WEBVTT - Davos Is Learning the ‘Art of the Deal’ With Trump

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. The Golden Age of

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>America begins right now. I will very simply put America first.

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to trump Andomics, the Bloomberg podcast that looks at

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 2>the economic world of Donald Trump, how he's already shaped

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 2>the global economy and what on earth is going to

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 2>happen next. I'm Stephanie Flanners, head of Government and Economics

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 2>at Bloomberg, and this week we're recording Trump Andomics in

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 2>the Swiss Alps, in the Bloomberg DeVos House at the

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:52.160
<v Speaker 2>World Economic Forum, And as we speak, we're looking at

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 2>pictures from Washington. We're recording on Monday, and the second

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 2>inauguration of Donald Trump is getting underway. So we did

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it was fitting given the timing that in

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 2>this episode we asked the question, is Davos learning the

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 2>art of the deal? You know, not so long ago,

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 2>the billionaires, the heads of state, the tech moguls who

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 2>come here every January for the World Economic Forum, they

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 2>thought they were done with Donald Trump, and now they

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:23.319
<v Speaker 2>seem to be pretty meekly falling into line.

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm super fired up for the future. It's going to

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 3>be very exciting.

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>As the President said, We're going to have a golden age.

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually very optimistic this time. He seems to have

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of energy around.

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 4>Reducing regulation, and if I can help him do that,

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to help him. I mean, seeing Donald Trump

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 4>get get up after getting shot.

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>In the face and pump his fist in.

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 4>The air with the American flag, it's like hard to

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 4>not get kind of emotional about that spirit.

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 2>And I'm wondering what the implications are for everyone else

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 2>and for markets, for money, for investors, for the broader world.

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 2>And I've got a stellar cast here to discuss these issues,

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's editor in chief, John Micklethwaite, and I'm very glad

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 2>that you made it this year. You were human ill

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 2>last year and lots of us had to pretend to

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 2>be you, which didn't go well at all. We have

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Jenny Leonard white House reporter who focuses on international economic

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 2>issues and has been the first to an awful lot

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 2>of trade stories and policies ever since she came to Bloomberg.

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 2>And Bradstone, who's now editor of Bloomberg business Week, but

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 2>before that was Senior Executive editor for Global Technology at

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News and the author of four books very relevant

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 2>to our discussions today, including Amazon Unbound, Jeff Bezos and

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 2>The Invention of a Global Empire Looking Around, and it

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 2>was written up rather nicely in an introductory story that

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News wrote, You'd have to say the movers and

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 2>shakers descending on the World Economic Forum here in Devils

0:02:56.200 --> 0:03:00.040
<v Speaker 2>this week have already been paying their dues to the

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 2>new president, realigning their priorities to better fit his somewhat

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 2>unreconstructed America First Agenda. We had a great quote from

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Lloyd Blankvine, the former head of Goldman Sachs. He said

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 2>he was reminded of what happened when Napoleon escaped from Elba,

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 2>and the French newspapers changed their tune pretty dramatically in

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 2>eighteen fifteen. They started off, in fact, the Monitor started

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 2>off characterizing Napoleon as a monster, but by the time

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 2>he got close to Paris, they announced that his Majesty

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 2>was arriving. And it definitely has sort of felt a

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 2>bit like that, And of course Donald Trump himself would

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 2>love the comparison with Napoleon. So let me start with you, Brad,

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 2>because there has been so much focus on how Silicon

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Valley has sort of turned on a dime with this

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 2>president and some of the key figures like Mark Zuckerberg

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 2>in particular. But maybe what's changed it is just they've

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 2>been able to show their true colors.

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 3>Everything has changed.

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 4>Let's go about eight years ago and all the CEOs

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 4>in to the White House looking like they had some

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 4>bad fish the night before, and there was Tim Cook

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 4>and Jeff Bezos and Cheryl Sandberg.

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 3>Zuckerberg didn't even go.

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 4>Elon didn't go, and then withdrew from the Presidential Council

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 4>a couple of weeks later when Trump withdrew from the

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 4>Paris Climate Accords, and so what happened? I mean, they

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 4>felt unjustly persecuted during the Biden years, either through the

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 4>anti trust agenda or the regulation of crypto, maybe a

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:29.799
<v Speaker 4>little bit of the anti tech mood in the media.

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 4>And they have come out of the last four years

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 4>in some ways you know, maga and it's startling.

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 3>But look, credit Trump a little bit.

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 4>He opened the tent large enough to make room for

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 4>all the tech leaders and they see a kind of

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 4>common cause with Trump on crypto, on anti trust, on

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 4>Mark and Dreesen calls it raising the tech flag building

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 4>acquiring investing, and I think you know, there's optimism, but

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 4>there's also opportunity.

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 3>And they know that by closing up.

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 4>To Trump and contributing to the inauguration and being up there.

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 3>In the day is today, that that is good for business.

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you make the point though, that you know

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 2>they have shifted in the last eight years. It's not

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 2>just that they're sort of suddenly waking up to the

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 2>reality of a second Trump term. So how much were

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 2>you surprised by any of what's happened in the last time.

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely shocked, because you know, there did seem to be

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 4>a sense of legitimate resistance eight years ago.

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 3>But the world has changed. And Trump, as you know,

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 3>as I said, you know, to his credit, he's evolved.

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 3>Now there's not a lot of consistency.

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, he was the one who raised the idea

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 4>of banning TikTok and has just given it a reprieve.

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 4>He was anti crypto and just launched the Trump coin

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:50.359
<v Speaker 4>and the Melennia coin to great enrichment of the family.

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 4>So he's seeing some of the political and frankly the

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 4>financial opportunities of being big Trump, being.

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 3>Big tech, big Trump. I think, well, that might be

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 3>even more appropriate.

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 2>Obviously financially, and that's a big part of all the

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 2>discussions around here. We have seen a lot of bedding

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 2>on and moving of money in line with the Trump agenda,

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 2>not just bitcoin, but price of oil, growth, stocks, the dollar.

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 2>They've all gone up there about eight percent. I was

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 2>looking at it this morning, since Donald Trump was elected,

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 2>and when I look at what the impact has already

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 2>been on countries like the UK, the big increase in

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 2>bond yield that's gone with this, you know, it feels

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 2>like already before he's done anything, any country with underlying weaknesses,

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 2>any government with underlying weaknesses, is having those exacerbated or

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 2>highlighted just by the fact of the Trump agenda, and

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 2>they're on the back foot. How would you say the

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 2>world has changed in particularly the sort of foreign policy

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 2>and financial markets.

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 1>What Brad said about tech is actually quite true of

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:04.280
<v Speaker 1>business in general, and not just linked to Trump. I mean,

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I think if you look around the world, compared with

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>say eight years ago, business people everywhere since both more

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>fear and more opportunity in their relations with government. The

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>idea when I first started coming to devoce that business

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>was this wonderful thing that existed outside the realms of government,

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and it was all about kind of doing good and

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>all that sort of stuff. Now business people realize that

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you can both get clobbered by government, and that applies

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>from Trump, but it also applies to the European Union

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and lots of other places. But also it's a chance

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>for enrichment, as you know, TikTok is suddenly discovering and

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>lots of other people that people in the Midwest now

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>will be thinking, well, maybe we can make money out

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of tariffs if they come our way. There'll be people

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you know around here thinking about different things that they

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>might be able together if Europe puts up bigger barriers

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and so on. So there's both kind of fear and

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>greed are driving business and government together, I think generally.

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>But on this specific question you said, you can see

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>it everywhere. You know, Britain has suddenly got somewhat sort

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of freaked out by a kind of semi Liz Trust moment.

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>You can argue how much of this is Rachel We've

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>spoilt also, you know, and how much of it is

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>just the simple fact that Trump has arrived and everything

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>has been thrown into greater kind of impact either good

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>or bad. And I think that's almost almost a way

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to look at Trump at the moment. He's sort of

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>throw every weakness or every strength is somehow being massively exaggerated.

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump is always about exaggerating.

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 2>And when it comes to the UK, I mean if

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 2>you look at actually the sort of gap in borrowing

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 2>costs between the UK and the US has barely moved,

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 2>and yet all of the pressure, none of the pressure

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 2>in the UK has all been on the chancellor for

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 2>reasons that sort of pre date that change. Well, I

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 2>want it in a little bit good defense. I'm just

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 2>looking at the spread on as you'd expect any Bloomberg imparted,

0:08:57.520 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 2>we will get onto some of these kind of broader

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 2>packs of basic things like the cost of money actually

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 2>going up along.

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>With all good news.

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 2>But Jenny, obviously a lot of the big news we've

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:13.959
<v Speaker 2>seen have been trying to game out how serious Donald

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Trump is on his agenda for tariffs, what it will

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 2>mean for different aspects of the global economy and different companies. So,

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 2>since you're usually the first to find out these things,

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 2>what's your sense so far?

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 5>Well, I would also say Washington has seen a big

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 5>shift since the last strund term on this. First of all,

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 5>they're all accepting the outcome that he's president again. But

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:43.679
<v Speaker 5>we also see both parties coming together wanting to do

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 5>things together, which I think eight years ago we wouldn't

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 5>have imagined them talking about, oh, we need to actually

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 5>do something on the border, because that played into the

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 5>election outcome. Maybe Trump has a point here on trade,

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 5>on tariffs. They're talking about tariffs in a very different

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 5>way than eight years ago. The GOP that's in the

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 5>Congress right now, I think has many more Trump allies

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:08.719
<v Speaker 5>than they did traditional free trade republicans eight years ago.

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 5>You know, we see TikTok is a massive shift from

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 5>a bipartisan, massively bipartisan legislation that passed saying this is

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 5>a national security threat, it has to be banned. All

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 5>of a sudden. Mike Walls, the incoming National Security Advisor, says,

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 5>this is a great app. I think I wish I

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 5>had it on my phone. That kind of shift is

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 5>what we're seeing right now. Doge is another example. This

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 5>is all things that we're seeing right now, and I

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 5>think when the rubber meets the road, we're going to

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 5>see if this actually sticks. I am a little bit

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 5>skeptical that everyone in the Republican Party will go along

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 5>with broad global tariffs hitting every country, every import. I

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 5>also think we've seen this from spending discussions in Washington.

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 5>When it comes to cutting your base in your district

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 5>or whatever project you care about, you know, they might

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 5>throw a fit. And I think that we'll see when

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.559
<v Speaker 5>the rubber meets the road if they're actually that far

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 5>along in their shrift.

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, we have had and you've been involved with some

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 2>of them. I mean, there have already been sort of

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 2>competing narratives coming out of the administration, precisely on tariffs,

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 2>because you have a sort of grown up view supposedly

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 2>that says, oh, they're going to be targeted. There was

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.679
<v Speaker 2>a Washington Post story that talked about that, and then

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 2>quite a lot of pushback that seems to have come

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 2>from even from Donald Trump himself.

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 5>Yes, I will say we'll probably see a repeat of

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 5>what we saw eight years ago on the economic front

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 5>and the battle on the inside on tariffs. We have

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 5>two camps. Largely, even though Scott Besson and Hard Lutnik

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 5>I think are talking about tariffs now in a way

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 5>that are a little bit more in line with the

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 5>Hawks than Steven Mnuchan maybe did eight years ago as

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 5>his Treasury secretary. But we had reported that there is

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 5>an effort under way to stage the tariffs, to not

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 5>hit every country, every reimport with ten percent, twenty percent,

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 5>you name it, at one time, but kind of go gradually.

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 5>And the way it was described to us is this

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 5>is a negotiating play. We open this up, countries will

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 5>come to the table, we get something out of it,

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 5>but we don't cause massive inflation by hitting every good

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 5>with twenty percent. We report it this morning that he's

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 5>not going after China the way he promised on the

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 5>campaign trail. Of all the executive orders he will sign today,

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 5>there's not going to be anything on tariffs. There will

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 5>be no day on tariffs, even though everyone who's been

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 5>following his truth social posts, I think we're expecting China

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:43.079
<v Speaker 5>tariffs for fentanyl, China tariffs for trade, Mexico Canada tariffs.

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 5>All that seems to have been put on pause for

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 5>we don't know how long. But that's the state of

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 5>play right now. And if you follow his public comments

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 5>but also privately, is what I'm told he has really

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 5>shifted on China to a much less adversarial tone. He

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 5>used to bring up in meetings with people his agrievances

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 5>about Beijing, and now we see he hopped on the phone.

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 5>He invited Chujingping to the inauguration. He's obviously not coming,

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 5>but sent his vice president. He tweeted about world peace

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 5>and he wants to save TikTok. And we also know

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 5>that nothing in Trump world really sticks for a very

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 5>long time. So this could all change tomorrow. If the

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 5>Hawks get in a room with the President and say, hey,

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 5>you know what, you really let down some of your

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 5>supporters who voted for you because you promised across the

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 5>world tariffs and you did nothing on day one, this

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 5>could sway him.

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean what is funny is, of course, of all

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 2>the things in Trump's agenda on which both parties he

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 2>has united, it is an aggressive antipathy towards China. So

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 2>if that's the one thing that he steps back from

0:13:55.920 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 2>will be interesting. But I mean, sorry, Elon, they need

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 2>for the need for pay Brad, this is this all, Elon.

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you have the you emphasize some of the

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 2>things that the tech well will be quite happy to

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 2>see the back of if they can like the competition

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 2>efforts to reign in tech. But both the control on

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 2>immigration and indeed the measures against China stood to damage

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 2>quite large parts of silicon value will certainly not be

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 2>particularly in their interests. Are they Are they betting that

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Elon's going to be the Trump whisperer.

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 3>And I think we don't know.

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 4>And I think you've put your finger on what will

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 4>be probably the most significant divide within the Trump rule

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 4>and coalition, and that's the line of thought represented by

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 4>Elon and his group of tech CEOs who are now

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 4>in government or advising government. And then I guess traditional

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 4>maga Steve Bannon and the like. And we're already seeing

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 4>clashes on issues like deportation and a T one B visas,

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 4>and it will be interesting to see how it plays out.

0:14:57.520 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 4>But I mean, you know, if you go back eight

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 4>years ago, what we know about Trump is that he

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 4>is he is, he can be influenced, and he's quite transactional.

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 3>And so when you saw.

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 4>The parade of CEOs like Tim Cook to the White

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 4>House to carve out relief for companies like Apple, I

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 4>think I think it often comes down to who is

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 4>the loudest voice in his ear and who has he

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 4>talked to most recently.

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 2>So it's a big big tech will be fine. Potentially

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 2>big tech is betting they're fine. Small and medium sized

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 2>tech and other businesses, and probably, I.

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 4>Mean, it really depends, you know. He said at one

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 4>point that he thought Mark Zuckerberg should spend the rest

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 4>of his life in jail. And now zuck Is is

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 4>at the inauguration.

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 3>Today, will the attitude change?

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 4>You know, Elon's interests are in some ways quite opposed

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 4>to Marx, and so if Elon does have the loudest

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 4>voice in the room, maybe Mark's on a little bit

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 4>of trouble.

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Joe mentioned it at the beginning. It is kind of

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 2>breathtaking the one eighty that corporate leaders seem to be

0:15:56.440 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 2>doing on ESG on a lot of their net zero goals.

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 2>We just saw the six largest US banks all quitting

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 2>the UN sponsored net zero alliance and McDonald's, Walmart. They're

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 2>rolling back all their DEI initiatives. Did they not mean

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 2>it ever? Or is this the thing that's performative?

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>It is incredible. I will I'm slightly crossed with Lloyd

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>blank Vine for using the monitor thing, which I've used

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>countless times, but I advise everyone in this room to

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>go look at it. It is the most incredible series of

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>headlines that begin with the cannibal as escape from his hideout,

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>he will never escape the mountains, and then it ends

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>with the Emperor has arrived in Fontaine Lower with I

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>think this is imperial match just in fourteen days. But

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that is pretty much what has happened with Suddenly CEOs

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>have jumped almost a medling and you can see it

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of the sort of things they talk about.

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>They are moving back from things. I mean a lot

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that some of this is posturing. It's just in the

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>same way as some of the diversity stuff maybe was

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>posturing in one way. Now some of the retreat is

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. They don't want to get called out

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>for not taking profits as seriously as their rivals, and

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these things they can fiddle with just

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 1>by changing the language a bit.

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:12.640
<v Speaker 2>But globally, is there going to be a divide though,

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 2>because I mean you've already seen it. We learned today

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 2>actually the mess is not taking away all of the

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 2>sort of moderating that it had outside of the US.

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:26.919
<v Speaker 2>How a big company is going to navigate that? Oh,

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm very green for the rest of the world, but

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 2>I've given up on all my climate things in the.

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what Brad. Brad may have different views

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>on this, but I tend to think there are two

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>different sort of things going on. One is the stuff

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to do with tech and this enormous increase in wealth,

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at throughout the history of commerce,

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>there's always been times where industries shoot from being the

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>people who everyone wants to be, whether you're Rockefeller and

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Morgan one hundred years ago, to suddenly being the malefactors

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of great wealth. And notwithstanding the recent love in I

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>think there is a real push to get the tech companies,

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>which is most obvious in Europe because they're all American,

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>but I think is generally there and it's going to

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 1>have touch points. We've got a film coming out on

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the number of children who died because they'd be pushed

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>towards suicide videos and things like that. There is a

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of nasty stuff around the tech companies per se,

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's one issue, and we'll see what happens on that,

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's obviously slightly altered by Elon's presence. But the

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>other one, more generally is business. I think on the whole.

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, most business people, there's quite a lot to

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>gain from Trump if he does deregulate. Two big things

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>they don't like is one the idea of immigration taking

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>taking away workers they would need. And as Jenny was saying,

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>on tariffs, and that will be the area. But I do, yes,

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I do think there is a there are divides there

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and there will be a big divide between Europe and America.

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that's very difficult to avoid.

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Have you seen, Jenny, have you seen sort of in

0:18:57.119 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 2>the in Washington and elsewhere, anyone kind of standing up

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 2>for DEI or well in climate I mean, there's a

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.959
<v Speaker 2>lot of support in Congress for still continuing to come

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 2>up climate change.

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but there's only so much you can do when

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 5>you're in the minority in both houses, so everything they

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 5>say kind of goes into avoid. I don't see anything

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 5>coming together as an actual initiative, you know, legislation they

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:30.440
<v Speaker 5>can't really pass without any Republicans, So it's sort of statements.

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And can I just add, I mean, for at

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.120
<v Speaker 4>least for tech CEOs, they have seen, they have watched

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 4>as both the legal and the political environment shifted. So

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 4>the Supreme Court struck down race based admissions at Harvard,

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, in terms of the political environment, just what

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 4>seems to be like a full shift away from the

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 4>principles of DEI. For a long time, they were criticized

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 4>for creating a discriminatory environment.

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 3>They you know, did these.

0:19:56.520 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 4>Annual transparency reports around the makeup of their workforces and

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 4>essentially showed no progress and got clobbered year after year.

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 4>And so I do think there's a feeling of like

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 4>genuine relief that they can, with political safety kind of

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 4>retreat from some of these commitments.

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 3>And I think at least in the US, there's a

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 3>realization that the population is.

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:19.160
<v Speaker 4>A lot more conservative than what was if you look

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 4>at poles surrounding like mass deportation. You know, generally it

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:25.719
<v Speaker 4>feels like, and the election demonstrated it, that the country

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 4>is supporting some of.

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 3>These Trump ideals.

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 4>And so with that cover, the tech CEOs at least

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 4>feel they're on safe ground to retreat from some of

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 4>these things that always made them feel uncomfortable.

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 2>There had been a lot of hand ringing around the

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 2>development of AI and how the training of the large

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:44.640
<v Speaker 2>language models and others on data was inherently biasing them

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 2>in favor of you know, stereotypes that came alongside the

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 2>DEI agenda, you know, concern about that. Do you think

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 2>that's going to stay or do will companies now feel

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 2>that I have to work about.

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 4>Well, Zuckerberg just promised a lot more masculine energy and

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 4>the Facebook, so I don't look, I mean, I think

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:05.199
<v Speaker 4>we're going to still hear those critiques level at the

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 4>tech companies, and I don't know if in this environment

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 4>they will have as much traction as they once did.

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 2>So, Jenny, we have already talked implicitly about this, but

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm interested in how it feels as a reporter on

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 2>the ground. There's always been a lot of corporate interests

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 2>behind the scenes, particularly in US politics and policy making,

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 2>but a lot of people have been sort of taken

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 2>aback by or found it jarring that just the very

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 2>explicit corporate interests literally sitting behind the president as he

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 2>gets inaugurated, the idea that policy is potentially being as

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:44.360
<v Speaker 2>affected by Elon Musk and his interests as any kind

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:47.199
<v Speaker 2>of broader ideological agendas. How does that affect the way

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 2>you're reporting and where the team's reporting.

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:52.360
<v Speaker 5>Well, first of all, what was very different this time

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 5>around was trum Ran his entire transition out of mar Lago,

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 5>which obviously there's no access for press, so it was

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 5>very hard to find out which CEOs he was dining with,

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 5>and that matters to the policymaking or jobs. You know,

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 5>everyone's there for a reason or an agenda, so that

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 5>was really different. It feels more explicit than it did

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 5>eight years ago because he came out of the gate

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 5>starting trade wars, and I remember talking to companies or

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:26.439
<v Speaker 5>their lobbyists in DC and everyone was terrified to be

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:29.880
<v Speaker 5>named in a tweet. So if you could just lay

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 5>low and deal with him behind the scenes, that was

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 5>sort of how big companies were approaching it last time around.

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 5>This time around, it seems like everyone is explicitly kissing

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 5>the rank. The story you mentioned also had the good

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:45.160
<v Speaker 5>anecdote about the Coca Cola bottle in the end, they're

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 5>made a special inauguration edition. So everyone is out there

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 5>now on whatever truth, social X, any platform they can

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 5>say I am meeting with Trump, I am close to Trump.

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 5>That is much more explicit this time around. It obviously

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 5>will create I think instability in the way that every

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:10.199
<v Speaker 5>single person that can go into the White House or

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 5>to mar A Lago to spend the weekend. There can't

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 5>shift policy on the fly, so it might be for

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 5>US reporters we might actually have a solid story but

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 5>are unaware that the president is having dinner in mar

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 5>A Lago with you name it and then completely shift

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 5>his policies. So I think the pace was already very

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 5>fast last time around, but the mar A Lago addition,

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 5>I think an access to this time around will be

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:39.919
<v Speaker 5>could be more challenging and more interesting to figure out

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 5>how we well.

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 2>It's true that we'd had an economic statecraft team pretty

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 2>much since Trump got elected the first time, and this

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 2>time is very much or at least alongside that, we

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 2>also have the corporate statecraft team, and I guess we'll

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:54.880
<v Speaker 2>see how they both do. I mean, John I said

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 2>at the start that in a sense, this was many

0:23:58.560 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 2>people on the outside of the US to say, well,

0:23:59.880 --> 0:24:01.679
<v Speaker 2>this is nothing new. There's always been a lot of

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 2>business interests involved in US policy, and there's plenty of

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 2>people I've spoken to international policy makers, particularly, I would say,

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 2>in what you might call the global South, who say,

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 2>thank goodness, we now have a nakedly transactional president. You know,

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 2>in America is on the world stage admitting that it's

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 2>totally self interested and it's just out for its own interest,

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 2>just like every other country, and it's not pretending to

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 2>have all these high ideals. You know, this is a

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 2>government I can do business with.

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there is a degree of that, definitely, you

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>can feel it. The only thing is on that I

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of be careful what you wish for, because in general,

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that world of free trade and globalization which people like

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:45.199
<v Speaker 1>me supported and which I think Donald Trump said I

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 1>was wrong about everything all my life, specially tariff, especially tarist,

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>but that was a world that enriched the poorer world,

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 1>and I think from that point of view, the global

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:59.439
<v Speaker 1>South would be ill advised to celebrate this thing. I

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>can see why that if you are a copper magnate

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in some place, this might sound great in the short term.

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>And yes, it is perhaps more honest than some of

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 1>the talk about talking about freedom and then coming in

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:14.679
<v Speaker 1>to beat people up behind it. But I think you

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:16.360
<v Speaker 1>have to be careful what you wish for. I did

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>listen to Jenny and a bit. It did strike me

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that some of this stuff could reverse relatively quickly. On Trump,

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, he does deeply believe in tariffs. I think

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>it's always been a been a constancy of his. So

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>at some point there is going to be an argument

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 1>with the tech people on Trump and Elon at some

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>point that could come apart, and more generally, I think

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:41.880
<v Speaker 1>on things like DEI and greenery without signing too sort

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of bled about it, there are other forces that will

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:49.719
<v Speaker 1>keep pushing it forward. One is just the pressure from investors,

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>which I don't think will change that much in terms

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.199
<v Speaker 1>of different categories. Secondly, it is on climate change. You

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 1>just have the fact that we have to deal with

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the climate, and I think lots of people see that.

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I think at the end, yes, you might see changes,

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>but I think I would still expect corporations will retreat

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 1>from some of the more publicly extreme versions of DEIS

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.159
<v Speaker 1>you might put it. But I don't think that's going

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to be. It's not going to go all the way

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 1>back to how it was in the nineteen fifties, where

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a group of white men sat and decided everything.

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 2>And in short term, I think the biggest thing internationally

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 2>that people will be dealing with is the global financial

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 2>side effects of everyone betting on a sort of super

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 2>sore away America that potentially has unsustainable growth but certainly

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 2>inflicts higher costs of borrowing.

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>You already see the bond rate, the bomb market. I

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 1>think I've put a Trump in the bond market will

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 1>police you, and that seems to be what's happening. Seems

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to be the one thing he's frightened of is if

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:49.239
<v Speaker 1>the bomb market turns on you. That that's something that

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>people can see. And so far Trump has always focused

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>We had a very good bit and the last edition

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 1>of Trump andomics on this. Trump is always focused on

0:26:57.400 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>the stock market. If you're running a government to the end,

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it's the bomb market, which probably matters more.

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Jenny, I can't help mentioning we've sort of got you

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 2>mid Atlantic almost because although you're still technically in DC,

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 2>you will be moving to Berlin. And I've sort of

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 2>intrigued how you think reporting this story from Europe. I mean,

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 2>I've said you have to still be on the phone

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 2>to Washington a lot. You'll be kind of covering both sides.

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 2>But how do you think the Europeans will be dealing

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 2>with this agenda?

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.119
<v Speaker 5>From my reporting right now, I would say they're not

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 5>as prepared as they should be. This is a little wonky,

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 5>but there is a big trade case that the Europeans

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:48.880
<v Speaker 5>brought against China. You might remember China used economic version

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 5>against Lithuania. It was about them opening a Taiwan trade office.

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 5>This has been in the works the entire Biden administration,

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 5>with lots of support from the Biden administration, and they

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 5>are seems set to withdrawa case which we reported last

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 5>week was angering the Trump team because it reinforces their

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 5>belief that the Europeans are weak and they're not willing

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:13.479
<v Speaker 5>to stand up to China, and Brussels is not willing

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 5>to defend one of its member states, and arguably a

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 5>smaller one. So I will be on the phone with

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 5>people in Washington. I think I will be on the

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 5>phone with people in different capitals and the people that

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 5>Trump sens there.

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 2>On this sort of transactionalism. I mean, if there's goment,

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:32.400
<v Speaker 2>there are some governments around the world who think, okay,

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 2>this is quite a straightforward thing. We just have to

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 2>work out how to sell something to Trump, how could

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 2>make it be in his interest. Europeans maybe they're a

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 2>lot that they're not so good.

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>At being transactional.

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 5>They're a little bit slow compared to the Trump timeline,

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 5>So I think if something gels and Brussels, Trump has

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 5>moved on to a new demand. So the transactional nature

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 5>I think really works well with countries one on one.

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 5>I think Trump obviously seems really close to Jorgo Maloney,

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 5>so he will find an ally and her and Victor orban.

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 5>But once you actually have to respond as a body

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 5>in Brussels, I don't know how well that's going to

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 5>work with the transactional So I could foresee a bunch

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 5>of fights in Europe on how to respond. Do you

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 5>stand up to him if he threatens tariffs or can

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 5>you work out something else that's good for your country.

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean John has been an orgy of sort of

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 2>talking Europe down, one could say, in response to the

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 2>to the Donald Trump's victory, and also what's happened in

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 2>financial markets, and just an enormous spotlight on whether it's

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 2>the lack of defense spending, just the lack of speed

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 2>and coming up to coming up with anything. Lack of

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 2>speed when it comes to the economy for sure, any.

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Positive opportunities and there maybe if I was an investor,

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I would be a lot richer than I am. But

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>there may be a kind of buying opportunity to the

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 1>extent that Europe is so written down, but it's on

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the face of it, it's hard not to see all

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>these pessimistic things about Europe and not add more because

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you look at it for exactly the reasons

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Jenny said. They're going to have this question about whether

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>they deal within through the European Union, which they are

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>supposed to do on trade things. But you know he

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>will start the way he acts the where you talked

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to him. He will immediately start ringing Macrol rather than

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 1>particularly going to Brussels. He's not going to pay much

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>attention to that. But to me, I went to a

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 1>meeting the other day where a group of bradslot came

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>across to see European politicians, and the message they basically

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 1>said is you have no idea about Trump, but you

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 1>are comparatively well informed about Trump compared with AI, because

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you have no idea what AI is going to do

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to the economy, you have no companies that are involved

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in this, You have nothing that you can really show

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the world in this. There isn't anything in continental Europe

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that we even think about, and so I think that

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>is almost small friendly. I'm slightly setting bread up to

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 1>say how great Europe is. I certainly yeah.

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 2>My effort to get anything out of you, but it

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 2>was positive on your is completely failed.

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 2>I look hopefully towards Brad, but I'm not sure i'll

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 2>get a better answer.

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean, Europe does have a couple of interesting

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 4>AI companies, including.

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Which is great, but it is very, very small compared

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>with ending in America.

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 4>But it is interesting that a lot of the leaders

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 4>of these AI companies are predicting that will we will

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 4>achieve the next benchmark superintelligence or AGI in the next

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 4>four years and so that you know, monumental economic and

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 4>social change. And we can debate what it is will

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 4>happen on Trump's watch.

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 2>And does it matter in your world that money is

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 2>much more expensive because it's going to get the cost

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 2>of finances going up.

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that it matters.

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 4>I think I think that's a that's an industry that is,

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, focused on creating the next thing, and you know,

0:31:57.560 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 4>to them and we'll see if it's true and overly optimistic,

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 4>but they believe that, you know, Trump is making it

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 4>safe again for business.

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 2>So in a year's time. I mean hopefully no one

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 2>here will remember what you said, and you know things

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 2>it will just go on the internet.

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know no one will listen to it.

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 2>What do you think will be Brad, What do you first,

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 2>what do you think we'll be talking about?

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, we'll be talking about Trump, right, because first role

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 4>of Trump is that you must always talk about Donald Trump.

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 4>I think in one year, this honeymoon period where he

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 4>has assembled a very broad coalition of supporters and partners.

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 3>And allies, I think that will end.

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 4>You know that that may not even last the next

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 4>few weeks or is as long as the first you know,

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 4>truly ambitious and.

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 3>Aggressive executive action.

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 4>I think you know, we've had the hottest year on

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:52.479
<v Speaker 4>record now for the past few years, so we we

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 4>will almost undoubtedly still be talking about climate change and

0:32:56.400 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 4>whether AI and the requirements data center usage or making

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 4>the problems worse rather than better. And then knock on wood,

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 4>last thing I think we might you know, be talking

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 4>about global conflict. I mean, in the short term, we're

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 4>seeing the sunsetting of the of the war in Gaza,

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 4>maybe some prospects for the war in Ukraine. But if

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 4>we're talking about a deglobalized world, where America is pulling

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 4>back as the world's policeman. Then you know, power uphoors

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 4>a vacuum, and I worry what the next four years

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 4>brings in that.

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Regard, Jenny, that's taken a quite a lot of ground

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 2>for what we'll talk about nam certainly that's the classic, well.

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 5>All the all the hopefully not a virus. I think tariffs,

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 5>tariffs will be Trump's going to be tariff man again.

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 5>I think in the year's time we see him probably

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 5>shift on China or his global tariff. He's probably going

0:33:56.360 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 5>to do something with the Canada Mexico agreement, rip that up,

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 5>which that will cause a lot of instability. So yeah,

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 5>I think tariffs will be on everyone's mind.

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Again.

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Jenny doesn't always like me quoting her back on this,

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 2>but I am struck by your answer. And when You've

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 2>got one of your many scoops a few years ago,

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 2>and I said, quite early in Trump's term, and I've

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:19.319
<v Speaker 2>complimented you, and you came back saying, never a dull

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:22.839
<v Speaker 2>moment in national trade policy, which I had to reply, oh,

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 2>there really have been, but you came into it at

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:30.320
<v Speaker 2>a very good time exactly, John, what will we be

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 2>talking about.

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, basically, I think Jenny and Brad has said all

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the main ones. I sort of agree with Jenny that

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that the trade thing will come back in

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:42.319
<v Speaker 1>because Trump cares about that. And I think also the

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>China thing will heat up again. It has to, because

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 1>I think it is the one thing where you can

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 1>unite America. You might be able to unite America and Europe,

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and that by definition brings in both of those sides.

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the main thing, and it's a very bad

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 1>cop out, is all the unexpected things. If you went

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 1>back a month ago, whoever thought that South Korea would

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 1>go crazy or that we'd all be looking at pictures

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of Pacific palisades? And the element about being president and

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump discovered it in the first Its first rain with

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:20.399
<v Speaker 1>COVID is that you get surprised by things that come

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>at you from the other side of the world Greenland

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Greenland exactly, or places you decide to invade just for

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the hell of it. Those but it will be that

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. And you add in on top of

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 1>it all the difficulties of Trump that Trump causes anyone

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>who tries to predict things. If you go to China,

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and you meet some very bright people whose job it

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:44.839
<v Speaker 1>is to try and explain what's happening in America to Xijingping.

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I think for them, the first Trump presidency was a

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:50.880
<v Speaker 1>complete nightmare because every morning they woke up to discover

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:54.880
<v Speaker 1>these tweets landing on them with places that they had

0:35:54.920 --> 0:35:57.320
<v Speaker 1>never ever thought of. It's hard to imagine that Jijingping

0:35:57.520 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 1>was thinking about the Panamaketer Canal and Greenland just a

0:36:00.680 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago, but now someone in Beijing is having

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:06.399
<v Speaker 1>to muster on that. The obvious answers, what do you think?

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 2>You've said it so well, John, and we've run out

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:09.839
<v Speaker 2>of time.

0:36:09.880 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>It's such a shame.

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 2>But we have been at various times while we record this,

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:18.880
<v Speaker 2>I should say that we've been watching footage from Washington,

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:22.799
<v Speaker 2>the both the outgoing and the incoming president getting into

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 2>the motorcade and heading heading for the inauguration, people people

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:30.799
<v Speaker 2>filing in, and you kind of get the sense that

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 2>people will be watching DC in various ways throughout this

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 2>World Economic Forum because his return casts such a shadow

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 2>or a spotlight on this, depending on what you think.

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:45.759
<v Speaker 2>But thank you very much to all of you, to Brad,

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 2>to Jenny, to John and all of you in the

0:36:48.080 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 2>audience for joining us for this only second ever episode

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 2>of trump Andomics from Bloomberg. We hope all of you

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:58.319
<v Speaker 2>here enjoyed it and those of you listening raped it

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 2>very highly and review it. It was hosted by me,

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Stephanie Flanders, and I was joined by Bradstone, Jenny Leonard

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 2>and John Wikelthwaite. Thanks very much, Thank you.