WEBVTT - Surveillance: UK Fiscal Plan

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene along

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferrill and Lisa A. Brownowitz jay Leie, we

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>bring you insight from the best an economics, finance, investment

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance and Apple Podcast SoundCloud,

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com and of course on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now Andrew Griffith, the UK Finances Financial Secretary

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to the Treasury and the City Minister. Andrew fantastically catch

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 1>up with you, sir. We understand the Chancellor and the

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister is meeting with the o b R today

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the Bank of Engle's guilt market operation and in the

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>middle of October. Should those forecasts from the o b

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>R be published before then? Well, the key thing to

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>take away is that the Government, the o b R

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and the Bank of England are all working coorp in

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a coordinated fashion, each doing their respective job. So the

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Banks doing its job on monetary policy and market conduct,

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the o b R its job on forecasts and bringing

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>forward though the forecasts when they're ready to be able

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 1>to wrap in the recently announced Government Growth Plan. And

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>then of course the Government Growth Plan which has features

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>about energy, protecting households and businesses, how we're going to

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>go forward on energy security, building clean energy going forward,

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and also a lot of supply side measures in the UK.

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a very growth orientated plan. So what you've seen

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>over the last week is each of those players do

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>their job. It's good that the Chancellor and the Prime

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Minister are joined up with the o b R. I

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>think that meeting finishes shortly. But you've seen a lot

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>of coordinated activity over the last coordinated action at all.

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I've seen a mess. So you come out last week

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>with a mini budget, the Bank having the follow up

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>with unprecedented intervention in the guilt market, and the o

0:01:57.600 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>b R. Now you visit the o b R and

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>look for some forecasts after the fact. Why weren't these

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>forecasts published alongside this many budget last week? Because the

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>growth plans got lots of components to it. There was

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>an imperative to act this time last week. It's tomorrow,

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is the quarter end. It's tomorrow that

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>energy prices would have gone up across the United Kingdom,

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:23.799
<v Speaker 1>real uncertainty for businesses and households, so it was right

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to do that. Then there's a lot of detail in

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 1>terms of how the UK government wants to see growth

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>going forward, and that wouldn't have been available to the

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 1>O b R to factor into their forecast. Indeed, some

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>of that we're still waiting to announce over the coming weeks,

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>plans for infrastructure, to the housing market, for childcare, some

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>of the deep seated challenges that probably all of our

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>major economies have with growth. So you know, look, it's

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>been a it's been a busy week, but each of

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 1>those players are doing their job in a coordinated fashion.

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 1>How concerned are you about the increase in borrowing class

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>with some people citing it's and in a half percent

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>mortgage cost at a time when the Bank of England

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>is being tasked with offsetting a proposal that has not

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.799
<v Speaker 1>been put out there, but the market is responding. Yeah. Look,

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of course, of course rising rates are a concern. We've

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>seen that obviously, you know, going into last week, I

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>think you've seen more tightening in the US that's now

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>happened in the UK as well. We've seen figures out

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 1>of Europe as well today indicating that they've got exactly

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 1>the same sort of issues around inflation. What the Energy

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>package measures do is actually reduced the headline rates of inflation,

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's something that's going the other way to the

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>tread birrel seeing. But Andrew, there is this discussion about

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>not releasing the o BR report earlier than the November

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty three deadline at a time when the markets moving,

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>it's having real term effects. Now, why not just release

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>it earlier to give people a sense of what's going on. Yeah, well, Lisa, look,

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I was a finance director for eleven years. You know

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>my board wanted me to release my figure as early

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>as I could, but they also wanted them to be credible,

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to take the time to reflect all the information in

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a very fast moving world that's available, so everyone to

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>have their own view on that. I think you just

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>have to recognize there is a balance between speed and

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 1>velocity and being able to wrap in information. Some of

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that information, as I say, will be coming forward. The

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>growth plan itself is a forty page document and some

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>of that detail will still be released over the coming weeks.

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>And it's not for you to decide how long the

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>o b R nates is it. Let's get real about this.

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:37.479
<v Speaker 1>We're reporting now that you haven't sought to accelerate the

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>watchdogs ECO forecast at all, that's our latest report. According

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to officials familiar with the comments after the o BR

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Treasury meeting, why haven't you asked them to accelerate it. Well,

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 1>I've just talked about how there's a lot of different detail.

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:54.359
<v Speaker 1>How familiar are with all of the growth plan? People

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>have heard some of the headline measures. They've been widely rewarded,

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 1>perhaps less so about the plan for interest structure, the

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>plan for immigration housing. You know, these elements really important

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:07.479
<v Speaker 1>elements of the growth Plan. That is how we're going

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to finance the fiscal announcements that were made last Friday.

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think you've just got to look at it

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>as a package. When the Chancellor asked the bar to

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 1>report on the twenty three November, it was in contemplation

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>of being able to take into account the whole of

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that package. You in the media, BR tell you what,

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>have you asked the o b R to bring forward

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:31.919
<v Speaker 1>those forecasts as soon as possible or have you told

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:35.919
<v Speaker 1>them that you want them at the end of November. Well,

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 1>the chance that will read out on on his meeting

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>in due course, but in the meantime, you know, don't

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>don't lose sight of the fact that the fundamentals here

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:49.479
<v Speaker 1>were strong coming in We started this with some of

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 1>the lowest rates of the lowest jet debt to GDP

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 1>and the G seven. The economy is still growing or

0:05:56.320 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>bit we acknowledge that. Andrews time Keenan New York comes

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 1>sorry about you. As we speak. The Bloomberg Financial Conditions

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 1>Index for the United Kingdom is a negative four standard deviations.

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>You have seen a seven standard deviation move and the

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>blended guilt price move. You have a derivative disaster. You

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>are the city minister. What are the regulators gonna do

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>finally to amend the derivative shell game that caused the

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Bank of England to bail out the marketing industry of

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>l d I. Yeah, and you'll be aware Tom about

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the independence of the regulators. So one of the things

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that you learn a city minister is the regulators have

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>their job to do. What my time did? They feel

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that we have the most competitive environment in which to

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>do business. Okay, you have a competitive environment that on

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a seventh standard deviation move, blew up. Fine, what does

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 1>the United Kingdom do off of the scandals of of

0:06:57.360 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seven and two thousand and eight to five

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 1>only control the natural greed of the derivative business. You're

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>at the heart of this, is City Minister, how do

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>we finally get our every eight year derivative blow up fixed? Well,

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the Bank of England is taking the actions that they

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>need to in the market right now. In the long term,

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of course, we look at the getting the right the

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>right regulatory structure and that's a shared objective of ourselves

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and the bank and the prudential regulators. So you know,

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of course one will always look at wherever there are

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>there are the points in the regulatory structure that there

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>needs to be looked at, but that's not but that's

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>not the focus for today. The Bank's made its its

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>judgment and it's into the markets and the thing the

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>thing to your to your point earlier, Tom in terms

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of the politics, is that we need to communicate how

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>this country is going to grow. That's what's going to

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>give people the confidence to invest, the confidence to hold

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the currency, and the ability for us as government to

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>find the high quality in all of the instruction that

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>we need to Mr Ferrell's questions earlier, what do you

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>need to do on this Friday evening to give confidence

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Monday that the different experts are advising the Trust government

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of the outcomes of their Reaganomics like policy. Well, I

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't accept that characterization. What what you need to know

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and the markets need to understand, is that we are

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>working absolutely in lockstep. You've seen a number of coordinated

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>announcements from both the Government and the Governor of the

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Bank of England over the course of this week. I

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>spend my time meeting investors, talking to regulators, talking to

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the fancial markets. But these are volatile times um and

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing that in every market, sometimes a different different

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>speeds and pace, but it's a macro trend that is

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing and some of the things that we are asked

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to do is to bring forward supply side reforms to

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>improve the UK's energy security situation because the aberrant here

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>is the strength of the US economy and the strength

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of the US dollar as a function of your greater

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>energy overnight. It's I just want to make this clear, John,

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I believe the Minister just told us it's our fault.

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 1>The UK is blown up. I think that's what I heard.

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>We don't have time and that's not that's not that

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is not what you heard. What you heard, is that

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 1>we've got a job to do to try and improve

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>our energy security. And if anyone thinks that this isn't

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>ultimately a macro issue that flows in part from Pugeon's

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>invasion of Ukraine, this is bloomberg. What we do know

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>is from the moment it was known that Jane Foley,

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a rubber bank would speak with US pounders weaken from

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>one twelve to a one ten handle as well. Jane Foley,

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I rarely do this, but I've got to get exceptionally

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>narrow here right down in the g I P function

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and some of the technicals and Sterling give us your

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>key support and key resistance levels for cable, Well we

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>see huge ranges right now, so that's really difficult to

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>do what we are targeting one oh four. Certainly cable

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>remains really very vulnerable because you've got to ask the question, well,

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>what happens when the Bank of England takes away this

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary support of the guilt market. You know, the cracks

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of the problem is still there, which is what is

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>this government going to do in terms of it's its

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>fiscal policies. Now it's one thing during the pandemic to

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>to wish you more debt when you have the Bank

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of England hoovering up some of that depth through quantity

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of easing. But to try and do that when the

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Central Bank has reversed course, it's clearly very difficult to

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>do a Now the Central Bank again is going through

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>its quantity of visa program. That is a credibility issue.

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Is is it supporting that the government's discal stands. Jane

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>explained to us the efficacy of foreign ex ange analysis

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>right now, when I look at fancy ratio and financial

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:08.839
<v Speaker 1>conditions indexes and fixed income spreads that are grim, does

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>foreign exchange really tell me what's going on? I think

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>it does. I think Sterling has been saying all year

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that UK fundamentals are grim. Sterling has been a poor

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>performer all year. The Bank of England has been failing

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to turn Sterling around with interest rate hikes and that's

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>certainly been the case since the spring um. And that

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>tells you that investors don't like what they see, and

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>they don't like what they see even more because of it,

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>because of the budget last week. And you know, even

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>if even if you know some of those measures were

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to be at reverse, and there's no sign at all

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that the government wants to do that. There is still

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:47.079
<v Speaker 1>being a dirty stain now on the credibility perhaps of

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the Bank of England, but certainly the credibility of dis government.

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>And and you know the government's talking about the necessity

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of this budget because it wanted to improve growth. Well actually,

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, for many, many people, a lot of those

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>subsidies on the energy price it's going to be taken

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 1>away in the form of higher mortgage payments. Anyway, people

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 1>are going to be poor as a consequence of this,

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and also maybe because of the way guilts look in

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>their pension portfolios. So no wonder We've got the latest

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>opinion polls saying that Labor has got a thirty three

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:18.079
<v Speaker 1>point lead over the Tories at this point. The United

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Kingdom has unique circumstances some ways but others not so much.

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 1>And we are seeing fiscal spending around the euroregion to

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>try to grapple with what is going to be a

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>difficult winter. How much does this just accelerate the dollar

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>dominance at a time when the US faces a different picture.

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Isn't necessarily engaged in the same kind of fiscal band

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>aid for a problem that has a longer lasting kind

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:43.199
<v Speaker 1>of timeframe. I think it does accelerate the outlook of

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the dollar. Mean, like you said, the market was already

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.599
<v Speaker 1>worried about global growth, it was already worried about UK fundamentals,

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>which of course is why the time in all this

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>BUDGECT was so particularly so bad, the chance of failing

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 1>to read those market conditions. But it does accelerate the

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the the movement into say favor for the dollar. But

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, would really like just to state that I

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think that US fundamentals operate on the on the

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>dollar in the same way that fundamentals of say that

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the UK operate on on sterling. And this is because

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the dollar has his own set of fundamentals. It is

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a huge invoicing currency. It is a massive reserve currency

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>because it's a huge invoicing currency. And the long the

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>short of it, the simplicity of it is that when

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>there is crisis, when there is uncertainty, people just need dollars.

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>They need it to cover their liabilities, to pay their invoices,

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>perhaps to cover their dollar debt liabilities, depending on where

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you are. So the dollar operates to his own set

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of fundamentals, which are pretty quite distinct from the fundamentals

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 1>of the of the US and Jane Foley, Jane just

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>wantedfull to catch up with you in London and then

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:48.679
<v Speaker 1>back here in New York as well. Jane Foley, thank

0:13:48.720 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you Rather Bank for John, Lisa and I and all

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.079
<v Speaker 1>of our team. We are going to continue to monitor

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:09.599
<v Speaker 1>this through the weekend as well, and it is across equities, bonds, currencies,

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and hydrocarbons. Given a war in Ukraine. Expert on this

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>is Regina Mayor, Global Head of Energy at KPMG, which

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>barely describes the nexus of our military experience with the

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>study of hydrocarbons at Rice University. Regina, thank you so

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>much for joining today. What are you watching in the

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas market when you begin your day? What

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is the thing we need to focus on right now?

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>So when I'm thinking about what's happening in Europe, because

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that's where there's a lot of attention these days, I

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>am looking at three things at every daytime. That is,

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>what is the natural gas stocks supply look like, what

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>are the spotting forward natural gas prices in Europe? And

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>what do we think the weather projections will be? Both

0:14:56.600 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>but today, tomorrow and the coming winter the near term.

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm near term optimistic because European gas docks are at

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>nine of normal for this time. They were at fifty

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>percent over the summer, so I think the EU has

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>done a great job of rebuilding that stock. Short term

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>prices are down fifty percent from their highs over the summer,

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>though there's still two higher than they were at this

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>time last year, but they have by the summer, and

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I think we're hoping that the weather stays more in

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>our favor. So near term optimism, But those are some

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of the things I look at near term. What about

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>longer term? Yeah, well, longer term, there's so much volatility.

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>If you just look at this week alone, Lisa Cradle

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>price jumped around eight up and down, and so I

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>think the market has a lot of jitters. We saw

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>some downward price pressure with recessionary concerns UH and the

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>strengthening of the dollar, but then we worried about demand

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>because the market got jittery with the what's happened with

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the North String pipelines, even though that actually does not

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>affect near term European gas, like is this pipeline for

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>not serving Europe? But the EU has done a great

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>job of reducing its short term dependence on Russian gas,

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and so I think that the added threats will create

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>upward price pressure. It will continue that, but the recessionary fears,

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the rampant inflation that you all have been talking about,

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that breeds a downward price pressure that keeps US more

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>in balanced. The analysts are are pegging average group price

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>for to be in the seventies, which I don't think

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I would have expected that just three months ago. Well,

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>sticking on the energy story in Europe, but we heard

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>from Enery Herdering, our correspondent in Washington, d C. About

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>how they're increasing calls from Europe for the US to

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>lower its natural gas prices as exports to Europe to

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>give them some assistance through the winter. Do you see

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that as a realistic outcome that the US is willing

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to provide marginal demand and somehow cap prices in some manner.

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think that most interesting. And that the paper

0:16:56.680 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that the EU is issued about creating an lergy transaction

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>based benchmark. Uh, you know, the markets are very transparent,

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 1>and you know high departments have been trading in the

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>ways that they've been trading for almost decades, right, So

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how successful that will ultimately be given

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>all this volatility that we've been talking about. I do

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 1>think though, the governments are really interested in having more

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>unified policies to protect their electorate and to secure energy

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>supplies for the coming winter month Regina the Netherlands. Inflation

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>in the hydrocarbon part of that, I believe is a

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fourteen percent, just unimaginable numbers. What are the

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:46.199
<v Speaker 1>ramifications if we get ninety days of sevent inflation in

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the Netherlands. Well, I'm not an economist, Tom, but I

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 1>mean I think it's you're seeing major price escalation. I'm

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>talking to a lot of senior executives that run manufacturing

0:17:56.520 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>companies all across Europe, and their energy costs are through

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the roof, and that cost then has to get translated

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>back down into goods and services that go to consumers,

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and that I think is what's driving some of these

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>these crazy inflationary numbers that we're seeing. And until we

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 1>can drive that overall energy cost down, you know, they're

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 1>making short term decisions to cut manufacturing runs as a

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>demand management response. But I think will continue to see

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of upward pressure on price given these higher

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:29.719
<v Speaker 1>energy costs. Regina, thank you and thanks for making it

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>this morning to join us. We appreciate it. Regina Mada

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>of KPMG holding on as the expertise of the chief

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:43.120
<v Speaker 1>investment strategist at LUTH, Jim Paulson recalibrates in the fourth

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>quarter with us this morning. What's the value of cash

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>right now? Mr Paulson? I, UM, it's nice to see

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 1>cash tom at least giving a positive yield of some merit,

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think it's the right asset to be

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>in right now. UM. I think they are pretty unsustainable

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>at the moment um, and it's all tied to police

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>officials raising rates. Um. In this country, the tenure yield

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>is going straight north, while commodity prices are collapsing, while

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>inflation surprise index is falling, while while the I S

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>M S price surveys from service and manufacturers are are

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.680
<v Speaker 1>falling out of bed, while inflation expectations in the bond

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 1>market break even rates are collapsing. Um. The dollar is

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 1>simply out of control and the upside is a reflection

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.439
<v Speaker 1>of yields, and I think you know, something's got to change.

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>It's gotten too extreme and probably what changes is rates

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.239
<v Speaker 1>stopped going up soon? And if that's the case, I

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>think the stock market is gonna have a good rip yet.

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Um And I don't think you'll be pleased by putting

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>too much in cash, but having some in cash. It's

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>nice to have a bond market that's yielding something, in

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 1>a cash market that shielding something. It's certainly gives Asset

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>allocators are just people, individuals and opportunity to diversify some

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 1>risks that they haven't had for quite some time. What's

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that coon option? You've got the gym on a rip?

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>What are you playing? What are you sitting? What's the

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:18.160
<v Speaker 1>pocket of the knocket you want to be present in? Well?

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I I think I look at this like coming out

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of a recession, uh, Jonathan, I I would. I would

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>look at early cycle stocks. And my favorite sector is

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the consumer discretionary sector. I think it's the one sector

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that's been most harmed by inflation. It destroys UH not

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>only their operations by squeezing their margins of the companies,

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>but it destroys the confidence of their customer base, and

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>so as inflation rolls over, I think those stocks come

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>back to life. I'd also, you know, look at growth stocks,

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly small cap growth. I my favorite tilt would be

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>towards small caps, which by the way, have held up

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>remarkably well in this last draft in the stock market

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 1>here uh since August, and I think that I would

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I would have some exposure there. I also think that

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>there's cycles beyond the UH consumer discretionary that probably play,

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>like industrials and and so forth. And I also think

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 1>there could be a play on the dollar. Yet, I

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 1>just think the dollar is too high, has got to

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>come down. And I don't know if i'd have a

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>broad based international bet right now, but I would maybe

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:29.239
<v Speaker 1>in the emerging markets excluding China, so Jim right now

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 1>Nike shares down premarket trading and screaming pie Uh. No,

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any particular preference to Nike. Uh, Lisa.

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm not mean to put you on the spot.

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I know that you're you're viewing this from a more big,

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 1>big picture sense. But I guess that the point that

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to make is what's the risk to

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the downside as you wait for the FED to blank.

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>When the FED saying we're not going to blink and

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>no things are not breaking, it looks like actually financial

0:21:55.400 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 1>stabilities holding in just fine in the US. I we're

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>getting really close to a blink and and probably a force.

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>It could be that we get a you know, a

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>really weak economic report. It could be that we get

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a really good inflation report, probably more likely as something breaks.

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>And you guys are bringing up things this morning that

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>are starting to show some cracks in the foundation. And

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:22.880
<v Speaker 1>right now, if something breaks in the US and it's

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:26.439
<v Speaker 1>a systemic problem, there's more downside risk in the stock market.

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think that the private balance sheets of the

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>United States, both households and corporations, are very solid, and

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:38.919
<v Speaker 1>they're very liquid, and the banking industry squeaky clean in

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>this country, and the chance of a systemic balance sheet

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 1>break here, I think are low. So I think something breaks,

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>but if it's not systemic, it will cause a pause

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>in the tightening cycle across the globe, and that could

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:56.679
<v Speaker 1>be a really big positive here for the stock market.

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>One point, you can you can you make that fun

0:22:58.000 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a point and then I'll come back. You just type

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:04.439
<v Speaker 1>of states you got a stage that, okay, I I

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:06.439
<v Speaker 1>just want to make a one point that you know,

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Powell seems bent on, you know, channelings inner inner Voker

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>moment and the entire Voker moment that actually occurred in

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>one there when Paul Voker took the funds rate from

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half percent in August I think to

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:29.640
<v Speaker 1>by December UM. The stock market after that two fell

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:32.959
<v Speaker 1>by a total of seven And I think it's important

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to recognize we're already down twenty in this country already.

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 1>So even if we're having a Powell moment, you know,

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting Volker had a Voker moment after fifteen years

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>of runaway inflation in this country. The pole fed is

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>wanting to do a Vocer moment after fifteen months of

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:54.199
<v Speaker 1>high inflation. I don't think the two are comparable and

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>don't need the same approach. Jim will continue this conversation

0:23:57.480 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>at the time, so we appreciate you thoughts and kind

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of instructive. The hope is that imposting that the Luthal Creek.

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening. Join

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 1>us live weekdays from seven to ten am Eastern on

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television each day from six

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to nine am for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>and international Relations and subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and of course on

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the terminal. I'm Tom Keene, and this is Bloomberg