WEBVTT - Weekend Bonus: Crypto IRL, Episode 5, with Tim and Katie

0:00:03.640 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily Bloomberg I Heard podcast,

0:00:07.120 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Stacy Marie Ishmael, Managing editor of Crypto for

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. Yes, I know it's Saturday, but we're here

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to offer you our listeners a special audio only version

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of a new weekly video series called Crypto. I r L.

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>That's I r L Like in Real Life, and it's

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 1>hosted by friends of the show, Katie Greifeld and Tim Stenovic.

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>This is episode five. If you want the full video experience,

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>head over to Bloomberg dot com slash qt or check

0:00:48.880 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it out on YouTube. Check this out. What do you think?

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I see by matt Levine? And I feel pretty excited

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 1>right now? Why are you excited? I love Matt Levine

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and I like I really like his brain. I got

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a surprise for you. What's that we got Matt Levine?

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna be talking to him. That's huge for us

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>right now and the audience. Matt Levine, it's good to

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>see you, good to be here. We've been really excited

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>about doing this. Me too, I guess, so thanks for

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>doing this. This. Yeah, this is everything. It's a little

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>bit exaggerated because that's single side it's single side, but

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>it's big. It's big. I decided I'm going to call

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>it a treatise. Is that okay? That is okay? Okay?

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>What about a tone? Tone is like a little bit

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>insultingly about how it's long, but sure, it's a tone

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>it is. Okay, let's talk about how long this is

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and how it should be read, because I found it

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>very educational, Like as I was reading it, I felt

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>like I was learning. There's a lot of things I

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>know about crypto. I'd like to think a lot, but

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel like perhaps sort of the fine shading was

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 1>missed out, Like I don't understand necessarily everything I know,

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and this helped to fill in some of the blanks.

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:31.799
<v Speaker 1>But how should people read this? Is this a textbook?

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Is this an article? Should I read it start to finish? Ideally? No,

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Like I mean, the way that I thought about it

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>was that crypto is like big enough as a topic

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to produce, you know, that much paper, but it's like

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>relatively a small topic. It's like everything in crypto for

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the most part, has been invented in the last like

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>twelve years or so, and so when you can do

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>is start from the beginning and kind of um logically

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>develop all of the things that exist in crypto today.

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 1>So that's what I tried to do. And it's not

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>quite as something, not quite as easy as that, but

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>like the idea is that you can sort of start

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>if someone's nothing about crypto. You can start by saying, well,

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>this is like what bitcoin is, and then you can

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of look at bitcoin and say, here are some

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.399
<v Speaker 1>generalizations of that concept. Here are some ways to take

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that in different directions. And that's what I tried to

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:33.519
<v Speaker 1>do here. So you don't have to get it start

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to finish, because like it sort of branches into different directions.

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>But the idea was to kind of start from nothing

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and develop more or less the system of crypto that

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>exists today that you have a line pretty early on

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I read the whole thing, but pretty early on keeping

0:03:52.120 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that I did text him that I was having weird

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>deja vu to college, for like, my partner has done

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the reading, but I haven't yet finished the reading. But

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Professor I did finish the reading, and I liked this

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>line that I don't have strong feelings for or against crypto.

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I like finance, and I like that you wrote that

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 1>specifically for me. That's what it felt like, because it

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>feels like crypto is sort of this market structure experiment

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and launching like an asset class at built in real time.

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>And I wasn't around when like Bill Gross was inventing

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 1>bond trading or something like that. Like, I haven't seen

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>this before, and it's fun to sort of watch and

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>cover and I feel like that's where you're coming from

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>in this piece. Yeah, And a lot of people would

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:46.359
<v Speaker 1>disagree with that, and so no, it's not a financial

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 1>market structure innovation at all. It's building a new web

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>or it's you know, it's not about the money, it's

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>about the tech or whatever. Right, But you know, I

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>have my doubts that that is true to something that. Okay,

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 1>so talking about people leaving trad fy going into crypto

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and how crypto is taking a lot of elements of

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the traditional finance system and just crypto a izing it.

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, you use the phrase in the piece

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>ingesting the traditional finance system. You have tokenized stocks, do

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 1>you have decentralized exchanges? Is that a worthy enough goal

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 1>for crypto? Like can we just say that's enough that

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>we've created this parallel system and it works, and that's

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>really cool, trouble done enough for what? Right? I mean,

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that would be I think that people who

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>are like are on Twitter a lot talking about how

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>crypto is going to change the world, would be a

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>little disappointed if crypto if the end result of crypto

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:46.039
<v Speaker 1>is making the financial system more efficient. But I also

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 1>think that a lot of people got rich and crypto

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 1>get even richer if that if that worked out right,

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>And I also think that, um, you know, the financial

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 1>system is really big, and it supports a lot of

0:05:55.040 --> 0:06:00.679
<v Speaker 1>real economic activity, and I think there are many places

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>where it is inefficient, in some places where it is

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:09.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, dangerous and has you know, a recent history

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of causing catastrophes, and if you improved those places by

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:15.719
<v Speaker 1>five percent, like that would be like a really meaningful

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 1>contribution to the world. I think that most fair observers

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>would say there are some real advantages to the cryptosystem

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 1>in terms of like, um, particularly sort of like speed

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 1>of innovation, and then there's some real disadvantages in terms

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of often speed of innovation and ability to like you know,

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:38.039
<v Speaker 1>exploit things, and and also like the sort of permissionlessness

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of crypto makes it a little bit more attractive to

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 1>anonymous possibly criminal actors, right, but so there's real problems.

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>But like, uh, if you think that it's a better

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 1>way to run a financial system, like having a better

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 1>way to run a financial system is really valuable with

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the giant financial system. And I guess that's my question,

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 1>Like that seems like a pretty respectable fee, like we

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:05.559
<v Speaker 1>made the system more. Like I think that, like people

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>in crypto would say, the way that we trade crypto

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>is way better than the way that we trade stocks

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>in terms of like anyone can sort of access the

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>same exchanges. There's like less of a divide between institutional

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and retail traders. Um, if you want to build something,

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>if you want to write a new derivative contract, it's

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a flatter hierarchy where you don't have

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to like sign up in is the with JP Morgan

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>um and and everything just sort of like works on

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>settles a bit faster. So I think that people are

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>real sort of gung ho about they have built um

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>has it ingested you know, the loan market or the

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>stock market, like really and like you know, I say

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>like that, you know, there's in two thousand seventeen a

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>real vogue for banks to say we're gonna move loan

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>trade into the blockchain, and like you don't hear that anymore,

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>not because they did it. You know, Like there's a

0:07:56.120 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of like kind of the bank action in projects

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that turned out to be kind of vaporware, like are

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>always a few years in the future, so I wouldn't

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>say it's happened yet. But like I think that the

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:09.679
<v Speaker 1>crypto people would say that we have a good system

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>for trading stuff, and let's trade more stuff on that system.

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think that they are having success in persuading

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>some people in finance that, in fact, it's a good

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>system to trade. This special audio only episode of Crypto

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I r L will be right back with more from

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Katie Greifeld and Tim Stanovic. If you want the full

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>video experience, head to Bloomberg dot com slash QT. I

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about trust because that's a big part

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of crypto and it's a big part of your peace.

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:00.559
<v Speaker 1>It was pretty fascinated with the id that we live

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>in a world where we kind of take trust for granted,

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that when we open up our banking app, the money

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that we see in there is actually ours. There's this

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>tension though, because crypto is trying to build out this

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of trust list system where everything is verified, but

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, you do have a lot of well,

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say a lot, but you do

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>have a handful of bad actors out there who have

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.199
<v Speaker 1>gotten away with at this point taking a lot of

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 1>people's money. It's more than a handful, more than a handfuls.

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>It's it's weird. There's so much bad stuff happening in

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a place that's supposed to be more trustworthy than the

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 1>traditional system, isn't. Yeah, I mean, this is the thing

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I talked about a lot. I mean I think that, um,

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 1>one thing I would say is that in traditional finance,

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>like you trust that your money is in your bank account,

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and I could probably articulate the sort of mechanisms by

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>which that trust is like fair, like it was like

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>reasonable to trust the money you rank. You can't be there,

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not sure that everyone could, because it's the

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>thing that you can kind of take for granted, where

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you can say, the banks just give me my money,

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:14.839
<v Speaker 1>and it's just like empirically trust reliable enough that you

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>just go around trusting it. And in some sense what

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you're trusting is not the bank, but like the background

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>rules of society. You sort of expect the rule of

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 1>law to work. You expect the government to sort of

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>do its job. You expect people to try to comply

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 1>with the law. You expect there to be laws that

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>say the bank has to give you your money, right

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Like you don't even you know, like check these things

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>off the checklist. You just kind of like go around

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>trusting these things. In crypto, there's sort of like two

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>different aspects to it. One is that you could verify

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>everything or not everything. But like like there are large

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>swaths of crypto where everything is kind of verifiable right

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>where they are like you know, open source algorithms and

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.959
<v Speaker 1>like verifiable you know, proof of things, and you can

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.439
<v Speaker 1>prove that your bitcoins belong to you on the blockchain,

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and most people don't do that, just the way most

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>people don't like sort of read the banking regulations before

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>putting their money in the bank. But there is a

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>notion that all of those proofs are openly available to

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone in a way that isn't really true of traditional banking,

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>where like, in traditional banking, like at some level, what

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you're trusting is that a bank examiner has gone into

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:26.199
<v Speaker 1>your bank and made sure that the money is there,

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that the auditor has audited the financial statements. In crypto,

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>everything can be verified by you. You don't do it

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>because that would take forever, but like you trust the

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>system in a different way. You trust the system in

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a way where you're like, if I had to, I

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>could prove everything. Um So I think that's an interesting

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>development um And it's like it leads to trust. It

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>leads to like people who trust the system rather than

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>verifying everything, but it leads to trust from a different

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>path than the way we do it in the rest

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of society. So used to banks working that a lot

0:11:56.520 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of people get into crypto, sometimes just because I want

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to make money, sometimes for philosophical reasons, and they're like,

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>they don't like trust, but they're still so used to

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that background principle of trust that they see an ad

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 1>for eight returns on their savings and they're like, well,

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that must be fine, right, Like, how could that go wrong?

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>It's advertised on a website and the website looks good.

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Is like, you know, I think there is sometimes an

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>attitude of like, someone would have done something about this

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>if it was fraud, which is you know, a very

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>traditional finance attitude that is really much not the sort

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of like uh like sort of front page attitude of crypto,

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>but it seems to have crept back in anyway. And

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>so I mean, how how could you possibly do due diligence? Then?

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, because there are you've read about how there's

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 1>incentives like miners, for example, have incentives not to completely

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, nuke the whole system because then they lose money. Um.

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>But for the average person coming into crypto, like, how

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 1>do you do that due diligence in the apps us

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of trust? I think it's hard, right, I mean I

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Speaker 1>think that there are there are people who spend for room.

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>It's like a hobby, and you spend a lot of

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>time familiarizing yourself with like the code and the algorithms

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and sort of get comfortable that like you can demonstrate

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that most of the stuff works, and then you're often

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>using like kind of defy and you're trying to avoid

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 1>like you're aware that you don't want to trust anyone,

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and so you're trying to avoid trusted central counterparties. Right,

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of people in crypto who are basically

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 1>trying to minimize their contact with like trusted central counterparties.

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>The other way to do it is the way you

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>do it in any other business, where like you try

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to find the trust really trusted central counterparties, right, And like,

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, crypto is sort of mature enough that you

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>know not to advertise like coin Base, but like coin

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Base is a US public company, right, Like I don't

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>know that, I don't know how effectively they're regulated. Right,

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it's still early for everyone, right, But like if you're

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a US investor, you might say, I'm going to go

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to the biggest name that's a public company where like

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:01.839
<v Speaker 1>the guy lives in America and it doesn't want to

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 1>get arrested, you know, And then you know you're hoping

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>for the best, but you're what you're doing is trusting

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the same background principles of of like you know, sort

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>of the rule of law and society that you trust

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>in a bank or any other you know, company. But

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>sometimes people who work at publicly traded companies go to jail.

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, there's a reliable You talk about crypto being

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a pretty broad umbrella here, and I feel like that

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking mostly about the financial uses of crypto,

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>but also under that umbrella is web three. Sure, and

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you make the point that you know, there's not a

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of ways where crypto touches like the real economy

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>or people's lives, but it feels like Web three theoretically

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>there's potential there for crypto to actually affect my day

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to day, but you take a pretty skeptical tone to it.

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that a lot of the I don't know.

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I just like the use cases that people are excited

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>about do not make me excited. You know, it's like

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you can what are those use cases? Well? I mean,

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>like I don't want to like parody it too much,

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>but like you know, you could like buy a sword

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>in a computer game, and you own the sword. You

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>can go to a different computer games sword or whatever.

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>But does he know, like the stuff you did in college,

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>which you like, when did you play with some metaverse

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>animal or something? Oh my god, we're talking about medo pats. No. Well, okay,

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>so I, for example, to talk about myself the center

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of my own universe. I started playing New Pets when

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I was eleven. I still occasionally interacted the game I

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>played a lot in college like that. I don't know

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that was a sort of a metaverse, uh? I couldn't

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>imagine that being on the blockchain and more integrated into

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>my life and identity. And yeah, I mean there's there's

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>like I want in the piece to take that seriously

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>because I think that like leaving aside you know, pats

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>or any particular thing, Like it is the case that

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in my lifetime, like when I was born, almost none

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of my life occurred on the Internet, and now like

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of my life occurs on the Internet in

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>different ways. And so like if you are building if

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to extract value from building systems from the

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>for the Internet, like that's a that's like very broadly speaking,

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>like the growth industry, right, and so like if you

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>say people are gonna be living more in the metaverse

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>in some broadway where they're going to spend more of

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>their time online, like twenty years ago, I would have said,

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to like hang out with my friends

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>like by like showing like sending them pictures on a

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>social media website. I want to like I have my

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>friends in person, and now like I just like people's

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>photos and Instagram, you know, Like, um, like this is

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>true that like more of life has moved to the

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:00.040
<v Speaker 1>to like the Internet broadly speaking, and so that it

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 1>is like a place where like the easiest access point

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>for crypto to sort of like affect the world is

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>like on the Internet. Um, that said, it's not clear

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's like easy, right, It's like your newo pets

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 1>weren't on the blockchain. It's not clear that they'd be

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:16.360
<v Speaker 1>better on the blockchain. So there's still like even if

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>you're even if your cases like the betaverse will be

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>everything like, that doesn't prove that like crypto is going

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:23.919
<v Speaker 1>like the blockchain is going to be the sort of

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>like underlying engine of the metaverse. Right, is part of

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 1>your skepticism about this Web three label due to the

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>fact that there are so many projects associated with Ponzi's. Yeah,

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:38.159
<v Speaker 1>and I mean this is not the only thing that

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>happens in Web three, but like a really important element

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of crypto and like Web three is that a lot

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of projects have their own tokens, and a lot of

0:17:53.520 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>people think very explicitly in terms of token omics, where

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>your thought process is not just let me build a

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>good product, but it's let me build a product, distribute

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>tokens tied to that product to the users of that product,

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and then they'll want the token to go up, and

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>so they'll use the product more. And so it is

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 1>hard early on to disentangle what's a good project from

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:20.199
<v Speaker 1>what is a project that has done a good job

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of hyping its tokens. And ah, it's not just that

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>some projects are ponzi's, it's that, like being a ponzi

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 1>is sort of baked into the nature of like a

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:33.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of what is going on and like this sort

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>of like crypto token economy. So with that in mind,

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously the word ponzi has a lot of

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>negative connotations, but one thing that I think is fascinating

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>metric is that there are people who are like enthusiastically

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>embracing that label and they're like, no, no, Ponzi's are

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 1>how we're going to build the last thing. Yeah, well

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's not a bad thing, right. It's distasteful, and

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it like makes it hard to evaluate projects because like

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you have both the pondsi element and like whatever is

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 1>actually going on. But it's not wrong that like giving

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 1>people economic incentives early on can like traw them to

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>projects that turn out to be good, and they can

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.400
<v Speaker 1>make those projects viable. Like I think it's a it's

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a reasonable and like very funny thought to have, and

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that has become sort of like normalized in crypto um.

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>If I could have put real money into the neo

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>pets Ponzi early on, I absolutely would have out have

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>bought all the neo points tokens right and like you know,

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>like where Beanie baby is that in like an analytage.

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I would have spent a lot of money on them.

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 1>Luckily I was like four, so I wasn't in control

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of my purse turns. But the problem with that is

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.239
<v Speaker 1>that in order for those to be worth something to you,

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you have to sell them to the next Katie Greifeld,

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 1>Who's you know, the next gullible little girl. This special

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 1>audio only episode of Crypto I r L will be

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:01.120
<v Speaker 1>right back with more from Katie gray Field and Tim Stanovic.

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>If you want the full video experience, head to Bloomberg

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash qt should talking about regulation, Yeah, I

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>feel like there's a lot of different ways we could

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:28.639
<v Speaker 1>get into it. I was thinking about it when you

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 1>were explaining trust, and I think a big reason that

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>we trust banks is because regulators, as you write in

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the piece, like there are people who regulators go inside

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>these banks. They know what they're doing. They kick tires

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:49.439
<v Speaker 1>and search for things and make sure that everything's up

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:53.199
<v Speaker 1>to snuff. Yeah, I mean that's a somewhat optimistic picture,

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:57.360
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, that's right basically true, Okay, And that, by

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>extension makes it so we trust banks in a way

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that crypto firms aren't necessarily backed up. Yeah, So what's

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:15.120
<v Speaker 1>missing from the regulatory puzzle here? Everything? Everything? Like right, Like,

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard because crypto is so like so much

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of cryptos philosophically opposed to regulation in general, So much

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of it is crossed, like like from the get go

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>is very cross border, so it's hard to know who

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:32.640
<v Speaker 1>has jurisdiction um even in the US, Like there are

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of these very sterile debates about what crypto tokens are,

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:39.919
<v Speaker 1>are they are they secure? Like which tokens or securities?

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Is the SEC in charge? Is the CFTC in charge?

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>And then like obviously a lot of stuff that happened

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:51.479
<v Speaker 1>in crypto is a substitute for banking, which is not

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>really the SEC or the CFTC. It's it's for banquets

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>for like the FED in the SEC, and that's a

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>much sort of higher level of regulation, Like that's the

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 1>examiners coming into the bank and making sure that everything

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:06.199
<v Speaker 1>is is working properly, whereas the SEC is more like,

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>if we find some fraud in your financial statements, will

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>go after you. Um. And like all of that in

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the US is like incredibly early on, where the SEC

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 1>is jousting for jurisdiction and going after some of the

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 1>most egregious projects and some of the less egregious but

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>like more obvious projects um, and bank regulators are putting

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>out papers about how stable colins should be regulated like banking,

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.360
<v Speaker 1>but like not really doing it. UM. So it's very

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:35.679
<v Speaker 1>very early on, and I don't really know where it

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>ends up, right, Like I think that a lot of

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:41.919
<v Speaker 1>people in crypto, like I think that crypto has built

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a system that obviates the need for regulation, where like, ah,

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>do you find protocols are trustworthy because you can read

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>their code, and if they're not because the code gets hacked,

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that's good because it's like adversarial hardening of the system

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and like eventually they'll get better. Um. And you have

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>uh this like openness and censorship resistance of like the

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>blockchain that makes it just the better system than a

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:17.439
<v Speaker 1>system of national regulation. A lot of those people, by

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the way, AH are thinking internationally about regulation and think, like,

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are countries that are like generous to

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 1>crypto and allow a lot of like innovation. There are

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 1>countries like the US that are sort of down on

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>crypto and try to um restrict it, you know, supervise

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it more closely. There are countries that sort of ban it.

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>And then there are countries that, like, I have repressive

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>governments that will take your savings, right, And like, if

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 1>you're in like if you're sort of like in the

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>crypto world and sort of country neutral, you're like saying

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that regulation is good is like not obviously true, right,

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Like there's places where national regulation would be bad for me,

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 1>right for like for for fairness or for the rule

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of law. And so I think there are people who

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:12.360
<v Speaker 1>see crypto as being a more neutral rule of law

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>than like some of the alternatives of actual law. My

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>bias about US regulation is that Congress is is such

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a difficult time legislating on controversial topics, and like it's

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 1>hard to imagine a comprehensive crypto bill being passed, not impossible, hard,

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and and so I think that there's going to be

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of like sort of ad hoc regulation by

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 1>enforcement in the SEC saying this is a security and

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get you for fraud. Probably being right about

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>most of those things. Um, I think it's like it's

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be much more messy and add howkin ways

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that are ah, probably bad for crypto. Malvin, thank you

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>so much. Thank you for having me. This is fun,

0:24:56.720 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>had fund had fun, he had fun. All yeah, fun

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>with us. I feel like that's like, I don't know,

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 1>we should include that, We should include that. Yeah, yeah.

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to see these episodes of Crypto I r

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 1>L in video. Check them out on Bloomberg Quicktake at

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, slash qt, or find Katie and Tim

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:42.199
<v Speaker 1>Over on YouTube. Just in time for Halloween. On the

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 1>next episode of Bloomberg Crypto, we're going to talk about brains.

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 1>No no, no, no, we're not. We're gonna talk about

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.360
<v Speaker 1>zombie coins. It might still melt your brain. Don't say

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want you. This is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:58.919
<v Speaker 1>podcast from Bloomberg and I Heart Radio. For more shows

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>from I heart Radio, visit the I heart Radio app,

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Send us

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>your comments. Questions or suggestions for the show to Crypto

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot net or find us on Twitter We're

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 1>at Crypto. The supervising producer of Bloomberg Crypto is Vicky Verglina.

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Our senior producer is Janet Babin. Our producers are Mohammed

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Faruk and Sharon Barriro. Our associate producers are Ty Butler

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and Moses on Them. Desta wonder At is our engineer.

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Original music by Leo Sidron. I'm Stacy, Marie Ishmael. Have

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a great weekend.