WEBVTT - Lots More on the Big Can Kick in Commercial Real Estate

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You know, one of

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the things that kind of surprised me is there was

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>all that concern about commercial real estate and specifically office buildings,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and instead we've seen it feels like we've seen more

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>stress in the multifamily space.

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a good point. I don't know, Like I'm

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 2>still worried because I still see these numbers, at least

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 2>an aggregate of vacancies not improving. And I sort of thought,

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, about six months ago there was another rash

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 2>of headlines about companies calling workers back to the office.

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 2>But I'm not sure if there's improvement. Like I'm still anxious.

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm not comfortable saying coast is clear yet.

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>But what do I know? You're caveating yourself caveat I

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 1>feel like that's what you're doing.

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 2>I did a deadlift one.

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Okay, barges.

0:00:57.520 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 2>This isn't after school special, except.

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I've decided I'm in a base my entire personality going

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>forward on campaigning for a strategic pork reserve in the US.

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Where's the best with imposta?

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>These are the important question? Is that robots taking over

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the world.

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:12.960
<v Speaker 2>No, I think that, like in a couple of years,

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 2>the AI will do a really good job of making

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 2>the Odd Lonch podcast and people today, I don't really

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 2>need to listen to Joe and Tracy anymore.

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>We do have touching. You're listening to lots more where

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>we catch up with friends about what's going on right now, because.

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Even when the Odd Lots is over, there's always lots more.

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>And we really do have the perfect guest. So Rich,

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>we had you on basically a year ago talking about

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>where stress is in the massive market for commercial real estate.

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>What have we seen since then?

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, first of all, it sort of feels like

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 3>dejean vous all over again. For me. There was a

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 3>bunch of three bank failures this time last year. Right

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 3>fast forward a year we didn't have any, and then

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 3>suddenly we have another bank failure or another bank stress test,

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 3>if you will, So look, maybe I'll start with office.

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 3>I think I'm certainly tired of talking about office. I

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 3>think most people understand that office valuations are down rather significantly.

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 3>We think office valuations generically are down around thirty five

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 3>percent or so, and peak to trough that'll probably be

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 3>down closer to fifty percent. So I think most people

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 3>understand that at this point, I do think there's still

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of debate and a little bit of

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 3>misunderstandings about well, not all office is bad. New clean

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 3>and green office even in New York city's doing exceptionally well.

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 3>And then maybe some of the Sunbell office properties where

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 3>you're seeing strong demographic shifts, those are working working as well.

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 3>But are people willing to step their toes in? Probably not.

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 3>I think they share share your views.

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>They share Joe's tendency towards self cavitation. That's a word

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>that I just came up with. We're speaking with Rich Hill.

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>He is the head of real estate strategy and Research

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>over at Cohen and Steers, formerly of Morgan Stanley, which

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>is how I met you and read your research for

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a number of years. One thing I wanted to get

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>your sense on. We have seen a rally in broad

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>cre since sort of November December. How much of that

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is just echoing the expectation for rate cuts? And I

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>feel like I feel like I should add a caveat here,

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>which is that we're recording this on March twentieth, the

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>day of the Fed interest rate decision, so who knows

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>what will happen, but the expectation is still for cuts,

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>So how much of that is feeding into the rally?

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so maybe just a level set. The trough in

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 3>listed rates listed real estate was October twenty fifth of

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty three. Since that time, listed reads are up

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 3>more than twenty percent. November was one of the best

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 3>months ever. December was pretty strong as well, top ten

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 3>month ever. So you bring up a good question how

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 3>much of this is just driven by rate cuts? So

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 3>let me let me unpack that a little bit for you.

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 3>And I think I'm going to be a little bit

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 3>wonky here, but I think that's probably that's great. That's

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 3>what we like. First and foremost listed reads do really

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 3>well in the aftermath of the FED stopping hiking interest rates.

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Usually on the next twelve month basis, they put up

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 3>double digit returns. So what we've seen happen is consistent

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 3>with what we've seen happen with history. But I also

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 3>think there's a few other things that are maybe not

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 3>as well understood, where I would say this is not

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 3>all about rate cuts, and I'll come back to that

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 3>in a second. October twenty fifth marked the high for

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 3>the tenure Treasury rate. It peaked a little bit above

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 3>five percent. At that point in time, people were really

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 3>concerned that the tenure Treasury rate was probably going to

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 3>be closer to six percent than four percent. Fast forward,

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 3>in the tenure treasury is now closer to four percent

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 3>than six percent. So I think that took a lot

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 3>of fear off the table. The second thing that we've

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 3>seen is we've actually seen lending conditions not begin to loosen,

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 3>because linding conditions are still tightening, but they're not tightening

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 3>as much as they used to, and so that basically

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 3>means linding conditions, the worst for lending conditions are behind us.

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 3>The second erouder has started to improve. The third point

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 3>I would make to you is that guess what in

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 3>AY growth net operating income growth for real estate is

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 3>holding up really, really well. It's actually one of the

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 3>few sectors of the S and P five hundred where

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 3>you're seeing revisions higher not lower. That's interesting, and there's

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 3>a couple of reasons for that. But I think what

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 3>I would ultimately say here is listed reads are leaning

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 3>indicator in downturns and recoveries, and what I think we're

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 3>starting to see is maybe some of the fear that

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 3>was in the market was it was turning out to

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 3>be not as bad as feared, and that's led to

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 3>a rally.

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 2>So it always helps, even if things are bad, if

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 2>they're going to be less bad because that's helped.

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>The direction of travel is good.

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the direction of travel is good, better than expectations

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 2>all the worst not being priced in. One of the

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 2>things that's come up in our past CRI episodes just

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.479
<v Speaker 2>this gap between where people think the market might be

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 2>and where the market actually is, which we have a

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 2>hard time knowing because there is just not a lot

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 2>of transaction period. So you can have these models and

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 2>you can have expectations or maybe price something off the

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 2>one building that did move. Are we seeing on the

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 2>non listed side, on the private side, are we seeing

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 2>any sort of pickup in transaction activity.

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a super fascinating conversation that we're having right now,

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 3>and I think it's the very most important question that

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 3>people can be asking right now. Let me explain how

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:14.559
<v Speaker 3>the transition mechanism usually works in fire cycles, transaction volumes fall,

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 3>they trough because when they're falling, there's a big spread

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 3>between where sellers want to sell and our buyers want

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 3>to buy. There's no transaction activity. Then as transaction volumes

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 3>trough and begin to rise, property valuations begin to fall.

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 3>Transaction property valuations begin to fall, and then about twelve

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 3>months later, appraisal valuations follow. What we're seeing this cycle

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 3>is dramatically different than that it's actually flipping on its head.

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Appraisals are actually leading transaction volumes significantly right now. You're right, transactions,

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 3>there's very little transparency in the transaction market. I just

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 3>got some updated numbers for February of twenty twenty four,

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 3>and the number of transactions that sold it looks like

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 3>it's back to COVID lows. So there is still a

0:06:56.160 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 3>pretty big bid asque spread. But appraisals, appraisal valueuas we

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 3>think are down generically around twenty percent right now peak

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 3>to trough. We think they'll be down twenty five to

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 3>thirty once everything goes through. But why are appraisal valuations

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 3>leading right now? What has everything to do with higher

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 3>interest rates and higher discount rates, and appraiser has no

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 3>choice but to deal with that. So this cycle is

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 3>a little bit different where transactions are just now beginning

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 3>to catch up to where appraisals are so.

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about sales transactions. But the other thing that's

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>happened in the market is you've had a lot of

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>new financing. So call it what you will extend and

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>pretend or amend and extend. There's different names, different pseudonyms

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>for this activity, but that feels like it's one of

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the things that has really given the market a little

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>bit of breathing room. So it's odd lots tradition to

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about the looming maturity wall, but the looming maturity

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>wall is not so looming anymore. It's more of a

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.119
<v Speaker 1>three foot privacy shrub. I think I've joked before.

0:07:57.400 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, if you guys can see me on the podcast,

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 3>I have a big smile on my face because this

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 3>is one of my favorite topics. First of all, look,

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 3>I push back on the idea of a maturity wall.

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 3>Earlier in my career, I always talked about maturity walls

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 3>because it gets a lot of clicks. But let's be clear.

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 3>Commercial mortgages have a seven year wall that means fifteen

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 3>percent of loans come due on average every single year,

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 3>which means over a three year time period, you should

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 3>expect forty five percent of loans to come due guess what,

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 3>forty two percent of loans are coming due over the

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 3>next three years. Not shocking at all, that's just sort

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 3>of math. Is it great that they're coming due right

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 3>now at this point of distress in the commercial real

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 3>estate market. No, but that was inevitably going to happen

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 3>at some point in the cycle. So that's point number one.

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Point number two is a statistic that's getting a ton

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 3>of headlines right now that there's almost a trillion dollars

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 3>of loans coming due in twenty twenty four. That is

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 3>factually true. But this time last year there was only

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:52.559
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more than six hundred billion dollars of

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 3>loans coming due in twenty twenty four. Like, you don't

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 3>just make up four hundred billion dollars of loans. Why

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 3>did that increase? Well, loan Behold, a lot of loans

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 3>that were maturing in twenty twenty three were amenda and

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 3>extended into twenty twenty four and beyond. Now, we actually

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 3>think that same strategy is going to play out in

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four as well. But what you're starting to

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 3>see is this prisoner's limb are being solved. Borrowers are

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 3>not in a good position lenders are not in a

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 3>good position. They're sort of forced to work with each

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 3>other right now. And I think your point about you know,

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:27.079
<v Speaker 3>call it what you will, modifications and extensions, what it's

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:28.719
<v Speaker 3>doing is that it's providing a little bit of a

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 3>safety net for commercial real estate valuations, where whereby we

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:33.839
<v Speaker 3>think valuations are going to be down twenty five to

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 3>thirty percent instead of like thirty five to forty like

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 3>we saw during the GFC. And it's because this is

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more orderly process than what people feared

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 3>a year ago.

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:44.959
<v Speaker 2>By the way, I just want to say Tracy that

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm really glad and thank you rich for saying that

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 2>when you're on the cell side and getting clicks, because

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 2>I've always had this intuition that journalists in cell side

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.319
<v Speaker 2>analysts are basically in the same job, and we sort

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.719
<v Speaker 2>of compete with each other for people's scarce attention. It's

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.319
<v Speaker 2>not that different. In fact, I would say, as I

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.079
<v Speaker 2>progressed in my journalism career, I felt I learned a

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 2>lot from reading cell side research, both in terms of

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 2>content but also in like, yeah, your job is, you know,

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 2>people have a million emails and you want them to

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:14.959
<v Speaker 2>open yours instead of the next guys.

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:18.199
<v Speaker 1>So I feel no one will know your research is

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>good if they don't read it.

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:20.839
<v Speaker 3>If they don't read it, yes, you got a in

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 3>a northern around time is spent on titles, and oh yeah.

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 2>I know they're getting really they've got they've gotten so good.

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 2>If I own a building and it's one of these

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 2>not on a B tier offices in New York City

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 2>and I still have a bunch of empty units and

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 2>the people who were my tenants aren't bringing their employees back,

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 2>wish do I want? Do I want them to bring

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 2>their employees back? Or do I want right cuts?

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 3>You want rate cuts first and foremost, first and foremost.

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 3>We had this debate internally at Colin Steers relatively recently.

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 3>What are we rooting for? And I think everyone in

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 3>there in the room said rate cuts. And so let's

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 3>maybe explain what that means. Commercial real estates inherently elevered

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 3>asset class. Yeah, very few people buy commercial real estate

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 3>building and don't put debt on it, so the cost

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 3>of financing actually really matters. I would much prefer right

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 3>now a hard landing scenario, believe it or not, where

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 3>real rates interest rates go much lower and grow slows

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 3>and credit spreads widen than a no landing scenario, whereby

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:39.199
<v Speaker 3>rates sort of stay where they are in growth and

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 3>credit spreads are just eh. I know, that's weird to

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 3>get your arms.

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Rud No, I believe it, but it still blows my mind.

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 3>It's inherently a level asset class. What matters more than

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 3>anything else is the cost of financing.

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Wait, so, on that note, I want to go back

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to what we were talking about, the refinancing, the amend

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and extend dynamic that we've seen in the market. Who

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>is refinancing? Is it the existing finance years Because as

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, they basically don't want to take the marks

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>on their portfolio or they don't want to have a

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>catalyst that causes them to record that loss. Who's actually

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:09.719
<v Speaker 1>doing it?

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:11.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So let me first of all give you a

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 3>stat that's I think really remarkable. If you looked at

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 3>commercial mortgage backed securities, the loans that we're maturing in

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty three, eighty percent of them paid off at

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 3>or before their maturity date. Eighty percent. Now, some of

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 3>them obviously paid off before their maturity date. You'll hear

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 3>much lower statistic for loans that were still outstanding at

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 3>their maturity date. But those loans still outstanding have inherent

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 3>negative selection. If you didn't pay off your loan prior

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 3>to the maturity date, there's probably something wrong with it.

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 3>So let me answer your question directly though, and I'm

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 3>going to focus on banks first and foremost. Why would

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:48.679
<v Speaker 3>a bank want to extend a loan, well, particularly.

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:51.559
<v Speaker 1>After March's banking drama and the expectation that there was

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:53.559
<v Speaker 1>going to be more pressure in terms of regulation.

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 3>There's two reasons, well three reasons. First of all, they're

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 3>not in the interest of owning properties. That's one number two.

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:03.319
<v Speaker 3>They actually don't want to sell a distress property into

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 3>a distress market. But there's an even more important point

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:08.719
<v Speaker 3>here that I don't think people are focusing on the

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 3>capital charges for modifying a loan at a new ninety

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 3>percent LTV or actually lower than owning that property on

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 3>your balance sheet. Oh, they're incentivized, assuming that they have

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:25.479
<v Speaker 3>appropriate reserves and the borrower has a plan, they're incentivized

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:27.559
<v Speaker 3>right now to actually extend that loan. I come back

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 3>to the point I made previously. This is like classic

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 3>prisoner's dilemma stuff. The barrower is not in a good spot,

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 3>the lender doesn't want the property back. They're actually coming

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:39.559
<v Speaker 3>together and finding a solution. And I don't think this

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:42.199
<v Speaker 3>is necessarily to kick the can down the road like

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 3>we've seen in the past. They're getting some pretty decent paydowns.

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.959
<v Speaker 3>They're actually not increasing their rate too much. It is

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 3>a prisoner's dilemma.

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.839
<v Speaker 1>One thing I've come to realize in my own career

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.199
<v Speaker 1>as a financial journalist is that kicking the can down

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the road has all these terrible connotations, especially since two

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight, but actually it kind of worked right.

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 1>We had a bunch of home loan modifications after two

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:05.959
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight, and you know, real estate recovered.

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 2>I have come to the conclusion that all of human

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 2>history is just a big hand ticket. We need to

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 2>destigmatize that concept forever. We're just going to be kicking

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.559
<v Speaker 2>the can for thousands of years to come. Put it

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 2>off to the next generation and they'll do the same.

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Your point about there's something wrong if you don't prepay

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 2>your loan like this is because real estate investors are

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 2>allergic to building up equity. The moment they have a

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 2>little bit of equity in the building, they want to

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 2>pull it out and buy the next building.

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 3>That's that's that's not wrong. Yeah, it's constantly refinancing. And

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 3>now some of this is because we've been a secular

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 3>decline in ten your treasure eight since nineteen eighty. You

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 3>could always refinance into a lower and lower and lower

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 3>interest rate month after month after month.

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 2>So someone I was talking to was explain to me,

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 2>like some of the banking issues that we've seen with

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 2>some of the community banks. Part of it, I mean,

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 2>we hit did an episode on Newyor Community Bank and

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 2>the issues that they've had in like the rent regulated

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 2>multifamily area. But the part of it is that a

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 2>lot of these banks just made a bunch of money

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 2>on prepayment penalties. I don't know if they're called penalties,

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 2>but those prepayment fees, and then the moment rates shot

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 2>up shoot up for the first time in forty years,

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 2>you just get that big slow down in Yeah.

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, well, it's probably fairly nuanced, but when you

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 3>prepay a fixed rate loan, you have a prepayment penalty

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 3>which basically compensates the lender for the interest cost that

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 3>they otherwise would have received over the life of the loan.

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 3>So there's a lot of different. There's a lot of

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 3>different reasons. I mean, I think the real issue that

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 3>the market's dealing with is a return to the old normal.

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 3>I get asked all the time, what do you think

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 3>about this new normal environment? It's not new normal environment.

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 3>What was weird was the last ten years where interest

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 3>rates were historically low, inflation was historically low. That created

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 3>a lot of weird dynamics for the commercial real estate market.

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 3>All the markets dealing with is a return to the

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 3>old normal and what that does for valuations. Valuations being

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 3>down twenty five to thirty percent. That's huge on a

0:15:57.560 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 3>headline basis, but if you actually think about what it

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 3>means in terms of how much valuations have increased over

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 3>the past ten years, it's really nothing. This is just

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 3>a deflating of the balloon that should occur from time

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 3>to time.

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And this is where I have to say, like,

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>even before the twenty twenty pandemic, there was talk about

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>underwriting standards slipping in CRE and CMBs specifically, I wanted

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to ask you one more thing. So one of the

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>themes that comes up on all these cre episodes is

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>this is not a monolithic asset class. So you obviously

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>have office, multifamily retail. So you have that segmentation. But

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>then even within those categories there's additional segmentation. So Joe

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the idea of a Class B office, you would

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>also have fancy offices that are Class A. You might

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>have a really nice shopping mall and then a zombie

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>one that's going out of business. I wanted to ask

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>in retail on shopping malls we heard recently in an

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>episode we did with Tom McGee from the International Council

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>of Shopping Centers, he would I was talking about there's

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of a revival of demand for shopping centers and

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that there's a structural lack of supply in certain types

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:09.880
<v Speaker 1>of shopping centers. Is that something that you've seen as well.

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:12.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Look, we really like open air shopping centers, and

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 3>we like them for a couple different reasons. First of all,

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:18.120
<v Speaker 3>we think institutional investors in private real estate are under

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 3>index to them.

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Is that a result of like the shopping mall fears

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of the time.

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they're just redline. I mean, no one wanted to

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:28.680
<v Speaker 3>buy a retail property from twenty ten until twenty twenty

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 3>because it was going through clickbait so called retail apocalypse.

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 3>That's not a great environment. So you've actually seen institutional

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 3>ownership of retail go down, while institutional ownership of multifamily

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 3>industrial has risen significantly. But there's actually something really interesting

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 3>that's happening. Two things in particular, no one was really

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 3>dumb enough to buy to build a new retail property

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 3>host the Great Financial Crisis because there was this big

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:58.679
<v Speaker 3>shakeout coming, so there's been no new supply of shopping centers.

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 3>At the same time, you had this great Darwinistic event

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 3>that happened in COVID where maybe I'm going to use

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 3>to bold of retirement, but it killed all the stuff

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 3>that wasn't you know, it was cuspy. So now you

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 3>actually have an environment that's right size from a supply

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 3>standpoint at a time that retailers e commerce companies have

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 3>actually realized that they can do micro fulfillment through the

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 3>retail stores. Consumer likes it. So you're actually seeing vacancies

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 3>for things like neighborhood centers, community centers, power centers actually

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 3>near historical lows. We haven't seen an environment like this before,

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 3>so it's actually a really strong asset class that people

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 3>aren't paying enough attention to.

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 2>So I take this key point that Okay, there's been

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 2>part of this story is that there's been this game

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 2>theory cooperation from lenders and borrowers to avoid pain. I

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:48.400
<v Speaker 2>take this point that there are some in New York

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 2>City even that there are prime offices that are doing

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 2>very well, and that not you know, CIRI and even

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:57.399
<v Speaker 2>office is not a monolith. On the other hand, it

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 2>does seem as though in many cities that there is

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 2>still just a lot of empty square footage within buildings,

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:07.159
<v Speaker 2>and I don't think people know what is going to

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 2>happen with it, or whether it's you know, where that's going.

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 2>And there's still you know, obviously there are some fancy

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 2>buildings in New York City, but there's a lot that's

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 2>just done between every block where it's just old and

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 2>shabby and you just see clearly not a lot of activity.

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 2>What is happening with that? And of course in some cities,

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, there's this fear of the urban death spiral,

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 2>which would be a very good headline for a research

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 2>piece or for a clickbait piece. But I guess the

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 2>retail apocalypse of the twenty tens has been replaced by

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 2>the urban death spiral that you have people are coming

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:38.880
<v Speaker 2>back to work, that you have dropped the tax base,

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 2>that the restaurants closed down and people don't want to

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 2>come back to work, et cetera. And then you just

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 2>have this sort of you know, like something out of

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 2>a horror movie or a zombie movie. What are people

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 2>saying about that these days?

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Well, the first point I would make is the

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 3>professor I think. I think he went to a professor

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 3>from NYU that coined the death spiral for New York

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 3>City actually came back relatively recently and said, I was wrong.

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 3>That's not playing out like the way I thought it was. Okay,

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 3>So look, the cliche answer is you take all these

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 3>dead dead, take all these underutilized office buildings and confront

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:14.919
<v Speaker 3>them a multifamily. Guess what, guys, That's easier said than

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 3>done for a lot of different reasons. So I think

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:21.199
<v Speaker 3>the real answer is people don't know, and that's one

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 3>of the reasons that people are unwilling to step into

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:26.439
<v Speaker 3>the office sector right now, even though valuations have come

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 3>down a lot. What do I think. I actually think

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 3>this is a once in a generation opportunity, once in

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 3>a lifetime opportunity for public and private stakeholders. To come

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 3>together and rethink how these cities should work. So it

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.919
<v Speaker 3>probably requires a master plan where you actually redevelop all

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:45.640
<v Speaker 3>of these into I hate to say work, live, play,

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 3>but there's a real opportunity to do that. And so

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.360
<v Speaker 3>could you imagine like walking down New York City where

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 3>it used to be all these Class B office buildings

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 3>that no one really wanted to work in, and now

0:20:55.680 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 3>suddenly it's like vibrant parks, it's restaurants. Well, I think

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 3>that's going to solve the world's problems apparently.

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Cos I think New York should let us redesign the city.

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm done. By the way, Tracy, the NYU professor the

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Rich mentioned, I'm pretty sure Arbat Gupta, who who has

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:15.719
<v Speaker 2>been to our odd lotch trivia event, we really need

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 2>to have him on the show because he was talking

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 2>about the urban doom loop. So there's a message to

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 2>us basically that we really got to book the ARPIT episode.

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's do it.

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Lots More is produced by Carmen Rodriguez and dash Ol Bennett,

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 2>with help from Moses Ondam and Kill Brooks.

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Our sound engineer is Blake Maples. Sage Bauman is the

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 1>head of Bloomberg podcasts.

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Please rate, review, and subscribe to Odd, Lots and Lots

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:46.959
<v Speaker 2>More on your favorite podcast platforms.

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 1>And remember that Bloomberg subscribers can listen to all our

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>podcasts ad free by connecting through Apple Podcasts. Thanks for listening.