WEBVTT - Stop Exaggerating Russian Actions

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>You are entering the freedom hunt. The hysteria around Russia

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>collusion continues on despite the lack of evidence. The media

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is now desperate to convince people that non criminal activity

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:28.319
<v Speaker 1>is criminal, that the president is guilty, and that there's

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>evidence that does not exist. They also don't want us

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to find out what really happened in that interview with

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>General Flynn that led to those perjury charges. We got

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 1>that and more coming up on The Buck Sexton Show.

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the Buck Sexton Show, where the mission or

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence.

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>What magno mistake American, You're a great American Again The

0:00:53.000 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexton Show begins. No, welcome to the Buck section Show. Everybody.

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Great to have you here with me on this most

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 1>excellent Thursday. Excellent. We need to get ready for what

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>is going to be quite a year in twenty nineteen.

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Time time to batten down the hatches, my friends, Get

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 1>ready for the squall. Dig deep in the trench. It's

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>going to get so much uglier, It's going to get

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>so much crazier. How is that even possible at this point,

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to fathom, but I know it to be

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the case. Unfortunately, a lot of very excited and over

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>excitable coverage today of this situation with Maria Boutina. Maria Boutina,

0:01:56.200 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>who is this Russian gun rights activist, and now she

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>has pleaded guilty to conspiring conspiring here, according to the

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Washington Post, with a senior Russian official, to infiltrate the

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>conservative movement in the United States as an agent for

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 1>the Kremlin from twenty fifteen until her arrest in July.

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>She's the first Russian national who is convicted of influence,

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of trying to influence, seeking to influence US policy in

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the run up to the twenty sixteen election. This is

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 1>being reported on by a credulous and ignorant media as

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 1>a spy has been found. This is being reported there

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're using the word spy. Yahoo has called her

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a spy. MSNBC. The main story on MSNBC just a

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>few moments ago when I was when I was doing

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>my last run of you know, the various sites that

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to make sure or I go through every

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>time I come on air. The main story was, in fact,

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>this Maria Boutina thing, and they were calling Maria Boutina

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>a spy. They were calling her a spy. Here's the

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>problem with that. She's not a spy. Now, that doesn't

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>mean what she did is okay, It doesn't mean that

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>what she did is, you know, just fine and dandy.

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>But why, once again do they have to exaggerate. Why

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>is the media continuing its trend of pushing further than

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the facts when it comes to anything relating to Russia, Trump,

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the election collusion, any of this stuff. Here's what really happened,

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>based on the facts as we know them. Maria Boutina,

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a Russian national, came to America and was trying to

0:03:53.120 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>gain influence in decision making circles, particularly the National Rifle Association,

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>but just in general American decision makers on the right,

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and wanted to open a back channel for communication for

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the Russian government or for prominent Russians attached to the

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Russian government. And here's how she's not a spy. One

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>she didn't ever try to access nor did she access

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>sensitive or classified information. She wasn't trying to steal info.

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Now maybe she would have eventually, but that's not the

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that's not what the charges are. She was trying to

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>get close to people that have influence in America. This

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 1>is acting as a foreign agent. Now, this corresponds to

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>another charge that has come up in this whole Russian

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>collusion madness of failure to register as a foreign agent.

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Call it a FARAH violation Foreign Agent Registration Act. And

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that's when you're in America and an American who is

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to push for a foreign agents interest here in

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>America right now, if you are advocating on behalf of

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:17.679
<v Speaker 1>let's say, you know, Saudi interests or Turkish interests or

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Thie interests in America, but you're doing it openly, you're saying, hey,

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I really I'm advocating for Thaie interests in America. That

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>falls under FARAH. And that's the kind of thing where

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>usually when they catch you, or if that comes to

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the government's attention, they say, hey, hey, you know you

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>got a register? All right, you got a register. It's

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:41.359
<v Speaker 1>essentially being a lobbyist. You're a lobbyist for a foreign government,

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to register, just like how if you're a

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>lobbyist period in our own government, you're supposed to register, right,

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>So this is the equivalent of unregistered lobbying activity. Because

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Maria Boutina was going around saying, hey, I'm Russian. I

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 1>want to open up a dialogue between America and Russia,

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and I want to be near decision makers and people

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>who are involved and have influence in the policy process

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of Russia. That's a very different thing. This

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>is not espionage. This is not spying. This is not

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>like Anna Chabman. Anna Chapman was accused of being what

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the KGB used to call an illegal which essentially was

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>a long, deep, long time, deep cover operative meant to

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>penetrate under false pretenses the very top levels of the

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:34.720
<v Speaker 1>United States government, steal secrets and take it back to Moscow,

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>pretending not to be a Russian right, pretending to be

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>something else. In this instance, Maria Buccino, this is somebody

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>who is walking around and saying, Hey, I'm Russian, and

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk to people about how we can

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>get American Russia to agree on some stuff. She's facing

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>up to five years in federal prison now. And now,

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>why is this so significant? By the way, for a

0:06:56.480 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>registration also came up in the general flintcase, but we'll

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:04.039
<v Speaker 1>get to that in a moment. They're saying this is

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>so important because it ties together the NRA, GOP, and Trump,

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>so the the three headed hydra that the left hate

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>so much. They hate the GOP, they hate the NRA,

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and wow do they hate Trump. And this lets them

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>tell this tale of a woman who was trying to

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Was she successful in any of this? Did she manage

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to influence US policy at all? You know? This is

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>this reminds me of the exaggeration of the impact of

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>some Facebook ads. You know when when they were asking

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the Google executive Peach I, CEO of Google, earlier this week,

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>how much money was spent by Russian associated accounts on

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Google during the election. You know what he said, It

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>was something relines about four thousand dollars. Spending four thousand

0:07:55.120 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>dollars on Google to influence an election is like pouring

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a cup of tap water in the ocean and saying

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you're changing its temperature. Technically, you might have altered the

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>temperature somewhat, but it's not percept it's not something that

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you could perceive, it's not something you could measure. Maria

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Boutina did not shift any US policy. Okay, Maria Boutina

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>was entirely unsuccessful in this, which, by the way, is

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>why the Mueller probe didn't even handle this case. Handed

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it off. This was not, in any way a major

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>case of espionage. This was not something that people should

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>be so excited about and so concerned about. But it

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>involves a Russian involves geop stuff and the elections. Oh,

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>oh my gosh, it's such a big story. We are

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>living in a time of hysteria and delusion that is

0:08:56.280 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>embraced by an increasingly desperate establishment. And the establishment is

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 1>desperate because not only is their power coming coming under

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>assault and therefore its longevity is in question, but we

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>also now are free to ask questions about why are

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>these people the establishment? What is it about the elites

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>in government, in journalism and media that has put them

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 1>in that position? Should we believe them? Should we trust them?

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Are they particularly good or competent what they do? No,

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:33.439
<v Speaker 1>they're not, and Trump exposes them, exposes them for not

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:40.559
<v Speaker 1>being what they think they are, which is exceptional, which

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>is excellent at what they do. No, they just are

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>powerful and influential. But that's different. That's a very different thing. Indeed,

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can be the leader of a foreign

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>country because everyone thinks you're great, or you can be

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the leader of a foreign country because you seize power

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>through brute force. Both cases, you're talking about a leader,

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>but only one side of the ledger would you have

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a situation where somebody could claim excellence and skill and

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the other it's just force and power. And the Left

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 1>is obsessed with power and with the exercise of that power,

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:18.079
<v Speaker 1>and they'll use force to get there, and anyone who

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>challenges that is a target to be destroyed. And that's

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>why they have to come up with all these different narratives.

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Narratives meant to undermine the opposition, undermine the people who

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>are a threat to their power. Maria Boutina, for example,

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>yet another individual who insaner times they would just say, okay,

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>just get out of America. They'd probably just deport her

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:41.599
<v Speaker 1>as they get out of America, go back to Russia.

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, you shouldn't be here trying to meddle in

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>our national conversation about anything in this way. You know,

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:52.199
<v Speaker 1>you're supposed to registers as an agent of a foreign country. Right,

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>there's foreign registration for Americans, you know, being an agent

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of a foreign power, and then there's being a foreigner

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>who's an agent of a or in power. Now General

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Flynn didn't register UNDERFERA. There are a lot of people

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>in DC who have not registered UNDERFERRA, but they were

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>going to use that, I think as additional leverage against him.

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>And this then brings me to what we see happening

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>through all the Russia collusion stuff. We see happening with

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>General Flynn, with all the people that have been caught

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>up Papadopolis and Cohen and Boutina and others. Now, and

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that is when is the law strict, literal and harsh

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and when is the law open to interpretation? Something that

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>we should look through with an ida mercy and decency

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and second chances, And increasingly in the most politically tense

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>investigations in the country, what we find is that Democrats

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>always take the most strict, uncharitable, vicious, aggressive view of

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the law, most literal interpretation of the law possible when

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>it is negative for a Republican and we always have

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the reverse for Democrats, whether it's Hillary or you name it.

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>The law is malleable, the law is open to interpretation,

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:25.079
<v Speaker 1>there's room to maneuver, and there's room for mercy. When

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a Democrat who is that issue? This is fundamentally

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:36.959
<v Speaker 1>destroying our sense. This Mueller probe, the hysteria around all things,

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Russia is destroying our sense that the law is impartially

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>applied when it comes to politics. We cannot run from this.

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>We have to confront it. We will do more of that.

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>In just a moment, he answered a bunch of questions,

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a great number of them apparently, and the agents knew

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.439
<v Speaker 1>that some of those those answers didn't fit very well

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>with what he knew. And what's fascinating about the information

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>we have is they made the conscious decision not to

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>raise those with him. So there is a certain feeling

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of a trap here that obviously he never clued into.

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>What's really troubling is not just the fact that they

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:19.199
<v Speaker 1>proceeded to criminalize it, but that the initial agents apparently

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>did not believe he was intentionally lying, and they did

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>not recommend the charge. Now you now fast forward to

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 1>where we are now, and I can only imagine what

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Flynn might be thinking and reading the recent filings, because

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>in one of the footnotes for Cohen, the prosecutors note

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that he came in and made all types of false

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>statements about all types of stuff to investigators and then

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>simply says, a matter of factly, he then corrected those

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>statements and I could imagine Michael Flynn reading this thing. Well, Okay,

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>what happened to my chance to correct? That's right, what

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>happened to Flynn's chance to correct? Who gets a second chance?

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Who gets the benefit of the doubt? That is what

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>is an issue here. I'm so sick of all these

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>smarmy left wing lawyers and pseudo lawyers who send they

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>broke the law, pleaded guilty, taking this view of everything

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>involving Trump at Russia and collusion and the lies and

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the perjury charges as though they've they've never seen how

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>criminal law actually functions. Some people get a lot of

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the way, other people don't. If it's based on politics,

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a huge problem. Hillary had nine lawyers in the room,

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>or there McCabe, who's a liar and a scoundrel and

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>was fired from the FBI for for those reasons. McCabe

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>made sure that Flynn didn't have any lawyer in the

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>room with him. Now, you don't need a lawyer. I

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>don't do that. We're just gonna we're just gonna talk

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to you about this thing. Liberals played dirty, and that's

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the that's the quick and dirty of what we're

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>really talking about here, and when you see how psychologically

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>traumatized they were by Trump's victory, and you go back

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and just from member all the people crying at that

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Hillary victory party that wasn't a victory, all the different

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>senior government employees who thought that they were going to

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>have eight years of a glorious Clinton administration and it

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>was gonna be so fantastic for their careers. And also

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it was really a pinnacle moment for a certain kind

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of liberal boomer that Hillary's eight years was going to

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>be a kind of golden era of Democrat liberalism in America,

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and that that was stolen from them, and that it

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>was so unfair and so wrong, and they lashed out,

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and people within the government. It wasn't just outside a government.

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>They lashed out too. And yet as I sit here,

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I still note that they have not produced any evidence

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of collusion, and they are still going after people for

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the petty of crimes. I mean, they're going after people

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>for for lies that don't really seem like lies. They

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>have all these shady dealings around figures in the government.

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Comey said just this past weekend, if the

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>administration was better organized, they never would have let Flynn

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>sit down with some FBI guys without the White House

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Council present. You know, He's basically like, we slipped we

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>slipped a couple of guys in there. You know, we

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>slipped them under the radar. You're gonna do that to

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the National Security Advisor, people say, oh, buck, But law

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>enforcement uses tricks and techniques and you know, essentially lying

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>all the time they gave people. Yeah, but they usually

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>don't do it without a criminal predicate to the National

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Security Advisor and give me a break. Your law enforcement

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>could also theoretically exercise any warrant that they want to

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>if they can convince a judge to sign off on it.

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>So you know, batter down your front door and you know,

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>send in an armored carrier and three and a squat team.

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know, usually if they're just trying to find

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>out if you you know, are running a credit card

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:07.959
<v Speaker 1>fraud scam or something, they don't do that. Discretion is

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a necessary component of the justice system, right there has

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to be good faith action from the people that are

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>entrusted with the power, and we're not seeing good faith action.

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I mean, I think Trump should look

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump should pardon Flynn full stop Pardon General Flynn, Play thirteen.

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I never directed him to do anything incorrect or wrong,

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 1>and he understands that. Look, he did some bad things

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>unrelated to me, in order to embarrass me. They cut

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 1>his turn down. How many people when they say, listen,

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 1>if you embarrass the President of the United States will

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>give you a deal. Your father in law, your wife

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:46.120
<v Speaker 1>will cut your jail. That's all it is. It's a

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:48.439
<v Speaker 1>terrible system we have. It's going on right now with

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 1>General Flynn. The FBI said he didn't lie, but Muller

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 1>said he did lie. So they took a man who's

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a general and a respected person and a nice man.

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 1>And I don't even know what he said about me, because,

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe they scared him enough they don't make

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 1>up the story. But I have a feeling that maybe

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:07.360
<v Speaker 1>he didn't. He's a tougher kind of a guy than Kohen.

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 1>But they took a general that they said didn't lie,

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and they convinced him he did lie, and he made

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 1>some kind of a deal. And now they're recommending no time,

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you know why, because they're embarrassed that they got caught.

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I think he's the President's right on them on this one.

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>He knows, you know. There Cohen can't prove the President

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>told him to do anything wrong. Cohen's the lawyer, he

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>should know better. Advice of counsel is a real thing.

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 1>And what they did to Flynn, I just said again,

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>they did Flynn dirty. Remember why Mueller was set up.

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Muller was set up as a special consul to look

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>at was or any collusion and any influence of Raisha

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>through the Trump campaign and influencing the election. There's been

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>no evidence of collusion at this point. And if there's

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>anything about Kohne yesterday that indirectly affects the president, Remember

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 1>the information came from a guy that was a liar

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and accused of lying to the Congress of the United States.

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>So how much credibility do you want to put in

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the words of a liar. It's a fair point from

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Graslie. There one other thing before we move on

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 1>to some other topics, I want to talk to you

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 1>about the Women's March and how it's in the midst

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 1>of some some disarray. It's like the women's marches, and

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>they're not all marching in the same direction. There's some

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>problems there. Also, the Senate some some break news on

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the Senate and Yemen and Kashogi. They're not They're not

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna let this thing go, even though now it's it's

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 1>too late for people to realize because everyone has just

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>assumed that they spend so much time on Kashogi because

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 1>he must be a you know, a US person, meaning

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 1>either a citizen or a Green card holder. He's not.

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I was a visitor, the visitor of the country. Are

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:04.919
<v Speaker 1>we responsible now for changing our foreign policy based on

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>anyone anywhere in the world that has something terrible happened

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to them if they are a journalist, we we then

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>have to change our foreign policy in a whole region

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 1>because of it. That's the new standard. It's not a

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 1>very it's not a very wise standard, if in fact

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>that that is our standard. I mean, the world is

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a dangerous place. I hate to be the bearer of platitudes.

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 1>But there's one more thing here on the whole the

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>DOJ's conduct. And I'm happy that a judge, Judge Sullivan,

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:33.679
<v Speaker 1>sounds like he wants to see those three O two's.

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>It seems very clear that with a seven month lag

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>between when the FBI had the initials sit down with Flynn,

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and when they filed the three O two and that

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>we've already seen reporting that the FBI agents did not

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>initially think that he lied and they didn't bring charges

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>right away, seems very clear that they just they fabricated

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>a pretext. You know, it's it's not that hard to

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 1>do this. It's not that hard to go through someone's testimony,

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and if you really really want to get them, find

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>something that is technically not accurate and say, well, you

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>say you misremembered, we say it's a lie. Guess what

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>their version is enough to get you prosecuted. And then

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>once they're prosecuting you, you're in a position where you

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>can either fight them and try to clear your name

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and risk complete financial ruin and long prison sentence, or

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you say, all right, I'll do whatever you say. I'll

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 1>do whatever you say. But here's something that I think

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>is worth pointing. This is from Bree Payton at the Federalist.

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:34.479
<v Speaker 1>The Department of Justice white text messages between former FBI

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:38.199
<v Speaker 1>employees Lisa Page and Peter Struck from their cell phones

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>before the Office of the Inspector General could review them.

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>According to a new report from the DOJ watchdog Page

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Instruct's involvement with Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation has been

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>heavily scrutinized after it was revealed they had sent numerous

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and to one another. Mueller has been tasked with looking

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>into whether or not Donald Trump and his campaign association

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>It's coordinated with Russian officials to steal the twenty sixteen

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 1>election away from Hillary Clinton. The eleven page report reveals

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that almost a month after Struck was removed from Mueller's team,

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>his government issued iPhone was wiped clean and restored to

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>factory settings by another individual working Muller's office. Special Counsel's

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>records officer told investigators she determined it did not contained

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>records that needed to be retained, no substance of text,

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:33.199
<v Speaker 1>notes or reminders. Wow, isn't that convenient? Inspector General just

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>has somebody look at Struck in Page's phones and go, yeah,

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing here we need to retain. We're just gonna

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 1>we're just gonna get rid of it, okay, because we've

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>seen a lot of stuff from them that should have

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>been retained, and a lot of stuff that the FBI

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to release. By the way, so somebody want

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to explain that one to me. Oh, that's just a coincidence, right,

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>It's it's always this is what you get from the

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>anti Trump Hillary hers out there. It's always just a

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>coincidence when something like this goes down. You know when

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 1>Hillary used bleach bit on her own server. Hey, you

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 1>know that was just a mistake. You know what, like

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 1>wipe it like with a cloth, she said, like with

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>a cloth, wiping it. Hello, don't you miss her? Don't

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you wish she was president? Oh? I know, I know

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>it could still happen. I still think she's you haven't

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>heard much better recently. I still think she's running as

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 1>much as everyone else thinks. That's crazy. Meanwhile, despite all

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 1>this stuff going on, there's at least one pull out

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:34.679
<v Speaker 1>today that says that Trump is about as popular at

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>this point in his presidency as Obama was in his presidency. So,

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, you've got the entire media saying Trump is

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a criminal, actually saying Trump is a criminal, actively rooting

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:51.719
<v Speaker 1>for his administration to collapse, people to go to prison,

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump's son in law to be indict I mean son

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 1>rather to be indicted and his son in law to

0:23:55.359 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 1>be indicted. And meanwhile, the president keeps in the fight.

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I gotta give him credit. And he even likes the job.

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Play fourteen. I love getting things done for the people.

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a nasty job because I get hit so hard,

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:14.400
<v Speaker 1>so unfairly by so many. I mean really unfairly. When

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you look at what we've done with taxes, what we've

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>done with regulations, what we've done with China and national

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>defense and so many other things, including the environment. The

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:27.199
<v Speaker 1>Paris Accord is not working out to well for Paris.

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Take a look at what's happened, the struggling. That whole

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>country is burning down. Okay, So, and I was the

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:35.400
<v Speaker 1>one that kept us out of the Paris Accord. If

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I was in the Paris Accord, we would be paying

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>trillions of dollars, trillions of dollars for nothing, and I

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't do that. And my people love the job I'm doing.

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>You know. The one thing, if I could get a

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>little wish for twenty nineteen, I would just like the

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 1>administration's critics to focus on policies that don't like instead

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:01.679
<v Speaker 1>of this just craziness about Russia and payoffs and women,

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're just all this nonsense. It's all inflated. It's

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>all exaggerated. They're connecting dots that aren't even there. You know,

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 1>tell me you don't like Trump because of the taxes.

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 1>Tell me you don't like Trump because you know of

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>of immigration fund. At least that we could have a

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:20.719
<v Speaker 1>discussion with somebody. But if you really think that there

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 1>was some crumblin conspiracy, I just I don't even know

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>what to say to those people. You know, at some

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>point you run out of a middle ground for any

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of a conversation. Oh one more thing here on

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the chief of staff. This was all from a Harris

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Faulkner interview on Fox News that the Harris got to

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:41.360
<v Speaker 1>sit down. Congrats to her on the with the President

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>on the chief of staff situation, play fifteen. We're interviewing

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>people now for chief of staff. Yes, five people, really

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>good ones, terrific people, mostly well known, but terrific people.

0:25:57.400 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>That actually wasn't from the Harris interview. That was from

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 1>just a press conference. But you know, I'm just saying,

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it's Christmas and my birthday coming up. Mister President, you

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>need a chief of staff the buck gets results. I'm

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 1>just putting it out there. I know people in the

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>White House listen to the show, the buck gets results

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 1>allers to it. But you gotta let him do his

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>radio show. Still, um disputes in the Democratic Party base

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>because they all hate one another. Um. I mean you

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>have the Muslims and the Jews, and the various exotic

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 1>sexual groups and the black church ladies with um, you know,

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the college queers. The only thing that keeps this the

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Democratic base together is for them to keep focusing on

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>No white man are the one ones keeping you down.

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>You must hate white man. It's the one thing they

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 1>all have in common. Now, it shouldn't be any surprise,

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 1>but that little SoundBite for man culture on Fox News

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>made lots of liberal heads explode. They got very upset

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>about that. But she was asked about a very specific thing,

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and that is a piece that came out this week

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>in Tablet magazine with the title is the Women's March

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>melting Down. And we have somebody who can talk to

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit about what the heck is going

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>on here with the whole Women's March movement and allegations

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 1>of anti Semitism within the leadership and all kinds of

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff going on there in as Felcher is with us. Now,

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:30.640
<v Speaker 1>she is a senior policy analyst at the Independent Women's

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:34.199
<v Speaker 1>Forum in as what is the truth theory? Is the

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Women's March melting down? What's happening? Well, they're certainly having

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit of drama in advance of their next march,

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 1>which just remind folks is the end of January, so

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:47.640
<v Speaker 1>this is not good timing for them. But yes, let's

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 1>refers to a piece that came out in Tablet magazine

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 1>talking about how even from the very first meeting of

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the leadership at the Women's March, there were anti Semitic

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:02.919
<v Speaker 1>elements to it, right, that some of the march leaders

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>or march organizers. We're talking about how, for example, Jewish

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>people apparently bear a special collective responsibilities exploiters of black

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and brown people. And also the false, the false conard

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 1>that Jews were the leaders of the American slave trade,

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that they were the genius behind the American slave trade

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. These are charges that come from

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Louis Farakon's book The Secret Relationship between Blacks and Jews.

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>So there's not really Actually, this is a bit frustrating

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>because conservatives and conservative media have been pointing out the

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>anti Semitic elements and the anti semitic statements that have

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 1>come out from leaders of the Women's March from day one.

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>But only because the Tablet magazine expose has now been

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 1>published is it getting any kind of mainstream coverage. But

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>this is another one of those frustrating moments where it's like, yes,

0:28:57.160 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>conservatives have known this for two years, where were you

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>mainstreaming media? And I mean Linda Sars, whom I actually

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>bumped into once at Union Station in DC, which is funny.

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>She didn't know who I was, but I was like,

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>oh wow, that's Lindisar Sir. Look at that Linda sarsor

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody who is very much associated with the Women's March

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and definitely has a fondness for some anti Semitic folks.

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah so um so. Linda star Storagemika Malory are the

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>two folks who get brought up in these contacts a lot.

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>They both have long standing relationships with Louis Faracon and

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 1>with the Nation of Islam. They've also refused to back

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 1>down from those relationships. This is not one of those

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>things where increasingly common unfortunately, where the social media mob

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>pulls out a tweet out of context from ten years ago.

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>U These are active and ongoing relationships, and both women

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 1>have have pretty much refused to disavow Louis Farrakon, who,

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is the most famous anti Semite in America.

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>It's basically him and David Duke. They can they can

0:29:56.920 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Duke haha, it out for that top. But but these

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>are not sort of you know, sort of We're not

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>dealing with with things that are are maybe ambiguous or

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 1>can be read both ways. No, no no, like Lewis Faracon

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 1>called Jews termites on Twitter, and by the way, Twitter

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't ban him for that, And these leaders of the

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Women's March have refused to break their association with Louis Farracon.

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>If this were on the right, by the way, if

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 1>this were a Trump rally or a for example, the

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Tea Party movement, can you imagine that this would go

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>two years without getting the kind of coverage that it's

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>getting now. Of course it would not. It would be

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 1>on the front page of every magazine and every news

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>broadcast for months until everybody involved resigned in disgrace. I mean,

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I just got to say, you know. The March leaders

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>were named twenty seventeen Women of the Year by Glamour magazine.

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 1>There was a glossy book published with Conde Nast on them.

0:30:55.800 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>They have a lucrative merchandise business selling branded Women's March gear.

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 1>They've raised millions of dollars through donations and institutional funding.

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>They've gotten money from places like Planned Parenthood and the

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Hospital Workers Union. What's this Fortune Magazine named Mallory, Linda Sarsore,

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Perez and Bland to its list of the world's great

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Greatest Leaders and New York Center Kirsten Gillibrand, in explaining

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>why these four women were on Time magazine's list of

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the one hundred most influential people, wrote, the Women's March

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 1>was the most inspiring and transformational moment I've ever witnessed

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>in politics. And it happened because of these four extraordinary women.

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 1>And she names the Mallory Bland, Perez, Sarsore. That's all

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 1>from his Talbot magazine piece. Let me just tell you Inez,

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I interviewed Bob Bland. She's a ludentic. Yeah. And by

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the way, Linda Sarsour opens at a rally for Jilla brand.

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 1>So these these folks were well integrated into the Democratic Party.

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 1>They were mainstream folks in the Democratic Party and as

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you said, they got this, you know, sort of star

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>studded coverage from everything from serious coverage in places like

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times and mainstream TV networks, but also

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean the glossy vagazine from from Conde nass all

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the glamour shots and by the way, all of those donations.

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Who talked about one of the other allegations from the

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Tablet magpiece, and this has also been covered by The

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Daily Beast in the past, is that a lot of

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that money has sort of disappeared and there's some allegations

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of financial impropriety on the part of these these Women's

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 1>March organizers. So again, all of this stuff would have

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 1>been immediately plastered on across the news were these women

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the leaders of say conservative movement, But because they were

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the leaders of the Women's March, a lot of this

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff was sort of pushed down and ignored for years,

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>for almost two years, until finally this massive exposity gets published.

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, they're still trying to fight back

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 1>against this. So a lot of UM reporters and journalists

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 1>who tweeted out this Tablet magpiece received an email from

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a PR firm hired by the Women's march basically asking

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>them to delete their critical tweets in exchange for unidentified,

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>off the record information. Can you imagine if, like the

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 1>press office of a White House for example, or going

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>back to Trump campaign, tweeted out or emails a bunch

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of reporters and said, if you take back your critical tweets,

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>we might give you some off the record information. It

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>would be the end of journalism if he had done that.

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 1>But because they did that, it got a little mockery

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 1>from the right. But he's basically passed unnoticed. You know this,

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>this Women's March that's supposed to happen the end of January.

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Is this gonna be? It's gonna be in DC, isn't it.

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 1>They're they're gonna march right past my apartment, aren't they.

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>It's terrified. Oh they they they marched past my apartment

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>last year. But the fun part of the Women's March

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>last year to me is is, um I was actually

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>just trying to try to go see a movie with

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 1>my husband and got like sort of caught up in

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 1>this this march and tried to get through. But the

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:10.359
<v Speaker 1>funniest part of it to me was like they all

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 1>went for brunch afterwards, apparently because I was sitting in

0:34:13.200 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>restaurants and all around me where women enjoying expensive brunches

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:20.839
<v Speaker 1>with the P word hats on their heads, and they

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 1>left their signs all over the city. And this is

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:25.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is sort of par for the course, right,

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 1>are you and some of the other conservative women of

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>DC considering a very a very state and polite counter

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 1>protests where you're all showing up and you know, just

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:39.879
<v Speaker 1>holding up signs with things like we don't hate men,

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and we actually believe in you know, in life and

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>having babies and you know, things like that at anything

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 1>of the works. Um well, I asked Independent Women's Form.

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>We're definitely planning on covering the women's march. I don't

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:54.279
<v Speaker 1>know if we're going to counter protest protest it yet

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>or if we're just going to maybe and ask some

0:34:57.320 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 1>pointed questions that these marches. I don't know exactly what

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that covered is going to look like yet, but we're

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:04.879
<v Speaker 1>definitely planning on being there and pushing back against this narrative, right,

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>because it's always it's always the groups on the left

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 1>that then claim to speak for women as a whole. Right.

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 1>It's it's never the group on the right that claim

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to speak for all women. It's always National Organization for Women,

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the Women's March. Well, let me tell you, all women

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 1>don't support the Women's March. They don't support the anti

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 1>semitism of Wonderstar Store and Jamaica Mallory and and they

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:29.760
<v Speaker 1>definitely don't support a lot of the fringe beliefs of

0:35:29.800 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the far left feminist agenda. So those those are they

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 1>represent themselves, They represent, you know, a certain percentage of women.

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 1>But really, at the end of the day, less than

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:43.439
<v Speaker 1>a third of American women even call themselves to even

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 1>identify as feminists. So really, these women are representing a

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:49.400
<v Speaker 1>very small group of people in this country. All right,

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 1>in as filter everybody Independent Women's Forum and look for

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:54.319
<v Speaker 1>stuff on the Federalist dot com too. In as great

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to have you. Thanks for having you, Buck Tabe, We'll

0:35:57.520 --> 0:36:00.320
<v Speaker 1>be right back. If you're like me, you use email

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 1>every day, probably too much throughout the day. But that

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 1>also means that you know, you should think about what

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:08.719
<v Speaker 1>is this company really like that you're trusting all this

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>information too? Are they left wing? Do you think that

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 1>they're scanning your information? Are they selling stuff to third parties?

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:20.959
<v Speaker 1>Skip all that nonsense. Join ipatriots dot Us. Ipatriots dot

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>us is a new conservative alternative to liberal based email services.

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:26.880
<v Speaker 1>If you're if you're concerned at all about your current

0:36:26.880 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 1>email service, your privacy and protection, this is the option

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:33.760
<v Speaker 1>for you. Ipatriots dot Us is secure, private, and includes

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:36.360
<v Speaker 1>more of what you want without the ads and spam.

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Your email and files are going to be safe with

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 1>their high end anti virus, anti spam encrypted software. Okay,

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:46.800
<v Speaker 1>ipatriots dot Us won't sell your information and it doesn't

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 1>support liberal agenda items. Show your patriot. Go to ipatriots

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:52.839
<v Speaker 1>dot us now, choose your membership program and input your

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:56.479
<v Speaker 1>desired ipatriots email address. During checkout, enter promo code buck

0:36:56.560 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 1>for ten percent savings during your first year membership. Again

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>enter romo code buck at ipatriots dot us. They say

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that walls don't work and a wall wall solve it.

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:11.479
<v Speaker 1>All that he's doing is putting up walls around people's hearts,

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and we are not a wall away from being better.

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 1>Don't waste billions of dollars of taxpayer money in order

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to build something that will not make our border more secure.

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 1>They say a wall is racist. The President went to

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the heart of what I call his brown menace theory.

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 1>These migrants, they're dirty people, They bring disease. This border

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 1>wall thing is about controlling the browning of America. Donald

0:37:41.640 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump is fixated on the southern border, as he was

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:46.799
<v Speaker 1>the day that he announced this campaign. It is not

0:37:46.920 --> 0:37:52.919
<v Speaker 1>about securing the borders. It is about xenophobic, racist, bigoted beliefs.

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Which one is it? Or is it both walls are

0:37:56.640 --> 0:38:01.240
<v Speaker 1>racist and walls don't work. I'm just wondering, if walls

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 1>don't work, why do Republicans want it so badly? Or

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 1>at least, why does Trump wanted so badly? Why do

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:11.719
<v Speaker 1>people who voted for Trump wanted so badly? We should

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:15.320
<v Speaker 1>we should feel comfortable digging into these questions a little bit, because,

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 1>first of all, of course a wall works, oh and

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:22.359
<v Speaker 1>the other the other objection to it is that it's

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 1>so expensive. Bernie Sanders's very pricey to wall. It's gonna

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>call it so much money. It's gonna be so expensive.

0:38:29.640 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to do play five. I think water security

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 1>is enormously important, but I think building a wall is

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:39.279
<v Speaker 1>a very costly and inefficient way to do that. And

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not alone. I mean, many experts think given the

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of technology that we have today, we can protect

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:47.879
<v Speaker 1>those southern bat without building the wall and spending five

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. Furthermore, I'm not quite sure he may, but

0:38:51.400 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not quite sure that he has the boats in

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:57.799
<v Speaker 1>the house. That last part is a non secretary. I mean,

0:38:57.800 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 1>it's irrelevant. It's not Democrat job to worry about whether

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Republicans have the votes in the House. Okay, Senator Sanders

0:39:03.719 --> 0:39:08.720
<v Speaker 1>can leave that up to the Republican Congress. But notice

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:11.799
<v Speaker 1>how with each of the objections, when you push back

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, when you look at the facts a

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit more, the objection starts to fall apart. Let's

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:22.359
<v Speaker 1>start with this. It's they say it's racist. Okay. Is

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the Israeli border wall racist? Okay that some of them

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 1>might say, Some lives in this country probably say yes.

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Is the wall that the Saudis are building, the fence

0:39:33.120 --> 0:39:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that Saudis are building between Saudi Arabia and Yemen? Is

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:41.640
<v Speaker 1>that racist? Is the wall in the western Sahara racist?

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Is the demilitarized zone between North and So I'm not

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 1>saying it's a good idea, if it's fair. I'm just

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:51.799
<v Speaker 1>at is it racist? Is the barrier between North and

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:56.239
<v Speaker 1>South Korea? Is that racist? You know? What about the

0:39:56.280 --> 0:39:58.480
<v Speaker 1>what about the fence that we have in San Diego?

0:39:58.640 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Is that racist if we tear it down because it's

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 1>a monument to racism. If the answers no, I'd like

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:09.719
<v Speaker 1>to know why. In terms of the cost we just

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:14.319
<v Speaker 1>hit pretty much today. I think it's official twenty two

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars in debt. We are twenty two trillion dollars

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:23.440
<v Speaker 1>in debt as a country. That is an astonishing number

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 1>considering that it wasn't long ago at all that we

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 1>weren't even into double digits on our national debt, and

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>yet here we are. We are spending ourselves into oblivion.

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Our political system is effectively now built upon intergenerational theft.

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:44.319
<v Speaker 1>Our political system is built upon people passing laws that

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 1>give benefits today based on IOUs that those in the

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 1>future will have to pay. That's not the way a

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:55.799
<v Speaker 1>responsible country is wrong. But nonetheless, when you're twenty two

0:40:55.840 --> 0:41:00.400
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars in debt and you have a major crisis

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:04.239
<v Speaker 1>continuing to occur at the border, I don't want to

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:06.799
<v Speaker 1>hear about how five billion dollars is too much to

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:12.280
<v Speaker 1>spend on something that is absolutely critical to US sovereignty

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:15.840
<v Speaker 1>into rule of law. So the notion that the real

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 1>issue here has cost is laughable. And I'm consistent on this.

0:41:19.520 --> 0:41:22.800
<v Speaker 1>People will point out that the Muller probe, for example,

0:41:22.840 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 1>has cost has cost money, and I always say to them, yes,

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I understand the Muller probe has cost money, But if

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:33.360
<v Speaker 1>there really was Russian collusion, fifty million dollars wouldn't be

0:41:33.880 --> 0:41:36.320
<v Speaker 1>too much to pay to find that out. The reason

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 1>the Muller probe is too much money isn't because it's

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 1>in principle too much money. It's because the whole thing

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:44.720
<v Speaker 1>is a witch hunt. It's a waste, it's a crock,

0:41:44.880 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a joke. A border wall is certainly not that.

0:41:50.680 --> 0:41:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh and then Chuck and Nancy all of a sudden

0:41:53.960 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 1>they are experts on the wall play four deed border security.

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:03.759
<v Speaker 1>The wall is a part of border security. You can't

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:06.880
<v Speaker 1>have very good border security without the wall. Knows that

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 1>is a political promise. Border security is a way too

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:14.279
<v Speaker 1>effectively on our I respond, the experts say you can

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:17.440
<v Speaker 1>do border security without a wall, which is wasteful and

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:21.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't solve the problem. I mean when he says that,

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 1>when he says the experts say. I always want to

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:26.880
<v Speaker 1>push back and say, well, what about the head of

0:42:26.920 --> 0:42:31.440
<v Speaker 1>border patrol, what about the head of customs enforcement? The

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:33.239
<v Speaker 1>people that have been working on the border for years

0:42:33.239 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and years and years, they say that a wall is

0:42:35.480 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 1>immensely helpful. So are they just misinformed? Are they paid

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 1>for by big wall, you know, instead of big oil?

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I just want to know why are they so confused?

0:42:46.640 --> 0:42:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Who are these experts? Are these immigration attorneys and activists

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that they're citing that that say that you don't need

0:42:53.040 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a wall to do this. A wall would certainly help,

0:42:57.760 --> 0:43:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and it has helped in many places as we know.

0:43:04.000 --> 0:43:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Here is David Rubin, who was the former mayor of Shiloh, Israel,

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about what the wall in Israel did for their security,

0:43:17.280 --> 0:43:19.919
<v Speaker 1>for their safety, and for the population of the state

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of Israel. Play clip eight. Between two thousand and ten

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and two thousand and twelve, there were fifty five thousand

0:43:26.600 --> 0:43:30.760
<v Speaker 1>illegal immigrants into Israel. The rapes and murders in southern

0:43:30.760 --> 0:43:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Tel Aviv skyrocket skyrocketed in those few years. The Israeli

0:43:35.400 --> 0:43:37.720
<v Speaker 1>government made a decision that they were going to build

0:43:37.719 --> 0:43:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the wall, a high tech steel wall on the southern

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:46.799
<v Speaker 1>border in two thousand and sixteen, the wall was up.

0:43:47.440 --> 0:43:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Two sixteen, there were eleven illegal immigrants who entered Israel,

0:43:53.440 --> 0:43:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and then they raised the height of the wall additional

0:43:57.320 --> 0:44:01.799
<v Speaker 1>several feet, and in two thousands seventeen there was not

0:44:02.000 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 1>one illegal immigrant that made it through the southern border

0:44:06.200 --> 0:44:13.399
<v Speaker 1>into Israel. So this is a remarkable works. It works

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:18.480
<v Speaker 1>from fifty five thousand across this one area into Israel

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to zero. Now I understand that the lib argument here

0:44:23.680 --> 0:44:26.360
<v Speaker 1>as well. It might be fifty five thousand, but what

0:44:26.440 --> 0:44:28.400
<v Speaker 1>if a dozen people get across? Then you could say

0:44:28.440 --> 0:44:31.120
<v Speaker 1>a wall doesn't stop everybody. Yeah, but would you rather

0:44:31.160 --> 0:44:35.520
<v Speaker 1>have fifty five thousand illegal crossings or a dozen or

0:44:35.600 --> 0:44:40.840
<v Speaker 1>five or five hundred or even five thousand. Security is

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:44.120
<v Speaker 1>about risk mitigation and doing the best you can with

0:44:44.160 --> 0:44:46.200
<v Speaker 1>what you have. We're not doing the best we can

0:44:46.239 --> 0:44:50.280
<v Speaker 1>with what we have. There's one other point, by the way,

0:44:50.320 --> 0:44:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that I wanted to make it that I think often

0:44:53.640 --> 0:44:55.839
<v Speaker 1>escapes the conversation here. You know, when people talk about

0:44:55.840 --> 0:44:58.680
<v Speaker 1>anchor babies, which I know now it's you're not supposed

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:00.799
<v Speaker 1>to say this anymore. You know, they have different to

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:04.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about family unification policy, reunification. It's not anchor babies.

0:45:05.320 --> 0:45:07.399
<v Speaker 1>One aspect of this that that does not get talked

0:45:07.440 --> 0:45:09.920
<v Speaker 1>about enough is that you know that when somebody has

0:45:09.960 --> 0:45:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a child in the United States and then they are

0:45:11.680 --> 0:45:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to be deported, even if they are a criminal, meaning

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that they commit a crime here, if they had a

0:45:17.120 --> 0:45:20.880
<v Speaker 1>child in the United States, it's considered a family separation.

0:45:21.760 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 1>So if you are in America and you are a

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:28.960
<v Speaker 1>member of a cartel, or you are somebody who's involved

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:33.320
<v Speaker 1>in drug trafficking at a serious level, and you're supposed

0:45:33.320 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to be deported from the country by Immigrations and Customs enforcement,

0:45:39.200 --> 0:45:42.919
<v Speaker 1>and you've had a kid in America, guess what. Now,

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:47.439
<v Speaker 1>the liberal argument is, we can't deport that person because oh,

0:45:47.480 --> 0:45:52.160
<v Speaker 1>that's right, we're separating families. So the anchor isn't just

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:57.799
<v Speaker 1>for people who are in America and might get deported otherwise, right.

0:45:57.880 --> 0:46:01.359
<v Speaker 1>The anchor then also extends to people who fall into

0:46:01.440 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the criminal justice system. Now, now the argument is made

0:46:05.200 --> 0:46:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that you can't you can't deport them, you can only

0:46:07.520 --> 0:46:10.640
<v Speaker 1>incarceerate them for whatever their sentence is, because that would

0:46:10.640 --> 0:46:14.600
<v Speaker 1>be that would be breaking apart families. Meanwhile, people that

0:46:14.600 --> 0:46:18.080
<v Speaker 1>gets into prison who are just Americans, those families are

0:46:18.120 --> 0:46:20.680
<v Speaker 1>broken up every day, and Liberals don't shed any big

0:46:20.680 --> 0:46:22.759
<v Speaker 1>tears over that one. So there's a there's a lot

0:46:22.800 --> 0:46:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of dishonesty around this issue. But I saw Tom Holman

0:46:26.800 --> 0:46:28.680
<v Speaker 1>last night, and I always really like this guy. We

0:46:28.680 --> 0:46:29.920
<v Speaker 1>got I gotta chat with them a little bit. We

0:46:29.960 --> 0:46:31.920
<v Speaker 1>always whenever I see him in Fox we have a

0:46:31.920 --> 0:46:34.399
<v Speaker 1>discussion about the border. Here's what he says about things

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:37.800
<v Speaker 1>play nine. I don't care if you're Republican, a Democrat.

0:46:38.120 --> 0:46:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Every one of those people should want to vote to

0:46:40.440 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 1>secure the border. There's no downside on securing a border,

0:46:43.680 --> 0:46:47.680
<v Speaker 1>less illegal immigration, less illegal drugs being smuggled. The wallship

0:46:47.719 --> 0:46:49.800
<v Speaker 1>proven they worked back in the early eighties. I was

0:46:49.800 --> 0:46:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a border TLAs standing on the line in San Diego.

0:46:52.160 --> 0:46:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Thousands came through every night. But once they built that

0:46:55.400 --> 0:47:00.319
<v Speaker 1>border barrier, the illegal crossings decreased dramatically. It is proven

0:47:00.320 --> 0:47:02.839
<v Speaker 1>it worked in San Diego, you El Paso. It has

0:47:02.880 --> 0:47:06.120
<v Speaker 1>proven one percent effective. So why would we not want

0:47:06.120 --> 0:47:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a wall because they don't want it to be effective.

0:47:10.040 --> 0:47:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know Tom knows that, but that's the truth.

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:16.279
<v Speaker 1>The problem with the wall is not that it doesn't work.

0:47:16.280 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 1>The problem that Democrats have with it is that it does,

0:47:19.520 --> 0:47:22.879
<v Speaker 1>which tells you everything you need to know about where

0:47:22.920 --> 0:47:26.200
<v Speaker 1>they really stand on immigration and how they really feel

0:47:26.239 --> 0:47:31.680
<v Speaker 1>about security at our southern border. You've got a lot

0:47:31.719 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of liberals and a lot of conservatives DS talking about

0:47:34.280 --> 0:47:36.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe there needs to be a breakup of the monopoly

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that these social media companies have because of the ideological

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:43.160
<v Speaker 1>bias on display. Well that's one option, but you know

0:47:43.160 --> 0:47:45.879
<v Speaker 1>what a better option is, just have a platform where

0:47:45.880 --> 0:47:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to worry about bias. That's snippy dot Com.

0:47:49.480 --> 0:47:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Thousands of listeners to this show have joined snippy dot

0:47:52.719 --> 0:47:56.760
<v Speaker 1>com and they're expressing their opinions and stirring up lively conversations.

0:47:56.880 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>As Namby's an unbiased social media platform. It's all about

0:47:59.680 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 1>common versation and community. Snippy not only encourages freedom of expression,

0:48:03.960 --> 0:48:06.920
<v Speaker 1>but it guarantees users the ability to discuss topics freely

0:48:07.160 --> 0:48:11.439
<v Speaker 1>without suppression from administrators. Okay, it is completely free to join.

0:48:11.480 --> 0:48:13.520
<v Speaker 1>You've got nothing to lose here, Just go check it

0:48:13.520 --> 0:48:18.359
<v Speaker 1>out for yourself. Snippy dot com no shadow banning and

0:48:18.480 --> 0:48:21.839
<v Speaker 1>no suppression of conservative thought ever. And now Snippy's got

0:48:21.880 --> 0:48:25.760
<v Speaker 1>an updated user interface and exciting new features. It's available

0:48:25.800 --> 0:48:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in the Apple App Store and available for Android. Snippy

0:48:29.040 --> 0:48:33.560
<v Speaker 1>dot com is your new alternative social media. I would

0:48:33.600 --> 0:48:37.120
<v Speaker 1>love to be able to regulate the content of speech.

0:48:37.520 --> 0:48:40.839
<v Speaker 1>The First Amendment prevents me from doing self, and that's

0:48:40.880 --> 0:48:43.359
<v Speaker 1>simply a function of the First Amendment. But I think

0:48:43.400 --> 0:48:46.799
<v Speaker 1>over the long run, it's better that government does not

0:48:46.920 --> 0:48:51.120
<v Speaker 1>regulate the content of speech. That's a Ted Lou Congressman Lou,

0:48:51.239 --> 0:48:57.520
<v Speaker 1>who you know, is increasingly popular in these progressive commentary

0:48:57.560 --> 0:49:00.000
<v Speaker 1>circles on TV because he's you know, he's a guy

0:49:00.160 --> 0:49:03.680
<v Speaker 1>like to drop the rhetorical bombs. But once again, you

0:49:03.719 --> 0:49:08.560
<v Speaker 1>get liberals here really telling you what's in their heart,

0:49:08.600 --> 0:49:13.120
<v Speaker 1>what's in their mind, what they really think about certain issues,

0:49:13.960 --> 0:49:20.279
<v Speaker 1>and on the speech police situation and the desire of

0:49:20.360 --> 0:49:24.240
<v Speaker 1>social media platforms and college campuses and now corporate America

0:49:24.840 --> 0:49:28.319
<v Speaker 1>to regulate the content of speech. Understand that, you know,

0:49:28.719 --> 0:49:31.279
<v Speaker 1>even when you have a Congressman who's supposed to be

0:49:31.280 --> 0:49:36.200
<v Speaker 1>all about upholding defending the Constitution, they if they're Democrats,

0:49:36.640 --> 0:49:38.400
<v Speaker 1>they would like to be able to tell you what

0:49:38.440 --> 0:49:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you can and can't say. And they have the hubrists

0:49:42.000 --> 0:49:46.319
<v Speaker 1>and the arrogance to believe that they know what's best

0:49:46.360 --> 0:49:48.479
<v Speaker 1>for you to be able to say and not say.

0:49:49.280 --> 0:49:51.440
<v Speaker 1>But they got to kind of admit that there's a

0:49:51.480 --> 0:49:53.279
<v Speaker 1>little problem there with the First Amendment, at least when

0:49:53.280 --> 0:49:56.800
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the government. Yeah, technically the government probably

0:49:56.800 --> 0:50:00.319
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be doing content, but they they want to be

0:50:00.360 --> 0:50:05.719
<v Speaker 1>in a position to dictate to you. And that totalitarian

0:50:05.880 --> 0:50:10.839
<v Speaker 1>impulse is in and of itself problematic, and you see

0:50:10.840 --> 0:50:14.960
<v Speaker 1>it now operating at so many different levels on the left.

0:50:15.760 --> 0:50:19.759
<v Speaker 1>You see it among people in the government who are

0:50:20.160 --> 0:50:24.719
<v Speaker 1>embracing language language restrictions that are constantly changing too and

0:50:24.719 --> 0:50:28.920
<v Speaker 1>are only becoming more restrictive. Right, we're never told, oh

0:50:28.960 --> 0:50:31.319
<v Speaker 1>you can actually you can talk about that issue. It

0:50:31.320 --> 0:50:33.560
<v Speaker 1>turns out we were wrong and we can have a

0:50:33.600 --> 0:50:35.640
<v Speaker 1>free and open debate about this. No, it's just more

0:50:35.640 --> 0:50:39.279
<v Speaker 1>and more things are being taken off the table, you know,

0:50:39.360 --> 0:50:45.120
<v Speaker 1>more areas of debate and inquiry and discussion are are

0:50:45.200 --> 0:50:50.040
<v Speaker 1>essentially roped off from discourse. This has been going, This

0:50:50.080 --> 0:50:54.480
<v Speaker 1>has been a longstanding project of the left to change

0:50:54.480 --> 0:50:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the way we can talk, to change the way that

0:50:57.640 --> 0:51:01.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, we are allowed to discussion issues because as

0:51:01.800 --> 0:51:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I as I've mentioned you many times, if they can

0:51:04.880 --> 0:51:10.360
<v Speaker 1>determine the words for you. They can largely direct the

0:51:10.400 --> 0:51:16.080
<v Speaker 1>thoughts for you. They can influence debated discussion in ways

0:51:16.080 --> 0:51:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's hard to even quantify and really even understand,

0:51:19.760 --> 0:51:25.960
<v Speaker 1>because we're just now automatically the grounds of the discussion

0:51:26.120 --> 0:51:29.480
<v Speaker 1>or are moving toward what they want, toward the policy

0:51:29.560 --> 0:51:34.520
<v Speaker 1>ends that they would prefer. But free speeches under is

0:51:34.600 --> 0:51:38.799
<v Speaker 1>under a very direct assault in this country, and it's

0:51:38.840 --> 0:51:41.160
<v Speaker 1>only going to get worse before it gets better. I mean,

0:51:41.200 --> 0:51:43.719
<v Speaker 1>the social media platforms are obviously a big part of this.

0:51:44.600 --> 0:51:47.279
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Democrats now and you know, by the way,

0:51:47.480 --> 0:51:51.240
<v Speaker 1>this is also you know, I go back and forth

0:51:51.800 --> 0:51:54.080
<v Speaker 1>with what should we do? How do we fight back

0:51:54.120 --> 0:51:57.640
<v Speaker 1>against this? You know, you've had you have sometimes these

0:51:58.360 --> 0:52:01.839
<v Speaker 1>these Hollywood lib types get away with saying really offensive stuff.

0:52:01.880 --> 0:52:05.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, Mika Brazinski just said somebody was

0:52:05.360 --> 0:52:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a blank boy, and you know that that the president

0:52:10.200 --> 0:52:13.000
<v Speaker 1>was acting in this way, and she's not she's not

0:52:13.040 --> 0:52:15.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna fire because she's in tight with MSNBC. I don't

0:52:15.640 --> 0:52:17.880
<v Speaker 1>know why anyone likes that show. Morning Joe. I really

0:52:18.120 --> 0:52:22.560
<v Speaker 1>struggle with what the what the upside of it is.

0:52:24.160 --> 0:52:25.520
<v Speaker 1>But then then you know there are other times and

0:52:25.600 --> 0:52:29.920
<v Speaker 1>people that you think maybe are are above reproach and

0:52:30.200 --> 0:52:34.640
<v Speaker 1>they get can't. You know, then the heart of tyranny,

0:52:34.760 --> 0:52:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and whether it's the tyranny of government or the tyranny

0:52:37.360 --> 0:52:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of a society that is abandoning principles of freedom, abandoning

0:52:44.600 --> 0:52:47.680
<v Speaker 1>principles regarding liberty, the heart of tyranny is not the

0:52:47.760 --> 0:52:54.560
<v Speaker 1>draconian enforcement of regulations, standards, and laws. It's the theckless.

0:52:55.280 --> 0:53:01.640
<v Speaker 1>It's the you know, the the constantly changing. It's the

0:53:01.719 --> 0:53:05.960
<v Speaker 1>capriciousness in the enforcement of laws. It's people saying, yeah, well,

0:53:06.000 --> 0:53:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you know you said that, so you get fired. You

0:53:08.239 --> 0:53:10.359
<v Speaker 1>said something very similar, but you don't get fired because

0:53:10.360 --> 0:53:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you know what that means. The person with all the

0:53:12.760 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 1>power is the person deciding, the person with that discretion. See,

0:53:17.680 --> 0:53:20.560
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like what we see with the DOJ

0:53:20.800 --> 0:53:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and the FBI, right, I mean, the big problem is

0:53:23.920 --> 0:53:29.480
<v Speaker 1>not that laws on perjury and processes around investigations are

0:53:29.520 --> 0:53:33.600
<v Speaker 1>too strict. It's that they're only too strict when it

0:53:33.680 --> 0:53:38.560
<v Speaker 1>comes to Republicans, to conservatives, to Trump allies. Well, this

0:53:38.640 --> 0:53:42.880
<v Speaker 1>is obviously politically motivated, and that's why that keeps happening.

0:53:43.440 --> 0:53:45.759
<v Speaker 1>We also see this with the speech police, whether we're

0:53:45.760 --> 0:53:49.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about you know, Kevin Hart, or we're talking about Mikabridginsky.

0:53:49.920 --> 0:53:52.799
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's these different standards that evolve for individuals

0:53:52.800 --> 0:53:56.000
<v Speaker 1>based upon where they fall in the political spectrum, and

0:53:56.080 --> 0:54:00.360
<v Speaker 1>it's just exhausting. I would love for this to be

0:54:00.400 --> 0:54:01.759
<v Speaker 1>the case in this country. I would love for us

0:54:01.800 --> 0:54:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to be in a place where we have some some hope,

0:54:05.640 --> 0:54:10.360
<v Speaker 1>some sense that you know, the the standard will at

0:54:10.440 --> 0:54:14.759
<v Speaker 1>least be uniformly applied when it comes to what's unacceptable

0:54:14.800 --> 0:54:16.799
<v Speaker 1>to say, when it comes to what's far too you

0:54:16.800 --> 0:54:19.399
<v Speaker 1>know what, what's beyond the pale. But you know, we're

0:54:19.440 --> 0:54:23.440
<v Speaker 1>not there. We're not there. And what really separates ideologically,

0:54:23.480 --> 0:54:25.839
<v Speaker 1>what separates a left from the right in the most

0:54:25.880 --> 0:54:29.840
<v Speaker 1>general terms, is they always think that they should be

0:54:29.880 --> 0:54:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the ones in control because they believe that their judgment

0:54:34.000 --> 0:54:37.040
<v Speaker 1>on these matters and their ability to use state power

0:54:37.800 --> 0:54:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to exercise that judgment, that they think that they always

0:54:44.040 --> 0:54:46.680
<v Speaker 1>know what the best way is. It's it's troubling, but

0:54:47.440 --> 0:54:49.520
<v Speaker 1>this is what's going to happen. Um. By the way,

0:54:49.560 --> 0:54:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, the speaking of these ABC is going to

0:54:53.800 --> 0:54:56.600
<v Speaker 1>bring back the Connors for season two. The ratings were

0:54:56.600 --> 0:55:01.120
<v Speaker 1>actually good. You know, Roseanne got fired for for you know,

0:55:01.239 --> 0:55:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a racist tweet one one racist tweet, he's out, homophobic

0:55:06.480 --> 0:55:09.359
<v Speaker 1>comment for micause she's not out. You know. Yeah, how

0:55:09.400 --> 0:55:11.640
<v Speaker 1>do you engage these things? Well, it depends on what

0:55:11.680 --> 0:55:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the executive at the time think and how much heat

0:55:13.560 --> 0:55:16.960
<v Speaker 1>they're willing to take. But it looks like they're going

0:55:17.040 --> 0:55:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to bring back that show the Connors, which I think

0:55:19.040 --> 0:55:22.319
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a surprise. John, if did you see it? Mike,

0:55:22.360 --> 0:55:24.839
<v Speaker 1>did you see this? I never saw it. I don't

0:55:24.880 --> 0:55:27.319
<v Speaker 1>know if I don't, I didn't see it. I saw

0:55:27.320 --> 0:55:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the first Roseanne. I did not think the first Roseanne

0:55:29.920 --> 0:55:33.320
<v Speaker 1>was funny. The new one, Noah, Yeah, the first episode

0:55:33.360 --> 0:55:36.560
<v Speaker 1>was okay, it was it was just, you know, it

0:55:36.640 --> 0:55:39.120
<v Speaker 1>felt a little contrived to me, the whole thing. But yeah,

0:55:39.480 --> 0:55:41.520
<v Speaker 1>this is you know, the speech and the way that

0:55:41.560 --> 0:55:43.640
<v Speaker 1>people get judged by these things. You know, there's a

0:55:43.640 --> 0:55:45.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of money, a lot of jobs that can hang

0:55:45.080 --> 0:55:47.600
<v Speaker 1>in the balance on this stuff. So we shall see.

0:55:47.640 --> 0:55:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I gotta talk to you about the Kashogi situation. I

0:55:50.000 --> 0:55:52.319
<v Speaker 1>know we've you know, you got an update on this.

0:55:52.400 --> 0:55:55.160
<v Speaker 1>The Senate has taken an action. It's not important. It's

0:55:55.160 --> 0:55:57.879
<v Speaker 1>an action that won't result in any further action most likely,

0:55:57.960 --> 0:56:00.160
<v Speaker 1>But we've got to get to the heart of what's

0:56:00.160 --> 0:56:01.480
<v Speaker 1>going on here with this foreign policy. Oh and by

0:56:01.480 --> 0:56:04.799
<v Speaker 1>the way, I stumbled into some protesters last night who

0:56:04.840 --> 0:56:07.680
<v Speaker 1>were protesting at a White House official's house, and I

0:56:07.719 --> 0:56:09.960
<v Speaker 1>happen to walk right in the middle of that protest

0:56:10.000 --> 0:56:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and speak to their organizers. I got some exclusive audio

0:56:13.239 --> 0:56:20.200
<v Speaker 1>for you. You are now entering the Freedom Technical Operations Center.

0:56:20.840 --> 0:56:23.960
<v Speaker 1>All sensitive programs must be kept strictly. Need to know

0:56:25.360 --> 0:56:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Team Buck is cleared and ready for the Buck brief.

0:56:29.600 --> 0:56:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Some breaking news. The Senate voted just a couple of

0:56:33.600 --> 0:56:38.760
<v Speaker 1>hours ago, fifty seven to thirty eight to end US

0:56:38.880 --> 0:56:42.359
<v Speaker 1>military involvement in Yemen. As lawmakers are still very very

0:56:42.440 --> 0:56:47.000
<v Speaker 1>upset over the killing of Koshogi and what they say

0:56:47.160 --> 0:56:50.839
<v Speaker 1>is the unacceptable response of the Trump administration to this.

0:56:51.600 --> 0:56:56.719
<v Speaker 1>All right, this like Russia is turning into its own

0:56:56.840 --> 0:57:01.320
<v Speaker 1>form of hysteria and pushing us closer and closer to

0:57:01.400 --> 0:57:05.760
<v Speaker 1>some very bad decision making. I think let's just start

0:57:05.760 --> 0:57:12.719
<v Speaker 1>with this. Jamal Kashogi is not an American citizen, was

0:57:12.800 --> 0:57:17.120
<v Speaker 1>not a citizen, was not a permanent resident. Jamal Kashogi

0:57:17.360 --> 0:57:21.000
<v Speaker 1>was not a US national. This is not one of

0:57:21.120 --> 0:57:25.680
<v Speaker 1>ours who was killed in a foreign consulate, on foreign

0:57:25.760 --> 0:57:29.480
<v Speaker 1>soil by a foreign entity. He's not, And there was

0:57:29.520 --> 0:57:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of lying. I checked into this to make

0:57:32.600 --> 0:57:35.880
<v Speaker 1>sure that the that I have this right, because I

0:57:35.880 --> 0:57:39.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's really important. We were being told for weeks,

0:57:39.960 --> 0:57:42.160
<v Speaker 1>weeks and weeks that he was a Green card holder.

0:57:42.200 --> 0:57:45.400
<v Speaker 1>A Green card holder, which means he's he's a permanent

0:57:45.880 --> 0:57:49.040
<v Speaker 1>resident of America. He could stay here his whole life,

0:57:49.080 --> 0:57:52.320
<v Speaker 1>his kids will be Americans. That is false. He was

0:57:52.360 --> 0:57:55.680
<v Speaker 1>an O one visa holder. He was a visitor to

0:57:55.760 --> 0:58:00.760
<v Speaker 1>this country who wrote a column for the Washington Post. Now,

0:58:00.840 --> 0:58:04.640
<v Speaker 1>none of that mitigates the brutal torture and murder that

0:58:04.640 --> 0:58:08.120
<v Speaker 1>he suffered. That doesn't change anything, but it does affect

0:58:08.920 --> 0:58:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the US responsibility for a major response to this. So

0:58:15.840 --> 0:58:18.880
<v Speaker 1>let's just all be very clear. There was an obvious

0:58:19.000 --> 0:58:24.800
<v Speaker 1>effort early on to create the perception that Kashogi was

0:58:24.840 --> 0:58:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a US person. We need to do more. America need

0:58:28.720 --> 0:58:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to speak up for one of its own here, and

0:58:30.400 --> 0:58:34.720
<v Speaker 1>we need to take decisive action to punish Saudi Arabia

0:58:34.880 --> 0:58:38.080
<v Speaker 1>for this, not just to speak out, but but to

0:58:38.120 --> 0:58:41.880
<v Speaker 1>make sure that they feel consequences for it. And only

0:58:41.920 --> 0:58:44.240
<v Speaker 1>now that you've that they've got this cycle of oh

0:58:44.280 --> 0:58:47.280
<v Speaker 1>my gosh, Kashogi, and you know, Kashogi's now part of

0:58:47.280 --> 0:58:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the people that are honored for being Time magazine, you know,

0:58:50.960 --> 0:58:54.640
<v Speaker 1>person of the Year along with and I'm not trying

0:58:54.640 --> 0:58:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to be controversial here, but you know that that newspaper

0:58:58.520 --> 0:59:01.960
<v Speaker 1>in Maryland where there is the mass shooting, they're also

0:59:03.000 --> 0:59:05.960
<v Speaker 1>they're also covered in this Man of the Year or

0:59:05.960 --> 0:59:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a Person of the Year in Time magazine. And they

0:59:09.760 --> 0:59:13.240
<v Speaker 1>weren't killed because of the danger of their journalism assignments.

0:59:13.280 --> 0:59:16.840
<v Speaker 1>This was a personal feud with a psychopath who went

0:59:16.880 --> 0:59:20.200
<v Speaker 1>in and shot them all, and it shot five of them.

0:59:20.360 --> 0:59:23.880
<v Speaker 1>And in essence, this is the equivalent of a postal

0:59:23.920 --> 0:59:26.720
<v Speaker 1>worker who goes in and shoots a bunch of people

0:59:26.720 --> 0:59:28.400
<v Speaker 1>who used to work with or something. I mean, this

0:59:28.440 --> 0:59:31.080
<v Speaker 1>is a that was a personal grudge, you know. To

0:59:31.320 --> 0:59:35.560
<v Speaker 1>say that that's a guardians of our democracy situation is

0:59:35.600 --> 0:59:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a terrible situation. It's a tragedy, but

0:59:39.160 --> 0:59:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's something of a stretch to include that

0:59:42.400 --> 0:59:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's a guardian of our democracy. Yeah, they were

0:59:45.520 --> 0:59:48.200
<v Speaker 1>doing their jobs and some of them got shot because

0:59:48.240 --> 0:59:51.040
<v Speaker 1>there was a maniac running around who didn't like some

0:59:51.120 --> 0:59:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of the stories that they had written. But it wasn't

0:59:53.600 --> 0:59:55.800
<v Speaker 1>because they were speaking truth to power. It was just

0:59:56.360 --> 1:00:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a crazy person. But back to Kashogi if I can

1:00:00.400 --> 1:00:03.000
<v Speaker 1>for a moment here, But the Senate has done is

1:00:03.080 --> 1:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>essentially senatorial virtue signaling. The House has already made it

1:00:08.400 --> 1:00:10.640
<v Speaker 1>clear that they're not going to go ahead with this measure,

1:00:10.640 --> 1:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that there's not going to be any real change in

1:00:14.440 --> 1:00:18.240
<v Speaker 1>US foreign policy visa vie the Saudis because of it.

1:00:18.280 --> 1:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>But they're they're just wanted to get on record, and

1:00:20.840 --> 1:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>it's because the elites, the establishment inside the Beltway and

1:00:25.440 --> 1:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>in the media here in America has made the Kashogi

1:00:29.200 --> 1:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>issue really just a big opportunity to bash Trump, and

1:00:33.760 --> 1:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that's why they're so fixated on this. This is why

1:00:37.440 --> 1:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Kashogi is the most famous, well known dissident to

1:00:43.440 --> 1:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>have been killed by a foreign power by far, despite

1:00:48.680 --> 1:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that there are a whole bunch of people

1:00:51.120 --> 1:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>in recent years who have been killed by Russia, who

1:00:53.240 --> 1:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, who have been taken out as a result

1:00:56.640 --> 1:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of their criticisms of a regime. And it's because there's

1:01:01.440 --> 1:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a tie in here where they're able to bash Trump

1:01:04.960 --> 1:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and anytime you can bash Trump, journalists get very very

1:01:07.800 --> 1:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>excited and they're very interested obviously about that opportunity. But

1:01:12.400 --> 1:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>our policy in Saudi with back in Saudi Arabia and

1:01:15.840 --> 1:01:20.040
<v Speaker 1>specifically the war in Yemen, is that we don't want

1:01:20.320 --> 1:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Yemen to fall into the hands of an enemy. And

1:01:24.280 --> 1:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that's what would occur. If the Saudis weren't engaged in

1:01:26.920 --> 1:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>this bombing campaign, you would have the Hoothies, who are

1:01:30.360 --> 1:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a Shia faction inside of Yemen who are backed by

1:01:34.480 --> 1:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the Iranians. You'd have the Hoothies likely able to seize power.

1:01:38.640 --> 1:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>You also have a very active Al Qaeda branch in Yemen,

1:01:44.080 --> 1:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and we're trying to suppress that and support the legitimate

1:01:49.200 --> 1:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>government as we see it inside of Yemen, and the

1:01:52.120 --> 1:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Saudis are our best proxy for doing that. But this

1:01:58.640 --> 1:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>is all because of Ira and this is because of

1:02:01.320 --> 1:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>some very serious interests we have at preventing the southern

1:02:07.280 --> 1:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>portion of the Arabian Peninsula from effectively becoming a launch

1:02:11.200 --> 1:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>pad for terrorist attacks. Remember Al Kaeda in the Arabian

1:02:14.280 --> 1:02:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Peninsula was just a few years ago. Consider the most

1:02:18.440 --> 1:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>active terror franchise at external plotting, meaning coming after the

1:02:23.680 --> 1:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>US and its interests. Al Kaida and the Arabian Peninsula

1:02:26.720 --> 1:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>has been behind some very high profile international attacks and

1:02:31.440 --> 1:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>attempted attacks in Europe and in the United States. So

1:02:35.800 --> 1:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>we can try to pretend like there's no real US

1:02:40.360 --> 1:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>interest in what's going on and Yem unfortunate, it's not true.

1:02:43.280 --> 1:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>And on the humanitarian side, and I'm somebody who has

1:02:47.040 --> 1:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>been trying to raise the alarm about what's going on

1:02:49.720 --> 1:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>in Yemen for a long time. We've done segments at

1:02:53.080 --> 1:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Hill TV. Look, I'm just gonna tell you this. We

1:02:54.920 --> 1:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>did a segment five months ago at least on Hill

1:02:58.880 --> 1:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>TV about the war in Yemen and how it's the

1:03:02.040 --> 1:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>biggest humanitarian disaster in the world, and it just didn't

1:03:07.360 --> 1:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>get very much attention. People didn't seem that interested in

1:03:12.640 --> 1:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that particular story. And I don't know, I can't Maybe

1:03:16.640 --> 1:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>we just didn't do a good enough job presenting it.

1:03:18.760 --> 1:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I would think that the biggest humanitarian crisis on planet

1:03:21.440 --> 1:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Earth would be something a lot of people were interested in.

1:03:23.480 --> 1:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>But I mean other journals, I mean other people in

1:03:26.000 --> 1:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the media who saw us covering that. Not a lot

1:03:30.440 --> 1:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of high level at a lot of high

1:03:32.040 --> 1:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>level interest. And I think in general, there hasn't been

1:03:34.400 --> 1:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that much interest until now because now it is look

1:03:38.560 --> 1:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>at out terrible yemen is. Look at what the Saudis

1:03:41.320 --> 1:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>are doing. Trump is so nice to the Saudis. This

1:03:45.600 --> 1:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>is all about bashing Trump. You know. They just keep

1:03:47.760 --> 1:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>using this kind of transitive property of criticism to eventually

1:03:53.360 --> 1:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>bring it back to how Trump is the bad guy here.

1:03:56.080 --> 1:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>You know. I would note that these same journals who

1:03:58.760 --> 1:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>were writing a lot of stories now about what's going

1:04:02.200 --> 1:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>on with the humanitarian crisis in Yemen, were pretty muted

1:04:08.240 --> 1:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>for a long time about the fact that the Obama

1:04:10.480 --> 1:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>administration presided over a supposed coalition to end the war

1:04:16.760 --> 1:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>in Syria, which is now killed close to six hundred

1:04:19.640 --> 1:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand people, and there was not a unified voice from

1:04:26.040 --> 1:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>journalists saying that Obama had failed, despite the fact that

1:04:29.680 --> 1:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>it was supposed to be US leadership. Remember, we're the

1:04:32.800 --> 1:04:36.840
<v Speaker 1>ones that negotiated with the Assad regime to get the

1:04:36.920 --> 1:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>chemical weapons out. You know, that was a John Kerry

1:04:39.360 --> 1:04:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Barack Obama move. You know, they were very much involved,

1:04:42.320 --> 1:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and the whole thing was a disaster. Syria has just

1:04:46.080 --> 1:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>been gutted topped to bottom. I mean, Syria is a

1:04:50.320 --> 1:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>shadow of its former self as a country, and there

1:04:54.680 --> 1:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of just incompetence on a splitting the

1:04:58.480 --> 1:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>abaministration during that, and it was just it was never

1:05:01.200 --> 1:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>really Obama's fault, though they never really wanted to say

1:05:04.840 --> 1:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that Obama was making bad decisions there. Meanwhile, we're not

1:05:08.840 --> 1:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the ones that are bombing Yemen. The Saudis are bombing Yemen.

1:05:12.720 --> 1:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>But we want the Saudis to be able to back

1:05:15.760 --> 1:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the legitimate government in Yemen over rebel groups that are

1:05:20.080 --> 1:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>proxies for Iran and over all Qaeda. And we're supposed

1:05:23.360 --> 1:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to change all that and give up that policy, shift

1:05:26.840 --> 1:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>around that policy because a foreigner, let's just say it,

1:05:30.720 --> 1:05:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, a foreign journalist was killed in a foreign

1:05:33.360 --> 1:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>country by a foreign entity, and this is now all

1:05:36.480 --> 1:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>America's problem. I mean, this guy was not one of ours.

1:05:40.480 --> 1:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>And so why are we so much more, you know,

1:05:43.880 --> 1:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>orders of magnitude more upset about this than the journalists

1:05:47.840 --> 1:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>who are tortured and killed in places like Turkey and

1:05:52.080 --> 1:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>places like Russia and places all over the world. You

1:05:55.920 --> 1:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>know what the answer is, It's not about the best

1:05:57.760 --> 1:06:00.280
<v Speaker 1>interests of the American people. It's not about us foreign

1:06:00.320 --> 1:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>policy and geopolitics. It's about can it be attributed to Trump?

1:06:05.320 --> 1:06:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Is it an opportunity to bash Trump? That's why they're

1:06:08.280 --> 1:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>so interested in this. It's really gross. You know, I

1:06:13.680 --> 1:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>do have to ask the question. I've got to keep

1:06:15.760 --> 1:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>it real. Why does the president have some of these

1:06:19.840 --> 1:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>just utter bozos from his past that he brought into

1:06:25.080 --> 1:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>this administration? You know what? It motivates the president to

1:06:28.640 --> 1:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>do this because there have been some people who Does

1:06:31.480 --> 1:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>anyone want to make excuses for Amorosa? The President certainly doesn't.

1:06:35.160 --> 1:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Does anyone want to make excuses for the much as

1:06:38.440 --> 1:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Scaramucci the President? Well, I guess they're on good terms. Now.

1:06:43.400 --> 1:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Does anyone want to want to talk about how great

1:06:46.560 --> 1:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Steve Bannon is? I mean, I don't know. I don't

1:06:49.600 --> 1:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>hear a lot of that. Certainly, I don't hear much

1:06:52.600 --> 1:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of it when it comes to Cohen, including from the

1:06:54.200 --> 1:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>President who says that Cohen is now terrible. So why

1:06:57.920 --> 1:07:00.360
<v Speaker 1>would somebody as terrible as Cohen get as close to

1:07:00.720 --> 1:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>never mind the President United States, a successful businessman like

1:07:03.640 --> 1:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. Well, good news we got the president to

1:07:06.840 --> 1:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>give an answer today if we can. Michael Cohen, he

1:07:10.120 --> 1:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>was your attorney three years. He was sentenced yesterday and

1:07:14.600 --> 1:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>It may seem like he got a break because it

1:07:16.440 --> 1:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>could have been twice as much, but it's still three

1:07:18.240 --> 1:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>years in federal prison, five hundred thousand dollars in restitution.

1:07:21.880 --> 1:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>This was someone who surreptitiously recorded you is now known

1:07:26.600 --> 1:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>as a criminal liar. Yet this was someone who was

1:07:29.760 --> 1:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>in your inner circle. Yeah, well it happens. I mean,

1:07:32.480 --> 1:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>look what happens. I hire usually good people, but it

1:07:35.760 --> 1:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>just happened. Why did you hire Michael Cohen? First of all,

1:07:39.960 --> 1:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that was his title of very low level work. Why

1:07:42.520 --> 1:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>did you need more public relations than he did law?

1:07:44.880 --> 1:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>But he did so. If you'd see him on television,

1:07:47.000 --> 1:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>he was okay in television. But years ago, many years,

1:07:50.800 --> 1:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>like twelve thirteen years ago, he did me a favor?

1:07:53.960 --> 1:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Did Trump a favor? I've heard this before, and I've

1:07:57.760 --> 1:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>been wondering when we'll finally get to find out what

1:08:01.040 --> 1:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>this favor was that got Cohen so deep into the

1:08:04.880 --> 1:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>President's good graces that he would become he's certainly in

1:08:08.920 --> 1:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>his inner circle. I mean, he's a guy who was

1:08:11.840 --> 1:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>very close to the president for a number of years.

1:08:14.360 --> 1:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody disputes that. So what, in fact

1:08:17.600 --> 1:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>was this favor? Well, the President told us listen, he

1:08:22.360 --> 1:08:24.439
<v Speaker 1>was on a committee and he was so responsive and

1:08:24.520 --> 1:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>so good, and I said, he's a nice guy. I

1:08:27.320 --> 1:08:29.719
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't wait a minute, Wait a minute, that was the favor,

1:08:30.200 --> 1:08:32.439
<v Speaker 1>because people have been asking, well, what is the favor

1:08:32.479 --> 1:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>that he did the president? He was on a committee

1:08:34.280 --> 1:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>with you. Was on a committee. It was a condominium

1:08:36.360 --> 1:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>committee many years ago, and he was a very big

1:08:40.000 --> 1:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>supporter of mine on that committee. I did a great job.

1:08:42.439 --> 1:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump World Tower to a very tall building right opposite

1:08:46.000 --> 1:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the United Nations. And when you build a building, people

1:08:49.160 --> 1:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>always get together at the end and they make a

1:08:50.880 --> 1:08:53.719
<v Speaker 1>settlement with the owner. They say the ceiling wasn't painted

1:08:53.800 --> 1:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the right color or something. You know, stuff sometimes serious stup.

1:08:56.960 --> 1:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>But in my case, it was a great building and

1:08:59.240 --> 1:09:00.559
<v Speaker 1>he was in the committee. I thought he was a

1:09:00.600 --> 1:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>great guy. I thought he was really a nice guy

1:09:02.280 --> 1:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>who was very supportive. You know, I'll say this, when

1:09:06.080 --> 1:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you've actually gotten to know somebody and they're not asking

1:09:09.240 --> 1:09:11.759
<v Speaker 1>you for something or that, you're not in a position

1:09:11.800 --> 1:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>where you feel like they inherently have an interest in

1:09:15.160 --> 1:09:18.479
<v Speaker 1>making you think one thing or another, you often get

1:09:18.520 --> 1:09:21.479
<v Speaker 1>a better sense of who you're dealing with, and you

1:09:21.520 --> 1:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>feel like you want to bring people into your professional

1:09:24.439 --> 1:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>life that you know from just life in general. And

1:09:28.479 --> 1:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I feel this way in media. The people that i've well,

1:09:31.400 --> 1:09:33.439
<v Speaker 1>certainly people i've worked with in the past. It's a

1:09:33.439 --> 1:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>little different. People i've worked with in the past are

1:09:36.080 --> 1:09:38.080
<v Speaker 1>if I've had a good experience, the first people that

1:09:38.160 --> 1:09:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to work with in the future. And I

1:09:41.040 --> 1:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>also think that loyalty is a very important trait to have.

1:09:46.479 --> 1:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>It's also a very important trait to respect, you know,

1:09:51.400 --> 1:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a very important trait that we should want other

1:09:53.400 --> 1:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>people to have as well. And to do that means

1:09:56.240 --> 1:10:00.559
<v Speaker 1>that you have to reward people for loyalty. So President

1:10:00.840 --> 1:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>is not a politician. I mean, I don't think that

1:10:03.120 --> 1:10:06.519
<v Speaker 1>he well he wasn't a politician before he's president, obviously,

1:10:06.560 --> 1:10:09.439
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think that he thought of the people

1:10:09.479 --> 1:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that he was bringing in as possible liabilities. I also

1:10:13.920 --> 1:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>think that there was so little prep in many ways

1:10:18.400 --> 1:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>for the possibility that he was really going to be

1:10:22.800 --> 1:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the next president the United States and leader of the

1:10:24.360 --> 1:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>free world, that there was a lot of learning on

1:10:27.160 --> 1:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the job about who to give certain jobs to. And

1:10:29.800 --> 1:10:33.519
<v Speaker 1>I think that's been quite clearly the case. But I

1:10:33.840 --> 1:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>go back and forth on this one because I am frustrated.

1:10:36.720 --> 1:10:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm frustrated the President has given so much authority and

1:10:41.520 --> 1:10:44.559
<v Speaker 1>so much trust while he's the occupant of the White

1:10:44.600 --> 1:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>House to just utter Bozo's third tier people when it

1:10:49.880 --> 1:10:52.479
<v Speaker 1>comes to their ethics and their intellects. Honestly, there's a

1:10:52.520 --> 1:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of them that are really low grade individuals and

1:10:56.360 --> 1:11:01.560
<v Speaker 1>they've been given incredibly powerful positions. So that's been a disappointment.

1:11:01.760 --> 1:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>And there are disappointments about this presidency. You know, we're

1:11:04.800 --> 1:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>going to have to start to face up to some

1:11:06.280 --> 1:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of the things that aren't what we wanted, aren't what

1:11:09.320 --> 1:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>was promised. It's not to say that I don't still

1:11:12.240 --> 1:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>support the President's not to say I'm not still just

1:11:14.840 --> 1:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>forever grateful that Hillary Clinton is not the president. I

1:11:17.960 --> 1:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>get it. But you know, on this one, on his

1:11:21.080 --> 1:11:23.679
<v Speaker 1>choice of advisors, and I'm not bitter that he hasn't

1:11:23.720 --> 1:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>given me the chief of staff job. Okay, don't no, No,

1:11:26.040 --> 1:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not not bitter, you know, I mean, would I

1:11:29.120 --> 1:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>be an amazing White House chief of staff, of course,

1:11:30.880 --> 1:11:33.559
<v Speaker 1>of course, But has the President asked me yet? No, No,

1:11:33.600 --> 1:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>he has not. But seriously, I do think that the

1:11:38.200 --> 1:11:40.439
<v Speaker 1>President gets a bit of leeway as well, or should

1:11:40.439 --> 1:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>get leeway for wanting to have people around that he

1:11:44.760 --> 1:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>feels at some level he can really trust because he

1:11:48.360 --> 1:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>is encircled with enemies all the time. I mean, he

1:11:51.439 --> 1:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>is besieged in a way that no president in my

1:11:54.439 --> 1:11:57.719
<v Speaker 1>lifetime has ever been. He cannot talk to or trust

1:11:57.800 --> 1:12:00.200
<v Speaker 1>most members of the press, he cannot talk to or

1:12:00.240 --> 1:12:04.799
<v Speaker 1>trust talk openly, at least honestly to many senior government

1:12:04.800 --> 1:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>officials and people who are career government servants. He has

1:12:08.479 --> 1:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to be wary of them, and I think the President

1:12:11.360 --> 1:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>would be foolish not to be. But yeah, we were

1:12:13.920 --> 1:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>told that it's because Cohen, you know, a long time

1:12:16.479 --> 1:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>ago did him a solid when he was on a

1:12:19.640 --> 1:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>condo board, and that's how it all happened. You know,

1:12:22.160 --> 1:12:25.639
<v Speaker 1>it's you know what is the power of weak associations?

1:12:25.680 --> 1:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes you just bump into somebody and that person changes

1:12:28.240 --> 1:12:31.320
<v Speaker 1>your life for better or war for worse. I think

1:12:31.360 --> 1:12:35.439
<v Speaker 1>with Cohen it's for worse. So we'll continue to follow

1:12:35.479 --> 1:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>this and got a big our three coming up. I

1:12:38.400 --> 1:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>bumped into some protesters last night. Yeah, that's right. I

1:12:43.720 --> 1:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>would they tend to find me or I don't know.

1:12:46.120 --> 1:12:48.960
<v Speaker 1>We just I have a sixth sense about these things.

1:12:49.000 --> 1:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>But I found one of these, one of these anti

1:12:51.439 --> 1:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>White House Administration official mobile protests going on last night,

1:12:56.120 --> 1:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and I interviewed the protest leader, asked about immigration, asked

1:13:00.280 --> 1:13:02.559
<v Speaker 1>him about what the heck are you doing here? Are

1:13:02.560 --> 1:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you harassing people? You'll want to hear that conversation. And

1:13:06.320 --> 1:13:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that's upright in just a few minutes. And I practically

1:13:10.680 --> 1:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>slipped into a food coma yesterday after I finished off

1:13:14.240 --> 1:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>some delicious pork chops courtesy of Omaha Steaks. And right now,

1:13:18.240 --> 1:13:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Omaha Steaks is giving an amazing limited time offer to

1:13:21.479 --> 1:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>my listeners. When you go to Omaha Steaks dot com

1:13:23.960 --> 1:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and Entercoade Buck into the search bar, you'll get seventy

1:13:27.120 --> 1:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>four percent off Omaha Steaks Family Gift Package originally one

1:13:30.400 --> 1:13:33.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ninety five dollars, now only forty nine ninety nine.

1:13:33.680 --> 1:13:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Order now and you'll get four hand cut age to Tendantis,

1:13:36.680 --> 1:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>top surloin steaks, two Savory Premium pork chops, four chicken

1:13:40.840 --> 1:13:44.680
<v Speaker 1>fried steaks, four Omaha Steaks burgers, four kilbasa saucea just

1:13:44.800 --> 1:13:49.639
<v Speaker 1>all Beef meatballs, potatoes, Zoa grata, apple, tartlets plus four

1:13:49.640 --> 1:13:52.559
<v Speaker 1>more burgers free. I'm telling you it's an incredible package.

1:13:52.600 --> 1:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I have it myself. I've almost gotten through my first one.

1:13:54.760 --> 1:13:56.439
<v Speaker 1>I might have to get a second one. That's right.

1:13:56.680 --> 1:13:59.400
<v Speaker 1>This limited time gift package is only forty nine ninety

1:13:59.479 --> 1:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>nine and you got to Omaha Steaks dot com. Make

1:14:01.640 --> 1:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>sure you type buck in the search bar and add

1:14:04.120 --> 1:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the Family Gift Package to your card. Don't wait, this

1:14:06.400 --> 1:14:08.839
<v Speaker 1>offer is going to end soon. Go to Omaha Steaks

1:14:08.920 --> 1:14:11.679
<v Speaker 1>dot com type buck in the search bar to send

1:14:11.680 --> 1:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the Omaha Steaks Family Gift Package today. So last night

1:14:17.400 --> 1:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>walking home and sure enough I stumble upon a protest

1:14:22.960 --> 1:14:26.839
<v Speaker 1>going on in the streets at DC. It's a funky

1:14:26.840 --> 1:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>assortment of folks. They are dancing, there's a lot of

1:14:30.120 --> 1:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>loud music, about thirty or forty protesters in a few

1:14:35.040 --> 1:14:38.759
<v Speaker 1>dozen police following them around as they block the streets

1:14:38.880 --> 1:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and generally just make a lot of noise. So I figured, hey,

1:14:43.600 --> 1:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of a media person, a journal an opinion journalist,

1:14:49.760 --> 1:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>if you will, maybe I'll stop and ask these folks

1:14:52.479 --> 1:14:55.559
<v Speaker 1>what the heck are you doing here? And this is

1:14:55.600 --> 1:14:58.599
<v Speaker 1>how that went. Mus for us nas sir, and I'm

1:14:58.600 --> 1:15:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the founding organizer of Work for Peace. Okay, let's Worked

1:15:01.720 --> 1:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>for Peace. Work for Pieces a queer and transgress roots

1:15:04.439 --> 1:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>movement that uses all forms of dance to promote peace.

1:15:07.120 --> 1:15:09.639
<v Speaker 1>We were founded in response to the Pulse nightclub shooting

1:15:09.840 --> 1:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to bring the dance lore into the streets to start

1:15:12.400 --> 1:15:14.479
<v Speaker 1>that we are here and we will dance. And we're

1:15:14.560 --> 1:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>best known for our dance protests in front of Mike

1:15:17.000 --> 1:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Pence's house and Avunca Trump's house. And so why are

1:15:21.360 --> 1:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you here right now in this location? So right here

1:15:24.200 --> 1:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>is the apartment complex where Stephen Miller lives. Stephen Miller, Well,

1:15:28.400 --> 1:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>would you look at that? I stumbled onto one of

1:15:32.120 --> 1:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>these protests at the home groups right. These are the

1:15:36.080 --> 1:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>people or among the people who find out where a

1:15:40.320 --> 1:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>prominent person that they disagree with politically lives, and they

1:15:44.479 --> 1:15:48.599
<v Speaker 1>gather outside their home and try to make a lot

1:15:48.600 --> 1:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of noise at night when they think the person is

1:15:50.920 --> 1:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>likely to be there. You'll recall this happened and was

1:15:54.280 --> 1:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>rather aggressive and terrifying outside of Tucker Carlson's home not

1:15:57.920 --> 1:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>long ago. It's happened in other places. My understanding is

1:16:02.080 --> 1:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>this isn't even the first time they've done this. To

1:16:05.160 --> 1:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>White House Senior advisor or senior aid whatever his title is,

1:16:08.760 --> 1:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Miller. They've done this before, although I've never seen

1:16:12.160 --> 1:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>them doing it like this. Now. Is this group intimidating, No,

1:16:17.479 --> 1:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>there were police everywhere. This was a group that was

1:16:21.479 --> 1:16:24.479
<v Speaker 1>honestly dancing in the streets. That was their whole thing.

1:16:24.479 --> 1:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>They're dancing in the streets, but they're playing very loud

1:16:27.160 --> 1:16:31.439
<v Speaker 1>music and they're harassing somebody. So I wanted to ask

1:16:31.439 --> 1:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a little more about why they choose these tactics. Remember

1:16:34.160 --> 1:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm speaking to the organizer of this group. I wanted

1:16:36.880 --> 1:16:39.679
<v Speaker 1>to ask them why they choose these tactics and what

1:16:39.760 --> 1:16:44.479
<v Speaker 1>they think about the issues overall. So strap in, folks,

1:16:44.479 --> 1:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>it gets interesting. The architect of family separation and the

1:16:49.280 --> 1:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>architect of using tear gas on migrant families, women and

1:16:52.840 --> 1:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>children who are at the border with the migrant teara beans.

1:16:56.240 --> 1:16:58.719
<v Speaker 1>So we're here to send a clear message to Stephen

1:16:58.760 --> 1:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Millern his immigration policies that he is pioneering are not

1:17:03.320 --> 1:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>tolerated by our communities. Why following to his house, though,

1:17:07.040 --> 1:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>why not just protest outside the White House. We're you

1:17:09.120 --> 1:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to have higher visibility because some people might think this

1:17:11.080 --> 1:17:13.479
<v Speaker 1>is harassment. Well, we were at the White House and

1:17:13.600 --> 1:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>then we came to his apartment complex. And when we

1:17:19.120 --> 1:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>think about harassment, what comes first to mind for me

1:17:23.160 --> 1:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>is ICE individuals breaking into migrant and refugee households and

1:17:27.560 --> 1:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>tearing them from their families and putting them in jail.

1:17:30.320 --> 1:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>What comes to mind is Roxanna, a trans LATINEX individual

1:17:34.920 --> 1:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>who was kept in ice, dehydrated and beaten by ICE

1:17:38.080 --> 1:17:41.160
<v Speaker 1>officials for ten days before she should we abolishize? Oh,

1:17:41.360 --> 1:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>just to be clear here, I ask this protest leader

1:17:45.160 --> 1:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>about whether it's harassment to gather outside the private home

1:17:49.439 --> 1:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of somebody who works in the White House in the

1:17:52.439 --> 1:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>US government, And the response I get is not really

1:17:56.960 --> 1:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>about whether it's harassment of that person. It's real harassment

1:18:00.600 --> 1:18:02.400
<v Speaker 1>is what ICE does to people at the border. I mean,

1:18:02.400 --> 1:18:04.639
<v Speaker 1>I would just know that this is when people talk

1:18:04.680 --> 1:18:08.839
<v Speaker 1>about what about is m This is a first class,

1:18:09.120 --> 1:18:15.559
<v Speaker 1>a one choice USDA example of what about ism has

1:18:15.680 --> 1:18:18.200
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with anything that I'm really talking about here.

1:18:18.240 --> 1:18:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, you are leading a protest outside of a

1:18:22.280 --> 1:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>person's home where they are operating their capacities as a

1:18:26.320 --> 1:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>private citizen, Like I'd like to have dinner and go

1:18:28.400 --> 1:18:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to sleep like a normal person, and you're making a

1:18:30.760 --> 1:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of noise and you're trying to embarrass them in

1:18:33.160 --> 1:18:36.160
<v Speaker 1>front of the people who live around them. And your

1:18:36.200 --> 1:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>answer to that as well, they're bad things that happened

1:18:38.200 --> 1:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to the border. By the way, to say that Stephen

1:18:39.960 --> 1:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Miller is the architect of tear gassing migrants in the border,

1:18:44.120 --> 1:18:47.559
<v Speaker 1>that's false. As we know, the Obama administration used tear

1:18:47.600 --> 1:18:50.120
<v Speaker 1>gas at the border. In fact, tear gas is a

1:18:50.600 --> 1:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>often used, often used technique of law enforcement for crowd

1:18:55.360 --> 1:18:59.479
<v Speaker 1>control and crowd dispersal. So that has nothing to do

1:18:59.560 --> 1:19:02.160
<v Speaker 1>with Stephen Miller at the border. And the notion of

1:19:02.520 --> 1:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>or the policy of child separation at the border that

1:19:06.640 --> 1:19:08.920
<v Speaker 1>was occurring under the Obama administration not in the same

1:19:09.080 --> 1:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>numbers as it has under the under the Trump administration.

1:19:12.360 --> 1:19:14.479
<v Speaker 1>But also you did not have a flood of people

1:19:14.560 --> 1:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to abuse our system and come across the border

1:19:18.080 --> 1:19:21.160
<v Speaker 1>by the tens of thousands. But then we get into

1:19:21.160 --> 1:19:23.519
<v Speaker 1>a little more of what this guy thinks about policy.

1:19:23.920 --> 1:19:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Get ready for it. We're here to advocate to abolish ice,

1:19:28.920 --> 1:19:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to let them in, and to send a clear message

1:19:31.120 --> 1:19:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to migrants and refugees in the caravan, that we are here,

1:19:34.360 --> 1:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we support you, and we will continue to work until

1:19:37.000 --> 1:19:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you are free and you are safe and secure. And

1:19:39.680 --> 1:19:43.200
<v Speaker 1>do you think that we should have open borders? Yes,

1:19:43.320 --> 1:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I do. I believe that when we think about the

1:19:46.320 --> 1:19:48.439
<v Speaker 1>reason why borders are in place, when we think about

1:19:48.560 --> 1:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>US imperialism and how it has desecrated other countries, many

1:19:52.920 --> 1:19:56.639
<v Speaker 1>of these countries from where individuals are coming seeking refuge

1:19:56.720 --> 1:20:00.559
<v Speaker 1>because of US imperialism. The US needs to open reporters.

1:20:00.800 --> 1:20:03.680
<v Speaker 1>It needs to We need to find a safe and

1:20:03.760 --> 1:20:07.400
<v Speaker 1>secure way to support the individuals whom we have marginalized

1:20:07.479 --> 1:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>as the US population. All Right, A lot of big

1:20:10.840 --> 1:20:14.680
<v Speaker 1>takeaways here. This is an interesting conversation with this guy. Now,

1:20:14.960 --> 1:20:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I yes, he's a liberal loon. I will say he was.

1:20:17.600 --> 1:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>He was very polite. He let me stop. I said,

1:20:20.080 --> 1:20:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I work for the Hill. I'd like to ask him

1:20:21.680 --> 1:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>some questions, and he was perfectly polite to me, and

1:20:25.720 --> 1:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>everybody there was kind of smiling and laughing. So you know,

1:20:28.200 --> 1:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I always come to you from a place of honesty. Right.

1:20:31.280 --> 1:20:35.439
<v Speaker 1>If I saw a bunch of menacing thug like you know,

1:20:36.520 --> 1:20:40.839
<v Speaker 1>jerks assembled outside, I mean these were like nice, happy, smiley,

1:20:41.439 --> 1:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>silly jerks. They were not menacing, They were not in

1:20:44.360 --> 1:20:46.680
<v Speaker 1>any way trying to intimidate anybody. I mean they were

1:20:47.160 --> 1:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>they were actually dancing in the streets with rainbow flags

1:20:50.400 --> 1:20:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and rainbow colored clothing on. So and I don't think

1:20:52.920 --> 1:20:54.920
<v Speaker 1>anybody was scared, but I also think that it was

1:20:55.040 --> 1:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>causing a bit of a disturbance. Anyway, Here's a guy

1:20:57.920 --> 1:21:00.839
<v Speaker 1>who has, as far as I under stand it, gathered

1:21:00.960 --> 1:21:02.920
<v Speaker 1>many times, and this is one of the things that

1:21:03.000 --> 1:21:05.759
<v Speaker 1>he does. He's an activist, he's a left wing activist,

1:21:06.120 --> 1:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and primarily on the issue of immigration. I noticed how

1:21:09.360 --> 1:21:13.400
<v Speaker 1>when I ask him about open borders, he doesn't miss

1:21:13.439 --> 1:21:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a beat. Yes, absolutely, we want open borders. When I

1:21:17.280 --> 1:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>asked him about whether ice should be abolished, he doesn't

1:21:20.280 --> 1:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>miss a beat. Absolutely, we should abolish ice. Now, these

1:21:26.280 --> 1:21:32.479
<v Speaker 1>are positions that are increasingly common and widespread within the

1:21:32.960 --> 1:21:37.559
<v Speaker 1>modern Democrat party. These are not really fringe positions anymore.

1:21:37.600 --> 1:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying they're majority positions, but they're not fringe.

1:21:40.880 --> 1:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>You can find plenty of Democrats for whom this is

1:21:45.280 --> 1:21:50.439
<v Speaker 1>the case. And I found most interesting that this guy,

1:21:50.560 --> 1:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>immediately when I asked him about open borders, he says, yes,

1:21:52.760 --> 1:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>we should have open borders. You've heard me tell you

1:21:55.400 --> 1:21:58.400
<v Speaker 1>this before, that the left believes that we owe it

1:21:58.520 --> 1:22:01.439
<v Speaker 1>to the world that we owe to the rest of

1:22:01.520 --> 1:22:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the world, bring them into our country, changing our culture

1:22:05.479 --> 1:22:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to accommodate them, changing our laws to accommodate them, and

1:22:09.680 --> 1:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>giving them our stuff via the welfare state, because of

1:22:13.800 --> 1:22:18.120
<v Speaker 1>all the injustice that the United States has done around

1:22:18.160 --> 1:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the world over the many, many decades, all the wrongs

1:22:22.439 --> 1:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that we have committed. You see, it's to make up

1:22:25.920 --> 1:22:30.120
<v Speaker 1>for colonialism, even though America was never a colonial power,

1:22:30.320 --> 1:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>but to make up for the legacy of Western imperialism,

1:22:35.000 --> 1:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the mantle of which was taken from Great Britain and

1:22:38.439 --> 1:22:41.479
<v Speaker 1>by the United States after the Second World War. So

1:22:42.520 --> 1:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the mentality that's at the heart of a lot

1:22:45.080 --> 1:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of this left wing activist thinking. And you're hearing a

1:22:48.240 --> 1:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>left wing activists just say it, right, he's just coming

1:22:50.840 --> 1:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>out and saying it, Yeah, that's right. We have to

1:22:52.920 --> 1:22:54.920
<v Speaker 1>take in all these margarets. Anyone wants to come to

1:22:55.000 --> 1:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>America should be able to come to America because we

1:22:59.280 --> 1:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>owe it to them because of all the bad things

1:23:01.960 --> 1:23:05.639
<v Speaker 1>we've done. This is very similar to the Obama point

1:23:05.720 --> 1:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of view about how we have to make amends with

1:23:07.920 --> 1:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world, and we should limit the

1:23:12.880 --> 1:23:15.360
<v Speaker 1>way that we use our power to our influence because

1:23:15.400 --> 1:23:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of all the bad stuff America is done. Do you

1:23:18.000 --> 1:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>think that the Democratic Party is in line with your

1:23:20.320 --> 1:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>thinking on this? Do you think you'll have a candidate

1:23:22.439 --> 1:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty that will be pro open borders? Should

1:23:25.000 --> 1:23:27.599
<v Speaker 1>they just be honest about this. We're here to push

1:23:27.640 --> 1:23:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party to continue fighting for justice and to

1:23:31.439 --> 1:23:34.439
<v Speaker 1>continue fighting for safety and security for migrants and refugees.

1:23:34.479 --> 1:23:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any concerns that following people to their

1:23:36.720 --> 1:23:38.920
<v Speaker 1>homes to protest at night when they're not at their

1:23:38.920 --> 1:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>places of work is shutting down discussion, could be seen

1:23:43.000 --> 1:23:46.559
<v Speaker 1>as intimidation, could be actually hurting your cause. We're here

1:23:46.600 --> 1:23:49.679
<v Speaker 1>to celebrate the queer entrance community. We're here to celebrate

1:23:49.800 --> 1:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>migrants and refugees. Now, put aside the silliness of a

1:23:53.760 --> 1:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of what this guy says and his inability to

1:23:55.840 --> 1:23:59.479
<v Speaker 1>answer some pretty straightforward questions. He is in line with

1:24:00.040 --> 1:24:02.519
<v Speaker 1>the Democrat base. He is in line with how they

1:24:02.600 --> 1:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>think about these things. This is where the Democrat Party

1:24:05.880 --> 1:24:09.439
<v Speaker 1>is going. Open borders, abolish ice. We owe it to

1:24:09.520 --> 1:24:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world who cares what happens to America.

1:24:13.160 --> 1:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>So in that sense, this protest was useful because I

1:24:15.280 --> 1:24:18.599
<v Speaker 1>got to see how crazy they are. Well, the weather

1:24:18.680 --> 1:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>outside may be frightful, but the smell indoors is delightful.

1:24:22.800 --> 1:24:26.880
<v Speaker 1>If you are drinking some delicious Black Rifle coffee, My friends,

1:24:27.040 --> 1:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>this is your cup of joe. If you love America,

1:24:30.720 --> 1:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>freedom and all the good stuff about this country, and

1:24:34.439 --> 1:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you support veterans in the process. By the way, I'm

1:24:37.280 --> 1:24:39.880
<v Speaker 1>all about Black Rifle Coffee. You should be to get

1:24:39.960 --> 1:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>yourself the gift of delicious coffee delivered to your front door,

1:24:43.479 --> 1:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>or get it as a gift for a friend of yours.

1:24:45.360 --> 1:24:48.479
<v Speaker 1>Black Rifle Coffee makes it easy with their coffee club. Okay,

1:24:48.840 --> 1:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>this is the best tasting, most energizing coffee you can get.

1:24:53.000 --> 1:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And they offer three, six and twelve months prepaid and

1:24:56.040 --> 1:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>pay as he goes subscriptions and you can gift them

1:24:58.840 --> 1:25:01.479
<v Speaker 1>for somebody. So on a cool, interesting gift for the

1:25:01.520 --> 1:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>holiday to give to somebody that you know they're gonna love.

1:25:04.479 --> 1:25:07.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's easy for you to set up Black Rifle Coffee.

1:25:07.640 --> 1:25:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Go to Black Riflecoffee dot com slash buck and you'll

1:25:10.200 --> 1:25:12.960
<v Speaker 1>see fifteen percent off your order, sign somebody else up

1:25:13.000 --> 1:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>for the coffee club, or sign yourself up again black

1:25:15.920 --> 1:25:19.599
<v Speaker 1>Riflecoffee dot com slash buck for fifteen percent off black

1:25:19.760 --> 1:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Riflecoffee dot Com slash buck. We do not live in

1:25:26.160 --> 1:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>charitable times when it comes to public discourse. I think

1:25:29.400 --> 1:25:32.679
<v Speaker 1>we could all agree on that we do not see

1:25:32.720 --> 1:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people acting with mercy and forgiveness in

1:25:37.160 --> 1:25:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the way that they approach others in public life. And

1:25:40.880 --> 1:25:46.360
<v Speaker 1>it's it's particularly pointed these days in the era of

1:25:46.640 --> 1:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Get Trump at all costs. There you had a couple

1:25:50.000 --> 1:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of hosts on the View who were really having a

1:25:53.200 --> 1:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>good laugh at the expense of Michael Cohen and saying

1:25:56.240 --> 1:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>he's a thog just like his boss, of course, Donald Trump,

1:26:00.000 --> 1:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and that you know, karma is a B word, and

1:26:03.600 --> 1:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you heard it, and they were the only ones. There

1:26:06.200 --> 1:26:09.439
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of jubilation yesterday on social media from

1:26:09.479 --> 1:26:12.200
<v Speaker 1>people that were just having a good laugh at the

1:26:12.280 --> 1:26:15.680
<v Speaker 1>fact that Michael Cohen's going to prison. Now. It goes

1:26:15.760 --> 1:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>without saying that Michael Cohen is a individual who is

1:26:20.680 --> 1:26:26.599
<v Speaker 1>ethically challenged, somebody who clearly was well beyond his skill

1:26:26.680 --> 1:26:29.519
<v Speaker 1>set when it came to where he was in terms

1:26:29.560 --> 1:26:34.439
<v Speaker 1>of access and influence, somebody who is not a model

1:26:34.439 --> 1:26:37.160
<v Speaker 1>for any of us to follow, and he is paying

1:26:37.479 --> 1:26:40.479
<v Speaker 1>a pretty hefty price, literally in the sense that he's

1:26:40.520 --> 1:26:43.400
<v Speaker 1>getting a big fine, and also that he will lose

1:26:43.920 --> 1:26:46.719
<v Speaker 1>three years of his life and his reputation is destroyed

1:26:46.760 --> 1:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and ruined. But I try to always be mindful of

1:26:50.360 --> 1:26:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the fact that, you know, these political disputes that we have,

1:26:54.560 --> 1:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>when we turn it into a matter of cheering for

1:26:58.360 --> 1:27:00.639
<v Speaker 1>one side or the other to have people and to prison,

1:27:01.360 --> 1:27:05.519
<v Speaker 1>we really debase ourselves in the process. I try very

1:27:05.600 --> 1:27:09.799
<v Speaker 1>hard not to do this. I'm reminded of a story

1:27:09.920 --> 1:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that was told to me many years ago by I

1:27:13.080 --> 1:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't even call him a friend. He was an associate

1:27:15.760 --> 1:27:18.400
<v Speaker 1>of mine in New York and he was not a

1:27:18.560 --> 1:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>nice guy. He was not somebody that I wanted to

1:27:21.880 --> 1:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>spend much time with or around. But he was one

1:27:24.840 --> 1:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of those friend of a friend guys that would just

1:27:28.160 --> 1:27:31.680
<v Speaker 1>end up hanging around. And this is when we were

1:27:32.320 --> 1:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I suppose a few years out of college and he

1:27:36.320 --> 1:27:38.439
<v Speaker 1>was in law school, and he told me about how

1:27:38.560 --> 1:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>he had spent some time down at the at the

1:27:42.439 --> 1:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Federal courthouse in New York City, and I forget even

1:27:47.840 --> 1:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the specific context of what it was that he was

1:27:51.439 --> 1:27:54.400
<v Speaker 1>saying and how it was that this, but essentially said

1:27:54.400 --> 1:27:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that he was down there for the defense of a

1:27:57.640 --> 1:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>guy who was on trial for insider trading, stock market fraud,

1:28:02.360 --> 1:28:05.439
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing, and he said that showing up

1:28:05.479 --> 1:28:07.599
<v Speaker 1>to this trial, we thought the whole time because everyone's

1:28:07.600 --> 1:28:10.880
<v Speaker 1>wearing a suit and you're in a courtroom, and there's

1:28:10.880 --> 1:28:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a certain normalcy that seeps in when you're in that courtroom.

1:28:15.280 --> 1:28:17.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is just what people are doing, and

1:28:17.160 --> 1:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>it's easy to forget the stakes and everyone goes home

1:28:21.080 --> 1:28:23.080
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the proceeding and it just seems

1:28:23.120 --> 1:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>like it's a process. It's a process. But I remember

1:28:26.320 --> 1:28:28.200
<v Speaker 1>he told me that at the end of that process

1:28:29.439 --> 1:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>there was a guilty verdict and this guy ended up

1:28:35.560 --> 1:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>or maybe even he took the plea, and it doesn't matter.

1:28:38.120 --> 1:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>He was it was clear at the end of the

1:28:39.840 --> 1:28:43.640
<v Speaker 1>process that the defendant was going to prison for some

1:28:43.840 --> 1:28:46.439
<v Speaker 1>period of time. And this friend of mine told me

1:28:46.520 --> 1:28:49.280
<v Speaker 1>about how he heard and he will never forget it,

1:28:49.800 --> 1:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>or this associate of mine that he heard the wife

1:28:54.600 --> 1:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>just start sobbing, sobbing at the recognition that she was

1:29:00.640 --> 1:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be separated from her husband for a few years,

1:29:04.840 --> 1:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>sosabbing at the recognition that her family name would never

1:29:08.120 --> 1:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>be quite the same that somebody that she had partnered

1:29:12.160 --> 1:29:14.559
<v Speaker 1>up with for life and had children with. There were

1:29:14.640 --> 1:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>kids in this family too, that they had suffered this fate.

1:29:19.920 --> 1:29:22.439
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it's not a trial where people at

1:29:22.479 --> 1:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the end feel like, yeah, that's right, justice is done.

1:29:26.320 --> 1:29:30.639
<v Speaker 1>This person is a terrible person. People get into desperate

1:29:30.720 --> 1:29:33.519
<v Speaker 1>circumstances and they cheat on their taxes. People get into

1:29:33.600 --> 1:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>desperate circumstances and they engage in insider training or some

1:29:38.960 --> 1:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of a white collar crime, you name it. And

1:29:42.320 --> 1:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I do think that we need to separate in our

1:29:45.280 --> 1:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>minds those who have truly victimized individuals, people who are

1:29:51.280 --> 1:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>violent criminals, people who have stolen from individuals, and those

1:29:54.960 --> 1:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>who have scammed the system. It's not to say that

1:29:58.320 --> 1:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>scamming the system is okay, but it's different. And we

1:30:01.880 --> 1:30:05.799
<v Speaker 1>know this, We intuitively know this, that a mass murderer

1:30:05.920 --> 1:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>is very different from an insurance fraud scamster. Right, these

1:30:10.120 --> 1:30:13.000
<v Speaker 1>are very different. You could sit down and I'm reminded

1:30:13.040 --> 1:30:16.439
<v Speaker 1>of a Christopher Hitchins once said that he had a

1:30:16.560 --> 1:30:19.560
<v Speaker 1>test for people who had a prior record. You know

1:30:19.640 --> 1:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that you could sit down with somebody and if they said, yeah,

1:30:22.000 --> 1:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I spent some time and to spend some

1:30:25.120 --> 1:30:29.639
<v Speaker 1>time in the slammer because embezzled some money from my company,

1:30:30.000 --> 1:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>he says, all right, well you paid your dues and

1:30:32.680 --> 1:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>sure enough you've come out and I hope you've reformed

1:30:36.080 --> 1:30:38.639
<v Speaker 1>your ways. But you'd continue having lunch if you sat

1:30:38.680 --> 1:30:40.760
<v Speaker 1>down with somebody like that. If you sat down you

1:30:40.840 --> 1:30:44.320
<v Speaker 1>found out that somebody was engaged in, you know, child

1:30:44.600 --> 1:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>sex trafficking, or was a rapist or a murderer, you

1:30:48.360 --> 1:30:51.160
<v Speaker 1>probably wouldn't continue the lunch and would want to get

1:30:51.200 --> 1:30:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the heck out of there. That's the obvious way of

1:30:55.439 --> 1:30:59.559
<v Speaker 1>separating out the degree and severity of crimes. We all

1:30:59.640 --> 1:31:02.600
<v Speaker 1>know there's a degree in severity. And I think that

1:31:02.840 --> 1:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>there's way too much celebration in our current moment from

1:31:08.120 --> 1:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats and a lot of anti Trump Republicans of

1:31:12.439 --> 1:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>people who are having their lives ruined, I mean, their

1:31:15.000 --> 1:31:20.800
<v Speaker 1>life savings wiped out for process crimes, for crimes that

1:31:21.640 --> 1:31:23.880
<v Speaker 1>are not the kind of thing that make anyone a

1:31:23.960 --> 1:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>bad person. They just make a mistake. You know, no

1:31:27.240 --> 1:31:30.559
<v Speaker 1>one's dying of a drug overdose. No one's losing their

1:31:30.640 --> 1:31:33.960
<v Speaker 1>life or their future because you know, Michael Cohen didn't

1:31:34.360 --> 1:31:36.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't pay all of his taxes to the State of

1:31:36.320 --> 1:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>New York or something. That's just not happening. And that's

1:31:39.880 --> 1:31:41.000
<v Speaker 1>not to say that he's a good guy and he

1:31:41.040 --> 1:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't pay a price. But I do think that those

1:31:44.360 --> 1:31:48.559
<v Speaker 1>who celebrate this, who take a position of glee at

1:31:48.640 --> 1:31:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the suffering of others, should be very troubled by their conduct.

1:31:53.360 --> 1:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And there's way too much of that right now with

1:31:56.000 --> 1:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>anyone associated with Trump. I mean, people are celebrating what

1:31:59.120 --> 1:32:01.519
<v Speaker 1>happened to Michael, and that happened in front of his

1:32:01.600 --> 1:32:04.439
<v Speaker 1>wife and in front of his kids, that happened in

1:32:04.560 --> 1:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>front of people who have known him. And yeah, I

1:32:07.680 --> 1:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>even love the guy. I mean I don't know him,

1:32:09.320 --> 1:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>but you know he has people who count on him

1:32:11.160 --> 1:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and love him. And he's not going to prison for

1:32:13.040 --> 1:32:16.360
<v Speaker 1>three years, which is not an insignificant amount of time.

1:32:16.960 --> 1:32:19.519
<v Speaker 1>General Flynn, do you ever think that after thirty years

1:32:19.560 --> 1:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of serving his country, being part of special operations in

1:32:23.000 --> 1:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Iraq Afghanistan at the top of the Defense Intelligence Agency,

1:32:26.680 --> 1:32:28.559
<v Speaker 1>do you think that he would be begging a court

1:32:28.680 --> 1:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>not to send him to prison, and for what exactly,

1:32:33.360 --> 1:32:38.000
<v Speaker 1>what's the crime that Flynn supposedly committed, misfremembering a phone

1:32:38.080 --> 1:32:40.960
<v Speaker 1>call that wasn't criminal in the first place, and for

1:32:41.120 --> 1:32:43.519
<v Speaker 1>that you can have your reputation on your life ruined.

1:32:44.520 --> 1:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I just ask that we all be a little contemplative

1:32:47.040 --> 1:32:51.040
<v Speaker 1>about this, and that we remember that those who run

1:32:51.120 --> 1:32:55.639
<v Speaker 1>around celebrating at the misfortune of Trump associates are, if

1:32:55.760 --> 1:33:02.040
<v Speaker 1>nothing else, completely abandoning any thing resembling a holiday spirit.

1:33:02.840 --> 1:33:04.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is a time of the year, as

1:33:04.360 --> 1:33:06.200
<v Speaker 1>we get into Christmas and we get into the New year,

1:33:06.200 --> 1:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>where you think about mercy and forgiveness, and this is

1:33:09.720 --> 1:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a country that is in need of a restoration of

1:33:13.120 --> 1:33:16.879
<v Speaker 1>those ideas. Right now. There is far too much desire

1:33:17.000 --> 1:33:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to see the other, to see your opponents destroyed, when

1:33:22.320 --> 1:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>really we should be thinking about how we can all

1:33:24.880 --> 1:33:28.559
<v Speaker 1>be better and do better for each other. So Merry

1:33:28.640 --> 1:33:31.479
<v Speaker 1>Christmas and goodwill to all, But not from the view.

1:33:31.800 --> 1:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Apparently she's back with her first public statement since the

1:33:38.479 --> 1:33:43.000
<v Speaker 1>effort to destroy Brett Cavanaugh with an avalanche of lies.

1:33:44.360 --> 1:33:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Doctor or Professor of Psychology PhD. Christine Blasi Ford is

1:33:53.040 --> 1:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>now presenting Awards for Sports Illustrated. Listen, I am honored

1:33:59.000 --> 1:34:01.519
<v Speaker 1>to speak with you from far about a woman I

1:34:01.640 --> 1:34:05.800
<v Speaker 1>admire so much, A woman who suffered abuse as a

1:34:05.920 --> 1:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable teenaged athlete, who found the courage to talk publicly

1:34:11.160 --> 1:34:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to stop the abuse of others. Her courage inspired other

1:34:15.920 --> 1:34:19.880
<v Speaker 1>survivors to end their silence, and we all know the result.

1:34:20.640 --> 1:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Rachel Den Hollander. I am in awe of you, and

1:34:24.360 --> 1:34:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I will always be inspired by you and stepping forward.

1:34:28.360 --> 1:34:32.800
<v Speaker 1>You took a huge risk, and you galvanized future generations

1:34:32.920 --> 1:34:36.879
<v Speaker 1>to come forward even when the odds are seemingly stacked

1:34:36.920 --> 1:34:42.559
<v Speaker 1>against them. Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome this year's Sports

1:34:42.640 --> 1:34:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Illustrated Inspiration of the Year, Rachel Den Hollander. Now this

1:34:48.240 --> 1:34:52.360
<v Speaker 1>situation does not surprise me at all. In fact, I

1:34:53.000 --> 1:34:55.800
<v Speaker 1>was arguing with people last summer that this is exactly

1:34:56.320 --> 1:34:59.320
<v Speaker 1>where we would be. There are a number of important

1:34:59.360 --> 1:35:03.280
<v Speaker 1>takeaways here. First of all, you will recall that it

1:35:03.520 --> 1:35:08.680
<v Speaker 1>was a widely used talking point during the effort to

1:35:08.800 --> 1:35:12.360
<v Speaker 1>destroy Brett Kavanaugh that this woman has nothing to gain.

1:35:12.520 --> 1:35:16.799
<v Speaker 1>That's what they kept saying, nothing to gain from coming forward,

1:35:17.600 --> 1:35:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and people like me on this show and elsewhere we're saying, really,

1:35:22.240 --> 1:35:25.840
<v Speaker 1>because Anita Hill had nothing to gain other than being

1:35:26.000 --> 1:35:31.240
<v Speaker 1>considered a hero for women's rights and womanhood for all eternity,

1:35:31.720 --> 1:35:36.400
<v Speaker 1>for getting speaking gigs and book deals and having movies

1:35:36.479 --> 1:35:39.120
<v Speaker 1>made about what a hero she is, I'd say that's

1:35:39.120 --> 1:35:44.639
<v Speaker 1>a lot to gain. And it was just obvious as

1:35:44.720 --> 1:35:48.120
<v Speaker 1>soon as Christina Blasi Ford came forward with this that

1:35:48.360 --> 1:35:51.960
<v Speaker 1>she was also going to benefit from the massive system

1:35:52.560 --> 1:35:58.439
<v Speaker 1>in place that's there specifically to prop up and reward

1:35:58.960 --> 1:36:02.120
<v Speaker 1>those who do the bid of the left. And now

1:36:02.160 --> 1:36:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that she's presenting awards for Sports Illustrated as well as

1:36:05.400 --> 1:36:08.519
<v Speaker 1>being considered for she was considered, I believe for Time

1:36:08.560 --> 1:36:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Magazine Person of the Year. She definitely is on Time

1:36:11.520 --> 1:36:14.120
<v Speaker 1>magazines cover for the month of December, so she's on

1:36:14.160 --> 1:36:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the cover of magazines. She is lionized. She has treated

1:36:18.040 --> 1:36:23.000
<v Speaker 1>like a hero, a truth teller when there is still

1:36:23.240 --> 1:36:25.919
<v Speaker 1>and this is where I get to the other component

1:36:26.000 --> 1:36:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of this no evidence to back up anything that she said.

1:36:29.840 --> 1:36:33.280
<v Speaker 1>In fact, what we know from the career sex crimes

1:36:33.360 --> 1:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>prosecutor who interviewed her in Congress, there would not have

1:36:38.200 --> 1:36:41.040
<v Speaker 1>even been enough based on what she had to share,

1:36:41.120 --> 1:36:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Based on the information that Christine Blasi Ford gave to

1:36:45.040 --> 1:36:51.519
<v Speaker 1>affect and arrest of Brett Kavanaugh today, never mind taking

1:36:51.600 --> 1:36:54.000
<v Speaker 1>it to this level of well, we have to believe her.

1:36:54.040 --> 1:36:55.679
<v Speaker 1>This woman has a right to be believed. I would

1:36:55.680 --> 1:36:58.640
<v Speaker 1>also note, does the woman who's accusing Keith Ellison have

1:36:58.680 --> 1:37:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a right to be believed? No, of course not. Keith

1:37:01.040 --> 1:37:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Ellison as a Democrat, and he's an African American and

1:37:03.479 --> 1:37:07.400
<v Speaker 1>he's in a different category for the left than other

1:37:07.760 --> 1:37:12.679
<v Speaker 1>guys who get accused. What about Michael Lavanatti himself? Does

1:37:12.800 --> 1:37:15.439
<v Speaker 1>his accuser of felony domestic abuse have a right to

1:37:15.520 --> 1:37:18.160
<v Speaker 1>be believed? Now? The right to be believed line only

1:37:18.200 --> 1:37:22.040
<v Speaker 1>gets trotted out when it benefits Democrats. And I would

1:37:22.080 --> 1:37:24.720
<v Speaker 1>note that none of this with Christine Lazzie Ford now

1:37:24.800 --> 1:37:27.960
<v Speaker 1>is surprising. You see what they've done is they've created

1:37:28.040 --> 1:37:32.480
<v Speaker 1>They're creating this image, this brand around her as a survivor,

1:37:32.760 --> 1:37:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and we're supposed to treat her as a survivor. When

1:37:35.960 --> 1:37:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that she was highly politically motivated to make

1:37:38.320 --> 1:37:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the allegations that she did. There's no evidence of support

1:37:41.160 --> 1:37:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the allegation that she brought forward. There are a lot

1:37:44.240 --> 1:37:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of inconsistencies and massive holes in her story. But she's

1:37:48.040 --> 1:37:52.639
<v Speaker 1>going to attach herself now to real survivors like Den Hollander,

1:37:52.720 --> 1:37:55.920
<v Speaker 1>people who were sexually abused, to a rape who are assaulted,

1:37:56.600 --> 1:38:00.400
<v Speaker 1>because in doing so, she is the spokes person for

1:38:00.479 --> 1:38:03.920
<v Speaker 1>those who are survivors. And if you call into question

1:38:04.040 --> 1:38:08.000
<v Speaker 1>her authenticity in that role, the left will of course say,

1:38:08.160 --> 1:38:12.040
<v Speaker 1>are you downplaying the people that she's speaking for. You know,

1:38:12.160 --> 1:38:16.160
<v Speaker 1>she is attaching herself to this movement and putting herself

1:38:16.320 --> 1:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>at the forefront of this movement, and what you are

1:38:19.120 --> 1:38:23.519
<v Speaker 1>seeing now is just the beginning of that effort. There's

1:38:23.560 --> 1:38:27.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be a lot more. Christine Blassie Ford is

1:38:27.280 --> 1:38:32.160
<v Speaker 1>now a left wing celebrity, and this was entirely predictable.

1:38:32.200 --> 1:38:34.040
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I predicted it. I know many of you

1:38:34.160 --> 1:38:37.759
<v Speaker 1>knew the same thing that she would be for decades

1:38:37.800 --> 1:38:41.479
<v Speaker 1>to come. Your kids will be watching movies, however, whatever

1:38:41.600 --> 1:38:44.160
<v Speaker 1>channel they watched them on. Your kids in ten or

1:38:44.240 --> 1:38:48.320
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years will be watching a movie where Christine Blassie

1:38:48.320 --> 1:38:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Ford is played by the most beautiful actress of our era,

1:38:53.080 --> 1:38:56.879
<v Speaker 1>and she's a heroine for all time, standing up against

1:38:57.280 --> 1:39:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the evil you know, rapist frat boy Brett Kavanaugh and

1:39:01.280 --> 1:39:04.120
<v Speaker 1>all the white male privilege. He said, that's what's going

1:39:04.240 --> 1:39:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to happen, and it was obvious, and we called it.

1:39:08.280 --> 1:39:09.760
<v Speaker 1>And I would just note that the people who were

1:39:09.800 --> 1:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>saying that wasn't going to happen. I think we should

1:39:12.200 --> 1:39:14.479
<v Speaker 1>be at a point now where you can say, we

1:39:14.560 --> 1:39:16.840
<v Speaker 1>don't have to listen to their opinions on these matters.

1:39:17.200 --> 1:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>They're obviously not very good analysts. Nothing to gain. They

1:39:21.080 --> 1:39:23.880
<v Speaker 1>said of Blasi Ford, that was a lie, and it

1:39:24.000 --> 1:39:26.600
<v Speaker 1>was an obvious lie. But at the time it was

1:39:26.800 --> 1:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>useful because it managed to take some of the ferocity

1:39:30.760 --> 1:39:33.400
<v Speaker 1>out of the argument that this was all a setup,

1:39:33.720 --> 1:39:36.559
<v Speaker 1>that this was all a hit, that Christine Blazzi Ford

1:39:36.680 --> 1:39:43.439
<v Speaker 1>is either a delusional, damaged person or just a vicious liar.

1:39:44.640 --> 1:39:48.800
<v Speaker 1>There's only one of two options, and she's one of them.

1:39:49.600 --> 1:39:52.759
<v Speaker 1>But they're treating her like she's a hero. Now, of course,

1:39:54.680 --> 1:40:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the show ain't over yet, folks. It's time for roll call.

1:40:04.120 --> 1:40:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Roll call is the best call, because there ain't no

1:40:06.960 --> 1:40:10.040
<v Speaker 1>call like the roll call. Facebook dot Com slash buck

1:40:10.120 --> 1:40:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Sexton and let's get right to it. Eric says buck

1:40:16.880 --> 1:40:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I found this very interesting, a body language take on

1:40:20.439 --> 1:40:26.439
<v Speaker 1>the wall discussion between Trump Pelosi, pants and Schumer. On

1:40:26.560 --> 1:40:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a side note to chime in on your best voice.

1:40:29.720 --> 1:40:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Clearly some people don't listen to the Stansbury Investor Hour

1:40:32.920 --> 1:40:37.320
<v Speaker 1>because clearly, Arianna Huffington is your best impression. L Ol.

1:40:37.560 --> 1:40:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Shields High, Darling, thank you so much for the kind wire.

1:40:41.439 --> 1:40:44.479
<v Speaker 1>It's about Arianna. She wants you to make sure that

1:40:44.640 --> 1:40:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you stretch, that you get all of your macros, and

1:40:47.760 --> 1:40:50.479
<v Speaker 1>you eat vegan and do yoga because this is all

1:40:50.560 --> 1:40:54.879
<v Speaker 1>the great CEOs of the twenty first century are very limber.

1:40:55.240 --> 1:40:59.479
<v Speaker 1>It's important to be limber. Arianna has a lot of

1:40:59.479 --> 1:41:05.400
<v Speaker 1>good advice for you. Steve right Hey, Buck outstanding show

1:41:05.479 --> 1:41:10.200
<v Speaker 1>as usual, Well, Steve, outstanding message as usual. Just catch

1:41:10.240 --> 1:41:12.599
<v Speaker 1>a gump on Wednesday's podcast. I love the guests today,

1:41:12.680 --> 1:41:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Andy McCarthy, Louie Gomert. A thought just occurred to me.

1:41:16.560 --> 1:41:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Is it possible for the President to direct the Army

1:41:19.439 --> 1:41:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Corps of Engineer Engineers to inspect and document the entire

1:41:23.600 --> 1:41:26.160
<v Speaker 1>southern border wall? Just seems like that would be a

1:41:26.240 --> 1:41:29.439
<v Speaker 1>great start with notations of weak spots along the border.

1:41:29.600 --> 1:41:34.240
<v Speaker 1>As always, love the show, Shields way High, Well, Steve,

1:41:34.640 --> 1:41:36.080
<v Speaker 1>it would be a good idea. I think that the

1:41:36.200 --> 1:41:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Army Corps of Engineers check out the border at Also,

1:41:39.720 --> 1:41:41.800
<v Speaker 1>we'd have to keep in mind that much of the

1:41:41.840 --> 1:41:44.200
<v Speaker 1>border doesn't have any wall or any fencing, So, you know,

1:41:44.240 --> 1:41:46.120
<v Speaker 1>we got we gotta be clear on that one, right,

1:41:46.200 --> 1:41:50.639
<v Speaker 1>there's most of the border is not in fact covered

1:41:50.680 --> 1:41:54.679
<v Speaker 1>by a fence or wall of any kind. And as

1:41:54.720 --> 1:41:56.479
<v Speaker 1>to how quickly it could happen, keep in mind that

1:41:56.560 --> 1:41:58.200
<v Speaker 1>there are some areas of the border where it's very

1:41:58.280 --> 1:42:02.120
<v Speaker 1>hard to cross. Regardless, there's some places where there's already

1:42:02.160 --> 1:42:04.559
<v Speaker 1>a natural barrier, or you're just going through a lot

1:42:04.600 --> 1:42:07.479
<v Speaker 1>of desert, and they have in place, you know, sensors

1:42:07.520 --> 1:42:09.840
<v Speaker 1>in border patrol in some ways of trying to catch you.

1:42:10.800 --> 1:42:12.920
<v Speaker 1>But there are other areas that are most highly trafficked.

1:42:12.960 --> 1:42:16.799
<v Speaker 1>So you would start with the most highly trafficked areas

1:42:16.920 --> 1:42:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of the border, and then you would make your way

1:42:20.600 --> 1:42:24.920
<v Speaker 1>from that to the lesser trafficked areas of the border.

1:42:25.360 --> 1:42:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean. Representative Jim Jordan, for example, shared the following

1:42:29.240 --> 1:42:33.320
<v Speaker 1>facts via Twitter yesterday. Walls work, These facts don't lie.

1:42:33.920 --> 1:42:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Israel illegal immigration down ninety nine percent, San Diego sector

1:42:38.240 --> 1:42:41.679
<v Speaker 1>of hard order down ninety two percent, El Paso down

1:42:41.840 --> 1:42:47.120
<v Speaker 1>ninety five, Tucson down ninety percent, Yuma down ninety five percent.

1:42:47.479 --> 1:42:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's build the border security wall. I have yet to

1:42:50.560 --> 1:42:54.800
<v Speaker 1>hear a serious counter argument to this. I've yet to

1:42:54.880 --> 1:42:57.960
<v Speaker 1>hear people say anything in terms of an argument other

1:42:58.040 --> 1:43:01.760
<v Speaker 1>than just well, don't work while don't work. Well, you

1:43:01.840 --> 1:43:04.360
<v Speaker 1>can chant it and you can yell at libs, but

1:43:04.520 --> 1:43:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that does not make it true. So there you have it.

1:43:11.479 --> 1:43:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Adamola Adaramola, Yeah, Adaramola writes, Hi, how is you well? Adamola?

1:43:21.400 --> 1:43:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you're a bot or a computer program from

1:43:24.200 --> 1:43:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a foreign country that is trying to engage me in

1:43:26.800 --> 1:43:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a Facebook discussion. So I will just write back to you,

1:43:29.800 --> 1:43:33.759
<v Speaker 1>I is fine, and please take me to your leader

1:43:34.000 --> 1:43:36.600
<v Speaker 1>because you're a bot, because you're not actually somebody I

1:43:36.640 --> 1:43:39.639
<v Speaker 1>think who listens to the show. That is my guess.

1:43:40.520 --> 1:43:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I've had plenty, plenty of boats, unfortunately, get into the Facebook.

1:43:43.160 --> 1:43:45.479
<v Speaker 1>But it's sometimes kind of funny because in real time

1:43:45.520 --> 1:43:47.439
<v Speaker 1>I read them and I go, oh, that's a bot.

1:43:48.400 --> 1:43:53.120
<v Speaker 1>James writes, he sent me a link, so that's not

1:43:53.200 --> 1:43:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a good one. Andrea writes, for your mom, I show

1:43:56.800 --> 1:43:59.600
<v Speaker 1>this to every class I teach. It's Swan Lake but

1:43:59.720 --> 1:44:05.599
<v Speaker 1>with acrobatic twist, and it's Great Chinese State Circus Swan Lake, Andrea,

1:44:05.680 --> 1:44:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I will send that to my mom. You apparently listen

1:44:08.200 --> 1:44:11.639
<v Speaker 1>to the show very very closely, because yes, my mom

1:44:11.840 --> 1:44:15.840
<v Speaker 1>was a professional ballet not belly some of you heard

1:44:15.880 --> 1:44:21.800
<v Speaker 1>me say belly ballet dancer with American Ballet Theater, one

1:44:21.840 --> 1:44:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of the premier, if not the premier ballet companies in

1:44:25.479 --> 1:44:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the country. That was some time ago, and since then

1:44:29.000 --> 1:44:31.640
<v Speaker 1>she's just been the greatest mom in the country. But

1:44:31.720 --> 1:44:35.519
<v Speaker 1>I will certainly send this link on over to her.

1:44:37.320 --> 1:44:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's see here, Rachel writes, Buck, with everything you talked

1:44:41.760 --> 1:44:45.000
<v Speaker 1>about with Andy McCarthy tonight pretending to Flynn, it just

1:44:45.200 --> 1:44:49.120
<v Speaker 1>seems like they were trying to entrap him. I'm no

1:44:49.320 --> 1:44:51.680
<v Speaker 1>lawyer and may not know the parameters of entrapment. Can

1:44:51.720 --> 1:44:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you explain why this is not an issue? No, Rachel,

1:44:55.120 --> 1:44:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right. In fact, the Wall Street Journal

1:44:58.040 --> 1:45:02.240
<v Speaker 1>editorial the Flynn in Trap pretty much says it they

1:45:02.840 --> 1:45:05.160
<v Speaker 1>they were trying to get this guy. They were not

1:45:05.600 --> 1:45:09.080
<v Speaker 1>doing this in good faith to have a discussion. Look

1:45:09.160 --> 1:45:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that there are two pretexts that they used to try

1:45:13.080 --> 1:45:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and get to excuse sending over what was essentially a

1:45:17.400 --> 1:45:20.759
<v Speaker 1>criminal probe to speak to the incoming national security advisor

1:45:20.800 --> 1:45:22.479
<v Speaker 1>and make sure that it seemed like it was no

1:45:22.600 --> 1:45:26.000
<v Speaker 1>big deal so he wouldn't have a lawyer. There. One

1:45:26.120 --> 1:45:29.800
<v Speaker 1>is the Logan Act, which is preposterous. You're going to

1:45:29.960 --> 1:45:35.640
<v Speaker 1>charge an incoming national security advisor with a law that

1:45:35.760 --> 1:45:38.080
<v Speaker 1>has never in the history of the United States sent

1:45:38.160 --> 1:45:41.200
<v Speaker 1>anyone to prison. I think one time a charge is

1:45:41.240 --> 1:45:43.479
<v Speaker 1>brought under the Logan Act and the person was found

1:45:43.560 --> 1:45:46.400
<v Speaker 1>not guilty, and it was in the nineteenth century. Okay,

1:45:46.640 --> 1:45:50.920
<v Speaker 1>this is ridiculous, And the fact that people in the

1:45:50.960 --> 1:45:52.920
<v Speaker 1>government would even bring it up just goes to show

1:45:52.960 --> 1:45:55.960
<v Speaker 1>you they're desperate to find some excuse for this. And

1:45:56.040 --> 1:45:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the other one is this notion of a counterintelligence threat

1:46:00.080 --> 1:46:04.080
<v Speaker 1>or a blackmail threat to Flynn. Essentially that the Russians

1:46:04.240 --> 1:46:08.160
<v Speaker 1>could have said, will you must tell us everything you'll

1:46:08.160 --> 1:46:11.360
<v Speaker 1>know about all the secrets, because otherwise we will tell

1:46:11.479 --> 1:46:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the American people that you told them something not true

1:46:15.840 --> 1:46:22.080
<v Speaker 1>about an unimportant conversation with Giseliek. Guess what nobody would

1:46:22.080 --> 1:46:25.040
<v Speaker 1>care if Flynn could just say, whatever I tell people,

1:46:25.040 --> 1:46:28.439
<v Speaker 1>I misremembered it wasn't an important conversation. You know. If

1:46:28.720 --> 1:46:30.640
<v Speaker 1>if let me put it, you this way, if the

1:46:30.720 --> 1:46:34.120
<v Speaker 1>incoming National Security advisor, if General Flynn had a conversation

1:46:34.200 --> 1:46:38.720
<v Speaker 1>with the Russians in which he said I had I

1:46:38.840 --> 1:46:41.439
<v Speaker 1>had corn flakes for breakfast yesterday, and in fact he

1:46:41.600 --> 1:46:47.240
<v Speaker 1>had Coco puffs. You know, technically that's not true. Nobody

1:46:47.280 --> 1:46:50.559
<v Speaker 1>would care, though, So the Russians don't have something on him.

1:46:50.880 --> 1:46:53.759
<v Speaker 1>There's no criminal act him speaking to them about foreign

1:46:53.800 --> 1:46:56.960
<v Speaker 1>policy at policy was not criminal, Okay, the whole idea.

1:46:57.000 --> 1:47:00.599
<v Speaker 1>And Sally Yates, who I think escapes way way more

1:47:00.640 --> 1:47:03.120
<v Speaker 1>easily from the blame here than she should in terms

1:47:03.160 --> 1:47:05.200
<v Speaker 1>of the public recognition of her role in this. She

1:47:05.360 --> 1:47:06.800
<v Speaker 1>was one of these people is pushing this. Look she's

1:47:06.800 --> 1:47:11.439
<v Speaker 1>a little Democrat, a little hall monitor democrat statist who

1:47:11.800 --> 1:47:14.639
<v Speaker 1>didn't like Trump, didn't like his people, and had devoted

1:47:14.720 --> 1:47:17.720
<v Speaker 1>her whole life to being a little DOJ bureaucrat, and

1:47:18.200 --> 1:47:20.479
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to find a way to get these guys,

1:47:20.560 --> 1:47:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and she did. And she remember she's the one who

1:47:22.880 --> 1:47:27.519
<v Speaker 1>also wouldn't wouldn't execute the order that Trump gave when

1:47:27.600 --> 1:47:29.720
<v Speaker 1>she was acting attorney general. I mean, the fact that

1:47:29.800 --> 1:47:32.839
<v Speaker 1>that woman was acting attorney general should be jaw dropping

1:47:32.880 --> 1:47:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to people. Look at these individuals at the top of

1:47:36.080 --> 1:47:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the DOJ, top of FBI. Look at this, Komi, McCabe, Yates, Struck.

1:47:42.960 --> 1:47:48.320
<v Speaker 1>These people are acting terribly, terribly when it comes to

1:47:48.600 --> 1:47:51.800
<v Speaker 1>their abuse of power and the use of their discretion.

1:47:51.880 --> 1:47:54.799
<v Speaker 1>And these are the most important people to Dogen the FBI.

1:47:55.280 --> 1:47:57.360
<v Speaker 1>These aren't just random people that we tried it out

1:47:57.400 --> 1:48:00.720
<v Speaker 1>from nowhere. They were the ones running these investigations. They

1:48:00.760 --> 1:48:05.439
<v Speaker 1>were the ones making these decisions. They're terrible. I really

1:48:05.520 --> 1:48:09.760
<v Speaker 1>betrayed the public trust and they're partisans and because they're

1:48:09.760 --> 1:48:12.880
<v Speaker 1>not honest about that fact, they're also liars and what

1:48:12.960 --> 1:48:15.640
<v Speaker 1>they're doing is dishonest and they're destroying people. I have

1:48:15.800 --> 1:48:19.800
<v Speaker 1>no respect none for Yates, for Komy, for Struck from

1:48:19.840 --> 1:48:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a cabe. These people have profaned the institutions that they

1:48:25.920 --> 1:48:30.680
<v Speaker 1>supposedly represented and worked for. Diane writes, Buck, thanks for

1:48:30.800 --> 1:48:32.760
<v Speaker 1>enlightening all of us in the hut. Are the Pelosian

1:48:32.800 --> 1:48:37.519
<v Speaker 1>Schumer homes surrounded by fences or more importantly walls. If so,

1:48:37.960 --> 1:48:41.320
<v Speaker 1>why I literally don't see either of them capable of

1:48:41.439 --> 1:48:44.080
<v Speaker 1>delivering policy beyond do as I say and not as

1:48:44.160 --> 1:48:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I do shield Hie Diane, Yeah, walls obviously work, and

1:48:48.920 --> 1:48:52.880
<v Speaker 1>this idea that walls don't work is just preposterous, and

1:48:53.120 --> 1:48:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's really it's embarrassing that people even say this.

1:48:56.920 --> 1:48:59.120
<v Speaker 1>It's so stupid. But it's just one of these It's

1:48:59.120 --> 1:49:01.680
<v Speaker 1>like saying we're a nation of immigrants. No, we're not.

1:49:02.520 --> 1:49:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Most of us were born here. We're not a nation

1:49:04.479 --> 1:49:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of immigrants. This is just not true. I mean, and

1:49:07.960 --> 1:49:09.800
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna say, well, over the course of our history,

1:49:09.840 --> 1:49:12.080
<v Speaker 1>well then all nations are nations of immigrants. People come

1:49:12.120 --> 1:49:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and go, there are migrations. I mean, it's just a

1:49:14.360 --> 1:49:17.160
<v Speaker 1>stupid thing that people say, or that immigrants do the

1:49:17.280 --> 1:49:22.160
<v Speaker 1>jobs Americans won't do well. Americans would do any job

1:49:22.320 --> 1:49:24.800
<v Speaker 1>if the pay was right, pretty much any legal, you know,

1:49:24.960 --> 1:49:27.559
<v Speaker 1>decent job that where the pay was right. But if

1:49:27.600 --> 1:49:31.400
<v Speaker 1>you bring in low wage, low skilled workers to undercut

1:49:31.479 --> 1:49:33.599
<v Speaker 1>which you're gonna pay Americans and by the way, pay

1:49:33.640 --> 1:49:35.840
<v Speaker 1>them off the books, then yeah, they won't do those jobs.

1:49:38.160 --> 1:49:40.960
<v Speaker 1>As to the walls, I mean, this is it's just stupid.

1:49:41.080 --> 1:49:43.920
<v Speaker 1>It's just not a smart, it's not an intelligent position

1:49:44.000 --> 1:49:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that the Left holds on this. But you know, they

1:49:46.160 --> 1:49:48.080
<v Speaker 1>managed to get away with it, and you know they're

1:49:48.160 --> 1:49:50.200
<v Speaker 1>they're a slippery bunch on the left, so we got

1:49:50.280 --> 1:49:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to hold them to account. Eric I am not Oss,

1:49:54.240 --> 1:49:56.800
<v Speaker 1>but became impressed with you on Real News on the

1:49:56.880 --> 1:49:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Blaze TV and have been following you since those days. WHOA, thanks, Eric,

1:50:00.439 --> 1:50:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I figured out some aspects of the Facebook algorithm.

1:50:03.320 --> 1:50:05.599
<v Speaker 1>The more people interact with posts on a Facebook page,

1:50:05.600 --> 1:50:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the more people will see it. So if people see

1:50:07.960 --> 1:50:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a post and feel the message is important, they need

1:50:10.040 --> 1:50:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to like and post and add comments this more people.

1:50:13.000 --> 1:50:15.000
<v Speaker 1>The more people do this, the more eyeballs will see it.

1:50:15.120 --> 1:50:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Shields high well. Eric, I can tell you that you

1:50:17.880 --> 1:50:21.599
<v Speaker 1>are correct and that interactions with a Facebook post are

1:50:21.640 --> 1:50:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a very important component of that Facebook post having reach

1:50:26.240 --> 1:50:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know, shares comments like so for those of

1:50:29.200 --> 1:50:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you who see things that I post, and also when

1:50:32.360 --> 1:50:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you talk to each other on posts on Facebook, that

1:50:35.280 --> 1:50:38.360
<v Speaker 1>helps us get the message out. And if you're listening

1:50:38.400 --> 1:50:40.400
<v Speaker 1>to the show and you have not already, please do

1:50:40.520 --> 1:50:43.400
<v Speaker 1>follow our Facebook page Facebook dot com slash Buck Sexton.

1:50:43.720 --> 1:50:45.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a way to communicate with all of you. You

1:50:45.280 --> 1:50:47.519
<v Speaker 1>can send me messages. I post there as often as

1:50:47.560 --> 1:50:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I can, and it's a kind of a central gathering

1:50:50.240 --> 1:50:54.240
<v Speaker 1>point for many members of Team Buck that is going

1:50:54.280 --> 1:50:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to be how we close it out today, Excited for

1:50:56.360 --> 1:50:59.840
<v Speaker 1>little Freestyle Friday tomorrow. Until then you have your orders

1:51:00.560 --> 1:51:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Shields high Sni double Py, My friends. Snippy dot com.

1:51:07.720 --> 1:51:10.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the new social media site you've heard me

1:51:10.280 --> 1:51:13.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about here on the show. I just was posting yesterday.

1:51:13.120 --> 1:51:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna post later today too. Snippy dot com is

1:51:15.960 --> 1:51:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a place where you can have unfettered, unrestricted conversation and

1:51:20.160 --> 1:51:22.960
<v Speaker 1>don't have to worry about anti conservative bias. Thousands of

1:51:23.040 --> 1:51:25.800
<v Speaker 1>my listeners have joined snippy dot com. They're expressing their

1:51:25.880 --> 1:51:28.640
<v Speaker 1>opinions and stirring up lively conversations. You know, if you

1:51:28.680 --> 1:51:30.720
<v Speaker 1>look at snippy dot com a few months ago, you

1:51:30.800 --> 1:51:32.639
<v Speaker 1>need to go back and check it out again because

1:51:32.680 --> 1:51:35.560
<v Speaker 1>they've done all kinds of awesome updates and if you

1:51:35.680 --> 1:51:38.679
<v Speaker 1>care about politics, sports, current events, food, fashion, really anything,

1:51:38.960 --> 1:51:42.519
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna find a lively chat on snippy dot com.

1:51:43.120 --> 1:51:46.800
<v Speaker 1>No shadow banning, no suppression of conservative thought ever. And

1:51:46.840 --> 1:51:50.200
<v Speaker 1>they've got an updated user interface and exciting new features too.

1:51:50.280 --> 1:51:53.000
<v Speaker 1>It's available in the Apple App Store and for Android.

1:51:53.560 --> 1:51:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Snippy dot com free to join, folks. This is a

1:51:57.520 --> 1:51:59.559
<v Speaker 1>free product I'm telling you about here. Just go check

1:51:59.600 --> 1:52:02.640
<v Speaker 1>it out. Snippy dot com s n i p p

1:52:03.040 --> 1:52:03.080
<v Speaker 1>y