WEBVTT - China’s New Game Plan for Dealing With Trump Tariffs

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Soon after US President Donald Trump's opening salvo of his

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 2>second trade war, hitting more than five hundred billion dollars

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 2>worth of Chinese goods with a ten percent tariff, China

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 2>retaliated with tariffs of its own, So yeah, r escut

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 2>It imposed ten to fifteen percent levees on fourteen billion

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 2>dollars worth of American goods, including coal, crude oil, and

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 2>cars with larger engines from the likes of GM and Ford.

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Those tariffs went into effect Monday, February tenth.

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 3>China's retaliatory tariffs on fourteen billion dollars of US goods

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:46.480
<v Speaker 3>also due to kick in today.

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 2>And within hours, Trump slapped a twenty five percent tariff

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 2>on all steel and aluminium imports, industries dominated by China.

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>So if it's made in the United States, there is

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>no tariff. What you have to do is make it

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>in the United States.

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 4>We don't need it from another country.

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 2>Jenny Marsh, who oversees Bloomberg's coverage of Greater China economy

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 2>and politics, says President Si Jinping doesn't appear to be

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 2>flustered by the flurry of tariffs coming from Trump.

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 5>You know you saw Tudor and Mexico's leader both rushing

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 5>together on the phone striking these deals. Chi Jinping setting

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 5>a very sort of cool, calm, collective signal that he

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:27.960
<v Speaker 5>isn't going to be doing the same thing, like he's

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.680
<v Speaker 5>a much bigger fish, and China's going to respond to

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 5>its own way.

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 2>And Bloomberg opinion columnist Sruly Wren says, China's response this

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 2>time is very different from the first trade war in

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty eighteen.

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 3>China is in a much weaker position than twenty eighteen

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 3>when President Trump started his first trade war. What happened

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 3>is that the Chinese economy has become more reliant their

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 3>exports than ever before, and China really doesn't want to

0:01:56.000 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 3>kill the only bride spot in its economy.

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to The Big Take Asia from Bloomberg News. I'm wanh.

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Today in the show, we unpacked China's response to Trump's

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 2>barrage of tariffs. Can China avoid a full blown trade

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 2>war with the US, and what's at stake for both

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 2>countries going forward.

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 4>We have one very big power over China, and that's tariffs.

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 2>In the past few weeks, President Trump has proposed and

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 2>delayed twenty five percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico. In comparison,

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 2>the tariffs on China are much lower at just ten percent.

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 2>But Trump says he's just getting started.

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>That was just an opening salvo. If we can't make

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a deal with China, then the tariffs who will be very,

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>very substantial.

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Jenny, and truly thanks for joining us. Let's get into it.

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 2>In the first trade war, the US and China imposed

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 2>of tit for tat tariffs on each other. Eventually things

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 2>calm down a bit when the two signed a trade

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 2>deal in twenty twenty. We're China basically committed to buying

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 2>more goods from the US. Now, what does Trump really

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 2>want from China this time around? How is it different

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:17.239
<v Speaker 2>from the first trade war?

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, he says he wants to rebalance trade, and I

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 5>think last time that meant getting China to buy more

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 5>from the US. But this time it seems broader. It

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 5>seems like what he actually wants is to get manufacturing

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 5>back on American shores. He really wants to return America

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 5>to this sort of like manufacturing powerhouse it used to be.

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 5>I think the interesting thing is that trade war won,

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 5>and it was all about China, Whereas this time around,

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 5>that's his goal rebalance trade, but with everybody to sort

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 5>of take aim at all these different sort of partners

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 5>and economies of America trades with to bring manufacturing back

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 5>to the US. So it's sort of a much more

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 5>ambitious and wide ranging doctrine that he's trying to roll

0:03:58.080 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 5>out this time around.

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Now, after you were tarras of ten percent on Chinese

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 2>goods took effect last week, Beijing responded with its own

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 2>round of tariffs. Truly, can you walk us through China's reaction?

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 3>It seems like China's response is quite muted this time.

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:16.599
<v Speaker 3>Instead of reciprocated ten percent broad based the teriff back

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 3>on the US, China basically targeted a few things like

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 3>oil and natural gas, and it also launched the Toothlip's

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 3>anti trust probe into Google, which basically left China more

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:30.679
<v Speaker 3>than a decade ago. It really compared to twenty eighteen,

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 3>the response was very muted.

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 2>And what's the rationale behind such a muted response, you think?

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 3>I think the problem with China is that this time

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 3>around twenty twenty five, China is in a much weaker

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:46.559
<v Speaker 3>position than twenty eighteen, when President Trump started his first

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 3>trade war. China had a notorious COVID zero lockdown, right,

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 3>and after China exited the COVID zero lockdown in late

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty two, what the middle class discovered was that

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 3>the economy had long COVID as well. You know, like

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 3>we are four years into the property downturn, and you

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 3>still see those unfinished apartment buildings pappered across China. These

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 3>developers they have already gone defunct, right, and the government

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 3>is not stepping in to finish those buildings and deliver

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 3>presole units to households. Basically, the Chinese people just say, okay,

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 3>the government doesn't care about consumer rights and saving deposits

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 3>basically doubled from twenty eighteen to twenty twenty five, and

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:32.559
<v Speaker 3>youth unemployment is in double digits. People have money, they're

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:36.359
<v Speaker 3>just not spending it. As a result, in twenty eighteen,

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:40.799
<v Speaker 3>consumption accounted for two thirds of China's economic growth. Now

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 3>it's not even one third.

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 2>So basically, in twenty eighteen, China was in a much

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 2>stronger position economically to respond, where they could say the

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Trump's tearuffs, fine, we can take a hit on exports

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 2>because we can rely on the strong Chinese consumers. But

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 2>now in twenty twenty five, Chinese economy is slowing. You've

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 2>got Chinese consumers not spending. China's domestic demand has drunk

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 2>so much that China has to rely on exports to

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 2>absorb all that production.

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yes, so China thought it was prepared, right, it

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.599
<v Speaker 3>was trying to beef up its own self reliance in

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 3>the supply chain. But in fact, by ignoring the middle

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 3>class and by failing to foster a strong consumer culture,

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 3>China is actually more vulnerable than before because in the

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 3>global trade war, the economy that has the most powerful

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 3>consumer base basically wings and Donald Trump knows that. Right,

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 3>he can threaten terroriffs and say really nasty things on

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 3>the global stage because he can basically shut off the

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 3>access to the world's most resilient consumers, Americans, and China

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 3>no longer has that.

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Jenny on the US side, what do you see as

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 2>the biggest difference between Trump's latest trade war and the

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 2>one in twenty eighteen.

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 5>I think for Trump, this is faster and more furious

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 5>than it was the first time around. First time around,

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 5>and we had investigations, it was quite slow walking. First

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 5>day in office. Is Bam, it's coming quick and it's broader.

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 5>I think for China, I think they've been here before,

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 5>and last time, during the last trade war, they unleashed

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 5>this sort of wolf warrior tactic that was going toe

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 5>to toe with Trump on the rhetoric, swinging back to

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 5>every tweet he said, and I think they realized I

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:27.239
<v Speaker 5>did them no favors because that wolf warrior approach didn't

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 5>go down well with other countries, and it just meant

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 5>that Trump hit back all that bit harder. And I

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 5>think this time they have learned from it and they're

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 5>going to be very careful. So I think it was

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 5>just they've had four years to think about this and

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 5>how they do things differently this time around, and so

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 5>I think they are coming back with a much more

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 5>considered response. Last time they were just responding to the

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 5>chaos of Trump when everyone was getting to know what

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 5>Trump was like, and now they have a much better

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 5>read on him and sort of how to protect themselves.

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 2>So how can China protect itself? I mean, there's been

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 2>tark about it behaving like the more sensible adult in

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 2>the room. Will that help it to avoid a full

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 2>blown trade war?

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't necessarily call China being the adult in the room.

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 3>I guess this time around, they are just trying to

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 3>play a little bit smarter. Instead of going in a

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 3>hard boxing match with Trump, they are playing basically the

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 3>Chinese taichi. They're just trying to play soft and the

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 3>elusive and the hope that the Trump will self destruct

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 3>in the meantime.

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:33.239
<v Speaker 2>If China's approach is like slow Tai Chi on tariffs,

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Trump is taking the opposite tack. On Monday, Trump doubled

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 2>down and slapped a twenty five percent tariff on all

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 2>steel and aluminum coming into the US. China doesn't export

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 2>a lot of these metals directly to the US, but

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 2>it does dominate the global steel and aluminum industries and

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 2>sells its products to countries like Canada and Mexico. They

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 2>then process the metal and sell it on to the US.

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:01.439
<v Speaker 2>So while the tariff is not directed China, China and

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 2>as trading partners, do end up taking the hit. After

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 2>the break, we'll look at how She's handling Trump's tariffs

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 2>and what China's trade war game plan could look like.

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Even though China's economy today is in a much more

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 2>fragile state than it was in twenty eighteen. That doesn't

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 2>mean that it's out of options when it comes to

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 2>fighting a trade war, Bloomberg. Shuly Wren says, in the

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 2>years since Donald Trump first launched his tariffs, Beijing has

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 2>been working to prepare the Chinese economy for a second strike.

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 3>In twenty eighteen, the trade war that President Trump launched

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.719
<v Speaker 3>basically was unexpected, right, and a lot of Chinese exporters

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 3>they were hurt, for sure. But these days they are

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 3>trying very hard to diversify the opening factories around the world.

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:02.839
<v Speaker 3>Basically have moved all everywhere, to Mexico to Vienna.

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Besides moving supply chains outside of China, Truly, says, China

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 2>has also reduced reliance on exports to the US. Back

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 2>in twenty eighteen, the US accounted for close to twenty

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 2>percent of China's exports. Now it's only some fifteen percent. Suly.

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 2>What more tools or other tools does China have and

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 2>its kit to deploy against Trump's trade war compared to

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty eighteen.

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, China has TikTok this time. Basically it could be

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 3>a good will towards Trump, because Trump has talked about

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 3>wanting to have TikTok for cheap, and perhaps the social

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 3>media can go IPO in New York and the US

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 3>government can make quite a bigger profit out of it.

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 3>So that's one tool that China could use and say, hey,

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 3>let me give you a nice gift. How about making

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 3>one hundred percent return on a bigger social media platform.

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 3>There are other tools that the Shi Chimpin could use,

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 3>but none of them will be very palatable to him.

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 3>For instance, the first time around, China did use the

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.839
<v Speaker 3>un it cheapened its currency to counter Trump's twenty five

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 3>percent terraff. This time around, China could still do that,

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 3>but the pressure of capital outflow is just that much stronger.

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 3>The economy is not doing very well. Investment returns in

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 3>China are very dismal, and people naturally want to put

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 3>money out of China. And if you weaken your currency

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 3>by another, say ten to fifteen percent, the pressure of

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 3>outflow it will just be that much greater. Another tool

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 3>is perhaps using stimulus, the big one that China did

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 3>after the global financial crisis. Again, it's not a good

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 3>option because China's decked to GDB racial is already at

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:48.719
<v Speaker 3>three hundred percent. It's one of the world's most indebted nations.

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 3>So if we're talking about stimulus, we will have to

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 3>talk about perhaps five percent of GDP every year for

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 3>years to come, and that's going to add even more

0:11:58.720 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 3>debt to the economy.

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Now, China has a reputation for playing the long game,

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 2>while the US, on the other hand, seems to have

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 2>a much shorter attention span. How do we think that

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 2>tilts the balance in these trade negotiations?

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean present shating Ping of course thinks he has

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 3>a lot more time to burn them present charmp Right,

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 3>he's only seventy one year old, and he doesn't face

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 3>term limits, not anymore, right, so he thinks he might

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 3>have a long game. But I am worried that the

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 3>government in Beijing could be a little bit too complacent.

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 3>What if China's economy just collapsed over the next four years.

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 3>There is systemic risks in China.

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Here's Jenny Marshagan.

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 5>I think that's right. I mean, I think beijing strategies

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 5>just damage limitation. Let's just try and get through the

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 5>next four years with as little damage as possible. They

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.959
<v Speaker 5>know they're going to be tariffs, And I also wonder

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 5>if thinking at where the opportunities might be for them,

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 5>because this time around, they're not the only target for Trump.

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:56.959
<v Speaker 5>He's going to target the European Union. He said, he's

0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 5>making these extraordinary expansionist claims. He wants to sort of

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:04.079
<v Speaker 5>buy Greenland and take over the guards of strip. That's

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 5>going to go down, you'd think very badly in the

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 5>global South. So for China, is there an opportunity there?

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 5>One of the biggest things of Biden achieved was sort

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 5>of getting the allies to come all in line with

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 5>US policy. And if that's all going to fraction, now,

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 5>can Beijing Brussels closer make amends with South Korea and Japan?

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 5>So I imagine they'll sort of be looking for like

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 5>where they can actually win during this trade war?

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 2>And how would Trump counter attack in this trade war?

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 2>If he senses that China's gaining the upper hand, are

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 2>we going to see him wheel tariffs with more force

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 2>this time around?

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 5>All indications are yes, But then the caveat is Trump

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 5>is so unpredictable the amount of uturns. He's already done.

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:50.439
<v Speaker 5>He's given Mexico and Canada this reprieve, and he's had

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 5>four years to think about tariffs and what he didn't

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 5>achieve last term, and he's got this sort of strong

0:13:56.760 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 5>cabinet around him. He's got he's loyalists, people who was

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 5>singing from the same hymn sheet, and he has much

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:05.319
<v Speaker 5>stronger mandate as well to do all of this.

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Now, surely do you think there could be other ways

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 2>that Trump could try to target China where it hurts.

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Terriff is a very obvious choice for him, but there

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 3>are other things that he can paint China on Presenting

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Pin cares very much about upgrading China's industrial sector right,

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 3>and he can impose more export controls on China, and

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 3>that hurts the sentiments back in China. Basically presenting Pain

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 3>likes to portray himself as a big character on the

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 3>world stage, and in China people don't call him directly

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 3>by name. They call him Dada basically means mister big.

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 3>And he has talked a big game. He has talked

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 3>about China dream right, and China establishing a multipolar world

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 3>and not being dominated by this one big bully in

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 3>the United States. Basically, but I'm not sure that his

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 3>deeds have been matched by his words. Let's take a

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 3>look at the economy. It's not going anywhere, right, He

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 3>tried to buffer China against the external shocks after the

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty eighteen trade war, and the Chinese economy is more

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 3>vulnerable than ever.

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 2>What can we expect in the weeks and months to

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 2>follow on tariffs?

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 3>A lot of back and forth negotiations, and I suspect

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 3>President Trump is going to paint him.

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 5>You know, there's this April one deadline, the trumpetermenication to

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 5>report back to Trump on the first trade war, and

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 5>once that happens, then I think sort of full more

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 5>negotiations will start with China, So we'll have a restart

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 5>of those sort of trade war talks we had last time,

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 5>and it'll be interesting to see who she didn't think

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 5>puts forward this time.

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 2>Do you see anyway for the US and China to

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 2>avoid the full blown trade war.

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't at this point. I think the deflationary pressure

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 3>in China is so strong that Chinese companies will be

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 3>very keen to export their products and services to the

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 3>rest of the world, especially to the US, because profit

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 3>margins are just that high, and that if President Trump

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 3>really clears up while protecting US labor, he is going

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 3>to use terraffs and the trade war to stop basically

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 3>China eating the world.

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 2>What are the risks you see beyond trade? If the

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 2>US is the instigator of trade wars with multiple countries,

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 2>does this in any way leave room for China to

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 2>step up on the world stage.

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 5>Trump is basically saying things which is so shocking to

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 5>sort of the rules based world order that America has

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 5>been the custodian of for decades, talking about taking over

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 5>the guards a strip or buying Greenland, or even annexing Canada.

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 5>This sort of does create some room, you think, for

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 5>Beijing to sort of amp up its rhetoric around Taiwan.

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 5>The US has been the leading figure opposing Chooting Ping's

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 5>territorial kind of rhetoric around Taiwan, his ambitions to take Taiwan.

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 5>And if you then have a US leader who himself

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 5>has all these sort of empire building aspirations, that makes

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 5>it much harder for the US to sort of have

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 5>the moral high ground to be trying to restrain China.

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 5>I'm restrained. She That doesn't mean she didn't. Ping's gonna

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 5>invade Taiwan anytime soon, but it just means he's got

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 5>a little bit more space now around that issue. And

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 5>I think that could be a dangerous.

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:14.479
<v Speaker 2>Thing, Jenny, and truly thanks so much for sharing your

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:20.880
<v Speaker 2>insights with us. This is The Big Take Asia from

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News.

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:22.399
<v Speaker 3>I'm wan ha.

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:26.439
<v Speaker 2>This episode was produced by Young Young, Naomi Um and

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Jessica Beck. It was edited by Patty Hirsh and Daniel

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 2>tien Kaid. It was fact checked by Adriana Tapia and Naomi.

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 2>It was mixed by Alex Suguiera and sound designed by Jessica.

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 2>Our senior producer is Naomi Shaven. Our senior editor is

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Elizabeth Ponso. Our executive producer is Nicole Beemster Brower. Sage

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Bauman is Bloomberg's head of Podcasts. If you like this episode,

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 2>make sure to subscribe and review The Big Take Asia

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 2>wherever you listen to podcasts. It really helps people find

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 2>the show. Thanks for listening, See you next time.