WEBVTT - Phillis Wheatley

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to steph you missed in history class from how

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Works dot Com. Hello, and welcome to the podcast.

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy V. Wilson and I'm Holly Fry. So I've

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:21.479
<v Speaker 1>had the same experience multiple times over the last year

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>or so, which is that I've been walking through museum

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>or a library and I've seen an exhibit on Phillis

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Sweetly and thought we really should do a podcast episode

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 1>on her now. Then that keeps happening for at least

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 1>a year, while for various reasons, other topics wind up

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>up at the top of the list. So Phillis Sweetly

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>is somebody who's basic biography I learned about and whose

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:47.639
<v Speaker 1>work I read in school. But it was only when

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>I got into the research for today's show that I

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 1>realized how very, very incomplete a lot of that was,

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and how dramatically people's perceptions and their interpretations of her

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>life and work have shifted since eighteenth century. I mean,

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>people have thought wildly different things about Phillis Sweetly over

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the years. So today we are going to talk about

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 1>not only Phillis Sweetly, who was one of only three

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>people in North America to publish their work while enslaved,

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>but also how her place in the world of literature,

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>especially black literature, rose and then fell, and then rose

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>again during her life and after her death. Phyllis Wheatley

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>was likely born in what's now Senegal or the Gambia

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in about seventeen fifty three. We don't have details about

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly where she was from, or which African nation or

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>people she belonged to. Even the connection to the Senegambia

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>region is a little tenuous. The slave ship that took

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>her to Boston, Massachusetts did stop there, but it also

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>made several other stops in western Africa, so it's really

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>tricky to pin down. The crew moved south along the

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>African coast as they tried to carry out the orders

0:01:56.560 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of the ship's owner, Timothy Fitch, which were to quote

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>purchase one hundred or one hundred ten prime slaves. Phillis

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>herself did not really fit that description of quote prime slaves.

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>She was about seven, judging by the fact that she

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>lost her front baby teeth by the time she arrived

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>in Boston. She was also small, and she was in

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>poor health. She probably would not have been purchased during

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the ship's first stops in Africa. But only later on

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and a final attempt for the crew to fill that

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>quota they'd been given. The ship finally departed with ninety

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>five enslaved Africans aboard, so Phillis may have been from

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>farther south along the African coast, possibly as far south

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>as Sierra Leone. We also don't know what Phillis Wheatley's

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>name was before she was taken from Africa, or even

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>what language it was in the ship she was aboard.

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:52.799
<v Speaker 1>Arrived in Boston, as we mentioned, and that happened on

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 1>July eleven, seventeen sixty one, with seventy five enslaved Africans

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>still living after the eight week transatlantic journey. In August,

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>John and Susannah Wheatley purchased her, and they named her

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>after the ship they bought her from, which was called

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the Charming Phyllis, also known simply as Phyllis. By the

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>time the ship arrived in Boston, Phillis herself was in

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 1>poor enough health that she was considered to be refuse,

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>which was the term that was used for enslaved people

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>who were too old, sick, or injured to be sailable.

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Charles J. Stratford, who was descended from one of Susannah

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Wheatley's relatives described it this way. Quote In or about

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the year seventeen sixty one, a slave ship arrived in

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Boston Harbor with the cargo of slaves. Aunt Wheatley was

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>in want of a domestic. She went on board to purchase,

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and looking through the ship's company of living freight, her

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>attention was drawn to that of a slender, frail female child,

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>which at once enlisted her sympathies. Owing to the frailty

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of the child, she procured her for a trifle, as

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the captain had fears of her dropping off his hands

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>without emolument by death. John Wheatley was a prosperous tailor

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and merchant, and he and his wife Susannah had twin children,

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Mary and Nathaniel, who were about eighteen at the time,

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and the family quickly realized that Phillis was really bright.

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 1>John and Susannah gave their children, especially Mary, permission to

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>tutor her. By the age of about nine, just two

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>years after she arrived in Boston, Phyllis had learned how

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 1>to speak, read, and write in English. In addition to

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>doing extensive Bible study, she also started learning Latin and Greek,

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>including translating part of Avid's Metamorphoses, expanding it into the

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>poem Naobian Distress for her children Slain by Apollo. Later on,

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>she also studied literature, history, geography, and astronomy, and she

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 1>also read lots and lots of poetry. Her work is

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>most often compared to English neo classical poet Alexander Pope,

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>but she read the work of other poets, including some

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>from the colonies. One of these was Mather Byles, whose

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>seventeen forty four poems on Various Occasions may have inspired

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the structure and arrangement of Phillis's own book. She was

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 1>so voracious in her education that she was allowed to

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>spend more time in study than in domestic labor at

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the Wheatly home. This was well before the rise of

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>anti literacy slave codes, which were passed and most of

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 1>the South in the early nineteenth century and made it

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>illegal to teach enslaved people to read and write. But

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>even so in the eighteenth century it was not typical

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>at all to educate enslaved people. Even though she had

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>no formal education. Phillis Wheatley's tutoring and her self study

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>also went well beyond what would have been expected for

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>eighteenth century white women. In seventeen sixty seven, two men

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 1>from Nantucket visited the Wheatly home and they told a

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>story about how they had been sailing there from Boston

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>when a storm struck their ship. They had narrowly escaped disaster.

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Phillis overheard their conversation and she wrote a poem about it,

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>which became her first published work on Mrs Hussey and Coffin,

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and that was printed in the December twenty one, seventeen

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>sixty seven edition of the Newport, Rhode Island Mercury. She

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>was fourteen at the time. By seventeen seventy, so just

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a few years later, tensions were rising between Britain and

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>its colonies. Although the Wheatly family were by all accounts loyalists,

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 1>meaning that they were loyal to Britain, Phyllis's sympathies were

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 1>with the Patriots cause. She attended church at the Old

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 1>South Meeting House, which is a place that comes up

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>over and over again in stories about the Revolutionary War,

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and in seventeen seventies she wrote two poems about relevant

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>events of the day that made it really clear which

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:47.919
<v Speaker 1>side she was on the first, on the death of

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Mr Snyder murdered by Richardson. She describes the murder of

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 1>a boy named Christopher Snyder or Cider at the hands

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>of customs officer Ebenezer Richardson. In this poem, she describes

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Christopher her as a murdyr. The second is on the

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>affray in King Street on the evening of the fifth

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of March seventeen seventy. It's not completely clear whether the

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>second one, which is obviously about the Boston massacre, has survived.

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>There is a poem with that name that was published

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>in the Boston Evening Post on March twelfth, seventeen seventy,

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>but it was not signed, and while some critics say

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>it's the same poem, others are not so sure. That

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>was a pretty common way of describing the Boston massacre,

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>which is why it's believable that two different poets could

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>have written a poem about it with roughly the same title.

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>It was also in seventeen seventy that Phyllis Wheetlely wrote

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the poem that would make her famous. This was called

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>an Elegaic Poem on the death of that celebrated divine

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and eminent servant of Jesus Christ, the Reverend and Learning

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>George Whitefield. Whitefield was an Anglican deacon who toward the

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>colonies that employed a style of preaching that was incredibly

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>dynamic and charismatic. He was really instrumental in the religious

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>revival that was known as the Great Awakening. How to say,

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>these are not the snappiest poem titles. They all tend

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to run a little long. Uh. Phillis wrote the elegy

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>shortly after Whitefield died on September seventeen seventy. It was

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>first circulated as a pamphlet in cities like Boston and Philadelphia.

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>In seventeen seventy one, it was reprinted along with the

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>funeral sermon that Ebenezer Pemberton had delivered on October eleventh,

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>seventeen seventy. This reprinting gave Wheatley an audience on both

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>sides of the Atlantic, especially after she sent a copy

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to Selina Hastings, Countess of Huntingdon. In addition to his

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>preaching tours in the colonies, white Field had been the

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Countess's personal chaplain. Almost instantly, Phillis Wheetley became the most

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:52.839
<v Speaker 1>famous African in Britain and its colonies, very well known

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>as a poet, and we will talk about what followed

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and the now famous Phillis Wheatley's writing career. After a

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 1>quick sponsor, Phillis sweetly kept writing new poems in the

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>early seventeen seventies. Although some of them were published in

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>pamphlets and newspapers, she didn't really want to just scatter

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>them all around, publishing them and lots of different places.

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 1>She wanted to publish them together in a book, and

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>by seventeen seventy two she had written enough to do it.

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 1>But to fund this book's publication, she needed to find

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>subscribers to commit to buying the work in advance. I

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:34.599
<v Speaker 1>imagine this as sort of a colonial version of Kickstarter.

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Either she or Susanna Wheatley, you're possibly both of them,

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>working together, started placing advertisements for this forthcoming book, with

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Ezekiel Russell as its printer, but sometime that summer Phillis

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>turned her attention to publishing in England instead. The reasons

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>for this are not entirely clear. There are a number

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of accounts that claim that she wasn't able to find

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>enough subscribers in the colonies, but They don't really cite

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>primary sources for that, but there is a seventeen seventy

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>three letter from one of her subscribers, John Andrews of Boston,

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>who suggested that it was really for financial reasons. Basically

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 1>she was getting better terms from a London press. The

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>not enough subscribers argument usually comes along with the explanation

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that racism was the root cause of her not finding

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:27.359
<v Speaker 1>an audience in the colonies. And this was not racism

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>as in white readers maliciously not wanting to read the

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 1>work of a black person. It was really racism, as

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>in white readers disbelieving that a black person could have

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>even written it. For the institution of slavery to exist

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the way that it did in the American colonies, it

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:47.959
<v Speaker 1>had to rest on the idea that Africans were less

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>than human and were inherently less intelligent than Europeans. So

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>there were definitely people on both sides of the Atlantic

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.559
<v Speaker 1>who thought that Wheatley's poems must be some kind of fraud.

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>We we dealt with this by getting some of Boston's

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>most prominent men to sign an attestation that she really

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>was the author of her own poems. This included Massachusetts

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Governor Thomas Hutchinson, Lieutenant Governor Andrew Oliver, the Reverend Mother Biles,

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and the Reverend Samuel, mother nephew and son of Cotton Mother,

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the Reverend Charles Chauncey, and John Hancock. A copy of

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>this attestation, dated October seventeen seventy two, appeared in Lloyd's

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Evening Post and British Chronicle in September of the following year,

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and a slightly reworded version of it was part of

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Wheatley's first book as well. And here's what the book

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>version said. Quote, we whose names are underwritten do assure

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the world that the poems specified in the following page were,

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>as we verily believe, written by Phillis, a young Negro

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:56.719
<v Speaker 1>girl who but a few years since brought an uncultivated

0:11:56.760 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>barbarian from Africa, has ever since been and now is

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>under the disadvantage of serving as a slave and a

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>family in this town. She has been examined by some

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of the best judges, and is thought qualified to write them.

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Although it's become part of the popular lure about Phyllis

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Wheatley that this took place, there's no actual evidence that

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the undersigned men actually met in a group and interrogated

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>her about her work. There's even a children's book that

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>hinges on this supposed meeting. It's actually a much more

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>likely scenario that there was a big meeting that was

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>documented to have happened on October um, and that she

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>took advantage of this gathering of prominent men to stop

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>by and and say, hey, would you please sign this

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>at a station that I actually wrote my own work.

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>This at of station was not the only step that

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>she took and getting her book published in England, and

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.319
<v Speaker 1>in getting people to believe that she had really written

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 1>what was in the book. She also wrote to William Legg,

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the Earl of Dartmouth, in October of seventeen seventy two,

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>sending him a copy of a poem she had written

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>about him. The Earl had just been named Secretary of

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>State for the Colonies, and she both celebrated his appointment

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>in the poem and included another attestation of her authenticity,

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>this one signed by Nathaniel Wheatley. Phillis also made a

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>third connection to Selina Hastings, the Countess of Huntingdon, the

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:25.559
<v Speaker 1>one whose personal chaplain had been the Reverend George Whitefield,

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the Countess, Lord Dartmouth, and Susannah Wheatley were all connected

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:33.079
<v Speaker 1>through the Countess of Huntingdon's Connection, which was a network

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of evangelical churches and chapels. Phillis dedicated her manuscript to

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the Countess, who advocated for its publication in England through

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>publisher Archibald Bill. Accompanied by Nathaniel Wheatley, Phillis went to

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>London in seventeen seventy three to oversee the publication of

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>her book. Sometimes this trip is also described as being

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>for the sake of her health. She was definitely there

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to work on the book. By this point she'd established

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>such a name for herself that she had a huge

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>list of notable people to visit. Probably the name that

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 1>people would be most likely to recognize today is Benjamin Franklin,

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 1>who was at the time in London. If you've listened

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to the Dido Elizabeth Bell's segment of our episode three

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Astonishing Bells, you'll recall that we talked about the Somerset Case,

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and this was a court case decided in seventeen seventy

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>two in which Lord Mansfield ruled that an enslaved person

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>brought to England could not be sold back into slavery.

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>In some places, this was interpreted as freeing all slaves

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in England, which it didn't really do, but it did

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>mean that when Phillis Wheatley arrived in London the following year,

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>under English law, she could not be forced back into slavery.

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>It's possible that this is one of the reasons that

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>she decided to publish her book in England rather than

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in the colonies. People in Boston definitely knew about the

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Somerset case by the time she made that decision. Fellows

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>sweet Lee's first and only published book, which was Poems

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>on various subjects religious and moral, was published on September one,

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>seventeen seventy three. This is the first published volume of

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>poetry by an African woman in the English speaking world.

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>It included that attestation of her authenticity that we read earlier,

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>along with a letter from John Wheatley briefly detailing where

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>she came from and how she had been educated, and

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>concluding quote relation is given by her master, who bought

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>her and with whom she now lives. The book's frontispiece

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>featured a portrait of her ringed in the words Phillis

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Wheatley negro servant to Mr John Wheatley of Boston. That

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>portrait is likely the work of enslaved African painter Scipio Moorehead,

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>who was also the subject of Wheatley's poem to s M.

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>A young African painter, on seeing his works. If you're

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>wondering about that wording of negro servant, A lot of

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>people who were enslaved were referred to as servants, especially

0:15:54.880 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in England and New England. A few weeks after Phillis

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>arrived in England, Susannah Wheatley became seriously ill, and Phillis

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>returned to Massachusetts to attend to her. Her ship arrived

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 1>on September sixteenth, seventeen seventy three. Four days later, the

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Boston Gazette noted her arrival among notable passengers aboard her ship,

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>calling her an extraordinary poetical genius. At some point not

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>long after that, Phillis was manumented by the Wheatlies, and

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a letter to David Wooster dated October eighteenth, seventeen seventy three,

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>she wrote, quote, since my return to America, my master has,

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>at the desire of my friends in England, given me

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>my freedom Her book had received at least nine reviews

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>in British papers, and many of those reviews had really

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>condemned the Wheatlies continued enslavement of her. So, even though

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>she could really not have been forced to return to

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>slavery under the Somerset ruling, after having been in England,

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the wheat Laves made that official. Phillis also took the

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>precautionary step of sending a copy of her manumission papers

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>to a contact she had in London for safe keeping.

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk about what we know of Phillis

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Wheatley's life as a free woman, including a famous exchange

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>with George Washington, but we're gonna first take a little

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>sponsor break. By the time Phillis Swheetlely returned from England,

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 1>the Colonies were definitely headed toward war with Britain. That was,

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, the Revolutionary War. George Washington was named Commander

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>in Chief of the Continental Army on June nineteenth, seventeen

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 1>seventy five, and on October twenty six of that year,

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Phillis Sweetley sent him a poem she had written in

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:43.919
<v Speaker 1>his honor, along with a letter. The letter read quote,

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:47.199
<v Speaker 1>I have taken the freedom to address your excellency in

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the enclosed poem and intreat your acceptance, though I am

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>not insensible of its inaccuracies. You're being appointed by the

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Grand Continental Congress to be General Lissimo of the Armies

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 1>of North America. Together, the fame of your virtues excite sensations.

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Not easy to suppress your generosity. Therefore, I presume will

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>pardon the attempt, wishing your excellency all possible success in

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the great cause you are so generously engaged in. This

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 1>poem ends with the widely quoted lines, Proceed great chief,

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 1>with virtue on thy side. By every action, let the

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Goddess guide a crown, a mansion, and a throne that

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>shine with gold unfading. Washington be thine that Washington is

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:39.199
<v Speaker 1>in all caps. Washington's reply, dated February tenth of the

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>following year, began with an apology for taking so long

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>to answer. It then went on to say, quote the

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>style and manner exhibit a striking proof of your great

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>poetical talents, in honor of which, and as a tribute

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 1>justly due to you, I would have published the poem

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:58.360
<v Speaker 1>had I not been apprehensive that while I only meant

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to give the world this new instance of your genius.

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I might have incurred the imputation of vanity. This and

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>nothing else determined me not to give it place in

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the public prints. If you should ever come to Cambridge

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>or near headquarters, I shall be happy to see a

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>person so favored by the muses and to whom nature

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 1>has been so liberal and beneficent in her dispensations. I

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 1>am with great respect, etcetera, etcetera. They're historians are divided

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>about whether she actually met George Washington and Cambridge. But

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 1>it cracks me up that this letter is basically like

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I would have published this incredibly flattering poem you wrote

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 1>about me, but then people might think I'm vain. Perhaps

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 1>to get around that accusation of vanity, George Washington also

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>sent the poem to Lieutenant Colonel Joseph Reid and closing

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>it in a letter that talked about all kinds of

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:55.160
<v Speaker 1>other various unrelated matters before concluding quote, I recollect nothing

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:57.919
<v Speaker 1>else worth giving you the trouble of unless you can

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>be amused by reading a letter and pol addressed to

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:04.120
<v Speaker 1>me by Mrs or Miss Phyllis Wheatley and searching over

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:06.679
<v Speaker 1>a parcel of papers the other day, in order to

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>destroy such as were useless. I brought it to light again.

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>At first with a view of doing justice to her

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 1>great poetical genius. I had a great mind to publish

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 1>the poem, but not knowing whether it might be considered

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 1>rather as a mark of my own vanity than as

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 1>a compliment to her, I laid it aside until I

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>came across it again in the manner just mentioned. Lieutenant

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Colonel Reid apparently took the hint. The poem was published

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in Pennsylvania Magazine in April of seventeen seventy six, and

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:44.120
<v Speaker 1>other publications picked it up from there. With the onset

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Revolutionary War, things got a lot more difficult

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 1>for Phyllis Wheatley. Susannah Wheatley had died on March third,

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>seventeen seventy four. Then Nathaniel Wheatley had actually died a

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 1>year before. His mother, Mary and John Wheatley both died

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in seventy seventy eight, So the Wheatly's had kept Phillis

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in bondage, but they'd also essentially been filling the role

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of her patrons. Without their support, she had trouble selling

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 1>poems and making ends meet, especially since the war meant

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 1>that reader's attention was really focused on other matters. On

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 1>April one, seventy eight, Phyllis Wheatly and a free black

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>man named John Peters announced their engagement. They married on

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving Day of that year, which was November six. Most

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 1>biographers have not been very kind to John Peters. That

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of paint him as a shiftless man who could

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 1>not get his act together, But in reality, things were

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:45.640
<v Speaker 1>extremely difficult for free black people in New England during

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the Revolutionary War. Jobs were hard to find, the pay

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:52.160
<v Speaker 1>was often so low that it wasn't enough to live on.

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>So John Peters tried his hand at running a grocery

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 1>and a bakery in a saloon, but he just was

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>not able to get a stable, finding antil footing under him.

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 1>He also referred to himself as a doctor and at

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 1>one point practice law, and some biographers have made a

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 1>great big deal of the fact that he didn't have

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a license to do either of those, even though there

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.400
<v Speaker 1>was not a licensing body that he could have applied

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to you at the time, Yeah, that was pretty common

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>practice this in this for people to hang out their

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 1>shingle and say they were a professional in a field

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>where today we would have a lot more um paperwork

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and applications and approvals before you could use those words.

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>For sure, that is not exclusive to John Peters at all.

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>We really don't know much at all about the last

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>few years of Phillis Wheatley's life, except that they seem

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to have been lived in poverty. John Peters wound up

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 1>in and out of jail for debt, and Phillis may

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>have had as many as three children, although there are

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 1>no records kept of their births or deaths. She died,

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>most likely due to complications from childbirth, on this number

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 1>five sev four, at the age of thirty one, with

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>most sources agreeing that her newborn died on that same day.

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Before she died, Phillis sweetly had written a second book,

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 1>which she had tried to publish in seventeen seventy nine,

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 1>but she couldn't find sufficient subscribers to do it again.

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>This was during the Revolutionary War. It was difficult. That

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>manuscript unfortunately has been lost. John Peters does seem to

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 1>have gotten his financial worries straightened out after the war

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>was over and led an upstanding life from that point.

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>He is the last person known to have had access

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to that manuscript. He may have taken it with him

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 1>when he eventually left Boston, but exactly where he went

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.439
<v Speaker 1>or what happened to the manuscript is just not clear.

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Fifty seven of Phyllis's poems survived today. Forty six of

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>them were published during her lifetime. In nine six, what

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 1>was believed to be her last poem was unearthed. That

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>was titled an Elegy on Leaving, and it was published

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>in Armenian Magazine, which would later become Methodist Magazine, in

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>July four. This magazine was edited by John Wesley, the

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>founder of Methodism, and it seems as though whoever sent

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the poem to him incorrectly attributed it. According to research

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>by Caroline Wiggington, it was really the work of Mary Wattley,

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 1>first published in her collection Original Poems on several occasions

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty years earlier. This was probably an honest mistake somebody made.

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 1>As we've talked about before, spellings were not very standardized

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 1>at this period, so it was it would have been

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>easy for Wheatly and what Lely or Watterly to have

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>been spelled in nearly the same or exactly the same way.

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>During and after Phillis Wheatley's lifetime, her work was used

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:56.360
<v Speaker 1>by abolitionists as evidence that Africans were humans with souls

0:24:56.400 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and intelligence equal to that of Europeans. But not everyone

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>had seen her work as evidence of the intrinsic humanity

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 1>and equality of Africans. Thomas Jefferson criticized her work heavily

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in Notes on the State of Virginia in seven he wrote, quote,

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>misery is often the parent of the most affecting touches

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and poetry among the Blacks. It's misery enough, God knows,

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>but no poetry. Love is the particular eastrom of the poet.

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Their love is ardent, but it kindles the senses only,

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>not the imagination. Religion indeed, has has produced a Phyllis Wheatly,

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:38.919
<v Speaker 1>but it could not produce a poet. The compositions composed

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 1>under her name are below the dignity of criticism. I

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>want to time travel and maybe um uh yeah, I

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>want to say bad things to Thomas Jefferson. That's what's up.

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Aside from Jefferson's disparagement, Wheatley's work started to fall out

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of favor in the nineteenth century, as it was overshadowed

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>by slave narratives and the work of people like Frederick Douglas.

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 1>This was especially true since Wheatley's enslavement had taken place

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>in such relative comfort. We don't want to downplay the

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>fact that she was still an enslaved person, but there

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 1>were certainly stories that were a lot darker out there circulating.

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>So her stood in sharp contrast to the writing that

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:24.640
<v Speaker 1>was tied at the time to the Antebellum South. By

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the turn of the twentieth century, writers and critics were

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 1>pointing out a range of perceived shortcomings and phillips sweet

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Lea's work, including that she wasn't personal enough, she wasn't

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>genuine enough, and she cared too little for other enslaved Africans.

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 1>And the words of James Weldon Johnson, who was writing

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:45.400
<v Speaker 1>in the nine preface to the Book of American Negro Poetry,

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>quote one looks in vain for some outburst or even

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>complaint against the bondage of her people, for some agonizing

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>cry about her native land. And two poems she refers

0:26:56.840 --> 0:27:00.440
<v Speaker 1>definitely to Africa as her home. But in each instance

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:03.719
<v Speaker 1>there seems to be under the sentiment of the lines,

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.919
<v Speaker 1>a feeling of almost smug contentment at her own escape

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>therefrom In the early to mid twentieth century, people started

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to write Philis Wheatlely off as a second rate imitator

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of Alexander Pope. This sort of criticism really escalated in

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen sixties, especially within the Black arts movement, which

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>saw Wheatly's work as not nearly political or radical enough.

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Writing in The New Yorker in two thousand three, Dr

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Henry Lewis Gates Jr. Described it this way, quote too

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 1>black to be taken seriously by white critics in the

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 1>eighteenth century, Wheatley was now considered too white to interest

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>black critics critics in the twentie A lot of this

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 1>criticism cites Wheatly's poem on being Brought from Africa to America,

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:53.679
<v Speaker 1>and the first stanza of this poem reads, twas mercy

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>brought me from my pagan land, taught my benighted soul

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to understand that there's a God and there's savior too.

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Once I redemption neither sought nor new so. In other words,

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>she's describing being brought from Africa to America as a

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 1>slave as something merciful because otherwise she wouldn't have learned

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:17.919
<v Speaker 1>about the existence of God and sought redemption. But the

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 1>poem's second stanza goes on to condemn racism and hypocrisy

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>among Christian slave owners, admonishing them to remember that, to

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 1>use her word, negroes are also human souls who are

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>able to enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Here is the

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>second half of that poem. Some view are sable race

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>with scornful eye. Their color is a diabolic dye. Remember, Christians,

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>negroes black as cane may be refined and joined the

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>angelic train. It's also worth noting that this poem, which

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>has been used to just write phil as sweetly off completely,

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 1>was written when she was about fourteen years old, and

0:28:57.400 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>if she had lived longer, it would have been thought

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of as part of her juvenile and not as part

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of her mature body of work, and criticisms that she

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>never condemned slavery are simply not accurate. Here's a stanza

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 1>from to the right Honorable William Earl of Dartmouth, which

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>we were referenced earlier, quote, should you, my lord, while

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you peruse my song wonder from whence my love of

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>freedom sprung whence flow these wishes for the common good?

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>By feeling hearts alone best understood, I young in life,

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 1>by seeming cruel fate was snatched from Africa's fancied happy seat.

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>What pangs excruciating must molest, what sorrows labor in my

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 1>parents breast stealed? Was that soul? And by no misery

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>moved that from a father seized his babe beloved. Such

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 1>such my case? And can I then but pray others

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>may never feel tyrannic sway? And that same book introduction

0:29:55.360 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>James Weldon Johnson dismissed that poem as unimpassioned. In the

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>last few decades, critics and scholars have started to take

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a closer look at Wheatley's actual writing, which had previously

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>been overshadowed by her biography and her general noteworthiness as

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>an enslaved black poet during the colonial era. Some of

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>this traces possible African influences in her work. Several literary critics,

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>including John C. Shields and Mary Catherine Loving, also interpreted

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 1>her work as a lot more subversive than previous criticism

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 1>had given it credit for. So it's hard to draw

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>comparisons to specific African cultures because Africa is not a monolith,

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and we don't know exactly where philis Wheatly was from

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>or what who were people in Africa would have been,

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>but several historians have noted that multiple West African people's

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 1>used funeral elegies as a central element of community life,

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>with these songs most often being performed by young women.

0:30:56.600 --> 0:31:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Nearly a third of wheatly surviving poems are elegies, and

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>structurally they have more in common with African elegies than

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 1>with elegaic poems from when she was living written in Europe.

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Another potential African influence on Wheatley's work is in its imagery.

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Margaretta Matilda O'Dell wrote the first biography, which was published

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 1>with an addition of her poems in eighteen thirty four,

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and in the introduction to that biography, O'Dell claimed, quote,

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>she does not seem to have preserved any remembrance of

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the place of her nativity or of her parents, accepting

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the simple circumstance that her mother poured out water before

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the sun at his rising, in reference no doubt to

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>an ancient African custom. The rising sun is frequently a

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>repeated theme in Wheatley's poetry, as well as plays on

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the words involving son as in the Male Child and

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>son as in the bright blazing Object in the sky.

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And then there's the fact that Wheatley was, based on

0:31:56.120 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 1>everything we know of her, obviously very smart, her making

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 1>connections in London and traveling there after the Somerset case

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 1>was decided to suggest that she was also politically very savvy.

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 1>She also removed a lot of explicitly pro patriot poems

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 1>from that collection of poetry before having it printed in London,

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and she replaced them with ones that would be more

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 1>acceptable to a more loyalist audience. So it's really reasonable

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to conclude that she understood how she was being constrained

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 1>by the world that she was living in, and she

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>was crafting poems to be well received within that world.

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>So instead of writing poems explicitly about the evils of slavery,

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>she wrote poems about loving liberty and freedom, which within

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>her overwhelmingly white audience and the colonies, would be read

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>as patriotism instead of as criticism. Do you have some

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 1>listener mailments? Tracy? What I have is actually a link

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 1>somebody shared on our Facebook page. UM the the listener

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>is Angel, who posted something on our Facebook wall, and

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the note just said check this out, So you don't

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 1>even have to write a lot for us to read

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>your message on the air. So what she wanted us

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to check out was a post from Cincinnati Museum Center

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:18.479
<v Speaker 1>which answered some of the questions that we had in

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>our episode about the Last Carolina parakeet about whether Incas,

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 1>who was the last Carolina parakeet, had been preserved through

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>taxidermy after his death or not. And so the answer,

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>according to this article that Angel shared with us is maybe. Um.

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 1>According to this blog post at the Cincinnati Museum Center,

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the Cincinnati Zoo announced that Incas would be shipped to

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the Smithsonian, just like Martha had been a few years before.

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Martha was the last Passenger pigeon, but Incas is not

0:33:48.400 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>currently in the Smithsonian's collection. There are, however, two unlabeled

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Carolina parakeets in the Cincinnati Museum Center collection, and one

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of them could be Incas, but it's really unclear. We

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>just do not know. Um. That explains though, why I

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>could not confirm that fact before we recorded the episode,

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 1>because it's a little bit of a mystery. If you

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>would like to write to us about this or another podcast,

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 1>or at history podcasts at how stuff works dot com.

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 1>We're also on Facebook at Facebook dot com slash missed

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:23.799
<v Speaker 1>in History and on Twitter at miss in History. Our

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Instagram and our Pinterest are also under the name missed

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 1>in History. You can come to our website, which is

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>missed in history dot com, and you will find show

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 1>notes for all of the episodes that Holly and I

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 1>have done together. Those list all the sources that we

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 1>used in the episode. You'll find a searchable archive of

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 1>every episode that we have ever done. Uh and if

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you would like to subscribe to our show if you

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>have not already, you can do that on Apple Podcasts,

0:34:51.560 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Google Play, and anywhere else you get podcasts. For more

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:03.240
<v Speaker 1>on this and thousands of other topics, visit how staff

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 1>works dot com. M