WEBVTT - Our Voice, Our Power

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, peeps, and welcome to book a f Daily

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:19.639
<v Speaker 1>with Me your Girl Danielle Moody recording from the Home Bunker, Folks.

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:23.639
<v Speaker 1>Over the past several weeks, since that piece of shit

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>in Selle Elon Musk has taken over Twitter and has basically,

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, thrown out the window all of the protections

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that were provided and should be provided by a social

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>media platform of its stature and of its importance, we've

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>seen a lot of think pieces and critical analysis around

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the importance of the Internet, around the importance of a

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>global town square, and the fact that our government, by

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>virtue of not understanding really truly how technology works, the

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.919
<v Speaker 1>importance of social media platforms, and just you know, sheer

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 1>ignorance has allowed a maniacal, egomaniac billionaire to take over

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>this platform and to do with it whatever he wants.

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Today's guest on wokef bridget Todd, who you may know

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>from the podcasts There Are No Girls on the Internet Now,

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>has a new podcast, The Internet Hate Machine. Her and

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I get into a conversation about the importance of regulation,

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>around the importance of seeing platforms like Twitter as a

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 1>public utility, and the missed opportunities that our government had

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>and still has and is still making in regard to

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>how they decide to regulate this force. The theme that

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I want folks to understand is that I feel like,

0:01:56.160 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the advent of social media, truly right,

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>like it taking hold in the early two thousands, Facebook

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>being I think the first, if I'm not wrong, outside

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of chat rooms and those things, followed by Twitter, and

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>then you know, later on Instagram and TikTok and you

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>know all of the other ones that would bubble up

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>in between. Twitter has stood alone in terms of the

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>power that this platform has had, The power it has

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>had for community organizers, the power it has had for activists,

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>for potential elected officials, for elected officials, for the presidents

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of the United States. It has been a place in

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>real time where you go to find out what is happening,

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>not only in this country, but around the world. We

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>learned about activations like the Arab Spring that took place

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>in the earlier two thousands. We learned about what was

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>happening in Ukraine, in Iran, in China. Because of social media,

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:14.079
<v Speaker 1>journalists have been able You've been able to follow them

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>in real time as they're on the ground in crisis

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>situations like in Ferguson. You know Ferguson and what happened

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>there is a prime example with the murder of Mike

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Brown that had it not been for on the ground

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>eye reporters tweeting and people beginning to follow in live

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>recording and periscoping what was happening in Ferguson, it would

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>have never been picked up by cable news and national

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>news outlets. It would have been yet another violent act

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that was contained to the community that it was happening in,

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to being blown up as a national crisis

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and incident. You look at George Floyd, right and the

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>fact that this begat an entire summer of activism because

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of the ability of those on the ground to film

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>what was happening and then to be able to send

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>those videos out into the universe. Without a robust Twitter,

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>we would have never had those activations. And so when

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>people say things like, well, Elon Musk is stupid and

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't know what he's doing, Elon Musk knows exactly

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>what the fuck he is doing. He is a white supremist,

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>in sell fucking misogynist, patriarchal piece of shit. I wish

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I could form an opinion he took over this platform

0:04:56.560 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>because like the greedy ass billionaire he is, he, much

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>like his ilk, do not want the people to organize,

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>do not want the people to unite, do not want

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:14.840
<v Speaker 1>those that have traditionally been marginalized and oppressed to have

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a voice and to develop a community of followers, right,

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Because then you know what that means. It means that

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>those that are at the top lose power because the

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>power is being taken back by the people. And how

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>do you stop activations like we saw in the summer

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty, how do you stop push back against

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>fascist regimes like the Republican Party and Donald Trump and

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Maga Dum. You take away the town square, you take

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>away a key to their organizing, right. That is what

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk has done. And so when you look at

0:05:56.839 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 1>it through that lens, you recognize that he is being

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>incredibly successful. Because when people like myself right and many

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>many other people with millions and millions of followers, decide

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that they no longer want to spend time on this platform,

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that they no longer want to deal with the inundation

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:22.799
<v Speaker 1>of racism and misogyny that is now part of Elon

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 1>Must's free speech plan, then it ceases to be the

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>powerful machine that it could be, and then people need

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to disperse and then figure out where they're going to

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>go next to unite. That was the point of Elon

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Must's takeover. So my conversation coming up next with bridget

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Todd delves into that and what it is, if anything,

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>that the people can do to hold onto their voice

0:06:53.080 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and their power. That conversation is coming up next, folks,

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I am very excited to bring to Woke. F bridget Todd,

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>who is tech guru extraordinaire, is the host of the

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>award winning podcast There Are No Girls on the Internet,

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and of the new pod, which my God couldn't have

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>dropped at a better time, The Internet Hate Machine. Bridget

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>let me just tell you that first, congrats on all

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>of the accolades with There Are No Girls on the Internet.

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>It has been It's so wonderful when I see black

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>women winning in spaces that we don't normally win in

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and creating room and space for conversations about people that

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>look like us that exist in this tech space. So

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say, like, shout out for that.

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>But your new pod comes at a time when the

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>billionaire troll Elon Musk has taken control over the world's

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>town square. And now all of a sudden, it seems

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>over the last several weeks that people are like, oh,

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>my Twitter actually is important. It isn't just a social

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>media you know platform that it is really a source

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>for organizing and activism and journalism. So, you know, before

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>we dive in, you know, I want to get a

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 1>sense of, you know, why you started this new pod,

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:47.079
<v Speaker 1>right and is it and was it provoked by the

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>impending you know cell that now has actually happened of Twitter. Yeah,

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me and that for that world,

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>welcome the podcast. So it was already in the work,

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and because I feel like I could sort of see

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:05.679
<v Speaker 1>the writing on the wall, I was already you know,

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>pitching and thinking about some of the concepts that we

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that we discuss on Internet Hate Machine before Elon officially

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>bought Twitter. But I could sort of see the ways

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:19.319
<v Speaker 1>that our social media platforms were primed or takeover in

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>some kind of way, you know, whether it's by bad

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:27.239
<v Speaker 1>actors and like charlatans and extremists, gamifying conversations and hijacking

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>conversations about its sensitive topics or topics that people really

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:32.959
<v Speaker 1>need to have conversation on, Like I could sort of

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>see that happening, and I could sort of see the

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>ways that these platforms should be designed and set up

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to have folks really be able to come to them,

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to organize, to connect with one one another, have community,

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and that makes them these these spaces that folks do

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 1>want to you know, hijack and disrupt. So I could

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:52.959
<v Speaker 1>sort of see the writing on the wall even before

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk actually bought Twitter, when we were in production

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>for the podcast that that deal actually went through. So

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh my god, perfect timing for show,

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>right right. You know, It's just I think that for

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>far too long, the folks have said that, you know,

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is toxic. Twitter is a toxic space, and you know,

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and and there were there had been moments where major

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>things would happen. You profiled one of them, um on

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the Internet hate machine, Leslie Jones, and you you profile

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and and I want to allow you to the space

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:36.839
<v Speaker 1>to tell the Willkaf audience about exactly that, which I'm

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>sure many you know, everyone remembers. But Leslie Jones, you

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>know SNL, big huge star comedian had Ghostbusters coming out,

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and she had been one of those people that were

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>using Twitter in a way that was enjoyable, right, Like,

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>we all wanted to follow her because, you know, her

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 1>commentary was fun and funny, and we felt like we

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:04.439
<v Speaker 1>were in real lifetime of like an SNL skit, right

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:07.719
<v Speaker 1>whenever she would cover sporting events or you know, just

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>do something fun and it kind of you know, her

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>presence at that time reminded us of like the good

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>naturedness of what it meant to build social media platforms.

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Then here comes along this motherfucker, Milo, the white supremicist

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I never pronounced his last name, right, and I don't

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>ever care about pronouncing his last name right, comes along

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and creates an entire campaign to target her for no

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>other reason than the fact that she's black. She's a

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 1>black woman who is famous and wealthy, and you know,

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>so I just want you to go into using her

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>story as kind of the kind of anchor story as

0:11:56.440 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 1>to what regular people, regular you know, folks that happened

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to be from marginalized communities have the experience at the

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>hands of white supremas, of misogynists, of these horrible trolls.

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm so glad that you put it that way. I

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>think that so often people hear the story of what

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>happened with Leslie Jones on Twitter and say, well, she's

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a big star, she's a celebrity who cares, Like, what

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 1>does this have to do with anything? But that's exactly

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the point that I posited in the episode about her,

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>which is that Leslie Jones was someone who was a

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>as you said, like a Twitter super user. Everyone loved

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the way that Leslie Jones tweeted. She was got global

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>fame for her hilarious live tweeting of the Olympics that year,

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and she was like beloved by Twitter and frankly got

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Twitter a lot of positive attention. Right. And so if

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>someone who is this big celebrity, wealthy and also like

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a Twitter super user, who is like beloved by Twitter,

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 1>if they could be harassed and abused in these ways

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and in ways that are criminal. Right. So it wasn't

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>just her being you know, people saying mean things to

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>her on Twitter. They hacked her website and and and

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>put intimate photos of her on her website, which is

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>which is a crime, you know. So it's it's these

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>ways that are that are go so far beyond people

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:13.559
<v Speaker 1>saying mean things to her. But if someone is famous

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and well connected as Leslie Jones, that can happen to

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>her and people can say, big deal. What does that

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 1>mean for the rest of us? What does that mean

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>for all the other black women and girls out there

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>who are using social media platforms and are also being

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>targeted for this kind of harassment or LGBTQ folks who

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>are being targeted for this kind of harassment. And so

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm so glad that that's how you put it. I

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>also think that the story of Leslie Jones being harassed

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and a targeted harassment campaign by Milo, it actually doesn't

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>start with Milo. It starts with Steve Bannon, because Steve

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>bann was really one of the first people to identify

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>this the powerful force of like disaffected white male gamers

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and say like, oh, this is a force that we

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>can really like weaponize. And it was him who really

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>empowered Milo at the time, working for Breitbart, his his

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:02.199
<v Speaker 1>publication to you know, separ had these kinds of attacks,

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and so again like it's so it's it's wild to

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>me how how often this gets sort of sidelined as

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:11.839
<v Speaker 1>a celebrity story when like Steve bannam went on to

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>be in the White House, right, So like, obviously this

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>is a story that has deeper roots than just something

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>bad happening to a celebrity on the internet. Yeah, and

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's right, And I'm so glad that

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you lifted that up on your episode, because what I

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>think is is becomes really problematic is when we're being

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>disingenuous about the actual problem. And the problem here isn't

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>just you know, a bunch of white guys that are

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>sitting behind a computer screen that you know, never go

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>outside and are just using their trolling as a way

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to you know, to lift up their masculinity. That this

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>is actually tied to a larger political movement that we

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>have seen that has been wept an eye. Whereas where Twitter,

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>for instance, in particular, of all the platforms, has been

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>weaponized um by really fragile white men such as Donald Trump,

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>such as Elon Musk m and others who get on

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>there are their grievances, stir up their and their inseell

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh bots to target and to shut down discourse.

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>And so one of the questions that I want to

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>ask to you is the past couple of weeks that

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I have gone on you know, to your former your

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>former outlet to MSNBC and you know, and been and

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about Elon Musk and they're like, oh, Danielle,

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>so you know, he's a spectacular failure and all of

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>these things. And I said, what is it that makes

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you all think that he's failing? Right? And so my question,

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>my question to you is, you know, as you're watching

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>daily the headlines and following the headlines about Twitter, about

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>advertisers pulling out, about you know, different attack tweets that

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Musk is putting out targeting you know, whether it's a

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>representative Alexandria Cassio Cortez or others, what do you make

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>of the narrative that is being spun around what he

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 1>is doing. Yeah, that's such a great question. I think

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that that idea that oh, this must be like can

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you believe this spectacular failure? I do think that that

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>in part is rooted in this idea that we need

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to challenge that a white guy who's a billionaire is

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>automatically a co genius. Musk is a genius. I also

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>think I agree with you. I think that the reason

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>why we see Twitter specifically as this battle ground for

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>who can have a voice, and who can have power

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>is because people who are traditionally marginalized. Twitter is our

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>is our domain, like we have been able even we

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>have been able to build platforms and voices for ourselves

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 1>using Twitter when other, you know, more traditional outlets and

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>places have not always helped us amplify our voices. And

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 1>so I think Elon Musk sees that like, Okay, this

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>is a place where black folks, brown folks, women, queer

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 1>folks are able to build up a voice that can

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>sometimes even challenge traditional power structures, right things like meet

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to you, where you can start a hashtag and have

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that be something that actually allows for accountability from power structures.

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that Elon Musk wants to cozy up with

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:35.880
<v Speaker 1>extremist right wing types, and part of that as being

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 1>is dismantling Twitter's power that marginalized people can use. And

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 1>so if you chip away at that power, if you

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>if you make it a place where you know, the

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>kinds of people who are like creating and shapers of

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 1>discourse aren't really there so much, if you make it

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>so that like if you do hang out on Twitter,

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 1>your mentions are going to be full of like nazis

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>tweeting garbage at you, and this make it a place

0:17:57.240 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that no one is going to want to hang out.

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:02.479
<v Speaker 1>I think that is imparcel to how you take away

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>some of a platform like Twitter's power. And I think

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not surprising that we saw, you know, when Trump

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>was deep platformed, the platform that really hurt him the

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>hardest was not having Twitter, because I think that Twitter

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is a unique kind of platform where you can really

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>get a message out there and get it to travel quickly.

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>And I think Elon Musk is trying to tip the

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>scales so that more folks on the extremeist side of things,

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:26.919
<v Speaker 1>on the right wing side of things, have access to

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that power because they're just not as they're just haven't

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>been as good at it as we are, I guess.

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that he is. So when people

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 1>say like, oh, he's really failing, he's really like, you know,

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:40.439
<v Speaker 1>ruining Twitter, I'm not going to say that's not by design.

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that he wants to make it so that

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is a place where folks like you and I

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>aren't gonna want to show up and aren't gonna want

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 1>to be able to build up power and voices on

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a platform do you think that government, though Bridget failed

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 1>here by not making Twitter a public utility? Do you

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 1>think that because we have essentially and I'll be super

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:08.880
<v Speaker 1>agist and not care optinagarians who don't actually understand how

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 1>social media in a lot of ways works, do you

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 1>think that there has been missed opportunities where they would

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>bring in, you know, Mark Zuckerberg and scold him with

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>regard to allowing misinformation whether it was about covid or

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the twenty sixteen election, to fester on Facebook and depress

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>like democratic voices and ads and campaign ads and what

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>have you. They bring them in to chastise them, but

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 1>don't really understand how like how this platform is used.

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>So do you think that government and has missed an

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>opportunity here? Yes, this is just I mean, this is

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>my opinion. So speaking for myself, I do think that

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:55.639
<v Speaker 1>government has missed an opportunity, and I think it's really

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that we're really seeing the impact of that.

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that when listen, when your community wants to

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>get information out there about an emergency, they don't go

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 1>to Facebook, they don't go to Instagram, they don't go

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in a snapchat, they go to Twitter, Right, so Twitter

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 1>is how most a lot of us get information about

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in our communities right now. The fact that

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a billionaire could wake up one day and outright by

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that platform essentially on a whim for a laugh, and

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, do what he's done to it is a

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 1>real problem. I think that you're exactly right. It pains

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 1>me when I see, you know, people who I know

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>did not who are not digital natives, who did not

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>grow up on law, who don't know the way that

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the Internet can really impact our real lived experiences, kind

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of dropping the ball when it comes to regulating and

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>making sure that these platforms are actually able to be

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the kind of public utilities that we know that is

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:52.919
<v Speaker 1>the purpose that they serve in our actual lives. The

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>fact that the fact that we're having this conversation after

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the fact really does tell me that our elected officials

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>have really failed us and dropped the ball. And frankly,

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I see it getting better. You know,

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I've the hearings that you were just describing, like I've

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:11.679
<v Speaker 1>solved some elected official chastising Mark Zuckerberg, and he was like,

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>will you commit to ending finn stuff? And Mark Zuckerberg

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>was like, what are you talking about? Right? Like, I

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>think it's I think it's also a testament to the

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:21.199
<v Speaker 1>fact that we need younger folks elected officials. We need

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to the ones who aren't younger folks need to have

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>more younger folks in their circles that they're actually listening to,

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>because we've got people making legislation about technology that frankly,

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:36.199
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if they truly really understand the impact of

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that technology. No. And I think you know what was

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 1>funny is that during the Obama years, I think that

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>people really took for granted how how much Obama understood

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>about how the world works, but also how to use,

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>how to utilize technology. He created the Chief Technology Officer.

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>He courted people from Silicon Valley to come in as

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>if it were they were doing their public service right here.

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Don't take that, you know, half a million dollar job

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>at Google, come and work for the government for scraps,

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>but you're going to be doing something good for America.

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Because he understood that we needed really bright, sharp minds

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 1>to catapult us into the future. And I'm not quite

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>sure that that energy that thinking, even with this administration

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 1>being a democratic administration, gets that, and so I wonder

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 1>what you think, bridget are the implications then moving forward,

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>when we have billionaires that are legitimately playing monopoly with

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:48.640
<v Speaker 1>our lives and our voices, and then have a government

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that is ineffectual in their ability to stop that from happening.

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 1>What does this look like down the road? What does

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the internet, this hate machine that it has become, as

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you cleverly have titled your pod, what does it look

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>like down the road a couple of years from now? Oh,

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>recipe for disaster. Like I hate to put it like that,

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 1>but absolute recipe for disaster. And I think even looking

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:15.880
<v Speaker 1>at the Biden administration, there are some things that I'll

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>say like, oh, good job doing this or that, but

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:21.199
<v Speaker 1>it's it often feels like too little, too late, like

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:24.640
<v Speaker 1>we're playing catchup on on issue right that we has

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>gotten so far, you know, far afield. And so I

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>think unless you have elected officials who truly understand what's

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>happening and are already and willing to act in meaningful ways,

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a recipe for disaster. I really, I think,

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, I especially look at like the younger generation,

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 1>so many of them, what it means to show up

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>as like an activist or somebody with a voice, or

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:51.479
<v Speaker 1>somebody who was really civically engaged means showing up online, right,

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>And so if our online platforms are not places where

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>they can where they can all do that meaningfully and safely,

0:23:57.880 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>where whether you're a black woman or a white man,

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and you can meaningfully show up and like make your

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>wayte heard and be civically engaged online. If our platforms

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>aren't places where that's possible, what do you think the

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:10.199
<v Speaker 1>next generation of like elected officials or people who are

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>physically engaged is going to look like we're leaving an

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 1>incredibly unequal, unfair playing field for the next generation. And

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I think unless we do something meaningful to change that,

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't I'm not. I'm concerned about what it's going

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to look like down the road. What are your hopes then,

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:32.399
<v Speaker 1>bridget for your new pod and what you hope to

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>bring or highlight to your audiences about this really important space, right,

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Like I think that you know, for at the beginning

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the advent of the Internet, it was considered like this

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of fun thing, right, you know, chat rooms and

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>websites and blogs and all of these, you know, it's

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>feeling it literally feels like, you know, little house on

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the Prairie times when you know from how it started

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>compare to like where we are right now. But where

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>we're headed seems so bleak and stark. And I think

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that you know, you raise such good alarms and questions.

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, what are you hoping that people take from

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>your pod? Yeah, I'm so glad that you asked. The

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>biggest one is probably that the state and the well

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>being and the health of our internet is connected to

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of that health of our democracy writ large. And so

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:28.640
<v Speaker 1>these are not issues that are just quote happening online

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>or things happening on Twitter. You can't tell someone just

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>just turn off your computer. It'll be fine. When all

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of us are not meaningly able to show up on

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>our our digital communications platforms and make our voices heard

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 1>and you know, express ourselves, that means that that is

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the connected to the health and well being of our democracy,

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and that you know, folks are not going to show

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 1>up online and sort of like your voice their opinion

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>about politics or our democracy. Folks are going to be

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>We've already seen. The research is very clear women and

0:25:57.320 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>women of color and black women especially are much less

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 1>likely to do things like run for office when they

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 1>know that they can be harassed online just for trying

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to serve their communities, right, and so we can't have

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a representative democracy. If that's the case, we can't have

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a fully functioning democracy. And the health and well being

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of our democracy is innately tied to the way that

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>women and women of color, and black women specifically are

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>able to show up online. If we're not able to

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.120
<v Speaker 1>show up, then we don't have a healthy democracy. The two,

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 1>in my mind, are very much connected. What do you think?

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Last question for you, like, what do our elected officials? Again,

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>because these are the overseers, the ones that we place

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the importance of representing our voices and our needs. What

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 1>do they need to understand one coming out of this

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 1>midterm election, going into a presidential election where the Internet

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:56.360
<v Speaker 1>is like the most critical infrastructure in order to get

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>out information to as many people as possible. I mean, yes,

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:02.439
<v Speaker 1>I believe in door knocking and I believe in phone calls,

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>but we know that tweets and ads and campaign videos,

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the ability to go viral is what allows people to

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 1>have a fighting chance in our democracy. Right, So what

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 1>do you what would your advice, your message, your warning

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>be to them. Yeah, I would say, I mean, what

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a good question first and the foremost, I take it seriously.

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I do think that we're still We're coming out of

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:28.640
<v Speaker 1>it a little bit, but I do think that we're

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>still in a place where for a lot of people,

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>like what happens on the internet is not real life,

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and we need to really get away from that notion

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>because the internet and real life are one and the

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 1>same in twenty twenty two, and I would say, really

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>start being able to speak to it when a woman

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>of color or a black woman is harassed or abuse

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:48.879
<v Speaker 1>on the internet, right, Like case and point, when I

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:52.199
<v Speaker 1>remember when Kamala Harris was first being talked about as

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Biden's VP pick, I really I was obviously excited about that,

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:58.400
<v Speaker 1>but I was a little disheartened to see that there

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:00.360
<v Speaker 1>weren't a lot of folks in the administration who were

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:04.200
<v Speaker 1>willing to openly talk about the kinds of harassment, like racist,

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>sis harassment that she was going to face, right, and

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 1>so they just say like, oh, well, we want to

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 1>support her, like we like her leadership this and that

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:15.400
<v Speaker 1>talk openly about it, normalize talking openly about the reality

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that you are setting Black women up to face when

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you are supporting their leadership. Same thing with Katanti Brown Jackson.

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I was a little again, a little disheartened to see

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the kinds of obvious racialized, sexualized, gendered disinformation, misinformation and

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 1>harassment that she was facing online. I was a little

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 1>sad to see that folks in the administration weren't calling

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it out the way that they should have. And so

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I would say, first and foremost, start talking about it.

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Don't dance around it, don't use ethemisms, call it out

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>directly and normalize it. Normalize calling it out, and normalize

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>saying like, we're not going to tolerate this, we see

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 1>what it is. Your little dog whistles online aren't going

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to work. We're not going to stand here and allow

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 1>for racist, sexist harassment of our elected officials. And so

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we're not even there yet. We're still in

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 1>a place where people they don't openly acknowledge it. It's

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>just like this thing that we all have to see

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>happening and do not have verbalized in a real way. Well,

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Bridget I just you know, I continue to commend you

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>for the work that you do in this tech space

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to elevate the issues that are facing marginalized communities to

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>give voice and to the needs right and also to

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>just engage more women, communities of color, queer people to

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 1>get involved and to take up space in this digital space. Folks.

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:38.959
<v Speaker 1>The pod is called the Internet Hate Machine and you

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>must check it out wherever you get your podcasts. Bridget,

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for making the time for woke

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>aff We appreciate you. Oh, I appreciate you so much,

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and thank you for all that you do, and thank

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>you for your You have a very engaged audience that

0:29:52.200 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you've built, so thank thanks all around. Thank you. That

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>is it for me today, dear friends, Aunt woke f

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>as always, Power to the people and to all the people. Power,

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>get woke and stay woke as fuck.