WEBVTT - Short Stuff: Streisand Effect

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Hey, and welcome to the short Stuff. I'm Josh, there's Chuck,

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>there's Babs. This is short stuff. Let's go Babs. Yeah,

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>we talked about this at some point, the Streisand effect,

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>wherein when you try to cover something up online, all

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you do is draw more attention to it. Yeah, and

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>it blows up in your face a ka, backfires Barbara. Yeah,

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>but I mean Barbara Streisand isn't the first person to

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 1>have something blow up in her face or backfire when

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>she tried to censor anything, and yet she got saddled

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>with this term. I think it's just a little bit

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of internet justice. Maybe, um, but at the very least,

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>we should probably give a little background on what Barbara

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>did to try to censor something in the first place

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>on the internet that drew the ire that ended up

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>getting her saddled with this. Wait a minute, that was

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>way too long for a short stuff, Chuck, let's edit

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>this out and start over. So in two thousand three,

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Babs sued a photographer his name is Kenneth Adelman, because

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>she said, I want you to delete this photo that

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you took from the sky that has my Malibu estate

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>in it. She said, will you delete and he said, uh, well,

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I was I'm not paparazzo. I was

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>doing an online project trekking erosion on the coastline. Your

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>house happened to be in it, and it's a big

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>environmental issue. And she said, well, I don't care. I'm

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:36.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna sue you for fifty million dollars. Fifty million dollars.

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>This guy is not you know, it's not Sheldon Addleson.

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>It's Kenneth Addleman. He doesn't have fifty million dollars. And

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>she wasn't laying out in the nude. It was just

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>her house, right, And again it was part of this

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>erosion project. So um, when it got out pretty quickly

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that Barbara Streisan was suing some some guy for fifty

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>million dollar dollers, it got picked up by the news

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of attention was drawn to this previously

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>fully overlooked thing, which was the photo of her house

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>on the Malibu Coastline. I believe it had been downloaded

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>six times in the entire history of that photographs existence, um,

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and two of those times were by her lawyer. But

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the number jumped up quite a bit after

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 1>word got out about the lawsuit. Is that not correct, Chuck, Yeah,

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the streisand effect happened and it was downloaded close to

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a half a million, half a million times. And the

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>next month after this lawsuit came out, and it prompted

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a blogger from dirt Tech name Michael Masnick to what

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 1>I say, dirt tech, dirt Tech, that's the hillbilly version.

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh he he labeled the strice End effect, and it

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of took hold. Yeah, it did, um because it's

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>catchy and everybody likes Barbra Streisen, but there's also something

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>about her that everybody doesn't like to you know, Uh,

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Emily loves her. There's nothing she doesn't like really since

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>a little like then No, No, she's a big fan

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>of Babs that that Christmas record plays on repeat. Have

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you ever heard well that I'm sure that the answer

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to this is yes. Have you ever heard, um that

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>her duets with Barry Gibb Oh? Sure those are great? Okay, Yeah,

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 1>they're about as good as a duet gets. And Barbara

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Strasend's great on her own. But I just think personally,

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I get the impression that she's always been the kind

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>who would suit just an average person. For fifty million dollars.

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>You know what I mean. You've never heard her take

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>on jingle bells. I don't think so, which is bizarre

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>because I've been on this planet for forty three years,

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and I thought I've heard every Christmas song ever created

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>around the world fifty million times. Oh, you would know it.

0:03:56.360 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>It's uh, she she changes it up a lot. I

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>gotta hear this. It's jingle bell, jingle bell, jingle bell,

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>jingle love the way. Hey what yes, Chuck, you just

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>literally changed my life. Yeah, just go listen to it

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>after this. You'll get a kick out of it, all right,

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I definitely will you. You're probably gonna want to throw

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>your sound system out the window. Or you might think

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it's the best thing ever. It's it's one of the two. Okay,

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'll just keep vascillating back and forth. All right,

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>So Strice in effect happens, she gets labeled, uh, you know,

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>gets named after her. And they've actually been studies on

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>this kind of thing since then. There was one in

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 1>China in two thousand eighteen that found out that their

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>attempts as a country to block access to Facebook and

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and other social media sites um that people may

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>not have been interested in have they not tried to

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 1>block it? Prompted millions of people UH to download VP

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and software just so they could get access to these sites.

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's the whole idea of the forbidden fruit. It's

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>like that that UM Chief Wigham telling Ralph to stay

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>out of his forbidden closet of mystery. It's like, why

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>are you so fascinated with whatever is in my forbidden

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>closet of mystery? That's definitely part of it. It's like,

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:11.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're saying no, you're not allowed to see this,

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>you're basically saying, do everything you can to see what

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to keep you from seeing. UM. And just

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>like how how Streisand's UM house photo that only be

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 1>downloaded six times prior to the lawsuit and then went

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>up to four thousand times right after. UM. That's just

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>it's just part and parcel with it. If you leave

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>it alone. I don't know about China and news of

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>democracies and what democracies are doing, that might be an exception,

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:42.239
<v Speaker 1>but typically if you leave whatever you're trying to censor alone,

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>apparently that will that will attract less attention to it

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>than than saying like, you're not allowed to hear this.

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>This is censored. Yeah, I mean, it's also the conundrum

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that every parent faces every day that their kid grows up.

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 1>Is like everything from curse words like not making a

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 1>big deal about it, to whatever they're watching and stuff

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>like that. It's just you know, it's like, well maybe

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>if we don't make a big deal out of it,

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be a big deal. Yes, there

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>is a giant bird and he's yellow and he loves you,

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>but you cannot see him. You're not allowed to watch that.

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>All right. We're gonna take a break and come back

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and talk about a few other versions of the Strisand

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>effect over the years right after this. So I just

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>want to point out if you're not gonna laugh at

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>my jokes today, I'll laugh at my own jokes. I'll

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 1>be over. Yeah, the big bird joke was a good one,

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>all right. So, um, there's a pair of researchers Sue

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:03.039
<v Speaker 1>Curry Jensen and Brian Martin, and together they kind of

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>created this paper partially on the Streisand effect, and they

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 1>gave some other examples, like you know, in addition to

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Barber Streisand and China um banning Twitter and Facebook Um,

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>some other other groups have have famously, you know, tried

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:19.559
<v Speaker 1>to censor things and it's blown up in their face.

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>And one of them was I don't remember where we

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>talked about it before, but the Mick Libel case, we

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>definitely have mentioned it before. Yeah, this was McDonald's in

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the nineties. They sued a couple of volunteers from London

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>green Peace because they had put out a pamphlet called

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>What's wrong with McDonald's and this, you know, this is

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>a street pamphlet. It wasn't even online. I mean, may

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>have been at some point, but this is the nineties,

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>so you know how pamphlets, it's not like that goes wide. Um,

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>they were just pamphlets and they until they got sued

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and the British press got ahold of it, called it,

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>like you said, McLibel, and it became the longest running

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>civil trial in the history of Britain. And they lost

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that one too, So it's they didn't get the message

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>or I guess when was Streisand's was that in the

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>eighties Streisan No Streisand's was two thousand three because it

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>was really internet project. Yeah, this proceeded Barbara Streisand so

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>she hadn't take a note from McDonald's maybe don't bring

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the lawsuit, No, because I mean the fact that it

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>was the longest running civil trial. The press stays interested

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>in that kind of thing, so pretty frequently they would

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>interview the plaintiffs or the defendants in the case and

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>they would just give them this big microphone to talk

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>about all the horrible things McDonald's was doing. It was

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a It was a bad move on McDonald's part, for sure. Um.

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>There was also one, as far as food goes, a

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>schoolgirl in Scotland named Martha Payne who was nine at

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the time, back in two thousand twelve, and she sounds

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>like one of the cooler nine year olds I've ever

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>heard of. She had a food blog, but her food

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>blog was about how terrible the food was at her school,

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>in her cafeteria, and so she would take pictures of

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>her school lunch and posted a picture on her blog

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and talk about the food and all that. And I

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>guess Jamie Oliver, who's a well known food guy and

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>food communicator, if there is such a thing. Sure, Um, yeah,

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>So Jamie Oliver tweeted about it and there was a

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>bunch of traffic to her blog, and the local school

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 1>board said, oh, we we can't have this. She's gonna

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:23.719
<v Speaker 1>make us look dumb, so let's just ban her from

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>taking photos in school of her food. Yeah, that didn't

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>work out. That blew up in their face as well,

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>because then what you end up being accused of is

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>like squashing the voice of a child. Um. Kind of

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>like what happened recently here in Georgia when that high

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>school girl took a picture of her crowded school without masks,

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and they suspended her for like a day. And then

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>we're like, uh, never mind, you can. I guess we

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't try and squash health whistleblowers in high school their

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Torrian sound. Yeah, so they let her back in school too,

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>They did. It was it was, it was rough, just

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>a very idea that they suspended her for. That is

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>really disappointing. What's even more disappointing, though, is that um

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:12.199
<v Speaker 1>that the two researchers I mentioned early or um they

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>basically said, you know, there's some really great famous cases

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>about this streisand effect happening, but way more often than not,

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the sensors who are working to censor things, um are

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>they do? They they censor and they like the streisand

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>effect doesn't happen. It's much more the exception than the rule.

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>And that even when UM there is a streisand effect

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to it. There's kind of a playbook what they call

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>outrage management UM that's used to kind of keep the

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>public outcry against whatever was discovered or the censorship that

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>was discovered in in order in manageable, I guess, which

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:56.679
<v Speaker 1>hence the name. Yeah, it's pretty scuzzy, uh to see

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>what they do, but it's sort of right out of

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the playbook that you would expect. Oh, it all sounds

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>It sounds very familiar, doesn't it. Yeah, very Bynesian. And

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>plus it's just the kind of thing you see all

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the time. You know, they trying to cover up or

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>they devalue the target, or they basically lie about it

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and reinterpret it. UM. They Another one is use official

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>channels to give an appearance of justice, right and then

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>intimidate people. So they gave in this In this article,

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Jansen and Martin gave an example of the Nazis and

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>their youthan Asia making air quotes everybody program of people

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>with disabilities, and that they used all five methods of

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that UM. They hid the program from the public. That's

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 1>number one. Um, they stigmatized people with disabilities as a

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>burden for society. That's devaluing the target. They lied about

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the events, so that's reinterpreting it. Anybody who had a question,

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:55.199
<v Speaker 1>like a parent of the victim, that kind of thing,

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:57.079
<v Speaker 1>they would just out and out say, oh, no, they

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:59.959
<v Speaker 1>died of you know this other this other disease or

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 1>from natural causes or something. They also intimidated parents who

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>would not back down into saying, hey, you want to

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 1>lose the rest of your kids, no, well, then be quiet.

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>And then they also allowed for formal complaints to be levied. Um.

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>But of course they never went anywhere, so it gave

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the appearance of using official channels for justice. So leave

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it to the Nazis to check off all five of

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 1>those scuzzie boxes. Stupid Nazis. Yeah. I think one of

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:27.719
<v Speaker 1>my favorite cases was when Al Franken, previous to being

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a senator, wrote that book Lies and the lying liars

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.439
<v Speaker 1>who tell them colon a fair and balanced to look

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>at the right and and Fox News took him to

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 1>court and says, wait a minute, that's our term fair

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and balance. That's intellectual property and the judge said, no,

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>those are just two words that are pretty commonly used. Uh,

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:51.079
<v Speaker 1>you don't own them. And Al Franken, I imagine as

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>soon as he heard that Fox News was suing him,

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 1>was like hit the roof and was like sweet because

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:58.319
<v Speaker 1>all that did was bring just tons and tons of

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:01.079
<v Speaker 1>pressed to his new book it was being launched. Yeah,

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and I guess it shot right onto the best seller

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>list right after that too. So maybe Fox News will

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>come and sue us because of our book. Maybe we

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>should change the title the Stuff you should Know an

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:19.719
<v Speaker 1>incomplete compendium of mostly interesting, fair and balanced things. Can

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you believe this title? And then maybe we could get

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 1>taken the court and get a lot of publicity out

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of it. That'd be wonderful, or chuck, if everybody just

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>went and bought our book, which you can pre order

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>now anywhere books are available, Um, that would have the

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>same effect without us having to go through the problem

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 1>being sued. That'd be great too, or having to go

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>back and retitle the things you got anything else? I

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have anything else. Beautiful segue by the way, nice plug. Uh,

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>And since we don't have anything else and we're down

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>to plugs, short stuff is app. Stuff you should know

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:57.319
<v Speaker 1>is production of iHeart Radios. How stuff works for more

0:13:57.360 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>podcasts for my heart Radio? Is it the iHeart Radio app?

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts are wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:05.839
<v Speaker 1>H