WEBVTT - TechStuff Gets a MoviePass

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with tech Stuff from how

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com. Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I just happened to be

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:20.240
<v Speaker 1>an executive producer at a little place called hell Stuff Works,

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech and listeners, Susanna, don't

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you cry for me? Asked if I could do an

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>episode about a company called movie Pass, which has made

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 1>the headlines a few times over the last year. So

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:37.559
<v Speaker 1>where did this company come from? What does it do,

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>how does it make money? Does it make money? And

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>what is its future? Does it have a future? Well, first,

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 1>before I go into the history, I think it's a

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>good idea to explain what movie passes. Value proposition is

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>what it's all about. But things do change. It's it's

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>method and business plan has changed dramatically several times, especially

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>in the last year. But here's is a general overview.

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>More or less. The company offers up a subscription based

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>service for going to the movies to see movies in

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>movie theaters for a recurring regular fee. Subscribers get to

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:18.639
<v Speaker 1>go to the movie theaters and watch movies a certain

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>number of times per month. That number changes depending upon

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>what era of movie passes history we're talking about. So

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>rather than buying a ticket every time you go to

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the movie theater, you would subscribe to this service, and

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 1>at a participating theater you would be able to activate it.

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of theaters did not want to participate,

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>but didn't have much choice in the matter. The business

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.279
<v Speaker 1>plan left a lot of people wondering how the heck

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>movie pass was going to make money because someone still

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>has to pay for those movie tickets, and movie tickets

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>aren't necessarily cheap. So unless movie Pass is charging an

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>enormous subscription fee and as get incredible deals on movie

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>ticket prices with these movie theaters, they're going to start

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:09.519
<v Speaker 1>losing money pretty fast. Well. According to the National Association

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:13.080
<v Speaker 1>of Theater Owners, the average movie ticket price in the

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>United States hit eight dollars ninety seven cents in two

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand seventeen, which is the most recent year they have

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>information available. That same page mentions that if you took

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a the average price in nineteen seventy seven, that was

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.799
<v Speaker 1>when it was a two dollars twenty three cents per ticket,

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and then you adjusted that amount for inflation, it would

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>be the same as nine dollars and forty cents in

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:41.959
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seventeen. So the point the Theater Association is

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to make is well, sure, it costs more dollars

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:50.519
<v Speaker 1>now than it did in nineteen seventy seven, but in actuality,

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>from a purchasing price standpoint, it's cheaper than it was

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy seven. So going to the movies as

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a bargain now, that's just the national average. I would

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>not be surprised to hear from you guys in the

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 1>United States in various places that the ticket prices are

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>much different from eight dollars and ninety seven cents per ticket.

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you right now, if movie ticket prices

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:18.399
<v Speaker 1>were eight dollars in ninety seven cents here in Atlanta,

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I'd go to the movies way more frequently. According to

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a site called ex pattistan, which is a site that

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>helps determine the difference in cost of living in various cities,

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>so if you wanted to relocate somewhere, you could find

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>out how much money you would need to have your

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>your you know, quality of life in that new place.

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>The cost for two movie tickets in Atlanta, Georgia, that's

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>where I live, is twenty five dollars, which means if

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you break that down by half, it's about twelve dollars

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty cents per ticket. That is way higher than that

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>supposed national average of eight dollars and ninety seven cents,

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and in other cities it's way more and so of

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>then twelve dollars fifty cents, especially once you start looking

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>at special screenings, like screenings where you can reserve a

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>seat or three D or imax, that kind of stuff.

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>So if you subscribed to movie Pass, and if the

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>subscription fee was something like ten bucks a month and

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you saw more than one movie, then you would be

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>saving a huge amount of money. And how the heck

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>was the company supposed to make money that way? How

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.119
<v Speaker 1>was it going to make money? If it's spending more

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>on tickets, then it's getting in subscription fees. That's part

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of what we'll look into. So now let's take a

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>look at the birth of movie Pass and how it

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>all got started. This goes back to two thousand eleven

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and a couple of co founders. So one of our

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>key players in this story is a guy named Stacy Spikes,

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and Spikes got started in the nineteen eighties. He started

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>as a project manager for Motown Records, which is pretty

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>darn cool. He worked for folks like Spike Lee and

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Queen Latifa, pretty awesome. He then went on to go

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>work with Sony and their music division before transitioning to

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>the head of marketing for Miramax. Back in nine he

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>founded a film festival in n in New York City,

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:12.599
<v Speaker 1>and he had a history in the entertainment business that

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>dated a couple of decades, so he had been around

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 1>for a while before coming up with this idea. The

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.280
<v Speaker 1>other key player in the early days it is a

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>guy named Hammett wat What had earned a degree from

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University back in nineteen four. His

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>first job was with the New Africa Opportunity Fund, which

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>is an investment company that focused on opportunities in Africa,

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and in two thousand he founded an advertising company called

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Next Medium. He would serve as the CEO of that

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>company until two thousand seven, then he would transition to

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Chairman of the board and then two years later he

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>would step down. So for three years while he was

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 1>also working at Next Medium, he also served as a

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 1>consultant for Nielsen Media Research. Then in two thousand nine,

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>he would become an entrepreneur in residence for True Ventures,

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>a venture capital firm. The two of them met and

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>got to talking about entertainment and movies and decided to

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>collaborate on a project with the goal of becoming the

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 1>Netflix of the movie going experience. Which is funny to

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>me because if you listen to my Netflix shows, you

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>know that Netflix started off to try and become the

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Amazon of something. So movie Pass was trying to become

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the Netflix of going to the movies. Netflix was trying

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 1>to become the Amazon of something. They weren't sure what

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>before they really got settled on the movie rental agency.

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:43.599
<v Speaker 1>But never mind all that. The plan was to create

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:46.679
<v Speaker 1>a service in which users would subscribe for a monthly

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>fee of fifty dollars a princely some In return, they

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 1>could see up to one movie per day every day

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>for a month. Initially, the two co founders encountered a

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>ton of resistance for an theater owners when they were

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>approaching them regarding this plan, and so their first attempt

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>was not destined for greatness. Uh what and Spikes thought

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe what they could do is launch a pilot program

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a small version of their idea tested out, get some

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>data and then use that to pitch to movie theater

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>owners in the future and maybe get a better chance

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of it, and they decided they would use the San

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Francisco area as their test site. Their proposal got a

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of interest from potential customers. Apparently about nineteen thousand

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>people signed up on in one day to try and

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>become part of this program, and Spikes and What had

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>ideas of how their business could benefit movie theater owners.

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>They had visions of using the data from their service

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to help theaters develop more effective marketing plans. Studios would

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>find the data helpful too, and that access to this

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>data could lead to increased patronage of theaters and even

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>increase the number of concessions purchases. And since concessions is

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>where movie theaters really make a lot of their revenue,

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:06.559
<v Speaker 1>which is due to the complicated nature of box office

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>sales and how much money goes to studios, this could

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>actually be a strong motivator for theaters to play ball,

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>but it did not work. Instead, it all fell apart. So,

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>according to the stories that broke around this time, major

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>theater chains were not told about this pilot program and

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>they objected to being included in it. They said they

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>would not participate in the program, and this was just

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>at you know, days before the program was supposed to

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 1>launch over the course of a weekend. Now this is

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty interesting to me, since the theory movie Pass would

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>be buying every ticket at full price from the theater,

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:46.319
<v Speaker 1>so people going to see movies would pay a flat

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>monthly fee for the privilege to movie Pass, but the

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>theaters themselves would still get the full price of a

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>movie ticket for every single screening. For the pilot program,

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a third party supplier was set to purchase these individual

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>tickets on half of movie Pass. In order for this

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to work moving forward and to scale up beyond just

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>being a San Francisco pilot program, the theaters were going

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to need to participate with movie Pass. There was gonna

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:15.199
<v Speaker 1>have to be some sort of partnership here and honor

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>vouchers from that company to allow movie Pass customers inside

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to watch a movie. Then, presumably the theaters would invoice

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>movie Pass for each ticket. But two of those chains,

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>AMC and Landmark, objected to this whole enterprise and said

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 1>they would not participate. The initial beta test was to

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>cover twenty one theaters and am C owned six of them,

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 1>so because they said they would not participate, Spikes and

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>What had to make the tough decision to step back

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>put this pilot program on pause. So they had to

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>tell all their customers, I'm sorry, we're not actually going

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to do this after all and put their business on

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>what they called a temporary hiatus. It was a bad

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>enough start to lead some analysts to that the company

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>was done before it could even begin. It was difficult

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>to imagine a scenario in which the business plan would

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>work unless movie Pass could establish some sort of major

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>discount ticket relationship with various movie theater owners and chains,

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and that just didn't seem likely. But the company wasn't

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>down for the count yet. I'll explain more in a second,

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>but first let's take a quick break to thank our sponsor.

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Spikes and Watt tried again a few months after the

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>abandoned pilot program, and this time the plan was slightly different.

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>They were going to provide vouchers to customers. So a

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 1>customer would sign up for the program, and when he

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>or she wanted to see a movie, they would select

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the film and time that they wanted to see it.

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:56.439
<v Speaker 1>And this would trigger a voucher to be sent to them,

0:10:56.480 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 1>which they would download and print. Each voucher print out

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>included a single use credit card number that was good

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>for the purchase price of the movie ticket. But this

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>approach didn't make customers or theater employees happy. It was

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a hassle to have to print a voucher at home

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 1>and then bring it with you, and the transactions at

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the theaters took a lot of time to process because

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>cashier's had to manually input the single use credit card

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>numbers into a system, then they had to wait for

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the system to validate the purchase. And then there were

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the allegations that movie chains were putting pressure on a

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>company called Hollywood Movie Money that was the company that

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>was actually in charge of producing the vouchers on behalf

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of movie Pass. And this Hollywood Movie Money under pressure

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>pulls out of this agreement, and this attempt ends up

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>fizzling out too. So this is the second attempt to

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>get movie Pass going, and the second time it fails. However,

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Spikes still wasn't discouraged. He went back to the drawing

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>board again and a few months later he returned with

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a new version of movie Pass. This one was a

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>little different from the earlier proposed one. The monthly fee

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:12.199
<v Speaker 1>you'd pay would be dependent upon where you lived, because,

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned, movie tickets cost a different amount depending

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:18.599
<v Speaker 1>upon where you are, and so if you lived in

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a more expensive market where the average movie ticket price

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>was higher, you'd have to pay a higher monthly fee

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 1>to be a subscriber to movie Pass compared to someone

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>who lived in a lower cost market. So the subscription

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>fees ranged from twenty nine dollars on the low end

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to thirty four dollars on the high end, which was

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>still a huge bargain when you consider the pilot program

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>was going to cost fifty bucks, and in general they

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 1>were aiming at a price that would represent roughly three

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>films a month. That was kind of how they came

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to the conclusion that this would be the right subscription price.

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Customers would download an app and they would get a

0:12:55.840 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>special debit card along with their subscription. The app depended

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>upon a smartphone's geolocation capabilities, and here's how it worked.

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's say that I have subscribed to movie Pass. I'm

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a movie Pass customer. I have decided I am going

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to go and watch a film at my local cinema, Plextorium,

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and I've got my smartphone and I look to see

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>which movies are playing. Let's say I'm in for a

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>bad time. I want to watch the matrix reloaded, so

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I choose the matrix reloaded. I choose the time I'm

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>going to go see it. I get to the theater,

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I activate my app the UH the app shows my selection,

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>It detects from my geolocation data that I am in

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>fact at the theater and sends a message back to

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>movie Pass headquarters. That message authorizes the debit card that

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>is associated with my account to become active for thirty minutes,

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and the debit card works the same way as any

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>other debit or credit card does. So in theory, at least,

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>movie theaters that accepted that tip of card would have

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>nothing to complain about. They could process the payment just

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 1>like any other ticket purchase, and they would get the

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>full purchase price at that point, and I would get

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to go in and see the movie. Using this approach,

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>movie Pass launched and invite only beta test, and immediately

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>there were questions from the industry, like, how could such

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a business remain in operation long if people were you know,

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>using the service they were paying for. If you actually

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>went and saw more than three movies in your region,

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>then every single time you're going to see a movie,

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you're costing movie pass money. How could you possibly stay

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>in business? I mean, if the average movie ticket in

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>my city cost more than twelve dollars a pop, we're

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>going to round it down to twelve dollars. Will say

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that my subscription is on the high end at thirty

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 1>four dollars per month. If I see more than two films,

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>movie passes losing money on that deal, if they're having

0:14:56.200 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to pay full price for the tickets, and presumably least

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>at first, I'm going to see as many movies as

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I possibly can. I mean, typically when people sign up

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to a news service like this, they binge initially. That

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>might tail off after a while, but it means that

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the more customers you get, the more expensive it is

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to operate. You're not making more money, you're actually losing

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>more money in that case. So it did not take

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>long for people to say, how can this service stick around?

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, not only does it cost them to operate

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>in this manner, they still have all the other expenses

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that any other company has. You know, to pay for

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the back end, to pay for office space, to pay salaries.

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>All that stuff still exists for this company too, on

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>top of the fact that their business plan means they

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 1>actually lose money the more people use their service. In

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>an interview with The New York Times, Spikes said that

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>his long term plans included revenue from several streams besides

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>subscription fees. So he was pressed on this point. They

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>were asked, you know, he was asked, rather, what exactly

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>do you plan to do? What what are these other

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>streams of revenue, and so he answered the question. He said,

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>there are three big ones, and that would be advertising,

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty straightforward. That means that he would allow

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>other companies to advertise through the app, and movie Pass

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>would be able to supplement the money coming in from

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>subscriptions by the fact that people are viewing ads on

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the app itself. Then there was sell through. So what

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>does that mean? What does sell through mean? What's sort

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of like up selling in the retail space or impulse shopping.

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>It's taking the opportunity to sell stuff related to the

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>movies that customers are seeing. So movie Pass knows what

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>movie I'm gonna go see. I have to select it,

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I select the title and the time, and it ends

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>up sending me the um the authorization for me to

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>purchase my movie ticket. But that means I'm I'm telling

0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>movie Pass each time I go to see a movie

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>what it is I'm going to see and where I'm

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing it. Based on that, they can send me data

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 1>about stuff that I might want to purchase that's related

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to the film I'm seeing. If I've just gone to

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>see the latest Star Wars film, movie Pass might present

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>me with offers to purchase the earlier films in the

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Star Wars saga on Blu Ray, or it might have

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>links to purchase merchandise related to Star Wars if I

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>want to get, you know, a real geeky Star Wars

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>T shirt or whatever, and and goodness knows I have

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>plenty of those. So that was the second revenue source.

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 1>The third was about data. The data side is one

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 1>I find particularly interesting, especially since I've recently done so

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:49.360
<v Speaker 1>many episodes about privacy and security. Now, according to Spikes nineties,

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>six percent of all movie tickets sold were from walk ups,

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>meaning the vast majority of seats at movie theaters were

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 1>being sold at the ticket counter, not in advance, and

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the challenge for theaters and for studios is that walk

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:09.679
<v Speaker 1>ups give very little information about the people coming to

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:13.199
<v Speaker 1>see those individual films. You can see at a glance

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>which movies are performing well, you can see in ticket

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>sales which ones are doing well, but you don't know

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>very much about the individual audiences. Spikes argued that with

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a program like movie Pass, theaters and studios would learn

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot about the type of people who go to

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>see specific kinds of films, and that this in turn

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>could help guide marketing efforts to maximize the number of

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:39.640
<v Speaker 1>people to see those movies, and so movie Pass would

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:43.120
<v Speaker 1>end up making some of its money by selling information

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>about its customers to other companies. Spikes would say, quote

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>our technology, lets us say this is the type of

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 1>people who are going, this is when they went, this

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>is what time of day it was. We can break

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>it up by age, by race, sex. The only thing

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 1>we can't tell you is what they ate for lunch

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and what their blood type is. End quote. Those probably

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>sound like pretty cool concepts to companies, but it might

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>come across as a little bit orwellian for your average

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>movie fan. In addition, I'm sure there was a hope

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that people would sign up for the service and then

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:24.199
<v Speaker 1>just you know, not use it that frequently. Kind of

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>like how some people will sign up for a gym

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>membership and then you know, they don't go to the gym.

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:31.959
<v Speaker 1>So the gym makes money whether you're there or not,

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>and if you're not there, you're not causing wear and

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>tear on equipment. So gems love it when you sign

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>up and you don't go, And maybe that was what

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:42.679
<v Speaker 1>movie Pass was kind of hoping for. Two and so

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>movie Pass began normal operations by early two thousand thirteen.

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 1>It had rolled out in many markets. At that time,

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>the only app available was for the iPhone, though you

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>could access the movie Pass system through a mobile website

0:19:57.880 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>if you happen to have a smartphone using a diff

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 1>front operating system than iOS, Every user or household member

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>would have to have his or her own subscription and

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>personal card. They didn't have an option for signing up

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 1>for like a family account or anything like that. The

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>app would depend upon that geolocation data to confirm that

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you were actually at the theater to buy a ticket

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 1>before you were allowed to use the associated cards. That way,

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't just claim that you're going to go see

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a movie and then use your activated debit card to

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 1>buy something else like a cheeseburger. And after a one

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>month trial period, users would be committed to a year

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>long plan with cancelation fees that would range from twenty

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 1>dollars to seventy five dollars. The amount of the cancelation

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>fee depended upon how long you had been a member.

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>If you wanted to cancel right away, you're gonna have

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to pay pay pay. So I began to grow its

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:51.920
<v Speaker 1>customer base, and because it was using a Discover card

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>methodology for payments originally anyway, later on they would change

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 1>that the master card. There wasn't a whole lot of

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>movie theater chain could do besides protests the whole concept

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>if in fact, they took Discover Card because the amount

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of the method of payment was pretty straightforward. Uh So

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>things continued. The one thing they really could do, if

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>they really wanted to, would be to put up a

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>fuss and demand that Movie Pass not include their theaters

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 1>in the app. Since you had to use the app

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:25.199
<v Speaker 1>to pick the daytime and title that you plan to

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>see and which movie theater you were going to, they

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>could at least in theory demand that their locations be

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>left off of Movie Passes service, but that was about it. Well,

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>things would rapidly change for movie Pass over the next

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.159
<v Speaker 1>few years. I'll explain more in just a second, but

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>first let's take another quick break to thank our sponsor.

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand and fourteen, movie Passes experience as a

0:21:57.000 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 1>company was starting to hit some bumps, and this would

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>continue up till today. On the one hand, movie Pass

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:09.199
<v Speaker 1>was able to forge something of an uneasy alliance with

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the movie theater chain AMC, which had been a pretty

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>reluctant participant up to this point and would continue to

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 1>be actually, but this deal was sort of a pilot

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>program for theaters in Boston, Massachusetts and Denver, Colorado. There

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>were two tiers of subscriptions that users could choose. For

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty five dollars a month, subscribers would be able to

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>see films in standard two D format at AMC theaters,

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and for forty five dollars a month, they could see

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 1>films in any format, including three D or IMAX. Now.

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>According to Business Insider, at this point, movie pass had

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>about thirty thousand subscribers, and the company began to consult

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>with an expert in the field, and it's a guy

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I talked about recently in the episodes about Netflix. So

0:22:58.040 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>if you heard those episodes, you're gonna hear a name

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>that's it was kind of familiar. That would be Mitch Low.

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Mitch Low was not only instrumental in getting Netflix up

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and running, but also after he left that company, he

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 1>would go on to co found the company red Box.

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, two thousand fourteen was also

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:18.439
<v Speaker 1>a tough year for the movie theaters in general because

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.360
<v Speaker 1>from a box office standpoint, gross revenue was down more

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>than five percent compared to two thousand thirteen. That might

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>have been one of the reasons AMC was actually willing

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to go through with this partnership, and that partnership would

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>begin in early two thousand fifteen. A year later, at

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the end of the pilot program, the two companies participated

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>in a data analysis study to see how it all

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:44.679
<v Speaker 1>shook out, and the white paper would come out in

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the spring of two thousand fifteen. And the white paper

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>which would come out that spring said that the average

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>theater customer was going to a MC movie theaters about

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>one and a half times per month on average. Before

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the pilot program. So you know, when you break out

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the average of all the people going who were not

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 1>in this program, at first, it ended up being one

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and a half times a month. Then once the pilot

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 1>program began, AMC saw that number go up to three

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>times per month, which was not surprising people went to

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the movies more after subscribing, but then it settled back

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>down to about one and a half times a month

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>after that. That led AMC to argue that this partnership

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>wasn't terribly valuable for the company, that they could actually

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>make more money launching their own subscription service, because if

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>they only experienced this rush of usage in the first

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 1>month and then it tapered off again, it would make

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>more sense if they could just keep all the money. So, uh,

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:47.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're if you're paying a premium price

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to go to the movie theater and you only go

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>one and a half times a month on average, then

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 1>chances are you're paying more for the subscription than you

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>would if you went to the theater and just bought

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 1>individual tickets. So AMC would win out if it were

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>in charge of the whole show. So they kind of

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>canceled or concluded this whole partnership. In two thousand sixteen,

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:10.919
<v Speaker 1>Mitch Lowe would go from being a consultant to movie

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Pass to becoming the CEO of movie Pass. Spikes, who

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>had been CEO, would become co chairman alongside fellow co

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>founder Hammett Watt. The following year, in data company Helios

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and Matheson Analytics announced it would acquire a majority stake

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in movie Pass for a reported twenty seven million dollars.

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>And while that was big news, the first move out

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the gate really made headlines, at least among movie Pass fans.

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>The company would offer a brand new plan for nine

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars per month. You could see quote unlimited movies in

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>theaters with no blackout dates, no contracts end quote. That

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>announcement was crazy. I mean, there's barely more than a

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>single ticket at the the average price in the US,

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 1>right like nine a month. That's like one dollar more

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>than what the average ticket cost was. Going to the

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>movies just two times for any person in the United

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:16.640
<v Speaker 1>States would mean that Movie Best would be paying more

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>than what it was getting in subscription fees. Here in Atlanta,

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>going just once would mean that the full ticket price

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>was more than what you were paying in a subscription fee.

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>By this point, Movie Bass had established discount ticket rates

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 1>with some movie theater chains, but not all of them.

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I bet you can guess the identity of one movie

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>theater chain that continued to refuse to have discount rates

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>with movie Pass If you can't guess, it's AMC. But

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>even so, even with discount ticket prices, even if they're

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>not paying full ticket cost, that's still a super low

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 1>subscription fee, and unsurprisingly people began to jump on board

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>because at that price, how could you not more than

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a fift people would attempt to sign up to the

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 1>service in the forty eight hours following their announcement, and

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that puts such a load on the company's servers that

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 1>they started to crash, and the app and the website

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 1>was unavailable quite a few times in that period. AMC's

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>reaction was negative, to say the least. The theater chain

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:22.919
<v Speaker 1>said it was going to look into the possibility of

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>shutting out movie Pass from its chain entirely. In early

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 1>movie Pass would remove ten AMC theaters off its app

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 1>in various cities, and that appeared to be in response

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to this problem of not getting those reduced ticket prices.

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>By the end of two thousand seventeen, movie Pass had

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>accumulated a million news subscribers. Usually you'd say that's a

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 1>good thing. The plan at this point was still to

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>make most of the revenue by selling data about customer

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:59.679
<v Speaker 1>behaviors to various partners, and since of the users were

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>class to fight as millennials, young people who are presumably

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:07.679
<v Speaker 1>going to potentially be a customer for a really long time,

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it seemed like that would be particularly valuable information. In

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eighteen, movie Pass announced a new division called

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 1>movie Pass Ventures, which would do film acquisition and distribution.

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 1>That led to some controversy later on. The first film

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the division would acquire was called American Animals, and the

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 1>second was the film Gaudy Geo t t I with

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>John Travolta. It received the rare zero percent rating on

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Rotten Tomatoes. Now, Rotten Tomatoes aggregates reviews from critics and

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 1>then assigns a rating based on that aggregation, so zero

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>percent doesn't automatically mean the movie is worse than say

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a twenty film. It just means more critics gave it

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a negative review. But the controversy came when the audience

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>score was much much higher than the critics score. Some

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>analysts suspected that there was manipulation at play, that maybe

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Movie Pass customers were given an incentive to give a

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 1>good review to these films, and a few people pointed

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>out that some of the user reviews that were being

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 1>left on Rotten Tomatoes had only ever reviewed one other

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>film in their history, and that other film was American Animals,

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the other movie Pass ventures picture, which does look a

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 1>little suspicious. In the spring of a movie Pass presentation

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>revealed that the app wasn't just using your location data

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 1>to make certain you were at the theater to buy

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>tickets when you said you were. It wasn't just an

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>activation methodology. It was also tracking you. It was including

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>information from before you arrive at the theater and after

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you visited the theater, So, in other words, they were

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>watching where customers were going, where they were coming from,

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>where they were going to. Spikes had originally said that

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't be able to tell you what you had

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>for lunch, but based on this data, they might have

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>been able to give a pretty darn good guess, and

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people argued that the company had not

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 1>clearly disclosed to people when they signed up to the

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>service that their location could be tracked. Subscription numbers dropped.

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>They dropped again a little bit later when movie passed,

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 1>in an effort to stop hemorrhaging so much money, remove

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the ability to see a film a day on that

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>nine dollars per month plan. Instead, now people could see

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>up to four movies a month. And this initial change.

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Part of this was because so many new people were

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>subscribing and going to the movies, so movie Pass was

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>losing more money more rapidly because they were so popular,

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>making it up in volume was not an option. In addition,

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 1>users would be prevented from buying tickets to select movies

0:30:57.200 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>more than once, so in other words, if you were

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 1>going to go see a really popular film, you were

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>limited to seeing that film just one time in the

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>movie theater during its run, rather than being able to

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>see it multiple times using your passes. That was one

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 1>way movie Pass was trying to limit the number of

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:16.959
<v Speaker 1>times people were going to the theater. In April two eighteen,

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>it became clear that the parent company for movie Pass

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 1>had been losing twenty million dollars every month since September

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand seventeen, and an auditor expressed concern that

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Movie Pass would not be able to continue for very

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>much longer. The company would reintroduce the one ticket per

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>day plan a little bit later, because subscribers were still

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 1>dropping off dramatically, and now the company was saying, well,

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>it hurts us financially to have too many subscribers, but

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>then we won't have a company if everybody leaves the service.

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>But then, in order to balance out the fact that

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>now you could go see a movie a day again,

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 1>they introduced the concept of peak pricing, in which customers

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 1>discover they would face additional fees to see certain popular

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 1>movies at busier times of day. So if you had

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>no job and you could go to the movie theater

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of a work day, you probably weren't

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 1>too bothered by this because you could just see the

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>film whenever you wanted to. But if you had normal

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 1>working hours, you were likely to run into peak pricing

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>because that happened to be the same time when you

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 1>would have availability to go see a movie in the

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 1>first place. Later, still, the company suffered a massive service outage,

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and they had tomorrow five million dollars because they admitted

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>they did not have enough money to stay in operation.

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Without taking out a five million dollar loan. It increased

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the subscription fee of fourteen dollars cents per month. Keep

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>in mind, this is still a point where you would

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 1>agree to like a year long plan, so while it

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>would be broken out to fourteen dollars per month, you're

0:32:56.280 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>actually paying for a full years service, so they subscription

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>fee goes up to month. And it also limited the

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>number of times UH subscribers could watch new popular movies

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and reduced which screenings you could go to, so for

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 1>brand new movies that were like tent pole films, you

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>would only be able to see it maybe once, and

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't go see it at the most popular times.

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>In early August two eighteen, the stock price for movie

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Passes parent company dropped fifty six percent and movie pass

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 1>would again remove the movie a day option for users,

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 1>going down to three films per month, so once again,

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you can no longer go see a new movie every

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 1>single day. You can only see three a month. According

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to Mitch Lowe, this was okay because the average person

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>would only go see three movies or fewer a month anyway,

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 1>so it wouldn't really impact most users, except it does

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>impact customer approval and the company did reduce the price

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>back down to nine dollars cents had been known for previously,

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>so at least that changed. It was no longer and

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>they said that they were going to nix the surge

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>pricing feature as well, but just a couple of weeks later,

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 1>in mid August, and yeah, we're getting real close to

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:16.240
<v Speaker 1>when I'm recording this episode. But this is how quickly

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 1>things have been changing. Movie Pass would change yet again

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 1>mid August. Now users could only choose from between six

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:29.319
<v Speaker 1>movies each day, with limited showtimes, so there was no

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>guarantee that the movie you wanted to see would even

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 1>be listed on the day you could go see it,

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 1>or it might be listed, but it might be only

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:41.839
<v Speaker 1>available at an inconvenient time because of the movie Pass availability,

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:44.279
<v Speaker 1>no matter how many times it might be showing at

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the actual theaters near you. On August two thousand eighteen,

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a board member of Helios and Matheson named Carl Schram

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 1>would resign, and as part of an open letter he

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>issued during his resignation, he alleged that movie Pass per

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 1>basfully withheld information and made critical decisions without informing the board,

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 1>let alone getting bored approval for them, and analytics company

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 1>called Sensor Tower Store Intelligence stated that the first time

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>downloads of movie Passes app have dropped by seventy six

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:20.799
<v Speaker 1>percent over the past three months. I'm recording this at

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the end of September two eighteen, uh in fact September

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 1>two eighteen, and that report published yesterday September. So as

0:35:29.800 --> 0:35:32.879
<v Speaker 1>I record this, there are tons of analysts who are

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>predicting the demise of movie Pass. Heck, by the time

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>this episode publishes one week after I have recorded it,

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that company might not exist anymore. It's been losing money,

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:46.880
<v Speaker 1>it's been losing subscribers. Who was playing a really dangerous

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:49.759
<v Speaker 1>waiting game to try and get enough users and to

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 1>be seen as valuable in order to make a profit

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 1>from all the data it was gathering. But that was

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a pretty expensive thing to wait out, and the controversies

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 1>have hurt the company's credibley with its user base. So

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:07.280
<v Speaker 1>will movie Pass survive? That's possible, but with competing services

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 1>coming out, some of which are coming out from the

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 1>very movie chains that have been resisting movie Past this

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 1>whole time, and with flagging user confidence and approval in

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the service itself, it's gonna be a long shot. Doesn't

0:36:21.600 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 1>mean it's impossible, but it's gonna be super challenging for

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>movie Pass to make it through UM and survive to

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:31.879
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nineteen. I would not be surprised to see

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>it go away. UM. It would be kind of a shame. Like,

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:38.239
<v Speaker 1>I still am not quite sure how the company could

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:42.240
<v Speaker 1>make enough money, even with those additional streams of revenue,

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to make it a truly profitable experience without it being

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:52.800
<v Speaker 1>something launched by the actual theater chain itself. It's tough, UM,

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know how I feel. Actually, I do

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:58.280
<v Speaker 1>know how I feel about making money through selling data.

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:02.399
<v Speaker 1>I feel schivy about it. It's a skive thing. It's

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:04.839
<v Speaker 1>one thing to say, oh, well, here's a way you

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:08.399
<v Speaker 1>can send Jonathan a message saying, oh, this new movie

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 1>is coming out, and you like this other movie that

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 1>was like it, so maybe you'll like this one too.

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 1>That I don't object to so much. But there's no

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>telling what sort of companies movie Pass might start selling

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 1>data to. It might be totally different companies that have

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 1>completely different business models, And I'm not terribly comfortable with that.

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>This happens all the time. You know, your information is

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>sold to tons of different actors out there, and by actors,

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean agents, you know, companies, that sort of thing.

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:43.319
<v Speaker 1>But I don't want to invite more of that necessarily

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:46.720
<v Speaker 1>into my life. That's just me. It's my own personal

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:55.319
<v Speaker 1>reflection text stuff. Listeners. We have some breaking news. Right

0:37:55.360 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 1>after I recorded this episode, some news broke that I

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 1>felt I had to include before we published. So I'm

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:03.480
<v Speaker 1>recording this attendom the day before the show goes live.

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm so sorry. Sorry, but anyway, some crazy stuff happened

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that I think we need to address. Movie Past did

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:18.320
<v Speaker 1>something I think is pretty insane. Several customers who had

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:22.440
<v Speaker 1>canceled their subscriptions after the service had gone through multiple

0:38:22.520 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 1>changes in two thousand eighteen ended up receiving emails that

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>said they would have to quote unquote opt out of

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 1>enrollment into a new subscription service. The email said that

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 1>these lucky individuals and I am using air quotes for

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:40.759
<v Speaker 1>that had been selected to be automatically enrolled in this

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 1>new service that would return to unlimited movies per month.

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 1>In reality, it would be unlimited movies within movie Pass inventory,

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 1>meaning you know movies that Movie Pass had access to.

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 1>That actually means that things like blockbusters on opening weekend

0:38:56.440 --> 0:39:00.320
<v Speaker 1>would be off limits, so not really unlimited movies, but anyway,

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 1>it meant that unless you went to the proper settings

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:06.960
<v Speaker 1>in your account and you opted out of this service

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:09.799
<v Speaker 1>that you did not ask to be in, you would

0:39:09.840 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 1>start getting charged by movie Pass for this service. So

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:17.319
<v Speaker 1>imagine that you are upset at movie Pass because the

0:39:17.360 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 1>service changes have been going back and forth and it's

0:39:19.719 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 1>not the service that you originally signed up for, so

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you decide it's not worth this hassle and you cancel

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 1>your subscription. And then, uh, as of like the end

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of September, you get an email that says, surprise, your

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:35.799
<v Speaker 1>service has been re enacted without your permission and that

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 1>if you don't do anything about it, you're going to

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 1>get charged for it. I think it's safe to say

0:39:40.640 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 1>this is banana. You should not have to deal with

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing. I think it's ridiculous for any

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:51.680
<v Speaker 1>company to enroll a former customer into a new subscription

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 1>service without their permission and then say it's on you

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to opt out of it. That to me is absolutely crazy.

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:03.800
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't sound ethical to me. Now that's my personal opinion,

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's a reasonable one. And then just

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:09.640
<v Speaker 1>hours before I was to come into this studio to

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 1>record this update, more news broke the CEO of Helios

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 1>and Mathison Analytics, Ted Farnsworth. Helios and Mathison Analytics is,

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of course, the parent company of movie Pass. Has said

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that they raised sixty five million dollars in new funding

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:31.279
<v Speaker 1>in September. But that being said, Helios and Mathison Analytics

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is still having some major problems. As of this recording.

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Their stock price for that company is at a single

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:43.840
<v Speaker 1>penny per stock one cent stocks, and it is in

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 1>danger of being delisted from the Nasdaq Stock Exchange. On

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:51.239
<v Speaker 1>October eighth, the company is going to hold a stockholder

0:40:51.320 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 1>meeting to discuss the possibility of a reverse stock split.

0:40:55.680 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Now I've talked about stock splits in the past. To

0:40:57.560 --> 0:40:59.800
<v Speaker 1>stock split is when you take the number of stocks

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and you increase that number, really the number of shares

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 1>in stock. You increase the number of shares, and then

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you decrease the individual share price. That way, the company's

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 1>value is preserved as a whole, but you can increase

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:17.319
<v Speaker 1>the number of shares. So you might typically hear of

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:20.799
<v Speaker 1>a two for one stock split, which means that if

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:23.399
<v Speaker 1>the company has a thousand stocks now it has two

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:26.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand stocks, but there are two thousand stocks where each

0:41:26.200 --> 0:41:29.120
<v Speaker 1>share is worth half of what they used to be worth.

0:41:29.480 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 1>This helps improve liquidity and trading, but it doesn't change

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:35.719
<v Speaker 1>the value of the company. This is going to be

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a reverse stock split, so instead of a stock splitting,

0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:44.799
<v Speaker 1>it's shares the stocks merging together. So this would be

0:41:44.960 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a five hundred shares of stock merging to form one share.

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:53.880
<v Speaker 1>So for every five hundred shares now there would just

0:41:53.920 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 1>be one share that would be five hundred times the

0:41:58.120 --> 0:42:01.919
<v Speaker 1>price of the original yaars, so instead of all one

0:42:01.960 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 1>cent share, it would be five dollars essentially. Yikes. Anyway,

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 1>those are the breaking news points that I wanted to

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:15.880
<v Speaker 1>include in this episode. Uh decided to add it on

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 1>here at the end, and I'm sure by the time

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:21.800
<v Speaker 1>this publishes, they'll be yet more news about movie Pass.

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Probably not good, but I only have so much time

0:42:27.480 --> 0:42:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and we have to publish at some point, so fingers crossed,

0:42:30.960 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it won't be catastrophic huge news. I'm sure we will

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:38.320
<v Speaker 1>be talking about movie Pass, perhaps in the past, tense

0:42:38.600 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 1>again in the future. All Right, Susannah, that was our

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 1>episode about movie Pass. If any of you out there

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 1>have suggestions for topics I should cover in future episodes

0:42:48.640 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of tech Stuff, whether it's a technology, a person in tech,

0:42:51.239 --> 0:42:54.399
<v Speaker 1>a company, a concept, anything like that. Maybe there's someone

0:42:54.440 --> 0:42:56.480
<v Speaker 1>you want me to interview or have on as a guest,

0:42:57.040 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 1>let me know, send me an email. The address for

0:42:59.520 --> 0:43:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the show is text stuff at how stuff works dot

0:43:03.480 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 1>com or drop me a line on Facebook or Twitter.

0:43:06.120 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 1>They handle of both of those is tech Stuff hs W.

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Remember you can go over to T public dot com

0:43:11.560 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 1>slash tech Stuff. That's T E E Public dot com

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:17.839
<v Speaker 1>slash tech Stuff. That's where we have our merchandise store.

0:43:18.120 --> 0:43:21.279
<v Speaker 1>You can buy yourself something cool from the store, maybe

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a T shirt or tote bag or stickers. Support the show.

0:43:26.400 --> 0:43:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Every purchase helps the show out a little bit. We

0:43:29.600 --> 0:43:33.080
<v Speaker 1>greatly appreciate it. And also don't forget follow us on

0:43:33.239 --> 0:43:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Instagram and I'll talk to you again really soon for

0:43:43.280 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 1>more on this and thousands of other topics. Because it

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 1>how stuff Works dot com.