Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom huge. Governor Cromo cancels his
Speaker 1: hypocritical Thanksgiving plans, The Biden transition begins, AOC versus Ted
Speaker 1: Cruz on the Stimulus Showdown, and Mattis calls for an
Speaker 1: end to America First buck Sexton mission, just coding the
Speaker 1: news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Mag No mistake America. Great,
Speaker 1: You're a great American again. This is the buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: Tumas CIA analysts again can speak to three hours without
Speaker 1: a phone call. Try doing that sometime. This Thanksgiving is
Speaker 1: going to suck a bit. This is not some existential reality.
Speaker 1: Cancel your plans. If you absolutely do not need to
Speaker 1: travel somewhere, travel by car. If you must try, I
Speaker 1: don't like it to be any number. I like it
Speaker 1: to be. Keep it to your mediate household. All of
Speaker 1: the mashed potatoes by yourself. That's what I'm going to do.
Speaker 1: Limit the number of people. Do it outside, and wear
Speaker 1: your mask. If you go over to a friend's house,
Speaker 1: mask up the whole time. You're not eating or drinking.
Speaker 1: Your college student shelter in place for at least seven
Speaker 1: days once you arrive. Separation should be the norm. Avoiding
Speaker 1: direct contact, including handshakes and hugs. Speak softer because louder voices,
Speaker 1: shouting and screaming, actually singing, spreads the virusity can test
Speaker 1: your way out of or into safety. Here, how about
Speaker 1: no libs. Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. Guys, great
Speaker 1: to be here with you. I just want to tell
Speaker 1: you right now that the people that are saying all
Speaker 1: that stuff, do you how many of them? How many
Speaker 1: of those media figures do you think are really going
Speaker 1: to do that? Are going to quarantine if they have
Speaker 1: college age children, make them quarantine when they come back
Speaker 1: from school. Are going to wear masks the whole time
Speaker 1: they're a Thanksgiving dinner with their family, except for the
Speaker 1: moments they're putting the food in. But they're going to
Speaker 1: mask up between bites, That's what they say. Unless you're
Speaker 1: eating or drinking, you got so sit there at the
Speaker 1: table with a mask on and then pull that mask
Speaker 1: down to shovel some turkey into your mouth. That's what
Speaker 1: they're telling you. This is crazy, all right. We all
Speaker 1: know this. People aren't going to do it, So why
Speaker 1: are they saying it? That's what I want to ask.
Speaker 1: Why are they saying it? And maybe this is a
Speaker 1: moment where we could do a bit of a reflection
Speaker 1: on what I often refer to as the original sin
Speaker 1: of the left of the Democrat Party, of socialists and collectivists,
Speaker 1: and that is hypocrisy. Now, hypocrisy is an area that
Speaker 1: they always run a foul of because so much of
Speaker 1: the collectivist mindset is based upon policies that the support
Speaker 1: of which gives you the benefit of being a good person.
Speaker 1: But you don't necessarily get touched by that policy. It's
Speaker 1: for what other people should do, you know, as a leftist,
Speaker 1: as a collectivist, what everyone else should be doing, But
Speaker 1: you yourself don't think that you should really do that.
Speaker 1: That doesn't sound worthwhile or faun or that's not a
Speaker 1: trade off you're willing to make. And you see this
Speaker 1: with countless areas of Democrat policy debates and just the
Speaker 1: way that they go about trying to be the busybodies
Speaker 1: in all of our lives. The hall monitors. Right, they'll
Speaker 1: tell you about how they want and this is classic
Speaker 1: with Democrat politicians. They want to raise taxes they themselves
Speaker 1: will pay. I mean, the people that are the biggest
Speaker 1: advocates of this, raising taxes on the rich they'll have
Speaker 1: an army of accountants making sure that they hide all
Speaker 1: of the funds they possibly can. Right, they'll do that,
Speaker 1: but they also want everyone else to pay more. And
Speaker 1: if that means that wages are depressed, if that means
Speaker 1: that hiring goes down for industries or companies, they don't
Speaker 1: really care because it makes them feel good to support it.
Speaker 1: Climate change perfect example of this. All the people you
Speaker 1: see who are the biggest advocates for climate change policy
Speaker 1: on a global scale, knowing that that's going to have
Speaker 1: terrible consequences, especially in the developing world, especially in countries
Speaker 1: where they are still very much in need of the
Speaker 1: glorious economic benefits of a fossil fuel based economy. Sorry,
Speaker 1: if they have to slow things down, if they can't
Speaker 1: have air conditioning and refrigeration and access to the kind
Speaker 1: of food and the kind of medicine and all these
Speaker 1: different products and things that rely on fossil fuels, if
Speaker 1: they can't really have that the way we do in
Speaker 1: the developed world. You know, we don't want the whole
Speaker 1: planet to overheat, so too bad. Oh, but then the
Speaker 1: collective has come up with this other idea. They'll say,
Speaker 1: that's why we need to have a global wealth redistribution
Speaker 1: program through climate change that everyone else is going to
Speaker 1: pay into. But trust me, John Kerry, who's now been
Speaker 1: tapped as the climate change are for an allegedly incoming
Speaker 1: by administration. The transition is going on right now. They're
Speaker 1: moving forward with a transition. Whether they get to the
Speaker 1: Oval office or not remains to be seen. But he
Speaker 1: got John Kerry coming in. This is a guy who
Speaker 1: when he was paying the absolute bare minimum tax rate
Speaker 1: on millions and millions of dollars of his wife's investment income,
Speaker 1: he also moved his yacht from Massachusetts to Rhode Island
Speaker 1: to pay small less tax on it. And trust me
Speaker 1: when I say, this guy flies private all the time,
Speaker 1: but he's going to be the climate changees are. That's right.
Speaker 1: He won't make the changes himself, but he does want
Speaker 1: to make them for you. And you see this. It
Speaker 1: keeps repeating, it keeps replaying itself because it's a mentality.
Speaker 1: It's about an approach to life. It's a way to
Speaker 1: get out of being held accountable. To principle, it's about
Speaker 1: what you support publicly, not what you do privately. That's
Speaker 1: this is a montrog This is a central concept for
Speaker 1: the left and for Democrats, and in an incoming by administration,
Speaker 1: you'll see this all over the place. And that then
Speaker 1: brings me back to Cuomo, who is among the very
Speaker 1: worst governors, among the worst when it comes to the
Speaker 1: delusions that he now pedals publicly about how he did
Speaker 1: a great job with leadership. He was showing everybody how
Speaker 1: it's done, how you're supposed to fight back the COVID
Speaker 1: virus as a leader. Well, he's been telling everybody that
Speaker 1: you can literally kill your relatives if you see them
Speaker 1: over Thanksgiving, So that's going to be on you. If
Speaker 1: you see them, stay home, quarantine. That's what he's telling everyone.
Speaker 1: And then it comes out that he was planning to
Speaker 1: have his eighty something year old mother and his two
Speaker 1: kids up to Albany to the governor's mansion for Thanksgiving,
Speaker 1: and anie they said, oh, but this is within the rules,
Speaker 1: within the limitations, And then they backed off even more
Speaker 1: because people were saying, well, if you if your mother
Speaker 1: is in her eighties, are you really going to expose
Speaker 1: or to college age or close to college age children.
Speaker 1: Is that a wise idea given his own standard that
Speaker 1: he said that if you see your relatives over Thanksgiving,
Speaker 1: you may kill them with COVID. No, that was a
Speaker 1: tough one. So now they're changing, they're changing his plans. Now,
Speaker 1: let me say, I don't care what the governor really does.
Speaker 1: I don't care who he spends his holidays with. And
Speaker 1: this is true of all these different democrats across the country.
Speaker 1: I want them to be able to make whatever decisions
Speaker 1: about their Thanksgiving that they see fit. My problem is, yes,
Speaker 1: the hypocrisy in all of this. They make mandates and dictates,
Speaker 1: they have demands, they put forward demands that they continuously
Speaker 1: violate themselves, and then they ask us to ignore it,
Speaker 1: or they say it's almost like they've managed to buy
Speaker 1: themselves with their good deed of making you do annoying things,
Speaker 1: you have to make the trade off you don't get
Speaker 1: to enjoy your Thanksgiving. Then then turn around and they say, well,
Speaker 1: at least in my public life, I'm making an important
Speaker 1: difference here. So if I fail personally, no big deal,
Speaker 1: No big deal. And he goes even further than that.
Speaker 1: In the case of the governor of New York, I mean,
Speaker 1: in California, they've got the ban on outdoor dining. Now
Speaker 1: for three weeks. Ben On outdoor done and can't go
Speaker 1: to restaurants anymore. And California is a state where there
Speaker 1: are a lot of places where you could actually comfortably
Speaker 1: eat outdoors, even without heat lamps or any of these
Speaker 1: other ways that places are trying to adapt to this
Speaker 1: new reality. In Oregon, as you know, Governor Kate Brown
Speaker 1: is telling people that they have to snitch on neighbors
Speaker 1: if they have too many people over for Thanksgiving, call
Speaker 1: the cops, she says, putting law enforcement in a terrible,
Speaker 1: an unwinnable position. And you know, beyond that, we see
Speaker 1: that there's now the CDC and the bureaucracies, I mean,
Speaker 1: the tyranny of the bureaucrats being enforced on all of
Speaker 1: us with you, guys, should not do this, don't do this,
Speaker 1: do that, wash your hands, use a lot of hand sanitizer.
Speaker 1: That's really going to turn this thing around. This is nonsense.
Speaker 1: No one really believes any of this stuff, but they
Speaker 1: keep saying it, and they view any independent thinking and
Speaker 1: any desire to hold them accountable for their hypocrisy as
Speaker 1: a threat to their authority, to their power, so they
Speaker 1: react very poorly to it. Here is, for example, Governor Cuomo,
Speaker 1: who is saying that law enforcement officer as well. You've
Speaker 1: had these cops, these sheriffs who have come forward law
Speaker 1: enforcement in different places than they've said that they're not
Speaker 1: going to enforce these COVID dictates. They're not going to
Speaker 1: ruin some families Thanksgive. Can you imagine you're with your family,
Speaker 1: you have that really what feels like a sacred American
Speaker 1: tradition of gathering around the dinner table on Thanksgiving and
Speaker 1: you're gonna get a knock at the door from a
Speaker 1: cop who's going to say how many of you are?
Speaker 1: They're in here? One of you has to leave. Do
Speaker 1: they really think that that's appropriate? Is this America or not? Well,
Speaker 1: here's how Cuomo responds to what's such an obvious and
Speaker 1: obvious conclusion that so many law enforcement officers have come
Speaker 1: to play clip one who don't have the right to
Speaker 1: pick laws that you think you will enforce, and you
Speaker 1: don't enforce laws that you don't agree with. Right, that's
Speaker 1: not a law enforcement officer. That's a dictator. That's a dictator,
Speaker 1: He says. Psychiatrists would call this projection. That's what it is.
Speaker 1: This is him projecting out there onto somebody else what
Speaker 1: he must know at some subconscious level he is guilty
Speaker 1: of he's acting like a dictator. He does not have
Speaker 1: the powers that he is using. I don't care what
Speaker 1: the emergency order says. Nobody ever thought an emergency order
Speaker 1: could be used in this way. But you see, the
Speaker 1: system has seems in it. The system has cracks that
Speaker 1: if you want to operate in a certain way, if
Speaker 1: you want to remove a degree of good faith from
Speaker 1: the process, you can exploit it. And guess what, that's
Speaker 1: true of law enforcement officers as well. In fact, the
Speaker 1: Obama administration used an expanded version of prosecutorial discretion. Right.
Speaker 1: They used prosecutorial discretion to pretend that the laws about
Speaker 1: illegal aliens did not count and there were no laws
Speaker 1: about illegal aliens in this country that they weren't going
Speaker 1: to get deported. So in this case, you've got sheriffs
Speaker 1: and cops who are just telling people, look, we're not
Speaker 1: planning to enforce this. There's nothing the governor can do
Speaker 1: except start firing cops. I guess ever, I can try
Speaker 1: to do that, and good luck dealing with the law
Speaker 1: enforcement unions on that. One. Governor not going to happen.
Speaker 1: So what's he going to do? Oh? We've seen there's
Speaker 1: a limitation to his power. We've seen the real dictator,
Speaker 1: the hypocritical dictator. Cuomo all of a sudden has a
Speaker 1: lot less bite, and it's just mostly bark because people
Speaker 1: are saying, they're not going to go along with this.
Speaker 1: What's he going to do? Going to fire all the cops,
Speaker 1: fire all the state troopers? How's he going to know
Speaker 1: who's enforcing this law and who's not. Now, sorry, too
Speaker 1: bad for him. Turns out there some people who still
Speaker 1: think this is America and who can watch the actions
Speaker 1: of the elites and the ruling class and take away
Speaker 1: what the rest of us can see too, which is
Speaker 1: that this is an exercise in a power grab that
Speaker 1: never should have been allowed. That they exploited the fear
Speaker 1: and the misery of Americans during yes a very dangerous
Speaker 1: diseases spread, and they did it so that they could
Speaker 1: be in charge in ways that you aren't allowed to question.
Speaker 1: But they want to make sure that they can still
Speaker 1: do whatever they want. And ultimately that's the weakness in
Speaker 1: all of this. We see they don't really believe what
Speaker 1: they say. They don't take the actions they demand of you,
Speaker 1: which is a reminder of a few things. One, these
Speaker 1: are unreasonable demands. Two, they are exaggerated in terms of
Speaker 1: the threat and the way they're trying to get you
Speaker 1: to comply. And three, it's time that we say no more.
Speaker 1: It's time that we hold the hypocrites to account, force
Speaker 1: their hand. What are they really gonna do if one
Speaker 1: or two of us say we're not going to comply. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we get arrested, we get fine, we get in trouble
Speaker 1: if everyone starts saying no on that issue. Outdoor dining,
Speaker 1: We're just going to keep restaurants open in the city.
Speaker 1: We're gonna have outdoor dining in California. We're just going
Speaker 1: to keep serving people. They can shut down all the restaurants.
Speaker 1: This is how we can fight back against the system.
Speaker 1: But it has to be an effort for many of us.
Speaker 1: Has to be something that we can all agree on,
Speaker 1: and I think we're getting closer to being there. And
Speaker 1: the hypocrisy of the elites is drawing us in together
Speaker 1: and uniting us in this quest to take back our
Speaker 1: freedom and darn it, to enjoy some turkey as a
Speaker 1: family on Thanksgiving. You're in the freedom. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. Please think about thinking about Thanksgiving
Speaker 1: differently this year because it has to be a different Thanksgiving.
Speaker 1: We can't have you look at that current rate of increase.
Speaker 1: You're going to six thousand cases in three weeks. You
Speaker 1: can't have an accelerant on that number. You really have
Speaker 1: to reduce that number. This is not a normal Thanksgiving.
Speaker 1: It's a better than normal Thanksgiving. It's a deeper Thanksgiving.
Speaker 1: It's a more meaningful Thanksgiving. Mariah loves me so much
Speaker 1: not coming to celebrate Thanksgiving with me, That's how much
Speaker 1: he loves me. We have to get our head there.
Speaker 1: If you love your family, you won't see them on Thanksgiving.
Speaker 1: That's what he wants you to know. That's what he
Speaker 1: wants you to take away. Yeah, this is where we are.
Speaker 1: If you love if you love your family, you can't
Speaker 1: see them. This is what the elites are now telling you.
Speaker 1: I just want to know, right now, do you want
Speaker 1: to play some bets? Do you want to take a
Speaker 1: guess as to how many of the people that have
Speaker 1: been some of the biggest advocates for lockdown, how many
Speaker 1: of them in this process are actually going to avoid
Speaker 1: being with family on Thanksgiving. Now. I know we won't
Speaker 1: always know, but I think that they'll probably be some
Speaker 1: photos and things will circulate. We'll know because these people
Speaker 1: have security details, they have other people around them. Oh
Speaker 1: and they have to be near them, right. They have
Speaker 1: to take that risk. Whether we're talking about the Pelosi's
Speaker 1: or the newsoms of the Cuomos. You know there's staff,
Speaker 1: they'll know what's going on. It'll leak. And I think
Speaker 1: you're going to have some of them that are telling
Speaker 1: you avoid family. And they won't avoid family, but you're
Speaker 1: supposed to. This is the Democrat mindset. You know, they
Speaker 1: don't have to recycle. Necessarily, you have to recycle. They
Speaker 1: don't have to pay higher taxes. You have to pay
Speaker 1: higher taxes. It's a very toxic mentality, very toxic mindset
Speaker 1: with which to approach day to day life. But that's
Speaker 1: what you have here, That's what you have. Oh here's
Speaker 1: also Cuomo on vaccinations to justify he wants at least
Speaker 1: six more months of dictator control. That's what he's led.
Speaker 1: At least six more months of it play twenty. It
Speaker 1: is going to be months and months and months before
Speaker 1: you hit a critical mass on the vaccination. I will
Speaker 1: wager anyone who wants to wager it will be at
Speaker 1: least six months before you hit critical mass. Now, what
Speaker 1: does critical mass mean? As I've told you, if within
Speaker 1: thirty days we have vaccinated millions of senior citizens and
Speaker 1: people who are at the highest risk from COVID nineteen,
Speaker 1: you're going to see the death rate from this, the
Speaker 1: daily death rate from where it is right now, drop
Speaker 1: off dramatically and maybe in half, you know, maybe more,
Speaker 1: and we'll start getting down to numbers that we understands
Speaker 1: as manageable in terms of cases and hospitalizations for a
Speaker 1: public health threat like this. So he's just playing games
Speaker 1: here by saying critical mass, does he mean vaccination for everyone?
Speaker 1: We don't need everyone to get vaccinated. What do you
Speaker 1: get when you have enough people vaccinated? Oh, that's right,
Speaker 1: that dirty phrase we're not supposed to use, but is
Speaker 1: the basis for vaccination theory heard immunity. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to The bus Essen Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Well,
Speaker 1: it's it's sort of like saying I have a constitutional
Speaker 1: right to drive drum. I have a constitutional right to
Speaker 1: not wear a seatbelt or to yell fire in a
Speaker 1: crowded movie theater, or to not follow the speed limit. Uh,
Speaker 1: it's you know, we're talking about a quarter of a
Speaker 1: million people dying already. You know, more than you know
Speaker 1: the Korean War, the Gulf War, and the Vietnam warre
Speaker 1: added together, which park. Don't you understand you wear a mask.
Speaker 1: It's there's no constitutional right to walk around without a mask.
Speaker 1: This is we did it in in nineteen eighteen. I
Speaker 1: don't know why we can't do it now. That's interesting
Speaker 1: because what he's really telling you is that they the
Speaker 1: government has a right then to mandate making you do
Speaker 1: anything that it wants to. And does he have an argument?
Speaker 1: This is the governor of Maryland, Hogan, who's a moron.
Speaker 1: Does he have an argument for how there's a how's
Speaker 1: a there's a there's a legal authority to shut down
Speaker 1: houses of worship? We have a First Amendment right the
Speaker 1: free exercise of religion. It's not the free exercise of
Speaker 1: religion unless somebody might cough on you and you might
Speaker 1: get sick. That Does he have an argument for this?
Speaker 1: Does he want to explain? No, as we know, they
Speaker 1: just don't want to deal with the fact that they're
Speaker 1: a bunch of more on tyrants who haven't been able
Speaker 1: to save people who don't know what to do, and
Speaker 1: so they just use and abuse their power even more.
Speaker 1: It's like driving drunk. Really, how many people drive drunk
Speaker 1: and create accidents for other people's there's a high percentage
Speaker 1: chance if you're driving on the influence. How many people
Speaker 1: walk around asymptomatic with COVID and give it to somebody
Speaker 1: else versus the general population of just walking around? The
Speaker 1: better the better analogy here would be no one's allowed
Speaker 1: to drive cars because thirty thousand people a year die
Speaker 1: in car accidents. That's the real analogy. We don't need cars.
Speaker 1: Who says who says we need vehicles? Bicycles everywhere? That's
Speaker 1: what the Libs suggest, bicycles everywhere. Why are you? Why
Speaker 1: are you such a monster? Thirty thousand people? You're dyeing vehicles?
Speaker 1: Can the government just mandate? Can I just outlaw all
Speaker 1: cars because it's dangerous? Well it could, I guess it
Speaker 1: could try if it was insane. That's what we're seeing.
Speaker 1: So that's that's a much more accurate analogy here. All right,
Speaker 1: that's a much more accurate analogy. But you know they're
Speaker 1: not going to go with that. Of course, it's it's
Speaker 1: nothing like driving. Oh and it says shouting fire in
Speaker 1: a crowded theater. They love to say this. This isn't
Speaker 1: an analogy that's often invoked by ignoramus's. They forget that
Speaker 1: this is a paraphrasing of Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell
Speaker 1: Holmes in Shank v Us back in nineteen nineteen, where
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court ended up holding that it was in
Speaker 1: fact a violation of the Espionage Act to distribute flyers
Speaker 1: opposing the First World War. This guy was a socialist
Speaker 1: and a nanti war activist, so explicitly First Amendment protected
Speaker 1: speech was not allowed. Was essentially struck down in nineteen nineteen.
Speaker 1: It is a wrong decision by the Supreme Court. This
Speaker 1: is a wrong decision like many other wrong decisions of the
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court has made. Because they said, he said
Speaker 1: it was a clear and present danger for him to
Speaker 1: be distributing this while we were at war, to say
Speaker 1: that this war is a bad idea, we shouldn't be
Speaker 1: doing it. That's right anti war activism. And the argument
Speaker 1: for shutting a town was it's like shouting fire in
Speaker 1: a crowded theater. So people who invoke this as a
Speaker 1: means of saying, I get to tell you what to do,
Speaker 1: because it's like shouting fire in a crowded theater. Are
Speaker 1: idiots who don't actually know the very case that they're
Speaker 1: talking about, or they don't even realize that's the case.
Speaker 1: It's just a phrase they've heard other people say. Do
Speaker 1: you think that Do you think that Hogan knows that background? Now?
Speaker 1: Of course, Well, it's just a governor who expects them
Speaker 1: to know anything about us history of the law. Unbelievable, unbelievable.
Speaker 1: But this is this is where we are, and now
Speaker 1: they're putting everyone on TV, putting them into putting the
Speaker 1: the public into panic mode as much as possible. Here's
Speaker 1: a CNN medical expert. Yeah, yet another one. We got
Speaker 1: to put this. I'm just wanted to see. NA never
Speaker 1: have people on TV with mds who don't tell the
Speaker 1: CNN brainwashed audience about how we're all going to die
Speaker 1: from COVID because of Trump. Do they ever put anyone
Speaker 1: on TV who has a more nuanced view of liberty
Speaker 1: and mandates? No, of course not play sixteen. We've seen
Speaker 1: cases continuing to grow since the middle of October, and
Speaker 1: what I'm really worried about is what's happening in just
Speaker 1: a couple of days now, which is Thanksgiving. And we
Speaker 1: know that this surge is largely driven by the changing
Speaker 1: weather and the changing behavioral patterns that come with changing weather,
Speaker 1: people going inside and sometimes spending more time less physically
Speaker 1: distant without masks in settings like a home or other spaces,
Speaker 1: and so this is really concerning. And Thanksgiving, of course,
Speaker 1: as a place, does time when people come together with families.
Speaker 1: So it's really really critical if you're concerned about the
Speaker 1: fact that hospital hospitalizations are up, that hospitals are full
Speaker 1: in regions across this country, that maybe you consider spending
Speaker 1: time apart this Thanksgiving so that you know that every
Speaker 1: person in your family can spend time together every Thanksgiving
Speaker 1: after this, Because of course, two hundred and fifty eight
Speaker 1: thousand families are thinking about a Thanksgiving with somebody who
Speaker 1: will never be with them again at that table. And
Speaker 1: so we've got to do what we can to protect ourselves,
Speaker 1: our loved ones in our communities. Why not just tell
Speaker 1: everybody that they can't go anywhere. Why not just have
Speaker 1: a three month straight up, you can't leave your home.
Speaker 1: The government will distribute food and slide under your door.
Speaker 1: I mean, I think we need to start asking these questions.
Speaker 1: Why not do that? Though there are lives at stake,
Speaker 1: It's only three months. It's only three months, by the
Speaker 1: way Biden's team is said, six to eight weeks. So
Speaker 1: this is I'm not that far off here. So why
Speaker 1: not just have a stay at home order for three
Speaker 1: months in this country? Oh, because industries would come to
Speaker 1: a halt because there would be catastrophic social consequences. There'd
Speaker 1: be a tremendous amount of health fallout from it, the
Speaker 1: economic attastrophe. It's not worth the cost. We as a
Speaker 1: society make decisions all the time that involve people dying,
Speaker 1: and we say, yes, we could save some degree of
Speaker 1: lives if we outlawed or ban the following thing. But
Speaker 1: we understand that individuals should have liberty and freedom because
Speaker 1: that's a basic part human autonomy. Is not something that
Speaker 1: we should just give up because the state thinks that
Speaker 1: has a better idea. This is why it's not about
Speaker 1: the seatbelt wearing. It's about banning driving, right, This is
Speaker 1: really where we need to go. That's where the argument
Speaker 1: And they'd say, oh, but that's so extreme. Oh, it's
Speaker 1: not extreme to tell people that they can't leave their
Speaker 1: homes or that they can't see their families on Thanksgiving,
Speaker 1: they can't operate their business, they can't go to a gym,
Speaker 1: they can't go to church. That's not extreme. This is crazy,
Speaker 1: and the people pushing this are part of some kind
Speaker 1: of lockdown cult at this point. Oh, we're saving so
Speaker 1: many lives. We've been doing all these things they've been saying,
Speaker 1: and we've gotten two hundred, two hundred and fifty thousand people.
Speaker 1: That is the death roll as of right now. So
Speaker 1: that that's with all of us doing all these great things.
Speaker 1: Please can't be. It can't have it both ways. It
Speaker 1: can't be. We keep doing what they tell us to
Speaker 1: do and a lot of people are dying anyway. And oh,
Speaker 1: but so many more would have died if we didn't
Speaker 1: listen to these experts. No, I do not believe that.
Speaker 1: I do not believe that. And they can keep banning
Speaker 1: me and throttling me on Facebook as much as they
Speaker 1: want for all this. They're they're complete sheep that don't
Speaker 1: think for themselves, don't look at what's happening around them,
Speaker 1: and come to their own conclusions. Now much easier to
Speaker 1: have some idiot go on TV at CNN and act
Speaker 1: like there's no there's no cost here to this. It's
Speaker 1: not just about Thanksgiving, it's about the day before the
Speaker 1: day after Thanksgiving. It's about a government that thinks that
Speaker 1: it's allowed to tell you to do things. Look at
Speaker 1: what they're telling there's no you have no constitutional prohibition,
Speaker 1: I mean constitutional right rather to be able to breathe
Speaker 1: free fresh air. You have no right to be able
Speaker 1: to just breathe. You don't have that right. It's not
Speaker 1: enuminated in the constitution. We can take that from you. Well,
Speaker 1: what about life liberty in the pursuit of happiness? How
Speaker 1: about that? What about the actual underlying foundation for all
Speaker 1: government action. You're gonna tell me that prohibiting my ability
Speaker 1: to see the people that matter most to me in
Speaker 1: the world, and preventing me from being able to go
Speaker 1: for a walk outside and breathe fresh air, that I
Speaker 1: need to explain to the government why they don't have
Speaker 1: a right to tell me not to do those things,
Speaker 1: You know, Molan Labbay, gentlemen, this is getting a little
Speaker 1: bit crazy. It's gone too far, and we need a
Speaker 1: lot more pushback about this, a lot more we're just
Speaker 1: beginning to see it. And you know, this is this
Speaker 1: guy who went in went in and saying that the
Speaker 1: hospitals are overflowing. Where are these Where are these hospitals
Speaker 1: that have no Now I understand they don't have hundreds
Speaker 1: and hundreds of ICU beds in every hospital. Where are
Speaker 1: the hospitals where you show up and you and they
Speaker 1: tell you, sorry, we can't treat you, nor can our
Speaker 1: neighboring hospital. We'll have you transferred right now? Where are
Speaker 1: these hospitals I'm still waiting to They always talk about
Speaker 1: the hospitals overflowing. Fifteen days to stop the spread was
Speaker 1: about hospital capacity. And we didn't exceed hospital capacity in
Speaker 1: April and May when you had far higher rates of
Speaker 1: death and hospitalization than you have right now. So why
Speaker 1: would we be exceeding those capacities now? I just think
Speaker 1: about these things and I know that I'm being lied to.
Speaker 1: It's all you have to do. You know they're not
Speaker 1: telling you the truth. I've been speaking to friends in
Speaker 1: New York City hospitals and say, hey, you guys overwhelmed
Speaker 1: a little bit of an uptake. But it's flu season
Speaker 1: as well, and so we expected this and they're not overwhelmed.
Speaker 1: There's nothing that can't handle the influx of patients. In fact,
Speaker 1: pay come in and stay for a shorter duration of time.
Speaker 1: They're more likely to get out and get back home,
Speaker 1: and then they're immune. That's what's actually happening in a
Speaker 1: lot of hospitals here in New York. I can't speak
Speaker 1: to every hospital in the country, but where are the
Speaker 1: where are the hospitals that cannot give care? Because that's it,
Speaker 1: that's an urgent, that's an emergency, right, Oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: we need Remember when we needed the ventilators, and we
Speaker 1: needed the Defense Production Act, and we needed more people,
Speaker 1: we needed all these things. Are we back there now
Speaker 1: or are they just running the same script again to
Speaker 1: keep you scared. Just wait two weeks, hospitals will be overwhelmed.
Speaker 1: Just wait two more weeks. You'll see in two weeks
Speaker 1: passes and everything's not what they said it was. We
Speaker 1: go wait a second, you guys are wrong. Oh no, no, no,
Speaker 1: two more weeks, the hospitals will be overwhelmed. Fauci is
Speaker 1: the single worst for this place. Seventeen. People in those
Speaker 1: environments still don't believe that this is a problem. They
Speaker 1: say it's maybe fake news, or it's just over exaggeration,
Speaker 1: or it's some sort of a conspiracy. The data don't lie, Judy,
Speaker 1: The data are real, and each day they come out
Speaker 1: from reliable sources. I hate this thing that they say
Speaker 1: that people are dying from this and saying that it's
Speaker 1: a hoax. No one who's dying of a respiratory virus
Speaker 1: thinks it's a hoax. And CNN put some nurse on
Speaker 1: TV you said that even as she has patients dying
Speaker 1: from COVID, they're talking about how it's fake news, it's
Speaker 1: a hoax. What a despicable thing to say. They're not
Speaker 1: They don't think that the virus isn't real when they
Speaker 1: have the virus come on. But this is what they do.
Speaker 1: It's just a way of demeaning any opposition. It's a
Speaker 1: way of demeaning any pushback to these mandates and this
Speaker 1: craziness that's going on right now. You heard it. Cuomo says,
Speaker 1: six months before you're a critical mask. You know what
Speaker 1: that means. They want to at least tell you what
Speaker 1: you can do, Whether you can go to the gym,
Speaker 1: who you can see, can you go to church, can
Speaker 1: you gather and protest of these measures, not allowed to
Speaker 1: do that. Six more months at least of this. I
Speaker 1: think it'll be more like nine. They might start to
Speaker 1: let up next June or July. That's that's when you'll
Speaker 1: you'll really see them finally stop with all the but
Speaker 1: they'll say, get ready for more masks this winter. And oh,
Speaker 1: and you think that they're not going to try to
Speaker 1: push these policies against the flu, you got another thing
Speaker 1: coming which we don't have a vaccine for, aren't going
Speaker 1: to and which tens of thousands of people die from
Speaker 1: every year. All their arguments about COVID do apply to
Speaker 1: the flu. Covid is just on a bigger scale. And
Speaker 1: if you actually look at the cases and lethality numbers,
Speaker 1: now it's even closer to the flu than we had
Speaker 1: anticipated six months ago, meaning that yes, it's it's more
Speaker 1: lethal than the flu, but not that much more lethal
Speaker 1: than the flu. So you think that they're just going
Speaker 1: to give this up, all this government control, all this
Speaker 1: mobilization of people to do what they want them to do,
Speaker 1: I don't think so. I don't think so. When Faucci
Speaker 1: goes on TV and says things like hospitals everywhere running
Speaker 1: out of beds and people are calling in fake news.
Speaker 1: This guy is just a classic Lib bureaucrat. That's what
Speaker 1: he is. That's his mentality. He can't even help it.
Speaker 1: It's who he is. You know. He really believes you
Speaker 1: know the system, and you know the mitigation. You know,
Speaker 1: you bring it all together. And however, we're gonna make
Speaker 1: sure we don't, you know, have too much of this
Speaker 1: going on. And oh, you know this guy, what exactly
Speaker 1: has been his utility in this process? I'm gonna ask
Speaker 1: you this question. I really, once you think about this,
Speaker 1: would we have been much worse off if there was
Speaker 1: no Fauci constantly going on TV to say, you know,
Speaker 1: be careful, don't see people wash your hands. You really
Speaker 1: think the country would have been much worse off? I
Speaker 1: don't think. I don't think it would have made any
Speaker 1: difference at all. I'm just gonna tell you that right now.
Speaker 1: I don't think that his admonitions have done anything for us.
Speaker 1: If anything, it's just been more annoying and divided us
Speaker 1: politically because he's so obviously a big LIB. But people
Speaker 1: don't want to see what's right in front of them,
Speaker 1: especially when their brainwashed. It's so hard to break through.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: I have been told that you can have fifteen for
Speaker 1: a funeral, so people are starting to say it's a
Speaker 1: funeral for their turkey. So there are ways to get
Speaker 1: around this. But seriously, I don't know who elected in this, Karen,
Speaker 1: you know, I mean, these busybodies think that they can
Speaker 1: dictate to us everything we do in our life and
Speaker 1: how we live our lives. Nothing in our country, nothing
Speaker 1: in our country's history, ever indicated that we would live
Speaker 1: in a world where one person would dictate are all
Speaker 1: of our behaviors. But even from a practical point of view,
Speaker 1: if you look at the data on this, the objective
Speaker 1: evidence is we've been putting more and more mandates on
Speaker 1: for the last six months. We have now more mandates
Speaker 1: than we've ever had, including these new ones, and guess what,
Speaker 1: we have more incidences of COVID positive patients than we've
Speaker 1: ever had. So there's no indication really that any of
Speaker 1: these lockdowns or any of these mandates have slowed this down.
Speaker 1: In fact, I think the Wall Street Journal put invest
Speaker 1: when they said the virus is insidious. It's largely spreading
Speaker 1: regardless of human behavior, and really the only thing that's
Speaker 1: going to slow it down is a vaccine. Yep, they're
Speaker 1: Senator ran Paul also an MD. Notice how you don't
Speaker 1: hear the media talk about that very often? Senator ran
Speaker 1: Paul telling everybody what anyone can plainly see. We're setting
Speaker 1: a record at this point for cases in places across
Speaker 1: the country, and we're more lockdown than we've ever been,
Speaker 1: or at least since what April? So what are we
Speaker 1: to think that if we weren't doing this, it would
Speaker 1: be ten times worse? What if I told you? And
Speaker 1: see these are the adult conversations that we're not allowed
Speaker 1: to have anymore. What if I told you that we
Speaker 1: could get rid of everything but restrictions on the largest
Speaker 1: mass gatherings. Right, So essentially we could say you can't
Speaker 1: have more than one hundred people indoors somewhere, or I
Speaker 1: don't know, two hundred people indoors somewhere. But everything else,
Speaker 1: it's you're on your own to make your own decisions.
Speaker 1: Will provide ppe and mask for people who want it.
Speaker 1: If you want to stay home from work, you can,
Speaker 1: and they'll be fun set aside for that. But all
Speaker 1: the restrictions went away, and you only had a what
Speaker 1: a ten percent increase across the board in cases, I
Speaker 1: think a lot of people would say, yeah, yeah, that's
Speaker 1: a worthwall trade. What about twenty percent? What about thirty percent?
Speaker 1: Maybe maybe you know people start to say, oh, that's
Speaker 1: don't you know or you know? But I'm just telling
Speaker 1: you there is a discussion to be headier. We don't
Speaker 1: even have it. We don't even have it, and they
Speaker 1: pretend that even a willingness to have the discussion is
Speaker 1: evil and wrong. Meanwhile, it's just like I said about cars,
Speaker 1: you could ban driving and save twenty to thirty thousand
Speaker 1: lives every year. Yeah, we're not going to do that.
Speaker 1: Why do we not care about life? No, we know
Speaker 1: there's a tradeoff. What the Democrats, what the lockdowners are
Speaker 1: doing right now is pretending that society does not make
Speaker 1: trade offs like this all the time. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: And there's so much disinformation coming out about these crazy
Speaker 1: court cases that he keeps doing and what's happening in
Speaker 1: Michigan right now, I mean, it feels like like they're
Speaker 1: attempting a coup to me, Sonny. I know everybody doesn't
Speaker 1: want to hear that, but that's what dictators do when
Speaker 1: they try to say this election isn't real, this didn't happen.
Speaker 1: I'm going to change it. Zero self awareness from democrats
Speaker 1: and liberals here about the allegations, the charges they make,
Speaker 1: Zero self awareness about this none. Let's start with this.
Speaker 1: Dictators do not go to court. It's not what they do.
Speaker 1: Dictators just tell the military, hey, go round up my opposition,
Speaker 1: lock them up, and I am I am el presidente forever. Right.
Speaker 1: That's what dictators do. So this notion that having a
Speaker 1: legal team present arguments be for a judge, what's happened?
Speaker 1: That they have a cognitive dissonance here. They have contradictions
Speaker 1: in the very allegations they make. What is the You know,
Speaker 1: when you look at this, they keep saying that these
Speaker 1: court cases are being laughed out of court, but then
Speaker 1: they also say that this is a horrible threat to democracy. Well,
Speaker 1: if they're being laughed out of court, if the judges
Speaker 1: are saying no, you guys don't prevail on this particular case,
Speaker 1: which has happened in some instances with it. They're not
Speaker 1: actually being laughed out of court, but they have not
Speaker 1: been successful in some of these court cases. And if
Speaker 1: the Trump legal team's response is, hm, Okay, well we're
Speaker 1: going to appeal that and maybe we'll come and bring
Speaker 1: another and bring another case before the judge, that's called
Speaker 1: the system, that's called the process. There's nothing about that
Speaker 1: that's troubling, that undermines it, that's dangerous, just not true.
Speaker 1: They can keep saying this stuff all day, but it's
Speaker 1: just not true. Okay, But they can't help themselves. And
Speaker 1: then also they really think that we're going to forget
Speaker 1: about what happened in twenty sixteen. They really believe that
Speaker 1: we're not going to remember all the psycho libs running
Speaker 1: around acting like Trump was taking orders from Vladimir Putin.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm not exaggerating that the Kremlin was the
Speaker 1: puppet master for Donald Trump, that he was a Manchurian
Speaker 1: candidate for Russia, that this is a time where we
Speaker 1: had a foreign asset, and you had former CIA directors
Speaker 1: saying this kind of stuff on of course CNN and MSNBC.
Speaker 1: In these places, you had people that we were all
Speaker 1: supposed to listen to and take seriously. We had the
Speaker 1: entirety of the mainstream liberal press believing that the president
Speaker 1: colluded with Russia, was part of some evil plot, and
Speaker 1: was there evidence for this? Was it true? No? No,
Speaker 1: there was not. It was not true. Have they ever
Speaker 1: admitted this? Have they ever come forward and said, you
Speaker 1: know what, we probably shouldn't have been running around pretending
Speaker 1: that that's really what was going on. We probably should
Speaker 1: have been a little bit more honest with our audiences
Speaker 1: with the people that were No, And are they ever
Speaker 1: going to do that? No, they are not. But we remember,
Speaker 1: we remember that they were full of lies during the
Speaker 1: Russia collusion nonsense, and that they did not accept the
Speaker 1: results of the twenty sixteen election. And it wasn't just
Speaker 1: in rhetorical terms. They did try a coup to use
Speaker 1: fake evidence and use the security apparatus, use the deep state,
Speaker 1: which is what they did. The deep state in Turkey
Speaker 1: is responsible for many coups, right the Darren Devlett. This
Speaker 1: is what people think of often as the you know,
Speaker 1: they think of it as the original concept of a
Speaker 1: deep state. There is this military industrial complex of sorts
Speaker 1: in Turkey that will just step in and say sorry,
Speaker 1: this election result will not stand or you know, we're
Speaker 1: the government. Now, they've done it many many times over
Speaker 1: the course the twentieth century. That's what a coup looks like,
Speaker 1: and a coup in the context of Trump, the attempted
Speaker 1: coup was that there were deep state individuals Comy Struck Page,
Speaker 1: Brannan Clapper, there were people from within the security apparatus
Speaker 1: who were Democrats and who are partisans who didn't accept
Speaker 1: the twenty sixteen election and then used fake evidence. This
Speaker 1: is all a matter of fact now, used fake evidence,
Speaker 1: the dossier, which was a joke and all full of
Speaker 1: bull Remember the Golden Showers. I mean, it was just preposterous,
Speaker 1: the whole thing. They used that and then media pressure
Speaker 1: to get an investigation going. The purpose of the investigation
Speaker 1: was to remove the president from office. Well, when you
Speaker 1: have a fake investigation, i'm sorry, an investigation based on
Speaker 1: fake evidence, knowingly fake evidence, and you use that as
Speaker 1: an excuse to bring a Soviet style political persecution, prosecution,
Speaker 1: that's a coup. So they try to coup in twenty
Speaker 1: sixteen and it didn't work. And now they're telling us
Speaker 1: that Trump bringing legal challenges and saying that he wants
Speaker 1: to establish, he wants to make it clear that there
Speaker 1: was fraud going on here. That's a coup. There was fraud.
Speaker 1: We all know that. It's just a question of how
Speaker 1: much and how much can we prove? Those are the
Speaker 1: outstanding questions. That's what still remains. But no, we have
Speaker 1: to be told constantly that the president is a threat
Speaker 1: to our sacred democracy. Oh my gosh. And he's just
Speaker 1: not genteel enough when he deals with these libs. Play eight.
Speaker 1: One thing though, that I believe doesn't deserve a word more.
Speaker 1: And I don't get when my brothers and sisters in
Speaker 1: the media keep playing to this. Who cares if Trump concedes?
Speaker 1: It's not in the law. It's a tradition that gives
Speaker 1: a nod to decency and disagreement. He's never been about that.
Speaker 1: He's never been about anything but his own selfish interests.
Speaker 1: And you know it. Why give him another chance to
Speaker 1: lie about the election or anything else or everything else.
Speaker 1: He isn't going to tell his follower or is to
Speaker 1: do anything but give him more money for a lost
Speaker 1: cause and use it maybe even on something else. Less
Speaker 1: is more from Trump, And I hope you all know that,
Speaker 1: do you think that he will go on air and
Speaker 1: apologize for this statement if and when Trump does concede.
Speaker 1: Do you think that if we get into December or
Speaker 1: January and the President gives an official statement, he says,
Speaker 1: I still believe there was fraud, but I will concede
Speaker 1: that the election results are what they are, which is possible, folks,
Speaker 1: I gotta I'm telling you the truth. There's this is
Speaker 1: actually probable. All right, let's all be honest about this.
Speaker 1: We we are the reality people. We're not the you know,
Speaker 1: living in a delusion Russia collusion people. We're the what's
Speaker 1: actually happening happening. That's what you know. Conservatism at its
Speaker 1: core has to be rooted in what is true and
Speaker 1: what's really going on there. They're certifying states now there.
Speaker 1: This process is moving along, and we have not seen
Speaker 1: the knockout punch or even anything close to it from
Speaker 1: the Trump legal team that could turn this thing around.
Speaker 1: It could happen, it has not happened. I always tell
Speaker 1: you that I will speak the truth you and I
Speaker 1: have to on this issue, and I think you all
Speaker 1: know it has not happened yet and it may not happen,
Speaker 1: in which case, Joe Biden will be the President of
Speaker 1: the United States. But there's also an upside to this,
Speaker 1: something I hope you all remember. I hope that we
Speaker 1: all can rally around here. And even some of the
Speaker 1: Libs on the left are aware of it. They're they're
Speaker 1: under standing it at some level, that trump Ism, as
Speaker 1: I have told you, In fact, I wrote an editorial
Speaker 1: on bucksexton dot com weeks ago about this, and you
Speaker 1: should all check out bucksexon dot com if you have
Speaker 1: not already today. Trump Ism is absolutely here to stay.
Speaker 1: Play three well, I think trumps Um is here to stay.
Speaker 1: Quite frankly, like you said, m we'll be enjoyed. Seventy
Speaker 1: or seventy million people voted for him in spite of
Speaker 1: the fact that they knew that he was racist and misogynists, transphobic, homophobic,
Speaker 1: and so they voted from anyway. And it just seems
Speaker 1: to me that that people's hearts and minds don't change
Speaker 1: that quickly. And if we stop talking about President Trump,
Speaker 1: then you know, I'm always fearful that past becomes prologue.
Speaker 1: Right when you forget about the past, it can happen
Speaker 1: again and again and again. And I do think that
Speaker 1: we're seeing someone that is trying to avent you know,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's election, someone who is a bankrupt when it
Speaker 1: comes to morality, and you know, the bottom line is
Speaker 1: this could happen again. Someone else could be voted into
Speaker 1: the presidency that is not as crass as President Trump.
Speaker 1: That sort of is a little smoother around the edges.
Speaker 1: If we forget who this Marson was in office for
Speaker 1: four years now, there's all the usual. Trump's a racist,
Speaker 1: he's awful, he's a besogaist, all that stuff. Right, He's
Speaker 1: a racist who got more votes from black and Latino
Speaker 1: voters in this last election than he did after being
Speaker 1: president for four years, and then Republicans generally do in
Speaker 1: presidential elections. But Trumpism is here to stay. That's that's reality.
Speaker 1: The Trump movement isn't going anywhere. So I'm glad to
Speaker 1: see that Libs. I'm glad to see that Libs are
Speaker 1: recognizing this because otherwise they're going to have some kind
Speaker 1: of a meltdown when they see that America first and
Speaker 1: the principles, the ideas that Donald Trump represented secure boarders,
Speaker 1: better trade deals, looking at American interests as separate and
Speaker 1: distinct from the interests of the global community calling out
Speaker 1: the losers and mediocritis who run the swamp for their
Speaker 1: own benefit, pretending to care about people when they don't
Speaker 1: give a damn about them. That's not going anywhere. And
Speaker 1: I also think that Trump is going to be running
Speaker 1: effectively a Trump a Trump movement largely from our lago.
Speaker 1: And this is again assuming that we don't have that
Speaker 1: legal turnabout that could still happen. So there we have it, friends,
Speaker 1: you're in the Freedom hud. This is the Buck Sex
Speaker 1: and Show podcast. I certainly would support investigating a president
Speaker 1: of the United States. What he has done in the
Speaker 1: four years that he has served as president is simply unconstonable.
Speaker 1: I think criminal in some cases is placed this country
Speaker 1: in danger, and the president of the United States is
Speaker 1: supposed to be about making sure that the country is
Speaker 1: safe and secure, and he has done everything possible to
Speaker 1: undermine our democracy. And I don't think that can be overlooked.
Speaker 1: And I don't know what Biden would do, and I
Speaker 1: know that Biden wants to move on. He does not
Speaker 1: want to be bogged down in investigations. But I think
Speaker 1: that the president of the United States should be investigated
Speaker 1: and we should send a message across the world that
Speaker 1: we will not tolerate the undermining of our democracy in
Speaker 1: the way that this president has done. This is Congresswoman
Speaker 1: Maxine Waters vocalizing the thoughts that many many Democrats share,
Speaker 1: which is that they it would not even be enough
Speaker 1: for Trump to leave. It's not even enough. If Trump loses,
Speaker 1: he's done, he's finished. They want retribution, they want to
Speaker 1: get him. And there's so many levels you can look
Speaker 1: at this on where it's clearly insane, it's clearly crazy.
Speaker 1: There's so many, but I would just say this first
Speaker 1: and foremost, they've investigated him for four years. They've thrown
Speaker 1: so much at Trump to investigative they've been they had
Speaker 1: the Russia collusion probe and then had impeachment and more
Speaker 1: witnesses and the Congress running that, and they had they've
Speaker 1: had the Southern District of New York, and they've had
Speaker 1: the District Attorney in Manhattan, and they've you know, they've
Speaker 1: had all these investigations. They're investigating the Trump the Trump
Speaker 1: campaign for Russia collusion, They're investigating the Trump Foundation for
Speaker 1: like tax frauther. I mean, all they've done is investigate
Speaker 1: this guy for four years, with everything they've got every
Speaker 1: tool at their disposal. They leaked his tax returns because
Speaker 1: they couldn't get them through other processes, right, So all
Speaker 1: they've done is harassed this guy with whatever BS investigations
Speaker 1: they possibly could. And now you've got a member of Congress,
Speaker 1: and she's not the only one. There are many others
Speaker 1: who are going to want to go after him when
Speaker 1: he leaves. Now, I'm gonna tell you this right now.
Speaker 1: I don't think that they're going to they're going to
Speaker 1: uh sick the DOJ on Trump like an attack dog.
Speaker 1: I don't think they're going to do that. What I
Speaker 1: do think will happen is that they'll allow it to
Speaker 1: occur at a at a lesser level of government. Now
Speaker 1: that that's not to say that that's not to say
Speaker 1: that there's a not no real risk here for the Trump's.
Speaker 1: When I say lesser level, I just mean further down
Speaker 1: the federal government. So you'll have the district attorney, say
Speaker 1: Vance in New York, will look at the Trump organization,
Speaker 1: and I think they will investigate them, but they're going
Speaker 1: to try to take it away from the DOJ level,
Speaker 1: at least initially and go lower down. So it seems
Speaker 1: like it's not come from the bid administration. But I'm
Speaker 1: gonna tell you this right now. These people play hardball.
Speaker 1: You know, they remember this. You know, denish to SUSA,
Speaker 1: who is honestly one of he's one of the conservatives
Speaker 1: that I used to read when I was, you know,
Speaker 1: a young guy coming up in the ranks, and you know,
Speaker 1: right college, and right after denish to SUSA, who I've
Speaker 1: had on the show many times and he's a friend
Speaker 1: of the show. He was treated differently for a completely
Speaker 1: to say it's non violent as even an exaggeration. It's
Speaker 1: he gave fifteen thousand dollars to a congressional candidate who
Speaker 1: was sure to lose, but it was he doubled up, essentially.
Speaker 1: I think he gave two fifteen thousand dollars contributions. He
Speaker 1: wasn't supposed to do that. Usually you pay a fine
Speaker 1: and you're told don't do anything else illegal for a year,
Speaker 1: and you know, we'll just let this go. They made
Speaker 1: him go to a halfway house. They wanted to send
Speaker 1: him to federal prison over that. And that was the
Speaker 1: Obama doj and that was acting through Preperaha, who was
Speaker 1: one of Obama's little henchmen. And that's the way that
Speaker 1: they treat their political opponents. They used the law as
Speaker 1: a weapon. So while I'm telling you that, I don't
Speaker 1: think the DJ is going to immediately because it's they
Speaker 1: wanted to be a little bit more subtle, you know,
Speaker 1: they want it to be a little bit more plausible
Speaker 1: deniability at least at first. But they are going to
Speaker 1: investigate people. You know, Maxine Waters is just saying what
Speaker 1: a lot of them are smart enough not to say
Speaker 1: out loud at this point in Congress, and you know,
Speaker 1: other Democrats. But what she's saying is a sentiment that
Speaker 1: they broadly share, which is that they want to see
Speaker 1: they want to see punishment, They want vengeance against Trump
Speaker 1: and against his supporters. I think you're going to see
Speaker 1: irs investigations of people who were very vocal allies of Trump.
Speaker 1: I think you're going to see deterrence, extremely harsh deterrence
Speaker 1: prosecutions if anyone around Trump for very minor things, and
Speaker 1: they'll tell us I mean, they'll be gaslining. Oh sorry. No,
Speaker 1: this has nothing to do with the fact that you know,
Speaker 1: we're not we're not going we're not going after Corey
Speaker 1: Lewandowski or we're not going after Steve Bannon, or we're
Speaker 1: not going because of their association with Trump. We're going
Speaker 1: after them because you know, they broke the law in
Speaker 1: some serious way. And we'll all say, really, just that's
Speaker 1: that's the We've seen what they did to Roger Stone,
Speaker 1: We've seen what they were willing to do in a
Speaker 1: kind of chord of public opinion to Brett Kavanaugh. I
Speaker 1: mean that they try to ruin and destroy people. So
Speaker 1: one thing that we do need to be prepared for
Speaker 1: is that even if they get their wish, there's gonna
Speaker 1: be no there's no outreach, there's no real call for unity,
Speaker 1: there's no willingness to be better than they've been in
Speaker 1: the Trump era. The left is going to be out
Speaker 1: for scalps. They're going to be out to make examples
Speaker 1: of people. And you may have this this cabal of
Speaker 1: the swamp at the top with Biden and other people
Speaker 1: you know from the Obama ministration that you know, people
Speaker 1: like Blinkin and Carrie who seem or just Mediocrates who
Speaker 1: seem relatively innocuous. But it's gonna be you know, whoever
Speaker 1: is running the Civil Rights Division at the DOJ, It's
Speaker 1: gonna be a US attorney for the Southern District or
Speaker 1: for the for the Eastern District of Virginia. And it's
Speaker 1: gonna be those players in this who, without even having
Speaker 1: to be told by the mafia boss in this case, Biden,
Speaker 1: know who has to be made an example of. No,
Speaker 1: who needs to be punished in a Biden era. So
Speaker 1: I'm telling you this now because I think we're gonna
Speaker 1: have to revisit this. Just give it time. Think of
Speaker 1: all the criminal prosecutions of Republicans that were effectively show
Speaker 1: trials if they got to the trial phase, or that
Speaker 1: were just investigations where the process was the punishment. Rick Perry,
Speaker 1: Chris Christie, Ted Stevens, of the guy what's his name
Speaker 1: of the governor of Wisconsin, Scott Walker. I mean, just go,
Speaker 1: there's a whole list. I can't even think of them
Speaker 1: all the top of my head. Enforced Trump at the
Speaker 1: very top of the list with Russia collusion. So get
Speaker 1: ready for lawfare from the Biden regime. But look for
Speaker 1: it to be a little bit cloaked, a little bit insidious.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Busts and Show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple podcasts at the iHeart Radio app
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts, I think they're all outstanding.
Speaker 1: I Mean, what really stands out to me, Brianna is
Speaker 1: the fact is that you're not seeing grifters, You're not
Speaker 1: seeing unqualified con artists, You're not seeing people who are,
Speaker 1: as far as we know, under investigation by the FBI.
Speaker 1: I mean, it just makes you realize all of the
Speaker 1: misfits that Donald Trump appointed office, and by comparison, that
Speaker 1: was really the Trump really had the Z team. This
Speaker 1: is really the A team. I mean it's really striking
Speaker 1: to me. From Tony Blincoln on down, they are all
Speaker 1: incredibly qualified, with the decades of experience, deep knowledge of
Speaker 1: foreign policy, deep commitment to American leadership, and just as importantly,
Speaker 1: they also know Joe Biden. They broke with them for
Speaker 1: a long time, and that's going to be a key
Speaker 1: advantage because there is going to be a trusting confidence
Speaker 1: on that team that you don't see amid the backbiding
Speaker 1: of the Trump administration. That's Republican turncoat, so former Republican,
Speaker 1: you know, turned Democrat Max Boot who's never seen a war,
Speaker 1: he didn't like for other people to fight, and now
Speaker 1: he's talking about how great the Biden foreign policy team
Speaker 1: will be I want to bring somebody in who is
Speaker 1: going to shake it up by dropping some truth bombs
Speaker 1: here about what the swamp, what the establishment foreign policy
Speaker 1: team would be under Biden, but also just more generally
Speaker 1: for it seems like they want us to forget the
Speaker 1: lessons we've learned under four years of Trump about what
Speaker 1: does work. We got our friend Harsanyi with us now,
Speaker 1: David Harsany of National Review, where he's a senior writer. David,
Speaker 1: great to have you, always great to be here, Thanks
Speaker 1: for having me. So let's let's start with the name
Speaker 1: people before we get into the philosophy of a would
Speaker 1: be Biden foreign policy. And I think it's I think
Speaker 1: this is an area where there's a lot of bipartisan
Speaker 1: crossover in terms of what's wrong. But let's start with
Speaker 1: with who he's named and what your thoughts are about
Speaker 1: the people that Max Boot, clearly not the A team,
Speaker 1: is calling the A team. Yeah, I mean I love
Speaker 1: that Max Boot says that this that was the Z team,
Speaker 1: the team that brought or helped at least, you know,
Speaker 1: bring about four or five potential peace deals in the
Speaker 1: Middle East that he would be raving about if hadn't
Speaker 1: been Obama, or if it had been Biden, but or
Speaker 1: would be Biden, Anthony Lincoln or Tony Blinken who met
Speaker 1: who I think he mentioned Jin has been essentially has
Speaker 1: the perfect swamp resume. I think he you know, he
Speaker 1: went to an Ivy League school. He worked for Clinton,
Speaker 1: he worked for Obama, He was a lobbyist, he was
Speaker 1: you know, uh the Senate, on the Senate Foreign Relations
Speaker 1: Committee when Democrats ran it, I believe and has literally
Speaker 1: been wrong about every single issue by the standards that
Speaker 1: he himself set wrong on Russia when he was mocking
Speaker 1: Mit Romney and all that was going on, you know,
Speaker 1: by his own I don't know that the reset's a
Speaker 1: bad idea with Russia, but that's his own, you know,
Speaker 1: his own words. Wrong on Syria where he wants more troops.
Speaker 1: Wrong on Iraq, where he was part of the decision
Speaker 1: making that went into going to Iraq for Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: Wrong on Israel in the Middle East in a huge way.
Speaker 1: Biden carry all these people who have been around forever
Speaker 1: say that there couldn't be any peace if we didn't
Speaker 1: first go through the Palestinians and even the Arab League
Speaker 1: and even the Gulf States, the Sooning Gulf States are
Speaker 1: now abandoning the PLO and Hamas and moving forward and
Speaker 1: making peace with Israel. Now you know, whether you think
Speaker 1: it's a good deal or not, that's a separate story.
Speaker 1: Well what it is, but it does show is that
Speaker 1: Biden's team, these these professionals that are not the Z
Speaker 1: team but the A team and deeply steeped and all
Speaker 1: the theories and understanding of the Middle East where wrong
Speaker 1: about everything, and yet they get to run everything and
Speaker 1: no one ever questions, uh, you know whatever, questions them
Speaker 1: simply because it's credentialism. They have all the right credentials,
Speaker 1: you know, David, I've worked as a as a research
Speaker 1: associate and research intern at a number of foreign policy
Speaker 1: think tanks in my in my formative years, and then
Speaker 1: was at the CIA, which is kind of like the
Speaker 1: government's little secret foreign policy think tank, right, but a
Speaker 1: lot of you get the people come in with the
Speaker 1: same kinds of credentials, you know, you go to these
Speaker 1: international relations schools and everything, which one of the reasons
Speaker 1: why the CIA and the intelligence community is actually so
Speaker 1: full of leftists, because they tend to self select for
Speaker 1: other people that you know, went to you know, Harvard
Speaker 1: or Colombia, and they do these international relations schools where
Speaker 1: they really don't learn very much. By the way, it's
Speaker 1: really just indoctrination into the BBC NPR view of global
Speaker 1: foreign policy. I mean, that's that's what you actually learn
Speaker 1: in those places. But but you're you're righting, and I
Speaker 1: think this is important for everyone to think about. Now.
Speaker 1: We were told Trump foreign policy because he didn't have
Speaker 1: experience in that arena, and the people he brought in
Speaker 1: were somewhat nontraditional. I mean some of them were people
Speaker 1: that have worked this in the past. Trump's foreign policy
Speaker 1: has been mostly successes. He did not get a deal
Speaker 1: with North Korea, so let's just get that in a way,
Speaker 1: and he tried and sometimes I think the stuff he
Speaker 1: said was a little weird about Kim Jong un. But still,
Speaker 1: but in terms of wars, disasters, terrible stuff happening in
Speaker 1: a foreign policy sense, how can we view the Trump
Speaker 1: foreign policy as anything other than extremely improved upon based
Speaker 1: on what we have with the Obama foreign policy? Right?
Speaker 1: I forgot to mention Libya, where we went in basically
Speaker 1: for the Europeans to try, you know, which was a
Speaker 1: disaster as well, which Barack Obama in his autobiography said
Speaker 1: was a disaster, and he says that it was Biden's
Speaker 1: team and Lincoln who were part of the strong voices
Speaker 1: convincing him to do it, because he never takes credit
Speaker 1: for anything he does wrong, of course, but he didn't
Speaker 1: can go to Congress, by the way to do it.
Speaker 1: And that's another spect of its so quickly mentioned. You know,
Speaker 1: when I read all these stories about how great, how
Speaker 1: America's back, it's all about Europe, right, It's all very eurocentric.
Speaker 1: The world is a big place. We have a lot
Speaker 1: of other places to deal within, a lot of other
Speaker 1: allies around the world. But yet doing what France and
Speaker 1: Germany want us to do seems to be really what
Speaker 1: they're talking about, and like going into Libya, like joining
Speaker 1: the Paris Accords, which will be ratified by the European
Speaker 1: Union book not by the United States Senate, where it
Speaker 1: should be if it's a real treaty. Um. But of
Speaker 1: course the media will say nothing. I already see all
Speaker 1: the same folks, you know, celebrating how we're going to be,
Speaker 1: you know, back out there doing what we've done for
Speaker 1: thirty five years and never once saying, you know, we
Speaker 1: haven't been an a war during this last fifty four years.
Speaker 1: You know that wasn't started earlier. Um. By the way,
Speaker 1: just to follow up on them, we're speaking to David
Speaker 1: Harsani of National Review. You should read Review dot com
Speaker 1: look for David's pieces every week. There, David, we not
Speaker 1: only do we not have a war, we didn't really
Speaker 1: dramatically escalate, except in the one case where there were.
Speaker 1: It wasn't even really a trupe escalation so much as
Speaker 1: a change of the rules of engagement in Syria, which
Speaker 1: is often left out of this, and it was early
Speaker 1: in the Trump administration, but Trump essentially said, let's let
Speaker 1: the guys in the field make the calls they need
Speaker 1: to defeat ISIS. They mopped up ISIS in weeks. People thought,
Speaker 1: people forget that there was going to be this street
Speaker 1: to street fighting in Rocca and oh my gosh, or
Speaker 1: we're gonna be stuck there forever. Trump managed to roll
Speaker 1: them up much more effective air strikes, put embedded soldiers
Speaker 1: with the Kurds, beat back the Islamic State and then
Speaker 1: didn't It didn't escalate. One hundred thousand troops in Afghanistan
Speaker 1: just to look tough, which is what Obama did with
Speaker 1: no real plan to win that war. And you're this
Speaker 1: isn't even brought up. I mean, the anti war left,
Speaker 1: to me is a joke because the anti war left
Speaker 1: only exists when there's a Republican to attack. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: agree with all of that, now listen. I obviously sometimes
Speaker 1: there is no right answer. There is no right or wrong.
Speaker 1: When you're dealing with Syria, there is better and worse,
Speaker 1: I would say, right, So we do the best we
Speaker 1: can and then we think about whether we want to
Speaker 1: be involved or not, or why we're involved in things
Speaker 1: like that. Very complicated situation, clearly, But let's talk about Iran,
Speaker 1: where when Trump got out of the RANDI or people
Speaker 1: like Tony Blinkoln and others immediately said that they were
Speaker 1: going to make a rush towards nuclear weapons, that war
Speaker 1: was now inevitable, and they did challenge American resolve a bit.
Speaker 1: And I think Trump both at the same time showed
Speaker 1: that we were pretty tough, but also held back from
Speaker 1: if you remember, bombing them when he heard about what
Speaker 1: the casualties might look like. But I think Iron learned
Speaker 1: their lesson, and then he killed Solomanni and so forth,
Speaker 1: who was a terrorist who I don't you know, I
Speaker 1: just don't think Obama would have taken him out. I mean,
Speaker 1: it was amazing to me that the media really tried
Speaker 1: to make this whole case. I remember the SOLOMONII very clearly.
Speaker 1: You know, I was working in the CIA's a rock
Speaker 1: desk when Solomani was I mean, he was orchestrating, you know,
Speaker 1: ambush's targeted at US soldiers with EFPs to maim and
Speaker 1: kill our troops. And remember, Solomani was not a war
Speaker 1: with US, right, he was just killing Americans in a
Speaker 1: country that wasn't Iran on because he thought it was
Speaker 1: good for Ronnie an interest and he felt like it.
Speaker 1: And we took that guy out, and the media was
Speaker 1: was apoplectic. I mean they were screaming hair on fire
Speaker 1: about the war that was coming with Iran because of this. No,
Speaker 1: there was no we just we just killed a terrorists
Speaker 1: that murdered on his order. He was like the mafia boss,
Speaker 1: the call for assassinations of US troops. We took him out,
Speaker 1: no consequences, Like, yeah, they fired some rockets just as
Speaker 1: a show. Yeah, but I meant, I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: they fired yea und percent agree with you. And also
Speaker 1: the fact was that that Solomoni was probably responsible for
Speaker 1: five to six hundred American deaths. That's an Obama administration
Speaker 1: Pentagon estimate, not something Trump came up with. And he
Speaker 1: was a killer of Americans. And the only reason we
Speaker 1: didn't go after guys like that, who was freely driving
Speaker 1: around Iroq like nothing was wrong during the Obama administration
Speaker 1: and apparently didn't had to stop doing it during the
Speaker 1: Trump administration was because the Iran deal was everything to
Speaker 1: a lot of these ideologus and the Obama administration. So
Speaker 1: I have to quickly say, I'm happy that we have
Speaker 1: sort of failed swamp creatures there instead of ideologus like
Speaker 1: Ben Rhodes. So there's still time, of course for him
Speaker 1: to be part of the administration, or maybe even Susan
Speaker 1: Rice or Chris Murphy or some someone like that. But
Speaker 1: you know, we shouldn't forget still that these people were
Speaker 1: wrong about Iran, They're wrong about moving the embassy to Jerusalem,
Speaker 1: They're wrong about everything, and we keep acting because of
Speaker 1: their credentials, like they have a level of professionalism that
Speaker 1: isn't there. I wrote a column on this, but if
Speaker 1: you or I were as bad at our jobs. Not
Speaker 1: thank god, I don't have a serious job like you
Speaker 1: know he does. But if we were as wrong at
Speaker 1: our jobs, we wouldn't have a job. Well this is
Speaker 1: you get to run thing. Yeah, I know, this is right.
Speaker 1: Biden has been more wrong than even Tony Blinkin in
Speaker 1: his history and he's the president now. So anyway, I
Speaker 1: just think that Trump blew up a lot of the
Speaker 1: conventional norms that we that were ossified in DC, that
Speaker 1: people thought, you know, this is the only way to
Speaker 1: move forward. And you know, they were clearly wrong on Israel,
Speaker 1: on Iran, on many other issues. I don't say, you know,
Speaker 1: obviously North Korea is a tough, tough thing, and other
Speaker 1: you know, he hasn't been great on every single issue,
Speaker 1: but just in general, I mean the whole his whole
Speaker 1: attitude of not being Eurocentric about everything. Why is it
Speaker 1: that the elites in this country, I mean, especially if
Speaker 1: you're a journal at a major news publication or one
Speaker 1: of the left leaning cable news channels out there, whatever,
Speaker 1: the French, the Germans and the and the English think
Speaker 1: we were all supposed to really care. You know, they'll
Speaker 1: share polls about like our presidential election about who, you know,
Speaker 1: who do the French support and I sit here, or
Speaker 1: who do the Brits even support. I say, we're pretty
Speaker 1: sure we fought a war, so we don't ever have
Speaker 1: to care about what they think of our leadership. Why
Speaker 1: are they so obsessed with this? Is it just this
Speaker 1: cultural affinity they have for how fancy and better than
Speaker 1: us the Europeans are. They're really not. I mean, I
Speaker 1: always like to tell people, you, guys want to see racism,
Speaker 1: go into some European countries and see how they deal
Speaker 1: with that big minorities. But anyway, David, go ahead. I'm
Speaker 1: really happy you mentioned all that because I actually am
Speaker 1: writing a book now that will come out next year
Speaker 1: on that very topic about how our elites, our journalists,
Speaker 1: our politicians are always looking to Europe despite the fact
Speaker 1: that we do everything, and I mean everything for racism
Speaker 1: to you know, to assimilation, to economics to healthcare better
Speaker 1: than they do by any standard. I think they look
Speaker 1: there because I think those folks are more sophisticated than
Speaker 1: we are. When you read about Lincoln, I keep mentioning
Speaker 1: him because I think he's probably the worst of the lot.
Speaker 1: But when you read about our next Secretary of State.
Speaker 1: In the Guardian, they talk about how he plays soccer,
Speaker 1: and how he is bilingual, and how he you know,
Speaker 1: he goes to Europe and how he went to school
Speaker 1: in Paris and all these things, while Pompeio and others
Speaker 1: are always on conservative talk radio in Iowa and places
Speaker 1: that don't matter. Right France matters, Brussels matters, Des Moines,
Speaker 1: does not matter to people in who work at the
Speaker 1: Brookings Institute or you know, work at the at the
Speaker 1: UN or etc. You know. I think that this might
Speaker 1: bite them. I think that Americans were pretty happy with
Speaker 1: the foreign policy we had in the last four years.
Speaker 1: I think they're happy about a less about as a
Speaker 1: belligerent outlook and hawkish outlook on the world. And we'll
Speaker 1: see how that shakes out politically. David Harsani, everybody check
Speaker 1: out his ladies at National Review dot com and follow
Speaker 1: him on Twitter. If you're on Twitter, David Harsani time
Speaker 1: is always fun. Thanks for joining, Thanks for having me.
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom Hud. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. There will be no separate peace between Israel
Speaker 1: and the Arab world. I want to make that very
Speaker 1: clear to all of you. I've heard several prominent politicians
Speaker 1: in Israel sometimes saying, well, the Arab world's in a
Speaker 1: different place now, we just have to reach out to them,
Speaker 1: and we could work some things with the Arab world,
Speaker 1: and we'll deal with the Palestinians. No, no, no, and no.
Speaker 1: I can tell you that reaffirmed even in the last
Speaker 1: week as I have talked to leaders of the Arab community.
Speaker 1: There will be no advance and separate peace with the
Speaker 1: Arab world without the Palestinian process and Palestinian piece. Everybody
Speaker 1: needs to understand that that is a hard reality. That
Speaker 1: is total bull. But that was John carry back in
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen. And notice that that he is just a
Speaker 1: stupid person's version of what an intelligent, authoritative person sounds like. Right,
Speaker 1: there will be no peace with the Palestinians separate and
Speaker 1: apart from the you know this whole thing. Well, he
Speaker 1: was wrong, but he presents this not even as his
Speaker 1: assessment or his opinion. He says this is established reality.
Speaker 1: He was wrong, and that was in twenty sixty And
Speaker 1: you know who proved him wrong. The Trump administration that
Speaker 1: has managed to negotiate peace deals with Gulf Arab states
Speaker 1: and Israel, and there were more on the way. I
Speaker 1: think those might fall by the wayside now because there's
Speaker 1: a constituency in this country of the leftists that really
Speaker 1: believe that American foreign policy we're supposed to care a
Speaker 1: lot about the plight of the Palestinians, even at the
Speaker 1: expense of US interests in the broader region, and we're
Speaker 1: not supposed to favor the interests of Israel, which is
Speaker 1: an allied and important state in the region. They really
Speaker 1: believe that. I mean that the left in this country
Speaker 1: thinks that we should really make a big that you
Speaker 1: and I are supposed to care about what's happening in
Speaker 1: the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. I don't care.
Speaker 1: I mean, I care as much as I do about
Speaker 1: any other place in the world. I hope people are
Speaker 1: safe and fed and happy, and everything's fine, but I'm
Speaker 1: not about to make it the centerpiece of the US
Speaker 1: government's attention in a region of hundreds of millions of
Speaker 1: people that has seen more than its fair share of
Speaker 1: violence and war in recent years, and that we just
Speaker 1: want it, We just want things to calm down, and
Speaker 1: we either want to send our men and women over
Speaker 1: there anymore. In uniform fighting. We don't want to do
Speaker 1: that anymore. And I think you're going to see a
Speaker 1: real struggle ahead here in this possible Biden administration. I
Speaker 1: think you're going to see a real struggle where everyone
Speaker 1: on the right is going to be saying, hold on
Speaker 1: a second, we don't want We're not doing this interventionist
Speaker 1: peace keeping, rebuilding other countries thing. It was a bad
Speaker 1: idea when Bush pushed it, and it was a bad
Speaker 1: idea when Obama pushed it. Trump didn't fall for that.
Speaker 1: We're not doing that again. And the left, because you know,
Speaker 1: the Democrats, because they'll be in charge under Biden administration,
Speaker 1: we'll all of a sudden forget all about their their
Speaker 1: anti war side. We'll forget, forget all about you know,
Speaker 1: bushlied babies died, and they'll pushing for the you know,
Speaker 1: for the exertion of US military power on behalf of
Speaker 1: the internationalist globalist consensus. And I'm gonna fight that tooth
Speaker 1: and nail, because I'm telling you this right now, I'm
Speaker 1: not going back over there for the CIA. And I'm
Speaker 1: not sending a future buck junior or Buckett. That doesn't
Speaker 1: sound that's not a good name, sounds like a thing
Speaker 1: you fill with water. Little little Uh, I don't know.
Speaker 1: Mark come up with a feeble little Sarah. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I just came up with the name. But I'm not
Speaker 1: sending my kids over the Middle East to fight in
Speaker 1: a war in twenty years because of the globalists. I'm
Speaker 1: not doing it. Thanks for listening to The Busson Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. All right, folks, we've got
Speaker 1: our friend Boris Epstein with us now. He's a strategic
Speaker 1: advisor to Trump twenty twenty and a member of the
Speaker 1: legal team. Boris, thanks for making the time for us.
Speaker 1: I really appreciate it. Thank you so much. Good to
Speaker 1: be with you, by friend. So tell me where where
Speaker 1: does all this stand right now? Because Biden is out there,
Speaker 1: he's named all these different people, is you know, director
Speaker 1: of National Intelligence and his National security advisor. I mean,
Speaker 1: he's moving forward the transition. He's acting like this is
Speaker 1: all over. Where do the legal challenges stand right now? Well,
Speaker 1: here's where it is. We continue to expose the widespread
Speaker 1: election fraud and voting irregularities all across the country. Buck.
Speaker 1: If you look at Georgia where they found ballots seeming
Speaker 1: thousands of ballots under every rock. The recount continues, and
Speaker 1: we're pressing for their recount to include signature matching so
Speaker 1: it's a true and honest recount in Georgia. In Pennsylvania,
Speaker 1: the legal fight continues. We actually scored two victories in
Speaker 1: the third Circuit yesterday. One was for an expedited hearing
Speaker 1: and one was another procedural emotion and that law law
Speaker 1: case continues in the Middle District of Pennsylvania, which is
Speaker 1: where it was initially, and now it's up to the
Speaker 1: up to the third Appello Circuit. In Michigan, yesterday, it
Speaker 1: was disappointing to see the Board of Canvassers certify the
Speaker 1: vote because there was so much regularity in Michigan and
Speaker 1: Wayne County alone, seventy one percent of roles. Voter rolls
Speaker 1: did not match up with the amount of people who
Speaker 1: actually voted. We're going to continue pressing our case in Michigan.
Speaker 1: In Wisconsin, the recount continues, and we are confident that
Speaker 1: we will see at the end of that over one
Speaker 1: hundred thousand people who voted outside of Wisconsin law because
Speaker 1: under Wisconsin law, under the Wisconsin constitution, voting by mail
Speaker 1: and absentee is a privilege. It is not a right.
Speaker 1: You have to apply to be able to do so.
Speaker 1: And we're confident that what this audit has done. When
Speaker 1: this um recount is done, we will see a huge
Speaker 1: amount of folks who voted that did not have approval
Speaker 1: to vote by mail an absentee. And in Arizona, a
Speaker 1: huge array over regularity, is huge array of election fraud
Speaker 1: that we've seen that we're going to be laying out
Speaker 1: and again pressing our case forward there, and the same
Speaker 1: thing in Nevada. So that is a jomp through all
Speaker 1: the states. We feel very confident in the once all
Speaker 1: the legal votes are counted, the legal votes are counted,
Speaker 1: President Trump will be a determined to of one reelection.
Speaker 1: And that's why we're pressing forward in this case. Can
Speaker 1: you just tell us boris what is the Trump legal
Speaker 1: team's central contention or contentions right now? In Pennsylvania. In Pennsylvania,
Speaker 1: a key issue is the fact that under Pennsylvania, all
Speaker 1: observers are required to observe and inspect mail in ballots
Speaker 1: and almost seven hundred thousand, seven hundred thousand mail in
Speaker 1: ballots in Philadelphia and Allegheny Counties alone will process without
Speaker 1: being observed. That's a key contention, the fact that, based
Speaker 1: on the Secretary of State's advice, Democrat counties were allowing
Speaker 1: their voters to cure ballots that were ineffective or defective
Speaker 1: in some way. But the Republican balance work is a
Speaker 1: huge due process and equal production problem as well. So
Speaker 1: those are two main points of contention in Pennsylvania. And
Speaker 1: so now so everyone understands a judge, a federal judge
Speaker 1: in Pennsylvania denied that initial claim. So it's gone to
Speaker 1: the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. How soon will that
Speaker 1: be heard and how quickly thereafter if the campaign does
Speaker 1: not get the remedy they see, could go up to
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court. Well, it's actually there's been a lot
Speaker 1: of motion practice there. So I actually went with Mayor
Speaker 1: Giuliani two Pennsylvania the last Tuesday to wait us one,
Speaker 1: which is where the middle district sits, and we filed
Speaker 1: a motion for leap to amend a complaint to expand
Speaker 1: our comput which happens often or especially fast moving mitigation. Well,
Speaker 1: that motions to amenda's supposed to be granted freely at
Speaker 1: the judge's discussion. The judge denied it, and that's all
Speaker 1: we are appealing right now. We're not appealing the motion
Speaker 1: Smith because that motion was on the First Amendment complaint,
Speaker 1: which we want to change anyway. So that is why
Speaker 1: we're in the third third circle right now, and we're
Speaker 1: all working to get to hearing as fast as possible.
Speaker 1: We did get an expedited hearing, expedited review granted to us,
Speaker 1: So are hearing on that specific thing on an appeal
Speaker 1: of our denial of the motion to amend, could be
Speaker 1: as soon as Wednesday, as soon as tomorrow. And now
Speaker 1: as for the the facts that are agreed upon, as
Speaker 1: much as that exists here on both sides, you're talking
Speaker 1: about the in Pennsylvania, the absence of observers right from
Speaker 1: both sides, is that proven? Is that an issue of
Speaker 1: there was a policy that Republican observers were not allowed
Speaker 1: within a certain distance of these counts. Because I've seen
Speaker 1: there's a contention there. I mean, people, I think Boris
Speaker 1: are getting lost in the well, well, what really what
Speaker 1: really can be proven here? What really happened? What could
Speaker 1: be proven? Observers are proputing corrals we're putting good and
Speaker 1: pends behind you know, behind these large, large gates, and
Speaker 1: they were not allowed to meaningfully observe, so they could
Speaker 1: be across a huge hallway or something that fail where
Speaker 1: well you're in the room. But nevertheless, it does not
Speaker 1: mean that they were allowed to enable to meaningfully observe.
Speaker 1: So that is what it boils down to. Were observers
Speaker 1: period and Republican observers specifically able to observe the counting
Speaker 1: and the processing of these mail in ballots, especially in
Speaker 1: Democrat counties. And so we're going understand what's the status
Speaker 1: of Georgia right now from the from the lawsuit perspective.
Speaker 1: Georgia's going through its recount as we speak, and we
Speaker 1: are we are pushing very hard. There's a let us
Speaker 1: set in the Secretary of State yesterday, but we're looking
Speaker 1: through all our options to ensure that that recount and
Speaker 1: that's what David Perdue carry uptlo. The Senator said as well,
Speaker 1: that that recount includes signature matching, so it's not a
Speaker 1: fake recount really, which is what the previous moment was,
Speaker 1: which was recounted the legal and the illegal votes. We
Speaker 1: all only want the legal votes to be counted. When
Speaker 1: will we find out if they're going to do the
Speaker 1: signature match recount. We are, we are working on that
Speaker 1: full time and we're hoping for positive ANSWA within days.
Speaker 1: And so this is this is really great for us
Speaker 1: because I really want everyone to understand the specifics here
Speaker 1: because you know, there's a lot of there's a lot
Speaker 1: of noise, as you know, and we're trying to get
Speaker 1: in to the signal here as so to speak. And
Speaker 1: on the issue of smart Madic and smart Madic software
Speaker 1: and the dominion voting machines. Is the legal team dealing
Speaker 1: with the official legal team looking into that specifically at all?
Speaker 1: Or is that entirely now Sidney Powell as a lawyer
Speaker 1: working on her own and that's essentially her own thing. No,
Speaker 1: our team is also looking into those issues, and Sydney
Speaker 1: Powe's looking at as well. She's mentioned, but we are
Speaker 1: we are looking into the issues with dominion. We know
Speaker 1: that six thousand votes were switched in Antrim County, Michigan
Speaker 1: from President Trump to four Vice President Joe Biden miraculously
Speaker 1: quote unquote, and then switch back Whatson was discovered, So
Speaker 1: we all continue to look into that and investigate that
Speaker 1: whole situation. As well, And just so I'm clear as well,
Speaker 1: we're speaking of Boris Epstein. He's a strategic advisor to
Speaker 1: Trump twenty twenty and a member of the legal team
Speaker 1: that's involved in all this stuff. The timelines here is
Speaker 1: there essentially a point at which all all motions legal
Speaker 1: motions you expect, will be either you know, decided one
Speaker 1: way or the other. How long can this? I think
Speaker 1: people are wondering, how long will these challenges drag on? Well,
Speaker 1: it's a constitutional process, right In the end, it is
Speaker 1: not these state officials, it's not the governors or the
Speaker 1: courts who decide and who won the election in each
Speaker 1: state under the elector's cause of the constitution. It is
Speaker 1: the state legislatures who decide, and they have until midnight
Speaker 1: on December thirteenth into December fourteenth to determine who won
Speaker 1: the legal vote in each state. So we have some
Speaker 1: time here. There is time for all this play out.
Speaker 1: And this is then staying completely within the constitutionally prescribed
Speaker 1: process one hundred percent. We're following the process. Give them mind,
Speaker 1: al Gore did not conceit of the suburb twelfth in
Speaker 1: two thousands, so we have time and the key hears this,
Speaker 1: It's not about the president or the presidency. It's about
Speaker 1: the American people in the constitution and making sure that
Speaker 1: American voting is full of integrity and done legitimately. That's
Speaker 1: what we're after, and that's what we want to count
Speaker 1: all the legal votes for. What can you tell us
Speaker 1: about the we hear often about a large number of affidavits,
Speaker 1: sworn affidavits from people under penalty of perjury who say
Speaker 1: they witnessed not mistakes so much as outright intentional fraud.
Speaker 1: Are those being deployed in court those affidavits in large
Speaker 1: numbers yet or are we expecting those to be introduced
Speaker 1: in the weeks ahead. We're using them throughout the country
Speaker 1: and more will be more will be deployed as well,
Speaker 1: as you said, But those are already been utilized in Pennsylvania,
Speaker 1: utilized in the in Michigan, in Nevada, we've been we've
Speaker 1: been using our affidavits from the American people who sworn
Speaker 1: affidavits under penalty of perjury to press forward our case
Speaker 1: that there's widespread election to regularity election fraud here and
Speaker 1: that is why this has to be worked through to
Speaker 1: the very end. Are there investigative efforts also underway to
Speaker 1: try to get to some of the the specifics of
Speaker 1: how these frauds took place. I mean, I know that
Speaker 1: you have sworn affidavits, people are saying they saw things.
Speaker 1: Are you able to uh, you know, is there any
Speaker 1: process for you to go to a judge to try
Speaker 1: to get a subpoena for surveillance camera footage or for
Speaker 1: documents that you have not had access to? Mean? Is
Speaker 1: that also going on? We're determined that on as needed basis,
Speaker 1: state by state. But you know, you make obviously a
Speaker 1: very good point. But to your listeners who are worried,
Speaker 1: do not be concerned. Rest assured that the president has campaigning,
Speaker 1: this team are doing everything possible to expose all of
Speaker 1: the election to regularity, election faud perpetrated by the left
Speaker 1: as they try to hold on to power at any cost. So, Boris,
Speaker 1: I'll let you go with this. I just need to
Speaker 1: hear it from you. You're telling me that legally, constitutionally,
Speaker 1: this thing is not over, and absolutely not over. We're
Speaker 1: keeping up the fight, and the fight is to count
Speaker 1: all the legal votes. Boris Epstein, Strategic advisor to Trump
Speaker 1: twenty twenty. Boris really appreciate you, makod time. I know
Speaker 1: you're busy. Good talking to you. Bucks. Thank you so much,
Speaker 1: God bless you're enough. Freedom mind. This is the Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show podcast. Would you go? Would you how? You know?
Speaker 1: How do you go to battle with Nicasio Cortez at
Speaker 1: some point where she turns to the demoderate or the
Speaker 1: conservative Democrat. She knows how to speak to young voters,
Speaker 1: and I trust her that she actually cares about her constituents.
Speaker 1: I believe she actually cares whether people have a meal
Speaker 1: on Thanksgiving. I don't know if Marco Rubio does. I
Speaker 1: don't know if it's sky Shares. I know my alc cares,
Speaker 1: and she will fight for her constituents come hell or
Speaker 1: high water, and for this country's democracy. Hell yeah, the constituents,
Speaker 1: those people represent, those constituents feel the same way about them.
Speaker 1: I don't get to make that judgment. Surprise. They haven't
Speaker 1: passed a bill to feed them. If thanks Giving a surprise,
Speaker 1: they're not doing a damn thing to give the elected
Speaker 1: to make sure that they picked up eleven seats. So
Speaker 1: somebody saw, what are they going to do with it?
Speaker 1: The Okay, we had a time, but what the question
Speaker 1: is what will they do with it, because right now
Speaker 1: they're doing Nathan for these people. Nathan, why aren't people
Speaker 1: getting aid from the government during this COVID lockdown period
Speaker 1: over this Thanksgiving week? Why isn't it happening. Why hasn't
Speaker 1: it happened in months? This is an important political debate,
Speaker 1: This is an important back and forth. We should all
Speaker 1: be very clear on this. We should know what the
Speaker 1: answer is here, and the answer is that Democrats like
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi, or led by Nancy Pelosi, have more important
Speaker 1: priorities they think, than getting people in a desperate situation
Speaker 1: caused a desperate financial an economic situation caused by government policy.
Speaker 1: They're not getting assistance from that very government. It's being
Speaker 1: held up. Pelosi is holding this hostage. And there was
Speaker 1: an exchange between okazio Quartz and Ted Cruz and now
Speaker 1: everything all this stuff happens on Twitter. I think it's
Speaker 1: see this is where you see so many of these
Speaker 1: back and forth. Acazio Quartz wrote, people across the country
Speaker 1: are going hungry, COVID is set to explode, and Mitch
Speaker 1: McConnell dismissed the Senate last week. Ocazio Quarte tweeted, I
Speaker 1: don't know how people can sleep at night. I really don't,
Speaker 1: and firing back, Ted Cruz wrote, why is your party
Speaker 1: filibustering five hundred billion in COVID relief? The Texas Republican? Oh? Sorry,
Speaker 1: and Joe Biden is cheering them on, thinking that blocking
Speaker 1: relief somehow helps Democrats win Georgia. The people Republicans have
Speaker 1: already passed five hundred billion dollars of COVID eight. That's
Speaker 1: a lot of money. Democrats say, no, must be more,
Speaker 1: must be a lot more, hundreds of billions more for cities.
Speaker 1: Democrats cities to be able to come out of their
Speaker 1: budgetary holes that existed long before COVID. That's really what's
Speaker 1: an issue here. But if we're going to talk about
Speaker 1: who's responsible for obstruction here, who's responsible for stopping this
Speaker 1: aid from getting to people? It is quite clear that
Speaker 1: the lion share of the blame is Pelosi. It should
Speaker 1: go to Pelosi and the Democrats. That much of it
Speaker 1: is clear, and people really are suffering right now. I
Speaker 1: think we have to remember that you're not hearing. You
Speaker 1: don't see as much of it on TV because the
Speaker 1: people that work in media look people like me who
Speaker 1: work in media do commentary. Our jobs have stayed pretty
Speaker 1: constant and we've had to make some changes. But I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, I don't work for CNN. I don't have
Speaker 1: some million dollar paycheck from a big legacy media institution.
Speaker 1: But a lot of people who work in areas where
Speaker 1: they can work stay at home jobs that can stay
Speaker 1: at home, they seem like they're doing okay, and they're
Speaker 1: the ones that determine what goes on your nightly news.
Speaker 1: But for people that have to show up, for people
Speaker 1: that have to be in person still to get their paycheck,
Speaker 1: big problems here. This is a a Los Angeles restaurant
Speaker 1: owner who's talking about what these new restrictions that Gavin
Speaker 1: Newsom just put into place, what they're doing to his business,
Speaker 1: Play and many other restaurants Play eleven. The biggest tool
Speaker 1: is going to We're going to lay off the people
Speaker 1: that we just brought back. We're gonna to furlough them
Speaker 1: likely as we downsize to take out only which you know,
Speaker 1: fires les, kids, lest from the house staff. So it's
Speaker 1: to break us all. It's about to break us all.
Speaker 1: But I guess if if he even makes that statement publicly,
Speaker 1: or are we supposed to to browbeat him. Are we
Speaker 1: supposed to be criticizing him, attacking him for not understanding
Speaker 1: what a riskness is to everybody of COVID. Oh my gosh, hide,
Speaker 1: hide under your bed. It is a man public health risk.
Speaker 1: It is dangerous to people who are old and infirm.
Speaker 1: It is manageable for everyone else. And what would have
Speaker 1: been a smarter strategy all along would be to create
Speaker 1: maximum protection in places of greatest risk, nursing homes, places
Speaker 1: where there are a lot of seniors who are congregated
Speaker 1: in close quarters with other people. That would have been
Speaker 1: a smarter policy. But we're not allowed to talk about
Speaker 1: smart policy because the moment we do, we're told we're
Speaker 1: being a heartless and being terrible. But I think it's
Speaker 1: pretty awful to tell people that they're going to lose
Speaker 1: their jobs in many cases again because of lockdowns that
Speaker 1: just simply don't work. I mean, that's really the ultimately
Speaker 1: the problem that I see with this that doesn't get
Speaker 1: enough attention. No one ever talks about it. So any
Speaker 1: you can listen to me on this, or you can
Speaker 1: listen to democrats. Listen to here. Here's Maxine Waters play four. Yes,
Speaker 1: we have to just keep pushing. We have to keep talking.
Speaker 1: We have to try to make people understand the dangers
Speaker 1: that we're all confronted with. You know, Joy, I'm in Washington.
Speaker 1: I didn't go back to Los Angeles because I listened
Speaker 1: to the experts, and I was not going to go
Speaker 1: into the airports, and I did not want to do
Speaker 1: anything that would endanger me and cause me not to
Speaker 1: be able to be back here next Monday, when we
Speaker 1: have to pass the Heroes Act, where we have to
Speaker 1: pass legislation that will help so many suffering people. So
Speaker 1: many people and families are hungry and they're standing in
Speaker 1: food lines, and I'm so worried about possible evictions, and
Speaker 1: so I think that we have to keep crying out.
Speaker 1: We have to keep talking. We have to keep trying
Speaker 1: to convince and do everything that we can to get
Speaker 1: people to understand that they can take responsibility, that they
Speaker 1: cannot be a part of spreading this virus. Yeah, the
Speaker 1: virus that they tell us spreads asymptomatically almost half the time.
Speaker 1: It's as easy as just I don't want to be
Speaker 1: a spreader. Put that aside for a second. Democrats demand
Speaker 1: the lockdowns. As we know Democrats demand these lockdowns, then
Speaker 1: they block COVID aid. Then they turn around and pretend
Speaker 1: that they care about the people that are being hurt
Speaker 1: by the lockdowns and that aren't getting COVID aid. Really,
Speaker 1: I mean, they're they're the arsonists running around screaming about
Speaker 1: how Saturday is that people's houses are burning down while
Speaker 1: they're blocking firefighters from getting to them. That's what the
Speaker 1: Democrats are with these COVID lockdowns. That's that's what's happening
Speaker 1: all across the country. But that's certainly not the way
Speaker 1: the media is going to depict it. No, we're all
Speaker 1: supposed to stand here in clap for the parade of
Speaker 1: swamp creatures that are going to be taking over in
Speaker 1: a Biden administration. So you know which we we just
Speaker 1: heard from the Trump legal team. It ain't over, folks.
Speaker 1: It's not looking probable, but it ain't over. It ain't
Speaker 1: over till the Zoftig self identified female sings. Thanks for
Speaker 1: listening to the Bus Sesson Showbote. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcast at the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. Like Soft Butter on Warm Toast. Time to
Speaker 1: spread some freedom coast to Coast. It's time for roll call,
Speaker 1: Role call everybody, Facebook dot com, slash Facebook dot com, slashbox,
Speaker 1: Sexton Teambuck at iHeartMedia dot com if you want to
Speaker 1: email us and what other things we have producer are Instagram, Instagram, TikTok, TikTok,
Speaker 1: don't stop, do the dance? Do you drop? Or do
Speaker 1: you know who that song is by? That you're bucking Kesha?
Speaker 1: All right, I'm glad see I know some things about
Speaker 1: some stuff. So yeah, that was a big song for all.
Speaker 1: I remember that one did Whatever happened to Kesha? I
Speaker 1: think she's still around. Didn't she spell her name with
Speaker 1: like a money sign? I think crazy? Yeah, that's kind
Speaker 1: of a that's kind of a baller move. Right. We
Speaker 1: don't say We don't say ball or more, we say fire.
Speaker 1: That's fire. Right? Who says that? Like, if something's cool,
Speaker 1: you say that's fire. No, maybe the kids do. That's
Speaker 1: what I'm saying. Yeah, the young, the youth, the team
Speaker 1: buck youth, the college agent below that. Listen to this
Speaker 1: show that you're gonna learn that fire. I want to
Speaker 1: be hip. I'm like thirty years younger than all these
Speaker 1: other radio hosts. I gotta be hip. You know, I
Speaker 1: gotta know the things about the stuff. Yeah, but if
Speaker 1: you keep talking about wanting to be hip, then you're not.
Speaker 1: I think it's one of those things too. It's like
Speaker 1: the word classy. If you refer to yourself as classy,
Speaker 1: it's not true. And if you refer to yourself as hip,
Speaker 1: I think it's also not true. Correct. Yeah, So don't
Speaker 1: say you want to be hip, just just I'm not.
Speaker 1: I'm not saying of hip. I'm just fire. So there
Speaker 1: we go. Nope, that's not doing it. Brought it full
Speaker 1: brought a full uh full circle. There and my TikTok
Speaker 1: we got we got the buck TikTok happing Now it's
Speaker 1: very exciting. I know a lot of your email me
Speaker 1: and say it's a Chinese platform for monitoring and stuff,
Speaker 1: and yeah that may be true, but whatever, it's fun.
Speaker 1: I like it. I learned how to cookstakes on it.
Speaker 1: Follow me on TikTok. What are the Chinese really gonna
Speaker 1: do with who you follow on TikTok and what you watch?
Speaker 1: It's okay, they're selling it to an American company, and
Speaker 1: I promise if I find out for my Intel contacts
Speaker 1: that they're really still spying on us. I'll let you
Speaker 1: know so for now. If you're on the I know
Speaker 1: this on he's like, what TikTok, Buck, what are you doing.
Speaker 1: I'm trying to be, you know, on the cutting edge.
Speaker 1: I'm also on Parlor and Rumble. You know. Parlor's great.
Speaker 1: I'm having so much fun there. It's it's so nice
Speaker 1: to read the comments, and they're nice saying patriotic Americans
Speaker 1: on Twitter. I have to mute the comments because they're like,
Speaker 1: go kill yourself, you know. On Parlor, the like Buck,
Speaker 1: thank you for your witticisms and your excellent insight. I
Speaker 1: love this country and I love Team Buck, and I
Speaker 1: just I just feel like a warm beacon of freedom
Speaker 1: every time I open up my Parlor account. Now it's great.
Speaker 1: I'm glading. You're getting love from somewhere. Yeah, it makes
Speaker 1: me happy. Yeah, exactly exactly. And you know, producer Mark
Speaker 1: the Snow Princess reminded me that it is almost one
Speaker 1: year since I met her on the street, which is
Speaker 1: what happened. I was doing a hit at Newsmax TV,
Speaker 1: the old I think it was the only hit at Newsmax.
Speaker 1: I did that whole year, and I did it because
Speaker 1: I had a couple of friends over there that I
Speaker 1: wanted to see who work at Newsmax, and sore like,
Speaker 1: come on over, do a hit, hang out, see everybody.
Speaker 1: So I was like, all right, I'll come over. So
Speaker 1: I went over and it you know, it was I hited.
Speaker 1: I think there were hundreds of people who were watching
Speaker 1: it at the time. And then I walked back home
Speaker 1: and I'm bumped into the snow Princess on the street
Speaker 1: and that's how it happened. Wow, I did not know
Speaker 1: that that's how it happened. Yeah, that's how it happened.
Speaker 1: And people are like, oh, does that mean you met
Speaker 1: a line? No, it means we actually met on the street.
Speaker 1: So did she recognize you or something or she was
Speaker 1: with a friend who recognized me and the friend was like,
Speaker 1: that's Buck Sexton. And then I was like, who is
Speaker 1: your friend the snow Princess, And that's how that's how
Speaker 1: it happened. We didn't we weren't it really able to
Speaker 1: go out for a little while because they were I
Speaker 1: had the holidays and stuff, so it wasn't Technically the
Speaker 1: dating anniversary would be uh, we would be uh in February,
Speaker 1: little of February. But we did meet. We did meet
Speaker 1: on the street in um in New York City, so
Speaker 1: it happened. It was like a cold there's also one
Speaker 1: of these nights in New York or like, why am
Speaker 1: I here? It's so crowded. Midtown was jammed with people.
Speaker 1: It was dark and cold. I'd just been in Newsmax,
Speaker 1: and I was like, oh, what am I doing? And uh,
Speaker 1: and then I meet the snow Princess. Yeah, and always
Speaker 1: asked for coming to my wedding. That's that's right. And
Speaker 1: people always ask uh, they asked about the snow Princess,
Speaker 1: and I always say, um, that's because she's from She's
Speaker 1: from Buffalo, So that's why she's it's she's from a
Speaker 1: snowy place. It's the princess of the snowy place. Buffalo
Speaker 1: does get a lot of snow. In case you didn't
Speaker 1: know that. Yeah, I think that's common knowledge for motion. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm just saying. I'm just saying. And Buffalo is one
Speaker 1: of those parts of New York. You know, there are
Speaker 1: parts of Pennsylvania that really feel more like the Midwest
Speaker 1: than Pennsylvania. You know, you get out in some parts
Speaker 1: of Pennsylvania and it's feels like America, you know. I
Speaker 1: mean it's you know, Philly is east Coast, Philly is
Speaker 1: Northeastern Corridor. You get out way West and you're like,
Speaker 1: am I in Ohio and you get kind of the
Speaker 1: same thing here when you're talking about way western New
Speaker 1: York or anywhere north of Yonkers really yep, the rest
Speaker 1: of New York State. Hmm. Yeah, I've been way up
Speaker 1: by the Saint Lawrence River and you're like, am I
Speaker 1: in Canada? Because it feels like I'm in Canada. So yeah,
Speaker 1: when we drove up to Cooperstown around Labor Day, I
Speaker 1: didn't realize that I was still in New York. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so this are the people would say, oh, you're from
Speaker 1: New York. I said, it's very There's a lot of
Speaker 1: different versions of New York. This is like when I
Speaker 1: went to I went to speak in Springfield, Illinois to
Speaker 1: a great group of conservatives. There a GOP group in Springfield,
Speaker 1: and Springfield actually has a pretty good GOP corps for
Speaker 1: a city. You know, it's the capital of Illinois, which
Speaker 1: people off and forget. Isn't Springfield the name of the
Speaker 1: town of the Simpsons too? It is, so the joke
Speaker 1: is which Springfield? Is it? Right? And there? Well, there's
Speaker 1: I think there's a Springfield in almost every state something
Speaker 1: like that exactly. So Springfield. I went there to speak
Speaker 1: and it's funny because they said, you think of Illinois
Speaker 1: and the media perception is Chicago Democrat, machine blue. You
Speaker 1: get out into other parts of the state and there's
Speaker 1: like red America. It's actually nice. Yeah, good things all right.
Speaker 1: Facebook dot com already told you that let's get to
Speaker 1: the roll call. Here we go, and pretty sure Mark
Speaker 1: and I will be talking more about Thanksgiving plans tomorrow. Basically,
Speaker 1: we're just going to discuss food and things that we
Speaker 1: recommend you all try in the food realm, or that
Speaker 1: you do that happens almost every day. That's true too.
Speaker 1: But Mark, like, are you a do you mix gravy?
Speaker 1: Do you use gravy as a kind of all of
Speaker 1: the above sauce, like the same way that some people
Speaker 1: just pour soy sauce, you know, on all of their
Speaker 1: Chinese food. Do you just sprinkle a little gravy on everything?
Speaker 1: Or do you limited to the to the turkey in
Speaker 1: the mashed potatoes. It mostly goes on the turkey, not
Speaker 1: even the mashed potatoes. I prefer mashed potatoes, would just butter,
Speaker 1: salt and pepper. See, but if it gets on, I
Speaker 1: won't be angry. You know. Right now, how do you
Speaker 1: feel about when you're do you do you keep your
Speaker 1: cranberry sauce in your gravy separate or do you allow
Speaker 1: them to mix. I don't even get the cranberry sauce.
Speaker 1: I'm not a big cranberry sauce guy either, but sometimes
Speaker 1: it does give you the salty, sweet umami flavor if
Speaker 1: you get the two of them mixed together. I'm just saying,
Speaker 1: you know, crazy things, crazy things gonna happen if I'm drinking,
Speaker 1: if I'm using cranberry anything, it's going in my vudca.
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna say this right now for everybody across America.
Speaker 1: There are some difficult truths that I have to tell
Speaker 1: you people. There are some things that you need to know,
Speaker 1: whether you want to know it or not. And I'm
Speaker 1: just gonna say it. No celery in your stuffing, and
Speaker 1: no wall nuts or nuts of any kind in you're stuffing.
Speaker 1: It's not civilized. We don't do that. That's not how
Speaker 1: you roll, all right, none of that. Now, if the
Speaker 1: celery is cooked. Maybe maybe I'm not going to throw
Speaker 1: a flag if it's kind of like a little but
Speaker 1: if if there's a crunch, I don't want anything crunching
Speaker 1: like that in the stuffing and producer mark walnuts and stuffing.
Speaker 1: What what are we? This is this communism? This is insane. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I don't like all the fancy schmanzy stuffing. Just give
Speaker 1: me the traditional way. Yeah, I mean the more of
Speaker 1: the stuffing is just about bread sopping up the other,
Speaker 1: you know, the juice of the of the turkey and
Speaker 1: then with butter and salt, and like that's what we
Speaker 1: really want. It's really just an excuse to eat turkey juice, butter, bread,
Speaker 1: which is what stuffing should taste like. You actually stuff
Speaker 1: the turkey. Uh yeah, my mom and usually you know,
Speaker 1: my mom is Sexton, who's the matriarch of the whole
Speaker 1: Sexton crew. She usually does the turkey, the stuffing in
Speaker 1: the turkey. Yeah. You can make it on the side too, though,
Speaker 1: and then all that means is you guys got to
Speaker 1: put it near your turkey on the plate, so then
Speaker 1: the juices drip into the stuffing that way exactly. That's
Speaker 1: most people I think make it on the side. Now, Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: all right, Kyle Buck. I live in coastal California, and
Speaker 1: I like your experiences in New York. Oh sorry, and
Speaker 1: like your experiences in New York. It's just silly when
Speaker 1: it comes to masks. I went for a thirty minute
Speaker 1: run today and passed six other runners. I was the
Speaker 1: only one not wearing a mask while running outside. They
Speaker 1: looked at me like I was the crazy one. However,
Speaker 1: the numerous bums I also passed who set up their
Speaker 1: shanties along the trail weren't wearing masks. So I guess
Speaker 1: I have more in common with the bums and other Californians.
Speaker 1: We both can't afford to live here and think that
Speaker 1: wearing masks outside is stupid. I'm leaving in a month.
Speaker 1: Can't wait. Chill tie, Kyle, where are you going? I
Speaker 1: want to know? I got to get those conservatives into
Speaker 1: some of these key states here. You know, we need
Speaker 1: we need a continued inflow of folks from blue states
Speaker 1: who are who are Republicans into Texas. We need the
Speaker 1: inflow into Florida. You know, I would love to see
Speaker 1: Colorado turnback red. I know Denver is Denver is like
Speaker 1: Portland in the mountains, and we've got this great audience
Speaker 1: at ninety three seven Freedom out in Denver and there
Speaker 1: it's like me here in New York. I mean, they're
Speaker 1: an island of sanity surrounded by Kami stand. It's just crazy,
Speaker 1: but it'd be nice. And we could flip Colorado red
Speaker 1: in Arizona. We gotta get Arizona back in the red column.
Speaker 1: So Kyle, pick one of those places. Please please don't leave,
Speaker 1: you know, California and moved to New Jersey, you know
Speaker 1: what I mean, Not that I think you would do that.
Speaker 1: No offense in New Jersey, preuser mark, but that's a
Speaker 1: Democrat stronghold. So I think I'm offended for my adopted state. Now, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: well there you go. We got it. We got great
Speaker 1: Jersey listeners to Jersey's very high happiness index for the state.
Speaker 1: It's it's a it's a great state. People just think
Speaker 1: of it as very much the road ninety five that
Speaker 1: the Arm of America is what I hear. It's not fair.
Speaker 1: It's a fair Jersey's great. I like Jersey. All right,
Speaker 1: John here, it's very's next up, Buck. I'm very hopeful
Speaker 1: about the two Georgia Senate seats. But let's say we
Speaker 1: win them and Biden takes office, I think the rhinos
Speaker 1: will be out in force. I don't think the Republicans
Speaker 1: party is anywhere near as unified as it appears to
Speaker 1: be under Trump. I'm especially worried about rhinos in the Senate.
Speaker 1: I don't think we know who they are, but we're
Speaker 1: about to find out. I feel that if Biden takes office,
Speaker 1: the Progressives will be able to get way more of
Speaker 1: their agenda through than they should with a Republican Senate.
Speaker 1: I feel if Biden takes office to progress oh yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean, look, John, the left goes to the mat
Speaker 1: on their policies and on their ideas. The left does
Speaker 1: a lot that I think the right would would would
Speaker 1: walk away from thinking that it's too heavy handed, meaning
Speaker 1: it's too one sided for their policy agenda items and
Speaker 1: everything else. So yeah, that's what I think, John, I
Speaker 1: think that they will if they were to take if
Speaker 1: the Democrats were to take the Senate, you would see
Speaker 1: a much more extreme implementation of policy than if Republicans. Now, granted,
Speaker 1: there's going to be that unified versus divided government fact,
Speaker 1: but if Republicans, I'm trying to say if they had
Speaker 1: unified government, look what they had under Trump. We had
Speaker 1: it for two years and then we lost control of
Speaker 1: the House. There was not a lot of hardcore what
Speaker 1: they do. Tax cuts that was it. That's really all
Speaker 1: we got from unified government on the right, which, as
Speaker 1: we all know, tax cuts are always as far as
Speaker 1: the Democrats are concerned, they're always temporary. So keep that
Speaker 1: all in mind, Joe, next up here, Hello, bucking producer Mark.
Speaker 1: It would appear the largest obstacle toward uncovering evidence of
Speaker 1: voter fraud faced by the president's legal team is the
Speaker 1: necessary time to defeat the other obstacles. This allows bureaucratic
Speaker 1: stall by their adversary to be a strong weapon of obstruction.
Speaker 1: In light of this, and the interest of providing future
Speaker 1: candidates a more genuine opportunity that due process, do you
Speaker 1: think it would be a good idea to repeal the
Speaker 1: twentieth Amendment and move the inauguration back to March. I
Speaker 1: think the duration of a lame duck is a lesser issue,
Speaker 1: though admittedly and more common one shieldside of thanks for
Speaker 1: all you do. Uh No, I think, Joe, I can
Speaker 1: see why you're saying that, but I do think we
Speaker 1: need to remember that. You want to you want it
Speaker 1: to be clear who the government is, you know. I
Speaker 1: think our transition period's probably about right. I think the founders,
Speaker 1: I think the the tradition that we have here is
Speaker 1: a good one. I think that it's well, it's well established,
Speaker 1: and I think it usually works. Yes, there are timelines here,
Speaker 1: but we need there to be timelines because otherwise, remember,
Speaker 1: whatever we're able to do, Democrats will do and then
Speaker 1: some So if we were able, you know, if we
Speaker 1: were in a position to discuss this, right, if we
Speaker 1: were I'm sorry too, to continue this. Rather, if we're
Speaker 1: in a position to continue these lawsuits, you know, the
Speaker 1: Democrats would actually do that and they would drag the
Speaker 1: whole thing out and the process would just become endless.
Speaker 1: So that's why there does need there do need to
Speaker 1: be there needs to be finality with some of this.
Speaker 1: And I know right now that's not working in Trump's
Speaker 1: Trump Team's favor, but I still think that because I
Speaker 1: believe in principle there's a good reason for it. You're
Speaker 1: in the freedom hud. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: More roll call here, h JR. Thank you for the
Speaker 1: suggestion to season the bread for it grilled cheese sandwich. Look,
Speaker 1: Buck's food takes already benefits for Team Buck from it.
Speaker 1: Salt and pepper added a good flavor, It was not overpowering.
Speaker 1: I may add some roasted garlic powder next time. Thank
Speaker 1: you Buck and Mark for providing consistent, excellent quality program
Speaker 1: shields high see producer Mark. Are you gonna Are you
Speaker 1: gonna take my advice now and do a little more
Speaker 1: seasoning of the bread for the grilled cheese. Yeah, I'll
Speaker 1: certainly try it. I just don't have any bread in
Speaker 1: the house right now. I'm gonna say next time you
Speaker 1: get some, though, and this is true for any sandwich.
Speaker 1: The bread should not just be a vessel for what's
Speaker 1: in between. Make the bread a part of the dish,
Speaker 1: you know, make use I always tell me with this too.
Speaker 1: I think you can get a better crisp on the
Speaker 1: bread if you are on a stovetop, use a pan
Speaker 1: instead of People love to toast it. I find that
Speaker 1: the toaster often, you know, goes too far for the bread.
Speaker 1: I like to really have control over the heat and
Speaker 1: see it. Because you know, toaster, I'm thinking about the
Speaker 1: ones where you put them in and it's you know,
Speaker 1: it pops up whatever. You don't always get a good
Speaker 1: result with that. So do the bread in a pan
Speaker 1: and that way you can kind of lightly seer both
Speaker 1: sides of the pan. Brown both sides, I should say,
Speaker 1: brown both sides of the bread in the pan, and
Speaker 1: use a little bit of butter and yeah, salting and
Speaker 1: peppering your bread. I'm telling you, folks, game changer. It's
Speaker 1: very important. One of the things they do with the
Speaker 1: great Italian like sub sandwich restaurants in New York because
Speaker 1: I used to be able to eat them before I
Speaker 1: found out I couldn't eat gluten. They'll put a little
Speaker 1: bit pretty smark, a little bit of olive oil. You know,
Speaker 1: the brush the bread with olive oil makes all the
Speaker 1: difference in the world. So you know you're going in,
Speaker 1: you think you're gonna have a great you know, Italian
Speaker 1: roast beef sub or something. You brush that bread on
Speaker 1: the inside and the outside with a little bit of
Speaker 1: olive oil and then sprinkle a little salt on it.
Speaker 1: Game changer. Game changer. That's what I'm here for. Everybody.
Speaker 1: You're just making me hungry again. Yeah, I'm going this
Speaker 1: always happens the end of the show. We both get hungry,
Speaker 1: all right, Robert, Team buck First off, producer Mark is awesome.
Speaker 1: I like how we pretty much stays a political during
Speaker 1: the fun part of your podcast. Also want to say,
Speaker 1: I've been using the reverse here method for stakes ever
Speaker 1: since I heard about it on your podcast. Well more
Speaker 1: culinary wisdom spread by the Buckster. Here's my real fear.
Speaker 1: You know, the Trump law team is going to make
Speaker 1: the case public as well as in court if the evidence,
Speaker 1: if is still a big if at this point is
Speaker 1: overwhelming and obvious. There's court in election fraud and then
Speaker 1: judges poop poo it is nothing. What will the mood
Speaker 1: be for seventy three million plus Trump voters if judges
Speaker 1: and elective officials do not take their oath seriously to
Speaker 1: hold the constitution. What's the average hard working, freedom loving
Speaker 1: Americans supposed to do? Could use some uplifting thoughts if
Speaker 1: you have any to share. Thanks for all you and
Speaker 1: your fantastic team. D Shields high. Robert, that's a got
Speaker 1: to cross that bridge when we come to it. But
Speaker 1: I don't think we're going to get there. I think
Speaker 1: that I think we're going to see the process play out,
Speaker 1: and we're gonna be fine. We're gonna be fine. She'll
Speaker 1: tie everyone