WEBVTT - Delta Variant Concerns as Kids Head Back-to-School

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carole Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanibek. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all harnessing the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Okay, it's all about when

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 1>you think about the narrative of this pandemic, how it's evolved,

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>how it's had an arc since the beginning. I think

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>now where we are in the narrative is the delta

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>variant and vaccine nations, getting people vaccinated, getting who vaccinated?

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 1>How young? How old? Uh, it's now turning towards the

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>very youngest. We think about getting back to school, and

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>there's lots of discussions and arguments to be made on

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>both sides. Dr Elizabeth med joins US. She's medical director

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of Pediatric Quality and safety at this Whedish Health Services

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the phone from Seattle. Uh dr me,

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. I guess you know.

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Lots of parts of the country are just about going

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>back to school, and California starts a week from Monday.

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh Here on East Coast, it's it's right after a

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>labor day. But the discussion is who should get vaccinated

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>as we think about back to school, should we be

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>should we be getting kids vaccinated? And how young? You know,

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I think absolutely. What we recommend is that kids twelve

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and over who are eligible for the vaccine get the

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 1>vaccine and get it soon. You know. The reality is

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that it takes several weeks between the couple of doses

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and then full immunity two weeks after that second dose.

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>And so for many kids who haven't gotten the vaccine yet,

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>we're already sort of talking about post going back to

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 1>school dates for them to be fully fully protected. The

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>cover of the new issue of Bloomberg Business Week is

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>all about In the cover story of today's Big Take,

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk about it in just a few minutes.

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>It's all about vaccine mandates for kids, and there's some

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty startling. UH statistic in here, UH the rollout of

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>shots to mills of kids ages twelve to seventeen, Although

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>they account for seven point five percent of the U

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>S population, it's really lagged. Only of that group has

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:16.119
<v Speaker 1>received their first dose. Why is that, doctor made? Why

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>are we seeing this reluctance from parents to inoculate their

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>kids When we think about vaccines in the early parts

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of our lives, that's when we get the most vaccines. Yeah,

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that's right. You know. I think there are a couple

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>of factors that play into that. And so one of

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:32.519
<v Speaker 1>those factors, I think is that we know that older

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>adults tend to get sicker, right, and so we know

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that although kids can get very thick, can end up

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>in the i C you can die from COVID, can

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>have long COVID, and all those other complications that we

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>think about, the rates of that happening in children and

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>teens are significantly lower than an older adults. And so

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that for many people who are high risk,

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, they want to get the vaccine for themselves

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>as soon as possible, and they may think differently about

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it when it comes to their kids. I think the

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>other factor here is that we know it's hard to

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>make a health care decision for yourself, and it's even

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>harder to make it for someone else, and so people,

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I think are feeling like they want to make sure

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>they have all of their questions before they proceed with

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>vaccines for their children. So dr me, what do we

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>know about how young we could, uh, we can give

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>this vaccine to a person? How young can they be? Mentioned?

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Twelve and older? How about some of the younger kids? Yeah,

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>so at this point it's approved for twelve and over.

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>We anticipate that it will be approved for younger children,

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>probably down to age five, potentially down to age two,

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>by kind of early to mid fall, and I know

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of parents are desperately waiting for those

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>dates to get their younger children vaccinated. And the reality

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of this pandemic is that, I think even for families

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>where everyone who's eligible has had the vaccine, so everybody

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>twelve and older and then the adults in the household,

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>many of those families still have younger children who are

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>not yet eligible. And so I think it's hard to

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of feel like we can get back to life

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>as normal for our families when we still have one

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>or more young children that aren't yet able to get

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine who are living in our house. Doctor. Back

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in May, Dr Fauci, the nation's top infectious disease doctor,

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>he said that by the first quarter of two UH

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have quote enough information regarding safety and

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>UH immune genicity. You can help me out with that

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 1>one if you want to be able to vaccinate children

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 1>at any age. Does do you agree with that timeline

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that in the first part of next year we're gonna

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>be able to vaccinate newborns to UH to two year olds. Yeah,

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that rings true for the most part. I mean, um,

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>we know that there are ongoing trials down to age

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>six months for multiple of the vaccines, and so we

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>anticipate having quite a bit of safety data even down

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 1>to union since I would guess that it will be

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>very similar to the flu shot, and so for the

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>flu shot, we start giving that at six months and older.

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not really convinced that we're going to be

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>vaccinating You weren't against COVID anytime soon, but I think

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>those young infants kind of six months and older will

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly be in the next way. What do we know

0:04:57.240 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>about dosage I was surprised when when my son got

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>his first flu shot that he got two of them

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>separated a few months apart, whereas I only got one,

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and it was that he got double passage. Basically, so

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>for that first year, for any child who's seven or younger,

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>for that first year, we recommend getting two doses a

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>month apart to really kind of stimulate the immune system

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 1>because for many vaccines, that first sort of primed you,

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and then that second dose is really what confers the

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>full immunity. And after that we consider that yearly dose

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of a booster. And so it may be the

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>same with with COVID. You know, we're already talking about

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.479
<v Speaker 1>potentially having boosters for high risk groups that have already

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>received the two vaccine series, so I think it will

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>be probably fairly similar to that. Dr me just quickly,

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>do you think schools will mandate vaccinations. I don't see

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that happening personally until they help full FDA approval for

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the age groups that we're talking about, and so I

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>think at that point we can really have that discussion.

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>But in my mind, it is unlikely to happen until

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>we reached that milestone, and hopefully that will be in

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the next few months. So do you think full approval

0:05:57.880 --> 0:05:59.799
<v Speaker 1>just in the last thirty seconds here, we could see

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that by next school year, so that next school year

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>they'll be mandated. I think it's there possible. And you know,

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:09.359
<v Speaker 1>so much of this is dependent on what is happening

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, and that has been very changeable,

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>so we really have had to be nimble with our

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>guidance and I think that will continue to ring true

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 1>as we enter of the winter and then spring next year.

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Dr Mead, We like talking to people who are in hospitals,

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>who are on the ground, who are talking to patients,

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>who are working with patients, just to get an update

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.359
<v Speaker 1>from the front lines. Are you seeing younger and younger

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 1>patients in your hospital than at other points during the pandemic?

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 1>We really are, you know. I'm a I'm a hospital pedutrician,

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>so I only work in the hospital. I see newborns

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.840
<v Speaker 1>up to eighteen who are sick, who are hospitalized, and

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you that throughout the pandemic, although the

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:47.159
<v Speaker 1>rates are lower than in adults and especially older adults,

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 1>we have seen young infants, kids, and teens who are

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 1>hospitalized who are very ill with COVID who are in

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the ICU, kids who are having long COVID symptoms. So

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 1>although the rates are lower, I think it's really important

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to reinforce for people this is still a disease that

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>can cause really critical illness in newborns all the way

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>through those those children and teenage years. So Dr me,

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>what are when you do see these patients and you know,

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>are most of them unvaccinated? And if so, what are

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>some of the typical reasons that you're finding, uh in

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>your hospital? You know, the majority of patients that are

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>showing up to the hospital that are very sick, that

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>are ending up in the ice with the delta variant

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in particular, are on vaccinated. So we know that the

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of those statients have not received the vaccine.

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's such an important point because we

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>know that although people who are vaccinated can transmit the

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>delta variant, they are vastly less likely to end up

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>with severe symptoms in the hospital, in the i CU

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>or to die from COVID. Right, So, what we're seeing

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>across the country is that it seems to be the

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>skewing now to younger people who are not vaccinated. So teams,

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and all the young adults to people in their twenties

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and thirties who have not received the vaccine, who are

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>ending up in the hospital and who are very, very

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>very sick on adulta variant in particular, if I think

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>back to how I felt at the beginning of this

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>pandemic and the way that I spoke with friends parents

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of young kids, we always said to each other, Hey,

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>this could be so much worse. This could be something

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that is really a big danger to our kids. And

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering, now, if we've gotten to that point, what

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>do we know about how dangerous the delta variant is

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>two kids? Is it more dangerous than the earlier or

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>or or the earlier versions of COVID nineteen that we

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>saw here in the US and in March April may

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>have last year. You know, the comprehensive data on that

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>really remains to be seen. So we don't have good

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>national data at this point on what the actual sort

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>of increase in rates of serious illness are. We do

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:39.839
<v Speaker 1>know that it is still thankfully more rare in kids

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and teens, and we're very grateful for that because that's

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.439
<v Speaker 1>not something we typically see in pediatrics when it comes

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to infectious disease, right, usually children get much thicker than adults,

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and so this seems to be different than that, which

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:53.719
<v Speaker 1>is good. But we know that rates of infection are skyrocketing.

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.679
<v Speaker 1>So we had about seventy two pediatric cases in the

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>last week. That was almost double the number from the

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>prior week, and it was five times the number that

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>we were seeing during the weeks in June. And so

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>as we start to see the numbers of six children

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and children who are positive for COVID going up, we

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:11.719
<v Speaker 1>know that those total numbers of kids who are really sick,

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>who are ending up in the hospital will also go up.

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>So Dr Me just give us a sense of how

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>things are in Seattle. Here in New York City, we're

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing cases go up, even though we have very high

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>vaccination rates. What's the how are things in Seattle? You know? Unfortunately,

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>across the country, we are starting to see those bed

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 1>numbers go up. So we're seeing hospitals start to fill again.

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing the number of cases go up. We're seeing

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the number of I see you admissions go up. There's

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>an estimation that there's about fifty thou people across the

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>country getting hospital that's with COVID right now, and so

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>we are very very concerned. I mean, these are numbers

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that we were seeing sort of at the height of

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, and we really had gotten better for some

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>time as people started to get vaccinated, and now with

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:54.079
<v Speaker 1>the delta variant and that increased contagion and transmitsibility, we're

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing those numbers go up again. So what I would

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>just say is, we know for certain the absolute best

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>way to protect yourself and the other people who live

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>with you or who you have close contact with from

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the delta variant is to get vaccinated, because we know

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that will dramatically decrease your risk of ending up in

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.199
<v Speaker 1>the hospital or dying from COVID. DR me just in

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the last seconds that we have. What do you tell

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>parents who come to you concerned that their kids under

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>twelve can't yet be vaccinated and they're concerned about them

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>actually getting COVID. I have so many parents who have

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>that concern, who are just desperate for the vaccine to

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>be approved for their younger children. We have a six

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>year old in my house who's not yet eligible, who

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>can't wait until he's able to get the vaccine, and

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's actually the majority of parents that I

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>talked to is who are really saying, you know, the

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>older kids are vaccinated or I'm vaccinated. I just can't

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>wait until my younger kids can get this so that

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>we can really feel like our whole bottle and our

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>whole family is protected. And my great hope is that

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that will happen really within the next couple of months.

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>It certainly seems to be the direction that things are going.

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Dr Elizabeth Mead, a medical director of pediatric Quality and

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Safety at Swedish Health Services, joining us on the phone

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>from Seattle. A big thank you for joining us this afternoon.

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>The new issue of Bloomberg Business Wig magazine. It is

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>available on newsstands now and at Bloomberg dot com Slash

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>business Week. The cover story also Today's big Take. It's

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>all about vaccine mandates for kids. Is it the next

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>big back to school fight? Children have to get vaccinated

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.959
<v Speaker 1>for less urgent threats and it works, So why not

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>with COVID? That's the big question. Joining us now is

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Joel Webber, editor at Bloomberg Business Week. He joins us

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>on the remote from Massachusetts. Riley Griffin, his healthcare reporter

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News. She joins us from New York City.

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for joining us today. UM, I'm Joel.

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with you. I I was really

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>surprised to see the lack of vaccine uptake in kids

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:48.959
<v Speaker 1>who are ages twelve to seventeen only have received their

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>first dose. What why is that? Yeah, there's definitely, um,

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a sense of of apathy and it has it's going

0:11:56.120 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to have some um, serious implications, I think, UM in

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the next weeks and months, especially as we're dealing with

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>this delta surge. You know that apathy is it's sort

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>of multifaceted and and some of that we go into

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>in the story. UM. The fact that kids haven't been

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>quite as susceptible yet is to covid is, I think

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the driving reasons. UM. There's also I think

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:26.319
<v Speaker 1>a feeling that the vaccines currently have emergency youth as authorization.

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>They don't have the full f d A blessing. So

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there's still some vaccine hesitancy around it. UM.

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>And we've seen, you know, other countries even take slightly

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>different approaches to how kids are supposed to be vaccinated.

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:41.719
<v Speaker 1>So I think they're that all creates a little bit

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of a fog that has um led to a slow adoption.

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think where Riley and Susie King King story

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 1>goes here is an important one because as we're just

0:12:55.720 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing now with New York mandating vaccines for for restaurants, friends,

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>in the not so distant future, we could very easily

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>see schools mandating vaccines. And one of the main questions

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that m Riley, i'd like you supposed to you is,

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, look like kids get vaccinated for all sorts

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of things that are far less urgent than COVID. So

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>could we potentially see schools manding meaning that mandating COVID immunization. Absolutely,

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that's a great question, and it's

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 1>one that we've seen play out, and there's precedent four.

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, educators are having a debate on their hands

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>right now as to whether to implement implement mandates requiring

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen vaccines as they routinely do for measle polio

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and other diseases, or to punt because of politics and

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:46.839
<v Speaker 1>let parents decide. This has really become so political, um

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>in part because of that emergency use authorization that you described,

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>But once there's a full approval in place. I have

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>no doubt that schools um at the request of states,

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>are going to put similar requirements in place. UM. This

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>is really just a part of the bedrock of our

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 1>education education system, and any parent listening knows that to

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>be true. UM. And these mandates persist even though they've

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>been so successful that the risk of contracting some of

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the illnesses they cover is almost non existent. You know,

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>what I like to put in perspective is that the

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>last US case of polio dates back to nineteen seventy nine,

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and yet all fifty states in the District of Columbia

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>require kids to get vaccinated with a polio shot before

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>going to school. Riley, You know, I fear that this

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to get really, really ugly, and really personal

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and really localized. Do we have any evidence or do

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>we have any precedent here for a COVID nineteen requirement,

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>because we've got a lot of states I'm thinking in

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the South and the West, they're going back to school.

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>If they're they're not already back, they're going back in

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the next week or two. Yeah, So what we have

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>right now is a legal vacuum because we've never seen

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>before a mandate put in play ace for an emergency

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>use authorized vaccine. That's not to say states can't do it.

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>They are just a little hesitant to wade out into

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>those tumultualist waters. But let me take you back into

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>history for a moment, because in nineteen o five, the U. S.

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court ruled to say that mandates are allowed, that

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 1>states can require vaccination, and that individual liberties are not absolute,

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that the average person cannot say, hey, in the face

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of a public health pandemic, we are going to reject

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine mandate. And the first mandate actually for school

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>kids goes back even further to eighteen fifty five. So

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a great deal of precedent um schools themselves to

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>know that this could likely be coming. I've spoken with

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>many administrators who said they're just waiting to get more

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>parents on board. They want to bolster trust and confidence,

0:15:56.480 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>especially while we still have that eu A status. How

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>do they tell you, Riley, that they're getting parents on board,

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>because we probably have a lot of parents who themselves

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>are not vaccinated, who are saying, no way, no, how,

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 1>when this thing becomes available for my kid. Well, one

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>thing they're doing is turning to community organizers, those in

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the community that people trust. UM. Another thing is going

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to be waiting for additional data. You've got data on

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the under twelve cohort coming this fall. We'll see data

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>from the Sizer BioNTech vaccine to be specific as soon

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>as September. And one thing people have pitched is why

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>not wait instead for that full approval before mandating the shots,

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>So that could push things back a little bit further.

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll see this be somewhat of a patchwork

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of policies across all fifty states. We're already seeing that,

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of course, UM play out with masks, but you could

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>see some of the early and more competent states in

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>terms of vaccination come out and say we need kids,

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>at least in that adolescent population where we've already seen

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>an authorization, UM get the shot going into the false

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>school year. So you know, one thing that really feels like,

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>UM they're leading by but from behind here is the

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the FDA, really and and it seems like they're kind

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:20.439
<v Speaker 1>of they've been slow walking a bit on the on

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the regular for for adults front, and then that becomes

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>almost UM pivotal for for uptick of vaccinating younger kids.

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>What's going on with the FDA? Why is it taking

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>so long? So the FDA is saying they've expedited the

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>process for that sixteen plus cohort and that we could

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>know as soon as September really whether or not that

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>group is going to get a full approval. And US

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>health officials all the way up to Biden himself are

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>really hopeful that that's going to sway hesitant adults. Now

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>with kids, they need six months of safety data, So

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you can't actually even apply for this biologics license that's

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 1>what it's called in technical terms, until you have that

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>six months. So we're going to see it take a

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit of time before FISER even makes the approach

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 1>to get a full approval for younger children. Um, what

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>can they do in the meantime, Again, it's just turned

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to those community organizers, activists, those at the grassroots level.

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Riley Griffin, his healthcare reporter at Bloomberg News. Riley's stories

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 1>on the cover of the new issue of Bloomberg Days

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:29.920
<v Speaker 1>This Week magazine. It's available on newsstands and at Bloomberg

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 1>dot com Slash Business Week. Also joining us Joel Webber,

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 1>editor of the magazine. This is Bloomberg Business Week with

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio.

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Will be very fluid right now. We work UH and

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.439
<v Speaker 1>it's on a daily for the team that's working on it,

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>but weekly from a leadership team, we're looking at making

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>sure we understand the semi conductor situation, and we're allocating

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>chips to our highest demand to take care of our

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>customers and also the vehicles that are in plants that

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>are capacity constraint, and it is especially your full size

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>trucks and suv. That was GM CEO Mary Barra saying

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that company will be very fluid on allocating trips and

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 1>it is currently focused on the highest demand vehicle. She

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>appeared with Bloomberg David Weston earlier today on Bloomberg Surveillance.

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, when we talk autos, Tim, it's best to

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>get in an expert, and we're talking about Kevin Tyney,

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and he's a theater senior autos analyst from Bloomberg Intelligence

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the phone from New Jersey. When I

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:28.360
<v Speaker 1>say he's an auto guy, he's the guy that's got

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>like grease under his fingernails. He's always taking a part

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>cars putting him back together. Like when he bought his house,

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 1>He's they basically said, I bought a garage that had

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>a house attached to it. So that's kind of you know,

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>he's a real auto geek. Evan so Kevin. So that

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>GM stock us down nine percent today, what gives? Yeah,

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming it's uh, probably more in my eyes, an

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>indictment of what consensus was than really where GM is at. UM.

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe that that little bear's tone uh during

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the all but you know, I don't think that's that's

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>something that's specifically to GM. Right, you're still navigating UM

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>supply constraints, you know, chip shortage, whatever it winds up being.

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>But I gotta tell you, you you know, some of the

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>pricing data, that margin data is is pretty incredible. The

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing that the industry has probably worked decades

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to get to is kind of where it is now.

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>And now it's it's a matter of managing it beyond

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 1>once we get out of you know, post pandemic, post

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:33.880
<v Speaker 1>chip shortage. How they manage the business, How do they

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>do that? How do they navigate through the chip shortage?

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Like what are they doing right now? Because we heard

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the year that car companies were even making

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>changes to how they were building cars because they couldn't

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.199
<v Speaker 1>get the right chips right. And and I'll tell you him,

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the things that's incredible. And I

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>actually have to go back after this call to check

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the numbers again. But you know, I think Mary Barr

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>talked about it. The focus is on the highest revenue

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and profit can tributing vehicles, and that's going to be

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>full size SUVs and pickup trucks. But I was looking

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:07.679
<v Speaker 1>at the numbers for the US for the second quarter

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and this really jumped out at me. The average car

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>coop and sedan for General motors was forty two dollars

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>in the US, right, And all that means is that

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and now granted there was only forty thousand units sold

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:25.400
<v Speaker 1>in the quarter, but that's a nine thousand dollar increase

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>from the first quarter sequentially, which basically says that all

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the low margin, um you know, low price vehicles are

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>out of the mix. Um the like, the best selling

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>vehicle was Chevrolet Bolt at like forty dollars, and then

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you have the second best selling was Corvette at eight

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>two tho dollars. And we're seeing this across all the automakers.

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, Ford also Mustang is the best selling car,

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:54.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, so you're talking about car prices, you know,

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>as in terms of average transaction that are near where

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>trucks are now because you don't have any of that

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>low profit margins stuff that was being made simply to

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>hit corporate average fuel economy or missions targets. Are we

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>going to ever? Is it? Is the intry just going

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to snap back to pre pandemic levels in terms of inventories,

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>in terms of incentives. And I mean because there's really

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>this is the worst time to be out looking for

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a car. Yeah, And and the short answer is no,

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think any automakers, at least our domestic guys

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>right if you had you know, if you look at

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 1>a Toyota or Subaru or even a Honda in the

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 1>United States, you know they they're inventory levels historically are

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>way more manageable than what the old Fiat Chrysler now

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 1>Stalantis or Ford or General motors run out. So if

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you figure sixty days historically is considered manageable, our domestic

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 1>guys would typically be in the seventies to eighties range,

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the the high volume Asian brands would

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>be closer to fifty days. So I think I think

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>what you know, Ford and GM have talked out as

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 1>getting and staying consistently in that fifty to sixty day range. Um,

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, so that's gonna support pricing, that's going to

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>support margins, uh and get them all discounting. Now, Paul

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>is like less than one percent. Typically it's six, right,

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 1>so you could walk into a dealership and assume six

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>percent off the sticker price right off the bat. Now

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>it's less than one. Yeah, just the demand is their

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 1>supply isn't right, Hey, Kevin, we learned yesterday that GM

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to idle some North American truck plants next

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:33.199
<v Speaker 1>week due to chip shortages. Mike McKee pointing out that

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>usually automakers shut plants for retooling during July, but it's

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>been almost forgotten because of distortions that we've seen during

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. How should we read into that move? Yeah,

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that that would be for the model gear change over

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 1>tim you know, you would see uh, you know, just

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>machinery updates and and new processes put in place during

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that summer shut down. That's normal. You know, as you

0:23:57.000 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>said that, this is a different kind of world in

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a different kind of year. So I'm not sure it's

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>it's due to that. Um. You know, if you have

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 1>and it's like this with any part in a vehicle, right,

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:11.360
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have luck nuts, you don't have a car, right,

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>If you don't have a steering wheel, if you don't

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>have a chip, you can't finish it and you can't

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:18.239
<v Speaker 1>drive it. So um, so there's probably a little bit

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>more of that. It's probably only a week or so, um,

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, and then the focus will be back on

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>on the truck side. So you know, there's there's no doubt.

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about most manufacturers, retail or in the twenty

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 1>two thirty days supply, which is just crazy. So, um,

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll get it back closer to that fifty sixty,

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think we're getting back to eight Kevin,

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>just real quick, thirty seconds, Tim, and I saw that

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the New York Car Show is canceled. I guess because

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of COVID. Is that a big deal for the automostry

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.679
<v Speaker 1>the car guys? It is? I mean, I I'm in

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>Detroit in another week or two, you know, Pebble Beaches

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.400
<v Speaker 1>coming up, and I think, really all the car guys

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 1>are really looking to get back out there and get

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>together and congregate. Uh So I was kind of I

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>was taken aback by that, and I'm hoping that doesn't

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>set off the string for you know, the other events

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that are scheduled already through the you know, through the

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>second half of the year. What's what's the material impact

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>on companies though, because this is a time where the

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>companies show media what their cars are, right, it's not

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that big of a deal. They've been able to survive

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>without them, sure, yeah. And and it is just that

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>in New York was mostly had become the luxury show,

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 1>in California is mostly the imports show, and Detroit is

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the domestic show. So yeah, not probably not a huge

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 1>impact to the bottom line. But I gotta say it's

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>fun to go to sure. Yeah. Yeah, I've gotten to

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>go a few times. It's a great one. Kevin Tynan,

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 1>senior autos analyst at Bloomberg Intelli, is joining us from

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Headquarters in Princeton, New Jersey, talking all things

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 1>GM and autos. Hey paul Um six point six five

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars I saw that number. How does that sound

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 1>to you? That sounds like, you know, the g d

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>P of a you know, relatively small kind tree. But

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not, it's not. It's in fact, Elon Musk's uh

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 1>compensation in the year as CEO of of Tesla, and

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the outside compensation that Elon Musk saw first awarded him

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago is increasingly hitting other companies. In

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the top folks at other companies. Andre's Melon, the wealth

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 1>reporter at Bloomberg News, writes about that in a story

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 1>out this morning. He joins us now in the Bloomberg

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Interactive Brokers studio. I you notice I said compensation, full compensation.

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I didn't say salary because this is not his salary.

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>This is his total compensation. Take us through how this

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:40.919
<v Speaker 1>has worked, because it's a little complicated. Then, you know,

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>just getting paid six billion dollars, you know, twenty four

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 1>times a year. Yes, nobody gets that in bi weekly paychecks. Right.

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:52.120
<v Speaker 1>What happens is that you get awarded large chunks of equity.

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>CEOs of public parid of companies mostly get paid in equity.

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>And the special thing about equity is that it rises

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>in value, especially when we're in a bull market, which

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>we've been in for quite some time, except for a

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>brief dip last year. Um, then the pay ends up

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>being worth quite a bit. Ellon got a ton of

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:14.159
<v Speaker 1>money three years ago and that sended up being worth

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>just you know, eye popping amounts, Like you said, GDP

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of a small country almost. So, I like in your story,

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 1>h one of the folks your chat with cited something

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the great Man theory. I mean, what is the great

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Man theory? And how does it how does it relate

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to compensation? So in this context, it really goes back

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to the idea that companies increasingly are staking larger and

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:44.360
<v Speaker 1>larger pay packages on just the CEO saying that we're

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna issue this big award that will pay the CEO

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of billions, hundreds of millions of dollars or even

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a billion or two if the company triples in size

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and value or you know, grows in size and value

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 1>by tenfold. And just taking that on on the CEO

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of gets the idea that it's it's just you

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 1>stake it on one guy, and and that's being done

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to an extent that we haven't really seen before. What

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:15.959
<v Speaker 1>do shareholders think of this? They are largely fine with

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 1>it um even though some investors are out or many

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>investors have been out there saying that, you know, economy

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>has to work for everybody. It's important that companies take

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 1>care of their employees. But when push comes to shove,

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to CEO compensation, sort of the mantra

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 1>that rules among investors is that if there's performance, it's

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>okay with pay. If there's a lot of performance, it's

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>okay with a lot of pay. And if you take

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that logic and draw it to an extreme, then it

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't become so crazy to pay a CEO a few

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars if the market value increases by say billion,

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>because it's just a small share of it, right. Crazy

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>part ends up being when you're paying one person this

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>even though he might be in charge of a company

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that employs ten thousand people, or a hundred thousand people,

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>or half a million people. And that's what the critics

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>are taking aim at, because that goes to the whole

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>income inequality, but really wealth inequality. It just shines a

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>light on it, and we see it every year when

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>proxy statements are filed and we see what some of

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:22.080
<v Speaker 1>these folks are getting paid. But some of these pay

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>packages that you cite in your story there, these are new.

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>These are like you know, hundred million dollar grants of options,

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you know that can just explode in value. And it's

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>not just the founders that get these. These are just

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>hired guns. That's what's new. I think, Yes, these are

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:43.719
<v Speaker 1>people on the payroll, they're hired. Help to put it colloquially,

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm wondering what happens in a bear market and

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>how this changes. Do CEOs start coming and saying, actually,

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather get compensated differently. So it's not just you

0:29:57.440 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>don't get hired. You don't get to stay CEO if

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't think the cup the stock is going to

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>go higher. So we got a small window of into

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that last year when the coronavirus took hold of the

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 1>nation and the markets went haywire and the outlook for

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>many companies changed pretty drastically. Obviously, bonus targets and three

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>year plans for share payouts all of a sudden were

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 1>obsolete and and didn't reflect reality. UM if a board

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 1>then would be um teetotal when it comes to pay

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 1>for performance and saying that this is ironclad. We're not

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>changing anything, then a lot of CEOs would have lost

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 1>out on a lot of money. What more than three

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 1>companies ended up doing was to tweak performance targets, or

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>issue new awards to make CEO's whole, or give them

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>extra opportunities to make their money. So that doesn't necessarily

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 1>reflect what every company did, but it's at least more

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 1>than three d companies did it. So that should give

0:30:55.240 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you some idea of the willingness to price the options.

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>That's what you ask for. You walk into your compensation

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 1>community to reprice my option. PA, I think I's on

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>my media review coming up, so and and and I

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>understand right, I mean if if, if this is someone

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 1>has value, the board generally is going to cave see

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that and honors. Just in the fifteen seconds we have left,

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>do we see this spreading even more than I already has.

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 1>What we don't see is any counter force that would

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 1>stop it? Um? I have I have yet to see that.

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll honder. Smelling Wealth, reporter for Bloomberg News.

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 1>He's with us in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. His

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 1>news story Elon Musk's outrageous Moonshot award catches on across America.

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 1>It has Elon Musk's numbers in there in addition to

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 1>nine other CEOs. How much they got paid last year

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and it is quite a lot of money. Honors, Thanks

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us a journal. Yeah, but you

0:31:53.200 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 1>let me drive. Oh no, no, no, no, pleasel made

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to drive a ball. Just drive baby. Good

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 1>questions the drive to the globe community. Thanks, we'll drive

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 1>us down on Bloomberg Radio. All right, we have the

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 1>markets pulling back just slightly, but let's face it, folks,

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>we are at or near all time highs. We have

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a FED that, despite some comments by FED Vice chair

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Clarida about potential tapering some point in in the future,

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 1>we have about as accommodative FED as you can ever want.

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 1>We've got strong earnings coming through. So what do you

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 1>do in this market? We'll check in with a professional

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Michael Sheldon. He's executive director and chief investment officer of

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 1>High Tower r d M Financial Group. He joins us

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from Westport, Connecticut. So, Michael, I've got

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a friend. He goes by the name of Tom Keane.

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to get him into the market, but he

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 1>just keeps missing some entry points. What are you doing

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 1>with your clients right here, right now. Well, I think

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 1>it's important we remain generally constructive in our longer term

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>outlook for the markets, and we think the tail winds

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 1>for that are continued growth in consumer and business spending

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 1>along with rising corporate profits. Back in March of this year,

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the estimate was that this year corporate profits would rise

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 1>about and now they're up to about on a year

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of a year basis, and the estimates are for continued

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>growth over the next couple of years, although more moderate

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>than we're seeing this year. So I think ultimately we're

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 1>likely to see a handoff from monetary and fiscal policy

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that's what's really helped rejuice the economy and gotten things

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 1>going to one that's fueled by the private sector. And

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>we clearly could see a few bumps in the road

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 1>in an average year. Since nineteen eighty, for example, the

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>we've seen an entry year draw down of about four

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 1>while the markets have still finished positive about three quarters

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of the time. So over overall we remain generally positive

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and there will be some pullback along the way, and

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that's something investors need to be prepared for. How big

0:34:03.080 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of a pullback should we be prepared for are we

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>talking I mean something like five percent? Are we talking?

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I think? I think, which is a higher level you

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 1>just mentioned is more is less likely? Excuse me, because

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the kind of that's really what you what you

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:20.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of associate with a bear market, and bear markets

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:23.399
<v Speaker 1>typically really only happen if there's some kind of exogeneous

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 1>event or when we're having a recession. And right now,

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:29.359
<v Speaker 1>the economic data overall is just generally pretty positive. So

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, over the past twelve months, for example, we've

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 1>had several pullbacks of anywhere between about four percent and

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 1>nine percent, So something in that range wouldn't be unheard of.

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 1>And again just keep in the back of your mind

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that since we had an average intra year draw down

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of about fourteen percent, so that shouldn't be I mean,

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:52.919
<v Speaker 1>that's also a possibility as well. Alright, Michael. So there

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:55.400
<v Speaker 1>is a debate in the market between those folks that

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 1>are you know, sticking with the tried and true growth stories,

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:00.279
<v Speaker 1>the apples, the Amazons, the one that got them to

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>this party. Some folks really over the last year have

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 1>really done well with a rotation trade into some more

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 1>cyclical names. Maybe the banks maybe some energy, maybe some

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:11.320
<v Speaker 1>small caps. Where are you in that discussion, that debate,

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's a good question right now. So we've

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 1>definitely seen some rotation in the market. UM growth has

0:35:17.680 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 1>really generally outperformed value for much of the past decade

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 1>or so, only every once in a while and maybe

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:24.760
<v Speaker 1>for a quarter or a month or so, has grown.

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Has value outperformed growth. Same thing with foreign The US

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:30.720
<v Speaker 1>has outperformed foreign markets for much of the past decade.

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 1>And over the past uh six to twelve months or so,

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 1>we had almost a perfect cocktail. We had a rise

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 1>in global growth, we had a rise in corporate profit expectations,

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:42.799
<v Speaker 1>arise in interest rates and inflation, and that gave us

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good bump up in value stocks and foreign

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:49.279
<v Speaker 1>stocks actually started to do better. So now over just

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 1>over the past few months because of the growth in

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the delta variant, because of the rise of inflation UM

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:59.439
<v Speaker 1>combined with the decline and interest rates as investors worry

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 1>about potent growth, we've started to see a rotation back

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:05.399
<v Speaker 1>into growth. So our thinking is right now that we're

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of in this transition, and we think you really

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 1>want to have a barbell approach, meaning you want to

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 1>have broad exposure to a range of sectors. We do

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 1>think you want to have growth and you want to

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:18.279
<v Speaker 1>have broad exposure at this point, I gotta tell you,

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Michael Paul Sweeney yesterday talking with Dave Wilson, Uh, they

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:24.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of had me feeling like a little fomo with

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the way the markets have been in recent years and

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:29.959
<v Speaker 1>not just in recent years, but really for the past

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:32.960
<v Speaker 1>few decades. Yeah, you made a mention of the Fidelity

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Contra Fund and just throwing money near four one k

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:38.239
<v Speaker 1>in there and looking brilliant, and it makes me think,

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's for me and my peers, people who

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:42.879
<v Speaker 1>are sort of midway through their careers, how we're how

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 1>we should be thinking about growth and about how we

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 1>should be thinking about realistic growth, especially given what we've

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:50.759
<v Speaker 1>seen in the last few decades, and whether or not

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that sustainable. Well, that's a good point. I'm in the

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:56.720
<v Speaker 1>current year right now, we're forecast to see approximately about

0:36:56.719 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 1>six and a half GDP growth, which is the fastest

0:36:59.239 --> 0:37:01.760
<v Speaker 1>growth we've seen in number of decades. And the reasons

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:04.800
<v Speaker 1>behind that are because of the incredible fiscal and monetary

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>support that we've seen to health the economy. First to

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 1>sort of get out of a downturn in early last year,

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 1>but by the monetary policy has continued as they fed

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:16.439
<v Speaker 1>by and twenty billion of bonds every month, which will

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 1>start to slow for next year. For reference, the GDP

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 1>estimate is about four that's still about twice the average

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of the past ten years or so. So I think

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 1>ultimately growth should start to slow somewhat. There are some variables,

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>for example, of productivity growth can rise above historic levels

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 1>due to things like technology uh and disruptive technology that

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>could help increase the rate of GDP growth. But ultimately,

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 1>because of all the depth that's out there, economic growth

0:37:46.760 --> 0:37:50.400
<v Speaker 1>will probably start to slow again. After strong growth this

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 1>year and next year. Mike, we mentioned some international I

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's probably an area we probably don't talk enough about.

0:37:56.560 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about allocating capital to international mark kids,

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:04.279
<v Speaker 1>whether they be developed or developing emerging markets. Yeah, so

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a great question. Um. You know, as as registered

0:38:06.880 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 1>investment advisors, we have to look at our asset allocation

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 1>on a regular basis, and we've generally been overweight the

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 1>US versus far in the past decade, which has been

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good decision. But um, these kind of things

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 1>go in cycles, and historically after a period of outperformance,

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:25.239
<v Speaker 1>foreign markets start to perform better. So looking at the

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 1>environment right now, foreign markets have more attractive valuation levels,

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:32.759
<v Speaker 1>they have higher dividend yields, and there's a variety a

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 1>large number of companies outside the U S which US

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:38.960
<v Speaker 1>companies would gain access to by investing in foreign stocks

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 1>versus US stocks. So the trade really hasn't worked that

0:38:42.080 --> 0:38:44.880
<v Speaker 1>well so far this year, especially in emerging markets. But

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 1>we think investors who have underweighted foreign stocks for much

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of the past decade or so should start to take

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a look at their allocation and and if the global

0:38:52.480 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 1>recovery continues and the delta variants starts to recede, that

0:38:57.080 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 1>should provide a bit of a tail when for foreign

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 1>markets in period ahead. Is that is that an f

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 1>to you or a when we think it's a win

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 1>not an if? What? What? How concern should we be

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 1>or how concern should investors be about the spread of

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the delta variant not just in the United States but

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 1>around the world. Yeah, I think generally speaking, um, the

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 1>developed markets around the world have obviously had more vaccinations,

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and the emerging markets and other parts of the world

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 1>have had less access to two vaccinations. UH, the delta

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 1>variant is certainly one of our near term concerns, and

0:39:31.440 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that along with rising inflation and worries about when the

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:37.839
<v Speaker 1>Fed will start to remove some of its policy accommodations,

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:39.799
<v Speaker 1>along with the fact interest rates have gone down, and

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of a lot of explicit explanations for why

0:39:42.600 --> 0:39:45.879
<v Speaker 1>interest rates have started to go down. Um, but those

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of factors all together could lead to maybe a

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 1>speed bump or a pullback as we head into the

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 1>August September October period. But I think more importantly, we

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 1>think the bigger picture is that economic cycle and the

0:39:57.320 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 1>last a period of years as a period as opposed

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to a period of months or quarters. Michael Sheldon, executive

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 1>director and a chief investment officer at High Tower r

0:40:05.239 --> 0:40:07.880
<v Speaker 1>d M, a financial group joining us from Westport, Connecticut,

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for taking the time. Thanks for

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:40:15.320 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:20.080
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:40:20.200 --> 0:40:22.960
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube. Search to Bloomberg Global News