WEBVTT - Tesla's Disappointing Results and Google's Shares Dip

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:02.239
<v Speaker 1>From Marhart.

0:00:02.279 --> 0:00:06.640
<v Speaker 2>We're Innovation, Money and Power Collie in Silicon Valley, Nbon.

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:11.559
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlove.

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Now from London in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 3>coming up. Full coverage of Tesla's disappointing second quarter results.

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 4>Flask Google investors still waiting for an AI payoff.

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:40.239
<v Speaker 5>We bring you the details and an.

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 3>Update from CrowdStrike on the global IT outage. But Ed,

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 3>we get straight to it. A big fall in Tesla stock.

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean the chart on the screen tells the

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 4>story right. We're down around twelve percent thirteen percent in

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 4>the session intraday. That would be the biggest drop since

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 4>January twenty fifth on a closing basis, a decline of

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 4>about twelve half percent I think is the biggest drop

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 4>going back to September of twenty twenty. There's a lot

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 4>of anxiety in the misunderstanding here. Fourth consecutive quarter of

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 4>EPs missing estimates, but a record revenue quarter where we

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:15.839
<v Speaker 4>return to urine year growth. Despite the estimate we would

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 4>see a declining growth. There's a lot to pass over.

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 4>I think robotaxis at the heart of it.

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:24.839
<v Speaker 3>Carric Yeah of course, the delay being the key watchword.

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 3>Here's a Musk had to say about the delay of

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 3>the robotaxi.

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 6>I wanted to make some important changes that I think

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 6>would improve the big the sort of the robotaxi. That

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 6>think that I think that were the main thing that

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 6>we're going to show and we're also going to show

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 6>up a couple of other things.

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 3>We turned to Craig Trudell because Craig, it was your team,

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 3>It was Ed plus your team that broke down the

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 3>fact that there would be this delay in robotaxis. This

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 3>is the future of the AI underpinning of Tesla. Why

0:01:57.920 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 3>are we so worried about this quarter's results?

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think you know, it wouldn't normally be a

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 7>huge cause for concern for an event to be pushed

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 7>back by all of two months. I mean, you know

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 7>how material is that for the company, except you know,

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 7>Elon Musk has has really leaned into this being you know,

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 7>the way forward for Tesla, and you know the reason

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 7>why you should or shouldn't you know, invest in the stock,

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 7>and so the slightest delay of you know, this event

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 7>to showcase you know what he's essentially betting the company

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 7>on as the company continues to have deteriorating earnings, is

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 7>you know, cause for concern, especially in light of the

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 7>move and the stock and the lead up to these earnings.

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 7>This was a stock that was really battered when they

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.959
<v Speaker 7>last reported results and has come roaring back over the

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 7>last few months. So right, I'm not surprised to see

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 7>the shares doing this.

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 4>And we underscore it's the delay of an event where

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 4>we were going to unveil or see publicly for the

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 4>first time, a purpose built ROBOTAXI actually debt Gray. They

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 4>went some way to explain the manufacturing process. It's going

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 4>to be this what they call revolutionary unboxed manufacturing strategy,

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 4>but the inference is that that will be post twenty

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 4>twenty five, right, Automotive Gross Margein taught me through where

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 4>the cell side is focused on that.

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, there's a real concern here that you know, not

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 7>only has has Tesla cut prices, but it's cut prices

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 7>and only seen sales shrink and so uh, that means

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 7>you have to to continue to cut costs, which you know, Tesla,

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 7>to its credit, has has done that very consistently for years,

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 7>but it also needs a product to reinvigorate sales, and

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 7>you know, Musk has has really you know spoken to

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 7>the importance of being able to offer people more affordable

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 7>evs in order for them to you know, be adopted

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 7>by a wider, you know set of consumers. But he

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 7>really has not you know, been willing to to sort

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 7>of back that up with with product we've we've seen

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 7>you know, the cyber truck roll out, but you got

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 7>to pay six figures to buy that truck. You know,

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 7>where is the model too, as people like to refer

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 7>to it, the vehicle that would be cheaper than the

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 7>Model three.

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 5>And that's a real.

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 7>Concern for folks who you know, are willing to credit

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 7>him with his you know vision and give him, you know,

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:20.919
<v Speaker 7>some time to you know, realize robotaxis. But he needs

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 7>to sort of deliver in the here and now more

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 7>affordable electric vehicles for Tesla to grow again.

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 4>Bloomber's cry Tudew Global Auto's editor in London, thank you

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 4>so much. Let's get reaction to Tesla's second quarter from

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.600
<v Speaker 4>an investor, but this time a retail or.

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 5>Individual investor.

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 4>Alexandra Metz aka Tesla Booma Mama holds thousands of shares

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 4>of Tesla and has done so since twenty twenty. She's

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 4>had previous careers in finance and as an investment analyst,

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 4>but now works as a visa consultant in California and

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 4>on x, the social platform owned by Mask. Is a

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 4>prominent voice in that large body of individuals who do

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 4>back elon Mask and a bullish on Tesla's long term Alexandre,

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 4>good morning to you, Welcome to Bloomberg Technology. The most

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 4>important takeaway from earnings of the earning score for you.

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 8>Please well, thank you ED for having me. For me,

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 8>the most important was actually that we're moving on into

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 8>this next phase of Tesla's growth, and all the markers

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 8>that we have laid there are still there and are

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 8>moving ahead in the same timeline with the same vigor

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 8>then anticipated. So as a retail investor, I mean I

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 8>acknowledge that the market and your typical audience probably doesn't

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 8>have the same large time horizon than we have, but

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 8>for us, it is really as a retail investor, just

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 8>another buying opportunity. Also, do remember we were at these

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 8>prices at the beginning of the month, right when we

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.840
<v Speaker 8>got the delivery and production numbers. The share price was

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:57.600
<v Speaker 8>about at the same level when your channel broke the

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 8>news that the Robotech Seed Day Taxi event was going

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 8>to be delayed by two months. We were already a

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 8>little bit higher. That's where we saw first fluctuations in

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 8>the stock price. Well, now it is confirmed for October tenth,

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 8>so it is a mere two months. Your colleague Greg

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 8>is completely right. It is not a long delay, and

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 8>there are technical reasons for it. But I also think

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 8>you know, Tesla wants to be ready, wants to be

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 8>sure to show whatever is necessary to convince the market,

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 8>the retail investors about autonomy and that being the crucial

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 8>part to Tesla's future.

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 9>Can you con well sell to us a little bit more?

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:43.359
<v Speaker 3>Confirm to us how you understand full self driving, the

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 3>focus on AI to eventually become some robotaxi fleet where

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 3>suddenly we've got to ride hailing app out of Tesla's

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 3>How does that become to bear in a good use,

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 3>efficient business strategy way for you?

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:03.599
<v Speaker 8>Well, I have mine model and I'm very happy to

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 8>share it with us, but we don't have Tesla's model yet. Right.

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 8>That is what is going to be the quintessence of

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 8>October tenth. So what I'm going to bring forward is

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 8>my interpretation from former speetures of Elon and the Tesla team,

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 8>So this may not be the current version, but for me,

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 8>it seems very clear there's going to be a threefold

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 8>business model. One Tesla's own fleet, meaning cars that are

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 8>either already in Tesla's possession, people handing back their leases

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 8>or whatever else, you know, inventory cars, whatever else they

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 8>they have in their own fleet that are going to

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 8>operate autonomously, and that are going to be strategically put

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 8>in cities at spots where they will have the best

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 8>yield of a robotaxi business could be airports, could be

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 8>shopping malls, whatever I mean. That's probably to be to

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 8>be tried out and found out how it's gone up right,

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 8>So that is one part of it. The second part

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 8>is that owners like me can participate and can enroll

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 8>their cars. Instead of standing here in front of my house,

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 8>it can just you know, travel around the day and

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 8>pick up clients and bring them to the places they

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 8>want to be brought to. And that's going to be

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 8>a revenue sharing model. And then the third one is

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 8>going to be the purpose built robotaxis. So those are

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 8>the ones.

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:34.439
<v Speaker 4>Alexander, right, which is why the date of availing and

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:36.439
<v Speaker 4>seeing it was important. Just real quick, I want to

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 4>think about the cell side for a second. One of

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:42.679
<v Speaker 4>Tesla's biggest balls is basically moving to the sidelines after earnings.

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm talking about New Streets.

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 5>Pf fer agree.

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 4>He's drapped, downgraded Tesla to neutral and is writing that

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 4>the stock is at the target price they had trading

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 4>at fifty times their twenty twenty six estimates. They see

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 4>limited and unreliable valuation upside, etc. Now we have you

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 4>on the program, retail or individual shareholder, how closely do

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 4>you follow those kind of fundamental analyzes that the sales

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 4>side make.

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 5>And characters like Pierre Well I form.

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 8>A peer a lot his French. I've lived a lot

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 8>in France, so I love him. I love his accent,

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:16.680
<v Speaker 8>I love the way he's doing that. I think at

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 8>this point he's wrong, And actually I liked how he

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 8>formulated his post because he was not saying that he

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 8>downgraded Tesla, but that Newstreet did it. So there was something.

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 5>Bizarre about it.

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 10>But let's put that aside.

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 8>He doesn't see in the next twelve months major developments

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 8>that could bring the stock higher. That's why they are

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 8>putting it to neutral, I completely disagree. I think we're

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 8>having in October, on October tenth, the ROBOTEXI Day. We'll

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 8>also have in October obviously Q three numbers, and then

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 8>we're going to move into twenty twenty five with a

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 8>lot of announcement, actually three of them. We will have

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.959
<v Speaker 8>the model too, how Craig called it, the cheaper version

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 8>of a Tesla be presented in early twenty twenty five.

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.559
<v Speaker 8>Will have production of Optimus at the end of twenty

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:02.079
<v Speaker 8>twenty five.

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 5>So there is a.

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 8>Lot of things happening. And he actually differ referred to

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 8>energy being and it's already twenty percent part of the

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 8>profit of it's about seventeen percent. Only there is much

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:17.599
<v Speaker 8>more margin and energy. I mean, if you want to

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 8>give me a minute to talk about energy revenues and profits,

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 8>because they are not like a car immediately consumed at

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 8>the moment of sales. They're actually over time because when

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 8>you sell energy, you actually get in the revenues and

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 8>get in the profits in installments. And so there is

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 8>a lot of waiting revenues and waiting profits already there,

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 8>and there is much more to come. And I'm very

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 8>surprised that Pierre didn't take care.

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Of that, alex I'm really glad Alexandre that you bring

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 3>up the other parts of just the cars, the optimist

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 3>side of things, the energy side of things. There's also

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 3>the dojo side of things, and many trying to understand

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 3>the logic there.

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:56.079
<v Speaker 9>Just take a listen to what Elo said last night.

0:10:56.920 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 6>We are going to double down on dojo and we

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 6>do see a path to being competitive with in video

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 6>with with dojo, and I think we kind of have

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 6>no choice because.

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 5>The demand for in videos.

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 11>So I.

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 3>In video shares down, as is most of the market today.

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 3>But some saying, look, because maybe this is a lack

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 3>of demand that's going to come from Tesla going forward.

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 3>Was that a surprise ultimately that they're really going to

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 3>be ramping up dojo because they are worried about the

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 3>supply side.

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 8>I'm so pleased you're bringing this up, Carolina, Thank you

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 8>so much. Well, it is actually funny because over the

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 8>last five six years, dojo was always one of those

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 8>topics in the earnings call, so shall I do it?

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 5>Shall I not?

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 9>And I do not?

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 8>It was really going It was a dance and I've

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 8>actually done about a six months ago, a whole timeline

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 8>of non committal. We would like to do it, but

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:51.959
<v Speaker 8>we're really not sure. Don't bet on it. Dojo is

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:55.839
<v Speaker 8>really not so clear yet. This is the first time

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 8>that Elon clearly said we actually have no choice. We're

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 8>going to double down on it. We're going to do it.

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 5>And this is a.

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 8>Fabulous news because Alexis supercomputers are so far ahead and

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 8>will make will make the whole Tesla infrastructure, the whole

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 8>digestion of videos and output so much more profitable, rather

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 8>than purchasing the Nvidia chips.

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:19.439
<v Speaker 5>Alexandro, we're running out of time.

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 4>We have a lot to get to, so I want

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 4>to ask, would you vote in favor of Tesla investing

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 4>in Xai per the poll in the Exchange last night.

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 8>I love that you did the yes. Thank you very much.

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:35.439
<v Speaker 8>I appreciate all of those. So we're close to sixty

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 8>nine percent, which is always a fun number, isn't it. Yes,

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.319
<v Speaker 8>I would actually vote for it, but not unconditionally, you

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 8>know how I like doing the analysis of things. This morning,

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 8>we just had news that Open Ai will probably produce

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 8>another five billion dollar loss this year. I think these

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:54.839
<v Speaker 8>AI companies need to be thoroughly analyzed in principle.

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 5>I love it.

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 8>I completely understand why it was a segregate identity from

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 8>the start. Elon reeksplain yesterday those engineers don't want to

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 8>be in a mega cup company. They want to have

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 8>all the upside of a small startup, so it needed

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 8>to be set up that way. But also I fully

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 8>underscerent that Tesla needs groc needs all this input, and

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:15.839
<v Speaker 8>Tesla has at the moment thirty billion dollars offer a

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 8>cash line, so investing five billion into XI could be

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 8>a good idea.

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 4>Okay, that was a screen grab of the poll, not

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 4>any member of the Bloomberg Technology team voting yes on it.

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 4>Alexandra Mehd's investor in Tesla, retail shareholder, thank you now.

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 5>Some other news.

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 4>Earlier this month, it was reported the Elon Musk had

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 4>pledged in an eight forty five million dollars a month

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 4>to a super pack supporting Trump's presidential campaign. On Tuesday,

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 4>Musk confirmed on x that he would be making donations, however,

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 4>at a much lower level than what had been reported.

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 4>He did not say how much he had contributed.

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:54.679
<v Speaker 9>Carol, well done for clearing that up.

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, let's check in on these markets and NASLAK currently

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 3>off by two point six percent. The worst daysis July seventeenth.

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 3>We are training at the lowest as juloon the eleventh.

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 3>Why are we lower? A worry that AI just isn't

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 3>reaping the rewards in the here and now. So coming

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 3>up we dive into that. We take a look at

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Alphabet's earnings. What it tells us if investors antsiness.

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 9>About AI and its rewards.

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Ioko Yoshioka's with US well founded Enhancement Group.

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 9>This is bluebig technology.

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Alphabet shares falling after the Google parents sunk more resources

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 3>thirteen billion dollars worth. They expect into driving to outmatch

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 3>rivals in artificial intelligence, fueling spending higher than analysts have

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 3>been expecting. CFO Ruth Porat wanting to sound some reassurance

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 3>on the call with media yesterday, saying quote, we are

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 3>seeing the benefit of our strength in AI AI infrastructure

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 3>as we generative AI solutions for cloud customers. There is

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 3>no question customers are turning to us as they are

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 3>building out the capabilities.

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 9>Let's discuss all of this.

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 3>Ioco Oshioka's with US put folio manager over at Wealth

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Enhancement Group. You hold shares of Alphabet they're down the

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 3>most since February. Look, revenue up some fifteen percent, earnings

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 3>per share jumping thirty one percent. But it seems to

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 3>be this idea of plunging thirteen billion dollars per quarter

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 3>into AI that is the real worry here.

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 11>Sure, hi Caroline, thanks for having me. You know, in

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 11>terms of Google, we thought it was a pretty solid quarter.

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 11>You know, we had strength in revenues out of UH

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 11>search and YouTube, and you know, Cloud was pretty strong. Now,

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 11>the thirteen billion dollars that is being spent on capax

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 11>and the twenty five billion that's been spent so far

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 11>your date, you know, you t you take that and

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 11>you say it's gonna be fifty billion for twenty twenty four.

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 11>You know, Google still has eighty billion dollars of net

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 11>cash on their balance sheet, and so, you know, I

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 11>think the spend is warranted. That infrastructure is really needed.

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 11>They needed it to do it for the cloud growth

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 11>to begin with, and so you know, it is something

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 11>that all the hyperscalers are continuing to do in twenty

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 11>twenty four, and investors are just asking, you know, what

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 11>is that return on investment? At some point in twenty

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 11>twenty five Oka.

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 4>When I was on the phone with Roofport, I asked

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 4>her if she would give me a revenue run rate

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 4>number like AWS. Did you probably remember last quarter? She said,

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm not going to do that because we'll address it

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 4>on the Analyst school. On the Analyst CAOL, they said

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 4>that year to date they had billions of dollars of

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 4>revenue from AI infrastructure and generative AI.

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 5>And I'm just curious for like and investigate you why.

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 4>Wasn't that enough If it was so good for Amazon

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 4>to give a number like that a few months ago.

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 9>I think it's on the spending side.

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 11>I think historically we've seen that, you know, companies that

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 11>spend more on capex just have less room on their

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 11>free cash flow to spend on money being returned to shareholders. So,

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 11>you know, that's probably the reason why the stock selling

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 11>off a.

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 9>Little bit today.

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 11>But over the long term, you know, the valuation for

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 11>Google is not extreme. It still is a quality company,

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:14.159
<v Speaker 11>it still has a good business model, and I think

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 11>it's pretty attractive at these levels.

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 3>What's so interesting is it feels as though Alphabet and

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:24.199
<v Speaker 3>indeed slightly Tesla are just shaking all of our concerns

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 3>about the AI hype and the fact that this isn't

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 3>going to be hugely revenue generating in this quarter.

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 9>Or the next.

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 3>How is your patience for AI to pay off? Whether

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 3>it's alphabet or whether it's in video or some of

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 3>the other names. I have just gone stratospheric and the

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 3>hope that AI is becoming a profitable reality.

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:45.120
<v Speaker 9>Sure, So I think.

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 11>In the broader scheme of things, you know, this sell

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 11>off in technology shares across all of tech, I think

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 11>it's actually a healthy.

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 9>Thing for markets.

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 11>We're seeing, you know, the broadening out of markets that

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.439
<v Speaker 11>we've been talking about for so long, and you're seeing

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 11>other of the market sort of pick up the slack,

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 11>which is great to see, you know. I think for AI,

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 11>Sunder Pitch I said it in terms of taking time,

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:10.640
<v Speaker 11>it's all going to take time.

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 9>And when we look back at.

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:16.400
<v Speaker 11>The cloud and the growth of cloud, that also took time.

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 11>I mean Aws, Microsoft Azure, and.

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 9>You know, Google Cloud. We're all being built.

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 11>You know, years and years ago, and we're just starting

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 11>to see that benefit and they're still growing at you know,

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 11>twenty five percent plus rates, and so, you know, I

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 11>think that AI is probably on a similar trajectory. It's

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 11>just not going to be in a straight line.

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 5>Are ok.

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:42.120
<v Speaker 4>Weimo fifty thousand paid rides a week, so Alphabet puts

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 4>another five billion dollars into it.

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 5>Your reaction to.

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 11>That, you know, I think, just as Tesla is putting

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 11>money into the robotaxi side of things, I think autonomous

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 11>driving cars are you know, something that is a long

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 11>term growth driver for many of these companies, whether be

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 11>Google or Tesla or even Nvidia in terms of the

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 11>overall chips that will be installed in many of these cars.

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 11>So I think it's still again another leg that maybe

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:15.119
<v Speaker 11>you know, again take more time that investors don't always

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 11>have the patients for, but it is another growth avenue

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 11>for many of these stocks.

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 4>Oko Yahia, portfolio manager at Wealth Enhancement Group, thank.

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 3>You today for our AI and Action segment. Let's bring

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:40.400
<v Speaker 3>in Alex retre CEO of Stainless is a company dedicated

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 3>to building basically a platform for high quality, easy to

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 3>use APIs by building software development kits SDKs for AI

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 3>companies like Open Ai and Anthropic Company recently closed a

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 3>three and a half million seed round.

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 9>Let's bring in Alex And you know what prompted you?

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 9>You were building and doing.

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 3>This over at Stripe basically, and you've taken it broader.

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 3>How different is it creating SDKs APIs over overt AI companies?

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 9>How much more difficult?

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a great question. There's a lot of techniques that

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>we use today. It's stay in lists that are similar

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to the techniques that we that I developed a Stripe

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:21.159
<v Speaker 1>empowered stripes stks, but a lot of things are different.

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.159
<v Speaker 1>For one thing, we need to support a much broader

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>variety of API design patterns. And that's true for just

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 1>building a platform that can support any company to build

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a great developer experience for their s API. That includes

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:39.479
<v Speaker 1>AI and non AI companies, but for companies like opening

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I and Thropic and wide variety of other AI companies

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that we support, we actually have to go a lot

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:48.919
<v Speaker 1>deeper to help developers really take full advantage of the

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.400
<v Speaker 1>full power of these APIs. They're much more advanced, they're

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>richer with things like streaming and function calling, and that

0:20:56.960 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>requires a lot more STK expertise. And then even fintech

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>API is like.

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 4>Straight, you're a team of ten with three and a

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 4>half million dollars in the bank, Just talk to me

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 4>about how difficult it is out there.

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 5>How you're going to grow your business?

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, great question. You know, with companies like open Ai

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Andthropic cloud Flare even using our SDKs, and a bunch

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 1>of smaller companies that are recognized within Silicon Valley as

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>leaders in API first strong developer experience using our product,

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a lot of inbound interest and so I'm

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>very glad that we've invested in building a strong platform

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>for scaling out SDKs for a large number of companies

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>because it's enabled us to keep our team small, focused

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and high skill while serving a large number of API companies.

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 4>Stainless CEO Alex Raptre in Today's AI and Action, thank

0:21:53.800 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 4>you very much. Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. Ed Ludlow

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 4>in San Francisco.

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 3>Calon hid right here in London at the moment, and

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 3>let's check in on these markets because we've had plenty

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 3>digest when it comes to Alphabet and Tesla. But look,

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 3>there are other companies that posted earnings and some of

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:17.439
<v Speaker 3>them well giving us some relief.

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 9>Texas Instruments up five tenths of a percent.

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 3>Maybe that glot the inventory glut is coming to an end.

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 3>We've got some reassuring signs that we're meeting expectations for

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 3>the forecast. Really, it seems to be the revival is

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 3>under the way in key markets. Look, there's still pressure

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 3>on automotive in industrial, but maybe that's sort of the

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 3>bottoming of that IBM three tens percent lower as we

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 3>expect their numbers of course, coming out after the bell today,

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:43.919
<v Speaker 3>consulting likely to be a little bit weaker.

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 9>Can software make up for it?

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Are we going to eke out that one percent revenue

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 3>growth that many are anticipating? Service now likely to see

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 3>some twenty twenty one percent growth in revenue and indeed

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 3>in earnings. How much again, are we starting to see

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:59.640
<v Speaker 3>appetite for artificial intelligence? Generative AI really managed to buoy

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 3>some their software sales at the moment when companies are

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 3>strapped for IT spending. I just want to take it

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 3>on a gear, though, and look at what's happening with

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 3>a story that just won't go away. For CrowdStrike in particular,

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:13.360
<v Speaker 3>we're currently seeing it off by twenty five percent over

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 3>the last five training days. Look, we've finally got some

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 3>sort of answer to why this happened. The massive global

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 3>IT outage was a bug in a quality assurance tool

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 3>the company uses to check updates for mistakes. Basically, it

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 3>allowed flawed data to go out to customers, causing last

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 3>week's meltdown, and the meltdown and stock continues.

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 9>Let's just get a little bit of detail.

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Katrina Manson is with us, and we've all been waiting

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 3>for further details. Can you give us the nuancewers to well, ultimately,

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 3>why this is so unique, how this qualities assurance step failed.

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 12>Can you even get the words out because it is

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 12>so complicated and so detailed, And what we've now got

0:23:56.600 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 12>is five days later, the preliminary incident report. Now this

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 12>right in the small print takes us to what cybersecurity

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 12>experts are saying is a welcome, detailed, transparent report, but

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 12>it is still early days as they do. What they're

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 12>saying is their root cause analysis, and.

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:14.679
<v Speaker 9>Let me read it to you.

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 12>Due to a bug in the content validata, one of

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 12>the two template instances past validation despite containing problematic content data.

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.400
<v Speaker 12>What that means is exactly as you said, the testing

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:32.120
<v Speaker 12>process for making updates in some way failed to flag

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 12>an error. So that's two things. If one there was

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 12>an error and to the testing process to find it

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 12>also had a problem, and because CrowdStrike is so instrumental

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 12>to what's called endpoint detection response, really protecting computers. In

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:50.640
<v Speaker 12>this case, Microsoft Windows computers, eight point five million of them,

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 12>according to Microsoft, experienced the blue screen of death that

0:24:54.680 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 12>affected hospitals, airports, retail, airlines. They're still getting back on

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 12>their feet, some of these companies, they're trying to do

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 12>automated fixes.

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 9>They're still in recovery mode.

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 12>At the same time, they're trying to share what went

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 12>wrong and promising that there will be fixes.

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:17.120
<v Speaker 4>The message from crowdstrikes like, look, we're going to make

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 4>sure technologically speaking that we know what happened and prevent

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 4>it happening again. But as you write, and I wrote

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 4>about earlier in the week, we still are learning about

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 4>how systemic this issue was, about how central CrowdStrike is

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 4>to an important supply chain.

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 5>What's the latest on that front.

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 12>I think this comes down to exactly that the single

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 12>point of failure. As we speak to customers, as we

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 12>speak to experts in this area, it really does become

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 12>clear that some of the things that protect people are

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:50.199
<v Speaker 12>also very very closely nestled inside their systems, and so

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 12>if something does go wrong. It has tremendous potential to

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 12>affect everything. This is another one of those single points

0:25:56.560 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 12>of failure that simply hadn't been noticed, caught, examined, and

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:04.959
<v Speaker 12>I think we will expect to hear from not only

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 12>as cybersecurity companies trying to make mileage out of this

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 12>potentially and perhaps trying to take customers, but also really

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 12>from those who look at cyber defense in this country

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 12>and worry that there are simply too many holds.

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 4>Katrina hold that thought bloombergs Katrina Manson with the latest

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 4>reporting on CrowdStrike. Other companies in the space, Let's stick

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 4>with cybersecurity and bring in Gil Schwed, founder and CEO

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 4>of Checkpoint Software Technologies, which just release its second quarter

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 4>results beat expectations and also announce a new incoming CEO.

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 4>And Gil, we will get to that, I promise. But

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:44.679
<v Speaker 4>you're in the game also of endpoint security.

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 5>To start.

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 4>What's the last seven days or so been like for

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 4>you and your company incoming and outgoing in your response

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 4>to what happened with CrowdStrike.

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 13>So, like everybody else, we've been watching it and supporting

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 13>customers and helping in what we can be helped. It's

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:05.200
<v Speaker 13>not a cybersecurity bug. It is a software bag that

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:09.399
<v Speaker 13>shouldn't have happened. But it shows us how dependent us

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 13>in software that can take the world up and down.

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:15.640
<v Speaker 13>And it's also a very strong We need a very

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 13>tight balance between these quick automatic updates and the cyber

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 13>risks that are involved, because these quick updates are supposed

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 13>to help solve vulnerabilities, and unfortunately, every week versus dozens

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 13>of vulnerabilities that are discovered in companies, and we really

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 13>need these quick updates to stop these attackers.

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 9>So gil have you changed anything?

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 3>Has the industry changed anything architecturally speaking, that would mean

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 3>that this cannot happen and become the single point of failure.

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 13>Again, I think we are learning, I mean the entire industry,

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 13>and again I don't want to exclude us. We need

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 13>to learn how to create this balance between quick updates

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 13>on one hand and avoiding vulnerabilities, which is also very

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 13>very important, and I think that's a lesson that the

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 13>entire world needs to learn.

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:11.879
<v Speaker 4>Kil I appreciate it. Early in this process. There are

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 4>questions about the future of firewalls, and I want to

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:16.400
<v Speaker 4>ask you about whether there's going to be the sort

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 4>of architectural shift in cyber security in the landscape. Our

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 4>analysts at Bloomberg Intelligence talk about a move to agent

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:31.360
<v Speaker 4>loss delivery and security from agents, like in the case

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 4>of endpoint security provided by CrowdStrike.

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 5>Big picture, how do you see that playing out.

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 13>In the last thirty years. Again, I'm in this business

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 13>for thirty one years, and I think we've kind of

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 13>invested the network cyber security part of things. With the Internet,

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 13>there's always again, there's dozens of technologies, even hundreds of technologies.

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 13>The two biggest one are the network security and the

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 13>endpoint technology, and I think we need both. I mean,

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 13>it would be easy for me to say everybody will

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 13>shift to the network. Many times people we'll say the

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 13>other around. But at the end of the day, we

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 13>need both the end point security and the perimeter security,

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 13>and each one of them compliments each other. And still

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 13>with all of that, we're still facing a lot of

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 13>cyber risks. They're just growing.

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 9>Unfortunately, there is.

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 3>So much to talk about with your company and your

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 3>industry kill because you, of course have managed to bat

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 3>expectations in your earnings. You're seeing the revenue growth as

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 3>it had been anticipated. You've got a new CEO coming

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 3>in but also we've got M and A not happening,

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 3>potentially happening.

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 9>Google and Wiz for example.

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Some of the interpretation is with your new CEO coming

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 3>in nadav Zaverira, that maybe you'll do more M and

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 3>A then maybe you could be beefing up pursuing deals.

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 13>Do you agree first, I hope so, I definitely hope

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 13>that we'll do more M and as we've been doing

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 13>two a year in the last few years. But we

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 13>can do more and we can do bigger ones. And

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 13>I do think that what happening between with and Google

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 13>is actually very interesting. A amazing company built a very

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 13>fast leadership in the cloud security space, and I think

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 13>the fact that they want to remain stand alone and

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 13>build a large companies something that we can all admire

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 13>because it will take so many many years to get

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 13>to the same financial numbers that we got with this.

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 13>I mean rumor is about wed deal.

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 3>We really want to talk about just how much you

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 3>continue to be innovating over in this space and Gilschwared comeback.

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 3>Of course, I currently SEEO checkpoints, software technologies handing over

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 3>those remains here remains as founder though, and what have

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 3>we got coming up?

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, a lot more in the news time for Talking Tech.

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 4>First up, hackers have leaked internal documents stolen from Lead

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 4>US Holdings. That's according to sources. Lead US is one

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 4>of the largest IT service providers to the US government,

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 4>servicing the likes of the Pentagon and NASA. A company

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 4>spokesperson says the leak stems from a previously disclosed breach

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 4>and had no effect on their network or any sensitive

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 4>customer data. Plus Meta has removed over sixty three thousand

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 4>accounts in Nigeria linked to scammers. The parent company of

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 4>Facebook said they removed accounts who used its social media

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 4>platform to blackmail and sexually extort its users. The mass

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 4>removal took place at the end of May, but just

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 4>six weeks after a Bloomberg article detailed the rise of

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 4>sex shaution scams on apps like Instagram and Snap and

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:29.959
<v Speaker 4>shares of Netty's a climbing. The company saw its biggest

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 4>intro day jump in over a month as it gets

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 4>set to launch its mobile game, the Raka Blade Point Mobile.

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 4>According to Goldman Sachs, the game publisher is expected to

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 4>generate sales of eight hundred and eighty million from the

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 4>game over its first twelve months. Nettie says forty million

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 4>people have already pre registered for the game.

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 5>Claren Now you love been a gaming ed.

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, coming up, we'll have blue Eggs list of ten

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 3>AI startups that you have to watch this year.

0:31:56.920 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 9>That's coming up next.

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, though, keep an eye on certain shares. More earnings

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 3>AT and T added far more mobile phone subscribers now.

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 3>Actually Wall Street analyst had expected in the second quarter,

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 3>fewer customers canceling, many adding wireless services to their broad

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 3>brand plans were up almost five percent.

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:13.479
<v Speaker 9>T Mobile down more than one percent.

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Not their earnings splashing some cash for win nine billion

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 3>dollars in a joint venture with a private equity firm

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 3>that's KKR to buy five optic internet service provider Metronet.

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 9>This is Room Med Technology.

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg is out with its second annual leader Board of

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 4>AI startups. The boom and AI innovation has led to

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 4>tens of billions of dollars funneled into AI companies in

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 4>just the first half of this year alone. From Open

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 4>Ai and Perplexity, Tosuno and many more. Of these ten

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:52.479
<v Speaker 4>startups you see here are some of the biggest and

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 4>best funded to be watching right now. Let's bring in

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 4>one of the co authors and one of the assemblers

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 4>of such a list. It is here the top ten,

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 4>Bloomboat Rangel Mets. Let's start with methodology. Some of it's obvious.

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 4>Open AI and anthropic are way up there. Perplexity super interesting.

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 4>But how did you and Sharene and Dina Bass put

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 4>this together?

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we used well, some of it is a

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 2>little bit of thinking, you know, of like what do

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 2>we think should be on this list? It should be

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 2>pointed out this is not a ranked list, so it's

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 2>not like one one through ten, you know, it's just

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 2>it's arbitrarily listed on the list.

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 10>But a lot of it is related.

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 2>To the evaluation how much money leaveries and also buzz,

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 2>which is admittedly a hard factor to pin down.

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 10>That's kind of up to up to your opinion.

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, Like, let's dwell on like a company like Suno.

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 3>Many of us have heard of the other players, but

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 3>Sono it's Massachusetts based, it's five hundred million dollar evaluation. Oh,

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 3>but nothing in comparison to open Ai. But why would

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 3>you pick this particular AI music generator?

0:33:57.600 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, Ason, it was one of a couple of companies

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 10>on this list.

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 2>That may sound a little surprising at first because it

0:34:03.080 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 2>hasn't raised a time money.

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 10>It's not worth a ton of money.

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 2>But it has gotten a ton of attention in good

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 2>ways and bad both from people that are using it

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 2>to make these very complicated sounding songs, kind of generating

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 2>music that just wasn't possible until quite recently with AI.

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:24.840
<v Speaker 2>But it's also gotten the ire of the very famously

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 2>litigious music industry. The biggest record labels in the world

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:32.760
<v Speaker 2>sued Suno and one of its competitors, Udo recently, claiming

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:38.239
<v Speaker 2>that it used songs copyrighted songs unlawfully in its training data.

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Let's go geographically, because I bring up a Cambridge based company.

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 3>These are largely US based companies actually, whether they be

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 3>in New Jersey or whether they be in San Francisco.

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 9>But there is what one.

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 3>Canadian one French is it hard to find international winners

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Right now?

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 2>I think there's an increasing number of really cool, strong

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:02.880
<v Speaker 2>inter staying companies all around the world. We actually relied

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 2>on some of our Bloomberg technology reporders that are in

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 2>other parts of the world to help us figure out

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 2>who in your geography do you think is most important?

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 2>And also this year to give a sense of how

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 2>hard it was to figure out who should.

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 10>Be on this list.

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:20.239
<v Speaker 2>This year we added an additional six companies that are

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:22.239
<v Speaker 2>ones we think people should also be keeping an eye on,

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:24.279
<v Speaker 2>and a number of those are from outside the US

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:27.239
<v Speaker 2>as well, So who knows next year those might be

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 2>also on the top ten.

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:31.279
<v Speaker 4>You know, I look at the list and how many

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 4>of the news headlines and stories for those companies we've

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 4>covered on the show, like super focused on their fundraising,

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 4>like you pointed out, But I'm a user of chat,

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 4>GPT and GROCK, and I've kind of played a bit

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:46.880
<v Speaker 4>with perplexity how much was the sort of real world

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 4>use of the technology. So those companies are making a

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:52.360
<v Speaker 4>part of your decision in saying, Okay, these are the

0:35:52.400 --> 0:35:52.879
<v Speaker 4>top ten.

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 10>That's absolutely some of it.

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 2>I think Opening Eye is an easy company to put

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 2>on a list like this because you see it achieving

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:04.759
<v Speaker 2>in like the multiple different areas that we were looking at.

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 2>It has brand recognition, It clearly has corporate users. It

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:11.400
<v Speaker 2>also has consumers that are really interested in the company.

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:13.799
<v Speaker 2>It's also raised a ton of money over time, and

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 2>it's worth a lot of money. But some of these

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 2>other companies, it was more like it was a combination

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:21.680
<v Speaker 2>of factors, but they might not have been up there

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 2>on every single one. And it's true that sometimes it

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:27.880
<v Speaker 2>is hard to gauge buzz if your entirely enterprise focused, right, like,

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 2>we don't always know who a ton of your customers are,

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:33.439
<v Speaker 2>for instance, because a lot of companies aren't are.

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 10>Either still experimenting with AI and not.

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:37.799
<v Speaker 2>Like really really using it in their daily practices, or

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 2>they might not want to be super public about what

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:41.719
<v Speaker 2>software they're using.

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Noted Rachel Metz. You and the team is always doing

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:55.040
<v Speaker 3>great work. Thanks for bringing it to us. We appreciate it.

0:36:56.840 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 14>I am so very honored, and I pledge to you

0:37:00.280 --> 0:37:04.399
<v Speaker 14>I will spend the coming weeks continuing to unite our

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 14>party so that we are ready to win.

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 3>In November, Vice President Kamala Harris there vowing to win

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 3>the election in her first campaign rally, and after, of course,

0:37:19.239 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 3>President Biden pulled out of the race and endorsed Harris.

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 9>Many gen Z voters were quick to.

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:27.279
<v Speaker 3>Embrace the campaign through means, video edits or the VP

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 3>that have well since gone viral on TikTok, on Instagram,

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:33.839
<v Speaker 3>on x Nayla Zaiden can talk us through the CEO

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:37.720
<v Speaker 3>of Future Caucus, a non partisan organization for young policymakers.

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 9>You join us now for more.

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:43.400
<v Speaker 3>Basically, what has become a mean frenzy so quickly previous

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:49.360
<v Speaker 3>speeches jumped upon brat summer has become well, Kamala is Brat.

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 3>This is a moment for gen Z to be awakened.

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Why is this happening so effectively?

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:58.320
<v Speaker 15>I love this and the fact that you just said

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 15>on Bloomberg, come is Brat is just an incredible turn

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:04.839
<v Speaker 15>of events that history we're living through.

0:38:05.280 --> 0:38:06.200
<v Speaker 10>I think, listen, you.

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:08.799
<v Speaker 15>Don't have to be a political expert to know that

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 15>the past few weeks, months, years in politics have felt exhausting.

0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 15>The race between two people who we have seen this

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:22.360
<v Speaker 15>matchup before has felt static, and this moment has introduced

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 15>some dynamism and frankly, some joy back into I think

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 15>what's otherwise a really tense political moment and seeing the

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 15>vice President's team capitalize on it, but also just a

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:38.320
<v Speaker 15>lot of organic content from random Internet users really speaks

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 15>to the sense of joy. I think that people are

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:46.840
<v Speaker 15>infusing back into the conversation where it really was lacking.

0:38:48.760 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 4>Leila on one sec director producer just telling me they're

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 4>adding Caroline saying that to the show reel for twenty

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:57.759
<v Speaker 4>twenty four for the benefit of our global audience. Caroline

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 4>and I have seen it, of course, and engage social media.

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:03.439
<v Speaker 4>Explain brought to us, Caroline, please, then we'll let Laila

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:03.759
<v Speaker 4>Way in.

0:39:04.680 --> 0:39:08.279
<v Speaker 3>Well, Charlie XCX is Bratt, which has got this new

0:39:08.680 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 3>song that basically is all about Bratt brat summer. And

0:39:11.960 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 3>what is BRATCHI says, it's a kind of it's a

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 3>female who's quick to laugh, who's doesn't take itself too seriously,

0:39:18.760 --> 0:39:19.799
<v Speaker 3>but goes deep.

0:39:19.560 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 9>Perhaps enjoys partying slightly.

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:25.919
<v Speaker 3>I mean, why, Layla, has this been a lexicon that's

0:39:25.920 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 3>going to be different to mobilize gen z and to

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:31.719
<v Speaker 3>the point where we see perhaps Trump to his to

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 3>his campaign's efforts thinking about crypto as the way to

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:36.840
<v Speaker 3>link to millennial or younger voters.

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, well, you know, the race really was about age

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 15>for months, and ultimately President Biden made his decision in

0:39:47.320 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 15>large part because of this push to move to generational

0:39:51.239 --> 0:39:54.440
<v Speaker 15>future that he just you know, wasn't representing, and so

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:58.880
<v Speaker 15>the willingness to lean into something that appeals so deeply

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:03.520
<v Speaker 15>to young people are at least sort of speaks their language.

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:08.839
<v Speaker 15>I think is people feel heard, people feel like excited,

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:12.399
<v Speaker 15>and I think I can't predict the future. I can't

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:15.280
<v Speaker 15>tell you how it will affect the vice president's campaign,

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 15>in part because you know, we don't actually have an

0:40:18.040 --> 0:40:22.719
<v Speaker 15>official nominee until the Nuns later next month. But I

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:26.720
<v Speaker 15>think one thing to know is that sebby social media

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:31.240
<v Speaker 15>users still need to to use another phrase of the moment,

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:34.600
<v Speaker 15>live in the context, right, So gen Z might have

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:37.720
<v Speaker 15>an absurd sense of humor, and they might really enjoy

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:41.319
<v Speaker 15>these sort of buzzwords and these trendy memes, but at

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:43.360
<v Speaker 15>the end of the day, they're serious and they're informed

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:44.720
<v Speaker 15>about policies they care about.

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 5>It's a great way to get people.

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:49.439
<v Speaker 4>Attention, Leila, there is a serious side to it, which

0:40:49.480 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 4>is also memes are a tool for ridicule misinformation. So

0:40:55.360 --> 0:40:58.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, generally this conversation has been about the positive

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 4>reaction on social media's come of a Harry. There is

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 4>negative reaction too, and the content in support of her

0:41:04.080 --> 0:41:07.959
<v Speaker 4>is also in competition with content in support of Trump

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:08.919
<v Speaker 4>and Jade Vance, etc.

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 5>You know, just explain the dynamic of that to our audience.

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 15>Well, social media has always been I think a really

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:21.719
<v Speaker 15>powerful way to reclaim negative terms, negative perceptions, and I

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 15>think that can really work in a positive a politicians

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 15>favor if they lean into it. Right, So, even looking

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:32.360
<v Speaker 15>at President Biden with dark Brandon, or last selection cycle

0:41:32.480 --> 0:41:36.279
<v Speaker 15>with Hillary Clinton's mention of deplorables and that becoming sort

0:41:36.320 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 15>of a galvanizing cry for Trump supporters, I do think

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:43.239
<v Speaker 15>that if politicians or their supporters lean into some of

0:41:43.280 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 15>the negative memes, it actually can be really powerful for them.

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 15>But there's no doubt in my mind that social media

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:54.320
<v Speaker 15>really is boosting inflammatory content, it can contribute to worsening

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:57.960
<v Speaker 15>political polarization. It's actually something that Future Caucus works very

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 15>deeply on, bringing young lawmakers together to get to know

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 15>each other as humans and not digital avatars. But social

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:07.920
<v Speaker 15>media definitely has the potential to add gasoline to a

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 15>polarized moment in history.

0:42:11.400 --> 0:42:15.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, for now, some are finding the positive, humorous side,

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:16.960
<v Speaker 3>there is a serious side to all of it. In

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Leila Zaid and we hope that we're bringing back on

0:42:19.080 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 3>to discuss the pros the cons of embracing social media

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:25.760
<v Speaker 3>in this campaign, CEO Future Care because we appreciate it. Meanwhile,

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:28.080
<v Speaker 3>that does it for This edition of Bloomberg Technology had

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:28.399
<v Speaker 3>a big.

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 4>One, A big one, so much to recap. Listen to

0:42:31.520 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 4>the podcast. It's on the terminal on Bloomberg platforms as

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:37.239
<v Speaker 4>well as Apple, Spotify and iHeart. I'm going to be

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:39.959
<v Speaker 4>off to mar again and the football tonight Chelsea Wrexham. Caro,

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:43.880
<v Speaker 4>take you away from London. This is Bloomberg Technology.