WEBVTT - Michael Nathanson: Disney Going All In On Streaming

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEO, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. One of the more interesting

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>stories out there in the marketplaces you look at individual

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:25.159
<v Speaker 1>companies as a Walt Disney company. Here's a company that

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago really made a hundred eighty

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>degree pivot in their business to really focus on streaming

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>UH and they're starting to get some rewards there. And

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>there's absolutely nobody better to walk us through the Walt

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 1>Disney story than Michael Nathanson. Michael is one of the

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>leading research analysts on Wall Street. He's a founding partner

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and senior research analyst at Moffatt. Nathan said, Mike, thanks

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:47.279
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us here. Some some numbers last

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>night out of Disney. I'd love to get your takeaway

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 1>because this is a company that right before our eyes,

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>it's really changing its entire business, isn't it. Yep, Good

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>morning to you, Paul Paul Um. What's amazing is, you know,

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>two years. I give them credit because two years ago

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 1>they made a really difficult decision of pulling back content

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 1>that they had sold to other people and forging revenues

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and profits in cash and having to go build it themselves, right,

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and you know, people were a bit dismissive of that decision, uh,

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>doubting whether or not they could pull it off. And

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>what they've done in the past, you know, two years

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>he's just remarkable, it really is. You know, almost a

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred million subscribers at Disney Plus. Um. You know, they've

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>taken control of Hulu from comcasts and that's going very nicely.

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>And it's really interesting to me is that then, you know,

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the focus from the investment community had always been on

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>court cutting and ESPN is you know, which you know

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>very well, and that doesn't come up anymore, right like that,

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>those questions are no longer relevant now it's really about

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the size and the profitability potential of this new director

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>consumer business at their building. So Michael, you know, obviously

0:01:57.680 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>there are so many elements of this to talk about,

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>but just briefly before we move back to what I'm

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>sure will be most of the conversation. What does Doesney

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>do with his theme parks? Does it downplay them completely?

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Does it make them smaller? Does it stop expanding? Okay,

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>hi Vanni, Notice that's a good question. Theme parks are

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 1>really important to the Walt Disney Company. H Here's why.

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Because they are a source of cash and there's a

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>source of growth. You look at theme parks the past decades,

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>so it has become the engine. So it used to

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.399
<v Speaker 1>be cable networks, but theme parks really became very important

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to Disney's financial picture. Um. They run the theme parks,

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, amazingly in terms of their ability to drive

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>pricing and profits, and I think it remains a central

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>piece of the Disney you know, the Disney machine. I

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>think over time the question will be is when did

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Disney start opening up theme parks in other parts of

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the world. As you know, they're in Hong Kong and Shanghai.

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, is there a Latin American theme park coming?

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Is there an Indian theme park coming? Um? You know,

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think as time goes on and streaming

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>becomes a more successful and more global, you know, maybe

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Disney starts opening up theme parks in other parts of

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:07.399
<v Speaker 1>the world. But so I think theme parks are core

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:10.519
<v Speaker 1>intential to what Disney does. And Michael, I'd love to

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>get your thoughts on their filmed entertainment business. You know,

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously just the dominant, dominant player in UM Hollywood with

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>all the brands that they have, but now with this

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>pandemic um the traditional windowing where they could make money

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>in the theaters and then the pay television and someone

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that just you know, window after window monetize an asset.

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Is that permanently changed, Mike? Yeah, Paul, you know that

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>is purbently changed. We cover the theater industry too, and

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know what what Wall Street has done is

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>we've incentivize film studios that own GtC companies to go

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>more direct, right, to go direct and summer and you're

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna see less films being put into theater um only

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the big ten poles and blockbusters. And even when they're

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>in the theater, the question is will they be released

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>day and date on DCC on direct consumer platforms? Right,

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>So you know, we are applotting Disney's ability to grow

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>their address and tumor business. And you know, Wall Street,

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>as you know because you've been analynced like me for

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a while has put a very low evaluation on anything

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 1>really to film, and very high valuation on things you

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>know that are streaming. So they'll still be filmed and

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>device question at theme parks, they're still the films that

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>benefit the entire Disney enterprise, you know, ten poles, you know,

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>but those are gonna be fewer and far between, uh

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>for the industry, and Disney will move those movies much

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:37.359
<v Speaker 1>more quickly onto their own platforms to drive more value

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>for consumers and then drive pricing. How do they keep

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:44.599
<v Speaker 1>the quality up over time? It seems like now you know,

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a writer's room for every you know, New York

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>condo building, and they're necessary, you know, But we're getting content.

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the newer content out of Netflix, these

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 1>these movies that they're premiering on Fridays, they're they're just

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>they're just okay, They're not great. Can they keep up

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the the quality that will keep people attached to Disney Plus? Yeah,

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, that is a great question that we don't

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>get enough of. Um there's just an assumption that you know,

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>content easy to make, and you know, and there's not

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>much of a of any kind of measure of of quality. Right. Um,

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>if you look at HBO for the for many years,

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>HBO just somehow year in year out produced great quality content.

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it comes down to, Um, the people who

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 1>are green lighting these these productions at Disney, they've got

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>really strong creative executives, and then it comes down to

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the people you hire to actually make this vision and

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 1>and and tell the story. Um. That's the question I

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 1>had for the management team a couple of quarters ago.

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I said, look, you know you guys, but Didney did

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>really well? Was they made less films? Those films were better?

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know. That's certainly a risk. Right when

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you expand your your output, do you have the same

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>quality control? We don't know. HBO has done it. But

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.280
<v Speaker 1>then to your point in Netflix, Netflix has a lot

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of things that miss. Um. You know, we're aware of

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:16.359
<v Speaker 1>the things that are really good because they become you know,

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>front page, streaming, streaming, you know content. But there's a

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of misses. And their model it's kind of built

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>for that because they take a ton of shots on

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 1>goal with a huge budget. Did think he has always

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 1>been a company that's just had less shots on goal

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 1>and those shots are always gone in. It's a great question.

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 1>It bears watching. But the people who are making those

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>decisions are still top of their field and that that

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>hasn't changed yet. I'm more worried, let's say, at HBO

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 1>and A T and T, because Warner Brothers HBO have

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>seen a change of leadership, and you wonder, like, will

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that lead down the road to a quality change they

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>need to clone Joel Kinnaman. I think Michael Nathanson, he

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>seems to be doing everything these days. Michael Nathanson, thank

0:06:56.600 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you so much for that wonderful analysis and context. Michael

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a senior research analyst at Malford Nathanson. On Disney There

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:07.679
<v Speaker 1>which is now down seven tenths of represent well. Western Union,

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>we know the name for decades and it's a global name.

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Just had earnings and we've got to welcome in now

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>chief financial officer Raj agre Wall, who is their chief

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>financial officer. As I already mentioned, Raj, just briefly tell

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>us about the trends that you saw during the pandemic.

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Did people need to use Western Union more? Hey, thanks

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>for having me. Yes, absolutely. Um, you know, we actually

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>saw that the need to receive money during the pandemic

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the last twelve months was greater

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>than ever before. Um. We also saw shifts in terms

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of how people were using our business. You know, we

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>have obviously a very broad retail network, but we have

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:51.239
<v Speaker 1>also a fantastic, um you know, well growing digital business

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that is now present in more than seventy five countries,

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and so we saw a tremendous growth in our digital

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>business because people were looking very frequently for online ways

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of sending money to their loved ones. And you can

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>imagine that during the pandemic. Um you know, in many

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of these other countries were going through a very difficult time,

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>which they continue to do so, and the people who

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>had the ability to send continue to send money, and

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>they used our business quite frequently. So, you know, we

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>really saw a mixed shift not only in our business

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>but also in the market overall, where digital parts of

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the market really took off during the course of last year. Roger,

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 1>we still have persistent higher than we would like unemployment

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. How has that impacted your flows

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and your business? Yeah, I mean, we we were very

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.439
<v Speaker 1>much a global business, Paul. You know, we we are

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>present in two hundred countries and territories around the world. Um,

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the US is obviously a very important market for us.

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, we we certainly saw, you know, some impacts

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>in the unemployment. The pandemic is not behind us yet.

0:08:57.440 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>We need to see how things play out. We are

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>uming that the second half of this year will be

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>in a better position economically, not only in the US

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>but also globally as the vaccines are more widely distributed.

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:14.079
<v Speaker 1>So we're hoping for a better second half economically. And uh,

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that again, people who have had

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the ability to send money, people who are still employed

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.679
<v Speaker 1>and making money, they've continued to use our business at

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a at a high rate. And uh, we've also seen

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the amount of principle going through our business go up

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>quite quite a bit. We grew a cross border principle

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>by twelve percent last year, whereas the entire market was

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>probably down a little bit. So, you know, I think

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>we're still getting good, good traffic and people still have

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a need to receive money. I'm a customer myself of

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>our business, and I've spent more money in the last

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>twelve months and I have historically because my you know,

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>my relatives have a need to get that money. So

0:09:55.320 --> 0:10:00.199
<v Speaker 1>why the decision to increase the dividend. It's a it's

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.719
<v Speaker 1>really a trend. We've had a track record over the

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>last fourteen years. We've increased the dividend by in thirteen

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of those fourteen years. So we have a lot of

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>confidence in the strength of our business. We know that

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>regenerated a strong, you know, large amount of cash flow

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.959
<v Speaker 1>last year, regenerated about nine million dollars of cash operating

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>cash flow. We'll have another good year this year, and

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>we think it's really what our shareholders want. And so

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>we've raised the dividend um in in thirteen of the

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>last fourteen years and this is just a continuation of

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>that trend. And uh, you know, we're looking for good things.

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>We have a good strategic agenda this year, and paying

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a good, healthy dividend there's a key part of that

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.839
<v Speaker 1>for us. Roger talked to us about the competitive landscape

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>for Western Union. You guys have obviously been in this

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 1>business for a long long time, have tremendous brand value,

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>but just a lot of technological competitors, whether it's you know,

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the apps, Venmo or something like that. Talk to us

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>about the competitive landscape for Western Union. Sure, yeah, and

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>then before we have a very large and strong and

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>faster growing digital business. Our digital business will be about

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars in size this year in terms of

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>revenue side, and we are very focused on the cross

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>border remittance market as you know, and there are many

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>acts like Venbo is much more of a domestically oriented

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>product here in the US, so ours is much more

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 1>about spending money all around the world, and that's really

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>where our strength is. We have the ability to settle

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>in a hundred and thirty currencies in a matter of minutes.

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>We have the regulatory and compliance capabilities that go with it.

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 1>We serve a number of different kinds of partners. We

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>have a white label offering that we've you know that

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>we're partnering with banks and other fintech type players, so

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:48.199
<v Speaker 1>we can really be the back end providers to other companies,

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>even other digital players that may not have the reach

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>that we do. Uh Saudi Telecom is one example that's

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>been very successful for us in Saudi Arabia. We have

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>another one in Russia with Spare, which is a bank

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>is one of ourgest bank in Russia, and so we

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>really have a number of different angles. We have a

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>branded Westernunion dot Com offering and uh, it's you know,

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I use our services as well, and you can you

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>can initiate and complete a transaction in a matter of

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:18.959
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds, and I can deliver the money from my

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>loved one in India in a matter of seconds. Very briefly, Ange,

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>if fees are quite high, considering some competitors don't charge

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>really at all, are you going to do anything about that?

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, our our fees are very representative of the

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>costs of doing business that we you know, it's not simple,

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not free to really move money around the world. Um,

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, to to have the regulatory and compliance capabilities

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and to actually protect consumers in terms of when they

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 1>send their money. Uh, there's a cost of doing business

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and two hundred markets and that's where we're doing. We're

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>in the business to make money, and the other others

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>who are are not charging a fee, it's not a

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>sustainable business all for them. So that's really the way

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>we look at it. Okay, Ros, thanks so much for

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Really appreciated raj Agrea Wall he's a chief

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>financial officer for Western Union, So we were wondering about

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>this question. We have a little bit of an insight

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>now into the U. S. China relationship going forward. Joe

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Biden had his first conversation as president with the Chinese leaders.

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>She's in pay and spoke of concern about China's coercive

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and unfair economic practices. Let's bring in someone who knows

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot more about all of this. Leland Miller is

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>CEO of China beige Book International. Leland, did you think

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the tone was just a little bit sharp, a little

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>bit harsh. What did it indicate to you about the

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>relationship going forward? Well, I think the call was essentially

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a box checking exercise. Biden at some point had to

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>talk to she. But then I want to talk about

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 1>in the early going, there's there's nothing that that you know,

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that the Biden administration wants to rush on in terms

0:13:56.800 --> 0:14:00.599
<v Speaker 1>of China policy. The focus is quite clearly domestic and

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:05.199
<v Speaker 1>focused on COVID. So I think that the coal set

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:07.719
<v Speaker 1>the tone that the White House wanted to to sort

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>of lay down. You know, we're gonna be tough on you,

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that you are a big time competitor. Uh, this is

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 1>a change relationship, but it wasn't deeply substantive. It was

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>just sort of a box checking exercise. All right, Leland,

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>at some point it has to be something more than

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a box checking exercise here. Um, it appears that you know,

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the US's view of China has changed since uh the

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Obama years. The last time President Biden, you know, was

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, in in power. There's as we're what do

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you think his policy will be going forward? Well, I

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>think he he looks at his congressional majority, which is

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>very slight and and steves very little allowance for there

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to be a let up in in in toughness on China.

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>So going forward, what he's essentially planning to do is

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to keep most of the Trump policies intact, at least

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>for the or term, maybe even the medium term. Uh. Now,

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you're you may see some good will measures. You could

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>see the two sides decide to open consulates or you know,

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>re re reduce each other's journalists. But essentially you're gonna

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>have the same type of China policy carried through for

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a while. Now. When Biden gets into more of the

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy, uh, you know, COVID's passed, and you start

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>looking at other foreign policy moves for the Biden administration,

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Iran, whether they get tripped up by North

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Korea and all of a sudden United States needs China's help.

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Then you may start seeing some more outreach, but right

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>now there's very little upside for Biden to offer much

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to she Well, what happened with the yuan leland and

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>what should we be on the lookout for. Is there

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>any way that China can send a message by setting

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the yuan differently? Well, I mean, look, the reason that

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you want has been surging, uh for for for many

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>months now is because of good reasons. Essentially, the Chinese

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>economy has been healing much faster than than the U.

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 1>S economy or or other economies around the world. And

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you also have higher rates in China, so there's been

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>an appetite for for for capital influence into China, and uh,

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you know these are these are good reasons, but they're

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>they're turning the situation into a problematic one for China

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>because it's looking at its exchange rate and it's a

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit worried that you know, it could be creeping

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>towards the towards an area where of real concerns. So

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are political sensitivities around where they plug

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the rate. But right now it's not problem territory. But

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>if you if you see a reversal in the US,

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>so you see some more bad news coming out of

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>US and Europe and more good news coming out of China.

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>This is actually gonna be a mixed bag for Beijing

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and the PBS, d L. And do you think the

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration will, I guess, re embrace kind of an

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>internationalism approach to China, whether it's some form of the

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Pacific you know alliance. How do you

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>think the US is is ultimately maybe has the best

0:16:56.160 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>shot of achieving some of its goals visa of each China. Yeah,

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, certainly the talking points are, you know, renewing

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>alliances in in consultation with our allies. But you know,

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>for for all to talk about that, that's not a strategy,

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a process. And so what will the bidens

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>strategy on China and Asia at large? B That hasn't

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>written itself yet. I think it's easy to look at

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:22.199
<v Speaker 1>this with within certain parameters and say Biden is not

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>going to pull back the tariffs, at least in the

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>early going. Biden is not going to pull back a

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:28.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of the technology or export controls and the early going,

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, but how does things develop from there? They

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>haven't addressed it. Everything is part of a review and

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>now there's reviews to review the reviews, and so this

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>has basically been a giant punt by the administration. It's

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>fair enough they want to focus on COVID, but at

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>some point they're going to have to to address these

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:48.439
<v Speaker 1>and they just haven't given a you know, a preview

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 1>yet of where they're going. Is there any danger in

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>taking too stern a tone with China? I mean, obviously

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>we saw at the end of the Top administration that

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 1>there were some sanctions placed by China on some of people,

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the people that are in the Trump administration. I sort

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of wondered if that was a message to the Widen administration, Look,

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>we want to start again, we want to start fresh.

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.199
<v Speaker 1>We're done with the old administration. And it seems like

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the Widen administrations ignored that message. If there was one. Well,

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>I think they're smart to ignore it. Uh one, because

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese reactor strength, not weakness. But more telling, Lee

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 1>Biden does not have a tough on China reputation over

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the years. I mean, as a senator, he wasn't tough

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>on China as VT under Obama, he certainly wasn't tough

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 1>on China. So this is a different political climate. I

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 1>think what the what the White House would like to

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>do right now is step the stage saying the times

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>have changed. This president is not going to be weak

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 1>on China, and I think that's setting that down as

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of the baseline, the fundamental you know, pre step governing.

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>The relationship is actually important and it gives them a

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>little more wiggle room to do things you know, either

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, either strongly or more weak going forward. Leilan,

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:00.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. We appreciate your

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>perspective as always on all things China and Asia. Leland Miller.

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>He's the CEO of the China Basebook International based in

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>New York. It is time for we'll be check in

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 1>with Laurence Sour, John's Tompkins University Associate Professor of the

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Emergency Medicine, and for once, perhaps most of this conversation

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 1>will be very upbeat. Dr Sour, we have now enough

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>vaccine apparently for everybody in the country by July. Is

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that does that tally with what you know? Your maths says,

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I think UM. Conceptually it does. So it's it's exciting

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to see that these contracts have been signed and that

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>there's pushed to move to create vaccine and move it

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>forward into the hands of vaccinators. I think UM, where well,

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>time will tell how effective our strategies are is in

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the space of making sure that people are there, ready

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to receive it, and that we have the health care

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>staff to deliver the vaccine. So it's great to see

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>those numbers get up to be able to vaccinate the

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 1>whole country and hopefully support vaccination efforts efforts across the globe. UM,

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and the key will be to convince people to take it,

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>especially those hesitant and hard to reach population. So, Lauren,

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the image of the day for me as it relates

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to the pandemics when I saw this morning and it

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 1>was of Dodger Stadium parking lot, and they had all

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the cones set up, all the lines set up, all

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the tents set up, but it was absolutely empty because

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 1>they had no vaccines. Um, what is your experience at

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Johns Hopkins in terms of supply of vaccines and kind

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of the rate at which you are receiving vaccines. Yeah,

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's a it's a I saw that same

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:43.199
<v Speaker 1>image and it is like very telling of where we

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:45.199
<v Speaker 1>are right now as a country and even as a

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:49.679
<v Speaker 1>world in delivering vaccines to people. So the creation of

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine and how quickly we got there so impressive.

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>But you know, here at Hopkins we're doing we're working

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 1>really hard to vaccinate our healthcare worker staff just so

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that we can be ready at another comes, particularly um,

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>if we see a surge after things like the Super

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Bowl or with varying centering into our population. We want

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to be ready and we want to protect our healthcare stuff.

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>That being said, I think what we're seeing is that

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>there's this group of people who are ready and willing

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to be vaccinated, and then very quickly, once we get

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 1>them vaccinated, the supplies body. So we don't always know

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 1>exactly what we're going to get UM. And I think

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 1>that's the story across the board is you know, you get,

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you get what you get when you get it, and

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>you don't always know what it's going to look like. UM.

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 1>But then I think what we're worried about seeing is

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to get to a certain point and

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>then suddenly there's going to be no one who's showing

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>up for vaccinations, and so that's that's that's the place

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 1>where we're focusing right now. Yeah, that'll be difficult. What

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>do you do with those vaccines at that point? I

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>mean do they do they keep for a long time?

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Will they work next year if there's another resurgence? Do

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>you shift them all to other countries? Yeah? I think

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be probably a mix. Um. The different

0:21:56.280 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 1>vaccines have different storage capabilities. Um. And what we really

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 1>want to focus on is making sure we're not defrosting

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 1>and preparing individual doses until we have identified enough people

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to take that whole bio or that whole set right

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>um and so um. The concern I think is is

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:17.199
<v Speaker 1>that we need to focus more efforts on getting to

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>those populations that aren't just gonna be waiting in line

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and ready to show up for those vaccines. And I

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>think we There is still a bit of a question

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.959
<v Speaker 1>on whether or not the variances will change the seasonality

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of the of the or the utility of the vaccine seasonally.

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:35.439
<v Speaker 1>So um, will we need regular vaccinations like we do

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>with flu um or is this a once or a

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>couple of times in a lifetime vaccine? I think you

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>know there's evidence towards leaning towards that seasonality, but what

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to wait and see. And so we want

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to use as much of the vaccine that's coming off

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the line as absolutely possible, as soon as possible to

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>get that protection level up um and reduce the number

0:22:57.040 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 1>of infections so our hospitals and our healthcare workers can

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>have of de breeze. So Lauren, if when a patient

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:08.120
<v Speaker 1>gets admitted, say today, with COVID, how has that experience

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>different for that patient, say from a year ago. I

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:15.719
<v Speaker 1>think a couple of things are vastly different. One is

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>how we manage that patient. Right, So we've learned so

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>much in the last year about the course of disease

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and cloviding team UM and and how to treat people

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:29.199
<v Speaker 1>who are sick with our Scooby too. And so the

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the hospital environment's going to look the same, the PPE

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:35.679
<v Speaker 1>is gonna look the same. But but the what we

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 1>do for those patients, what drugs are available to some

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>extent for those patients, even where the patient ends up

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 1>within the hospital or health care system, like, we have

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the capacity to provide supportive care and get people home

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and out faster, which is always great. The last time

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 1>you could stay in the hospital, the better. Um And

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we're seeing more of an ability to manage

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the surgence in some places because we're getting better treating

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the individual patient. Still, in many places across the country,

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>our hospitals are overwhelmed as these patients. So some things

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>haven't changed as much as we'd like them to. Lauren,

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>do you imagine that schools will be fully up and

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:14.920
<v Speaker 1>running by September, by by the new semester. I think

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that's definitely the hope. I think we have a lot

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:19.439
<v Speaker 1>of work to do in building the trust back in

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the educational system, so both with the teachers and with

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the people who are sending their kids to school. UM

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 1>And we have a lot of education around what's safe

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 1>and what isn't. So we want to get teachers vaccinated.

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 1>We want to make sure that we have enough vaccine

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.199
<v Speaker 1>to support teachers getting back into the classroom and then

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 1>getting kids back into the classroom. But we also have

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to think about what does COVID look like in kids?

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Can kids get there for you know, can kids pick

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 1>up COVID and get their families sick? And so how

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>do we create safe spaces and give the schools themselves

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the tools to to create the safest space for these

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 1>kids possible. I think getting kids back to school should

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>be our absolute number one priority in that in that area,

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's good for kids to be in school, and

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>we have a whole group of kids who have not

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>experienced that for almost a year, so it has to

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>be a priority. Hey, Lauren, thank you so much once

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 1>again for joining us. We always appreciate at your time.

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Lauren Soer, Social Professor of Emergency Medicine at the Johns

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins School of Medicine. We should know that the Bloomberg

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 1>School of Public Health is supported by Michael R. Bloomberg, founder,

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg LP, and Bloomberg Philanthropies and this radio station. Thanks

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>for listening to Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever a podcast

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:34.439
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn. I'm on Twitter at

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Bonnie Quinn and I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.719
<v Speaker 1>pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch us

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 1>worldwide at Bloomberg Radio