WEBVTT - The Problem of Immortality: Terror Management Theory

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey you welcome to Stuff to bow

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Julie Douglas. Julie,

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 1>you live in Atlanta, Georgia. I live in Atlanta, Georgia,

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>or we live in to Caatijo, wherever we're in the

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>vast frawl that that that we call the city of Atlanta.

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you have therefore been to the Bodies Exhibit,

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's been entombed here in the city

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>for like a decade now. Yeah. Actually, I probably was

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the first people who was lining up to

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>see that exhibit, sure that it would be gone within

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>weeks and I would never have a chance to see

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 1>these plastic sized cadavers frolicking around playing basketball. Yeah, we

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>had no idea that we would see flyers and and

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>posters for the Body's Exhibit for almost almost the next

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>ten years. It's it feels like on like every surface

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>imaginable on the Marta train, it just gets to where

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>your board with with it. You're just on your commute,

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you're you're reading a book. You look up, Oh, there's

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a flayed Chinese man. Yeah, although every once in a

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>while it will sort of catch me off guard. Like

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>if I come up an escalator and I saw I

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>see this raw imagery of this physical body in front

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of me, I will be kind of shocked a bit

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>because it's really I mean, it's the human body stripped

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to its bare essence. It's a reminder that we die,

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that we are this material, and we're ephemeral beings that

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>this material it rots, it leaves. But the question is

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>is taking a cadaver, removing its skin, plasticizing it, and

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>then rearranging it. Is this really a confrontation with death? Yeah?

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Because what goes through your mind when you confront this

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>this image of this this flayed body that's been it's

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>been essentially turned to plastic, but to retaining all of

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>its its features and surfaces. Uh, what are we thinking

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>when we watch it play chess or play basketball or

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever the pose happens happens to be um, A lot

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of the personality is taken away when you remove the

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>skin from it. It becomes more of an anatomical specimen

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:09.640
<v Speaker 1>than a person. If you have any any lingering concerns

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>about who was this, this guy, this, this girl, you

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>know in their former life and and this is something

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>they wanted for themselves. Those tend that those thoughts that

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:21.799
<v Speaker 1>tend to come later after you have left the facility. Yeah.

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>According to Jane Desmond, she's a professor of anthropology at

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the University of Illinois and an author on a paper

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>on this very topic, she says, this process of subtraction

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that's taken away all the social markers in a sense,

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>idealizes and universalizes these individuals so that symbolically they come

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to stand for undifferentiated humans, which allows us to look

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>with impunity. Impunity because we're not really looking at the

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>person or an individual. And she says, in many ways,

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>we don't see graphic images of death. We see fictionalized

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>images of death. Yeah. And I would also add that

0:02:57.840 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that the bodies exhibit in the in the way that

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>these these cadavers are are frozen in time like this,

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>they're more symbols of life than death. You're seeing like

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 1>this eternally living uh sample of physiology before you. You're

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>not seeing a rotting body. You're seeing this eternally fresh

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>red uh, you know, just right off the meat counter body.

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>That's I love the way you put that, because it

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>really does show you the distance that we have put

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>between ourselves and death. We think we're confronting it because

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing the human body which is no longer alive,

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>laid bare, but really we are immortalizing it. Yeah, and

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I imagine that's not what the Gunte von Hagens, the

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>German physician and anatomist uh that created the body's exhibit,

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>really wanted for us. Uh. Gunther On Haggins seems like

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:48.839
<v Speaker 1>a guy who's all about confronting death. He himself often

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>talks about his inevitable demise from Parkinson's disease, so it's

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting that he's created something that distances us from

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>death rather than brings us closer to our under standing

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of it. Well, and in a sense too, he's immortalizing

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>himself through this act right live on in history as

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the person who came up with this plastination technique which

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>allowed people to really view cadavers in various ways, whether

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 1>or not they were reconfigured to look like they were

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>playing sports, or maybe one section of their body was

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>cut up so much so that you could really see

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the tissues in a way that had never really been

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>displayed before. So I wanted to bring up this this

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>idea by Burned Heinrich, and I'm reading a book by

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>him right now called Everlasting Life, and it's about insect

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:38.239
<v Speaker 1>and animal death and it's really interesting, and he says

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>that human death is becoming more and more divorced from nature.

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 1>We pump are dead with polluting chemicals like formaldehyde. We

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>put them into airtight boxes and then plant them in

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>precious real estate that could be used for agriculture. We

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>think we're denying death that way. Yeah, it's ridiculous. I've

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I've thought this for some time. It's just look, go

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to these remarkable meanings to distance ourselves not only from

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the decay of the body, but but also from the

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>act of dying. I mean, we have whole institutions in

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>place so that we don't have to confront the realities

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>of physical death, right so much so to the point

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that we're embalming ourselves and this hope that there's some

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of immortality available to us. And that's what we're

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about today, This idea of immortality, why it's problematic,

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and why we need this story of immortality yea, and

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>arguably why immortality and the quest for immortality is at

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the heart of every human endeavor. Now we'll we'll put

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 1>that to you the end of the episode. If you

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>believe that that the quest for immortality is in fact

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>such a vital part of who we are as humans,

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 1>or if there's a little more to us right like

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>on a day to day basis, could it be affecting

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>our decisions? Yeah, we shall see. Now, I feel like

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 1>we should before we go further, we should discuss our

0:05:56.760 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>own takes on this. I feel like I probably think

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>about death a lot, and I feel like I've always

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of thought about death. Um Like, I can't remember

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a time when when I when I didn't think about it,

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and and and it's not not like I was encountering

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 1>death at an early stage in life. You know, my

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>life was was comfortably death free for for the longest

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>period of time. But it seems like there's always been

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a kind of confrontation of it, at least in the

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>media that I've consumed throughout my life. So it seems

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>like I've I've always been there with it. Yeah. I

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I have said before that this podcast has had me

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it quite a bit um since we began.

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Although I am difficult to work with right, right, I'll

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>just bring me death, no, but more and from the

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>route of consciousness, because I equate you know, non consciousness,

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:53.479
<v Speaker 1>not so much sleep or or even coma with death.

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know, basically, when you start thinking about consciousness

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and life and you begin to try to center where

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>all this is coming from, inevitably you will land on

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the death card and start to think about that. So

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>when we struck upon this talk by Stephen Cave who

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>has a book out about immortality and and he discusses

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>these various ways in which we approach immortality, it really

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>struck me because he says that we can't help it.

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>We humans have several different ways that we create this

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>narrative of immortality. And he says, really there are four

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>different types of it. One really well known. In fact,

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty historical one. I think everybody is familiar

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>with resurrection, this idea that you might come back to

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>life after dying, and this is a belief that is

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>found in various religions. We're talking about a literal resurrection

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of the body, but also a heavenly resurrection or a

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>recycling of the soul into a new body and time,

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>which leads to different ideas about what this resurrection could be. Yeah,

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>this one's pretty pretty fabulous because again it's part of

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the three major Judaeo Christian religions, I mean Judaism, Christianity,

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and Islam. And it's the idea that resurrection life after

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>death involves you being born again in this body or

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>perhaps in another body just like this one, and we

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>it's it's often, it's often something that you end up

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>skimming over within those faiths. You end up being told,

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>all right, yeah, you know there's a bodily resurrection, but

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you really end up buying into other ideas of resurrection

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that we'll discuss um. Because there are so many complications.

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>You get into questions of well, which version of me,

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:36.559
<v Speaker 1>which which body is going to come back? And my

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 1>coming back is this this rotting body of this uh,

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>this preserved body. What happens if something happens to the

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:45.559
<v Speaker 1>body of the body is not not not prepared properly

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>for burial, but it's not buried the right way of

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>it's lost. You get into all these concerns, and then

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you get into all these additional theological concerns, Well, what

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>happens to my soul when it's not in a body,

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>is there an intermediate place that it goes to? And

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>we touched on some of the additional issues in our

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 1>our episode on Hell and the problem with Hell when

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you start figuring out, well, where does the soul go

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>when it goes to Hell, because a lot of these

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>interpretations of hell also require you to have a physical

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>body again in order for it to work, and then

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>in some cases your soul is destroyed. It's logistical nightmare

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>because yes, you, like you said, you know, if the

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>body didn't come back exactly as it was, what about

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the soul? Do they match up? And this is really interesting.

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Cave had pointed this out in his talk that

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Romans would get so annoyed with early Christians about this

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>idea of resurrection that they would say, Okay, you think

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>this guy's coming back, We'll let me chop him up

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to bits and pieces and bury him in various locations

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.199
<v Speaker 1>throughout these lands, and we'll see if he gets resurrected bodily,

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, resurrect that. It was kind of mean spirited

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 1>by the Romans, you have to admit though they were

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:54.199
<v Speaker 1>trying to prove a point, But yes, it was um

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>any anytimes you're anytime you're chopping up a corpse. Just

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>despite your seria, it's you're you're in a weird area

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and you need to rethink where you are. But but

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to your point, uh, it does. It's just one slice

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of the cake when you're looking at the problems and

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to square away, um, how bodily resurlection resurrection would work.

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>And then you've got that soul, the idea that this

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:21.199
<v Speaker 1>soul might persist. Yeah, this now, the idea that there

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>is this um, this part of us that is spirit.

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>That's of course, and it's a very ancient idea. You

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>look back to the the ancient Egyptians, you look back

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to even more primitive models, uh, and you will see

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>this idea that there's something in us that lives on. Now,

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>they're sort of cave focuses on just one version of this,

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>but they're they're according to some other experts, they're they're

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of two. One is the idea of an astral body. Now,

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the idea that when we're alive, we're just kind

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of this conjoined thing. We have two bodies. We have

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a physical body and an astral body living is one.

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>And then when that physical body dies this astral body

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>lives on to U two, mourn for our own death too,

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe haunt somewhere, to say goodbye to loved ones, to

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>go off wandering through the universe, what have you? Uh.

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>But and it's and it's worth on. This is the idea,

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>this is the the immortality, this is the life after

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>death that is most commonly encountered in works of fiction.

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Marley's ghost that is essentially an astral body. It's

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>really convenient, yeah, because your your body dies and then

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>there's this sort of see through you that looks just

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 1>like you. It's it's a Hamlet's ghost. And it's also

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a kind of version of life after death that we

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>often end up buying into, at least a little bit,

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you know now and again, despite what we believe, uh,

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, based on our faith, based on our science,

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>based on our reason as we discussed in our Hell episode. Uh,

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's rare for someone to really have one solid

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>idea of what they think the soul is and what

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the the the afterlife may or may not consist of.

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>We're we're likely to dabble, as humans were likely to

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>entertain certain ideas or believe in things on one level,

0:11:58.280 --> 0:11:59.599
<v Speaker 1>while we don't believe in them in the other, and

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the astral body is one of them. Now, from the

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 1>astral body, we get into the idea of the immaterial soul. Well, now,

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:08.679
<v Speaker 1>what's the difference. The difference is that the astral body

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>is like, my body dies, and here's this version of me,

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that spirit that looks just like me. But the immaterial

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>soul doesn't necessarily look like a body. It's just like

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it's an energy. It's it can't be perceived by the senses,

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and and it and it doesn't need the body to exist. Right,

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>And that idea dates back at least in a formal

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>form to Plato. So again, im material soul, astral body.

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a great literary device, right, because you can really

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>call into that presence. But there's this idea that we

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>all have that there's this core to ourselves, you know,

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps could persist beyond us, that what makes me

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>me certainly couldn't die with my physical body. Yeah, and

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Plato is really into it based on two core arguments.

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>One was the cycle of opposites. This is the idea

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that that that everything in the natural world hasn't has

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>an opposite, And these opposites are often interlocked. So death

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>comes from life, and therefore life must come from death

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and the other the other argumenting makes is

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>is reminiscence. And this is the idea that that the

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.079
<v Speaker 1>view of learning is really the process of remembering knowledge

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>from past lives, which, you know, you could take that

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:17.079
<v Speaker 1>in different interpretations. You could just go on with the

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 1>straight up um um, you know, hippie dippie past lives

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of view, where you know, I've been an Egyptian

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>king in my past life, or you can maybe even

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>look at that from a sort of a genetic counterpoint.

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>That's one of the interesting things when you start looking

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 1>at at some of these ideas of immortality, like what, uh,

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, what is reminiscence, but but epigenetic or genetic

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>influence on who you are, you can sort of go

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>wild with sort of breaking these down and trying to

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>apply Yeah, you're not going to have your grandmother's um

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of our great grandmother's ghostly experiences, but as you say,

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you might have epigenetic markers of her physical experience manifest

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>themselves in you later in physical ways in which genetics

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.559
<v Speaker 1>get turned on and off. So that's very interesting. The

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:03.199
<v Speaker 1>third way that Cave says that we are chasing immortality

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>is that we're trying to solve death. And he says,

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.439
<v Speaker 1>this has been going on for time immemorial, and you've

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>got alchemy and now you have all sorts of different technologies.

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:15.559
<v Speaker 1>Today you have nanotechnology, you have different ways of delivering drugs.

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>This is and we've talked about this with Aubrey de

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Gray who says that the first person UH to live

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to five hundred years old has already been born today

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>because we have these sort of technologies that can maintain

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>our bodies like a classic car. And you start to

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>think about this, You think our ancestors lived to be

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>forty years old. We now have a life expectancy of

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>eighty years old currently right now. Um, is this a

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of Moore's law of life expectancy that is emerging

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the Moore's law of the idea that

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>computer processing can be doubled every two years. So in

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the same way, you know, every x amount of decades

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>is human life extending by twenty years. Yeah. He makes

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 1>an impressive argument and uh, and he also takes the

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>war against death, which is that's the whole topic in itself,

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, but he breaks it down into into core

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>arguably winnable battles like this is what death is. This

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>is what is happening on a physical level to the body.

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>And here are the areas where we can we could

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>fight it. We figured, you know, and we discussed in

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the past, past episode, So I'll refer you back to

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>that for all the details are degree in its ways

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to vanquish death. Yeah. So the fourth type of immortality

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that Stephen Cave says we we are after is narrative.

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>And this is what we were sort of alluding to

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>with the body's exhibit. Here we have this kind of

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>narrative unfolding that will ensure some sort of immortality of

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the story of the bodies that are displayed of the

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>person who created this plascination technique. Yeah, it's the idea

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that even though everything that we are is going to

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>cease to exist at some point, the things that we created,

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the things that we influenced, are going to live on, um,

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, not forever, but at least for a while, right,

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and are close enough to forever for the you know,

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>for that brief life that we have. Yeah. Again, this

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>idea that through achievement by becoming so famous that your

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>your name lives on or infamous. Right. You know, if

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you can't give the fame, go for the infamy. It's

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>generally easier to achieve, which, as we will discuss in

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, could be tied up with the ways

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that we behave. All right, before we go into that,

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in this idea of being terrified of death and something

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>called terror management theory, let's take a quick break. All right,

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>we are back, and before we get into terror management theory,

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>we have to talk about someone named Ernest Becker, Yes,

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Ernest Becker, and he is the author of the book

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>The Denial of Death, and this is where we get

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the idea of Terror management theory or t MT. That's right,

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>he was anthropologies. I actually want to polish a prize

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>for that work. It's in nineteen seventy three work and

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 1>among other things Becker Becker proposed that in times of crisis,

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>when fears of death are aroused, people are more likely

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to embrace leaders who provide psychological security by making their

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>citizens feel like they are valued contributors to a great

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 1>mission to eradicate evil. And that is what this terror

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>management theory is built on. It was proposed by social

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>psychologists in nineteen eighties six Jeff Greenberg, Tom Paczynski, and

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Sheldon Solomon, and it was initiated by two really simple questions.

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>The first one was why do people have such a

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>great need to feel good about themselves? And too, why

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.199
<v Speaker 1>do people have so much trouble getting along with those

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 1>people who have different ideas from them. Yeah, this is

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating theory and one that really really drives home

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of what you end up seeing in the

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>world around you, especially as far as fearmongering, because when

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>political voices, when media voices start beating the wards ms

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>start mongering up all of that fear, they're playing into

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:07.199
<v Speaker 1>t MT, that's right. Sheldon Solomon, who is one of

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the authors of Terror Management Theory, in an interview with

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>John oh Lair for Scientific Americans, said, quote, although self

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>awareness gives rise to unbridled awe and joy, it can

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:22.159
<v Speaker 1>also lead to the potentially overwhelming dread engendered by the

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>realization that, wait for this, it's so brutal, that death

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>is inevitable, that it can occur for reasons that can

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>never be anticipated or controlled, and that humans are corporeal

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 1>creatures breathing pieces of defecating meat no more significant or

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:41.880
<v Speaker 1>enduring than porcupines of peaches. But he says that humans

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:46.479
<v Speaker 1>as ingenious as we are have actually unconsciously solved this

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 1>existential dilemma by developing cultural world views. This has been

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>our savior when we are met with this kind of terror. Yeah,

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:57.399
<v Speaker 1>and the world view doesn't. We're not just talking about

0:18:57.680 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 1>views on what happening to the state of the soul

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 1>in the afterlife, but also views about what is important

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 1>in life? What is uh, you know, what are the

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>values I hold to? What what is the the US

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>group that I'm a part of, and what are the

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>other groups outside of my world view outside of this

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>this sphere that I've built for myself with ideas, this

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 1>fortress of ideas. Uh. This this whole TMT issue um

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 1>terror management theory really brings to mind a scene from

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. Willie want them, you know,

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:33.679
<v Speaker 1>the scene where they drink the fizzy lifting uh liquid

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>for fizzy liquid juice or soda or whatever it's it's called.

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>They're in this huge cylindrical room, right, they drink this

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 1>uh this stuff and they start floating and they're floating

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>them in the bubbles, and it's all fun and games

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>until they realize that there is a big circular fan

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the room, and then if they

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 1>keep floating up, they're gonna be chopped to pieces. So

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:55.639
<v Speaker 1>as they float up and up, they suddenly become aware.

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, at first, it's just all dreams and giggles.

0:19:57.840 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 1>Though I'm floating around. It's wonderful. But then they realize

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 1>they're going to die, and then so what do they

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>start doing? Then they start figuring out how am I

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:06.679
<v Speaker 1>going to stop? How am I gonna what am I

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna do? And so what do you what are you doing?

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>That state the only thing you can do is reach

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>out and try and grab the structures around you in

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>these In this case, the structures are these worldviews that

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:20.199
<v Speaker 1>we've built for ourselves, things that that that seem or

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>we've certainly built up to be solid, something to to

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:26.120
<v Speaker 1>give us some grounding about our place in the universe,

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>about what's important, why it's important, and and and and

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and why life itself is important. Yeah, Solomon says that

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>we manage this, this potentially paralyzing terror resulting from this

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>awareness of death, that fan, that we're being sucked into

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and that cultures provide three things, one meaning by offering

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:48.679
<v Speaker 1>an account of the origin of the universe to a

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>blueprint for acceptable conduct on Earth right. Three a promise

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of immortality symbolically um. And it could be by a

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>creation of say a large monument, great works of art

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>or science, fortunes having children, and literally literally through various

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>kinds of afterlives that are central peace of organized religions.

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>And so the testable idea here is, if you confront

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>someone with death, are you going to can you actually

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:19.719
<v Speaker 1>observe them reaching out and clinging to that structure, clinging

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to those worldviews that they might have, you know, otherwise

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 1>otherwise drift a comfortable distance away from And is this

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 1>immortality narrative is it on some level destructive? Yeah? And

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>then the hidden question, and that is our most world views,

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in their in their more little interpretation, destructive. But I'll

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>leave that to to our listeners to consider. Yeah. I mean,

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>because again we're talking about conceiving of death and very

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>abstract terms. Um. So when we fly too close to

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:49.239
<v Speaker 1>that son of death, you know, we we we do

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>get singed by it, and we recoil and back into

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 1>ourselves and back into that immortality narrative. And the thing

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that makes us fly too close that son of death

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>is something called mortality salience. Yeah, and that's just straight

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>up that moment when you realize, hey, I'm gonna die,

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the closer you are to the reality uh and the

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the well, maybe not acceptance of death, but at least

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the confrontation of death. Now. Solomon says that there's a

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 1>huge body of evidence that shows that's just that momentarily, uh,

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 1>thinking about death typically by asking people to think about themselves.

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Dying intensifies as people strivings to protect and bolster the

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:36.120
<v Speaker 1>aspects of the world views that they coddle and hold dear. Yeah,

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's we all encounter little bits of this

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>in our own life. You know, something, something bad happens

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>in the world. Are you hear you hear a story

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>about someone else in in your city or your neighborhood

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 1>dying or suffering, uh, some sort of bad bit of luck.

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>And then suddenly you're a little more like, well, maybe

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I should, uh you know, maybe I should go home

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:57.439
<v Speaker 1>and check on the house. Maybe I should uh you know,

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 1>upgrade the security systems. Maybe I should do this to

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the other Suddenly the threats in life become a little

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>more real and it's changed your behavior. Right, you go

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>out and you get in his security systems. There have

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 1>been three hundred independent studies about mortality salience in whether

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>or not effects our behavior and in twenty different countries

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that has lent support to this idea of terror management theory.

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>But perhaps one of the first studies is the most

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 1>startling in its ability to show people doubling down on

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>their beliefs when they think that they've been violated and

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>they're reminded at death at the same time. And Solomon

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 1>in his team pursued this with a group of judges. Yes,

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 1>this took place in Tucson, Arizona, and uh and involved

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it involved actually recruited court judges because they wanted people

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:49.160
<v Speaker 1>who whose job it is in theory to make unbiased

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 1>decisions about about issues of well, if not mortality, than

0:23:54.400 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 1>at least ethics and law rational thinkers. Yeah, so, so

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>what do they confront them with? A nice sort of

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a nice gray area, a nice a nice mortal quandary

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>for anyone to to chew over prostitution of course, Okay,

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about twenty two municipal court judges, and they

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>were told that in the study that the team was

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:21.159
<v Speaker 1>studying the relation between personality traits, attitudes and bond decisions.

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Bond decisions, of course, being that sum of money that

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>judges will assign that a defendant pays prior to trial

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.719
<v Speaker 1>so that they can be released from prison. So what

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>did they do Well. They gave judges a set of

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:38.399
<v Speaker 1>questionnaires that consisted of the standard personality assessment instruments, but

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>they also squeaked in a couple of those mortality salience

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>in there. And they did it by asking um them

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to say, please briefly describe the emotions that the thought

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 1>of your own death arouses in you. And the second

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>one was jotted down as specifically as you can what

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>you think will happen to you as you physically die

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and once you're physically dead. Now, only half of those

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty two judges were given these sort of doctored personality

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>questions that had that mortality mortality salience in them. So

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>they each of the judges review the brief. They they

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>review this case of this individual brought in on a

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>prostitution charge, and they have to decide where they're going

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to set the bond, right, how much money is the

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>is the is the individual going to have to pay

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in order to walk the streets? Again, that's right. Judges

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 1>in the control conditions set an average bond of fifty dollars.

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:31.400
<v Speaker 1>These are the people who did not have the reminders

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of death, and that's a typical charge for this kind

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of case. But the judges who thought about their death

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>set an average bond of four hundred and fifty five dollars. Yes,

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>so I'd like to like for you can imagine that

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>that room in the Willy Wonka movie, and here are

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the judges. He's flow here, she is floating free am

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.880
<v Speaker 1>in the bubbles, you know, and and they they're thinking, oh, well, prostitution,

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a great it's a very complicated issue. Uh.

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:57.919
<v Speaker 1>You know, a nice low bond is a is an

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 1>acceptable place, uh from to to to to decide on

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>this particular topic. Then there made to look up. They

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:07.199
<v Speaker 1>see the fan, they think about in imminent death, and

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>what do they do. They reach out. They hold onto

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that structure that that that worldview structure that's made out

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of morals and uh and ethics and ideas about what's

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>wrong and right in life. Maybe some of these ideas

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>are things that they have they've drifted away from a

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>lot in their life, you know, they they've drift away

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>from in their professional career. But just thinking about death

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 1>makes them clinging back to that, uh, that skeleton of

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>ideas and then make this, uh, this, this rougher call

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:35.439
<v Speaker 1>on what the bond should be said at. And the

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.360
<v Speaker 1>problem is that it can really cloud your thinking, right,

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and it can actually like this is the real problem,

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>It can cause a person to be easily manipulated. And

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 1>this is where Becker's early work really comes into play

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>concerning fear and politics, and it's something that Solomon actually

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:55.639
<v Speaker 1>followed up on with experiments in which participants were told

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to review statements from and vote for one of three

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 1>political cool candidates. Okay, and they had different leadership styles.

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about charismatic, task oriented in relationship oriented. The

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:12.239
<v Speaker 1>participants then selected the candidate that they would vote for. Now,

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:15.119
<v Speaker 1>in the control condition, those people who didn't get the

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 1>death reminders, only four of participants voted for the charismatic candidate. Now,

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 1>for those people who were given the the death reminder,

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>there was an almost eight hundred percent increase in votes

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>for the charismatic leader. And Solomon again followed up with

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 1>several other studies concerning President Bush the Second and John

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Kerry and found again and again that when those death

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>reminders were sublime early or overtly inserted, bushes support levels

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:53.120
<v Speaker 1>sword the charismatic candidate. So again we're reminded of death,

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>we end up clinging to these worldviews. It's it's it's

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:01.160
<v Speaker 1>fascinating and frightening to think about, because it really breaks

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>down what's happening in the world around is I'm I'm

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>both a large and a small level. Certainly when we

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>see the media or a politician, uh, you know, mongering

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 1>up those feelings of insecurity and fear, but but also

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>like the smaller moments in life, like when you see

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:21.400
<v Speaker 1>some sort of really severe attitude on something suddenly come

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>out of a person that and you didn't expect it

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:27.359
<v Speaker 1>by For instant example, this I was I was, I

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>was hearing about somebody talking about encountering this guy who

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:32.640
<v Speaker 1>suddenly out of nowhere. Um mentioned that he didn't think

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that his his son should wear pink, just in case

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>it would have some sort of a negative influence on

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>his character. For for an infant to wear the color pink.

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh and and the the individual who said this was

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 1>somebody that when they would normally look at them and think, oh,

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>this this is just a normal dude. This guy doesn't

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>have any weird hang ups. But but now that after

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I've you know, really read about this, this t M

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>T about t MT and its effects. Honest, you can

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>easily imagine, uh, this this being a guy who maybe

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>grew up with that kind of severe worldview in his

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in the backbone of his of his his views on life,

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>he's drifted away from him. And then something like having

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a child, uh bring him a little closer to that mortality,

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>make him have to think about that and therefore force

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>him to cling to some of these, uh, these ideas

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and notions that he normally would have drifted away from. Yeah,

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and you can look at heteronorms really that the basis

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of that is being um motivated from fear, fear of

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the other. So and by the way, pink used to

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>be a color that men war like back in the day.

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I think Josh Clark usually has an article on that. Uh.

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>So to delightful color. I wish, you know, I wish

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 1>everyone would be cool with it. Yeah, except for that

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>pepptal bismol one. Yeah, that and that just reminds you

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of throwing up. Yeah, and that's a shade that's often

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>found in hospitals, to which I find really disconcerting. But anyway,

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that's for another day. Yea color color theory. That's that

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>would be a whole other episode that we should probably

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>do someday. We probably should. Um. But the thing is

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>is that we can't help but cling to these immortality myths,

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>these narratives. And his piece for The New York Times,

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Cave actually wrote this opinion opinion piece that looks at

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the BBC show Torchwood, which examines immortality and death and says,

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>what would happen to all our death defying systems? If

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:27.640
<v Speaker 1>there were no more death, we would have no need

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 1>for progress or our faith or fame. Suddenly we would

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 1>have nothing to do. Yet, in the greatest of ironies,

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>we would have endless eons in which to do it.

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Action would lose its purpose, in time, its value. This

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>is the true awfulness of immortality. Yeah, this is this

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 1>is where we get into the really deep far future

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:49.719
<v Speaker 1>gazing stuff where for for a while that there's been

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that idea. Okay, if we can live forever, we just

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>get bored. What would we do now? On one hand,

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I definitely buy that because I I like to think

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of of books. For instance, Uh, we've all read a

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>book that's that really strikes a chord with us. We're

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>really digging, and on some level we think, Man, I

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>wish this book would never end because I'm enjoying it

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that much. But of course books follow a certain pattern.

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>There's a narrative arc, there's a there's a story that

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>has to be told, their pinpoints that have to be hit.

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>There's rising action, there's following action, there's a climax, uh, etcetera.

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>And and so it has to follow that basic pattern

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 1>in order to be effective. And that's why you're loving

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 1>it so much, because because it is obeying a form

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and function. If it went on forever, then it would

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>lose that form and function, and then it would lose

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>its effect to to to entertain you. So and I

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>feel like life is sort of like that. You know,

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 1>there has to be a short amount of time in

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 1>which to accomplish things. There has to be um uh,

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the rising action and following action for it all to

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 1>make sense. But then on the other hand, when when

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>mortals say, oh, immortality probably sucks because you probably would

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>get bored, it does sort of sound like um like

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 1>us non celebrity us, non you know, super rich people

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>thinking oh, well those rich people, they're they're just all miserable. Anyway,

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>we're in deep down. We we like to think. But

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 1>if I had it, if I had that money, if

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I had an immortality, well, I could probably do something

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>proper with it. Yeah, the lottery might destroy the average

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>person because it's just too much money and and just

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 1>totally destroys their lives. But me, I think I might

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 1>be able to pull it off because I'm I'm a

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 1>little more grounded, and I feel like we we all

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>have those feelings. That is, it's the fantasy. It's again

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the immortality fantasy that we all have that if we

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 1>could just reach it, we would do something worthwhile with it. Now,

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime, we have mortality to deal with, and

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 1>so the question becomes, is there a better way to

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 1>deal with our own mortality rather than play into fear.

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, narratives of immortality are great, but is there

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a way to be rational about death and not disince

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>ourselves from it, really examine it and be okay with it. Well,

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:00.080
<v Speaker 1>I think what you're talking about here is simply and

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>we talk about it. Can we have conversations about death?

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 1>And can we you know, if not actually dragged the

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>bodies out into the open and um, you know, and

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 1>pull them apart. Can we at least drag the topic

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>out in the open and pull it apart? Yeah? No. Um.

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Becker of The Denial of Death, which was written at

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 1>teen seventy three, said, stripping away the destructions of death quote,

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>with the right intensity and scope of shock, we might

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 1>even ask ourselves what are we to do with our lives?

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 1>We might then begin to think of how again to

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>give to people a secure feeling that their lives count,

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that there is a heroic human condition contribution to be

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 1>made to cosmic life. In a dialogue with the community

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of Once Fellows, that was very nice. Yeah. Yeah, I mean,

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>in a way, it's it's about taking the punch out

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of death, you know, because in all this distancing ourselves

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 1>from it, which we've done just throughout human history, we

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 1>end up giving it so much more power. We i mean,

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the very active personifying death of creating this kind of

0:33:57.520 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 1>like grim reaper image that either exist as an actual

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>symbol or listen on abstract symbol in the human psyche.

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>It comes from from this point in our time where

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:09.880
<v Speaker 1>we we get away from the idea that death is

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 1>something that our body does, and rather it's something external.

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Death is something that happens to it's death is something

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:16.879
<v Speaker 1>that's done to us. It's an enemy that can be

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:19.959
<v Speaker 1>thought and can be defeated and should be feared rather

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 1>than a natural part of the ark. You can actually

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 1>meet up at something called a death cafe if you

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted to discuss this, and if you go to death

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com you will be met with the message. At

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 1>death cafes, people drink tea, eat cake and discuss death.

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Our aim is to increase awareness of death to help

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 1>people make the most of their finite lives. You can

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:43.279
<v Speaker 1>find meetups in your city. I would hope we all listen,

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>we all wear black and listen to eyesters into New

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:47.279
<v Speaker 1>Button as well. Like it seems like that would be

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a good, good vibe. I'm getting a very German vibe

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 1>from all of this. I don't know, I'm getting some

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 1>like some red hat society people. Yeah, yeah, why not

0:34:57.000 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 1>cheerful discussions? Yeah, instead of going to nonsense and um, celebrating,

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:06.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, with your passage into menopause, why not go

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to the death cafe. That may be something that I

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:11.479
<v Speaker 1>do instead of doing the red hat thing. Yeah, yeah,

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:13.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm planning ahead. Well, you know, you should definitely check

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 1>one of these out and then report back. I mean,

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 1>our listeners should do the same. I was thinking about that. Actually,

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 1>you know. The one thing I always come back to

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is a is something my dad told him, and he said,

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>and he was talking about death at some point, and

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:26.840
<v Speaker 1>he said, well, you know, everybody does it, so it

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>couldn't be that big of a deal. And uh and

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and certainly that's the case. Everybody dies. And I don't

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:35.800
<v Speaker 1>even necessarily buy into this idea that there there's anyone

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>alive today that's going to live to see six years old,

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:42.319
<v Speaker 1>or much less that six thousand year point. That actuaries

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:45.240
<v Speaker 1>have have figured out that if you could live forever

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:47.839
<v Speaker 1>like six thousand, it's pretty much the maximum you get

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:50.839
<v Speaker 1>to without dying in a car wreck or something. Um. Yeah,

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I saw that, but then I don't know, there's so

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>many problems I have with that. Um, it's the other

0:35:57.680 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 1>way of looking at it, in a more sort of

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 1>cosmic way to think about it is you have existence

0:36:02.560 --> 0:36:06.919
<v Speaker 1>and you have non existence, and throughout human history, each

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of us has not existed, and then for just an

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 1>instant we've existed, and then we're gonna not exist again.

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:15.919
<v Speaker 1>We have so much experience that not existing that we

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:17.879
<v Speaker 1>were gonna be able to handle it just fine. This

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>is not gonna be really a new state for any

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of us. It's gonna be returned to the status quo. Uh.

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:25.239
<v Speaker 1>And and then another way to look at it, too

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is to think about the nature of time. Uh. And

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:31.359
<v Speaker 1>you know when we talk about oh, living forever, uh,

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 1>that we want to be something that that lasts in

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 1>this universe. But as we've discussed before, if you if you,

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 1>if you look at time and space and you you

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:44.400
<v Speaker 1>take away the human perspective, uh, in time and space

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:47.279
<v Speaker 1>are one, and there's no moment that has been or

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 1>will be or is right now that has any uh

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 1>any any special privilege in the time space continuum. So

0:36:55.840 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 1>in a sense, everything is currently uh nothing really was

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:03.839
<v Speaker 1>or will be. So everything is immortal. I mean, it's

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 1>all part of the fabric of the universe. I always

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 1>think about this way. You think that Oprah is sort

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:12.320
<v Speaker 1>of an immortal being right, everybody knows her, all corners

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of the earth, perhaps Bill Gates even maybe there uh,

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:20.760
<v Speaker 1>these sort of iconic images will laugh for five hundred years,

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a thousand, maybe ten thousand, doubt it. But you know,

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 1>all of this, even this, even these immortality narratives that

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:32.240
<v Speaker 1>we come up with our finite except for Gilgamesh, because

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 1>that one, which is, you know, one of the like

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the oldest story about the quest for immortality, it sticks

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>with us. But otherwise the Osmandiez principle definitely applies to everybody.

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:45.839
<v Speaker 1>No matter how awesome you are, no matter how much

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of an impact you make on this life, you're probably

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be forgotten eventually. Now, if anybody's interested in that

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 1>six thousand year figure that we dropped, the actuaries are saying, hey,

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:58.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a possibility. I believe that's from the Economist article

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that features Stephen Cave. I'm sorry, I don't have the

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:03.320
<v Speaker 1>title with me right now, but if you want to

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 1>check that out, you can just go to Economist dot com.

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, so we have presented you with a lot

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of food for thought about immortality, about the nature of

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the human soul, about our about how terror management theory

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 1>um effects us? I mean, does the fear of death

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and the quest for immortality really influence us at such

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a deep and impressive level? Uh, it's it's certainly a

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 1>strong argument. Um. Also, what would happen if we if

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:31.840
<v Speaker 1>we could live forever? That's a wonderful question to explore.

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that we would get bored? Uh? And

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:36.239
<v Speaker 1>uh and and just lose interest? Do you think that

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:39.399
<v Speaker 1>we'd find enough stuff to occupy our minds for three

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:41.719
<v Speaker 1>hundred years, six thousand years? Or what have you? Do

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you believe you follow the philosophy of Emmanuel? Can't that

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 1>who who stated that if that without a belief in

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:52.760
<v Speaker 1>God and a belief in the immortal nature of the soul,

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 1>that there would there'd be no virtue in the world

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 1>at all. That it's ultimately that that fear of of

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 1>what will happened to us and what will happen to

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 1>us long term, that it that informs human morality? Or

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 1>is there a kinder way for for humans to organize themselves? Also,

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:11.000
<v Speaker 1>would you want to live forever? I would love to

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:13.399
<v Speaker 1>see what the results are from you guys on that one. Well,

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 1>on that note, let's call over the robot because I

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 1>have a related bit of listener mail to share here.

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:23.319
<v Speaker 1>This coming to us through Facebook. Alec writes in and says, Hi,

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 1>my name is Alec. I love your podcast so much

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:27.719
<v Speaker 1>that I've been going back and listening to all the

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:31.360
<v Speaker 1>old ones. I recently listened to the death on Ice

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:34.279
<v Speaker 1>podcast and this brought up so many what if scenarios.

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:37.320
<v Speaker 1>One I thought of is what if someone is signed

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 1>up to be put on ice, you know, crime frozen,

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:43.839
<v Speaker 1>but committed a horrible crime and are put to death

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>by the state. Will they be allowed to be frozen afterwards?

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Does that count is serving their sentence even if revived later.

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 1>The other interesting scenario I thought of, UH could make

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a good future drama or sitcom where the guy's wife

0:39:56.800 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 1>dies and his frozen, then he marries again and him

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:01.879
<v Speaker 1>and his current wife or frozen later and all three

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 1>year brought back at the same time. That'd be crazy,

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and that would indeed be for make for an awesome

0:40:07.719 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 1>futuristic sitcom. But indeed, when we start talking about the

0:40:12.000 --> 0:40:16.320
<v Speaker 1>idea of living forever or uh coming back to life

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:19.319
<v Speaker 1>in some sort of scientific sense and all with all

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of its complications, then does life after death and or

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>resurrection and or immortality. Do these things become basic human

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:29.880
<v Speaker 1>rights or these just privileges for the elite? Yeah, we

0:40:29.920 --> 0:40:32.240
<v Speaker 1>talked about this before that there's a service called Virtual

0:40:32.320 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Eternity which will actually give people different levels of access

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 1>to your history and maybe even personal messages you want

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to give to people in your life after you are gone.

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:44.960
<v Speaker 1>And it brings up this whole idea of how you'll

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 1>be represented in this other way once you are gone.

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Not to mention even just the ability one day to

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:58.640
<v Speaker 1>try to download memories or you know, the synaptic uh

0:40:58.800 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 1>flashes that format. And if you want to see a

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 1>really cool fictional examination of that scenario, check out the

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Black Mirror episode. I'll be right back, really top notch.

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 1>But in the meantime, you want to check out all

0:41:12.000 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 1>sorts of podcasts that we've done, all the videos, the

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:17.280
<v Speaker 1>blog post, what have you, links to our various social

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:20.359
<v Speaker 1>media accounts including Facebook, Twitter and all that. You need

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 1>to go to stuff to blow your mind. Dot com Uh,

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that's where you find everything. That's the mothership. Oh and

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:26.759
<v Speaker 1>I want to add real quick to if you're a

0:41:26.760 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 1>long term listener or a new listener, uh, and you

0:41:29.480 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 1>dig our show and you're an iTunes user, go to

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:34.759
<v Speaker 1>iTunes and give us a positive rating because the show

0:41:34.800 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 1>has been around for a long time and uh, and

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 1>there's their views on there from our very early days

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:42.440
<v Speaker 1>when we had a different title, different set up and

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 1>we were just learning the ropes. Uh, So we could

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 1>use a little boost in the algorithm there every now

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and then. So, so check us out, indeed, and if

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 1>you'd like to send us a note, you can do

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 1>so at Blow the Mind at Discovery dot com for

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:01.920
<v Speaker 1>more on this and thousands of other topics. Does It

0:42:02.040 --> 0:42:09.840
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works dot com MHM