WEBVTT - Why The World Started Hedging Its US Dollar Exposure

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Authoughts podcast.

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:23.279
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Joe Wisenthal.

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Joe, there are so many huge stories that you could

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 2>pull out of this year, but I mean, like some

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 2>actually really really big ones. So we had Liberation Day

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 2>and the market crash. We had the continued weakness in

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 2>the US dollar, which has been this sort of slow

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 2>burned crash across the year. And we're recording this. Let's

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:48.480
<v Speaker 2>see October seventeenth, and you know, dollar down yet again.

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 3>Well it is down, but however there's been a little

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, we hit hiss low in mid September.

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Don't make apologies for the dollar, Joe.

0:00:56.200 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, I just like keep going, all right, keep going.

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Then I might add something fall in the dollar. The

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 3>fall in the doll is very big.

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 4>So far.

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 2>There's here but this huge ramp up in the price

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 2>of gold, which seems to hit a new record all

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 2>the time. And then we've had the continued strength slash resilience,

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 2>whatever you want to call it, enthusiasm about AI in

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 2>the stock market, and it really seems like there's this

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 2>division at the moment between how people feel about corporate

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 2>America and how people feel about sovereign America in the

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 2>form of its currency.

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 3>You know what I really regret doing tracing. I really regret.

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Did you have like a horde of gold that you

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 2>got rid.

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 3>Of over I took out a gold denominated mortgage. You know,

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 3>I feel so stupid. I feel so stupid. Why did

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 3>I do that? I could get paid in dollars and

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 3>I took out a gold denominated mortgage. What was I thinking?

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 3>I didn't, But had I done, that would have been

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 3>a very bad trade.

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I remember those stories.

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 3>From like, you know, a little bit of a tangent,

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 3>remember all those stories from like the Hungarians they took

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 3>out those Swiss denominated mortgage back of the two thousands.

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 2>And that was very much a europe thing for a while.

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that was a really funny list. We don't have

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 3>to talk about that. But one thing, I was just

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 3>the only reason I caveated the dollar fall, which I

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 3>do think it has. It is quite a bit down

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 3>from the beginning of the year. All that being said,

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 3>it is striking in the last several weeks the degree

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 3>to which a few of the very popular consensus ideas

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 3>for this year are turning a little bit. And I

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 3>say that tenure treasury is the time we're recording this

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 3>October seventeenth has fallen below four percent. How many times

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 3>did you hear about the steepener trade this year? How

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 3>many times did you hear about fiscal dominance losing control?

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 3>At the long end the dollar it stabilized a little bit.

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 3>So it is a very interesting moment from markets in

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 3>many respects right now.

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 2>There's definitely a lot to talk about. Congrats on managing

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 2>your personal FX liability.

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm doing a good job.

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.679
<v Speaker 2>Getting paid in dollars and paying your mortgage dollars. Well

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 2>done show, All right, Well, you know, this is the

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 2>kind of thing that a lot of big investors are

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 2>thinking about at the moment, and we should definitely think

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 2>about it too. And who is the one person that

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 2>we really like to talk to when we talk about

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 2>these big trends, And.

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Who is the one person that is always in town

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 3>Because we're in Washington, DC right now, when we go

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 3>to a new town, who is the other guy who

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 3>always is probably going to be there at the.

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Same time, the person that we run into on the

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 2>street in various outfits, Although this time you're wearing a suit,

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 2>So there we go. The last time we run into randomly,

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 2>you were wearing hiking gear and so were we. Anyway,

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 2>we are here in DC. We have the perfect guest.

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 2>As always, We are speaking once again with Hun Sunction.

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 2>He is the economic Advisor and head of the Monetary

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 2>and Economic Department at the Bank for International Settlements the BIS.

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 2>We love talking to him and it's so great to

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 2>have him here to talk about something that's really been

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 2>on the minds of a lot of market participants, a

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 2>lot of policymakers right now. So Hun, thank you so

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 2>much for coming back on our thoughts.

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 4>Thank you Tracy, thank you Joe. It's great to be back.

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Since Joe doubts my entire premise.

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 3>For this episode, the entire premise at all.

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Now, let's just start with how unusual would you say

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 2>this year has been? And I feel like so much

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 2>has happened. We kind of have to cast our minds

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 2>back to April when we did have Liberation Day and

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 2>when we did see the dollar fall as the market

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:27.720
<v Speaker 2>was selling off, which was something that's not really supposed

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 2>to happen. You're supposed to have investors reach for the

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 2>safe haven of the green back in times of turmoil

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 2>and stress. And now, you know, fast forward to October,

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 2>I think we've gotten a little bit more used to

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 2>that particular dynamic. But how surprised were you at that Well, it.

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 4>Was a very unusual combination of events in April. So

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 4>what we saw was the so called triple decline where

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 4>you had stocks, bonds, and the dollar, yeah, falling in unison.

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 4>And that's very unusual because in a risk off episode,

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 4>you know, which April was, typically the dollar would rally.

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 4>You know, there'll be a kind of safe have and flow.

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 4>And you know, back then, there was of course a

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 4>lot of news and you saw a lot of stories

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 4>back then about you know, possibly the dollar, you know,

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 4>losing its international status and so on. I think in

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 4>retrospect that was, you know, quite hasty, and I think

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:27.040
<v Speaker 4>now that we have the data, we can piece together

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 4>in a more kind of coherent way what was going on.

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 4>And in short, I think it was a kind of

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 4>hedging story where investors who had lots of exposures to

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 4>the US dollar, we're trying to reduce some of those exposures.

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 4>And we can get into some of the details and

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:51.799
<v Speaker 4>how you know, that kind of trade might transpire, and

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 4>it just so happens that this is also the year

0:05:55.000 --> 0:06:00.719
<v Speaker 4>that the BIS conducts its triannual survey of f X markets,

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 4>and we've just published the results, and I think we

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.799
<v Speaker 4>can also shed some more light on the events in April.

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 3>Let's keep it big pictures still, and then we'll drive

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 3>down into specific months and weeks. What people work for

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 3>the BIS, they prey must take out mortgages and Swiss

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Frank there living there in bars anyway, sidetrack, what are

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 3>some of the big takeaways from this year service?

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:27.239
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, so I think well, actually before we go there, Joe,

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:32.119
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's worth you know, thinking about how FX

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 4>market is really a figure in the investment strategy. So

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, if you're a long term investor, let's say

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 4>that you're a Euro area pension fund, what you have

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 4>are obligations to your you know, local euros beneficiaries in euros,

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 4>but you have a very large balance sheet and so

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 4>you need to have a very broad exposure to global assets,

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, including those in non euro denominated assets. So

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:01.720
<v Speaker 4>what tends to happen is some of the euros are

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 4>then converted into dollars to invest in in dollar assets.

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:08.919
<v Speaker 4>But of course what you want to do is to

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 4>make sure that you hedge that currency risk. And this

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 4>is where this instrument called an FX swap really comes

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 4>into its own, and it's an operation where essentially the

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 4>Euro Area investor pledges some euros and then borrows dollars

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 4>and then with those dollars then go into dollar denominated assets.

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 4>And as you do that, you also promise to unwind

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 4>that transaction at a known exchange rate that affixed in

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 4>a moment in the future. So essentially, once you've gone

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 4>through that transaction, your currency risk is hedged. Now exactly

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 4>how much of your foreign portfolio you hedge in this

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 4>way that varies over time, I mean it depends, for example,

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 4>on you know, how high the hedging costs are. Because

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 4>you're typically doing this fairly short term and you're rolling

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 4>over these hedges. What's important is the short term dollar

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 4>interest rate, because you know, you're borrowing dollars in order

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 4>to invest in dollar assets. So when the short term

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 4>interest rate is very high, that's typically a time when

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 4>hedging costs are very high. And so what had happened

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 4>over the last few years was that these so called

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 4>hedge ratios. You know, the proportion of your assets that

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 4>you actually hedge had been really you know, trending down.

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 4>And you know to the extent that some investors you know,

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 4>didn't hedge at all, And why would you if the

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 4>dollar is surging and the hedging cost is so large.

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 4>And so when the turbulence broke earlier in the year,

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 4>a lot of investors were basically caught with very large

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 4>dollar exposures, you know, having not hedged. And I think

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 4>one piece of evidence that you know this was that

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 4>the events of April was very much an expost hedging story,

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, hedging after the fact was that, you know,

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 4>we saw a lot of the telltale signs of swaps

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 4>being taken out and dollars being sold happening in the market.

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 4>So what would happen is, you know, if an investor

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 4>is holding dollar assets, you know, without a hedge, but

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 4>you're concerned about the dollar falling, then what you would

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 4>do is you would put on a hedge X post.

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 4>You would put on a hedge after the event. And

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 4>you could do that, for example, by actually then engaging

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 4>in an FX swap right there, but then selling the

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 4>dollars that you've acquired so rather than investing those dollars

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 4>into dollar assets, you simply sell it in the spot market.

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 4>What that kind of dynamics would would imply is that

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 4>there would be you know, lots of downward pressure in

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 4>those situations where institutional investors are trying to you know,

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 4>raise their head ratios. But expost So back to the triannual,

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 4>what do we see there that to you know, puts

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 4>additional light on this episode. By the way, on the triangle,

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 4>you know this, it's just so happens that the sampling

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 4>period was April this year, amazing, so you know, it

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 4>may be slightly distorted by the events of you know,

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 4>the April episode. On the other hand, the silver lining

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 4>is that we have some great data on really the

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 4>you know, the events of the of the April episode.

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 4>But the headline numbers are really quite you know, quite notable.

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 4>It's nine point six trillion dollars daily flow. This is

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 4>like something like almost thirty percent higher than the previous

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 4>survey in twenty two. The dollar is still very much

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 4>the dominant currency. It's ninety percent of all of the

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 4>transactions have the dollar on one side. It's even higher

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 4>than what we saw in twenty two so you know,

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 4>in spite of the survey being affected perhaps by these

0:10:57.400 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, stress events in April, you know, we think

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 4>we've got a very very very good sort of take.

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 4>One of the things that we noticed this year is,

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 4>of course, you know, as well as the FFX swaps,

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 4>which is by far the largest segment of the of

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 4>the transactions, we also see a lot of a big

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 4>increase in the spot transactions and also outright forwards. So

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 4>let me just explain that for your listeners. You know,

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 4>when you engage in US in an effect swap, you know,

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 4>the investor with borrow dollars by pledging euros, and then

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 4>there's also a promise to reverse that. Now that promise

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.559
<v Speaker 4>is called a forward, and of course you can get that,

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 4>you know, without going through the swap. You can just

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 4>go to a deal and say, look, you know, just

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 4>sell me a outright forward so called, and then I

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 4>would actually then have a dollar obligation.

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 3>A swap is like a spark trade plusure forward exactly.

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 4>Okay, it's that combination. And what we see is as

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 4>well as the swaps, we see the two components, the

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 4>spot and the forward being very very large this year.

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:06.839
<v Speaker 4>And we think that the events of April must have

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 4>had a you know, had an impact because you know,

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 4>as well as getting a swap and selling the dollars

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 4>in the spot market, you can also just ask a

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 4>dealer for a forward contract, but then of course the

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 4>dealer has to hedge, so you know there's going to

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 4>be a spot sale anyway, and so that combination would

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 4>actually lead you to a situation where both the spot

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:34.439
<v Speaker 4>and the forward transactions go up a lot. And that's

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 4>exactly what we see.

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 3>Interesting.

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 4>So this is another piece of the evidence that this

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 4>was very much exposed hedging. And let me mention just

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 4>two other things on this. We put out a bulletin

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 4>earlier in the summer we you know, lay out all

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 4>the other pieces of evidence that we could gather. But

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 4>it's also notable that if you look at the actual

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 4>portfolio flow numbers, the international portfolio flow numbers, there was

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 4>no real selling in April, so you know, there was

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 4>a very very small outflow, but on the scale of things,

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 4>it was really tiny. There was certainly no you know,

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:11.679
<v Speaker 4>concerted portfolio outflows you know from the US. So that's

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 4>really the i think, perhaps the most you know, compelling

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 4>evidence that the so called sell America trade was not,

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, was not the story behind the eight episode.

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Why should we care, either qualitatively or quantitatively if this

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 2>was a hedge America story and not a sell America's

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:45.439
<v Speaker 2>story outright.

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 4>Over the long term, it is possible that you know,

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 4>long term investors would then reassess their global exposures. And

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 4>you see and you hear a lot of anecdotal evidence

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 4>that you know, these conversations are going on, but so

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 4>far that hasn't really you know, translated into actions. But

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 4>I think what you know does flow very you know

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.679
<v Speaker 4>clearly from you know, from the actions in the spring,

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 4>is that when we look at the various pieces of

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:16.559
<v Speaker 4>the global financial system, every part depends on other parts,

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 4>and there is this network effect where provided that everyone

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 4>else is doing what they're doing around the US dollar,

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 4>then it's also in my interest. So actually, you know,

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 4>be part of that ecosystem. So if you have this

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 4>kind of need network effect, it's very difficult to have

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 4>this whole sale shift away.

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 3>One of the things that I think is unusual, and

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 3>I probably said this in a few other episodes, but

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 3>what I think is striking about this environment is that

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 3>if you look at the US it can come up

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 3>with a long list of reasons to be concerned, which

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 3>we don't need to come down recapitulate now. On the

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 3>other hand, the most affitable, impressive, cutting edge companies in

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 3>the world that everyone would love to have exposure to

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 3>in some way or in the US. And it strikes

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 3>me is that's the unusual situation, which is we don't

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 3>typically associate volatile sovereigns with being the home of the

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 3>most dynamic companies in the world. And so to my mind,

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 3>I would love to have exposed more exposure to in

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 3>Video and Microsoft and all of these companies that are

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 3>making money hand over fist without having exposure to the

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 3>US itself, And hence I might want to hedge.

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean, certainly, you know the equity market story, I

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 4>mean that really isn't a class of its own, and

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 4>as you say, that's really been a very very strong theme.

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 4>But more broadly, you know, capital markets. If you think

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:47.359
<v Speaker 4>about how capital markets operate, that there's a whole ecosystem

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 4>behind that, and you have the underlying securities obviously, but

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 4>then you have the hedging instruments, and then you have

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 4>a whole set of investors who are actually you know,

0:15:57.000 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 4>taking part and the banking system is absolutely crucial in

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 4>providing those hedging services. And I think when we last

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 4>discussed this back in Jackson Hole, you know, we talked

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 4>about how the FX swap market makes you know, money

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 4>fungible across currencies. And you know, money is ultimately something

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 4>to do with banks. So you know, the central bank,

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, issues high powered money. Commercial banks are there

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 4>also to issue money that the other users will will

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 4>take advantage of. And FX swaps are there, you know,

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 4>basically providing this service of making money fungible across currencies.

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 4>So you know, every piece fits into every other piece

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 4>in that sense. And so you know, we should think

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 4>about this in terms of the mutually reinforcing pieces of

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 4>this you know, this network.

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 2>What have you observed in terms of the actual trends

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 2>in FX hedging costs, because, as you described it in April,

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 2>suddenly it all starts kicking off a lot of large

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 2>investors who are not that used perhaps to having to

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 2>hedge their dollar exposure suddenly scrambled to do it x

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 2>post as you described. Did that mean that the cost

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 2>of actually doing so actually increased or was it still

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 2>relatively cheap?

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 4>Well, actually, it's primarily about how high the short term

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 4>interest rates are actually, and in particular, if you're a

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 4>non US investor investing in dollar assets, it's really how

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:30.360
<v Speaker 4>high the short term dollar interest rate is, because essentially

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 4>what we're doing is, you know, you're pledging euros, let's say,

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 4>and then borrowing dollars short term and then investing in

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 4>dollar assets. And so it's really about how high that

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 4>short term interest rate is relative to the yield you're

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:46.639
<v Speaker 4>getting on the asset itself. And so if you have

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 4>a flat yield curve, you know, which is what we've had,

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 4>or even inverted yel curve, then hedging costs are very high.

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 4>And so in fact, you know, investors have typically hedged,

0:17:56.680 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 4>and hedge ratios have fluctuated. There's no system matter survey,

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 4>but it's fluctuated between forty and sixty percent. I mean,

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 4>there are some pockets of official data, like the Japanese

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 4>life insurance companies, but typically this is you know, really

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 4>quite quite anecdotal. But what had happened in the last

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 4>year or so was the hedge ratios had gone down gradually.

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 4>Some firms were not even hedging at all, you know,

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 4>they were trying to win both on the stronger dollar,

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 4>but also on the high yields. Yeah, actually they just

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 4>meant mentioned a very interesting point here. Actually, it's actually

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 4>worth thinking about the parallels between this story about you know,

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 4>advanced economy investors holding US DOT assets with the story

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 4>about local currency emerging market bonds. You know, that's actually

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 4>a very very you know, important asset class that really

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 4>grew up after the GFC. And that's typical asset class

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 4>where the investor would not hedge. So if you want

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 4>to enter in to a large emerging market sovereign BONDERNT trade,

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 4>you would actually buy the instrument on an unheedge basis.

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 4>And you do that because you know, you think the

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 4>emerging market currency will appreciate as well as the YEL

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 4>four and so you win twice. You know, you gain

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 4>both on the yield, you know, as well as on

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.439
<v Speaker 4>the exchange rate. But of course when the tide turns,

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:27.640
<v Speaker 4>that's when you know scramble to you know hedge ex

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 4>post and that's exactly you know the same type of

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 4>thing that we saw you know, in this in this episode.

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 4>And you know, and there were actually emerging market investors,

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 4>especially from Asia, who were you know, caught with a

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 4>very low hedge ratios and there was this ex post

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 4>hedging going on. So there's actually a very interesting parallel

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 4>between you know, what was you know going on this

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:55.640
<v Speaker 4>April and the much older trade, which is the emerging

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 4>market trade.

0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 2>So Joe, on the plus side, people aren't necessarily selling

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 2>dollar assets. On the downside, the negative side, we're basically

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 2>treating dollar assets the way we would allow emerging market.

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 5>Pond were like, I think I'm going to buy some

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 5>local currency US day. That's right, actually, but like, so

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 5>what was it about April then that caused the like

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 5>what I mean, we know there was yeah, the Launcher

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 5>trade war and there were like massive tariffs, et cetera.

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 5>But like, what was it about that such that people's

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 5>impulses to hedge more expost factor as you've described it.

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 5>What was the thing they said, Oh, we want to

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 5>change our the our sort of our exposure to US dollars,

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 5>even if we don't want to sell them.

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 4>I think it's probably a combination of several things. But

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 4>where the you know, where the investors found themselves in

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 4>terms of the hedge ratios had a lot to do

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 4>with this. Actually, if you look through your you know,

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg news database, you'll find plenty of stories from twenty

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:05.879
<v Speaker 4>three for where let's say life insurance companies announce that

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 4>they will not be hedging, you know there, so you

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 4>know they would be holding let's say US dollar assets

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 4>but without a hedge. And as I said, you know,

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 4>there were some firms that didn't hedge at all. And

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 4>in a risk of environment, what typically happens that you

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:25.400
<v Speaker 4>want to take some chips off the table, and that

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:29.160
<v Speaker 4>just means reducing your exposure. Yeah, and if you're exposed,

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, in this double whammy fashion, you know you

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 4>would actually try and you know, either hedge ex post

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 4>or reduce your exposure. It looks like from the evidence

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 4>that it was very much the expost hedging story.

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 2>So if people are hedging their dollar exposure more than

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 2>perhaps some of them at least used to do, we

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 2>have to worry about things like rollover risk or some

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 2>sort of I guess duration mismatched where you have a

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 2>short term hedge, whether it's a forward or a swap

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 2>or whatever, mismatch to a longer term asset. I mean,

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 2>this is this is what the BIS does on a

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 2>day to day basis, is worry about potential risks so

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 2>are you worried here?

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 4>That's a really great comment, Tracy, And I think this

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.719
<v Speaker 4>was you know where I was going to go next.

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 4>Of course, you have this. You know, once you hedge,

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 4>you've hedged the currency risk at least until the maturity

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 4>of the swap, which is typically you know, one month

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:36.399
<v Speaker 4>to three months. But it's a short term. It's a

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 4>short term liability that you need to roll over, and

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 4>from time to time you might get caught in a

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 4>liquidity you know, stress episode where it's difficult to source

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 4>the dollars to actually repay. And this was, for example,

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 4>what happened during the GFC. It's also what happened during

0:22:55.840 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 4>March twenty twenty when there was also a scramble for dollars.

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 4>And you know, when you're a long term investor, you've

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 4>hedged using a short term effect swap, but you're holding

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 4>you know, long term securities, you have a maturity mismatch.

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 4>So either you have to somehow, you know, sell your

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 4>long term assess which is going to be very difficult

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.439
<v Speaker 4>at a fair price, or you have to join the

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 4>scramble for dollars with all the other borrowers of dollars

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 4>in the market and so this is the paradox where

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 4>you know you're a long term investor, but actually you

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 4>have this short term you know, dollar obligation. And so

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:37.679
<v Speaker 4>you know we are swapping one well, we are actually

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, exchanging one type of risk for another. We're

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 4>actually changing currency mismatch for maturity mismatch. And you know, empirically,

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 4>if you look at the evidence over the years, it's

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 4>when the dollar is falling for a long period of

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 4>time that these head ratios become very, very high. So

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 4>you know, a good example is the period before the

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 4>GFC when a dollar was you know, really falling, you know,

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 4>quite considerably. But then what happened at the GFC was

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 4>of course in a dollar really spiked because there was

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 4>a scramble for dollars. So you know, there's always this

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 4>trade off. You either have to beart some currency risk

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 4>or you bear this maturity risk, and then the bear

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 4>this maturity mismatch risk, I should say, and and so

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:30.400
<v Speaker 4>we you know, it's really you know, changing one type

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 4>of risk or another.

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:51.160
<v Speaker 3>Tracy really loves currency markets because she loves the fact

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 3>that when the line moves, it's you can never tell

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 3>whether it's the numerator or denominator that's at fault.

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:00.200
<v Speaker 2>But this is sarcasm, by the way, for those who don't.

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.120
<v Speaker 3>No, I hate you hate currency markets because you never

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 3>know whether we should be telling it's the numertor.

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you say the dollar is going down. Someone's going

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 2>to be like, oh no, but it's up against like

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 2>some obscure currency that no one's ever heard of.

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 3>But EM and you mentioned EM and many EM bond

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 3>funds indices and in currency is doing very well. And

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:23.400
<v Speaker 3>so this gets to the question, is this numerator story

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:26.199
<v Speaker 3>is it about dollar weekening or is it about so

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 3>we've been talking a lot about financial flows. Has something

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 3>changed though in the sort of underlying economic fundamentals of

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:35.679
<v Speaker 3>a lot of ems. I've heard some rumblings about this.

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 3>People excited about EMS in a way that I don't

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 3>think they were excited about to the same degree during

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 3>the twenty tens at all. And I just while we

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 3>were chatting, I pulled up a bunch of lines of

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 3>EM related funds currency all doing very well. In your research,

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:53.120
<v Speaker 3>are there fundamental changes in the EM world that are

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 3>like people are excited about for reasons other than the

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 3>fact that the dollar is week.

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 4>So this is right timely Joe and as it happens.

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 4>On Monday, we published a bulletin exactly on this question.

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 4>Are the emerging markets doing well because of better policy,

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 4>better fundamentals or is it really about the global financial

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:18.439
<v Speaker 4>market trends? And the short answer is it's a bit

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 4>of both. And you would and you would you know,

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 4>not think of otherwise. Why is it better fundamentals? Well,

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 4>I think it's certainly there's been much better policy, especially

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 4>monetary policy, and also the emerging markets have have really

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 4>been buoyed by actually, you know, the week of dollar,

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 4>the week ofd dollar has been a tailwind for much

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:51.119
<v Speaker 4>of the year. This is why emerging market assets have really,

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 4>you know, rallied quite hard. And there's a parallel with

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 4>credit spreads as well, because you know, when credit is

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 4>doing well, we also tend to see emerging market as

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 4>it's also doing well. And if we break it down,

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 4>so why would a weakening dollar be a tailwind for

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 4>emerging markets? Well, you know, in the simplest possible case,

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 4>if a borrower has borrowed dollars but then has invested

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 4>in local currency assets, you know, there's this currenty mismatch.

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 4>But then there's a windfall when the when the dollar weekends.

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 4>That's a very simple story. It's probably not the most important.

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 4>But there's another very interesting element here, which has to

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 4>do with the so called risk taking channel. And the

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 4>idea here is if you have a very diversified, you know,

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 4>portfolio of these of the loans to all of these

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 4>current sy mismatch borrowers, the improved credit risk on these

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 4>borrowers really you know, shrinks the tail risk in the

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:54.719
<v Speaker 4>credit for the you know, for the lender. So if

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 4>you like, the value at risk goes down, and that

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 4>really opens the door to two more credit. So this

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 4>is very very strong relationship between a week of dollar

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 4>and faster growth of dollar denominated credit. And because of

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 4>how important dollar credit is for supply chains, if there's

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 4>any product, if there's any good that out there that

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 4>relies on very complex supply chains, global value chains, those

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 4>products will tend to do very well. And what you've

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 4>seen is actually, in spite of the week of dollar,

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:33.479
<v Speaker 4>exports have gone up in these very highly sophisticated goods,

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 4>and much more so than the goods that are much

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 4>more affected by just a simple the simple trade effect

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 4>and exchange rate. So semiconductor for example. I mean this

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 4>has been one of the surprises. Clearly there's the AI boom,

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 4>but it's not just that. If you look at semiconductor

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 4>trade exports from Asia that's really been very, very resilient

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 4>this year, and anything that has to do with global

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 4>supply chains you would also see. But there's a you know,

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 4>there's a sting in the tail here because, as we

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 4>talked about earlier, emerging markets increasingly are becoming net creditors

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 4>to the rest of the world, and there was very

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:18.959
<v Speaker 4>little hedging going on, and so when you're caught in

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 4>one of these down drafts, you get hit both from

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, the wiki dollar and also the and also

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 4>the high yields. And so we saw a lot of

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 4>this you know scrambling, you know, back in April. So

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 4>it's primarily a tailwind, and it has been a tailwind

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 4>for a long time. But there is this third element,

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 4>this new element, which I think we need to keep

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 4>an eye on.

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 2>What do you see when you look at the price

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 2>of gold. So we are recording this on October seventeenth.

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 2>It's coming down a tiny bit this morning, but still

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 2>above four thousand dollars an ounce. What is that telling

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 2>you about how investors are feeling about various global currencies

0:29:56.920 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 2>at the moment.

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, Tracy, I mean, we we hear a lot about

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 4>the so called debasement trade, but I think that's probably

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 4>overdoing things. You know, Debasement is really about the value

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 4>of money relative to you know, goods and services. We

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 4>don't really see a surge in inflation. We don't see

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:21.719
<v Speaker 4>surge in the price of you know, even commodities. I mean,

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 4>look at you know, look at oil, look at other commodities,

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, everything other than gold. And so I think

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 4>we should probably look for a more tailored explanation for

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 4>gold other than simply the you know, this broader sort

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 4>of sense of you know, you a flight from you know,

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 4>fiard currencies, and you know, I think one thing which

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 4>goes back to our initial conversation on the role of

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 4>the dollar in the global financial system. Certainly central banks

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 4>have been big buyers of gold, and there has been

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 4>you know that sort of you know, set of very

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 4>sort of firm you know backdrop to you know, to

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 4>the market, and other people have jumped on the bandwagon

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 4>in a way it's actually behaving like a risk asset.

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 4>And the events today and you know, last week as well.

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 4>Rather than there being a flight to gold during stress times,

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 4>what we're seeing is it's behaving a bit like bitcoin

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 4>and the risk asset, So it sort of tells you

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 4>that there's been a little bit more of a speculative element,

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, here, but it's certainly behaving in a way

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 4>that's very different from the historical norms.

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, for a long time, Trace has talked about this.

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 3>For a long time. You could sort of model the

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 3>price of gold via real rates, and when they're very

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 3>low or suppressed or whatever, gold went up. It kind

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 3>of seemed like it changed not long after Putin had

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of his money seized. And when you talk

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 3>about central banks accumulating gold, being woken up to the

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 3>fact that your money is never really your money if

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 3>it's in a bank, it seems like it could be

0:31:56.640 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 3>part of it.

0:31:57.160 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, Joe, I mean, certainly, there are very few assets

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 4>which are not the liabilities of someone of someone, and

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, typically whether it's a fixed income instrument or

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 4>an equity, it's someone's liability, so someone has the obligation

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 4>to pay you. And gold is one of those which

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 4>is not the liability of of of of any particular individual.

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 4>I think, you know, when we look back, we can

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 4>see these sort of broad, you know, swings in the

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 4>price of gold. After the breakdown of Bretton Woods in

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 4>the early seventies, you know, there was a brief spike,

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 4>but then we had a very very long period when

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, gold wasn't doing very much. I think it's

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 4>probably something even before the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Joe.

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 4>So you know, we've seen the trend where something you know,

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 4>like this has also happened actually a few years back,

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 4>even even before the Russian invasion of Ukrainian twenty two.

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 4>But I think it's you know, this this element, this

0:32:55.520 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 4>this attribute where it's not the liability of any particular uh,

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, legal entity or individual. I think you know

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 4>is giving this a particular Yeah.

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 2>So I'm looking at the top menu on Bloomberg right now,

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 2>and you know, it's feeling a little bit nervy at

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 2>the moment. So the number one story is banks trio

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 2>of alleged frauds, sparksphere of broader issues. So this is

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 2>the idea that this is Jamie Diamond's cockroach idea that

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 2>we're starting to see some losses emerge from either outright

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 2>frauds or just bad investments, and people are starting to

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 2>get a little bit nervous. Do you see any sorts

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 2>of I guess credit oriented concerns out there at the moment?

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, Tracy, I mean, certainly this week is a very

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 4>news rich environment. We love you are you are you know,

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 4>contributing to that, and I think it's great. You know,

0:33:56.600 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 4>we we we hear a lot of these comments, uh,

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, on credit. Certainly, credit standards have been eroding

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 4>for a long time, and we have been one of

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:12.360
<v Speaker 4>the many voices, you know, even before this week, you know,

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 4>just pointing out that credit spreads have fallen to historical lows.

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 4>But if you look at the the trajectory of credit

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 4>to the private sector and compare that to what's been

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:30.799
<v Speaker 4>happening to government debt there, that really isn't a comparison.

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 4>So it's certainly before the GFC, the big growth was

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 4>in the credit to the private sector, especially in the

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 4>form of mortgages. But after that, what we've seen is

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 4>credits the private sector has really been very subdued, and

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 4>instead it's really been the government in a bond market

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 4>which has grown tremendously now what we're seeing now is

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:57.880
<v Speaker 4>you know, some signs of the erosion or credit standards,

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, coming back to bite. But if you're worried

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 4>about something very systemic, if you're worried about systemic risk,

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 4>the first thing to ask is how fast has this

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:12.320
<v Speaker 4>grown in the recent past. And typically something that's grown

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 4>very rapidly, will you know, give you some course for concern.

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 4>In this case, the really rapidly growing element has not

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 4>been credit to the private sector. It's been credit to

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:27.400
<v Speaker 4>the government and in particular the government bond market. So

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 4>we should have you know, we should of course worry

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 4>about you know, these you know, these events, and of

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 4>course the headlines you know create you know, as I said,

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:39.439
<v Speaker 4>it's a very news rich environment. We hear that, yeah,

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:41.879
<v Speaker 4>and we hear the same stories in the panels. If

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:45.319
<v Speaker 4>it's really a concern about, you know, is this the

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 4>precursor to the next you know, systemic crisis, it's probably

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:50.840
<v Speaker 4>not the case.

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:55.359
<v Speaker 3>Actually just brings a mind something that I don't think

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 3>I've really asked in such a way before. But another

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 3>thing that's grown a lot is the stock market or

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 3>equity equity markets.

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 4>There was actually a.

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 3>Really good article in the Wall Street Journal several days

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 3>ago about the degree to which equity exposure, at least

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:12.359
<v Speaker 3>in the US has spread demographically, so a lot many

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 3>more like working class households own stocks than they used to.

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 3>When I think about people who are in the business

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 3>of being worried about financial stability, I don't think the

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 3>stocks are high on their radar. They're called risky assets.

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:29.840
<v Speaker 3>We all know they're risky, and usually crises don't emerge

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:33.720
<v Speaker 3>from assets that we all agree are risky. Crises emerge

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 3>from assets that we think are going to be redeemed

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 3>from a dollar's worth we're going to get a dollars

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 3>back or whatever, or worried about getting back at all.

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:45.359
<v Speaker 3>But I'm curious, from the perspective of someone who professionally

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:50.320
<v Speaker 3>maybe worries, how do you and your colleagues think about

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 3>equity exposure, especially given the widespread view that equity exposure

0:36:56.200 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 3>is fueling consumption in the United States, a driver of

0:36:59.080 --> 0:37:01.920
<v Speaker 3>the economy, that there's a lot of speculative acts, Like

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 3>is there much modeling work being done on equity and

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:09.399
<v Speaker 3>risky assets specifically as a source of broader risk?

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:12.839
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, I think I think the you know, the main

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 4>channel would be through the real economy, through through real

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:21.880
<v Speaker 4>economic activity, rather than through let's say a de leveraging

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 4>episode or an equidity episode. I think it's worth thinking

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:29.360
<v Speaker 4>back to the dot com bubble of two thousand. You know,

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 4>that was a period, of course when the valuations were

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:36.480
<v Speaker 4>even more extreme, and when the stock market fell in

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 4>two thousand, of course we did see some effect, and

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:45.399
<v Speaker 4>of course a lot of investors lost money, but there

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:47.799
<v Speaker 4>was nothing like the same kind of impact on the

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:52.399
<v Speaker 4>real economy that we had with the GFC. And very

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:55.760
<v Speaker 4>simplistic way of putting this is whenever you have debt

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 4>of various kinds, that's when you should be worried, because,

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:03.880
<v Speaker 4>as you said, it's when you're promised one dollar but

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:07.399
<v Speaker 4>then you don't deliver. That's when you know there are

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 4>sort of ripercussions throughout the economy. Now, clearly with the

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 4>equity markets, there are wealth effects. So you know, if

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 4>you have a very large portfolio, you feel richer and

0:38:17.719 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 4>then you spend more, and so there is a real

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 4>economy effect of the stock market. And so if we

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:27.240
<v Speaker 4>see a pullback in the stock market, very sustained pullback,

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 4>we will see some effect like that. Now, the estimates

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 4>of the wealth effect on consumption, for example, has varied

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 4>over the years, but given the if you like, the

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:42.680
<v Speaker 4>democratization of stocks, we could expect a slightly larger magnitudes.

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 4>But on the scale of things, that effect tends to

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 4>be very small compared to the kinds of effects that

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 4>are associated with de leveraging episodes.

0:38:52.239 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Do you see any pockets of leverage out there that

0:38:54.640 --> 0:38:56.280
<v Speaker 2>aren't getting enough attention at the moment?

0:38:57.239 --> 0:38:59.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think you're very good at shining a light

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:02.480
<v Speaker 4>on those all those pockets. Actually, I think probably, I

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:05.400
<v Speaker 4>don't think I can really say anything here that you

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:09.720
<v Speaker 4>haven't heard of, but I think it's certainly worth bearing

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:12.840
<v Speaker 4>in mind the broad magnitudes. Yeah, in one of the

0:39:12.840 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 4>things that we've you know, we've talked about a lot

0:39:15.680 --> 0:39:20.280
<v Speaker 4>this year in our various official publications is the fact

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 4>that even you know, safe acets can be a source

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 4>of stress in the market, because it's not default that

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:31.479
<v Speaker 4>you know, propagates stress. It's more than de leveraging. I think,

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:36.200
<v Speaker 4>you know, if let's say, long rates were to you know,

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:40.360
<v Speaker 4>shoot up, and therefore mortgage rates also shoot up, you know,

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 4>that would be a really big deal for the real economy,

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:45.400
<v Speaker 4>and that would happen even without any defaults.

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:47.760
<v Speaker 3>By the way, when we started this conversation, the tenure

0:39:47.920 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 3>was below four percent. It's above it now. So keeping

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:53.960
<v Speaker 3>our listeners up to date on what's going on in

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:56.920
<v Speaker 3>the treasury market. October seventeenth, twenty twenty.

0:39:56.719 --> 0:39:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Five, very good. I mean, the other interesting thing is

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 2>if all the acting like a speculative asset, Now, what

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:04.920
<v Speaker 2>happens when all of that starts reversing and you know,

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:07.200
<v Speaker 2>the thing that you thought was worth four thousand dollars

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 2>is no longer worth four thousand dollars, and gold is

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 2>typically used as collateral.

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 3>I always say, you know, it's really scary when you

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 3>see people like intensely buying gold because like what's up?

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:16.719
<v Speaker 4>Like what?

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:20.120
<v Speaker 3>But what's really scary is why they start selling, right,

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 3>Because again, no, you's true, right, because actually no one

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:25.279
<v Speaker 3>has you have to be a real psychic have a

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:28.840
<v Speaker 3>gold denominated mortgage, you have dollar denominated mortgages, et cetera.

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:31.960
<v Speaker 3>And so when you see like usually one of those

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:34.800
<v Speaker 3>things you notice is that in a real credit event,

0:40:34.840 --> 0:40:37.439
<v Speaker 3>when you really get that vic spike and people are

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:40.360
<v Speaker 3>really worried about making that payment on their mortgage, and

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 3>they're really worried about paying their monthly subscription to their

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:46.919
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg terminal. They need dollars and then they sell gold

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:48.279
<v Speaker 3>and you're like, oh, things are getting really.

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Rough, all right.

0:40:49.960 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 3>I think that was a comment, that question comment not

0:40:54.120 --> 0:40:54.800
<v Speaker 3>even a question.

0:40:55.400 --> 0:40:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Thank you Joe for your comment. And it's always lovely

0:40:58.719 --> 0:41:01.319
<v Speaker 2>catching up. This is been fantastic. Thank you so much

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:02.439
<v Speaker 2>for coming back on the show.

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 4>Thank you very much, tra Sick, and thank you Jeff,

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:05.359
<v Speaker 4>Thank you so much.

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:05.919
<v Speaker 3>As us.

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:20.759
<v Speaker 2>Joe, I always enjoy catching up with him. He has

0:41:20.800 --> 0:41:23.240
<v Speaker 2>a fantastic way of explaining things in a very soothing,

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 2>calming manner. I do think so. Nuance is important, absolutely,

0:41:29.120 --> 0:41:32.520
<v Speaker 2>and technicalities in the market are important. So if the

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:36.800
<v Speaker 2>dollar going down is being exacerbated by hedging versus people

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:40.399
<v Speaker 2>selling dollars outright, that is an important thing to talk

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 2>about and to capture. However, I still feel like the

0:41:44.640 --> 0:41:48.720
<v Speaker 2>direction of travel is not fantastic for the dollar itself.

0:41:48.760 --> 0:41:51.439
<v Speaker 2>If people are treating dollar assets the way they used

0:41:51.440 --> 0:41:55.480
<v Speaker 2>to treat local em bonds in terms of hedging, that exposure, Yeah,

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:58.200
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't seem great necessarily for the US.

0:41:58.280 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean no, I mean, look, it's sort of you know,

0:42:01.160 --> 0:42:03.239
<v Speaker 3>I think of a currency as sort of like being

0:42:03.239 --> 0:42:06.520
<v Speaker 3>the token at Chuck E Cheese, you know, and you

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 3>want to play the games. But it was really nice

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 3>of like the token is going up and you can

0:42:10.719 --> 0:42:12.040
<v Speaker 3>play the games at.

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Play more games, or eat more pizza.

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:16.719
<v Speaker 3>Or or eat more pizza. But I think we're in

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:20.160
<v Speaker 3>this situation where people want to keep playing the games,

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:22.680
<v Speaker 3>they just don't really like the whole arcade.

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:25.360
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, yeah, this.

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Is this is the way I think about it. The

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 3>games are still fun, it's just that you're worried about

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:31.200
<v Speaker 3>the direction of the arcade.

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:35.680
<v Speaker 3>And so I think, because this is why, you know,

0:42:35.840 --> 0:42:37.840
<v Speaker 3>like how are you getting You're not going to like

0:42:37.880 --> 0:42:39.960
<v Speaker 3>do business in the United States, give me a break.

0:42:40.000 --> 0:42:43.080
<v Speaker 3>That's completely unrealistic, even if you don't like if you

0:42:43.120 --> 0:42:45.759
<v Speaker 3>put it the direction of travel. And so I think

0:42:45.800 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 3>sort of intuitively you could sort of understand why I

0:42:48.600 --> 0:42:50.400
<v Speaker 3>don't want to leave town. I just don't want to

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:51.719
<v Speaker 3>have arcade exposure.

0:42:52.040 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. I guess what we kind of need. We need

0:42:55.560 --> 0:42:57.919
<v Speaker 2>another big crisis so that we can observe what gold

0:42:58.040 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 2>does during that time. Yeah, and also what the dollar

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 2>does during that time.

0:43:01.719 --> 0:43:03.879
<v Speaker 3>I think I'm gonna run with this our actually I'm

0:43:03.880 --> 0:43:04.200
<v Speaker 3>gonna win.

0:43:04.280 --> 0:43:06.400
<v Speaker 2>It's a really good analogy because like, if.

0:43:06.239 --> 0:43:08.440
<v Speaker 3>You think like or you know, Chuck E Cheese has

0:43:08.480 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 3>a lot of fun games. But also I don't really

0:43:10.600 --> 0:43:12.799
<v Speaker 3>think the business swallow Chuck E Cheese. It's like that

0:43:12.960 --> 0:43:14.680
<v Speaker 3>good like how dare you?

0:43:15.000 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 4>Well?

0:43:15.200 --> 0:43:17.400
<v Speaker 3>A lot of them have closed out, but it doesn't

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:19.120
<v Speaker 3>mean the games inside were less fun. So I don't

0:43:19.120 --> 0:43:21.239
<v Speaker 3>want to hold those tokens in my pocket forever. I

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:23.319
<v Speaker 3>want to have exposure in case they go they go

0:43:23.440 --> 0:43:25.759
<v Speaker 3>to business or something like. That doesn't make the games

0:43:25.840 --> 0:43:29.520
<v Speaker 3>less fun in the meantime. And you've solved this problem

0:43:29.560 --> 0:43:31.560
<v Speaker 3>of wanting to play the games but being worried about

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:33.319
<v Speaker 3>the future of Chuck E Cheese by hedging them.

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:36.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to restart Chuck E Cheese and roll it

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 2>out across the country, just to ruin your analogy, your

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 2>preferred market analogy. No, I think it's a good one.

0:43:42.480 --> 0:43:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Thank you. Finally all right, but I will not be

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 3>taking out Chuck E Cheese denominated well, no, so that

0:43:48.600 --> 0:43:50.439
<v Speaker 3>would be the great thing. If you could imagine getting

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:53.160
<v Speaker 3>a Chuck E Cheese token denominated mortgage and then it

0:43:53.160 --> 0:43:55.000
<v Speaker 3>goes out of business. You don't even have to pay back.

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:55.319
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretty sure somewhere in like a box somewhere I

0:43:58.200 --> 0:44:00.200
<v Speaker 2>still have a bunch of like Chuck E Cheese, these

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 2>tickets or something like that. Maybe I should take them

0:44:03.120 --> 0:44:04.440
<v Speaker 2>out anyway.

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:07.960
<v Speaker 3>So this is another interesting question because what is the

0:44:08.000 --> 0:44:10.320
<v Speaker 3>exchange ratio between a token and a ticket?

0:44:10.520 --> 0:44:11.279
<v Speaker 4>Right? Yeah?

0:44:11.680 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know.

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:15.440
<v Speaker 3>This is sort of like one of those communist countries, Chucky.

0:44:16.120 --> 0:44:18.799
<v Speaker 3>This is a paper that someone write, Chuck E che

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:23.480
<v Speaker 3>is the dual circulation economy in which they have tokens

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:26.600
<v Speaker 3>for the games and tickets for the prizes, and how

0:44:26.640 --> 0:44:29.640
<v Speaker 3>they manage that exchange ratio is very similar to us

0:44:29.640 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 3>a planned economy.

0:44:30.800 --> 0:44:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Do you think I can find someone to provide like

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:36.560
<v Speaker 2>a swap on a token versus a ticket or something.

0:44:36.640 --> 0:44:38.120
<v Speaker 3>I think there's something here. I think we're I think

0:44:38.120 --> 0:44:39.760
<v Speaker 3>we're hitting on something important.

0:44:39.920 --> 0:44:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I think we should end. We should leave it there,

0:44:42.760 --> 0:44:45.640
<v Speaker 2>all right. This has been another episode of the Authoughts podcast.

0:44:45.719 --> 0:44:48.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:51.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:44:51.400 --> 0:44:54.799
<v Speaker 3>Follow our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carman armand dash Ol

0:44:54.800 --> 0:44:58.399
<v Speaker 3>Bennett at dashbot and Kelbrooks at Kelbrooks. From where odd

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:00.959
<v Speaker 3>Laws content, go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots

0:45:00.960 --> 0:45:03.360
<v Speaker 3>with the daily newsletter and all of our episodes, and

0:45:03.400 --> 0:45:05.319
<v Speaker 3>you can chat about all of these topics twenty four

0:45:05.320 --> 0:45:09.280
<v Speaker 3>to seven in our discord discord dot gg slash lots.

0:45:09.520 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 2>And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like it

0:45:12.040 --> 0:45:15.240
<v Speaker 2>when we talk to Hymnsumtionin about upcoming risks in the market,

0:45:15.280 --> 0:45:17.680
<v Speaker 2>then please leave us a positive review on your favorite

0:45:17.719 --> 0:45:21.120
<v Speaker 2>podcast platform. And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber,

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:24.080
<v Speaker 2>you can listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free.

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:26.400
<v Speaker 2>All you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel

0:45:26.400 --> 0:45:29.920
<v Speaker 2>on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening.