Speaker 1: Our two Sean Hannity Show eight hundred and nine to
Speaker 1: four one Sean. If you want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the programmer right, massive developments as it relates to
Speaker 1: the issue of Iran with the President this morning and
Speaker 1: now confirmed that in fact, the Iranians they want a deal.
Speaker 1: By the way, it's a joke that the Iranian state media,
Speaker 1: there is no state media upon the instantaneous announcement that
Speaker 1: there is a possibility now that the Iranians may give
Speaker 1: in here. I think that, you know, even the presidents
Speaker 1: saying the war could be settled in a five day
Speaker 1: period if things go well. Let me play the President
Speaker 1: from earlier today that Iran has agreed to Knowen Richmond
Speaker 1: even for medical purposes, which is a long way from
Speaker 1: what they were telling Steve Woodcoff and Jared Kushner when
Speaker 1: they were negotiating up until Operation Epic Fury began.
Speaker 2: Are we doomp into Iran directly?
Speaker 3: You know?
Speaker 2: Pimal the thank you all right?
Speaker 1: So, and the President said, we've had strong talks with Iran.
Speaker 1: If they want to make a deal, we'll make a deal.
Speaker 4: We have had very very strong talks. We'll see where
Speaker 4: they lead. We have points of major points of agreement.
Speaker 4: I would say almost all points of agreement. Perhaps that
Speaker 4: hasn't been conveyed. Communication, as you know, has been blown
Speaker 4: to pieces. They were unable to talk to each other.
Speaker 4: But we've had very strong talks. Mister Witchcoff and mister
Speaker 4: Kushner had them. They went I would say perfectly.
Speaker 5: I would say that if.
Speaker 4: They carry through with that, it'll end that problem, that conflict,
Speaker 4: and I think it'll end it very, very substantially. We
Speaker 4: have very much in mind our partners in the Middle East.
Speaker 4: We've had great relationships with a lot of them. As
Speaker 4: you know, a lot of them were surprisingly hit and
Speaker 4: I was surprised to see it, and so was everyone else.
Speaker 4: But we have they're very much in mind and discussions.
Speaker 4: So the discussions took place yesterday, they went into yesterday evening.
Speaker 4: They want very much to make a deal. We'd like
Speaker 4: to make a deal.
Speaker 1: Too, all right, Then, the President said, Iran, and this
Speaker 1: is critical here. This is what they wouldn't agree to,
Speaker 1: which became the imminent threat. Coupled with the sixty percent
Speaker 1: enriched uranium. He said, they've agreed to not having a
Speaker 1: nuclear weapon. This if in fact this turns out to
Speaker 1: be true. This is game changing. Listen, though, you said there's.
Speaker 3: Many points of agreement with Iran, right now, what can.
Speaker 4: You give us the like fifteen points fifteen points? Yes, well,
Speaker 4: they're not going to have a nuclear weapon. That's number one.
Speaker 4: That's number one, two and three they will never have
Speaker 4: a nuclear weapon.
Speaker 2: Yes, they've agreed to that.
Speaker 1: That is huge news. And anyway, joining us to analyze
Speaker 1: what's going on here, we have doctor Michael Mulkowski is
Speaker 1: with US President's CEO of the Jewish Institute for National
Speaker 1: Security of America, and our friend Ambassador Nathan Sales, who
Speaker 1: served in the first Trump administration as Ambassador at Large
Speaker 1: for counter Terrorism and acting Under Secretary of State Ambassador.
Speaker 1: I like the idea of hope. It sounds like they've
Speaker 1: just been defeated. You know, it's almost like saying unconditional
Speaker 1: surrender without unconditional surrender. But I do think there's got
Speaker 1: to be a component here. If they have all this
Speaker 1: sixty percent enriched uranium, that's got to be a part
Speaker 1: of it, and I would imagine the President would insist
Speaker 1: on it.
Speaker 3: I think so too. The Iranian regime has proven itself
Speaker 3: over the years to be completely untrustworthy. No matter what
Speaker 3: they promise, no matter what they put in writing, the
Speaker 3: key question is always going to be is it actually
Speaker 3: going to be implemented? And you know, for years they
Speaker 3: said we don't have a nuclear weapons program, and then
Speaker 3: Israel knuck into the country and stole their archive and
Speaker 3: brought it out for the world to see. Oh, it
Speaker 3: looks like they do have a nuclear weapons program. For
Speaker 3: years they told us our ballistic missiles can only go
Speaker 3: two thousand kilometers. Well they just took a shot at
Speaker 3: Diego Gar about four thousand kilometers away. So clearly anything
Speaker 3: they commit to, anything they say, has to be taken
Speaker 3: with an entire shaker of salt. So right now, I'm
Speaker 3: not surprised that the regime would be desperate for some
Speaker 3: sort of deal to preserve whatever is left of their
Speaker 3: ballistic missile capabilities or their nuclear capabilities. If we're not
Speaker 3: going to end the war militarily but diplomatically, right now,
Speaker 3: we have to make sure that the endgame accomplishes all
Speaker 3: of our military objectives, no nuclear program whatsoever. And as
Speaker 3: we've seen, their ballistic missile program is even more dangerous
Speaker 3: than we thought it was.
Speaker 2: That's got to go to agreed, Doctor Mukowski, what do you.
Speaker 6: Think, Yeah, tell me various keptical Look, if we could
Speaker 6: get a great deal, that would be terrific. But I
Speaker 6: think a great deal means to completely cleanse this country
Speaker 6: of Iran any of its nuclear material, not just all
Speaker 6: the nuclear facilities, but any of that highly rid geranium.
Speaker 6: All has to be a counted for And because what
Speaker 6: worries me if the regime survives. If you have a deal,
Speaker 6: by definition, the regime will survive.
Speaker 1: Well, tell me who the regime is? At this point,
Speaker 1: do we even know who the regime is? I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm sure the president and Steve Whitkoff and Jared Kushner
Speaker 1: are convinced that they know they're talking to the right people. However,
Speaker 1: we'll know very quickly. We'll know in short order, because
Speaker 1: I would imagine one of the first things they want
Speaker 1: to do is they're going to go in and extract
Speaker 1: any sixty percent and rich uranium and it will be
Speaker 1: in our possession, So we'll know right away if they
Speaker 1: mean it or not.
Speaker 7: Right.
Speaker 6: Well, yeah, except, I mean, by the way, your point
Speaker 6: is well taken. Who is the regime? I assume one
Speaker 6: of the people they're speaking to, and that I think
Speaker 6: been reported is the Speaker of the Parliament. But you
Speaker 6: do ever kind of weekend at Bernie's kind of situation
Speaker 6: with the with the so called Supreme leader there. We
Speaker 6: don't know if he's alive or dead. However, I think
Speaker 6: it's got to be all the mguranium, not just the
Speaker 6: sixty percent. My concern about if a deal would be
Speaker 6: that the Iranians then will try to drag this out,
Speaker 6: because we all know that that's what they do. So
Speaker 6: if there was such a deal, there'd have to be
Speaker 6: immediate disclosure and access to all enrich uranium, the stuff
Speaker 6: that's buried everything, and destruction then of all those facilities,
Speaker 6: and that would have to be immediate that they start
Speaker 6: playing around. I think then we would have to resume
Speaker 6: our military operations.
Speaker 2: Well, I think.
Speaker 1: It's going to be a little bit more complicated than
Speaker 1: just blowing it up, Ambassador Sales, because if you blow
Speaker 1: it up, then you run the risk of a you know,
Speaker 1: a radiation leak the likes of which we've never seen
Speaker 1: well you know since Hiroshima and Nagasaki probably on steroids
Speaker 1: and human growth form one.
Speaker 2: Am I wrong about that?
Speaker 3: Yeah? It could be very dicey. Sean and so you know,
Speaker 3: I agree, one of the key outcomes of this war,
Speaker 3: whether accomplished via military means or through diplomacy, has to
Speaker 3: be a complete accounting of all Iranian and rich uranium
Speaker 3: and it's removal from the country. And it's not going
Speaker 3: to be we trust the Iranian to go look for
Speaker 3: it and give it to us. We're going to have
Speaker 3: to go in and get it ourselves. Now, ideally we
Speaker 3: would do that after the bullets stopped flying. We don't
Speaker 3: want to put our force at unnecessary risk. But we
Speaker 3: actually have highly capable, highly trained special forces that have
Speaker 3: trained precisely for this mission to go into hostile territory
Speaker 3: to identify enriched uranium and to exfiltrate it one or
Speaker 3: two to dilute it on site so that it can
Speaker 3: never be a threat to the United States again. So
Speaker 3: you know, the best case scenario would be after we
Speaker 3: accomplish our military objectives in this war and the fighting stops,
Speaker 3: one of the terms one of the conditions of the
Speaker 3: cease fire is we're going to go in and get it,
Speaker 3: and we're going to do it in a controlled way
Speaker 3: so that those risks you just identified of damaging the
Speaker 3: canisters and nuclear fallout. We never have to worry about
Speaker 3: that because we control the environment on the way in
Speaker 3: and on the way out.
Speaker 2: Maybe you can explain to me.
Speaker 1: I've had others try, and I'm.
Speaker 2: Not well versed in this.
Speaker 1: My understanding is they can be preserved in those canisters,
Speaker 1: but they would be in gas form, not necessarily liquid form.
Speaker 1: That's how little knowledge I have about enriched uranium. Do
Speaker 1: you know any more than I do?
Speaker 3: Don I've got a nuclear engineer, so I know about
Speaker 3: as much as you do, maybe a little more, maybe
Speaker 3: a little less. I think the key point here is
Speaker 3: there's no civilian use, no plausible civilian use for those canisters.
Speaker 3: The only reason they could have uranium enriched to this
Speaker 3: level is to preserve a pathway to a bomb. And
Speaker 3: if you leave them with access to those canisters in
Speaker 3: any way, you leave them with a path to a bomb,
Speaker 3: and they're not going to give up on it. They're
Speaker 3: only going to give up if we take the material
Speaker 3: and have a very strict enforcement regime. After the bullet
Speaker 3: stopped flying, it.
Speaker 1: Would seem to me that the time to do that
Speaker 1: would be immediately. Mikemakowsky, in other words, that while our
Speaker 1: military is still positioned that would have to be done
Speaker 1: while they're still there. That would be the trust and
Speaker 1: verified moment on that very important issue as it relates
Speaker 1: to the Iranians having to pay back America for this
Speaker 1: military conflict. I just know Trump well enough. I've not
Speaker 1: disgusted with them, but I would imagine he's going to
Speaker 1: want them to pay us for what we had to
Speaker 1: do here.
Speaker 6: Yeah, by the way, I completely agree, we would have
Speaker 6: to maintain our forces, and I agree as the ambassador said,
Speaker 6: we can't rely on the iraniance and just disclose. We
Speaker 6: have to make sure that we've gone ourselves and access
Speaker 6: every point that we think that miser facilities are or
Speaker 6: where there could be any enrich uranium, and there'd have
Speaker 6: to be in orderly removal. I will say, though, if
Speaker 6: there is no deal, then we might have to do that,
Speaker 6: I think in the context of this conflict, which would
Speaker 6: obviously pose a lot more risk to our forces. But
Speaker 6: I think for President Trump, who I think is an
Speaker 6: outstanding job here to really fully declare victory, there has
Speaker 6: to be be a complete resolution, whether through negotiations or
Speaker 6: through the war. Of the nuclear material and the nuclear facilities.
Speaker 1: Well, I think one of the goals also is to
Speaker 1: be ambassador. No going back. We're done. This is it.
Speaker 1: This is our last, you know, excursion back to Iran.
Speaker 1: So this has to be one and done and complete
Speaker 1: and move on, which would be fully in keeping with
Speaker 1: the Trump doctrine.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 3: I think that's exactly right, Sean. And that's why I
Speaker 3: also think it's important to ensure that our military objectives
Speaker 3: are fully accomplished before we call things off. We don't
Speaker 3: want to end things prematurely with twenty five percent of
Speaker 3: the targets on the list still existing, only to find
Speaker 3: out that the Iranians are now six months from now
Speaker 3: reconstituting their ballistic missile program, building drones, building centrifuges that
Speaker 3: they can use to enricheranium again. America has made a
Speaker 3: huge investment in this war, in blood and in treasure.
Speaker 3: We want to make sure that we're doing it right
Speaker 3: so we don't have to come back and do it again.
Speaker 3: So that might mean we need a little bit of patience.
Speaker 3: We might need to let this thing cook for a
Speaker 3: little while, let the military work its way through its
Speaker 3: war plan to make sure that it's accomplishing all of
Speaker 3: its objectives before calling things off. Prematurely and letting the
Speaker 3: Iranians up from the mat, which they can then use
Speaker 3: to restart all of the programs that we're concerned about.
Speaker 1: All right, quick break more with doctor Mike Mukowsky and
Speaker 1: Ambassador Nathan Sales with the latest developments out of I
Speaker 1: Rant on the other side than your calls coming up
Speaker 1: eight hundred and ninety four one Shawn this Monday, as
Speaker 1: we continue.
Speaker 7: Elections, palls, campaigns, the latest news on your candidate. We've
Speaker 7: got you covered this election year, knocking in right here
Speaker 7: on the Sean Kennedy Show.
Speaker 1: Can we continue now, Doctor Mike mckofsky is with us,
Speaker 1: and Ambassador Nathan Sales is back with us all these
Speaker 1: latest breaking developments. Some hope now in this ongoing conflict
Speaker 1: of epic fury with President Trump's announcement this morning that
Speaker 1: in fact, the US and Iran have been discussing over
Speaker 1: the last two days, good productive conversations regarding a complete
Speaker 1: total resolution to the hostilities. There markets responding accordingly the
Speaker 1: minute that this truth social post went out this morning. Anyway,
Speaker 1: we continue our discussion. As much as people want to
Speaker 1: declare that Donald Trump has full control over Israel's actions,
Speaker 1: I would imagine their objectives are very different than the
Speaker 1: United States, so I would imagine they want regime change.
Speaker 1: That's never been a stated goal of Donald Trump, although
Speaker 1: he did say at one point the regime needs to go.
Speaker 1: And the regime kind of has gone already, isn't it.
Speaker 6: I don't think the Israelis believe that you have to
Speaker 6: end the war with the regime collapse. They'd obviously prefer that,
Speaker 6: as I'm sure President Trump would, but I think I
Speaker 6: don't think that. I think the key is and I
Speaker 6: think both countries share this, that the conditions have to
Speaker 6: be set for a collapse of the regime, and and
Speaker 6: and and by the way, you know, it's impossible to
Speaker 6: predict when that could be. It could happen as soon
Speaker 6: as the fighting stops, or it could be, you know,
Speaker 6: months later. I mean, the big demonstrations we saw beginning
Speaker 6: in the end of December early January, those took place
Speaker 6: six months after the Twelve Day War. So they have
Speaker 6: no idea when this is going to start. I don't
Speaker 6: think the Israeli is going to push President Trump to
Speaker 6: go until the regime willipse. I think the key is
Speaker 6: setting the conditions, which is weakening the conventional and destroying.
Speaker 1: The nuclear I would imagine maybe there's a final thought here.
Speaker 1: We'll give it to you, ambassador, that anywhere, any place, anytime,
Speaker 1: inspections have to be part of any deal.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and that's one of the things that the JCPOA,
Speaker 3: the Obama era nuclear deal, never had, and that's one
Speaker 3: of the reasons why it was fatally flawed. It ultimately
Speaker 3: depended on us taking the Iranian regime's word for it,
Speaker 3: and that, as we know, is not worth a paper
Speaker 3: that it's written on. So we really robust inspections to
Speaker 3: make sure that they don't reconstitute a nuclear program of
Speaker 3: ballistic missile capability and so on. Are the Iranians prepared
Speaker 3: to say yes? I think we have to watch this
Speaker 3: with a very jaded eye. Don't say anything right now
Speaker 3: to make us stop. Because we've got them down on
Speaker 3: the mat and they're desperate to survive. It's easy to
Speaker 3: say something.
Speaker 1: We would know within forty eight hours if they meant it,
Speaker 1: because probably within forty eight hours we would have a
Speaker 1: team of people in there to extract any sixty percent
Speaker 1: and rich uranium they have. That's I think I will
Speaker 1: have our answer that quickly.
Speaker 2: In my view.
Speaker 1: So it's once again the decision will be in the
Speaker 1: Iranian's hands, and this time I don't think with all
Speaker 1: of our military in place, I don't think they really
Speaker 1: have any option. It's either that or you know, the
Speaker 1: next layer of quote leadership will be gone. I mean
Speaker 1: the CUDS Forces headquarters is the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Forces
Speaker 1: headquarters were all taken out today in the last twenty
Speaker 1: four hours. So there's not much there in terms of
Speaker 1: their ability to fight back anymore. Over eight thousand targets,
Speaker 1: all their ships in the straighter horn moves ballistic missile
Speaker 1: capabilities have been diminished by ninety percent. But you know
Speaker 1: they have proven once and again that common sense does
Speaker 1: not dictate what they do.
Speaker 2: Anyway.
Speaker 1: We appreciate you, Ambassador Nathan Sales, Doctor Mike Mukowski, thank you.
Speaker 5: This is what's right with America. You're listening to the
Speaker 5: Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1: This was on Fox News Sunday. The Secretary General of NATO,
Speaker 1: who's been very supportive of President Trump. And you know,
Speaker 1: we have been on this program very critical of our
Speaker 1: NATO allies in European nations. Now they have finally gotten
Speaker 1: on board. Yes, they get more of their energy because
Speaker 1: of the straight of hor moves way.
Speaker 2: More than we get.
Speaker 1: And they have been weak and feckless, and oh, we
Speaker 1: don't want to get involved.
Speaker 2: We don't like conflict.
Speaker 1: And unfortunately, I think that you are watching a decaying continent.
Speaker 1: I'm not even sure that Europe has a path to recover.
Speaker 1: I think think the NATO alliance has been weak, and
Speaker 1: significantly NATO countries have not kept up with their responsibility
Speaker 1: in terms of national security and national defense. They have allowed,
Speaker 1: especially in Western Europe, unfettered immigration without any assimilation, resulting
Speaker 1: in Sharia courts and countries like Great Britain, no go zones,
Speaker 1: and countries like France where not even police and medical
Speaker 1: personnel are allowed into certain neighborhoods. Why people want to
Speaker 1: emigrate to a country and not adopt to that country's
Speaker 1: values and mores and assimilate. I don't know why they're
Speaker 1: allowed to do it. I really don't know. A couple
Speaker 1: that with their radical socialism that they have bought into
Speaker 1: now for decades, and climate alarmism. It's very hard to understand.
Speaker 1: And one person that has been pretty stepfast and supporting
Speaker 1: the president is the Secretary General of NATO. And his
Speaker 1: name is Mark Rutt, and he understood that it was
Speaker 1: critical the US takeout arounds nuclear capabilities. Why Great Britain, France, Spain,
Speaker 1: other countries have been so weak I can't explain here.
Speaker 1: Listen to Mark Rutt.
Speaker 8: Well, let me first of all say that I know
Speaker 8: there's a lot of debate in the US and the
Speaker 8: Europe where this campaign of the president against Iran was necessary,
Speaker 8: and let me tell you it is. It is crucial
Speaker 8: that the president at the US is doing this to
Speaker 8: take out the nucle capability and the basticnesshock capability because
Speaker 8: this is posing a threat. It is an existential threat
Speaker 8: to Israel, it's a threat to the religion, it is
Speaker 8: a threat to Europe, to the whole world. And so
Speaker 8: it is really crucial that the US is doing this.
Speaker 8: And I hope that people understand that argument. Even if
Speaker 8: they're doubting whether it was necessary or not, it is
Speaker 8: necessary and a command to presidence leadership on this.
Speaker 1: And Mark rad even responded to Trump calling NATO allies
Speaker 1: cowards and frankly they were listen, he called them cowards.
Speaker 2: So how does that square.
Speaker 1: With with what you're saying now about their willingness to
Speaker 1: show up.
Speaker 8: Yes. Well again, the good use is that these twenty
Speaker 8: two countries are following the President's lead on making sure
Speaker 8: that we free up the rat or form. Most obviously,
Speaker 8: the military campaign is still ongoing, so that's why we
Speaker 8: are working now these countries together and also with the
Speaker 8: US to make sure that we assess what then and
Speaker 8: how we can do this. But we also say this,
Speaker 8: the United States has been planning for this for weeks
Speaker 8: for obvious reasons, because of security, it was impossible to
Speaker 8: share that knowledge with allies because that would then have
Speaker 8: prevented the effect of the first attack, because there was
Speaker 8: a risk always of leaking. So I totally understand why
Speaker 8: the US was not able to share this with allies.
Speaker 8: But at the same time, it means that European allies
Speaker 8: and partners all over the world have used the last
Speaker 8: couple of weeks to make sure that we come together,
Speaker 8: that they started planning to see what we can do
Speaker 8: collectively as allies, as partners of the United States at
Speaker 8: a moment as possible for the straitor who moves to
Speaker 8: open up and therefore answering the President's school want this,
Speaker 8: and that's what I told him. I said, Hey, they
Speaker 8: are following your lead.
Speaker 2: And I think that's very important anyway.
Speaker 1: That's Mark Rutt, the Secretary General of NATO, and I
Speaker 1: don't know if NATO can survive as an alliance. We
Speaker 1: pay more than every other country combined. The President forced
Speaker 1: them to more than double their contribution to our Defense
Speaker 1: Strategy agreement, and it's still not enough on their end.
Speaker 1: And NATO is nothing without the United States. They need us.
Speaker 1: And as the President said, what good is an alliance
Speaker 1: if when we need a little help from you? And
Speaker 1: we didn't even really need it, but it was in
Speaker 1: their best interest to help us. They didn't even want
Speaker 1: to show up in the beginning.
Speaker 2: It was pathetic.
Speaker 1: Let's get to our phones, Alabama. Robert on the Sean
Speaker 1: Hannity Show, Hi.
Speaker 5: Hey, Sean, how are you?
Speaker 2: I'm good, sir. What's going on?
Speaker 5: Just a couple of quick questions. And I was. I
Speaker 5: was listening to that conversation you were having with those
Speaker 5: two gentlemen earlier, and it was an interesting conversation about
Speaker 5: the uranium. Uh, do we know where the uranium is at?
Speaker 1: I have every belief, according to my sources, we know
Speaker 1: exactly where it is.
Speaker 2: Yes.
Speaker 5: Good because these people, I mean once you know you're
Speaker 5: going to push these this is a religious ideology, so
Speaker 5: you push these people just a little bit too far,
Speaker 5: and you know, they believe dying for the cause is
Speaker 5: a win win, so that it seems pretty imperative that
Speaker 5: we get our hands on that.
Speaker 1: You know, how many more layers deep in terms of
Speaker 1: leadership levels, and I ran, do we have to get
Speaker 1: to before somebody's like, this is a horrible way of
Speaker 1: life and we're not going to have a country at
Speaker 1: the end of it if this continues, that they just
Speaker 1: give up their nuclear ambition because they've lost let's be
Speaker 1: honest here, they've lost this conflict, they've lost this this entire.
Speaker 2: You know, war. But they just don't realize it yet,
Speaker 2: I know.
Speaker 5: And now they're quick to tell you, hey, we've been
Speaker 5: around for seven thousand years. You've only been around for
Speaker 5: two hundred and fifty. And they use that like, you know,
Speaker 5: we know a whole lot more than you do. You know,
Speaker 5: that's what they seem to think. And they thumb their noses,
Speaker 5: said no, we don't want no deal. In fact, we
Speaker 5: got four hundred and sixty kilograms of sixty percent enriched uranium.
Speaker 5: I mean that ooh, no wonder he had to act
Speaker 5: right then and there because he.
Speaker 1: Really had no choice. Steve Woodkoff has said it. The
Speaker 1: CIA director Ratcliffe has said it. Dan Bongino was on
Speaker 1: He was so passionate, you know, when he was on
Speaker 1: My show last week. But Wi Cough really laid it
Speaker 1: out as to why it was an imminent threat. And
Speaker 1: you know, for people that have other agendas, I noticed
Speaker 1: there's a lot of people that you know, have an
Speaker 1: anti Israel agenda. I don't care what they have to say.
Speaker 1: I think they're just fundamentally wrong. They don't understand the
Speaker 1: Trump doctor, and they don't want to standard. There's almost
Speaker 1: like a part of people that wants Donald Trump to
Speaker 1: fail rather than making the world a safer, more secure
Speaker 1: place for future generations. I don't understand their thinking, and
Speaker 1: I don't really care to understand their thinking. It's meaningless
Speaker 1: to me.
Speaker 5: Now because if you try going in going down that
Speaker 5: rabbit hole, you'll go crazy.
Speaker 2: I don't want I'll tell you.
Speaker 1: This if you take the converse side of it, If
Speaker 1: this was the imminent threat that Steve would call who
Speaker 1: I've known a long time, and I believe you're asking
Speaker 1: me if I believe him you're not, But I'm saying hypothetically,
Speaker 1: my answer is yes, I do.
Speaker 2: And he was there.
Speaker 1: And if that's what they're bragging about, and that's their
Speaker 1: commitment even after Operation Midnight Hammer, then we really at
Speaker 1: that point don't have any other choice. President had no
Speaker 1: choice here, and so I think he made the right call.
Speaker 1: If and I'm hopeful, I mean, I'd rather this thing
Speaker 1: come to an end. I'd rather extract this enriched uranium safely.
Speaker 1: I'd rather eliminate the threat for the region, for the world.
Speaker 1: I'd rather we never go back there ever. Again, I
Speaker 1: wanted to end as quickly as possible. I want the
Speaker 1: free flow of oil at market prices to be re established.
Speaker 1: I think we could be well on our way to that.
Speaker 1: You know, the President seemed hopeful today when he talked
Speaker 1: about fifteen of the major points that we were insisting
Speaker 1: on they were agreeing to.
Speaker 3: Have.
Speaker 1: They now had enough. Is this what it takes to
Speaker 1: get them to, you know, get on their knees and say,
Speaker 1: cry uncle, I don't know, We'll see time will tell.
Speaker 1: Appreciate the call, my friend eight hundred nine four one, Shawn.
Speaker 1: If you want to be a part of the program,
Speaker 1: all right quick break, right back to our busy phones
Speaker 1: toll free. It's eight hundred ninety four one sean. If
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program rolling
Speaker 1: along this Monday, right back to our busy phones toll free, eight.
Speaker 2: Hundred nine four one sean.
Speaker 1: If you want to join us, Let's say hi to
Speaker 1: Tandra Is in my free state of Florida, San or
Speaker 1: how are you glad you called?
Speaker 9: Oh hey, how are you Sean? My husband and I
Speaker 9: are big fans and we love the Free State of Florida,
Speaker 9: and we're so happy here. I have two things. One,
Speaker 9: I'd like to give President Trump some just big kudos
Speaker 9: and thanks and a shout out as he navigates us
Speaker 9: through this historic, historic tough time. You know, he had
Speaker 9: intel the time was now to act on Iran, and
Speaker 9: he took it. And if that means that we have
Speaker 9: to go through some short term discomfort for some long
Speaker 9: term gain, we are totally on board. Because as sure
Speaker 9: as I sit here and speak to you, I believe
Speaker 9: one thousand percent that President Donald Trump has our best
Speaker 9: interest at heart. I absolutely know that what's every firebber
Speaker 9: of my being that that man wants nothing more than
Speaker 9: for our country to be strong, to be great, and
Speaker 9: I am just so thankful. I'm so thankful that he
Speaker 9: is our president. I cannot imagine what things would be like.
Speaker 6: If he was not.
Speaker 5: Mike.
Speaker 1: He's really once in one hundred and fifty year historical figure.
Speaker 1: I mean, think of all the presidents going way way back,
Speaker 1: you know that talked about Iran not having it goes
Speaker 1: back as far as Clinton for crying out loud that
Speaker 1: they can't have a nuclear weapon. You know, look at
Speaker 1: the idiotic deal of Obama, the idiotic you know, allowance
Speaker 1: of Joe Biden, what sixteen seventeen trillion, a billion dollars
Speaker 1: in money, you know, cargo, planes of cash and other currency.
Speaker 1: Please please, you know, if we if we buy you off,
Speaker 1: will you please be nice to us. It was, it
Speaker 1: was just foolishness, appeasement, and it came to a head
Speaker 1: under President Trump. And thank god he got there when
Speaker 1: he did, because these are really dark, evil people and
Speaker 1: we've seen this and witnessed this. They have a history
Speaker 1: of murder and death, and you know, their adherence to
Speaker 1: the sick ideology. This, this death cult, would have been
Speaker 1: an existential threat to the US and the entire world.
Speaker 2: Scary times agreed, agreed.
Speaker 9: My second thing I would like to pose to you
Speaker 9: is this, I have a specific query for you about
Speaker 9: the Save Act because I feel like that we are
Speaker 9: being held hostage by these you know, self righteous, pontificating Dems.
Speaker 9: We've got these TSA workers, air traffic controlers, FBI, CIA,
Speaker 9: our amazing active duty military coast Guard, border patrol not
Speaker 9: being paid makes us less safe all the way around. So,
Speaker 9: sitting here in our wonderful state where we've got great,
Speaker 9: great leaders in our state, right, what can we do
Speaker 9: those of us listening to you who are in our
Speaker 9: great states and feel powerless? What can we do to
Speaker 9: put pressure on these senators from where we sit because
Speaker 9: this is just it's just disgusting to this pontificating and
Speaker 9: chess beating to continue. There is what can we do?
Speaker 9: Can you give us some direction and tell us what.
Speaker 1: Well the most important thing you do, and you have
Speaker 1: good senators, and we have good senators here in the
Speaker 1: free state of Florida, we just do Number one. Number
Speaker 1: two is we for a variety of reasons, we're You're
Speaker 1: dealing with two different issues here. One is funding the
Speaker 1: Department of Homeland Security. Democrats thought they came up with
Speaker 1: a clever deal, and yet they would still not fund ICE.
Speaker 1: And then once the president said that he would send
Speaker 1: ICE agents to help the TSA out because people have
Speaker 1: been waiting six seven hours just to get through TSA
Speaker 1: to get on an airplane. I have friends that work
Speaker 1: it for the TSA. These people have not been paid
Speaker 1: in thirty seven days now thirty seven days, and the
Speaker 1: Democrats don't care. But you know, the idea that they
Speaker 1: want this unilateral right, you know, to to docs ICE agents.
Speaker 1: You know, they believe it's their inherent right to do so.
Speaker 1: I mean, people take pictures all the time when they
Speaker 1: go through TSA. Is disgusting to me. I think they
Speaker 1: ought to be able to protect their identity and their families.
Speaker 1: These guys are there to help out and help people
Speaker 1: get through these lines so that they can you know,
Speaker 1: get on airplanes and not disrupt travel in the country.
Speaker 1: Tom Holman's graded his job. I think they would do.
Speaker 1: I know they're doing a great job, and you know
Speaker 1: they've been They've been working under the most difficult circumstances
Speaker 1: being you know, slandered and smeared every day of the week.
Speaker 1: So that's issue won on the Save Act, Call your
Speaker 1: senator and tell you senator you want them to fight
Speaker 1: as hard as they can fight to get that passed.
Speaker 1: You know, we've we've now debated this ad nauseum almost
Speaker 1: every day on this program. We've given you every side
Speaker 1: of that argument. Why this is an issue for some people,
Speaker 1: I I don't know. It's an eighty five point fifteen issue.
Speaker 1: It should be a no brainer for everybody, and Democrats
Speaker 1: that don't support it only have nefarious intentions. So my
Speaker 1: advice to you to answer your question directly is call
Speaker 1: your senators or call senators that are on the.
Speaker 2: Fence, and I hope that helps anyway.
Speaker 1: Eight hundred nine point one Sean, if you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program,