WEBVTT - July Jobs Report Beats Expectations

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanebeck. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:09.879
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all harnessing the power of Business

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:23.279
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:34.880
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Again, another bang up jobs

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>number today, some good news for folks that really take

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a look at the jobs as a driver this economy.

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:42.840
<v Speaker 1>And earlier today, speaking from the White House, President Biden

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>said July's jobs report shows that his economic policies are working.

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a listen. What is indisputable now is this

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>The Biden plan is working. The Biden Plan produces results,

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Biden Plan is moving the country forward. Right now.

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>The first administration is history to jobs every single month

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in our first six months in office. Alright, That was

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>President Biden that I would say, taking a little bit

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of a victory lap there on the strong data coming

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 1>out of the labor market. Let's bring in Lindsay Pigs,

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>chief economists for Steple Financial. She joins us on the

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>phone from Wisconsin. So, Lindsay, you know, on the surface,

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>it seemed like a really really solid number. It's not

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>that million dollars, that million job number that people were

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>hoping for at some point here, but still very strong.

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>What's your takeaway, Well, it certainly was very strong. And

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to your point, if we actually add in the revision

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>from June and May, the overall change was actually well

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>over a million new jobs added to the U. S economy.

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think this was a very strong report all around.

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Really hard to find weakness in that type of jobs number.

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>But but, but, and this is what Michael McKee talked

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to us a little bit about Dave Wilson earlier. It

0:01:56.680 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>covers the first two weeks of the month, that's the

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>survey data comes in. So that wasn't when we were

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about the delta variant. That wasn't when companies were

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 1>saying do not return to the office in September. How

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>does that affect the way that hiring is going to

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 1>go uh in this period. Well, there is some fear

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>that that the impact on the delta variant is going

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>to have an impact going forward, but at least for now,

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>businesses don't appear to be deterred from continuing to add

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>employees as we as we continue to attempt to reach

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>this this new normal. Now, to your point, we have

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>seen the fear of the delta variant to lay some

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>companies reopening requiring employees to go back to work, but

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't necessarily translate into the second part of the equation,

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 1>which is layoffs or a slower pace of hiring. This

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>just speaks to a different way that we are working

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and right now, still restaurants, hotels, the travel industry, the

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the industries that were the hardest hit are those that

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>are most desperate to get employees back in the doors

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>so that they can reopen to full capacity. But the

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>one constraint that they are seeing is the limited pool

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of available labor. So I do think that this report

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>could actually be it could have been ecuse me, even

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:20.359
<v Speaker 1>stronger if we saw more workers available and ready to

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>go back to work. Do you expect that to materially

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>change over the next several weeks as schools reopened. I know,

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>for example, California reopens a lot of their schools Monday.

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>A lot of other schools in the South and the

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>West have are to reopened, and here in the Northeast

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of after Labor Day. For a lot of people,

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>we hear that childcare and back to school is a

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>really big issue. Do you factor that into your outlook

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>for labor? Oh? Absolutely. According to the BLS, there's some

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>seven million Americans that report they are currently sidelined from

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the labor force because of daycare or childcare issues. And

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>as we see America's youth return to full time in

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>person learning, I do think that's going to create a

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>lot less pressure on the labor market. Also, as we

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>see some of these federal programs expire, enhance unemployment benefits expire,

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and also vaccination rates continue to rise, that's going to

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>eliminate some of the fear of contracting or spreading the

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>virus or even the new delta variants. So as we

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>move forward, there are a lot of factors that are

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>on the positive side for the economy to continue this

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>recovery at a very robust pace. Lindsey F. J. Powell

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>sees a month like this, with those May and June

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>upward revisions as well, how does he changes thinking at

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the FED. Well, policymakers have been very clear that they

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>will continue to wait for further substantial progress, particularly when

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the labor market before adjusting accommodation. Now,

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.479
<v Speaker 1>certainly one report is not going to be enough to

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.559
<v Speaker 1>dictate a change in policy, but it certainly moves the ball.

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>It moves the FED closer to at least releasing an

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>outline for an eventual adjustment to policy, with of course

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>taper being that first step. And we continue to anticipated

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>outline being released as early as later this month, with

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a formal announcement coming for taper by the end of

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.239
<v Speaker 1>the year. So that does make the actual taper event

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>at least in my opinion, of two events pushing that

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>first rate increase out to three or beyond. So even

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>as the data continues to strengthen, we're still looking at

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a FED likely to be very accommodated, very patient for

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 1>quite some time. Lindsay has the delta variant altered um

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Steeple's outlook for GDP for the remainder this year until

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:43.280
<v Speaker 1>next year. Well, we had already factored in a lingering

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>fear of the virus and potentially a second round resurgence

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>around the fall, the time when we start to see

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>flu season set in. So we had anticipated that some

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>return of restrictions would be placed in the country, not

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 1>the owner's restrictions that we saw in twenty but certainly

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a return of mask mandates. This this was not unanticipated

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>by ourselves or I think many economists trying to factor

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>in these uncertainties. But I think the biggest component right

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 1>now is the change in policy metrics, specifically coming out

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of the federal government. When you talk about UH stopping

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the the influx of trillions upon trillions upon trillions of

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>dollars into the economy, that's going to have a material

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>effect on top line g d P. When we look

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>at the organic components, the consumer is extremely strong, wage growth,

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>gage growth up at four percent, housing, manufacturing services all

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>running it at full speed. The economy is well established,

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>but it will be slower than the six and a

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>half percent at the start of the year. Lindsay Piggs,

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I thank you so much for joining us. Really appreciate

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>it as always. Lindsay Piggs Pigs, chief economists for Steeple

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Financial Paul Sweeney temps down of ECNY Bloomberg Interactive Broker's

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>studio in New York. Paul, earlier this week, you and

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I uh got the news in the afternoon of the

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>New York Auto Show, right was canceled. We're discussing that

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>it felt like one of those moments, like from March

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of where you think things are going in a certain

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>way and then you start hearing about these events being canceled,

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:14.239
<v Speaker 1>and that that changes things. Um Indeed, the delta variant

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>is increasingly threatening some parts of the US economy. Read

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Pickart writes about it on the Bloomberg terminal and on

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. She's US economy reporter for Bloomberg New

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>She's on the phone in Washington, d C. Read help

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>us make sense of the jobs report that we got today,

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>coming out a time when companies are saying, wait a second,

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>we've told you to come back to the office in September.

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Hold that thought. Maybe October, maybe January. Absolutely so so.

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>The delta variant, as we all know, it's spreading rapidly,

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and as a result, it's injected a lot of uncertainty

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>into the economic outlook. In just a couple of weeks.

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>So we got to f fantastic jazz report today. UM.

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>But the key thing to keep in mind about it

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>is that it's a snot shot of mid July. So

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>in the weeks since then, delta has escalated and companies

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>like Black Cross up in Amazon have all pushed back

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>their return to work these um and as you mentioned

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>just now, you've also started to seek conventions start to

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>get canceled. UM. So we're trying to monitor high frequency

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>data as a result, UM, and you're start just starting

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to see UM there it might be having an impact

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>on spending, particularly on things like entertainment and travel. Um.

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the key with these high frequency indicators

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>is there is a lot of noise. So interpreting this

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>volatile data on a week tweek basis can be quite challenging. Yeah,

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>it does, but I think it's really helpful for those

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:38.079
<v Speaker 1>that can really spend the time with it because I

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:42.199
<v Speaker 1>think about certain data points like open table, you know, restaurants,

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>where's the restaurant traffic? What are we seeing in the

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 1>last week or two? Because this two and I've been

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about it just feels like this delta variant discussion

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>is really heated up over the last couple of weeks.

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Right so, so right now with the open table data,

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>we haven't been a clear downward trend yet, but the

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>same that didcount to me that I thought was quite interesting. UM.

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>So there's a company called Castle Systems which essentially tracks

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>UM electronic access to office buildings, so you know, think

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of like the little fob that you often white to

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>get into your office building on each day. And you

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>started to see this pullback UM last week from its

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>pandemic peaks just a week earlier. And so we're starting

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to kind of see these moments where it's not you know,

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you're not sure if it's UM a one week thing

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:33.839
<v Speaker 1>or the start of a broader trend. But the fact

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>that it could be the start of a broader trend

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:39.119
<v Speaker 1>is part of why there's all of the economic concerncy

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that we have and plays a lot into you know,

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:45.079
<v Speaker 1>how long we think this is gonna last? What UM,

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>what the economic effects are going to be UM. But

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to monthly data, things like the jobs report,

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have to wait a little while until

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>we can actually start to see any impact in those figures.

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about this during during the break and it's

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>it seems like, at least the way that we're living

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>right now, I haven't pulled back my spending. I'm still

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>going into the office. Maybe in the metro New York

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>area's got generally a high vaccination rate. Maybe you know, UM,

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>it'll be interesting to see on the regional side read

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>what is the other data that we should really be

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>keeping an eye on, because you do point out that

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:20.319
<v Speaker 1>total spending using Make of America debon and credit cards

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>decelerated meaningfully last week according to economists from the Bank

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>m JP. Morgan actually had a no doubt today as well,

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>UM using their Chase cards spending data that showed a

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:35.559
<v Speaker 1>similar kind of picture in terms of I'll pull back

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:41.119
<v Speaker 1>in spending on travel, UM and entertainment categories. UM. But

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>but I do want to talk a little bit about

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>today's jobs report, if that's okay. It's one of those

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>things that, you know, not often do we get to

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about a report that's kind of right across the board.

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>There's this obviously had a couple of caveats, um and

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>like every report does. UM, but I think it showed

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>us that heading into this the delta variant, we had

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of momentum. So not only did we get

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>more jobs than we expected UM for the July report,

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>but we also saw pretty significant upward revision to the

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>prior month as well. So you have all this job growth,

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you saw unemployment decline more than most people thought UM,

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and you saw the number of long term unemployed or

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the folks who have been out of work for twenty

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>seven weeks or more followed by the most on record. UM.

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>So there there's definitely the sense that you have this

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>massive wave of economist momentum heading into delta UM. And

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously a delta proposes, you know, adds uncertainty, but for

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:48.679
<v Speaker 1>now most economists see delta as a downside risk rather

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>than changing fundamentally changing their baseline forecast. Hevery thanks so

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>much for this. We really appreciate your reporting. Here. Reid Pickered,

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>US economy reporter for Bloomberg News joining us on the

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>phone from washing in, d C. Again, this that the

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>narrative we've had tim for the last you know, seventeen

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>eighteen months. It is what is a virus? What is

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a coronavirus? Right? What do we name it? What do

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:11.679
<v Speaker 1>we call it? And oh my gosh, this is bad.

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 1>This is much worse than we thought. This is not

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>just going to go away. Then it became one, thankfully

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of shutdowns and all that thing. And then it became,

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 1>oh my goodness, these vaccines came, and it came perhaps

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>earlier than we thought, and oh boy, are they efficient

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 1>and do they get the job done? And now it's

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>seems to be getting jabs into people in vaccination rates

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and mass. And but now we've got a delta variant.

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>It is throwing a wrange in everything. It seems like

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 1>we're just hitting rewind a little bit here and again

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the discussion points are point we've got to get people

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated and to um mass. We have to have that

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>discussion again. I think that's coming back. It's definitely coming back,

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>especially in the context of school. Paul. It's it's interesting because,

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 1>and I've talked about this this week, but there's this

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>air of uncertainty around corporate earnings and at least when

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it comes to guide and and companies just don't know

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>what the delta variant is going to do in terms

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of changing consumer behavior. Peter Kern, the Expedia Group CEO

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:10.719
<v Speaker 1>and vice chair, was on Bloomberg TV earlier today. He

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 1>said that even though this isn't COVID all over again,

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Like this isn't lockdowns at least here in the US.

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>When it's it's more of a wave right. When cases

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>go up, local governments around the world change their recommendations

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>some he said, like Australia lockdown. That changes things, and

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>it changes things in an unforeseen way. Yeah, it does.

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>And it just kind of just reminds us, um that

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:32.839
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be with us for a while

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>in some form, And it's a question of how has

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>it has been from the beginning, of how we alter

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>our behavior, how we deal with it, how we engage

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>with it on a daily basis. Thankfully, you know, the vaccine,

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>many many people are vaccinated in many parts of the world. Unfortunately,

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:50.959
<v Speaker 1>many parts of the the world are are tremendously under vaccinated,

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's where the focus needs to go on a

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>global scale. But given that there is good vaccination rates

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and many parts of the world, Uh, you know, we're

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>told by the exper US that this is this is different. Um.

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>We can live with this, we can work through this, um,

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 1>and but there may be some time force I'm asking, well,

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little bit more about the virus and vaccines.

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Because it is the cover of this week's Bloomberg Business Week.

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>It's available on newsstands and at Bloomberg dot com slash

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>business Week. It is a double issue. It has a fantastic,

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>fantastic group of stories. Joel Webber's editor of Bloomberg Business Week.

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>He joins us now on the remote from Massachusetts, I

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>want to start droll with the with the cover here. Uh,

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Vaccine Mandates for Kids is the next big back to

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>school fight. It is the cover story by Riley Griffin

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and Susie Ring. Take us into Uh we talked to

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you earlier this week about the story. Take us into

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the cover though, who is it and how did you

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>choose it? Amazingly, this is the daughter of one of

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>our our directors on the staff. Really this is not

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a stock photo yet not a stock photo and we

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>shot it last weekend. Um. She actually is a gap

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>model or has been a gap models kind of took

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>her out of her retirement. Did you did you have

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to get her agents to approved that dad approved? We

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>did not. We did not pay Dad for for this. Um.

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>So so uh, you know, we tried to look a

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit into the teacher with this story because we're

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>just around the corner from the school year starting. Um,

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have a real moment here with society when

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>schools reopened and kids who you know, obviously below twelve

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>don't have um vaccination abilities yet, but twelves and seven team,

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>we've seemed really lackluster numbers, and so we're gonna see

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting moment here with schools decided to mandate

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>vaccines as kids begin going back to school with those

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that can get vaccines, and then you know, potentially as

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>early as the beginning of the new year, we could

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>see kids under twelve start to get vaccinated as well. Yeah,

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting and Joel, you probably saw that the news.

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>But here in the state of New Jersey where I live,

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the Governor Murphy just announced that schools will require masking.

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Everybody's coming back full service, everybody in the in the

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>in the classroom, but h going to require mask and

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that appears to be one path forward in some some states.

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I think of Florida maybe taking a different

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>path that's going to be. And you know, masking is

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:22.239
<v Speaker 1>divisive and and you know vaccination is is that plus

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>like times of thousand really um, And what we know

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>though is the delta variant being such a variable here. Um,

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to see more and more states

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>come around to a masking mandate, at least for school

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>as sort of a uh AN entry point, right, And

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously I think some of those decisions are going to

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>break down politically at least dong state lines. But yeah,

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that that masking mandate is sort of part of it,

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and the vaccination discussion isn't far beyond. Now, keep in mind,

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the other variable on all of this is that school's

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 1>mandate vaccines all the time. You know that it's different

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>about the COVID one is that we still don't have

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and the FDA backing and that FDA acting is sort

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of the thing that everybody's watching for. We're still under

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the Emergency Use authorization. I don't imagine though, that people

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:08.199
<v Speaker 1>who are declining shots right now are going to be

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>lining up once the FDA fully approves these vaccines. But

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you know it's because of delta. We've actually seen some

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 1>uptick in places uh in terms of inoculations in places

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that have been there too for slow to adopt. So

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>it is yet another thing that can hopefully help overcome

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>some hesitancy. One thing that we were also talking about

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>this week, joll and it's in the current issue of

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week is the mad rush to deliver groceries

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>in ten minutes. Vcs have bet billions of dollars on

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>getting you bananas and beer in a very short period

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of time. Uh, what's the opportunity there? This is a

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>story by Alex Webb of Bloomberg Quick take Over in London.

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:46.639
<v Speaker 1>The illustration for this story is awesome. It's a little

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>beer can with rocket jets on attached to it. Back

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:53.360
<v Speaker 1>um there. Obviously, there have been the instant cart kind

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of services that have effectively teamed up with grocery stores

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and to do delivery for the past year. But the

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>other phenomenon on is this new thing where we're seeing

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>basically what are dark stores pop up and those these

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 1>locations are actually their own services, things like gorillas is

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>is is it one? Get here? Is another? Bill puff

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:16.199
<v Speaker 1>as another. There's other ones. Even New York has its

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>own versions of this. But they're all promising basically to

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:23.159
<v Speaker 1>be able to deliver groceries within tend to fifteen or

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty minutes. And VC has spotted a huge opportunity here

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>to disrupt the corner Deli. Those corner delis have long

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>been very profitable UM, and by pouring a ton of

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>VC money into this, it's opened up an opportunity. But

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the thing is that that window is is dependent upon

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 1>UM being there without that much competition, and we're already

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:50.479
<v Speaker 1>seeing so many competitors that potentially the profit won't won't

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:53.399
<v Speaker 1>be sustainable. I love the corner of Bodega. I know

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 1>I do too. I think most peop who would want

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 1>to take it from you? Right? I had to go

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to ours this morning to get some milk, ran out

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of milk and it was closed. It was too early.

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I had to put a one that was way further away,

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 1>And I was actually thinking about this story because it

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>was like the one time where I needed to get

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 1>milk in ten minutes or less. Joe Weber Or Weber

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>is editor at Bloomberg Business Week, joining us each and

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>every day here on Bloomberg Business Week. You heard Paul

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 1>earlier mentioned New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy mandating masks in

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>schools as cases increase among a younger population. That next

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>month is going to start in person lessons. Also some

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 1>other virus headlines United becoming the first major US carry

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 1>to require employee inoculation UH and JP Morgan Chase, as

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 1>we talked about earlier, is bringing back its mask requirement

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 1>as Amazon did for frontline workers, even for those people

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>who have already been vaccinated. So a host of virus

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 1>news to get to. Let's do it as we do

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:49.679
<v Speaker 1>each and every Friday, with Dr Ian LUs Beder, clinical

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Professor of Medicine at n y U Langones Medical Center,

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the phone from New York City. Dr

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>LUs Beder always great to check in with you on Fridays.

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.199
<v Speaker 1>It feels different now, and I know I don't I

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:04.360
<v Speaker 1>don't want to. I don't want to say that we're

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 1>not looking at the data because the data is different,

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's why it does feel different. I think where

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>are we in terms of getting out of this pandemic?

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Hello Tim and Paul, Hope you guys are doing well. Um.

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 1>I think in terms of the pandemic, it's becoming pretty

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>obvious that essentially everyone, certainly in the United States and globally,

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to be exposed to the delta variant. We always,

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>even at the beginning of this, with vaccines and so forth.

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.919
<v Speaker 1>Two years ago, talked about slowing the spread, and I

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>think that's really all we can hope for is to

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 1>slow the spread. Everyone is going to be exposed at

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>this rate. The vaccinated people certainly have an advantage UH

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:48.919
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that at this time it looks like

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the vaccines, even as antibody levels drop a bit, are

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>really avoiding UM for the most part, hospitalizations and severe disease.

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, the unvaccinated UH typically will get a bad cold,

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:06.360
<v Speaker 1>but certainly a significant percent will get hospitalized. And at

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>this point it looks like the vast majority of patients

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 1>who are hospitalized with COVID are unvaccinated. So vaccines are

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>one arm. Everyone is going to be exposed. Even those

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>who have been vaccinated may well get DELTA to one

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>degree or another, it looks like they will avoid severe disease,

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and we're relying on other things to kind of hold

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>things up. Masks, for example, which also are not a

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.959
<v Speaker 1>cure old by any means, they do reduce spread maybe

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:43.399
<v Speaker 1>fifty depending on the kind of mask, obviously the more effective.

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think what we're doing is trying to UM

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>have a variety of techniques to to mitigate because we're

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>really not going to stop the pandemic at this point,

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>there are just too many people who are unvaccinated. Uh.

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 1>It's too hard to destroy me at all these vaccines,

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think all we can do is do our

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>best to sort of protect vulnerable people while the pandemic

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:13.119
<v Speaker 1>plays out. And this is really what happened in Unfortunately

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 1>without vaccines. But it took about three years for everyone

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to get infected, fifty million plus dead, uh, and ultimately

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>it went away. And I think that's what's gonna happen here.

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>But there will be more carnage before that happens. Dr

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:29.439
<v Speaker 1>los Pader want to get a sense of timing if

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>we can even do that. In terms of this delta variant,

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>is this something that could burn itself out quickly or

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>is this going to stay around? I'm thinking about some

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of the short surgeones we saw in the UK and

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:44.679
<v Speaker 1>in Israel. Um, is that what we're gonna see here?

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Is this going to be here for longer in terms

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:49.719
<v Speaker 1>of this variant? You know, I think that's a good question.

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I think in the next few months we are going

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>to have a significant increase in cases throughout the United

0:22:56.119 --> 0:23:00.199
<v Speaker 1>States and basically everyone in the US. Probably by the

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>end of the year will be exposed and whoever gets sick, um,

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, will get sick. And so I think in

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the US it probably will burn itself out. Globally it

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>probably will continue, and of course as it continues globally

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>there's risk of other variants. So I think Delta will

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>burn itself out in the United States. Fortunately, it doesn't

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>seem to be much worse than the original alpha variant.

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:29.919
<v Speaker 1>Maybe in some pockets, certainly much more contagious. But I

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think COVID will go away, and it may even

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 1>become a chronic illness like influenza, where you do get

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a yearly shot. We don't really know that yet. Hopefully

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that won't happen. It did not happen in with influenza,

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>which is different. Um. But I agree with you. I

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to see a surge in the next

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:52.640
<v Speaker 1>few months and then probably a significant drop in cases

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>as the wave goes through the United States. Is this

0:23:56.080 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the last wave of the of this pandemic? Good question, US.

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I think at the end of this ways everyone in

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the United States three million plus will have been exposed

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 1>one way or another to COVID. Either they will have

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.199
<v Speaker 1>had the vaccine, they will have had the disease of

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>or they will have UM you know, recovered or died.

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 1>So I think in the US come mid year, I

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>think will be in a somewhat better place. If there's

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>still new variants that are coming up, and are antibody

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>levels are dropping, which they probably will, we may need

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a booster sometime, you know, elate full early winter. The

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 1>the FDA hasn't really commented about that. Most people that

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I've checked still have good antibody levels. Some are still

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>getting delta because the delta is a little resistant, has

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 1>mutated enough so that our antibodies UM don't fully capture it.

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 1>So if a new strain were to come along that's

0:24:57.240 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>significantly different, that could be a problem come you know,

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>next spring. You know, Dr Tim and I always like

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 1>to when we have experts in frontline healthcare workers on

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:10.119
<v Speaker 1>would like to ask how the folks at your facility

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 1>are doing. It's been such a long seventeen months. How

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 1>are they doing right now? So, you know, I think

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the hospitals in New York really had a terrible siege

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>UM a year ago, a year and a half ago,

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 1>we were really the epicenter. Fortunately, now, the the case rate,

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the incidents is somewhere three plus or minus. There are

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 1>not many cases in the hospital. All of those cases

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>are unvaccinated. Most are doing fairly well. So I think

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>this area in the Northeast is doing fairly well. That

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:44.160
<v Speaker 1>is not the case in other parts of the country.

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think in in the Northeast or the Tri

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>State area here, I think we're going to be okay.

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, kids with masks and so forth. I think

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe treating ourselves more than treating the disease. But um,

0:25:57.000 --> 0:25:58.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, there there are pros and comes to that,

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>but I think we're through the worst of it in

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:03.919
<v Speaker 1>New York as best as I can tell. Well, that

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:06.360
<v Speaker 1>is certainly some good news to end on. Dr Ian

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Las Beader, Clinical Professor of Medicine at n y U

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Langon Medical Center. It is always a treat to talk

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to you each and every Friday. Dr LUs Better, thank

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:15.719
<v Speaker 1>you so much for taking the time. All right, Berkshire

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:20.439
<v Speaker 1>Hathaway reporting earnings tomorrow. Everybody's gonna be looking, obviously for

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>how the company is dealing with the current environment. But

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of course people really want to hear from Warren Buffett

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and what is Warren Buffett and his team going to

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>do with all that cash on the balance sheet? What's

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the next big deal? Cat Chick Lnsky joins us. She

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>is our ace Bloomberg News reporter on Warren Buffett and

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Berkshire Hathaway. She joins us on the phone from New

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>York City. Kat, Thanks so much for joining us here.

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>First question, really tough one, This might throw you back.

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 1>Why did they report on Saturday? It's a weird quirk

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 1>and uh definitely makes for a busy week for all

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the reporters. But it is that he tends to actually

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:00.360
<v Speaker 1>like to report on days in which shareholders can take

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>some time to look at the the release without getting

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>swamped by too many too much coverage of it. So um,

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>so you know, he, Yeah, he has the weird quirk,

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 1>but but he's he's loved to put it either on

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>everybody's attention. I mean, he's got full attention at the marketplace.

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>And what about that cash that that Paul mentioned? What

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>do we know about the types of deals that that

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Berkshire Hathaway is looking at right now? Well, and that's

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:28.959
<v Speaker 1>the biggest question, right and you know, Berkshire has simply

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>too much cash and too few opportunities. They really haven't

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 1>been able to strike a ton of deals recently, and

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's been weighing on them for the past couple

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of years now, especially with the back boom going on um.

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>But one of the biggest questions is will they have

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>other avenues to deploy it. You know, Berkshire and Buffett

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>have finally started doing more share buy backs, and we

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>have a hint. You know that they did at least

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>more than six billion dollars worth of buybacks in the quarter,

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>which is a substantial amount. But when you're Berkshire and

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you're throwing off that much cash, you know, it's a

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>little hard to tell if that's actually going to be

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 1>able to keep up with the gushing flows of cash

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 1>that the conglomerate produces. And I think that's gonna be

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the biggest key. You know. A couple of months ago

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>we learned that Greg Abele is in line to take

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 1>over for Buffett once he decided to to step down.

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's that's the key there. Once he

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>decides agreed, and you know, he's coming up one Buffet

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:23.880
<v Speaker 1>is so I'm you know, I think he really loves

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to stick with this business. But every earning is from

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>here on out, everyone's going to be scrutinizing it more

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 1>because it's one thing to say, hey, you know, I'll

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>give Warren Buffett the benefit of the doubts and maybe

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>he can find you know, another deal months down the

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>line and it's worth him waiting. Um. It's another thing

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to say that, you know, hey, I'm going to give

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>greg Able that benefit of the doubt. Do we have

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 1>any idea how their investment philosophy, they're operating strategy may

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>change under Greg abel Well, we know for certain greg

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Abele is going to face more pressure and that might mean,

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, Buffett has long shine away from dividend um

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>he finds by backs the much better use of shareholder return.

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, there is a chance and analysts keep raising

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>this point of you know, greg Able might face more

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>pressure to actually issue a diffident and have a one

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 1>time you know, way to release that cash. We've also

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>been seeing and this is you know a little different

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>from Berkshire. We um there was a hint that Berkshire

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>sold this vacuum cleaner company, Kirby Um, just in recent months,

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and so there is sort of this idea that maybe

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Berkshire is at a point in which it is really saying,

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>look at all the companies we own, you know, are

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 1>all of them sort of worth owning in the same way?

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 1>And and that could be something that potentially changes. But

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously just one company down, we'll see um whether they

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of take that tax with other ones. I think

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it's really notable that the company can't find deals right now,

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 1>considering that we are likely going to see a record

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 1>summer in terms of amount of money UH spent on

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 1>deals and is looking like it's going to be a

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>record year. So so what makes a Berkshire deal at

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Berkshire deal agreed? And and I think actually Berkshire's pitch

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>has just sort of been lost in the stream of

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>capital that's coming after all these deals. I mean, Bercher's

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>pitch for a long time to potential companies is, hey,

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're a family owned business in particular,

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and you want it to have a home at this conglomerate,

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that will let you sort of run the business like

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>you've wanted to run it and give you that sort

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 1>of freedom to handle things on your own, that autonomy

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that something to be found at Berkshire. And and that's

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 1>an enticing pitch. I think for many companies. But when

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you have private equity and you have facts, and you

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>have all this money on the sideline, you know, buffet

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to overpay for a deal. And so you know,

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>if other companies are willing to pay up for some

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>of these acquisitions, Berkshire, you know, is going to lose.

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the five year chart to function ceo

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 1>MP and over the last five years Berkshire hathways underformed

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the SMP. Is there any pressure building? I think there's

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pressure building. Yeah, Berkshire has underperformed the

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 1>SMP five hundred and you know, it's gotten to a

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 1>point where I think people really question the size. I mean,

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a huge company. And when you look at all

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the arraysed businesses in it's in. You know, sometimes that

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 1>breath is beneficial and that you know, when one business

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:13.239
<v Speaker 1>is doing well, maybe another business is not in it's

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of off sets it. But I think the idea

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that there's not that many huge deals that Berkshire can

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>find for a well priced you know, a well priced price,

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and and I think that sort of question is going

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to continue to make investors a little more cautious on

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the stock catch Glinsky. Finance reporter Fort Bloomberg knew she's

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be up early covering Berkshire Hathway earnings on

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Saturday morning, and we certainly appreciate that. What a busy

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>week we've had in terms of earnings, in terms of

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 1>economic data today, we obviously had the jobs number coming

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 1>in better than expected, markets generally moving hire. A lot

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of folks trying to say, boys, the next five to

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 1>seven percent, moving this stock market higher or lower. Let's

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>check up with Ryan Dietrich, He's chief market strategies for

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 1>LPL Financial, joined us on the phone from Charlotte, North Carolina. Tim,

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>if you don't know what, Charlotte's a little town southwest

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 1>of Durham, North Carolina, at home with Duke University. Just

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 1>wants to point that out to you. All right, Ryan,

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>let's we've had a lot of earnings over the past

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks, We've had a lot of economic data here.

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>What say you about this equity market? Here? Guys, thanks

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>for having me back. And before we go there, I

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 1>do want to point out we are right now at

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>LPL we're having a we call our focus conference with

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>more than ten thousand of our advisors virtually we had

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 1>speaking of Duke, we had Mike Sachowski virtually with our

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 1>CEO Dan Arnold on Wednesday. And I'm not a huge

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Duke fan. I'll just give it out there, but it

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>was an incredible Sweeney about that. Okay, there you go.

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 1>But anyway that that that's my that's my part about Duke.

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>It was really cool as our focus event with our advisors.

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 1>But listen, there's like you said, I mean, there's the

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 1>strong jobs number. FED is still accommodati of the economy

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 1>is doing better than we thought. But what's also happening.

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 1>We're making new highs right today could be the forty

0:32:56.760 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>four new all time high so far this year. What

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 1>in the world does that mean? Well, guys, and you

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 1>look at previous years up to this point, only two

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>had more new all time highs ninety five and sixty four,

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's a small sample size. What happens then those

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>two previous years markets continue to be really strong, and

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>ninety five they did pretty good the second half of

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 1>sixty four. So I think the truth is there's a

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 1>momentum behind this market. History would say you probably will

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you definitely want to continue to be a buyer, of

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 1>any dips. But the answer your question could the next

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 1>five or seven percent up or down. We wouldn't be

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 1>surprised if it was down, right. We don't had a

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 1>five percent correction since last October. This is August, the

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>worst month of the year in a post election year.

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:40.959
<v Speaker 1>September is the worst month on average. October is obviously vaultile.

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>So we've been bullish, come all you guys for a while,

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 1>but I tell you it makes sense. Maybe we could

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 1>be due for some normal third quarter of volatility. Here, Ryan,

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 1>what is it that that that sets that sends stocks

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 1>lower than the third quarter this year? Yeah, very welcould be, Yeah,

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>very well, could be. You know, the FED policy and

0:33:56.840 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the inflation and the worries there at the same time,

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it's send the best answer, but sometimes the truth it's

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 1>just been a while since we've had any volatility. Markets

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 1>sometimes just get volatile to be volatile, but the inflation

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:10.399
<v Speaker 1>concerns are clearly still out there. And then also, hey,

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 1>we're making new highs. People are pretty optimistic, right, I mean,

0:34:13.200 --> 0:34:15.399
<v Speaker 1>sometimes if everyone's on one side of the boat, that's

0:34:15.440 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 1>what can kind of trip things up, if you will,

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:19.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jackson Hole obviously is a couple of weeks

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 1>from now that's going to be, you know, very closely watched,

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're they're going to talk about tapering or not

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and what's what's it mean? What's the FED thing about inflation?

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 1>And we've seen some pretty big policy decisions made at

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:32.759
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Hole over the years. So we're not saying that's

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the trip up situation, but that's just something to be

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 1>aware of. And lastly, September it's still out there. Remember

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:40.760
<v Speaker 1>said last September guys, we had nearly a ten percent correction. Honestly,

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>no one probably remembers why it happened. We just had

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a big rally than a ten percent correction pre election jitters.

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes the calendar can just be something you want to

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to. Alright. So Ryan, we're, you know, well

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 1>through the earning season here, we're gonna have some of

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the retailers coming up next, some consumer names coming up next.

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 1>How's you take it at these earnings? They've been great

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of comparisons. Are they good enough for this market? Yeah,

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 1>we think they are. We are making new highs as

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:09.320
<v Speaker 1>we speak. I mean it's amazing, right, I mean, recent

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:11.760
<v Speaker 1>recent data says we might be up almost ninety percent

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 1>year over year in the second quarter. Just a couple

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 1>of months ago we were thinking, you know, about mid

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:18.839
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent. I mean, it's just amazing how quickly it's

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:20.839
<v Speaker 1>come up. So but that's the key thing, right, It's

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 1>all about expectations and you know, clearing the bar, and

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the bar is getting higher and higher. I mean just

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 1>today's again today's number UM on the jobs number obviously

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>really strong. It's got some excitement. Look at the ten

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:33.800
<v Speaker 1>ure yield, right, the tenure yield obviously has been surprising

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 1>many to the downside. Maybe potentially form a little double

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>bottom with a nice move higher here. So we're optimistic

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that earnings will continue to be strong. But we also

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 1>think that early cyclical value group UM that it is

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously struggled, no question about the last two or three months,

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is still where you're going to find some leadership the

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 1>second half of this year. And with the action on

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the tenure, we're optimistic that maybe we found a technical

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:55.720
<v Speaker 1>bottom here and you can start having a higher tenure,

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 1>which should be a tail win for banks, financials and

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 1>value in general. I know you're studying in technicals. I

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:03.239
<v Speaker 1>know you're looking at the technicals. But this is all

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 1>happening in the background of the delta variant spreading. Uh,

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>We've been talking throughout the show about potential softening and spending.

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>There some data from Bank of America Debt and credit cards.

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday it said it decelerated meaningful spending, that is last week,

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 1>and then today we got some news from Chase that

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 1>said spending spending data has softened recently as well. How

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 1>do you look at alternative data like that when you're

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 1>thinking about where the market's going to go. Well, we

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously pay attention to it, but at the same time,

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 1>we're almost back in that world where what was bad

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 1>news good news? Right? I mean, okay, so if the

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 1>delta variant is terrible as it is, and then the

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 1>spending slows down, and we do see a little economic

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:40.719
<v Speaker 1>slow down because honestly, the job's number was strong, a

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of that was before some of the delta variant stuff,

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 1>like you know, kind of creep started creeping up again.

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 1>So we have to have to look at it like that.

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:49.760
<v Speaker 1>But but again, if if things start to slow down, well,

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the Fed they've said what they've said, right, the Fed

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 1>might actually you know, keep policy low for a while

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and then they ignore tapering for a little bit longer.

0:36:56.400 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 1>So so as strange as it sounds, and fiscal policy

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:01.359
<v Speaker 1>still out there, so bad news could be good news.

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:02.880
<v Speaker 1>We saw that a lot last year, right, I mean

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 1>this time a year ago. Markets in the midst of

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a five month winstree five month winstree can we have

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the worst headlines in our country's history. A

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:10.839
<v Speaker 1>lot of it was because, yeah, the economy came back,

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:13.439
<v Speaker 1>but that fiscal monetary policy is there, So it's it's

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:14.880
<v Speaker 1>just kind of the way I guess you gotta you

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 1>gotta look at it from a full picture point of view,

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:19.319
<v Speaker 1>and bad news could be good news from an investment's

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 1>point of view, Ryan, what are your investment professionals, you know,

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:25.799
<v Speaker 1>hearing from their clients these days? You know, I know

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 1>there's that wall of worry out there, and uh, you know,

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you can make the argument that it's higher than ever

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:34.399
<v Speaker 1>right now. So what are they hearing? Yeah, I mean

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a great question there. So the two that we've been

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 1>hearing a lot lately, a delta variant, which we just

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:40.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of touched on, and but also stagflation, right, I mean,

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 1>stagflation is the idea clearly that the inflation is going higher,

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the economy is starting the weekends. Those are some of

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the things that are the concerns we're hearing about. Again.

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're in the camp similar to the FED,

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that the inflation is probably transitory here, um, you know,

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:56.160
<v Speaker 1>And and and yeah, we had two percent inflation for

0:37:56.200 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 1>like a decade, and we might see two and a

0:37:57.520 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 1>half three percent for a couple of years, coming off

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 1>the worst for session in our lifetime. That's that's not

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:04.320
<v Speaker 1>overly concerning to us, but we're watching it closely. But

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:06.240
<v Speaker 1>those are the two things we're hearing a lot about.

0:38:06.360 --> 0:38:07.879
<v Speaker 1>And and you're right, there is a fear of heights.

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean people everyone's optimistic. Then you get a little correction.

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:13.279
<v Speaker 1>I remember the almost five percent correction back in the

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 1>late January early February game stop. I mean that was

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 1>only a five percent correction, not quite but almost. There's

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fear on that of modest pullback. So

0:38:21.239 --> 0:38:22.839
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing we want to keep seeing. We're gonna

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 1>pull backs eventually, want fear to come in and that

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:27.920
<v Speaker 1>can be you know, wash out the weekends and continue

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the upward trajectory that we think we're still on. So

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:32.879
<v Speaker 1>when you see those meme stocks and even Robin Hood

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 1>today and so on, does that kind of point to

0:38:35.080 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you as a well, this is a sign of a

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 1>frothy market, sign of a topping market when you see

0:38:39.160 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 1>those types of market behaviors. Yeah, and in the near

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:44.359
<v Speaker 1>term absolutely can be. I mean there's no doubt. Remember

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:46.319
<v Speaker 1>coin bases I p O came out literally the day

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:48.880
<v Speaker 1>that you know, Bitcoin tops back in April, so you

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:52.120
<v Speaker 1>see then Robin Hood, So that's kind of out there. Um.

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:54.320
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, you know, the meme stops

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:56.799
<v Speaker 1>are one that memes stocks are one thing. But the

0:38:56.840 --> 0:39:00.800
<v Speaker 1>truth is, hey, earnings are strong. I know, evaluations are stretched,

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 1>but when you have the relatively low rates that we

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 1>still have, Yeah, you know, stocks about be expensive, but

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:08.480
<v Speaker 1>bonds are really expensive. So it still makes sense to

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 1>us the second half of this year is we keep

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 1>going that stocks will do a little bit better in

0:39:11.960 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 1>bonds and value is probably gonna do a little bit

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:15.080
<v Speaker 1>better than growth. Is how we're telling our more than

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thousand advisors how we see the world. Brian Dietrich,

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 1>chief market strategist at LPL Financial, joining us on the

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 1>phone from Charlotte, North Carolina. Ryan is always a pleasure

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>when you join us. Thank you so much for taking

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the time. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download

0:39:30.880 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com, and

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you can also listen to our radio show at two

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:38.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:43.359
<v Speaker 1>search Bloomberg Global News.