WEBVTT - Gene Sperling: Democrats Must Stick Together To Go Big

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney. Along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. As well. As President elected

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:23.319
<v Speaker 1>by then prepares to take the office, much of the

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>focus will be on his economic plan. Taking a preview

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>what we might see, we welcome Gene Sperling. He's a

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>former director of the National Economic Council under president's Clinton

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and Obama. He is now president of Sparling Economic Strategies

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>based in Santa Monica, California. Gene, thanks so much for

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>joining us here. A lot to unpack here as it

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>relates to the President elect and his first one days,

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe even first ten days, maybe even today in terms

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 1>of his actions from an economic perspective. What do you

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>think he and his administration need to get done quickly? Well,

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I think they've made it smart decision in that they

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>are bifurcating their uh call it a hundred day plan

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>or uh economics start, which is to first focus on

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the economic relief needed for the crisis. So that means

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>both getting huge amounts up to four hundred billion dollars

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to ensure that we are able as a country to

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>truly deal with the COVID crisis, and that includes the

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>vaccine distribution, all of the testing, all of the things

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 1>that we've been so weak and weaker than other nations in.

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>And then also the funding that would go to UH

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>people who are hurting, people who are at risk of

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>losing being evicted. Obviously, you know, more general support, but

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>really for people who need it in the taking the

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>checks up to two thousands. But they're saying, let's do

0:01:56.240 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that first. Let's do that relief package first, let's get

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that done. Let's not hold up UH that for more complex,

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 1>longer term issues. So you'll see them move quickly, and

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 1>they're going to try to make it bipartisan. They're going

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to try to do what's called regular order, working with

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Republicans do something with sixty votes. But they know and

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that they in their back pocket they have the ability

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>through a process called reconciliation, to pass this with just

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:29.839
<v Speaker 1>fifty Democratic votes. That won't be their goal, but that's

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a backup plan to make sure they get this part

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>done fast while people are hurting. Economy needs that. Then

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 1>they say, let's come back and do the build better

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>jobs plan, the infrastructure, the green uh climate jobs, the manufacturing,

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the enhancing care caregiving jobs across the country. They know

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that's going to take longer, it's gonna be a little

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>more complex. Uh. So they're saying that's our that's that's

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>phase two. And I think that both are important. One

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>is about relief and emergency, the others about more long

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>term recovery, about speeding the speed in which we get

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 1>back to long term Uh, I mean we get back

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to full employment. Remember, uh we're still down nine and

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a half million jobs since the start of COVID, So

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>we're still in a deep hole with a lot of

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>risk still out there for this recovery. And at this

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>point we have former President George W. Bush and his

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>wife Laura arriving on the platform. Do you know I

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>want to ask you who will Joe Biden and team

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>be targeting in terms of trying to get some of

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, what they want done. I mean, for example,

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>at one point nine trillion dollars stimulus, there's very few

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>people who actually believe that it will be the full

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>one point nine trillion dollars. But to get up as

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>much as possible, who are the power brokers they need

0:03:55.000 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>to to be to be targeting well, I think the

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I think in the end of the day, the most

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>important thing is can they keep all of the Democrats together,

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>because again, if they have fifty votes they get to

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>use for a budget matters which are kind of the

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>major kind of spending issues. You can do it with reconciliation.

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>So it would be the Democrats that might be holdouts.

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, you'd want to make sure that

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the that the ones who are seen as the more

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>moderate Democrats. You know, I think people will be looking

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot at Joe Mansion from West Virginia, UH, Senator

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Cinema from Arizona Center, Tester from Montana. They're gonna want

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 1>to say, where can what in this package can we

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>get agreement on? That goes all the way from the

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:55.919
<v Speaker 1>most progressive members like Bernie Sanders to the more conservative

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 1>members of the Democratic Party like Joe Manson. But I

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>think when they start, they're going to start with the

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>view that a lot of Republicans are not are going

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to want to support the major money for vaccine distribution.

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 1>You've had several Republicans support the taking the checks to

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand dollars. It's gonna be hard for lots of

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>people to vote against extending long term unemployment. So I

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.359
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to start with a fairly broad view,

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>looking for where the Republicans, uh, you know, can support them.

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>The biding can show he's doing bipartisan economic legislation, but

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:37.359
<v Speaker 1>in the end of the day, they know that ultimate

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 1>backup card is having all fifty Democrats on board, and

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 1>so yes, I think they'll be looking for where their

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 1>most progressive and most moderate members can find common ground. So, Gene,

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it's fairly clear that this pandemic and the economic disruption

0:05:55.640 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>has just exposed yet again, income, inequality, wealth, any quality

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>in this country. And his president, like Biden, thinks about

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>his economic plan is fiscal stimulus, plans plural. How do

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you think what's the best way to go about addressing

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:14.600
<v Speaker 1>some of these issues? Well, you know, you're absolutely right.

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it is fair to say that,

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>um that the pandemic, rather than create economic and racial disparities,

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 1>has just exposed and accelerated them. And I think that

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>will be very much on his mind and will impact

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>his policies. And remember during the campaign he talked about

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the k recovery or recovery that might have an okay

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>GDP number, but when you looked beneath it, you would

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 1>find people who are more fortunate Like myself. We've been

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>able to continue to work and work from home doing well.

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>And you've heard Leo Brainerd at the Federal Reserve estimate

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:59.359
<v Speaker 1>that for lower income workers or those who can't just

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>work from the unemployment rate is close to near depression levels.

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think he's going to be looking at that

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>very closely. So Number one, you've got to prevent downward falls. Uh.

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, recessions are tough, but if you lose your home,

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're evicted, if you don't have food on the table,

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's that's offensive to our values. That causes

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>long term unemployment that many people don't recover from. So

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna you know, I think these policies

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>will be very targeted to that, and I think when

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you see him do his jobs plan, there will be

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of focus on making sure, you know, not

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>just putting dollars out and hoping people, you know, not

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>worrying about who gets hired, but doing it in a

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>way that is ensuring you're improving uh, not just homeownership,

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>but closing that racial homeownership gap, which is a way

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of closing the racial wealth gap, making sure when you

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, most presidents often have just an infrastructure plan

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>by I didn't build back better plan includes caregiving jobs

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>those tend to be and health workers those tend to

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>be often helping more women, helping more more women of color.

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>That's very important to him. Gene, who is the next

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>federal reserved chair? And uh, you know, you know, uh,

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna you know that that's going to be the

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the fun parlor games among economic

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>nerds across the globe. Uh. And I don't want to.

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess I have too many friends who were probably

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>soon Uh you know, I really I really don't know.

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>And I'm gonna I've worked enough with Joe Biden to

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>not want to totally second, you know, try to front

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>run his choices. I think that I think there's no

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>question that the fact that they won Georgia, uh and

0:08:55.920 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that they do control the Senate does give him more

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>discretion to think about picking somebody knew, somebody who might

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:07.959
<v Speaker 1>be more his own person. But I'm guessing that even

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>within the Buying administration, as they're scrambling to get their

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>cabinet in and chosen and confirmed, I would bet that

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that decision has not been made. Gen thirty seconds. What's

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the greatest risk to this economy? Here? Markets equit, markets

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>hitting all time highs. But what's the risk out there?

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, doing too little, doing too little under uh,

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, underestimating you know that would end up being

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the problem. Before that, you you can only get one

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>bite at the apple, things get worse. Uh. You can

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>imagine a new strain that's that's resistant to the new vaccine.

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>When I came inven to be any C director, we

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>were looking at a strong economic year, and then you

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>had the NW clear meltdown in Japan, you had the

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you had the Arab Spring. Things happen, and I think

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>that's why what you heard from yelling is the risks

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of going small are much greater than the risk of

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>going big. And I think that is going to define

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>what you see from this president economically in his first year.

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Gene Sperling, thank you so much for joining us today.

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>On everything that we know so far, and the parlor

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>games in Washington, d C among economic circles. And you

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>know who might actually be filling out the different roles

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>in d C over the coming couple of years. Jean Sparling,

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>former director of the National Economic Council under Presidents Clinton

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and Obama and president of Sparreling Economic Strategies, joining us there. So, Paul,

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>it is an auspicious day. It always is only coming,

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously once every four years, and today we're going to

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>see President elect Joe Biden and Vice President let Kamala

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Harris sworn in. Yeah, it's gonna be a very unique day,

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>unique inauguration, Vanni, with what we're doing with in terms

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic and what in a couple of weeks ago,

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>but a day of celebration, nonetheless. So let's hand it

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>over now to our colleague David Weston, who's going to

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:08.839
<v Speaker 1>continue for the next three hours with Balance of Power

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Inauguration Day in our nation's capital. Stay tuned for live

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>coverage of the inauguration of Joe Biden on a special

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg's Balance of Power with David Weston. Our

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.319
<v Speaker 1>Wall Wall coverage starts at eleven a m. Wall Street

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Time on Bloomberg Radio and Television. Let's get a preview

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of what we might experience later today as inauguration takes place.

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 1>We welcome Jennie shan Zano, Bloomberg Politics contributor, author of

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>American Democracy in Crisis, also professor Political Science at Iona College. Professor.

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for joining us, Jennie. What do you

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to hear from soon to be President

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Biden in his inaugural address? You know, what I'm expecting

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to hear is a theme of bipartisanship. This is somebody

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>who has been in the Senate for much of his

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>adult life. He understands that in order to get all

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>of the bills he wants to get passed and addressed

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.439
<v Speaker 1>all of the challenges we're facing, he's going to need

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to work across the aisle. So I expect we're going

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to hear about bipartisanship or reach across the aisle. A

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>call for unity that seems to be the buzzword of

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:18.559
<v Speaker 1>the day. Um. You know, so we've had historic inaugural

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 1>addresses obviously in the past, but I do think that

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:23.839
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a stark contrast to what we

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>heard in sixteen with the infamous carnage speech. I think

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Biden's tony is going to be completely different from its predecessor, Genie.

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>How does Kamala Harris's role manifest She has an opportunity

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:39.599
<v Speaker 1>right now that previous vice presidents haven't had. How will

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>her and Biden define this new role. It's gonna be

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 1>so fascinating because, of course, Kamala Harris a historic pick.

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>She's the first woman, she is the first African American

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Indian descent. Of course, also she is likely to be

0:12:56.080 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the leading candidate for the presidency in we widely expect

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that Joe Biden, given his age at seventy eight, is

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>not going to be running again. Um. If that is

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the case, then Kamala Harris is going to be not

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>just serving as vice president and helping the president through

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>all of these challenges we're facing, but also herself gearing

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>up for a run. And that is going to, I

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>think be fascinating. And I know you're both probably shocked

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that I'm talking about today, but if we recall Donald Trump,

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it was vunny the day of his inauguration

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>or the day after he announced he was running in

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 1>so you know, it is really uh, you know, time

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to gear up for four and Kamala Harris is going

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to be a leading contender obviously for that position. So, Jenny,

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the first one days of any president's term tend to

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 1>be very, very busy where they have a lot of

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>they try to get a lot of work done. What

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>do you think this president can't get done in the

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>first one days. It's been fascinating. He's been talking about

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>not just the one hundred day marker, which we're so

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 1>used to in the U s. Sort of this historic day,

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a hundred days, he's been talking about ten days. And

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>what we expect is he is immediately as early as today,

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be sending to Congress a massive immigration bill

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>um that I think is going to be a sweeping

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>proposal to provide citizenship for eleven million undocumented people living

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. We also expect in the first day,

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>just this afternoon, he's going to sign a series of

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>executive orders dealing with everything from the environment and climate again,

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to immigration, to the public health crisis COVID, and to

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>racial justice. So he has a lot on his plate,

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>not just in the first hundred days, but in the

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>first day, because he's expected to be in the Oval

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Office working as early as this afternoon. President Hump earlier

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>this morning made some remarks to reporters and also obviously

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>made some remarks on the podium before he left Joint

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Bass Andrews. He said we will be back, and he

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>had told reporters hopefully it's not going to be a

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>long goodbye. I'm curious as to what you think President

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump will try to do next, particularly given that among

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the pardons where Steve Bonna, we were expecting some that

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>we didn't get, and then we did get the Steve

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Bonn on one. What was the significance of the significance

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in my mind, is that exactly tied to this we

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>will be back statement that he made. I think the president,

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the President Trump expects that he or members of his family,

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>his daughter, his daughter in law, and his son, all

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>looking at potential races in Florida and the South part

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of the United States, may rely on somebody like as

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Steve Bannon to be an advisor for potential runs for

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Congress and potentially if a President Trump, former President Trump

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>decides to run again. So I think you're absolutely right.

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I was also struck by his remarks in terms of

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>how he took credit for what is going to happen

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>in the Biden administration, saying that he laid the foundation

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>for what ever good they're able to achieve with a

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of luck. So it was sort of the first

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>time I've heard somebody take credit prior to his successor

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>entering office. So I thought that was fascinating as well. Jennie, Realistically,

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>what do you think um soon to be President Biden

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>can get done legislatively? He has obviously a long track

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>record in Congress, bipartisan historical record. Can he bring reluctant

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Republicans and maybe some Democrats over to his side to

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>get meaningful legislation done. He's going to have to do that,

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>And I want to be optimistic on this day of

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of celebration and say yes he can. As you mentioned,

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>he's perfectly situated to do that given his history in

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the Senate and of reaching across the aisle. I'm not

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>so sure he's going to be able to get the

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>bills that he wants passed in the way he wants.

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>For instance, this almost two trillion dollar stimulus bill we're

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>already hearing yesterday, during the confirmation, hearings pushback from Republicans

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>on things like the fifteen dollar minimum wage, on the

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>fourteen hundred dollars called by Marco Rubio also contender for

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 1>a more piecemeal approach, So there is going to be

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>pushed back from Republicans, and I suspect in the case

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:15.479
<v Speaker 1>of COVID immigration and the other bills infrastructure that he

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>wants to get past, these are going to be watered down,

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>if you will. I don't think we'll get at one

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>point nine trillion dollar. I think we're going to be

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>closer to a one trillion dollar bill at the end.

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be a negotiation for sure, because he

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>needs not just the moderate Republicans, he needs to also

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>maintain the Democrats. And I would say one thing to

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>watch for Democrats or Republicans who leave their party. Genie.

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Genie will be contributing throughout the day, so

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>do continue to listen and watch a Genie. Sean Zano

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg politics contributor, professor at Iona College and author of

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a new book, American Democracy in Crisis. This is Bloomberg. Well,

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>we're just seeing continued gains here for you as equities

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>with an ASDAG up one point seven recent now more

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:02.919
<v Speaker 1>than one percent on the ten year yield at one

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>oh ninety eight. Let's bring in Bloomberg process that reporter

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Ponsa to give us an idea of what markets

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 1>are really concentrating on today. Would seem that the dollar

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>index is a little bit weaker relative to, for example,

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 1>the Canadian dollar. But other than that, it's all about equity, Sarah.

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 1>It is all about equities today, and we see the

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>NAZAC at record highs, we see the SMP five hundred

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>at record highs. We also see the Russell two thousand

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>at record highs. So from small caps to large caps,

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:30.239
<v Speaker 1>but really asserting itself in the markets today is the

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Fame trade once again, this after Netflix was the first

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of the group to report earnings yesterday after the bell

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and really just performing. You could say, we saw a

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 1>net new subscribers coming at eight point five one million

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that not only beat Netflix his own forecast, but it

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>also beat the expectations from analysts on Wall Street of

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>six point six million. On top of that, they finally

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>passed two hundred million subscriber mark. At the same time,

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:56.120
<v Speaker 1>they said cash flow will now allow it to stop

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 1>relying on debt to fuel growth. So we see Netflix

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 1>this morning up almost fifteent, trading out a new record high,

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and you see the other fang names just trading in tandem.

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 1>You look at your best performers on a points basis,

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:12.160
<v Speaker 1>at least in the SMP five dred as we speak,

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that's Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, each up at least two and

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a half percent this morning. Yeah, it's just extraordinary story

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>last night with Netflix. I think the other big thing,

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Sarah as the company said that you know they're gonna

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>be free cash flow positive pretty quickly, I think a

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit faster than the street expected. So kind of

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>showing how that company is really matured and really kind

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of grown into its its growth story. Oh surely, and

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 1>coming into this earning season, A big question for the

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 1>likes of Netflix, maybe Amazon. You think of other large

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>technology companies that benefited all of and even benefited from

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the rollout of of COVID nineteen and the play out

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and people forced to stay at home and work from home.

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>The question really has been, we know that business was

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>pulled forwards for them. We know that many people bought

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.199
<v Speaker 1>Netflix of scripture because they were stuck at home with

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 1>nothing else to watch, and and they needed to. We

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>know that happened. Another question is what comes next for

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>these businesses. And there's been this push and pull when

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 1>we hear investors talk about this rotation not just from

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 1>from growth to value, but from defensives to cyclicals, and

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the idea that we might see this shift into the

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>reopening play from the stay at home trade. But it

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>makes you think when you see these companies continue to

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>deliver uh growth companies, And this is also an argument

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that's made. It's it's not as if they are going

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to just drift off it and everyone's gonna stop talking

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>about them, and they're no longer going to be strong

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>companies like you pointed out Netflix now going to be

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 1>cash flow positive. I mean, these are strong companies and

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 1>it makes you wonder if we can see this reopening trade.

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Small caps continue to run, but in tandem with big

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>tech and and streaming companies like Netflix that did very

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>well in How much is the market reacting to John

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 1>at Yellen's testimony. Obviously she is going to be the

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>next to insury secretary. It's you know, almost without a

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:07.360
<v Speaker 1>doubt that she'll be voted in by sort of all

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>sides of Congress um and therefore, you know, will try

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to implement a lot of what Joe Biden has been annunciating,

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the one point nine trillion dollars in stimulus and so on.

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>How much is today's trade off the back about not

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>too much. I mean, we've known that Janet Yellen was

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be Treasury Secretary for quite a while. Now,

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>she's also a known entity on Wall Street. The expectation

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:32.880
<v Speaker 1>is that there really shouldn't be too many surprises here.

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>She has been touting the one point nine trillion dollar

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 1>stimulus package. On the back of that, we have seen

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 1>inflation expectations pick up tad Currently I'm looking at tenure

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>break even inflation expectations holding around two point one to

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>per center. So now there were some surprises yesterday. Max

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.439
<v Speaker 1>Gochman over Pacific Life Fund Advisors actually reached out to

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>me to say that what was surprising within her testimony

0:21:54.920 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>was her discussion of tax hikes, saying that it's going

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>to come immediately, but possibly we could see a change

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to the tax code as part of the infrastructure plan.

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>So that maybe did take some infestors off guard, But

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say necessarily that the testimony that we are

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing from Janet Yellen is affecting stock prices, or the

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 1>bond market or the dollar today for instance. I mean,

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>she's a known entity on Wall Street and we've known

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 1>for quite a while now that she was the nominee

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>as well. Fiscal stimulus sarah um, you know, one point

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 1>nine trillion plan proposed. Hearing some pushback that it's not

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>all going to get past. What do you think the

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>market's kind of discounting here about this next round of stimulus? Right, So,

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 1>there has been some pushback the idea that we might

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>not see it all get past or all get past immediately.

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>But we haven't seen any negative reaction to this pushback

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 1>whatsoever in markets. I mean, you see benchmarks today trading

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>at record highs. You see the tenure not really moving

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>all that much, but still holding above one percent and

0:22:57.280 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>well above one percent now at one point nine percent

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and holding. So we're not seeing much reaction in the markets.

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>And we've heard it many times, the idea that the

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 1>market is forward looking and the expectation, it seems is

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that even if if it's not done immediately, it will

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 1>get done eventually, and the market, no matter what is

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 1>just looking ahead and saying we've got trillions of dollars

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 1>worth of fiscal stimulus coming down the pipeline. Uh, and

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 1>clearly the markets like that. Sarah Ponzac, thank you so much.

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate that. Sarah Ponzack, cross asset reporter for Bloomberg News,

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>giving us the thoughts on the markets again, Vanni. Uh,

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>equity markets hitting all time highs here on this bullish

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>outlook I think for the economy in the near intermediate term,

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>given stimulus and given low interest rates. Yeah, absolutely. I

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.479
<v Speaker 1>mean it's the same narrative that we've been listening to

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>right as long as we've known. You know that the

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>election results were pretty accepted, you know, and maybe not

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:58.880
<v Speaker 1>by everybody, but that that that none of the court proceedings,

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>for example, was going to exceed in the stock market.

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's see where the action is under the hood, and

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 1>we do that with when we're stocks editor Dave Wilson, Dave,

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 1>what are you looking at today? Well, there's plenty of

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the same in Netflix, a perfect example. You know, you

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>go back and look at the stock performance after past

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 1>and earning these reports, and you see it was down

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 1>in seven of the past eight quarters. So it's a

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 1>real contrast to what we're seeing today with the percent

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 1>plus gain that Greg Jarrett mentioned. You know, the other

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:34.679
<v Speaker 1>side of the coin is what's going on with the

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:38.919
<v Speaker 1>financial companies. You know, in general, the fourth quarter results

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 1>just haven't been well received. I mean, sure, you've got

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley shares higher in the wake of their results.

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>They're only up one percent, though, and the two worst

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 1>performers in the S and P five hundred are companies

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 1>that also reported fourth quarter results today, Bank of New

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 1>York Malwine, which is down six percent, and US Bank

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Corps down four point four percent. So, you know, and

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>that's consistent with what we saw on Friday. Uh, the

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>reaction to the figures out of City Group and JP,

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Chase and Wells Fargo. You know, you put that

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>all together, and you know, it kind of shows you

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that is as good as the results might be, if

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at them relative to analysts estimates, they're really

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 1>not going over all that well in terms of the

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>market reactions. So that's going to be something to watch

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:31.199
<v Speaker 1>as we go through. You know, is it going to

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 1>be more of a Netflix kind of a response to results,

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>or is it going to be more in line with

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing with the banks. Beyond that day, does

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a monumental shift happening in Washington, d C. And in

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the country today in terms of leadership and what that

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>means for policy going forward. But today is the day

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 1>for pumping circumstances. So what is volume like, Well, you

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 1>look at what's going on. Just check out the first

0:25:56.680 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 1>half hour of trading in stocks listed on either of

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the New York Stock Exchange or NASDAK. We saw about

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>two point six billion shares change hands. And just to

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>provide some context to that, you go back and look

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>at yesterday, just you know, for a point of reference,

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's actually just a little bit above what we

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>saw a week ago. So you know it trading carries

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 1>on basically, and with the earnings reports coming out and

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and all the rest. I mean, it's not exactly a surprise.

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:33.400
<v Speaker 1>One interesting name, guys, I thought was really interesting today

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 1>Ali Baba. The stock is up five percent and I

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 1>guess jack Ma is alive and well, and that's a

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess a reprieve for shareholders in this company. Dave, Well,

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>it is because it's the first time he's really common

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:48.400
<v Speaker 1>seen in public in about three months. You know, ever,

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>since China's government started clamping down on him, you know,

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>in the wake of UH you know and Financial, the

0:26:56.200 --> 0:27:00.199
<v Speaker 1>UH consumer finance company in which Ali Baba as a

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 1>controlling stake you know, and planned to go public or

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 1>with him in the biggest UH initial public offering ever worldwide,

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:10.199
<v Speaker 1>and Chinese government didn't let that happen. And since you know,

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:12.919
<v Speaker 1>Jack Ma is kind of keeping a low profile, may

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>it was real concern about, you know, well where is he?

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 1>And he showed up in a live stream video for

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>this event that he sponsors honoring rural teachers, so at

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>least people have some reassurance that he's still around. And

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 1>then from there it's a matter of, you know, what

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>does Uh ali Baba look like going forward, which is

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a you know, a much bigger question, you know, given

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.640
<v Speaker 1>UH you know, the the back and forth in terms

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:41.679
<v Speaker 1>of how companies are being perceived. I mean, Ali Baba

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of dodged a bullet last week because there was

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>talk UH that the company might uh be kind of

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>taken off the list of potential investments for for US

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>investors with a blacklist, but that didn't happen. So you know,

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Ali Baba has got the all clear for the moment,

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and having Jack Mob being seen in public a sort

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of goes along with that. We're expecting a minimum of

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>fifteen executive order is likely to be signed in the

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 1>five o'clock hour or thereabouts, things like, you know, reversing

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the US withdrawal from the Harris Climate Accord and the

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 1>w h O. Also, though, things like revoking apartment for

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the Keystone Xcel pipeline DAVI or any stocks moving on

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the idea that we're going to be reversing some of

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 1>what Donald Trump had put in place. Well, I'm not

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:29.679
<v Speaker 1>seeing a whole lot of reaction a TC Energy, and

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:33.919
<v Speaker 1>that's the Canadian company that owns Transcanta pipelines, and they

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>would be directly affected by that order, assuming it's coming

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>on Keystone xl UH shares are only down half for

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>percent in US training though, and they've kind of been,

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, a little changed the last couple of days.

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Is the prospect of this executive order has come up.

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I suppose you could argue that, yeah, it's something that

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>people have been anticipating because you know, President elect Biden

0:28:56.760 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>had pledged to revoke the permit it, so now it's

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>just a matter of following through. Uh So, you know

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll see how things unfold from here. You know what's

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting today stock that kind of called my eye hitting

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a fifty two week high. General Motors. The stock is

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a fifty seven percent on a trailing twelve month basis

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 1>on a year to date basis, and Bloomberg has got

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a nice article on the terminal today about how Mary

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 1>barrat maybe getting some of that tesla Um kind of

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>halo effective as they move into electric vehicles on autonomous

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>vehicles uh GM. Heck of a move. Yeah, it's all

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>about this unit called Cruise. I mean, GM has a

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>majority steak. You know, yesterday we found out there was

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a two billion dollar round of fundraising with Microsoft leading

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the way along with GM. It's certainly uh gets your attention.

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>And the story you noted, Paul Um highlights. You know,

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>so the back and forth on Twitter between uh GM

0:29:55.480 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>CEO Mary Barr and Microsoft CEO Sacha Adela about this deal,

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>so you know, to kind of have the in premeter

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of Microsoft down your business. Yeah, I mean that definitely

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>gets people's attention. You know, it's interesting. You know we've

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>always talked about that. You know, when are the big

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>global automakers going to make the move into electrical vehicles,

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>if for no other reason than to get some of

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the valuation bump that maybe they could from someone like

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, like that Tesla enjoys for so long, and

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe we're starting to see a little bit of movement

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>there on some of these companies. Dave Wilson, thanks so

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us Bloomberg Stock centeror we appreciate that.

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Looking at the market again, a relatively good day here

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 1>as we start the trading. We have the SMP up

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 1>about just under one percent here, so we'll certainly keep

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>an eye on that, and we'll have more inauguration coverage

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>coming up in just moments. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews at

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn.

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Bonnie Quinn, and I'm Paul Sweeney.

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio m H