WEBVTT - Surveillance: Central Bank Stimulus With Blanchflower

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm term Keene Jay Leye.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance,

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>investment and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg Let's

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>turn now to the UK with Rupert Harrison, black Rock

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>multi Asset Strategies portfolio manager, formerly of the Treasury as

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>while working alongside the former Chance that George Osborne. Rupert,

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>fantastic to have you with us on a program this morning,

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>especially on a morning like this morning. Rupert, let's talk

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>about the response from the Bank of England what may

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>still come from Treasury a little bit later. I agree

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>very strongly with what you've all been saying in the

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>sense that I think this is a real demonstration of

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>strength from the UK system. I think it shows us

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>at maturity from the Bank of England, which is an

0:00:56.600 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>institution that is I think comfortable in its independence, confident

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:04.399
<v Speaker 1>of its independent and therefore willing to be seen to

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>act in a coordinated way with the Treasury. We saw

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>some similar things in the past, the funding from lending

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>for schemes set up in two douzen twelves. But I

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>think it is a big advantage of having strong credible institutions.

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I think, as you say, it would be very difficult

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>for the FED to do something similar. Indeed, we saw

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the FED deliberately separate its emergency fifty basis points cut

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>from the G seven Finance ministers called I think largely

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>due to wanting to avoid the perception of impositions on

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>its independent So yes, I do think this is UKs

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>stiticians demonstrating how you can loose confidence by coordination. RiPP

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about how important it is to help SAMES

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>in a moment like the moment we're in right now.

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 1>It seems to be a big focus of the Bank

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>of England. How do we get that focus to go

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>beyond the UK in two places like Europe and into

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>places like the United States. Well, look, I think that

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the policy community get it. I think that we will

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>see further action in the budget in the UK to

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:02.919
<v Speaker 1>a you know, the these term funding schemes for banks

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>with incentives to lend to SAMES there. They're similar to

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the kind of things we did in the UK in

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:10.799
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and twelve with funding for lending they're okay. Frankly,

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the banks can gain the targets, and this is not

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a way to guarantee that you're going to get cash

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to sames. You have to see finance ministries acting really

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to get cash to the simes in trouble on top

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:25.119
<v Speaker 1>of the band central bank actions. I think you will

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>see that in Europe. I think it will be, you know,

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a combination of European wide and Frankie, you just have

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:32.959
<v Speaker 1>to going to have to wait and see national level actions.

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Um and I hope that we will see it in

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the US, but of course it's going to be a

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:41.239
<v Speaker 1>much more difficult mechanism to get agreement around that, even

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.920
<v Speaker 1>though the policy community I think now fully understand that

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that's what's needed. Let me ask you the same question

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I asked of our Stephanie Flanders earlier today. Did the

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>reason we get that this action today? Was it because

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of Prime Minister Jansen? Was it was because we had

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>essentially a pro Brexit vote? Was it because we have

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a new independence, are freethinking in the United Kingdom less

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>attached to the European continent? No, I don't think so.

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I think this is because of the sort of historic

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 1>patterns and working of the UK institutions. I think the

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Treasury in the Bank of England to have for a

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>long time now worked well together, and I think that

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>there is an understanding in the Treasury and the Bank

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:23.799
<v Speaker 1>that this is a time for this. You know, this

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 1>is not a time for holding back. So I think

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you will see Chancellor Richie Sunac in the budget later today.

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, if anything, you know, doing too much, I

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>think you will very much not want to be seen

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>as kind of under delivering. I think it will be

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>over delivered. Belt embraces, you know, resilience and you know,

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>insurance against what might be become. I don't think that

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, particular to this government. I think it speaks

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>more to a sort of historic strength of UK institutions.

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>But of course it is very welcome to see the

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>UK I think performing kind of well internationally compared to

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>other countries. Going to your core, which is in staying.

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>How does this give you conviction when it comes to

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>putting on a trade? In other words, are you going

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to invest more in UK assets as a result of

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>what the policymakers did. It's certainly at the margin makes

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 1>us feel more comfortable that the UK is going to

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>do everything possible to avoid permanent economic damage from this disruption.

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>But frankly, you know, I think we've seen in market

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.039
<v Speaker 1>action over the last few days that while policy actions

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>are welcome, you know, people of a market are very

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 1>very aware that policymakers are our secondary at the moment

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to the sort of fundamentals of the spread of the virus,

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know, in a sense market to pay more

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>attention to the to the negatives I when and how

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>widely our restrictions on activity going to be. I think

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.479
<v Speaker 1>that it's it's about putting confidence in place so that

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 1>if we do get to a peak situation where people

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>can see beyond the peak of the virus, that's when

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 1>people will take confidence from policy measures being in place

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to prevent permanent damage, and that's where will help see

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the kind of more rapid bounced back. Rupert Harrison, thank

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you so much with black Rock this morning, joining us

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>after an historic moment for the Bank of England. Without

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>question our interview of the day on this moment for

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>central bankers, and with this and the honor of having

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>David blanch Flower with us of Dartmouth College, of course,

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>his public service to his very united Kingdom is public

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 1>service and getting Cardiff back into the Premier League and

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 1>then out again in the Premier League. We're thrilled to

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Professor blanch Flower could join us this morning. Uh, David,

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>here we are. Quote. This is prudence with a purpose.

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>It's resilience with a reason, and that reason is to

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>fulfill the Bank of England's mission, namely to promote the

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>good of the people of the United Kingdom by maintaining

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 1>monetary and financial stability. By acting today, the Bank is

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>ensuring that the strength of our financial system can be

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>directed to where it's most needed in the months ahead.

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Mark Kearney, how do you do today? Very impressive. I

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>was just listening to the press conference. I thought they

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>did extremely well. Um the co ordination between the three

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>banks the Mideast um coming on a day ahead of

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the UK budget, so it looked like, you know, the

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>big boys are in charge. I thought, what was interesting

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>reminded me of October seven, two thousand and eight. But

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I think Kari said it right then. The problem was

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the financial system causing a crisis, and he said, you know,

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the financial system here is going to try and come

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>in and um support this this crisis. So I thought

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it was pretty impressive, the two that the governor and

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the new governor sitting there together. Um, I was really impressed.

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean the concern is do that what I mean?

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I remember in October seven six central banks cut. I

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 1>was part of it. The big deal then was did

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>they we knew things that the markets didn't know? And

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the question is is that true? Now? Are the more

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>things they know that? That's the question I think on

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the table. Do you have a confidence with a medical

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>crisis and an original ECB to begin with the ECB

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 1>or frankly any other central bank and execute what the

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 1>governor and the governor designate executed today. Well, obviously the

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>big concern is that we're whatever is twelve years now

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>past that crisis, and the room to maneuver for the

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>central bank is somewhat limited. I mean, the Bank of

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>England will cut from point seven five to point to

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>five perhaps I thought they might go points is a

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>big deal. What what can ECB does? I mean ECP

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>is already negative. Christine the guard is obviously talking about

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>this being a major problem. The room to maneuver is

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>somewhat limited. Obviously, the coordination with fiscal policies that big

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to you. And the fact that this statement was made

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>on the day when the bodies of the new Bodish

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Chancer that makes a statement for the budget suggests that

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>these things are coordinated and that's going to be the

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>problem down that, like could the ECB coordinate with other governments?

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>What are the Germans going to say and do? What's

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>going to happen at the at the o MC where

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>it looks like a hundred basis points cuts already priced

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>into the meeting next week, Danny, there's also a question

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of what's the roadmap here? And a lot of people

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>are pointing to two thousand and eight, and since you

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>have experience at the Bank of England when you were

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a part of their indust rates heading a Monetary policy

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>committee as an external member from two thousand and six

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand nine through the crisis, is the two

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:42.839
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight period the one we should be looking at? Well?

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>It seems so. I mean, that's the only two cuts

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that I recall, Like this emergency meeting, which they very

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>well did in secretum, there was the two meetings to

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:54.199
<v Speaker 1>fare in the Bank of England have had at the

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>nine eleven which may may be comparable I mean the

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>cut into a thousand and eight, the October cut. In

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>a sense, what it signaled it was that it's more

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>than anything. It's signaled that the central banks were on

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the case. It's much more to come. And I think

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that's what they were signaling today. I mean, they could

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>have thrown more actively didn't do more que today they

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>have they've sort of holding that back that they did

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of things about um but counter sectal buffer

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>for the bank money for the same. So they certainly

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>signaled there was more to come. But the issue is,

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>well Tom was just saying what what what can they do?

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>How much more can they do? And the concern is

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 1>if this crisis, as Regard says today is comfortable to

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight that there are limits to what

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the policymakers can do. So, you know, I thought it

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>was very impressive, good that they got in there, but

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>down the road know how much they can do. Danny,

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>are there any non traditional tools that we did not

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>see deployed in two thousand and eight ways to sort

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of I think outside of the historical reference, it can

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.559
<v Speaker 1>the central banks to poy now well, yeah, absolutely, I

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:06.199
<v Speaker 1>mean I think Americ Rosen grinning the US right. He

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:09.199
<v Speaker 1>started to talk about the ability of the FED to

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>broaden what it buys, not to just buy mbs and

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>government backed securities, to broaden out what it buy. Is

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that's an obvious possibility that it works negative. Um, that's

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:24.199
<v Speaker 1>still on the table. But I think that I think

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>for the listeners, I remember being brief saying central banks

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>could buy anything, um and literally anything, So obviously I

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's on the table. Um. The possibility that QUI

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:40.679
<v Speaker 1>will broaden and extend, and as a said, it's thought

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>about in the United States, that's the possibility of going

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 1>negative exist. Now how negative, David, I've got to get

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>squeeze us in a headline coming out of the United Kingdom,

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>no doubt what. I'm the Chancellor as well. The United

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Kingdom sees this year's GDP growth one point one percent

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>versus one point four very quickly, your professor. With that

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>diminished g d P growth, do we also see diminished inflation?

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>So we've got a combination a weaker growth and disinflation. Well,

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we do. But I think the mark that

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:13.319
<v Speaker 1>worries the markets will think that that at one point

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>one percent is overly optimistic. Ian the scale of the

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>scale of the shock that currently looks to be large,

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:22.839
<v Speaker 1>So I think that might well be very optimistic. And

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of course what the central Bank is going to have

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to do is just look through inflation, look at what's

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>happening in the real economy, and that's what they've done today.

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.319
<v Speaker 1>So I think what happens to INFLA is broadly irrelevant.

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>But it sounds totally optimistic on the part of the

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of the O b R and the government to think

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that output in the UK is going to grow this

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>year too. Short of visit David blanche Flower of Dartmouth

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>College here and of course has worked with the Bank

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of England. It is a fired up Nora Roubini with

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:01.119
<v Speaker 1>us today. His book of a Good Deck Togo was outstanding.

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>There is there a book coming up here, you know,

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about the right thing in you want but

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>he is going to be out next year. Okay, very good.

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>There's there's a break slusive from Bloomberg surveillance. One of

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the great themes we've had here over the last number

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of weeks is a team that has just been dedicated

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>in folks, really working seven days a week to get

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>his voices and One of the voices was Jeffrey Curry

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of Goldman sex On Oil, who was out front of

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 1>an oil war of Saudi UH and Russia and then

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>was with us again today and with his microeconomics from Chicago,

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>was just prodigious on these demand and supply shocks that

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>we see. Let's discuss this now with Neral Rabini and

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the backdrop for me on this Neral is a visceral

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>feeling of the old world of Saudi Arabia taking on Russia.

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>What's your take on how anyone would take on Russia.

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Is it doable for Saudi Arabia to actually go after

0:12:56.960 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Mr Putin on oil? Well, so the Arabia going after Russia,

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's also going after the U S sail producers.

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Both of them are tried to sell the Arabia and

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I would say over time, uh, the shell gas producer

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe a bigger threat to sell the Arabia than put

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>In and they all in Russia. The other thing in

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>this game is that while in Russia you have to

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>give credit to put In. That on the micro side

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>is physically conservatives low budget deficit, low public debt, is

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>low inflation, while the budget deficits Saudi Arabia right now

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>is seven percent of GDP, so their break even physically

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>it's more like eighty dollar barrel, while for Russias around

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>fort So in this war, actually on the physical side,

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>it's true that Saouldi have more reserves than they can

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>run them down. But between the two, on the micropoint

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of view, Saudi are weaker. But of course they can

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>play this game for a few months until the Russian

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>is gonna come and say let's do a deal by

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>both sides want to get rid of the shell gas

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>producer in US, but the shell gus producing US once

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>all goes to forty fifty, are going to be back.

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Even if they're back the margin. How does Germany buy

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 1>from Saudi Arabia versus their long term relationship on hydrocarbons

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>with Russia. Uh, well, you know, they have to diversify

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and they've decided to phase out essentially called so they're

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna do more renewable energy, but definitely they need still

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>oil from the Middle East and they need GUS from Russia.

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>So for Germany there's no other option absolutely So, So

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>if we're lower oil for longer, what does that mean?

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, for the overall global GDP picture. Because you

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>compare that, you weigh at against these you know, the

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>issues presented by the coronavirus on the demand side is

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that pushes into a global recession. There's lower oil keep

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>us from going into a global recession. How do you

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>weigh those two? Well, if the price of oil falls

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>because of a increasing supply, there is a price war

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to fall in demand. Because until now a

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>week ago was a falling demand recession on global growth,

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>prices were falling. That was a negative signal. But now

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>all prices are falling because there's going to be a

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>glass of supply from Russia and from Saudi Arabia. Then

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>in that situation, actually I think that the impact on

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the global economy at the margin is positive because the

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>marginal propensity to spend of all importers is greater than

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the marginal propensity to spend of the all exporters. So

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>they all exports are gonna produce less, they're gonna do

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>less capex, they're gonna fire some workers. But then the

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>consumers of oil, even in country like the US where

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>we're not any more net importer, the distributional and benefit

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>goes to the consumer, and they hurting the producer let

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>alone in countries like China, like India, like Japan, like Korea,

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>like most of Europe that are net all importers. So

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>at the margin, actually this is a war that is

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>bad for the stock market because the stock market reflects

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the energy company's stocks. But for the real economy, actually

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>collapsing all prices is a benefit at the margin. It's

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>not going to prevent the recession because you have a coronavirus,

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's gonna make it less damaging at least for

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the consumers. So the strategic value here for Saudi Arabia

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and in Russia to kind of put pressure on the

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>U S shale producers. That will happen. We've seen the

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>balance sheets for these shales producers not good, so there's

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of credit issues here. But as soon as oil,

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>as you say, oil comes back to hour, Wall Street's

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna come right back to the shale patch and we're

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna have those guys start backed up in a year

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>or two. I mean, so strategically the oils in the

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>ground in the shale area. So I just you know,

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see the long term strategic value for

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>what Saudi Arabia and Russia are trying to do it.

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Seems like the near term costs are just too much.

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh their cost But then if you can let many

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>of these guys, especially the smaller ones going bankrupt, and

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>many of them were over leveraged, it's going to take

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years until these people are gonna be

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>able to start producing again. When you have consolidation in

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the shale, gus in all industries, so you have a

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>short term loss of income, say for three four months,

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>they get the truth by June, and then at that

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>point many of these smaller guys are gonna be already bankrupt,

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and you have some reduction in product. It's not gonna

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>be a used reduction production the United States, but you

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>can cause enough damage that you buy yourself maybe another

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, but you're right. Over the medium long term,

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 1>there is no way in which especially the Saudi is

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 1>not along the Russians can essentially deal with the fact

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that we've shell gas and oil. The equilibrium all price

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 1>without OPEC, it's closer to twenty, if not ten. Right,

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>in a perfect competitive economy which there is no cartile equilibrium,

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>all prices might be closer town. We're gonna have demand

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 1>fall in the medium term because there's gonna be pick

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>All dement and therefore all prices have to be lower. No,

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I got one minute left more than anybody I know.

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>You know Milan, your Iranian Turkish. You ended up in

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Milan Synagogue Centrale told Jewish sense of Milan as well.

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>What do you how do you synthesize a lockdown in

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>your Milan? Well, it's terrible. I saw a video essentially

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:56.679
<v Speaker 1>of Saskala and Viemon zone totally empty, deserted, like a

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>total desert. But I think the Italians are doing the

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>right They're finally doing what China did, because in the

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>US we are actually fudging it, pretending there's not spreading,

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's gonna get worse. In Italy. Now they're gonna

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>realize they have to do what China did, total quarantine.

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna collapse the economy for a quarter. But if

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you can stop the contagion, then the economy is gonna

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 1>recover with the monitor and physical stables. If instead you

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>fudge that you can count down the road like the

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 1>US is gonna explode in your face. So in the

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>short time, economy is weaken ling less, but over time

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna weekend more so the Italians now are going

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:31.920
<v Speaker 1>China while we're still doing what Italy did a month ago.

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's a mistaken us being you. Thank you so much,

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of course, with New York University and his economic work

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:44.159
<v Speaker 1>worldwidetre look he pop futures minneus seventies six right now.

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a miracle. It's a miracle magic here. I don't

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>take blame nor credit, and I've never trade. But when

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 1>you blame my life, which did you blame? Are your

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:55.359
<v Speaker 1>dets a lot of snow buttter Nero being there on

0:18:55.440 --> 0:19:09.640
<v Speaker 1>international you can ask you want to bring an handsome goal.

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 1>I now he's very excited about jumping in, and I

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>can see it. He said he wouldn't speak into the

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Bostri so his chief US Secretary strategist give money to John.

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, your thoughts your message for clients this morning? Well,

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I can I just jump in on the I mean,

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>if you look at those of Americans who are you

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>know on you know or you know, paycheck to paycheck,

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that guy is probably not going to be benefited all

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that much by by moving his tax returns by a month,

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and at least we got to find a program for

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 1>those people. Do we're gonna do? We all agree apparel

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:42.360
<v Speaker 1>tax cuts just doesn't know. I think, more broadly, John,

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the discussion here is about whether some of these demands

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 1>side initiatives on the stimulus side are going to be

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 1>useless or limited in use. I don't I don't think.

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think use. I don't think it's useless. They're

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna have an effect way after this crisis is gone. Um,

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think that these things, the narrower they are addressing,

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, displacement in the in the energy sector, leisure businesses,

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and displaced workers. And the benefit of being more targeted

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:12.640
<v Speaker 1>is it doesn't have to be expensive. It just has

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to be appropriate. Otherwise all you're gonna see is at

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>least we'd say before is that this money is going

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to get saved and and it just it just doesn't

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>have an impact. Well, I don't mind if it gets saved,

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and I don't mind if it gets used to pace debt.

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't expect them to go out to a restaurant.

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't expect them to get a flight. The worry

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 1>we have right now is that people won't be able

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to make the mutgage repayments. People won't be able to

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>make their loan repayments. And I think that I think

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the government has a really important role to play there.

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if small businesses need to make sure that

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.479
<v Speaker 1>they have lines of credit available to them so that

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 1>if they have a hard time making payroll that the

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>banks are going to lengths and the government can backstop that.

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Those kind of actions I think are critical. This is

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 1>such a guy discussion, Mr Brandwich, would you please explain

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>to the world that the number one headache right now,

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>without question is children will be home from school. Now

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that totally upsets for millions of Americans, the apple cart

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and in so many different ways. I mean, not to me,

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 1>that's far greater than anything else. Well, that is going

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to be the key question is if you do shut

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>down schools will not keep people out of work, And

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that's an issue. But those are people often who have

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>jobs that they go to on routine levels or even

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>if they've got gigs. I mean, this is gonna be

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a serious issue. But John, I'm curious about you know,

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 1>all the people have part time jobs the gig economy.

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Right now, I was watching I was looking at how

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Uber and Lift and some of the other ride sharing

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:37.399
<v Speaker 1>companies are looking at possibly compensating ride drivers if they

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>have to self quarantine for fourteen days or take off

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>because they're sick. I mean, how much does this expose

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>some of the cracks that's been created by that entire infrastructure.

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>First of all, the answer is yes, it does, and

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see that. But I think that the

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>difference between this turning into a recession and not is

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>not whether or not the economy takes a little bit

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of hit, but whether or not come and he has

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>decided to lay off workers, or whether those gig workers

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>there's enough of them that actually creates a problem. You know,

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>if if you look at the way that recessions have

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>worked historically, it takes a period of time for a company,

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>especially the labor market is tight. Companies, if they think

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be over in the next two or

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>three months or whatever that period is, they're not gonna

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:20.679
<v Speaker 1>want to lay off workers if they can avoid it,

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 1>and they rather take it out of profits in the

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>near term, because hiring that worker back is going to

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>be more expensive, and that's gonna be critical. If this

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>lasts longer, then you have a second issue. Yes, his

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 1>individuals are displaced, but but broadly, I don't think you

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>will have that futures negative negative. And then take this

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>recession discussion and it's all earnings, earnings, earnings for fancy

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 1>guys like you right now, forget about that. What's the

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:47.360
<v Speaker 1>due to the revenue dynamic? And what is the revenue

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 1>dynamic in this crisis signal to you six months out? Well,

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 1>we you know, first of all, the first quarter UM

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 1>is really gonna be fine. Why because we had a

0:22:56.760 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>good January and February and even now we're just beginning

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to see certain things being closed down. So the first

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>quarter earnings, you know, our estimate is is it used

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to be that we're gonna have six and a half

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 1>percent earnings in the first quarter. Now we think we'll

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 1>have one. That's not a great number, but it's not

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 1>a disaster. The second quarter we think that, you know,

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 1>EPs for the for the SMP is gonna be somewhere

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>between down five and ten percent UM. But it really

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the question is how much longer does this does it

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 1>go on? If that's all we're looking at, and you

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>get a bounce in the second half of the year,

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 1>which we think you will flat earnings this year, which

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 1>is what we're calling for. It's not brilliant, but it's

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 1>if that's your worst case, that's not terrible, but it

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>has to be. Ultimately, it's how how how quickly we

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>contain Can you model what kind of multiple you would

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>put on those earnings at the moment? John, Yeah, I

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>mean the multiple is gonna move, you know, Tom It

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>keeps harping on this issue with the VIX, but it's like,

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it's super important if the VIX ends the year of fifteen,

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>meaning if this thing is reasonably resolved by the middle

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of the one five. But if if the end of

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the question we're is a VIX on December thirty one,

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>not whereas the vix on on Wednesday. But if the

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>VIX on December thirty one is back down somewhere in

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that ballpark, which means that this is is now part

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of our history, then you're gonna have a multiple over

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>eighteen on the market um come year end. How depending

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 1>on are all of your estimates on the policy response,

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:22.880
<v Speaker 1>on the idea that we get a coherent and timely

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>policy response in the United States, Yeah, I'm not. I'm

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:28.120
<v Speaker 1>not assuming that we're gonna get something brilliant on policy.

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>What I am assuming and I think, but what when

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I talk to in stitial investors they're assuming is that

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the number of cases is going to rise as we

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 1>test more people, and the news flow is gonna get

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit ugly over the coming weeks. But in

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>if we use the Chinese or Korean experience or whatever,

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:47.120
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna see in two or three months from now,

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the number of cases is gonna be shrinking, a number

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of new cases, and the market's gonna say, Okay, this

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>thing is now under control. And if that's the way

0:24:57.040 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 1>it plays out, then um, then and the multiple does

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:02.640
<v Speaker 1>rise back up? On should I get out of cash

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:05.679
<v Speaker 1>and triple average cash? What do you think? Triple leverage?

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I mean, do I think? I mean,

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we have a thirty three hundred target between now and

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year. You're sustaining that right now? No? No,

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:15.439
<v Speaker 1>we went from thirty six hundred to three hundred. But

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 1>what I do I believe that the mark will be

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>higher between now and the end of the year. Absolutely,

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 1>do I think they will see new lows. Fay feels

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:26.679
<v Speaker 1>like December, the end of the week, at the end

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>of the week December thirty one feels that white silm

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 1>it does futures negative seventy one, down futures negative five

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>seventy four, John, thank you so much. We're gonna say it, John,

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you bring in Megan Green here with some

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>really interesting what's great about her? She's got a fancy

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>British education as well, so she can really do the

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 1>trans atlantic look. To be honest, knows you're better than

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>anyone I speak to on a regular basis. Macan Green

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>joining us Now, how the Kennedy say, any a fellow, Megan,

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's get straight to Europe. The ECB tomorrow, Christine Laguard

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>coming down and telling you you leaders reportedly that if

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 1>they don't act, we could have an outcome that remind

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>us of our way. Your thoughts on that line, Yeah,

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that's pretty stark. Um. I think

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it's probably a bit overdone, except for where Italy is concerned, right,

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>because Italy still has a massive debt burden, they're almost

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly in recession. They're going to go further into recession

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 1>with the entire country in lockdown, and so then you know,

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 1>you could get some throwback to the sovereign debt crisis. UM.

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that the e c D has

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>more tools now than they had in two thousand and eight,

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 1>which is a good thing. I'm just not sure they're

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:40.640
<v Speaker 1>going to use them this week, so UM, I think

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>they'll probably end up cutting rates and they'll probably announce

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>more QUI I don't think that will help much at all. UM.

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>With the tool that they do have that could help

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 1>as their targeted lending refinancing operations with tel tros Um,

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 1>which already exists, UH, and they should use them to

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:57.719
<v Speaker 1>try to get cash exactly where cash is needed. This

0:26:57.800 --> 0:26:59.679
<v Speaker 1>is a different challenge to two thousand and eight in

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that and TIS hasn't for all of us. Across the

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>developed world, we were looking at the seizing up of

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 1>markets um in a multi year decline and then really

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>slow recovery this time around. A lot of businesses need of,

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, a bridge loan for a quarter or two

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and then they might be able to weather this, and

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.199
<v Speaker 1>so getting cash exactly where it's needed as difficult. I

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>think the Teltro's could help, just because they're targeted and

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>subsidized by the ECB, but I don't think we'll hear

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 1>an announcement about it. Well, let's talk about those lending

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>tools and talk to our listeners about the tow try

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're not familiar too familiar with ECP monetary policy

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:32.160
<v Speaker 1>over the last few years, it has been a tool

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that they've deployed many times under President Mario drag Megan,

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>how can Christine the guard adapt that to address the

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:42.640
<v Speaker 1>same issue, so she could offer her teltro's at its

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>own rate rather than at the deposit rate right now?

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>So right now banks keep borrows needs to be at

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the deposit rate, which is negative, so they get paid

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>as long as they lend onto the real economy, and

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>so it can be targeted more specifically to lending onto

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the sames or to lending to small companies and distress

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 1>um and then the cultural rate could be deeply negative.

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>So essentially banks could borrow from the e c D

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it let's say negative two basis points, so they get

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>paid to borrow, and then they could lend it on

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to distress companies at negative rates as well. So they've

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 1>been a bit from a carry trade, but everybody gets

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>subsidized by the ECB. Essentially, Megan Green, in honor of

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 1>all the people listening to this who studied some of

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:27.399
<v Speaker 1>this in some books at some time. What you're discussing

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 1>almost sounds like devious or affected or funny money procedures.

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Is there any evidence any of this will work without

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>some form of consequence out there? Well, so you could

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>end up with a misallocation of capital. You're right, if

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you're subsidizing everyone, everyone will want to borrow. So it's like,

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, I'm you know, central bank t ball.

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Everybody gets a blue ribbon, this undegree, and this isn't

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the first best option for anyone. And of course there's

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>a big fiscal stimulus package would be the best option, um,

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>but that doesn't seem to be coming down the line

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and the way or the size that lots of people

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>are hoping for, particularly in the in the Eurozone. And

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>so the e c D is kind of the second

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>best option here. But but at least there is one, um,

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the US to FETs hands are really

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>tied by Dodd Frank after the last crisis. So at

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 1>least the ECB has the more for more room for

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 1>reneuver Megan. I'm I'm kind of struck by by the

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>focus right now on the public sector, the public response

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>from politicians and uh AND and monetary policy members. You

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and I have talked a lot about the private investing

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>sector and how it's exploded with respect to capital. Supposedly,

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>there's all this dry powder on the books of private

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>equity firms and private debt firms. Why isn't the focus

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 1>on whether or not they are going to actually deploy

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>some of that and help some companies stay in business

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>through this period of time with bridge loans or other

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 1>types of measures. Yeah, that's a great question. So for starters,

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that there is a perception that there's

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>tons of dry powder out there in the private markets, um,

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:09.719
<v Speaker 1>partly because we just don't know what's sitting on their books.

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's possible that they don't have any dry powder

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>at all. Um. And there's you know, for example, a

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of clos sitting out there, um that that could

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 1>go under. So I think that the credit worry certainly

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>applies to private markets as well. UM. But secondly, you know,

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the prive factors are in the business of making money,

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 1>so um, it might be in their best interest to

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>provide bridge loans that they're under new obligation. That's for sure.

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think what we need to see is um

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>numbers that are so big coming out of fiscal or

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>monetaryary authorities that are targeted to get us through these

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>court you know, a couple of months, quarter or two

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>where we need to get cash where it's desperately needed

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 1>for individuals of corporate Megan. They're also is a proposal

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 1>out by German regulators to possibly ease up on some

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of the capital requirements offer banks. Basically they don't have

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to hold us much capital if they use that money

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to go out and give loans to companies that they

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 1>can stay in business. I'm just wondering whether banks are

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 1>really and and should be in the position forget you know,

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>extending some of the deadlines from a charities and things

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>like that to keep people going, but to actually extend

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>loans at a time when we could be heading into

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 1>a recession and that could potentially financially weaken them. Yeah,

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 1>so you raise a good point. I think it does

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 1>make sense to reduce countercyclical capital buffers, and so that

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>UK did it earlier today, Um, it makes sense in

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 1>years on too, But you're right for starters, you know,

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it could put banks in a perilous position going into

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a downturn. But also it's not like the cost of

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>borrowing has really been the issue, So it's it's not

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>like this will make businesses desperately want to go and

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>borrow from banks. And it's not like banks are actually

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>obliged to go ahead and land. So there is a

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 1>question about how much any of that capital is really

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>being freed up for lending because banks get to make

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>their own decisions even if governments lean on them. Um,

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not sure how much this will help. I'm

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>not particularly worried about UM banks in this case, although

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 1>European banks I am more worried about than than us. Thanks, um,

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think if we're heading into a

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>downturn anyhow, UM, it's worth trying to avoid one rather

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 1>than not doing anything because you're worried that a downturn

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>might come. And Megan, thank you so much. Mega Green

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 1>with us with the Harvard County Senior Fellow. Thrilled to

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 1>have her with us. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keane before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio.