WEBVTT - What is the EmDrive?

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. Hey there, everyone, and welcome to Forward Thinking,

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the podcast that looks at the future and says it's astounding.

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Time is fleeting. I'm Jonathan Strickland, I'm Joe McCormick, and

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that's not the first time we've used that lyric on

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>this show. Well anyway, but we warp around sometimes, warp around,

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 1>warp warp yes, okay, sorry, Well, today we're gonna be

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 1>talking about not just one listener request, but a topic

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>we have gotten lots of requests about in the past

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>few weeks, right, right, But generally we've been getting requests.

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I think this is sort of like some people are

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:52.559
<v Speaker 1>confusing a couple of topics and sort of putting them

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>into the same category, but understandably. So let's let's back

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>up and tell the story of the so called NASA

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>M Drive. First of all, I'm just gonna have to

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:05.479
<v Speaker 1>say I don't think it is quite correct or appropriate

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>to call it the NASA M Drive. From what I

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>can tell, it is not in essence a NASA project.

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>The M Drive is sort of a concept. Uh, there's

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>there's one main model, but then others that are very similar.

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>And then recently we've had some experiments by a subdivision

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of the Johnson Space Center at NASA who have tested

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>versions of the M drive, and we'll talk more about

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that that division a little bit later in the episode. Right,

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:34.479
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think there, I don't think it's really

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>correct to call it the NASA M Drive, so we'll

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>just call it the M drive. So, simply put, the

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>M drive is a proposed method for generating thrust in

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:49.919
<v Speaker 1>space without propellant. It's a propellantless drive, which is um

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>or at least propellant in the way that we we

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>generally understand propellant, because there are some weird, wacky, uh

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>quasi explanations of what might be going on in which

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>we could be talking about a quantum propellant. But we'll

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>get to that too, sure, Okay, So let's look at

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>how today's space vehicles work. So today's space propulsion is

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty much all based on Newton's third law, which is

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:19.519
<v Speaker 1>pretty good as a good law. Yeah, it's also known

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>as the conservation of momentum. And that's where Newton said

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that you can't keep a witch in your basement unless

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you pay attacks to the local region. No, that was

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the fourth thought. Sorry, just holy grail. The conservation of momentum.

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's for every action there is an equal and

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>opposite reaction. You've heard this one before. You could paraphrase.

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>This is the sort of throw the medicine ball method,

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>as I've called it. So imagine you're sitting in a

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>rolling office chair on a very smooth surface, and you've

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>got one of those big heavy medicine balls in your

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and your feet are not on the ground, you're not adding,

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:01.519
<v Speaker 1>you're not embracing against anything. And now you just take

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that ball in your hands and you throw it as

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>hard as you can. What happens, well, the ball goes

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>off in one direction and then you roll away in

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the opposite direction. And this is the basic principle behind

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a chemical rocket engine. So in a chemical rocket engine,

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you burn fuel to eject lots of mass or propellant.

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>The goal of the burning in a rocket engine is

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the exhaust um. So you're going to be throwing all

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>this hot gas out the back of the rocket. And then,

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of course, because of conservation and momentum, the rocket gets

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>pushed forward with a proportional force, and there's actually a

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>mathematical way to determine what that force is going to be. Yeah,

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>it's incredibly simple. Actually it's too. To figure out momentum.

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>You take the mass of the body that's going to

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>be that's that's in motion, and you multiply that with

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>its velocity. No Velocity is speed in a set direction,

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's really important with momentum when you're talking about

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>conserving momentum. So, uh, the mass of the propellant in

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>this case is very low, We're not it's especially compared

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to the rocket itself, right, it's much smaller, but velocity

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>is incredible. So you multiply those two things together. Well, meanwhile,

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you've got the rocket which has got a certain mass.

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>As long as the the the momentum is going to

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 1>be greater than the rocket, then obviously you're going to

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 1>have to uh, if you if both sides of that

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>equation have to be equal, you have to have some

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>velocity with the rocket going in the opposite direction. That's

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 1>what's conserving the momentum. Uh, So the rocket will end

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>up moving through space in the opposite way from the

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>direction of the propellant um. And if you want to

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>picture this relationship with just a concrete example. Imagine instead

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:46.559
<v Speaker 1>of the big medicine ball, you sit in the rolling

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>office chair and you shoot a gun. Right, the weight

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of the bullet that's not much mass. It's a very

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>low mass object, but it escapes with very high velocity,

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 1>and it's probably gonna make you roll, maybe as much

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>or more than the medicine ball. So that's your basic thing.

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>That's just your basic rocket. Right, That's just the way

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>that uh well, that's the way the universe works that

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 1>our understanding of physics has. This is one of the

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 1>fundamental laws, this conservation of momentum. You cannot create it,

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you cannot destroy it. You can only conserve it, right, right,

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you can move momentum around. Yeah, So it's not just

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>chemical rockets though. This is all methods of space propulsion

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that we have that follow Newton's third law. So, for example,

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you have something like ion thrusters. Now this is this

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 1>can be classified as a type of electric propulsion, but

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>it's still accelerates by ejecting propellant. In this case, the

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>propellant is ions or charged particles that are being sort

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of electrically gathered and flung out the back of the vehicle,

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's a relatively low amount of mass, but it

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>can accelerate it at very high speed and you can

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>have you know, you can have a constant acceleration where

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the acceleration itself might not be very drum attic, but

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>over time, because you're accelerating, you're building onto that velocity,

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you get faster and faster and faster. It's just that

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that you know, uh, acceleration is very smooth and slow,

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>but that doesn't mean the speed is slow. The speed

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>will just get additively. It starts out not fast. Right now,

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you might be thinking, wait a minute, now, I can

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>think of some methods of travel in space that aren't

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>based on throwing mass out of the back, Like what

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>about a solar sale or what about beamed propulsion. Well,

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 1>in both of those cases, you're still conserving momentum. It's

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>just that instead of throwing something out the back, you're

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>letting something push you from the outside. Right because radiation,

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:48.479
<v Speaker 1>electromagnetic radiation has forced So a solar sale would like

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>stretch out a big reflective sale and let the sunlight

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>push it out away from the sun. Or you might

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>have some kind of system where you could beam energy

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 1>or something or beam ions at an object in space

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to push it forward, and that's I'll find that also

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>is still obeying Newton's third law. Yeah, the interesting thing

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>here is that we often think of electromagnetic radiation is

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>not possessing any mass, right, like the idea that um

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a photon is. We often think of it as a

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>massless particle that carries light. However, it's kind of massless. Yeah,

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>it has a relativistic mass, so there's that. But but

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>also the interesting thing about momentum with electromagnetic radiation is

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that we're really looking at the energy of the particle.

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>And the way you determine the momentum of a of

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>electro magnetic waves is that you take the energy and

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you divide it by the speed of light. Now, the

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>speed allow is a huge number, so unless that energy

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>is truly astronomical, it's also going to be a very

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>very very small number when you're done with that division.

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>But that's the momentum of that electromagnetic wave. So in

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>other words, as you might imagine, it takes a lot

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of energy to create a little momentum using electromagnetic radiation. Right.

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>But of course, even in these scenarios where we're talking

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>about electromagnetic radiation or something having some kind of momentum

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>like a force that can impart. The laws of physics

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>tell us that you can't accelerate a closed system because

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about there is an open system. So

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you might have a solar sale that even if you

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>um discount say like like charged particles and and stuff

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>like that, flying into things that do have mass. If

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you're just talking about radiation pressure pushing on a solar sale,

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that's an open system. It's being fed energy from the

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>outside right now. According to the everything we understand about

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the laws of physics, you cannot accelerate a closed system,

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:49.079
<v Speaker 1>a system that doesn't have mass or energy coming in

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>or going out. Right. So, Uh, one example I have

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>seen that I read in an article somewhere was that

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>imagine that you are sitting in the driver's seat of

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a car and the engine isn't on. Uh. This is

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>John Byas is analogy. There we go, thank you, thank you,

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and that you push on the steering wheel in order

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to try and make the car go. That doesn't work. Uh.

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>You know that as a closed system, and there's nothing

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>going in there to make that. Plus as you're pushing

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>here obviously pushing yourself backward. It's all being equalled out.

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Nothing's happening. Momentum is preserved within the system, but you

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>don't get an external motion there. The car won't move

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>right right, even the Flintstone's car. If you know, if

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you're moving your feet, that's a that's a fricative surface

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>pushing against that that is an open system exactly. So

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, according to the laws of physics, we know

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of three ways to move something. You can eject mass

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>like chemical rocket. You can push against something like we

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>do with the Flintstone car, feet in the Flintstone car,

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the wheels of a car with an engine. Or you

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>can be pushed by something like a sail in the

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 1>ocean or a solar sail. That's conservation and momentum. We've,

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.839
<v Speaker 1>as far as we know, with one passe double exception

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>now never ever seen this violated. So that brings us

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to the thing that may or may not be an exception.

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>And before we get too much into m drive, which

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously we haven't gotten into it really at

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>all yet. But before we really leap into this, we

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>should also say you're gonna hear a lot of hypothesizing

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>going on among the three of us. And that's because

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>this is actually something where every single research organization that

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>has taken a look at it has come up with

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a different means of explaining what the heck is going on. So,

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>if you are listening to this hoping that we're going

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to give you the definitive answer as to does the

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>M drive work, does it not work? If it does work,

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>why does it work, I just want to go ahead

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, I got to warn you that's not happening,

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>not yet anyway, certainly not definitely not us Right, Well,

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll offer plenty more cafaats as we go down the road,

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>because this is getting into territory. I think that even

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>weird for lots of physicists, as we are by no

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>means physicists. So we're doing We're doing our best here, folks.

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.079
<v Speaker 1>But so let's talk about the M drive. The M

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>drive is sort of you could also call it the

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>RF resonant cavity thruster. That's what has been referred to

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in some of the literature RF, meaning radio frequency UM.

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>It is one system, and not the only one ever

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>proposed that attempts to challenge the absolute necessity of propellant

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>for for space travel, like we're talking about. It wants

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to generate thrust like a traveling force without propellant. Okay,

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>So the m drive was invented by the UK aerospace

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>engineer Roger Shawyer. Uh sometime around the year two thousand

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:46.599
<v Speaker 1>and shaw You're created the company's Satellite Propulsion Research or

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>spr Ltd in the early two thousands around the device

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and to sort of uh promote his research. But the

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 1>basic idea is actually pretty simple. Like once you get

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>into the physics, the math is incredibly complic hated, but

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the device itself is pretty simple. Yeah. The idea is

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>you're bouncing microwaves around inside a very specifically designed cavity,

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:16.959
<v Speaker 1>right that will turn pure DC electricity just creating that yeah,

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>electric energy into microwaves that generate thrust without ejecting any mass.

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>So in other words, you've got a chamber. There's no

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>opening in that chamber, so there's no way for the

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.839
<v Speaker 1>microwaves to escape because otherwise the microwaves will be acting

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>like the propellant that we had talked about the previous ones.

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>So and and as I said, that would be a

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>very inefficient means of generating thrust because electromagnet magnetic radiation

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>is very low momentum. But uh, imagine that you've got this.

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>This is yeah, this is not even pushing from the outside. Right,

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>You've got a closed off chamber. All the microwaves are in.

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Microwave radiation is inside that chamber. There's nowhere for it

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to go. But one end of the chamber is wider

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>than the other end of the chamber. And that, according

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to the various tests and the various design documentation that

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>we've come across, is the secret. Right, that's the that's

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the thing that that design is. Yes, and it's integrally

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>important to creating that thrust. Yeah, let me try to

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>explain it a little better. So I found a two

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand six paper where show your attempts to explain his

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>theory and sort of diagram how the thing works. Again,

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>it's lots of advanced math. I am not qualified to

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.440
<v Speaker 1>evaluate it or tell you whether whether his math is

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>correct or incorrect, but I can at least look at

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>what he's proposing. So the paper is called a Theory

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of Microwave Propulsion for Spacecraft. And here is how you

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>claimed it would work. You have a magnetron it's like

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>in a microwave oven. Your your microwave has one of these,

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's just it's like a vacuum tube that turns

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>electricity into microwave radiation. And then you have a quote

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>closed papered wave guide. A wave guide is usually just

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be it's some kind of like pipe or something.

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a device that guides electromagnetic radiation or

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>waves in some way for a machine to make use of.

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>And in this case it has to be specifically like

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>he says, closed and tapered, so it's not open, and

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>it uh, it is like you said, it's bigger on

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>one end than it is on the other. And the

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>magnetron generates microwaves. The microwaves are fed through a tube

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>into this specially designed wave guide. And then this is

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a quote from his paper. He says, the group velocity

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of the electromagnetic wave at the endplate of the larger

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>section is higher than the group velocity at the endplate

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of the smaller section. Thus, the radiation pressure at the

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>larger endplate is higher than at the smaller endplate. So

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 1>he's saying there's going to be despite the fact that

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a closed system. There's going to be greater radiation

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>pressure on one part of this system than on the other,

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>which if you have a pressure your differential, this should

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>result in the thrust in. Yeah, and that's an important thing,

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>unidirectional thrust. Right, Like you can without bracing against anything,

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>sit in a rolling chair and rock back and forth.

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>You know what? What But what would you need to

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>do to generate unidirectional thrust? That's the question. And even

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>with this description it's still I mean, if you start

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the laws of momentum, it still sounds pretty

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>confusing because you're talking about a closed system. Uh, think

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of it as if you were in um to to

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>macro size this to get out of the electromagnetic world.

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Imagine that you've got a spacecraft and it has one

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>wall that's larger. You know, it's shaped in almost a

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>triangular way. Where you have one and that's very wide,

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and one and that's that's much more narrow. They both

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>have flat walls. And you get three quarters of your

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>crew to line up against the wide portion and the

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>last quarter to wine to line up on the on

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the the smaller portion, And tell everyone put your hands

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>on the on the wall and push as hard as

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you can, you would not expect the spacecraft to move

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>through space. Because so though Sawyer has an answer for this, Okay,

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>So he's got a theory about why this works. And

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>what he claims is that his device um because of

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>relativistic considerations. That again, we're not qualified to evaluate the

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>physics of those. Some other people who are kind of

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>qualified do seem rather dubious. Uh, because of relativistic considerations,

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not a closed system. It's actually an open system

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>once you've take into account these quantum physics that he's

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about. Yeah, so if you just go and look

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>at like the fact on his website, he tries to

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>explain it. So he says, for example, the thrust is

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the result of the reaction between the end plates of

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the wave guide and the electromagnetic wave of propagated within it. Okay. Again,

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>while that sounds like a closed system to me, but

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>he says it not because at the propagation velocities and

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a quote, at the propagation velocities uh, parentheses

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 1>greater than one tenth the speed of light closed parentheses,

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:15.919
<v Speaker 1>the effects of special relativity must be considered. Different reference

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 1>planes have to be used for the E M wave

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and the wave guide itself. The thruster is therefore an

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:26.160
<v Speaker 1>open system and a net force can be produced. So

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:29.239
<v Speaker 1>he's invoking relativistic physics like a like a sort of

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>like Lorenz transformation, essentially saying that that to your your

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 1>point of reference is what determines whether the system is

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>open or closed, and that from one point of reference,

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it appears to be a closed system, but if you

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>change your point of reference, it's an open system. It's

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>very similar whenever we get into discussions about about speed

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and time, about how your experience of time is going

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to remain the same no matter how fast you're traveling,

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>but your speed of time compared to someone else's speed

0:17:56.560 --> 0:18:00.439
<v Speaker 1>of time will change, well, will appear to be different

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>based upon your both relative speeds relative to one another.

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Um So, so it's one of those things where like

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>without a further deeper understanding on my part, my first,

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>my my knee jerk reaction, I completely admit this is

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 1>based off ignorance. But my knee jerk reaction is you're

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>using special relativity like a get on a jail free card,

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 1>like like well it's only or or obi wan Kenobi

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>would be like, well, it's only a closed system from

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a certain point of view. I'm like, you're gonna make

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>me watch a prequel trilogy where I learned that you're

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:39.479
<v Speaker 1>just a big liar, Mr Obi one. Okay, So well,

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>let's get back to where all of this sort of

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:44.919
<v Speaker 1>hype in the media has come from. Yeah, because in

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the past month or so, there have been so many

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>stories in the popular media that have been talking about

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's where all of our requests came from, too,

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:55.359
<v Speaker 1>is like in the last month. Yeah, but this is

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>not the only time this has come up. In fact,

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you if you go back over the year, you will

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>see sort of a cycle of like resurgence and then

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>dying off of M drive related hype a theory you do, Yeah,

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 1>at least of the dying off part. Well, yeah, okay,

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>So there have been times when there's some supposed new

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 1>somebody comes out and says something about M drive and

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>this may be shaw Your's M drive or any other

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:27.199
<v Speaker 1>similar form of sort of like closed microwave propulsion, right,

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.360
<v Speaker 1>because he's not the only person who's been working on this.

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 1>They're they're very similar technologies. You might even call them parallel.

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.239
<v Speaker 1>That are, they're being considered and tested. But like so,

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>let's say within the past year or so, you've seen

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a headline that says something like NASA confirms impossible space

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>drive or something like that, right, Uh, that sounds exciting. Yeah,

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>NASA confirmed it. Yeah, we like NASA. NASA does good work,

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure, and that is in reaction to, uh this

0:19:55.920 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>presentation that came in July from a team out of

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the Johnson Space Center, which we mentioned before. Yeah, and

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>their presentation was called, quote anomalous thrust production from an

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>RF test device measured on a low thrust torsion pendulum

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:19.439
<v Speaker 1>rolls off the tongue and uh so the division we

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 1>keep talking about this, this group within NASA has a

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>name Eagle Works. Well that's that's a that's an unofficial name.

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>They don't have. It's you know, based on skunk worksite,

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>actually legal works. It's done by the folks from scrubs.

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't get that reference at all. Is NASA's Advanced

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Propulsion Research Group. Yeah, you could also say they're the

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>ones who are given the amazing responsibility to investigate the

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 1>least likely, most fringe, most far reaching possible hypotheses because

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the idea being that. Sure, a lot of these ideas

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 1>that were coming up with and I'm not speaking just

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>about the M drive. I'm talking about lots of stuff here,

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>warp drive exactly, at warp drive and that kind of

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll mention warp drive with the M drive as well

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later too. But at any rate, Uh,

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>they're they're in charge of looking at all these things

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:22.439
<v Speaker 1>because even though many of them may be extremely unlikely

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to ever work out, if one of them does, we

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 1>definitely want to get in on that. So right, well,

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can understand why people might be excited

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 1>about this if there is a test that seems to indicate, oh,

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe you could generate thrust without ejecting mass. I mean,

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 1>propellantless drive would revolutionize space dravel would be It would

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>wreck physics departments across the world too. I mean you

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 1>would you would have to rewrite the books on physics.

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 1>You would have to at least sit there and say,

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>all right, for your basic classical system this holds true.

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>But in these cases addendum to classical physics and we'll

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>actually talk about that at the end of this episode,

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Like what this means, Yeah, yeah, sure, okay, but but

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 1>so in this July uh paper, I believe it was

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a conference presentation, conference presentation. Yes, yes, now that's totally correct. Um.

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.959
<v Speaker 1>The group leader of Eagle Works one Dr Harold Sonny White,

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>proposed that the M drive should in fact be able

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to provide thrust because the quantum vacuum. They're giant quotation

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 1>marks around that, y'all. The quantum vacuum should function the

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>same way that propellant ions do in a magneto hydro

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>dynamics drive. So let's unpack all of this just a

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>little bit. No idea what hydro dynamics drive is, Well,

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 1>it has something to do with the leader of the

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>League of Evil Mutants, right, Welcome to Die, right, And

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.679
<v Speaker 1>then apparently one of the Spider Man villains is in

0:22:56.720 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>there too, with Hydroman there, and so obviously the comic

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>book villains are are are deep and NASA is what

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>we're getting into. Lauren, can you explain this? Did you

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>look this up? I can? I can explain this a

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Okay, So, so quantum vacuum. Quantum vacuum is

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the term for the concept that the vacuum of space

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:18.400
<v Speaker 1>is not empty, but rather is is filled with like

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Heisenberg uncertainty related virtual particles and photons that simultaneously exist

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and don't exist sporadically and or predictably the way that

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>they do. So, Yeah, like the vacuum of space is

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 1>full of quantum possibility, right, and and if there's a possibility,

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that means that at least some of the time there's

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>a reality. So if you think of this like I

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>think of it, I always go back to electron tunneling

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>because that goes back to my my technology stuff. So

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>electron tunneling the the electron doesn't necessarily tunnel through anything.

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>This is a term that we use for things like

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>when you're making a transistor and if they transistor gate

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>is too narrow, sometimes an electron can appear to have

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 1>tunneled straight through the gate, but it doesn't leave a

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>hole or anything. What happens is you've got a field

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that somewhere within that field the electron exists. So there's

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>a percentage of probability that the electron will exist at

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.920
<v Speaker 1>any given point in that field. If that field can

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 1>overlap a gate, that means that there are there is

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a possibility the electron could exist on the other side

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of the gate and as long as there's a possibility.

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>It means that sometimes there is an electron on the

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:33.959
<v Speaker 1>other side of that gate because nature finds a way. Yeah, well,

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 1>and an electronics This is what we call a bad

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>thing because you don't want your electrons to be able

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to go through the gates of the gates are not open.

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>That's the gates are designed to stop them exactly. You're

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>supposed to have the control flow of electricity. Also in

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>dinosaur amusement parks um, that is a very bad probability.

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure we'll find that out in the in the

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>upcoming documentary World. Okay, so so we've got a quantum vacuum,

0:24:56.760 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>but what about magneto hydrodynamics. Okay, that is the fancy

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>term for a type of plasma physics, and quantum vacuum

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>is not a thing that is really agreed upon solidly

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>by the physics community, but magnetohydrodynamics totally are. It's basically,

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>when a conductive field slashes around, and it's also in

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the presence of a magnetic field, it will generate electrical currents.

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Those currents will muck around to the magnetic field, producing

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>mechanical forces that'll muck with the fluid and with anything

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>else that happens to be nearby. Now see this makes

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>perfect sense to me, and this is why we're talking

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 1>about electro magnetism, the the the the relationship between electricity

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 1>and magnetism. So if you have a magnetic field, uh,

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and you've got a conductor, then clearly you're going to

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>have the ability to generate to induce electricity to flow.

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's the very basics of a lot of

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 1>our electrical electricity power grids here. Okay, can you give

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>me a concrete example and explain how it would work?

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, So let's say that you've got a an

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>iron nail and you've got a copper wire that's wrapped

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:02.199
<v Speaker 1>around the iron nail, and then you introduce that to

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a fluctuating magnetic field. Now fluctuating is important in this case.

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>But if it's a fluctuating magnetic field that will induce

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>electrons to flow through that copper wire, so induced electricity

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:15.439
<v Speaker 1>to flow. It's the same thing we're talking about here,

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>except we're talking about plasmas rather than you know, a

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>like an actual magnet or an electro magnet. But it's

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it's the same basic principles it's the principles of electricity

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and magnetism working together and they kind of feed off

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of one another. Sure where does the mechanical force come in? Oh, well,

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>that would just depend upon you having some sort of

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>magnetic system that would have to be able to react to, uh,

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 1>the actual magnetic forces. I mean, you would have to

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>for for a mechanical thing, for a physical force to happen.

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine you have to have some sort of

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 1>possibly ferro magnetic material to be attracted to it. Otherwise

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I don't know where you would get mechanical

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:59.239
<v Speaker 1>forces from that point. Otherwise, Um, it's it's a bit

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of physics that I do not understand. The caveat number

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>like thousand of this podcast episode, scientists say that this

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:10.880
<v Speaker 1>is tot's a real thing, y'all. So I believe them.

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>You could have it be a mechanical force, now that

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I think on it. If you've got a plasma, the

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>mechanical force may just be the fluid I motion of

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the plasma. The fact that the magnetic forces are going

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to force the plasma to change different shapes, that could

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>be it as well. So uh yeah, anyway, fascinating stuff.

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>This parody actually made a vehicle out of this? Yes? Actually, um, okay,

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:38.400
<v Speaker 1>So magneto hydrodynamic drives are engines that capitalize on this

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:42.120
<v Speaker 1>weird trick of physics, maybe by using the mechanical force

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>created by the system to push against matter that's nearby

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:48.159
<v Speaker 1>and propel a vehicle forward. I think that's what the

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>m drive is talking about. But in practical, tested, reproducible systems, UM,

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you can use the mechanical force created by the system

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to funnel a liquid like like water or air through

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a series of ducks running the length of a vehicle.

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:06.640
<v Speaker 1>So the vehicle therefore moves forward from the force of

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the fluid that it's it's funneling being pushed out through

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the back end of the vehicle. Wait a minute, is

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 1>this the Red October in then for Red October caterpillar drive?

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 1>Is that what it was? No? No, that was that

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>was nuclear stuff. But but this is this is similar, um,

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and they're actually no no, wait no, I think in

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 1>the I think it is. It's a nuclear powered magneto

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>hydrodynamic drive system. It's a it's a possibility. Obviously that

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 1>was fiction. It's the caterpillar driven fiction. I'm sorry. I

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>interrupted you. I'm sorry, please go ahead. No, no, Mitsubishi

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>did make a real submarine back in the early nineties

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that contained this kind of drive. It was powered by

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>superconductive coils containing liquid hydrogen um. Well, and it was

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>also powered by seawater, because that's what it was pushing

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 1>through the system, right, right, Yeah, So so this sub

0:28:57.240 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>was called the Yamato one, and it was pretty badass

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 1>but also really impractical because it had a top speed

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:05.479
<v Speaker 1>of like nine miles per hour a k a about

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>fifteen kilometers PERU. That might be comparable to some objections

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>people have raised about the m trun Right, but so,

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, what Dr White of Eagle Works is saying

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 1>is that if you suppose that the quantum vacuum of

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 1>space contains enough particles to push against or maybe through,

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>uh magneto hydro dynamic type drive, then it could it

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>could work. Okay, Well I don't know whether that's true

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 1>or not, but that's interesting that he says. So yeah,

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's all I have to say. Yeah, It's

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those things where where at some point

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you have to say, well, this this is dealing with

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a level of understanding beyond my own and I can't

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>really have an opinion about it beyond that. Okay, well,

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about actual tests. I mean there there have

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>been tests, yeah, there, And this is why but er

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I think repeatedly getting excited because there have been multiple tests,

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>some done I think in the United States in China

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>where they're like, okay, well we're building one of these things,

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>some kind of electromagnetic drive system, like an M drive

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>or or a CANAI drive. You know, it's bouncing microwaves

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 1>inside an apparently closed system and generating thrust one way

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 1>or another. Like in China, They've been doing some right

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>since twenty ten or so, this this team out of

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 1>China has been publishing research concerning this sort of technology.

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 1>As the last thing that I saw from them was

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that they were working on ways to monitor these devices

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 1>from the inside with like embedded therma couples, because monitoring

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 1>this kind of system is pretty important to make sure

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that it doesn't explode um. But but but they have

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>not this team out of China has not yet provide

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>an explanation for how an M drive would provide propulsion

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>in a vacuum. And well, I mean not not one

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that's been widely accepted by the scientific community. And an

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>important thing to call or or an important thing to

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:06.719
<v Speaker 1>point out rather is that none of the tests on

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 1>M drive technology have been conducted in vacuums yet, which

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 1>is a really important variable in this whole space travel equation. Right. Well,

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so one of the things we need to

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 1>look at is a lot of these tests do report results.

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:24.959
<v Speaker 1>They say, hey, hey, this we generated some number of

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>micro Newton's of force or not force of thrust. Yeah,

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>so they register some tiny amount of apparently unidirectional thrust.

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>They say, we we put it on a you know,

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>a machine that will gauge if there's thrust, and they

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>did register some tiny, tiny, tiny amount of thrust. Now,

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the question is why did they register that. Is that

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 1>because the device is actually working as proposed, or because

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>there's been some kind of error, or because uh, you know,

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 1>there's something wrong with how the experiment is devised, right right,

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there's some kind of factor that they have not

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>taken into account, a couple of which we will discuss

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>later on um. But so all of this hype recently,

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, up until now, no one has tested

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>this in a vacuum. Someone from Eagle works um. An

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 1>engineered by the name of Paul March went on an

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 1>enthusiast web forum called NASA space Flight dot Com and

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>said that NASA has built, has has run a successful

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>vacuum test of an M drive, And that is what

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I think all of these news sources are going bonkers about. Yeah,

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 1>because the the important thing we need to point out

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>here with the vacuum versus non the know in atmosphere

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 1>tests is that, uh, there are other variables that could

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>affect measurement right where you could end up having a

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 1>false positive on an outcome. For example, you might think

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that your M drive has produced thrust, but in fact

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a nigh undetectable breeze could have affected the um the measurement,

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 1>And that was one of the things. That's why people

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 1>are saying, you have to have a successful test within

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a vacuum environment to rule out some of these other variables.

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Plus that's the environment that this thing would be working

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>in in the first place. Yeah, I mean, there are

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things that can happen if you don't

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>actually have a vacuum. So so we've heard this report

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 1>apparently on an internet forum that there finally has been

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a successful vacuum test. But that's a report on an

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>internet forum. Yeah, and it's a really cool internet forum.

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Apparently some of the like a bunch of engineers from

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Eagle Works hang out there and kind of bounce ideas

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 1>off of this community of like minded enthusiasts. So, you know,

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 1>but internet forum. Yeahah, so, so if you just look

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>at the ones that have been published with the not

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 1>fully vacuumized, that'd be the term. The chambers that are

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that are not actually if a full vacuum um you

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 1>could I I've seen it suggested by some critics that

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:09.839
<v Speaker 1>perhaps heating the air could cause convection currents that could

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>move the device, and that and then you get the

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 1>false positive. The device seems to move on its own,

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's actually because of convection currents. Obviously, that is

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 1>something that you could eliminate by putting it through a

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:26.880
<v Speaker 1>vacuum chamber. Another criticism I've seen some critics make is

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 1>simply that these are hyper sensitive test conditions. It's not

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 1>registering huge amounts of force, very very small. Yeah, I've

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:39.280
<v Speaker 1>seen it compared to you know, it's orders of magnitude

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:43.360
<v Speaker 1>below the weight of a raisin. Yeah, I've I've also

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 1>heard that it's significantly lower than what had been predicted.

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Although to be fair and at least one UH incarnation

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:55.279
<v Speaker 1>of this device, it was said that it would only

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 1>work if the device were already in motion and not

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>uh work. You couldn't use it to to start, you

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>had to be moving already and then it would uh

0:35:04.960 --> 0:35:09.840
<v Speaker 1>provide an acceleration. But um either way, you know, the

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:12.719
<v Speaker 1>measurements were talking about a very small and some would

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>even argue well within a margin of error where you know,

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the the the amounts being measured are smaller than what

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 1>you could UH safely expect is beyond error with the

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:28.919
<v Speaker 1>metric the measurement devices you're using. Yeah, and another thing

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that that multiple critics have pointed out is that it

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>seems like the more accurate the test conditions are, the

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 1>smaller the registered force appears to be. So like the

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 1>better the test is, the less force they seem to detect.

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Another thing I've seen quite a few scientists and science

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:52.799
<v Speaker 1>writers do is sort of register mirthful skepticism at the

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:55.799
<v Speaker 1>suggestion that the action of the devices made possible by

0:35:55.800 --> 0:36:00.359
<v Speaker 1>this quote quantum vacuum, virtual plasma. And the thing that

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:02.839
<v Speaker 1>is that they've never heard of such a thing and

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 1>do not understand what it is, with the implication that

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just kind of made up, like it's not a

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>real thing, like it might as well have come out

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>from a Star Trek Next Generation episode ye be followed

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 1>by reverse the polarity. Again, that's something that I think

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 1>we can't really comment on, but I've seen actual physicists

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>making that all. I've at least seen physicists say I

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:28.360
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what this is supposed to mean, like

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:30.440
<v Speaker 1>this is my field of study, and I do not

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 1>know what that is supposed to mean, which maybe it

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:36.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that. It doesn't necessarily mean that the phrase

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 1>is complete nonsense. It may be a weird way of

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 1>explaining something that truly exists, but it's just a weird

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 1>way of saying it. And that's why the physicist would say, like,

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't without further explanation, I don't know what this

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:55.399
<v Speaker 1>means literally. But there have been a lot of good

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:59.440
<v Speaker 1>criticisms basically of the hype around this device, and I

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of the criticism is not necessarily directed

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:05.440
<v Speaker 1>at the actual like the Eagle Works scientists who are

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:08.840
<v Speaker 1>testing it, but more at the more the media for

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:12.799
<v Speaker 1>sort of overplaying the results. Yeah, definitely, yeah, or not

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:16.240
<v Speaker 1>even the Chinese team or a shower, but the media,

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 1>which is fair because a lot of right you know, sure, well,

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:21.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, we work in this field. It's

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:23.880
<v Speaker 1>easy to get excited about something that seems to be

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:27.719
<v Speaker 1>new and revolutionary, especially if it's going to have us

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 1>redefine the laws of physics, right, and that's that's a

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 1>tall order. Think it's less exciting when the new and

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 1>revolutionary thing has happened like four times in the past decade.

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 1>But sorry, right, well, I was going to say that, Um,

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, I read a thing in Astronautes where there

0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:46.840
<v Speaker 1>was a you know, the the The author was criticizing

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the media reaction mainly like like Lauren was saying, and

0:37:51.520 --> 0:37:53.880
<v Speaker 1>less about you know, the actual people behind it, but

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:57.320
<v Speaker 1>went on to say things that we're really thought provoking

0:37:57.360 --> 0:38:00.399
<v Speaker 1>to me. For one thing, it was in that post

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 1>where I read about shaw Your's design supposedly only working

0:38:04.480 --> 0:38:06.919
<v Speaker 1>once the engine was already in motion, that it would

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 1>not be able to provide thrust until it was already moving, which,

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 1>as as the author pointed out, makes it very difficult

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:18.719
<v Speaker 1>to measure you know you're yeah, yeah, you've complicated things

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 1>significantly at that point. And also it all seems to

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>contradict all the the miraculous findings that are happening, like

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:28.160
<v Speaker 1>well the guy who designed it said, oh, it shouldn't

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:30.839
<v Speaker 1>be working, and people are like, hey, look how well

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it's working, or you know, it appears something appears to

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 1>be working. Now you could argue that perhaps UH, it

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 1>would work better in the already in motion model that

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Shaw your head said was necessary in the first place. Um,

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:51.799
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely a ton of enthusiasm and criticism about this,

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:58.240
<v Speaker 1>and to be honest, it's so it's so early really,

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we we talked about it being discussed as

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 1>far back as in that era, but still from an

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 1>actual testing perspective, it's so early on that it's it's

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 1>hard to draw any kind of conclusions about There are

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:19.759
<v Speaker 1>also other weird UH revelations about this. There were some

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:23.319
<v Speaker 1>there's some talk about possibly this could be a lead

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 1>into a warp drive where it's actually warping spacetime. There

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 1>was some talk about the using lasers to UH to

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:35.239
<v Speaker 1>see if any space time warping was taking place, and

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:38.279
<v Speaker 1>that it appeared to be so and then other people say, well,

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that's weird because in other devices that are using much

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 1>more high powered microwave and other forms of transmissions, you

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:50.719
<v Speaker 1>don't see this. And it's you would figure that as

0:39:50.800 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you're adding more energy into the system, the effect would

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 1>be greater and greater. So wouldn't we have already seen

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 1>this by now? I mean the relative amount of power

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that's being used in these m drives is very very small.

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 1>You look at something like the large Hadron collider and

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you think, why haven't we seen some of these same

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:13.440
<v Speaker 1>effects in this other and this other methodology. Even if

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:15.880
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't what we were looking for, it should be

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:18.359
<v Speaker 1>so pronounced that it it would be impossible to to not

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:22.240
<v Speaker 1>see it, right, So there are a lot of interesting

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:24.440
<v Speaker 1>questions along those lines. It's and it may be that

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 1>there are totally legitimate answers that we just don't know

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the We don't know the right questions to ask or

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 1>where to look. Yet It's possible, but it's you know.

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>One thing to keep in mind is the more outlandishould

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 1>we get, or at least the more the more we

0:40:37.239 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 1>have to start really reconsidering our uh idea of how

0:40:42.040 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the universe works, the greater the proof needs to be

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to justify that decision, right, all right, Well, I think

0:40:49.960 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that should sort of lead us into the conclusion of

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:55.879
<v Speaker 1>this discussion, which is, like, what does this all mean? Yeah,

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:58.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean I look at this, Yeah, what

0:40:58.800 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 1>what could it mean? Because obviously, we, like we've said

0:41:01.600 --> 0:41:05.360
<v Speaker 1>many times, we don't know how to evaluate the scientific merits.

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 1>We've read a lot of what seems like very rational

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and level headed criticism of it. I'm fine if people

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 1>want to keep testing this and and and find out

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:18.279
<v Speaker 1>maybe there are some kind of results you can show

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 1>in a much better controlled test environment that actually would

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:25.040
<v Speaker 1>satisfy a lot more scientific skepticism. But let's say you

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:31.440
<v Speaker 1>do find some really significant looking results here. It seems

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:36.280
<v Speaker 1>like there are three options. Either conservation of momentum is wrong,

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:41.920
<v Speaker 1>or this doesn't violate conservation of momentum but exploit some

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of loophole in physics we don't understand yet. Or

0:41:46.560 --> 0:41:49.840
<v Speaker 1>there's just an error. There's just something we we did wrong.

0:41:50.400 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 1>So and it's like, what is how do we choose

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:57.319
<v Speaker 1>between these different possibilities. Well, for following as Razor, we

0:41:57.400 --> 0:42:01.319
<v Speaker 1>go with the the measurement error. Yeah, because that's the

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the if it doesn't require you to redefine the

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 1>laws of physics, because obviously that would require the most

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:12.440
<v Speaker 1>amount of proof for that to be justified, or it

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:17.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't require inventing or describing new laws of physics that

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 1>complement the ones we already know. Uh, then you know,

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the most likely answer is that it comes down to

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 1>either a measurement error human error. There's some problem in

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the math um that seems to be the most likely,

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:36.279
<v Speaker 1>and you usually you know, it doesn't necessarily always work

0:42:36.280 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 1>out this way, but the reason why it's a it's

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:42.799
<v Speaker 1>a rule is that more often than not, the simplest explanation,

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:46.279
<v Speaker 1>the one that requires the least amount of energy for

0:42:46.400 --> 0:42:50.759
<v Speaker 1>it to happen, is the right answer. Yeah, I've seen

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:54.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of critics of these results. Uh. Compare it

0:42:54.520 --> 0:42:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to the thing that happened a while back with the

0:42:57.200 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 1>supposedly faster than light neutrinos. You know, so there was

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a test. I don't remember when that was. Was that,

0:43:06.400 --> 0:43:08.279
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, I think it was one or two

0:43:08.360 --> 0:43:10.719
<v Speaker 1>years ago, a few years ago. Um, but but yeah,

0:43:10.760 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 1>there was supposedly a test result that had detected massive

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:20.239
<v Speaker 1>particles neutrinos moving faster than light yeah, Um, and everything

0:43:20.280 --> 0:43:23.640
<v Speaker 1>we know about physics tells us that's not possible. You know,

0:43:23.760 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 1>so if if you go by Einstein and and we

0:43:27.120 --> 0:43:30.640
<v Speaker 1>all know that we probably should like he's given us

0:43:30.640 --> 0:43:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of reasons. We've seen the loss of relativity

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:38.920
<v Speaker 1>hold up so many times and fail I think zero times, Um,

0:43:39.280 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that it would be very strange to suddenly detect own annoy.

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:45.840
<v Speaker 1>We've been wrong about this for decades and decades. But

0:43:46.120 --> 0:43:48.719
<v Speaker 1>and so when when people looked back into the experiment,

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:52.279
<v Speaker 1>they were like, oh, right it was. It was in

0:43:52.320 --> 0:43:56.480
<v Speaker 1>fact an experimental error caused by malfunctioning equipment. Essentially, like

0:43:56.640 --> 0:43:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the way it wart was this. You you had a

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:01.719
<v Speaker 1>time when the new trinos were admitted, in a time

0:44:01.760 --> 0:44:04.800
<v Speaker 1>when they were detected, and that amount of time appeared

0:44:04.800 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to be less than what it would have taken light

0:44:07.120 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to go from those two points. But then essentially what

0:44:10.280 --> 0:44:13.680
<v Speaker 1>was found out, and I'm oversimplifying, is a stopwatch was off.

0:44:14.480 --> 0:44:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I think there was like a loose wire or something.

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:19.840
<v Speaker 1>So so it was a it was a false reading

0:44:19.880 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that gave the impression that the new trinos had arrived

0:44:23.719 --> 0:44:27.200
<v Speaker 1>earlier than they should have, but in fact, upon uh

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:31.799
<v Speaker 1>further inquiry, it does not. It wasn't the case. So

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:34.680
<v Speaker 1>although it did lead to some great knot knock jokes,

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:42.560
<v Speaker 1>which was which was uh new Trino knock knock nice Yeah,

0:44:43.040 --> 0:44:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the new Trino anti telephone. Yeah, so so things like that.

0:44:46.640 --> 0:44:49.560
<v Speaker 1>But at any rate, I agree, I think it reminds

0:44:49.560 --> 0:44:52.920
<v Speaker 1>me quite a bit of that now it I hope

0:44:53.440 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that it turns out there's something in this that ends

0:44:56.719 --> 0:45:00.800
<v Speaker 1>up being, uh, you know, a viable me means of

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:04.360
<v Speaker 1>creating thrust, because well, yeah, that'd be amazing. Yeah, but

0:45:04.480 --> 0:45:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it would be beyond phenomenal, it would be, so there's

0:45:08.320 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 1>we have every reason to want it to work out.

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:15.640
<v Speaker 1>And also, like, I just really loved attending physics. That's

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:17.960
<v Speaker 1>my favorite day whenever we get to say, like, oh,

0:45:18.040 --> 0:45:19.959
<v Speaker 1>everything that we knew about the universe was a little

0:45:19.960 --> 0:45:22.120
<v Speaker 1>bit wonky. Where's my least favorite days when we have

0:45:22.200 --> 0:45:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to change the dictionary so that literally literally means the

0:45:25.120 --> 0:45:29.440
<v Speaker 1>opposite of literally. Well, you know, there is a certain

0:45:29.480 --> 0:45:31.840
<v Speaker 1>mindset you can kind of get into when you're trying

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to properly practice scientific skepticism where you want to say, okay,

0:45:36.560 --> 0:45:39.800
<v Speaker 1>hold on, now, let's let's you know, not get carried away.

0:45:39.920 --> 0:45:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's look at all the possibilities, and that's a good

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 1>thing to do, you know, I totally advocate that, But

0:45:46.200 --> 0:45:49.600
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, we also do need to remember

0:45:49.600 --> 0:45:51.879
<v Speaker 1>to be open minded. You know, people have been wrong

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:54.399
<v Speaker 1>about things before, even things they were really certain about.

0:45:54.480 --> 0:45:58.600
<v Speaker 1>It seems really like we're probably not wrong about conservation

0:45:58.600 --> 0:46:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of momentum. But but who knows. I mean, I I

0:46:02.000 --> 0:46:06.640
<v Speaker 1>am all. I'm all for people doing these experiments, though

0:46:06.680 --> 0:46:09.759
<v Speaker 1>I have seen people question whether tax money should be

0:46:09.880 --> 0:46:13.799
<v Speaker 1>used to do experiments that seem to violate the laws

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 1>of physics. You know that are pretty well understood. Yeah,

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:18.880
<v Speaker 1>if it were. If there were, I don't know what

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I think. If there were at least a very compelling

0:46:21.880 --> 0:46:26.319
<v Speaker 1>argument that lots of physicists said, this makes sense that

0:46:26.480 --> 0:46:30.120
<v Speaker 1>it was not uh, it was not defying the law

0:46:30.160 --> 0:46:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of momentum, that it was actually working within that system.

0:46:33.719 --> 0:46:35.600
<v Speaker 1>If there were, if there were a lot of there

0:46:35.600 --> 0:46:37.680
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be a lot of agreement, Like if Shawyer

0:46:37.760 --> 0:46:39.560
<v Speaker 1>came out and said no, no, no, here's how I

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:42.879
<v Speaker 1>think it's working, and everyone said that's really cool, then

0:46:43.000 --> 0:46:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I would be like, let's go ahead, because the potential

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:48.560
<v Speaker 1>benefit is so huge that it would be worth the

0:46:48.640 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 1>investment and if it didn't work out, then it didn't

0:46:51.520 --> 0:46:54.239
<v Speaker 1>work out. Yeah, and again, to be totally fair to them,

0:46:54.320 --> 0:46:57.480
<v Speaker 1>they do say it doesn't violate conservation of momentum. They

0:46:57.480 --> 0:47:00.440
<v Speaker 1>fall into the loophole category. I say that they're something

0:47:00.480 --> 0:47:03.880
<v Speaker 1>else about physics, that it's exploiting and it's not actually

0:47:03.960 --> 0:47:07.759
<v Speaker 1>violating Newton I think, um, you know, I I am

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:11.399
<v Speaker 1>definitely on the side of you want to always add

0:47:11.520 --> 0:47:15.960
<v Speaker 1>some skepticism and critical thinking to your science. It's absolutely necessary.

0:47:17.000 --> 0:47:20.720
<v Speaker 1>But you don't want to fall into the trap of denialism.

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:25.800
<v Speaker 1>You're don't you're denying something even the potential of working. Uh.

0:47:25.920 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's why most of the actual reports from

0:47:29.000 --> 0:47:32.600
<v Speaker 1>scientists I've seen have said I don't know how this

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:37.799
<v Speaker 1>could work, as opposed to this doesn't work. Right there there.

0:47:37.840 --> 0:47:39.960
<v Speaker 1>You might say it sounds like they're hedging their bets,

0:47:40.000 --> 0:47:43.880
<v Speaker 1>but really what they're saying is they're being responsible. According

0:47:43.920 --> 0:47:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to what we know about science, this should not work.

0:47:47.480 --> 0:47:49.840
<v Speaker 1>But that's according to what we know. There could be

0:47:49.840 --> 0:47:53.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff we don't know that explains why it would work

0:47:53.719 --> 0:47:59.520
<v Speaker 1>if in fact it does. That's yours is responsible science. Yeah, yeah,

0:47:59.800 --> 0:48:02.239
<v Speaker 1>uh so, Yeah, so you're if you're out there and

0:48:02.280 --> 0:48:04.799
<v Speaker 1>you're like, no, no, I swear I can show you

0:48:04.840 --> 0:48:09.440
<v Speaker 1>how it works by all means, you know, please, we'd

0:48:09.480 --> 0:48:11.680
<v Speaker 1>love to hear about that. Yeah, so we we look

0:48:11.719 --> 0:48:14.880
<v Speaker 1>forward to following up on this story. Now. You know,

0:48:14.960 --> 0:48:17.239
<v Speaker 1>we said that the story has had cycles. I think

0:48:17.239 --> 0:48:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that the reason for the excitement dying down is that

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the the studies that where an effect was measured, the

0:48:25.840 --> 0:48:29.759
<v Speaker 1>effects have always been so small and difficult to replicate.

0:48:30.080 --> 0:48:32.839
<v Speaker 1>That that's why it kind of dies down. You don't

0:48:32.920 --> 0:48:37.440
<v Speaker 1>tend to see a big hoop lah over uh you know, uh,

0:48:37.920 --> 0:48:41.759
<v Speaker 1>promising technology fails to work. That doesn't tend to happen, right,

0:48:41.960 --> 0:48:43.799
<v Speaker 1>But if if you if you say you're coming out

0:48:43.800 --> 0:48:46.240
<v Speaker 1>with the technology that is meant to change the world

0:48:46.680 --> 0:48:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that grabs headlines, if it doesn't work out, unless it's

0:48:50.160 --> 0:48:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a truly spectacular failure, it just you know, people just

0:48:54.560 --> 0:48:59.480
<v Speaker 1>don't notice anymore. But they but they try not to

0:48:59.480 --> 0:49:03.200
<v Speaker 1>schedule the in science, right, yeah, you don't don't. Don't live,

0:49:03.480 --> 0:49:05.960
<v Speaker 1>don't make a live television event of your test of

0:49:06.040 --> 0:49:08.839
<v Speaker 1>the m drive. You might have egg on your face

0:49:08.880 --> 0:49:12.960
<v Speaker 1>unless you're approaching it from a truly like objective scientific approach, thing.

0:49:13.280 --> 0:49:15.040
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna do our best and see if there's a

0:49:15.040 --> 0:49:18.160
<v Speaker 1>measurable effect here as opposed to wait, I got something

0:49:18.200 --> 0:49:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to sell you. You know you don't want to do

0:49:19.520 --> 0:49:21.440
<v Speaker 1>with that approach. That would be terrible. Well, this has

0:49:21.480 --> 0:49:24.239
<v Speaker 1>been really fun, y'all. Yeah, this was one of those

0:49:24.280 --> 0:49:27.160
<v Speaker 1>where we have actually had him Drive on our list

0:49:27.200 --> 0:49:29.319
<v Speaker 1>for a while before people started asking about it. You know,

0:49:29.360 --> 0:49:31.719
<v Speaker 1>one of these things about because it is from one

0:49:31.719 --> 0:49:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of the older cycles, and also just because you know,

0:49:34.920 --> 0:49:37.440
<v Speaker 1>it is a forward thinking kind of thing, like the

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:41.200
<v Speaker 1>idea of the warp drive or this space drive that

0:49:41.239 --> 0:49:45.040
<v Speaker 1>would not require us to carry an enormous rocket filled

0:49:45.080 --> 0:49:50.280
<v Speaker 1>with Yeah, you don't because obviously that makes it harder

0:49:50.280 --> 0:49:52.719
<v Speaker 1>and it limits how far you can go. So this

0:49:52.760 --> 0:49:54.680
<v Speaker 1>was one of those really important things that we definitely

0:49:54.680 --> 0:49:57.120
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk about and it was exciting. Yeah, and

0:49:57.120 --> 0:49:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and thank you so much to everyone who wrote in

0:49:59.640 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and her just talk about it. Yes, I encourage you

0:50:02.920 --> 0:50:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to keep writing in because we depend upon hearing from

0:50:06.480 --> 0:50:08.759
<v Speaker 1>you to figure out what we're gonna talk about next.

0:50:08.840 --> 0:50:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise it's us just kind of sitting around saying what's

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:16.560
<v Speaker 1>on TV? Spiders again, the future of Morse. But hey,

0:50:16.560 --> 0:50:21.239
<v Speaker 1>did you see that scientists fed carbon nanotubes to spiders

0:50:21.280 --> 0:50:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that then spun silk that were carbon infused spider silk

0:50:24.960 --> 0:50:28.440
<v Speaker 1>with the strongest tensile strength of any fiber produced here too,

0:50:28.440 --> 0:50:33.680
<v Speaker 1>for I am not it happened this week. Yeah, pretty exciting.

0:50:33.960 --> 0:50:36.960
<v Speaker 1>There's another there's another episode right there, all right, But

0:50:37.000 --> 0:50:40.080
<v Speaker 1>if you guys have any suggestions that are not spider related,

0:50:40.800 --> 0:50:43.239
<v Speaker 1>you can disappoint Lauren, but inform the rest of us

0:50:43.239 --> 0:50:46.600
<v Speaker 1>by writing to fw thinking at how Stuff Works dot com,

0:50:46.680 --> 0:50:49.720
<v Speaker 1>or drop us a line on Facebook, Twitter or Google Plus.

0:50:49.719 --> 0:50:52.440
<v Speaker 1>At Twitter and Google Plus, we are fw thinking. Just

0:50:52.520 --> 0:50:55.520
<v Speaker 1>search fw thinking at Facebook. We will pop right up,

0:50:55.600 --> 0:50:57.440
<v Speaker 1>leave us a message, and we will talk to you

0:50:57.480 --> 0:51:05.640
<v Speaker 1>again really soon. For more on this topic and the

0:51:05.680 --> 0:51:18.720
<v Speaker 1>future of technology, visit forward Thinking dot Com Problem brought

0:51:18.719 --> 0:51:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to you by Toyota. Let's Go Places,