WEBVTT - Markets, Ukraine, And Crypto (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Katarina Simonetti, Senior vice

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>president Private wealth adviser at Morgan Stanley, joins us. Katarina,

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>on a day like today, give me an example of

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the incoming phone calls you've received from your

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>clients today. Well, thank you for having me on the show.

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>You know, it certainly has been, you know, a difficult

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>year for investors, and you know specifically this day, and

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the type of phone calls we would receive

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>on the day like today would be focused on the

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 1>fact that investors are getting uncomfortable um with the stocks

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and bonds that they own, and they might understand that

0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the quality of their portfolio is really high and there

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>really welcal asitions, but we are all human beings and

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard to manage through the sphere, and we

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>tell our our clients all the time, over and over

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and over again to focus on the long term. But

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you see returns on the day like today and you

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>know what we're so during the previous week and in combination,

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>is getting progressively difficult for them to focus on that

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>long term, to have that big picture you know, in

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>mind and in our review. The only thing that we

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>can do at the moment is go back to basis,

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>go back to all the work that was done through

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the portfolio construction on making sure that the portfolio quality

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>is really high on the income generation, to in quality

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of the portfolio only asset allocation between stocks and bonds,

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and also internationally because surprisingly many when we look at

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the returns and the European markets in general, um, you

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>know they're not you know, quite quite as bad as

0:01:57.320 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>good which seemed here in the US, making our case

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>for at allocation, but investors are concerned in the scary time. Sorry,

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we haven't seen Katerina true capitulation. And

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's necessary, but it seems to

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>be something that a lot of people want. Right now.

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>The VIX is at thirty three, but it's taken so

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>long for to get there. This sell off seems fairly orderly.

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:27.679
<v Speaker 1>What what what do you think we need to see? Well,

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:31.399
<v Speaker 1>bottoms are hard to printict to begin with, and the

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:36.799
<v Speaker 1>market is getting to the the the range that we

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly have expected. You know, we thought that on

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the lower side we could see anywhere from uh thirty

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>four hundred to thirty eight hundred. We're at thirty seven

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:51.239
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine at the moment. And it's not used to

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>anyone that we are in the bare market and you know,

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the rallies that we have been seeing. The one of

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the big things to keep in mind is that, you know,

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the bear market rallies, which is totally normal during the

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>bear markets, and we have to um analyze the data

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:11.639
<v Speaker 1>that is coming in and you know see really the

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the path out of this bear market, which we quite

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>frankly think is not going to last too long. We

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 1>think that with all of the earnings revisions to the negative,

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>eventually as we get through the force and force and

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a third and forced quarter of earning reports, we're going

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to get some positive news and maybe get get this

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>catalyst that we need to get for the third and

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter. You think we need to get through the

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>second half of the year. That's what we think. Yes,

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>we think that that we're here. But but but at

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the same time, you know, here's a little bit of

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a positivity means as difficult asitors to you know, focus

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>on it. Right now, our up range for the year

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>is forty two hundred to three hundred because as the inflation,

0:03:57.640 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, get get somewhat out of control and as

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>tu more confidence in pools a little bit and we

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>start seeing the end of this earnings revision cycles and

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>companies get into in position where the earnings are normal.

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>We're looking for that general market normalization. You know that

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that is you know, difficult to achieve. We just have

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>been through this COVID environment. There's UM, a war in um,

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you know in Ukraine. That as the geo political risk.

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>But the biggest thing is that consumer confidence is at

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the all time low. I mean, we have not seen

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the numbers at the quite frankly at the levels that

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>they are today. And the big part of it is

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the price of blowing gases. Inflation is you know, just

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:43.679
<v Speaker 1>just the day to day. But at the same time,

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:46.679
<v Speaker 1>in our view, market cycles are getting hotter but shorter,

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and we even though the but we totally appreciate the

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:54.840
<v Speaker 1>possibility of the recession, thinks that it's not you deal

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that you know, it might be on the horizon, but

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>it also is not something that is a sure thing,

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>all right in terms of kind of getting a sense

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of are we seeing capitulation. I have an SMP that's

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>off three point three percent this morning. I look at

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 1>the w e I function on the Bloomberg terminal and

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I see the volume so far this morning is thirty

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 1>three above the thirty day average so far today. So

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that's a little bit of something to pay attention to. Katerina,

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>when when you talk to clients and they say, I

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>think this is the bomb. I want to buy some stuff,

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to put some money to work. Are there

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>any sectors today that you feel comfortable with? Absolutely? They

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>are all these sectors that would do better than others,

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, in this type of environment. In all of

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you the data point the re focus on is inflation

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 1>and that it might be peaking. Actually so so the

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>sectors that dwell in this environment are utilities, healthcare, real estate,

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>UH and consumer stables. And consumer stables is the you know,

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a little tricky because there is a price pressure

0:05:57.600 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>there you know, but but we think that this is

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the after that that those Hubert defensive sectors, you know,

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that are positions well in this environment. But you know,

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>speaking about inflation, even though we think that inflation might

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>be declining, um, we think it's seemed to be higher

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>than just stored at a level. So we always view

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 1>portfolio through the prism of income. All right, Katerina, great,

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 1>great stuff. As always, always appreciate getting your perspective. Katerina Semonetti,

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Senior vice president, a private wealth advisor at Morgan Stanley

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>talking to her clients today, holding some hands today snp

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>off three point. Let's get to our next guest, Matt,

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>because I don't know what this guy does. Chris Campbell.

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>He's a chief strategist for Kroll. I know Kroll as

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>like the security people, right, yes, okay, but before joining Kroll,

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>he actually had a real job. He was a former

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>assistant secretary from the U. S. Department of Treasury. Chris,

0:06:54.000 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>what does a assistant secretary for the U S? N correct? Like,

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 1>what did you do for like day to day? What

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>did you do? Yes, it was it was a very

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>busy time seventeen and eighteen. We uh, you know, we

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>had reregulation of Dodd frank And and Starman's Oxley and

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>tax performers underway, and so many other things, cyper security

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, it's a great variety of things.

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>There's no question it was. It was very difficult time,

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>amazing time, but also I you know, as I like

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to point out, there was good economic time as well.

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>The country was doing pretty well at that time. What

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, it wasn't that difficult about how

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>about being the assistant treasure secretary. Now, you know, I

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>have got a lot of respect for my friends at

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Treasury and I wished them a lot very well. So

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you also interacted with FED chair J. Pal Um during

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that time through you know, various type types of meaning

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>what do you expect to hear from our Federal Reserve

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>chairman this week? I mean it is it's ugly out there.

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>As it relates to inflation, yeah, there's no question. Like

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I've been saying for a long time

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the inflation was unfortunate, not gonna be transitory, and unfortunately

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I was right. Um. You know, I have great respect

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>for cham pale Um, and I mean you guys basically

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>put him in there right we did was through February.

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, he came in and under the Trump administration, uh,

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, and was renominated by President Biden. Um, look

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>at it's and confirmed. You know it's it's a It's

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a very difficult job. There's no question about it. Uh.

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Chairman Powell is a consensus chairman, always has been. I

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>think one thing I always say it's great about him

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>as he's able to talk about the economy in ways

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that it's really approachable and kind of democratizes the way,

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, otherwise very very unapproachable topics. But he has

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly difficult job, and I believe unfortunately he's this

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>move too slow. Um. So I think that uh, he's

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:49.599
<v Speaker 1>now faced with an impossible set of of of challenges

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and um, he's either gonna have to choose to precimpitly

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>raise rates or and drive the economy in the in

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the tank, or live with inflation and the and the

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>really difficult things that are going to happen with that. Now.

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I just wondered, like, how does a failed to reserve

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>board some smart people there, led by j Pal, how

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>do they fall behind the curve? They do their best

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>on economic forecasting. Um, you know I can Sherman Pal's

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>uh approach to the FED is he's he's most he's

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.559
<v Speaker 1>really a consensus builder, and he's a consensus guy. He's

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>very even keel um and uh, you know that approach

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:30.119
<v Speaker 1>would in almost every other circumstance would work. But this unfortunate.

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Right now, this is a word a time where I

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>think inflation is just you know, it got away from them.

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>They forecasted inappropriately, unfortunately, and now there's a real challenge

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>ahead and they're gonna have to find ways of either

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>shocking the system by raising rates precipitously, um, because there's

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>so much outside of their control, supply chains, um, you know, Russia, UM, China, uh,

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of regulation and I mean I was gonna just

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>point out that it's not all about the FED. I

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>know that. Um. There was there were a few days

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple weeks ago when the administration wanted us to

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:07.119
<v Speaker 1>believe that the FED was solely responsible for inflation or deflation,

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>like passing the buck. But obviously there are other things.

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>If you spend five trillion dollars in a year, if

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you um, you know, try and regulate oil companies out

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:22.439
<v Speaker 1>of existence, then you're gonna have some, um, some some

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:24.559
<v Speaker 1>some feedback from that. Right. All I can tell is

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you're a very smart guy. No, there's like, there's no question.

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean I got you know, from my advantage point,

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Congress and passed and spent way too much money. Um.

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, there was some of that that's really necessary.

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>That the government came in a shutdown the economy, so

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>there was there was a real challenge there for a while.

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>But that we Congress certainly overspent um and both on

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the fiscal and monitary side and quantity of using and

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>it continued for so long, and so there you know,

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>on both sides of the of the equation are to

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>blame here um, And now we're in significant debt. What

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 1>one thing is not talked about is that you know

0:10:56.600 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that again the impossible challenge of raising a just rates

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.239
<v Speaker 1>is also going to make the fiscal side almost impossible

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>because now most of us are THEAXX period dollars that

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be collected are going to be spent on

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>servicing our nation's debt. And doesn't seem like people talk

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>about fiscal solution or a policy solution to this. We

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>only talk about what can the Fed do? And I appreciate.

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>That's fun for us. We talked about the FED all

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>day long. Um. But there the difficulty is in Washington

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>as well. Right, they can't come in and just cut

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:34.959
<v Speaker 1>taxes and um, well they can't do anything stimulative, right,

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise that risks boosting inflation even further. Yeah, Like, I mean,

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>they're they're gonna I know, I know my friends and Washington,

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I've worked with them a long time. They're gonna want

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to spend more money, There's no question. And as the

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>economy continues to degrade, they're gonna want to provide assistance

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to families, and so it's gonna be a great pressure

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>on them to spend more money. You know. But fast

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>forward to November, likely is going to be a divided government. Um.

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>And really in those situations, if there is a willingness um,

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the president being democratic, perhaps the Congress being

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Republican at that time, there could be a bigger solution

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that we we could be we could be seeing. But

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:12.199
<v Speaker 1>until then, I see nothing happening in Washington. DC is

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:15.959
<v Speaker 1>really broken. Yeah, I guess, Chris, how about a recession?

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Is that something that you're talking to your clients about

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is a real risk and if so, when, maybe so,

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:24.439
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna happen sooner rather than later. Um.

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, even again, I'm talking about before. The FAT

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>has an impossible set of choices ahead of them. But

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the choices they have, and likely the choices

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna take, is a is a participitous increase in

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>in interest rates that is for sure going to lead

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 1>to us at recession. And I like to say, Um,

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>there's about half of our country who live paycheck to paycheck,

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and so if we go into recessionary times and if

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>we can't get inflation under control, we're in stiflation. That

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:51.319
<v Speaker 1>means that the majority of our our our fellow Americans,

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna be able to afford food and gas

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and clothing. That's gonna be a real challenge. It's gonna,

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, put socio economic pressure, economic pressure and everything

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>else absent what the markets are going through. So what

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>do you expect from the FED on Wednesday and the

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:08.320
<v Speaker 1>next few meetings. I think they're going to have to

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>start shocking um. And it's it's uncharacteristic of Cherman Powell

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:14.079
<v Speaker 1>and this FED, but I just can't see him doing

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>it right. You can't see him coming out in surprising markets.

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>So now as we ratchet up expectations for seventy five,

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna have to do a hundred like I like,

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I just I think he's gonna have to go beyond

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty um do something. I don't think he's you know

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that the German pal is not Paul Wolkers. It's not

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:31.439
<v Speaker 1>going to follow that path. But I think he has

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to do some things that are that are going to

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>be uncharacteristic of him and what the markets don't expect

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 1>in order to do something that's going to get inflation

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>under control. Chris, good stuff, man, good stuff. You're coming back.

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 1>By by the way, we just kind of did a

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>little vote. You're gonna come back. You're pretty good, guess.

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Chris Campbell, chief strategist for Cool. We like to talk

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>about education. Two NBA from the Thunderbird School of Global Management.

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I love that, uh, and then a bachelors from the

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>University of California at Santa Barbara. I think students should

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 1>pay the state of California to go to Santa But

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that's how beautiful do Santa Barbara is mean, I know,

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:07.679
<v Speaker 1>but they should pay more because they're literally on the

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.079
<v Speaker 1>beach and one of the most beautiful spots in the country.

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Good stuff there. Let's switch gears a little bit talk

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>geo politics, and there's absolutely no one better to do

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that with than Jack Divine. He's a founding partner and

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>president of the ark And Group. Awesome. We're talking a

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty two year veteran of the c I, a former

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>acting CIA Director of Operations, and headed CIA's Afghan Task

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Force from five to eighty seven. Remember kids, that was

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>when the Soviets were there. Jack. You know you're also

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the author of a book that I read last year,

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Spymaster's Prison to Fight Against Russian Aggression. Good stuff. I

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>highly recommend it. I cannot really fathom how much President

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Putin has miscalculated, seemingly in Ukraine. What do you make

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of the whole situation here over the last four months. Well,

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you're the only one surprised. I mean,

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure he is UH and his intelligence with salty

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and there's no question about it. The key question was

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>whether or not the Ukrainians would fight, and I think

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>he grossly underestimated that because of the relatively little resistancy

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>UH faced in fourteen when he went into the Crimea

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and the thumb buss. So I think he thought he

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>had a cake walk, and I think he's surprised by

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>his own army. I think he thought he had a

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>drugger army. Is he's invested in high end weaponry but

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't look at the basic blocking and tackling of logistics

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and those things that made you to seas As Grant

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>win the civil war. Alright, so he's made some mistakes.

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>But how is this likely to play out? How Jack,

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>do you expect this to end? Well, I think everybody thought,

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's get Zelisio on a plane before it's

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>too late. And this is in the first couple of weeks,

0:15:56.760 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 1>but it quickly became clear that's what we're talk about

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a second ago, that the army and its structure this week,

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>So the Russians basically got put pushed back. Now, I

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>think you're at a point where the Russians are using

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>heavier artillery and so on, and they're making slow but

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>steady progress, but it is slow and bloody. I also

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>think there's a catch up here. I think as the

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>artillery has arrived through the uh for the Ukrainians, they're

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be pushing back again. So you're going to

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>see more counter pushing in somewhere not too far out,

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I would say, before before the end of the year,

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>if not Thanksgiving. You're going to find somewhat of a

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>stalemate where they can make some gains and then they

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>pushed back. Ukrainians make gains and they get pushed back.

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>We haven't reached that point and there, but it will arrive,

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and that because the Russians cannot win over the occupy

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the Ukraine and Ukrainians unfortunately won't be able to reoccupy

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>all of the suratory without significant cause. So I think

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>we're probably looking very soon to the stalemate where everyone

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>was going to feel that this is going to be

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.159
<v Speaker 1>a battle as far as it goes. There will may

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>not be a negotiated settlement both sites made. Just lower

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the firing level and it will go on like it

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 1>has Pointing four team. But we're looking now, I think

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>it closely where the standoff will be. All right, Well,

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>that's it's obviously a tragedy in so many ways, but

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I love to get your your take on that. Jack.

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Let me also ask you what you think about what

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing in this country and the market fallout from

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that inflation at eight point six percent, the highest since

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the early eighties, the markets really tanking for the third

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 1>day in a row. You're speaking, I believe you're speaking

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>at the S three Air conference at the New York

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Stock Exchange. It's a company on whose board you serve

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and has become really noted in the financial industry for

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>it's short data. What are you talking about out there, Well,

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>we already get the experts that are at the Summer

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that address that. I'm more of a military political analysts,

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 1>but I would say, frankly, if we're looking in the

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>context of the Ukraine, it's it's there's a cost here,

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:20.919
<v Speaker 1>we're paying that cost. But some are the some are

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the Russians. But there are overarching issues in the economy

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 1>that I think many many experts on your show understand.

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, where are we going to go with the

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>interest rates? And I think be enabled to monitor various

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>um UH variables rather as UH as the Street Group does,

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 1>enable analysts to have a better handle on the speed

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 1>in which variations are taking place. If you want to

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>gut reaction. My own gut reaction is the platon is

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be with us a while an interest increased

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>interest rates are coming down down the road, and it's

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 1>any going to be a difficult year, not only for

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 1>the United States, not only for Russia Ukraine, but probably

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>probably worldwide, including the Chinese. Hey Jack, you just mentioned

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese. I wonder what they're the Chinese. What do

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 1>you think China is taking away from what's happening in

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine as it relates as Taiwan. So here we're seeing

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of static and and chest speeding uh and

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>from China right now about they'll they'll go to the

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 1>last man to preserve there are countries as if we

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>were going to attack. My senses, they looked carefully, very carefully,

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>what is happening to the Russians? And I think they're

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 1>asking itself, we don't want to make the mistakes Putin

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:43.919
<v Speaker 1>made that looking at Taiwan, attacking an island, by the way,

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:45.719
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you a much more difficult thing than

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the land work, and looking at the cost of the

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Russians now paying and the cost that they would pay,

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and it would throw off their economic game immensely. My

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>honest opinion is that I think when they looked at it,

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 1>whatever they they had in their mind, a lot of

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 1>people talked about. But my my view is it's pushed

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>off to an indefinite period. I think they need they're

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 1>more concerned about solidifying or economic and power in the region. Uh,

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:18.360
<v Speaker 1>but a war would totally disrupt their economy, totally disrupt

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>their placed in the world. So I think that's it's

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>further off and a lot can happen between and many

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 1>of the military and trying to think they need to

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 1>have a Taiwan part of it. So I think they've

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>they've seen this and this is actually helpful and not

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 1>having a confrontation with them. All right, Jack, awesome stuff

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 1>as always, Jack Divine, founding partner president of the ark

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>And Group. They are obviously obsessed with what's going on

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>in markets today, and that's not just what's happening in

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:58.880
<v Speaker 1>stocks and bonds. Crypto has become an increasingly important part

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of fine financial markets. Nick Carter joins us right now,

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 1>who um kicked it off? And Nick correct me if

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm wrong here. As one of the first analysts

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>on the street following crypto before he founded his venture

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 1>crypto venture company Castle Island and also founded coin Metrics. UM,

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>what is going on? It's not just Bitcoin that's failing

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>as an inflation hedge. I note that gold also hasn't

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>performed terribly well. But the drops that we've seen in

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>crypto UM far outperform or underperform anything else. Why well, UM,

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>then thanks for having me on. Yeah, the crypto markets

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.880
<v Speaker 1>going through its own little de leveraging cycle here. UM,

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>there are a bunch of lenders that are blowing up

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 1>and uh, in fact, some of their positions are visible. Uh,

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>their liquidation thresholds are visible on the blockchain, and so

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>there's an element of stop hunting that's also going on

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>in the market right now with UM, So that would

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 1>probably explain some of the reflexivity. But yes, we are

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 1>having our own little de leveraging cycle, obviously not helped

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>by the fact that financial conditions are getting very, very tight.

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>So it was already tough before Tara us D and

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Luna that UM catastrophic collapse. Is that starting to UM

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to spread? Is there any contagion effect from that, because

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>now we see that Celsius is also barred money being

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>taken out and moved around. Yeah, entirely. Yes, there's a

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>daisy chain of risk care and uh that's precisely correct.

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Its traces from Tara, which was um its peaked the

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:44.640
<v Speaker 1>largest sort of defied lenning protocol, the anchor protocol within Tara.

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>That was really the reason it blew up was was

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>the was the largest UM lender in the DeFi space,

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and a bunch of sort of centralized lenders that take

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 1>retail deposits and offer a yield on that they were

0:22:56.920 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 1>putting client funds in it. And Celsius, which is this

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>big crypto lender which is now paused withdrawals. They were

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 1>probably the biggest user of the anchor protocol of Terra

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 1>and so now that terror fails, Celsius suffered a ton

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of withdrawals. Uh, they're clearly distressed. We're not true if

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a liquidity or a solvency crisis, and then the

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:22.959
<v Speaker 1>next daisy chain would be other lenders that have exposure

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>or relationships with Celsius um and then other lenders that

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>also suffer outflows due to the confidence crisis. So there's

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>your precisely right, there's a daisy chain of risk here,

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing it play out really really quickly. Hey, Nick,

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I know, as as Matt mentioned, you were at Fidelity

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:41.479
<v Speaker 1>as the first crypto analysts there. I'd love to get

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 1>your perspective about as you look at the sell off here,

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>these are the other assets of crypto. What percentage from

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>your perspective do you feel like is institutional ownership of

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 1>crypto across the board versus retail today? How institutionalized has

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 1>it become? It? Well, it's it depends what kind of

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 1>institution you refer to. Obviously, we have a very small

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>amount of sovereign ownership. Um, we have some corporates UH

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that own bitcoin. That's probably the largest sort of institutional

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 1>tranche there. And then of course you do have asset

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>management products created by the likes of Fidelity. Overall, say,

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:23.439
<v Speaker 1>the crypto market is still very retail driven, um and UM.

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, if it were more institutionalized, i'd expect to

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 1>see the volatility attenuate, and I would expect to see

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>uh softer peaks and less aggressive bottoms through rebalance, and

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 1>we're not really seeing that. To me, it's still very

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:42.640
<v Speaker 1>retail driven. Remember, it's as small as a class as

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>of right now. It's collectively all the crypto assets are

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>worth less than a trillion dollars, so you know, it

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really have the liquidity profile to absorb you know,

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the largest institutions, But I mean since I've certainly seen

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot more half type for it, I just haven't

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 1>seen a ton of institutional option in size. Well that

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>could change now obviously, given the crypto winter has gone,

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 1>UM has turned into like a polar vortex. I want

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to ask about something maybe a little more esoteric for

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>many of our listeners. But people in crypto have been

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>waiting for the merge to happen at Ethereum, which would

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>change UM the verification system from proof of work to

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 1>proof of steak. There have been a couple of hurdles lately. UM.

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>There are concerns that a lot of the steaking is well,

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 1>it's too UM concentrated, and the difficulty bomb that had

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.360
<v Speaker 1>been planned to help move this along has been delayed.

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about proof of steak in the merge? Yeah,

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that's well. Prior to sort of everything falling apart in

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:50.959
<v Speaker 1>crypto markets, that was the biggest catalyst that people were

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 1>looking for, in which it was expected in the fall

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>of this year, and for a serium, it's a big

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 1>part of the story because they had determined that they

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>were going to make this transition from day one. It

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>just took some five or six years to get there.

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 1>Um and it's a key part of the ethereum. Uh,

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the pr positioning, let's say, in terms of

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 1>moving away from the energy intensive profork and moving to

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>privo state model. There's definitely some snags there because um,

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I would say provo stake is just less battle tested

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 1>in the wild. Um And, yeah, it does raise centralization risks,

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 1>um either through these large staking pools that have these

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>economies of scale so you have concentrated liquidity, or through

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 1>custodians that a mass lots of the coins when they

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>do the staking. So you know there's concerns there. But UM,

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 1>all right, Nick, that's great stuff. We appreciate. Check back

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:48.160
<v Speaker 1>in with you later on all things crypto. Nick Carter

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>founding partner Castle Island Ventures. He went the University of

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 1>St Andrew's and University of Edinburgh, so it begs the

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>question how many times did he play the old course?

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>It's St Andrew's will get that next time we talked

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 1>to him. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller, I'm

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt Miller three. On Fall Sweeney, I'm

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:20.399
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney Before the podcast. You can

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio