1 00:00:02,480 --> 00:00:07,040 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News. 2 00:00:18,040 --> 00:00:21,080 Speaker 2: Hello and welcome to another episode of the All Thoughts podcast. 3 00:00:21,200 --> 00:00:22,560 Speaker 2: I'm Tracy Alloway. 4 00:00:22,280 --> 00:00:23,400 Speaker 1: And I'm Joe Wasenthal. 5 00:00:23,920 --> 00:00:26,479 Speaker 2: Joe, if I had said to you a few years 6 00:00:26,480 --> 00:00:30,680 Speaker 2: ago that there's a bank and the bank is taking deposits, 7 00:00:30,920 --> 00:00:34,280 Speaker 2: you know, checking accounts, and it's putting that money into 8 00:00:34,600 --> 00:00:39,400 Speaker 2: US treasuries, and that business model is going to completely fail. 9 00:00:39,960 --> 00:00:42,480 Speaker 2: The bank is going to collapse, what would you have said? 10 00:00:45,200 --> 00:00:47,560 Speaker 1: I said, let's short the stock. That's what I would 11 00:00:47,560 --> 00:00:49,479 Speaker 1: have said. I said, if you told me that and 12 00:00:49,560 --> 00:00:52,919 Speaker 1: you knew the only insight, the only actionable thing there, 13 00:00:52,960 --> 00:00:54,000 Speaker 1: I said, all right, let's short it. 14 00:00:54,080 --> 00:00:55,360 Speaker 2: All right, that's the right answer. 15 00:00:55,520 --> 00:00:55,960 Speaker 3: Clearly. 16 00:00:56,120 --> 00:00:58,640 Speaker 2: If you were a banking regulator, what would you have done? 17 00:00:59,240 --> 00:01:02,840 Speaker 1: Well, I don't know anything about big a banking regular 18 00:01:03,000 --> 00:01:06,960 Speaker 1: It seems really hard. And regulators in general often get 19 00:01:07,000 --> 00:01:11,360 Speaker 1: criticized in various ways, and they're like, oh, you busted 20 00:01:11,360 --> 00:01:14,240 Speaker 1: this really small time tiki tech insider trading ring. It's 21 00:01:14,280 --> 00:01:16,600 Speaker 1: not that big of a deal. Or oh, here's this 22 00:01:16,880 --> 00:01:18,920 Speaker 1: thing that collapsed and why didn't you catch it before? 23 00:01:18,959 --> 00:01:20,959 Speaker 1: They're always going to get upset about that. But I 24 00:01:21,040 --> 00:01:22,840 Speaker 1: have to say, I have a lot of sympathy for 25 00:01:22,880 --> 00:01:26,120 Speaker 1: the regulators because for the most part, my impression is 26 00:01:26,160 --> 00:01:30,240 Speaker 1: that the US has one of the most robust, transparent, 27 00:01:30,440 --> 00:01:34,119 Speaker 1: high depth capital markets and financial systems in the entire world, 28 00:01:34,360 --> 00:01:37,280 Speaker 1: which for the most part does not collapse. And so 29 00:01:37,360 --> 00:01:39,840 Speaker 1: I feel like when it comes to regulatory issues, there's 30 00:01:39,880 --> 00:01:42,200 Speaker 1: a lot of unseen where what we see is like, 31 00:01:42,520 --> 00:01:44,880 Speaker 1: if they're in the news, it's not good. But most 32 00:01:44,880 --> 00:01:46,200 Speaker 1: of the time things aren't the news. 33 00:01:46,280 --> 00:01:50,000 Speaker 2: That should be the tagline for America's financial system most 34 00:01:50,040 --> 00:01:53,960 Speaker 2: of the time does not collapse. Yeah, and ironically, well 35 00:01:54,360 --> 00:01:57,000 Speaker 2: I'm talking of course, or I was talking about Silicon 36 00:01:57,080 --> 00:01:59,480 Speaker 2: Valley Bank. Yeah, and the collapse there, And I think 37 00:01:59,600 --> 00:02:02,520 Speaker 2: it's still very surprising to me. In one sense it 38 00:02:02,600 --> 00:02:05,280 Speaker 2: was an old fashioned bank run, But in another sense, 39 00:02:05,320 --> 00:02:08,239 Speaker 2: it's very surprising that here's a bank that's basically buying 40 00:02:08,280 --> 00:02:12,480 Speaker 2: a bunch of ultra safe assets US treasuries and still 41 00:02:12,560 --> 00:02:15,680 Speaker 2: it ran into trouble. And banks, of course are mandated 42 00:02:15,680 --> 00:02:18,440 Speaker 2: to buy treasuries as well. We've talked about this on 43 00:02:18,480 --> 00:02:21,959 Speaker 2: the show any number of times now, but I want 44 00:02:21,960 --> 00:02:22,840 Speaker 2: to talk more about it. 45 00:02:23,040 --> 00:02:25,000 Speaker 1: Sure, you know. The one thing I'll say too, that 46 00:02:25,000 --> 00:02:27,679 Speaker 1: I've been thinking a lot with SVB is. I think 47 00:02:27,720 --> 00:02:29,120 Speaker 1: in the wake of the two thousand and eight two 48 00:02:29,120 --> 00:02:33,200 Speaker 1: thousand and nine financial crisis, we got very focused on 49 00:02:33,200 --> 00:02:35,680 Speaker 1: the asset side of the balance, right, and so it's like, 50 00:02:35,800 --> 00:02:37,880 Speaker 1: what they hit, what kind of subprime loans do they have, 51 00:02:38,080 --> 00:02:40,320 Speaker 1: and how good are there all of that, et cetera. 52 00:02:40,680 --> 00:02:42,640 Speaker 1: But one of the things, you know, like Josh Younger 53 00:02:42,800 --> 00:02:45,720 Speaker 1: talked about recently in others. Stephen Kelly had a note 54 00:02:45,720 --> 00:02:47,800 Speaker 1: in our newsletter, you know, a lot of it is 55 00:02:47,840 --> 00:02:52,560 Speaker 1: the difficulty in modeling the liability side and the slipperiness 56 00:02:52,720 --> 00:02:55,360 Speaker 1: of the deposit base and how hard that is to 57 00:02:55,400 --> 00:02:58,000 Speaker 1: know because you can have long duration deposits that suddenly 58 00:02:58,000 --> 00:03:01,560 Speaker 1: become overnight deposits. It's really tricky, and I still think 59 00:03:01,600 --> 00:03:03,480 Speaker 1: these are difficult things to understand. 60 00:03:03,639 --> 00:03:06,480 Speaker 2: Yeah, it feels like we're always fighting the last bank 61 00:03:06,600 --> 00:03:09,799 Speaker 2: battle or the last bond battle. Okay, Well, on that note, 62 00:03:09,840 --> 00:03:12,160 Speaker 2: we do, in fact have the perfect guest. We are 63 00:03:12,200 --> 00:03:14,600 Speaker 2: going to be speaking with ro Hit Chopra. He is, 64 00:03:14,680 --> 00:03:19,080 Speaker 2: of course the former director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 65 00:03:19,400 --> 00:03:23,280 Speaker 2: also a former FTC commissioner, so really the perfect person 66 00:03:23,360 --> 00:03:25,280 Speaker 2: to talk to. If we want to dig into what 67 00:03:25,360 --> 00:03:28,560 Speaker 2: happened to SVB, what it means for bank regulation, and 68 00:03:28,600 --> 00:03:32,720 Speaker 2: then also what banks are doing right now. Hit Thank 69 00:03:32,760 --> 00:03:33,400 Speaker 2: you so much. 70 00:03:33,200 --> 00:03:35,080 Speaker 4: For coming on all thoughts, Thanks for having me. 71 00:03:35,680 --> 00:03:38,440 Speaker 2: Here's my first question. Maybe it's a little pointed, but 72 00:03:38,600 --> 00:03:41,520 Speaker 2: does the CFPB still exist? So we just got the 73 00:03:41,560 --> 00:03:44,760 Speaker 2: one big beautiful bill that's been passed and it looks 74 00:03:44,840 --> 00:03:47,600 Speaker 2: like it slashes funding for the bureau, And of course 75 00:03:47,920 --> 00:03:51,600 Speaker 2: we know that Trump isn't exactly a fan of federal agencies, 76 00:03:51,760 --> 00:03:53,720 Speaker 2: so I'm curious is it still functioning? 77 00:03:53,760 --> 00:03:54,680 Speaker 1: There's already kind of good at it. 78 00:03:54,800 --> 00:03:58,200 Speaker 4: Yeah, anyway, it's a good question, and it seems by 79 00:03:58,440 --> 00:04:03,160 Speaker 4: every single piece of evidence that it's just maybe there 80 00:04:03,280 --> 00:04:06,600 Speaker 4: technically but not doing a damn thing. We are hearing 81 00:04:07,320 --> 00:04:12,360 Speaker 4: nearly every day about another financial institution that is being 82 00:04:12,440 --> 00:04:16,240 Speaker 4: released from obligations. It has been months since there has 83 00:04:16,360 --> 00:04:20,840 Speaker 4: been an enforcement action, and many are estimating that this 84 00:04:20,960 --> 00:04:24,479 Speaker 4: means billions and billions of dollars that consumers are not 85 00:04:24,560 --> 00:04:28,960 Speaker 4: getting back in refunds and frankly a big disadvantage to 86 00:04:29,680 --> 00:04:32,960 Speaker 4: all of those financial companies that follow the rules. 87 00:04:32,839 --> 00:04:36,120 Speaker 1: When it was working, when or when it was operating, 88 00:04:36,360 --> 00:04:40,240 Speaker 1: describe to me what the remit of the CFPB is. 89 00:04:40,279 --> 00:04:43,200 Speaker 1: And one of the criticisms of the people leveled is 90 00:04:43,200 --> 00:04:45,680 Speaker 1: they didn't know what the scope was, etc. What is 91 00:04:45,760 --> 00:04:47,800 Speaker 1: the formal scope of the CFPP. 92 00:04:47,960 --> 00:04:52,880 Speaker 4: Well, essentially, we saw decades ago that there weren't just 93 00:04:53,120 --> 00:04:57,240 Speaker 4: banks in the business of offering consumer loans and products. 94 00:04:57,640 --> 00:05:02,080 Speaker 4: It was all sorts of other companies heyday lenders, auto lenders, 95 00:05:02,120 --> 00:05:05,600 Speaker 4: and in fact now the bulk of mortgages are originated 96 00:05:05,680 --> 00:05:09,360 Speaker 4: outside of banks, the bulk of auto loans, and so 97 00:05:09,640 --> 00:05:14,560 Speaker 4: after the subprime mortgage crisis, there was broad agreement that 98 00:05:14,600 --> 00:05:19,200 Speaker 4: the Federal Reserve Board and other agencies just didn't focus 99 00:05:19,440 --> 00:05:23,880 Speaker 4: and have the attention on making sure that existing consumer 100 00:05:24,040 --> 00:05:28,720 Speaker 4: law was being followed. So the CFPB is responsible for 101 00:05:28,760 --> 00:05:34,760 Speaker 4: inspecting the largest financial institutions and taking them to court 102 00:05:35,040 --> 00:05:38,520 Speaker 4: when they break the law. Of course, also administering all 103 00:05:38,600 --> 00:05:43,279 Speaker 4: sorts of rules that keep the mortgage markets, the credit report, 104 00:05:43,440 --> 00:05:46,120 Speaker 4: credit reporting companies, and so many others in line. 105 00:05:46,520 --> 00:05:50,440 Speaker 2: How does the CFPB interact with all the other bank 106 00:05:50,560 --> 00:05:54,279 Speaker 2: policy stakeholders, because there seems to be quite a few. 107 00:05:54,320 --> 00:05:58,400 Speaker 4: You mean, the other regulators. The CFPB is the only 108 00:05:59,440 --> 00:06:05,640 Speaker 4: regulate that oversees that gigantic non bank consumer lending apparatus, 109 00:06:06,160 --> 00:06:10,920 Speaker 4: and also it has primary and exclusive jurisdiction overall banks 110 00:06:10,920 --> 00:06:14,800 Speaker 4: and credit unions over ten billion in assets. That means 111 00:06:14,800 --> 00:06:19,440 Speaker 4: every credit card company, every big player in the market 112 00:06:19,920 --> 00:06:24,000 Speaker 4: is primarily overseen by the CFPB. So the fact that 113 00:06:24,400 --> 00:06:28,320 Speaker 4: it is now functionally a dead fish is leaving a 114 00:06:28,480 --> 00:06:32,040 Speaker 4: very very big gap that no one can even legally 115 00:06:32,080 --> 00:06:32,480 Speaker 4: fill in. 116 00:06:33,360 --> 00:06:35,680 Speaker 1: Where do you see the biggest gap manifesting right now 117 00:06:35,720 --> 00:06:40,200 Speaker 1: when you look at the consumer financial landscape, What isn't 118 00:06:40,279 --> 00:06:44,360 Speaker 1: being enforced or what isn't being examined that in your 119 00:06:44,480 --> 00:06:46,680 Speaker 1: view merite enforcement or examination. 120 00:06:46,839 --> 00:06:50,039 Speaker 4: Well, I think the top priority is always trying to 121 00:06:50,160 --> 00:06:55,800 Speaker 4: understand the linkage between the biggest markets and the broader economy. 122 00:06:55,839 --> 00:06:59,200 Speaker 4: We saw that that linkage with the mortgage market was 123 00:06:59,320 --> 00:07:03,640 Speaker 4: pretty damn big, and its failure really crashed not just 124 00:07:03,720 --> 00:07:08,359 Speaker 4: the US financial system but the entire global marketplace. So, 125 00:07:08,440 --> 00:07:12,640 Speaker 4: of course, making sure that mortgages are fair and transparent, 126 00:07:12,760 --> 00:07:16,480 Speaker 4: that key rules like the qualified Mortgage Rule, which sets 127 00:07:16,480 --> 00:07:19,400 Speaker 4: some of the core standards to make sure there is 128 00:07:19,440 --> 00:07:23,480 Speaker 4: not predatory mortgage lending, but also the nuts and bolts 129 00:07:24,200 --> 00:07:27,800 Speaker 4: most of the issues that come in are people who 130 00:07:27,880 --> 00:07:30,560 Speaker 4: have errors on their credit report they say, that's not 131 00:07:30,640 --> 00:07:35,920 Speaker 4: even my name, or people whose bank accounts were illegally 132 00:07:36,000 --> 00:07:40,400 Speaker 4: debited or cleaned out due to fraud. There's all sorts 133 00:07:40,440 --> 00:07:46,880 Speaker 4: of issues that protect specific populations, military members, and so 134 00:07:47,040 --> 00:07:51,440 Speaker 4: many other pieces that keep the markets working. So I 135 00:07:51,440 --> 00:07:54,560 Speaker 4: don't want to pinpoint anything other than to say that 136 00:07:54,640 --> 00:07:58,040 Speaker 4: when I took office, it was after another few years 137 00:07:58,080 --> 00:08:01,480 Speaker 4: where there really wasn't much going on there, and we 138 00:08:01,640 --> 00:08:05,960 Speaker 4: saw how financial firms not just push the envelope, but 139 00:08:06,040 --> 00:08:10,560 Speaker 4: sometimes outright took advantage of people without any accountability. 140 00:08:11,360 --> 00:08:14,960 Speaker 2: Well, speaking of accountability, you know, we mentioned SVB at 141 00:08:14,960 --> 00:08:18,200 Speaker 2: the top of the show, and one thing I've heard 142 00:08:18,200 --> 00:08:20,840 Speaker 2: there's a little bit of a chicken and egg situation 143 00:08:21,200 --> 00:08:24,680 Speaker 2: when people are analyzing the root cause of that particular 144 00:08:24,920 --> 00:08:28,160 Speaker 2: bank collapse. So some people say, well, interest rates went 145 00:08:28,240 --> 00:08:31,960 Speaker 2: up and that led to paper losses on the bank's 146 00:08:32,000 --> 00:08:34,839 Speaker 2: bond holdings, and so people got nervous and started pulling 147 00:08:34,840 --> 00:08:37,960 Speaker 2: their money. And then other people say, well, people started 148 00:08:37,960 --> 00:08:42,360 Speaker 2: pulling their money even though the bond losses didn't necessarily 149 00:08:42,400 --> 00:08:45,839 Speaker 2: need to be crystallized anytime soon. So I'm curious, can 150 00:08:45,880 --> 00:08:51,040 Speaker 2: you pinpoint the spark that set off the latest bank crisis. 151 00:08:51,200 --> 00:08:57,040 Speaker 4: Well for me, it really was March eighth, twenty twenty three. 152 00:08:57,800 --> 00:09:01,720 Speaker 4: Two things happened that day. One was the wind down 153 00:09:01,840 --> 00:09:06,800 Speaker 4: of a bank called Silvergate Bank, which was heavily involved 154 00:09:06,920 --> 00:09:11,360 Speaker 4: in banking some of the major crypto trading platforms. There 155 00:09:11,440 --> 00:09:15,240 Speaker 4: was a flight of deposits out of that bank after 156 00:09:15,640 --> 00:09:19,640 Speaker 4: the crypto winter and the collapse of FTX. We had 157 00:09:19,679 --> 00:09:22,760 Speaker 4: been tracking I Serve on the FDIC board and we 158 00:09:22,760 --> 00:09:26,400 Speaker 4: were tracking Silvergate Bank, and on that day they announced 159 00:09:26,440 --> 00:09:29,200 Speaker 4: that they were not going to need to be put 160 00:09:29,200 --> 00:09:33,680 Speaker 4: into receivership, they would be self liquidating. And simultaneously, on 161 00:09:33,760 --> 00:09:38,559 Speaker 4: that same day, we had an announcement by Silicon Valley Bank, 162 00:09:38,679 --> 00:09:41,640 Speaker 4: which was a little bit of a goofy press release 163 00:09:41,720 --> 00:09:47,080 Speaker 4: they issued saying they're experiencing some real losses on their 164 00:09:47,120 --> 00:09:51,320 Speaker 4: securities portfolio and they're going to be looking for capital. 165 00:09:52,200 --> 00:09:57,280 Speaker 4: It raised a lot of red flags and suspicions about 166 00:09:57,320 --> 00:10:01,200 Speaker 4: whether they were viable. And this is something that is 167 00:10:01,280 --> 00:10:05,800 Speaker 4: just so fundamental about banking and deposit taking is that 168 00:10:06,320 --> 00:10:09,400 Speaker 4: it really is based on a belief that your money 169 00:10:09,480 --> 00:10:12,040 Speaker 4: is going to be there. And the truth is is 170 00:10:12,480 --> 00:10:17,840 Speaker 4: with federal deposit insurance and Federal Reserve discount window lending. 171 00:10:18,600 --> 00:10:22,720 Speaker 4: It always is, except when you have a bank that 172 00:10:22,840 --> 00:10:28,200 Speaker 4: is over ninety percent uninsured deposits. This is something that 173 00:10:28,320 --> 00:10:32,160 Speaker 4: is really unusual, and some would argue as not even 174 00:10:32,200 --> 00:10:36,000 Speaker 4: really a bank when you are that dependent on very 175 00:10:36,120 --> 00:10:41,400 Speaker 4: very large depositors that you grew so quickly, and so 176 00:10:42,120 --> 00:10:44,120 Speaker 4: then the run began. 177 00:10:44,840 --> 00:10:49,079 Speaker 1: How much would you ascribe it to the high percentage 178 00:10:49,320 --> 00:10:55,760 Speaker 1: of non insured deposits versus the concentration so in very 179 00:10:55,760 --> 00:10:59,040 Speaker 1: specific industries. So you mentioned the crypto one, but also 180 00:10:59,120 --> 00:11:01,800 Speaker 1: here are all of these startups. It had raised a 181 00:11:01,840 --> 00:11:04,560 Speaker 1: ton of money in twenty twenty and twenty twenty one. 182 00:11:05,160 --> 00:11:06,920 Speaker 1: A bunch of them apparently just put their money on 183 00:11:07,000 --> 00:11:09,920 Speaker 1: a bank, which is kind of weird to me, non insured, 184 00:11:10,000 --> 00:11:12,640 Speaker 1: and then we had the stock market plunge in twenty 185 00:11:12,679 --> 00:11:16,400 Speaker 1: twenty two. Funding dried up. There was no very little 186 00:11:16,520 --> 00:11:19,400 Speaker 1: new VC fundraising, so new dry powder to be put 187 00:11:19,440 --> 00:11:22,440 Speaker 1: into the bank. Startups drawing down their own deposits just 188 00:11:22,440 --> 00:11:24,800 Speaker 1: to make payroll or whatever else. And so you have 189 00:11:24,840 --> 00:11:27,120 Speaker 1: two things going on. One is the high level of 190 00:11:27,160 --> 00:11:30,320 Speaker 1: uninsured deposits, but also the concentration, so that there was 191 00:11:30,360 --> 00:11:33,760 Speaker 1: this one specific sector that was all going through the 192 00:11:33,800 --> 00:11:34,839 Speaker 1: cycle at the same time. 193 00:11:34,960 --> 00:11:37,679 Speaker 4: So let me just push on that because even though 194 00:11:37,720 --> 00:11:40,400 Speaker 4: it is one sector, and I agree with you, the 195 00:11:40,440 --> 00:11:45,520 Speaker 4: concentration was an important factor in this. But let's remember 196 00:11:45,640 --> 00:11:51,160 Speaker 4: that the individual firms that were funded by venture capital, 197 00:11:51,240 --> 00:11:54,120 Speaker 4: many of them were doing fine. There was not necessarily 198 00:11:54,240 --> 00:12:00,640 Speaker 4: something specifically or systemically wrong with those businesses. But I think, 199 00:12:01,400 --> 00:12:04,160 Speaker 4: and I agree with every small and mid sized business 200 00:12:04,200 --> 00:12:08,520 Speaker 4: out there. If I am launching a startup, whether it 201 00:12:08,600 --> 00:12:13,440 Speaker 4: is an AI company or a dry cleaner, it doesn't 202 00:12:13,520 --> 00:12:16,800 Speaker 4: rank in the top twenty reasons of my business failing 203 00:12:16,880 --> 00:12:19,640 Speaker 4: that my bank is going to fail. Sure, And so 204 00:12:19,760 --> 00:12:23,640 Speaker 4: what you start hearing is that these businesses, which are 205 00:12:23,720 --> 00:12:29,240 Speaker 4: highly networked as well as much faster communication, you get 206 00:12:29,320 --> 00:12:33,720 Speaker 4: the advice from your funders and others that you need 207 00:12:33,760 --> 00:12:37,679 Speaker 4: to run. And it was very clear that it was 208 00:12:37,760 --> 00:12:41,680 Speaker 4: not just happening at SVB, it then was happening all 209 00:12:41,760 --> 00:12:42,600 Speaker 4: over the system. 210 00:12:43,200 --> 00:12:46,240 Speaker 2: I was on a train to Connecticut around that time 211 00:12:46,440 --> 00:12:49,240 Speaker 2: and someone was sitting kind of close to me, and 212 00:12:49,400 --> 00:12:52,160 Speaker 2: it turned out they were banking with SVB. Their company was, 213 00:12:52,440 --> 00:12:54,640 Speaker 2: and I could hear the panic and their voice as 214 00:12:54,679 --> 00:12:57,640 Speaker 2: they tried to digest the news of what was happening. 215 00:12:58,080 --> 00:13:02,079 Speaker 2: But on that note, why did corporate treasurers, why did 216 00:13:02,080 --> 00:13:04,560 Speaker 2: they put all their deposits in a single bank when 217 00:13:04,600 --> 00:13:08,760 Speaker 2: presumably they know that there's a cap on FDIC insurance. 218 00:13:08,880 --> 00:13:11,360 Speaker 4: Yeah, it's a good question. I think there are some 219 00:13:11,559 --> 00:13:15,880 Speaker 4: practical issues for some small and mid sized businesses about 220 00:13:15,920 --> 00:13:18,800 Speaker 4: when you're running payroll or when you're getting in a 221 00:13:18,800 --> 00:13:21,839 Speaker 4: lot of receipts. I don't have as much sympathy for 222 00:13:22,000 --> 00:13:25,320 Speaker 4: some of the very large companies that we have learned 223 00:13:25,400 --> 00:13:29,920 Speaker 4: through public reporting put a whole lot of funds in 224 00:13:29,960 --> 00:13:35,880 Speaker 4: that bank, including really their entire cash reserves. So at 225 00:13:35,920 --> 00:13:38,839 Speaker 4: the end of the day, though the regulators had, we 226 00:13:38,920 --> 00:13:42,920 Speaker 4: saw an active run that was occurring, and of course 227 00:13:43,720 --> 00:13:48,280 Speaker 4: those insured depositors, the insured depositors really through the entire crisis, 228 00:13:48,720 --> 00:13:54,199 Speaker 4: did not really run. It was those uninsured started at 229 00:13:54,240 --> 00:14:00,840 Speaker 4: Silicon Valley Bank after that Wednesday release. By fry Day morning, 230 00:14:01,880 --> 00:14:05,319 Speaker 4: they were dead. We had actually voted the night before 231 00:14:06,000 --> 00:14:08,840 Speaker 4: or maybe at the pre dawn hours to accept it 232 00:14:08,880 --> 00:14:12,200 Speaker 4: into receivership, and I believe by the time it was 233 00:14:12,320 --> 00:14:17,040 Speaker 4: closed it had roughly one hundred billion dollars queued up 234 00:14:17,080 --> 00:14:21,720 Speaker 4: of outbound wires. So this was an enormous and fast run. 235 00:14:22,280 --> 00:14:26,240 Speaker 4: And many of those techno libertarians that we often hear 236 00:14:26,320 --> 00:14:30,640 Speaker 4: about who want no regulation, they were actively beating the 237 00:14:30,760 --> 00:14:33,960 Speaker 4: drum online asking for a Baila. 238 00:14:34,160 --> 00:14:36,720 Speaker 1: Well, this is actually interesting point. I was going to 239 00:14:36,760 --> 00:14:38,240 Speaker 1: go there next. And I think again it was a 240 00:14:38,400 --> 00:14:41,320 Speaker 1: thing that Stephen Kelly wrote for us. But one of 241 00:14:41,360 --> 00:14:44,160 Speaker 1: the things about twenty twenty three, I think it said 242 00:14:44,280 --> 00:14:47,360 Speaker 1: it wasn't a crisis of regional banks. It was a 243 00:14:47,400 --> 00:14:51,520 Speaker 1: regional bank crisis, as in specifically the region of California, 244 00:14:51,560 --> 00:14:53,880 Speaker 1: because then there were other parts of there were other 245 00:14:53,920 --> 00:14:56,240 Speaker 1: banks that got into a lot of trouble, and the 246 00:14:56,280 --> 00:14:59,480 Speaker 1: all thing they had in common was that they were 247 00:14:59,520 --> 00:15:02,040 Speaker 1: all sort of in some way connected to California. I 248 00:15:02,080 --> 00:15:04,080 Speaker 1: think I remember like people were going out looking for 249 00:15:04,080 --> 00:15:06,320 Speaker 1: any bank that had California in the title in some 250 00:15:06,440 --> 00:15:09,640 Speaker 1: way and betting against them. But talk to us about 251 00:15:10,040 --> 00:15:14,440 Speaker 1: regulating banks and monitoring runs in the world of these networks, 252 00:15:14,480 --> 00:15:18,240 Speaker 1: whether the the public networks on social media or just 253 00:15:18,280 --> 00:15:20,760 Speaker 1: the sort of networks of like mind individuals who are 254 00:15:20,800 --> 00:15:21,960 Speaker 1: all in the same WhatsApp group. 255 00:15:22,200 --> 00:15:26,280 Speaker 4: Yeah, I'm a believer that we can never fight and 256 00:15:26,320 --> 00:15:29,840 Speaker 4: We shouldn't want to fight the speed of communication. We 257 00:15:29,960 --> 00:15:34,440 Speaker 4: want markets to have live information. I will say this, 258 00:15:34,640 --> 00:15:39,120 Speaker 4: we saw the run start first at Silicon Valley Bank, 259 00:15:39,680 --> 00:15:42,720 Speaker 4: and then I think because of the confluence of factors 260 00:15:42,720 --> 00:15:47,200 Speaker 4: with Silvergate, it wasn't just California as anything that seemed 261 00:15:47,240 --> 00:15:52,240 Speaker 4: to have any crypto or tech adjacency. Of course, the 262 00:15:52,400 --> 00:15:56,680 Speaker 4: second bank that we closed that Sunday was Signature Bank, 263 00:15:56,720 --> 00:16:00,440 Speaker 4: which operated a crypto network but also had a very 264 00:16:00,600 --> 00:16:03,840 Speaker 4: real business. It is a New York City bank that 265 00:16:04,400 --> 00:16:07,800 Speaker 4: was deeply involved in New York City multifamily real estate. 266 00:16:08,360 --> 00:16:11,280 Speaker 4: You at the same time, Joe had people worried about 267 00:16:11,320 --> 00:16:15,600 Speaker 4: commercial real estate. But what we were seeing was that 268 00:16:15,800 --> 00:16:20,680 Speaker 4: the banks with the highest percentage of uninsured deposits, they 269 00:16:20,720 --> 00:16:24,800 Speaker 4: were being badly battered almost immediately. 270 00:16:41,040 --> 00:16:44,720 Speaker 2: So ultimately a decision was made to expand the deposit 271 00:16:44,840 --> 00:16:49,080 Speaker 2: insurance net and basically bail out SVB customers and others. 272 00:16:50,240 --> 00:16:53,600 Speaker 2: What was the decision making process like building up to 273 00:16:53,640 --> 00:16:55,960 Speaker 2: that and how big a deal is that? Is there 274 00:16:56,040 --> 00:16:57,600 Speaker 2: like a legacy from that decision. 275 00:16:57,840 --> 00:17:00,400 Speaker 4: It's a very big deal, and it's one that in 276 00:17:00,480 --> 00:17:03,360 Speaker 4: many ways is still hard to live with the decision, 277 00:17:03,440 --> 00:17:06,480 Speaker 4: even though it was the right decision, I think. Here's 278 00:17:06,520 --> 00:17:11,800 Speaker 4: how it works. The federal law basically directs the Federal 279 00:17:11,840 --> 00:17:17,200 Speaker 4: Deposit Insurance Corporation the FDIC, to resolve a failed bank 280 00:17:17,320 --> 00:17:21,560 Speaker 4: at the least cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund. That's 281 00:17:21,640 --> 00:17:26,400 Speaker 4: the fund that everyone pays into with their bank deposits, 282 00:17:26,880 --> 00:17:29,320 Speaker 4: and it builds up a fund to pay for certain 283 00:17:29,359 --> 00:17:33,600 Speaker 4: bank failures and make sure deposits are made whole. And 284 00:17:33,680 --> 00:17:37,439 Speaker 4: here's what was interesting about Silicon Valley Bank and Signature 285 00:17:37,520 --> 00:17:41,560 Speaker 4: Bank and then later First Republic. It was a super 286 00:17:41,600 --> 00:17:48,040 Speaker 4: majority of uninsured deposits. That means a bank failure is 287 00:17:48,080 --> 00:17:52,280 Speaker 4: not that expensive to resolve. The cost to the Deposit 288 00:17:52,359 --> 00:17:57,040 Speaker 4: Insurance Fund for a bank that is ninety percent plus 289 00:17:57,240 --> 00:18:02,560 Speaker 4: uninsured is going to be pretty low. And if the 290 00:18:02,680 --> 00:18:06,760 Speaker 4: law says resolve it at the least cost, in many ways, 291 00:18:06,800 --> 00:18:12,200 Speaker 4: the best case is sometimes to liquidate it, make as 292 00:18:12,240 --> 00:18:15,040 Speaker 4: many people whole as possible, and top them up with 293 00:18:15,119 --> 00:18:19,199 Speaker 4: the deposit Insurance Fund. But there is a proviso in 294 00:18:19,280 --> 00:18:24,639 Speaker 4: the law which says that if a failure is likely 295 00:18:24,880 --> 00:18:29,800 Speaker 4: to lead to systemic effects or to threaten the viability 296 00:18:30,440 --> 00:18:34,880 Speaker 4: of the US financial system, there's a process of key 297 00:18:34,960 --> 00:18:39,399 Speaker 4: turning that a series of regulators must go through to 298 00:18:39,600 --> 00:18:43,719 Speaker 4: recommend to the Treasury Secretary, who must consult with the 299 00:18:43,760 --> 00:18:47,920 Speaker 4: President to authorize the FDIC to take a different path. 300 00:18:48,000 --> 00:18:53,840 Speaker 4: So over the weekend the Sunday after the failure of 301 00:18:53,920 --> 00:18:58,639 Speaker 4: Silicon Valley Bank, and Sunday morning, roughly Signature Bank was 302 00:18:58,720 --> 00:19:04,320 Speaker 4: taken into receivership. First Republic was a zombie and basically 303 00:19:04,400 --> 00:19:09,879 Speaker 4: dead already. There was a decision where the FDIC board 304 00:19:09,880 --> 00:19:14,119 Speaker 4: we voted to turn that key, and the Federal Reserve 305 00:19:14,160 --> 00:19:18,399 Speaker 4: Board had voted to turn that key, and ultimately the 306 00:19:18,440 --> 00:19:24,040 Speaker 4: Treasury Secretary discussed it with the President and activated that authority. 307 00:19:24,119 --> 00:19:31,760 Speaker 4: The authority essentially led to the backstopping of all uninsured deposits. 308 00:19:32,400 --> 00:19:36,960 Speaker 4: That meant that everyone would be made whole in the 309 00:19:37,000 --> 00:19:40,600 Speaker 4: case of the failure, and it was a tough decision. 310 00:19:40,720 --> 00:19:45,679 Speaker 4: I think there was a question I was arguing and questioning, 311 00:19:45,760 --> 00:19:50,080 Speaker 4: should we be maybe raising the limit dramatically, perhaps to 312 00:19:50,359 --> 00:19:53,720 Speaker 4: twenty five or fifty million dollars. What we were seeing 313 00:19:53,760 --> 00:19:59,240 Speaker 4: in the system was active movement of uninsured deposits everywhere, 314 00:20:00,280 --> 00:20:06,400 Speaker 4: and ultimately the decision to invoke that exception really did 315 00:20:06,520 --> 00:20:09,800 Speaker 4: calm the system for the most part with the big 316 00:20:09,880 --> 00:20:12,320 Speaker 4: exception of First Republic Bank. 317 00:20:12,800 --> 00:20:15,639 Speaker 2: So the other thing that happened other than the expanded 318 00:20:15,680 --> 00:20:19,680 Speaker 2: deposit insurance was the creation of a new FED Lending 319 00:20:20,240 --> 00:20:24,639 Speaker 2: facility another acronym, the BTFP. How big a deal was 320 00:20:24,720 --> 00:20:26,000 Speaker 2: that one? 321 00:20:26,240 --> 00:20:29,000 Speaker 4: That one was weird. All banks have the ability to 322 00:20:29,080 --> 00:20:33,480 Speaker 4: access the discount window through the Federal Reserve, but the 323 00:20:33,480 --> 00:20:38,240 Speaker 4: Federal Reserve used some bailout authorities to launch this bank 324 00:20:38,320 --> 00:20:43,160 Speaker 4: term funding program. This allowed banks to pledge their treasury 325 00:20:43,240 --> 00:20:48,959 Speaker 4: securities at par and draw funds from the Federal Reserve. 326 00:20:49,359 --> 00:20:51,280 Speaker 4: I think there were a lot of us who raised 327 00:20:51,280 --> 00:20:56,000 Speaker 4: our eyebrows at this. If the banks already had access 328 00:20:56,040 --> 00:21:01,880 Speaker 4: to the discount window, why did they need this special program. 329 00:21:02,160 --> 00:21:05,359 Speaker 4: I worried about the precedent setting of this. It was 330 00:21:06,040 --> 00:21:08,720 Speaker 4: justified on the basis that there is stigma of going 331 00:21:08,760 --> 00:21:14,280 Speaker 4: to the discount window. Ultimately, we saw some financial institutions 332 00:21:14,520 --> 00:21:18,919 Speaker 4: game and arbitrage the program by drawing on it but 333 00:21:19,040 --> 00:21:22,040 Speaker 4: then earning interest on reserves. I think we just have 334 00:21:22,160 --> 00:21:28,200 Speaker 4: to be really careful when the Fed engages in lots 335 00:21:28,280 --> 00:21:32,159 Speaker 4: of bailout programs, because it sends a signal to the 336 00:21:32,200 --> 00:21:35,520 Speaker 4: market that they can expect it the next time. 337 00:21:35,359 --> 00:21:39,199 Speaker 1: Around as a regulator. There are many people who say this, 338 00:21:39,320 --> 00:21:42,720 Speaker 1: and you had a high level of scrutiny towards companies 339 00:21:42,720 --> 00:21:45,879 Speaker 1: that banked crypto companies, and many of them claimed that 340 00:21:45,920 --> 00:21:48,399 Speaker 1: they were treated unfairly. What is it just from a 341 00:21:48,480 --> 00:21:51,040 Speaker 1: high level, let's start there. From a high level, what 342 00:21:51,280 --> 00:21:55,679 Speaker 1: issues emerge when, if any issues emerge from a bank 343 00:21:55,760 --> 00:21:58,560 Speaker 1: that tries to build up a business among crypto companies. 344 00:21:58,640 --> 00:22:01,680 Speaker 4: I think this is a bit of a conspiracy theory. Yeah. 345 00:22:01,800 --> 00:22:04,600 Speaker 1: No, look, I'm but I'm just from a regulatory person. 346 00:22:04,600 --> 00:22:06,800 Speaker 4: Okay, go on, because because the truth is is that 347 00:22:07,800 --> 00:22:11,119 Speaker 4: the issues with Silicon Valley Bank, as you know and 348 00:22:11,680 --> 00:22:16,320 Speaker 4: described earlier, was really about being so deeply underwater on 349 00:22:16,400 --> 00:22:17,960 Speaker 4: their treasure securities. 350 00:22:18,000 --> 00:22:20,400 Speaker 1: But there's sure whether we're talking about Signature Bank, which 351 00:22:20,400 --> 00:22:23,720 Speaker 1: did have a pretty big crypto book. But also you 352 00:22:23,800 --> 00:22:25,960 Speaker 1: just get all these crypto companies like, oh, we don't 353 00:22:26,000 --> 00:22:29,080 Speaker 1: have it's so difficult for us to find a bank account. 354 00:22:29,119 --> 00:22:31,080 Speaker 1: Is it difficult for them to do banking? 355 00:22:31,240 --> 00:22:34,440 Speaker 4: Yeah, so let's see what we mean about banking for 356 00:22:34,680 --> 00:22:39,440 Speaker 4: crypto lending. Certainly there are going to be some banks 357 00:22:39,480 --> 00:22:43,400 Speaker 4: who feel they have no expertise in this, I think 358 00:22:43,400 --> 00:22:46,840 Speaker 4: the really interesting question is about deposit taking. 359 00:22:46,920 --> 00:22:49,119 Speaker 1: Yes, definitely, I'm not talking about crypto. I'm talking about 360 00:22:49,160 --> 00:22:53,040 Speaker 1: the deposit taking from crypto, native com cryptic company deposit taking. 361 00:22:53,640 --> 00:22:56,560 Speaker 4: There are a set of issues that banks always are 362 00:22:56,600 --> 00:22:59,199 Speaker 4: going to want to look at when it comes to 363 00:22:59,280 --> 00:23:02,399 Speaker 4: taking very very large deposits with a lot of in 364 00:23:02,480 --> 00:23:06,119 Speaker 4: and out activity, and much of that is related to 365 00:23:06,240 --> 00:23:10,879 Speaker 4: their own obligations for money laundering as well as what 366 00:23:11,080 --> 00:23:15,479 Speaker 4: was mentioned before, deposit concentration. So when you are a 367 00:23:15,520 --> 00:23:19,159 Speaker 4: bank that has a couple of depositors who are the 368 00:23:19,359 --> 00:23:23,720 Speaker 4: super majority of your deposit base, you're obviously going to 369 00:23:23,760 --> 00:23:26,760 Speaker 4: take some steps to be careful around that. And I 370 00:23:26,800 --> 00:23:31,080 Speaker 4: would say that the crypto issues in this run were 371 00:23:31,080 --> 00:23:36,080 Speaker 4: fairly muted. It was really the perception about the potential 372 00:23:36,240 --> 00:23:40,000 Speaker 4: exposures that we saw through the market, though I feel 373 00:23:40,080 --> 00:23:44,720 Speaker 4: that within a few days the fixation again was on 374 00:23:45,359 --> 00:23:46,640 Speaker 4: uninsured deposits. 375 00:23:47,520 --> 00:23:50,159 Speaker 2: When it comes to the bond losses, it strikes me 376 00:23:50,440 --> 00:23:53,520 Speaker 2: that the FED is kind of in a difficult position because, 377 00:23:53,560 --> 00:23:56,960 Speaker 2: on the one hand, it has to conduct monetary policy. 378 00:23:57,040 --> 00:23:59,919 Speaker 2: If inflation is high, it has to raise benchmark rates, 379 00:24:00,200 --> 00:24:02,680 Speaker 2: But on the other hand, it also has a financial 380 00:24:02,680 --> 00:24:05,720 Speaker 2: stability mandate. It's not part of the dual mandate, but 381 00:24:06,000 --> 00:24:09,399 Speaker 2: it is a regulator, and raising interest rates in this 382 00:24:09,520 --> 00:24:13,280 Speaker 2: case sparked a bank run. It seems how is the 383 00:24:13,320 --> 00:24:16,200 Speaker 2: Fed supposed to balance these two goals. 384 00:24:16,480 --> 00:24:18,840 Speaker 4: I don't see that as a balance at all. Okay, 385 00:24:18,960 --> 00:24:22,400 Speaker 4: I think there is a lot that the Federal Reserve 386 00:24:23,240 --> 00:24:29,840 Speaker 4: has really missed in many of the situations involving financial 387 00:24:29,880 --> 00:24:36,880 Speaker 4: stability around Lehman Brothers, as well as even including COVID, 388 00:24:37,320 --> 00:24:42,119 Speaker 4: But certainly this one was a more clear linkage where 389 00:24:42,400 --> 00:24:48,159 Speaker 4: when you have high concentrations of bond portfolios that are underwater, 390 00:24:48,880 --> 00:24:52,560 Speaker 4: you need to be extra careful to not make sure 391 00:24:52,680 --> 00:24:57,640 Speaker 4: that they are under capitalized, that they lack liquidity, and frankly, 392 00:24:58,200 --> 00:25:02,000 Speaker 4: that you are not turning upnd I when you are 393 00:25:02,040 --> 00:25:07,080 Speaker 4: supervising that institution. The warning signs with Silicon Valley Bank 394 00:25:07,359 --> 00:25:10,760 Speaker 4: were there for months, and I do think there was 395 00:25:10,880 --> 00:25:15,120 Speaker 4: a bit of a culture at the Federal Reserve of 396 00:25:15,200 --> 00:25:19,239 Speaker 4: really taking a light touch in the years leading up 397 00:25:19,280 --> 00:25:23,720 Speaker 4: to the crisis that I think has proven to be costing. 398 00:25:38,680 --> 00:25:40,280 Speaker 1: I want to go back to crypto because I want 399 00:25:40,280 --> 00:25:44,240 Speaker 1: to talk, not just I understand the obligations that a 400 00:25:44,280 --> 00:25:48,280 Speaker 1: bank has in terms of money laundering, in terms of 401 00:25:48,480 --> 00:25:51,920 Speaker 1: lots of in and out transactions, et cetera. However, from 402 00:25:51,920 --> 00:25:55,280 Speaker 1: a regulatory perspective, were banks that built up a crypto 403 00:25:55,440 --> 00:25:59,119 Speaker 1: book of business? Did they get extra scrutiny in somewhere 404 00:25:59,200 --> 00:26:00,960 Speaker 1: does that man extra scrutiny? 405 00:26:01,560 --> 00:26:03,960 Speaker 4: I think you always want to make sure that rules 406 00:26:04,000 --> 00:26:07,240 Speaker 4: are as clear as possible, and I do think bank 407 00:26:07,280 --> 00:26:13,960 Speaker 4: regulation has turned into really a messy set of rules. Frankly, 408 00:26:14,000 --> 00:26:18,000 Speaker 4: I think to accommodate the largest players rather than simple, 409 00:26:18,080 --> 00:26:23,000 Speaker 4: bright line rules when it comes to new types of activities. 410 00:26:23,800 --> 00:26:28,240 Speaker 4: There's no question that novel activities are going to need 411 00:26:28,440 --> 00:26:33,280 Speaker 4: a little bit more look than say a straightforward mortgage 412 00:26:33,440 --> 00:26:37,680 Speaker 4: or a straightforward small business loan. So when you have, 413 00:26:37,960 --> 00:26:43,200 Speaker 4: particularly a bank that doesn't have experience in a product, 414 00:26:43,200 --> 00:26:47,440 Speaker 4: that may pose some real risks to them, I don't 415 00:26:47,440 --> 00:26:51,080 Speaker 4: think it's unreasonable for a bank regulator to kick the 416 00:26:51,119 --> 00:26:51,840 Speaker 4: tires in what. 417 00:26:51,840 --> 00:26:53,920 Speaker 1: Is kicking the tires look like? Specifically? 418 00:26:54,119 --> 00:26:57,119 Speaker 4: I think it can take a wide range of activities. 419 00:26:57,160 --> 00:27:00,080 Speaker 4: It really depends on what type of new business that 420 00:27:00,080 --> 00:27:04,080 Speaker 4: that bank is offering. But at the core, making sure 421 00:27:04,240 --> 00:27:08,840 Speaker 4: that that bank is well capitalized and liquid is always 422 00:27:08,880 --> 00:27:12,399 Speaker 4: the top priority. But if you know, banks play a 423 00:27:12,560 --> 00:27:18,200 Speaker 4: major role in the financial state craft of America and 424 00:27:18,320 --> 00:27:22,199 Speaker 4: one of the big reasons and benefits of the reserve 425 00:27:22,320 --> 00:27:27,359 Speaker 4: currency is the role in detecting and deterring terrorism, finance, 426 00:27:27,520 --> 00:27:31,600 Speaker 4: drug cartels, and more. And federal law puts some real obligations. 427 00:27:30,960 --> 00:27:35,120 Speaker 2: On them for that. Okay, So speaking of novel businesses, 428 00:27:35,200 --> 00:27:37,120 Speaker 2: I want to widen the net a little bit and 429 00:27:37,240 --> 00:27:40,480 Speaker 2: maybe talk about fintech and what banks are doing right now. 430 00:27:40,640 --> 00:27:43,480 Speaker 2: And here I have to issue a disclaimer, which is 431 00:27:43,800 --> 00:27:47,280 Speaker 2: I'm very jaded about fintech in general. I used to 432 00:27:47,280 --> 00:27:50,280 Speaker 2: cover it at the FT and I heard the same stories, 433 00:27:50,359 --> 00:27:53,480 Speaker 2: the same themes over and over again, like big tech 434 00:27:53,640 --> 00:27:56,600 Speaker 2: is coming for the banks, or retail is coming for 435 00:27:56,640 --> 00:28:00,560 Speaker 2: the banks, like Walmart starting a financial product, and things 436 00:28:00,600 --> 00:28:04,680 Speaker 2: like that. Fast forward to today, I mean, it does 437 00:28:04,720 --> 00:28:08,439 Speaker 2: seem like this is something that is actually happening. What's 438 00:28:08,520 --> 00:28:11,280 Speaker 2: the ultimate ambition there in the payment space? 439 00:28:11,560 --> 00:28:16,680 Speaker 4: Well, payments is really something that has so rapidly changed. 440 00:28:17,359 --> 00:28:20,679 Speaker 4: Many of it is very good. It's easier to move money, 441 00:28:20,720 --> 00:28:25,520 Speaker 4: particularly with mobile devices. It's faster than it used to be. 442 00:28:26,320 --> 00:28:29,879 Speaker 4: I do think that we have some real concerns about 443 00:28:29,920 --> 00:28:34,439 Speaker 4: the playbook that many of the firms who are moving money, 444 00:28:34,680 --> 00:28:38,520 Speaker 4: how are they monetizing it. A lot of our payments 445 00:28:38,640 --> 00:28:42,280 Speaker 4: companies and big tech companies, I think are really drooling 446 00:28:42,800 --> 00:28:46,320 Speaker 4: over what they see in China where Ali pay and 447 00:28:46,400 --> 00:28:51,520 Speaker 4: we Chat pay are trafficking almost all of the consumer 448 00:28:51,640 --> 00:28:55,040 Speaker 4: payments non cash payments in pay. 449 00:28:54,880 --> 00:28:57,560 Speaker 2: In cash at a Starbucks in Beijing. I know from 450 00:28:57,600 --> 00:28:59,160 Speaker 2: personal experience. 451 00:28:59,040 --> 00:28:59,640 Speaker 3: And we happen. 452 00:29:00,360 --> 00:29:04,840 Speaker 4: There's a lot of questions about what is the monetization 453 00:29:05,000 --> 00:29:08,040 Speaker 4: scheme there. When I was at the CPPB, we led 454 00:29:08,080 --> 00:29:11,920 Speaker 4: a study that looked at all of these major payment platforms, 455 00:29:12,600 --> 00:29:17,320 Speaker 4: and I think there was a desire to monetize a 456 00:29:17,360 --> 00:29:22,280 Speaker 4: lot of that payment's information through surveillance, being able to 457 00:29:22,360 --> 00:29:26,200 Speaker 4: know exactly not just the amount someone is paying, but 458 00:29:26,280 --> 00:29:31,400 Speaker 4: the skew level data in their basket, ultimately feeding a 459 00:29:31,480 --> 00:29:38,800 Speaker 4: foundational algorithm that ultimately could serve up personalized prices. There 460 00:29:38,880 --> 00:29:41,640 Speaker 4: was lots of issues we dealt with when it comes 461 00:29:41,640 --> 00:29:45,960 Speaker 4: to fraud and identity theft. There were certainly issues when 462 00:29:46,000 --> 00:29:50,280 Speaker 4: it comes to the shift of where money was being stored. 463 00:29:50,880 --> 00:29:54,320 Speaker 4: Many people believed that the app they were using to 464 00:29:54,440 --> 00:29:58,120 Speaker 4: send money had money in a bank account somewhere, but 465 00:29:58,240 --> 00:30:02,040 Speaker 4: in fact maybe it was in an uninsured account. So 466 00:30:02,080 --> 00:30:05,840 Speaker 4: I think that we should be looking at payments in 467 00:30:05,920 --> 00:30:09,800 Speaker 4: terms of what is the ambitions of those companies and 468 00:30:09,840 --> 00:30:13,600 Speaker 4: why do they want it. We worked hard with global 469 00:30:13,640 --> 00:30:19,920 Speaker 4: central banks and regulators to inject more competition. Apple, for example, 470 00:30:20,040 --> 00:30:24,800 Speaker 4: had a real choke hold over iOS devices, only allowing 471 00:30:24,920 --> 00:30:28,800 Speaker 4: Apple Pay to be used. Europe has banned that practice. 472 00:30:28,960 --> 00:30:32,480 Speaker 4: Other countries are looking to restrict it as well. So 473 00:30:33,160 --> 00:30:38,080 Speaker 4: I think that stable coin, and once stable coin becomes 474 00:30:38,320 --> 00:30:43,440 Speaker 4: part of the broader ecosystem, which it may, it will 475 00:30:43,480 --> 00:30:48,080 Speaker 4: open up some additional issues about how payments in America 476 00:30:48,120 --> 00:30:49,240 Speaker 4: will ultimately work. 477 00:30:49,400 --> 00:30:52,000 Speaker 1: Yeah, I was just gonna ask about that, actually, because 478 00:30:52,000 --> 00:30:56,720 Speaker 1: to some extent that seems like a potentially good thing. 479 00:30:56,800 --> 00:30:59,920 Speaker 1: If I'm worried about Okay, there's a handful of Internet giants, 480 00:31:00,320 --> 00:31:02,880 Speaker 1: a handful of commerce giants who want to have more 481 00:31:02,960 --> 00:31:07,080 Speaker 1: and more skew level data about myself and what I buy. 482 00:31:07,880 --> 00:31:11,680 Speaker 1: To my mind, it seems possible that stable coins and 483 00:31:11,800 --> 00:31:15,120 Speaker 1: having your own distributed wallet on your phone or something 484 00:31:15,200 --> 00:31:18,800 Speaker 1: like that could change the architecture of the Internet such 485 00:31:18,840 --> 00:31:23,880 Speaker 1: that there isn't such a information bottleneck that only a 486 00:31:23,920 --> 00:31:25,480 Speaker 1: few giant companies have access to. 487 00:31:25,760 --> 00:31:28,320 Speaker 4: Yeah, it depends on who's issuing them. When I was 488 00:31:28,360 --> 00:31:32,400 Speaker 4: at the Federal Trade Commission, Mark Zuckerberg, Cheryl Sandberg others 489 00:31:33,200 --> 00:31:38,520 Speaker 4: announced the Libra project, which I think was completely a 490 00:31:38,520 --> 00:31:42,480 Speaker 4: way to cement more of a mode of Facebook and 491 00:31:42,840 --> 00:31:46,480 Speaker 4: now Meta's empire of being able to track and trace 492 00:31:46,640 --> 00:31:50,080 Speaker 4: the flow of money and ultimately to be able to 493 00:31:50,280 --> 00:31:55,800 Speaker 4: ensure that merchants operating in their ecosystem would use their 494 00:31:55,880 --> 00:32:01,120 Speaker 4: currency of choice. So I think it's really important that 495 00:32:01,520 --> 00:32:06,920 Speaker 4: we do not have payments and money controlled by any 496 00:32:06,960 --> 00:32:11,240 Speaker 4: real big commercial player. It is if there is a 497 00:32:11,320 --> 00:32:16,120 Speaker 4: stable coin that is issued completely separately that is not 498 00:32:16,280 --> 00:32:20,960 Speaker 4: affiliated with one of those companies. But I worry that 499 00:32:21,000 --> 00:32:26,000 Speaker 4: the market could easily tip to award an existing big 500 00:32:26,040 --> 00:32:30,440 Speaker 4: tech network, and ultimately that might provide huge advantages to 501 00:32:30,520 --> 00:32:33,560 Speaker 4: that firm, but not necessarily the whole economy. 502 00:32:34,040 --> 00:32:36,480 Speaker 1: Tracy, you know it's funny to me, is you know, 503 00:32:36,520 --> 00:32:38,520 Speaker 1: you have all the crypto people and a lot of 504 00:32:38,560 --> 00:32:40,840 Speaker 1: them got really upset about Libra again and how that 505 00:32:41,280 --> 00:32:44,560 Speaker 1: thing holl failed. But to my mind, if you think 506 00:32:44,640 --> 00:32:48,200 Speaker 1: about it, many of those same tech people hated the 507 00:32:48,280 --> 00:32:52,440 Speaker 1: speech regulations that it existed on the big social networks 508 00:32:52,480 --> 00:32:54,440 Speaker 1: in the early twenty twenties and the late tens, and 509 00:32:54,440 --> 00:32:56,440 Speaker 1: the idea of shadow banning and all of this stuff. 510 00:32:56,760 --> 00:32:59,520 Speaker 1: And it's like, imagine if they did that to payments, right, Like, 511 00:32:59,600 --> 00:33:02,760 Speaker 1: do you really want to invest that same power that 512 00:33:02,840 --> 00:33:05,480 Speaker 1: they have to decide what is appropriate speech and not 513 00:33:05,600 --> 00:33:09,080 Speaker 1: appropriate speech into the realm of Okay, Now they also 514 00:33:09,160 --> 00:33:11,920 Speaker 1: have the ability to regulate what is appropriate payments and 515 00:33:11,920 --> 00:33:14,480 Speaker 1: inappropriate payments. That's a lot of investiture of power. 516 00:33:14,600 --> 00:33:16,400 Speaker 2: This is the issue that came up in the UK, 517 00:33:16,720 --> 00:33:19,600 Speaker 2: right there was already some drama about who was it 518 00:33:19,760 --> 00:33:23,360 Speaker 2: Nigel Frage's bank account being taken away because of his politics, 519 00:33:23,400 --> 00:33:25,640 Speaker 2: So yeah, that concern is definitely there. 520 00:33:25,960 --> 00:33:30,640 Speaker 4: And we have that here where PayPal had sent out 521 00:33:31,240 --> 00:33:38,160 Speaker 4: some terms and conditions that allowed PayPal to find people 522 00:33:39,160 --> 00:33:44,800 Speaker 4: for their speech, presumably off platform. And I think we 523 00:33:44,920 --> 00:33:49,760 Speaker 4: need to be really careful about giving any of those 524 00:33:49,920 --> 00:33:55,320 Speaker 4: firms the ability to really have a big footprint, either 525 00:33:55,400 --> 00:33:58,120 Speaker 4: on speech or on commerce. And that is part of 526 00:33:58,160 --> 00:34:04,080 Speaker 4: the reason why developed countries have separated banking and commerce. 527 00:34:04,680 --> 00:34:07,680 Speaker 4: But we are now potentially in a new era and 528 00:34:07,720 --> 00:34:11,280 Speaker 4: I would argue stable coin is not really about crypto. 529 00:34:11,400 --> 00:34:15,360 Speaker 4: That might certainly be the technology, but it is essentially 530 00:34:15,400 --> 00:34:17,400 Speaker 4: a new type of payments and banking. 531 00:34:17,480 --> 00:34:20,759 Speaker 2: Charter wait talk more about that, because most people when 532 00:34:20,880 --> 00:34:22,840 Speaker 2: they think of stable coins, they probably think of a 533 00:34:22,880 --> 00:34:25,680 Speaker 2: money market fund. But as you point out, there's a 534 00:34:25,760 --> 00:34:28,719 Speaker 2: huge overlap with banking in the sense that stable coin 535 00:34:28,760 --> 00:34:31,840 Speaker 2: issuers are taking in people's money and for the most 536 00:34:31,880 --> 00:34:37,040 Speaker 2: part supposedly putting it into things like US treasuries, maybe gold, 537 00:34:37,360 --> 00:34:40,799 Speaker 2: ultra safe assets, and the whole business is built on 538 00:34:40,840 --> 00:34:43,960 Speaker 2: the premise that depositors are always going to get their 539 00:34:44,000 --> 00:34:48,000 Speaker 2: money back, right. That seems like an echo of a bank. 540 00:34:48,520 --> 00:34:52,200 Speaker 4: That's right, and I think over time we have seen 541 00:34:52,440 --> 00:34:57,919 Speaker 4: how the line has blurred between a bank and other 542 00:34:58,080 --> 00:35:06,040 Speaker 4: types of deposit instruments. Essentially, the Federal Reserve has multiple 543 00:35:06,120 --> 00:35:10,320 Speaker 4: times needed to stabilize money market funds, and in fact 544 00:35:10,760 --> 00:35:14,040 Speaker 4: has a facility at the New York Federal Reserve, the 545 00:35:14,200 --> 00:35:17,919 Speaker 4: Overnight Reverse Repo program that one could consider a sort 546 00:35:17,920 --> 00:35:21,919 Speaker 4: of daily bailout program to keep it stable and transmit 547 00:35:22,080 --> 00:35:26,560 Speaker 4: monetary policy. I really worry that if we keep having 548 00:35:26,880 --> 00:35:32,520 Speaker 4: enormous flows from banks to these money funds, we are 549 00:35:32,719 --> 00:35:37,719 Speaker 4: essentially going to create problems with how we transmit and 550 00:35:37,800 --> 00:35:41,400 Speaker 4: intermediate credit to the real economy. I would argue that 551 00:35:41,480 --> 00:35:44,800 Speaker 4: a stable coin, if it was a tokenized bank deposit 552 00:35:45,840 --> 00:35:48,719 Speaker 4: versus a tokenized money market fund, has a lot of 553 00:35:48,880 --> 00:35:54,480 Speaker 4: different effects. Long term, most of us know that banks 554 00:35:54,480 --> 00:35:58,040 Speaker 4: are still the key to lend to small businesses, to 555 00:35:58,200 --> 00:36:01,879 Speaker 4: lend to farms, and to lend to the real economy. 556 00:36:01,960 --> 00:36:05,080 Speaker 4: If you are essentially putting a thumb on the scale 557 00:36:05,800 --> 00:36:09,480 Speaker 4: toward money market funds or tokenized money market funds, the 558 00:36:09,520 --> 00:36:14,680 Speaker 4: beneficiaries are very large firms, sovereigns, and others who can 559 00:36:14,760 --> 00:36:18,480 Speaker 4: access those money markets. So we should really want to 560 00:36:18,520 --> 00:36:22,719 Speaker 4: make sure that banks or there is some something that 561 00:36:22,840 --> 00:36:28,080 Speaker 4: takes the place of filling in the gap for small businesses, farmers, 562 00:36:28,120 --> 00:36:29,880 Speaker 4: and others who depend on bank credit. 563 00:36:30,120 --> 00:36:34,239 Speaker 1: So the Senate in June passed the Genius Act to 564 00:36:34,239 --> 00:36:37,640 Speaker 1: start creating a more robust set of stable coin regulations, 565 00:36:37,840 --> 00:36:41,520 Speaker 1: but it did not allow for yield bearing stable coins. 566 00:36:41,560 --> 00:36:44,120 Speaker 1: So it's a great business if you're in the stable 567 00:36:44,160 --> 00:36:46,040 Speaker 1: coin business collect all that yield, but you don't have 568 00:36:46,080 --> 00:36:48,880 Speaker 1: to pass it out unlike a bank. What's your perspective 569 00:36:48,920 --> 00:36:53,440 Speaker 1: on that Is this about preserving the importance of deposit 570 00:36:53,480 --> 00:36:57,359 Speaker 1: taking bank institutions so that they're not disremediated into this way, 571 00:36:57,520 --> 00:37:00,680 Speaker 1: or is this just a stop to the bank so 572 00:37:00,719 --> 00:37:03,240 Speaker 1: that normal ol deposits are still a good business. 573 00:37:03,600 --> 00:37:07,839 Speaker 4: It's a very messy piece of legislation. I think there 574 00:37:07,920 --> 00:37:13,280 Speaker 4: is some arguments that yield chasing of a uninsured product 575 00:37:13,360 --> 00:37:16,600 Speaker 4: is probably a recipe for more bailouts and more mess. 576 00:37:17,320 --> 00:37:20,920 Speaker 4: On the other hand, we can't be setting federal laws 577 00:37:20,960 --> 00:37:25,240 Speaker 4: to advantage banks. They often get what they want anyway. 578 00:37:25,880 --> 00:37:29,800 Speaker 4: I would argue that one of the best ways to 579 00:37:29,840 --> 00:37:36,319 Speaker 4: pursue some tokenized payment systems that could potentially disintermediate the 580 00:37:36,360 --> 00:37:40,960 Speaker 4: incumbent payment networks would be to use tokenized bank deposits, 581 00:37:41,440 --> 00:37:45,200 Speaker 4: and just like we could have paper cash, each issued 582 00:37:45,280 --> 00:37:50,200 Speaker 4: by a different regional federal Reserve bank, our digital wallets 583 00:37:50,280 --> 00:37:55,080 Speaker 4: could host tokenized bank deposits that are sitting in banks 584 00:37:55,160 --> 00:38:00,840 Speaker 4: across the country and being intermediated into credit to the 585 00:38:00,880 --> 00:38:04,719 Speaker 4: real economy. I think what we see is largely a 586 00:38:04,840 --> 00:38:09,600 Speaker 4: legislative framework that is going to benefit the big crypto incumbents. Well. 587 00:38:09,640 --> 00:38:14,120 Speaker 2: Speaking of benefiting the big another large ish trend in 588 00:38:14,160 --> 00:38:17,680 Speaker 2: the banking system is consolidation, of course, and post the 589 00:38:17,719 --> 00:38:21,400 Speaker 2: financial crisis, I think we saw the number of small banks, 590 00:38:21,520 --> 00:38:24,840 Speaker 2: regional banks out there absolutely plunge, and I think it 591 00:38:24,880 --> 00:38:27,719 Speaker 2: took a few years before we actually got a new 592 00:38:27,760 --> 00:38:30,680 Speaker 2: bank set up, a Denovo Bank, and it was I 593 00:38:30,719 --> 00:38:33,840 Speaker 2: think in Pennsylvania Amish Country, which was kind of funny. 594 00:38:34,520 --> 00:38:37,680 Speaker 2: I guess my question is, like, presumably you want a 595 00:38:37,760 --> 00:38:40,400 Speaker 2: diverse network of lenders out there because you want to 596 00:38:40,440 --> 00:38:43,040 Speaker 2: avoid the too big to fail problem and you want 597 00:38:43,040 --> 00:38:45,720 Speaker 2: people to have access to credit. To your point earlier, 598 00:38:46,280 --> 00:38:50,160 Speaker 2: how do you encourage a more diverse or dynamic banking 599 00:38:50,200 --> 00:38:54,120 Speaker 2: system and avoid the outcome where Joe and I always 600 00:38:54,200 --> 00:38:56,640 Speaker 2: like to throw up the charts of how JP Morgan 601 00:38:56,760 --> 00:38:59,360 Speaker 2: or Wells Fargo came into being, and it's just a 602 00:38:59,480 --> 00:39:03,560 Speaker 2: story of them snapping up lots and lots of companies. 603 00:39:04,040 --> 00:39:06,759 Speaker 4: Decades ago, there was a Supreme Court case that was 604 00:39:06,880 --> 00:39:12,480 Speaker 4: very precient that warned that consolidation in the banking system 605 00:39:12,520 --> 00:39:16,960 Speaker 4: would ultimately contribute to mass consolidation in the real economy. 606 00:39:17,440 --> 00:39:22,160 Speaker 4: And you're right, the number of small community banks has dwindled, 607 00:39:22,200 --> 00:39:27,280 Speaker 4: and there's all sorts of reasons for this, including changing technology, 608 00:39:27,719 --> 00:39:31,400 Speaker 4: consumer preferences, so much more. But I think one of 609 00:39:31,440 --> 00:39:35,279 Speaker 4: the real big reasons is that there is a perception 610 00:39:36,480 --> 00:39:41,319 Speaker 4: that the very largest banks, as you mentioned, will be protected. 611 00:39:42,080 --> 00:39:45,759 Speaker 4: When Silicon Valley Bank was failing, where was all the 612 00:39:45,840 --> 00:39:50,520 Speaker 4: money flowing to? They were taking their money out of 613 00:39:50,600 --> 00:39:54,680 Speaker 4: Silicon Valley Banks, Signature Bank and others. It went to 614 00:39:54,800 --> 00:40:02,040 Speaker 4: the very big guys. Because every investor leaves that these 615 00:40:02,160 --> 00:40:07,560 Speaker 4: banks are essentially always going to be protected, they are 616 00:40:07,640 --> 00:40:13,000 Speaker 4: able to raise money with that implicit guarantee, and that 617 00:40:13,080 --> 00:40:16,640 Speaker 4: means they are able to out compete on so many 618 00:40:16,680 --> 00:40:23,200 Speaker 4: dimensions unfairly. I think they're smaller counterparts. So I really 619 00:40:23,239 --> 00:40:27,960 Speaker 4: think we need to be careful about giving benefits and 620 00:40:28,040 --> 00:40:31,640 Speaker 4: picking winners and losers, and that's what we have been doing, 621 00:40:31,840 --> 00:40:35,840 Speaker 4: is essentially picking the very largest banks as the winners 622 00:40:36,640 --> 00:40:50,239 Speaker 4: and others as the losers. 623 00:40:54,719 --> 00:40:58,040 Speaker 1: We recently had the Robin Hood CEO on the podcast, 624 00:40:58,440 --> 00:41:01,760 Speaker 1: and they're very excited about tokenization of all kinds of things, 625 00:41:01,840 --> 00:41:05,799 Speaker 1: including a tokenization of stock for that matter. And due 626 00:41:05,840 --> 00:41:11,600 Speaker 1: to crypto technology of some sorts, there's enforcing borders in 627 00:41:11,680 --> 00:41:15,359 Speaker 1: terms of defining what a regulatory perimeter even is from 628 00:41:15,360 --> 00:41:20,040 Speaker 1: a geographical standpoint is really hard. And due to smart 629 00:41:20,080 --> 00:41:24,600 Speaker 1: contracts and stable coins, et cetera, it's very plausible that 630 00:41:24,680 --> 00:41:27,200 Speaker 1: you could somewhere in the world, maybe in an offshore 631 00:41:27,400 --> 00:41:31,640 Speaker 1: or a lightly regulated country, create some token that tracks 632 00:41:31,640 --> 00:41:35,320 Speaker 1: some regulated instrument and it trades like a regulated instrument 633 00:41:35,400 --> 00:41:38,560 Speaker 1: up until maybe something goes bust. Is there a danger 634 00:41:38,840 --> 00:41:43,680 Speaker 1: that regulating consumer facing financial products, that law won't be 635 00:41:43,680 --> 00:41:45,880 Speaker 1: able to keep up, that there's this sort of like 636 00:41:45,960 --> 00:41:50,320 Speaker 1: technological explosion of things, and that to some extent, because 637 00:41:50,360 --> 00:41:52,799 Speaker 1: anyone who has access to a stable coin wallet and 638 00:41:52,840 --> 00:41:55,600 Speaker 1: access to the internet can theoretically trade it anything anywhere 639 00:41:55,800 --> 00:41:58,600 Speaker 1: that it would just be a crisis from the regulatory 640 00:41:58,680 --> 00:42:01,080 Speaker 1: perspective and keeping a hand on everything that's going on. 641 00:42:01,160 --> 00:42:03,160 Speaker 4: Well, I think we do have a jump ball right 642 00:42:03,200 --> 00:42:07,279 Speaker 4: now on the future of the dollar. We do see 643 00:42:07,480 --> 00:42:13,800 Speaker 4: the Trump administration very interested I think in fundamentally rethinking 644 00:42:13,800 --> 00:42:17,040 Speaker 4: the role of the dollar in the system. You raise 645 00:42:17,600 --> 00:42:21,760 Speaker 4: this example of technology, but for years we have seen 646 00:42:21,840 --> 00:42:25,719 Speaker 4: I believe it's a fourteen trillion dollar market of offshore 647 00:42:25,880 --> 00:42:31,600 Speaker 4: dollars euro dollars, which poses very serious and significant issues 648 00:42:32,120 --> 00:42:33,200 Speaker 4: for the entire. 649 00:42:33,000 --> 00:42:37,799 Speaker 1: Regulars of eurostocks, like literally not the Eurostocks index, but 650 00:42:38,160 --> 00:42:44,120 Speaker 1: something that resembles in trading a US listed regulated stock, 651 00:42:44,760 --> 00:42:48,680 Speaker 1: except it's on some digital exchange. It's a decentralized exchange, 652 00:42:48,680 --> 00:42:51,400 Speaker 1: but it moves in the same way. And how do 653 00:42:51,440 --> 00:42:53,000 Speaker 1: you even begin to wrap your head around here? 654 00:42:53,080 --> 00:42:56,240 Speaker 4: Yeah? Well, I think the way in which you want 655 00:42:56,280 --> 00:43:01,960 Speaker 4: to is constantly to figure out how do we solve 656 00:43:02,040 --> 00:43:05,440 Speaker 4: real problems in the economy and how do you build 657 00:43:05,480 --> 00:43:09,479 Speaker 4: for that, rather than allowing for product services to create 658 00:43:09,520 --> 00:43:13,760 Speaker 4: it purely based on arbitrage. I also think we want 659 00:43:13,800 --> 00:43:18,680 Speaker 4: to make sure that we don't try and create something 660 00:43:18,840 --> 00:43:23,600 Speaker 4: so complex that it will always be arbitraged around. And 661 00:43:23,640 --> 00:43:28,400 Speaker 4: we need a lot more simple bright lines that investors, consumers, 662 00:43:28,440 --> 00:43:33,799 Speaker 4: everyone can really easily understand and easily follow. Ultimately, the 663 00:43:34,000 --> 00:43:37,600 Speaker 4: US is going to be the place where people want 664 00:43:37,640 --> 00:43:41,200 Speaker 4: to do business because of strong rule of law and 665 00:43:41,800 --> 00:43:45,239 Speaker 4: a good legal system and all of those things, and 666 00:43:45,280 --> 00:43:47,960 Speaker 4: that's one of the most important things to safeguard. 667 00:43:48,200 --> 00:43:51,080 Speaker 2: Speaking of novel businesses, and I guess the idea of 668 00:43:51,160 --> 00:43:55,160 Speaker 2: policy kind of chasing after new tech, I'm just going 669 00:43:55,239 --> 00:43:59,400 Speaker 2: to go all Seinfeld on this question and ask what's 670 00:43:59,480 --> 00:44:02,640 Speaker 2: the deal with buy now, pay later? Because that is 671 00:44:02,920 --> 00:44:07,440 Speaker 2: everywhere nowadays. And obviously the question. The wider question it 672 00:44:07,480 --> 00:44:10,120 Speaker 2: poses is whether or not consumers are just taking on 673 00:44:10,520 --> 00:44:13,120 Speaker 2: a load of credit in a new way that possibly 674 00:44:13,239 --> 00:44:15,000 Speaker 2: isn't accounted for very well. 675 00:44:15,440 --> 00:44:18,319 Speaker 4: Well, it's always interesting. There's a table published by the 676 00:44:18,320 --> 00:44:22,640 Speaker 4: Federal Reserve about consumer credit outstanding, and it is always 677 00:44:22,680 --> 00:44:26,560 Speaker 4: missing many things, including by Now Pay Later, which we 678 00:44:26,640 --> 00:44:32,000 Speaker 4: have seen surge through the pandemic, growing more than ten x. 679 00:44:33,560 --> 00:44:37,080 Speaker 4: It has really changed quite a bit. Tracy by Now 680 00:44:37,120 --> 00:44:42,359 Speaker 4: pay Later, strangely was not really homegrown in America. It 681 00:44:42,440 --> 00:44:48,680 Speaker 4: came from other jurisdictions. It was popular in Sweden, Australia, 682 00:44:48,840 --> 00:44:52,400 Speaker 4: and now it is a major form of credit. Just 683 00:44:52,440 --> 00:44:56,760 Speaker 4: so everyone understands what it is. You take out alone 684 00:44:56,880 --> 00:45:01,200 Speaker 4: often pay in four. It does not have an interest rate, 685 00:45:01,520 --> 00:45:04,600 Speaker 4: but the buy now, Pay later lender takes a cut 686 00:45:04,640 --> 00:45:07,759 Speaker 4: from the merchant, just like a credit card company does. 687 00:45:08,480 --> 00:45:12,719 Speaker 4: So you have seen a lot of consumers believe that 688 00:45:12,800 --> 00:45:15,719 Speaker 4: this is a better way because it is no interest. 689 00:45:16,040 --> 00:45:20,480 Speaker 4: But the CFPB did extensive study on it and found 690 00:45:20,520 --> 00:45:24,400 Speaker 4: that there's very significant issues when it comes to people 691 00:45:24,480 --> 00:45:28,400 Speaker 4: returning goods and not necessarily getting it credited. There's issues 692 00:45:28,440 --> 00:45:32,160 Speaker 4: of people having multiple buy now, pay later loans, across 693 00:45:32,200 --> 00:45:36,120 Speaker 4: different lenders and are levered up. I would hear actually 694 00:45:36,160 --> 00:45:39,440 Speaker 4: complains from auto lenders who would say to me, how 695 00:45:39,480 --> 00:45:41,640 Speaker 4: am I supposed to write this auto loan if I 696 00:45:41,760 --> 00:45:44,759 Speaker 4: don't know what the buy and now pay later loans 697 00:45:44,800 --> 00:45:46,760 Speaker 4: are because they're not on the credit report. 698 00:45:46,880 --> 00:45:50,480 Speaker 1: Yeah, this strikes me as super interesting. I mean, just 699 00:45:50,520 --> 00:45:54,360 Speaker 1: like how inadequate right now is our tracking, both in 700 00:45:54,440 --> 00:45:57,719 Speaker 1: terms of the scale of it, just when we think about, okay, 701 00:45:57,719 --> 00:46:01,560 Speaker 1: we want to have aggregate sense of consumer consumer indebtedness, 702 00:46:02,000 --> 00:46:04,799 Speaker 1: and then how much of a struggle is it for 703 00:46:04,960 --> 00:46:09,320 Speaker 1: actual lenders to judge the credit worthiness of consumers because 704 00:46:09,360 --> 00:46:11,839 Speaker 1: of the lack of visibility and to be npl. 705 00:46:11,719 --> 00:46:14,640 Speaker 4: The faster it grows, the more difficult it will be. 706 00:46:15,040 --> 00:46:17,680 Speaker 4: And I think a key piece of this is we 707 00:46:17,800 --> 00:46:21,279 Speaker 4: are seeing all sorts of buy now, pay later like 708 00:46:21,360 --> 00:46:26,799 Speaker 4: products go beyond the traditional lenders. We're seeing banks and 709 00:46:26,880 --> 00:46:29,799 Speaker 4: credit card companies say, use my card and then go 710 00:46:29,840 --> 00:46:32,479 Speaker 4: online and you can convert it to buy now, pay later, 711 00:46:32,960 --> 00:46:36,640 Speaker 4: or some people thinking about how to connect it to 712 00:46:36,760 --> 00:46:40,759 Speaker 4: community bank debit cards. So I do believe it is 713 00:46:40,840 --> 00:46:47,160 Speaker 4: a big blind spot about consumer credit outstanding right now. 714 00:46:47,200 --> 00:46:52,960 Speaker 4: Obviously it is a relatively modest piece of the overall 715 00:46:53,160 --> 00:46:57,680 Speaker 4: unsecured debt. But if it continues its trajectory, even if 716 00:46:57,680 --> 00:46:59,839 Speaker 4: it slows its growth, it will be a big piece 717 00:46:59,840 --> 00:47:00,680 Speaker 4: of that pie. 718 00:47:01,080 --> 00:47:05,440 Speaker 2: I mean, presumably by now pay later would fall or 719 00:47:05,440 --> 00:47:09,480 Speaker 2: could fall under the remit of the CFPB. But well, 720 00:47:09,480 --> 00:47:13,239 Speaker 2: it does, it does, But I mean the CFPB is 721 00:47:13,719 --> 00:47:17,080 Speaker 2: not really functioning anymore. That seems like an issue. 722 00:47:17,239 --> 00:47:21,839 Speaker 4: Well, what we are seeing is that the protections that 723 00:47:21,880 --> 00:47:24,600 Speaker 4: the CFPB tried to put in place for buy now, 724 00:47:24,640 --> 00:47:27,960 Speaker 4: pay later borrows some basic ones. You can get some 725 00:47:28,000 --> 00:47:31,920 Speaker 4: statements that you're able to return goods and get it credited. 726 00:47:32,680 --> 00:47:34,680 Speaker 4: It looks like a lot of that is just being 727 00:47:35,120 --> 00:47:39,360 Speaker 4: thrown into trash or just not enforced. We are seeing 728 00:47:39,480 --> 00:47:42,759 Speaker 4: states all over the country though, looking to beef up 729 00:47:42,800 --> 00:47:47,200 Speaker 4: protections because they see how this could create a treadmill 730 00:47:47,320 --> 00:47:48,920 Speaker 4: of debt for people. 731 00:47:49,680 --> 00:47:52,759 Speaker 2: Just one more question for me. So you were head 732 00:47:52,760 --> 00:47:55,799 Speaker 2: of the CFPB under the Bien administration, and you were 733 00:47:56,200 --> 00:48:00,400 Speaker 2: at the FTC under the first Trump administration, and you 734 00:48:00,480 --> 00:48:05,479 Speaker 2: got to experience some of the second Trump administration. What's 735 00:48:05,520 --> 00:48:09,840 Speaker 2: your sense of the difference between Trump one and Trump 736 00:48:10,000 --> 00:48:13,520 Speaker 2: two point zero and how that administration is operating and 737 00:48:13,600 --> 00:48:15,880 Speaker 2: thinking about things like regulation. 738 00:48:16,280 --> 00:48:19,960 Speaker 4: Yeah, I think that there is when it comes to finance, 739 00:48:20,600 --> 00:48:26,880 Speaker 4: a real sense of concern about how they want to 740 00:48:26,920 --> 00:48:29,000 Speaker 4: think about the dollar and how they want to think 741 00:48:29,000 --> 00:48:32,280 Speaker 4: of the future of treasury securities. I see Secretary Beson 742 00:48:32,480 --> 00:48:37,759 Speaker 4: talk very deliberately about wanting stable coin, for example, to 743 00:48:37,840 --> 00:48:41,600 Speaker 4: be a way to boost demand for treasuries. Of course, 744 00:48:41,880 --> 00:48:45,799 Speaker 4: there's lots of issues with that, but I think more broadly, 745 00:48:46,640 --> 00:48:51,879 Speaker 4: the first Trump administration was a lot less organized, and 746 00:48:52,239 --> 00:48:55,600 Speaker 4: now there is a clearly a plan that they are 747 00:48:56,040 --> 00:49:01,040 Speaker 4: executing on, even if it seems chaotic. So I think 748 00:49:01,600 --> 00:49:04,640 Speaker 4: for those who have concerns about it, I don't think 749 00:49:04,760 --> 00:49:09,759 Speaker 4: they should write it off as just chaos or craziness. 750 00:49:10,360 --> 00:49:12,520 Speaker 4: I think there is a lot of things that are 751 00:49:12,600 --> 00:49:18,120 Speaker 4: being done that will have lasting effects on the financial system. 752 00:49:18,200 --> 00:49:20,799 Speaker 2: All right, ro hit Chopra, thank you so much for 753 00:49:20,880 --> 00:49:23,680 Speaker 2: coming on all thoughts. That was so interesting and really 754 00:49:23,719 --> 00:49:26,520 Speaker 2: good to get a regulator's actually perspective. 755 00:49:27,040 --> 00:49:41,960 Speaker 3: Thanks for having Thank you so much, Joe. 756 00:49:42,000 --> 00:49:44,120 Speaker 2: That was really interesting and I'm so glad we could 757 00:49:44,120 --> 00:49:45,920 Speaker 2: have ro hit On to give a sort of fly 758 00:49:46,040 --> 00:49:49,279 Speaker 2: on the wall perspective of a regulator. Dearing you know 759 00:49:49,320 --> 00:49:51,120 Speaker 2: what was a pretty dramatic time. 760 00:49:51,560 --> 00:49:56,160 Speaker 1: There's so many interesting things happening in Finnrag right now 761 00:49:56,800 --> 00:50:00,120 Speaker 1: in general, just obviously the sort of like turning of 762 00:50:00,239 --> 00:50:02,120 Speaker 1: the dial, you know, I think, like a really big 763 00:50:02,160 --> 00:50:05,320 Speaker 1: picture story that doesn't get a lot of attention because 764 00:50:05,320 --> 00:50:08,880 Speaker 1: we focus a lot on the changing administrations because the 765 00:50:08,920 --> 00:50:12,479 Speaker 1: financial crisis was a really long time ago. These things 766 00:50:12,520 --> 00:50:15,000 Speaker 1: always ebb and flow, right, So you have a crisis 767 00:50:15,040 --> 00:50:17,640 Speaker 1: and everyone cracks down and you sort of you know, 768 00:50:17,760 --> 00:50:20,120 Speaker 1: you do the max and then memories fade. You're like, 769 00:50:20,120 --> 00:50:22,560 Speaker 1: why do we have the Like this is I feel 770 00:50:22,560 --> 00:50:24,839 Speaker 1: like it's human nature. As the two thousand and nine 771 00:50:24,840 --> 00:50:28,680 Speaker 1: twenty ten reforms go further into the past, we're just 772 00:50:28,719 --> 00:50:30,759 Speaker 1: going to have this sort of natural loosening until the 773 00:50:30,800 --> 00:50:33,759 Speaker 1: financial crisis of twenty forty five or whatever it is. 774 00:50:34,000 --> 00:50:36,600 Speaker 2: Well, I mean, why do we have the CFPP. The 775 00:50:36,640 --> 00:50:38,880 Speaker 2: whole answer is it was created after the two thousand 776 00:50:38,880 --> 00:50:41,200 Speaker 2: and eight financial crisis. The other thing I thought was 777 00:50:41,200 --> 00:50:44,719 Speaker 2: really interesting, and this gets to the consolidation point, which 778 00:50:44,719 --> 00:50:48,200 Speaker 2: I think is a massive, massive story in the US 779 00:50:48,320 --> 00:50:51,719 Speaker 2: financial industry. But it's just that idea of Okay, if 780 00:50:51,719 --> 00:50:54,680 Speaker 2: you're worried about your deposit at a smaller bank, the 781 00:50:54,800 --> 00:50:56,839 Speaker 2: natural thing is to move it into a too big 782 00:50:56,880 --> 00:50:59,960 Speaker 2: to fail bank because you know that the US government, 783 00:51:00,000 --> 00:51:02,359 Speaker 2: based on precedent, is not going to let them go. 784 00:51:02,760 --> 00:51:05,120 Speaker 2: And so that again seems to give the big banks 785 00:51:05,120 --> 00:51:09,760 Speaker 2: a sort of unnatural edge perhaps in terms of deposit taking. 786 00:51:09,880 --> 00:51:13,160 Speaker 1: I mean, I I know, we talked about this after 787 00:51:13,560 --> 00:51:17,280 Speaker 1: SVB in multiple episodes, but the sheer number of banks 788 00:51:17,280 --> 00:51:20,520 Speaker 1: in the United States that still exist like boggles the mind. 789 00:51:20,840 --> 00:51:23,600 Speaker 1: There's no other country in the world that has as 790 00:51:23,719 --> 00:51:27,759 Speaker 1: many Canada's like six banks. We're so heavily banked in 791 00:51:27,800 --> 00:51:31,160 Speaker 1: this country. It's still today the random. 792 00:51:31,000 --> 00:51:33,759 Speaker 2: There used to be a lot more, a lot more, Yeah. 793 00:51:33,520 --> 00:51:37,520 Speaker 1: But I mean, it's staggering the number of community banks 794 00:51:37,560 --> 00:51:40,600 Speaker 1: and regional banks that exist in the United States, even 795 00:51:40,600 --> 00:51:41,560 Speaker 1: with all the consulidations. 796 00:51:41,640 --> 00:51:44,160 Speaker 2: Do you want to be like Canada, Joe, that's the question. 797 00:51:44,440 --> 00:51:47,040 Speaker 1: No, I don't know. I mean, I like genuinely don't 798 00:51:47,040 --> 00:51:51,000 Speaker 1: know what the optimal distribution is or anything. But given 799 00:51:51,080 --> 00:51:54,680 Speaker 1: the advantages that the big banks have, the perception of safety, 800 00:51:54,880 --> 00:51:57,799 Speaker 1: they're technological capabilities that they can invest in that a 801 00:51:57,800 --> 00:52:01,680 Speaker 1: community bank will never be able to replicate. Brand et cetera. 802 00:52:02,360 --> 00:52:04,759 Speaker 1: The proliferation of banks is still like a sort of 803 00:52:04,960 --> 00:52:07,360 Speaker 1: interesting phenomenon of our financial system. 804 00:52:07,480 --> 00:52:10,040 Speaker 2: The other thing that struck me from that conversation was 805 00:52:10,239 --> 00:52:12,719 Speaker 2: the buy now, pay later stuff, which you know. 806 00:52:12,719 --> 00:52:13,920 Speaker 1: Got to do more on that period. 807 00:52:13,960 --> 00:52:16,680 Speaker 2: Absolutely, it's becoming a really interesting story. But it just 808 00:52:16,760 --> 00:52:18,640 Speaker 2: kind of blows my mind that no one is actually 809 00:52:18,680 --> 00:52:21,759 Speaker 2: tracking that credit because the whole thing is supposed to 810 00:52:21,760 --> 00:52:26,719 Speaker 2: be technology driven. It's plugged into the checkout process of 811 00:52:26,760 --> 00:52:30,160 Speaker 2: a website, it's really easy to do. It seems insane 812 00:52:30,200 --> 00:52:33,040 Speaker 2: to me that like the credit bureaus can't track it 813 00:52:33,280 --> 00:52:35,080 Speaker 2: at the same time, and it seems like a huge, 814 00:52:35,120 --> 00:52:37,200 Speaker 2: huge data hole for the US economy. 815 00:52:37,360 --> 00:52:40,759 Speaker 1: That's a huge story. I completely agree. And then you know, 816 00:52:40,800 --> 00:52:42,440 Speaker 1: we sort of talked about at the end. I mean, 817 00:52:42,480 --> 00:52:46,400 Speaker 1: I think it's such an interesting question the degree to which, 818 00:52:46,800 --> 00:52:49,880 Speaker 1: if it happens, we'll see stable coins become part of 819 00:52:49,880 --> 00:52:52,759 Speaker 1: the payment's landscape in a meaningful way rather than just 820 00:52:52,840 --> 00:52:56,480 Speaker 1: a way to get money onto cryptocurrency trading websites, which 821 00:52:56,520 --> 00:52:59,919 Speaker 1: is where they began. And then all of the things 822 00:53:00,120 --> 00:53:03,320 Speaker 1: around tokenization of equity. I mean, it's just a fact 823 00:53:04,080 --> 00:53:09,120 Speaker 1: that Robin Hood, whose CEO we had on unilaterally announced 824 00:53:09,160 --> 00:53:11,640 Speaker 1: that at some point there's going to be some version 825 00:53:11,680 --> 00:53:17,920 Speaker 1: of tokenized equity or tokens that correspond to equity in 826 00:53:18,000 --> 00:53:22,200 Speaker 1: private companies doing it unilatterly. How regulators are going to 827 00:53:22,320 --> 00:53:25,480 Speaker 1: actually get their handle on this? I have no idea. 828 00:53:25,640 --> 00:53:29,000 Speaker 2: Yeah, tokens, tokens everywhere, and not a bank to lend. 829 00:53:29,120 --> 00:53:31,040 Speaker 2: I think that was ro HiT's point, right, All right, 830 00:53:31,080 --> 00:53:31,799 Speaker 2: shall we leave it there? 831 00:53:31,880 --> 00:53:32,560 Speaker 1: Let's leave it there. 832 00:53:32,719 --> 00:53:35,120 Speaker 2: This has been another episode of the Odd Lots podcast. 833 00:53:35,200 --> 00:53:37,879 Speaker 2: I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy. 834 00:53:37,600 --> 00:53:40,279 Speaker 1: Alloway and I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at 835 00:53:40,280 --> 00:53:43,600 Speaker 1: the Stalwart. Follow our guest Roe Hit Chopra. He's at 836 00:53:43,680 --> 00:53:47,439 Speaker 1: Chopra USA. Follow our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen Arman, 837 00:53:47,520 --> 00:53:50,440 Speaker 1: dash Ol Bennett at Dashbock and kel Brooks at Keil Brooks. 838 00:53:50,840 --> 00:53:53,480 Speaker 1: More Odd Lots content go to Bloomberg dot com slash 839 00:53:53,480 --> 00:53:55,920 Speaker 1: odd Lots. We have a daily newsletter and all of 840 00:53:55,960 --> 00:53:58,040 Speaker 1: our episodes, and you can chat about all of these 841 00:53:58,080 --> 00:54:01,120 Speaker 1: topics twenty four to seven in our disc discord do 842 00:54:01,280 --> 00:54:03,279 Speaker 1: Gg slashlins. 843 00:54:02,719 --> 00:54:05,120 Speaker 2: And if you enjoy Odlots, if you like it when 844 00:54:05,160 --> 00:54:08,399 Speaker 2: we do autopsies of failed banks with regulators. Then please 845 00:54:08,440 --> 00:54:11,480 Speaker 2: leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. 846 00:54:11,600 --> 00:54:14,359 Speaker 2: And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can 847 00:54:14,400 --> 00:54:17,680 Speaker 2: listen to all of our episodes absolutely a free All 848 00:54:17,719 --> 00:54:19,680 Speaker 2: you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel on 849 00:54:19,760 --> 00:54:22,000 Speaker 2: Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there. 850 00:54:22,320 --> 00:54:23,120 Speaker 3: Thanks for listening.