WEBVTT - Surveillance: Stimulus Talks With Kudlow

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast and I'm Tom Keene

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Jay Lee. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and of course on the Bloomberg, on

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Television and on radio on police to say, it's

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>an Ay cud Low National Economic Council Director, Larry. I

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:36.200
<v Speaker 1>appreciate your time this morning, sir, so thank you. Let's

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>start with that stimulus conversation, the latest update, please, Larry,

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>where are we well? The ball is not moving much

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>right now. I mean, the two sides are still talking

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and the committee chairs in the Senate and House, the

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:56.279
<v Speaker 1>relevant committees, they're talking on a lot of these issues appropriations,

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>small business, banking and so forth and so on. So

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a that's a good thing. On the other hand,

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 1>there's still policy issues that divide the two times the

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 1>two teams. UM President mentioned some of them last night. Uh,

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't want to bail out poorly run states and

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>local governments and their pension funds and so forth, So

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that's an issue. There are other policy issues that remain unresolved.

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 1>So it's very difficult. The clock is taking, as you know,

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 1>be very difficult. Um, even if you had a deal

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the next few days, you've got to go through the

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>committee print and then you've got to have votes in

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the House and the Senate. So it's not gonna be easy.

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to predict anything. I'm just saying, Uh,

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>there's more agreement than there was a while back. There

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:47.119
<v Speaker 1>are still policy disagreements, UM, some numerical disagreements. So we'll

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>see it's still up for grabs. Well, let's stop with

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>numerical then we get to substance, Larry, what numerical disagreement

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>is the right now? Well, I think that in specific areas.

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm not going to get involved in negotiating

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:08.679
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan this morning, but in specific areas there are numerical issues. Now.

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>President Trump, for example, has said, for let's say the checks,

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the mailed out checks for economic assistance. Uh, he's willing

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to bid higher on that. He has no problem. Uh,

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.119
<v Speaker 1>he's willing to go with P p P for these

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>small businesses, Uh, no problem. He's willing to help the airlines,

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>no problem on that score. He's always been willing to

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>do these things. He's willing to help the schools as

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>they of course transition and renovate, to make school openings

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>UH safe and you know, cover the health guidelines. He's

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>willing to do that. He's not willing, though, to pour

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>lots of money into various healthcare schemes that might benefit

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>folks who are not US citizens. He has a big

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>problem with that. I just mentioned some of the state

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:00.919
<v Speaker 1>and local issues and the pension issue, and there are

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>other issues at stake. UM. One thing that's interesting that's

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>come up UM in the in the Munition Secretary munition

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>proposal called the Republican Proposal. We are very much we're

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>keen on on shoring for all kinds of supply chains,

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>including pharmaceuticals and related equipment. That's very dar and important,

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:25.799
<v Speaker 1>and we would like to reward companies that either come

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to the US for the first time or moved back

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>from China or wherever. So we proposed investment tax credits.

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Apparently the other side doesn't like that. We've also proposed

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>deductions for restaurant meals and other forms of hospitality and entertainment.

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Apparently the numbers there are sticking points, so I can't

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>go through the entire list. I'm just gonna say, still issues.

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I think many people feel like we're just going around

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>in circles at the moment, Larryous, we drift towards the election.

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>One question that's being asked by by many, in fact,

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>is whether both sides are negotiating and good faith. Now,

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of course you're not gonna say that about yourself, but

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I do want to do you think the other side

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>is nicko shanning and good faith? Do you think speak

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Speaker Pelosi is negoshanning and good faithful? Or is this

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>just political postering with Eleven Diace to go, Well, look,

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a political analyst. Uh. I don't do personal stuff.

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I can't get into everybody's said. I'm just gonna assume

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that we've been at this since July or mid July,

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>that there is good faith at this point. I'm not

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>even sure what that means. Look, there's very hard headed,

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 1>experienced professional people engaged in the discussions. There are veterans,

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>all right. Speaker Pelosi is a veteran. UH. Mr Mnusian

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>is a terrific money man. He knows the budget story

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>up and down, including taxes. UH. Senator McConnell is a

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>very crafty, wiley veteran in these games. So they are engaged,

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>they are talking, Jonathan, and I will ascribe how about this,

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I will ascribe good faith to all sides. I'm not

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 1>going to pick away on that. Let just see that

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the President's done that for you. Sure. Well, Look the

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>President said yesterday evening Nancy Pelosi doesn't want to approve

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>anythink because she thinks it will help her politically. Not

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.840
<v Speaker 1>too well. I'll leave that to the president. That's his view.

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 1>That's his view, and I don't have a I don't

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 1>have I'm a policy guy, Jonathan, I don't have a

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 1>view on that. I appreciate that. All I all I

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 1>want to say is this. We are in a very

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>very strong recovery. The v shape recovery is coming on

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>very strong. We had phenomenal numbers yesterday on following on

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 1>employment clients and rising existing home sales um. But there

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>are areas of this economy that could benefit from assistance.

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I acknowledge that I don't think the recovery depends on assistance,

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:49.600
<v Speaker 1>but the p PP lending for small businesses would be

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 1>very helpful. UH. President Trump took the lead awhile back

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>on providing UH federal unemployment assistance by an executive order

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 1>with a plus am the states. It would be very

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>helpful if Congress appropriated that in some form a way.

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>There's unspent funds all over the place from last Springs Bill.

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Why not repurpose that and legislated put it in you know, codified.

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:17.359
<v Speaker 1>It's not forever. It might be three months or six months.

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.679
<v Speaker 1>That could help Americans. We need the airlines. That could

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>help the economy, put people back to work, get kids

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 1>back to school. So I just, you know, sometimes thinks

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>instead of these two thousand page bills with gargan numbers,

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:37.039
<v Speaker 1>why not just have you know, separate votes on specific items.

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 1>That's the way appropriations used to be many decades. I

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>have to have to say, you sound a lot more

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>like a Senate Republican than you do a member of

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 1>this administration, because that sounds like the position of Leader

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:52.599
<v Speaker 1>McConnell when you say the V shaped economy is coming

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 1>on very strong. If I'm a Senate Republican right now,

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering, Okay, if marries right, why do we need

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a two trillion dollar package? The V shaped recovery is

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 1>coming along very strong? Why do we well, let me say.

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I have many many friends amongst center Republicans, and I

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>speak at their breakfast at lunches all the time. But

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I am uh the NYC director for President Trump, who

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>has given me a great opportunity, uh, and I'm doing

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>my best to help him out on all these issues.

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>So don't don't suggest that I'm on one side for another.

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>By the way, well, Larry, you give me just the

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>president's position, and at the moment, there is no deal

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>life between the president's position. In mind, I support him entirely.

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving you his thoughts on why the numbers don't

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>add up and why these policies don't yet work. That's

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the best I can do. I'm not going to predict

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>an outcomes, Ouathan, Yes, maybe no, maybe. I mean, I'm

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>not here to do that. I just give you a

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>lay of the land, and I appreciate you doing that.

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Did lead the McConnell's how the White House not to

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>accept a deal, I I am not aware of that.

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I am not aware of that, because reportedly he told

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>colleagues that he had told the White House to exactly that,

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>not to accept the deal. The president seems to according

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to Chief of Staff Mark Meadows that he can lean

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>on Senate Republicans, and from where I'm sitting and where

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>others are as well, it doesn't seem to be any

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>evidence of that, Larry, Why the confidence that you can

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>lean on Senate Republicans to possibile that big What I've

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>heard from the President we are a long meeting Wednesday.

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 1>What I've heard from Chief Meadows and what I've heard

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>from Secretary Minution is that Leader McConnell and the GOP

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>conference in this Senate would be willing to support a

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 1>bill as long as it is a genuinely by partisan

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>bill and that their asks are included. For example, we

0:08:56.360 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>haven't talked about liability insurance. That is a controversial matter

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>with the House team, but it's an important key ask

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>for the Senate Republicans. If there's a genuinely bipartisan bill.

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Leader McConnell has said, uh, and I've heard it from

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the President Mark Meadows notion, Um, they go along with it.

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>So I'll just leave it there. I can't speak for once,

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I can't speak for Mr McConnell, but I'm just saying

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that's what i've heard onlinability protection. Have you made any

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>progress whatsoever in the last month with House Democrats. Jonathan,

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to get involved in that sort of thing.

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>You know. I can't do that. I'm not gonna again.

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>We not, Larry. I mean, you've you've given me enough

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>information so far on how the talks are going. I'm

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>just trying to work out whether you've made any progress

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>on that particular topic. And it seems to be a

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>huge sticking point for negotiations. Because you're such a great

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>journalist and I'd love to give you as much information

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>as possible, but I cannot include you in the negotiations. Larry,

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>what's the plan? B Once you walk away, You've seen

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 1>this a million times. At some point you realize nothing

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>gets done. Well, look, we have an election in what

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>eleven days? Yeah, the clock is ticking. The clock is ticking.

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just mechanically, mechanically, it takes a while. You've

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>got to vote in both houses. You might have to

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>have a conference vote. Now, that could be done fast,

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.679
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we take it there too. Just writing

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>up the legislative print of a two thousand plus page

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>bill takes time. And then you have the issue of

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:41.559
<v Speaker 1>the operational executions. All right, Uh, I don't know that

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that could be done, mailing checks, re engaging the lending

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>programs for small businesses. Um, we would do the best

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 1>we can. Secretary Munition did a heck of a job

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>last spring, but I don't know between now and the election,

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>So those are still dangling in the air. Well, Larry,

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>if you can't get it done now, and this is

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>my final question, you've given us so much time this morning,

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and I appreciate that, thank you. It doesn't look like

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you've made a lot of progress on state aid. It

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look like you've made a lot of progression on

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>liability protections. You can't confirm or tonight that right now.

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>If you can't get us done in the next eleven days,

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:23.079
<v Speaker 1>why would you be able to get this done before January. Well,

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take this a day at a time. The

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>election results well undoubtedly bear heavilyer on this. And remember,

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of course, the Congress is still in session. There's a

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:37.839
<v Speaker 1>so called lane duck session that will come up. You've

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>got a judicial vote coming I believe next week. With

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>respect him, Miss Barrett, highly qualified, terrific candidate for the

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court. So it's tricky business, and the clock is ticking,

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>so we will see. I don't want to make any predictions.

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>What I do know is this, Jonathan, the economy is

0:11:56.520 --> 0:12:01.319
<v Speaker 1>running faster and hotter than almost any but he thought possible.

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>And as President Trump said last night with great clarity,

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>he is not going to allow tax hikes or regulatory hikes.

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:14.679
<v Speaker 1>He's for lowering taxes and regulation. He completely opposes a

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>government takeover of healthcare. He completely opposes an end to

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:23.199
<v Speaker 1>oil and natural gas, which would be devastating for the economy.

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>You've got economists, distinguished economists at the Hoover Institute, Stanford,

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 1>who say those policy would lose ten percent of g

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>d P five million jobs. Middle class families with the

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars their whole increase under Trump, which was a record increase.

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>That's what the president opposes. He doesn't see a dark winner.

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 1>He's he's an optimistic recovery and prosperity. Uh. The other

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>team looks to me like very pessimism and a stagnation,

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 1>uh decline scenario. Those came out in the debate last night,

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think that it's gonna bear heavily on November

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>as results. Larry, if I was leading McConnell right now,

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>here and you talk about the hot economy, I'd be

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>asking why on earth do we need a two trillion

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 1>dollar package. Larry, It's great to catch up with you

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:13.599
<v Speaker 1>as always, and I appreciate your time this morning and

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>hopefully we can catch up on payrolls Friday after the election.

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Sir Larry Catlo, National Economic Council Director, A special thanks,

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of course, also to Bloomberg Radio listeners as well. So

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>if you have any interest in hydrocarbons, any interest in

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the future of this great debate, not out to November,

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>not out of the inauguration, but how about ten years,

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>we have the correct guest for good conversation. We rip

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 1>up the script with left Sony best Laws of course

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street we contributor and truly one of the world's

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>experts on natural guests dynamics as well. SONA thank you

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. What is the political economics

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of the less oil? These two candidates were talking about?

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>What is your timeline to What is really interesting is

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that the candidates are talking about it, but the markets

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>are taking care of it themselves. You had the BPCO

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>on recently, and also the way the market is going

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>right now and the way people are behaving. Every utility

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>company is increasing the share of it's renewable energy within

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>its own energy um energy use. In the US, if

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you go to Texas, the largest growth sector in energy

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>in Texas is in fact renewable energy, solar energy. You

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>go into the Middle East, the largest investments that are

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>going on in the Middle East in Saudi in u A,

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 1>in solar. So the point that is really interesting that

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>was missed last night was the fact that people are

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>already investing in solar or inac in Windsor. I was

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Washington News Beer of Bloomberg with Spencer Abraham

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 1>long ago and far away our Secretary of Energy for

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Bush the Younger, the day we discovered that America really

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have a national oil policy. Do we need one?

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, there there was a time when we needed

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>an oil policy and energy policy when energy was such

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a huge part of the economy. Remember when we started,

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, when we actually did have an energy policy

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>at one point, or we what we call energy policy,

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>was when energy was more like fifteen percent of the economy,

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe ten percent. Today, the size of the energy sector,

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>which is really the mainly the oil and gas sector

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>in the US, is close to three, and so energy,

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>while being very important, is not where it was compared

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>to health sector, compared to technology, compared to the other

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>sectors that have been growing. So it's not that we

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>don't need energy to lubricate and to use our in

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>our in our parts and in our manufacturing, but it

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>is not exactly as important as it was at the

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>period that you're talking about, and when I started working

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>on energy in my career well after, let's talk about

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>where you think we're going. Right now, we're producing about

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>tamillion pounds of all a day in the United States.

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>What do you think the trajectory is of all of

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>this actually is over the next five to ten years.

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I think, as Vice President Biden said, it is going

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to be a transition. It has been a very slow transition.

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>When I started again working on this transition, it was

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>almost like twenty years ago, UM natural gas was taking

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>um a little bit more share from oil, but it

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>was pretty slow. As we've seen in the last two years,

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>natural gas has taken a bigger share from coal and oil,

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and solar and wind are taking a bigger share from

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>everything else. So the transition could could be a while.

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>As you as we see the electric cars have been

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit slower to come to market. Tesla obviously

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>has been fabulous, and other cars are still having technical

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>problems when they come in. But if you look at

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:18.199
<v Speaker 1>the economy moving forward, I would think that whether it

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>is ten years or fifteen years or twenty five years,

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>there will be a transition that with faster and faster

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:29.199
<v Speaker 1>growth towards uneibles as the technology that is helping with

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>batteries help us move in that direction much faster. It's fun.

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Has the pandemic accelerated that shift? You know, the pandemic

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 1>hasn't slowed it down the side. I think what is

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 1>really interesting is that oil and gas got slowed down

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>with the pandemic, right and generally the economy slowed down,

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>which meant that you were using energy less. In fact,

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>the President last night said that we have cleaned area,

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and the reason is because our economy is not a

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>full capacity. Of course, air gets to be cleaner if

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you're not drive in as much and not using your factories.

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>But but renewable energy investments have been going pretty close

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to schedule, maybe delayed a little bit, but much faster

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:13.199
<v Speaker 1>than the oil and gas investments that were in the

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>works before COVID. That's a lot of this begs the

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>question what we need the government to do here? If,

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 1>as you say, that private companies are heading in this

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:27.679
<v Speaker 1>direction anyway, you know what the government could do is

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>we had some we had a lot of support for

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>cooling gas industry over the last twenty thirty years, and

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 1>if some of that could also move more into the

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>into the renewable energy, I think it would be really

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>really helpful. Also in terms of the government having clear

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:51.199
<v Speaker 1>policies on on regulation and making it easier to invest

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>in infrastructure and in energy, particularly renewable energy, could make

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 1>it easier. As you know, the regulation that has had

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 1>been and the looked around solar energy has been very confusing.

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>It has been on off, on, off, on off, and

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it has affected consumers. So having something that is clear

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 1>and long term would help the industry. Let's end on

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure more broadly. Four years ago, after the election, the

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump Trade, the so called Trump trade was all about

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure spending. Wasn't just about tax cuts, It's all about

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.479
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure spending. Then if started, it just did not happen.

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Why does it not happen in America? Why can't we

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>make it happen. You know, I think, Um, it's interesting

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:36.919
<v Speaker 1>because two thousand eight it did not happen either, Right,

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 1>there was a moment where we could have put some

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of the money that came into the economy, um, into

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 1>the doctor. As you said, it didn't happen during the

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:50.400
<v Speaker 1>last four years. I'm actually more optimistic Jonathan about the

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>next four years. I think this is a time where

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 1>post COVID. COVID has had a lot of physical and

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>psychological impact on people, but this might be the time

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>where in fact, you have industry, you have the financial sector,

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and you have the government coming together to build infrastructure.

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 1>And I think that some of the delays we could

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 1>blame on on all kinds of things, but the biggest

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:19.239
<v Speaker 1>problems about infrastructure in our country is that, you know,

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of federal versus states issues and some of the

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 1>regulation that has delayed infrastructure. And that could be something

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that the Democrats come together with the Republicans and health

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:33.199
<v Speaker 1>resolves so that our roads and bridges do catch up

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>with the Chinese. I mean, it is really interesting how

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>in the last especially post COVID, how the Chinese have

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 1>continued with their infrastructure but also continued investing in their

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>new financial structure. We're still in a financial structure which

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>is the old mode. Whereas they're bringing in digital currency,

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 1>they're bringing in um you know, clean energy, they're bringing

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:00.159
<v Speaker 1>in new infrastructure, they're being in new health policy. Is

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>so I think it is time, if we want to

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>be number one, to to bring all of those things

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>together and to the forefront. It's interesting to me how

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>much the rest of the world is waiting for the

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>US to come out with some sort of fiscal support bill.

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>How this affects Europe, it affects emerging markets. How much

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>does the recovery in the developing world in particular hinge

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:24.479
<v Speaker 1>on the US passing fiscal stimulus. Well, I mean, if

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>we have something like a tweet trillion UH fiscal stimulus,

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it will be large. It will impact other countries. But

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 1>also what has happened over the last week or two

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>in Washington with the World Bank IMF meetings, as you

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>could see, was relatively i would say, hugely different than

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>what tom Kin and I have experienced before with the

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>i m F. We also have, in addition to the

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>US stimulus, the IMF head and the chief economist of

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the I M S saying that countries should start borrowing

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot more. That is the exact opposite of the

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>austerity plants that you had for the last twenty thirty

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 1>years by the I m F. So if you put

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that together with our stimulus, I think it could be

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a very interesting period of higher growth in the economies

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of across the clock plus interest rates and in fact

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>not go into a negative zone. And we might be

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>going faster into a period of inflation with the kind

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>of death that is getting accumulated and will continue to

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>get accumulated. So we might have different problems on our

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 1>hands very soon. I'm started very quickly here you are

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:36.399
<v Speaker 1>of Iran. Is President Biden's strategy with Iran the same

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 1>as President Obama's? You know, I think that that countries

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>are evolving. I'm not sure if his policy is the same.

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I think his policy is to engage just his life,

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 1>like he said last night, with with the allies, so

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:57.439
<v Speaker 1>that the approach to Iran will be an approach that

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>brings together all allies together and it's not just one

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>country versus another country. And if you do bring it

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 1>run back into society, into the normal society and the

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 1>normal economy. I think that region could be in a

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 1>much better place than it is today after bachelors. Always

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:19.640
<v Speaker 1>fantastic to catch up with you, Thanks for your time

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 1>of Rock Creek Group and Bloomberg Wall Street Week contributor

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>joining us now on this market. A lot to Childood

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>j H C m C a fund manager, A lot

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.399
<v Speaker 1>of fantastic to catch up with you. As always, this

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>credit market spread to tight treasury yehs a low, they

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>been higher this week. Fixed income, it's been a huge

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>trade through. Do you think it's gonna break anytime soon?

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Good morning? All Well, it's hard to tell whether it

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>breaks or not, but you can't. I mean, this is

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a mistake. I think many people too. They're very short

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>term oriented and if you think of running portfolios, they're

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>they're like tankers you've hid, just shift them overnight. So

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>will the market break? You know? I think the market

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>is getting expensive and I do think if you dissect

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the credit market, its fortunes are closely tied to whether

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>economic growth happens and what kind of a stimulus package passes.

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's a possibility. Yes, Lolly, what's so

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>important to me? And it's great to have you on

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Matthew conversation is in Japan, we are witnessing

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>almost a lassitude where the dynamics have been sucked out

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of the fixed income market for various reasons. Is that

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be the surprise a year and two years

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>forward that we migrate from bond and fixed income dynamics

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to a much more static market. It's possible. But look,

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>there are differences between the Japanese markets in the US markets. Um.

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>The investor based is different, the indices are different, um.

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 1>So they're absolutely notable differences. The key point is they've

0:24:57.240 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>been fighting with low rate for an extended period of

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>time and a little to no inflation. Can that happen here? Sure?

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think Cathy hits Kathy Jones hit the

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>right point, which is, you know, we're talking about rising

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>ten year rates and blah blah blah. Look, people were

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about a four year and four percent ten year

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>not that long ago, right for not thinking like maybe

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>one percent, Max, I think it is entirely possible, it's

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:24.439
<v Speaker 1>lower for longer. It is entirely, entirely possible. And what's amazingly,

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:28.400
<v Speaker 1>says as Cathy Jones stretch and he flapped, there was extraordinary,

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Tom, that it definitely was extraordinary, which brings

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 1>me to credit spread slyly. One reason why I always

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>love having you on is because you're very realistic about

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental picture and struggle with pairing it with the

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>unlimited or seemingly liquidity from central banks. How do you

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 1>retain that bearish view in light of the fact the

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>FED is backstopping this market and don't fight the Fed

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:56.120
<v Speaker 1>is the predominant feeling across the street. So it's actually interesting.

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:58.439
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you how we're constructing, how we're thinking about it,

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>but this don't fight the Fed. I think it's very

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting because I think one of the possible mistakes the

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:05.959
<v Speaker 1>market is making for the future is now I think

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody now bigs in that the corporate bond purchasing is

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 1>now in the tool kits, as you know, as J.

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Powell talks about. But there may be a nuance in

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>this crisis versus the global financial crisis, which is this

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>was a global pandemic and it's hit everybody at the

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:25.399
<v Speaker 1>same time. It wasn't there was no bad actor. So

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I will warn the market that in the future when

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>we have another crisis, which we will cycles still happen

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 1>regardless of what other people say it is entirely possible

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that corporate bonds may not be in the tools. I

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>just want to make sure I plant that feet in

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 1>people's mind. The second piece is how do we construct

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the portfolios. Look, I think investment grade has gone really expensive,

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>well in duration investment grade. I think what you need

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 1>to do is pick the companies that are actually on

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a path to de leverage. There are not a whole

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of them, and take duration risk on those. It's

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a bad credit picking, Hi, you we're still playing the liquidity,

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 1>which is the refinancing theme. So buy the bonds that

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>are callable in good quality companies. The rest of the

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>high yield is challenging. And just because you guys talked

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:11.719
<v Speaker 1>about math and you knew I was going to talk

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>about statistics, let me walk you through one thing. High

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>yield average index spread in the US is four hundred

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 1>and ninety today. Okay, let's just assume to beat that

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 1>index you have to back for companies that are in

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the five eight hundred basis points in spread range. That's

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 1>only of the US high yield index, And out of

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that twenty per cent, nearly half half is energy, leisure,

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>capital goods that are at the epic center of coronavirus

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>related slowdown and stimmulus stainments. This is why you can't

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>disentangle high yield fundamentals from the economic recovery. So let's

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:52.640
<v Speaker 1>start with investment gride and then we got to high

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>yield because you set a couple of things there. The

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>companies with an investment grade on the path towards the leveraging.

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:02.400
<v Speaker 1>You said there weren't, manny, where'd you find them? They're

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 1>not that many, but there are a few companies that

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:06.879
<v Speaker 1>have basically learned their lesson and they're gonna be leveraged.

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:09.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean they are basically selling assets and they're making

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 1>sure they are working down their leverage and either that

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:15.120
<v Speaker 1>we're basically when people were talking about that, there were

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, three four for and a half times levered

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>pre chronicle virus crisis, where the market was a little

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>bit criticizing. Okay, it's started the leverage now because the

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 1>good times may not last. I think those companies are

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:29.679
<v Speaker 1>really working towards working down that leverage now. There is

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a point that I think there are some there is

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a narrative in the market which I don't agree with,

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 1>which is this golden age of bond investor, because now

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that people have put on the seat, they're gonna be leverage.

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Let me point this out. Large companies are not borrowing

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>from banks. They're going to the bond market. The biggest

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>difference between bank and the bond market is bank that

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>is table at par with no penalty. You can't do

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that with the bond market. So what are your I

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>G or high yield? What the companies are banking on

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 1>future IBADOG growth or asset sales to de leverage. Again,

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that is highly highly dependent on the economic growth, Lilly,

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 1>our preferreds a legitimate yield equivalent or do they have

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>too much of an equity component? I think preferred if

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>you find you know, there are some fixed for life

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 1>preferred that are very high coupon, and you know, I

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 1>think as the company is through the pandemic, none of

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>these things are going to get cold. So at least

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>until you get a better picture of the outlook, there

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>are decent places to be yes, Lally, is there any

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>trade to be had in the eleven days left before

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the U S Election? No? I mean it's it's these

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>things are very hard. But the market is similar to

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the equity market. There is a general trade that's happening,

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>which is stimulus induced. Right, whichever party wins, it's likely

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have a stimulus. The question is how big

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be. And you can see it the

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>companies that may get the better from the stimulus. You

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 1>can see the stocks and also on the bond market

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a movement, but nothing does. It's

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>not recommending. It's not the golden age of credit. Was

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I've got to ask, was that a little bit of

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>shade a page Jim and Greg Peter's in the last

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks trouble Hold on, Hold on a second,

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>hold on, No, I'm not actually calling anybody out. I

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>have heard that narrative. I'm not sure they're one of them,

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>so I can't really open. Okay, I'm just wondering if

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I should tee them up for a conversation at the

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>nine o'clock in the next couple of weeks, so that

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I thank you as always seriously trying to start some

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>what we've tried to do it on a Friday. This

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>is really really important, is trying to understand that yes,

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 1>we do economics, finance, investment, Yes we do politics, and

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 1>we do it with fancy ties and suits and dresses.

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>As we talked to the bloomer elite of the world,

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and we've forgotten not that there's a whole bunch of

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>other people out there helping us with that has been

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Foy. Pet Foy is with a small shop called

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the Metropolitan Metropolitan Transit Authority where he is chairman and CEO.

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>And pet I want to go right down to the basics.

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>So last time you were on, we talked about a

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 1>bus driver moving people around Northern Central Park. How about

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Radigan Hendy Hartley Woods in Augustine doing what you guys

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>do every day, which is jumping on tracks of moving railroads. Yeah,

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>those five tom those five Long Island Railroad employees on

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday at the Long Island Railroad East New York station,

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>save the man's life mt A. People do that regularly. Uh.

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>They were the right five men on the on the

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>on the spot. They called the train dispatchers, stop the trains.

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>They were flaggers, so they knew what they knew what

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to do, jumped down and brought the man up to

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 1>up the safety. It have been a terrible situation had

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>they not been there, had they not been used their

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 1>training and their brave ray and courage saved the man's life.

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Incredible public You are distracted by getting billions in aid

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 1>from this natural disaster along with other cities nationwide. What

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 1>is your message to the elites of Washington this morning

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 1>on your need to get a check in the mail?

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 1>But there are three reasons the MTA needs twelve billion dollars.

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 1>One is jobs, jobs, jobs, the second is social equity,

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and the third is environment. I described last time I

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 1>was on the drastic cuts we may be forced to

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 1>make in service of the fifth reduction on subways and busses,

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 1>up the fifty percent on Long Island Railroad and Metro

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>North and laying off eight to nine thousand colleagues our

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 1>preliminary estimates. If we were if our hand were forced

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 1>then we had to do, that would be a reduction

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and economic activity in the New York region of about

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a hundred billion dollars and a reduction of about three

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty thousand jobs, including three hundred thousand jobs

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 1>in New York. From a social equity point of view,

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>right now, we're carrying on subway and busses about three

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>million customers a day. That's up substantially from the depths

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of pandemic. But those are workers who can't work remotely,

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 1>who can't telecommute, and there were essential workers. And just

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 1>as mt A workers at subways, buses, Long Island Railroad

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and Metro North or heroes carrying heroes during the depths

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic, they continue to do that. The people

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>were carrying don't have the option of a car, they

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 1>don't have an option of working from home. And it's

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a matter of social equity. And lastly, there's a limit.

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 1>We're now carrying about ninety percent of pre pandemic passenger

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 1>car and truck volumes on our bridges and tunnels mighty percent.

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 1>There's a limit to how many cars and trucks can

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>come into the City of New York, can come into Manhattan.

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 1>We're near reaching that limit. So from the point of

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 1>view of jobs, social equity in the environment, we need

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 1>this funding as a first order priority. Okay, so what's

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>your absolute deadline when it comes to making these cuts.

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 1>What's your deadline for getting this funding. So at LISA,

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 1>like any organization, we're on a calendar year. We will

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 1>present a plan and a budget to our board in November.

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 1>The board will vote on it in December. It's got

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to be adopted in December, and obviously bond investors and

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 1>credit rating agencies and folks like yourselves are going to

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:28.920
<v Speaker 1>be looking at that process. So we really need funding

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and certainty about funding uh early to mid December at

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the at the absolute latest. If a bill doesn't. We've

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>been obviously watching the sausage making going on in Washington,

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and we really urge the Senate Republican leadership to support

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>funding for mass transit as well as the State of

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 1>New York. In the City of New York. If we

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>don't get that, the m t A may be forced

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 1>our hand, may be forced to make drastic draponent and

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:56.879
<v Speaker 1>service cuts until weigh off thousands of people. The economics,

0:34:56.920 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 1>social equity, and environmental consequences of that will be dum

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.400
<v Speaker 1>at it. I have to say, Pat, as a lifelong

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 1>New Yorker born and raised, Yes, wridership has increased from

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the depths of the pandemic, but is far below anything

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 1>it has been in recent memory. Given the fact that

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the m t A, the subway system, etcetera is the

0:35:14.400 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 1>lifeblood of New York City, is New York City dying now?

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 1>New York City is not not dying. New York City

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 1>is experiencing a tough time. New York was the epicenter

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic. Frankly the United States in the world,

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 1>thanks the Governor Clomo's leadership that uh, you know, we've

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:34.719
<v Speaker 1>broken the curve. Havn't uh we've broken the curve, right,

0:35:34.719 --> 0:35:38.279
<v Speaker 1>The curves been broken. Infection rates are are low. Other

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:41.239
<v Speaker 1>parts of the country. You're experiencing spikes. New York City

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 1>is going through a tough time. New York City has

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 1>gone through tough times before the nineteen pandemic hind eleven,

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Superstorm Sandy. I've lived here all my life in New York.

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:55.319
<v Speaker 1>The city will survive. Other cities New York, London, Milan, Bombay,

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Bombay have gone through pandemics in the past. New York

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 1>will get through us. But to get through what the

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 1>m t A has got to be funded. It is

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the circulatory system of the New York City Regional eCOM.

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Pet Forward. Thank you so much for the Metropolitan Transit Authority,

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:14.360
<v Speaker 1>their chairman, and their c Thanks for listening to the

0:36:14.400 --> 0:36:20.879
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple podcasts. SoundCloud,

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 1>or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:29.799
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keane before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio