WEBVTT - Draft Show: Filling A WR Void?

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. This is the Dallas

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com Draft Show, your war room for insider

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>news and drafted analysis from deep within the confines of

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys headquarters at the Star in Frisco. Smith running back

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>from and now your hosts, David Hellman, Jeff Kavanaugh, Kevin Turner,

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and Kyle humans. We are five weeks, thirty five days

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>supposedly until the NFL Draft, which was originally going to

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>be in Las Vegas, Nevada. I can't even say that

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>anymore because things change over the course of the last

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks, and now now we look forward to

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the draft, still doing the same dates, but it might

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>look a lot more condensed, to say the least, because

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of the coronavirus and things going on that are out

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of the NFL's control. But we are still excited to

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:21.839
<v Speaker 1>give you some hot draft takes here on the Dallas

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com Draft Show. Jeff Kavanaugh, Kevin Turner, David Hellman,

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and myself Kyle Yeoman's guys, it's been a crazy week,

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>not only because of outside factors but also just overall

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 1>with the moves and the shaking and the free agency

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of switches up the way that you think about

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>this draft a little bit, doesn't it. Well, free agency

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>hasn't started yet, you know. So I'm watching Gerald McCoy

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>tape right now while we'd record the draft show. That's

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>just in case the Cowboys think about signing him at

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>some point. That would be huge, Yeah, just to see

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.559
<v Speaker 1>what it would look like if maybe you added a player,

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>which of course they have not. But yeah, actually free

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>agency opens today, does it not? Yeah? So, I mean,

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean we all know it's bs. The legal tampering

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:18.119
<v Speaker 1>window opened on Monday morning, negotiating negotiating period. Tampering is illegal,

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's no, it's legal tapering. That's really kind of

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>a it's an oxymoron. Yeah, it's the word I'm looking for. Oxymoron. But,

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>like Dave said, today is the official start of free agency.

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Four o'clock Eastern time, three o'clock Central is whenever that

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>window opened. So you're over there looking at Gerald McCoy,

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>apparently he agreed to terms reportedly with the Dallas Cowboys.

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>What do you what do you see in over there? Jeff?

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I see a guy that unfortunately is playing a lot

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of defensive end in a three man front, which is

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 1>probably not fun for him, because I know that he

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>can play the three technique. Uh. He was really good

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>at the three technique for a while in Tampa Bay. Right, Yeah, No.

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I would say in theory, okay, if MALIEK. Collins were

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to sign somewhere else, like maybe with the Las Vegas Raiders,

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>yeah them or wherever? Yeah? Where? And in theory, if

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Gerald McCoy signed with the Cowboys, I would say, even

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>if MALIEK. Collins is making more money, I think Gerald

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>McCoy is a slightly better player today. It's just the

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>difference of signing a what is Malik twenty six? The

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>difference of twenty six year old and thirty two year old. Yeah,

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>one of you gets paid a lot because they expect

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you to keep getting better, and one of you they're like,

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>please don't get worse. So the guy who you're hoping

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>please don't get worse, I think will be a slight

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>upgrade over which MALIEK. Collins. You're talking about a thirty

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>two year old who at one point was dominant. Well,

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I was arguably the best d tackle in the league.

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean Gerald McCoy's peak was before Aaron Donald showed up.

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>But even you know, seventy percent of what Gerald McCoy

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>was sounds great to me for a team that obvious,

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and like, this is what we've been talking about for

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>two months. As you know that they're going to address

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>things in free agency, know they're going to lose players

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>in free agency, you know, like theoretically, you know, we

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>thought Robert Quinn had a good chance to come back,

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>but maybe he signs a deal that's worth maybe why

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>he's as much as as what people expected, and maybe

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>he goes somewhere like Chicago. So this week is gonna

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>end next week as well for that matter, but it's

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>really going to shape out what we know about this

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>roster because we were borderline clueless coming into the week

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and now we're only starting to put it together. Well,

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>there were so many other moves that are maybe going

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to happen in terms of Maury Cooper, he's returning or

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>supposedly returning. Byron Jones has agreed to terms to a

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>five year, eighty two and a half million dollars deal

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 1>with the Dolphins. You talked about Quinn. Randall Cobb has

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:48.600
<v Speaker 1>moved on we'll talk about some replacements for Randall Cobb

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>coming up in the third segment, but you also have

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>a couple of signees. We talk about McCoy, you talk

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>about Blake Jarwin, he has officially signed or resigned an extension,

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and then Jason Witten has agreed to terms to go

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to the Las Vegas Raiders at this moment, But where

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>does that leave the draft for the Cowboys? Because there

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>has been a lot of shifting, a lot of shaking,

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and McCoy's not the number one answer in terms of

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the defensive line. You're gonna have to find some production

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to replace a guy like Robert Quinn to just basically

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:24.160
<v Speaker 1>put bodies up there. You talk about MALIEK Collins, who's

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>already gone. You might have that replacement with McCoy in

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>that specific standpoint, But where does this leave the draft

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 1>strategy for the Cowboys? Your need at cornerback is still

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>there and glaring to me, you're needed on the defensive

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>line is still there. Even if you hypothetically do add

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Gerald McCoy, whether it's defensive tackle or a defensive end,

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:44.919
<v Speaker 1>you still need to address that You're still gonna need

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a safety at some point. The need at wide receiver,

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 1>I think is the one that elevates a little more

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>than maybe it did in the last couple of months

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>when we've been talking about it, and every time Jeff

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>would bring up a wide receiver in the first round

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and we'd go, let's go, we gotta go defense. Now

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>we go ill you know what, let's go passing on

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Judy might be a kind of foolish if that's therefore,

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you know things like that. So I know we'll talk

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers in the third segment. But I do think

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.479
<v Speaker 1>the way things have shaped out over the last couple days,

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 1>if these signing or these agree agreements there you come

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to light. If they do come to light that I

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>do think the position that's kind of elevated itself and

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>made itself more likely is wide receiver. But it's not

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a huge difference in what you need it. Anyways, you're

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>still gonna need to add a cornerback. I actually I disagree.

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh can we go, Dave? Go get him, Dave. I'm

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>not doing this because I went to Louisiana State University.

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>You probably no, I'm not. But is it your son?

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Can we talk about Calevan Chase on we can't because

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>all right, we all four of us were smart man.

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>We can read writing on the wall. We've known Byron

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Jones was going to be gone yea for the majority

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 1>of this draft process. But didn't it stop me from

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>being a really right, you're gonna beat that drum and

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 1>you're entitled to do it. That's totally fine. Point being

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>is Byron Jones is likely out the door and has

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>likely been out the door for a long time. Maybe

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you saw Robert Quinn coming, maybe you weren't completely blindsided

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>by it, but I thought there was at least a

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>chance that they managed to bring him back. I thought

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>there was. And so now right end looks real, Dicey

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and I have the names pulled up right here. You know,

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys aren't going to sign Jadeveon Clowney. Let's let's

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>be real. Everson Griffin's hanging out out there. And then

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>it's like not a super inspiring list, And so all

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden edge rusher to me is I know

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a guy who could play right defensive end. Oh is

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>he technically employed by the Cowboys but has a murky Yeah,

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>we're just really talking about a bunch of hypothetical stuff.

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>All I'm saying is that you know, once upon a

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>time there were certain things that would get to where

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't play NFL football, and those certain things no

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>longer stop you from playing NFL football. I were a

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>guy we're talking about a Randy Gregory right now. Wow,

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't talking about anybody. I'm just saying, if you're

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>hypothetically yeah, I just put the name on. If I

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>were a guy who currently was suspended, but the reason

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I've been suspended many times is no longer a reason

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>people get suspended. I'm saying I would probably file for

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>reinstatement and expect to play football the next year. So

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe they have a right defensive end and they just

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>need some depth. If Klevan Chason is there at seventeen,

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>do you let your hope for Randy Gregory dissuade you

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>from that pick. I'd pick the best player available. Who

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>are the guys that you're not? Take Jerry Judy over

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Chase On? Who's who? If it was, I mean, let's

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>get real hypothetical here and just say it's like Chase

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:47.319
<v Speaker 1>On and CJ. Henderson like that, Judy's gone, Judy's It's

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>not a wide receiver. I can't imagine they're going to

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>draft a receiver in the first round now that Amari

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Cooper is hypothetically under contract for five years. Well, Henderson

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>versus Chason is easy. You trade down one spot when

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>you see who picks one of them and the other. No,

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you can't do that. If that doesn't work, you trade

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 1>down one more spot until somebody picks. Tell me who

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:08.439
<v Speaker 1>you like? Of them are gone. I trust Henderson, okay,

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>even more than Chas Chase on six and a half

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>sacks in his best college season ever. He's Chase like.

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I like the traits. Chason is an upside. It's got

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:21.319
<v Speaker 1>a huge c J. Henderson's got taped that says he

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>could be a really, really really good NFL corner, and

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Chase on has glimpses where you're like, I think so see,

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:31.559
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm just all of I mean, you don't

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>want to panic pick. I get that, but that could

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>solve a lot of your problems with your pass rush

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:38.719
<v Speaker 1>if you I mean, if he even falls that far,

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>which I don't think is going to happen. He's too

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>athletic for a team to let him fall to seventeen.

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>This is why they do exercises and they stack him up,

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and well, I like to keep Ken Law on the mix.

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we'll see what happens there, no matter

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 1>if Gerald McCoy is here or not. But if I've

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 1>got a Henderson chase on all three of those wide receivers,

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>who keep those guys in there? Right, Rugs, Judy from

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Alabama and also um Cede Lamb from Oklahoma, you're putting

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>them on a board. Who how are you guys rinking

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>those five guys? I only heard lam at the end,

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>so I'm sure he's at the three wide receivers. The

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 1>three wide receivers Chase On and C J. Henderson and

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Law guys soon would be last. Henderson would be second

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to last in your three receivers up at the top. Yeah,

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the three receivers would be the Lamb is the top

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of the I'll be ahead of the wide receivers, Ken Law,

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe ahead of Rugs, but not ahead of Judy or CD. Okay,

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:36.319
<v Speaker 1>I think I would take I can't pass on Cede

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Lamb if he's there, I can't do it. U Probably

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>not Judy either, But I don't really believe one of

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 1>them might be there. I don't think both of them

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>will be I think one of the three will be there.

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>And then overall, yeah, I don't know. I'm not I

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>don't think so. I'm not drafting Rugs at seventeen. No,

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:57.839
<v Speaker 1>I would draft Lamb or Judy at seventeen. And then

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>probably Cardinals might have helped you out there by getting

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins. Absolutely might have just gone from receiver to

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>offensive tackle. Absolutely no, and they need to go out

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>which I was really excited. If you another piece of

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the million things that have happened this week, the Colts

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>theoretically traded for DeForest Buckner and they gave number thirteen

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to San Francisco, who doesn't need a wide receiver, but

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>they they do need a defensive tackle though, so that's

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a roadblock the law. Are we pretending the forty nine

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>ers are stocked at receiver right now? Well, they got

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to the Super Bowl and they had a guy named

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Deebo Samuel that was one of their best pieces. Araniel

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Sanders is a free agent. Yeah, they're true, although Debo

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and one Dante pettis the then also they also have

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>like no picks whatsoever. I wouldn't be surprised if they

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 1>don't make that pick if they trade out, of which

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>is smart. Absolutely always trade down. Maybe they trade back

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to seventeen because the Cowboys have their eye on a

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>kin law law or a ace on or whatever. Yeah,

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>forty hours will get created with pick thirteen and pick

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty one that they have now, right, Yeah, So like,

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:09.719
<v Speaker 1>I bet they I bet they get a target for

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Shanahan. I can't see them not adding a wide

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:15.439
<v Speaker 1>receiver one of those picks. I just if they keep

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 1>those picks, I canna say after those two picks, like,

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they pick again until the fourth round,

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>So I wouldn't be shocked they're not making both of

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>those picks. I just I have a hard time. You

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>really think they're gonna make that trade though, and they're

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna get rid of DeForest Buckner and go up to

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.559
<v Speaker 1>thirteen and draft a guy that's a wide receiver and

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver loaded class when you could get a

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>game changer in the later rounds. I think they're going

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.599
<v Speaker 1>up for somebody else if they stick and pick. I

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're going up for anybody, Like I don't

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>think you just think that was a move, Yeah, yeah,

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that was pain Yeah Yeah, I think that was you

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>give them twenty million dollars and we'll take a first

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 1>round pick and we'll take a pick. Figure it out

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and keep the winning window open and not get you know,

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>he'll got a team in their division like the Rams

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>who have gone all in on just bringing guys in

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and paying them, and they're sitting there panicking, going is

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>our window closing? You know? The forty Niners, Like, let's

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>keep this thing open. Yeah. I think John lynchend Calshanna

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:06.959
<v Speaker 1>have a pretty good plan in San Francisco. They on

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>their numbers last year. Their number two receiver right now

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>would be Kendrick Bourne, So yeah, they could get at

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe pick a receiver now. Kind of going off of

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>what Dave just said, let's let's get nuts with this.

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.719
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about you miss all segment feels it is

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>forty pick at thirty four by the way too, so thirteen,

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:27.199
<v Speaker 1>thirty one and thirty four and they don't not get

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>until like the four. Okay, Yeah, they're good shape. So

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>with that being said, if they wanted to pick up

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>a couple picks from let's say a team that is

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>currently at seventeen overall, like Dave said, facetiously, a little

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>bit earlier, it wasn't facetious for the rect What player

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>would have to fall to eleven or twelve in order

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>to try and trade up and hope that he falls

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to thirteen? Only two of them exist that I would

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 1>go up for. I want a seedee Lamb. No, no, no,

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:56.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going up. Can't trade up for a receiver. No.

0:13:56.240 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I would only go up for Okuda and I would

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:02.719
<v Speaker 1>go up for Isaiah Simmons. Would I know way to

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>get one of them to thirteen and I'll go up?

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Would you go up for Derek Brown? One in three

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Derek Brown? That's hypothetically Gerald McCoy and DeMarcus Lawrence starts

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to feel pretty good. Yeah, but at the same and

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean to throw shade at Gerald McCoy, but

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I just think about which are Pairing him with DeMarcus

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence is one thing, but like, do defensive tackles affect

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the game enough to be worth that type of resource?

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>And I know this team might be desperate for that

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>because last year affect their defensive tackles didn't help their

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>ends at all. But theoretical, but all theoretically, don't know

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>for sure. But Gerald McCoy, who is good. He's had

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>five sacks for like seven straight years. He's a pretty

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>good player. Could be in the fold to help you

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>with that. I don't know if I'd go up for

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Derek Brown one, I no doubt I would go up

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and Simmons our top five players in the draft class.

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about going up to thirteen, right, Yes, if

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Derek Brown's at thirteen, you go get him. He's falling

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>because of his test numbers? What's the most No, no, no, no,

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>no, no no no. I don't think he's falling because of

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>his test numbers. Because he posted a video of him

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>running a three cone at his training facility that was

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>like seven and a half seconds instead of eight point two,

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>which probably took him fifty times to run. And that's

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>why you finally posted instead of running at prote But whatever,

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you're so mean, what's he falling for? Then? Because I

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>think people are wondering what's a nose tackle? What's a

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>nose tackle worth? Even a great one? When Snax Harrison

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>was highly paid, he was getting traded for fourth and

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>fifth round picks, and he was the best nose tackle

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>pole Worth. We've talked about offensive tackles. I mean, there's

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a couple of those that'll go in the

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>top ten. Maybe another team stretches and takes an offensive

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>tackle three, so there's three going in the top ten.

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>You talk about the quarterbacks, offensive tackles are worth it.

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Quarterbacks are worth was a nose tackle worth trading up

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>for in the first round? What am I giving up

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to get there first? To go from seventeen to thirty third?

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Probably your third round pick at least. Yeah, if I mean,

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>it's all up to the team boy that's tempting to

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>get Derek Brown in there. Though I don't agree with

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you at all. I mean, and I get it. It's frustrating.

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Cowboys value knows taxed enough or

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>haven't in the past. But I still don't want to

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>trade up for I'm with Woods out there again this

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>year guys no offense, But yeah, I'd love for that

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to happen. But what sis this with money? The draft

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>is about value, Free agency is about need. I like

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>your two and then and okay, again, this is not

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>so much about my own evaluation, but it reminds me

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of DeMarcus Lawrence. Actually, if any team, let

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>alone the Cowboys, is convinced that Calvan Chason is the

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>only other difference making edge. That's the type of guy

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>you trade up for, because I mean you have Chase

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Young and then Chason, and like, aren't those the only

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>guys with like twitchy pro upside? I mean Ajpanessa and

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Yader grossmatosmatos? Do you think again? And I know you

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>don't love Chason, but do you think his upside seems

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>as high to you? No? Not as a pure pass

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>right No. And if you're convinced that Chason is ascending, yeah,

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that is a guy that a team would absolutely trade

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>up for if they were sold that he was that guy.

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I think they're just gonna be a guy that pops

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>in this draft class as a pass rusher. It's just

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 1>can you guess which one it is? Like between Ouchie

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 1>at Michigan and o'kwarat Notre Dame and just run down

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 1>your list of Curtis Weaver. There's gonna be a guys

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>greener from Florida. I love him. Yeah, that's that's a

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 1>second round pipe dream for me, right, you know? So yeah,

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 1>I know, But like it's like, who's gonna be this

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>year's Max Crosby Er? You know we do this every

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 1>year Neil Hunter. So that's why, like the Neil Hunter,

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 1>that frame is what puts you onto guys like uh,

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Chase absolutely like hold on the guys who are six

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 1>five six six two fifty Randy Gregory picture, Yeah, that plays,

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>That plays, which is why I could see like, that's

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's an option at seventeen realistically, but

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:04.120
<v Speaker 1>with Robert Quinn probably no longer in the building. It's

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>something you got to look at, and I don't think

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 1>you're replacing that in free agency with the guys that

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 1>are available. We'll see what happens with Randy Gregory. It's

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>worth pointing out, but I can't count on it. I

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>don't want to write the idea of Chase on at

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>seventeen off only because the NFL surprises us sometimes. We

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 1>all watched Cleland Farrell, the Clemson to five who announced

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:26.199
<v Speaker 1>how you say his last name? After he was drafted,

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>after we called him Farrell for years, and when you

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>watched him on tape going to the year, people were

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about him as a top ten pick. But when

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 1>you watched him on tape, you're like, oh, it's a

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:37.719
<v Speaker 1>second round guy. Solid, and the writers were like, oh,

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>top five pick, yeah, well somebody do that with well

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Epanessa sneaking in the top fifteen because somebody is just like, yeah,

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>that's our guy, will like there's gonna be names in

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the first round that we go, oh wow, really yeah,

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>where did that come from? That's gonna happen now? Okay.

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Kind of with that being said, it seems like lost

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.360
<v Speaker 1>in the shuffle has been the safety position. We've talked

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>about corner because Byron Jones left, We've talked about defensive

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>tackle in that defensive end because there are there's an

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 1>obvious need there for the Cowboys, but safety's kind of

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>gone to the wayside, even though Jeff Heath has reportedly

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>agreed to a deal with the Las Vegas Raiders over

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the past twenty four hours. So now where does that

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 1>put safety on your board? Seventeen or later. Darian Thompson

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:28.199
<v Speaker 1>theoretically supposedly back with the Cowboys, so that put that

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>int honestly think they would roll that out. Wow, Darion Thompson,

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Xavier Wood and you go look at some of Darien

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Thompson snap counts last year. I can't go. Man, when

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>he was healthy he played, I could see them I

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>can't do it much. I can't say I'd be surprised.

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Donovan Wilson had a great preseason where we're making some progress,

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you know. It's it's interesting though, like sorry, I mean,

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:51.679
<v Speaker 1>I was saying, these leopards don't really change their stripes

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>too much. Spots, Ye, they have spots too. They're different.

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 1>There's the cant differences. These are different leopards though, these

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 1>aren't the same kind of I mean, I know it's

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>it's well, it's the same king leopard, but a lot

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of well, it's still of the cat family. Don't don't

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you feel God, we are so off the rails right now.

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 1>This is awesome, don't you feel like? I mean again,

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>nothing is finalized, but the fact that the Cowboys are

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>even showing interest in Gerald McCoy to me the signals

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:24.239
<v Speaker 1>that things are at least slightly different than they were.

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 1>But they've liked three techniques over the years. It's the

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>one technique in the safety position, Like those are the

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>things that you're having to pull them and go please, yeah,

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>please drive one of these. Oh maybe on day three

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>we find a guy we like and we will. It's like,

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>it's very interesting. I just when when Darry and Thompson

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:44.959
<v Speaker 1>if that ends up you know, happening, you know, as

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>free agency begins in the next you know, a few days.

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 1>Um to me, I justed immediately went dude, he played

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot when Jeff Heath was big last year. They

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 1>trusted him to play as it was Darry and Thompson,

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Xavier Woods back there a lot less. Completely agree with

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 1>you that there's I can't rule out the possibility that

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>they roll that out. But safety, to me is interesting

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 1>because we so we it's it's crazy, you know, we

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>did the draft show last week. Yeah, and we kind

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of hypothesize, like, man, maybe this COVID nineteen thing is

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna affect things like we didn't even we didn't even

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:23.919
<v Speaker 1>come close to hitting on like how much was going

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to be affected. And that's in a week. We could

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>still change from here on out. That's another thing. I specifically,

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I think about Grant Delpit all the time because I said,

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, Grant Delpit didn't work out at the combine.

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 1>He's kind of a forgotten man. He's gonna go to

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>LSU's pro day and light it up and everybody's gonna

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:41.640
<v Speaker 1>be talking about him as a top as a first

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>round pick again, he's not going to have that chance anymore, probably,

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's I've actually I've talked to people on the

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>scouting side who were like, this is going to mess

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>with stuff more than you can understand. People. Yeah, I

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:59.159
<v Speaker 1>mean any number of prospects. Guys aren't coming into facilities

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>like so instead spending like two days with a guy

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>getting to know his personality, letting him wow you in

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the meeting room and get on the whiteboard and all

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that good stuff, Like you're gonna have like a twenty

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>minute skype session with a guy. Yeah, And if you

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>don't have numbers to stand on by now, you're probably

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>not going to get a chance to post new ones.

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's gonna be more guestimating going on

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:25.639
<v Speaker 1>with NFL scouting departments with this draft than since like

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the eighties probably, which could be make more like Jeff

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>was seeing earlier, huh picks you yeah early in the draft.

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Also free agency too, Like hypothetically, wouldn't you want to

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>let's see if we get Jadeveon Clowney in here, at

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>least give him a physical right, like you'd love to

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>do that hypothetically, but like, yeah, not really able to

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>do that right now. It's it's affecting all of it,

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 1>which I even you know, not to get too deep

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>in the weeds with coronavirus, but like you know, NBA

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>players continue to test positive for it, and you know,

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>knock on wood, I'm not trying to like speculate too much,

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>but what if a guy who's about sign a major

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>contract has COVID nineteen you know what I mean, Like,

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just wild thing. Think there's gonna be a

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:08.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of people that have it and don't know they

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>have it absolutely and what does that do? I mean, man,

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>we could go real deep on that. So I'll refrain

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 1>from anything. But I feel like this is going to

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>last a little longer than we thought it was going to. Yeah,

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not a definite thing that the draft even happens.

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah at the end of April, right, and the draft

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>could be pushed back. It's the NFL has done a

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>good job of keeping things on track and being a

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:32.120
<v Speaker 1>really good distraction. Yeah, through all this, but like, well,

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm not convinced the draft even happened. There's not going

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to be saying the public aspects not going to happen.

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to get to see Joe Burrow ride

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a boat across the Belaggio Fountain, which is really the point. Disappointing. Um,

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I mean, is it going to be a

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 1>conference call? Is it going to be a tele conference?

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Are they gonna skype the draft? Nothing's gonna surprise anymore.

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:54.640
<v Speaker 1>You kind of threw out a couple of ideas there.

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>There's actually a Twitter on the twenty question we do

0:23:57.560 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 1>with that, So let's go ahead and go to our break.

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, we'll address that question, look at

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>some innovative ways on how we're going to hold this

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>draft here in twenty twenty, and some other questions from

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.479
<v Speaker 1>your Twitter questions when we return here on the Dallas

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com Draft Show. I'm Jay Novachik, former tight

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 1>end for the Dallas Cowboys. Back in the day, I

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>was the guy who always got the tough yards, and

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 1>that's why I run with John Deer today. In fact,

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I have a John Dear three zero twenty five E

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:28.640
<v Speaker 1>tractor that can handle any yard work I need to do,

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>even the tough yards way out back. So if you

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:34.199
<v Speaker 1>have one acre or a thousand, John Deer has the

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>equipment that's just right for you. Visit a John Deer

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.120
<v Speaker 1>dealer today and run with us. We are the official

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 1>tractor provider of your Dallas Cowboys. Slura is a proud

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>sponsor of the Dallas Cowboys, helping fans see more and

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>do more with our best vision solutions. Our lens technologies

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>reveal a world more beautiful than you can imagine. For

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a limited time, get the slur next Gen Offer, where

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you buy the latest generation of transitions lenses would select

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Eslora lenses. You can choose a second pair of clear

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>lenses for free with qualifying frame purchases. Restrictions apply. Find

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a participating eyecare professional by visiting esseloor USA dot com

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>or see more. Do more? Want to use what the

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>pros use? How about the official men's skincare brand of

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys, Jack Black. Right now you can get

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the Jack Black Starter, a curated collection of Cowboys locker

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>room favorites, for just ten bucks with free shipping. The

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 1>starter includes four Jack Black skincare favorites, plus a full

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>sized and tense therapy lip bomb. Go to get Jack

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Black dot com slash Cowboys and use the code word

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>team JB. That's get Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys,

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the Jack Black Starter, ten bucks free shipping your new apartments. Big,

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 1>such a great deal. That's okay, just okay? What's not

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>right above the subway? Well, I bet you don't even

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>notice it after that's my neighbor, ain't it? Deal? That's

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>still okay? It's not okay. Get a great deal with

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 1>America's best network. Come into an AT and T store

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to find out how to get one of our popular

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>smartphones for zero dollars down based on GWS one s

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>cour September twenty nineteen. This is the Dallas Cowboys dot

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Com Draft Show. Welcome back into the Dallas Cowboys dot

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Com Draft Show, presented by Miller, Like Jeff Capitol, Kevin Turner,

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Dave Hellman, and myself Kyle Yeoman's let's go to some

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Twitter on the twenty Twitter on like that, shout out

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>at Kale, shout out Brian brought us absolutely always and

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>forever Now thoughts and prayers. First questions. JD on Twitter said,

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 1>they say the draft is going to a non public

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>event and they will think of an quote unquote innovative

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>way to do it. If you were in control, guys,

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 1>how would you make the event more enjoyable as a

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:55.119
<v Speaker 1>non public event. Do you have my real answer or

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>my fun answer? That's a great let's do both fun answer.

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I want your fun answer. My fun answer is live

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 1>animals and a will and you spin it and that's

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 1>what the team, that's what player your team gets. That's

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>all right. At first, the Cincinnati BEng will spend the

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>will of all So you're just going to completely change

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 1>the complexion of the draft. It said more to go

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:16.479
<v Speaker 1>to Georgia Kicker. That's where the wheel ended the question.

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:19.640
<v Speaker 1>All I can do is answer the question asked. That's

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the question that was asked. Answer. I thought there's would

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>be something really cool there. All right, I'll take the

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 1>rest of the answer off. What if they did it

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:27.679
<v Speaker 1>like the voice and like all the teams sit in

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:31.159
<v Speaker 1>chairs and face away from the process, two chairs just

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:33.360
<v Speaker 1>read off his stat line. Yeah, he walks out, Yeah,

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and the person hit the button and like you think

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:38.959
<v Speaker 1>it's Joe Burrow, but you hit it and it's actually

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 1>like Jacob Eeson. You're like everybody's just sitting there waiting

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to hear sixteen and a half sexam. Now, I would

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 1>like to see the front offices fight over the guy

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 1>once they both press the button yes, and then they

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>just fight back and forth. I think that would be intritated,

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, physically, or you could you're talking about spinning animals,

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:00.880
<v Speaker 1>so I could spin the players. The animals are just there.

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:04.880
<v Speaker 1>It's it's gonna be interesting if they're not allowed to

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>do it publicly with you know, no more than like

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:10.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty people in the room, but they still want

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to televise it. You're not gonna have like they're not

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:16.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna have eighty, you know, thirty players sitting in a

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 1>green room. No. I don't think this is hard though,

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think it really affects it at all.

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.199
<v Speaker 1>People are gonna watch, however, many analysts are gonna have

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:25.400
<v Speaker 1>on the TV, which you don't need the TV. All

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you need is to listen to us during the draft.

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>But if you have to watch on TV, they could

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 1>have analysts that are in different locations put onto a

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:34.719
<v Speaker 1>screen and then they could have the board behind them

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 1>and you could have another camera with whoever's announcing the picks.

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't, I don't think this is a big

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>deal for the draft other than the preparation part of

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the draft. Agree, I mean, that's the big one is

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>how it's going to affect how they prepare. But like

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it's the NFL, they're gonna try to find a way

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to make it over the top and entertaining, Like they're

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 1>not just gonna let the teams sit in their war

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>rooms and phone in their picks like they need the

0:28:56.880 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 1>MLB draft, Yeah, from the work, They're going to have

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a visual component to this. Yeah, please the

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>TV audience well, And kind of going back to even

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the way that they've done it in the past, how

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>big of a role have the fans actually been in

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the draft process up until maybe the last five years,

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Because in the past it was just in New York,

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it was in a theater. You had fans in a

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>dark lit room way back in the back. But then

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 1>now that they've started moving the draft of these different cities,

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you have those fans start showing up, like in Nashville

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and Philadelphia and Dallas of course, who hosted it back

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>in twenty eighteen. There are these different aspects to having

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 1>these fans in the building. But before that it really

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the fans weren't the main attraction. The picks are

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>always going to be that main attraction. Why do you

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 1>try to push the draft back a month just to

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>try to see if things slow down? I think it's

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>still keep it in Vegas or do the same thing

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to do anyway, Well, that's will want

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you to push it back. I think the time is

0:29:57.880 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>they're going to reach a time when they realize, oh wow,

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>we do want to see two a throw. Oh I

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 1>do want to do my thirty visits. Oh, I do

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>like there's a lot of parts of this process that

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>are getting skipped. Yeah. I think teams will be asking

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, hey, if it looks like this is going

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to wind down at all and we can find ways

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to get our visits in and get workouts in and

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>get more medicals in, can we do that? It just

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 1>feels like it might be too soon to say. I mean,

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>think of him. I mean a week ago you could

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>have told me restaurants we're gonna be closed. A week ago,

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 1>we were only just starting to grasp the severity of this.

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not a medical expert, but it doesn't sound

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>like it's gonna be done anytime soon. So yeah, I

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Revisit that topic in a couple of weeks. Yeah,

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I agree, with you. I'm not one hundred percent convinced

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that it'll happen on the regularly scheduled weekend. Okay, So

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 1>our next question here on Twitter on the twenty actually

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>comes from all the way out in California. Mike Crumb asked,

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>does McCoy signing with the Cowboys affect the comp pics

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 1>next season? Can they target that or wouldn't it likely

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 1>affect those compics like Byron and Quinn. So that's a

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>fun it's a fun thing to keep in mind when

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you're watching what the Cowboys do is it doesn't affect

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a comp pic formula when a player has been released, right,

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>But McCoy was on a one year deal. He's a

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>regular old free agent. So yes, bottom line, when they

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>sign him, or if they sign him, you know, we'll

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>see what the money looks like, we'll see the guarantees,

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 1>it will probably affect that formula. But here's the good news.

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I promise MALIEK. Collins is going to get more than

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Gerald McCoy gets. Yeah, so at worst you can wash

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>out that compic. Yeah, I'm still looking at Byron Jones

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and Robert Quinn and Randall Cobb. I do I do?

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about Cobb because well, I mean, I'll

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 1>probably get you at least a fifth like Beasley did

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 1>last year, and Byron will get you a third, and

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Quinn will be a three or a four. And if

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>they were to sign McCoy, we think that would probably

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 1>be like so that would probably take away like your fifth,

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 1>probably it would take away your MALIEK. Collins one that

0:31:56.680 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 1>we don't even have considered yet. But this size of

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the Byron and Quinn deals is I mean those Gerald

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 1>McCoy is not going to wash that out. And honestly,

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I saw what you said on Twitter yesterday, Jeff, I

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 1>would be surprised if the Cowboys do a supersizeable deal

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 1>one because they don't do that anyway. But two, they

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>don't want to mess with those picks. What about Jeff

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Heath as well? Are you going to get one for him?

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>They're projecting currently on over the cap that both Witten

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and Heath will get you sixth round picks. Apparently four

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 1>million dollar deals can get you. But also you got

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:35.959
<v Speaker 1>to keep an eye on those because the Cowboys have

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to bring players into their team. For sure, they will

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 1>easily wash them. They will probably wash those out just

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the next few weeks by just

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 1>doing routine business or sign Desmond Trufon or something really hard.

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 1>If I fum the Cowboys, I would try really hard

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to bring in guys that were released trade late round.

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Trufon was released, Max Harrison was Harrison was released, Lynval

0:32:57.360 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Joseph was released, Leonard Floyd, Floyd was released, Jenkins Jerry

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 1>on the record said that he liked him. Yeah, that

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Peter King articles from twenty sixteen. I don't Brandon Carr.

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>They just said that his option wasn't picked up, so

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I that counsel's releasing him, so they'll fill it out.

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>They always party a little bit late in free agency too.

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>We've seen that I'm keeping my eyes on guys who

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>were released from old contracts because that doesn't affect your

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>comp Okay, our next question has to do with still

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>free agency, but keeping it with the twenty twenty draft.

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>And I like this guy's name, the Landlorian. He says

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 1>which non Cowboys free agent signing will have the largest

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>effect on the Cowboys first round pick, and which move

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 1>will have the largest effect on the draft overall, talking

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:42.719
<v Speaker 1>about free agency in general, and then also specifically, what

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>could affect the Cowboys. We talked about Buckner and the

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Colts a little bit earlier. With the forty nine ers

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 1>now picking at thirteen, the Hopkins trade, that one might

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 1>be the one for me. Hopkins trade is the big

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>one because you're seeing a lot of I mean, it's

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 1>mock draft, so who knows, but you're seeing a ton

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of Ceedee lambed Arizona talk. And now I think you're

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 1>to see nothing but Jedrick Wills, Tristan Wirfs, McKay Beckton.

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I think you're just going to see the left tackles

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 1>going to Arizona. So I think DeAndre Hopkins is that's

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that's number one? Right? Yeah, I think so. And I

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 1>think also, I mean they're in front of the Cowboys.

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>The Bucks pick at fourteen. Yeah, and if it does

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 1>become official that they end up signing Tom Brady, that's

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>another team that doesn't need a quarterback. So it could

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 1>potentially be a situation where maybe one of those quarterbacks,

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Love most likely maybe doesn't get to seventeen. Its

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:36.240
<v Speaker 1>very possible. I do think all four quarterbacks will probably

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>go before seventeen, but it's possible. So also that could

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 1>come into play. Indianapolis was a hot spot for a

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:44.399
<v Speaker 1>quarterback as well, in which they could still do that.

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers is only supposedly signed to a one year deal,

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 1>but it seems a little less likely now that their

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:54.879
<v Speaker 1>first pick, first round pick, is gone. Yeah, so oh well, yeah,

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 1>yet are young for a little half baked idea real quick,

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 1>just real quick. Matt Stafford to the Patriots the Lions

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 1>draft two at three? Didn't we establish that like trading

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 1>half baked? But I liked it, didn't wet. I'm pretty

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 1>sure we established like trading Stafford would absolutely cripple their cap. Yeah,

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:19.759
<v Speaker 1>most hit to not have him on the off and

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that would ruin my Cam Newton to New England plan. Also, yeah,

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:29.280
<v Speaker 1>New England. It's not happening. Is Bill hated Tom because

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Tom was an old man that couldn't move anymore. And

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 1>he's like, man, the NFL, you gotta be able to move.

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson just killed us. So he's gonna be like,

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:36.479
<v Speaker 1>oh wait, can I get Cam for like a fourth

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>round pick? Fifth round pick? Sweep? Actually, I'll do you

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:42.759
<v Speaker 1>one better, which so I love the idea, but it's

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>not the Patriots having fun. It's not the Patriots style

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 1>to pay that price anyway. Sure, what they're gonna do

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 1>is wait for the Panthers to cut Cam when nobody

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 1>wants to trade a lot for an injured old quarterback

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and then sign him to a very favorable deal because

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 1>players want to play for Bill Belichick or Jared Stidham

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to win the whole thing. Yeah, that's Josh Rosen.

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I kind of want to go back to kind of

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 1>just sticking with this question, but going back to Tom

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Brady and the Buccaneers talk. Of course, with them being

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>up in front of the Cowboys, they need offensive tackle

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 1>help and corner help. So is there a chance that

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 1>maybe some of those better offensive tackles go off the

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:24.359
<v Speaker 1>board early? You we talked about a Beckton, we talked

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 1>about a Worths, and maybe and Andrew Thomas from Georgia.

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 1>There's three guys that, maybe four guys that go in

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the top dozen picks in terms of offensive tackles. Is

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 1>it possible that CJ. Henderson doesn't even make it to

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 1>seventeen because the Buccaneers may pick them up there? Oh? Sure, absolutely.

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>The minute c J. Henderson ran a four three nine,

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I started to think, oh yeah, absolutely, I mean, when

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a guy that size can run like and obviously the

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 1>tape is more important, but when you show you have

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:56.279
<v Speaker 1>that straight line speed at the one position where straight

0:36:56.320 --> 0:37:00.160
<v Speaker 1>line speed is very, very important, it makes sense. It

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 1>makes a ton of sense. I wouldn't bank on him

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 1>being there at all. The Bucks at fourteen could use

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a cornerback. Ye, the Broncos at fifteen could use a

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:10.440
<v Speaker 1>cornerback with Chris Harris not being there anymore. That's another

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:13.160
<v Speaker 1>free agent move that could affect how the Cowboys draft.

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:16.879
<v Speaker 1>Oh kind of look cornerbacks of premium position. So that's

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 1>why I think that's the round sliding thing is becoming

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:22.960
<v Speaker 1>more of a realistic type of thing. I'm talking they're

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about earlier. So I believe he'll slide. I just

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know that I'm willing to give away a premium

0:37:28.520 --> 0:37:29.840
<v Speaker 1>pick to go get him. I want a team to

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:32.520
<v Speaker 1>get drunk and go draft running back in the top

0:37:32.560 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 1>sixteen picks. That's what I'm looking Oh, that's what I'm

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 1>looking for, Jandre Swift. That would be mile practice. I mean,

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:44.840
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a guy in Houston name Bill O'Brien. Great point, like,

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 1>there's really good running backs in this draft, but nobody's

0:37:47.239 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 1>even gonna talk about him in the top half of

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the first round because the world learned that quickly. They're like,

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:53.360
<v Speaker 1>don't do that. Well, it's not only okay to be

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:56.399
<v Speaker 1>fair though, Like there's just there's not a running back

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:59.240
<v Speaker 1>deserving of that type of pick. Oh, they're all the same,

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that's that's not sat. Quon Barkley is not a much

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 1>better football player than DeAndre Swift. Here be you're I

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 1>think you're being you're exaggerating to fit your bit right now.

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't do bits, Yes you do. I don't do bits.

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Count sixteen just cut their running back. Now that tells you, hey,

0:38:19.280 --> 0:38:21.799
<v Speaker 1>they needed to save some cat money, or be maybe

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:24.880
<v Speaker 1>they don't value the running back as much. Or see,

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 1>hey we're at sixteen, we can get the first running

0:38:26.960 --> 0:38:28.839
<v Speaker 1>back in the draft, and we'll just pay him wait

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:31.080
<v Speaker 1>less than we're gonna put pay Devonte Freeman. Wouldn't that

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 1>be just thrown out ideas to try to make things

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 1>look a little better for the tables at seventeen. I

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 1>understand and agree with the philosophy that, like running back

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:42.439
<v Speaker 1>is the most easily replaceable position in football, But if

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 1>there was a running back worth taking in the top

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:46.799
<v Speaker 1>sixteen this year, we'd be talking about him. There just

0:38:46.880 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 1>isn't one. There's just not one here like Todd Gurley

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:52.279
<v Speaker 1>when fully healthy, is worth where he was drafted. I

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:54.800
<v Speaker 1>want you to remember that three years from now, when

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 1>it'll be one of these guys, it's all no idea

0:38:56.680 --> 0:38:58.839
<v Speaker 1>which one and depend where they go and how much

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:00.279
<v Speaker 1>that team wants to run the ball. But one of

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 1>these guys will be considered the best running back in football.

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like one of the one of one

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of the guys picked this year will be considered the

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 1>best running back in football in three years. The fact

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:11.239
<v Speaker 1>thing think about winning out a specific guy, though, I think,

0:39:11.320 --> 0:39:13.239
<v Speaker 1>goes to the point of that it doesn't matter. That

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter. I get that who's the best running

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:19.799
<v Speaker 1>back in football right now? Probably Barkley, because common perception

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:21.799
<v Speaker 1>has been over the over the past two or three

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 1>years that it's been Zeke, it's been Barkley, It's now Henry,

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:29.399
<v Speaker 1>it was McCaffrey, it was Levan Bell, it's tons of them,

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:31.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and Nick Chubb will be if they start

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:33.200
<v Speaker 1>winning games. Nick Chub will get attention for being one

0:39:33.239 --> 0:39:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of the best. Most of those guys were really highly drafted,

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 1>just saying, and they get the ball three hundred times

0:39:39.200 --> 0:39:41.319
<v Speaker 1>a year, so they end up with thirteen hundred yards

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and we say they're awesome. Well, it's it's the second

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:47.240
<v Speaker 1>contract that spooks everybody, right, And that is a separate argument,

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Like it's if a guy is special, he's worth drafting

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:52.760
<v Speaker 1>in the first round. It's the second contract that should

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:54.359
<v Speaker 1>scare worth draft in the first round if he holds

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:56.279
<v Speaker 1>out it for three years. Point is, there's not a

0:39:56.280 --> 0:39:58.840
<v Speaker 1>consensus number one running back in this draft. There's not

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:00.839
<v Speaker 1>a consensus point of the is not a running back

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:03.359
<v Speaker 1>that anybody agrees is worth the first round? There has

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:07.560
<v Speaker 1>been in the past, Yeah, Zach, clearly, Right, Barkley, It's

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 1>not because the position doesn't fully matter. It's just that

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>this is not the best crop of running backs. Let's

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and go back to defense though. Question table

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 1>at me two questions here from Seth Hall. What are

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 1>some names of edge players that would be drafted for

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 1>traits later in the draft, so potentially day three, we

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:27.440
<v Speaker 1>can maybe even bump that up the day two if

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>we want to. And do you see a double dip

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:32.839
<v Speaker 1>at cornerback where the Cowboys maybe try and address some

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:36.480
<v Speaker 1>of that secondary need with multiple picks here in twenty twenty.

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:39.799
<v Speaker 1>Alex Highsmith of Charlotte is a good edge player. I

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 1>think you could say he may be a three four

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:43.760
<v Speaker 1>type because he's got a little bit of a lean frame.

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 1>You got something for those Conference USA defensive players, right,

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:50.759
<v Speaker 1>small school guys that go dominant. But Ladarius Hamilton from

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:53.759
<v Speaker 1>Texas or North Texas for an edge guy. You know,

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I look as much as I support the main green

0:40:57.080 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know that I do. You do Confort US

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Basketball champs. By the way, I don't know if Ladarius

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:07.360
<v Speaker 1>hamleybe maybe seventh round. You know, we have to be

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:09.799
<v Speaker 1>a late round or maybe even a signy guy. Yeah,

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and everything's traits. There another name I don't know, like

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:15.399
<v Speaker 1>I think Daryl Taylor from Tennessee. I think he might

0:41:15.520 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 1>slide into the third round just because there is gonna

0:41:17.600 --> 0:41:21.399
<v Speaker 1>be people grasping for pass rushers of some sort um.

0:41:21.680 --> 0:41:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Garvin's got a little upside too from Miami. I

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>think he's a guy who's kind of interesting. But man,

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I tell you, it it does dry up very quickly at

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 1>edge this year after the first two first two days,

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:36.080
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, look, there's always gonna be sleepers that

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you kind of come across. But I haven't been wowed

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 1>by a ton of guys on those you know, Day

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:43.800
<v Speaker 1>three guys. Usually you find find guys at each position

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that you kind of make your guy man at edge rusher.

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:51.320
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't been that way. I'm absolutely terrified of drafting

0:41:51.400 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 1>edge rushers outside like the top one hundred or so picks.

0:41:54.080 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 1>To be honest with you, like, there's always gonna be

0:41:56.800 --> 0:41:59.880
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be surprises, Like, you know, Max Crosby's a

0:41:59.880 --> 0:42:01.839
<v Speaker 1>guy we can talk about. That was a fourth round

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:05.799
<v Speaker 1>pick who looks really promising. But by and large, the

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:08.680
<v Speaker 1>guys who can bend and get to the corner at

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the NFL level like that is such a valuable trait

0:42:11.560 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 1>that those guys go early. Even if you got polished.

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Here you go, guys. I just wanted to pull up

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:19.480
<v Speaker 1>my combined sheet and find the guys who run better

0:42:19.520 --> 0:42:22.120
<v Speaker 1>than a seven second three cone that ran a good forty,

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:27.919
<v Speaker 1>and those are your sleepers. So Jason Strowbridge, man, that's

0:42:27.920 --> 0:42:32.320
<v Speaker 1>not a sleeper to me. Wrong, Nope, he was a

0:42:32.360 --> 0:42:36.960
<v Speaker 1>seven four five Nope, Nope, You're sleeper is Derek TUSCA

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 1>at North Dakota State. We'll take it. Our guy went

0:42:39.800 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 1>sub seven there in the three cone. And let me

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 1>see if there's anyone else in this group. That's my

0:42:46.000 --> 0:42:48.239
<v Speaker 1>only sleeper. Yeah, there's not. There's not only you know

0:42:48.239 --> 0:42:52.400
<v Speaker 1>what Trevis Gibson from from Tulsa as a player that

0:42:52.440 --> 0:42:54.359
<v Speaker 1>I think is kind of interesting. He had eight sacks

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:57.880
<v Speaker 1>last year. He's from Cedar Hill. He's a guy who

0:42:58.160 --> 0:42:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, you see a little bit of just speed,

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:02.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's just kind of looking for at some point.

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the US the run stopping defensive ends aren't fun,

0:43:06.680 --> 0:43:09.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, but they are needed in the league, and

0:43:09.239 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that's what you're gonna kind of usually get on day three.

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:12.080
<v Speaker 1>But as far as the guy who could turn into

0:43:12.120 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a sad guy, Travis Gibson from Tulsa, who was a

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Senior Bowl guy. He's a guy who's a little interesting,

0:43:17.719 --> 0:43:21.000
<v Speaker 1>probably around four round five type of guy. I've got

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:23.760
<v Speaker 1>another Senior Bowl guy for you. How about DJ Wandham

0:43:23.800 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 1>from South Carolina. I'm not nuts about want him on tape.

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I've got a grade on him. Let me

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:30.600
<v Speaker 1>see it in my gray hairs on him. But kind

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:32.759
<v Speaker 1>of while you're finding that Curtis Weaver in a seven

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:37.160
<v Speaker 1>flat three cone. Yea jem, seriously, yeah you do? Damn,

0:43:37.239 --> 0:43:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about this forty yard again, that's probably

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 1>know that's probably a third round maybe third Yeah you

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:45.680
<v Speaker 1>really though? Okay, But back to Wanham. Wandham has a

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:48.319
<v Speaker 1>four seven forty and then also he had a seven

0:43:48.360 --> 0:43:51.800
<v Speaker 1>point two five two cone, so he's had good numbers,

0:43:52.320 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 1>solid numbers for an edge guy. Vertical of thirty four

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and a half inches, broad jump of one twenty three.

0:43:57.440 --> 0:44:00.239
<v Speaker 1>You tested really well with the combine, looked pretty good

0:44:00.239 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 1>at the Senior Bowl as what as well, Maybe he

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:05.360
<v Speaker 1>inches his way up into the fourth round. My problem

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:08.239
<v Speaker 1>with him is just getting blown off the ball when

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:10.319
<v Speaker 1>it if you're gonna run the bowl right at him,

0:44:10.440 --> 0:44:14.200
<v Speaker 1>which like, hey, we're talking about upside you know, pass

0:44:14.320 --> 0:44:17.359
<v Speaker 1>rush type guys. In fact, DJ want him. They played

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Alabama and he beat Jedrick Wills a couple of times.

0:44:19.880 --> 0:44:21.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean like he got around him. He didn't finish

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:23.959
<v Speaker 1>the job, but he got around Jeddrick Wills, who maybe

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:26.759
<v Speaker 1>the first offensive tackle taking in this draft. But you

0:44:26.760 --> 0:44:30.439
<v Speaker 1>don't see him finished very often, and you definitely don't

0:44:30.480 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 1>see the play strength you see the speed, you do

0:44:32.680 --> 0:44:35.480
<v Speaker 1>not see the play strength, and that's that's kind of bothersome,

0:44:35.719 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you know. But what what were we talking about her?

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about round five, round six, the trade. You're there,

0:44:40.280 --> 0:44:43.919
<v Speaker 1>DJ want him right there? Yeah, absolutely, question, that's the question.

0:44:44.360 --> 0:44:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Round five, Absolutely exactly, so real quick yes or no,

0:44:48.400 --> 0:44:50.960
<v Speaker 1>double different corner. I would love it. I mean, I

0:44:51.040 --> 0:44:52.839
<v Speaker 1>beat his name into the ground. I'm a big fan

0:44:52.880 --> 0:44:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of Dane Jackson. Pittsburgh looked great at the Senior Bowl,

0:44:56.680 --> 0:45:00.520
<v Speaker 1>um sticky. I like his tenacity. I mean, I mean,

0:45:00.600 --> 0:45:03.759
<v Speaker 1>he's a Day three cornerback, so I keep taking him

0:45:03.760 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 1>in the box. You have a good senior boy. I

0:45:05.600 --> 0:45:07.279
<v Speaker 1>picked you in the fifth rap as well because it's

0:45:07.320 --> 0:45:09.719
<v Speaker 1>the one. I mean, obviously you can watch all the

0:45:09.760 --> 0:45:12.240
<v Speaker 1>tape you want when you get to go to Mobile

0:45:12.280 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and go against some of the best players, and yeah,

0:45:14.080 --> 0:45:17.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean the receivers in Mobile were fantastic. So for

0:45:17.360 --> 0:45:18.920
<v Speaker 1>him to play as well as he did against some

0:45:18.960 --> 0:45:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of those guys was really impressive to me. It's hard,

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to say, but yeah, I mean I could

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:27.480
<v Speaker 1>absolutely see a first and fifth, second and fourth type

0:45:27.520 --> 0:45:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of deal. It depends on what they do in free agency,

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:32.200
<v Speaker 1>but you gotta fix the secondary somehow and to be

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a broken record. But two of them a pet Katy

0:45:34.480 --> 0:45:37.080
<v Speaker 1>pet kat, Mammy House, Louisiana Tech guy, Louisiana Tech and

0:45:37.080 --> 0:45:39.439
<v Speaker 1>meet Robertson. We're gonna find out five four, Well maybe

0:45:39.440 --> 0:45:41.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe teams are Maybe teams aren't going to find out

0:45:41.400 --> 0:45:46.320
<v Speaker 1>how healthy he is. That's a fast nine. Oh sorry,

0:45:46.360 --> 0:45:48.759
<v Speaker 1>but hey, if that's not for your taste, can I

0:45:48.760 --> 0:45:51.000
<v Speaker 1>interest you in Reggie Robinson of Tulsa. I like these

0:45:51.040 --> 0:45:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Tulsa guys a little bit. Reggie robs I've got third

0:45:53.080 --> 0:45:56.080
<v Speaker 1>round grade one. He's a top one hundred player. Now

0:45:56.280 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of starting to see draft Twitter kind of yeah,

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, Reggie watched the Jgie Robinson tape. Oh no,

0:46:02.320 --> 0:46:05.319
<v Speaker 1>Retchie Robinson tape has been good all along. He's exciting

0:46:05.360 --> 0:46:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and he's really good. I know he got hurt and

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:11.239
<v Speaker 1>he's not declaring. Thyland Wallace, the wide receiver from Oklahoma State,

0:46:11.400 --> 0:46:13.920
<v Speaker 1>he shut him down. Yeah, and that was very excellent.

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:15.839
<v Speaker 1>Tyland Wallace would have been one of those guys if

0:46:15.880 --> 0:46:18.399
<v Speaker 1>he came out that was in the mix, top ten,

0:46:18.680 --> 0:46:21.279
<v Speaker 1>top twelve wide receiver in the draft. Reggie Robinson is

0:46:21.280 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a name not to sleep on. I would draft him

0:46:24.040 --> 0:46:27.440
<v Speaker 1>as high ast pick eighty one, eighty two, Yeah, third

0:46:27.520 --> 0:46:29.480
<v Speaker 1>round pick, whatever it is. I would draft him that high.

0:46:29.480 --> 0:46:31.759
<v Speaker 1>But I do think because of the small school thing,

0:46:31.960 --> 0:46:34.160
<v Speaker 1>because he's a little lanky, because he doesn't like to

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 1>play the run too much. I think you're going to

0:46:36.160 --> 0:46:38.000
<v Speaker 1>see him full to day three and I would love

0:46:38.080 --> 0:46:40.879
<v Speaker 1>him at fourth round value. Reggie Robinson and a Meek

0:46:41.040 --> 0:46:44.439
<v Speaker 1>Robertson from Louisiana Tech. There's some good cornerbacks on day

0:46:44.440 --> 0:46:47.080
<v Speaker 1>three to keep your keep your eye on. I like it, Jeff, Yes,

0:46:47.160 --> 0:46:50.560
<v Speaker 1>or no double dip of corners corner there we go. Okay,

0:46:50.560 --> 0:46:52.759
<v Speaker 1>So that'll do it for Twitter. On the twenty when

0:46:52.760 --> 0:46:56.719
<v Speaker 1>we come back, I've got five potential draftees that will

0:46:56.760 --> 0:47:00.120
<v Speaker 1>replace Randall Cobb. We'll see who likes which pick and

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:02.279
<v Speaker 1>where in the NFL draft when we return here on

0:47:02.280 --> 0:47:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show presented by Miller

0:47:04.680 --> 0:47:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Lite since eighteen sixty five. Stetson Hats are American maid

0:47:09.840 --> 0:47:13.160
<v Speaker 1>with pride right here in Texas, and Stetson is proud

0:47:13.200 --> 0:47:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to be on the field with America's team. Want to

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:18.920
<v Speaker 1>show your Texas and team pride too, you can. By

0:47:19.000 --> 0:47:21.799
<v Speaker 1>purchasing your own Stetson, you can look just like how

0:47:21.800 --> 0:47:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the flag guys do on field at every home game.

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Stetson heads the official crown of all self respecting Cowboys

0:47:28.600 --> 0:47:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and your favorite football team. Get yours today in the

0:47:31.920 --> 0:47:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Stadium Pro Shop or at Stetson dot Com. Your new

0:47:35.400 --> 0:47:41.000
<v Speaker 1>apartment's big, Such a great deal, It's okay, just okay.

0:47:41.080 --> 0:47:47.400
<v Speaker 1>What's not right above the subway? Well, I bet you

0:47:47.400 --> 0:47:52.480
<v Speaker 1>don't even notice it after that's my neighbor. Hang deal,

0:47:52.520 --> 0:47:55.799
<v Speaker 1>that's just okay, It's not okay. Get a great deal

0:47:55.840 --> 0:47:58.200
<v Speaker 1>with America's best network. Come into an AT and T

0:47:58.320 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>store to find out how to get one of our

0:47:59.680 --> 0:48:02.920
<v Speaker 1>pocket the smartphones for zero dollars down based on GWS

0:48:02.920 --> 0:48:06.120
<v Speaker 1>one score September twenty nineteen. Slor is a proud sponsor

0:48:06.200 --> 0:48:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboys, helping fans see more and do

0:48:09.600 --> 0:48:13.160
<v Speaker 1>more with our best vision solutions. Our lens technologies reveal

0:48:13.200 --> 0:48:15.719
<v Speaker 1>a world more beautiful than you can imagine. For a

0:48:15.760 --> 0:48:18.600
<v Speaker 1>limited time, get the slur next Gen offer, where you

0:48:18.680 --> 0:48:22.320
<v Speaker 1>buy the latest generation of Transitions lenses with select SLOR lenses,

0:48:22.440 --> 0:48:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you can choose a second pair of clear lenses for free.

0:48:24.920 --> 0:48:29.000
<v Speaker 1>With qualifying frame purchases. Restrictions apply. Find a participating eyecare

0:48:29.080 --> 0:48:33.480
<v Speaker 1>professional by visiting slor usa dot com. Slor see more,

0:48:33.840 --> 0:48:37.440
<v Speaker 1>do more. So you're shopping, and that's when you see it.

0:48:37.880 --> 0:48:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I hold twenty three doctor Pepper stack from top to

0:48:40.880 --> 0:48:43.120
<v Speaker 1>bottom as far as the eye can see. The phrase

0:48:43.120 --> 0:48:44.640
<v Speaker 1>two going to be true comes to mind. Yet there

0:48:44.640 --> 0:48:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it is a rich, delicious doctor Pepper paradise. Wait, did

0:48:49.640 --> 0:48:51.880
<v Speaker 1>did that can of doctor Pepper just open itself for you?

0:48:52.760 --> 0:48:55.880
<v Speaker 1>They all are as if to say, so nice to

0:48:55.920 --> 0:48:58.000
<v Speaker 1>treat you. And even though it feels weird to talk

0:48:58.000 --> 0:49:00.120
<v Speaker 1>to we, can you pick one up and say, it's

0:49:00.160 --> 0:49:03.239
<v Speaker 1>so nice to be treated doctor Pepper, So nice to

0:49:03.239 --> 0:49:08.520
<v Speaker 1>treat you. This is the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Shows.

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Final segment here from the SWBC Mortgage Studios of Dallas

0:49:15.360 --> 0:49:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com Draft Show, presented by Miller Lite Wide

0:49:18.600 --> 0:49:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Receiver has been a topic of conversation for quite some time. Really,

0:49:23.320 --> 0:49:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the entirety of the draft show this season because of

0:49:26.560 --> 0:49:28.759
<v Speaker 1>this class and how deep it is. And now we've

0:49:28.760 --> 0:49:30.759
<v Speaker 1>got a little bit of a spot to phil. I

0:49:30.800 --> 0:49:35.080
<v Speaker 1>remember the first show of this season, Jeff Cavanaugh said,

0:49:35.239 --> 0:49:38.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm convinced Randall Cobb's coming back because of Mike McCarthy's

0:49:38.760 --> 0:49:42.320
<v Speaker 1>press conference. Didn't know about Bill O'Brien. Yeah, I wouldn't.

0:49:42.400 --> 0:49:44.799
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't. I wasn't as informed as I needed to

0:49:44.800 --> 0:49:50.880
<v Speaker 1>be about Bill O'Brien. Didn't O'Brien. It is absolutely not

0:49:51.040 --> 0:49:54.439
<v Speaker 1>our fault. I mean, I think the world of Randall

0:49:54.480 --> 0:49:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Cobb as a guy, and he's a great player. Randall

0:49:57.640 --> 0:50:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Cobb himself, I think probably did a double take when

0:50:00.760 --> 0:50:03.600
<v Speaker 1>he saw the offer. Oh He's like, I just had

0:50:03.600 --> 0:50:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a one year old, five million dollars deal and I'm

0:50:05.520 --> 0:50:08.279
<v Speaker 1>a year older and I'm getting double that for three okay,

0:50:08.600 --> 0:50:12.160
<v Speaker 1>double triple, well nine million a year. Well yeah, but

0:50:12.200 --> 0:50:16.440
<v Speaker 1>he's getting eighteen guaranteed. Okay, yeah, he's getting eighteen million

0:50:16.480 --> 0:50:20.840
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed twenty seven million. I mean it sounds mean to say,

0:50:20.880 --> 0:50:23.960
<v Speaker 1>like get your money, Randall, but like that's stunning to me.

0:50:24.120 --> 0:50:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Bills competent. I mean, I would have found leaking like

0:50:26.719 --> 0:50:29.000
<v Speaker 1>what DeAndre Hopkins wanted in a contract to try to

0:50:29.040 --> 0:50:30.920
<v Speaker 1>be like that's why we traded him. It's not because

0:50:30.960 --> 0:50:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm really mean to him and made Aaron Hernandez comments.

0:50:33.600 --> 0:50:36.680
<v Speaker 1>It's because he wanted eighteen to twenty million. The whole

0:50:36.680 --> 0:50:38.799
<v Speaker 1>world's like, wait, that's what he's worth. That's that's what

0:50:38.840 --> 0:50:42.319
<v Speaker 1>receivers gast receiver in the league right now potentially now,

0:50:42.520 --> 0:50:45.839
<v Speaker 1>So sorry, I side in a world, in a world

0:50:45.920 --> 0:50:48.520
<v Speaker 1>where Bill O'Brien is not running a football team, I

0:50:48.560 --> 0:50:51.879
<v Speaker 1>think would be back. Probably that's a very good point.

0:50:51.960 --> 0:50:54.840
<v Speaker 1>But we have to replace him nonetheless, because he's not

0:50:54.960 --> 0:50:56.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be wearing a star on the side of

0:50:56.400 --> 0:50:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the helmet. I've got five guys in this draft, all

0:50:59.400 --> 0:51:02.520
<v Speaker 1>from different parts of the draft that could be replacements

0:51:02.640 --> 0:51:04.840
<v Speaker 1>all right now. Up in the first round, I have

0:51:04.960 --> 0:51:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Raiger of TCU, And the reason why I put

0:51:07.280 --> 0:51:09.640
<v Speaker 1>him there is because I didn't want to be a

0:51:09.640 --> 0:51:11.840
<v Speaker 1>coward and say either one of the three guys that

0:51:11.880 --> 0:51:15.120
<v Speaker 1>could be there, Henry Ruggs from Alabama, Jerry Judy from Alabama,

0:51:15.120 --> 0:51:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and Ceedee Lamb from Oklahoma. I don't want to bank

0:51:18.040 --> 0:51:20.279
<v Speaker 1>on the fact that one of those three guys is

0:51:20.280 --> 0:51:22.279
<v Speaker 1>going to be there. So I put Jalen Reagor because

0:51:22.280 --> 0:51:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna get Rigor at fifty one, I really

0:51:24.120 --> 0:51:28.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think so. Do you think he's worth seventeen potentially Yes, Okay,

0:51:28.480 --> 0:51:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he's that good and I don't know, maybe

0:51:30.600 --> 0:51:33.160
<v Speaker 1>we've had this conversation. I think this debate prior, but

0:51:33.239 --> 0:51:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he could be good enough to be up

0:51:35.480 --> 0:51:37.879
<v Speaker 1>at seventeen if that's where you're willing to take a guy.

0:51:38.120 --> 0:51:41.399
<v Speaker 1>I've got kJ Hamler from Penn State in the second round.

0:51:41.480 --> 0:51:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Lynn Bowden Junior out of Kentucky, guy who really reminds

0:51:44.760 --> 0:51:47.359
<v Speaker 1>me of Randall Cobb when you watch his Randall Cobb

0:51:47.480 --> 0:51:51.960
<v Speaker 1>told me himself in November, he was like, he's the

0:51:51.960 --> 0:51:54.880
<v Speaker 1>best Kentucky football player ever. Wow. And I was like,

0:51:55.000 --> 0:51:57.879
<v Speaker 1>that's that's high praise coming from one of the best

0:51:57.960 --> 0:52:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Kentucky football players ever, even though like the best because

0:52:00.800 --> 0:52:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of the situation just in Jenna, I mean because he

0:52:03.280 --> 0:52:06.759
<v Speaker 1>moved to quarterback, even to quarterback and like didn't miss

0:52:06.800 --> 0:52:11.759
<v Speaker 1>a beat. Like the offense was insane. It's little yeah,

0:52:11.760 --> 0:52:15.160
<v Speaker 1>because he's not a wide receiver, he's a high school quarterback.

0:52:15.239 --> 0:52:17.600
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, Limboden Junior also just kind

0:52:17.600 --> 0:52:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of a Swiss Army nine. If he's he's very reliable,

0:52:20.200 --> 0:52:22.600
<v Speaker 1>much like Randall Cob. And then I have Devin DuVernay

0:52:22.640 --> 0:52:24.840
<v Speaker 1>as an early day three guy. That's a little bit

0:52:24.880 --> 0:52:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of a stretch for me to say he's early day three.

0:52:27.160 --> 0:52:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he could go as high as the third round,

0:52:29.560 --> 0:52:31.719
<v Speaker 1>but he could fall to the fourth. And if he's there,

0:52:31.760 --> 0:52:34.040
<v Speaker 1>then I'll say that maybe he was the guy that

0:52:34.120 --> 0:52:36.640
<v Speaker 1>was left off of this long list of wide receivers

0:52:36.680 --> 0:52:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and then late day three of James Prochet out of SMU.

0:52:40.360 --> 0:52:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Which guy out of these five do you guys like

0:52:43.080 --> 0:52:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the most in terms of the Cowboys replacing Randall cop

0:52:46.000 --> 0:52:48.759
<v Speaker 1>I like the best player the most. I'll take Gregor.

0:52:49.000 --> 0:52:52.120
<v Speaker 1>But we're combining a play at the position, right, Yeah,

0:52:52.200 --> 0:52:56.160
<v Speaker 1>because I think this is obviously an awesome segment idea. Yeah,

0:52:56.239 --> 0:52:58.839
<v Speaker 1>the exact same thing. Did you on a YouTube? Oh

0:52:58.880 --> 0:53:01.839
<v Speaker 1>did you really check that? Uh? No, no, no, because

0:53:01.840 --> 0:53:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's no. It's the thing that makes the

0:53:03.520 --> 0:53:05.640
<v Speaker 1>most sense right now, is it does? Where in the draft?

0:53:05.680 --> 0:53:08.680
<v Speaker 1>And which name do you like? And amongst those ones,

0:53:09.840 --> 0:53:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I would probably say Hamler in the second yeah, or

0:53:16.040 --> 0:53:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I would have guessed you'd be out on Hamdler. I

0:53:19.120 --> 0:53:21.480
<v Speaker 1>like Hammler. I just I have other names I want

0:53:21.480 --> 0:53:24.439
<v Speaker 1>to throw in there. kJ Hill at Ohio State didn't

0:53:24.480 --> 0:53:26.200
<v Speaker 1>have a good combine, but he's still up there. Get

0:53:26.239 --> 0:53:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a bad combine, and I would still take him in

0:53:27.719 --> 0:53:30.319
<v Speaker 1>the third, and I'd love him in the four. I

0:53:30.400 --> 0:53:32.240
<v Speaker 1>was going to throw out Hill for the same reason

0:53:32.360 --> 0:53:35.040
<v Speaker 1>is if you can get him at one twenty three,

0:53:35.480 --> 0:53:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think you could plug and play kJ Hill. Honestly,

0:53:38.920 --> 0:53:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the reason I like Hammler is just because he's the

0:53:43.600 --> 0:53:46.160
<v Speaker 1>only one of that group, maybe DuVernay to some extent

0:53:46.360 --> 0:53:49.360
<v Speaker 1>where you can say, Okay, Mary Cooper's a bigger threat,

0:53:49.400 --> 0:53:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and Michael Gallup's a bigger threat, but you still have

0:53:51.760 --> 0:53:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to know where is kJ Hammler because because if he

0:53:54.280 --> 0:53:56.319
<v Speaker 1>don't subject the fact that he can run by you

0:53:56.360 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 1>at any moment, then your defense is in trouble. And

0:53:59.000 --> 0:54:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I think adding that l it's like it's like what

0:54:01.000 --> 0:54:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Will Fuller does for Houston, the splits for Deshaun Watson.

0:54:04.640 --> 0:54:07.600
<v Speaker 1>When Will Fueler's on or off the field, the splits

0:54:07.600 --> 0:54:10.279
<v Speaker 1>are much bigger than when DeAndre Hopkins was on or

0:54:10.320 --> 0:54:12.480
<v Speaker 1>off the field, because teams have to respect that speed.

0:54:12.560 --> 0:54:14.120
<v Speaker 1>You got to you have to be afraid of it.

0:54:14.760 --> 0:54:18.480
<v Speaker 1>And so Handler, I'm interested in a lot, maybe at

0:54:18.520 --> 0:54:20.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty one, how good of a route runner is Handler

0:54:20.640 --> 0:54:23.440
<v Speaker 1>compared to Devin DuVernay, because DuVernay is not your I

0:54:23.480 --> 0:54:25.279
<v Speaker 1>don't think the runner. I don't think du Rene is

0:54:25.320 --> 0:54:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a good route round. I don't think so either. I

0:54:26.520 --> 0:54:28.080
<v Speaker 1>think he rounds it up a little bit, and I

0:54:28.080 --> 0:54:30.600
<v Speaker 1>think he's a straight line guy. Yeah. And is Handler

0:54:30.600 --> 0:54:32.759
<v Speaker 1>a better route rounder though, Yeah. Handler is one of

0:54:32.760 --> 0:54:34.800
<v Speaker 1>those guys that when you watch him on tape, if

0:54:34.960 --> 0:54:37.200
<v Speaker 1>if it's one guy trying to stay in front of him,

0:54:37.920 --> 0:54:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you can't like the acceleration, the speed, just the physical tools.

0:54:41.920 --> 0:54:44.920
<v Speaker 1>They're different. Duverne is fast too, but he's going to

0:54:45.040 --> 0:54:47.239
<v Speaker 1>run you over. He's not going to be able to

0:54:47.280 --> 0:54:49.439
<v Speaker 1>really routch you up. He gets to it Texas because

0:54:49.480 --> 0:54:51.319
<v Speaker 1>you get so many free releases where he can kind

0:54:51.360 --> 0:54:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of stem a guy and then break and he can

0:54:53.000 --> 0:54:55.600
<v Speaker 1>do that. But in terms of lateral agility as a

0:54:55.680 --> 0:54:58.000
<v Speaker 1>route runner, Handler's got it, and I don't think Duvernaid does.

0:54:58.160 --> 0:55:00.960
<v Speaker 1>My big difference in those two guy to me, aside

0:55:00.960 --> 0:55:02.920
<v Speaker 1>from the route running you're talking about, is that Dubnat

0:55:03.000 --> 0:55:05.759
<v Speaker 1>catches everything that's thrown at him and hamdwar does not.

0:55:06.040 --> 0:55:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Right hand, there's a little bit of a body catcher

0:55:07.800 --> 0:55:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in the questions a small guy, and yeah, and there's

0:55:11.080 --> 0:55:12.799
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of handware that makes you go, y'all

0:55:12.800 --> 0:55:15.000
<v Speaker 1>are killing me, because this is why I didn't think

0:55:15.000 --> 0:55:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you were gonna talk like handler. Sorry, finish your finish

0:55:18.120 --> 0:55:21.239
<v Speaker 1>your thought. Well. The Duberna brings a little more in

0:55:21.360 --> 0:55:25.400
<v Speaker 1>terms of toughness, catching everything, some of those things. You know.

0:55:25.520 --> 0:55:27.400
<v Speaker 1>The thing is kind of a mixture both of these

0:55:27.440 --> 0:55:29.560
<v Speaker 1>guys kind of a mixture of what Randall Cop brought

0:55:29.600 --> 0:55:32.040
<v Speaker 1>because Randall Cop had some drops in terms of the

0:55:32.760 --> 0:55:35.680
<v Speaker 1>toughness and the attitude that you want and all that stuff,

0:55:36.080 --> 0:55:38.880
<v Speaker 1>like Dubna's got that. So I just don't want to

0:55:39.200 --> 0:55:41.640
<v Speaker 1>take the guy later. I don't want to draft a

0:55:41.719 --> 0:55:46.160
<v Speaker 1>really unpolished, fast guy. That's all that's fair in the

0:55:46.200 --> 0:55:49.040
<v Speaker 1>second round. Yeah, in the fourth round, sure, because can

0:55:49.040 --> 0:55:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I dangle John how high tower from Day three is

0:55:52.480 --> 0:55:54.520
<v Speaker 1>when traits take over. But like with a top one

0:55:54.600 --> 0:55:56.879
<v Speaker 1>hundred pick, I want a more polished product. That's why,

0:55:56.960 --> 0:55:58.600
<v Speaker 1>like kJ Hill, I think he's the best slot route

0:55:58.640 --> 0:56:00.680
<v Speaker 1>runner in the quest. I agree, he's not a good athlete.

0:56:00.719 --> 0:56:04.200
<v Speaker 1>He's not big, he's not super fast. He runs great

0:56:04.280 --> 0:56:05.800
<v Speaker 1>routes and gets open from the slot and catches, and

0:56:06.800 --> 0:56:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Lynn Bowden Junior is fascinating, and I think

0:56:10.000 --> 0:56:12.759
<v Speaker 1>he's under the radar in this very crowded class for

0:56:12.800 --> 0:56:14.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple of reasons. One and he's been dealing with

0:56:14.960 --> 0:56:16.960
<v Speaker 1>an injury that's kept him from working out. And that

0:56:17.080 --> 0:56:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean obviously now with all the quarantine, it's totally different.

0:56:20.840 --> 0:56:23.040
<v Speaker 1>On top of that, there's not a lot of tape

0:56:23.080 --> 0:56:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of him playing wide receiver in twenty nineteen, So it's

0:56:26.239 --> 0:56:29.319
<v Speaker 1>a problem. It's a problem, But like I'm I'm just

0:56:29.360 --> 0:56:33.200
<v Speaker 1>willing to take a chance on his and just usefulness,

0:56:33.280 --> 0:56:35.400
<v Speaker 1>like like Kyle called him a Swiss army knife. He

0:56:35.440 --> 0:56:39.680
<v Speaker 1>played quarterback at Kentucky, did not stop their offense from

0:56:39.760 --> 0:56:44.840
<v Speaker 1>being extremely effective. He was unbelievably reliable for the wild Kids.

0:56:44.880 --> 0:56:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Got speed, he can carry the ball, he runs like

0:56:47.480 --> 0:56:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a running back, he's got good vision. I'll at whatever,

0:56:51.200 --> 0:56:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and he's the guy that's just better at sports than

0:56:53.480 --> 0:56:58.640
<v Speaker 1>all of us. Yes, Mike McCarthy talked about play whatever.

0:56:59.600 --> 0:57:02.440
<v Speaker 1>One of the nineteen things. One of the nineteen clues

0:57:02.520 --> 0:57:04.560
<v Speaker 1>we got that made us think Randall cop might be

0:57:04.560 --> 0:57:07.240
<v Speaker 1>coming back was Mike McCarthy going on and on about

0:57:07.400 --> 0:57:09.719
<v Speaker 1>how he liked to use Randall in the backfield and

0:57:09.800 --> 0:57:12.520
<v Speaker 1>his quarterback experience made him useful for this and that

0:57:12.600 --> 0:57:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and the other. It's a it's maybe it's a lazy

0:57:15.800 --> 0:57:17.880
<v Speaker 1>comparison because they both went to Kentucky, But I don't

0:57:17.880 --> 0:57:20.440
<v Speaker 1>think so. Like I think they're very similar players, you know.

0:57:20.520 --> 0:57:22.680
<v Speaker 1>And the thing is is I put him on this list,

0:57:22.880 --> 0:57:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and I completely it escaped my mind whenever I was

0:57:26.640 --> 0:57:29.760
<v Speaker 1>making it. That also Randall Cobb went to Kentucky because

0:57:29.800 --> 0:57:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I was just looking for a guy to replace Randall Cobb.

0:57:32.120 --> 0:57:34.120
<v Speaker 1>So as much as you could really say it's a

0:57:34.160 --> 0:57:39.040
<v Speaker 1>lazy comparison, just because or there's very similar quarterbacks, can

0:57:39.040 --> 0:57:42.920
<v Speaker 1>play in the slot, very athletic, good reliable, move out

0:57:42.920 --> 0:57:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of the backfield, move all over the formation. I'd be

0:57:45.600 --> 0:57:48.920
<v Speaker 1>ecstatic to draft that guy third round. I don't have

0:57:48.960 --> 0:57:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a good grasp on his range. Again, I'm thinking three

0:57:51.760 --> 0:57:55.160
<v Speaker 1>through fifth, and I think I don't think he goes

0:57:55.200 --> 0:57:57.720
<v Speaker 1>in the top two rounds for sure. No, I've I've

0:57:57.760 --> 0:57:59.600
<v Speaker 1>had a scout tell me that he could be a

0:57:59.680 --> 0:58:04.800
<v Speaker 1>second round pick. Yes, that's I mean with this, I

0:58:04.840 --> 0:58:07.160
<v Speaker 1>know I would. I think if he's there in the

0:58:07.200 --> 0:58:10.200
<v Speaker 1>third round, i'd be thrilled. But I yeah, I don't

0:58:10.200 --> 0:58:11.640
<v Speaker 1>have a good grasp on it. But I think he's

0:58:11.640 --> 0:58:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a great player. So, man, who did you wait, Katie,

0:58:15.880 --> 0:58:18.000
<v Speaker 1>did you actually give a player? Did you say out

0:58:18.040 --> 0:58:20.880
<v Speaker 1>there John high Tower Tower? But of Boise State, someone

0:58:20.920 --> 0:58:23.560
<v Speaker 1>who's not on your list, okay, just because they hate

0:58:23.560 --> 0:58:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the boys state background. But he is a matchup guy.

0:58:25.920 --> 0:58:28.360
<v Speaker 1>He's a mismatch guy. He's a speed guy. He's a

0:58:28.400 --> 0:58:30.680
<v Speaker 1>guy who's gotta win earlier in the route because he's

0:58:30.720 --> 0:58:32.920
<v Speaker 1>not very strong when he's going up. And you know,

0:58:33.000 --> 0:58:35.400
<v Speaker 1>press coverage and things like that. But the jet sweep

0:58:35.440 --> 0:58:37.800
<v Speaker 1>elements and things like that that McCarthy does like to

0:58:37.880 --> 0:58:40.360
<v Speaker 1>use in his offense and Kellen does like to use

0:58:40.360 --> 0:58:42.360
<v Speaker 1>in his offense. He's very good at that. He's a

0:58:42.400 --> 0:58:44.000
<v Speaker 1>guy you can hand the ball too, and things like that,

0:58:44.120 --> 0:58:47.520
<v Speaker 1>so also return value. So high Tower is an interesting player.

0:58:47.560 --> 0:58:49.640
<v Speaker 1>But again, I know I chose a guy who's not

0:58:49.680 --> 0:58:52.560
<v Speaker 1>on your list. Right there, DuVernay to me, right there,

0:58:52.640 --> 0:58:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I love kJ Hilbert. Dude, isn't his Rangelet doesn't it

0:58:57.760 --> 0:58:59.600
<v Speaker 1>feel like his range is like right in between where

0:58:59.600 --> 0:59:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the cowboy will be picking in the things you say that,

0:59:02.680 --> 0:59:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it breaks my heart that we can't really

0:59:04.800 --> 0:59:10.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about justin Jefferson. But I don't not super realistic

0:59:10.600 --> 0:59:12.720
<v Speaker 1>at seventeen, but definitely won't be there at fifty one.

0:59:12.760 --> 0:59:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd love at fifty one. I don't want him at

0:59:14.400 --> 0:59:18.560
<v Speaker 1>seventeen exactly. Um, I guess you can't rule out the

0:59:18.600 --> 0:59:21.120
<v Speaker 1>possibility that they addressed this in free agency. I think

0:59:21.160 --> 0:59:25.880
<v Speaker 1>our friend Jane Slater linking Emmanuel Sanders to the Cowboys

0:59:25.920 --> 0:59:28.560
<v Speaker 1>this morning. We'll see, but so much since he's got,

0:59:28.680 --> 0:59:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, bad knee. But if you could get him

0:59:30.760 --> 0:59:33.800
<v Speaker 1>on the Randall Cob deal one million, one year, eight million,

0:59:33.920 --> 0:59:35.840
<v Speaker 1>depending on the size of the deal. But man, there's

0:59:35.840 --> 0:59:38.080
<v Speaker 1>just so many good receivers to be had in this draft.

0:59:38.480 --> 0:59:42.960
<v Speaker 1>But I mean signing sign Emmanuel Sanders or draft a

0:59:43.000 --> 0:59:46.280
<v Speaker 1>free agent drafted wide receiver. I'd rather draft a guy,

0:59:46.360 --> 0:59:49.480
<v Speaker 1>although if you could sign a veteran to a very

0:59:49.720 --> 0:59:52.640
<v Speaker 1>friendly deal like they did with Randall Cobb, wouldn't necessarily

0:59:52.680 --> 0:59:56.280
<v Speaker 1>stop you from drafting somebody either to both. Yeah, I

0:59:56.360 --> 0:59:58.240
<v Speaker 1>do want them to fill the need before the draft.

0:59:58.480 --> 1:00:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't want you to go into a draft heating

1:00:00.720 --> 1:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to find a slot you have to get a slot receiver.

1:00:02.920 --> 1:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that would be a little bit silly, But

1:00:04.360 --> 1:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean you have to go Emmanuel Sanders. There

1:00:06.560 --> 1:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>could be a lower level to it. If there's a

1:00:08.680 --> 1:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>position where you could plug and play, it's probably this thing.

1:00:12.400 --> 1:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>And I mean that's tricky because receivers so hard to

1:00:14.880 --> 1:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>adjust to and used a lot of late round picks

1:00:17.280 --> 1:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and receivers and haven't haven't had anything. Noah Brown ain't

1:00:20.200 --> 1:00:22.959
<v Speaker 1>doing a whole lot. Cedric Wilson, No, you're not wrong.

1:00:23.440 --> 1:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Tavon two could be Danny Cole. This is a little bit.

1:00:28.680 --> 1:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't go back some mere Matt Johnson at safety.

1:00:31.160 --> 1:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Remember that Matt Johnson. I remember got a pick in

1:00:34.680 --> 1:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>practice and then limped to the trainers same play, the

1:00:39.240 --> 1:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>most Matt Johnson thing of all time. Out from Matt Well,

1:00:43.320 --> 1:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that is gonna do it here for the Dallas Cowboys

1:00:45.320 --> 1:00:48.160
<v Speaker 1>dot Com Draft Show presented by Miller Lte. Did you

1:00:48.200 --> 1:00:49.560
<v Speaker 1>think that that name was going to be the last

1:00:49.600 --> 1:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>level way throughout? Matt Johnson and Danny Cole wherever you

1:00:52.720 --> 1:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>guys are, Keep it real, Keeping it real. From Jeff

1:00:55.560 --> 1:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Cavanaugh for Kevin Turner, for Dave Hellman. I'm Kyle Yeomans.

1:00:58.920 --> 1:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening. We'll be back next week here from

1:01:01.040 --> 1:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the SWBC Mortgage studios in Frisco. This has been a

1:01:06.160 --> 1:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>production of Dallas Cowboys dot com and the Dallas Cowboys

1:01:09.800 --> 1:01:10.479
<v Speaker 1>Football Club