WEBVTT - China’s Clean-Tech Glut Undercuts US Onshoring Hopes

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Dana Perkins and you're listening to Switched on

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the B and EF podcast. China is churning out clean

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>energy technology at a breakneck pace, driving down costs on

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>everything from solar panels to lithium ion batteries, with supply

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>far exceeding domestic demand. Extremely competitively priced equipment necessary for

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the energy transition is available all over the world. At

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:26.079
<v Speaker 1>the same time, many countries are looking at onshoring and

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:29.319
<v Speaker 1>near shoring production of the very same things that China

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>is producing. Many China based clean tech manufacturers are experiencing

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>razor thin profit margins all the while, six hundred and

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>forty nine billion dollars of new factories are set to

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>come online between twenty twenty four and twenty twenty seven,

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>which would bring prices even lower. On today's show, I

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:48.919
<v Speaker 1>speak with bnaf's head of Trade and Supply Chains and

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Twan Wagner Jones. We talk about how China and other

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>parts of the world are addressing over supply through policy,

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and whether the US's Inflation Reduction Act and the European

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Union's net zero Industry are going to be enough to

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>stimulate more local manufacturing. BNF subscribers will be able to

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>find Antoine's research note titled China's clean Tech overcapacity threatens

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 1>on Shoring Dreams at BNF dot com or at BNF

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg terminal. Make sure to subscribe to switched

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>on if you want a reminder when we publish future episodes.

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>And if you like this show, if you give us

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a review on Apple Podcasts or on Spotify, it's going

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 1>to make it easier for others to find us. Right now, though,

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>let's talk to Antoine about overcapacity in the clean tech

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing sector. Anton thank you for joining today. We're going

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to be talking about oversupply and some of the most

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>important parts of the energy transition AIDIA.

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 2>It's great to be back.

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>So there were this old three of things that were

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>considered Chinese exports that were quite dominant in the industries

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that they were in, which were household appliances, furniture, and clothing.

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>But now there's this new three. So what are the

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>new three and how long have these been things that

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>essentially China's been dominating.

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, in the early two thousands, China's just joined the

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 2>WTO and it's in this big boom of export lead growth,

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 2>which is really leading to the economy expanding at a

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 2>rapid rate, and it's producing these goods at low costs

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 2>and exporting some of them to the rest of the

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 2>world in the sectors that you just mentioned. Since there's

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 2>been a bit of a shift and right now the

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 2>Chinese economy is in a very different position, and we're

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 2>seeing basically an implosion of the housing sector, which is

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:32.639
<v Speaker 2>a real drag on growth, and that's a situation that

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 2>sort of persisted. So the Chinese government's thinking about what

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 2>are some of the other levers that can be pulled on,

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 2>and going back to this idea of export lead growth

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 2>and identifying a few priority areas has been part of

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 2>the solution, and electric vehicles, solar modules, and lithium ion

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 2>batteries are the three sectors that have been picked out

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 2>as especially full of potential when it comes to being

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 2>sectors that are expanding rapidly and for their being growing

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 2>markets outside of China for those goods. And what's really

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 2>interesting is we've seen a shift recently where this has

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 2>been a priority that's been identified by the Chinese government

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 2>in terms of exporting these different goods, but we're also

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 2>starting to see the likes of Bloomberg News Goldman Sachs

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:14.399
<v Speaker 2>the Financial Times start to draw comparisons looking at those

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 2>sectors and their contribution towards Chinese GDP at a time

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 2>where things are slowing down a bit, and comparing it

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 2>explicitly with the real estate sector and its contribution to GDP.

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 2>So really a repositioning of the energy transition, not just

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 2>talking about China's role in sectors that could be labeled

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 2>as strategic or key to the energy transition, but also

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 2>talking about the macroeconomic weight of those different sectors and

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 2>their contribution to the Chinese economy, which is a pretty

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 2>new shift and one that's quite exciting. Now.

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>We did a show not that long ago on battery

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing in China and this set of new facilities that

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>are coming online called gigafactories, which are at a scale

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>never seen before anywhere in the world. Can you talk

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit specifically about the battery part of it

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and kind of what's happening there.

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. So, what we do at BNF is we track

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 2>inment in lots of different sectors, and we started doing

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 2>the same for the supply chain side of the energy

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 2>transition story. As of last year. We recently re updated

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 2>our numbers in a report, the Energy Transition Investment Trends

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Report that was published earlier this year, and we tracked

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 2>about one hundred and twenty five billion in supply chain

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 2>related investment over the last year, and a big part

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 2>of that was from battery cell factories coming online. So

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 2>huge part of what's being invested what we think will

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 2>we be invested across all clean energy factories are in

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 2>the battery value chain because of the fact that that

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 2>specific supply chain is so capital intensive. Now, when we

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 2>look at where stuff's coming online, that's where things get

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 2>really interesting. So when we look at clean energy supply

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 2>chain investments written large, there's a lot of excitement about

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:46.359
<v Speaker 2>onshoring and localizing things outside of China, But when we

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 2>look at where new factories are actually coming online and

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 2>still doing so, things are still more than ninety percent

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 2>concentrated in one place, and that's China. So we're seeing

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 2>we're still seeing a lot of momentum bekind new factories

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 2>coming online in one part of the wor world, and

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 2>they're doing so at a massive scale. In the past,

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the reasons for why Chinese manufacturers were

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 2>starting to try and find footholds in certain sectors was

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.359
<v Speaker 2>due to low labor costs or significant public support. But

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 2>now we've reached a situation where those battery manufacturers are

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 2>at the technological frontier of what's being done in that space,

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 2>where we've reached levels of scale and sort of the

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 2>accompanying networks of providers in certain regions that just allow

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 2>them to outcompete basically any other sort of nascent battery

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 2>making industries outside of China. And that's a real big

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 2>part of why China is so competitive is really down

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 2>to scale at this stage and down to investments in

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 2>supply chains that stretch back quite a few years now.

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>So another one of the industries that China has been

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 1>very dominant in arguably for much longer than even the

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>battery space is the solar sector. Can you talk about

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:49.559
<v Speaker 1>some of the history there and how they have also

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>used scale in order to really be the largest manufacturer

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 1>in the world for solar modules.

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 2>So now we're going to talk about overcapacity, and we're

0:05:58.240 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 2>going to talk about it in a way in which

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.479
<v Speaker 2>is quite specific to the two sectors we're talking about

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 2>just now, batteries and solar. What's really interesting with solos

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 2>we've seen sort of cyclical over capacity be a feature

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 2>of the market stretching back for as long as China's

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 2>been involved in manufacturing at scale, so over the last

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 2>decade plus. But right now things are a little bit different.

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 2>So right now we've actually got a situation where in

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty two, by the end of the year, China

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 2>had more than enough manufacturing capacity, and whether it was

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 2>in the upper bit of the value chain in polosilicon

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 2>manufacturing or whether it's all the way down downstream to

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 2>module making, it had enough manufacturing capacity within its own

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 2>borders to supply the whole of the world's demand. But

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 2>what we saw over the last year is a pretty

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 2>unexpected boom in continued investments in new factories. They're built

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 2>so quickly in China that many of them came online

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty three. And right now, when we look

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 2>at Chinese manufacturing capacity and we compare it to global demand,

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 2>so China's nameplate manufacturing capacity is more than twice what

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 2>would be required to meet global demand. And based on

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 2>what's been announced, and many Chinese manufacturers don't announce manufacturing

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 2>capacity investments that far ahead of time, but just based

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 2>on announcements that will continue to be the case even

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 2>as demand grows according to our optimistic scenario over the

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 2>next two years. So pretty shocking levels of over capacity.

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 2>That's the case for solar modules. It's also the case

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 2>for polysilicon, where there's over one point one terrawatts of

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 2>polysilicon manufacturing online in China today, and then if we're

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 2>looking at our demand numbers for the world, we're at

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 2>somewhere around six hundred and seventy giga what's required for

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four, according again to optimistic scenario, So just

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 2>to give you an idea of the scale of overcapacity

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 2>is really pretty shocking. And it's also the case for

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 2>battery manufacturing where similarly, battery cell manufacturing capacity in China

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 2>is basically more than twice global demand. That will remain

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 2>the case going forwards based on announced facilities, and it

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 2>means that China's able to pull off pretty impressive feats

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 2>like building enough lift your mind battery cells love year

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 2>to supply all of the world's demand. So we're at

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 2>levels of continued over investment in battery manufacturing, in solar manufacturing,

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing that continue and we actually track the numbers

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 2>and we identified about four hundred and sixty nine billion

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 2>dollars of overinvestment above what would be required to meet

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 2>demand under our net zero scenario over the next four

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 2>years in battery manufacturing and solar manufacturing.

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Now you had said that Chinese manufacturing facilities come online

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>really fast. How fast is really fast? Months? Years?

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 2>It depends on whether you're retrofitting an existing facility. It

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 2>depends on whether you're building something a bit more involved

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to technology, So polysilicon plants might take

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 2>a couple of years. They are a little bit more

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 2>complicated to set up and get running. A module factory

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 2>is a little bit less complicated, relatively speaking, and can

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 2>be put up in a few months if you're retrofitting,

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 2>if there's an existing production process which is more aligned

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 2>with the one that you're putting in place, then it

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 2>can be done relatively quickly, within sort of I've heard

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 2>three months, but six months being something that's routinely cited

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 2>as the amount of lead time required to put up

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 2>a new module factory.

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>So then is it reasonable to say that this is

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:12.079
<v Speaker 1>very intentional and that this isn't a series of projects

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that were already in the pipeline that then got completed,

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>but the market wasn't exactly ready for and the economics

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't match what they projected their demand to be. But

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>these came online regardless of where current demand was, almost

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>reaching then for future demand that maybe they see coming,

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of if you have the supply, then the

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>demand will exist because the economics will be so low.

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>So they're kind of creating the market where maybe even

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>closer to being paras aligned to thinking about bringing down

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>emissions and making the renewable energy transition even faster if

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you think about it.

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, That's one of the big messages from a

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 2>recent piece of research that we've just published is looking

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 2>at this overcapacity story, and there's a number of different

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 2>outcomes and conclusions that you can draw from what's going on,

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 2>and one is that it's brought the cost of renewable

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 2>energy crashing down. It's brought the cost of electric vehicles,

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 2>of batteries, of solar modules, for example, and even within China,

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 2>and this is a bit different to the rest of

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:10.679
<v Speaker 2>the world's wind industry, the cost of wind turbines falling

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 2>pretty rapidly, so we've seen, for example, the spot market

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 2>rate for a Chinese solar module is now around eleven

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 2>dollars cents per what a year ago it was double that,

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 2>So it's really rapidly falling, and that means the world

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 2>gets to profit, especially at a time when, for example,

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 2>in the West, like the energy transition has never been

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 2>submitted to the levels of political scrutiny that it's under,

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 2>whether that's in Europe, whether that's in North America. And

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 2>now we're at a time where the economic case for

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 2>the energy transition is stronger than ever, and a big

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 2>part of that is due to the fact that we've

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 2>got this massive surplus glut in good quality, low cost

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 2>technology coming from China right now. That is a positive

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 2>story and it's one that should lead to an acceleration

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 2>of the energy transition. We've even seen sort of reports

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 2>of people now in Europe putting up solar modules along fences,

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 2>for example, because you can do that now it's cheap enough.

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of the forecasts and scenarios that we

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>actually run show quite a bit of adoption. And so

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>these charts that kind of go up into the right

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to demand, some of them at a

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>steeper curve, and some of them taper off a little

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.679
<v Speaker 1>bit more depending on what's actually happening in the economy.

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>And one of these areas where there has been some

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>forecast around some cooling demand in particular coming from the

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>companies themselves that are the producers, is electric vehicles. So

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking about electric vehicles, the number of vehicles

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that are actually coming online from China, are those actually

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>then being also exported or are those being focused on

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>their domestic market.

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, great question. There's been the recent story of the

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 2>slowdown in growth in electric vehicle sales. It's one driven

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 2>by a number of different factors, such as interest rates

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 2>for example. There's a question now is whether or not

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 2>we're sort of at a historical turning point where we're

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 2>starting to see very explicitly a lot of Chinese EV

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 2>manufacturers BYD being the most commonly cited one, but there

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 2>are many others turn their gaze beyond China in a

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 2>much more serious sense than they were in the past

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to looking at growing markets. Chinese market

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 2>is becoming increasingly oversaturated, it's incredibly competitive, so there's a

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 2>lot of looking abroad. So again, BYD, the world's largest

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 2>producer of EV's also produces a lot of its own batteries,

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 2>has now been commissioning large carrier ships that are specifically

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 2>designed to carry vehicles, and it's sort of leading the

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 2>charge along with another couple of EV manufacturers like Great

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 2>War Motive, for example, in trying to sell more to

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 2>emerging economies, set up manufacturing there, but also sell cars

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.319
<v Speaker 2>from out of China into Europe, and that's something that

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 2>we've seen recently, a bit of an emerging trend where

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 2>we saw about nine percent of evs sold within the

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 2>EU last year come from Chinese headquartered manufacturers, and that's

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 2>a share that we expect to see growing and that's

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:41.559
<v Speaker 2>in turn led to a bit of a pivot from

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 2>the European Commission, which is now a little bit concerned

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 2>about that penetration and is thinking about whether or not

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 2>to put in place new tariffs. So there's currently an

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 2>anti subsidy investigation that's been launched by the European Commission

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 2>looking explicitly at whether or not there'd be an argument

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 2>that could be made that Chinese manufacturers are benefiting from

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 2>unfair subsidies and that would provide the backing or the

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 2>cover to put in place new trade measures which is

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 2>something that the EUS shine away from in the past.

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 2>It's got pretty minimal tariffs on most clean technology, especially

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 2>when you compare it to other regions of the world

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 2>that are also aligned with the EU in terms of

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:16.839
<v Speaker 2>trying to build out local supply chains at local manufacturing,

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 2>like the US, like India, both of which are much

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 2>more comfortable with using protectionist tools as part of their

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 2>industrial strategy. Arsenal.

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>So, we've seen battery prices fall and the levelized cost

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of electricity for solar being below what would be considering

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 1>traditional high carbon energy sources like coal, for example, in

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>most locations in the world. But when it comes to

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles, the argument is often that electric vehicles are

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 1>not yet at price parity with internal combustion engine vehicles

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and that we are moving in that direction, but we're

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>not there just yet. So the question is are these

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Chinese vehicles that are coming online in places like Europe,

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>are they getting closer faster?

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, they are. There's been a bit of a focus

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 2>in the West on when it comes to ev manufacturing,

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 2>with presenting large SUVs for example, many of which are

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 2>quite pricey. So when you look at the average sort

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:08.079
<v Speaker 2>of price points for electric vehicles sold in the US,

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 2>for example, you're around forty to fifty thousand dollars. Now,

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 2>the picture in China's very different, And just within China

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 2>you've got things like BYD's cgull hatchback, which is a

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 2>model that's regularly cited now just because of the fact

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 2>that it's being sold at pretty shockingly low prices of

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 2>under ten thousand dollars per car. Now, when BYD is

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 2>sort of setting those cars and exporting them abroad, we're

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 2>typically seeing prices around double that. But even if you're

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 2>stacking on top tariffs and shipping costs and all these

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 2>other things, you're still seeing cars that are sold at

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 2>extremely competitive rates. So the outcome of that will be

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 2>that the tipping points that we'd be seeing would be

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 2>reached more quickly because we're starting to see a wave

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 2>of again, good quality, cheaper cars come into these markets

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 2>where traditionally speaking exactly that economic tipping point was holding

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 2>back adoption and leaving it as the preserve of countries

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 2>that are able to dole out extremely generous upfront grants

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 2>for buyers, or countries that a richer and able to

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 2>afford those cars. We might see a bit of a

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 2>change there, and it's something that will be quite interesting. Again,

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 2>there will be differences based on region and based on

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 2>how comfortable different parts of the world are with employing

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 2>measures around market access. And for example, the US seems

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 2>like a bit of a less of a promising market

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 2>for Chinese auto manufacturers than Europe. So byd and these

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 2>other companies are much less bullish when it comes to

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 2>their ability to set into the US market as opposed

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 2>to other parts of the world.

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>So you had mentioned subsidies, and the thing that's really

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>coming to my mind given that we're recording here in Europe,

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>is this parallel maybe with the agriculture industry, where you

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>see governments intervening and actually asking farmers not to produce

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in order to keep prices at a certain place so

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that they're high enough in order to support the farmers

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that are in this industry. It seems like the reverse

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>thing is happening in China, where they're actively promoting this

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>global oversupply and domestic oversupply in these industries. Can you

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about the role of the Chinese

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>government in how solar batteries and electric vehicles are really

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>working From the manufacturing side.

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's a bit of a framing of intention, and

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 2>when you look at reporting around this, you often see

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 2>things like the Chinese government's planned to dominate the solar industry.

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 2>These are sectors that have been identified as priority sectors

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 2>by the Chinese government, and there has been sort of

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 2>low cost credit, for example, that's being provided by states

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 2>financial institutions. There are subsidies offered at a local level

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to power or land, just as happens

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 2>in much of the rest of the world that's trying

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 2>to pursue growth via industrial strategy. But really something that

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 2>goes unsaid is the extent to which this is the

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 2>result of market forces, and to quite a shocking extent. Actually,

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 2>when you look at the margins that we're seeing in

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 2>the solar industry, in the battery making space, in ev manufacturing,

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 2>even among wind turbine makers within China, margins have shrunk

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 2>considerably due to the fact that competition's gone from red

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 2>hot to white hot recently. It's an incredibly tough space

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 2>to operate in and actually a lot of the overcapacity

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 2>that we're seeing is not so much the result of

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 2>an intentional policy to try and flood the world markets

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 2>with this kind of technology, it's more the result of

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 2>companies playing a big game of chicken, and basically the

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:08.239
<v Speaker 2>first to blink in terms of not constantly updating your

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 2>manufacturing facilities is instantly rendered irrelevant. And what I mean

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 2>by that is that we're seeing very fast technology cycles.

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 2>In solar for example, we're seeing a shift to ND

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 2>type modules called top con modules, away from PERK, which

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 2>was the previous dominant technology. That's happened in just a

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 2>couple of years, and that means that you're constantly having

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 2>to invest in new manufacturing capacity to stay relevant. And

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 2>we're also seeing that in the battery making space, where

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing rapid shifts from nickel heavy chemistries to ones

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 2>that are more iron based. And again we're seeing the

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 2>picture change extremely dynamically from year to year, and that

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 2>results in the same sort of thing, massive investments in

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 2>just trying to stay relevant in the space. And actually

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 2>proof of this has a big dynamic that we're seeing

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 2>is the fact that these companies' share prices have really

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 2>not been doing great. They've been underperforming the Shanghai Stock

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Market index. That's been a persistent trend that we've seen

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 2>over the last few months and is directly linked to

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 2>this idea of massive overcapacity, pressure on prices, pressure on margins,

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 2>and that is part of the reason why these manufacturers

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:10.360
<v Speaker 2>are now looking abroad and looking to try and sell

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:12.719
<v Speaker 2>their products outside of China because of the fact that

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 2>their home market is so oversaturated, and that oversaturation is

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:18.959
<v Speaker 2>the result of relentless extreme competition.

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk a bit about how the rest of

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the world is reacting. There's a growing trend of Western

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:29.959
<v Speaker 1>countries actually looking to nearshore and onshore production. We've actually

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>talked about this with you on this show. So how

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>has that progressed? And, you know, without giving away the punchline,

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you've talked about this as we've gone through this show.

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>Chinese manufacturing has led to dramatically lower prices in a

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of the areas that they actually go into. So

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>have these nearshore and onshore manufacturing facilities have they been

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>able to get anywhere close to being competitive?

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 2>So we can again talk back to those investment numbers

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned earlier. So when we look at new factories

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 2>that are supposed to come online this year outside of China,

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 2>across solar manufacturing, battery manufacturing, wind manufacturing, hydrogen electrializer manufacturing.

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 2>We see a quadrupling of the levels that we saw

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 2>last year this year, and by the end of next

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 2>year we should be at eight times twenty twenty three levels.

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 2>So we're basically on the cusp when we look at

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 2>what's been announced of a pretty big wave of not

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 2>just breaking ground or starting to make investments, but factories

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 2>actually coming online for clean technologies across North America and

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 2>across Europe. That's a real big shift, and that's really

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:33.719
<v Speaker 2>driven by a lot of those policies that you mentioned,

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 2>which are things like the Inflation Reduction Act in the US,

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 2>which is incredibly generous when it comes to subsidies for manufacturers,

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 2>many of which are in the form of production based

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 2>tax credits, but also in the form of the Federal

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 2>loan program, for example. And in Europe we're starting to

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:48.919
<v Speaker 2>see the Net Zero Industry Act, which is still in

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 2>a proposal stage, but sets out these incredibly ambitious targets

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 2>for local manufacturing, and it's being increasingly backed up by

0:19:56.600 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 2>member states starting to give company specific support to certain

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:03.880
<v Speaker 2>firms willing to manufacture in Europe, but also in the

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 2>form of countries trying to put in place their own

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 2>versions of the inflation reduction acts, such as France, for example,

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:11.640
<v Speaker 2>which is very keen to start to provide tax credits

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 2>to manufacturers setting up shop there. So this is a

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.360
<v Speaker 2>big shift that we're seeing. The question is is that competitive.

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 2>The answer is no, not from an economic perspective, but

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 2>on shoring, localizing supply chains was never really about making

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 2>the case that it was economically competitive. There was always

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 2>this idea, at least among those who are honestly presenting

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 2>these ideas, that there would be a premium to be

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 2>paid as a result of this, but that that would

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 2>be worth the co benefits in terms of resiliency, in

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 2>terms of local value creation, in terms of jobs. And

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 2>that's a calculus that has changed a little bit due

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 2>to the current overcapacity situation and the current low prices

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 2>that we're seeing do mean that that economic gap is

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 2>greater than ever before, and that manufacturing in Europe and

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 2>manufacturing in the US comes at a greater cost compared

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 2>to the current cheap technology that we could be relying

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 2>on then was the case in the past. So it

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 2>does reshuffle the cards a bit in terms of the

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 2>implied cost of trying to make good on all of

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.399
<v Speaker 2>these onshoring plans, and we're starting to see that trickle

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 2>down through decisions made by companies such as meyer Burger,

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 2>for example, which is a Swiss company. It operates out

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 2>of Germany, but it's Europe's only real claim for solar

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:22.919
<v Speaker 2>manufacturing to be happening at scale when it comes to

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 2>the downstream bits of the value chain, so cells and modules.

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 2>That company has recently said that it's basically winding down

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 2>its European operations and shifting to the US where there's

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:34.919
<v Speaker 2>better access to subsidies. And the real driving force for

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 2>that is the current crash in module prices that we've

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 2>seen that is directly resulting from Chinese oversupply. And that's

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 2>at a time where the EU is saying we want

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 2>to have forty percent of our solar demand sourced from

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 2>locally made solar modules by twenty thirty. If it's unable

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 2>to keep existing manufacturers from decamping elsewhere, how is it

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 2>going to achieve those objectives is a big question that

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 2>is unanswered at present when it comes to the EU's

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 2>current policy making environment. There's similar pressures on manufacturers in

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 2>the US, where even if you have more generous subsidies

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 2>in the form of the IRA's tax credits. You're still

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 2>seeing manufacturers like Cubic PV, which had a big eight

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 2>to ten gigawatts per year plant for making PV wafers

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 2>in the US as basically announced it's canceling those plans

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 2>due to the overcapacity situation, rendering its planned operations unfeasible

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:23.679
<v Speaker 2>from an economic standpoint. So this is a real pressure

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 2>and it's really weighing on these onsuring plans, and it's

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 2>meaning that policymakers are going to have to do one

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:31.959
<v Speaker 2>of two things, either give up or double down and

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 2>get serious, but probably in a more focused and targeted

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 2>way than in the past, where there was a vague

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:39.439
<v Speaker 2>thought that if you pursued localization it would sort of

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 2>work out, and in the EU it wouldn't involve hard

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:45.400
<v Speaker 2>decisions around trade barriers or around thinking more about how

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 2>to restructure subsidies. It would just sort of happened if

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 2>it was identified as a priority. That doesn't seem realistic now,

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 2>and it seems like there's going to be real pressure

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 2>on policymakers to either do what the French government is

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 2>doing and go extremely hard in one direction and say no,

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 2>we're going to double down on this. We're going to

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 2>put in place market access barriers for Chinese companies willing

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 2>to sell evs into France or benefit from ev subsidies

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 2>in France, or for example, go the way of Germany,

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 2>where a member of the coalition government is really not

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 2>keen on any kind of measures that could be deemed

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 2>to be sort of market interference or distortive in nature,

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 2>and where we're seeing real pushback against the idea of

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 2>putting in place concrete measures for incentivizing local solar manufacturing.

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 2>So there's real hard discussions that are already happening in

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 2>these countries because of this overall global situation that we've

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:32.479
<v Speaker 2>got as a backdrop, And that's going to mean that

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:34.199
<v Speaker 2>the next year is going to be really key to

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 2>understanding the extent to which all of this vague talk

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 2>of onshuring and localization is actually going to bear out

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:40.360
<v Speaker 2>in reality.

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>So even for the countries that have decided that they

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:46.359
<v Speaker 1>are not going to promote intervention, you're clearly seeing the

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Chinese government intervening in their market. And in the US,

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the Inflation Reduction Act has often been referred to as

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a game changer for many of the markets that they've

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>been helping to bolster like hydrogen. But when we think

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>about the Inflation Reduction Act, it's not completely in them.

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.919
<v Speaker 1>You've definitely already established that, but it has changed it

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and changed the market for the US specifically. What impact

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.400
<v Speaker 1>has that had on other countries that perhaps aren't as

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>proactive about getting involved with pricing and manufacturing and where

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and for how much?

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 2>So there's massive pressure by the IRA pushing other parts

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 2>of the world to pursue the same sort of onshowing agenda.

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 2>But that's why we've seen so much of the policy

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:27.120
<v Speaker 2>making around this be quite fuzzy and inexact, and where

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 2>many of the conversations have been happening have avoided making

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.439
<v Speaker 2>these hard choices about doubling down and what the actual

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 2>objectives are is exactly because of the fact that a

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 2>lot of these policies have been reactive by nature, have

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 2>been drawn up in a bit of a scramble to

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 2>provide something to compare what's being offered in the US against.

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 2>And the upshot is proposals that have come out of

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 2>the EU which are still at a very early stage

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 2>and still being brought into question. There's still a lot

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 2>of skepticism about the extent to which these extremely ambitious

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 2>onshowing targets that are being put forward by the European Commission,

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 2>whether or not there to be taken seriously. And that's

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 2>a direct result of the fact that the Iras really

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 2>put pressure in a very short timeframe on redrawing the

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 2>map when it comes to industrial strategies across the world.

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk a little bit about the future because

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:12.919
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that we're addressing now is that

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a supply and demand imbalance currently. But when we

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>look into the future, if we are to reach net

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>zero targets that have been stated all over the world,

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 1>there has to be a really market increase in demand

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of these industries, so does the demand

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>essentially catch up and is just an issue of timing?

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>And are we having a conversation regarding timing which will

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>more or less sort itself out over the next decade

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>or so.

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:42.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's the Jevam's paradox, which is basically this idea

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 2>that if something gets cheaper or more efficient then it's useful,

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 2>increased demand will go up. That's probably something that we'll see.

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 2>That's something that we're already seeing for solo where deployment

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 2>is surging past forecasts and where low prices are meaning

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 2>a pretty rapid growth across the board. We'll see that

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:59.360
<v Speaker 2>across all of these different sexes. There's overcapacity now it's

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 2>providing extra low prices is going to speed deployment and uptake,

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:05.439
<v Speaker 2>and that's something that is quite clear. The cause of

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 2>relationship there is very simple. There's also another part of

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:10.119
<v Speaker 2>the story as well, where because of the fact that

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing extremely fast cycles when it comes to technology

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 2>and the needs to update factories that I mentioned earlier,

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 2>is that many of these factories that are built now

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:20.199
<v Speaker 2>will be redundant in a few years if they're not

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 2>constantly invested in. That's part of the cause for a

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:24.679
<v Speaker 2>lot of this overinvestment, and we're already seeing a lot

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 2>of planned over investment going forward. But it's also relevant

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 2>to the overall picture because of this incredibly dynamic space

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 2>that we're seeing, whether it's with solar technology and the

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 2>shifts between different types of technology that we're seeing there,

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 2>or whether it's rapid advances in new battery chemistries in

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.120
<v Speaker 2>the littumon space. So those are also things to sort

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 2>of bear in mind. But overall. What's really interesting, and

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 2>again this is part of the work that we did

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 2>just looking at sort of energy transition investment trends earlier

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 2>this year, is that even as we tracked one point

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:55.439
<v Speaker 2>three trillion in energy transition spending last year, that was

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:57.879
<v Speaker 2>maybe three or four times less than what was actually

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 2>needed according to our net zero scenario, we're really seeing

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 2>a big shortfall. But that small share that we saw

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 2>in energy transition supply chains investment was the one or

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 2>one of the very few areas where investment was on track,

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 2>whereas a part of the puzzle that we have solved.

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 2>And yes there are issues in terms of concentration and

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:17.880
<v Speaker 2>resiliency of those supply chains written large, and how aligned

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 2>it is with different political objectives that very enormously based

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 2>by region. But the fact is is one part of

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 2>the equation that has been solved for and where we're

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:28.919
<v Speaker 2>not seeing a systematic shortfall investment, which is sadly the

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 2>case across much of the world's energy transition. And that

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 2>is something to find solis in when.

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 1>We look at a lot of these different government incentive

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>schemes and trade barriers. So the opposite of an incentive,

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you've actually seen some of these be quite porous. So

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 1>for example, you see some Chinese companies actually setting up

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing in Mexico to work around some of these barriers

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 1>and to also take advantage of this near shoring push.

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Are we seeing that really common and is it happening

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 1>all over the world or is it just in Mexico.

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 2>I expect we're going to see much more in the

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 2>way of protectionism when it comes to clean tech over

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 2>the next few years. Is something we're going to be

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 2>actively tracking in much more of a serious way over

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 2>the next few months. What we've seen in the past

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 2>is we've seen tariffs on certain products coming directly from China,

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 2>leading to Chinese manufacturers basically upping sticks and setting up

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 2>factories in regions where they have equally low costs for

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 2>manufacturing and where they're able to sell into the US.

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 2>And the big example there is PV with Southeast Asia,

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:32.959
<v Speaker 2>where you've seen an influx of the major Chinese manufacturers

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 2>into places like Malaysia and Vietnam specifically to get around

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.239
<v Speaker 2>the US tariffs on Chinese imports. That's been a bit

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 2>of a game of cat and mouse. There's been a

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 2>bit of a ping pong match with different sort of

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 2>officials within the Commerce Department in the US, lobbying sometimes successfully.

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 2>We've seen some relaxation of those rules for restrictions on

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 2>modules coming from Southeast Asia. But it's a clear example

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 2>of the kind of reactions and strategies that we've seen

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 2>employed by companies affected by these policies. The question is

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 2>will that happen to other sectors. Now, Mexico is an

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 2>interesting example. We're about to publish, well, we will have

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 2>published a note by the time this podcast comes out

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 2>on specifically addressing this issue. And what's the issue in

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 2>question is that US policymakers have talked about exports, specifically

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 2>of Chinese electric vehicles manufactured in Mexico being sold into

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 2>the US, where because of the USMCA favorable trade terms

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 2>between Mexico and the US, they're avoiding the twenty seven

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 2>point five percent tariffs that are applied to Chinese EV's

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 2>coming from China into the United States. So it could

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 2>be sort of a back door where you could start

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 2>to see because of low Mexican manufacturing costs, so factory

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 2>workers in Mexico are actually paid less than in China.

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Now it's pretty shocking fact, but there's a real case

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 2>to be made for manufacturing in Mexico, and Chinese EV

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 2>manufacturers could profit from that and set into the US. However,

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 2>there's a few big howevers. One is that there's no

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 2>real existing lithumind battery supply chain in Mexico right now,

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 2>so the current government has been quite interventionist and hasn't

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 2>had the most relaxed approach to foreign or private investment

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 2>into the lithium ion battery space. That's sort of held

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 2>back a lot of investments, whether or not it is

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 2>on the exploration side of things for mineral extraction for

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 2>lithium extraction, or whether or not it's an actual setting

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 2>up battery factories and EV production lines. It's acted as

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a drag on those investments there. And

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing an election coming up sort of midyear where

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:24.239
<v Speaker 2>the likely front runner, Cloudy of Shinbaum, also stems from

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 2>the same sort of school of thoughts. So even though

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 2>we're hearing a lot as she's on the campaign trail

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 2>about opportunities for Mexico to become a big hub for

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 2>battery manufacturing and benefiting from the US's focus on near assuring,

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot of its supply chains. There's a lack of

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 2>clarity about whether or not she'll be willing to put

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 2>in place the reforms that would actually enable that to

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 2>happen because of how politically charged they are within the

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 2>current Mexico political ecosystem. Now, the other thing is that

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 2>there are a couple of Chinese EV manufacturers active in Mexico,

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 2>only two that we've tracked. Jac is one of them,

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 2>and it's pretty minor footprint when you compare it in

0:30:58.320 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 2>the grand scheme of things. We've seen a lot of

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 2>talk of BYD again of a number of Chinese EV

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 2>manufacturers talking about setting up in Mexico, but we've not

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 2>really seen anything confirmed, nothing concrete as of present. And actually,

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 2>what's really interesting too is that a lot of the

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 2>fears or concerns that are cited by US policy makers

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 2>are around, Okay, we've put in place these IRA subsidies

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 2>that also benefit North American EV assembly and manufacturing writ large,

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Chinese manufacturers could benefit from that. Well. Actually, a lot

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 2>of the fine print within those subsidies and the thirty

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 2>D EV or Clean Vehicle Tax credit that provides a

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 2>sort of upfront purchase grant for EV buyers in the US,

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 2>which is incredibly important, receives a lot of media attention

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 2>that isn't available in most cases if a Chinese company

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 2>is involved in the manufacturing process. So already you're seeing

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 2>an environment in Mexico that isn't super favorable to setting

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 2>up a battery manufacturing hub anytime soon. You're seeing a

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 2>lack of real concrete investments by Chinese manufacturers, and you're

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 2>also seeing an environment in the US where market access

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 2>for Chinese firms isn't a given. So our conclusion is

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 2>that those concerns are overblown and overstated. But we are

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 2>going to enter a new era of tariffs potentially in

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 2>the US if Donald Trump wins. We've heard talk of

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 2>sixty percent tariffs on everything coming into the US, and

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 2>we've also heard talk of one hundred percent tariffs, is

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 2>something that was recently mentioned by Donald Trump at a

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 2>speech on specifically Chinese made vehicles coming from Mexico. So again,

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Chinese manufacturers, they're not particularly looking to sell into the

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 2>US because the current environment seems to be incredibly difficult.

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 2>But the big question is what happens to Europe. Europe

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 2>still remains incredibly open when it comes to citing Chinese

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 2>manufacturers or East Asian manufacturers in general, tariffs are still low.

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 2>The big question there is will that change, And that's

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 2>when things will get quite interesting when it comes to

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 2>re examining how that would play out in practice and

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 2>whether or not we could see circumvention implored as a

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 2>strategy and response.

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>We spend a lot of time talking about established markets

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 1>in the energy system. So we've talked about the US

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and Europe and China, but let's talk a little bit

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 1>about some of the markets that are growing in many

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>respects because of population growth. So I'm thinking of parts

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 1>about perhaps India, where in other parts of the world

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>there are growing economies, both in terms of people and

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in terms of energy access. What is happening there and

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 1>how does all of this global economic interplay for these industries,

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 1>how does it impact them.

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 2>There's a big risk when all of these richer countries

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 2>try and outcompete each other by offering subsidies and trying

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 2>to push forward with this onshoring agenda, that this sort

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 2>of deprives much of the developing world of an opportunity

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 2>to profit from those industries and use them as a

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 2>way in which develop their own economies. That's a real concern,

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 2>but it's something that's quite interesting. It really depends again

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 2>on where you're looking. Southeast Asia is becoming a pretty

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 2>big hub for manufacturing clean technology, and that's something where

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 2>we've seen massive investments from Chinese manufacturers, but also an

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 2>increasing focus when it comes to engagement from the US

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 2>or from the EU on having a role to play

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 2>there too. The situation in sub Hian Africa is very different.

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 2>We've seen a lot of excitement around potential sort of

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 2>battery manufacturing or even exports of things like hydrogen for example,

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 2>from subs Hiana, but when it comes to realizing projects

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 2>to tapping into local demand, things are much more complicated

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 2>and difficult. One country that's quite interesting is India. So

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 2>since twenty nineteen and even before, but really twenty nineteen

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 2>was the point where things intensified, we've seen a real

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 2>push from the Indian government to onchore solar manufacturing. Specifically,

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 2>it's deployed all kinds of different tools, from import tariffs,

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 2>from approving a certain list of manufacturers to take part

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 2>in bids. When it comes to soda auctions, it also

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 2>takes the form of local content requirements. There's been a

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 2>real battery of measures that's been deployed for onshoring soda,

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:36.319
<v Speaker 2>and it's gone well, it's not gone great. There's been

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:41.319
<v Speaker 2>a degree of uncertainty from investors and developers complaining a

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 2>lot about increased costs, about the lower availability of modules

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 2>at a low prices, increased the cost of doing business

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 2>for developers in India large it's been quite inflatory, just

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:53.840
<v Speaker 2>in the same way as any of these sort of

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 2>protectionist measures would be. But we've really seen it as

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 2>a sort of sandbox for trying out these measures in

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 2>an environment that's very different to the US, that's very

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 2>different from Europe. What we have seen is limited success

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 2>in growing out four years on from when this started

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 2>out in serious limited success when it comes to growing

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 2>out supply chains up and down the solar value chain.

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:16.880
<v Speaker 2>But we have seen some pretty big investments in solar

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 2>module manufacturing, and there's increasing interest and detailed talk about

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 2>doing the same for manufacturing cells and even going up

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:27.759
<v Speaker 2>towards wafers. It's still early days, but it's still a

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:30.239
<v Speaker 2>really interesting experiment that we're seeing and that would be

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:32.240
<v Speaker 2>good to track, just because of the fact that local

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 2>demand is set to increase incredibly rapidly, and we've already

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 2>seen a real credible commitment from the Indian government. When

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 2>it comes to clean energy, manufacturing in India is held

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 2>back by all kinds of structural factors. It accounts for

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 2>a smaller share of GDP that you might expect given

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 2>its developmental trajectory, but there's still a big case to

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 2>be made for some of the fact that production costs

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:53.839
<v Speaker 2>could be quite low, and it could serve as quite

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:57.359
<v Speaker 2>a useful base when it comes to diversifact fighting manufacturing

0:35:57.520 --> 0:36:00.359
<v Speaker 2>away from relying on China, for example. There's a lot

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 2>of excitement around cooperating with India, as there is with

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 2>places like Indonesia, for example, and playing a more important

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 2>role within those battery or solar value chains. So it's

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 2>still relatively early days in a part of the world

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 2>where the amount of budgetary headroom for achieving these kind

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:18.400
<v Speaker 2>of objectives is a lot more limited than say the US.

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:20.800
<v Speaker 2>But I would sort of continue to look at India

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 2>quite closely just because of the fact that the government

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 2>is extremely comfortable with taking quite an aggressive stance on onsuring.

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:31.359
<v Speaker 2>It's been doing so since much before, several years before

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 2>the IRA came into force. And it's showing a level

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 2>of determination that sort of hints that it might not

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 2>just do that for solar it might also do that

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 2>for say, battery manufacturing when that starts to grow out

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 2>in a more serious way in India, which we expect

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:45.760
<v Speaker 2>to be the case over the next few years.

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Now, this is a story that is really equal parts

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:52.919
<v Speaker 1>economics and policy. So just recently, Janet Yellen, the US

0:36:53.000 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of the Treasury, was in China negotiating with the

0:36:56.280 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Chinese government. Can you talk a little bit about what

0:36:58.360 --> 0:36:58.919
<v Speaker 1>happened there.

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So this is a concern that we've seen cited.

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 2>If you go back in history, we had semiconductors coming

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 2>from Japan, similar concerns about overcapacity cited about government support

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:12.840
<v Speaker 2>in Japan leading to perceptions around dumping on global markets,

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 2>and that was something that led to a policy response

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:16.880
<v Speaker 2>to some of the US And when it comes to

0:37:17.040 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 2>China specifically, we've seen still be a sort of perennial

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 2>concern that's been brought up again and again and again.

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 2>This time again, these overcapacity concerns have been brought up

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 2>by Janet Yellen in the Treasury Department. They've been brought

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 2>up by Catherine tie in the Commerce Department during a

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 2>recent trip to Brussels, where those talk around Chinese overcapacity

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 2>as a structural issue echoes with many of the views

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 2>that are being cited in the European Commission and across

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 2>member states. So there's a general consensus that something needs

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 2>to be done. There's a desire to engage with China

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 2>about ways in which to resolve this issue, and the

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Chinese government has identified overcapacity as a concern, but I

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 2>think it's just it's still quite difficult for it to

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:58.240
<v Speaker 2>act at a time when those sectors are potential sources

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:01.279
<v Speaker 2>of growth, when the Chinese government's ability to sort of

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 2>slow down investment even as it limits IPOs for example,

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 2>and tries to weigh on the decisions to expand manufacturing

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 2>are surprisingly limited when a lot of the incentives are

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 2>given at a local level in China, and at a

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 2>time when things aren't as coordinated as they might seem.

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Those sectors are priority sexers that have been identified by

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:20.719
<v Speaker 2>the Chinese government, But as I've mentioned, a lot of

0:38:20.760 --> 0:38:23.400
<v Speaker 2>those investments, a lot of that over capacity are the

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 2>results of market forces, are the results of firms trying

0:38:26.560 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 2>to outcompete each other, trying to outinnovate each other, and

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 2>that's why we're seeing completely bonkers level of overinvestments in

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:36.320
<v Speaker 2>solar and in batteries and across evs, and that's unlikely

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:38.799
<v Speaker 2>to change in the short term as a result of

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 2>this kind of engagement that we're seeing at present.

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Antoine, thank you very much for joining today and talking

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:47.239
<v Speaker 1>us through some of the really important highlights of the

0:38:47.239 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 1>incredibly complex world of supply chains in global trade as

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 1>it relates to the energy transition.

0:38:53.239 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 2>It was a real pleasure. As always, Thank you so much, Dana.

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode of Switched On was produced by Cam Gray

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:12.319
<v Speaker 1>with production assistance from Kamala Shelling. Bloomberg NEIF is a

0:39:12.360 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 1>service provided by Bloomberg Finance LP and its affiliates. This

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 1>recording does not constitute, nor should it be construed as

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 1>investment in vice, investment recommendations, or a recommendation as to

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 1>an investment or other strategy. Bloomberg ANIFF should not be

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:28.760
<v Speaker 1>considered as information sufficient upon which to base an investment decision.

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:31.839
<v Speaker 1>Neither Bloomberg Finance Lp nor any of its affiliates makes

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 1>any representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness

0:39:35.640 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of the information contained in this recording, and any liability

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:41.360
<v Speaker 1>as a result of this recording is expressly disclaimed.