WEBVTT - Connecting the Dots

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>No Wagner family DNA was found on a crime scene.

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Does it matter to this case? I would say that

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:12.479
<v Speaker 1>they absolutely need some sort of physical evidence. It clearly

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>isn't happening with the DNA, is the shoe prints, and

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it's the ballistics that's got juror's eyes were glued to

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the latest witness to testify in George Wagner the Fourth's

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>murder trial. This is the Piked and Massacre returned to

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Pike County season four, episode nine, Connecting the dots. I'm

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.599
<v Speaker 1>Courtney Armstrong, a television producer at Katie Studios, with Stephanie

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Lydecker and Jeff Shane. It's important to note that George

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>Wagner has pleaded not guilty and has maintained he did

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>not kill anyone. His father, Billy Wagner, whose trial is upcoming,

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>has also pleaded not guilty to all charges. Here's Stephanie

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and Jeff speaking about some of the revelations from the

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>autopsy results. They mentioned doctor Karen Luhman, who you may

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>remember is the forensic pathologist who performed all at autopsies

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and testified at the child How were three people at

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Dana Roden's home shot in their sleep. I just am

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to wrap my head around how the perpetrators were

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 1>able to walk around home shooting one person at a

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>time without waking anyone else up. And also, one thing

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>that I thought was interesting about Luman's testimony was how

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>she determined that some of the shots fired that night

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 1>were what she called at intermediate range, which is essentially

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 1>anywhere between three inches and three feet from someone, and

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>then others weren't. She said that's based on something called stippling,

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>or actual evidence of damage to the victim, based on

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>how close the muzzle of the gun was to the

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>victim itself. Some victims had that and were seemingly shot

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>at close range, but some didn't. So the choreographing of

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>all of that seems so complicated. Who was where when?

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>This morning? Lead Prosecutor Angie Kaneppa begins by addressing exactly

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>this question. Back on the stand is doctor Karen Luhman

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>speaking about Hannah Hazel Gilly's injuries? Can you tell us

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 1>where was gunshot? Wound number one located on the diagram.

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Number one is on the far left. It looks like

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>it's on the right forehead. It's a little more on

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the side of the forehead. Doctor, can you tell us

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>what did you determine the distance to be of that

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>gunshot wound? That is intermediate? And again that intermediate is

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>somewhere not contact or lose contact, but somewhere less than

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>three feet Yeah, okay, Shots two, three, and four we're indeterminate,

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>while shot five was again close range or what she

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:03.679
<v Speaker 1>calls intermediate. When you conducted your examination of Hannah Rode in,

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>how many gunshot wounds did you observe her to have? Two?

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>And can you tell us if you determined a distance? Yes?

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 1>And what was that it was indetermined? Canepa has a

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>chart where she keeps track of the myriad of gunshots,

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>some at a distance, some close, all while the victims

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>were asleep. Then she brings up the idea of how

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>this might be affected by the use of a silencer.

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>And doctor loman I believe you testified to this before.

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>But do you know or do you have an opinion

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>if there was a silencer used on a weapon, could

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that possibly impact your distance determinations? It possibly could? Yes, Okay.

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>The defense has no choice but to address the introduction

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of a possible use of a silencer as well. On

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the last one, of the last points the prostitute made

0:03:56.240 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the silence, How would that impact determination of the distance?

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>A silencer in general would fit around or in the

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>area of the muzzle, and it could capture some of

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the soot or stipling that normally would have landed on

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 1>clothes or the body. It may capture that. So, if

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 1>I understand what you're saying, the distance could actually be

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>closer than what you have observed. Yes, this is a

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>turning point in the trial. It's the first of many

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>loose threads that the prosecution finally begins to weave together

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>for a jury, a public, and a media weary after

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>weeks of detail specific testimony. So far, the prosecution has

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>worked in a meticulous linear fashion, laying out the grizzly

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 1>narrative that they want the jury to consider. Here's long

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>crime reporter Anjeanette Levy. I've covered a lot of trials

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>my career, a lot of criminal cases, but I've never

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 1>seen one presented in this fashion in court, where it's

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>all chronological or goes in chronological order of the investigation.

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's a two and a half year investigation

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>between the time of the homicides and the arrest sometimes

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it just feels like we're bouncing around a lot. You know,

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 1>it'll be up to the jury to determine whether or

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 1>not that was a good strategy. I've often wondered, are

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:34.840
<v Speaker 1>they confused by this? Here's James Pilcher, longtime investigative reporter

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>in Cincinnati, now with Local twelve. When it comes to

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 1>physical evidence, it's the shoe prints, and it's the ballistics

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 1>without Guy. And this is exactly how the prosecution begins

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to connect the dots and tighten the new son George

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:53.479
<v Speaker 1>and the Wagner family. Today, prosecutors present some of the

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>most crucial evidence yet in the trial of George Wagner

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 1>the Fourth and the Pike County massacre. Local twelve James

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Pilcher reports on key footprints that were found at the scene.

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Susan Elliott, a shoeprint specialist for the AHIB Bureau of

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Criminal Investigation at the time of the murders, declined to

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>be on camera with her testimony, but she matched footprints

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 1>found at the first crime scene with an actual shoe

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>style in size. Juror's eyes were glued to the latest

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>witness to testify in George Wagner the Fourth's murder trial

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:28.359
<v Speaker 1>as she opened large pizza boxes inside pieces of flooring

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>cut from one of the Pike County crime seats, the

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>trailer on Union Hill Road where Chris Roden Senior and

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Gary Rodin were murdered. She said these impressions that have

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>since been enhanced, were not in the crime lab's shoe database.

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>You may recall from last season the testimony of shoeprint

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 1>expert William Bodsiac during pre trial motions. Bodesiac, who worked

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>on the oj Simpson case, stated that investigators finally found

0:06:56.240 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the model shoe that made the Prince at Walmart with

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Susan Elliott who made the actual discovery James Pilcher. She's

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the one to found at all. She was the one

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that new will be looking out for the Walmart shoes

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>because she remembered, you know, our shoeprin expert found these

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>shoes of Walmarts, so we need to be looking for

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>anything for Walmar. Here is testimony from Brian Scheiterer had

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>BCI investigator who provided testimony the same day about how

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>they use that information As a result of learning that

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you were looking for a size eleven shoe that you

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>believed belonged to whoever committed these murders, or at least

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the individuals. What did you guys do? In

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>response to that information, it was decided that we would

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>contact the walmarts within a fifty mile radius of Pike

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>County and asked for all their records for transactions involving

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that shoe dated back to January first of twenty sixteen.

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>In an addition to getting the records of any transactions,

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>did you also get a request and receive video surveilance

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that corresponded with this y? As we know from previous episodes,

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>this is how the recorded video of Angela buying the

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>same model she is was found. Subsequently, they then seized

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a receipt from the purchase. Here's Jeff speaking with Mike

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Allen and your expertise as a lawyer. How big is

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>this piece of evidence? It's really big because you've got

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the receipt for purchasing them, they match up in size,

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and then of course she got the bloody footprint in

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the trailers. So it's very strong evidence. And

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:46.959
<v Speaker 1>I think that's something that the jury is going to

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>be thinking about. And do you think you know without

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>DNA evidence, this shoeprint is maybe the closest thing we have.

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>How much weight can the prosecution put on it? Oh,

0:08:57.679 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I think they can put a lot of weight on it.

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean the odds of it being some kind of

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>coincidence are in the millions, So I think they'll put

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of weight on It's it's real strong evidence

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:13.559
<v Speaker 1>for the statement. What's the defensive counter argument to this?

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>How do they defend the shoe print? I guess you

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>would have to argue that it's a pretty popular brand

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of shoe at Walmart. You'd have to do your homework

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and it. I don't know any other way to do that, because,

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>like I said, it's such strong evidence, you'd have to

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>argue that well, you know, it is what it is.

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 1>But they were in a real tough position on that one.

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how they're going to do it. They're

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>just going to have to argue coincidence, and I don't

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>think the jury's going to buy that. Here's forensic death

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>investigator Joseph Scott Morgan. Well, for me, shoper prints tell everything.

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>The shoe prints are indicative of purpose. They're indicative of

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>thought and air being taken when it comes to planning,

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>because from where did the shop prints originate, well, they

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>originated from a pair of shoes that were purchased for

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:17.439
<v Speaker 1>the sole purpose of, you know, following through with this

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>horrible plan. We've already got Angela Wagner actually stating that

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>she purchased the shoes and for them to have the

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>utility to go out for them to commit these crops. Next,

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 1>angel Wilson turns to ballistics. Mister White, where do you work?

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I work at the Bureau of Criminal Investigation also known

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>as BCA in London, Ohio. We have been able to

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>gather from preliminary motions and prosecution filings that there is

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a connection, they assert between shell casings found at at

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>least one of the crime scenes and weapons link back

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Wagner family. So we do expect that this

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 1>ballistics expert will prove a very important to this case.

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>White is a striking presence on the stand. He wears

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a broad shouldered black three piece suit and sports a

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>wide flat beard that ends the midway down his chest.

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.319
<v Speaker 1>When Matt White comes to work in London, Ohio, VCI,

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>what does he do every day? Our primary duties involved

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>examination of firearms to determine their operability, as well as

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>looking at fired ammunition components, be it a fire cartridge

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>case or a fire bullet. I can perform microscopic examinations

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to determine if they've been fired in or from a

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>particular farm, and if not, I could generate a potential

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>list of farms that could have been fired from. I

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>want to take you back to April of two sixteen,

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:51.319
<v Speaker 1>April twenty sixteen, at some point where you asked to

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Adam of fads that have been collected as part of

0:11:55.400 --> 0:12:00.439
<v Speaker 1>an investigation of an eight person homicide in Pike count Yes,

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I was, And can you tell the jury how were

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you initially brought into this case or asked to assist.

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>My supervisors notified us that there was a larger case

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that was coming into the laboratory, and I just happened

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:18.559
<v Speaker 1>to be the person selected to work the case at

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:23.559
<v Speaker 1>the time. White goes on to testify that he identified

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>two types of bullets at Chris Senior's home, thirty caliber

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>bullets from a high profiled rifle and forty caliber bullets

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>from an unknown firearm crime scene too. The home of

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Frankie Rowden and Hannah Hazela Gilly was a different story,

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>were several of the items that you examined from this

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>scene shell casings had been recovered by the crime scene unit.

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes they were. Yes, this is one fired watching long

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>rifle cartridge case. The fact that that cartridge has the

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 1>name long rifle, does that mean that it has to

0:12:56.760 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>be or can only be fired out of a rifle. No,

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly not. Twenty long rifle cartridge is generic. It can

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>be fired in a pistol, revolver, a rifle, any fire

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that's designed to actually fire that specific cartridge. Were you

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>also ask to be I think it came from Seeing three. Yes,

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I was. Was one of the items that you were

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:26.079
<v Speaker 1>asked to look at with respect the scene three as

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>shell casing. That was our cartridge casing that was recovered

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>from under a crib in this residence. Yes, that's correct.

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>This is a fire twenty two long rifle cartridge case

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>remick and brand with a rectangular wedge shaped fine pin impressure.

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>That item had the same general class characteristics as the

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>shell casings that you just testified too from scene two. Yes,

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that's correct, and again or those consistent with the other

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>projectiles recovered. An autopsy of the other victims have Seen

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>three and the other victims have scene two. Yes, they

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>are Stephanie and Jeff. So we have two types of

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:11.839
<v Speaker 1>bullets found at the scene. We have thirty caliber high

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>powered rifle bullets and forty caliber bullets found in Chris

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Senior's home. And we know from Fortner's testimony last week

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that the thirty calibers were sprayed from outside the trailer

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and the forties were found to have gone through the

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>floor and into the dirt below the home, so they

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>were shot inside. Now here's where it gets confusing, because

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>at Frankie and Dana Roden's homes they found twenty two

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>caliber bullets. Does that mean that whoever did this, whether

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it's one person or many people, did they do that

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>by switching out guns mid murder scene? Or does that

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>mean they almost divided and conquered and that different family

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>members were using different guns and that they were committing

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>these murders simultaneously. They moved on to crime scene four,

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Kenneth Roden's house. If you recall there was only one

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>shot fired Station Divot D two eighty two. You've already

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>opened her up. Do you recognize the markings on that package? Yes,

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>laboratory number, item number and my initials and we're able

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>to examine that item and reach any conclusion with respect

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to brand and caliber associated with that Yes, I was

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>able to conclude this as a fired forty Smith and

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Wesson cartridge case horn Day brand. Were you asked to

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>make some comparisons in this case to determine whether or

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>not certain pieces of evidence had been fired by the

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>same weapon at each scene? Yes, I was. Were you

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>able to reach a conclusion to a reasonable degree of

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>scientific certainty as to whether or not the forty caliber

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>shell casing a scene one was fired from the same

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>firearm that fired the forty caliber shellcasing the scene forty Yes,

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>microscopic comparison examining of the two fired forty Smith and

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Weston cartridge cases, I was able to conclude the two

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>forty Smith and Weston cartridge cases had been fired in

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the same fire. Media outlets jumped on the breaking news. Today,

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors turned to the bullets used in all eight murders.

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>The casings included a forty caliber shell found on Chris

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Senior's kitchen floor. He also showed the bullets to retrieved

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>from the victim's bodies. His testimony came after another BCI

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>agent walked through the crime scene where police found Chris

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Senior's brother, Kenneth Rowden, shot in his bed. Agents also

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 1>found a forty caliber shell in his bed. We're going

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to take a break. We'll be back in a moment.

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>The next day, the prosecution picks up once again with

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 1>testimony from Matthew White Angel. Wilson is intent on further

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>closing the loop on the physical ballistic evidence. In addition

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to that information that you passed onto the investigators, did

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 1>you do further work or further analysis to try to

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>determine what kind of twenty two or what kind of

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>forty was involved in these homicides? Yes. Oftentimes, if I'm

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>encountered evidence and there's no firearms submitted, I can look

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:29.919
<v Speaker 1>at certain features of the fire cartridge cases or the

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:33.639
<v Speaker 1>fire bullets to give a possible list of firearms that

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 1>could have fired them to aid investigators and what they

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>should be looking for. In the case of the twenty two,

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 1>he pinpoints the probable gun used. I was able to

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>examine other examples of test fires taken with Walter Cold

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eleven twenty two pistols. I was able to physically

0:17:54.800 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>examine a couple different of the specific guns. I was

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:04.439
<v Speaker 1>able to disassemble them, look at them further, examine the

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>firing pin itself, take additional test fires for comparison. In

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>addition to that, I corresponded with a design engineer at

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Walter in Germany about the shape the orientation of the

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>fine pin impression. He was able to look at some

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>stock examples at the factory of farms that they were producing,

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and he agreed and concurred that the shape of the

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:36.640
<v Speaker 1>fine pin impression and the orientation of it was consistent

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>with the farms that they produced the Walter Colt nineteen

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:46.360
<v Speaker 1>eleven twenty two pistols. In the case of the forty caliber,

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:49.159
<v Speaker 1>he pulls up an enlargement of the bullet casing, pointing

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:52.400
<v Speaker 1>out marks around the base of it. You can see

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:56.919
<v Speaker 1>the fine pin impression itself. It's elliptical, it is not

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>circular in shape. Those two features are very common with

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>block firearms. So based on those observations, again, did you

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>begin to feel that a block firearm or a forty

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>cow block was responsible for shooting the showcases recover from

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 1>scene one in ze four. Yes, the lock is by

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>far the most common firearm encountered that has those two characteristics. Next,

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution asked a key question of light. But at

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that time, when you were doing your initial work in

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 1>this case, did you have a firearm that had been

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:45.640
<v Speaker 1>plected as evidence to compare from the scene or from

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a suspect. No, I did not to understand the recovery

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of the Wagner's firearms. Brian Scheider is asked to step

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>back and give the jury a big picture on how

0:19:56.880 --> 0:20:01.120
<v Speaker 1>they began their investigation. Remember, at the time, BCI did

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>not yet know the Wagners were involved. Back to that

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>very first day, you responded to the Sheriff's office, you

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>interviewed some people, then what happened? Then what did you do?

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Things were still very confusing at that time. There's a

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 1>lot of information coming in, as you can expect. The

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>media was on scene at the time, so this had

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>went statewide as well as national. So eventually we went

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 1>back to the piked And Police Department and we try

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to organize things like we knew this was going to

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>be We're going to be in for the long haul

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>on this. We're trying to say, here's what we had

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>at the crime scenes, here's what the families told us,

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and here's tips that are coming in. That's all happening

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>extremely fast. Like it's overwhelming, it overloads you, it's coming

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>in so fast. We also established a tip system because

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:54.160
<v Speaker 1>we had so many tips coming in. Ultimately, I believe

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>we had eleven hundred and forty three tips that came

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.360
<v Speaker 1>in through the end of the investigation to the arrests,

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and eleven forty three of those tips were investigated and cleared.

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 1>And so how was that tip system established. They would

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>mark the tip, it would get assigned to an agent,

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>and the agent would go out investigate the tip and

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>respond back and report his or her findings. At some point,

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>they received a tip about the Wagner's collection of firearms.

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Here's Jeff speaking with Mike Gallen. Law enforcement have to

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>verify who sent the tip or does it not matter

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>if if it checks out? You mean, when the tip

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 1>comes in, try to figure out who it is. Yeah,

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Like if they got a tip that, oh, you should

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>search this property because there might be weapons there. If

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that tip checks out, doesn't matter who called it in.

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 1>In theory, wouldn't they want to track that person down

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>because that's a good witness or they don't care. They

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>probably would have to have more than that. You know,

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>they get a tip like that, they'd have to develop

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>its somewhat, you know, just some Tom Dick or Harry

0:21:54.560 --> 0:21:57.199
<v Speaker 1>calling and saying, Hey, you know, I think there's a

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>bunch of evidence and weapons down there Joe Jones's house.

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 1>The cops will have to have more than that. You

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:06.360
<v Speaker 1>just use the term to develop the tip. I've never

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 1>heard that. What does that mean? You know, perhaps try

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to find out whatever this witness said, maybe go to

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the place, check it out, maybe talked to other people.

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:18.719
<v Speaker 1>I just think that would be very weak to go

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to a judge and ask for a search warrant just

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>based on a completely anonymous tips that they would have

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to bolster that somehow it was enough to get warrants

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to search the Wagner's property. We also talked about you

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>seeking court orders for various phone records and Facebook records

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and any other records are correct, and can you tell

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 1>us kind of at what point did that start to

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>happen and what kinds of information were you receiving that

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>led you to turn your attention to them. It takes

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a long time to examine those things, you know, many

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of those files are extremely large, several thousand pages. It

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>is these electronic records a lead BCI to Jake Wagner

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 1>via social media posts about custody of his and Hannime

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Rodin's young child. When we first made contact with Jake Wagner,

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.239
<v Speaker 1>he had indicated that everything was okay, that he had

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a good relationship with Hannah, and there's no issues involving

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>their child that they shared together. So that that was

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a little suspicious morranted a little further investigation, obviously, But

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>we were also conducting an interviews of friends and family

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>who were reporting a similar situation. So you kind of

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:39.120
<v Speaker 1>have conflicting stories, right. You have one side that's saying

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 1>everything's okay, and then you have records and family members

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and friends that are saying that's not true. So that

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, you need to investigate that that's important,

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a lead, that's that's something that needs to be

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>ran down, and so that's what we started to do.

0:23:56.200 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Did you also look at Jake's fall and did you

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 1>find anything of interest on that phone? Yes? And can

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you tell us what you thought? And again, these were

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>expedited reviews of these records. It wasn't like we had

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 1>days to go through these. We literally downloaded these phones

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and started going through quickly. But one of the most

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting things that we found on Jake's phone at that

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>time was under the note section, and it was a

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>list of guns owned by the Wagoners or purported to be.

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>So basically there's a list with each Wagner's name and

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 1>then a list of guns underneath each of those names.

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:37.640
<v Speaker 1>At this point, the defense objects and everyone approaches Judge

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 1>during upon request, they consult briefly and during rules testimony

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>can continue. Thank you, honor, Agent Scheider. I'm going to

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>show you what is going to be marked as students

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:56.360
<v Speaker 1>at h two. Okay, and can you tell us first

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of all, Agent Scheider, what are we looking at? This

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>was again, this is a an extraction report or a

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>snippet of an extraction report related to Jake's iPhone that

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>we took of May of seventeen, and this was found

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>in the notes section of the phone, and it is

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a list of firearms and associated Wagner names. Go through

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>those and tell us which guns are listed belonging and

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>belonging to do and what date was that list created

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 1>pursuing to the reports. I'm having trump to see you

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that February eleventh, twenty fifteen. Okay, thank you, and go

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:42.679
<v Speaker 1>ahead and tell us what guns are listed there? Starting

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 1>at the top, the list starts with George's and Acadian possession,

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and it says Glock seventeen nine millimeter, Baretta ninety six

0:25:54.800 --> 0:26:01.640
<v Speaker 1>forty caliber, Taurus Revolver three fifty seven, Remington fourteen twenty two,

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Ruger M seventy seven to seventy, ruger M seventy seven,

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, Hornets, Remington Woodmaster thirty six, Ruger M seventy

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>seven twenty two, c Z twenty two and SKS seven

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>point six two by thirty nine. And who else is

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>listed on that list? Moms, dad's and Jake's. Okay, that

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>is at the extent of the list. It was extracted

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 1>from the phone belonging to Jake Wagner. Yes, but you

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:40.360
<v Speaker 1>seize pursued to the search warrant. Yes, let's stop here

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>for another break. Here's Jeff speaking with McAllen. He pretty

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>much figured out what the firearms were through that obviously

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the help of the corner, what the what the rounds showed,

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>what kind of weapon they were fired from. And you know,

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:08.360
<v Speaker 1>they got a real break on Jake's phone when they

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 1>got the search warrant for that and found on the

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>notes portion just about every gun that the family had,

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and it matched up. Again. That was just good old

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>fashioned police work, not a lot of technology in that.

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of Jake Wagner writing all this

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff down? Stupid? It was just stupid. Why would you

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>do that? You know? In many ways, I think he

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>covered his tracks, or at least tried to cover his

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>tracks pretty well, but it's just stupid. I guess he

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:40.679
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to keep track of what everybody had, and

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>my goodness, you talk about an arsenal, they had just

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>about any kind of weapon you can think of. Learning

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:49.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot of guns, though, does not necessarily make you

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 1>guilty of murder. It definitely does not make you guilty

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of murder. But it's a piece of the puzzle, especially

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>when two of the weapons that he had on that

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:01.919
<v Speaker 1>list were the type of weapons that were used to

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 1>commit theach murders. When you can tie a weapon or weapons,

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, to a homicide, that's big. I mean, it's

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>good evidence. The jury wants to hear that, so it's

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>strong evidence. More on that next time. We're going to

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>take a short break. The Piketon Massacre returns with all

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>new episodes starting Wednesday, January fourth, with Angela and Jake

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Wagner taking the stand. There's much more to uncover and

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the biggest bombshells are yet to come. Don't defense ready?

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes you wish you to call a witness at this time,

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>then yes, we call it George. For more information on

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the case and relevant photos, follow us on Instagram at

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Katie Underscore Studios. The Piketon Masaker is produced by Stephanie Lydecker,

0:28:56.560 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Shane, Scott de Graw, Andrew ar Now, Gabriel Castillo

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and me Courtney Armstrong. Editing and sound designed by Jeff Tis.

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Music by Jared Aston. The piked In Masacer is a

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>production of iHeartRadio and Kati Studios. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows.