:06.400
<v Speaker 1>you a quiz, wes A. Actually, I'm gonna open this

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 1>up to both kissing cousins. Both guys on that side

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of the table can chime in. I might not respond

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:16.440
<v Speaker 1>to that title. And Sydney, can you help me out

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 1>with maybe a clock, because we're gonna give you twenty seconds.

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Here we go, I'll tell you when to start, Sydney.

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Eli Manning has started a hundred and seventy seven straight

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:27.760
<v Speaker 1>games at quarterback, the longest actor streak in the NFL.

0:40:28.080 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 1>The Redskins have started ten different quarterbacks over that span.

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Name seven out of the ten. Give me a twenty seconds, Sydney,

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins, Robert Griffin, We've got Rex Grossman, Jason Campbell,

0:40:43.120 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 1>John Beck, John Beck, McCoy, Patrick Ramsey. That's seven. Keep going,

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:56.080
<v Speaker 1>how many do we need to name? Just damn them

0:40:56.280 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 1>name more? Sony seconds five seven out of ten. Very good.

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:05.400
<v Speaker 1>You did it with plenty of time to spare. Here's

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:08.120
<v Speaker 1>who you missed, Greg? Do you know any No? I

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:09.880
<v Speaker 1>wasn't thinking. Why did you shake your head when I

0:41:09.880 --> 0:41:13.280
<v Speaker 1>said Patrick Ramsey? I didn't. I misheard what the question

0:41:13.800 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 1>mark Brunel Todd Collins playoffs? St I gotta wait, did

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you say beck Collins started a playoff game? And this one, guys,

0:41:24.560 --> 0:41:30.319
<v Speaker 1>Donovan McNabb, get that terrible era. That was a depressing time,

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 1>still faded Donovan McNabb era in Washington. We're like error

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:42.280
<v Speaker 1>nailed it. Moving forward to the NFC West. Uh, we

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 1>were tasking NFL now where we do multiple hits per week? Uh,

0:41:47.080 --> 0:41:49.719
<v Speaker 1>if you're interested, you check out How do you find

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 1>NFL now, Greg, NFL dot com, slash now, sure, why not? Now?

0:41:55.320 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 1>NFL It's on Apple, TVs, It's everywhere, al right. Good.

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:02.120
<v Speaker 1>So we do these game previews and I was tasked

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:04.200
<v Speaker 1>with trying to set the boys up with a way

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to get into this game, the Arizona Cardinals at San

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Francisco forty Niners, And I said, West, after two big

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:14.959
<v Speaker 1>showdowns for the Cardinals against the Bengals and Seahawks. Could

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:18.399
<v Speaker 1>the forty niners uh serve as a potential letdown game?

0:42:18.560 --> 0:42:25.200
<v Speaker 1>And West how did you respond? Extended laughter? Skeletor laughter?

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 1>The same guy who said Blaine Gabbert was looking pretty good.

0:42:30.880 --> 0:42:32.920
<v Speaker 1>It could very well be a letdown game and the

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals might only win by thirty. Oh stop, all right,

0:42:36.760 --> 0:42:39.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe twenty. Can you hear that? By the way, listen closely.

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:45.799
<v Speaker 1>It's the Blame Gabbert resurrection campaign. Because you're hearing some

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 1>positive buzz around Blame Gabbert. Honey Badger said, Uh, this week,

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he's underrated. Blame Gabbert on the comeback, Tram

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 1>called him much better than Kaepernick. Right, he did, and

0:42:57.120 --> 0:43:00.239
<v Speaker 1>I agree with him. I I think Blaine Gabbert is

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:03.200
<v Speaker 1>playing well. And in that Honey Badger story, Bruce Arians

0:43:03.200 --> 0:43:05.400
<v Speaker 1>also had a quote saying how much how well he

0:43:05.480 --> 0:43:07.800
<v Speaker 1>thinks playing Gabbert is playing that he thinks he's a

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:10.920
<v Speaker 1>good quarterback. I thought when you were listening for that sound,

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that you had picked up the sound of Hubris coming

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>from Chris Westling and perhaps the rest of the Bird

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:20.680
<v Speaker 1>gang out there. That's what we call us big Cardinals fans.

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's scorn and derision than coming off to

0:43:24.560 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 1>All I'm saying is, if there ever was a letdown game,

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:30.239
<v Speaker 1>if that is a real phenomenon, maybe it's not. It's

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:34.799
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna come in a dead stadium on the road

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:39.320
<v Speaker 1>in the division, after two monster games on national television

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:42.600
<v Speaker 1>where you proved yourself totally agree, and against the team

0:43:42.600 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 1>who has been frisky enough at home. They've been okay

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:48.120
<v Speaker 1>at home even last week. They were a little more

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:54.239
<v Speaker 1>competitive than we really expected. Once the last I mean,

0:43:54.440 --> 0:43:56.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's twenty to nothing, you figure it's gotta add thirties,

0:43:57.440 --> 0:43:59.239
<v Speaker 1>and they come back sort of make it a game

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that makes total sense. It's except for the fact that

0:44:01.600 --> 0:44:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals have the most talented roster in the NFL

0:44:03.840 --> 0:44:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and the Forts have the least talented roster in the NFL.

0:44:06.320 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 1>They're running preseason lineups out there on offense. Yeah, And

0:44:09.160 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I also look at teams that have these letdown games

0:44:11.680 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 1>are often not the Patriots. It's not the best teams

0:44:14.560 --> 0:44:17.000
<v Speaker 1>in the league. It's those halfway their teams that do

0:44:17.160 --> 0:44:20.120
<v Speaker 1>something surprising and then they cave in there there. This

0:44:20.200 --> 0:44:22.080
<v Speaker 1>is not built that this way that this team with

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:25.160
<v Speaker 1>under arians the way he's gotten them up game after

0:44:25.160 --> 0:44:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the team, I don't see them as letdown fodder. And

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:34.600
<v Speaker 1>uh we all took the Cardinals not surprisingly. Moving on

0:44:36.120 --> 0:44:41.279
<v Speaker 1>late game, the Pittsburgh Steelers with Ben Roethlisberger doing Big

0:44:41.280 --> 0:44:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Ben things with his boy Antonio Brown, head to Century

0:44:45.560 --> 0:44:49.879
<v Speaker 1>Link Field to take on the Seahawks. Uh. Seahawks, we

0:44:50.000 --> 0:44:53.239
<v Speaker 1>know do not have Marshawn Lynch. He could be out

0:44:53.320 --> 0:44:57.080
<v Speaker 1>until the end of the regular season after undergoing sports

0:44:57.080 --> 0:44:59.640
<v Speaker 1>hernia surgery. So that is a big loss. But at

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the same at the same time, was Thomas Rawls is

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:05.799
<v Speaker 1>coming off the type of game that Marshaw Lynch has

0:45:05.840 --> 0:45:08.279
<v Speaker 1>never had in his NFL career? Is he a guy

0:45:08.320 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna cause this offense not to miss a beat?

0:45:10.760 --> 0:45:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Or will Beast mode be missed? If you think that

0:45:15.040 --> 0:45:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks are gonna miss Marshawn Lynch, you haven't been

0:45:17.440 --> 0:45:21.400
<v Speaker 1>watching him play. This year. Thomas Rawls has outplayed him.

0:45:21.400 --> 0:45:23.799
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned this Sunday night. Marshawn Lynch has rushed for

0:45:23.840 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 1>seventy five yards one time all year. Thomas Rawls has

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:29.759
<v Speaker 1>done it three times, over a hundred and has their

0:45:29.800 --> 0:45:32.600
<v Speaker 1>two best games by a running back all year, and

0:45:32.640 --> 0:45:35.399
<v Speaker 1>frankly looks like he fits his offense better than Marshawn Lynch.

0:45:35.719 --> 0:45:38.840
<v Speaker 1>There are a few things sadder than thinking about fantasy

0:45:38.840 --> 0:45:41.759
<v Speaker 1>owners out there that spent like a seventh overall pick

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:44.840
<v Speaker 1>on Marshaw Lynch and that didn't handcuff it up with

0:45:44.920 --> 0:45:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Rawls. There's people out there that that got stuck

0:45:47.880 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 1>like that, because you're right, Lynch has done nothing all year.

0:45:50.520 --> 0:45:52.560
<v Speaker 1>He's never been close to the old Lynch. This year,

0:45:52.800 --> 0:45:55.880
<v Speaker 1>he's been banged up, in ineffective, and now Rawls is

0:45:56.160 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe a better option. At this stage. It's crazy that

0:45:58.760 --> 0:46:03.799
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Rawls and rafted rookie is absolutely more valuable to

0:46:03.880 --> 0:46:06.200
<v Speaker 1>their team than Jimmy Graham, the guy who gave up

0:46:06.560 --> 0:46:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, first round pick, has been an All Pro player.

0:46:09.239 --> 0:46:11.520
<v Speaker 1>At this point, we're just kind of expecting Graham to

0:46:11.520 --> 0:46:13.960
<v Speaker 1>get three for thirty nine every week. It's no longer

0:46:14.360 --> 0:46:16.600
<v Speaker 1>even a big story here. Here are some people. He

0:46:16.600 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 1>has five thirty yards on the season, which isn't the

0:46:19.120 --> 0:46:21.399
<v Speaker 1>worst thing ever. But here's who else is right around

0:46:21.480 --> 0:46:26.239
<v Speaker 1>him in the yardage race. Benjamin Watson, couple ahead of him,

0:46:26.280 --> 0:46:31.040
<v Speaker 1>replaced team in New Orleans, Doug Baldwin in Seattle, Danny

0:46:31.080 --> 0:46:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Woodhead in San Diego. These are the players that are

0:46:34.520 --> 0:46:37.879
<v Speaker 1>right around Danny Amondla Marvin Jones. I mean, these are

0:46:37.920 --> 0:46:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the types of company, the types of company that Jimmy

0:46:40.520 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Graham is keeping right now. The bigger numbers two touchdowns.

0:46:43.520 --> 0:46:45.120
<v Speaker 1>He's supposed to be one of the best red zone

0:46:45.120 --> 0:46:48.880
<v Speaker 1>threats in the league, historically prolific in terms of production

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 1>in New Orleans. I guess we figured it was gonna

0:46:51.200 --> 0:46:53.279
<v Speaker 1>go down, but I don't think anybody predicted he would

0:46:53.320 --> 0:46:57.759
<v Speaker 1>be this this unproductive, you know, bevel though, when they

0:46:57.800 --> 0:47:01.200
<v Speaker 1>do what they do when you have a healthy running back,

0:47:02.080 --> 0:47:05.520
<v Speaker 1>they're fine. The two times they've tried to plug star

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:07.880
<v Speaker 1>guys that they've added to kind of take that offense

0:47:07.880 --> 0:47:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and make it more dynamic Percy Harvin and Jimmy Graham,

0:47:11.600 --> 0:47:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not been a very successful experiment. The first was

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:16.880
<v Speaker 1>an absolute disaster. Havan thing I can't really put on

0:47:16.920 --> 0:47:19.799
<v Speaker 1>the o c at although he's actually though, but the

0:47:19.840 --> 0:47:22.960
<v Speaker 1>players that's fair. But the players talked about the way

0:47:23.000 --> 0:47:25.359
<v Speaker 1>he was used in the lack of explosive players from

0:47:25.360 --> 0:47:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Harvan and that offense nearly toward that locker room apart

0:47:28.520 --> 0:47:30.880
<v Speaker 1>before they went back to what they do. The crazy

0:47:30.960 --> 0:47:33.640
<v Speaker 1>thing is that the Seahawks are having this season where

0:47:33.640 --> 0:47:36.600
<v Speaker 1>they're struggling in their five and five, and when you

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:41.240
<v Speaker 1>think of their defense, the strength is upfront, like everyone

0:47:41.239 --> 0:47:43.719
<v Speaker 1>has always thought the secondary. That's how you know, that's

0:47:43.760 --> 0:47:47.560
<v Speaker 1>how this band defensive. Cliff Avrow and Michael Bennett might

0:47:47.560 --> 0:47:49.400
<v Speaker 1>be the best duo in the league right now with

0:47:49.400 --> 0:47:53.040
<v Speaker 1>where being hurt they are there. Cliff Avrow has been amazing,

0:47:53.320 --> 0:47:56.319
<v Speaker 1>Bennett's been really consistent in great all year. That that is,

0:47:56.520 --> 0:47:58.919
<v Speaker 1>they're playing better than they've ever played in this whole run.

0:47:59.200 --> 0:48:00.919
<v Speaker 1>And yet the second there, I know they were fine

0:48:01.000 --> 0:48:03.920
<v Speaker 1>last week against San Francisco. They basically give up the

0:48:03.960 --> 0:48:06.160
<v Speaker 1>same plays every week. I mean they gave up. They

0:48:06.160 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 1>give up the big plays down the middle of the defense.

0:48:09.080 --> 0:48:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Earl Thomas is very often involved in giving up the

0:48:12.040 --> 0:48:14.840
<v Speaker 1>play as Cam Chancellor has not been a great player

0:48:14.840 --> 0:48:16.560
<v Speaker 1>for them in coverage at all, not that that was

0:48:16.600 --> 0:48:19.319
<v Speaker 1>ever his strong suit, and again and again people are

0:48:19.400 --> 0:48:21.920
<v Speaker 1>hitting him with those same plays. I'm a little surprised

0:48:21.960 --> 0:48:25.359
<v Speaker 1>that only one of us took the Steelers, and it

0:48:25.440 --> 0:48:28.520
<v Speaker 1>was kind of or the right renegade. Um, are we

0:48:28.680 --> 0:48:32.400
<v Speaker 1>kinda overlooking what the Steelers can do against the Seahawks

0:48:32.600 --> 0:48:34.840
<v Speaker 1>defense that hasn't been nearly as good this season? No,

0:48:35.000 --> 0:48:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a coin flip game. I respect

0:48:36.800 --> 0:48:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers and and I think they have the best

0:48:39.440 --> 0:48:41.719
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver duo in the NFL right now, and I

0:48:41.760 --> 0:48:44.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's even close. Mart Tavis Bryant is an animal.

0:48:45.160 --> 0:48:48.040
<v Speaker 1>That guy is incredible. Who else is better than those

0:48:48.040 --> 0:48:50.480
<v Speaker 1>two guys? But you're playing in Seattle, this game was

0:48:50.480 --> 0:48:52.759
<v Speaker 1>in Pittsburgh, I think it'd be I'd probably lean the

0:48:52.760 --> 0:48:54.600
<v Speaker 1>other way. I mean, this is the game that you know,

0:48:54.640 --> 0:48:57.359
<v Speaker 1>we're making our picks on Wednesday, and there's a lot

0:48:57.400 --> 0:49:00.480
<v Speaker 1>more information to be learned before the games. This was

0:49:00.640 --> 0:49:02.960
<v Speaker 1>this one I might switch because I really look at

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh and I understand the Chiefs and the Bills and

0:49:05.400 --> 0:49:07.879
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff. They forget it wild card. They're gonna

0:49:07.920 --> 0:49:09.279
<v Speaker 1>not gonna win the division. But if they get in

0:49:09.360 --> 0:49:11.200
<v Speaker 1>as a wild card, I look at this team is

0:49:11.200 --> 0:49:13.400
<v Speaker 1>one that could upset the Apple Cart entirely and go

0:49:13.520 --> 0:49:15.640
<v Speaker 1>right to the super Bowl even without Levy on Bell,

0:49:15.800 --> 0:49:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I agree, and I think if they can win this

0:49:17.680 --> 0:49:19.200
<v Speaker 1>game and this is the best game of the week.

0:49:19.320 --> 0:49:21.240
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the more interesting games of the season,

0:49:21.360 --> 0:49:24.880
<v Speaker 1>just because because Seattle right now, to me is fascinating

0:49:24.880 --> 0:49:27.040
<v Speaker 1>because they've been the best team in the NFL now

0:49:27.120 --> 0:49:28.960
<v Speaker 1>for this is the fourth year where they're one of

0:49:28.960 --> 0:49:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the time they should be one of the teams. And

0:49:30.640 --> 0:49:32.759
<v Speaker 1>if they lose this game, it's like they're they are

0:49:32.840 --> 0:49:34.680
<v Speaker 1>running out of time. And I think Pittsburgh could go

0:49:34.719 --> 0:49:36.719
<v Speaker 1>pick them up. And if Pittsburgh could win this game,

0:49:36.880 --> 0:49:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Michael Berger, who's waiting to come on the show, doesn't

0:49:39.120 --> 0:49:41.360
<v Speaker 1>want to hear it, but Pittsburgh could still win that division.

0:49:41.440 --> 0:49:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that's possible. Still have Cincinnati left on the schedule.

0:49:46.400 --> 0:49:49.719
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmmm. That is a good game, CBS. I might

0:49:49.760 --> 0:49:54.480
<v Speaker 1>be the philling GM game. Get excited about that all

0:49:54.560 --> 0:49:58.800
<v Speaker 1>right now? He talks to listen. I care about who's

0:49:58.840 --> 0:50:01.480
<v Speaker 1>calling the games, filling jeem And by the way, Mike

0:50:01.520 --> 0:50:05.239
<v Speaker 1>Tariko and Jay Gruden or John Gruden, we talked about it.

0:50:05.960 --> 0:50:09.560
<v Speaker 1>What a team. Oh yeah, Tariko going off on the

0:50:09.600 --> 0:50:12.560
<v Speaker 1>officials at the end of the telecast was you know, classic,

0:50:14.280 --> 0:50:18.239
<v Speaker 1>what a pair. Now we move on to a man,

0:50:18.560 --> 0:50:22.360
<v Speaker 1>uh that needs an introduction, all right? He is a

0:50:22.480 --> 0:50:28.120
<v Speaker 1>producer for NFL Network, uh specifically the Around the NFL program.

0:50:28.600 --> 0:50:31.120
<v Speaker 1>We are the Around the NFL podcast. He's a man

0:50:31.200 --> 0:50:34.040
<v Speaker 1>with interesting insight on the NFL world. So he said,

0:50:34.080 --> 0:50:36.839
<v Speaker 1>why don't we get the old Burger in here and

0:50:37.160 --> 0:50:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, toss it around a little bit. I've got

0:50:39.080 --> 0:50:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a prop to give Burger when he give us in

0:50:40.600 --> 0:50:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a little credit to give him. Okay, good, let's bring

0:50:42.680 --> 0:50:46.319
<v Speaker 1>him in. Michael Burger sitting to my left to West

0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:49.560
<v Speaker 1>is right. We need someone between me and West today. Um,

0:50:49.719 --> 0:50:53.279
<v Speaker 1>here is Michael Burger. Welcome back. Thank you. Then, I

0:50:53.280 --> 0:50:55.480
<v Speaker 1>am truly honored. As I said, I looked it up.

0:50:55.520 --> 0:50:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it was almost two years ago to the

0:50:57.480 --> 0:50:59.279
<v Speaker 1>day that I was in here. And things you've got,

0:50:59.320 --> 0:51:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you've come along in two years. Yeah, yes, we are

0:51:03.320 --> 0:51:07.640
<v Speaker 1>incredibly popular. The paparazzi's way, I had to get through

0:51:07.680 --> 0:51:09.879
<v Speaker 1>them just to get in the door. We've been we've

0:51:09.880 --> 0:51:12.600
<v Speaker 1>been on your program. So that's that helps, That help, right.

0:51:12.640 --> 0:51:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a sort of a symbiotic relationship you

0:51:14.840 --> 0:51:17.200
<v Speaker 1>guys have. You know, we're all one media group here,

0:51:17.239 --> 0:51:19.640
<v Speaker 1>so we're getting all the insights, all the content, guys,

0:51:19.680 --> 0:51:22.759
<v Speaker 1>all the content where you get were you responsible for

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:25.439
<v Speaker 1>the name around the NFL? That could be a better

0:51:25.560 --> 0:51:28.399
<v Speaker 1>name for both the show in the podcast. Well, what

0:51:28.400 --> 0:51:29.960
<v Speaker 1>what would you write? What else? What else? What would

0:51:29.960 --> 0:51:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you write? If you had your druthers? What would you

0:51:31.360 --> 0:51:35.960
<v Speaker 1>call these programs? Stick to Football? Okay, I'll take that

0:51:36.000 --> 0:51:38.480
<v Speaker 1>into the next in the next meeting, and just stick

0:51:38.520 --> 0:51:41.839
<v Speaker 1>to Football podcast STF dot com. That's probably already take

0:51:42.239 --> 0:51:44.719
<v Speaker 1>you crazy idea here. I think we should probably stop

0:51:44.800 --> 0:51:48.840
<v Speaker 1>renaming our shows. That that makes sense. I was not

0:51:49.000 --> 0:51:52.000
<v Speaker 1>here the first time Burger was on the show. That's right,

0:51:52.160 --> 0:51:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that's right. So this is the first time I'm sharing

0:51:54.360 --> 0:51:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a studio with Burger. I have goose bumps absolution. But Mark,

0:51:58.040 --> 0:52:00.399
<v Speaker 1>you remember the last time Burger was here? Us does

0:52:00.440 --> 0:52:04.759
<v Speaker 1>West We We got into a hot debate about the

0:52:04.800 --> 0:52:07.840
<v Speaker 1>longevity and the success in the career of Colin Kaepernick

0:52:08.000 --> 0:52:12.400
<v Speaker 1>verse Alex Smith, and Burger went out on a limb

0:52:13.080 --> 0:52:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to say that, without any question, he believed that Alex

0:52:16.080 --> 0:52:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Smith would be the better quarterback long term. And now

0:52:18.239 --> 0:52:21.200
<v Speaker 1>this is two seasons ago, and I don't remember how

0:52:21.239 --> 0:52:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the rest of us made it, but I know that

0:52:22.640 --> 0:52:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I was on the other side of the fence. I

0:52:26.880 --> 0:52:29.400
<v Speaker 1>hammered him pretty hard for it, and and he was

0:52:29.440 --> 0:52:33.680
<v Speaker 1>absolutely correct. How do you guys remember this earlier in

0:52:33.719 --> 0:52:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the show, you pointed to your head and talked about

0:52:35.760 --> 0:52:39.000
<v Speaker 1>my brain. Well, that's where it's coming from. This and

0:52:39.000 --> 0:52:42.120
<v Speaker 1>this is why burgers back on the show that one

0:52:42.640 --> 0:52:46.560
<v Speaker 1>in two years ago. Right. We we waited, I mean

0:52:46.600 --> 0:52:49.080
<v Speaker 1>we waited as long as we could until Kaepernick was

0:52:49.160 --> 0:52:53.359
<v Speaker 1>finally just bissilely over and they were like, all right,

0:52:53.360 --> 0:52:55.880
<v Speaker 1>this guy doesn't know what he not. Only that you

0:52:55.880 --> 0:52:57.920
<v Speaker 1>sold out your girlfriend and made her wait for the

0:52:57.960 --> 0:53:01.279
<v Speaker 1>direct TV man just to come here to their their

0:53:01.320 --> 0:53:04.200
<v Speaker 1>their wires being it's I'm glad I'm here. Let's put

0:53:04.200 --> 0:53:05.640
<v Speaker 1>it like that. All right, So we want to talk

0:53:05.640 --> 0:53:07.719
<v Speaker 1>to some football. Let's do it. Let's tack to football. Yes,

0:53:07.800 --> 0:53:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and why not? Since yes, since you are a Cincinnati

0:53:12.640 --> 0:53:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Bengals fan, I am. Let's talk about since a big

0:53:17.800 --> 0:53:20.400
<v Speaker 1>what was that dessert? I called him a deserter your thoughts.

0:53:20.760 --> 0:53:23.239
<v Speaker 1>I was born with the mind of my own. I'm

0:53:23.280 --> 0:53:26.359
<v Speaker 1>not a sheep. Uh, this this would be this will

0:53:26.560 --> 0:53:29.520
<v Speaker 1>be a good podcast in the off season, West and

0:53:29.560 --> 0:53:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Burger talk about being a Cincinnati sports fan. I like that,

0:53:33.400 --> 0:53:35.360
<v Speaker 1>But for now, let's talk about their game on Sunday.

0:53:35.400 --> 0:53:38.400
<v Speaker 1>They're coming off back to back losses. They played pretty

0:53:38.400 --> 0:53:41.600
<v Speaker 1>well on Monday night. Uh, on Sunday night, but we're

0:53:41.640 --> 0:53:44.279
<v Speaker 1>defeated by a great Cardinals team. Now they get the

0:53:44.360 --> 0:53:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Rams in their building. Burger, a Rams team that listen,

0:53:47.800 --> 0:53:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, we can't make much sense of, uh, what's

0:53:50.680 --> 0:53:53.120
<v Speaker 1>going on at their quarterback situation. Todd Gurley hasn't even

0:53:53.120 --> 0:53:55.640
<v Speaker 1>been dominant a couple of weeks. This seems well set up,

0:53:55.719 --> 0:53:58.000
<v Speaker 1>yes or no Burger for Cincinnati to get back on track.

0:53:58.080 --> 0:54:00.200
<v Speaker 1>You'd have to think. So. I mean, the brand ms

0:54:00.239 --> 0:54:04.120
<v Speaker 1>are what thirty feet in total offense? Everything first in scoring? Defense?

0:54:04.480 --> 0:54:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, watch ability, Todd Gurley hasn't been Todd Gurley

0:54:08.560 --> 0:54:10.799
<v Speaker 1>like in the last few games. Earlier in the year,

0:54:10.800 --> 0:54:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals were having trouble stopping the run. And if

0:54:12.400 --> 0:54:14.160
<v Speaker 1>this game had been played Week six, I would have said,

0:54:14.200 --> 0:54:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a really bad matchup for the Bengals. They think

0:54:16.480 --> 0:54:18.360
<v Speaker 1>they're thirteen now and run defense they were in the

0:54:18.360 --> 0:54:20.640
<v Speaker 1>bottom five or last month. They've got to be top five.

0:54:21.719 --> 0:54:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Um yeah, he's back. That helps, so uh, I mean,

0:54:24.280 --> 0:54:26.239
<v Speaker 1>I you'd have to think this is this feels like

0:54:26.280 --> 0:54:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a Bengals win. I red zone is gonna be interesting.

0:54:28.320 --> 0:54:30.399
<v Speaker 1>I think both those teams are second in the league

0:54:30.400 --> 0:54:33.879
<v Speaker 1>in red zone offense and defense, respectively, So I think

0:54:33.880 --> 0:54:36.640
<v Speaker 1>what happens down near the goal line will obviously play

0:54:36.640 --> 0:54:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a big part. But you, I mean, we saw case

0:54:39.080 --> 0:54:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Keenum didn't really help things last week, ignite the Rams offense,

0:54:43.360 --> 0:54:45.359
<v Speaker 1>So you'd have to think this sets up for Bengals win.

0:54:45.440 --> 0:54:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I will say that obviously, the the tragic Steadman Bailey incident,

0:54:48.880 --> 0:54:51.239
<v Speaker 1>uh last night, you'd have to think, Um, I mean,

0:54:51.280 --> 0:54:54.280
<v Speaker 1>let's hope that doesn't factor into any You know, Bailey

0:54:54.400 --> 0:54:59.440
<v Speaker 1>was involved in a note in his car. He underwent

0:54:59.480 --> 0:55:04.680
<v Speaker 1>surgery today, is I believe is in critical condition, table condition,

0:55:04.719 --> 0:55:06.600
<v Speaker 1>there's but there's so there's not a lot of information

0:55:06.600 --> 0:55:11.560
<v Speaker 1>about what his situation is. But that is obviously terrible news. Uh.

0:55:11.640 --> 0:55:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Back to football end of it. Greg, you you said

0:55:14.600 --> 0:55:17.400
<v Speaker 1>on our last last week you talked about Andy Dalton,

0:55:17.440 --> 0:55:20.320
<v Speaker 1>how you hadn't seen the Andy Dalton of the earlier

0:55:20.360 --> 0:55:22.600
<v Speaker 1>in the season the last few weeks. Did you see

0:55:22.719 --> 0:55:24.719
<v Speaker 1>enough on Sunday night to be back in and not

0:55:25.120 --> 0:55:27.360
<v Speaker 1>be worried all about Andy? He made some big throws

0:55:27.360 --> 0:55:29.200
<v Speaker 1>in that game. Yeah, he went down the field, which

0:55:29.200 --> 0:55:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I think I had been missing for a month, although

0:55:32.400 --> 0:55:36.839
<v Speaker 1>on the play of the game he missed. Really, if

0:55:36.880 --> 0:55:39.000
<v Speaker 1>he puts that ball out there, they might win that game.

0:55:39.000 --> 0:55:41.520
<v Speaker 1>And we're talking about what a performance that easily could

0:55:41.520 --> 0:55:45.319
<v Speaker 1>have been an interception on the play that aj Green

0:55:45.360 --> 0:55:49.120
<v Speaker 1>wind up catching out of bounds. And I think we've

0:55:49.120 --> 0:55:51.839
<v Speaker 1>seen enough from him that it would be surprising if

0:55:51.840 --> 0:55:53.640
<v Speaker 1>they had another big letdown game. But this is one

0:55:53.640 --> 0:55:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of the best defenses in the NFL, so I wouldn't

0:55:56.400 --> 0:55:58.239
<v Speaker 1>never count it out. Why do we keep saying they're

0:55:58.239 --> 0:56:01.879
<v Speaker 1>one of the best defense in the NFL. Was one

0:56:01.920 --> 0:56:04.759
<v Speaker 1>game and they were missing Quinn and Long in that game.

0:56:05.239 --> 0:56:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Case Keenum, it looks like it's gonna start despite that concussion.

0:56:08.239 --> 0:56:10.080
<v Speaker 1>By the way, he is limited in practice, if you

0:56:10.160 --> 0:56:13.719
<v Speaker 1>gotta double down on that one. We talked about the

0:56:13.719 --> 0:56:16.000
<v Speaker 1>fact that the Steelers are still coming up on their schedule.

0:56:16.080 --> 0:56:19.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean Cincinnati, what they've done all years, what the

0:56:19.320 --> 0:56:22.280
<v Speaker 1>reverses in the past where they have that epic melt

0:56:22.360 --> 0:56:24.680
<v Speaker 1>where suddenly they're not the Bengals we respect anymore, and

0:56:24.719 --> 0:56:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you're just looking at a January defeat. This is not

0:56:27.320 --> 0:56:29.919
<v Speaker 1>that team, but they have to go in and stamp St.

0:56:29.960 --> 0:56:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Louis to make that true. I don't think the Rams

0:56:32.160 --> 0:56:34.239
<v Speaker 1>are gonna score enough points to hang in this game,

0:56:34.280 --> 0:56:35.759
<v Speaker 1>not at all. I'm taking a look. I know this

0:56:35.840 --> 0:56:37.600
<v Speaker 1>is the offense and that runs through Girly, but you

0:56:37.640 --> 0:56:40.600
<v Speaker 1>look at their receiving sets. These are the receiving arts

0:56:40.600 --> 0:56:46.239
<v Speaker 1>for their top four receivers, britt Cook, Austin, and Cunningham three, three, ten,

0:56:46.320 --> 0:56:48.799
<v Speaker 1>and one eighty nine. This is where ten games into

0:56:48.880 --> 0:56:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the season, and these guys are on pace for all

0:56:51.440 --> 0:56:53.760
<v Speaker 1>about five hundred outside of Austin. This is the fifth

0:56:53.840 --> 0:56:55.400
<v Speaker 1>year in a row this has been the case with

0:56:55.440 --> 0:56:57.440
<v Speaker 1>this dead on arrival. She shouldn't be able to keep

0:56:57.440 --> 0:56:59.879
<v Speaker 1>pace with The receivers are like what third or fourth

0:56:59.920 --> 0:57:02.960
<v Speaker 1>on the list of problems though. The quarterback the offensive line,

0:57:03.000 --> 0:57:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Greg Robinson his fifteen He's been flagged fifteen times for

0:57:06.160 --> 0:57:09.240
<v Speaker 1>holding since he entered the league. Orlando Pace was flagged

0:57:09.280 --> 0:57:13.479
<v Speaker 1>eleven times in his entire career. Wow, well you know

0:57:13.520 --> 0:57:16.560
<v Speaker 1>he's not Orlando Pace. The fact that the Rams can't

0:57:16.560 --> 0:57:18.680
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball sets up well for the Bengals, who

0:57:18.840 --> 0:57:21.720
<v Speaker 1>their secondary is a mess right now after losing dark

0:57:21.760 --> 0:57:25.320
<v Speaker 1>West Denard for the year last year. Pac Man still hurt. Yeah,

0:57:25.360 --> 0:57:27.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a big loss. Um you know there Leon Hall

0:57:27.960 --> 0:57:30.160
<v Speaker 1>has played in the slot this year and hasn't played

0:57:30.160 --> 0:57:33.080
<v Speaker 1>all that well. Frankly, Um Drake Kirkpatrick I think was

0:57:33.160 --> 0:57:35.880
<v Speaker 1>in the bottom five of all corners in the league

0:57:35.880 --> 0:57:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a Pro Football Focus as of two weeks ago. So

0:57:37.720 --> 0:57:39.200
<v Speaker 1>they got some issues in the back end and it's

0:57:39.200 --> 0:57:41.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna come up in games against one more against Steelers,

0:57:41.720 --> 0:57:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Like you mentioned, they still play the Broncos their schedule

0:57:44.080 --> 0:57:46.280
<v Speaker 1>long term, just looking at you know, obviously the Steelers

0:57:46.320 --> 0:57:49.200
<v Speaker 1>only two games back and and you'd like to think that, uh,

0:57:49.280 --> 0:57:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, they'll be able to hold on. But their

0:57:50.520 --> 0:57:52.920
<v Speaker 1>sc the Bengal schedule does set up well. They only

0:57:52.960 --> 0:57:55.640
<v Speaker 1>have really the Steelers and the Broncos left. Their other

0:57:55.640 --> 0:57:59.760
<v Speaker 1>four games are Rams, Browns, Ravens and Niners. Look out

0:57:59.800 --> 0:58:02.680
<v Speaker 1>for the Browns. That's perfect. You get a couple of tests,

0:58:02.800 --> 0:58:05.440
<v Speaker 1>but you get some couples, should be right. Just a

0:58:05.520 --> 0:58:09.160
<v Speaker 1>question for the room, who who is there any person

0:58:09.200 --> 0:58:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that's more overly emotional on a football Sunday than Michael Berger.

0:58:12.640 --> 0:58:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean he really gets a little too storms uncomfortable yeah,

0:58:17.080 --> 0:58:20.120
<v Speaker 1>but he cut this year is internal. That's more burning intensity.

0:58:20.160 --> 0:58:22.560
<v Speaker 1>For It's mostly it's mostly my trash can that gets

0:58:22.560 --> 0:58:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the brunt of the of the you know, but I

0:58:24.760 --> 0:58:27.120
<v Speaker 1>try to keep it confined to my cubicle, not a

0:58:27.200 --> 0:58:32.240
<v Speaker 1>yelling off of like a third down. Miss Gott. Editor

0:58:32.280 --> 0:58:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Mark Ortega could give you a run out of your money.

0:58:34.800 --> 0:58:37.360
<v Speaker 1>It's just general zan nous and wildness. I've been vocal

0:58:37.480 --> 0:58:40.440
<v Speaker 1>in my distaste for our our move across the news. Yeah,

0:58:40.480 --> 0:58:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that's right. We used to be neighbors. Yeah, we've been

0:58:42.720 --> 0:58:45.240
<v Speaker 1>banished to a corner like the guy with the red

0:58:45.240 --> 0:58:48.960
<v Speaker 1>stapler and office space. And one thing I do miss

0:58:49.040 --> 0:58:52.360
<v Speaker 1>is seeing the intensity, whether it's Red's baseball, right or

0:58:52.760 --> 0:58:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Bengals football. Uh so I missed you. Yeah, go all

0:58:56.760 --> 0:58:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, go all in or go home. You're gonna

0:58:58.480 --> 0:59:02.040
<v Speaker 1>panic if they lose this game. One absolutely. Mark and

0:59:02.040 --> 0:59:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I haven't said two words to each other since we

0:59:03.840 --> 0:59:06.280
<v Speaker 1>made that move like four months ago. Well, outside of

0:59:06.280 --> 0:59:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that dynamic to each other, there's a wall. You never

0:59:12.440 --> 0:59:14.800
<v Speaker 1>liked each other anyway, It's fine. We took the Bengals

0:59:15.080 --> 0:59:18.840
<v Speaker 1>toross the board to get back in the wind. Common

0:59:18.920 --> 0:59:21.800
<v Speaker 1>move to nine and two let's talk about Sunday Night football.

0:59:21.800 --> 0:59:24.560
<v Speaker 1>This was supposed to be an Alan Chris. You know

0:59:24.600 --> 0:59:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I love talking about announcers Greg as we spoke about earlier. Uh,

0:59:27.600 --> 0:59:30.120
<v Speaker 1>they were supposed to get you know, Brady Manning Ball

0:59:31.080 --> 0:59:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Its Ossweiler, Brady one by Brock, there's the cell Brady v. Brock.

0:59:37.640 --> 0:59:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Are they gonna put those graphics? You know they do

0:59:39.280 --> 0:59:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the whole like Manny, Are they gonna be man at

0:59:41.360 --> 0:59:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Brady Wilder one in big Roman numeral at the bottom

0:59:44.360 --> 0:59:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of a new sense of humor that NBC. Yes, they're

0:59:49.880 --> 0:59:53.520
<v Speaker 1>no just subtle sense of humor anyway. So the New

0:59:53.520 --> 0:59:57.520
<v Speaker 1>England Patriots tenant. Oh so you get excited, oh wow

0:59:57.560 --> 1:00:00.000
<v Speaker 1>six you know, but they're not playing that great. Uh

1:00:00.000 --> 1:00:01.560
<v Speaker 1>on Monday Night didn't play like great. This is a

1:00:01.560 --> 1:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>short week for them. They're beat up. As we've talked

1:00:03.880 --> 1:00:06.840
<v Speaker 1>about Burger, I'll set you up again for this. Yeah. Uh.

1:00:06.880 --> 1:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>There is a case to be made on the road

1:00:09.440 --> 1:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>in prime time against the great defense and a young

1:00:12.400 --> 1:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>broncoswall look promising reigning player of the Week that the

1:00:15.680 --> 1:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Pats are ready to go down. You buy them? I'm not.

1:00:18.160 --> 1:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>This is this is a tough one. I think you know,

1:00:20.760 --> 1:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>at some point the war of attrition has to you know,

1:00:24.320 --> 1:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>they don't. They simply don't have anyone to throw the

1:00:26.840 --> 1:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>ball to anymore. I think you lose Dion Lewis, fine,

1:00:29.160 --> 1:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you'll lose Edelman, Fine, you'll lose Am And I mean

1:00:31.800 --> 1:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I literally, I you know bluefell and you know James

1:00:35.440 --> 1:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>White's catching two touchdowns. I guess every year this is

1:00:37.760 --> 1:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the lesson we say this. I feel like every year

1:00:39.600 --> 1:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>about the Patriots is who is he throwing the ball to?

1:00:41.200 --> 1:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>And they still do it every year and win fourteen games. Um,

1:00:43.680 --> 1:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think on some level you have to start

1:00:45.640 --> 1:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to really push the panic button. But at the same time,

1:00:47.680 --> 1:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking Bill Belichick against a guy making a second

1:00:50.680 --> 1:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>career start all day, every day, and I think, listen

1:00:53.680 --> 1:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to the Broncos defense we all know is probably the

1:00:56.040 --> 1:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>best in the league top to bottom um. But I

1:00:58.520 --> 1:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>just until until I see Brock ost Wailer, have I

1:01:02.400 --> 1:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>need a larger sample size to think that he's gonna

1:01:04.960 --> 1:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>go beat Bill Belichick on Sunday Night, whether it's even

1:01:07.360 --> 1:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>in Denver or not. I've taken the Patriots on the

1:01:09.560 --> 1:01:13.680
<v Speaker 1>vibrant broadcast vehicle known as NFL Now. Yes, earlier today,

1:01:13.800 --> 1:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I predicted that James White four touchdowns it's gonna happens,

1:01:19.200 --> 1:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and if not, Chris Wesleyan in the off season will

1:01:21.760 --> 1:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>canoe from the Los Angeles port to Nicaragua. That possibly,

1:01:29.000 --> 1:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It's just something like what if what

1:01:30.920 --> 1:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>if James White does get four a touchdown, then Chris

1:01:35.000 --> 1:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Westling will not canoe from Los Angeles either way, I'm

1:01:39.160 --> 1:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>not can know what's gonna happen. In classic Bill Belichick fashion,

1:01:42.280 --> 1:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>it will be Brandon Bolden catching four touchdown and not Yeah,

1:01:45.840 --> 1:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and then you're not going anywhere either way. West So

1:01:47.800 --> 1:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you're fine. I U on the same NFL Now story, Mibrant.

1:01:52.280 --> 1:01:55.439
<v Speaker 1>I had brock Wise brock ost Wier winning this game,

1:01:55.520 --> 1:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and in our UH sponsor mandated hot take of the

1:01:58.440 --> 1:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>week that we have to write every week, also have

1:02:00.880 --> 1:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Brocoss Willer winning. But I could never pick Brocoss Waller

1:02:04.760 --> 1:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>over Tom Brady. Of course, I'm gonna pick the Patriots

1:02:06.720 --> 1:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>in this game. What do you mean, why would you

1:02:08.800 --> 1:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>do it then? For bold because we have to come

1:02:11.640 --> 1:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>up with a hot wi to do go through the

1:02:16.680 --> 1:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>games that you picked this week. I am certain I

1:02:21.840 --> 1:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>have seventeen other things on my docket, and and it's

1:02:24.320 --> 1:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>like the death throws this. You have to come up

1:02:26.600 --> 1:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>with a hot take this week in order for a

1:02:28.240 --> 1:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>bold prediction. I'm like, all right, let me chalk out

1:02:31.040 --> 1:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>seventy words on Brockos. I will say that everybody who

1:02:34.280 --> 1:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>watched brock Oswhilder playing, we all watched I think a

1:02:36.800 --> 1:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>portion or some of that game. I watched most of it.

1:02:38.720 --> 1:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he that's what the Gary Kubiak offense is

1:02:41.320 --> 1:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>supposed to look like. And you know, he played better

1:02:45.000 --> 1:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>than I think most people expected. Is he gonna you know,

1:02:47.080 --> 1:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>can he do that against the Patriots on Sunday? We'll

1:02:48.880 --> 1:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>see he makes really so much good or bad And

1:02:54.640 --> 1:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that's great for a first start. But this is the

1:02:57.640 --> 1:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>best Patriots defense I think in the last decade, and

1:03:00.760 --> 1:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>they can present problem for you. Just Jamie Collins coming

1:03:03.880 --> 1:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>back to ye big Syrod Taylor another young quarterback last week,

1:03:08.200 --> 1:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>so this could be a game in the teens. They

1:03:10.480 --> 1:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>gave him a f C Player of the Week. Brock Austin.

1:03:13.560 --> 1:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I know because I don't know if it's because of

1:03:15.320 --> 1:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>just the situation he was in, but it was a

1:03:17.800 --> 1:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>perfect passerrading. But their job, right if you watched the

1:03:21.760 --> 1:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>If you watch the game and listen, he managed the

1:03:23.760 --> 1:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>game well, that I agree with, but perfect passer rading

1:03:26.240 --> 1:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>means literally zero when you watch what he did to

1:03:28.600 --> 1:03:32.479
<v Speaker 1>forge that one good pass the whole game, he didn't

1:03:32.480 --> 1:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>make it. He had Vernon Davis plant and uh had

1:03:38.400 --> 1:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>another good pass that Owen Daniels dropped. He also didn't

1:03:41.000 --> 1:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>turn the ball over, which has been the problem for Denver.

1:03:43.120 --> 1:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>So I just, I just, I mean, just from from

1:03:44.760 --> 1:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a schematic standpoint, there was a lot of play action.

1:03:46.760 --> 1:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>The tight ends were more involved. It's what we've seen

1:03:48.840 --> 1:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>from the Ravens and Texan. Yeah, it just it looked

1:03:51.400 --> 1:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>like running game came to absolutely so I like that

1:03:53.760 --> 1:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Vernon Davis got in the mix. That might look good too.

1:03:56.560 --> 1:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>It was a huge positive and a huge sign of

1:03:59.640 --> 1:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>how my Osweiler helped. But watch out, you got you got?

1:04:03.440 --> 1:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, Damarius Thomas going on Butler Island. We should mention.

1:04:07.760 --> 1:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>But we should mention because this new This news came

1:04:11.000 --> 1:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>after we recorded yesterday's podcast. Peyton Manning team announced out

1:04:15.680 --> 1:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>at least the next two weeks at least he's gonna

1:04:18.560 --> 1:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>be in a walking boot. And I think it's natural

1:04:21.200 --> 1:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to wonder if he ever plays for the Broncos. I

1:04:24.520 --> 1:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>think if brock Ey Swidler plays at the level he

1:04:27.200 --> 1:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>played last week, there's little chance that Manning again, he

1:04:31.640 --> 1:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>really struggles. And Manning does prove hees healthy again in

1:04:34.560 --> 1:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>three weeks, then this offense so much better. I took

1:04:38.560 --> 1:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos in this game. I am alone. It was

1:04:40.480 --> 1:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a hero pick where it was until Greg. You don't

1:04:44.720 --> 1:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>pretend you think I ruined this thing. You love it.

1:04:48.120 --> 1:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>But finally Monday Night Football and what after we have

1:04:51.400 --> 1:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to what a bummer? Yeah, what a bummer. Listen, everyone

1:04:54.720 --> 1:04:57.280
<v Speaker 1>wants to he wants to see match shop against against

1:04:57.280 --> 1:04:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the Josh McCown. Come on, that's what they're tuning in

1:04:59.520 --> 1:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>for on months. It's a funeral. ESPN was so desperate

1:05:02.560 --> 1:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>to find a way to play this game, an angle

1:05:05.520 --> 1:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to take on it that all throughout Monday Night Football

1:05:07.800 --> 1:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>this week, it was just a really kind of odd,

1:05:11.080 --> 1:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>like uh staccato type massive cutaways and all the different

1:05:15.920 --> 1:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>all this Johnny Man's, Oh Johnny Johnny Man football, it

1:05:19.600 --> 1:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>was different like John Gruden. It was like, oh Johnny football, Jack,

1:05:22.760 --> 1:05:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you gotta love him, Johnny Football. I men, it's like him,

1:05:25.320 --> 1:05:27.720
<v Speaker 1>like running around and it was just like Johnny Football

1:05:27.760 --> 1:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Monday Night. And then in like fine print says Ravens

1:05:30.160 --> 1:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Brown exactly, and it's like, how are we now supposed

1:05:32.680 --> 1:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to take this game seriously as a piece of entertainment

1:05:35.280 --> 1:05:37.919
<v Speaker 1>to watch Manzel back on the bench, as we said

1:05:37.960 --> 1:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>on yesterday's podcast because of his hard partying lifestyle or

1:05:42.400 --> 1:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>just being out and taking off the team enough where

1:05:45.360 --> 1:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>they said you're you're now our third string quarterback. So

1:05:47.800 --> 1:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>it's Josh McCown back in the lineup against yes, Matt

1:05:50.640 --> 1:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>schob who replaces Joe Flacco, who tours a c L

1:05:54.000 --> 1:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and mc L last Sunday. So, yeah, this is a game.

1:05:56.880 --> 1:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be hard to get excited about, especially when

1:05:58.840 --> 1:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about two teams that are combined five and

1:06:01.760 --> 1:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>fifteen this year. I say, don't tell a buys it

1:06:04.480 --> 1:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>put on you remember like the ESPN Strongman copy, put

1:06:07.920 --> 1:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that on, Magnus fair, magnuson. Yeah, let's make this the

1:06:14.120 --> 1:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Heidi game too. Around midway through the third quarter, just

1:06:16.960 --> 1:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>put Heidi on, or you know, like NBC and now

1:06:19.160 --> 1:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Fox is getting into like doing the musicals, like just

1:06:21.880 --> 1:06:24.040
<v Speaker 1>throw something together in the next four days, get a

1:06:24.120 --> 1:06:28.840
<v Speaker 1>musical out there of Middler on the roof, Storry and

1:06:28.920 --> 1:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>match hup and some of the players they'll throw an interception.

1:06:32.320 --> 1:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>What would you call that? Yeah, I don't pick six.

1:06:34.920 --> 1:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, so this game, Yeah, well we can't talk

1:06:40.120 --> 1:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>without so yeah, that's why we can't. That's so here

1:06:43.720 --> 1:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>we go. This, this is the game that's happening. Uh,

1:06:46.200 --> 1:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>anybody have anything to say? But we all took Cleveland,

1:06:48.360 --> 1:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>but I think initially was before Manzell. What do you

1:06:51.720 --> 1:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>gotta say? Was anybody want to trade ships on Monday?

1:06:54.720 --> 1:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>That's all you got? Come on, Mark, I've covered every

1:06:57.680 --> 1:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Monday night game, which I enjoy. But this game come

1:07:00.000 --> 1:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and I give it up in a heartbeat? Mark, what

1:07:02.120 --> 1:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to root for them to win on national TV?

1:07:04.720 --> 1:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Even though you're saying, oh, I'd like to have the

1:07:06.640 --> 1:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>number one overall pick when push comes, you don't want

1:07:09.600 --> 1:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the number one pick? Well, I won't. I would like

1:07:13.520 --> 1:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to see them win and not here. Here's one thing

1:07:15.600 --> 1:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I have a I have a quick comment and I

1:07:16.920 --> 1:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>have a question for Burger to start off with. But

1:07:20.320 --> 1:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I think Mike Petton this was the most defining decision

1:07:24.920 --> 1:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna makes the Browns coach for a long long time,

1:07:27.240 --> 1:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think he made the right one. If you

1:07:28.920 --> 1:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>listen to players in that locker room, to a man,

1:07:32.200 --> 1:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>they feel like he did what was right for the

1:07:34.040 --> 1:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>team and he stood by it. And I respect Patton

1:07:36.720 --> 1:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and John Harball said the same thing. It's not easy

1:07:39.200 --> 1:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to have done this. It goes against everything that makes

1:07:41.280 --> 1:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland even marginally marketable. But question you had you got

1:07:46.120 --> 1:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Kaepernick and Alex Smith right two years ago, Johnny Manziel

1:07:51.480 --> 1:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>first playing Gabbert career going forward? Do they have careers

1:07:56.200 --> 1:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>going forward? And the other two years before burgers back

1:08:01.560 --> 1:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>on and then we'll have the December. Um, God, I

1:08:06.800 --> 1:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I mean, in all seriousness, I you know,

1:08:08.720 --> 1:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I listen, Blaine Gabbert is a is a career backup

1:08:10.920 --> 1:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and will be. I don't I don't think he's I

1:08:12.440 --> 1:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>mean to have him to someone say we're giving you

1:08:14.600 --> 1:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the keys to the kingdom. I don't see that happening

1:08:16.280 --> 1:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>anytime soon. Johnny Manzel Listen, I mean, do we think

1:08:19.960 --> 1:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>someone's taking a shot on this guy. He's not playing

1:08:22.200 --> 1:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>for the Browns anymore after this year? We think so?

1:08:24.600 --> 1:08:26.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I don't know, I don't know. We

1:08:26.520 --> 1:08:29.599
<v Speaker 1>haven't done a podcast since they officially announced, the expect

1:08:30.000 --> 1:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that McCown was going to be the starter, but they

1:08:32.120 --> 1:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>officially announce m accounts the starter, but he didn't even

1:08:34.960 --> 1:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>say for the rest memory fails him once again. We did.

1:08:38.520 --> 1:08:41.560
<v Speaker 1>But you can't do the show come out right, But

1:08:41.640 --> 1:08:43.519
<v Speaker 1>you can't. I mean to your most thinking about today's

1:08:43.520 --> 1:08:45.519
<v Speaker 1>press conference, which is really when he talked about it

1:08:45.600 --> 1:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and said it's not for the rest of the season necessarily,

1:08:48.800 --> 1:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>And for him to say that shows they're not closed off.

1:08:51.960 --> 1:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think if they get to the last couple

1:08:53.400 --> 1:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of weeks of this season, they might just left take it.

1:08:55.200 --> 1:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>But but to Sessler's point, if you say, as you

1:08:57.600 --> 1:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>said the defining moment of his if you say we're

1:09:00.120 --> 1:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>we're benching you and it's fully supported by everybody in

1:09:03.040 --> 1:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the locker room, and then you go back to Manziel

1:09:05.360 --> 1:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>two or three weeks later, where does that leave you

1:09:07.439 --> 1:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>in the standing? Yeah? Yeah, it's he's in a messy

1:09:10.439 --> 1:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>situation and can't go back to him at this point.

1:09:13.560 --> 1:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>That's why. And this isn't piling on the Browns mark.

1:09:16.680 --> 1:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>It's if you if that job opens up in the offseason,

1:09:20.560 --> 1:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>like I would seriously, even though there's only a finite

1:09:23.400 --> 1:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>number of jobs to take in the NFL. It seems

1:09:25.880 --> 1:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>like you're always gonna end up in a total s

1:09:27.880 --> 1:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>storm no matter what, one way or the other. He's

1:09:30.240 --> 1:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>just the latest guy to get caught up in the web.

1:09:32.360 --> 1:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>That is why would keep Mike Patton for next season,

1:09:36.479 --> 1:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Because it can't get worse, and you've got to give

1:09:39.240 --> 1:09:41.560
<v Speaker 1>first coach in a long time a chance to do

1:09:41.680 --> 1:09:45.519
<v Speaker 1>more than two years. That's honestly, I look at Ron Rivera,

1:09:45.560 --> 1:09:47.479
<v Speaker 1>who was gone a couple of seasons ago, and I

1:09:47.600 --> 1:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>look at they don't have Carolina's roster by any extent.

1:09:50.760 --> 1:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>But you give this guy a chance because you're not

1:09:53.000 --> 1:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna get anyone to sign up for this job. And

1:09:54.920 --> 1:09:57.080
<v Speaker 1>if he can sweep the rat Birds, at least he

1:09:57.160 --> 1:09:59.599
<v Speaker 1>got something like that, you go, you go, got John,

1:09:59.640 --> 1:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>It's make him the new GM. No, you do not

1:10:02.160 --> 1:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>do that. It would take you four years to hire him. Actually,

1:10:05.360 --> 1:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that's not a bad idea. Maybe get Dick and Marone,

1:10:08.080 --> 1:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>who are working together down there in Jackson him. That

1:10:11.040 --> 1:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>is an awful idea of by Greg. We all took

1:10:13.800 --> 1:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the Browns. Uh really sorry, I'm gonna take the Ravens.

1:10:17.040 --> 1:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Why not taking the raven Well, it's hard to pick

1:10:19.479 --> 1:10:21.679
<v Speaker 1>a match job team into that. That's true. I would

1:10:21.760 --> 1:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>never pick I'm taking the Ravens. He could draw up

1:10:24.400 --> 1:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>any team in the NFL and I would pick him

1:10:26.800 --> 1:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to beat match up. One sneaky thing that could turn

1:10:29.080 --> 1:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>this into an absolute disaster. Cleveland cut Terence West, so

1:10:32.840 --> 1:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>they trade him to the Titans for a bag of spoons.

1:10:35.240 --> 1:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>He's now on the Ravens and he's from Baltimore. The

1:10:37.880 --> 1:10:40.639
<v Speaker 1>Ravens love Terence West a running back, and they said

1:10:40.680 --> 1:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna play. It is the most Browns thing ever

1:10:43.120 --> 1:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that Terence West runs for a hundred and fifty yards

1:10:45.320 --> 1:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and two touchdowns on this defense. I still think the

1:10:47.320 --> 1:10:50.559
<v Speaker 1>most Browns thing ever this season was injuring the crappy

1:10:50.880 --> 1:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>rookie quarterback to get to Ben Roethlisberger. Wait, wasn't Yes,

1:10:54.640 --> 1:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the release of Terence West. It was a trade.

1:10:57.240 --> 1:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>The trade of Terence West part of what enraged Mark

1:11:00.400 --> 1:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>so much that he gave up on the team. It

1:11:02.320 --> 1:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>was not signing Chris Carter's son or Kristen working on McDonald.

1:11:06.240 --> 1:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to get Dion Carter, Kristen Michael and run

1:11:09.000 --> 1:11:12.479
<v Speaker 1>a complete offense Ron Carter and with a complete spread

1:11:12.560 --> 1:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>offense with Manzell texas A and M style, and just

1:11:15.040 --> 1:11:17.680
<v Speaker 1>after twenty years, thirty years that both both of those

1:11:17.760 --> 1:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>players currently on practice squads. Um, alright, I'm not in

1:11:21.200 --> 1:11:24.519
<v Speaker 1>a solid place, Michael Burger. You've said it all and

1:11:24.680 --> 1:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>more something after two years, assess was not in a

1:11:26.880 --> 1:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>good place. Something's never changed. And maybe when you come

1:11:30.240 --> 1:11:33.479
<v Speaker 1>back again. And I would say, although for like, for

1:11:33.600 --> 1:11:35.519
<v Speaker 1>bit purposes, it would be funny to have you on

1:11:36.000 --> 1:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>in two years, but we we enjoyed happer than that.

1:11:39.000 --> 1:11:41.599
<v Speaker 1>Maybe sooner than that two years this time. I look

1:11:41.640 --> 1:11:43.639
<v Speaker 1>forward to it. Thanks West, you have the final decision.

1:11:43.800 --> 1:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Sooner than two years, two years, three options. I'll go sooner,

1:11:49.720 --> 1:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>all right, I love it. It would have been off

1:11:51.360 --> 1:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>awkward if you would have said never. Hey, look he

1:11:55.439 --> 1:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>earned it by besting me in the debate. Right there

1:11:58.760 --> 1:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>we go. Burn. Next time you're on the show, we

1:12:02.000 --> 1:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>will talk about your appearance on Wheel of Fortune. I

1:12:04.560 --> 1:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>can't wait. By the way, do you want to tell

1:12:05.720 --> 1:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>everybody when the television version of this show? Absolutely take

1:12:08.840 --> 1:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>it out here without a Here we go. The around

1:12:11.000 --> 1:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the NFL television show Thank You is on five days

1:12:14.040 --> 1:12:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a week, and this is when it's on. You're ready, Yeah,

1:12:17.560 --> 1:12:21.479
<v Speaker 1>six pm Eastern Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday. A special

1:12:21.600 --> 1:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>three hour show on Thursday that begins at two pm Easter.

1:12:24.960 --> 1:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>You've got that right. And that's where that's where on

1:12:27.120 --> 1:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a normal Thursday you can find our Thursday night previews.

1:12:31.479 --> 1:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Well it hasn't been that normal, but it's Thursday. You

1:12:35.439 --> 1:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>had a little hiatus. You're back. It's why we we

1:12:37.960 --> 1:12:39.759
<v Speaker 1>we juiced it up a little bit. You're fine everything.

1:12:39.920 --> 1:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you see a ratings spike when every are minute

1:12:43.000 --> 1:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>by minute ratings? If you look at it, it is,

1:12:44.840 --> 1:12:47.559
<v Speaker 1>they're so high they're almost unreadable. It's like you can't

1:12:47.560 --> 1:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>even the Super Bowl bath exactly. Synergy, and we have

1:12:51.360 --> 1:12:53.519
<v Speaker 1>Greg On sometimes yelling at Mike Silver, which is always

1:12:53.560 --> 1:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a fun segment, and vice versa. It's okay, yeah, silver dessert.

1:12:59.120 --> 1:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's it, Thanks guys. I just want to

1:13:02.439 --> 1:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>wish both Burger happy Thanksgiving every bed the same to

1:13:06.040 --> 1:13:08.719
<v Speaker 1>you guys as well, all the colleagues, all the heroes,

1:13:09.360 --> 1:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Happy Thanksgiving, and all the listeners in America Happy Thanksgiving.

1:13:13.120 --> 1:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I know it's not celebrated a lot of our listenership

1:13:15.640 --> 1:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>is Canadas Thanksgiving, but it's like a month before. Well,

1:13:19.280 --> 1:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're I'm gonna say that Happy Thanksgiving two

1:13:21.880 --> 1:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand sixteen to Canada and seventeen to me when I'm

1:13:24.760 --> 1:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>back on the show next. Absolutely everything covered. Thank you

1:13:29.160 --> 1:13:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to Sydney and everyone behind the glass. This is Dan

1:13:31.360 --> 1:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Hansas signing off for Quiet Store, the Mailman, Boga the Boss,

1:13:39.920 --> 1:13:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and Sydney behind the Glass tell Sunday