WEBVTT - Hold The Line w/ Buck Sexton - 07-14-22

0:00:11.657 --> 0:00:14.937
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure

0:00:14.937 --> 0:00:17.577
<v Speaker 1>you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeart Radio app

0:00:17.857 --> 0:00:23.297
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts. Earlier today, in Jerusalem,

0:00:23.377 --> 0:00:25.817
<v Speaker 1>President Biden put her on on notice about its nuclear

0:00:25.857 --> 0:00:28.337
<v Speaker 1>ambitions during a joint news conference. Well it is really

0:00:28.337 --> 0:00:31.777
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister Yea or Lapide. But despite the tough talk,

0:00:31.817 --> 0:00:34.857
<v Speaker 1>the President is simultaneously trying to revive the Obama era

0:00:34.977 --> 0:00:37.017
<v Speaker 1>nuclear deal that has caused a lot of friction with

0:00:37.057 --> 0:00:40.897
<v Speaker 1>America's closest ally Israel. So what else will unfold during

0:00:40.937 --> 0:00:47.737
<v Speaker 1>Biden's Middle East trip? I'll discuss and tonight's holding one.

0:00:49.817 --> 0:00:54.057
<v Speaker 1>We mean what we say as we mean what we say.

0:00:54.297 --> 0:00:58.177
<v Speaker 1>They have an opportunity to accept disagreement has been laid down.

0:00:58.177 --> 0:01:02.337
<v Speaker 1>If they don't, maybe it absolutely clear. We will not

0:01:02.737 --> 0:01:07.617
<v Speaker 1>be said again, we will not allow Ran to acquire

0:01:07.617 --> 0:01:11.297
<v Speaker 1>a nuclear weapon. Welcome all the line on buck Sexton.

0:01:11.417 --> 0:01:14.857
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden saying in no uncertain terms there that in

0:01:15.057 --> 0:01:20.177
<v Speaker 1>a nuclear Iran is a totally unacceptable state. But what

0:01:20.217 --> 0:01:23.697
<v Speaker 1>does that mean? What is this Biden regime that has

0:01:23.737 --> 0:01:27.097
<v Speaker 1>really set new records of incompetence, that has no political

0:01:27.177 --> 0:01:31.497
<v Speaker 1>capital to spend even among Democrat voters these days. That

0:01:31.697 --> 0:01:36.217
<v Speaker 1>is completely plummeting in the polls, that has shown no

0:01:36.537 --> 0:01:40.017
<v Speaker 1>capability at home or abroad to improve on or anything.

0:01:40.577 --> 0:01:44.217
<v Speaker 1>How seriously will the mullah's take Biden's word on this?

0:01:44.817 --> 0:01:47.537
<v Speaker 1>Did they listen to the words of a commander in

0:01:47.617 --> 0:01:50.977
<v Speaker 1>chief who seems too old, who seems feeble, who seems

0:01:51.057 --> 0:01:55.177
<v Speaker 1>befuddled and foggy at par too many times? Did they

0:01:55.177 --> 0:01:57.017
<v Speaker 1>hear that and say, yeah, you know, we're going to

0:01:57.177 --> 0:02:01.937
<v Speaker 1>change our policies here, We're gonna divert away from what

0:02:02.057 --> 0:02:05.497
<v Speaker 1>seems to be a serious effort here to reach full

0:02:05.897 --> 0:02:10.897
<v Speaker 1>nuclear breakout capability. Well, the Israeli Prime Minister Pain told

0:02:10.937 --> 0:02:13.977
<v Speaker 1>Biden they get tougher run around because He's like, look,

0:02:14.337 --> 0:02:18.497
<v Speaker 1>words alone aren't going to be enough. Words will not

0:02:18.577 --> 0:02:23.817
<v Speaker 1>stop them, mister President. Diplomacy will not stop them. The

0:02:23.937 --> 0:02:27.017
<v Speaker 1>only thing that will stop I run is knowing that

0:02:27.417 --> 0:02:31.937
<v Speaker 1>if they continue to develop their nuclear program, the free

0:02:32.017 --> 0:02:38.497
<v Speaker 1>world will use force. The only way to stop them

0:02:38.617 --> 0:02:42.057
<v Speaker 1>is to put a credible military threat on the table.

0:02:44.377 --> 0:02:48.417
<v Speaker 1>You have said many times, mister President, that big countries

0:02:48.417 --> 0:02:53.217
<v Speaker 1>do not bluff. I completely agree. It should not be

0:02:53.257 --> 0:02:56.097
<v Speaker 1>a bluff. But the real thing the Iranian regime must

0:02:56.177 --> 0:03:00.497
<v Speaker 1>know that if they continue to deceive the world, they

0:03:00.497 --> 0:03:05.617
<v Speaker 1>will pay a heavy price. That price, it seems, would be,

0:03:06.577 --> 0:03:10.937
<v Speaker 1>at a minimum, military airstrike against the running facilities if

0:03:10.937 --> 0:03:15.457
<v Speaker 1>they continue on this pathway. Because economic pressure may not

0:03:15.577 --> 0:03:17.977
<v Speaker 1>be enough, the US and Israel did put out this

0:03:18.057 --> 0:03:22.097
<v Speaker 1>joint declaration. The United States stresses that integral to this

0:03:22.177 --> 0:03:25.137
<v Speaker 1>pledge is the commitment never to allow Iran to acquire

0:03:25.177 --> 0:03:28.137
<v Speaker 1>a nuclear weapon, and that it is prepared to use

0:03:28.297 --> 0:03:31.937
<v Speaker 1>all elements of its national power to ensure that outcome. Again,

0:03:32.697 --> 0:03:39.177
<v Speaker 1>words that seem strong on this issue, but not particularly specific,

0:03:39.897 --> 0:03:44.137
<v Speaker 1>and that then leads us to why Joe Biden is

0:03:44.377 --> 0:03:47.697
<v Speaker 1>on the issue of foreign policy, a president that nobody

0:03:47.737 --> 0:03:50.657
<v Speaker 1>can really put stock in. You'll recall that in two

0:03:50.697 --> 0:03:55.897
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight, when Barack Obama was the Democrat nominee,

0:03:56.417 --> 0:04:00.297
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden was a third tier candidate in that election.

0:04:00.457 --> 0:04:03.057
<v Speaker 1>He got a very small percentage of the actual vote

0:04:03.537 --> 0:04:06.857
<v Speaker 1>and was generally a joke alongside people like Dennis Cucinage,

0:04:07.137 --> 0:04:11.857
<v Speaker 1>but he was added to the Obama ticket specifically. Joe

0:04:11.897 --> 0:04:16.777
<v Speaker 1>Biden was at it specifically because of his foreign policy acumen, right,

0:04:16.857 --> 0:04:21.137
<v Speaker 1>the ability that Joe Biden would bring to the Obama

0:04:21.177 --> 0:04:24.537
<v Speaker 1>White House to understand the complex foreign policy issues of

0:04:24.577 --> 0:04:26.617
<v Speaker 1>the day. And then you can fast forward in your

0:04:26.657 --> 0:04:31.137
<v Speaker 1>head through eight years of an Obama regime that was

0:04:31.297 --> 0:04:36.217
<v Speaker 1>on the foreign policy side, a total disaster. You had

0:04:36.257 --> 0:04:41.497
<v Speaker 1>the Syrian Civil War breakout. Obama kept saying that we

0:04:41.577 --> 0:04:44.057
<v Speaker 1>would lead on that issue and we would stop the violence.

0:04:44.097 --> 0:04:46.457
<v Speaker 1>Were more than half a million people died in that conflict.

0:04:47.177 --> 0:04:51.417
<v Speaker 1>It also coincided with the rise of the Islamic State,

0:04:51.977 --> 0:04:54.617
<v Speaker 1>which happened after Obama pulled troops out of Iraq, and

0:04:54.737 --> 0:04:57.137
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden we had a security vacuum in

0:04:57.177 --> 0:05:00.417
<v Speaker 1>that country, a sudden security vacuum that was filled by

0:05:00.697 --> 0:05:06.017
<v Speaker 1>Isis lunatics who managed to seize control of a few,

0:05:06.537 --> 0:05:08.977
<v Speaker 1>well a large portion of that country and a few

0:05:08.977 --> 0:05:12.657
<v Speaker 1>million people who fell under the reign of that terror regime.

0:05:13.297 --> 0:05:18.057
<v Speaker 1>The toppling of the Kadafi government in Libya led by

0:05:18.257 --> 0:05:21.457
<v Speaker 1>people like Hillary Clinton, Obama's then secretary of State, and

0:05:21.497 --> 0:05:23.257
<v Speaker 1>then eventually we all know what happened in the e

0:05:23.297 --> 0:05:33.977
<v Speaker 1>Benghazi debacle. But you look across the board, whether it's Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya, Syria, China,

0:05:34.097 --> 0:05:37.977
<v Speaker 1>policy and for eight years while Biden was one of

0:05:37.977 --> 0:05:42.297
<v Speaker 1>the primary voices and supposedly one of the main architects

0:05:42.577 --> 0:05:46.177
<v Speaker 1>of the Obama administration's foreign policy, it all was a mess.

0:05:47.017 --> 0:05:52.857
<v Speaker 1>It just showed a total lack of strategic thinking and understanding.

0:05:53.777 --> 0:05:56.137
<v Speaker 1>And so why would we believe anything would be better

0:05:56.177 --> 0:06:00.977
<v Speaker 1>now that now that Biden and not Obama is running

0:06:00.977 --> 0:06:04.457
<v Speaker 1>the show, is the commander in chief. We know that

0:06:04.497 --> 0:06:08.137
<v Speaker 1>there was this deeply flawed irandeal signed assigned by the

0:06:08.257 --> 0:06:12.297
<v Speaker 1>Obama administration in which it was pretty clear that Obama mortgaged,

0:06:12.337 --> 0:06:15.897
<v Speaker 1>if you will, sold out the rest of his foreign

0:06:16.017 --> 0:06:21.537
<v Speaker 1>policy goals in the Middle East. No peace process progress,

0:06:21.577 --> 0:06:24.337
<v Speaker 1>for example, not even the start of a failed peace

0:06:24.377 --> 0:06:27.217
<v Speaker 1>process under the Obama administration. But it was also they

0:06:27.257 --> 0:06:30.057
<v Speaker 1>get this Iran deal. But the Iran deal just allowed

0:06:30.097 --> 0:06:32.857
<v Speaker 1>for Iran to get a lot wealthier and to integrate

0:06:32.897 --> 0:06:36.737
<v Speaker 1>itself into the global financial community and not have to

0:06:36.817 --> 0:06:41.097
<v Speaker 1>actually submit itself to the full scale across the board

0:06:41.137 --> 0:06:46.577
<v Speaker 1>inspections of everything, including including military facilities, and never really

0:06:46.617 --> 0:06:50.417
<v Speaker 1>eliminated its ability to get to that eventual breakout. Range.

0:06:50.497 --> 0:06:54.217
<v Speaker 1>Didn't stop the Iran deal. The Joint Comprehensive Plan of

0:06:54.257 --> 0:06:58.297
<v Speaker 1>Action they called. It didn't stop them from developing ballistic

0:06:58.337 --> 0:07:01.977
<v Speaker 1>missile capability, it didn't deal with Iranian support for terrorist

0:07:02.057 --> 0:07:05.497
<v Speaker 1>groups all across the region. And so the Trump administration

0:07:05.577 --> 0:07:07.497
<v Speaker 1>came in and said this is nonsense. We're just going

0:07:07.537 --> 0:07:09.097
<v Speaker 1>to put a lot of pressure on Iran again that

0:07:09.137 --> 0:07:12.697
<v Speaker 1>they stopped this crap. Now the Biden administrations in office,

0:07:12.737 --> 0:07:14.537
<v Speaker 1>and they're trying to get a nuclear deal, and here's

0:07:14.537 --> 0:07:16.937
<v Speaker 1>Biden just this week saying they won't wait forever for

0:07:17.017 --> 0:07:22.177
<v Speaker 1>that deal. Watch. We've laid out for the people, for

0:07:22.617 --> 0:07:27.017
<v Speaker 1>the leadership of Iran what we're willing to accept. No, no,

0:07:27.137 --> 0:07:30.897
<v Speaker 1>to get back into JCPOA. We're waiting for the response

0:07:31.737 --> 0:07:34.377
<v Speaker 1>when that occurred. When that will come, I'm not certain,

0:07:35.017 --> 0:07:38.737
<v Speaker 1>but we are not going to wait forever. We're not

0:07:38.817 --> 0:07:41.897
<v Speaker 1>going to wait forever or what I mean. You can

0:07:41.937 --> 0:07:44.777
<v Speaker 1>almost imagine the mullah's asking that question out about what

0:07:44.817 --> 0:07:49.097
<v Speaker 1>exactly is Joe Biden going to do? What evidence is

0:07:49.137 --> 0:07:51.737
<v Speaker 1>there that Joe Biden is a force to be reckoned

0:07:51.737 --> 0:07:55.497
<v Speaker 1>with as a foreign policy mind and as commander in

0:07:55.577 --> 0:07:59.377
<v Speaker 1>chief now of the United States. Not much right, not

0:07:59.537 --> 0:08:01.697
<v Speaker 1>much of anything. It's pretty shocking when you see this

0:08:01.777 --> 0:08:05.817
<v Speaker 1>continue to play out Joe Biden. It's it's reckless that

0:08:05.857 --> 0:08:08.657
<v Speaker 1>he has done so much damage to our economy and

0:08:08.737 --> 0:08:13.137
<v Speaker 1>has been so incompetent as president, forcing mask and vaccine

0:08:13.177 --> 0:08:16.257
<v Speaker 1>mandates on people. All this idiocy, But when you see

0:08:16.297 --> 0:08:21.217
<v Speaker 1>the global issues that Biden is actually facing. We already

0:08:21.257 --> 0:08:23.017
<v Speaker 1>have a war in Europe that seems to have no

0:08:23.177 --> 0:08:25.617
<v Speaker 1>end in sight. The Obama industrate, I'm sorry, the Biden

0:08:25.657 --> 0:08:28.817
<v Speaker 1>administration has deeply mismanaged that. And now we have the

0:08:28.817 --> 0:08:32.257
<v Speaker 1>possibility of a nuclear Iran on Biden's watch, and maybe

0:08:32.257 --> 0:08:35.417
<v Speaker 1>a Chinese invasion of Taiwan too. All these things could happen.

0:08:36.257 --> 0:08:38.257
<v Speaker 1>And if you're our enemies, if you're the bad guys,

0:08:38.817 --> 0:08:42.737
<v Speaker 1>what better time than now while you have the confused,

0:08:42.857 --> 0:08:46.217
<v Speaker 1>doddering fool Joe Biden in the White House, we'll have

0:08:46.297 --> 0:08:47.617
<v Speaker 1>more on his trip to than at the least with

0:08:47.657 --> 0:08:50.417
<v Speaker 1>former White House Deputy National Security Advisor Steve Yates coming

0:08:50.497 --> 0:08:52.537
<v Speaker 1>up at first, let's off've got the newest sponsor to

0:08:52.577 --> 0:08:54.737
<v Speaker 1>hold the line off grid. Panama A lot even worried

0:08:54.737 --> 0:08:57.537
<v Speaker 1>about the reported food shortages and power outages headed our way.

0:08:57.617 --> 0:08:59.897
<v Speaker 1>You're not alone. If you look at the skyrocket and

0:08:59.937 --> 0:09:02.177
<v Speaker 1>cost of energy and food prices going through the roof.

0:09:02.377 --> 0:09:05.177
<v Speaker 1>We're certainly heading in the wrong direction. Many are choosing

0:09:05.217 --> 0:09:07.577
<v Speaker 1>to go off grid. When you think of going off grid,

0:09:07.657 --> 0:09:09.697
<v Speaker 1>you think of living in the mountains, somewhere away from

0:09:09.697 --> 0:09:13.297
<v Speaker 1>civil right. But there's actually a safe option for going

0:09:13.377 --> 0:09:16.577
<v Speaker 1>totally off grid in Panama, Central America. A modern home

0:09:16.657 --> 0:09:19.297
<v Speaker 1>starts at only one hundred thousand dollars. These homes are

0:09:19.297 --> 0:09:21.457
<v Speaker 1>fully set up on a self sustaining farm, with all

0:09:21.457 --> 0:09:24.377
<v Speaker 1>of your needs met right on the property. Panama offers

0:09:24.377 --> 0:09:27.017
<v Speaker 1>a stable government, cost effective, high quality medical care, and

0:09:27.057 --> 0:09:30.097
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic climate. There are only twenty four homes being

0:09:30.137 --> 0:09:32.177
<v Speaker 1>offered in the community, so reach out to them quickly

0:09:32.457 --> 0:09:35.177
<v Speaker 1>at off grid Panama dot com or call them now

0:09:35.217 --> 0:09:38.817
<v Speaker 1>at nine oh four two three six four seven three seven.

0:09:39.217 --> 0:09:42.217
<v Speaker 1>Again that's off grid Panama dot com or nine zero

0:09:42.297 --> 0:09:45.337
<v Speaker 1>four two three six four seven three seven. Be patient,

0:09:45.417 --> 0:09:47.257
<v Speaker 1>leave the message. We think that's going to set out quickly.

0:09:47.257 --> 0:09:49.857
<v Speaker 1>They'll call everyone back though within twenty four hours we'll

0:09:49.857 --> 0:09:58.657
<v Speaker 1>be right back with more. Hold the line. While on

0:09:58.777 --> 0:10:01.417
<v Speaker 1>is Middle East trip, President Biden is trying to reassure

0:10:01.497 --> 0:10:03.617
<v Speaker 1>leaders that two things can be true at the same time.

0:10:03.937 --> 0:10:06.657
<v Speaker 1>The United States can pursue a new nuclear deal with Iran,

0:10:06.777 --> 0:10:09.577
<v Speaker 1>and can also use military force as a last resort

0:10:10.097 --> 0:10:13.577
<v Speaker 1>to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. So which is it?

0:10:13.977 --> 0:10:16.577
<v Speaker 1>Let's ask a senior fellow of the America First Policy

0:10:16.617 --> 0:10:20.417
<v Speaker 1>Institute and former White House Deputy National Security Advisor Dvates.

0:10:20.417 --> 0:10:23.017
<v Speaker 1>Do you good to see you? Good to see you, Buck?

0:10:23.097 --> 0:10:28.177
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Let's start with the Iran equation here. There

0:10:28.217 --> 0:10:33.057
<v Speaker 1>were some moments, for example, when Biden was in Israel

0:10:33.537 --> 0:10:36.737
<v Speaker 1>where he said just earlier this week, the US will

0:10:36.937 --> 0:10:40.177
<v Speaker 1>use force as a last resort. Watch this one in

0:10:40.177 --> 0:10:41.937
<v Speaker 1>the past, that you'll do anything, and you say it again,

0:10:41.937 --> 0:10:45.017
<v Speaker 1>that you'll ensure Iran would not acquire nuclear weapons. Does

0:10:45.057 --> 0:10:49.617
<v Speaker 1>that also mean, sir, that you would use force against Iran?

0:10:49.817 --> 0:10:52.577
<v Speaker 1>Is that what that means if I was the last resort? Yes,

0:10:54.057 --> 0:10:57.497
<v Speaker 1>So do you think one he means that? And to

0:10:58.177 --> 0:11:01.777
<v Speaker 1>how worried are you we're going to get to that point? Well,

0:11:01.817 --> 0:11:04.337
<v Speaker 1>it's something that you concern everyone if we should we

0:11:04.417 --> 0:11:06.257
<v Speaker 1>should get to that kind of a point. I mean,

0:11:06.577 --> 0:11:10.137
<v Speaker 1>we've as a nation had somewhat of our fill of

0:11:10.297 --> 0:11:14.577
<v Speaker 1>protracted and dangerous wars in the broader Middle East, and

0:11:14.897 --> 0:11:19.617
<v Speaker 1>that certainly would be quite a dramatic development. I think

0:11:19.857 --> 0:11:22.177
<v Speaker 1>we have to take a step back when President Biden

0:11:22.257 --> 0:11:25.777
<v Speaker 1>is speaking. I wish it weren't so, but we never

0:11:25.897 --> 0:11:28.977
<v Speaker 1>quite know when the president declares a policy whether he's

0:11:29.017 --> 0:11:32.537
<v Speaker 1>actually setting it or whether a member of his staff

0:11:32.657 --> 0:11:34.857
<v Speaker 1>is going to call for a cleanup on Aisle four

0:11:35.337 --> 0:11:37.737
<v Speaker 1>and try to say this is what the president meant.

0:11:38.377 --> 0:11:40.977
<v Speaker 1>But in the broader Middle East, as you know very well,

0:11:41.657 --> 0:11:44.177
<v Speaker 1>these words will carry a lot of weight, will reverberate,

0:11:45.417 --> 0:11:48.537
<v Speaker 1>and really, if he was serious about trying to avoid

0:11:48.577 --> 0:11:52.417
<v Speaker 1>that outcome, he would have embraced, rather than somewhat marginalized,

0:11:52.457 --> 0:11:56.097
<v Speaker 1>the Abraham Accords, and he would have embraced the maximum

0:11:56.137 --> 0:11:59.297
<v Speaker 1>pressure policy rather than going back to the tried and

0:11:59.337 --> 0:12:02.657
<v Speaker 1>true appeasement which has led to this potential nuclear breakout.

0:12:03.457 --> 0:12:06.177
<v Speaker 1>And also just can he tell everybody, Stephen, what is

0:12:06.217 --> 0:12:09.177
<v Speaker 1>going on with regard to the Iranian nuclear program right now?

0:12:09.337 --> 0:12:11.177
<v Speaker 1>There was a headline a couple of days ago, I

0:12:11.217 --> 0:12:15.057
<v Speaker 1>think it was from Reuters that at fordaw the Iranians

0:12:15.057 --> 0:12:18.777
<v Speaker 1>have enriched uranium again. They have or are enriching it again,

0:12:19.177 --> 0:12:21.897
<v Speaker 1>taken up to twenty percent that got new and their

0:12:21.977 --> 0:12:26.737
<v Speaker 1>best centrifuges spinning in a highly fortified facility, So what's

0:12:26.737 --> 0:12:31.817
<v Speaker 1>going on there? Well, even the Biden administration's top envoy

0:12:32.537 --> 0:12:37.777
<v Speaker 1>was somewhat sadly admitting that the Iranians are much closer

0:12:37.777 --> 0:12:40.817
<v Speaker 1>to a breakout point in the year and a half

0:12:40.857 --> 0:12:43.937
<v Speaker 1>of the Biden administration than they were before under the

0:12:43.977 --> 0:12:48.257
<v Speaker 1>maximum pressure policies of the previous administration used to be

0:12:48.297 --> 0:12:52.057
<v Speaker 1>there are estimates of weeks or months for them to

0:12:52.177 --> 0:12:55.337
<v Speaker 1>be able to reach the dangerous threshold, but they're now

0:12:55.457 --> 0:12:59.017
<v Speaker 1>enriching uranium up to a percentage point where experts say

0:12:59.017 --> 0:13:01.497
<v Speaker 1>it could be really just a matter of a day

0:13:01.697 --> 0:13:05.697
<v Speaker 1>or two, the equivalent of flipping a switch. That's pretty shocking,

0:13:05.977 --> 0:13:08.697
<v Speaker 1>and that was coming from a negotiator that has already

0:13:08.737 --> 0:13:12.737
<v Speaker 1>tried to give them all kinds of benefits to induce

0:13:12.817 --> 0:13:16.017
<v Speaker 1>them back into an agreement. I mean, Stephen, is this

0:13:16.097 --> 0:13:18.377
<v Speaker 1>going to a place where you know, up to this

0:13:18.417 --> 0:13:23.177
<v Speaker 1>point there's been this sense of status quo, means Iran

0:13:23.617 --> 0:13:26.297
<v Speaker 1>could go toward a nuclear repon at some point. There's

0:13:26.297 --> 0:13:28.777
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a lot of negotiation, but it's not necessarily

0:13:28.777 --> 0:13:32.177
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. Are we heading toward Iran's getting the nukes,

0:13:32.577 --> 0:13:34.817
<v Speaker 1>or Iran's going to suffer through massive air strikes to

0:13:34.857 --> 0:13:36.417
<v Speaker 1>stop them from getting the nukes. I mean, are we

0:13:36.497 --> 0:13:38.777
<v Speaker 1>on is that the trajector right now? Or is the

0:13:38.777 --> 0:13:42.257
<v Speaker 1>third way still possible? Well, I think that there are

0:13:42.297 --> 0:13:45.497
<v Speaker 1>some alternatives that are possible, And first and foremost, I

0:13:45.537 --> 0:13:47.897
<v Speaker 1>think the biggest mistake would be for the President or

0:13:47.897 --> 0:13:50.817
<v Speaker 1>anyone else to lead us into a one on one

0:13:50.897 --> 0:13:54.497
<v Speaker 1>situation with the run. We have some substantial allies in

0:13:54.537 --> 0:13:57.497
<v Speaker 1>the region that have skin in this game, and in

0:13:57.537 --> 0:13:59.897
<v Speaker 1>some ways we should allow them to step up and

0:13:59.937 --> 0:14:03.137
<v Speaker 1>play their role. We we know for sure that Israel

0:14:03.257 --> 0:14:05.977
<v Speaker 1>is quite concerned and would probably be willing and able

0:14:06.017 --> 0:14:09.657
<v Speaker 1>to act independently if it got to nuclear breakout territory

0:14:09.697 --> 0:14:13.737
<v Speaker 1>any but the Saudis have a pretty deep vested interest,

0:14:14.017 --> 0:14:15.617
<v Speaker 1>and one of the key parts of this trip was

0:14:15.657 --> 0:14:20.977
<v Speaker 1>supposedly applying some good traditional realism to American foreign policy

0:14:21.297 --> 0:14:26.297
<v Speaker 1>in engaging the largest, most capable ally in the region

0:14:26.377 --> 0:14:31.177
<v Speaker 1>to balance and deter the Iranians. And this focus can't

0:14:31.217 --> 0:14:32.977
<v Speaker 1>just be in the nuclear program. It has to be

0:14:33.017 --> 0:14:37.137
<v Speaker 1>on the leadership, and they're building a stronger balance of

0:14:37.257 --> 0:14:41.297
<v Speaker 1>power against Iran. That's what was lost when the Biden

0:14:41.377 --> 0:14:45.977
<v Speaker 1>team minimized or sort of brushed aside, the Abraham Accords approach.

0:14:46.617 --> 0:14:50.577
<v Speaker 1>So there's also, of course, the Saudi situation. Biden is

0:14:50.577 --> 0:14:52.857
<v Speaker 1>heading the Saudi Arabia to advance the US interests their

0:14:52.977 --> 0:14:56.137
<v Speaker 1>energy security a huge part of this, but also a

0:14:56.177 --> 0:14:59.417
<v Speaker 1>lot of conversation around how when Trump was in office,

0:14:59.537 --> 0:15:03.377
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Kashogi human rights that became the huge focus. And

0:15:03.617 --> 0:15:05.937
<v Speaker 1>right now Biden's going over to the Saudis to say, hey,

0:15:05.937 --> 0:15:07.897
<v Speaker 1>can you pump some more oil? Is he going to

0:15:08.017 --> 0:15:10.777
<v Speaker 1>address the Kashogi issue. We'll get to that second, But

0:15:10.937 --> 0:15:13.777
<v Speaker 1>first off, he says he will send a direct message

0:15:13.817 --> 0:15:18.137
<v Speaker 1>of Saudi's peace and extraordinary opportunities. Watch this one, and

0:15:18.217 --> 0:15:21.457
<v Speaker 1>when I see the Saudi leadership tomorrow, I'll be carrying

0:15:21.457 --> 0:15:25.617
<v Speaker 1>a direct message message of peace and extraordinary opportunities that

0:15:26.057 --> 0:15:29.497
<v Speaker 1>a more stable and integrated region could bring to the

0:15:29.537 --> 0:15:33.257
<v Speaker 1>region and quite frankly, the whole world. Now, there are

0:15:33.297 --> 0:15:37.457
<v Speaker 1>some points of optimism here in the Saudi relationship with

0:15:38.177 --> 0:15:41.137
<v Speaker 1>the US ally Israel. Right now you're going to have

0:15:41.177 --> 0:15:44.537
<v Speaker 1>the Saudi's allowing even more flights in the Saudi airspace.

0:15:44.577 --> 0:15:48.137
<v Speaker 1>They're moving toward total normalization of relations. But it's interesting

0:15:48.177 --> 0:15:52.737
<v Speaker 1>because that really got going under Biden's predecessor, didn't it.

0:15:52.737 --> 0:15:56.617
<v Speaker 1>It did, And frankly, it's being driven by countries and

0:15:56.817 --> 0:16:01.217
<v Speaker 1>leaders in the region. In some ways, that's a healthy development.

0:16:01.297 --> 0:16:05.417
<v Speaker 1>People tried to say the Trump administration was isolationist or

0:16:05.617 --> 0:16:08.697
<v Speaker 1>was bad towards alliances. It was quite the opposite, having

0:16:08.777 --> 0:16:13.057
<v Speaker 1>allies being willing and able to step up and shape

0:16:13.097 --> 0:16:17.497
<v Speaker 1>their own regions and engage in collective self defense and deterrence.

0:16:17.777 --> 0:16:20.177
<v Speaker 1>That minimizes the need for the United States that has

0:16:20.217 --> 0:16:22.737
<v Speaker 1>stepped in in a time of emergency. That's good for

0:16:22.737 --> 0:16:24.697
<v Speaker 1>the United States, it's good for the alliances, and it's

0:16:24.737 --> 0:16:27.697
<v Speaker 1>good for those countries in the region. And it's really

0:16:27.737 --> 0:16:31.817
<v Speaker 1>been this pathology that tries to drag us back into

0:16:32.177 --> 0:16:35.737
<v Speaker 1>the grievances of the Palestinians may have or an overly

0:16:35.857 --> 0:16:38.697
<v Speaker 1>narrow focus on a few issues, and when people want

0:16:38.737 --> 0:16:41.657
<v Speaker 1>to talk about human rights, I don't really take any

0:16:41.697 --> 0:16:45.217
<v Speaker 1>of them seriously. If they're okay with a president engaging

0:16:45.257 --> 0:16:48.937
<v Speaker 1>a leader of China where there's an admitted international genocide,

0:16:49.497 --> 0:16:53.537
<v Speaker 1>the crushing of Hong Kong and threatening of neighbors by

0:16:53.577 --> 0:16:56.697
<v Speaker 1>a nuclear power. If you don't talk about these issues

0:16:56.977 --> 0:16:59.577
<v Speaker 1>with regard to engagement there. Then there's got to be

0:16:59.697 --> 0:17:02.817
<v Speaker 1>space in the engagement of Saudi Arabia to do real

0:17:02.937 --> 0:17:06.297
<v Speaker 1>things to try to bottle up Iran and advance American

0:17:06.297 --> 0:17:10.697
<v Speaker 1>interests without having to enter another war. As overseas, he

0:17:10.737 --> 0:17:14.657
<v Speaker 1>has also been speaking about the US relationship with Ukraine

0:17:14.857 --> 0:17:18.417
<v Speaker 1>and the Russian invasion of that country. Seems the bid

0:17:18.417 --> 0:17:21.897
<v Speaker 1>administration policy where he says out loud that it's whatever

0:17:21.977 --> 0:17:25.017
<v Speaker 1>it takes, as long as it takes to defeat Russia.

0:17:25.057 --> 0:17:29.217
<v Speaker 1>We just sent them some more advanced long range rocket systems.

0:17:30.257 --> 0:17:33.817
<v Speaker 1>Where do you think that's going, Steve Well sadly, it

0:17:33.897 --> 0:17:36.297
<v Speaker 1>just seems to be in a long term slow burn,

0:17:37.097 --> 0:17:41.017
<v Speaker 1>and we just empirically, you have to acknowledge that the

0:17:41.137 --> 0:17:45.337
<v Speaker 1>territory of Ukraine has been there's a significant percentage that

0:17:45.377 --> 0:17:47.977
<v Speaker 1>has been lost to Russia in this conflict so far,

0:17:48.577 --> 0:17:51.097
<v Speaker 1>and there's no real terms on the table for that.

0:17:51.177 --> 0:17:55.657
<v Speaker 1>Going another way, we also have become very out of

0:17:55.737 --> 0:17:59.977
<v Speaker 1>balance in terms of Americans chipping in another billion dollars here,

0:18:00.057 --> 0:18:04.457
<v Speaker 1>another billion dollars there, and the Europeans collectively are giving

0:18:04.657 --> 0:18:07.897
<v Speaker 1>much much less, and so we really need to get

0:18:07.937 --> 0:18:12.017
<v Speaker 1>back to a healthier approach, pressing the Europeans to step

0:18:12.137 --> 0:18:15.217
<v Speaker 1>up and take care of other Europeans because apparently we

0:18:15.297 --> 0:18:17.977
<v Speaker 1>have challenges in the Middle East that require attention that

0:18:18.017 --> 0:18:20.937
<v Speaker 1>the President is highlighting, and there's been this long talk

0:18:20.937 --> 0:18:23.017
<v Speaker 1>of a pivot to Asia that never seems to happen

0:18:23.137 --> 0:18:29.057
<v Speaker 1>because we continue to provide a welfare safety net to Europeans. Steve,

0:18:29.457 --> 0:18:33.017
<v Speaker 1>thanks for the perspective and expertise. Appreciate it, my pleasure.

0:18:33.097 --> 0:18:37.337
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Buck. It's becoming increasingly obvious that the Left

0:18:37.417 --> 0:18:39.897
<v Speaker 1>is desperate to spin the inflation numbers report to make

0:18:39.897 --> 0:18:42.457
<v Speaker 1>it look like they're actually fighting the forty year high

0:18:42.457 --> 0:18:44.817
<v Speaker 1>inflation rates. But Americans are smarter than that. We'll have

0:18:44.857 --> 0:18:47.137
<v Speaker 1>that story coming up with the founder and executive director

0:18:47.177 --> 0:18:49.937
<v Speaker 1>of Power the Future, Daniel Turner. Let's talk about protecting

0:18:49.937 --> 0:18:51.857
<v Speaker 1>your most viable asset, your home. I don't know if

0:18:51.857 --> 0:18:53.497
<v Speaker 1>you saw this, but there's a recent story about an

0:18:53.537 --> 0:18:55.937
<v Speaker 1>Arizona real estate agent that found the home she lived

0:18:55.977 --> 0:18:58.537
<v Speaker 1>and was listed for sale. Problem was, she wasn't selling

0:18:58.537 --> 0:19:00.417
<v Speaker 1>her home. She was the victim of home title fraud,

0:19:00.417 --> 0:19:03.217
<v Speaker 1>a devastating crime happening all over the country. According to

0:19:03.217 --> 0:19:05.417
<v Speaker 1>the experts at home title lock. The crime is incredibly

0:19:05.457 --> 0:19:08.217
<v Speaker 1>profitable and hard to detect an identity. If he simply

0:19:08.257 --> 0:19:10.577
<v Speaker 1>creates a fake title transfer for your home and refiles

0:19:10.617 --> 0:19:12.537
<v Speaker 1>as a new owner, then he can take out loans

0:19:12.577 --> 0:19:15.417
<v Speaker 1>on your home or sell it. Typical identity theft services

0:19:15.457 --> 0:19:18.337
<v Speaker 1>don't cover you, and neither there's homeowner's insurance. Home tedle

0:19:18.377 --> 0:19:21.177
<v Speaker 1>lock does. Home title lock puts a barrier around your

0:19:21.177 --> 0:19:23.577
<v Speaker 1>home's title. The instant they detect anyone tampering with it,

0:19:23.617 --> 0:19:26.497
<v Speaker 1>they help shut it down. They go to hometitlelock dot com.

0:19:26.497 --> 0:19:28.977
<v Speaker 1>Read the testimonials from government officials to tell you about

0:19:28.977 --> 0:19:31.537
<v Speaker 1>this crime and then take action. Register your address to

0:19:31.537 --> 0:19:33.497
<v Speaker 1>see if you're already a victim and don't even know it.

0:19:33.657 --> 0:19:35.497
<v Speaker 1>And when you protect your hometell them Buck sent you

0:19:35.497 --> 0:19:38.777
<v Speaker 1>to get thirty free days of protection. Hometitleock dot com

0:19:38.777 --> 0:19:48.937
<v Speaker 1>hometitlelock dot com. I understand inflation is a real challenge

0:19:48.977 --> 0:19:52.097
<v Speaker 1>to American families. I'm doing everything within my power by

0:19:52.097 --> 0:19:54.617
<v Speaker 1>executive orders to bring down the price and address to

0:19:54.737 --> 0:19:57.857
<v Speaker 1>Prudent price syite. Prudent's war is already hurting American families

0:19:57.857 --> 0:20:00.857
<v Speaker 1>at the gas pump from Prudent's price site in gasoline.

0:20:01.297 --> 0:20:05.857
<v Speaker 1>Prudent invaded Ukraine, oh Dale with this Prudent price syite.

0:20:06.017 --> 0:20:09.817
<v Speaker 1>Whenever they are my power to blunt Prudent's gas price.

0:20:11.257 --> 0:20:13.657
<v Speaker 1>The Left is now desperate to spend the inflation numbers

0:20:13.657 --> 0:20:16.857
<v Speaker 1>report to make it look like they're fighting the forty

0:20:16.937 --> 0:20:19.697
<v Speaker 1>year high inflation rates. And no one wants to hide

0:20:19.777 --> 0:20:22.977
<v Speaker 1>this problem more than President Joe Biden. Here's Council of

0:20:22.977 --> 0:20:27.217
<v Speaker 1>Economic Advisors Chairwoman Cecilia Rouse admitting that President Biden is

0:20:27.257 --> 0:20:31.057
<v Speaker 1>relying on the Federal Reserve to fix his inflation problem.

0:20:31.337 --> 0:20:33.617
<v Speaker 1>You know, the President is giving the Federal Reserve the

0:20:33.657 --> 0:20:35.697
<v Speaker 1>space it needs to do what it needs to do

0:20:35.777 --> 0:20:38.697
<v Speaker 1>to control inflation. The Federal Reserve has the dual mandate

0:20:38.737 --> 0:20:41.857
<v Speaker 1>of controlling prices while maintaining maximum employment. It is doing

0:20:41.857 --> 0:20:44.017
<v Speaker 1>what it needs to do. Other presidents have tried to

0:20:44.697 --> 0:20:48.497
<v Speaker 1>intervene in the actions. As President has said, they're independent.

0:20:48.537 --> 0:20:51.137
<v Speaker 1>He respects what they need to do. And part of

0:20:51.137 --> 0:20:53.817
<v Speaker 1>what the Federal reserves actions will do, and we're already

0:20:53.817 --> 0:20:57.177
<v Speaker 1>seeing it is to cool off the housing market, which

0:20:57.177 --> 0:21:01.177
<v Speaker 1>will find its way into helping with rent. So it's

0:21:01.177 --> 0:21:03.297
<v Speaker 1>obvious we need to fight these inflation rates. But the

0:21:03.297 --> 0:21:05.577
<v Speaker 1>president is not willing to do the work, Well, who

0:21:05.617 --> 0:21:07.297
<v Speaker 1>are we going to rely and actually get the job done?

0:21:07.657 --> 0:21:09.817
<v Speaker 1>I mean now in studio, founder and executive director of

0:21:10.297 --> 0:21:12.977
<v Speaker 1>the Future, Daniel Turner, Daniel Man, thanks for being here.

0:21:13.017 --> 0:21:15.457
<v Speaker 1>Great to be here. So why are we seeing the

0:21:15.497 --> 0:21:17.457
<v Speaker 1>inflation numbers that we're seeing right now? I mean, so

0:21:17.577 --> 0:21:19.937
<v Speaker 1>much of it is driven by really high energy prices.

0:21:20.017 --> 0:21:25.057
<v Speaker 1>Right Everything that we consume, transport, eat, manufacture, it requires energy.

0:21:25.057 --> 0:21:27.217
<v Speaker 1>And as energy prices have gone up, the price of

0:21:27.257 --> 0:21:30.497
<v Speaker 1>those goods have gone up, and all those prices ultimately

0:21:30.497 --> 0:21:33.137
<v Speaker 1>get passed onto the consumer. So if one of the

0:21:33.137 --> 0:21:36.457
<v Speaker 1>ways to tackle energy, besides the outrageous spending bills coming

0:21:36.497 --> 0:21:38.897
<v Speaker 1>out of DC, the other way to really tackle inflation

0:21:38.937 --> 0:21:41.617
<v Speaker 1>would be to do everything possible to drive down the

0:21:41.697 --> 0:21:44.817
<v Speaker 1>price of energy, and that would ultimately drive down prices. So,

0:21:44.897 --> 0:21:48.057
<v Speaker 1>talking for a second about the ways in which the

0:21:48.097 --> 0:21:50.537
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration has made it harder for them to be

0:21:50.777 --> 0:21:54.897
<v Speaker 1>energy fossil fuel energy production in this country, what are

0:21:54.897 --> 0:21:57.577
<v Speaker 1>the things the one that everyone points a keystone axel

0:21:57.617 --> 0:22:00.977
<v Speaker 1>pipeline canceling that for example, Okay, that goes in the column.

0:22:01.337 --> 0:22:03.977
<v Speaker 1>What else, though, what else have they done that has

0:22:04.017 --> 0:22:06.817
<v Speaker 1>made it either more expensive or just more onerous from

0:22:06.817 --> 0:22:11.537
<v Speaker 1>a regulatory perspective to do the refining as well as

0:22:11.577 --> 0:22:15.217
<v Speaker 1>the exploration and bringing that gas up from the ground. Yeah, Unfortunately,

0:22:15.217 --> 0:22:17.257
<v Speaker 1>this is an industry that requires a lot of government

0:22:17.257 --> 0:22:20.697
<v Speaker 1>cooperation because of just the nature of the industry. So

0:22:20.897 --> 0:22:24.097
<v Speaker 1>Biden keeps talking about these nine thousand leases that we have. Great,

0:22:24.137 --> 0:22:26.337
<v Speaker 1>we have those leases, but you need government permission to

0:22:26.377 --> 0:22:29.857
<v Speaker 1>do exploratory drilling, and that's just one set of permissions.

0:22:30.017 --> 0:22:32.417
<v Speaker 1>Then you need another set of permissions to do actual

0:22:32.537 --> 0:22:35.737
<v Speaker 1>drilling and extraction. And once you extract oil and gas,

0:22:35.857 --> 0:22:38.377
<v Speaker 1>you don't have permission necessarily to transport it. That's another

0:22:38.417 --> 0:22:40.817
<v Speaker 1>set of permissions. And all of these stages and all

0:22:40.817 --> 0:22:43.377
<v Speaker 1>these steps require the government's cooperation, and all of them

0:22:43.417 --> 0:22:46.937
<v Speaker 1>are being shut down by the Department of Interior, predominantly

0:22:46.977 --> 0:22:49.257
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Interior. You add on top of that

0:22:49.337 --> 0:22:53.537
<v Speaker 1>just land use access. So on passover on Good Friday,

0:22:54.497 --> 0:22:56.817
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent of the land was made available when we

0:22:56.897 --> 0:22:59.097
<v Speaker 1>have been given a promise of one hundred percent of

0:22:59.177 --> 0:23:02.937
<v Speaker 1>land leases. Deb Holland, Secretary of Interior, only announced twenty percent.

0:23:03.177 --> 0:23:05.537
<v Speaker 1>We've removed the million acres of land for oil and

0:23:05.577 --> 0:23:08.337
<v Speaker 1>gas exploration in Alaska, a million acres in the Gulf

0:23:08.417 --> 0:23:11.337
<v Speaker 1>of Mexico, and just this week announcing we'removing more oil

0:23:11.377 --> 0:23:13.657
<v Speaker 1>and gas leases from the Gulf and from the Atlantic.

0:23:13.777 --> 0:23:16.657
<v Speaker 1>So again they're sending all these signals to the industry

0:23:16.737 --> 0:23:19.017
<v Speaker 1>saying we're not going to let you produce oil and

0:23:19.057 --> 0:23:22.577
<v Speaker 1>gas easily, and so the industry is responding in kind

0:23:22.937 --> 0:23:25.697
<v Speaker 1>by producing lesson prices going up. So we know that

0:23:25.777 --> 0:23:28.337
<v Speaker 1>the latest numbers, We've got this from Fox Business just

0:23:28.497 --> 0:23:31.897
<v Speaker 1>reporting on it nine point one percent in June. So

0:23:31.937 --> 0:23:36.897
<v Speaker 1>that's more of a acceleration than one's expected forty year high. Right,

0:23:37.377 --> 0:23:39.417
<v Speaker 1>you put out this statement on how Biden is not

0:23:39.537 --> 0:23:44.297
<v Speaker 1>fighting inflation properly. With inflation exploding at home, President Biden

0:23:44.337 --> 0:23:46.977
<v Speaker 1>heads to Saudi Arabia hat in hand to beg for

0:23:47.057 --> 0:23:49.577
<v Speaker 1>more oil. If he wants to stop his terrible inflation,

0:23:49.657 --> 0:23:52.017
<v Speaker 1>Biden shouldn't be in Saudi Arabia begging for oiler. Should

0:23:52.017 --> 0:23:54.937
<v Speaker 1>be in America's Permian basin telling energy workers he's going

0:23:54.977 --> 0:23:58.497
<v Speaker 1>to get out of the way. Yeah, why doesn't he

0:23:58.577 --> 0:23:59.737
<v Speaker 1>do that? I mean, if we're going to ask the

0:23:59.777 --> 0:24:03.177
<v Speaker 1>Saudi's to turn our more capacity, why is in Biden try,

0:24:03.457 --> 0:24:06.457
<v Speaker 1>I have never heard this White House say we want

0:24:06.497 --> 0:24:10.577
<v Speaker 1>to expand oil production here at home. No, that's a

0:24:10.617 --> 0:24:12.897
<v Speaker 1>great point. He's never said anything like that. He's given

0:24:12.937 --> 0:24:16.217
<v Speaker 1>these saphisms, I want to do everything possible to increase

0:24:16.337 --> 0:24:18.257
<v Speaker 1>energy production, but he's never said I want to see

0:24:18.257 --> 0:24:20.737
<v Speaker 1>America produce more So. He's going to the Saudis, he's

0:24:20.777 --> 0:24:23.297
<v Speaker 1>there right now. He's sent envoys to Venezuela and to

0:24:23.377 --> 0:24:26.257
<v Speaker 1>the Iranians, right so he understands we have a supply problem,

0:24:26.417 --> 0:24:29.857
<v Speaker 1>but he's not interested in that supply coming from domestic producers.

0:24:29.857 --> 0:24:32.177
<v Speaker 1>And just case in point, last week or two weeks ago,

0:24:32.217 --> 0:24:35.297
<v Speaker 1>when the major CEOs of the energy industry were in DC,

0:24:35.777 --> 0:24:38.177
<v Speaker 1>he refused to meet with them. Deb Holland, I'm sorry,

0:24:38.297 --> 0:24:40.937
<v Speaker 1>Jennifer Granham, Secretary of Energy, met with them, but the

0:24:40.937 --> 0:24:43.217
<v Speaker 1>President made it he was proud of the fact he

0:24:43.217 --> 0:24:45.817
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't meet with them. So again, he doesn't want to

0:24:45.817 --> 0:24:49.017
<v Speaker 1>cooperate with us. And we can't survive without cooperation from government.

0:24:49.137 --> 0:24:51.217
<v Speaker 1>So this White House wants to say that they have

0:24:51.777 --> 0:24:55.817
<v Speaker 1>they're doing everything they can to deal with the energy

0:24:55.857 --> 0:24:58.177
<v Speaker 1>crunch right now at the high price of gas, But

0:24:58.257 --> 0:25:00.257
<v Speaker 1>they also think that the people that actually produced the

0:25:00.257 --> 0:25:04.497
<v Speaker 1>gas are basically dirty and immoral. He talks with more

0:25:04.577 --> 0:25:07.537
<v Speaker 1>hostility towards the oil and gas industry in America than

0:25:07.577 --> 0:25:09.537
<v Speaker 1>he does to the rest of the world, right than

0:25:09.577 --> 0:25:12.057
<v Speaker 1>he does about our arch enemies. He has much more

0:25:12.257 --> 0:25:15.617
<v Speaker 1>favorable opinions about gij ping than he does about American

0:25:15.657 --> 0:25:19.977
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuel industry, and that's telling here is representative. Hakim Jeffries,

0:25:20.017 --> 0:25:22.937
<v Speaker 1>for example, was asked about Biden's high inflation numbers. This

0:25:23.017 --> 0:25:26.857
<v Speaker 1>is interesting to see what a political challenge this is

0:25:26.857 --> 0:25:29.897
<v Speaker 1>for Democrats. Watch this one, and I think that President

0:25:29.937 --> 0:25:33.417
<v Speaker 1>Biden has continued to lead in a way that has

0:25:33.457 --> 0:25:36.937
<v Speaker 1>brought about a strong economic recovery from the standpoint of

0:25:37.017 --> 0:25:42.577
<v Speaker 1>low unemployment, increased wages, and significant job growth. I believe

0:25:42.657 --> 0:25:45.937
<v Speaker 1>nine million jobs have been created under the presidency of

0:25:46.057 --> 0:25:49.777
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden. That's a record in American history. But issues remain,

0:25:50.657 --> 0:25:55.017
<v Speaker 1>certainly as it relates to increased costs. So, yeah, Jakim

0:25:55.057 --> 0:25:57.537
<v Speaker 1>Jeffries are saying the Biden's done a good job in

0:25:57.537 --> 0:26:02.857
<v Speaker 1>this economic recovery, and yet the American people disagree. Yeah. Yeah,

0:26:02.857 --> 0:26:04.937
<v Speaker 1>the polling all shows that they put this squarely in

0:26:05.017 --> 0:26:07.057
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden's hands, and the American people aren't following for

0:26:07.097 --> 0:26:09.577
<v Speaker 1>the fact that this administration has allowed them to go

0:26:09.617 --> 0:26:12.417
<v Speaker 1>back to work and thought that that's job creation, right,

0:26:12.457 --> 0:26:15.137
<v Speaker 1>So they don't believe that the president's job numbers. They

0:26:15.217 --> 0:26:17.417
<v Speaker 1>also don't believe that first montage you play. They don't

0:26:17.417 --> 0:26:21.177
<v Speaker 1>believe the pudin price hike, at the pudent price inflation.

0:26:21.377 --> 0:26:24.057
<v Speaker 1>They don't believe it's COVID. They don't believe it's supply chain.

0:26:24.057 --> 0:26:27.577
<v Speaker 1>They're putting the energy crisis at Joe Biden's hands because

0:26:27.577 --> 0:26:30.057
<v Speaker 1>they remember the campaign when he said, very clearly he

0:26:30.097 --> 0:26:31.657
<v Speaker 1>said to that girl, look at me in the eye.

0:26:31.697 --> 0:26:33.977
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to tell you I'm putting oil and gas

0:26:33.977 --> 0:26:36.977
<v Speaker 1>out of business. They listen to him and and they

0:26:36.977 --> 0:26:38.337
<v Speaker 1>believe him, and that's what he said he was going

0:26:38.377 --> 0:26:40.897
<v Speaker 1>to do, and he's doing it. If the domestic oil

0:26:40.937 --> 0:26:44.257
<v Speaker 1>producers had a White House that said, you know what,

0:26:44.377 --> 0:26:46.977
<v Speaker 1>let's just let's just do it. Let's drill, baby, drill,

0:26:47.057 --> 0:26:50.057
<v Speaker 1>let's go for it. What kind of additional capacity could

0:26:50.097 --> 0:26:52.177
<v Speaker 1>be brought online. I know it would take time, it's

0:26:52.217 --> 0:26:55.617
<v Speaker 1>not an overnight thing. But let's say within the next

0:26:55.657 --> 0:26:57.817
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, what will we be looking at. I mean,

0:26:58.217 --> 0:27:01.297
<v Speaker 1>it took the president, the Trump administration in two solid

0:27:01.377 --> 0:27:04.377
<v Speaker 1>years to get to true energy independence. We started celebrating

0:27:04.377 --> 0:27:07.057
<v Speaker 1>it at the end of eighteen beginning of twenty nineteen.

0:27:07.097 --> 0:27:09.417
<v Speaker 1>So the industry takes a while to come online. But

0:27:09.497 --> 0:27:12.857
<v Speaker 1>it did happen because the industry itself felt that they

0:27:12.857 --> 0:27:14.657
<v Speaker 1>were getting the right signals from government that they were

0:27:14.657 --> 0:27:16.577
<v Speaker 1>going to get out of the way. President Trump was

0:27:16.577 --> 0:27:18.777
<v Speaker 1>incredible for this industry, but he didn't discover a new

0:27:18.777 --> 0:27:22.137
<v Speaker 1>oil patch. We had no new technology that came about

0:27:22.177 --> 0:27:24.617
<v Speaker 1>the miracle of a President Trump did for oil and gases.

0:27:24.657 --> 0:27:26.857
<v Speaker 1>He just let us do our darned jobs. And if

0:27:26.857 --> 0:27:29.297
<v Speaker 1>this administration said, like, you guys are the experts, you

0:27:29.417 --> 0:27:31.577
<v Speaker 1>do it responsibly, you do it better than anyone else

0:27:31.577 --> 0:27:33.897
<v Speaker 1>in the world. Go out and find oil and gas

0:27:33.937 --> 0:27:35.777
<v Speaker 1>and bring us to market, we would We would be

0:27:35.777 --> 0:27:38.297
<v Speaker 1>bringing two or three million more barrels a day. And

0:27:38.377 --> 0:27:40.817
<v Speaker 1>when we back to a dollar eighty nine a gas

0:27:40.857 --> 0:27:43.457
<v Speaker 1>a gallon gas like we saw under President Trump, would

0:27:43.457 --> 0:27:45.617
<v Speaker 1>be back to sixty dollar barrel oil. You know, this

0:27:45.657 --> 0:27:48.337
<v Speaker 1>industry wants to make its money off of volume. It

0:27:48.377 --> 0:27:50.697
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to make its money off of price. But

0:27:50.737 --> 0:27:53.217
<v Speaker 1>the Biden does administration believes in government. They don't believe

0:27:53.217 --> 0:27:57.377
<v Speaker 1>in freedom markets. Daniel, thanks very well, I appreciate it. Yeah.

0:27:57.457 --> 0:27:59.537
<v Speaker 1>With the mid terms approaching fast, even the far left

0:27:59.617 --> 0:28:01.697
<v Speaker 1>media outlets are starting to warn of a red wave

0:28:01.817 --> 0:28:03.897
<v Speaker 1>on the way. We'll talk with Ryan Grudowski, author of

0:28:03.937 --> 0:28:06.257
<v Speaker 1>They're Not Listing, when we return. Right now, I want

0:28:06.297 --> 0:28:07.697
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you about a great deal for my

0:28:07.737 --> 0:28:10.337
<v Speaker 1>friends at my Patriots Apply. If you needed more proof

0:28:10.337 --> 0:28:12.017
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to have massive food shortages in the

0:28:12.137 --> 0:28:15.137
<v Speaker 1>very near future, here it is. Many American farmers have

0:28:15.177 --> 0:28:17.697
<v Speaker 1>announced that they don't have enough fertilizer because of global

0:28:17.697 --> 0:28:21.017
<v Speaker 1>supply chain breakdowns, and as everybody knows, without fertilizer you

0:28:21.057 --> 0:28:23.777
<v Speaker 1>can't grow food. You can expect to see prolonged food

0:28:23.817 --> 0:28:26.897
<v Speaker 1>shortages and sky high prices for the next year at least.

0:28:26.937 --> 0:28:28.937
<v Speaker 1>So what can you do to avoid this nightmare and

0:28:29.057 --> 0:28:32.457
<v Speaker 1>protect your family. It's easy. Just visit prepare with Buck

0:28:32.537 --> 0:28:34.977
<v Speaker 1>dot com. At Prepare with Buck dot com you'll find

0:28:34.977 --> 0:28:37.057
<v Speaker 1>a special offer. Get one hundred and fifty dollars off

0:28:37.057 --> 0:28:40.017
<v Speaker 1>a three month supply of long term emergency food storage

0:28:40.017 --> 0:28:42.577
<v Speaker 1>from my Patriots Supply. Don't skimp. Get one kit for

0:28:42.657 --> 0:28:45.577
<v Speaker 1>each person in your family. Each My Patriots Supply kit

0:28:45.617 --> 0:28:49.177
<v Speaker 1>has enough food for three solid months per person, providing

0:28:49.217 --> 0:28:50.897
<v Speaker 1>more than two thousand collars a day to keep your

0:28:50.937 --> 0:28:53.577
<v Speaker 1>energy up. They're going to prepare Prepare with Buck dot

0:28:53.577 --> 0:28:55.577
<v Speaker 1>com today and save one hundred and fifty dollars on

0:28:55.657 --> 0:28:59.217
<v Speaker 1>each three month kit you require. More food shortages are coming,

0:28:59.297 --> 0:29:08.017
<v Speaker 1>go to prepare with buck dot com. Is there a

0:29:08.057 --> 0:29:10.937
<v Speaker 1>red wave on the way. We know by inflation is

0:29:10.977 --> 0:29:13.097
<v Speaker 1>at an all time high. We know his approval ratings

0:29:13.097 --> 0:29:15.857
<v Speaker 1>are tanking. So when we start to see Democrat voters

0:29:15.937 --> 0:29:18.377
<v Speaker 1>changing their minds in the upcoming midterm elections, what I

0:29:18.457 --> 0:29:21.057
<v Speaker 1>mean now, someone who knows this stuff backwards and forwards

0:29:21.537 --> 0:29:24.937
<v Speaker 1>author of they're not listening and also check out his

0:29:25.057 --> 0:29:28.857
<v Speaker 1>National Populist newsletter on substack, Ryan Gerdusky, Ryan, good to

0:29:28.897 --> 0:29:32.017
<v Speaker 1>be with you man, Thank you for having me. So

0:29:32.217 --> 0:29:35.297
<v Speaker 1>you've got this great piece the long shots which Republicans

0:29:35.377 --> 0:29:39.097
<v Speaker 1>can win that we least expect. Walk us through some

0:29:39.137 --> 0:29:41.137
<v Speaker 1>of this, tell us who I mean, These are not

0:29:41.177 --> 0:29:43.577
<v Speaker 1>the ones you're saying we're gonna win. These are ones

0:29:43.617 --> 0:29:46.737
<v Speaker 1>you're saying in the piece because of the trajectory of

0:29:46.777 --> 0:29:49.937
<v Speaker 1>the GOP right now because of the beginnings of the

0:29:50.057 --> 0:29:52.697
<v Speaker 1>red wave, we could win and some of them are

0:29:52.697 --> 0:29:54.977
<v Speaker 1>really pretty surprising. So take us through some of them.

0:29:55.577 --> 0:29:58.777
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right. So you have a lot of areas

0:29:58.777 --> 0:30:01.137
<v Speaker 1>that Republicans are kind of cast out in New England

0:30:01.497 --> 0:30:05.977
<v Speaker 1>California where Republicans could see some resurgence. So let's take

0:30:06.057 --> 0:30:09.057
<v Speaker 1>in new hand, New England. You've Alan Fung in Rhode

0:30:09.097 --> 0:30:12.537
<v Speaker 1>Island's second congres National This is the western portion of

0:30:12.697 --> 0:30:15.177
<v Speaker 1>Rhode Island. Alan Fung is the guy who's run for

0:30:15.217 --> 0:30:18.057
<v Speaker 1>governor twice loss but he did very well in the

0:30:18.057 --> 0:30:20.257
<v Speaker 1>western half of it. This is a district that's tracking

0:30:20.377 --> 0:30:23.177
<v Speaker 1>right over time, and it could be the first time

0:30:23.177 --> 0:30:26.457
<v Speaker 1>Republicans see a victory in Rhode Island in decades. Similarly,

0:30:26.497 --> 0:30:29.377
<v Speaker 1>in New Hampshire second Congressional district, you have thirty six

0:30:29.457 --> 0:30:32.657
<v Speaker 1>year old Mayor George Hansell, who is a mayor of

0:30:33.057 --> 0:30:36.697
<v Speaker 1>a fairly large town in the region called Keene, New Hampshire.

0:30:36.977 --> 0:30:39.857
<v Speaker 1>He won by a huge margin for his mayoral reelection.

0:30:40.457 --> 0:30:43.057
<v Speaker 1>He's running in a fairly democratic area. But once again,

0:30:43.097 --> 0:30:45.777
<v Speaker 1>this is an area that went Republican in twenty ten

0:30:46.257 --> 0:30:48.737
<v Speaker 1>or the twenty ten read way that they had there.

0:30:49.617 --> 0:30:52.697
<v Speaker 1>There are overall six congressional seats in New England that

0:30:52.737 --> 0:30:55.737
<v Speaker 1>are up for grabs for Republicans, two in Connecticut, one

0:30:55.777 --> 0:30:57.897
<v Speaker 1>in Rhode Island, two in New Hampshire, and one in Maine,

0:30:58.177 --> 0:31:01.537
<v Speaker 1>those two being the long shots. In California in the

0:31:01.537 --> 0:31:05.777
<v Speaker 1>Central Valley, and people talk about the Hispanic moving towards Republican,

0:31:05.937 --> 0:31:09.657
<v Speaker 1>especially working class Hispanics. There's no better part of working

0:31:09.657 --> 0:31:12.377
<v Speaker 1>class spacks in the Central Valley of California, which is

0:31:12.377 --> 0:31:16.537
<v Speaker 1>three congressional districts, two which are representing currently by Democrats,

0:31:16.537 --> 0:31:21.097
<v Speaker 1>one by a Republican. California's ninth congressional district, Republican Tom

0:31:21.137 --> 0:31:24.057
<v Speaker 1>Patty is making a bid to win one of those

0:31:24.097 --> 0:31:27.417
<v Speaker 1>congressional seats. If he wins, it will also mean that

0:31:27.577 --> 0:31:31.897
<v Speaker 1>Republicans carry the nearby thirteenth Congressional District and the twenty

0:31:31.937 --> 0:31:35.177
<v Speaker 1>second Congressional District, which is currently helped by Republican David Valdeo.

0:31:36.177 --> 0:31:38.617
<v Speaker 1>Those are just some of the areas that people are looking.

0:31:38.977 --> 0:31:41.817
<v Speaker 1>Similarly in the Northwest right now, Republicans just have four

0:31:41.857 --> 0:31:45.577
<v Speaker 1>congressional seats, but there's four more that are vulnerable. Republican

0:31:45.657 --> 0:31:51.377
<v Speaker 1>Canada Alec Scarleto's is running and he is the subject

0:31:51.417 --> 0:31:56.777
<v Speaker 1>of Clint Eastwood's movie fifteen seventeen to Paris. He's running too.

0:31:57.937 --> 0:31:59.857
<v Speaker 1>So is he the guy who was on the bullet

0:31:59.857 --> 0:32:02.577
<v Speaker 1>train who ran and grabbed the guy who at the

0:32:02.577 --> 0:32:04.337
<v Speaker 1>AK forty seven who was going to do the mass

0:32:04.377 --> 0:32:07.057
<v Speaker 1>casualty terror attack. Is that that's the guy? Yeah, Yeah,

0:32:07.177 --> 0:32:09.777
<v Speaker 1>that's him. Yes, he's so. He's running for Congress. Two

0:32:09.817 --> 0:32:11.977
<v Speaker 1>years ago he did fairly well. I got in the

0:32:11.977 --> 0:32:14.977
<v Speaker 1>mid forties, didn't win. Is running now in an open

0:32:15.097 --> 0:32:18.057
<v Speaker 1>seat and in a Republican wave here who knows? And

0:32:18.097 --> 0:32:20.617
<v Speaker 1>if he wins, it means Republicans are probably picking up

0:32:20.897 --> 0:32:24.617
<v Speaker 1>two or three more seats in the Pacific Northwest, which

0:32:24.617 --> 0:32:28.017
<v Speaker 1>would be monumental area that Republicans really haven't won many

0:32:28.057 --> 0:32:34.137
<v Speaker 1>seats in a very very long time. Now, if the

0:32:34.217 --> 0:32:37.337
<v Speaker 1>Senate is going to come down to a couple of

0:32:37.417 --> 0:32:41.137
<v Speaker 1>races control of the Senate, Ryan, what are the races

0:32:41.177 --> 0:32:44.977
<v Speaker 1>and how do you think the GOP is looking in them? Well,

0:32:44.977 --> 0:32:48.817
<v Speaker 1>there's five major races. New Hampshire where the incumbent Republican

0:32:48.897 --> 0:32:51.937
<v Speaker 1>people have been selling New Hampshire is an easy Democrat win. However,

0:32:52.057 --> 0:32:56.297
<v Speaker 1>the Democrat incumbents popularity is in the high thirties. You

0:32:56.377 --> 0:33:00.577
<v Speaker 1>have Georgia, which is Democrat hell currently Arizona, Nevada, and

0:33:00.617 --> 0:33:04.137
<v Speaker 1>then Pennsylvania, which is a retiring Republican seat for Pat Toomey.

0:33:04.777 --> 0:33:08.497
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are in a mixed shape. In Nevada, certainly they

0:33:08.537 --> 0:33:11.457
<v Speaker 1>have a top tier candidate, Adam Adam Laxolt. In the

0:33:11.457 --> 0:33:15.457
<v Speaker 1>other states not they didn't do amazing recruitment. However, in

0:33:15.537 --> 0:33:19.937
<v Speaker 1>a wave year that may not matter as much. Certainly

0:33:19.977 --> 0:33:23.257
<v Speaker 1>there's problems with the races in Georgia right now. Of

0:33:23.657 --> 0:33:26.657
<v Speaker 1>herschel Walker is not the strongest candidate. He's had many

0:33:26.697 --> 0:33:30.297
<v Speaker 1>many flubs in his background is troublesome. However, he could

0:33:30.297 --> 0:33:33.137
<v Speaker 1>still pull up an upset there. If it is truly

0:33:33.177 --> 0:33:35.577
<v Speaker 1>this astronomical wave A, Republicans are going to pick up

0:33:35.617 --> 0:33:38.057
<v Speaker 1>victories left, right and center. Then it's going to be

0:33:38.257 --> 0:33:42.777
<v Speaker 1>the shocking victory will be Joe od in Colorado. Now Colorado,

0:33:42.817 --> 0:33:45.737
<v Speaker 1>once again, Republicans haven't won statewide or presidential races two

0:33:45.737 --> 0:33:49.097
<v Speaker 1>thousand and four. However, they have one in two and

0:33:49.177 --> 0:33:52.977
<v Speaker 1>ten and in two thou and fourteen, and the Republican

0:33:53.217 --> 0:33:56.857
<v Speaker 1>the Democrat rather said Bennett when he ran in twenty sixteen,

0:33:56.937 --> 0:34:00.697
<v Speaker 1>only got fifty percent against a much underfunded candidate who

0:34:00.777 --> 0:34:04.017
<v Speaker 1>got forty six percent, not a huge amount of money

0:34:04.057 --> 0:34:07.577
<v Speaker 1>for a state that people considered to be completely blue.

0:34:07.777 --> 0:34:09.937
<v Speaker 1>So if there's been your shocking victory will be Joe

0:34:10.057 --> 0:34:13.857
<v Speaker 1>od in the Colorado Senate race. And there's even been

0:34:13.897 --> 0:34:17.777
<v Speaker 1>some talk in Democrats circles and some pieces in places

0:34:17.817 --> 0:34:20.937
<v Speaker 1>like the New York Times, Ryan, I've seen on concerns

0:34:20.977 --> 0:34:26.537
<v Speaker 1>about races in places like Oregon in Washington State, what

0:34:26.617 --> 0:34:30.017
<v Speaker 1>are you seeing there? Yeah, Oregon is Oregon special this

0:34:30.137 --> 0:34:32.697
<v Speaker 1>year because they have not only a Republican and Democrat,

0:34:32.937 --> 0:34:36.897
<v Speaker 1>but an independent candidate, a former Democrat turned independent running

0:34:36.937 --> 0:34:42.017
<v Speaker 1>statewide for governor. She's received the independent has received endorsements

0:34:42.057 --> 0:34:45.457
<v Speaker 1>from prominent Democrats and prominent former Republicans from the state

0:34:46.057 --> 0:34:50.937
<v Speaker 1>liberal Republicans, so it's really up for grabs. Republicans have

0:34:51.017 --> 0:34:53.777
<v Speaker 1>only won one statewide race in Oregon since two thousand

0:34:53.817 --> 0:34:56.697
<v Speaker 1>and haven't won the governor's race since nineteen eighty two.

0:34:57.017 --> 0:35:01.417
<v Speaker 1>So Christine Dreisen running for governor. Drazen running for governor,

0:35:01.577 --> 0:35:04.137
<v Speaker 1>she could be the first Republican governor in forty years.

0:35:04.177 --> 0:35:07.137
<v Speaker 1>If she's able to pull off this upset. Washington Post,

0:35:07.137 --> 0:35:11.057
<v Speaker 1>by the way, released an article titled Trump potential twenty

0:35:11.097 --> 0:35:14.777
<v Speaker 1>twenty four announcement could wreak havoc on the mid terms?

0:35:14.897 --> 0:35:17.777
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Play. This went out for us a little bit.

0:35:18.377 --> 0:35:20.897
<v Speaker 1>First off, is it believe now? I mean, I know

0:35:20.937 --> 0:35:24.137
<v Speaker 1>with Trump, let's believed could change tomorrow because Trump changes

0:35:24.177 --> 0:35:26.657
<v Speaker 1>his mind and who knows, But does it believe he'll likely,

0:35:26.817 --> 0:35:30.937
<v Speaker 1>in your estimation, announce before the election. If he does,

0:35:31.577 --> 0:35:34.417
<v Speaker 1>what do you think that does to the election? And

0:35:34.457 --> 0:35:36.817
<v Speaker 1>what does it what does it all look like? You know,

0:35:36.897 --> 0:35:38.777
<v Speaker 1>people were guessing he was going to announce on fourth

0:35:38.777 --> 0:35:41.737
<v Speaker 1>of July weekend, which obviously came and went with no announcement.

0:35:42.097 --> 0:35:46.617
<v Speaker 1>Is he going to announce for September? When they're saying possibly?

0:35:46.657 --> 0:35:48.497
<v Speaker 1>But once again it's Donald Trump. I don't think that

0:35:48.537 --> 0:35:51.137
<v Speaker 1>he is in any rush to announce. He is the presumptive.

0:35:51.697 --> 0:35:55.177
<v Speaker 1>He's presumptively running already. He would have the absolute lead

0:35:55.217 --> 0:35:58.977
<v Speaker 1>if he did run as of this point, before debates

0:35:59.017 --> 0:36:02.177
<v Speaker 1>happen or anything else. You know, who knows, But he

0:36:02.337 --> 0:36:04.737
<v Speaker 1>is and he's got tons of money, so he doesn't

0:36:04.777 --> 0:36:07.537
<v Speaker 1>have to rush to win to run. I think a

0:36:07.577 --> 0:36:09.657
<v Speaker 1>lot of Democrats are hoping he does because they'll make

0:36:09.657 --> 0:36:11.857
<v Speaker 1>the entire election about Donald Trump again. But really, what

0:36:11.977 --> 0:36:14.377
<v Speaker 1>some voters minds is Joe Biden. It was like the

0:36:14.417 --> 0:36:17.857
<v Speaker 1>abortion comment abortion. The abortion decision came and went, and

0:36:17.937 --> 0:36:21.177
<v Speaker 1>Democrats didn't receive any long lasting, real major bump in

0:36:21.217 --> 0:36:25.457
<v Speaker 1>the polls. Neither did Joe Biden. Republicans generic ballot fell

0:36:25.737 --> 0:36:28.697
<v Speaker 1>a point, but it's slowly climbing back up again. I

0:36:28.777 --> 0:36:31.177
<v Speaker 1>just don't think these are the major concision issues on

0:36:31.257 --> 0:36:35.897
<v Speaker 1>concerned voters minds, especially with a recession likely coming in

0:36:35.977 --> 0:36:39.297
<v Speaker 1>Q four of this year, which would be near election day.

0:36:39.617 --> 0:36:41.697
<v Speaker 1>Even CNN is admitting the Democrats are going to face

0:36:41.697 --> 0:36:43.817
<v Speaker 1>some real problems holding on to seats in the midterms.

0:36:43.817 --> 0:36:46.897
<v Speaker 1>Then a recent article, they wrote the President Biden's approval

0:36:46.977 --> 0:36:49.817
<v Speaker 1>ratings falling to the lowest levels of his presidency, that

0:36:49.897 --> 0:36:53.337
<v Speaker 1>traditional pattern threatens Democrats, that sweeping losses in November's mid

0:36:53.497 --> 0:36:56.817
<v Speaker 1>term elections ryan a pickup of what in the House

0:36:57.097 --> 0:36:59.817
<v Speaker 1>and a balance of what in the Senate. In your mind,

0:36:59.977 --> 0:37:03.417
<v Speaker 1>is a red wave the likes of which the Republicans

0:37:03.457 --> 0:37:07.017
<v Speaker 1>should be proud of. What is is what is hitting

0:37:07.017 --> 0:37:10.457
<v Speaker 1>the number properly in your mind. If they hit two

0:37:10.537 --> 0:37:13.577
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty five, that will be a very successful election,

0:37:13.577 --> 0:37:15.737
<v Speaker 1>and thirty seas will be great. If they went two

0:37:15.817 --> 0:37:20.217
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty will be a monumental, generational victory, the

0:37:20.297 --> 0:37:22.697
<v Speaker 1>likes of which we really haven't seen Republicans hit that

0:37:22.777 --> 0:37:25.657
<v Speaker 1>kind of a number. Anything more than that is just,

0:37:26.177 --> 0:37:28.977
<v Speaker 1>you know, astronomical. But two hundred and thirty five, I

0:37:29.057 --> 0:37:32.857
<v Speaker 1>think would be reasonable. Two two hundred and forty, possible

0:37:33.337 --> 0:37:35.697
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and fifty and a real big red wave,

0:37:35.737 --> 0:37:39.297
<v Speaker 1>and anything more than that is just really cherries on

0:37:39.337 --> 0:37:41.257
<v Speaker 1>the cake at that point. That means the Democrats will

0:37:41.257 --> 0:37:43.617
<v Speaker 1>have really no functional power in Washington in the House,

0:37:44.257 --> 0:37:46.937
<v Speaker 1>and they could even have defective Republicans and it really

0:37:46.937 --> 0:37:52.177
<v Speaker 1>won't matter. Subscribe to Ryan Grdusky's National Populist newsletter on

0:37:52.257 --> 0:37:54.217
<v Speaker 1>sub stack, folks, if you want to be really in

0:37:54.257 --> 0:37:56.777
<v Speaker 1>the know going into this election. Ryan, thanks so much,

0:37:57.897 --> 0:38:02.617
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. AOC admit she knows some more information about

0:38:02.697 --> 0:38:05.857
<v Speaker 1>January sixth, apparently, and there's still been no Democrat that

0:38:05.897 --> 0:38:08.017
<v Speaker 1>can tell us what a woman is, which is interesting.

0:38:08.017 --> 0:38:16.897
<v Speaker 1>We got that and more coming up in quickts. AOC

0:38:17.737 --> 0:38:21.217
<v Speaker 1>has some interesting information she shares about January sixth, and

0:38:21.257 --> 0:38:23.257
<v Speaker 1>there has still been no Democrat that can tell us

0:38:23.257 --> 0:38:25.377
<v Speaker 1>what a woman is, at least publicly. So we got

0:38:25.377 --> 0:38:28.457
<v Speaker 1>those stories in quick. Kids. Let's get to it. First

0:38:28.497 --> 0:38:33.697
<v Speaker 1>of all, Oh my, here we have AOC talking about

0:38:33.777 --> 0:38:38.977
<v Speaker 1>Capitol Hill police. Now, if I were to say a letting,

0:38:39.017 --> 0:38:40.617
<v Speaker 1>I have said this before, but if I were to say,

0:38:40.937 --> 0:38:44.257
<v Speaker 1>it's very strange that there's video of Capitol Hill police

0:38:44.257 --> 0:38:50.537
<v Speaker 1>officers waving waving on some of the rioters on January sixth,

0:38:51.057 --> 0:38:53.577
<v Speaker 1>that's a conspiracy. I'm a conspiracy theorists and bad person

0:38:53.617 --> 0:38:56.617
<v Speaker 1>for you been bringing it up. But AOC is very

0:38:56.697 --> 0:38:59.137
<v Speaker 1>upset about the fact that she believes there are or

0:38:59.177 --> 0:39:03.337
<v Speaker 1>the thought that she believes there are insurrectionists among the

0:39:03.377 --> 0:39:07.577
<v Speaker 1>Capitol Hill police officers who were, as she says, holding

0:39:07.577 --> 0:39:11.057
<v Speaker 1>the doors open for them on January six and who

0:39:11.417 --> 0:39:17.737
<v Speaker 1>were effectively the enablers of the insurrection. Here she is

0:39:17.817 --> 0:39:20.857
<v Speaker 1>member of Congress freaking out about it. Watch if these

0:39:20.977 --> 0:39:26.017
<v Speaker 1>insurrectionists and that there were actual officers working with this,

0:39:26.137 --> 0:39:27.577
<v Speaker 1>And we never got to the bottom of that, and

0:39:27.617 --> 0:39:29.617
<v Speaker 1>we never got any answers about that, and then to

0:39:29.737 --> 0:39:31.857
<v Speaker 1>this day we're just supposed to pretend that that never happened.

0:39:32.497 --> 0:39:35.697
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea what happened to the people on

0:39:35.697 --> 0:39:39.337
<v Speaker 1>the inside who were very clearly sympathetic with what was

0:39:39.377 --> 0:39:41.697
<v Speaker 1>going on and opening the doors wide open for that.

0:39:44.617 --> 0:39:46.137
<v Speaker 1>So she's allowed to bring this up, of course, because

0:39:46.177 --> 0:39:48.817
<v Speaker 1>she's a Democrat. But it does raise some questions, doesn't it.

0:39:49.337 --> 0:39:54.617
<v Speaker 1>Why did members of Capital police essentially wave on rioters

0:39:54.657 --> 0:39:57.977
<v Speaker 1>that day? If this was really about security, securing the

0:39:57.977 --> 0:40:00.017
<v Speaker 1>capital in the future, if this was about preventing something

0:40:00.017 --> 0:40:02.337
<v Speaker 1>like that from happening again, wouldn't that be one of

0:40:02.377 --> 0:40:04.857
<v Speaker 1>the first questions we would see answered. Wouldn't we have

0:40:05.017 --> 0:40:08.017
<v Speaker 1>those those Capital Police officers testifying about why they just

0:40:08.177 --> 0:40:09.897
<v Speaker 1>moved the barricades out the way and said, come on.

0:40:09.897 --> 0:40:14.017
<v Speaker 1>It seems kind of important, doesn't as to me? But

0:40:14.057 --> 0:40:15.777
<v Speaker 1>then again, I also think it's important to be able

0:40:15.777 --> 0:40:19.217
<v Speaker 1>to tell people what a woman is, which I think

0:40:19.337 --> 0:40:21.857
<v Speaker 1>is pretty straightforward, like this shouldn't be that hard. It

0:40:21.857 --> 0:40:24.657
<v Speaker 1>appears that there are Democrats who are still totally unable

0:40:24.697 --> 0:40:28.617
<v Speaker 1>to answer this. The president of the National Women's Law

0:40:28.737 --> 0:40:31.657
<v Speaker 1>Center was asked, and this is what you said about

0:40:31.737 --> 0:40:35.897
<v Speaker 1>the very complicated question what is a woman? Since you

0:40:35.937 --> 0:40:38.297
<v Speaker 1>are the president of the National Women's Law Center. I

0:40:38.337 --> 0:40:40.657
<v Speaker 1>was hoping that you could define what a woman is

0:40:40.657 --> 0:40:44.217
<v Speaker 1>for us in this committee. Hearing that there are people

0:40:44.337 --> 0:40:48.937
<v Speaker 1>who identify as non binary, I think, okay, we're not

0:40:48.977 --> 0:40:50.897
<v Speaker 1>going to go there. I was hoping maybe you would be.

0:40:51.177 --> 0:40:53.337
<v Speaker 1>I was hoping that maybe you would say something that

0:40:53.697 --> 0:40:57.017
<v Speaker 1>maybe we learned in high school biology that has to

0:40:57.057 --> 0:40:59.897
<v Speaker 1>do with X and Y chromosomes, but to which define

0:40:59.977 --> 0:41:01.577
<v Speaker 1>male and female. But I guess we're not going to

0:41:01.657 --> 0:41:05.097
<v Speaker 1>get in there. Nope, we are not. Not with these democrats.

0:41:05.937 --> 0:41:08.617
<v Speaker 1>And here is Kamala taking a page on a Biden's

0:41:08.617 --> 0:41:11.617
<v Speaker 1>playbook with some you just got to hear this one.

0:41:11.697 --> 0:41:17.177
<v Speaker 1>Watch together. We are expanding access to transportation. Seems like

0:41:17.217 --> 0:41:19.697
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's a small issue. It's a big issue. You

0:41:19.737 --> 0:41:21.777
<v Speaker 1>need to get to go and need to be able

0:41:21.817 --> 0:41:23.537
<v Speaker 1>to get where you need to go to do the

0:41:23.537 --> 0:41:28.297
<v Speaker 1>work and get home whatever that means. All right, that's

0:41:28.337 --> 0:41:30.177
<v Speaker 1>different than I told the line No spinoos with Bill

0:41:30.297 --> 0:41:36.417
<v Speaker 1>Riley is next. She'll tie