WEBVTT - FFW Micro - Dameon Pierce

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>You found Fantasy Football Weekly Micro a deep dive on

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>one player in just five to ten minutes. Now, here's

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>your host, Paul Georgian. It's Fantasy Football Weekly micro edition

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and maybe my favorite micro edition that we've done todate

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:25.119
<v Speaker 1>because it's my guy, Damian Pierce. Oh okay, I can't

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>wait to dig in deep dive on one of my

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>favorite running backs in the league. Joining me today as

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>he has for each of the Fantasy Football Weekly micro editions.

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Gullantine Leagues dot com writer Tyler Cannabile.

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 2>Excited to be here, excited to talk about Damian Pierce.

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 2>He is the scepter winner of Kyle Brandt's Angry Run

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 2>of the Year Annual, First Annual, First Annual.

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, here's him at the NFL Awards.

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 1>Oh I remember the run. My pants are still in

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>orbit on that run. That was such a bad ass run.

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I think six broken tackles in one run.

0:00:58.440 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 3>Very possibly crazy run.

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh god, And you know what, it wasn't alone. I mean,

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that was not like some fluke. Damian Pierce just shreds dudes.

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh god, I love that guy. But I'll let you

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>set the table. You did a You've done a lot

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>of research on Damian Pierce. I think you and I

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you probably are not going to share quite my enthusiasm,

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>but that's okay.

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, I still like Damian Pierce.

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 2>He finishes the RB twenty three last year in average

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 2>points per game. Currently going off the board is RB

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty one, so that's kind of the same area. First

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 2>the player, he was third in rush attempts per broken

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 2>tackle kind of the same style we use with Dave

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Montgomery a couple episodes ago, and the only guys, the

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 2>only guys that were higher than him were Lamar Jackson

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Derrick Henry.

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so Lamar Jackson's obviously pretty special. That's Henry's head

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of the Great Company to be Oh yes, yeah, that's

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>awfully good. Broken tackles is kind of the name of

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Damian Pierce's game. It's the it's the squat frame, it's

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the power, but it's the footwork. What he does so

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>brilliantly and guys his size almost never do, is the

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>footwork and balance that that allow him to break tackles.

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Because defenders don't get clean shots on him, they get

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>glancing shots at him, and Damian Pierce is able to

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>break those at all. I love it. It's just the footwork

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 1>does not belong on a player his size, with his build.

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 3>It also doesn't belong on a team that he's on.

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:21.839
<v Speaker 1>Right now, Well, I'm bullish on this team. I think

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I think Houston is going to be a dramatically better team.

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I love you know, remember they at the end of

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>last year they were a good team. They mistakenly won

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that last game, but they were also a good team

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>through most of December. And they've got what appears to

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>be a much more competent coaching staff, and we'll talk

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more about that a little later on

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>in the show here.

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I agree with you that this year they

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 2>should be better, at least on paper than they were

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 2>last year, because I mean the beginning weeks one through

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, twelve or thirteen last year they were

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 2>just horrendous. David Davis Mills or is Kyle Allens You're

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 2>not gonna be so you don't want any parts of

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 2>that offense?

0:02:57.600 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yet some games both.

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>So so now, oh it's gonna be Stroud or Young?

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Well is it? I've heard reports that they might not

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 3>even take a QB. They don't like.

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 2>I think they only like Bryce Young that's what I've heard.

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 2>They could be doing smokeshre and we don't know.

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't think that's true.

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 3>You think that they can go quarterback too.

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>And then do they have picked twelve?

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 3>It's twelve twelve.

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh, and that should be a wide receiver. And we

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>like Nico Collins around here. We're part of the Nico

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Collins fan club. But uh, they almost certain Robert they

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>signed Robert Wards, don't care. I think they go wide

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>receiver there, and now this offense gets a lot more developed.

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, somebody else I signed was Devin Singletary, which I

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 2>actually think was a really good signing for Damian Pierce

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 2>because Devin Singletary is like, I'm not worried about him, Like, oh,

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Devin Singletary is in town, He's gonna take all the touches.

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 2>That's just not gonna happen, especially when you're buying Damian pierces.

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>And Singletary doesn't catch, and Pierce is a sneaky good

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>pass receiver. Last year he caught seventy seven percent of

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the passes thrown his way. I believe it was thirty

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>three receptions on the season. Now that's not half bad.

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>He's got roomed to grow as a receiver. He was

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>underutilized there last year. And at Florida, they would throw

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>to Damian Pierce downfield. I mean they'd send him on

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a crossing route and you know they'd hit him eighteen

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>yards down field. They can do a lot more with

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Damian Pierce in the passing game. Houston's new offensive coordinator

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:23.919
<v Speaker 1>is Bobby Slowik. He was in San Francisco with Demico Ryans.

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>He was the passing game coordinator. And what we know

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>about the forty nine ers is they always put their

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 1>running backs in high output situations constantly. I mean, no

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 1>matter who it is, no matter how far they've gone

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>down on the depth chart, no matter who the guy is,

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>their running backs produced. And I'm very excited about a

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>forty nine ers style offense being married with Damian Pierce.

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 2>Oh, if we get that forty nine ers style offense,

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:48.599
<v Speaker 2>I'm right there with you, Like, this is the upside

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 2>you have at Damian Pierce.

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 3>Because you know what the player is. You just got

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 3>to hope the situation is gonna be good.

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 2>So if we see that kind of volume and situations

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 2>from our boy Damian Pierce, then I'm all in. But

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 2>The only reservation I have is can we trust the

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 2>mid round drafted running back in the NFL?

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Because we've seen this story before.

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Austin Eckler and Aaron Jones are the only round four

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 2>or later guys that have kept their starting jobs and

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 2>performed at as a top twenty four running back. Over

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 2>like I just kind of did the past like three

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 2>or four years, there are only two guys.

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Eaza Pacheco is going to so we add him we

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:26.119
<v Speaker 1>asumably we can add him into this into this mix.

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>And just because he was miss drafted doesn't mean he's

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a bad player. I mean, I you know, I think

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that people got it wrong. If you're to rehold that

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>draft today, Damian Pierce would not be in the fourth

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>round and what Pierce would have been a second or

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>third round.

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 2>And one of the things to build off of that

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 2>is when I was doing like kind of like looking

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 2>at the rookies last season going into last year's NFL draft,

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Damian Pierce is a name that kept popping up because

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 2>you saw it on the field that Florida. The only

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 2>problem was that Florida coaching staff just wouldn't use him,

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't use him, and they didn't use Anthony Richardson either

0:05:57.200 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 2>used the other.

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.559
<v Speaker 3>I don't remember the quarterback before him, but he was Jones.

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Maybe don't quote me on that, but it's Florida kind

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 2>of ruined I think his draft stocks. So I think

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 2>he sure if they used him right, he would have

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 2>gone as the top whatever guy. I just we've seen

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 2>this in the past where they looked like the starter

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 2>and then they weren't. Just some names that they're out

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:19.799
<v Speaker 2>there Michael Carter last year, Elijah Mitchell, James Robinson especially

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 2>was the one guy we were like, oh, he was

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 2>a seventh round pick and now he's sure.

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he tore his achilles.

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's, you know, a devastating injury for a

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>running back.

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 3>But they drafted etn before they before he tore.

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 2>His achilles, that's true. Yeah, So that was the whole

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 2>thing is they replaced him right after he finished. I think

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 2>he was like the RBS five or six that year,

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't remember exactly. And then another name is Alfred Morris,

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 2>not recently, but another guy who six round picked, crazy

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 2>rookie season and then never heard from again.

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>So Damian Pierce finishes as RB twenty three in a

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>season in which he had four rushing touchdowns four and

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 1>he still finished his RB twenty three. His style, I mean,

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 1>Damian Pierce is a goal line Devin Singletary is not

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>a goal line back. Damian Pierce is going to get

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>all the carries inside the five. Damian Pierce could turn

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>those four rushing touchdowns into twelve rushing touchdowns. He chipped

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in one through the air last year. That could turn

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>into two or three this year with this new offense.

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's not inconceivable that Damian Pierce hits twelve

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>fourteen touchdowns this season in a vastly improved Houston offense

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>based on his skill set and presumed improvement around him

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and the work that he should get at the goal line.

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I just can't believe that. I can't believe that a

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>player's good as him is going to somehow get held

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to four rushing touchdowns again. And I see way way

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>more upside this year than hit the production he had

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>last year.

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 2>I agree, the upside is much higher. Like I said,

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 2>I love the player. I absolutely love Damian Pierce as

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 2>a player. I just I don't trust that he's going

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 2>to be the only guy there. Kind of the same

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 2>thing we have with Tony Pollard where I'm just weird.

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 2>There's so many If they spend.

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 3>A round two pick on a run, would you be

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 3>a little worried then yes, yeah.

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know why they would do that. Your

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>team with Houston needs, has all the needs they've got,

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and you've got Damian Pierson roster. I would I would

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of questions.

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 2>I hope it doesn't matter that Damian Pierce wasn't this

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 2>new coaching styles pick. I know that's always that always

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 2>gets talked about, Oh it's not their guy that didn't

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 2>draft him. I think it gets over played a little

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 2>too much, but I do think it's worth mentioning.

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>At least if they take a running back up, we'll

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about that. Yes, yeah, I don't believe they will.

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I hope they don't. I'd be I don't know how

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you could watch the tape of that offense and not

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>come to the conclusion that your best offensive player is

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Damian Pierce. So you know, I'd be surprised. But I

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:39.559
<v Speaker 1>have seen people mocking running back to Houston, and I'm like,

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:43.079
<v Speaker 1>did you guys not watch any Texans games?

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if Sharbona ends up in Houston, that would be

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 2>worst case scenario, that'd be a disaster.

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, because he's a super cool player. We

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>just broke him down on Friday's Fantasy Football Weekly, really

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>really interested in what he's going to be able to do.

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 1>All Right, So you and I disagree a little bit

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 1>on Damian p but we both like him. I like

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>him a lot. So let's, uh, let's talk about some

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of the other players going around that ADP of RB

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty one.

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, David Montgomery RB nineteen, and we were pretty

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 2>high on d the last guy.

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 3>I liked him.

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I liked Montgomery's opportunity, but I like this one more

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>because there's less competition. I feel like and I trust

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the touchdowns. But I said that about Montgomery too. I

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:25.199
<v Speaker 1>trust his touchdowns too. I'm gonna go Montgomery.

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:27.719
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I'm gonna go Mctgomery. He's going to higher than him.

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:29.839
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I'm gonna Gogery close.

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 3>JK.

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Dobbins RB twenty Oh man, another high volume guy, you know,

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 2>which probably should be a runnof.

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take Pierce just because he hasn't had an

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>ACL in the recent past.

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Isaiah Pacheco RB twenty two.

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 1>See, I think I think Kansas City is a sneaky

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>team to take a h take a running back in

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>this draft, So I'm not gonna go Pacheco. I'm gonna

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>go with the Damian Pierce here.

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm with Pierce on this one too, just because we

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 2>saw Damian Pierces be a better player than Pachecko was.

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Plus Pacheco's yes, ninear the pass catcher that Damian Pierce correct?

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Correct? All right? DeAndre Swift RB twenty.

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Three, Well, we think Montgomery's gonna get almost all of

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the touchdowns. And yeah, I'm pretty much out on Swift,

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>so not close.

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Pierce, all right, I'm pretty sure I know where you're

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 2>going this one. But cam Akers RB twenty four.

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Look at you know, I'll acknowledge camp Maker's had a

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>had a really nice December and he looked good. But

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:29.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm playing it safe here and I'm not gonna I'm

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna take Damian Pierce, who I know is really good.

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Let's do one more just because I thought of it. Yeah,

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Najie Harris, pretty sure he's growing as RB seventeen right now.

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I think i'd rather have Pierce. I feel pretty burned

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>on Naji Harris. Yeah, you know you and I broke

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 1>his game down a couple of weeks ago, and it

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>just even with the even given opportunities, he didn't do

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:52.559
<v Speaker 1>much with him. So yeah, I'm pretty much out on Harris.

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I know Damian Pierce.

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm in on Pierce, but I'm, like I said, I

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 2>love the player. I'm going to take a shot on

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 2>this range of guys because we don't really there's no

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 2>definitive guy really even like really like in this range

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 2>of players, the Montgomery Dobbins checko, like, we don't really

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 2>know what their situation is gonna look like for any

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 2>of them. So I'm definitely down to take a shot

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 2>on Pierce, who I think is He's definitely a better

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 2>running back I think than Cam Akers, than Isaiah Chaco.

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 3>So I'm I'm wanting to take the shot.

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I love I love Damian Pierson Dynasty and Empire leagues,

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>because Houston is going to be much better. And you know,

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>just the upgraded quarterback right, whether it's Stroud or Young

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>or maybe they go weird done as they take Richards

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and whatever, that quarterback position's going to be a lot better.

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>And I see Houston doing a little bit of what

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville did uh. You know, going from worst to first

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>place in the division. I'm not saying they're gonna do that,

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>but you know, the trajectory is all heading the right way.

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm buying I'm buying low on Houston and that includes

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Dynasty and Empire leagues. I want, I want young, good

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>players from that offense.

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Totally fair. I think I'm with you too. I'm with you.

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 3>They're gonna be a lot better.

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening to today's Fantasy Football Weekly. Gro addition,

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>we've got another one coming up tomorrow as we dig into.

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Miles Sanders submitted by somebody on Twitter.

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes, thank you for the Twitter submissions. If you'd like

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to recommend a player for us to break down at

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Paul Charchi and on Twitter and at Tyler Cannabilee, k

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:21.719
<v Speaker 1>N A E B L E. Talk to you tomorrow, everybody,