WEBVTT - What to Do About Your Office Crush

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:07.039
<v Speaker 1>From office crushes to dating your boss to secret affairs.

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Is it ever okay to mix love and work? This week,

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about all kinds of office romance. This is

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:32.559
<v Speaker 1>game Plan. Hi. I'm Francesco Leavie. Rebecca Greenfield is on

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.239
<v Speaker 1>vacation this week, but I'm very pleased that we have

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>with us as a guest host, Jenny Kaplan, who is

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:42.639
<v Speaker 1>also co host of Bloomberg's Material World podcast. Jenny, thank

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you for coming in and helping out. I'm very excited

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 1>to be here, especially to talk about this hot topic.

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Oh it's so hot office romance. Let's get right into it.

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>My first question is why why do they even happen?

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Isn't work a place that you go to get work done.

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>What are people doing getting all sexy with each other?

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>It's true, and especially because everyone sort of agrees that

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a bad idea, but you know, I think

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>it really starts with the fact that we just spend

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>so much of our lives at work. I mean, when

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you're not sleeping most of the time you're at the office. Yeah,

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm playing dumb, but I actually think that it's reasonably

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:24.839
<v Speaker 1>obvious why these things do happen. When they happen. Work

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a breeding ground, I think for for

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a romance. You're around these people all the time that

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 1>you work with. It's a it's sort of a safe

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>place to experiment with whether you're compatible with somebody. Like

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>in normal life, if you like somebody, you have to

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>contrive a bunch of reasons to be around them to

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>see if you actually really get along and are attracted

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to each other and want a date. The office is

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a structure that's all set up for you to do that.

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Every day. You can, you can chat, you can have

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>your little office inside jokes, and you can kind of

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>cultivate a crush on somebody over a long period of

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>time without anything being inappropriate about it. It's also sort

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>of a filter. You know that these people likely aren't

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:09.399
<v Speaker 1>serial killers. You see them at the office, you probably

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>know something about their background, and you're not just you know,

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>flipping through pictures on an app. Yes, they're not just

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>some rando that you swept right on or left. And

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>also they're likely to have something in common with you.

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 1>You know, you at least work in the same field.

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 1>Um maybe you have similar job functions, and so that

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that is kind of like a preset baseline level of

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>compatibility that you know you have. So that's all the

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>reasons why it can happen, um, and why it does

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>seem to happen so often. In fact, the stats on

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:46.079
<v Speaker 1>this are pretty clear. Um. There was a survey from

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the Society of Human Resource Management that said one in

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>four people have had an office romance just about So

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>it happens, but there's a lot of ways it can

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>go wrong, right, I Mean, the conventional wisdom is, though

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>it happens, it shouldn't. Yeah, and then I think we

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>should just like break down all the reasons, um, even

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>if it seems kind of obvious. So just to start with,

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>in the best case scenario, when the relationship is two

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>sided and everyone's happy, it can make it hard for

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the people working around you. I mean, you have created

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>this sort of very different relationship, and maybe you're on

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a team with other people who have to work and

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of understand those boundaries and how they've shifted. It's

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of unfair to them, and people are going

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to question whether any of the achievements that you've made

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>are things that you've really gotten on your own merit.

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>If you get a promotion or if you get some

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of special treatment or favoritism. And in fact, in

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that same s h RM survey, companies who said that

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>they had a policy that forbids office romance cited that

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>as one of the main reasons that it could cause favoritism.

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>The other reasons were the potential for sexual harassment claims

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>UM and then retaliation bowl when relationships don't work out,

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>using the workplace as a place to take it out

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>on their ex partner. And even if there isn't, you know,

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>some sort of formal retaliation because of a power dynamic.

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:17.159
<v Speaker 1>There's definitely emotional risk here. I mean, you're working with

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 1>these people all the time, assuming you want to keep

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>your job. If the relationship goes south, you're going to

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>be stuck working with someone who you probably have pretty

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>mixed and potentially sad feelings about. Yeah, I mean, it's

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>it sounds awful. It's just like high school. You have

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to show up every day and see the person that

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you broke up with. Doesn't matter if you unfollow them

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook and Twitter. There they are every day and

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you have to figure out a way to contain your

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>feelings and keep working. So from the company perspective, how

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>do they handle this. Yeah, So I talked to Edward

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Yost from the Society Human Resource Management, the authority on

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>all things HR, and I asked him why so few

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>companies have a policy on this, because according to that survey,

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>youer than half actually even have a policy. And here's

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>what he said. It's always a safer place to go

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to have no policy than to have one in place

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>that you don't adhere to. Uh. And that I mean

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that means that if you have the policy in place,

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you must be willing to part with your very best

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 1>employee if they violate that policy. If that's what the

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>policy says, that it's a zero tolerance you will not

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:28.280
<v Speaker 1>date one of your subordinates and you find out that

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>they are, you must be willing to do that. The

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>other really interesting thing we talked about was in some

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>cases where companies do have a policy around office romance,

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>they require these things called love contracts, which I'll let

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>him explain. Essentially, it's a it's a contract or or

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>a document that acknowledges from both parties that there is

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a consensual relationship, that there's there are no undo pressures

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>being put on one employee or the other to become

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>involved this relationship, and that if something weren't to go

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>wrong with the relationship, that is essentially their personal business,

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and that they're going to keep the personal relationship out

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:15.039
<v Speaker 1>of the office as much as possible, or the fights

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 1>aren't going to happen in the office. They're going to

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>remain professional. And another thing that he really hit on

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>in our conversation was how badly it can go when

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the people in a relationship are in a supervisor supervisor

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>or a manager employee relationship, when there's that imbalance of power,

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>there's so much other stuff going on. It's really no

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>matter how genuine you're feelings for somebody might be, it's

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>really hard to have to do your job appropriately as

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a boss if you've brought that element in. And even

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>if you start off a relationship where you have sort

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>of parallel positions, it can switch and someone can become

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the boss. Someone can become responsible for doing things like

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 1>annual reviews and things like that for a partner, which

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:04.599
<v Speaker 1>just sounds like a whole crazy god yeah or deal,

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.280
<v Speaker 1>or you weren't working on the same project and now

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you are, and suddenly you have all these new questions

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to answer. But instead of just sitting around and scolding

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>people for having office romances. I think we should accept

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>that they happen, and there's got to be a way

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to deal with it when it does, and to get

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>some help with that. I'm very excited about our guest

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>today who is an expert on all things relationships. Cheryl

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Strait is a best selling author. Her books include Wild

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and Tiny Beautiful Things. For years she wrote an advice

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>column called Deer Sugar, and now she co hosts the

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Deer Sugars podcast with Steve Almond. Cheryl, thanks for joining us.

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>It's great to be here. Thanks for having me. So

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you must get a fair number of questions in your

0:07:56.480 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>long career answering relationship questions that have to do with

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>love at the office. Absolutely, I mean there's no We

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>spend so much time at work, whether it be an

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>office or other kind of job, that it's inevitable that

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>people are going to become attracted to each other. And

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the sorts of letters that I get, and now in

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>my work with Steve on the podcast that we get,

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>they sort of fall into three categories. The letters from

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>people who are saying, look, I am feeling really attracted

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to a coworker. And you know, sometimes that attraction is

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>between two single people. UM. Sometimes it's somebody who's married,

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>And so there's that other layer of saying, you know,

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm attracted to my coworker and he or she is married,

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and so am I? And what should we do? And

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 1>really somebody who's trying, I think, to resist that attraction

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>for a number of reasons. Um. And then there are

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>people who are saying, Okay, we made the leap. I

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 1>fell for somebody I work with and we had an

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>affair or we had a fling, or we had a

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>relationship and now it's ended or and now it's gone

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>in this direction that feels kind of ikey and negative

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and what how do we How do I work with

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>somebody who is essentially a former lover? And then that

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>third category are the people who just really fell in

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>love and they happen to work together, sometimes in different,

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>very different roles where there's a power difference, which is

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>always complicated, And the big question there is, you know,

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>how do we manage this at work? Do we keep

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it a secret? Do we do we tell everyone? And

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>what do we do? You know, what do we do here?

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>It is we are in love? And the fact as

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.439
<v Speaker 1>we work together, so when you're facing I mean, these

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>are very different kinds of questions and dilemmas. Do you

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>have particular rules or guidelines that you sort of think

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>apply to office romances? I mean, how do you look

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>at those three different categories and try to advise people

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>on what they should do? I think it's always complicated

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:57.959
<v Speaker 1>when we are talking about love and lust. I mean,

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>most of us realized that that area of sort of

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>human sexuality and desire and emotion, those emotional connections we

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 1>have um sometimes with people we spend a lot of

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>time with. We most of us know what we should do.

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>We most of us know that the general rule is

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>don't bring romance or sex into the office or into

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>your job, your work life. Keep those things separate. And

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the reason for that very clear line is that it

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>gets really complicated when you don't. Most of us would

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>say our most important areas of our lives are our careers,

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in our in our family or home, or romantic relationships.

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>And when you put the two together, it could be

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>really great or it could be really terrible. And in

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.199
<v Speaker 1>some ways it has the potential if that relationship should

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:47.679
<v Speaker 1>go bad to you ruin your your work life, at

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>least temporarily. And so the first advice I have with

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's asking questions about this is, you know, really

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>try to avoid it. Try to keep those realms separate,

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to avoid those complications. But the fact, as we are

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>human and you know, we don't live by guidelines, most

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of us will cross many clear lines in the course

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 1>of our lives, especially our love lives. And so the

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:14.079
<v Speaker 1>biggest piece of advice I give to people is really, um,

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>be very mindful with each step and and to think,

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 1>try to think as clearly as possible about how to

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>keep those realms separate even when you have mixed them up.

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>As you said, most people know better what what do you?

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>And yet it happens like office romance has happened. So

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>what do you think is so enticing about getting into

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>relationships with the people that we work with. I think

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just a great venue frankly to meet people,

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 1>which is really unfortunate. Some of it is really just

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>sheer numbers. I mean, you're spending several hours a day

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>with these other people. I think that most of us,

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I work alone. I'm a writer and in

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a little podcasters. So you know, I don't really go

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to the office and work with other people that when

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I used to have jobs, I you know, fell in

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>love with those people. I mean, you grow to know

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and care for people you spend time with as a

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>general rule, unless of course you loathe them and despise them.

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know, if they're generally good people and you're

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:18.319
<v Speaker 1>generally compatible, it's no surprise that what you know, when

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>you share that time together and you start to share

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>those friendships and intimacies, that sex and love and romance

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>are going to come into play. I mean, one of

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the first pieces of advice I would give to people

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>really who who aren't yet in any kind of tangle

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to love or romance or lust at

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the office, is you know, to try to keep it

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>from happening from the outset to really embrace a very

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>firm boundary when it comes to the kinds of feelings

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna allow yourself to have. I mean, to the

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>extent that we can allow ourselves selves to have feelings,

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to really set that boundary and say I am only

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:01.439
<v Speaker 1>going to be friends with with people with coworkers. I'm

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>not going to um allow myself to have those feelings,

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and if I do start to have them, I'm going

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to do everything in my power to to shut them

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>down turn away from them. That's almost always easier said

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>than done. But I do think that there is something

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to be said for intention. I know a lot of

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the advice I give people about other situations, when you

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>go in with the intention, with the consciousness, if you will,

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of not doing something or making sure that you don't

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>go down a certain path, I think you're a lot

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>more successful in preventing it. Are there certain hard and

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>fast rules that you think about when it comes to

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, like this is a firm boundary you absolutely

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:46.439
<v Speaker 1>should not get in any sort of relationship with a

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.679
<v Speaker 1>boss or you know, if you're doing if you're working

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>on a project together or something like that. Do you

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>think that there are harder rules that are like really

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>really knows. I think honesty really is the best policy

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and in almost to every regard. And I know that

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people out there, maybe people listening, and

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly people have written to me. You know, We'll get

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>into a relationship and with somebody at the office and think, okay,

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 1>as long as we keep it a secret, we're doing

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>due diligence in terms of keeping that out of the

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>workplace and not letting that relationship interfere with work. But

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's actually wrong because of course the

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>relationship exists, and so what you're doing is not only

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>bringing that relationship into the office, you're also bringing a

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>lie into the office, a secret. And you know, I

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>think that it's much more fair, um, not only to

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>one's co workers, but really to the two people in

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the relationship themselves to be honest about it, to be

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>out with the relationship so that so that you know,

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>everything is on the table, everything's seen, that everything, every

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>possibility where a power dynamic might go the wrong way

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>or might be um you know, called into question when

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>it comes to two ethics or so forth, that that

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>everything that all of the people who are involved UM

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>with that situation are aware of the different dynamics that

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>go on. You know, my husband and I don't work

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>at an office, but we sometimes work together. And I

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine UH doing a project with him and also

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to pretend that there isn't this other layer of

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>our relationship that's really about something that's not about work

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>at all. And you know, I think that. Of course,

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>sometimes that kind of truth telling can cause a lot

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of strife at the at the outset, a lot of

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>people will be upset or have a lot of questions

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>about what dynamics might be going on with these you know,

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>we've got especially a supervisor um and in in somebody

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>who's really uh a boss a boss employee sort of relationship.

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that that that kind of transparency

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>is almost always the best way. Secrecy never leads to

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>good things. And when something is right out there, you

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>can discuss it, you can make decisions, you can put

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>people in different departments, give them different responsibilities if that

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>is of any concern. And you also just don't have

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>to have the burden of a secret to keep. And also,

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>even if you think you're keeping something a secret, there's

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good chance that at least some of your

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>coworkers know about it. Right, Well, that's it. And I

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>think that when we do withhold information from other people,

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>even if we have good intentions, people who get involved

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>relationships who say let's keep this separate, you know, let's

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>just keep us out of the office, and and you know,

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the arguments I think a lot of those

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>people make you know, it's like, you know this saying

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>that we're in a relationship would only cause trouble essentially

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>for for our our employment, our employers and our coworkers.

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know the fact is that the secrets, as

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>you say, are almost always revealed. The and withholding information

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>is a kind of lie of omission, and people feel

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>betrayed by that. So in your work, what are some

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of examples of letters along these lines that have really

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>made you think or that you think are really tough

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 1>issues when it comes to love in the work? Is

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>there anywhere you've really struggled to sort of figure out

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>what exactly is the right thing to do? Yeah, I

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>think really the most complicated scenario is a situation where

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, a boss has you know, fallen in love

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>with and started a relationship with somebody who reports to

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>him or her. That's a really complicated dynamic. And and

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and then on top of that, they they work in

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 1>in a situation where they can't be transferred to a

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 1>different department or that you know that that dynamic can't

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>be obliterated except if one or the other of them

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:38.920
<v Speaker 1>quits the job. And that that's also the scenario where

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 1>people are most likely to keep secrets because the boss,

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 1>if you will, doesn't want the other employees to think

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that here she is favoring his or her lover. But

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of course, you know, there there's that undeniable loyalty that

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:53.719
<v Speaker 1>comes from, you know, the people we are sleeping with.

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>You know that that we feel towards people we are

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 1>sleeping with and in love with. And so you know,

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 1>even if you go out your way for that for

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 1>that relationship to not to interfere with that boss employee relationship,

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 1>it almost always does. And so you know, that is

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 1>a really I think difficult situation to navigate and and

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>sometimes really the only ethical answer, the only practical answers

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.199
<v Speaker 1>to say, yeah, that that somebody needs to find a

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 1>new job, and usually it's the person with the least

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>amount of power network situation, um, and those are those

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>are hard things to do, now, you know, I do

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>want to say that I'm sure there are people listening

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:33.880
<v Speaker 1>out there who are are sort of shaking their heads

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>at us because they work with their partners very happily

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:41.439
<v Speaker 1>and very peaceably and without conflict, and they work with

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 1>many co workers and there are no problems. And you know,

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's true too, I think as much as

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 1>we're saying, like try to avoid a real romantic relationship

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 1>in the workplace, the fact of the matter is as

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.959
<v Speaker 1>they exist, they always have existed, and they probably always

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>will and they don't always go badly. I think if

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:01.439
<v Speaker 1>you have a really functional work environment that is all

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 1>about communication and transparency and mutual respect um, and that

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:09.679
<v Speaker 1>that that the two people in the relationship are not

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>who they really do, go out of their ways to

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>not you know, make work decisions based on that romantic alliance.

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it can be done with some grace and

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 1>and to me, the solution to this, you know, this

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 1>problem that we're going to have throughout time is not

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to say never ever ever do it, and if you

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>do do it, you're going to be punished, but rather

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to say it's not a good idea because it's complicated,

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>but we're capable of dealing with complexity, that we that

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>we do have the capacity um when we rely on

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that open communication and that ethic those ethical um sort

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of decision making processes, that romance and the workplace can

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>coexist on occasion. I think that kind of sums up

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole issue. So it's a good place to end

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Cheryl Straits so much for for taking the

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>time if to us. Oh, thank you. It was great

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you. So, as Cheryl said, I think

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.199
<v Speaker 1>the easiest way to get around all this is just

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>by not getting into office relationships to begin with. But

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>since it's going to happen, sometimes the second best way

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to deal with it is just by being honest, even

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 1>if that's awkward for you and potentially your coworkers. Yeah,

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and just be aware that if you're not honest, people

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 1>are going to figure it out eventually. I once worked

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 1>somewhere not here, and I'm not just saying that. It

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 1>definitely wasn't here, but a coworker was like trying to

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>tip me off to some office gossip, and so she

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 1>asked me to look at um, somebody who is pretty senior,

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 1>to look at their public outlook calendar. And I like

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>looked at it, and there was some vacation days blocked off,

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, some needings, nothing out of the ordinary. And

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 1>I was like, Okay, what am I looking at here?

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 1>And then she's like, now, look at so and so's calendar,

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>his female colleague, And I looked at her calendar and

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>she had exactly the same vacation days blocked off, and

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:10.119
<v Speaker 1>I was like, Okay, oh my god, wait, I know

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>them people just dine out on this kind of gossip.

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Like you, you cannot be too You can't be careful

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>enough to keep this from your coworkers, so you may

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 1>as well be open and honest about it. And I think,

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>by the way, those two people, they dated for a

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:28.159
<v Speaker 1>long time and they ended up getting married, and I

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think they still work together, although I'm not sure,

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>which is another thing that I think that you have

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to consider, like both in the case of office romances

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that go well and everybody everything works out happily and

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:41.120
<v Speaker 1>people get married, which Cheryl did say, like these things

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>can work out both in those cases and in the

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 1>cases where they go really badly, your best bet is

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to not work with that person anymore. So you might

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>have to find a way. No matter which way the

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>relationship goes, you are probably going to have to find

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a new job or a new position in within your company.

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 1>And that really means waging whether the relationship is important

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>enough to you to make such a significant shift in

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:11.439
<v Speaker 1>your career. And now it's time for half bake takes,

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 1>halfy fake takes. You can call us and leave us

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>a voicemail if you have a half big take you'd

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>like to share, and we might play it on the podcast.

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:25.399
<v Speaker 1>It's two and two six s zero one six six.

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 1>This week we have a listener happy take from Jeff.

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Jeff from New York, and my half bake

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>take is that if you commute on public transit, it's

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>completely appropriate and acceptable to ignore people from work to

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>take the same route. The most interactions should have as

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a smile and a nod my community, my podcast to

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 1>be compressed time, and the last thing I want to

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>do is make yet more small talk and remind myself

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 1>of work relatedly. It's completely unacceptable and should probably be

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 1>a human resource of offense to corner someone on the

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>commune to discuss work issues. I know people can be

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>hard to pin down, but there are some lines you

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>just don't cross, and we need to respect the commute bubble.

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>There is like nothing worse than getting stuck with talking

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>about work things or with work people on the subway.

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>And I say that even about people that I like.

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>The first thing in the morning, you count on that

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 1>time between being at home and being at work, and

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>if you don't get it because somebody has burdened you

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>with work relationships on your commute, it just throws your

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>whole day off. I agree, I totally respect Jeff's dedication

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to the commute hour. I do think that it's a

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:33.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit better in the afternoon, like in the evening

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>if someone wants to chat briefly on the way home,

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 1>But early in the morning it's lately I feel like

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I have timed my exit at times when I've seen

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>somebody like a few feet ahead of me on the

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 1>escalator to make sure that I don't get stuck on

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:50.439
<v Speaker 1>the same train as them, just because like there's not

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>enough to fill the whole train ride home. So like,

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>let's say you start talking with somebody on the way out,

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 1>and it's like fine, because it's like, Okay, you had

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a few things to catch up on that you didn't

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>get too during the day. Is there that project? But

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>then it's like ten minutes into the train ride and

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you're done talking about that, and it's like, oh, now

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>what do we do? Yeah, I will say it's a

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>good time. Very on theme for this episode, it's sometimes

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a good time to catch up with gossip. Though gossip

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:18.919
<v Speaker 1>I think is always welcome if it's good, Jenny, what

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is your not fully formed idea that is so important

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:25.679
<v Speaker 1>you have to say it on a podcast. When it

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>comes to ice breakers, I think you should not be

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:34.160
<v Speaker 1>allowed to ask for very specific answers, like I'll give

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you an example. I don't think you should be able

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 1>to say what's your favorite song, your favorite artist, your

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>favorite TV show or movie or whatever, because I think

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.400
<v Speaker 1>it's too much pressure and people freak out and you're

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 1>judged by this, like remembering a name in a moment

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of panic, and it's just too much. And who really

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>has favorites? Like it's kind of psychotic to have a

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>real if you're not a six year old who's like,

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:59.439
<v Speaker 1>favorite TV show is Arthur and favorite color is yellow,

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Like you should don't really have favorites. You should have

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>like a few things that you like a lot that

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>shift every six months or so, and a lot of

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>times people just pick a go to favorite thing that

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 1>they know sounds cool, issue yes, it's very performative, and

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>like who knows if that if they even like that thing,

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>or if you're like me, you get totally paralyzed. Like

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 1>somebody asked me once what my hobbies were, and I

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:23.439
<v Speaker 1>literally I couldn't remember a single one. I was like,

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 1>I think I do stuff, and then I had to

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 1>text him like a day later and be like, oh,

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I play the guitar, just so he knew. I promise

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I do something. I promise, I promise I have hobbies.

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>But being asked of you have hobbies like it's it's

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 1>along the same lines as what's your favorite movie. It's

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:46.880
<v Speaker 1>like you're signaling virtue, You're saying something about yourself, and

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>so the implication is like, you must have hobbies, you

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 1>must have ways that you cultivate yourself as a human being, right,

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and then you're like, I must what's your half bag

0:25:57.000 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>take Francesca my half bige take, which is very half

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>because I it's sort of a problem with that. A

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>solution is I don't know what to do with that moment.

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:09.239
<v Speaker 1>After you've had lunch with a colleague, and usually at

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>these lunches, you know you've gone over a lot of stuff.

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>You've talked careers, you've talked gossip, and then you kind

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>of like one of you walks the other back to

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>their desk or kind of drops somebody off and keeps walking,

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and there's like such an awkward moment where you kind

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of have usually have to cut your conversation off mid

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>sentence or stand by somebody's desk and like try to

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:33.880
<v Speaker 1>let the conversation come to a natural end because you're

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you've been in this social mode for the last like

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>five minutes to an hour, and then it's just like

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I never know what to say, so I always end

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 1>up saying like Okay, good lunch, Like okay, bye, see

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you later. Thanks, What do you say? I don't know.

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>There is the awkward thanks. It's like why why are

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you thanking them for having lunch with you? I think

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>we need to come up with a special phrase that

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>you can just like signal okay, we're done having social

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 1>lunch talking time and we're going back to work now.

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>But it's got to be something that's like just unique

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to that scenario that's that's weird, or like in h

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>in sports when you end the huddle and you're like break,

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, that would be so good break, and

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 1>then you just like disorient people and they kind of

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>look at your funny and walk away. Yes it could

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:25.640
<v Speaker 1>be good. And this has been half bag Takes, half

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:29.640
<v Speaker 1>bake Takes. Thanks for listening to another episode of game Plan.

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 1>You can find me on Twitter at Francesca Today, and

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you can find me at Jenny and Kaplan. You can

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 1>tweet your half bake takes at us or anything else

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you like. You can also call us and leave us

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a voicemail at two and to six one seven zero

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>one six six And if you'd like to hear from

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 1>me Rebecca and sometimes Jenny maybe even throughout the week,

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you can subscribe to our newsletter. Just go to Bloomberg

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Newsletters and check the game Plan button.

0:27:57.280 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>For more episodes of game Plan. You can find us

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, on the Bloomberg Turbinal, and wherever you

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>listen to shows like this. This show was produced by

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Magnus Hendrickson and Liz Smith. Head of podcast is Alec McCabe.

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>And we'll see you next week. Oh we can. Like

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 1>we always talk about work life balance, but what about

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>work love life balance. It's not bad to start writing

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>this is in pain um