WEBVTT - Marco Rubio On The Effort To Save Jobs And Get People Working Again

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm so Tracy. Obviously, we've been

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:24.080
<v Speaker 1>covering this NonStop story of the virus and the crisis

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>from different from various economic and market angles for the

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>last several weeks now, but today we're going to do

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>something a little bit different than some of our recent episodes.

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>What are we doing today? We're actually going to be

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>talking to someone who's involved in formulating the policy response

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>how the US anyway is addressing the economic crisis that's

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>coinciding with the public health crisis. Right, So it sounds

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>like this is our chance to sort of put a

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of the theory that we've been discussing into actual practice.

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's one thing to talk about what governments should do, uh,

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and of course we do quite a lot of that

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast already, but it's quite another thing to

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about what governments are actually doing or how they

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>should put those ideas into actions. Yeah, that's exactly right,

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Like there is this general idea out there that we know.

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>He's like, Okay, there needs to be a fiscal response

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to this crisis, which we've seen to quite a large degree.

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>In some countries, people sort of overwhelmingly agree that it

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>can't just be monetary. There's this idea I would say,

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 1>I was sort of freezing or winter arizing the real

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>economy so that people can continue to make their payments,

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>make payroll things like that while their bills are coming

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to so that they could simultaneously pay their bills but

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>now work right. And of course with all of those ideas,

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>there are sort of all these different trade offs that

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>policymakers have to start considering. And a big one that

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>comes up time and time again is the idea of

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>moral hazard. You know, are you going to end up

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>rewarding people for bad behavior? How you calibrate one program

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>so that it doesn't interfere with another program? How do

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you incentivize people to take up the programs that you

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>actually want them to take up. And of course all

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of this is happening under immense time pressure, during the

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>time of coronavirus, when everyone is quite stressed and worried

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>about a lot of things. Right, there's so many aspects

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 1>of this current economic crisis that are extraordinary. The time

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>pressure is one. The scale of the layoffs that we've seen,

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>at least in the US have been so far off

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:47.519
<v Speaker 1>the charts that past periods don't even register. Is a

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>blip if you were to say, look at initial claims.

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>And because this isn't just a normal recession, because it's

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a complete shutdown, so many whether it's households or businesses,

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>are essentially in the position in where one day they

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>were doing fine and then the next day they were

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>on the brink of crisis and layoff right exactly. So

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the scale is different, the speed is different. Possibly you

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>could say that our political situation is a little bit

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>different in the US at the moment. So who are

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 1>we talking to about all of this? Well, I think

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>what you said about the politics is exactly right, because

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that we saw during the rush

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to pass the legislation at the end of March was

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of, at least temporarily, a high degree of political

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>unanimity and politicians on sort of both sides of the

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>aisle agreeing that whatever people think about government spending, deficits

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>moral hazard, paying people who are unemployed, and so on,

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>they all put their views on that aside, at least temporarily,

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and we'll see how long that last. So today on

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, we are going to be talking to a

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>very active policy maker in this space. He's Florida's Senator

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Marco Rubio. He's been championing, in particular the small business

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>loans aspects of the deal that attempt to keep people

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>on their payrolls during this crisis. Senator Rubio, thank you

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>very much for joining us at this extraordinary time. In

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>your view, let's just sort of set the stage right now.

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a sense for how well the payroll

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>protection part of the CARES Act is working? And do

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you have visibility and do how much money has been dispersed.

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Are you able to see that data billions of dollars

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 1>have been dispersed. We won't. I think one of the

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>fundamental misunderstanding because people think that the money being dispersed

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>is coming out of the treasury. The money the treasury

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that we allocated, that we appropriated in the bill is

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>guarantees that the cash that's actually dispersed it is from

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the banks, so it's the bank's cash. And then this

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>money is there on the federal side to guarantee the vaults,

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's why they're making them. So unless the banks

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>are announcing it publicly or updating it regularly. You know,

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 1>in a public form, we're not going to have a

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>total real time insight into what's been dispersed. Suffice it

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to say, like JPMorgan this morning had already dispersed nine billion.

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:14.280
<v Speaker 1>We know that they have to disperse it within ten

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>days of approval. So you're gonna see a big bumping

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>in those, uh in those disbursements here coming up as

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>we're getting on the you know, the ten day mark

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of the first approvals, and in some cases we're at

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>it and for some people, and so anyway, the it's

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 1>moving along. My sense of it is, I think we

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>have to have some perspective here. Let's do the timeline. Okay,

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Seventeen days ago, on March seven, the President signs the

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 1>Cares Act, which creates a three hundred and fifty billion

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 1>dollar brand new program that basically half to businesses in

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>America are eligible for. Seven days later, they begin taking applications,

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and eleven days ten to eleven days after that, they're

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>dispersing billions of dollars to cover the paychecks of millions

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of American workers. All of that in the span of

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>seventeen days. I know of no other program with this

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 1>reach that has moved that quickly, and I think it's

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a combination of things. It's the fact that we're relying

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>on the private sector through banks to distribute it, and

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of hard work. And yeah, there were some

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:14.039
<v Speaker 1>issues in the early part of it, because when anytime

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you start something that's big and new, you're going to

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>have some issues. But I don't think you can sit

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>back seven. I mean it's it's dispersed funds faster than

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:25.039
<v Speaker 1>the I R S did two taxpayers. It's dispersed funds

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>faster than the direct payments to entire industries. So you know,

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a program that's getting better every single day.

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 1>It will never be without issues, because nothing that you do,

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>especially in a crisis emergency situation, is going to be perfect,

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's going to be very good and it's going

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to continue to improve. Just on the subject of scale,

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>even though the Treasury isn't actually dispersing this money, it is,

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 1>as you say, just guaranteeing the loans. The program is

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>never the less capped at three billion, and it's also

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 1>capped at length. I think it's eight weeks. Would you

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>expect that cap to get lifted at some point? Well,

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the eight week issues. From the time you get the disbursement,

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 1>you're supposed to spend it on payroll and then and

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the rationale for that is the purpose of this program

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>was to uh keep employees attached to their employers. We

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>had companies coming to us saying, we don't want to

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>let go of our workers, even if the government's forced

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>us to close. We value our workers and we want

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to continue to pay them the way other companies are,

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>even if they're not working full time and in some

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>cases not even coming in at all. We don't want

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to lose them. We feel bad for them, and I

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>think that's especially true in small business. And so we said, well,

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>we're going to provide a vehicle for that to happen

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>so people don't have to go into the unemployment system.

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>And but in order to do that, you have to

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of define what the time period is so you're

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>not sitting on this for two years and in fact

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>not hiring people back. In terms of the amount, the

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>amount is important because once once the amount that the

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Treasury and the government has to guarantee loans is reached,

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the banks will stop issuing these loans. They're not going

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to issue loans unless the guarantee is there. That's why

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>it's important to replenish these funds. So look, it's so

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you a specificity a specific day, but

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.559
<v Speaker 1>if you look at it, we're started the day about

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>two hundred over two d forty billion dollars of of

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>commitments already, So it's hard to imagine finishing the week

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>without being very very close to that number. Given now

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you've got UM pay pals now in

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>UM you know, a bunch of other fencins are in,

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and we're keep adding community banks. So I think the

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>pace in the scope of this is going to pick

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>up pretty quickly. M So, just to talk politics for

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 1>one second, UM, there seems to be a wide consensus

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>that it's worth topping up the program. Democrats want to

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>pair this with more money for city states hospitals, maybe

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>more on the you ey side. Do you see a

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>path forward if it's uh, the program is going to

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>soon run dry, whether it's this week or next, to

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>replenish it and come to some sort of agreement with

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats again with kind of with the same level

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of unanimity that we saw the first time the first

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>go round. Yeah, except that I don't know why the

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>two have to be paired. I think the issue of

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>paycheck protection, we know that's very simple. That's just as

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a program that's now up and running, we have a

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty good sense of how to outlay it, and it

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>just needs additional funds so we don't have to stop

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:33.319
<v Speaker 1>with and guarantees. Every single member of the Senate Republican,

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Democrat and Independent has hospitals and has cities who are

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>not even receiving direct monies from the original Cares Act,

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and we want to help them to The problem is

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you've got to design a formula for distributing the funds.

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, what is the formula that's going to be

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>used to determine how much they say, with thirty thousand

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>people gets versus a city with two hundred thousand people,

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's going to take some time to devise a

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>formula that works. I'll give you as an example. You know,

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 1>we passed this care Is Act and it had money

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>being distributed, but because of the unique structure of its finances,

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Memorial Hospital in Miami, Florida, the second largest hospital

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in the country, the second largest public hospital in the country,

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 1>was being badly hurt by the formula that that they

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>came up with an HHS. It was fixed. But that's

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>just an example of why when you distribute that amount

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of money, you have to have a formula in place

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>that everybody signs out. That's more complicated than saying, let's

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>just put more money into a program that's up and

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>running and we know how it's distributed, so that that's

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the that's the issue with that one. It's not that

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 1>anyone's against it, is we got you know, everyone wants

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>to know how that's how it's going to be designed,

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and how we're going to determine how much cities get.

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Is it per capita? Is it there's population size alone,

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and not account for some of the costs they have.

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, in our intro, Joe and I were talking

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the difficulty of calibrating public policy,

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:54.319
<v Speaker 1>especially under this kind of time pressure, and also balancing

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>it with a lot of the other initiatives that the

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:00.040
<v Speaker 1>government is currently unrolling. So I was wondering, when it

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>comes to the p p P, how do you balance

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that with the expanded unemployment benefits, Because of course there's

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 1>a discussion now that some workers might be better off

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 1>taking unemployment rather than being kept on the payroll. And

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>these are all decisions and discussions that small businesses are

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>having to have at the moment right well. And I

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>think the answer to that question is that since you

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 1>can't have both, you can't you can't both be on

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the payroll of your employer to the p p P

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and also on unemployment. Um, whatever you're spending on one side,

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>you're you're saving on the other. So um. But it's,

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 1>as you said, it's very difficult right now to predict

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>exactly what people are going to do because there's no

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>sustinct as business. There's every business makes a different decision.

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>There's not one set across the board of however one's

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>going to decide. So we have seen I mean, look,

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>there are going to be cases of people that decide

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to go back to work because in

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>my state, I'm actually making more on unemployment than I

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>would by working. Obviously, there's an impediment to that, and

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that is that many states have had their systems crash.

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>So there I know people have been waiting for three

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>weeks to get into the Florida system because the phones

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>are being answered. You know, the website was overwhelmed, etcetera.

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Some people are gonna say, you know, I'd rather just

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 1>have my job back because I know I'm gonna get

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>paid and it's going to be there when this all ends.

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>The unemployment benefit goes away in four months, some people

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:19.959
<v Speaker 1>and some businesses are going to decide when I was

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a perfect time to lay people off. You know, we

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>have a issue emerging with the hotels and restaurant particular hotels,

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>A lot of them came to us and asked for

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>special language. Many of them are franchises of big companies,

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and but they're not owned by the company, so we

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.199
<v Speaker 1>created special language for them to be included in the

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Small Business Protection Program. And now some of them are saying, well,

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:40.959
<v Speaker 1>we want you to change the law. We don't want

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to use the money for payroll. We want to use

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>it to pay franchise fees and things of that nature.

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, well, that's why it's called the

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Paycheck Protection Act. The reason why we carved you in

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>this because you told us you wanted to keep your

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>workers on payroll even if you had no people staying.

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to do that. So you know, there's

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that kind of stuff going on. And

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying they're not going through tough times, but

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>our program the wrong one for them to come to

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>for for the assistance they're seeking. If it's about keeping

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>people on the payroll, well for it. So the bottom

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>line is, in an emergency, unprecedented situation, you're going to

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of unanticipated things come up. And what

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>we have to do is are on the side of action.

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>The worst thing that could happen is we don't do

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>anything real quickly. While we're in this situation now, and

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>there's this widespread view that it's nobody's fault that we

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>want to keep jab businesses and payrolls alive to get

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>through this health crisis, why not apply some of the

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>principles of payroll protection to some of the larger companies,

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>more direct cash grants to larger corporations that are currently

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 1>getting helped maybe through the FED programs and so forth,

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to either through suasion or force have them keep more

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 1>people on the payroll. Well, I think if this is

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a model that we can make work. Some people would

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>argue that, and in fact, I remember nearing the end

0:13:55.720 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of our deliberations and Senate one of the senator lunches

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>in the Republicly conference. We had a number of people

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 1>stand up and say, hey, why aren't we doing that

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>for everybody? You know? But of course I'm the chairman

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>of the Small Business Committee, and all we we took

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 1>we so we we didn't have that in our mandate.

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 1>We actually took on additional things like the no profit

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>sector and independent contractors and ten ninety nine employees that

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>qualifying or this as well for the first time. So

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>but I agree, I mean, I think there's a model

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>there that could be followed. Obviously a lot more money,

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>because when you're talking now about entities that employed thousands

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of people, you're not talking about ten billion dollar loans

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>will pay roll over eight weeks. You're talking about multi

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>multibillion dollar loans. But I think it's a concept that

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>could theoretically work in those settings as well. I think

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that the notion in that front was just um trying

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to Most of those companies were just asking for access

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to some credit vehicle that they could use to ride

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>through the short term of what they were facing. But

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>but I agree, I mean, I think it's a model

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that could be applied to different businesses of different sizes.

0:14:57.440 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Have you had any discussions with anyone else in government

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>about expanding it. Are people asking you how it's going

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>with the small business p p P. Yeah. So you know,

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting because it's the one that's gotten the most

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>attention early on. And you know, when we started this process,

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I would say, you know, the first day that came

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>out with the REGs was that Friday, we had a

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>list of like thirty things that we were hearing from

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>bankers and lenders all across the country. And that list

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>has basically been narrowed down to minute little details. In essence,

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>it was a lot of work that went into sort

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of getting these questions answered. Ivan Treasury today released its

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>third set of guidance that dealt with some additional questions

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that were lingering. And in that process is you know,

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you that every day is the first

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>day that this came out, I had twelve senators called

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and even the second day we had eight. So people

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>are watching and there. Now what's happening now is people

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>are hearing from businesses that are actually having funds dispersed.

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>But I can tell you that during the process of

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>this conversation, there was talk about even among our work group,

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>are by partisan work group. Who else could we include?

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>And it really just came down as a function of dollars,

0:15:58.200 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, when they originally told us we had three

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion and then increased to three fifty. But if

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>they wanted us to take on some of the other

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>sectors that some people were talking about, it would need

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot more than three fifty. It will probably take

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>up most of the bills. So um, there's been some

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about it, but really the focus over the last

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>week has been about improving the program and the questions

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that we're holding back lenders, and luckily we've been able

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>to do most of that. And then one of the

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>things I focused on a lot is some of the

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>underserved communities, uh small, really small micro businesses, minority communities

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that may not have sta strong banking relationships and therefore

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>having access problems. And that's why I've been harping all

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>week on the need to bring in non bank lenders,

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>which is in the bill right. This is not something

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>we came up with. Now. The bill specifically talks about

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>fin techs and non bank lenders being on ramped into

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the system, and that's beginning to happen where approximately individual

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>lenders now are participating, from credit unions to small banks,

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and as they're as they're ramping up and coming on

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the system, it creates more access points. And I'm really

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>excited about payper au and fin techs because PayPal told

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 1>me the first leon they made was five thousand dollars,

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>So that gives you an idea of the small, small, small,

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>micro business impact this could happen and m and I

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 1>think as that ramps up, I think those access issues

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>are going to be improved. That's really what we've been

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>focusing on here in the last few days. Senator, before

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to go in a few more minutes, let's

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about the sort of post crisis period. Hopefully the

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>health crisis ends quickly and businesses of various sorts can reopen,

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and everyone wants that, but I also think that sort

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of realistically, we know not all businesses are going to reopen.

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Most economists expect unemployment to remain somewhat elevated for quite

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>some time. What do you see as either in a

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>round four or round five of what the government can

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>be doing to get us We were at what a

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of people thought was full employment, three point five

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:56.120
<v Speaker 1>percent unemployment, the best levels in decades. How what could

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the government do to get us is back to that

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>as fast as possible. Well, I think it really begins

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>by people in positions of influence and leadership being brutally honest,

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and that is we're not going to go back immediately

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:09.439
<v Speaker 1>the way things were March first. I think when you

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>start to see here whenever that is different jurisdictions and

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:17.679
<v Speaker 1>states begin to modify the restrictions they've put in place,

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it isn't gonna be zero to sixty. It's gonna be

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're gonna reopen parks and we're gonna allow

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>kids to go to school for two hours, but you're

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>still gonna have a lot of the same regulations in

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 1>place for a while. And that includes, you know, how

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>close you can stand in line to people, how many

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:34.199
<v Speaker 1>people can gather into place. That's just a fact that

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>people need to absorb that that we're not going to

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>go back to just March first right away. The second

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 1>point I would make is I will try to divide

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 1>this up into three buckets. The first is, we don't

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>know yet how bad the damage is. This reminds me

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of a hurricane. You're sitting at home and hurricane is

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 1>howling outside and it sounds really bad, and you know

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 1>it's really bad, and you see some trees falling and

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>branches breaking, but you have no idea how widespread the

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 1>damage is. Until it's over and you come outside and

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you start to do a damage assessment. We won't know

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the full economic damage. And some of it's gonna have

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a tail to It's gonna linger for some period of time,

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 1>so that before we can even talk about exactly how

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to solve that, we have to know the full extent

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of it. I think we're related to that is not

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>just how to recover, but some strategic decisions we're gonna

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>have to make about the structure of our economy. And

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>in particular, I am a huge supporter of capitalism because

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:26.119
<v Speaker 1>capitalism always reaches the most efficient outcome. But every now

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 1>and then, the most efficient outcome is not in our

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:30.920
<v Speaker 1>national interest, and we have faced that here with critical

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>shortages of certain things. You know, we don't have a

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>critical shortage, for example, in our food supply. We may

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>have some disruptions eventually, but not shortages because we can

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>domestically feed ourselves, but we can't make pep you know. Uh.

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Personal protection equipment. We struggle to make ventilators. We had

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:50.159
<v Speaker 1>to repurpose industries for that. Some of the basic active

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>ingredients and our leading pharmaceuticals come from abroad, I think,

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and not to mention if you want to get into

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>other realms, things like rarest minerals and telecommunication and so

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>the question be times when is something so critical to

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.879
<v Speaker 1>our national security or national well being, But we have

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to have a domestic capacity to do it. Even if

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it's from a pure market perspective, it's not the most

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>efficient place to do it. And that's a that leads

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 1>us to industrial policy, which is something we've talked about

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of years. I'm not saying that applies

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to every industry, but there are some. We're gonna have

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:22.439
<v Speaker 1>to define what they are and we're gonna have to

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:26.360
<v Speaker 1>have policies around that. Well, just on that point, I mean,

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you yourself put out a paper about how you see

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the economy last year. Do you think there's a broader

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 1>rethink in the GOP about economics and how it should work,

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe moving away from free markets towards a system where

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>there is a greater role for the government. And secondly,

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>if that's the case, how do you get Republican voters

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to actually vote for government rule or government policy that

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>could be in their interests. Well, I would argue to

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you that we already have government policy that makes those

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 1>sources of decisions. No, I'm not talking about government owning

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the means of production or even directing the means of production.

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about government having policies that incentivize certain capacities

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>domestically that wouldn't otherwise exist. But we do that now.

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>We do that now through our tax code. Our tax

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>code has an immediate tax benefit to for example, returning

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>value to your investors to share by back, so that, um,

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>we we incentivize that. There's nothing inherently evil about it,

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>but we incentivize it. And maybe we should be incentivizing

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 1>investment instead. And then there are some industries, for example,

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 1>that it will never be cost effective to mind for

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:36.679
<v Speaker 1>rare earth minerals in the US, because the Chinese are

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>subsidizing their industry and are going to undercut our price point.

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 1>But we don't want to be dependent on them, and

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>so we're gonna have to come up with some government

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>policies to even the playing field. You see that somewhat

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>in telecommunications in this whole five G issue with Huawei,

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>where there are there are no non Chinese companies that

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>are able to offer the product of always offering because

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>they're able to do it at a lower cost because

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>they're subsidized and protected domestically as well in their market

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.199
<v Speaker 1>by the Chinese government. So that is not We're not

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>We're we're not. We're not talking about socialism, not talking

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>about communism, We're not talking about government ownership of the

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>telecommunications industry. But we are saying, to the extent you're

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>going to have incentives for certain outcomes in your economy,

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>should they not be incentives towards outcomes that serve the

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>national interest, which include national security. But I would argue

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>also in food, the creation of dignified work that's widely

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>available so that you can have strong communities and strong families.

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>But just real quickly and then we'll wrap up. I mean,

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Tracy mentioned this report you put out a year ago,

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 1>and I was pretty astonished at the time, this called

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>American Investment in the twenty first century. Fascinating paper. It's

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 1>cited a number of like random obscure left wing economists

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that like I follow on Twitter, I couldn't even really

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>believe it was coming from a senator, let a loan,

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>a Republican senator in your caucus. Do you sense some

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of shift or some sort of um, you know,

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 1>increased skepticism or rethinking about some of the lease a

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>fair views. It did not seem like the sort of

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the Heritage Institute views that I was sort of used

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to seeing from Republicans for many years. And I'm curious

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>if you think there is some general shift in sort

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of this philosophy. You know, it's a work in progress.

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I would argue to you that most of us in

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Republican politics are a product of, you know, twenty or

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty five years of sort of uh, the you know,

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the LEAs a fair libertarian view of economics, and that's

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>deeply embedded in in a lot of the decisions and

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>policies that Republicans of pursuit. And generally they're right, I mean,

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:37.919
<v Speaker 1>low taxes, less spending, all these this is the ideal outcome.

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 1>And I don't argue against any of that. I'm not

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>arguing that we should be a high tax environment or

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a high regulatory environment, but I am arguing that within

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:48.199
<v Speaker 1>that framework, there are certain exceptions that are in our

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>national interests, and I think the crisis has revealed some

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of them, um, in terms of the inability to ramp

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>up production of certain things without massive disrupt asking, you know,

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Ford and General motors to make ventilators and so forth.

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:06.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's a growing sense of it. I'm

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 1>not sure it's still I can tell you when we

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 1>did the tax bill, there was a tremendous amount of

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 1>pushback against the child tax credit. A lot of people

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>viewed it as some sort of a welfare payment. And

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 1>my argument was, whether they're paying it in payroll tax

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>or they're paying it in income tax, it's still a tax.

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>It's money that's coming out of their paycheck. And and

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 1>and our tax coach should reflect what we say is

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>one of our priorities, which is strong families. I think

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that ironically, that turned out to be the most popular

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 1>part of the tax bill that we've passed, and UM

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted to actually do more in that regard

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>than we ended up doing. We've got an increased but

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to do more. So I'd say this is

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 1>still a work in progress, but there are certainly a

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>growing number of people today in the Senate and in

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 1>the House who share these views to some degree. A

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Senator Rubio, really appreciate you taking the time and thank

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>you for coming on the podcast. Thanks for having me.

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much. Well, Tracy, I really enjoyed sort of

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 1>getting the chance to um. I would say, you know,

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a cliche, but here how the sausage is made

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit, because you know, on the one hand,

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the Cares Act, it was incredibly rapid from the onset

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of the downturn in late February early March, it was

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>just a few weeks by lightning. You know, that's lightning

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>by Washington standards. On the other hand, there's so much

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>damage and even by early March. I remember we were talking,

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, we talked with Claudia sam in early March.

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 1>It's like send the checks out now. And so it's

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of interesting hearing from his perspective all the different

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 1>calculations and the sort of different factors that have to

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 1>go into a bill of this size. Yeah, it was

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 1>also interesting to hear him talk about the role of

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the inks, and he sounded pretty pleased with it. One

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.679
<v Speaker 1>of the criticisms of the program has been the idea

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that the money is running through banks which actually have

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to make the loans even though they're guaranteed by the government.

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Could that function have been better fulfilled by something else,

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>such as, you know, some sort of government body. So

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting to hear him talk about that, as well

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:25.120
<v Speaker 1>as the participation of the fintech firms. One other thing

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking during the discussion was just how important

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>hierarchy and incentives are in government. So he mentioned, you

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>know that this had happened for small businesses partly because

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.959
<v Speaker 1>he was head of the Small Business Committee and so

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that was his job. He was tasked to help that

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>particular component of the economy, and that's how this program

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>came about. Yeah. Absolutely. I also thought it was interesting

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that he did say that it could be a model

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and we haven't seen it yet, but it could be

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a model in the future for Okay, well, if you're

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>going to give company small businesses grant to not do layoffs,

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 1>why not do something similar for large companies. And the

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:11.640
<v Speaker 1>fact that it had been discussed within the center, within

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Caucus, the fact that he was open to it,

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:17.919
<v Speaker 1>I thought was pretty interesting, and just generally it was

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's been like on Twitter talking a lot

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>about the rollout, so I guess it was good to

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>hear his view that things are getting better and getting

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:31.640
<v Speaker 1>smoother on the disbursement of fund standpoint absolutely. And then

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the other interesting thing was, of course, the broader discussion

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>about how the Republican Party is thinking about economics at

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the moment. If you haven't read the policy paper, American

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:45.479
<v Speaker 1>Investment in the twenty one Century is definitely worth reading.

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps something you wouldn't necessarily expect to be coming from

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a Republican senator. But one thing that always interests me

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 1>in this discussion is I feel like, even if Republicans

0:27:56.480 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 1>are moving towards a position where there is potentially a

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>role for greater participation by the government, I always wonder

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>if voters are going to be on board with that,

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>especially since voters have been told, you know, for three

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>decades now that the government should be as small as possible,

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that intervention regulation, it's all bad for them. I always

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>wonder if that public shift is possible or can happen

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>as quickly as some people might want it to. I

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:32.119
<v Speaker 1>think it'll be really interesting. I mean, we're going to

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 1>be in this country, for sure, dealing with the sort

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of economic and political fallout prices. Right, so maybe this

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>is the moment when that shift happens. Well yeah, I

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>mean a we were just at you know, three point

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>four or three point five unemployment. The number of people

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>who are either seeing their small businesses or businesses of

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>any size go from drop lose revenue in a matter

0:28:56.240 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>of days. The number of people who are experienced seeing

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>job procarity or job straight up job laws, people in

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of areas. I mean, think about it. If

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you imagine if you were a dentist before you never

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>thought okay, you didn't think teeth are recession. But suddenly

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 1>here you have an economic crisis in which no one

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>is going out, no one is going to the dentist.

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>So the idea of sort of labor market procarity economic

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>procarity is reaching a whole new realm of people in

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 1>this crisis. So it does feel like and for better

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>or worse, this could open up sort of new thinking

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and new opportunities, sort of the new ideas among people

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that it's like, oh wow, I am really exposed to

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 1>economic volatility in a way that I had previously realized.

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>And again I think people should really read this paper.

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>As you mentioned, because I wasn't kidding. It's like, you know,

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>one of these points, it is like going after a

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 1>shareholder primacy and how that's hurt the role of American businesses.

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>The It will be interesting to see if these ideas

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and this crisis allows some of these ideas to further

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 1>take root within the party. This discussion always makes me

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>think of relativism versus absolutism, So I always think of

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party is sort of a relativist party in

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the sense that if a policy is enacted people Republicans

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>tend to get upset. I'm basing a lot of this

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>off my dad, by the way. Um, but Republicans tend

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>to get upset if it benefits someone else more than them.

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>There's this sort of sense of unfairness, I guess about it.

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>But maybe this is the moment when that starts to

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>change and it shifts more towards a sort of absolute

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 1>gains kind of regime. But um, yeah, let's see, there's

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>a we'll be talking about this for a long time.

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>There'll be a lot to a lot to a lot

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to chew over. Indeed, all right, well, this has been

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>another episode of the All Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway and

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Why Isn't All? You can follow me on

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at the Start Work, And you should follow our

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 1>guest on Twitter, Florida Senator Marco Rubio. He's at Marco

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Rubio and follow our producer on Twitter, Laura Carlson. She's

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 1>at Laura M. Carlson. Followed the Bloomberg head of Podcasts

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, Francesca Levi at Francesca Today, and check out

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>all of our podcasts unto the handle at podcasts. Thanks

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>for listening.