Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Follow fuck on Facebook, Instagram,
Speaker 1: and Twitter. There's so little about the Biden presidency that
Speaker 1: has been a surprise. In fact, if anything, it feels
Speaker 1: like it was all so obvious. We all saw this
Speaker 1: coming in so many ways that it's not even it's
Speaker 1: not even worth anyone time to say I told you
Speaker 1: this was going to happen, because we all you knew,
Speaker 1: I knew, we all knew this was going to happen,
Speaker 1: and now we're seeing it play out before us. Joe
Speaker 1: Biden is a sub mediocrity. He's a buffoon. He's too
Speaker 1: old for the job, he's not smart enough for the job.
Speaker 1: He isn't a leader. I mean, there's so many problems
Speaker 1: here and we're just seeing this. And his vice president
Speaker 1: is no better in the skills and ability department. She's
Speaker 1: also somebody we've seen that you would not describe as
Speaker 1: a leader if you were being objective. But we'll get
Speaker 1: to all that in a moment. I want to focus
Speaker 1: in on what's going on with you at home now
Speaker 1: and at work. Whenever you're online. True online privacy is
Speaker 1: in the past. Your online data always seems to be
Speaker 1: under the magnifying glass by Big Tech. There's anxiety from
Speaker 1: not having control of your online data while it is
Speaker 1: being manipulated and sold to advertisers. But now there's a
Speaker 1: new way with the ultimate privacy and cybersecurity communications tool
Speaker 1: in your hands. Introducing Secure, an instant messaging and email
Speaker 1: platform hosted in Switzerland, protecting your data with the strictest
Speaker 1: privacy laws in the world. Secure is spelled sek you
Speaker 1: are and uses proprietary encryption technologies and independent platform and
Speaker 1: Swiss privacy laws to ensure complete privacy and security of
Speaker 1: your data on desktop and in transit. This is secure
Speaker 1: and private instant messaging and email. It assures your conversations,
Speaker 1: messages and data are kept completely safe and drive it
Speaker 1: Secure does not mine your data and is not subject
Speaker 1: to the Cloud Act. Take back your freedom, privacy and
Speaker 1: online security with Secure by going to seku are dot com.
Speaker 1: That's sek you are secure dot com. Make sure you
Speaker 1: use the coupon code buck that'll tell them you heard
Speaker 1: about them here on the show and also get you
Speaker 1: one week free and twenty five percent off. It's a
Speaker 1: great deal. Please use that coupon code buck. Just go
Speaker 1: right now seku are dot com that's the website Secure
Speaker 1: dot com and regain your privacy use coupon code buck.
Speaker 1: You must all commit to an ambitious climate action if
Speaker 1: you're going to prevent the worst impacts of climate change,
Speaker 1: limiting global warning warming to no more than one point
Speaker 1: five degree celsius, lead the global transition the clean energy technology.
Speaker 1: You know, when on over in the tank and the Penagon.
Speaker 1: When I first was elected advice president with President Obama,
Speaker 1: the military saddest down to let us know what the
Speaker 1: greatest threats facing America were, the greatest physical threats. This
Speaker 1: is not a joke. You know what, the Joint chiefs
Speaker 1: told us. The greatest threats facing America was global warming
Speaker 1: because there'll be significant population movements, fights over land, millions
Speaker 1: of people leaving places because they're literally sinking below the
Speaker 1: sea in Indonesia because of the fights over what is
Speaker 1: ariable land anymore. You know what is a joke? Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's IQ. I mean, this is not a smart individual.
Speaker 1: He's running the country, not a bright guy. And we're
Speaker 1: supposed to sit here and listen to this utter buffoon
Speaker 1: ramble on in front of the military about how the
Speaker 1: greatest threat this country faces his climate change. That is
Speaker 1: the dumbest thing I've heard since people were walking around
Speaker 1: round in marches and in riots yelling defund the police.
Speaker 1: Does it get dumber than this? I don't know. It
Speaker 1: looks like Democrats are always trying to find a new
Speaker 1: way to say insane things and have everybody just go
Speaker 1: along with it for some reason. What No rational, well
Speaker 1: adjusted human being who is capable of thinking for himself
Speaker 1: or herself believes the greatest threat to America is climate change.
Speaker 1: This is crazy stuff. But these are the same people
Speaker 1: that believe at any moment now there could be another insurrection.
Speaker 1: Oh no, another insurrection. You'll notice that the Biden administration
Speaker 1: is in charge. Democrats have majorities in Congress, or at
Speaker 1: least in the House, and a de facto majority in
Speaker 1: the Senate. And there aren't riots all over the country.
Speaker 1: Republicans aren't. We're not burning down everything. We're not throwing
Speaker 1: a fit because our guy isn't in charge. No, that's
Speaker 1: what the other side does. But one time, a handful
Speaker 1: in the grand scheme of things of Republicans got out
Speaker 1: of hand and rioted at Capitol Hill. And I don't
Speaker 1: even know if they call themselves Republicans. The probably thought
Speaker 1: themselves as Trumpers or right wingers or whatever they want
Speaker 1: to self identify as, but one time we have to
Speaker 1: hear about it forever. There is no proportionality in the
Speaker 1: thinking of the modern Democrat left. There's no sense of
Speaker 1: what is truly reasonable and what is based in objective truth.
Speaker 1: It's just whatever they want, whatever they feel like saying,
Speaker 1: whatever advances their desire, because that's really what their primary
Speaker 1: political motivator is. What do they want? It's not what's right,
Speaker 1: what's best, what works? What do they want? It's like
Speaker 1: the tantrum of a child running the United States government,
Speaker 1: and Joe Biden is just there to give voice to
Speaker 1: and play Kate pander to those tantrums. Climate change is
Speaker 1: the greatest threat. No reasonable person who is capable of
Speaker 1: any wisdom, any sound judgment goes, yeah, that's right, bigger threat.
Speaker 1: We just went through a global pandemic, right, we could
Speaker 1: go through another one. You'd think that at least they'd
Speaker 1: say a worse version of COVID would be a bigger threat.
Speaker 1: You think at least they'd recognize, I don't know, nuclear
Speaker 1: war with China's a bigger threat. Whole bunch of things
Speaker 1: you could put in there, But no, this is the
Speaker 1: commander in chief and are supposed expert class, and all
Speaker 1: the journos the clapping seals. All they do is just
Speaker 1: talk about how great Joe Biden is, how amazing Kamala is.
Speaker 1: I mean, she's not really amazing, but we're gonna say
Speaker 1: she's amazing because we know we're supposed to say she's amazing.
Speaker 1: We all see it for what it is, at least
Speaker 1: you do if you're listening to this show, because if
Speaker 1: you didn't, if you didn't see this based on what
Speaker 1: is real and what is true, you would you'd be
Speaker 1: watching you know, MSNBC, you'd be reading the New York
Speaker 1: Times and storial page. You'd be woke. But no, you
Speaker 1: choose to live in the real world. So instead you're
Speaker 1: here with me and Biden, of course talking tough on
Speaker 1: the world stage right now, a little less tough about
Speaker 1: the UK. You may have seen this one of our
Speaker 1: closest allies. I mean I even have a hard time
Speaker 1: thinking of Canada is not really an ally. It's a
Speaker 1: family member, right, I mean, Canada they're not even a buddy.
Speaker 1: They're like our brother. But the UK is right up
Speaker 1: there as as among our very closest allies and really
Speaker 1: kind of like a if Canada is our brother, the
Speaker 1: UK as a cousin and already Biden's caused some issues here.
Speaker 1: According to the UK Times, Biden ordered US officials to
Speaker 1: give Johnson, Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister in the UK,
Speaker 1: give a diplomatic rebuke a de marsh for putting the
Speaker 1: Northern Ireland peace process at risk over Brexit negotiations with
Speaker 1: the EU. The Biden folks are saying, oh, no, that's
Speaker 1: not true at all. You know, they're given this whole
Speaker 1: world tour about democracy is back and we stand together.
Speaker 1: I'm sure Boris Johnson remembers that Biden once called him
Speaker 1: a physical and emotional clone of Donald Trump, and he
Speaker 1: didn't meet it as a compliment. I'm sure that there
Speaker 1: are other world leaders who can look at Joe Biden
Speaker 1: with clear eyes and understand that this is an individual
Speaker 1: who is neither mentally, nor physically nor spiritually capable of
Speaker 1: being a leader in any meaningful way. But now he
Speaker 1: parades around the world because it makes Democrats feel better
Speaker 1: to have a guy with a D next to his
Speaker 1: name all the time who just does the bidding of
Speaker 1: the Democrat establishment, which is all Joe Biden has ever done.
Speaker 1: This is who he is, and yet he talks about
Speaker 1: standing up to Russia, standing up to UH enemies on
Speaker 1: the world stage. Here he is play fourteen. But I've
Speaker 1: been clear the United States will respond in a robust
Speaker 1: and meaningful way when the Russian government engages in harmful activities.
Speaker 1: We've already demonstrated that I'm going to communicate that there
Speaker 1: are consequences for reality and for violating the sovereignty of democracies.
Speaker 1: Conference's gonna be consequences for you, no joke, consequences. You
Speaker 1: know here, I am telling you Russia, We're gon We're
Speaker 1: gonna listen to me. Folks, listen to me. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: tell Putin better knock it off. You better knock it off. Yeah,
Speaker 1: this is this is who this is. I mean, people
Speaker 1: who's talk about how how they The journal has always
Speaker 1: viewed Trump as the angry uncle at at Thanksgiving dinner.
Speaker 1: Made president. Joe Biden is the confused uncle that everybody
Speaker 1: has to sort of pat on the shoulder and say, Okay, yes,
Speaker 1: we love the new board game that you built. That
Speaker 1: doesn't make sense to anybody, but congratulations, right that Joe
Speaker 1: Biden is an absurdity, and he is the commander in
Speaker 1: chief global warming folks, no joke, There wasn't the Pentagon.
Speaker 1: And I said, you know what, the biggest I'm gonna
Speaker 1: tell you right now, I'm because I'm I'm folksy. You
Speaker 1: notice I use the word folks and a conna do
Speaker 1: this thing where I'm gonna repeat the same phrase that
Speaker 1: I've said a million times. But I'm gonna just act
Speaker 1: like I'm leaning in, like you're my friend. Because I've
Speaker 1: been doing politics for you know, like fifty years, and
Speaker 1: I've I've learned little tricks of the trade, so I
Speaker 1: never have to know anything. I don't have to understand.
Speaker 1: But if I just make my voice sound like this,
Speaker 1: and even though I'm from Delaware, start to sound like
Speaker 1: I'm maybe maybe I'm from the Midwest. Maybe I'm from
Speaker 1: the South. You can't really tell. See I move all around.
Speaker 1: I'm Joe Biden. I'm like a friend at the dinner table,
Speaker 1: you know, I just here to here to sort of
Speaker 1: breathy talk to you about some nonsense. And hey, here
Speaker 1: I am commander in chief. It's amazing this guy is
Speaker 1: in charge, but he is, But he is Oh, yes,
Speaker 1: you know who's I'm sure shaking in his boots, Vladimir Putin.
Speaker 1: I'm sure he's terrified. Play eleven. I've been in and
Speaker 1: out of here many many times. I've visited a well
Speaker 1: over one hundred countries as president or as Chamber of
Speaker 1: the Forigner Relations Committee, or man as Vice President or
Speaker 1: Chamber of the Foreign Relations Committee. This is my first
Speaker 1: overseas trip this Presdy United States. I'm heading to the
Speaker 1: G seven, then to the NATO Ministerial, and then to
Speaker 1: meet with mister Putin to let him know what I
Speaker 1: want him to know. At every point along in the way,
Speaker 1: we're gonna make it clear that the United States is back,
Speaker 1: and democracies of the world are standing together to tackle
Speaker 1: the toughest challenges and the issues that matter most to
Speaker 1: our future. That we're committed to leading with strength, defending
Speaker 1: our values, and delivering for our people. America's better position
Speaker 1: to advance our national security and our economic prosperity when
Speaker 1: we bring together like minded nations to stand with us.
Speaker 1: Every speech that Joe Biden has ever given, pretty much
Speaker 1: you could just put at any point in history and
Speaker 1: say this is a politician giving a speech that's who
Speaker 1: this guy is. So we's always been I'm standing up
Speaker 1: for our value. I'm not going to tell you what
Speaker 1: the values are. I'm standing up for our values. Gonna
Speaker 1: be back. I'm gonna do this thing where I bring
Speaker 1: you down here with my voice and then all of
Speaker 1: a sudden, I get loud because that means I'm serious,
Speaker 1: no joke. Yeah, this is the guy who's not a
Speaker 1: leader of the free world. Everybody. Meanwhile, back at home,
Speaker 1: how are things going? Oh, that's right, us inflation at
Speaker 1: a thirteen year high, prices surging five percent. Gee, it
Speaker 1: turns out when you spend money like there is no tomorrow,
Speaker 1: things start getting a lot more expensive for everybody tomorrow.
Speaker 1: And using this meaning as an opportunity to move our
Speaker 1: interest forward. So it's not about friendship. They have known
Speaker 1: each other for a long time. They have a lot
Speaker 1: of disagreements. But this is going to be a candid conversation.
Speaker 1: It's going to be a straightforward conversation. The President's going
Speaker 1: to raise areas where he has concerned, whether it's the
Speaker 1: ransomware attacks or the aggression on the border of Ukraine,
Speaker 1: or human rights abuses. But there are also areas we
Speaker 1: think we can work together clear stability. We signed an
Speaker 1: extension of new Start Russia as an important partner as
Speaker 1: it relates to the run nuclear Deal where negotiations are ongoing.
Speaker 1: So we want to move to a more stable and
Speaker 1: predictable relationship that's in our interest. We don't want it
Speaker 1: to be adversarial and always heightened, and that's what we're hopeful.
Speaker 1: This will be the beginning of the Start too. I
Speaker 1: just wanted you all to hear that because wait, now,
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, Democrats don't want an adversarial relationship
Speaker 1: with Russia. That's what you just said. For four years,
Speaker 1: we heard that Russia had quite literally undermined our democracy
Speaker 1: by putting a Kremlin agent in the White House as
Speaker 1: president through stealing in election in twenty sixteen. This is
Speaker 1: what our lunatic, dishonest media was telling everybody for four years.
Speaker 1: And now it's well, you know, we're gonna talk tough
Speaker 1: to putin, but we don't want an adversarial relationship. You
Speaker 1: don't want an adversarial relationship. I thought Russia was our
Speaker 1: biggest concern. I thought Russia was high ding under my bed,
Speaker 1: and I had to be terrified that Russia was going
Speaker 1: to jump out of the shadows at any moment. Putin
Speaker 1: and the Kremlin were just going to attack me. That's
Speaker 1: if you believed the corporate democrat media. For the last
Speaker 1: four years, well until this year, Russia was a horrible country,
Speaker 1: working in all kinds of ways to attack us and
Speaker 1: undermine us and doing all these things. And look, I've
Speaker 1: been very critical of Putin for a long time, as
Speaker 1: others have on the right. He's not a good guy.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's no confusion about this. He is an authoritarian.
Speaker 1: But Democrats like authoritarians. The great lie that the Democrats
Speaker 1: tell themselves is that they're they're the party of you know,
Speaker 1: they're they're the party of liberty, the party of the
Speaker 1: people of democracy, when really it is the Democrats who
Speaker 1: are all about consolidation of power through a state apparatus
Speaker 1: and then wielding that as a political bludgeon instrument against
Speaker 1: anybody who disagrees. It is the Democrats who want to
Speaker 1: shut down free speech. It is the Democrats who want
Speaker 1: to shut down the free exercise of religion. It is
Speaker 1: the Democrats who want to make you mask up and
Speaker 1: stay home when they say so because they say so,
Speaker 1: and just go down the list. They're the ones that
Speaker 1: want to, in Maoist cultural revolution style, politicize absolutely everything
Speaker 1: and make effective human sacrifices out of people who get
Speaker 1: caught up in the machinery of ropeness. They view this
Speaker 1: as somehow advancing the country's interests. They think this is
Speaker 1: better for all of us. Yes, that's great. Use racial
Speaker 1: Marxism to divide us all and then make sure that
Speaker 1: there's no grace or mercy or decency in our politics
Speaker 1: toward those you disagree with. It's not that they're wrong,
Speaker 1: it's that they're evil. It's not that they disagree, it's
Speaker 1: that they're bad. This is central to the Democrat ethos today.
Speaker 1: Unfortunately for this country. It is a different Democrat party
Speaker 1: than it was ten years ago, certainly that it was
Speaker 1: fifty years ago. And they think they're the great friends
Speaker 1: of democracy. They're certainly not the great friends of the
Speaker 1: constitution and individual liberty. That much is clear. They are
Speaker 1: the party of authoritarians. They are the party of the state,
Speaker 1: big s state. And yet they go around talking about how, yes,
Speaker 1: now now America's back. Biden says, we didn't go anywhere
Speaker 1: where did they get this idea that America was disappearing
Speaker 1: or had disappeared. That's just not true. The media created
Speaker 1: a false narrative. We'll talk about the false narrative of
Speaker 1: the clearing of Lafayette Square later, which was a big lie.
Speaker 1: Another big lie the media told about Trump. But it
Speaker 1: served the purpose at the time, so they're fine with it.
Speaker 1: There's no embarrassment from them. You have to remember that
Speaker 1: they don't care. But they're working so hard now to
Speaker 1: create a a vision of Biden the great Statesman traversing
Speaker 1: the globe after Kamala Harris completely flopped in Guatemala and Mexico.
Speaker 1: We all know it, we all saw it. But the
Speaker 1: problem that they're going to have to deal with is
Speaker 1: that the results of this Biden administration are already starting
Speaker 1: to show up, and they are not good. When you're
Speaker 1: talking about US inflation at a thirteen year high, what
Speaker 1: you're saying is inflation is the worst since the financial
Speaker 1: crisis since August of two thousand and eight. Consumer inflation
Speaker 1: up considerably. This follows a four point two rise for
Speaker 1: the year that in April. All right, the Core price Index,
Speaker 1: which excludes the volatile categories of food and energy, rose
Speaker 1: three point eight percent in May from a year before,
Speaker 1: the largest increase for that reading since Jude of nineteen
Speaker 1: ninety two. According to the Wall Street Journal, prices for
Speaker 1: use cars and trucks leapt seven point three percent from
Speaker 1: the previous month, driving one third of the rise the
Speaker 1: overall index. On a month to month basis, overall prices
Speaker 1: rose point six percent. Friends, you're making less money now,
Speaker 1: Your dollars go less far, you have less buying power,
Speaker 1: Your bank account is worth less. All those hours you
Speaker 1: put to have those numbers on the screen. The Democrat
Speaker 1: policies of wild overspending and just acting like nothing matter.
Speaker 1: And look, yes, it is true for what the Republicans.
Speaker 1: Republicans spent too much money. Donald Trump, yes, spent too
Speaker 1: much money as well. That is true. I'm not going
Speaker 1: to walk away from that or pretend it didn't happen.
Speaker 1: But it's one thing when you find out your kid
Speaker 1: ran up five hundred dollars on the family credit card
Speaker 1: whereout you see. It's another thing when the kids like
Speaker 1: I'm gonna run up ten grand Right, you can say
Speaker 1: that both of these things are bad ideas, and one
Speaker 1: of them is a lot worse than the other. This
Speaker 1: is what the Democrats are doing. They are spending, they
Speaker 1: are dragging the economy down, and they're taking a redistributive
Speaker 1: approach to everything, to power in society, to money, to
Speaker 1: our rights there. I mean, they're Marxists on so many levels.
Speaker 1: It's all about finding the divides between people and then
Speaker 1: just promise to equal things out, create greater equity at
Speaker 1: the expensive individual rights, at the expense of what is
Speaker 1: actually right, because it makes some people feel better. Father's
Speaker 1: Day is around the corner, and if your dad or
Speaker 1: grandfather serve this great country of ours, how cool would
Speaker 1: it be to give him something meaningful this year, something
Speaker 1: that recognize what he gave to this country, something like
Speaker 1: the American flag. If you know your father grandfather would
Speaker 1: be moved by a gift like this, then let me
Speaker 1: recommend you to my friends at Allegiance Flag Supply. Everything
Speaker 1: this country means your dad is reflected in the quality
Speaker 1: of the craftsmanship Allegiance Flag Supply puts into all their flags.
Speaker 1: And these are flags that are made in America, which
Speaker 1: is actually really uncommon, believe it or not. They are
Speaker 1: hands sown by seamstresses in Charleston, South Carolina who had
Speaker 1: lost jobs previously to company's outsourcing overseas, and they're made
Speaker 1: with materials that do not allow for cutting corners in
Speaker 1: the manufacturing process. All of this translates into a flag
Speaker 1: that waves proudly outside your father's home, his dock, or
Speaker 1: on his boat and won't get tangled, torn or shredded,
Speaker 1: which happens to so many other flags in the marketplace
Speaker 1: because they're cheaply made, they're made in China, and honestly,
Speaker 1: the people making them don't care. Allegiance Flag supply cares
Speaker 1: about this country, about patriotism, and about getting you the best,
Speaker 1: highest quality, made in America flags you'll ever see. This
Speaker 1: is the way to say thank you to Dad on
Speaker 1: multiple levels this Father's Day. Go to show Allegiance dot
Speaker 1: com and enter promo code buck to get ten percent
Speaker 1: off your order. That also lets them know you heard
Speaker 1: about them here on the show. Go to show Allegiance
Speaker 1: dot com that's the website and enter promo code buck
Speaker 1: for ten percent off your order and get yours in
Speaker 1: time for Father's Day on June twentieth that Show Allegiance
Speaker 1: dot Com. Enter promo code buck for ten percent off.
Speaker 1: So how is fumbling bumbling Biden doing on the world stage?
Speaker 1: Is he annoying some of our good dear friends over
Speaker 1: in the UK. Not an auspicious start. We have our
Speaker 1: friend Raheem Kassam with us now to talk about this.
Speaker 1: He is the co host of the war Room podcast
Speaker 1: I'm sure you all know very well. He also is
Speaker 1: the editor of the National Pulse. Go to National Pulse
Speaker 1: dot com for their latest reporting. Raheem, great to have you.
Speaker 1: Thank you for having me in congratulations. I appreciate that, sir.
Speaker 1: We're gonna have you on the other show soon too.
Speaker 1: And I want to know what you think so far
Speaker 1: about Biden deciding to de marsh. We are told to
Speaker 1: give a stern lecture to Johnson's people Boris Johnson of
Speaker 1: the UK over Northern Ireland. Not not what friends now?
Speaker 1: What friends are supposed to do to friends during trips
Speaker 1: like this? For him, well, I mean Biden is really
Speaker 1: trying to execute a grudge here. Remember the Brexit campaign
Speaker 1: was interfered with by his boss, Barack Obama, who traveled
Speaker 1: to the United Kingdom ahead of the Brexit referendum in
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen to say, if you vote for this, you
Speaker 1: will go to the back of the queue for any
Speaker 1: trade deals that you possibly might want to do with
Speaker 1: other nations around the world if the United States, obviously
Speaker 1: being one of the most important trading partners for the
Speaker 1: United Kingdom around the world, and Obama's threats remember didn't work.
Speaker 1: The British public rose up on June to twenty third
Speaker 1: of twenty sixteen and said, you know, with a with
Speaker 1: a pretty big majority, I mean, fifty two verses forty
Speaker 1: eight doesn't sound like a lot, but actually the percentage
Speaker 1: difference there, it's not a four percent difference, the percentage
Speaker 1: difference from one to the other. And now the percentage
Speaker 1: difference in the approval, I think it's like seventy percent
Speaker 1: approval now breaxit. It really has backfard on the globalist
Speaker 1: So of course Joe Biden wants to trot on over
Speaker 1: there after he's dealt with the cicadas, of course at Dallas,
Speaker 1: trot on over to the United Kingdom and say, well, look,
Speaker 1: we warned you, we warned you, this is going to happen.
Speaker 1: The British public don't care. What they care about is
Speaker 1: that they have the autonomy now to do their own
Speaker 1: trade deals on the world stage, that they have the
Speaker 1: autonomy to make their own laws in their own parliament
Speaker 1: and hold to account those people who were making their laws.
Speaker 1: Of course, there was always going to be some difficulty.
Speaker 1: Nobody pretended there wasn't going to be some difficulty, whether
Speaker 1: it was on the Irish border, whether it was trading
Speaker 1: with the EU itself. All of those things are totally
Speaker 1: natural and will appeal to Americans as being totally natural,
Speaker 1: because Americas still remembers what it was like developing its
Speaker 1: own nation after seventeen seventy six, what Hamilton had to do,
Speaker 1: the report on the subject of manufacturers, all of that,
Speaker 1: and that's happening in it on a smaller scale, but
Speaker 1: that's happening in Britain again today. Joe Biden has a
Speaker 1: has a has an interest in Boris Johnson. Let's put
Speaker 1: it this way. Boris Johnson is a globalist. He masquerades
Speaker 1: as a conservative, sometimes even masqueraded as a libertarian. But
Speaker 1: his wife, his new wife, worked at the Clinton Global Initiative,
Speaker 1: one of their subsidiaries. And Boris Johnson has actually taken
Speaker 1: the United of Kingdon through a pretty authoritarian lockdown this
Speaker 1: last year and a half. So Joe Biden is very
Speaker 1: interested in sort of forcing Boris Johnson to heal. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: it's just going to make Boris Johnson less popular with
Speaker 1: the British public and make Joe Biden and sadly America
Speaker 1: more unpopular with the British public too. What is it
Speaker 1: about Brexit, raheem that so upsets American leftists and the
Speaker 1: Democrat hardy you know, the Biden, Schumer, Pelosi, AOC axis.
Speaker 1: They hate Brexit, and I mean obviously with Pelosi and Biden,
Speaker 1: it's not like they really know much about it, but
Speaker 1: they know they're supposed to hate it. Why, well, it's
Speaker 1: very simple. It's it's nationism, right, It's nationism versus globalism,
Speaker 1: the idea that you should control your own destiny, the
Speaker 1: idea that your vote actually might mean something, that you
Speaker 1: may actually be able to hold a politicians to account.
Speaker 1: Of course, politicians hate the idea of this. But for
Speaker 1: American politicians that have used their several decades in power
Speaker 1: to sap America out, to bleed America out, to export
Speaker 1: America out to other countries, to trash the manufacturing industry
Speaker 1: in the country, and all of this, what Prexit was
Speaker 1: was not a you know, crescendo of a pro nation
Speaker 1: movement around the world. It was the first brick out
Speaker 1: of the war. So now they look at things that
Speaker 1: they like, like the United Nations and the World Health
Speaker 1: Organization and all of these other bodies that they have
Speaker 1: tried to put together to put bureaucrats, bureaucrats like Fauci
Speaker 1: in to control what's actually going on in terms of policy,
Speaker 1: while people think they control what's going on policy by
Speaker 1: using their vote at the ballot box. That Brexit movement
Speaker 1: was a brick out of the war in the wider
Speaker 1: globalist project. And you know what, you know, it's really
Speaker 1: interesting about it. You know, COVID nineteen and authoritarian lockdowns aside,
Speaker 1: Before that all happened, there was just these incredible green
Speaker 1: shoots of economic prosperity, you know, manifesting themselves in the
Speaker 1: United Kingdom. People wanted to invest again in such a
Speaker 1: massive way, and of course they the Bidens, the Pelosi's
Speaker 1: and all the others, they cannot afford to let that happen.
Speaker 1: We're speaking of Rahim Kasam, co host of The War
Speaker 1: Room podcasts and editor of the National National Pulse Skill
Speaker 1: checkout National Pulse dot com for their latest and raheem
Speaker 1: a lot of well, it's it's supposed to sound tough,
Speaker 1: but it's very vague when it comes to what Biden
Speaker 1: saying about Russia. You know, we have the White House
Speaker 1: Press secretary saying, well, we don't want to be confrontational
Speaker 1: with Russia, and Biden giving his speech on the way
Speaker 1: out on it before his trip saying, you know, Hammer
Speaker 1: talk to Putin's gonna be tough. You know, we're We're
Speaker 1: not really clear on what exactly that means. I just
Speaker 1: think there's there's almost a like a multiple personality disorder
Speaker 1: from the Democrats on Russia. So is Russia hiding under
Speaker 1: their bed doing doing collusion and destroying our democracy or
Speaker 1: should we work with them? It seems like they can't
Speaker 1: figure out what the line's supposed to be. They can't
Speaker 1: figure it out because actually the Democratic Party has a
Speaker 1: Democratic Party machine actually has a waning grip on foreign policy.
Speaker 1: They fundamentally misunderstand, you, particularly the world as it is today.
Speaker 1: They misunderstood Brexit, they misunderstood bol scenario in Brazil, they
Speaker 1: misunderstood Mode in India. They misunderstand quite a lot of
Speaker 1: things all around the world. And so they're on the
Speaker 1: fly attempting to make new new kind of geopolitical strictures
Speaker 1: up in their minds. This may sound like a kind
Speaker 1: of a niche point, but for instance, the DC think
Speaker 1: tank circuit right, which is a multi billion dollar industry
Speaker 1: here in Washington, DC, really used to control all of
Speaker 1: that policy papers, brief things, meetings, lectures, seminars, one on ones,
Speaker 1: all of that. But actually the DC think tank circuit
Speaker 1: was left utterly stunned and rebuked by what happened both
Speaker 1: in the United Kingdom and the United States in twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: and they've never really recovered from that. They find it
Speaker 1: harder and harder to fundrade, they find it harder and
Speaker 1: harder to convey their ideas. And it was really the
Speaker 1: globalists and the Democrats who used them as the kind
Speaker 1: of intellectual vanguard of where geopolitically they should stand. The
Speaker 1: Democrats don't have that anymore. So they're all over the place. Yes,
Speaker 1: you're right to time out. They're all over the place
Speaker 1: on Russia, and they get played by the way by everybody.
Speaker 1: They got played of the CCP's virus. They're getting played
Speaker 1: by Russia now and they'll be played by other actors
Speaker 1: in over thecoming months and years as well. I mean,
Speaker 1: do you really think I mean, who would you choose
Speaker 1: in a chess match? Right? Would you choose Ladimir Putin?
Speaker 1: Would you choose Kamala Harris? And let's all just be
Speaker 1: honest about that. Would you choose Joe? I don't think
Speaker 1: you could even choose Joe Biden because as if he
Speaker 1: was if this was a street fighter and he was
Speaker 1: on your screen as a potential thing, it would be
Speaker 1: character great and locked out. Joe Biden is asleep, So
Speaker 1: so you politically speaking, Um, I mean this is a
Speaker 1: really interesting point that not enough people are talking about. Now.
Speaker 1: We actually kind of have a vacuum of leadership in
Speaker 1: the world. It's amazing, isn't it? Because because Biden's actually
Speaker 1: going around and his favorite talking point is American leadership
Speaker 1: is back and democracies unite. And I'm just asking, one,
Speaker 1: when did when was American leadership gone under Trump? And two?
Speaker 1: When were we not united with democracies? Exactly? The whole
Speaker 1: thing just feels so phony. It is phony. They have
Speaker 1: to build a straw man up to knock it down. Um.
Speaker 1: You know, most people now realizing if you look at
Speaker 1: the polling, I've been looking a lot of a lot
Speaker 1: of the Rasmussen polling recently some of the others out there.
Speaker 1: If you look at all of that, I mean, institutionally speaking,
Speaker 1: Americans have a less confidence in their institutions, both domestically
Speaker 1: and foreign policy wise, than almost ever before. I think
Speaker 1: the media's approval rating was at nine percent two years ago.
Speaker 1: Imagine what that is today. So the Democats have to
Speaker 1: find straw men to knockdown. Kamala Harris tried it on
Speaker 1: her recent trip. I'm going to study the root causes.
Speaker 1: It was a disaster. I mean, it was an embarrassment,
Speaker 1: and even the left media is saying that Kamala Harris's
Speaker 1: trip was an embarrassment. So I think they are in
Speaker 1: free or rather are in the midst of experiencing an
Speaker 1: incredibly rude awakening. People don't think they're legitimate in any way.
Speaker 1: Speaking to Rahem Kassam, co host of the War Room podcast,
Speaker 1: you can get wherever you listen to your podcasts, Raheem,
Speaker 1: I wanted to switch gears with you for a second too.
Speaker 1: It turns out the story from last year that Donald
Speaker 1: Trump as the you know, the the second coming of
Speaker 1: of like Mussolini, eliminated protesters from the square for a
Speaker 1: photo opera remember this one. I mean you you run
Speaker 1: a website. You know what it is to be dealing
Speaker 1: with the new cycle every day, as well as doing
Speaker 1: commentary and an analysis on on your podcast. What I'm
Speaker 1: trying to convey to my audience all the time now
Speaker 1: is understand that they aren't when these things happen. Yes
Speaker 1: we have to point it out, and yes we have
Speaker 1: to to set the record straight, but they're not. The
Speaker 1: The Democrat corporate media is not embarrassed by this. Their
Speaker 1: attitude is we got away with another one. It worked
Speaker 1: when it had to work. Yeah, there's there's, but there's
Speaker 1: no accountability in media right. The The entire premise of
Speaker 1: the First Amendment, which the media, by the way, is
Speaker 1: is constantly attacking for people like you and me. But
Speaker 1: the entire premise of the First Amendment that they that
Speaker 1: they hide behind when when it comes to them is that,
Speaker 1: you know, speech is free, and that's fine, but when
Speaker 1: there's accountability behind that speech, the media runs screaming for
Speaker 1: the hills. And I'm just talking about accountability in terms
Speaker 1: of people should be fired for misreporting things. People should
Speaker 1: be mocked and ridiculed and humiliated, as so many of
Speaker 1: these people should be. I mean, look at the Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden hard Drive from Hell, which, by the way, I'm
Speaker 1: standing in the very room that I still and I
Speaker 1: received that drive all those months ago and started pouring
Speaker 1: through it. You look at the COVID nineteen and the
Speaker 1: CCP virus stuff and whether it was made in the lab,
Speaker 1: and that was a conspiracy theory, And now most people
Speaker 1: are like, well, yeah, I mean, that probably is what happened.
Speaker 1: There aren't actually any bats around that area. So there's
Speaker 1: never been anybody held accountable in the media for not
Speaker 1: just telling these lies, but regurgitating the lines of bureaucrats
Speaker 1: and politicians who lie to the American public for their
Speaker 1: own personal game. That interview between Chuck Todd and doctor
Speaker 1: Fauchi yesterday is case in point of all of it.
Speaker 1: Chuck Todd knows that doctor Fauchy, knows that doctor Fouchie
Speaker 1: is telling lies, but he goes out there anyway and
Speaker 1: acts as his public relations executive live on national television.
Speaker 1: So what does accountability look like? You know, how do
Speaker 1: you actually get these reports, as these stenographers that sit
Speaker 1: in the White House press room to be held accountable
Speaker 1: to their actions when you know they're not going to
Speaker 1: lose their jobs because they're employed by these big corporate
Speaker 1: entities that have an interest in keeping them lying to
Speaker 1: the public. I don't know quite yet what it looks like,
Speaker 1: but I do know that many people are asking questions
Speaker 1: about what it's going to look like. Check out my
Speaker 1: friend Raheim Kassam's podcast, war Room with Steve Bannon, Raheem
Speaker 1: Kassam and Jason Miller. Raheem, great to have you, man,
Speaker 1: We'll talk to you soon. Thank you. Buck us. Another
Speaker 1: big lie the media told about Trump during the election year,
Speaker 1: no less and magnified for maximum political impact, and it
Speaker 1: was all bull all false. Collection of headlines gives you
Speaker 1: a sense of what the reality is. Park police planned
Speaker 1: to clear area before Trump photo. Op Watchdog says that's
Speaker 1: the New York Times. Watchdog report finds park police did
Speaker 1: not clear racial injustice protesters from Lafayette Park for Trump's
Speaker 1: visit to the area. Washington Post the lingering questions about
Speaker 1: the clearing the clearing of Lafayette Square. Fox News has
Speaker 1: it police did not clear Lafayette Square so Trump could
Speaker 1: pose for photo with the Bible. Inspector General says, yeah,
Speaker 1: so let's all just take a moment here to be
Speaker 1: clear on what happened, the Interior Department, Okay has an
Speaker 1: Inspector General who investigated whether or not Donald Trump, as
Speaker 1: was reported all across the anti Trump media. They said
Speaker 1: he had tear gas, deployed non lethal weapons against pro
Speaker 1: Chester's police, brutality, violence, cats and dogs living together, massisteria right,
Speaker 1: all this horrible stuff. It was all for a photo op.
Speaker 1: Who the bible hoocause Trump is such a monster. Except
Speaker 1: that's not true. It's a lie. This is what the
Speaker 1: Interior Department Inspector General Port actually says. Quote. The evidence
Speaker 1: did not support that the park police had cleared the
Speaker 1: area for for mister Trump, who strode through it on
Speaker 1: June one of twenty twenty before posing for photographs in
Speaker 1: front of Saint John's Episcopal Church holding a Bible. The
Speaker 1: thirty page report by the Interior Departments Inspector General offers
Speaker 1: new details about the park Police's decision making. And so, folks,
Speaker 1: I mean, what else, what else do we really need
Speaker 1: to see here? And what else do we really need
Speaker 1: to know? They lied again about Trump? Another lie about Trump.
Speaker 1: It was not a photo op. And this was one
Speaker 1: week after the death of George Floyd and following you know,
Speaker 1: all the riots that BLM was setting up all over
Speaker 1: the place. So the park police decided that they had
Speaker 1: to have a contractor come in to set up a
Speaker 1: fence to stop the continued violent protests from from going on.
Speaker 1: It's it's just unreal, unreal. And they said there may
Speaker 1: have been inadequate communications between federal officials, but that effectively
Speaker 1: what the storyline was, as report of the media at
Speaker 1: the time, was evil fascist Trump tear gases peaceful protesters
Speaker 1: who weren't peaceful. What was going on outside that White
Speaker 1: House and on the streets of DC at this point
Speaker 1: was chaos, bedlam, madness. Oh because of social justice. Yeah, sure,
Speaker 1: it was all really about that. And they told this
Speaker 1: story about Trump and it was just not true. It
Speaker 1: was just it was a lot, and they didn't care
Speaker 1: that it wasn't true, and they don't care that it's
Speaker 1: not true now. And this is the important part. This
Speaker 1: is what I want you all to remember. The media
Speaker 1: now exists as warring propaganda machines. The media exists to
Speaker 1: push points of view, and those who pretend they're not
Speaker 1: doing that are often the biggest frauds and the ones
Speaker 1: you must be on the most guard against So this
Speaker 1: call at the CNN's of the world, they're they're the
Speaker 1: biggest liars. But this was just part of another in
Speaker 1: a series of breathtaking headlines, Oh my gosh from the
Speaker 1: corporate media, the anti Republican, anti Trump, corporate media. And
Speaker 1: it was just not true, all right. They were planning
Speaker 1: to clear the square before Trump was doing anything. Had
Speaker 1: nothing to do with Trump. But that's not how it
Speaker 1: was reported at the time because they lied about him
Speaker 1: whenever they felt like it, because they thought that even
Speaker 1: lying about Trump was right and moral, because he's so bad,
Speaker 1: you gotta lie about him. That was their viewpoint. Those
Speaker 1: who have experienced Marxism, those who have lived in societies
Speaker 1: overrun with social justice warriors of one kind or another,
Speaker 1: are critical at this point in American history because they
Speaker 1: can tell us about their experiences and what really happens
Speaker 1: when you have people who believe putting the collective and
Speaker 1: putting the state over the individual is a pathway to heaven,
Speaker 1: when as we know, it is unfortunately a conveyor belt
Speaker 1: to hell. It ruins societies, it ruins countries because it
Speaker 1: negates universal truths and ignores essential components of human nature
Speaker 1: and the reality of life all around us. Marxism is
Speaker 1: a fallist see when it comes to human nature, when
Speaker 1: it comes to history, when it comes to morality. And
Speaker 1: yet it has infected so much of the modern world.
Speaker 1: And the largest single communist country, as you know, and
Speaker 1: I understand that it now has state directed market activity
Speaker 1: and has become very wealthy. But the largest communist country
Speaker 1: in the world is, in fact China, the People's Republic
Speaker 1: of China. The Chinese Communist Party runs it. There are
Speaker 1: many institutions, they'll talk about, a Central Committee and a
Speaker 1: Polite Borough, and all these institutions are borrowed directly from
Speaker 1: Soviet Communism, at least in their structure and their naming.
Speaker 1: For a reason, people who point out that China is
Speaker 1: essentially a mafia state don't necessarily seem to understand that, yeah,
Speaker 1: so was the Soviet Union, Folks, that was also a
Speaker 1: mafia state of sorts, thugs with absolute power running things
Speaker 1: for their benefit and the benefit of their cronies, all
Speaker 1: under the pretense of what's good for the people. The
Speaker 1: difference between there are many differences between the Chinese approach
Speaker 1: and the Soviet approach. The Chinese recognized that without markets
Speaker 1: you can't compete. Without market incentives, you'll never be wealthy
Speaker 1: enough to enforce your will against the capitalist states and
Speaker 1: the free world. So a Virginia mom, though this was
Speaker 1: up on foxnews dot Com today. Virginia mom who actually
Speaker 1: escaped from Mao's Cultural Revolution in China which started run
Speaker 1: around nineteen sixty six. I believe it was she spoke
Speaker 1: up about critical race theory. She spoke up about what
Speaker 1: actually she sees going on in America today, and she
Speaker 1: has a direct as she's making comparison between critical race theories,
Speaker 1: teachings of racial Marxism, as I keep telling you, and
Speaker 1: the approach of the cultural revolution in communist China under
Speaker 1: mouse it own. This is what this mother said at
Speaker 1: this school board meeting in Virginia. Play it. I've been
Speaker 1: very alarmed about what's going on in our school. You
Speaker 1: are now teaching training our children to be social justice
Speaker 1: warriors and to loathe our country and our history. Growing
Speaker 1: up in Mouth, China or the Saint very familiar. They
Speaker 1: are communist regime use the same critical theories to divide people.
Speaker 1: The only difference is the use class instead of race.
Speaker 1: During the Cultural Revolution, I witnessed students and teachers that
Speaker 1: can turn against each other. We change school names to
Speaker 1: be politically correct. We were taught to denounce our heritage.
Speaker 1: The Red Guards destroy any sense that is not Communists, statues, books,
Speaker 1: and anything else. We are also encouraging reporting each other,
Speaker 1: just like the student Equity Ambassador program and a bias
Speaker 1: reporting system. This is indeed American version of the Chinese
Speaker 1: Communist the Chinese culture Revolution. The critical race theory has
Speaker 1: its roots in culture mrxism. It should have no place
Speaker 1: in our school. There was a period in America roughly
Speaker 1: the nineteen early nineteen seventies where because the Soviet Communism
Speaker 1: had become so obviously decrepit and so clearly horrific through
Speaker 1: Stalin's purges and then just the continued police state apparatus,
Speaker 1: most infamous of the KGB, but the KGB went through
Speaker 1: various iterations different It was the NKVD, and there were
Speaker 1: different variations of the secret police in Russia, stretching all
Speaker 1: the way back to the Cheka and the Okrana. But
Speaker 1: by the time the nineteen seventies rolled around, anybody who
Speaker 1: was not just a truly delusional and abject moron fellow
Speaker 1: traveler of Soviet communism realized the Soviet Union hasn't actually
Speaker 1: created a worker's paradise. It's misery and deprivation and poverty.
Speaker 1: So what did they do? What do the American left do? Well?
Speaker 1: They all of a sudden developed a fondness for Maoism.
Speaker 1: That's right, and the and the Western left as well.
Speaker 1: Jean Paul Sartre, for example, the French Intellectuelle. He used
Speaker 1: to sell copies of a banned Maoist newspaper back in
Speaker 1: Paris in the seventies. And you had the Rolling Stones
Speaker 1: interrupted a concert in nineteen seventy at the Palais de
Speaker 1: Spa Paris in Paris. They brought a French Maoist they
Speaker 1: called Serge July on stage so they could celebrate Maoism
Speaker 1: in the West. You see, that was cool if you're
Speaker 1: a rocker, Yeah, Maoism. Yeah, man, it isn't that hip?
Speaker 1: That guy mao he really knows what's up. Oh. And
Speaker 1: then the Cultural Revolution stories started to come out, and
Speaker 1: then people started to learn more as well about the
Speaker 1: Great Leap Forward and the famine and the millions and
Speaker 1: millions of people who were killed as a direct results.
Speaker 1: Sometimes at the direct order of state policy. But there's
Speaker 1: the famine, and then later on there was there's Mouth's
Speaker 1: Great Famine, and then there's the Cultural Revolution in part
Speaker 1: to shut down any inquiry or criticism about the fact
Speaker 1: that Mao's moronic communist policies, thuggish, idiotic policies and starting
Speaker 1: to sound a little bit like how we describe some
Speaker 1: people in this country, right, that they resulted in mass
Speaker 1: death and deprivation and starvation and the usage of hunger
Speaker 1: as a weapon against dissidents. That was a classic Maoist
Speaker 1: tactic during the Great Leap Forward and the famine. But
Speaker 1: you start to you start to look at these stories
Speaker 1: and what happened. I mean, this woman, this mother in
Speaker 1: Virginia was talking about the Red Guards. They were basically
Speaker 1: a paramilitary youth organization of college students and high school students.
Speaker 1: Oh what a surprise. They went for the young, easily misled,
Speaker 1: very emotional idiots and had them do a lot of
Speaker 1: the dirty work the Red Guards would engage. This is
Speaker 1: under Mao's Cultural Revolution. Okay, when people talk about a
Speaker 1: Maoist struggle session, we should really know about this. It
Speaker 1: went on from nineteen sixty six until nineteen seventy six,
Speaker 1: about a million people more like a million and a
Speaker 1: half they think were murdered as a result of this
Speaker 1: over the course of ten years, about over million and
Speaker 1: a half in this country. We're told that it's a
Speaker 1: national crisis because the state through police killed I think
Speaker 1: it was nine unarmed black men and not even necessarily illegally.
Speaker 1: In twenty eighteen, it was I think that was the number.
Speaker 1: It might have been fourteen the year after that. In Maos, China,
Speaker 1: from nineteen seventy six to nineteen nineteen sixty six to
Speaker 1: seventy six, about one point five million people killed directly
Speaker 1: as a result of state policy murdered. China just pretends
Speaker 1: like it didn't even happen. What kind of things occurred
Speaker 1: during this culture revolution? And it was all about getting
Speaker 1: rid of the old ways of thinking. You could say
Speaker 1: that the Culture Revolution was very progressive in that sense.
Speaker 1: They wanted to get rid of the four olds. They
Speaker 1: called it old thinking, old culture, old custom, and the
Speaker 1: old habits of exploitation. This is where the class warfare
Speaker 1: thing came in. Can you start to see the comparison.
Speaker 1: Why am I telling you about this? It's not just
Speaker 1: for the sake of a fascinating, terrifying part of our history,
Speaker 1: which is, you know, I find worth knowing just in
Speaker 1: the first place. But this mother who survived this period,
Speaker 1: this Chinese American mother who fled Mao's culture Revolution, is
Speaker 1: warning about what happened there happening here in different ways,
Speaker 1: but similar enough that she's deeply concerned that she's frightened
Speaker 1: separation of people, the Balkanization that's occurring. Get rid of
Speaker 1: the old ways of thinking. Tear down oh I don't know,
Speaker 1: old heroes. Tear down the emblems of the past that
Speaker 1: united people in a nation. Focus in on their divisions
Speaker 1: and exacerbate them, turn them against each other, make them
Speaker 1: hate each other. But promise them that if you the party,
Speaker 1: so to speak, if you're in power, you will create equity.
Speaker 1: You'll make those divisions go away, because you'll make everybody
Speaker 1: the same. But you're gonna need a lot of authority
Speaker 1: to do that, and you're gonna have to destroy a
Speaker 1: lot of what came before, you know, like the patriarchy,
Speaker 1: for example, or pull down Columbus statues, or get rid
Speaker 1: of the founding Fathers, stuff like that. You want to
Speaker 1: eliminate all that from the public's mind you want, and
Speaker 1: not just erase it, but degrade it, defame it, make
Speaker 1: it something that people are ashamed of. And anybody who
Speaker 1: stands in the way of that, you have to punish them.
Speaker 1: You have to you could say, cancel them. Are you
Speaker 1: seeing some of these comparisons? This woman who saw this
Speaker 1: in China is seeing the seeds of it growing here
Speaker 1: in America, and she's concerned. I say, we listen to
Speaker 1: her and take this seriously. How did Mao's Communist China
Speaker 1: get the Culture Revolution going? Who do they rely on? Yes,
Speaker 1: the mobilization of the youth were essential in this essential.
Speaker 1: They preyed upon their idealism and their lack of life
Speaker 1: experience and wisdom to create the Red Guards. As the
Speaker 1: mother in Virginia who's now gone viral, the Chinese American
Speaker 1: mother who says she's worried about culture revolution here in America,
Speaker 1: she mentioned specifically the Red Guards. Well, what level of
Speaker 1: extremism were were the communist leaders able to put into
Speaker 1: the minds of the young? Well during the Culture Revolution
Speaker 1: at one of the probably the most elite high school
Speaker 1: in Beijing in the whole country, where both Mao Zidong
Speaker 1: and Den Chiaoping, later premier of China, had had their
Speaker 1: children go to school there, at least they each had
Speaker 1: daughters go there. They the students at that school beat
Speaker 1: a teacher named Beyond zong Yun to death, and later
Speaker 1: on there were posters about this that cultural revolutionaries across
Speaker 1: China would display. They thought this was something to be
Speaker 1: proud of. And do you know what their explanation for
Speaker 1: why this teacher was beaten to death was? There was
Speaker 1: an earthquake drill and she, while evacuating the students, had
Speaker 1: failed to rescue a portrait on the wall of Mao Zedong.
Speaker 1: You left the Mao portrait in the classroom. Now we
Speaker 1: must beat you to death because you got to be
Speaker 1: canceled taking a little step further. Where's the humanity? Where's
Speaker 1: the decency? Where's the perspective? No? No, no, The young,
Speaker 1: you see, are so easy to mobilize in this form
Speaker 1: of absolutism. The young or so quick to think that
Speaker 1: they're going to transform the world and make it perfect.
Speaker 1: Are They're being exploited, their naivete exploited by the most
Speaker 1: cynical and duplicitous and despicable older people like Mao Zedong.
Speaker 1: And those around him. I mean to give you a
Speaker 1: sense of how much this still affects thinking. In China,
Speaker 1: there was a fellow was paraded around by the Red
Speaker 1: Guards named ji zong Jun. And of course my Mandarin
Speaker 1: is non existent, so I apologize if some of my
Speaker 1: names here or not lining up perfectly. But zizong Chun
Speaker 1: was a communist revolutionary, but Mao no longer liked him,
Speaker 1: so the Red Guards paraded him around Beijing on a
Speaker 1: truck and were beating him publicly as struggle sessions. See
Speaker 1: this guy's bad. Now, we beat him because he's not
Speaker 1: part of our glorious revolution. It was so bad, in fact,
Speaker 1: that his wife was forced to denounce their son. You
Speaker 1: might be wondering, Buck, why are you telling us about
Speaker 1: this zijung zong Jun fellow. Well, because the son that
Speaker 1: he denounced, or that she denounced, rather that the wife denounced,
Speaker 1: was Xi Jinping, the current premiere of China. This is
Speaker 1: not ancient history I'm talking about here. This is my parents'
Speaker 1: generation in China. This is now. The leadership of China
Speaker 1: went through this. This was not long ago. And she's
Speaker 1: sister during the Hijinping, the current premiere of China. He
Speaker 1: had to flee and lived in a cave for a
Speaker 1: long time. Because the Culture Revolution got so out of control,
Speaker 1: and Sijianping sister was under so much pressure and received
Speaker 1: so much hatred from the vanguard of the revolution and
Speaker 1: the Red Guard specifically, she committed suicide. There were millions
Speaker 1: of young people who were who were exiled at the
Speaker 1: countryside by Mao's apparatus of terror and this great Chinese purge?
Speaker 1: What did it? Now? This is where you start to
Speaker 1: see the again, the similarities here. What was the revolution
Speaker 1: even about? Just getting rid of everything before, Erase everything
Speaker 1: in society that had held people together here that they
Speaker 1: believed in, Get rid of their cultural traditions, their religious traditions,
Speaker 1: and we're gonna make something new, you know, like I
Speaker 1: don't know, getting rid of all gender tradition, for example,
Speaker 1: get getting rid of gender as a concept. That would
Speaker 1: be one way to dramatically change the society instead of
Speaker 1: allowing people to have a story of an America that
Speaker 1: grew over time and dealt with its injustices, and which
Speaker 1: there were good guys and bad guys, but in the
Speaker 1: end America has always been moving in the right direction
Speaker 1: and say no what came before was evil and awful
Speaker 1: and still is to this day unless you put us
Speaker 1: in charge. And we mean of everything, the culture, your schools,
Speaker 1: your politics, the economy, everything, what you can say, the
Speaker 1: words you can use. And if you step out of line,
Speaker 1: if you stand against us, we'll crush you, will cancel you.
Speaker 1: You can see the ways these mentalities line up. Sure,
Speaker 1: it's more extreme in the context of China. We don't
Speaker 1: have people who are being beaten in the public square,
Speaker 1: but we do have cops all across the country being
Speaker 1: hit with bottles of yearn and beaten with rocks because
Speaker 1: of the BLM movement, which is based on the idea
Speaker 1: that the state is engaged in racist murder as a
Speaker 1: component of the omnipresent white supremacy in America today. These
Speaker 1: are pretty foundational attacks on our society, aren't they The
Speaker 1: people in charge? Mind you right now, the ones in
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party that are pushing this stuff, they want
Speaker 1: more power for the state, not less. They just want
Speaker 1: all the safeguards, all the individual rights, all the constitutional
Speaker 1: protections to be gone. They want to wait their own
Speaker 1: version of what is an American cultural revolution. Look, it
Speaker 1: shouldn't matter what your politics are who you voted for
Speaker 1: when it comes to using online platforms and just using
Speaker 1: the Internet. But it does. You don't have the right
Speaker 1: to express yourself freely. You have big tech looking over
Speaker 1: your shoulder, censoring, surveiling, and suppressing you. Do you want
Speaker 1: to fight back? You can take control of the Internet
Speaker 1: of your privacy for yourself by using Express vpn. All right.
Speaker 1: When you use express vpn, it's just an app you
Speaker 1: have on your computer or phone. You anonymize much of
Speaker 1: your online presence by hiding your IP address. That makes
Speaker 1: your activity much more difficult to trace and sell to advertisers.
Speaker 1: What's more, Express vpn encrypts one one hundred percent of
Speaker 1: your network data to protect you from eavesdroppers and cyber criminals.
Speaker 1: Revoke Big Tex right to your data. All it takes
Speaker 1: is one click. It's really easy to do Express vpn.
Speaker 1: That's where you have to go. Visit Express v pn
Speaker 1: dot com slash buck. This is the vpn I trust
Speaker 1: for online protection. Just go to this website Express vpn
Speaker 1: dot com slash buck to get three extra months free
Speaker 1: with my exclusive link. One more time. That's Express vpn
Speaker 1: dot com slash buck. Revoke Big Text rite to your data,
Speaker 1: create privacy for yourself online Express VPN, dot com, slash
Speaker 1: buck this term cancel culture. I don't agree with this
Speaker 1: term cancel culture. I think this is about consequences, consequence culture,
Speaker 1: and you know, there are consequences. I think two things
Speaker 1: that he said, and this is just sort of not
Speaker 1: the first time that he has made his opinion known.
Speaker 1: I mean, he at one point, I think, called Rachel
Speaker 1: Lindsay angry when when she says, in fact, she was
Speaker 1: just sort of sticking up for herself, sort of leaning
Speaker 1: into that angry black woman trope, and um, it does
Speaker 1: seem like he still has work to do. He did
Speaker 1: say that he in his interview that Sarah was referencing
Speaker 1: in with GMA, he said he was seeking guidance from
Speaker 1: a race educator and strategist who's teaching him how to
Speaker 1: learn from that experience and move forward. And so can
Speaker 1: he you know, work again in this industry. Of course,
Speaker 1: I think he can. I think people want to see
Speaker 1: folks learn when it comes especially to anti racism. And
Speaker 1: he's got you know, an eight figure severance pay, is
Speaker 1: my understanding. I think that's what's being reported, and so
Speaker 1: he's going to be well compensated. So let's just justify
Speaker 1: hyper sensitivity from the woke left that that's what this
Speaker 1: This h legal analyst on the View again, the dumbest
Speaker 1: talk show on television, the lowest general IQ discussion about
Speaker 1: politics you will find anywhere in you know, mainstream television
Speaker 1: is the View, So just start with that. It is
Speaker 1: the dumbest show about politics on TV. I think you
Speaker 1: would get better politics watching a show about people who
Speaker 1: live in like the Canadian Arctic, trying to keep themselves
Speaker 1: warm by not know and living off the grid. You'll
Speaker 1: you'll learned more about politics that's worthwhile from that than
Speaker 1: you will the View. But notice that the changing of
Speaker 1: the terminology here is the go to. No, it's not
Speaker 1: cancel culture, it's consequence culture. Our problem is not with
Speaker 1: the words. Our problem is not with how we're describing this.
Speaker 1: What is cancel culture. What it really turns into is
Speaker 1: social pressure and professional consequence for people who stand in
Speaker 1: the way of the left wing culture revolution that's underway.
Speaker 1: That's what it is. It is the weaponization phase of
Speaker 1: the cultural revolution that the American left is pushing right
Speaker 1: now in this country. You sometimes get caught up in
Speaker 1: it because you try to stop it, and then of
Speaker 1: course you're a target that they want to completely destroy.
Speaker 1: But there are others who are a warning. If you will,
Speaker 1: they fall somewhat in the more collateral damage category. Or
Speaker 1: you know, yeah, maybe so we bomb the wrong target,
Speaker 1: but at least everybody knows that we'll drop bombs on people.
Speaker 1: That's the idea you get from the left. That's their
Speaker 1: view of how all of this plays out. Chris Harrison. Look,
Speaker 1: I don't watch The Bachelor. I don't care about The Bachelor.
Speaker 1: In the twenty years that it has been on, I've
Speaker 1: been forced by a few dates in my life to
Speaker 1: watch an episode or two of it, and I don't
Speaker 1: understand why when it's one guy with twenty beautiful women
Speaker 1: fighting over him, why women like this? This is not
Speaker 1: what dating is like in real life. This is a
Speaker 1: totally artificial circumstance. The women are all being kind of,
Speaker 1: you know, attacking each other and undermining each other, and
Speaker 1: the whole thing to me seems to undermine women's value
Speaker 1: in the dating pool in society. I don't think it's
Speaker 1: it's finding love. I think the whole thing is so
Speaker 1: forced and absurd. But again, I don't watch Network television
Speaker 1: as a results, I think that it's it's ninety percent brainless.
Speaker 1: But anyway, look, I mean, this guy, Chris Harrison's like
Speaker 1: you here, he's a nice guy. I mean, I don't know,
Speaker 1: I've never met him. I've heard from people. I've heard
Speaker 1: from people who know people in the entertainment industry. This
Speaker 1: is like three levels removed that he's a nice guy.
Speaker 1: But what did he do? And if we're going to
Speaker 1: say this is about consequence, okay, my problem isn't that
Speaker 1: there shouldn't be consequences in society for people obviously, So
Speaker 1: there's a dishonesty in trying to and trying to change
Speaker 1: the terminology. I've heard other leftists say this too, but
Speaker 1: they know that cancel culture, because it's vicious and stupid
Speaker 1: enough in practice, has started to come with a negative connotation.
Speaker 1: So they want to move the terms to give them
Speaker 1: more political clout to use for more cancelation. This is
Speaker 1: how you get liberals become progressives, become democratic socialists, become
Speaker 1: liberals again, become progressives. You know, this is what they
Speaker 1: do when the term gets polluted that the left is
Speaker 1: using because of the recognition of the reality of what
Speaker 1: it means and what it does. They just want to
Speaker 1: use a different term. Oh, let's just change the words,
Speaker 1: you know, let's figure this out. You know, in time
Speaker 1: they realize that it's tough to argue that illegal immigration
Speaker 1: is legal because it's called illegal for a reason. Right.
Speaker 1: So now it's undocumented, Well that's not a legal issue,
Speaker 1: right you just you just need a document, you know,
Speaker 1: undocumented not a big deal, right? Do you see how
Speaker 1: they do this? And Chris Harrison, what did he do?
Speaker 1: He defended a woman, Rachel Kirkconnell, who was a contestant
Speaker 1: on the show show and I believe was engaged to
Speaker 1: marry a black man, if my memory is correct here,
Speaker 1: And it came out that she had attended a anti
Speaker 1: Bellam themed fraternity party years ago and she and so
Speaker 1: then it was she was racist and she was a
Speaker 1: terrible person. This is all the stuff that we heard.
Speaker 1: Engaged to mary a black man at the time, but
Speaker 1: she's clearly so racist because she went to this anti
Speaker 1: Bellam themed party. And all that Chris Harrison is guilty
Speaker 1: of with this is saying, hey, can we maybe show
Speaker 1: a little grace and forgiveness here to her? I really
Speaker 1: don't think she's a racist more or less, that's what
Speaker 1: he said. He didn't say what she did is okay.
Speaker 1: He didn't say racism is fine or any anyone like that.
Speaker 1: He just said, maybe, can we ease up a little bit?
Speaker 1: Can we show a just like in the Culture Revolution,
Speaker 1: do you think the Red Guards we're gonna be okay
Speaker 1: with somebody saying, hey, do you really need to beat
Speaker 1: elderly writers in public like for the amusement of crowds
Speaker 1: by saying that they're undermining the revolution? Do you think
Speaker 1: that's really a decent, humane thing to do? Do you
Speaker 1: think of you if you had said that to them?
Speaker 1: They're okay with it, They're going, yeah, you know what,
Speaker 1: you're right, Maybe we'll stop being such vicious psychos. No,
Speaker 1: of course not. Now you're a problem. You're in the way.
Speaker 1: Now you get got too. Chris Harrison says, let's not
Speaker 1: be so vicious. Let's understand the context here. She apologized.
Speaker 1: You know, people have learned more about what's acceptable and
Speaker 1: what's not acceptable practice and these sorts of things. That's
Speaker 1: in many ways a direct threat. Decency and mercy are
Speaker 1: a direct threat to the American left's cultural revolution aims.
Speaker 1: Because the moment you start to see your fellow Americans
Speaker 1: as people who make mistakes, and everybody's imperfect, and we
Speaker 1: all have our challenges, and we all have our insecurities,
Speaker 1: and maybe there's something about our common human experience that
Speaker 1: should always hold us together, and we should seek to
Speaker 1: be to be kind and to elevate one another. And
Speaker 1: you know, instead of allowing that to start to flourish,
Speaker 1: it's let's have more speeches by that total lunatic psychiatrist
Speaker 1: who showed up at Yale said she wants to shoot
Speaker 1: white people in the head and she'll feel good about
Speaker 1: it afterwards. And by the way, she hasn't back down
Speaker 1: from any of this at all. I mean that woman
Speaker 1: is truly I mean she hates white people. She does
Speaker 1: this professor Killinani or doctor Killinani. She said, actually an MD,
Speaker 1: she hates white people. She's made that very clear. Or
Speaker 1: she says she hates whiteness. This is the new game
Speaker 1: that's being played by the left. By the way, it's
Speaker 1: not white people that are the problem, it's whiteness that's
Speaker 1: the problem. Oh oh okay, yeah, imagine trying to make
Speaker 1: that sort of separation with any other group of people.
Speaker 1: The people described as being a certain in color versus
Speaker 1: just the color of their skill. I mean, this is
Speaker 1: but again, controlling the language, controlling people's psychology. This is
Speaker 1: where the this is actually what the left excels in.
Speaker 1: This is it's it's destructive, it's evil, but it does
Speaker 1: work anyway they want. They they view Harrison as somebody. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I know he's getting a big pad and everything, but
Speaker 1: he he was he went through the machine. I mean
Speaker 1: they they said that he's a problem. They attack this guy.
Speaker 1: The message has been sent. The message by the way,
Speaker 1: he's getting a payoff because it's contractual. And you know,
Speaker 1: they haven't been able to find way to nullify contracts
Speaker 1: as a result of cancel culture quite yet, but trust me,
Speaker 1: when they can get away with it, they will. But
Speaker 1: I mean, this is this is madness. Do you think
Speaker 1: that Hunter Biden is going to lose a single dollar
Speaker 1: of income? Do you think that Hunter Biden is going
Speaker 1: to be treated as though he's a pariah from society.
Speaker 1: This is a guy who impregnates strippers and denies paternity
Speaker 1: and does drugs and gets kicked out of the military
Speaker 1: and as a crackhead, and as I mean, the whole thing,
Speaker 1: I mean This guy's a clotal mess and I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: You know, Joe Biden is his dad. Okay, there's something
Speaker 1: something up here. But do you think that the hunter
Speaker 1: Biden's n word text messages are going to result in
Speaker 1: any consequences? Remember it's consequence culture now for him now,
Speaker 1: of course not, because, just as it was for Mao,
Speaker 1: it's not really about purifying society to make it better.
Speaker 1: It's about having unchecked power within a society to do
Speaker 1: whatever you want. It's about my team versus your team.
Speaker 1: That's what cultural revolution is. You do what we say
Speaker 1: or else. The narratives of injustice and struggle and division
Speaker 1: and oppression are just the means to mobilize our side again,
Speaker 1: your side. It doesn't matter if you actually oppress. It
Speaker 1: doesn't matter if you're actually exploitative, capitalist, or a racist
Speaker 1: or any of these things. You will be treated as
Speaker 1: such unless you do what we say. That is the
Speaker 1: essence of a Maoist culture revolution. And that is the
Speaker 1: essence of what is going on in America today in
Speaker 1: our culture. With the left calling the shots, it is frightening.
Speaker 1: We should all recognize it as such and don't allow
Speaker 1: them to gaslight you. I saw recently we talked about
Speaker 1: it here on the show, Obama saying, you know, oh,
Speaker 1: critical race theory is so important to the right all
Speaker 1: of a sudden, Yeah, that's right. We have a problem
Speaker 1: with the left teaching racial oppression and victimology studies to
Speaker 1: kids and then suggesting that anyone who questions any of
Speaker 1: this is a bad person. We have a problem with that. Indoctrination.
Speaker 1: Mass indoctrination and socie doesn't lead to happy outcomes. Free
Speaker 1: societies with free inquiry and free expression and individuality and
Speaker 1: space for debate and discussion. They those create beautiful things,
Speaker 1: great art, great literature, happy functional families. I mean, those
Speaker 1: are the things you can get in free societies. With
Speaker 1: the state in full control, you just get equity through misery.
Speaker 1: Except for the people in charge. They'll always be doing
Speaker 1: just fine. Plans to jam hospitals, schools, and small businesses
Speaker 1: with new hash stakes tests of wokeness, to dramatically curtail
Speaker 1: Americans right to keep and bear arms, and of course,
Speaker 1: to tip the scales of our electoral system permanently in
Speaker 1: their favor. Yesterday, the Radical Parade began with an attempt
Speaker 1: to use the cause of paycheck fairness as cover for
Speaker 1: placing unprecedented new legal burdens on American employers. Wage discrimination
Speaker 1: on the basis of sucks has been illegal for sixty years.
Speaker 1: They're just using all kinds of social justice pressure on
Speaker 1: a whole array of legislation, aren't they. This is the
Speaker 1: whole point now, And I'm wondering if Biden is saving
Speaker 1: some of the stuff that he may do for closer
Speaker 1: to the mid terms, if he thinks it'll be popular enough.
Speaker 1: One thing they haven't they haven't gotten rid of yet
Speaker 1: and not at all, is canceling student loan dead. I mean,
Speaker 1: they're spending so much money and you have to recognize it.
Speaker 1: For Democrats writing checks from the public treasury to favor
Speaker 1: constituencies that will translate into votes. Is that's like their
Speaker 1: business model. That's central to what they do. Here is
Speaker 1: Elizabeth Warren on that right now, play twelve right now.
Speaker 1: President Biden this evening could sign a piece of paper
Speaker 1: and cancel student loan debt for fifty thousand dollars. He
Speaker 1: could wipe out all student loan debt for thirty eight
Speaker 1: million Americans and substantially cut it for another five million Americans. Yep,
Speaker 1: he might do it. He might do it. This is
Speaker 1: this is the problem is that at some point the
Speaker 1: authoritarian democrats will just realize that the only way they
Speaker 1: can really keep power is if they just start they
Speaker 1: treat the treasury as spoils, and essentially they can just
Speaker 1: write checks that other people are going to pay for.
Speaker 1: I mean, imagine if you were a running a political
Speaker 1: campaign and you could give money to whomever you wanted
Speaker 1: and it wasn't your money, right, wouldn't you just start
Speaker 1: going around write and checks to people. I mean, look
Speaker 1: at what the Biden administration's done with the even sending
Speaker 1: the federal unemployment benefits even further than was reasonable or necessary.
Speaker 1: Look what the Bide administrations doing with wiping out fifty
Speaker 1: thousand dollars of student loan debt. I mean, I have
Speaker 1: I got all kinds of expenses that I run business expenses.
Speaker 1: I gotta paid lawyers, and I've got it. You know,
Speaker 1: I got accounts, I got staff, I have all these things.
Speaker 1: So if I run up that on a credit card,
Speaker 1: that doesn't get paid off. But I did all those
Speaker 1: things instead instead of getting an advanced degree, I just
Speaker 1: worked and built a career in media. But I could
Speaker 1: have I could have had fifty thousand dollars of my
Speaker 1: student loans wiped away. M isn't that interesting? But you're
Speaker 1: going to see more of this, and anyone who tries
Speaker 1: to stand in the way of just treating the federal
Speaker 1: the federal government purse as a spoil system, it's going
Speaker 1: to be called horrible names and they're just going to
Speaker 1: defame you, So get ready for that. And we are,
Speaker 1: of course a threat to democracy. They'll do anything, they'll
Speaker 1: be a threat to democracy. Play fifteen. Republicans are afraid
Speaker 1: of losing power and they are willing to crush our
Speaker 1: democracy to protect their power. So what are we gonna do?
Speaker 1: We could hang back, we could pause, we could turn
Speaker 1: the other way while Republicans do this, or we could
Speaker 1: fight back. Me I'm fighting back. We can. We're a
Speaker 1: good fight, Brock. And you know they're a throat toward democracy. Roar, roar.
Speaker 1: She's so horrible. I mean, I'm sorry, she's I mean,
Speaker 1: how could this person have won any election? Oh? Here,
Speaker 1: I am, I'm just worse water. I'm going along pretty
Speaker 1: ser Mark, make it stop, man, I can't handle it.
Speaker 1: Then clip hurt my ears too. Oh my gosh. It
Speaker 1: was brutal. Borrow. We're just gonna take some money, and
Speaker 1: we're gonna give it to the people who deserve the money.
Speaker 1: I mean, I get to still be a millionaire who
Speaker 1: lives in a big, fancy house. But we're gonna take
Speaker 1: those fat cat Wall Street types and squeeze those little
Speaker 1: kitty cats until they go wow. What is your level
Speaker 1: of concern that we're going to discredit public health officials
Speaker 1: to the point of, you know, look at Russia. They
Speaker 1: actually have a good vaccine and none of their citizens
Speaker 1: will take it because they don't trust their own government. Right.
Speaker 1: It's very dangerous, Chuck, because a lot of what you're
Speaker 1: seeing as attacks on me, quite frankly, or attacks on science,
Speaker 1: because all of the things that I have spoken about
Speaker 1: consistently from the very beginning have been fundamentally based on science.
Speaker 1: Sometimes those things were inconvenient truths for people, and there
Speaker 1: was pushback against me. So if you are trying to,
Speaker 1: you know, get at me as a public health official
Speaker 1: and a scientist, you really attack not only doctor Anthony Fauci,
Speaker 1: you're attacking science and anybody that looks at what's going
Speaker 1: on clearly sees that you have to be asleep not
Speaker 1: to see that that is what's going on. Science and
Speaker 1: the truths are being attacked, not once, but twice. Doctor
Speaker 1: Fauci says that an attack on him is an attack
Speaker 1: on science. Remember I just watch Braveheart with the snow Princess.
Speaker 1: Great great movie, totally love it. And and the evil
Speaker 1: sheriff who kills William Wallace's wife, you know, cuts her
Speaker 1: throat at the in the town square. He says, an
Speaker 1: attack on the king's guards is the same as an
Speaker 1: attack on the king himself, right, And it really really
Speaker 1: hammers home for you when you hear that. Okay, so
Speaker 1: you're just like a you know, you're just a an
Speaker 1: iron fished authoritarian who's gonna continue with that nonsense because
Speaker 1: it's clearly not the same as an attack of the
Speaker 1: king himself, right. The King is a different person in
Speaker 1: a different place. It's not the same thing. You can
Speaker 1: pretend it is, but it's not the same thing. An
Speaker 1: attack on Fauci is not an attack on science. And
Speaker 1: yet he says it twice. Remember Louis the fourteenth said,
Speaker 1: leta same moix this state is me. I am the state.
Speaker 1: And for Fauci, you could say, lascience say wow, lascience
Speaker 1: say Fauci. Science is Fauci, and Fauci is science. This
Speaker 1: is what this little lab coat stalinist is saying. In
Speaker 1: case you were wondering what's buck right about this guy
Speaker 1: all along? Did I nail this one? The answer is yes,
Speaker 1: yes I did. Fauci is the worst. He has been
Speaker 1: wrong over and over again. He has been disastrous for
Speaker 1: America's response to the COVID pandemic. He is a tool
Speaker 1: of the Democrats. He bent the knee like a little
Speaker 1: coward to the Democrat teachers unions. He always always did
Speaker 1: whatever the shrill hysterics over at CNN an MSNBC wanted
Speaker 1: him too, among other channels. He loved the little cult
Speaker 1: of personality that was created around him. And now, sure enough,
Speaker 1: as more truth comes out about this, we find ourselves recognizing.
Speaker 1: We find ourselves recognizing that a lot of people were hoodwinked, bamboozled,
Speaker 1: misled by the not so good doctor. You know, I
Speaker 1: could have just been in the background and just been
Speaker 1: at least defer to the policy community of politicians who
Speaker 1: are elected and theoretically accountable. However, I like being on
Speaker 1: TV a lot and having my face everywhere, so instead
Speaker 1: you had to see me every five minutes because I
Speaker 1: am science. Yeah, that's pretty much what we went through.
Speaker 1: That's what we saw here Play sixteen. All of us
Speaker 1: have always realized, and I feel this way. I haven't changed.
Speaker 1: Most of the scientists that I know feel that way
Speaker 1: that the most likely origin is a natural origin from
Speaker 1: an animal VERSI wat's a human. However, we have not
Speaker 1: ruled out the possibility that there could have been a
Speaker 1: leak from the lab of them working on the virus.
Speaker 1: It could have been that someone was infected early on.
Speaker 1: They brought him into the lab and it came out
Speaker 1: of the lab, but it was already out in the community. No, no, no,
Speaker 1: fouch I'm sorry, buddy. The most likely origin is from
Speaker 1: a natural reservoir to human. This is what he's saying.
Speaker 1: Where where is the proof of this? Stop just saying likely.
Speaker 1: We think consensus, the science we believe what is true
Speaker 1: is not the same thing as what Fauci thinks. This
Speaker 1: is a very important lesson. It's one that we have learned,
Speaker 1: unfortunately only through suffering far too much in the process.
Speaker 1: And I just I'm still I'm still furious about what
Speaker 1: Fauci has done to this country. I'm still very angry
Speaker 1: about the fact that the media prop this guy up.
Speaker 1: I mean, he's actually giving interviews where he says, if
Speaker 1: you're attacking me, you're attacking science. What a meglomaniacal loon
Speaker 1: this guy is. I mean, he's really deluded. He really
Speaker 1: thinks he should have his face crocheted on pillows in
Speaker 1: the background of TV shots with Democrat governors trying to
Speaker 1: look like they worship at the altar of Fauci because
Speaker 1: they do. I warned about this guy all along. I
Speaker 1: saw exactly who he was, and I am sitting here
Speaker 1: now just telling you, yes, I'm proud of that because
Speaker 1: I had I had conservatives who were you know, I
Speaker 1: had a couple of I'm not going to say they're
Speaker 1: a couple of conservatives want to debate me. Probably you
Speaker 1: don't want to debate me on Fauchis, and but they're
Speaker 1: kind of friends of mine, not big people, not people
Speaker 1: that you'd be like, ooh, but a couple of people
Speaker 1: are all I want to come on your show and
Speaker 1: debate you on Fauchis. And I was like, now, because honestly,
Speaker 1: and I know this is easy to say now, I
Speaker 1: didn't want them to embarrass themselves by by defending the
Speaker 1: double mask, by defending all the reversals and the school
Speaker 1: closures and the mitigation measure. You got to wear a
Speaker 1: mask when you go up to the hostess, but not
Speaker 1: when you sit at the table. I mean they have
Speaker 1: now people in New York and vaccinated and unvaccinated sections
Speaker 1: of restaurants. If I had told you that that's where
Speaker 1: we'd be a year into this thing, if I told
Speaker 1: you at the very beginning, you said, no, No, that
Speaker 1: is where we are. That is what has happened people
Speaker 1: all all over New York City. I mean the things
Speaker 1: I don't want to I'm see. I'm not gonna do
Speaker 1: with data. I'm not gonna go around mask shame people.
Speaker 1: But there are people all over New York City still
Speaker 1: walk around outside by themselves who are vaccinated with masks on.
Speaker 1: Is that normal? Is that reasonable? No? People who do
Speaker 1: this should be embarrassed. I mean, this is like walking
Speaker 1: around on a beautiful sunny day in you know, rubber
Speaker 1: rain boots, the big umbrella out and a rubber raincoat on,
Speaker 1: and everyone say, well, what are you? What are you doing?
Speaker 1: I mean, yeah, you're allowed to, but what's wrong with you?
Speaker 1: Like there's no rain. Stop. It's not comfortable. You're not
Speaker 1: enjoying this. It's hot. But they have been exactly you guys,
Speaker 1: I said along. They have been brainwashed, utterly and completely brainwashed.
Speaker 1: And part of the brainwashing process you have to you
Speaker 1: have to understand is that people never want to accept
Speaker 1: I mean, this is true of cults, it's true of
Speaker 1: you know, people that get drawn too deeply into self
Speaker 1: improvement and multi level marketing stuff. You know, they don't
Speaker 1: want to believe it they were swindled. It's actually one
Speaker 1: of the things that fraudsters always rely on. Fraudsters know
Speaker 1: that nobody wants to admit that they were defrauded, and
Speaker 1: so a lot of fraud goes unreported and entirely unpunished
Speaker 1: because people would rather take the hit. Oh, you know,
Speaker 1: this guy emptied teen thousand dollars out of my savings
Speaker 1: account promising to be a you know, a prince of
Speaker 1: Kazakhstand or something. And I, you know, I'm not going
Speaker 1: to tell the FBI about it. I don't want to
Speaker 1: get into it because I'm embarrassed. Right, It's embarrassing for
Speaker 1: people it should be that they so deeply and completely
Speaker 1: were consumed by Faucism. They really believe this little turret. Honestly,
Speaker 1: they thought that this was the way to go. It's remarkable,
Speaker 1: it's remarkable. But here we are. Here we are the
Speaker 1: little lab coat Tyrant enjoyed every second of the power
Speaker 1: and the attention that he got. And if you stop
Speaker 1: to think for a moment, I mean, I know you've
Speaker 1: been listening to me. So you you vote for the
Speaker 1: theses of this show by listening every day, So you're
Speaker 1: you're right here with me, every single one of you.
Speaker 1: Who who is lending me your ears for whatever length
Speaker 1: of time you do, You're voting for what I'm putting
Speaker 1: forward into the national conversation. As you know, it's already
Speaker 1: a national conversation. It's about to be a really big
Speaker 1: national conversation we're having here. But Fauci is the worst.
Speaker 1: And I'm glad that people understand that. I'm glad that
Speaker 1: people now recognize who he is. Folks, I gotta tell you,
Speaker 1: if you're listening to this on radio, this is going
Speaker 1: to be the second to last show I do in
Speaker 1: this time slot. I am moving as of June twenty first,
Speaker 1: to the twelve to three slot with Clay Travis it'll
Speaker 1: be the Clay, Travis and Buck Sexton Show twelve to three.
Speaker 1: We're gonna be on close to four hundred stations across
Speaker 1: the country, so we are very excited about that obviously,
Speaker 1: and I'll be able to speak to you all right
Speaker 1: in the middle of the day. We will For those
Speaker 1: who have always said, Puck, I want you to take
Speaker 1: phone calls. Guess what phones will be live, so you'll
Speaker 1: be able to call in. Will talk to your your bucks,
Speaker 1: talk to your Clay Clay. You know a claister. I
Speaker 1: don't know if we have a name for him, but
Speaker 1: whatever you guys want to call him. Clay is a
Speaker 1: great dude, and we are going to do a really,
Speaker 1: really solid show. I can assure you We're gonna have
Speaker 1: a lot of fun. He's a very high wattage guy,
Speaker 1: and he brings some knowledge that obviously I don't have
Speaker 1: about the sports world, which I as you know, I'm
Speaker 1: always honest with you about what I know and don't know.
Speaker 1: Don't come to me for help on your calculus homework,
Speaker 1: and don't come to me for your sports knowledge. That's
Speaker 1: what producer Mark has been providing us with you on
Speaker 1: the show. Many of you have been asking, and Producer
Speaker 1: Mark is going to stay on board with the Jesse
Speaker 1: Kelly Show, which will be replacing me in the six
Speaker 1: to nine. So Producer Mark is going to continue to
Speaker 1: man his post there, and we're hoping that I get
Speaker 1: to work with him more down down the line, but
Speaker 1: for now, Producer Mark is going to be making sure
Speaker 1: that Jesse has a seamless transition and has a has
Speaker 1: a great you know, just a great initial showing, early
Speaker 1: showing on all those stations. I'm just so happy because,
Speaker 1: you know, I could tell you that, I could tell
Speaker 1: you that, you know, when I first came on board,
Speaker 1: there was I came on board with Premier Networks five
Speaker 1: years ago and this time slot had been very it
Speaker 1: had been very challenging to get traction from six to
Speaker 1: nine previously, and this time slot had actually been losing
Speaker 1: some syndication stations when I when I came on board,
Speaker 1: I mean a considerable number actually. So I came on
Speaker 1: and was able to get this this time slot to
Speaker 1: a place where we were adding and adding. I think
Speaker 1: I started with something like one hundred and one hundred
Speaker 1: and ten, one hundred and fifteen stations and finished with
Speaker 1: over the course of five five years, about two hundred stations,
Speaker 1: so we close to double the station list for this
Speaker 1: show while also growing a podcast that is substantial. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'll say that just you know the the iTunes rankings,
Speaker 1: which some of you see those are not That's not
Speaker 1: just the most listeners. There's also new listeners and duration
Speaker 1: of listen and who Apple likes, and there's a lot
Speaker 1: of things that go into that list of the top
Speaker 1: one hundred political podcasts. Uh. It's it's roughly corresponds with
Speaker 1: most listens, but there are other there are and this
Speaker 1: is known, there are other factors that go into it
Speaker 1: that that determines on the Apple platform. But do you
Speaker 1: see we've often we've been you know, in the sixties
Speaker 1: and the seventies on that Apple list, and that includes
Speaker 1: non conservative podcast too and everything else. So we've built
Speaker 1: a substantial podcast audience too over the course of this.
Speaker 1: And this is my way of saying, as I I'm
Speaker 1: gonna get more into this tomorrow because it will be
Speaker 1: my last show in this time slot. But it has
Speaker 1: been such an incredible experience to have folks who learned
Speaker 1: about me because I just turned on the radio and
Speaker 1: they didn't know who the host was even going to
Speaker 1: be five years ago, back in twenty twenty sixteen when
Speaker 1: I started this, they didn't know, you know, how things
Speaker 1: were going to shake out for this show. And we
Speaker 1: came to the table. We you know, we didn't have
Speaker 1: any of our presenting sponsors, you know the way of response.
Speaker 1: We had advertiser, but we didn't have presenting sponsors. And
Speaker 1: some of the long standing relationships we've built here with
Speaker 1: great sponsors that are now on the show, and I've
Speaker 1: been with me. I mean some of these sponsor I've
Speaker 1: been with me now for for four or five years.
Speaker 1: So we just built this whole community. And I'm gonna
Speaker 1: tell you there's a little there's a little part for
Speaker 1: me that feels I'm so excited about the new show,
Speaker 1: and how could I not be. I to be twelve
Speaker 1: to three in the Rush slot for four. And remember,
Speaker 1: I'd like to put it that way. I am following
Speaker 1: the I'm following the Rush Limball slot, right, I'm following
Speaker 1: Rush into this slot. There is no replacing And you'll
Speaker 1: never say there's no replacing Rush. Neither Clay nor I
Speaker 1: believe we are replacing. He is irreplaceable, but we are
Speaker 1: following him. Into this slot on the air and planning
Speaker 1: to do a really really strong show that I think
Speaker 1: you'll you'll enjoy a whole lot. It's gonna be it's
Speaker 1: gonna be a pretty fast paced show too. We're gonna
Speaker 1: cover a lot of ground, and there will be that
Speaker 1: live element to it. It's gonna be one. It's gonna
Speaker 1: be a one hundred percent live show. So we're gonna
Speaker 1: be taking calls, We're gonna be You're gonna be here
Speaker 1: and everything as it happens, and Clay and I are
Speaker 1: are excited about that, and how can we not be.
Speaker 1: I mean, in terms of just sheer audience numbers, it's
Speaker 1: tough to come close to that four hundred stations and
Speaker 1: all the listeners will have every day, plus there will
Speaker 1: be a podcast of that show. Um, but I know
Speaker 1: it's it feels a little bit like, you know, you
Speaker 1: get it. You get comfortable in an apartment, it becomes
Speaker 1: your home. And now I'm moving to a new radio home,
Speaker 1: and I want to tell you all that I really
Speaker 1: like this radio home that we built. And I'm very
Speaker 1: thankful the producer Mark for being with us for the
Speaker 1: last two years and making this place is as successful
Speaker 1: as it has been, and as as much as much
Speaker 1: fun and as just everything. I mean, this is a community.
Speaker 1: People listen to this show. You're all spending time with me,
Speaker 1: and in a sense, we're all spending time with each other,
Speaker 1: and there's a connection there, there's a bond. And even
Speaker 1: though I'm going to be moving to a time when
Speaker 1: I'm hoping a lot more people will will share in
Speaker 1: that with us, and I'll just continue doing what I
Speaker 1: do there. Um, it's a change, you know, I'm leaving.
Speaker 1: I'm leaving my apartment and moving to a house in
Speaker 1: the suburbs. It's a pretty big, nice house, but you
Speaker 1: know I'm not actually doing that, by the way, But
Speaker 1: you know what I'm saying with our with our metaphor here.
Speaker 1: And so there's a part of me that has a
Speaker 1: bit of this stalgia, especially given the fact that for
Speaker 1: the last twelve months this show has been not only
Speaker 1: my life's work, it's been my lifeline in a sense
Speaker 1: to the outside world. And I wrote out this pandemic
Speaker 1: with all of you listening, a little snorty French bulldog
Speaker 1: named Toolula and my girl from the Snow Princess and
Speaker 1: producer Mark and that's it. I mean, that was the
Speaker 1: pandemic for me doing this show, and then a small
Speaker 1: group of people with me every day, and we came
Speaker 1: through it. You know, we came through it first from
Speaker 1: a health standpoint. Obviously. I'm always pleased when I hear
Speaker 1: from members of the audience who tell me that, you know,
Speaker 1: they're okay. Maybe they had a close call with COVID,
Speaker 1: but they're good. And I've heard a lot of people
Speaker 1: that you know, had that experience and got through it.
Speaker 1: So I'm always happy for that good news. And professionally,
Speaker 1: this show came through stronger than ever we did, and
Speaker 1: so moving to the twelve to three slot is a
Speaker 1: great honor and it's only possible because of so many
Speaker 1: of you listening. But I'm gonna miss our little freedom
Speaker 1: Hut here from six to nine. I'm gonna miss it.
Speaker 1: And i know for a lot of you it's you know,
Speaker 1: eight to eleven, or it's nine to midnight or whatever.
Speaker 1: But I'm gonna miss it. But I'm excited for the
Speaker 1: It's not gonna be a Freedom Hut, folks. It's gonna
Speaker 1: be a Freedom Castle. Deblasio enlist the Feds to battle
Speaker 1: soaring New York City gun crime, which he says was
Speaker 1: triggered by cops getting sick and dying from COVID instead
Speaker 1: of his own NYPD cuts that took eighteen hundred officers
Speaker 1: out of the force. This is what I mean when
Speaker 1: I talk about the Democrats learning the wrong lessons. We
Speaker 1: suffer the consequences of their bad decision making. And what
Speaker 1: do they do. They turn around and then say, ah,
Speaker 1: I know what I've got to do. Now, I know
Speaker 1: what has to be different, and they fill in the
Speaker 1: blank with the wrong thing, or they tell you that
Speaker 1: the reason for the current surgeon crime, the reason that
Speaker 1: there's been this escalation of violence in New York City
Speaker 1: is and they say something that's just not true. So
Speaker 1: their diagnosis of the problem is wrong, and their solution
Speaker 1: after making the wrong diagnosis is also incorrect. And this
Speaker 1: is what you see with the Blasio It is not,
Speaker 1: in fact the case that we have a crime problem
Speaker 1: because of COVID. In fact, if you look at other
Speaker 1: countries around the world, I mean, there's plenty of data
Speaker 1: to support what I'm saying on this. COVID has and
Speaker 1: should have resulted in massive declines in crime around the
Speaker 1: world because you had people not interacting with other people.
Speaker 1: Fewer people at bars, fewer people going out at night
Speaker 1: on the streets should mean less crime. Yet we've had
Speaker 1: markedly more crime. Why is that, Well, they don't want
Speaker 1: to admit this you, but it's because they decided to
Speaker 1: throw police under the bus. They decided to pander to
Speaker 1: the BLM movement, and they thought that in an election year,
Speaker 1: mobilizing the left wing base and yes, pushing for as
Speaker 1: many possible activists to get out there on the streets
Speaker 1: and push for minority votes to turn out in the
Speaker 1: highest possible numbers for Joe Biden, that was the most
Speaker 1: important goal, that mattered more than anything else. And so
Speaker 1: we see this now with the aftermath of the undermining
Speaker 1: of police, the supporting of these BLM narratives out there.
Speaker 1: We see this happening, and we recognize it at some
Speaker 1: level that this is not going to go away until
Speaker 1: they at least begin to speak honestly about how we
Speaker 1: got here, and certainly until they recognize that you only
Speaker 1: make this better when you take appropriate action. Blasio cut
Speaker 1: the NYPD by eighteen hundred last year. This is all
Speaker 1: on the Daily Mail dot com. He cut the budget
Speaker 1: by eighteen hundred, and he disbanded, a six hundred officer
Speaker 1: playing clothes unit that was tasked with tackling street crime.
Speaker 1: And the NYPD union has long said that the spike
Speaker 1: in crime is a result of deblasio policies, and this
Speaker 1: is true. Now, you could say, well, why is it
Speaker 1: Deblasio's fault if it happened in so many other cities too.
Speaker 1: Ah well, let's answer that, shall we Because the BLM
Speaker 1: movement was pushing for police reform or abolishing the police,
Speaker 1: or defunding the police in all major US cities last year.
Speaker 1: So it is not in fact surprising at all that
Speaker 1: the reason that I'm giving for the increasing crime in
Speaker 1: New York City is also the reason for the increasing
Speaker 1: crime in so many other places across the country. But
Speaker 1: you know what Deblasio saying he's going to do now
Speaker 1: to come up with a way to solve the problem.
Speaker 1: You know what his latest is. He wants to embed
Speaker 1: members of the ATF the partnership between the NYPD and
Speaker 1: the federal ATF. This is crucial. Everyone agrees the number
Speaker 1: one issue is guns, getting the guns off our streets.
Speaker 1: And we all know that the proliferation of guns during
Speaker 1: the pandemic was unprecedented and troubling, and therefore we have
Speaker 1: to double down on getting guns off our streets. No, no, no,
Speaker 1: everyone does not agree that the number one problem is guns.
Speaker 1: This guy is a delusional loon. There's absolutely no consensus
Speaker 1: that the problem is guns. The problem is that moron
Speaker 1: democrats like de Blasio undermined lawn force, and now the
Speaker 1: good people of New York City, as well as many
Speaker 1: other cities all across America, are suffering as a result
Speaker 1: of it. That's the issue. He can try to distract
Speaker 1: us with something else, but here he can hear more
Speaker 1: of the worst mayor in America blathering on for a second.
Speaker 1: ATF is where it all comes together, the Federal Bureau
Speaker 1: of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. This is the leading edge.
Speaker 1: This is the part of the federal government that finds
Speaker 1: the guns, gets them out of the hands of bad guys,
Speaker 1: and keeps communities safe. And it means we're going to
Speaker 1: have ATF agents directly embedded in the NYPD working together
Speaker 1: to find guns and quickly act on the information that
Speaker 1: they find to stop the flow of guns. This works
Speaker 1: so well, doesn't it in Chicago? You know, making it
Speaker 1: really owner is to get guns legally, being very restrictive,
Speaker 1: very putative about people who have guns. You know what's
Speaker 1: gonna end up happening here. They're gonna end up finding it.
Speaker 1: You know. This ATF NYPD Intel task Force is gonna
Speaker 1: get some guy who's got, you know, an unregistered twelve
Speaker 1: gage shotgun like a double barrel that he uses to
Speaker 1: go skeet shooting at his country home over the weekend.
Speaker 1: They're gonna grab that guy and say, see, we don't
Speaker 1: have any special treatment here, will lock him up for
Speaker 1: three years. Now, we're making people safe. This is the
Speaker 1: kind of craziness that the Democrats and de Blasio like
Speaker 1: to engage in. They like to pretend as though all
Speaker 1: guns taken from lawful citizens hands makes us all safer.
Speaker 1: I mean, you should just think of it this way.
Speaker 1: If Bill Deblasio could, he would make it completely illegal
Speaker 1: for anyone in New York City who's not law enforcement
Speaker 1: to have a gun. If he could get away with it,
Speaker 1: he would do it. So that tells you a lot
Speaker 1: about where this stands. And the ATF director of the
Speaker 1: Biden administration is a lunatic anti gun zella it, which
Speaker 1: of course is why he's found his perfect position, being
Speaker 1: the authoritarian bureaucrat in charge of trying to go after guns, tobacco.
Speaker 1: Think about this alcohol. I mean the fact that the
Speaker 1: at F and now it's the ATFE if you're wondering,
Speaker 1: because they have explosives in there too. The fact the
Speaker 1: ATF even exists just goes to show you how much
Speaker 1: mission creep there can really be in the federal government,
Speaker 1: how outrageous the overreach from the federal government can become
Speaker 1: if left unchecked. I mean the ATF, you go back
Speaker 1: in its history anything hmm. You go to Ruby Ridge,
Speaker 1: and you go to Waco, and you go to some
Speaker 1: of these situations. At F and FBI and federal law
Speaker 1: enforcement all of a sudden is something that you realize
Speaker 1: Democrats have so much less of a problem with then
Speaker 1: they do local law enforcement. They talk about defunding the police.
Speaker 1: You'll notice they never talk about defunding the FBI and
Speaker 1: the ATF. Why is that, Well, because the ATF and
Speaker 1: the FBI are top down instruments of national power for
Speaker 1: the Democrats, of nationwide implementation of central policy, and are
Speaker 1: used for political reasons to go after opponents of the
Speaker 1: Democrat regime. You know, like Russia collusion and Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: or in this case, harassing lawful gun owners, because I
Speaker 1: can assure you the ATF is going to go after
Speaker 1: plenty of people now in New York who have no
Speaker 1: criminal history but have an unregistered firearm. Guess what their
Speaker 1: firearm should not have to be registered. New York City's
Speaker 1: laws are unconstitutional when it comes to the Second Amendment,
Speaker 1: and they keep playing games where they change the law
Speaker 1: or they hope that it will just get dragged through
Speaker 1: the courts. Even more, they play process games with the
Speaker 1: Second Amendment in this city. It's appalling. They couldn't even
Speaker 1: tell you until recently whether you could legally take a
Speaker 1: New York City licensed premise permit. Handguns you can have
Speaker 1: only in your home in a lockbox. And remember separate
Speaker 1: lockbox for the ammunition and a trigger guard on the
Speaker 1: gun too, so that if a burglar, if a home
Speaker 1: invasion happens, you can throw the lockbox with your AMMO
Speaker 1: at his head. That's going to be your best option.
Speaker 1: The NYPD and Sivance's District Attorney's office couldn't even tell
Speaker 1: you if it was legal for you to take that
Speaker 1: lawfully registered and locked weapon outside city limits or not.
Speaker 1: They weren't really sure. I mean, that's the kind of
Speaker 1: gun control law we have in New York City. It's stupid,
Speaker 1: it's unconstitutional, and it's tyrannical. And I gotta tell you,
Speaker 1: after what we've all seen the last year from a
Speaker 1: government that is willing to shut down churches, that is
Speaker 1: willing to put people through physical discomfort with the idiocy
Speaker 1: of the double mask policy, at all of this because
Speaker 1: of some tyrants in lab codes working for the federal government.
Speaker 1: I think, more than we have in a long time,
Speaker 1: we understand that the check on government tyranny that the
Speaker 1: Second Amendment represents is very important. Deblasio hates it. That's
Speaker 1: why he wants the at if he wants the Feds
Speaker 1: to come in. First of all, it's not gonna do
Speaker 1: a darn thing to stop actual violent crime in this city.
Speaker 1: You and I both know it. Second of all, it's
Speaker 1: a distraction from the fact that Deblasio is a moron.
Speaker 1: And third, the Democrats have a tyrannical impulse to disarm
Speaker 1: the population. You know it and I know it. Eighteen buck,
Speaker 1: it's time for roll call. There we go, Facebook dot Com,
Speaker 1: slash Buck Sex and Team bucket, iHeartMedia dot Com. A
Speaker 1: quick bit of business for all of you listening to
Speaker 1: the show. I am off the air next week. I'm
Speaker 1: not gonna be doing radio or podcast. I have a
Speaker 1: week of well preparation. Some I wouldn't say relation. I'd
Speaker 1: say have a week of rest and preparation. I'm not
Speaker 1: really relaxing because we're launching the big, big Show June
Speaker 1: twenty first Premiere radio network, syndicated on almost four hundred
Speaker 1: stations across the country. Very very exciting stuff, and I
Speaker 1: just want you to make sure you know though, that
Speaker 1: next week we will have in this time slot and
Speaker 1: also for your podcast lists, we will have guest hosts.
Speaker 1: So pruser Mark. Who who do we have slotted so far?
Speaker 1: I know it's not all final and official yet, but
Speaker 1: who are a couple of folks we've got guesting next week?
Speaker 1: Next year? Next week we have Freedom Hut favorite Ben
Speaker 1: Winegarten filling in. Oh wonderful, Yes, okay, right, so we
Speaker 1: got Ben wine Garten joining very He's just a very
Speaker 1: high intellect guy and a really good guy, a nice, honest,
Speaker 1: solid individual. Ben Winegardner. So I think I just said Winegardner.
Speaker 1: It's wine Garten, isn't it. I always do that. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but I know him. But I know him so well
Speaker 1: that he wouldn't even we go back. I've known Ben
Speaker 1: for almost ten years now, we go back to the Blaze.
Speaker 1: We work together there. So yeah, he's gonna be on
Speaker 1: for next week. Great guy. Fellow Mets fan. Well, he's
Speaker 1: my favorite guest host. I see you got like a
Speaker 1: Mets Mafia thing going on here. I'm usually partial fellow
Speaker 1: Mets fans. I'll admitted, I don't know. I don't think
Speaker 1: we've ever had a Yankees fan guest host on the
Speaker 1: radio here. I'm just I'm just putting two and two together.
Speaker 1: I mean there's a reason for it. Yeah, before I
Speaker 1: hire them. I mean, luckily, I don't care about baseball.
Speaker 1: But to some of the Yankees fans in the audience,
Speaker 1: this may not have gone totally unnoticed. Producer Mark, I
Speaker 1: feel like you'd even throw a Red Sox fan to
Speaker 1: this audience before a Yankees fan. I mean, let's just
Speaker 1: call it a happy coincidence, a happy coincidence. Let's here
Speaker 1: from some of you, we got Marcus Hey bucking Producer
Speaker 1: Mark first bucket, huge congratulations on taking over for Rush
Speaker 1: I can't think of a better person suitor to carry
Speaker 1: on the radio cause of conservatism. Now, my main point
Speaker 1: of all the government intrusion and rights violations during COD
Speaker 1: what concerns be the most, and I don't think I
Speaker 1: have heard anyone address it is the fact that, for
Speaker 1: seemingly the first time, the government has put restrictions on
Speaker 1: being able to return to your home country, obviously for
Speaker 1: violations of federal law like treason akin to refusing re
Speaker 1: entry to people who ran away to ices. But we
Speaker 1: even allowed John Walker, Lindback, and bo Bergdall to return home.
Speaker 1: But if I leave the country, even though I have
Speaker 1: proof of COVID VACS, I still have to prove no
Speaker 1: active infection prior to being allowed to return to the US,
Speaker 1: regardless that I'm a citizen and I have health insurance
Speaker 1: and supposedly my wearing a mask on a plane will
Speaker 1: protect others from getting infected. I think this sets a
Speaker 1: very dangerous precedent that the government can set conditions for
Speaker 1: you to return to the US, even if you're a
Speaker 1: citizen or naturalized. I'm surprised nobody seems to have challenged
Speaker 1: this in court. Marcus. First of all, thank you so
Speaker 1: much for the kind words, and I would say that
Speaker 1: you have to remember the powers the pandemic hours that
Speaker 1: governments have, right health emergency powers, and everyone's gotten a
Speaker 1: big reminder of this during the pandemic are extraordinarily severe.
Speaker 1: I mean, under quarantine authority, they can pretty much like
Speaker 1: detain you and like it's They're not going to call
Speaker 1: it in prison, but that's what it is. You know,
Speaker 1: if there was a bad enough virus going around and
Speaker 1: there were people that were just saying, sorry, I'm not
Speaker 1: going to stay home, you could see that there are
Speaker 1: people in this government who would say we are going
Speaker 1: to handcuff you and lock you up in a place
Speaker 1: and not let you leave, and men with guns are
Speaker 1: going to enforce that rule. You could see that happening.
Speaker 1: You could see that happening. So just remember that, folks,
Speaker 1: our little test drive of authoritarianism is not something that
Speaker 1: you should forget anytime soon, because it could come back
Speaker 1: and be even worse the next time. And I think
Speaker 1: that faucism is now something we're going to be fighting
Speaker 1: for a long time. The mindset of the health bureaucrat
Speaker 1: tyrant this is a big problem. Alex not original Saturday
Speaker 1: Squad but I've been with you for a few years now.
Speaker 1: I discovered your show on the late night slot of
Speaker 1: my local conservative talk station, and I can remember thinking
Speaker 1: they should move you before some of the earlier hosts,
Speaker 1: who I'll refrained from mentioning by name. Thanks Alex, and
Speaker 1: I probably agree. Luckily, I was able to circumvent the
Speaker 1: station's poor choices by making the podcast a daily highlight
Speaker 1: of my drive home. I wish it had not taken
Speaker 1: the absence of Rush, but given the situation being what
Speaker 1: it is, I think your well deserved promotion was the
Speaker 1: best choice possible to carry on the legacy of leadership, intellect,
Speaker 1: humor and freedom loving and broadcast excellence each midday. Congratulations.
Speaker 1: I can't wait to tune into you and play in
Speaker 1: a couple of weeks. Alex, thank you so much. I
Speaker 1: really do appreciate that a lot. And we're gonna do
Speaker 1: I'm just telling you, we're gonna do a great show.
Speaker 1: Clay and I are not Rush, and we're never going
Speaker 1: to be Rush, but we're going to do a great show.
Speaker 1: And those of you that have felt that absence for
Speaker 1: the last five or so months, we're never going to
Speaker 1: be able to make it go away, but we're hoping
Speaker 1: we're going to be able to help to step in
Speaker 1: and help the cause of conservatism. Tim, hey Buck, first,
Speaker 1: congratulations on the new show. I'm sure Rush would give
Speaker 1: his blessings. I'm wondering if Trump would be poison his
Speaker 1: fruit at this point because, whether right or wrong, of
Speaker 1: his refusal to let go of events about the past
Speaker 1: election that ultimately led to Biden being installed? Is Trump
Speaker 1: too controversial and polarizing to be an effective candidate for
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four? Should he quietly move aside for someone
Speaker 1: like Ronda Santis and offer his support for the next candidate.
Speaker 1: I would support either direction to save our republic from
Speaker 1: the current American Marxist regime. What's your opinion? Also, if
Speaker 1: the bacon ader from Wendy seems a bit too extreme,
Speaker 1: there's also the son of bacon ader same overall taste
Speaker 1: less meat shields Hi from Ohio. All right, Tim, thanks
Speaker 1: so much, and let me say that I'm going to
Speaker 1: continue to talk about the Trump versus de Santis situation
Speaker 1: a lot on the new show. For me, right now,
Speaker 1: I think DeSantis is the move, but I'm open to
Speaker 1: being told I'm wrong. As always, Team Last show in
Speaker 1: this slot tomorrow, off next week June twenty feet the
Speaker 1: big launch, twelve to three. Until then, she'll tie