WEBVTT - 2026 Midterms Polling Update 

0:00:07.010 --> 0:00:11.900
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to It Could Happen Here. I'm Garrison Davis, joined

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:13.780
<v Speaker 1>by Robert Evans. Hello.

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:17.100
<v Speaker 2>Hello, Garrison Davis. How are you doing today?

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.260
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing okay. I'm really, I'm getting prepared to vote.

0:00:22.500 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm psyching myself up.

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:26.820
<v Speaker 2>Just like the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps told you to do, huh?

0:00:27.140 --> 0:00:28.550
<v Speaker 3>I think that's what we want to start with.

0:00:28.570 --> 0:00:32.590
<v Speaker 1>This isn't, this isn't... In general, this episode will be

0:00:32.610 --> 0:00:36.350
<v Speaker 1>kind of going over the midterm polls as they are

0:00:37.070 --> 0:00:39.970
<v Speaker 1>in early October, kind of what we can get a

0:00:40.010 --> 0:00:42.430
<v Speaker 1>sense of the election about a month out, now that

0:00:42.450 --> 0:00:45.450
<v Speaker 1>we're just a few weeks away from the election. But

0:00:45.610 --> 0:00:50.710
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks ago, the IRGC, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

0:00:51.110 --> 0:00:51.870
<v Speaker 2>Prince of the pod.

0:00:53.630 --> 0:00:53.910
<v Speaker 4>Sure.

0:00:54.190 --> 0:00:55.750
<v Speaker 3>At this point, man.

0:00:59.340 --> 0:01:04.390
<v Speaker 1>One bad day, full Stalinist, full Maoist.

0:01:04.610 --> 0:01:07.490
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's more, it's a slightly differentist.

0:01:07.510 --> 0:01:12.770
<v Speaker 1>A few weeks ago, the IRGC released a 26-page letter,

0:01:13.010 --> 0:01:14.670
<v Speaker 1>not short.

0:01:14.870 --> 0:01:16.919
<v Speaker 2>Not strong on brevity, the IRGC.

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Addressed to the American people, a spokesperson from the IRGC

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:26.370
<v Speaker 1>told Reuters, quote, the American people are not knowledgeable about

0:01:26.410 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>many developments. We believe if they knew more, they would

0:01:30.220 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>think differently and take other decisions, unquote.

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:36.540
<v Speaker 2>You guys might have more faith in the American people

0:01:36.580 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 2>than I do at this point.

0:01:38.620 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>The start of the letter and how it's addressed reads,

0:01:41.470 --> 0:01:44.170
<v Speaker 1>to the honorable people of the United States of America,

0:01:44.350 --> 0:01:47.430
<v Speaker 1>the scholars, the students, and the members of the media.

0:01:47.450 --> 0:01:50.210
<v Speaker 1>I think that last part is important because at least

0:01:50.250 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>some of them know that The American people are not

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>reading a 26-page letter. This is going to be mostly

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>read by journalists.

0:01:56.470 --> 0:01:58.290
<v Speaker 2>This is going to be read by nerds on Twitter.

0:01:58.310 --> 0:01:59.710
<v Speaker 2>And blue sky, I guess.

0:01:59.850 --> 0:02:00.770
<v Speaker 3>And nerds on Twitter.

0:02:01.430 --> 0:02:01.730
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:02:02.310 --> 0:02:04.630
<v Speaker 1>Now, I actually was able to get a short video.

0:02:04.650 --> 0:02:07.170
<v Speaker 1>The IRGC also released a short video kind of summarizing

0:02:07.510 --> 0:02:11.089
<v Speaker 1>the letter. And I will play that here for Robert.

0:02:23.930 --> 0:02:26.269
<v Speaker 1>So that's, yeah, that's the special, that's the special video.

0:02:26.570 --> 0:02:28.690
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that really is. That's something else.

0:02:29.210 --> 0:02:31.610
<v Speaker 1>So there's a few sections before. The bulk of the

0:02:31.650 --> 0:02:34.460
<v Speaker 1>letter is arguing why Iran is the victor in the war,

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>concrete evidence of Iran's victory. They have a section on

0:02:38.139 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the meaning of, quote, death to America.

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:43.700
<v Speaker 1>Which reads, quote, Death to America does not in any

0:02:43.740 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>way express any ill will toward the American people who

0:02:46.980 --> 0:02:49.980
<v Speaker 1>have themselves suffered through the same oppression. Death to America

0:02:50.020 --> 0:02:53.639
<v Speaker 1>is a prayer for the eradication of the diabolical ruling

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:55.980
<v Speaker 1>elite whose seat of power is in the White House.

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:58.980
<v Speaker 1>And the letter goes on to say that the RGC

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:01.780
<v Speaker 1>and the people of Iran have no feeling of hostility

0:03:01.860 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 1>toward the American people.

0:03:03.380 --> 0:03:06.380
<v Speaker 3>And then they ask, how can the U.S. be saved?

0:03:07.460 --> 0:03:09.750
<v Speaker 1>And this is what leads to the bulk of the

0:03:09.780 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>letter saying, which is essentially trying to get Americans to

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>vote harder.

0:03:15.419 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 3>You're finished, fascism.

0:03:17.980 --> 0:03:18.340
<v Speaker 4>Oh, man.

0:03:18.380 --> 0:03:21.100
<v Speaker 1>But there's also a few other interesting kind of like

0:03:22.100 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>name drops here. Quote, God will come to the aid

0:03:25.780 --> 0:03:28.799
<v Speaker 1>of the American people if they decide to change course. Thankfully,

0:03:28.910 --> 0:03:31.109
<v Speaker 1>Americans are waking up to the truth. Over the past

0:03:31.150 --> 0:03:34.050
<v Speaker 1>two years, Americans have participated in numerous demonstrations in cities

0:03:34.090 --> 0:03:37.210
<v Speaker 1>across the U.S. to express their outrage at Israel's genocidal

0:03:37.310 --> 0:03:38.110
<v Speaker 1>actions in Gaza.

0:03:38.930 --> 0:03:39.350
<v Speaker 5>Moreover.

0:03:39.890 --> 0:03:46.500
<v Speaker 1>The no-kings rallies that swept across the U.S. last year

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>were a nationwide repudiation of the burgeoning autocratic tendencies within

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the American government. These powerful manifestations of collective action are

0:03:55.400 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>evidence of a national awakening spreading through the U.S. Polls

0:04:01.340 --> 0:04:03.930
<v Speaker 1>show that the majority of Americans, especially younger Americans, no

0:04:03.970 --> 0:04:07.130
<v Speaker 1>longer wish to be complicit in their government's crimes against

0:04:07.230 --> 0:04:10.100
<v Speaker 1>other nations, unquote. Part of what makes this so funny

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to me is how diametrically opposed it is to the

0:04:14.740 --> 0:04:17.340
<v Speaker 1>messaging coming out of like, you know, U.S. based like

0:04:17.380 --> 0:04:19.039
<v Speaker 1>Maoists or like anti-imperialists.

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:19.370
<v Speaker 4>You know?

0:04:19.430 --> 0:04:22.890
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, like the U.S. far left. Absolutely. They're so much,

0:04:23.210 --> 0:04:25.750
<v Speaker 2>so much more generous to the American people.

0:04:28.029 --> 0:04:31.150
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's something that's really, that's really funny to me.

0:04:31.630 --> 0:04:35.420
<v Speaker 1>As for the vote harder section, let's read one paragraph here.

0:04:36.330 --> 0:04:38.670
<v Speaker 1>Your response may be that you do not accept these

0:04:38.890 --> 0:04:41.540
<v Speaker 1>atrocious actions, but are powerless to do anything about them.

0:04:42.060 --> 0:04:45.300
<v Speaker 1>This answer, however, is not acceptable. You are the ones

0:04:45.339 --> 0:04:48.780
<v Speaker 1>who empower with your votes. The government had allowed to

0:04:48.820 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>do what it wants. Although American politicians often win your

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.860
<v Speaker 1>votes through deception of false promises, as Trump did, you

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>can change the makeup of the government if you apply

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the criteria for good leadership in choosing the people you

0:04:59.620 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>vote into office.

0:05:01.170 --> 0:05:03.870
<v Speaker 2>See, guys, I gotta tell you, it's not that easy.

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:08.820
<v Speaker 2>First off, I've voted every time I've gotten the chance,

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:10.980
<v Speaker 2>pretty much. I don't think I've ever empowered anyone with

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:11.820
<v Speaker 2>my votes.

0:05:12.050 --> 0:05:15.270
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's one of those kind of Adam Curtis moments.

0:05:15.310 --> 0:05:15.970
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:05:15.990 --> 0:05:21.430
<v Speaker 1>We have the IRGC advocating the ideal of electoral politics,

0:05:21.650 --> 0:05:24.710
<v Speaker 1>something that does not exist really in Iran either.

0:05:25.150 --> 0:05:28.150
<v Speaker 2>It's consistent with there's that one famous interview with an

0:05:28.190 --> 0:05:31.190
<v Speaker 2>Iranian cleric where he's like, as Alexander de Tocqueville, who

0:05:31.210 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure all Americans have read once said, he's like, guys,

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 2>you are way overestimating us.

0:05:41.060 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>So, yeah, if you have any sort of anti-imperialist impulses

0:05:44.580 --> 0:05:48.580
<v Speaker 1>as per as per the IRGC, get your voter registration

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>up to date.

0:05:50.260 --> 0:05:54.109
<v Speaker 2>Get your voter registration card and get out there. If

0:05:54.150 --> 0:05:55.849
<v Speaker 2>you're in line, stay in line.

0:05:55.870 --> 0:05:58.230
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:05:59.029 --> 0:06:01.150
<v Speaker 1>So part of why this letter was released is because

0:06:01.190 --> 0:06:03.859
<v Speaker 1>it is just a few weeks away from the midterms.

0:06:04.100 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>We are less than a month away from the 2026

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.300
<v Speaker 1>midterm elections. And so I thought we should do a

0:06:08.300 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>little update on polling and take a look at some

0:06:10.220 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>of the close races.

0:06:12.220 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 3>Sure. And let's start by talking about the current makeup

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 3>of Congress.

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:19.099
<v Speaker 1>Right now in the House, 218 seats are held.

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:20.109
<v Speaker 3>By Republicans, 214 Democrats.

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:25.930
<v Speaker 1>By Democrats, and there's one independent who caucuses with the Republicans.

0:06:25.930 --> 0:06:30.750
<v Speaker 1>218 seats are what's needed for a majority. This has

0:06:30.790 --> 0:06:34.830
<v Speaker 1>been a very small majority that the Republicans have been

0:06:34.850 --> 0:06:37.809
<v Speaker 1>able to hold onto in the House these past few years.

0:06:38.550 --> 0:06:41.590
<v Speaker 1>The Cook Political Report is forecasting that the Dems will

0:06:41.610 --> 0:06:45.010
<v Speaker 1>pick up around five to 15 seats in the midterms,

0:06:45.589 --> 0:06:48.700
<v Speaker 1>likely putting them in charge of the House with anywhere

0:06:48.740 --> 0:06:53.919
<v Speaker 1>between 220 to 230 seats. And this lead in polling

0:06:54.100 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and their projected victory has only grown these past few weeks.

0:06:57.900 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not becoming a closer race for the Republicans.

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 2>No, this things don't look good for them because gasoline

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 2>costs all of the money in your pocket now. That

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.260
<v Speaker 2>is a huge factor. That's a big part of the reason.

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:11.470
<v Speaker 1>I'll go over some of the kind of main issues

0:07:11.510 --> 0:07:15.070
<v Speaker 1>driving the election person polling and gas prices is like.

0:07:15.550 --> 0:07:16.590
<v Speaker 1>number one or number two.

0:07:16.810 --> 0:07:21.050
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I have trouble imagining anything other than other cost

0:07:21.090 --> 0:07:25.530
<v Speaker 2>of living stuff being like a larger impact on voters.

0:07:25.870 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Something that is interesting, the redistricting across Alabama, California, Florida, Louisiana,

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina, Ohio, Tennessee, Texas, and Utah will likely have

0:07:34.620 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>a minimal impact in the results like in total. There's

0:07:38.180 --> 0:07:41.060
<v Speaker 1>obviously for the people actually impacted the people whose votes

0:07:41.100 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>are being diluted, especially.

0:07:42.740 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Not that this is not bad or a problem. It's

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:47.610
<v Speaker 2>just they have fucked up enough that it's not going

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:50.090
<v Speaker 2>to benefit them to the extent. That's what it seemed

0:07:50.110 --> 0:07:52.090
<v Speaker 2>like to me, that they're not going to benefit the

0:07:52.130 --> 0:07:52.710
<v Speaker 2>way that they were.

0:07:53.490 --> 0:07:56.210
<v Speaker 1>No. So I don't want to discount the impact of

0:07:56.250 --> 0:07:58.710
<v Speaker 1>the erosion of the Voting Rights Act by any means,

0:07:59.350 --> 0:08:03.220
<v Speaker 1>or the just larger structural issues of partisan gerrymandering. But

0:08:03.580 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>an analysis by Harvard estimated a net gain of only

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:11.030
<v Speaker 1>two seats for Republicans... in these midterms, though other estimates

0:08:11.230 --> 0:08:13.850
<v Speaker 1>give them a few more seats, anywhere between five to nine.

0:08:15.030 --> 0:08:18.180
<v Speaker 1>So we're looking at somewhere between a couple seats. I

0:08:18.220 --> 0:08:20.060
<v Speaker 1>think nine is probably a bit optimistic.

0:08:20.140 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for the Republicans.

0:08:21.940 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Around two to five seats they could net because of

0:08:25.660 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the redistricting measures.

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:28.340
<v Speaker 2>Could, might, yeah.

0:08:28.620 --> 0:08:33.930
<v Speaker 1>Even that gain will likely be undone in the coming years,

0:08:33.990 --> 0:08:37.180
<v Speaker 1>going into 2028. When Virginia is able to push forward

0:08:37.260 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>its redistricting again, which they tried to do earlier, but

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:43.359
<v Speaker 1>because of a procedural error, it was shot down. So

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.220
<v Speaker 1>that that will also net Democrats a few more seats

0:08:46.340 --> 0:08:49.090
<v Speaker 1>that will start to kind of even things out. And

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:51.910
<v Speaker 1>then we had this whole little fun redistricting for nothing.

0:08:52.390 --> 0:08:55.110
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a real just a marker of how badly

0:08:55.170 --> 0:09:01.250
<v Speaker 2>they have botched their their starting position going into this administration.

0:09:02.130 --> 0:09:05.490
<v Speaker 2>just kind of a catastrophic series of political decisions. We'll

0:09:05.510 --> 0:09:07.609
<v Speaker 2>see if any of that matters, but it really does

0:09:07.670 --> 0:09:10.110
<v Speaker 2>highlight how pissed off people are.

0:09:11.010 --> 0:09:15.790
<v Speaker 1>Now, obviously, the Senate is kind of the big question here. Yeah.

0:09:15.990 --> 0:09:18.570
<v Speaker 1>Will Democrats be able to actually take the Senate? Will

0:09:18.590 --> 0:09:20.860
<v Speaker 1>they be able to control all of Congress, not just

0:09:20.890 --> 0:09:21.319
<v Speaker 1>the House?

0:09:21.910 --> 0:09:22.130
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:26.260
<v Speaker 1>Currently, the Republicans have a 53-seat majority, plus a Fetterman.

0:09:27.350 --> 0:09:30.710
<v Speaker 1>and the vice president who can vote. So that kind

0:09:30.730 --> 0:09:33.070
<v Speaker 1>of really throws a wrench in all these numbers, the

0:09:33.110 --> 0:09:35.370
<v Speaker 1>Fetterman factor and the Vance factor.

0:09:36.010 --> 0:09:36.610
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:09:36.630 --> 0:09:40.110
<v Speaker 1>Democrats just have 45 seats plus two independents who caucus

0:09:40.190 --> 0:09:45.050
<v Speaker 1>with the Democrats, like Bernie Sanders. So essentially, things actually

0:09:45.090 --> 0:09:50.050
<v Speaker 1>sit at like 54 to 46, adjusting for independents and Fetterman.

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 1>So Democrats really need a net gain of like four

0:09:53.700 --> 0:09:57.570
<v Speaker 1>to five seats to be able to Have the Senate

0:09:57.590 --> 0:09:59.530
<v Speaker 1>be a more of a competitive voter.

0:10:00.030 --> 0:10:01.410
<v Speaker 2>Know, voting arena.

0:10:01.429 --> 0:10:03.580
<v Speaker 3>Also, you know, considering J.D. Vance.

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:07.020
<v Speaker 1>There are 35 Senate seats on the ballot next month.

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:11.620
<v Speaker 1>So Democrats will need to flip around four to five seats,

0:10:11.660 --> 0:10:14.220
<v Speaker 1>like I said, and one of the seats Democrats have

0:10:14.300 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>wanted to flip for a long time, and especially this year,

0:10:18.780 --> 0:10:23.349
<v Speaker 1>is Maine. with susan collins one of our worst lawmakers

0:10:23.790 --> 0:10:26.609
<v Speaker 1>yes and republica as i reported on ed a few

0:10:26.790 --> 0:10:31.110
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago republica did that great investigation into into

0:10:31.170 --> 0:10:38.620
<v Speaker 1>military contracting corruption and bribery involving susan collins so union

0:10:38.660 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 1>logger troy jackson is trying to unseat collins Right now,

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:48.620
<v Speaker 1>this race leans D or is a toss up. Morrist

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>has Jackson up four points ahead of Collins among registered voters, but.

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:55.750
<v Speaker 3>With a margin of error of 3.8%.

0:10:55.750 --> 0:11:00.650
<v Speaker 1>So that's essentially still almost within the margin of error.

0:11:01.170 --> 0:11:02.890
<v Speaker 1>This is going to be a very close race, right?

0:11:02.929 --> 0:11:06.050
<v Speaker 1>A margin of error like that. This is still basically

0:11:06.090 --> 0:11:08.609
<v Speaker 1>a toss up. Other polling shows roughly the same results.

0:11:09.110 --> 0:11:12.010
<v Speaker 1>Jackson up a few points, but within the margin of error.

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:19.540
<v Speaker 1>Per Morrist, among the Maine electorate, 57% think Collins will win.

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:22.439
<v Speaker 1>That's not saying 57% want Collins to win, but they

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:24.850
<v Speaker 1>think that will happen, right? That's what they think is

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:28.910
<v Speaker 1>more likely. A survey from the Maine People's Resource Center

0:11:29.590 --> 0:11:35.050
<v Speaker 1>found Jackson ahead among independent voters, 58% to 33% for Collins.

0:11:36.250 --> 0:11:41.230
<v Speaker 1>The Maine People's Resource Center is a progressive-leaning institution. Obviously,

0:11:41.270 --> 0:11:44.030
<v Speaker 1>this race in Maine has been a big shit show,

0:11:44.130 --> 0:11:48.490
<v Speaker 1>to say the least. And since Jackson has taken over

0:11:49.030 --> 0:11:52.790
<v Speaker 1>as the nominee, Democratic Party establishment consultants have really swooped

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.500
<v Speaker 1>into Maine and have been trying to keep Jackson on

0:11:55.540 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a tight leash. Jackson's campaign has not replicated the Platner-style

0:12:01.140 --> 0:12:02.780
<v Speaker 1>intensive town hall strategy.

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.500
<v Speaker 2>I think that would be a bad idea. It would

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:07.939
<v Speaker 2>be really obvious if he just tried to be Graham

0:12:07.980 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Platner without the scandal, right?

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.739
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's try to be Graham Platner, but I think

0:12:13.780 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>it is, the style of campaigning is very different. Yeah.

0:12:18.020 --> 0:12:21.300
<v Speaker 1>Jackson's not as accessible to the electorate. Consultants have tried

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:22.700
<v Speaker 1>to keep him from doing Q &amp; As at the

0:12:22.740 --> 0:12:25.819
<v Speaker 1>events that he does end up doing. They've been dissuading

0:12:25.860 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>him from talking about ICE and Israel and Palestine. Great.

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:34.620
<v Speaker 1>So they really have been trying to keep him on

0:12:34.660 --> 0:12:36.699
<v Speaker 1>a pretty tight leash. There's a story in New York

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:39.460
<v Speaker 1>Magazine a few weeks ago that kind of details how

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:44.300
<v Speaker 1>Democratic establishment consultants have been trying to lead the Jackson

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:47.679
<v Speaker 1>campaign that if people are interested in that specific topic,

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:51.839
<v Speaker 1>I recommend they check out. So this is one of

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:55.140
<v Speaker 1>the races that Democrats really do need to flip if

0:12:55.660 --> 0:12:58.340
<v Speaker 1>they have a chance of winning the Senate. And it is,

0:12:58.540 --> 0:13:02.540
<v Speaker 1>you know, theoretically possible, you know, he may be slightly

0:13:02.610 --> 0:13:05.590
<v Speaker 1>ahead in the polls, but only very slightly. But I think, yeah,

0:13:05.790 --> 0:13:08.700
<v Speaker 1>this is this is essentially a toss up. especially looking

0:13:08.740 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>back at 2020 when the Democrat in that race also was,

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:15.110
<v Speaker 1>you know, a little bit ahead and Collins still ended

0:13:15.150 --> 0:13:15.980
<v Speaker 1>up walking away with it.

0:13:16.429 --> 0:13:19.530
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think they're I mean, they're they're both trying

0:13:19.570 --> 0:13:22.970
<v Speaker 2>to avoid having another platner who gets like out of

0:13:23.050 --> 0:13:25.849
<v Speaker 2>control of them and is saying shit that the DNC

0:13:25.910 --> 0:13:27.910
<v Speaker 2>does not want to have to stand by. And I

0:13:27.929 --> 0:13:30.890
<v Speaker 2>think they are also hoping that that Plattner's campaign at

0:13:30.929 --> 0:13:34.150
<v Speaker 2>least did enough damage to Collins that she isn't going

0:13:34.190 --> 0:13:35.890
<v Speaker 2>to be able to like pull out a win this time.

0:13:35.950 --> 0:13:37.530
<v Speaker 2>And maybe that'll be the case, you know, that might

0:13:37.570 --> 0:13:39.209
<v Speaker 2>wind up being a play that works.

0:13:39.590 --> 0:13:39.970
<v Speaker 3>Definitely.

0:13:40.150 --> 0:13:42.910
<v Speaker 2>It's not a great position to have someone who is

0:13:42.950 --> 0:13:46.210
<v Speaker 2>doing as well as Plattner had been doing get dropped

0:13:46.290 --> 0:13:48.660
<v Speaker 2>out with a scandal that fucked up. Like that's a,

0:13:48.730 --> 0:13:50.830
<v Speaker 2>that's a, that's not easy to handle.

0:13:51.130 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:13:51.630 --> 0:13:54.859
<v Speaker 1>Especially mobilizing that many people who were already kind of

0:13:54.900 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>disillusioned with politics, giving them that sort of hope and

0:13:57.740 --> 0:13:59.990
<v Speaker 1>then having that hope be ripped away. And then those

0:14:00.030 --> 0:14:02.430
<v Speaker 1>people who maybe, some of them who even still want

0:14:02.470 --> 0:14:06.950
<v Speaker 1>to be politically engaged, the Jackson campaign is not letting

0:14:06.990 --> 0:14:09.530
<v Speaker 1>them touch the campaign with a 10-foot pole, which you

0:14:09.550 --> 0:14:11.929
<v Speaker 1>can maybe understand their reasons for. But there's a lot

0:14:11.950 --> 0:14:18.050
<v Speaker 1>of grassroots, very working-class-oriented activists who want to be involved

0:14:18.090 --> 0:14:21.410
<v Speaker 1>in some way that are not being tapped. And as

0:14:21.530 --> 0:14:23.580
<v Speaker 1>strong as Plattner's campaign was, it was because it was

0:14:23.660 --> 0:14:25.540
<v Speaker 1>built on the work that they were doing. Yeah.

0:14:25.700 --> 0:14:26.980
<v Speaker 3>Not just him as a person.

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:14:27.690 --> 0:14:30.250
<v Speaker 3>So those are sort of complicating factors in this race.

0:14:30.750 --> 0:14:34.070
<v Speaker 2>And you know what's a complicating factor in this podcast episode, Garrison?

0:14:34.230 --> 0:14:36.010
<v Speaker 1>The fact that we have to pivot to ads in

0:14:36.030 --> 0:14:37.950
<v Speaker 1>order to pay the bills. We have to pivot to

0:14:38.030 --> 0:14:38.590
<v Speaker 1>ads right now.

0:14:38.650 --> 0:14:41.070
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, that is a complicating factor in our lives.

0:14:52.250 --> 0:14:53.030
<v Speaker 2>And we're back.

0:14:53.710 --> 0:14:56.670
<v Speaker 1>How do you feel about North Carolina, Robert? Of the Carolinas,

0:14:56.830 --> 0:15:00.630
<v Speaker 1>definitely my favorite. That's so true, actually.

0:15:00.730 --> 0:15:05.050
<v Speaker 2>Easily the best of the Carolinas. Top 50% Carolina. Sorry

0:15:05.070 --> 0:15:09.150
<v Speaker 2>to everyone in South Carolina. I did not apologize, South Carolina.

0:15:09.330 --> 0:15:10.150
<v Speaker 2>You need to know that.

0:15:11.970 --> 0:15:14.130
<v Speaker 1>Well, North Carolina could also be one of the states

0:15:14.430 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that flip for the Dems. Former Democratic Governor Roy Cooper

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>is facing former RNC Chair Michael Watley.

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:23.940
<v Speaker 2>What a name.

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Who is running to replace Republican Senator Tom Tillis.

0:15:28.380 --> 0:15:31.990
<v Speaker 2>Those are both silly names. Have some self-respect. God damn it.

0:15:32.950 --> 0:15:35.710
<v Speaker 3>This race is leaning Democrat. This is not a toss-up.

0:15:35.870 --> 0:15:39.190
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Polls from late September have Cooper ahead 5 to

0:15:39.190 --> 0:15:40.330
<v Speaker 1>13 points.

0:15:40.730 --> 0:15:41.530
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's pretty good.

0:15:42.030 --> 0:15:45.570
<v Speaker 1>And last week, a Republican super PAC pulled $ 30 million

0:15:45.630 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of ad money out of the state to use in

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>other races.

0:15:50.260 --> 0:15:50.420
<v Speaker 4>So.

0:15:51.070 --> 0:15:54.050
<v Speaker 1>That's a sign that at least even among some Republicans,

0:15:54.090 --> 0:15:56.620
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of giving up on this. Roy Cooper is

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:00.460
<v Speaker 1>a pretty strong candidate for this state. I should say,

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:03.140
<v Speaker 1>as we're going through all of these sort of candidates,

0:16:03.700 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>this is not, it could happen here, endorsing any candidate

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:07.540
<v Speaker 1>just because they.

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:09.180
<v Speaker 3>Belong to one party or another.

0:16:09.210 --> 0:16:10.550
<v Speaker 2>Not our thing.

0:16:11.070 --> 0:16:12.870
<v Speaker 1>I'm just talking about this in terms of what the

0:16:12.910 --> 0:16:15.930
<v Speaker 1>Democrats want in order to take back power and the

0:16:15.950 --> 0:16:17.890
<v Speaker 1>sort of how these candidates relate to each state.

0:16:18.710 --> 0:16:19.170
<v Speaker 2>Roy Cooper.

0:16:19.860 --> 0:16:23.970
<v Speaker 1>is a relatively liked figure in North Carolina. That is

0:16:24.250 --> 0:16:26.450
<v Speaker 1>reflected in the polling for this. His campaign is also

0:16:26.490 --> 0:16:28.650
<v Speaker 1>helped by the fact he's not going up against an incumbent.

0:16:28.670 --> 0:16:32.420
<v Speaker 1>He's not going up against someone who voters already are

0:16:32.460 --> 0:16:34.780
<v Speaker 1>familiar with, already like, who they just want to keep

0:16:34.820 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in power. He's going up against a new guy, a

0:16:37.660 --> 0:16:40.850
<v Speaker 1>former RNC chair. So this is one of those states

0:16:40.910 --> 0:16:43.490
<v Speaker 1>where the Democrats will probably flip. You can kind of

0:16:43.570 --> 0:16:47.010
<v Speaker 1>count this on the four to five states needed to flip.

0:16:47.050 --> 0:16:49.110
<v Speaker 1>This is the most kind of certain one.

0:16:49.250 --> 0:16:52.100
<v Speaker 2>There'd be a massive polling error if it goes the

0:16:52.140 --> 0:16:54.100
<v Speaker 2>other way or some sort of fuckery.

0:16:54.620 --> 0:16:59.300
<v Speaker 1>And just a total misread of the situation on the ground. Now,

0:16:59.340 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the more interesting kind of surprises is Alaska,

0:17:03.580 --> 0:17:07.929
<v Speaker 1>which could also flip for Democrats. The former Democratic congressman,

0:17:08.090 --> 0:17:12.230
<v Speaker 1>Mary Peltola, is going up against sitting Senator Dan Sullivan.

0:17:12.730 --> 0:17:17.390
<v Speaker 1>Paltola is definitely running more as, like, a centrist. Very

0:17:17.430 --> 0:17:18.369
<v Speaker 1>pro-fossil fuels.

0:17:18.609 --> 0:17:19.550
<v Speaker 3>You're in Alaska.

0:17:19.570 --> 0:17:19.990
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:17:20.690 --> 0:17:22.630
<v Speaker 2>Pro-gun, too. Pro-gun.

0:17:22.950 --> 0:17:26.919
<v Speaker 3>Her campaign slogan is Fish Family Freedom.

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:28.580
<v Speaker 2>That makes sense.

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Not a terrible slogan for running in Alaska. Not bad

0:17:31.540 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 1>for Alaska. And rather than attacking Republicans, a lot of

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:39.290
<v Speaker 1>her campaign messaging is focused on taking on, quote, D.C.

0:17:39.700 --> 0:17:42.010
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's very much like Alaska versus D.C.

0:17:42.170 --> 0:17:42.910
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:17:42.950 --> 0:17:43.090
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:17:43.150 --> 0:17:46.110
<v Speaker 2>Corruption is a massive issue for the whole electorate. So

0:17:46.630 --> 0:17:50.109
<v Speaker 2>that makes sense. Like that's, yeah, kind of the obvious play.

0:17:50.190 --> 0:17:53.750
<v Speaker 1>And really prioritizing Alaska as like its own special interest

0:17:53.790 --> 0:17:57.649
<v Speaker 1>because it's so different from every other state. Yeah. part

0:17:57.670 --> 0:17:59.310
<v Speaker 1>of Peltola's strategy is trying to, you know, is trying

0:17:59.330 --> 0:18:02.100
<v Speaker 1>to attract certain Republicans, which is why she's not really

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:06.100
<v Speaker 1>going hard against Republicans per se, but attacking this sort of, like, D.C.

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.900
<v Speaker 1>swamp establishment. That's her main strategy here. A New York

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:14.780
<v Speaker 1>Times-Siena poll from late September to early October has Peltola

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:15.940
<v Speaker 1>up seven points.

0:18:16.590 --> 0:18:21.190
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a pretty solid lead. Alaska's been wavering the

0:18:21.230 --> 0:18:24.850
<v Speaker 2>last couple of elections between blue and red. So this

0:18:24.930 --> 0:18:27.820
<v Speaker 2>is not like a, A sea change.

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:30.260
<v Speaker 2>This is kind of an incremental change in some of

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:35.430
<v Speaker 2>the the and obviously the disaster that is this administration

0:18:35.470 --> 0:18:37.810
<v Speaker 2>has pushed things further along than I think it otherwise

0:18:37.869 --> 0:18:39.369
<v Speaker 2>would be. But this is it's been moving in this

0:18:39.410 --> 0:18:40.129
<v Speaker 2>direction a while.

0:18:40.230 --> 0:18:40.490
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:18:40.650 --> 0:18:43.139
<v Speaker 1>And like Alaska hasn't had a Democratic senator in like

0:18:43.180 --> 0:18:46.460
<v Speaker 1>almost 20 years. this would be a significant event if

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:47.020
<v Speaker 1>this happened.

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, yeah, yeah. I didn't mean to say it wouldn't.

0:18:49.220 --> 0:18:51.500
<v Speaker 2>I've just been like this, this pattern has been occurring

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:53.540
<v Speaker 2>since before like Trump too.

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:54.060
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:18:54.420 --> 0:18:58.869
<v Speaker 1>And obviously there's this general pattern of in the midterms, usually,

0:18:58.890 --> 0:19:02.450
<v Speaker 1>especially the house, but sometimes the Senate as well, shifts

0:19:02.510 --> 0:19:05.590
<v Speaker 1>to the opposition party. You know, this is like politics 101.

0:19:05.590 --> 0:19:08.889
<v Speaker 1>This is very basic pattern. And what we're looking at

0:19:08.930 --> 0:19:11.300
<v Speaker 1>is this, this could be even stronger this year than

0:19:11.700 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>some years previously, probably not as strong as 2018, but,

0:19:14.660 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 1>But taking back the Senate and the House would be huge,

0:19:18.180 --> 0:19:19.899
<v Speaker 1>especially because of how far they have to go in

0:19:19.940 --> 0:19:23.390
<v Speaker 1>the Senate in order to retake it. Yeah. Now, the

0:19:23.430 --> 0:19:25.870
<v Speaker 1>race in Alaska, this definitely used to lean Republican, right?

0:19:25.910 --> 0:19:28.150
<v Speaker 1>This was not seen to be a very competitive race.

0:19:28.830 --> 0:19:32.100
<v Speaker 1>But recently, this went to a toss-up, right? And now,

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>some models even have it leaning Democrat. So this is

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:37.340
<v Speaker 1>one race where there's been a lot of movement.

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:38.660
<v Speaker 3>And J.D.

0:19:38.700 --> 0:19:43.830
<v Speaker 1>Vance was dropped into Alaska to campaign for Sullivan last week.

0:19:44.150 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>something that they may not have needed to do or

0:19:46.300 --> 0:19:48.430
<v Speaker 1>thought they needed to do a few months ago.

0:19:49.050 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 3>But now... this is competitive enough that they're sending in

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 3>the vice president. Will J.D.

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Vance actually help Republicans win the state? That's certainly debatable.

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:00.250
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if I would be putting J.D. in

0:20:00.310 --> 0:20:01.310
<v Speaker 2>as my pen shitter.

0:20:01.350 --> 0:20:03.250
<v Speaker 3>That's the thing, right?

0:20:03.310 --> 0:20:05.150
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who I'd put in as my pen

0:20:05.170 --> 0:20:08.370
<v Speaker 1>shitter right now in the Republican bench, but Vance would

0:20:08.410 --> 0:20:15.950
<v Speaker 1>be the bottom of my list. Like, honestly, send in Fetterman. No, legitimately, yes.

0:20:16.270 --> 0:20:17.750
<v Speaker 1>He'll do better for you.

0:20:17.670 --> 0:20:18.090
<v Speaker 2>In this instance.

0:20:18.130 --> 0:20:21.870
<v Speaker 1>Sending Fetterman to campaign for the Republicans would be, I think,

0:20:21.950 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>probably a smarter move.

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:27.500
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you could convince him to do it. What a nightmare.

0:20:27.780 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 3>What a horrible situation.

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 2>It's it's things are really bad, buddy. Things are really bad.

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I know when like we were getting shot at by

0:20:38.220 --> 0:20:40.979
<v Speaker 1>federal agents in Portland, things were bad, but things are

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:43.540
<v Speaker 1>a lot darker. Yeah, well, I'm about to get maybe

0:20:43.580 --> 0:20:46.439
<v Speaker 1>shot at by federal agents in like 20 minutes.

0:20:46.619 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, because they just shot a dude with an

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:50.180
<v Speaker 2>actual gun in New York. Yeah.

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:51.980
<v Speaker 3>Time is a spiral.

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about Texas.

0:20:55.900 --> 0:20:56.140
<v Speaker 1>Sure.

0:20:56.460 --> 0:21:00.129
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm excited to talk about Texas because this is

0:21:00.190 --> 0:21:02.869
<v Speaker 2>the first time I get to be like a little

0:21:03.490 --> 0:21:07.590
<v Speaker 2>optimistic about more than like two Texas elections, actually. So, yeah,

0:21:07.650 --> 0:21:08.810
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm excited.

0:21:09.310 --> 0:21:10.630
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about Talafrico.

0:21:10.950 --> 0:21:11.780
<v Speaker 2>Talafrico.

0:21:14.420 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 3>In terms of the Senate, the big, big.

0:21:15.700 --> 0:21:19.780
<v Speaker 1>Question is Texas with James Talafrico going up against Kenny Pax,

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:20.540
<v Speaker 1>Ken Paxton.

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:23.260
<v Speaker 2>K-Pax, as I like to call him. You probably didn't

0:21:23.300 --> 0:21:25.590
<v Speaker 2>see that movie, Garrison. It's not good. No, no.

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:29.340
<v Speaker 1>I did just see Out of Sight, the Steven Soderbergh movie.

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if I've seen that one.

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:34.659
<v Speaker 3>From like the 90s. It's like the proto Ocean's Eleven.

0:21:34.780 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:21:35.300 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 3>It's the hottest I've ever seen George Clooney.

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:38.020
<v Speaker 2>Oh, Cloon Tang.

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:38.459
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:21:38.820 --> 0:21:40.959
<v Speaker 3>He plays like a serial bank robber.

0:21:41.180 --> 0:21:42.220
<v Speaker 2>That's a good role for him.

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:46.109
<v Speaker 3>Who keeps going to jail, prison, then he breaks out.

0:21:46.630 --> 0:21:48.110
<v Speaker 1>And then it kind of cuts between a few different

0:21:48.130 --> 0:21:51.130
<v Speaker 1>timelines as he gets into a sort of doomed romance

0:21:51.190 --> 0:21:54.060
<v Speaker 1>with a federal marshal played by Jennifer Lopez.

0:21:54.660 --> 0:21:56.859
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I was going to say I've seen this movie

0:21:57.020 --> 0:22:00.020
<v Speaker 2>and then... Well, no, I have seen this movie with J-Lo. Yeah, yeah,

0:22:00.060 --> 0:22:02.020
<v Speaker 2>I have seen this movie. It's hard to tell because

0:22:02.060 --> 0:22:04.340
<v Speaker 2>like the first half of that description is like 18

0:22:04.340 --> 0:22:05.820
<v Speaker 2>different George Clooney movies. Exactly.

0:22:06.340 --> 0:22:09.980
<v Speaker 1>He's like a bank robber. He keeps going to prison. No,

0:22:10.020 --> 0:22:12.880
<v Speaker 1>especially like the late 90s, early 2000s. This is like

0:22:13.070 --> 0:22:15.030
<v Speaker 1>his role. He had this like on lock. Yeah.

0:22:15.780 --> 0:22:17.260
<v Speaker 3>The hottest bank robber you've ever seen.

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:18.980
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, people love a criminal.

0:22:19.700 --> 0:22:23.020
<v Speaker 3>Speaking of, Ken Paxton, not doing great in the polls.

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Marist and New York Times have Tallarico up six

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 1>points as of late September, with a recent Fox News

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.690
<v Speaker 1>poll showing Tallarico at 51% to Paxton's 49%.

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 2>Not good for old Kay Pax.

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:48.940
<v Speaker 1>No. There's also this big enthusiasm gap that the Fox

0:22:48.980 --> 0:22:55.810
<v Speaker 1>News poll really focused on. Among MAGA Republicans, 64% say

0:22:55.830 --> 0:22:59.730
<v Speaker 1>they're extremely interested in the midterms. But for non-MAGA Republicans,

0:23:00.410 --> 0:23:03.970
<v Speaker 1>only 50% is extremely interested in the midterms. So that's

0:23:03.990 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>almost like a 15% gap among Republicans for Republicans. how

0:23:09.180 --> 0:23:12.260
<v Speaker 1>much they're invested in these midterms. And this difference does

0:23:12.300 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 1>not exist on the Democratic side. The Fox News polling

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:18.250
<v Speaker 1>has Democrats broken down into two categories, similar to MAGA

0:23:18.290 --> 0:23:25.310
<v Speaker 1>or non-MAGA. They have DSA Democrats and non-DSA Democrats. Which

0:23:25.390 --> 0:23:28.550
<v Speaker 1>is funny on its face. DSA Democrats are at 68%,

0:23:28.550 --> 0:23:30.629
<v Speaker 1>non-DSA is at 67%. So basically no gap. Jeez.

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 2>And I think this has less to do with Tallarico's

0:23:37.859 --> 0:23:41.419
<v Speaker 2>specific characteristics as a candidate and everything to do with

0:23:41.460 --> 0:23:44.140
<v Speaker 2>the fact that Ken Paxton is the literal Christian devil. Yes,

0:23:44.180 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 2>he is Satan. And people want to see him beaten. Yes.

0:23:49.350 --> 0:23:51.550
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, these numbers are not just interesting because

0:23:51.590 --> 0:23:54.369
<v Speaker 1>of the gap between MAGA and non-MAGA Republicans, but also

0:23:54.710 --> 0:23:59.449
<v Speaker 1>MAGA Republicans are at 64% for enthusiasm versus Democrats are

0:23:59.470 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>at 67, 68. So that's a few points ahead just

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:08.379
<v Speaker 1>for enthusiasm. against the mega kind of hardcore. And the

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:11.580
<v Speaker 1>other really worrying part of this for Republicans is that

0:24:11.780 --> 0:24:14.609
<v Speaker 1>out of the percent that say that they will vote,

0:24:15.180 --> 0:24:21.250
<v Speaker 1>mega is at 76%. Non-mega is at 65%. That's an 11% gap.

0:24:21.730 --> 0:24:25.889
<v Speaker 1>And similarly, this gap does not exist for the Democrats,

0:24:26.050 --> 0:24:27.330
<v Speaker 1>DSA or otherwise.

0:24:27.570 --> 0:24:31.070
<v Speaker 2>That is really interesting. And it says a lot about

0:24:31.530 --> 0:24:35.030
<v Speaker 2>MAGA Republicans that they have just completely given up any

0:24:35.109 --> 0:24:37.879
<v Speaker 2>kind of like moral standards for their candidates.

0:24:37.890 --> 0:24:38.340
<v Speaker 3>Do not care.

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Does not matter at all. In a lot of the country,

0:24:41.380 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Republicans and MAGA Republicans are synonyms, but that's not the

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.340
<v Speaker 2>case in a lot of Texas. Like Texas has a

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:48.860
<v Speaker 2>lot of Bush Republicans still.

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:51.620
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean, like those people still likely are going

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:53.850
<v Speaker 1>to vote for Trump in the presidential election.

0:24:53.950 --> 0:24:54.490
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:24:54.590 --> 0:24:58.629
<v Speaker 1>But oversimplifying their, like all of their politics to MAGA is,

0:24:59.170 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>is a I think it's a sort of theoretical mistake.

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:04.740
<v Speaker 2>It's a mistake. Those people are not. Some of them are.

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 2>But because there's there's a chunk of Republicans that look

0:25:07.540 --> 0:25:10.140
<v Speaker 2>like they're going to Tallarico, but it's not a huge chunk. No,

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:12.419
<v Speaker 2>it's more that some of them just aren't going to

0:25:12.460 --> 0:25:14.610
<v Speaker 2>vote or are going to put in like a protest candidate.

0:25:14.619 --> 0:25:16.969
<v Speaker 2>You know, I've read some interviews to that stance with

0:25:16.990 --> 0:25:19.230
<v Speaker 2>like Republican voters who are on sort of the Bush

0:25:19.250 --> 0:25:20.969
<v Speaker 2>Republican side of things being like, I'm just going to

0:25:21.530 --> 0:25:23.470
<v Speaker 2>put in a protest vote or something, which in this

0:25:23.570 --> 0:25:27.010
<v Speaker 2>instance is just as good as voting for Tallarico. in

0:25:27.050 --> 0:25:30.450
<v Speaker 2>terms of stopping Paxton from winning again. Because the Republicans

0:25:30.470 --> 0:25:32.780
<v Speaker 2>who have some degree of moral fiber left are also

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 2>disgusted with Ken Paxton. He's gross.

0:25:35.060 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>On that topic, I don't know if you saw this,

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:43.180
<v Speaker 1>Ken Paxton's ex-wife, who is a Texas state senator, was

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>tapped for an election ad where she does not even

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:50.970
<v Speaker 1>say her ex-husband's name, but just begs people to vote

0:25:51.030 --> 0:25:54.890
<v Speaker 1>for the, quote, Republican ticket to stay on the team.

0:25:55.170 --> 0:25:56.100
<v Speaker 3>I want to play the ad.

0:25:56.710 --> 0:25:58.210
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. God, this is great.

0:25:58.490 --> 0:26:01.850
<v Speaker 6>I'm Texas Senator Angela Paxton. People have asked my thoughts

0:26:01.910 --> 0:26:04.190
<v Speaker 6>about this election and turns out I have some.

0:26:04.950 --> 0:26:06.430
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about the elephant in the room.

0:26:07.190 --> 0:26:09.679
<v Speaker 6>In a general election, it's not as much about the

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:12.460
<v Speaker 6>individual players on the team. It's about getting the whole

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 6>team across the finish line. Either we hold every Republican

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 6>seat or we hand the future of Texas to the

0:26:18.780 --> 0:26:22.139
<v Speaker 6>other team. That's why I'm voting for the Republican ticket

0:26:22.300 --> 0:26:25.310
<v Speaker 6>on November 3rd. Let's hold the line together.

0:26:25.900 --> 0:26:27.980
<v Speaker 3>Texas PAC is responsible for the content of this advertising.

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:30.140
<v Speaker 2>Rousing. Won't even say his name.

0:26:30.180 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 3>Rousing message.

0:26:30.859 --> 0:26:37.129
<v Speaker 2>Crazy stuff. Wow. Wild stuff. Hold your nose and vote

0:26:37.170 --> 0:26:39.130
<v Speaker 2>for my shitty ex, the psychopath.

0:26:39.150 --> 0:26:41.869
<v Speaker 3>Especially because she starts by saying, let's address the elephant

0:26:41.950 --> 0:26:42.470
<v Speaker 3>in the room.

0:26:42.770 --> 0:26:44.340
<v Speaker 2>And then doesn't. Does not at all.

0:26:44.350 --> 0:26:45.350
<v Speaker 3>Does not address the elephant.

0:26:45.650 --> 0:26:49.180
<v Speaker 2>Can't bring herself to say his name. Oh my God,

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 2>that's amazing.

0:26:50.260 --> 0:26:52.740
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the most incredible political ads I've ever seen.

0:26:53.220 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Almost as good as, we may as well play this one.

0:26:56.010 --> 0:27:00.080
<v Speaker 1>This is technically a House ad. Unfortunately, we're going to

0:27:00.100 --> 0:27:02.380
<v Speaker 1>drop it here in the Senate section. But in terms

0:27:02.420 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of talking about political ads, this is an ad running

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:09.780
<v Speaker 1>in Ohio in response to a series of anti-trans ads

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:12.860
<v Speaker 1>that the Republicans have been blasting in the airwaves.

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:17.220
<v Speaker 4>Seen these ads? They're a complete lie. Records show not

0:27:17.350 --> 0:27:20.250
<v Speaker 4>only is this woman actually from Texas, she didn't have

0:27:20.470 --> 0:27:25.139
<v Speaker 4>any surgery as a minor. He protected men who abused

0:27:25.180 --> 0:27:28.159
<v Speaker 4>young girls by voting in the Senate to block the

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:34.070
<v Speaker 4>release of the Epstein files. Maybe that's because Husted took

0:27:34.070 --> 0:27:37.390
<v Speaker 4>$ 116, 000 from associates of Jeffrey Epstein, 10 times more than

0:27:37.630 --> 0:27:41.010
<v Speaker 4>any other senator. John Husted should be ashamed.

0:27:41.170 --> 0:27:43.090
<v Speaker 6>I'm sure Brown and I approve this message.

0:27:43.390 --> 0:27:45.210
<v Speaker 3>It's that easy. It's that easy, folks.

0:27:45.490 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:27:48.380 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 2>The ads made for you, really.

0:27:50.390 --> 0:27:53.540
<v Speaker 1>If the Republicans want to make, quote unquote, protecting young

0:27:53.619 --> 0:27:57.419
<v Speaker 1>girls the center of their politics. Yeah. They fucking handed

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:00.180
<v Speaker 1>you the silver platter. The Epstein's right there. Yeah.

0:28:00.930 --> 0:28:05.370
<v Speaker 2>It's frustrating because Tyler Rico has fucking recently made some

0:28:05.410 --> 0:28:09.950
<v Speaker 2>kind of bows to the anti-trans kids in sports panic shit,

0:28:09.990 --> 0:28:11.850
<v Speaker 2>which was very wishy-washy.

0:28:11.869 --> 0:28:15.830
<v Speaker 1>Wishy-washy, flippy-floppy, not standing firmly where he should be, certainly. No,

0:28:15.970 --> 0:28:18.330
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think that's helping him, honestly. I think

0:28:18.350 --> 0:28:20.379
<v Speaker 1>the primary thing helping him is that Ken Paxton is

0:28:20.390 --> 0:28:26.060
<v Speaker 1>an abominable monster. He's awful. He's the devil. Like.

0:28:27.260 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 2>And to run against the devil, you simply have to

0:28:29.420 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 2>not be the devil. I guess it's harder than that.

0:28:31.580 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Trump won.

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:34.020
<v Speaker 3>And also offer people real things as well.

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:36.360
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm not being fair to the campaign. Like

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:38.140
<v Speaker 2>he has run a much better campaign than that.

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm also just saying like in general, I think

0:28:40.740 --> 0:28:43.580
<v Speaker 1>the sort of running as just not Trump. Yes.

0:28:43.660 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 3>That's not one as a strategy.

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:49.979
<v Speaker 2>That's not enough. Tallarico has worked hard to portray himself as,

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 2>other than being a Democrat, like a Texas Christian that

0:28:54.540 --> 0:28:57.460
<v Speaker 2>Texans can, you know, find respectable, right?

0:28:58.090 --> 0:29:02.910
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. We'll talk a little bit more about Texas. But first,

0:29:03.630 --> 0:29:04.590
<v Speaker 1>here are some ads.

0:29:15.590 --> 0:29:18.610
<v Speaker 2>And we're back. I did want to mention one more

0:29:18.650 --> 0:29:22.580
<v Speaker 2>thing about the K-Pax campaign. Paxton's Senate campaign recently put

0:29:22.710 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 2>out a series of missing posters demanding proof of life

0:29:26.780 --> 0:29:27.900
<v Speaker 2>for James Tallarico.

0:29:28.020 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh, yeah.

0:29:28.740 --> 0:29:31.209
<v Speaker 2>A little less than two weeks ago, he took sick

0:29:31.210 --> 0:29:34.970
<v Speaker 2>with the flu. He got diagnosed on September 30th. And

0:29:34.970 --> 0:29:37.580
<v Speaker 2>after that, he had to like attend he attended like

0:29:37.620 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 2>a Hispanic business council meeting via video that had been

0:29:40.580 --> 0:29:43.719
<v Speaker 2>scheduled to attend in person yeah he told attendees I'm

0:29:43.740 --> 0:29:45.660
<v Speaker 2>running a fever and I'm at my most contagious right

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 2>now and I guess I've been shaking too many hands

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:49.020
<v Speaker 2>on the campaign trail so I want to keep everybody

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:51.310
<v Speaker 2>safe he stated that if he passed his illness to

0:29:51.350 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 2>somebody's grandmother or baby he couldn't live with himself Totally

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:59.300
<v Speaker 2>reasonable thing. But Paxton's campaign put out this like old

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:02.820
<v Speaker 2>West looking like wanted poster of him demanding proof of

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 2>life because he's been absent 12 days from the campaign trail.

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>They're doing the fucking Mitch McConnell bullshit.

0:30:09.020 --> 0:30:13.350
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's it's nonsense. He's been making statements. He's just not.

0:30:13.770 --> 0:30:15.170
<v Speaker 2>He's sick. That happens.

0:30:15.450 --> 0:30:17.650
<v Speaker 1>He's booked for a CNN town hall on October 14th.

0:30:18.310 --> 0:30:21.709
<v Speaker 1>There's been a pretty bad illness going around. I think

0:30:21.730 --> 0:30:24.010
<v Speaker 1>there's probably a few. There is a cold.

0:30:24.050 --> 0:30:25.490
<v Speaker 3>There is a COVID strain.

0:30:25.590 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 2>And he's young for politics, but he's also at the

0:30:27.620 --> 0:30:30.500
<v Speaker 2>age in which flus and shit hit yard. He's not

0:30:30.540 --> 0:30:30.900
<v Speaker 2>a baby.

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I did see a clip from the president in the

0:30:33.980 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 1>past few days talking about this. And he said that

0:30:36.820 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Paxton's hiding because he's been forced to eat meat when running.

0:30:40.870 --> 0:30:42.910
<v Speaker 1>And so he's been vomiting up meat all the time.

0:30:42.950 --> 0:30:43.990
<v Speaker 1>And that's why he's not.

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:49.980
<v Speaker 7>what non-visible donald what what the fuck because trump's been

0:30:50.220 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 7>trump just learned what veganism is yeah and he said

0:30:52.980 --> 0:30:55.140
<v Speaker 7>he said he says it really funny and it's been

0:30:55.180 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 7>like the main thing he's been attacking tala tala frico

0:30:58.100 --> 0:31:00.660
<v Speaker 7>with is that the fact that he's like a.

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Alleged vegan right because he's not a vegan yes like

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:06.300
<v Speaker 2>no even if you were a vegan if you wanted

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:09.420
<v Speaker 2>to win a major election in texas you would lie

0:31:09.510 --> 0:31:12.510
<v Speaker 2>about that yeah that's almost more of a disqualifying factor

0:31:12.530 --> 0:31:14.930
<v Speaker 2>in texas politics than being a democrat.

0:31:16.090 --> 0:31:18.110
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, that's been the main thing Trump's been trying

0:31:18.150 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to attack Talifrico for is this alleged vegan status. And

0:31:22.890 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the idea that Talifrico is having to fake being a

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:29.900
<v Speaker 1>meat eater and has gotten sick from eating meat and

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 1>is thus vomiting.

0:31:31.540 --> 0:31:33.460
<v Speaker 3>And that's why he's out of the spotlight.

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:35.500
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, of course. That's definitely it.

0:31:35.660 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Simple, basic stuff. Politics 101.

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:43.770
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, politics something or other. gubernatorial election is also going

0:31:43.830 --> 0:31:47.190
<v Speaker 2>to be this year for Texas. And this is like

0:31:47.230 --> 0:31:50.540
<v Speaker 2>the first time in a while that it's looked actually

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:56.340
<v Speaker 2>kind of competitive. Gina Hinojosa is running against Greg Abbott,

0:31:56.580 --> 0:32:00.080
<v Speaker 2>who is right up there with Ken Paxton in terms

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:02.950
<v Speaker 2>of being an evil scumbag. Like, he is just a monster,

0:32:03.010 --> 0:32:06.070
<v Speaker 2>although a much more popular monster than Ken Paxton is

0:32:06.170 --> 0:32:10.190
<v Speaker 2>with voters. But even so, Hinojosa is giving him a

0:32:10.230 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 2>run for his money. Right now, the real clear politics

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:18.180
<v Speaker 2>average trend has Abbott at 48.1% and Hinojosa at 46.4%.

0:32:19.540 --> 0:32:24.390
<v Speaker 2>But there are several polls that have Hinojosa ahead, including YouGov.

0:32:24.830 --> 0:32:27.450
<v Speaker 2>The New York Times Siena poll has her up by three.

0:32:27.870 --> 0:32:31.590
<v Speaker 2>Marist has her up by three. ReconMR at Siena has

0:32:31.610 --> 0:32:33.650
<v Speaker 2>her up by four. Now, obviously, there are some like

0:32:33.690 --> 0:32:36.790
<v Speaker 2>Telemundo has Abbott up by seven. Fox has Abbott up

0:32:36.830 --> 0:32:39.470
<v Speaker 2>by five. And there are definitely more polls that have

0:32:39.550 --> 0:32:43.010
<v Speaker 2>Abbott ahead. But this looks close enough that like it's

0:32:43.190 --> 0:32:44.950
<v Speaker 2>being considered by a lot of people to be a

0:32:45.010 --> 0:32:46.890
<v Speaker 2>toss up or close to a toss up.

0:32:46.990 --> 0:32:47.630
<v Speaker 3>It's competitive.

0:32:47.650 --> 0:32:52.860
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Pull it off. I'm not saying I think that's

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:57.420
<v Speaker 2>the likeliest thing to happen here because this is still Texas.

0:32:57.480 --> 0:33:00.100
<v Speaker 2>And I I just can't be that optimistic about the

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:03.710
<v Speaker 2>gubernatorial race. But I would love it if Gina could

0:33:03.790 --> 0:33:07.010
<v Speaker 2>unseat Greg Abbott because he is just a fucking monster.

0:33:07.610 --> 0:33:10.770
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, she's a monster. Running a really good campaign.

0:33:10.950 --> 0:33:11.150
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:33:11.190 --> 0:33:14.490
<v Speaker 2>She's currently in the House of Representatives representing the 49th District.

0:33:14.770 --> 0:33:16.590
<v Speaker 3>The Texas House or the federal?

0:33:16.910 --> 0:33:18.710
<v Speaker 2>In the Texas House. She's a state legislator.

0:33:18.750 --> 0:33:19.210
<v Speaker 3>The Texas House.

0:33:19.270 --> 0:33:19.490
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:33:19.850 --> 0:33:20.090
<v Speaker 3>Got it.

0:33:20.250 --> 0:33:20.430
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:33:20.530 --> 0:33:23.410
<v Speaker 2>And she worked for the AFL prior to that. She's

0:33:23.430 --> 0:33:25.430
<v Speaker 2>been a lawyer for quite some time. She was part

0:33:25.450 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 2>of the legal team that sued Tom DeLay. The Hinojos

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 2>are like a prominent North Texas family. I went to

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:33.420
<v Speaker 2>school with one of her, I don't know if it

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 2>was her kid or like a cousin or something, but

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:38.910
<v Speaker 2>like the Hinojos are like a prominent wealthy family in

0:33:38.950 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 2>North Texas. So- It's very interesting that she's and I

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:46.340
<v Speaker 2>haven't enough of a deep dive. I think a lot

0:33:46.380 --> 0:33:49.290
<v Speaker 2>of what's helping her is just the general unpopularity of

0:33:49.310 --> 0:33:52.350
<v Speaker 2>the Republican Party right now. And I do kind of

0:33:52.410 --> 0:33:55.250
<v Speaker 2>suspect that Greg Abbott is being dragged down a little

0:33:55.270 --> 0:33:58.710
<v Speaker 2>bit by Ken Paxton, too, like that, just the general

0:33:58.750 --> 0:34:01.390
<v Speaker 2>the overall trend. And also, like, I think he knows

0:34:01.450 --> 0:34:04.610
<v Speaker 2>is probably benefiting from some of the enthusiasm that Tallarico's

0:34:04.650 --> 0:34:06.010
<v Speaker 2>campaign has helped to generate, too.

0:34:06.110 --> 0:34:06.270
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:34:06.510 --> 0:34:08.700
<v Speaker 2>Obviously, she's also made a lot of really good moves

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:11.620
<v Speaker 2>on her own that have increased enthusiasm, but But in general,

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:15.900
<v Speaker 2>I think because Texas looks competitive in a way it

0:34:15.980 --> 0:34:19.259
<v Speaker 2>really hasn't, it's benefiting probably both candidates a lot. Just

0:34:19.300 --> 0:34:21.880
<v Speaker 2>that that is bringing more people out to volunteer. It's

0:34:21.900 --> 0:34:25.180
<v Speaker 2>bringing more people out to donate. Just creating this impression

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:27.839
<v Speaker 2>that like this might be a winnable fight has done

0:34:27.910 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 2>a lot.

0:34:28.530 --> 0:34:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:34:28.930 --> 0:34:31.649
<v Speaker 2>So that's one to keep watch on. Again, I would

0:34:31.710 --> 0:34:34.850
<v Speaker 2>say a gun to my head. Abbott's still probably going

0:34:34.870 --> 0:34:37.430
<v Speaker 2>to eke out a victory, but I can't say definitely.

0:34:37.450 --> 0:34:37.950
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:34:37.969 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Right. Yeah, he does have that sort of incumbent advantage.

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:45.799
<v Speaker 1>And that's another factor with the Tallarico-Paxton thing. Paxton does

0:34:45.820 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 1>not have that incumbent advantage. I think Corbyn would be

0:34:48.420 --> 0:34:51.350
<v Speaker 1>a much harder candidate for Tallarico to beat.

0:34:51.410 --> 0:34:53.650
<v Speaker 2>This wouldn't be an election if Corbyn had won the primary.

0:34:53.710 --> 0:34:57.590
<v Speaker 1>That's why we were sort of softly excited when Paxton won.

0:34:57.930 --> 0:35:01.690
<v Speaker 1>Because as dangerous as it is for Paxton to potentially

0:35:01.710 --> 0:35:05.140
<v Speaker 1>be in the Senate, he has a much bigger attack potential.

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 3>Attack radius or.

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:12.590
<v Speaker 1>Attack surface than Cornyn does. Another one of these kind

0:35:12.630 --> 0:35:15.310
<v Speaker 1>of long shots, actually, I would say the biggest long

0:35:15.350 --> 0:35:19.310
<v Speaker 1>shot for a flip is in Florida with progressive Democrat

0:35:19.390 --> 0:35:23.589
<v Speaker 1>Angie Nixon running against Ashley Moody, who took Rubio's seat.

0:35:24.610 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 1>The best poll for Nixon as of a few days

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:31.140
<v Speaker 1>ago is by Florida Politics. And according to them, the

0:35:31.180 --> 0:35:35.320
<v Speaker 1>race is at a tie, 45%. But a recent poll

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:39.990
<v Speaker 1>from Stetson University has Moody leading 51 to 40, so

0:35:39.989 --> 0:35:43.910
<v Speaker 1>11 points. A YouGov poll from late September to early

0:35:43.950 --> 0:35:47.209
<v Speaker 1>October has Moody five points ahead, with 5% of likely

0:35:47.250 --> 0:35:51.549
<v Speaker 1>voters still undecided. Though, actually, as of just a few

0:35:51.590 --> 0:35:55.090
<v Speaker 1>hours ago, as of recording, we're recording this on Thursday night,

0:35:55.890 --> 0:35:59.820
<v Speaker 1>Florida Politics did another poll, which shows Moody at 47%

0:35:59.820 --> 0:36:02.380
<v Speaker 1>and Angie Nixon at 45%.

0:36:03.550 --> 0:36:04.650
<v Speaker 3>Within margin of error.

0:36:05.150 --> 0:36:10.149
<v Speaker 1>So a slight difference from the last poll that had

0:36:10.190 --> 0:36:13.410
<v Speaker 1>them tied. This is one of those races that the Democrats,

0:36:13.850 --> 0:36:17.180
<v Speaker 1>as the DNC, is not actually expecting Nixon to win.

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:19.899
<v Speaker 1>They're not really pumping much money in, or really any

0:36:20.320 --> 0:36:24.380
<v Speaker 1>money in. They're not helping. All of this is the

0:36:24.420 --> 0:36:27.770
<v Speaker 1>result of just Nixon being a really good politician. The

0:36:27.810 --> 0:36:29.350
<v Speaker 1>fact that the race is this close.

0:36:29.630 --> 0:36:29.750
<v Speaker 4>Mm-hmm.

0:36:30.310 --> 0:36:33.310
<v Speaker 1>And Nixon's a sort of sleeper candidate. I was not

0:36:33.370 --> 0:36:36.930
<v Speaker 1>familiar with Nixon until the primary. Since then, I've watched

0:36:37.250 --> 0:36:40.730
<v Speaker 1>videos of her working in the state house from these

0:36:40.750 --> 0:36:43.130
<v Speaker 1>past few years and then campaign appearances.

0:36:43.710 --> 0:36:46.430
<v Speaker 3>She is great. She is really good.

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:50.759
<v Speaker 1>A really clear communicator of working class issues, issues impacting

0:36:51.300 --> 0:36:54.060
<v Speaker 1>the black community in Florida. Florida's a state we often

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:56.940
<v Speaker 1>reduce to kind of the worst of the worst people.

0:36:57.680 --> 0:37:00.890
<v Speaker 1>But there's a lot of good people people in Florida

0:37:00.930 --> 0:37:04.180
<v Speaker 1>as well. They just haven't been represented in politics for

0:37:04.890 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 1>almost as long as I've been alive. Yeah.

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:10.420
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean, it gets forgotten, but there's like a

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 2>reason why the 2000 election hinged on Florida. And it

0:37:13.620 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 2>was because it was really close.

0:37:15.860 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm really interested to see what the results of

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 1>this race is, because this will indicate kind of how

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:22.790
<v Speaker 1>much Trump is hurting the Republicans if it's like a really,

0:37:22.830 --> 0:37:25.810
<v Speaker 1>really close race, if the results are really close. And

0:37:25.850 --> 0:37:28.330
<v Speaker 1>it will also point to Nixon's strength as a candidate,

0:37:28.370 --> 0:37:32.010
<v Speaker 1>and I'm interested to watch what she does after this election,

0:37:32.310 --> 0:37:35.140
<v Speaker 1>whether or not she wins. Now, of course, there's the

0:37:35.180 --> 0:37:38.500
<v Speaker 1>other close race, which is in Michigan, which currently leans

0:37:38.540 --> 0:37:42.260
<v Speaker 1>Democrat with Abdul El-Sayed on average, polling about 3% ahead

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:47.009
<v Speaker 1>of former Republican Congressman Mike Rogers. A Mars poll from

0:37:47.030 --> 0:37:50.989
<v Speaker 1>late September has El-Sayed at 51 to Rogers 44, a

0:37:51.410 --> 0:37:55.450
<v Speaker 1>seven point lead. That's El-Sayed's most favorable poll. A New

0:37:55.469 --> 0:37:57.890
<v Speaker 1>York Times Siena poll from mid-September shows El Cid up

0:37:58.010 --> 0:38:01.010
<v Speaker 1>five points. A Fox poll has him up one point.

0:38:02.010 --> 0:38:05.050
<v Speaker 1>If Abdul wins, Dems could hold on to this seat,

0:38:05.450 --> 0:38:08.259
<v Speaker 1>strengthening their chances of controlling the Senate, but this would

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 1>not be a flip. So this is something that they

0:38:10.540 --> 0:38:12.719
<v Speaker 1>really need to hold on to in order to have

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a chance, but this will not go towards the sort

0:38:14.980 --> 0:38:17.399
<v Speaker 1>of four to five seats they need in order to flip.

0:38:18.489 --> 0:38:20.050
<v Speaker 1>Before we close, I do want to just mention a

0:38:20.110 --> 0:38:22.730
<v Speaker 1>few of the sort of underlying factors that could be

0:38:22.750 --> 0:38:25.870
<v Speaker 1>influencing this election. One of the big ones just is

0:38:26.250 --> 0:38:30.609
<v Speaker 1>Trump and how much everyone hates him. He has a 36%

0:38:30.610 --> 0:38:35.140
<v Speaker 1>approval rating, which is the lowest pre-midterm approval rating in

0:38:35.140 --> 0:38:35.820
<v Speaker 1>50 years.

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:36.899
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that makes sense.

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 3>Not good. Not great for the Republicans. Not what you'd want, yeah.

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Not what you would want.

0:38:43.180 --> 0:38:45.620
<v Speaker 1>And remember when I was talking about the enthusiasm gap

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:49.839
<v Speaker 1>that the Fox poll was showing? The latest KFF health

0:38:49.880 --> 0:38:53.360
<v Speaker 1>tracking poll, it's from the organization formerly known as Kaiser

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:58.170
<v Speaker 1>Family Foundation. They found a very large enthusiasm gap between

0:38:58.210 --> 0:39:02.210
<v Speaker 1>parties in their last poll, with Democratic voters much more

0:39:02.250 --> 0:39:04.790
<v Speaker 1>likely than Republican voters to say they're, quote, more motivated

0:39:04.930 --> 0:39:06.129
<v Speaker 1>to vote this year.

0:39:07.410 --> 0:39:08.140
<v Speaker 2>Way more than usual.

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:09.020
<v Speaker 1>It's 63% to 38%.

0:39:09.020 --> 0:39:10.850
<v Speaker 3>That's a huge gap. The cost of health care and gas.

0:39:17.120 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Thai as voters top affordability worries. A quarter of respondents

0:39:22.180 --> 0:39:25.709
<v Speaker 1>said that they are very worried about affording each ahead

0:39:25.750 --> 0:39:27.489
<v Speaker 1>of food, utilities and housing. So 25% said they were

0:39:27.510 --> 0:39:33.470
<v Speaker 1>very worried. about affording health care. 25% said they're very

0:39:33.650 --> 0:39:37.529
<v Speaker 1>worried about affording gas. So that's the tie. It's 50%

0:39:37.530 --> 0:39:38.690
<v Speaker 1>of the concern.

0:39:39.550 --> 0:39:40.209
<v Speaker 3>It's those two.

0:39:41.390 --> 0:39:43.450
<v Speaker 1>The Democratic Party has a clear edge over the Republican

0:39:43.469 --> 0:39:46.710
<v Speaker 1>Party on who voters trust to handle many top issues

0:39:46.770 --> 0:39:50.570
<v Speaker 1>in the election, including cost of health care. 42% of

0:39:50.610 --> 0:39:54.489
<v Speaker 1>respondents trust the Democrats more on these issues. For cost

0:39:54.530 --> 0:40:00.790
<v Speaker 1>of living, 39% of respondents trust Democrats more, going to 25%

0:40:00.790 --> 0:40:03.890
<v Speaker 1>for the Republicans. And the cost of living was the

0:40:03.930 --> 0:40:08.320
<v Speaker 1>top issue for both Democrat and independent voters, while Republican

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:12.500
<v Speaker 1>voters wanted candidates to discuss, quote, fraud. That's the big

0:40:12.540 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 1>issue for Republicans right now.

0:40:14.620 --> 0:40:15.319
<v Speaker 3>This is, you know, J.D.

0:40:15.400 --> 0:40:18.739
<v Speaker 1>Vance's task force, the post kind of doge thing. is

0:40:18.760 --> 0:40:21.660
<v Speaker 1>they're really obsessed with this idea of fraud and not

0:40:21.700 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 1>really the type of fraud that Robert or I would

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:28.940
<v Speaker 1>talk about. I think everyone's pretty familiar with how much

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:33.500
<v Speaker 1>we're all being ripped off all the time. Scam culture

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 1>is huge. Corporate fraud.

0:40:35.140 --> 0:40:36.360
<v Speaker 2>The only culture.

0:40:37.020 --> 0:40:40.739
<v Speaker 1>It's everything, right? And that's not what Republicans are interested in.

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 1>They are wanting to kick people off public benefits, right?

0:40:44.100 --> 0:40:46.380
<v Speaker 1>That's the type of fraud that they are mostly interested in.

0:40:47.230 --> 0:40:50.910
<v Speaker 1>To close, the most interesting part about this KFF poll, though,

0:40:51.210 --> 0:40:54.890
<v Speaker 1>is the numbers around Medicare for All. Quote, two-thirds of

0:40:54.910 --> 0:40:58.850
<v Speaker 1>the public, 66%, said they favor Medicare for All, the

0:40:58.930 --> 0:41:02.279
<v Speaker 1>highest share KFF has recorded since it began polling the

0:41:02.340 --> 0:41:07.140
<v Speaker 1>idea in 2016. And, this is the really crazy part, quote,

0:41:07.620 --> 0:41:11.739
<v Speaker 1>about half, 52%, said they would favor Medicare for All

0:41:12.140 --> 0:41:15.480
<v Speaker 1>if it eliminated private health insurance companies, while 47% oppose.

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:20.589
<v Speaker 1>That is a huge change from like five years ago.

0:41:20.810 --> 0:41:24.490
<v Speaker 1>This has been the biggest kind of protest against Medicare

0:41:24.530 --> 0:41:26.089
<v Speaker 1>for All is the idea that it would take away

0:41:26.130 --> 0:41:30.270
<v Speaker 1>your private health care. When respondents get told this in polling, historically,

0:41:30.330 --> 0:41:32.569
<v Speaker 1>we've seen support for Medicare for All take a big dip.

0:41:33.450 --> 0:41:36.650
<v Speaker 1>This is the first time a majority of respondents have

0:41:36.670 --> 0:41:39.770
<v Speaker 1>said they would still support Medicare for All if it

0:41:39.810 --> 0:41:42.980
<v Speaker 1>took away private health care. To quote KFF, quote, This

0:41:43.060 --> 0:41:46.180
<v Speaker 1>marks a departure from when KFF last asked this question

0:41:46.340 --> 0:41:49.609
<v Speaker 1>in October 2020, when the prospect of eliminating private health

0:41:49.650 --> 0:41:52.549
<v Speaker 1>insurance companies led to lower support for Medicare for All

0:41:52.810 --> 0:41:56.569
<v Speaker 1>at just 37%. So this is a huge thing. And

0:41:56.590 --> 0:41:59.650
<v Speaker 1>I would be remiss to mention, you know, most of

0:41:59.690 --> 0:42:03.609
<v Speaker 1>these candidates we're talking about in the Senate, the Democratic ones,

0:42:03.650 --> 0:42:07.819
<v Speaker 1>you know, Troy Jackson, Angie Nixon, Abdul, Al-Said, they are

0:42:08.140 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 1>running on Medicare for all. This has become a big

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 1>resurgent topic, this election. The cost of healthcare is a

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 1>big topic in these midterms. And rather than doing this

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:22.580
<v Speaker 1>sort of Pete Buttigieg style, Medicare for all who want it,

0:42:22.620 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, just kind of vaguely talking about having a

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:29.140
<v Speaker 1>public option, right? These candidates are being a bit more

0:42:29.219 --> 0:42:32.960
<v Speaker 1>strict about Medicare for all as like an actual policy

0:42:33.020 --> 0:42:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and as a policy guarantee. I think Abdul's policy has

0:42:37.380 --> 0:42:41.600
<v Speaker 1>some slight differences where it does not completely eliminate private healthcare,

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:45.870
<v Speaker 1>but it says that private healthcare should become redundant and

0:42:45.910 --> 0:42:48.730
<v Speaker 1>still has a focus on a universal single payer system,

0:42:48.770 --> 0:42:52.150
<v Speaker 1>which is much closer to the Bernie Sanders version than

0:42:52.170 --> 0:42:55.430
<v Speaker 1>the sort of like half-assed versions that we've seen from

0:42:55.750 --> 0:42:58.790
<v Speaker 1>other progressive candidates, you know, running for president like six

0:42:58.810 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>years ago. So something that, you know, maybe two or

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:03.940
<v Speaker 1>three years ago, I felt like it's kind of like

0:43:03.980 --> 0:43:07.819
<v Speaker 1>a political bygone. This focus on Medicare for all is

0:43:07.860 --> 0:43:11.420
<v Speaker 1>definitely coming back in a big way. And people are

0:43:11.460 --> 0:43:13.410
<v Speaker 1>not nearly as scared of the prospect of them not

0:43:13.469 --> 0:43:17.129
<v Speaker 1>having private insurance because private insurance sucks. Yeah, it's gotten

0:43:17.170 --> 0:43:23.210
<v Speaker 1>even worse. We're what, like two years after the Mangione assassination,

0:43:23.670 --> 0:43:26.360
<v Speaker 1>things still suck. Everyone still hates healthcare companies.

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:29.530
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, only hate them more as time goes on.

0:43:30.060 --> 0:43:32.100
<v Speaker 1>So, yeah, that is the kind of rough overview of

0:43:32.860 --> 0:43:35.940
<v Speaker 1>the issues affecting the midterms and where the polling stands

0:43:36.780 --> 0:43:39.779
<v Speaker 1>now just a few weeks away from November.

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:41.960
<v Speaker 3>I want to say third. Let's see if I'm right.

0:43:42.380 --> 0:43:42.859
<v Speaker 3>I am right.

0:43:42.980 --> 0:43:45.660
<v Speaker 1>Boom. We'll probably do a few more polling updates on

0:43:45.700 --> 0:43:49.049
<v Speaker 1>executive disorder as we get closer to to Election Day.

0:43:49.230 --> 0:43:49.770
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely.

0:43:50.290 --> 0:43:51.850
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, that's that's all for me here.

0:43:51.870 --> 0:43:52.230
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:43:53.060 --> 0:43:55.950
<v Speaker 2>Remember, guys, do what the IRGC would want you to do.

0:43:56.680 --> 0:43:58.830
<v Speaker 2>Register to vote.

0:43:59.030 --> 0:44:00.149
<v Speaker 3>We're not telling you to vote.

0:44:00.630 --> 0:44:08.720
<v Speaker 2>No, the Iranian government. We're not. Good stuff.

0:44:12.239 --> 0:44:14.660
<v Speaker 5>It Could Happen Here is a production of Cool Zone Media.

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:19.219
<v Speaker 5>For more podcasts from Cool Zone Media, visit our website, coolzonemedia.com,

0:44:19.680 --> 0:44:22.480
<v Speaker 5>or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:44:22.840 --> 0:44:25.640
<v Speaker 5>or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can now find

0:44:25.700 --> 0:44:28.640
<v Speaker 5>sources for It Could Happen Here listed directly in episode descriptions.

0:44:29.140 --> 0:44:29.820
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening.