WEBVTT - Hour 1 - Mike Renner (04-27-20)

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:03.480
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to The Dan Patrick Show on Fox

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio. Hope you had a great weekend, safe weekend.

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in, stay awhile if you can. Dan and the

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Dan Ns Dan Patrick Show a lot to talk about.

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Peter King will stop by Reggie Miller. Final hour of

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:17.759
<v Speaker 1>the program. We'll check in with Pro Football Focus in

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>their draft analyst Mike Renner, who had some great, great

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>opinions over the weekend following the three days of the

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>NFL Draft, will explore the draft, some of the goods,

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:30.319
<v Speaker 1>some of the bads, some of the ugly. Also, you

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>had parts three and four of the Bulls documentary. We'll

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about the brilliance the genius of Dennis Rodman. Coming up,

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the New Orleans Saints are going to sign Jamis Winston

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to a one year deal. They're locking up Taysom Hill

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>what looks like to be a two or three year deal.

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 1>Not quarterback money, but pretty good money for a multi

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>purpose player. We'll talk about that coming up with Peter

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>King as well. You can watch if you like YouTube

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash The Dan Patrick Show. You can also

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>listen if you'd like three hundred and sixty two radio

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>affiliates around the country, including the Fox Sports radio lineup.

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:09.399
<v Speaker 1>Mclovin's job has to come up with a poll question.

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>We got a couple of stats of the day. We

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:13.119
<v Speaker 1>got to play of the day coming up as well.

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>The first ever virtual NFL Draft was a hit, a

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:20.040
<v Speaker 1>big hit. They're already talking about using some of these

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>elements as they move forward with future drafts. And the

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>ratings obviously didn't suffer. People were looking for something to watch,

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>anything to watch. First and second day set records for

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a viewership. And you show the executive, you show coaches,

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:39.199
<v Speaker 1>you show players at home, and it humanized these people.

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>It provided a lot of fun content content, and you know,

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>people were picking apart the home decor of the players

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and the coaches and the gms, and some writers suggested

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>doing the draft like this every year moving forward. I

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>disagree with that. It's a novel approach, but you know,

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>this cold for this because it was we're going through.

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>This wasn't somebody who said, hey, let's do this. This

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>was a necessity. I can't imagine next year in LA

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>or the following year in Vegas, you're going to do

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>this and not really kind of explore what Vegas and

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles are all about. You want that pomp and circumstance.

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.239
<v Speaker 1>This was great. You know, the Draft has changed since

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 1>they moved it out of Radio City Music Hall, took

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>over cities like Philadelphia and Nashville. Did a wonderful job,

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure there's going to be compromises here. You

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>can take the best parts of both formats. But either way,

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the Draft will go down as a bright spot in

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>NFL history. The commissioner and everybody in front of the camera,

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>behind the camera, behind the scenes did a wonderful job

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>with this. The draft delivered both in abundance, entertainment and

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>some optimism there. But I can't see moving forward where

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Hey we're in Vegas. Remember Vegas was going to have

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a boat. They were going to have gondolas taking the

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 1>players to the stage. They had canals that they were

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>going to use. That was the opposite of what we had.

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I liked it. It did humanize Belichick at home with

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 1>his dog. You had the setup with Cliff Kingsbury, Mike

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Vrabel kids, pets. You know, you had the draft picks

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>at home with their family. I like it. You can

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>incorporate that. I would love it if we had the

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>capability the technology to be able to give you a

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>screen of all of the war rooms. Now you couldn't

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>hear it, but you could pick your war room and

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>you could just watch that. Now, you could also have

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the split screen where you have the commissioner, you have

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the draft picks, you have videos, whatever that is. You

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>could do that, but you could pick your draft room,

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>your war room there, and I think that would be entertaining.

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I did like the fact that you had these front

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>office people, coaches or players in their element with their families,

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think as we move forward, you'll incorporate some

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of that. But if that's all you were showing, you know,

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you're not showing, you know, the red carpet, and you're

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>not showing what Vegas is going to look like when

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>they roll this out, what they're gonna do with the

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>new stadium and the rollout in Los Angeles. You know,

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>I think we like this because we were hungry for anything.

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>You could have shown anything, and I think we would

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.840
<v Speaker 1>have been fine with it. But I can't imagine as

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>we move forward where you go, Okay, that's what the

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>draft is going to be. You know, the network wants

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to show, you know, bells and whistles here. They want

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to have people in locations, they want to have beautiful

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>pictures there. They weren't able to do that. You got

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:50.280
<v Speaker 1>creative lighting on Bristol, Connecticut and the ESPN headquarters, like

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>that was the glam shot. Now we did get some,

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, Cliff Kingsbury with his home, but other than that,

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, nobody really was had a tricked out place.

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I liked the simplicity of Belichick there. And I think

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the dog made the pick. I started to think that

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>did the dog hit a button that? Like Bill put

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>him up there? And all of a sudden, did you

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>know the dog you know with his paw like click

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>on something? And then they drafted the kid out of

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 1>Lenora Rhyne and I thought that was his name. I

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>went they drafted Lenora Rhyne. Oh that's right. There is

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a college called Lenora Rhyne. I liked it. It was fun,

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 1>it was well done. I thought Rhys Davis Trey Wingo.

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>To be able to navigate the traffic that you have there,

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>just on the draft by itself without this pandemic is

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>hard to do, and they were able to do it seamlessly.

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:53.919
<v Speaker 1>Anybody want to keep the draft the way it was

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>what we saw this weekend. As we move forward, that's

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:00.040
<v Speaker 1>what you want to see, any of the Danettes. I

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>want to see this as we move forward. I liked it,

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>but I liked it as a one off. Yeah, Seaton, Yeah,

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's some elements of it you can keep,

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>but I don't want it to be that stripped down.

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>That was a little too basic. Yeah, Paulie, I do

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>like a handful of draftees from home, and but they've

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>always done that. They have draftees on the site. What

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>if they have in Vegas, but they'll have drafteas at home.

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>You can see the home reaction. So as long as

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>they keep that part of it. But as far as

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>like Belichick at home, that was perfect. That looks like

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>what we would do doing a fantasy football draft. You pick,

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you jump up, you walk around your house, you go back,

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you pick. Yeah. Mclovin, Yeah, I mean I kind of

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>agree with paul. It was interesting to see the gms

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and their kids. But I love the Nashville and the

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Philly the pump, and I think the economic reasons are

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 1>valid too, Like, isn't that a lot of money to

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>those cities? Oh sure, yeah, and it will be for

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles with that new stadium, and then of course

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Vegas when they get their opportunity. All right, age seven

0:06:57.640 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>seven three d P show email address DP of dampad

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>dot com Twitter, hand to a DPS show. Mclevin's got

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 1>a pull question or two. There were a couple of surprises,

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>not many surprises. Remember, leading up to the draft, we

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of analysts say, oh, there's gonna be

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of trades. I don't think you had a

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of trades because of the virtual draft set up.

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that that played a large role in this,

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that teams were a little bit more cautious in what

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>they were doing, and they locked in on who they

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>wanted and they did their damnness to get that pick.

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>You saw some outliers, which we'll talk about, you know,

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles taking Jalen Hurts, what happened with the Packers

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>with Jordan Love. But I think there were some jams

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>who were frustrated that they were trying to make picks

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and they couldn't do it. What do you have? McLevin?

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I had a question, what is the biggest

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>surprise the Packers taking quarterback in the first round and

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>no wide receivers, the Eagles taking Jalen Hurts in the

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>second round. I don't know if it's a surprise, but

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Jamis Winston signing with the Saints. I'm fine with Jamis

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>instance signing with the Saints. I think it's like that. Yes,

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a very good move. But I got

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Sean Payton and I've got Drew Brees. I don't need

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>him to play, but when he does play, I want

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>him to make better decisions. We all know he has

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>great talent. He doesn't make good decisions with Sean Payton

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and Drew Brees. No more excuses. If you can't learn

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>with them, then you're not going to learn the position.

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm fine with that. Jalen Hurts with the Eagles, I

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>get it. This isn't about Hey, the Eagles are looking

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>at maybe they're Taysom Hill. I think they're looking at

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>their quarterback and Carson Wentz. To me, this is more

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 1>about Carson Wentz than it is. We want to find

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>our Taysom Hill as well or our Lamar Jackson. I

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>think I like Jalen Hurts. I wish that he would

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:48.319
<v Speaker 1>have gone to a team where he would have been

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the eventual successor in maybe two years, but he might

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>be playing because of the way Carson Wentz plays. I

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>like what the Eagles did in getting Jalen Hurts. Nate

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Sudfeld is not going to scare anybody. I think Jalen

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Hurts has the ability to come in and put some

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>pressure on a defense if he has to, you know.

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>But I think Carson Wentz played all every game last year,

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>so maybe he's getting smarter, but he has to. Yes, mclovin,

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I gotta tell you, if Philly was ready to burn

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>down Lincoln Financial Field, they were I raped. The fans were, stop.

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>You got your wide receiver in the first round, which

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you needed that, and you got it. This was a

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>value pick, and you got Jalen Hurts and you got

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a really what I think is a really good backup quarterback.

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, to start the season they took a wide receiver.

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Then no one expected them to take Jalen Ragar instead

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>of the one that everyone knew Jefferson from Alice you

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, but then again they bowed McNabb in ninety eight.

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I know, look, we we don't know, we don't know.

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 1>It's like when they go, oh, you know what, we're

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna bring in Nick Foles. Nick Foles, he can't play,

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, he nearly retired. How did that work out?

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>And I was there at the NAB draft when they

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>booed him, and I went, yeah, they don't even know

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>this guy. Donovan McNabb is a borderline Hall of famer.

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Now we want those shiny objects that we know. Their

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:16.839
<v Speaker 1>job is to find the right person, not Hey, you

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>guys don't know who this guy is. Would any camp

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>be any good? That's not always the case. We know

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that there are just so many situations where we go,

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>who's that guy? Who's Russell Wilson? Wait, Dak Prescott. That's

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>why when it comes to draft picks, when you see

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing, the team and what they're doing, I'm

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>going to give you the benefit of the doubt. I'm

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>assuming you got guys who spent a lot of time

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>on that player or the player you're not going to take. Yeah,

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Paul Dan, I went back and looked at some old

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>drafts and draft grades today, and you're exactly right. When

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson was drafted, people said, that makes no sense.

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>You just spent a bunch of money on Matt Flynn

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>in the offseason. That's a wasted draft pick. When Kirk

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Cousins was drafted by the Red that makes no sense.

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:02.679
<v Speaker 1>In the first round you took a quarterback, you take

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the fourth game alignment or a tight end.

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Same thing with um you know different Dak Prescott, like

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Tony Rown was in his prime. You don't need a quarterback. Yeah,

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>that's why when it comes to the reaction overreaction, and

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:19.839
<v Speaker 1>you guys, remember when people Dallas Cowboy fans wanted Johnny Manziel,

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>not Zack Martin, not a Hall of Famer. You wanted

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Johnny Manziel because you knew Johnny Manziel. We like when

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>our teams draft somebody we know. Then you get the

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Packers with Jordan love Now. I told you on Friday,

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>why didn't like it for a couple of reasons. Now,

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I was letting it soak in. I was gonna let

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>it simmer a little bit and go, Okay, maybe I

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>have a different approach here. Maybe I'm gonna feel differently

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>about this now I feel worse about this if I'm

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a Packer fan for the following reason. You trade it

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:57.559
<v Speaker 1>up for Jordan love Now, I told you that. I

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>found out my source said the cold We're going to

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:05.319
<v Speaker 1>take Jordan Love. They ended up taking a quarterback in

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Jacobieson out of Washington they were going to take. From

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>what I was told they were taking Jordan Love. That's

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 1>where the Packers wanted to go up and get it.

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Why maybe they think he's the next Patrick Mahomes. I

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 1>have a problem with it. If you're going to look

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>at the Green Bay Packers and say, well, you got

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the greatest quarterback, why can't he make these wide receivers great?

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady did this. The reason why the Packers didn't

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>go to the super Bowl was because of their defense,

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>not their offense. Now do I think they were a

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>legitimate thirteen and three team. I do not, In fact,

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the entire season. I even said on the show numerous times,

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how good the Packers are, and I

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>still don't. I think they're more of a ten or

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:54.839
<v Speaker 1>eleven win team. They won thirteen. They could have gone

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to the super Bowl. The reason why they didn't their defense.

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>That's what they needed to shore up. Now you can

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>say did they do a good job and that, well,

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>we can discuss that as well. If you're taking Jordan Love.

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:12.079
<v Speaker 1>You just signed up Aaron Rodgers. He's got four years left.

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>So if I look at the financials here, what are

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you gonna do? Trade him? Cut him? Is Rogers leaving

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in the next two years, and I'm going to say

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>probably not three years. Maybe the reason why you draft

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback in the first round is you get to

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 1>have that rookie contract. So I'm going to take Jordan Love.

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 1>The first three years of that team friendly contract, he's

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>not playing. Then we get to the fourth year, will

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>he be playing? Then what if we get to the

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:49.439
<v Speaker 1>fifth year where you've taken him, and you've just wasted

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the five year window to have a quarterback who doesn't

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>make achingly painful money for the salary cap. Right, look

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>at what Alex Smith did for the Chiefs, and the

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs said we can get Mahomes. He sits for one year,

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 1>not one and they win a Super Bowl because they

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>have a team friendly contract. That's why it doesn't make

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:13.959
<v Speaker 1>any sense for Jordan Love. Now, we could all sit

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>here and go, well, but if he's a Pro Bowl

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>quarterback and he's your quarterback for the next ten years,

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>he's not going to be my quarterback. For the next

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>four years. What I want out of that quarterback is

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>immediate dividends. Joe Burrow plays right away. Twoah sits for

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>one year. Justin Herbert probably sits for one year. Now

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I have a team friendly contract. Jordan Love, he's not

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>sitting for one, he's not sitting for two. Maybe the

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>third year you get Jordan Love in there. Maybe that's

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>best case scenario. That's why I didn't agree you trade up.

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>You could use defensive help. If you're going to trade up,

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>trade up for somebody who helps you now a thirteen

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and three team unless management went, you know, we're really

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>not that good. We got a lot of holes here.

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>You found the running back. Your wide receivers are you know,

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>aside from Davante Adams, they're okay. That's not a ringing

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>endorsement there. But I got Aaron Rodgers. Your defense was poor.

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Your defense hurt you, and the Niners ran all over you.

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>If that's who teams would always build their team in

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>accordance to how they matched up with the Patriots. If

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm the Packers, how do we match up with the Niners, who,

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>by the way, got even better they did? Scary? I

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>think Baltimore got better, and I'm talking about you know,

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the elite teams getting better. Baltimore got better, but San

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Francisco got a steal in Trent Williams. So you have

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Joe Staley retire and they go get Trent Williams, crazy,

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>get a wide receiver, trade to Forrest Buckner, you get

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>defensive line. John Lynch did a good job, did a

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>good job, and that's the difference there. You know, the

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco forty nine ers got better. Green Bay didn't

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>get better. They got different, but they didn't get better.

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>In my opinion, you didn't take any wide receivers in

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver heavy draft. You didn't take one. Okay,

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>it's your defense going to be formidable, and if it is,

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>then maybe this works out. Baltimore got better. Now Dobbins

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Ingram might think is thirty. So you got a guy,

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, another running back in there. I love Queen Patrick. Queen,

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you got a talented defensive player as well. But you know,

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>when people talk about a draft and they give you

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a grade, your draft is in entire draft, not just

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the first two picks. We focus on the first and

0:16:56.400 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>second rounds. Drafts are won and lost after that, and

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I was also looking at the Vikings. The Vikings had

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>twelve picks on the last day, like an expansion team

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>has twelve picks, not a team that's a playoff team.

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Those guys aren't gonna Why not take twelve picks and

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:20.439
<v Speaker 1>narrow and package that to get three picks. Because three picks,

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I can get guys who will play. Twelve picks they're

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>not going to play on a playoff caliber team. Didn't

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>understand that philosophy at all. Take the twelve and move

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 1>up and get two great players instead a bunch of bodies.

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>And plus you have the offseason. That's not an offseason.

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>You're not even gonna give them a chance to make

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>the team. But if I trade those picks up and

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I get some guys who are going to play, that

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to me was the smart choice. All right, come up

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>with a poll question here, we'll talk to a Mic

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Renner Pro Football Focus. Fritzie said, you got to look

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>at these opinions with Mike Renner. He did a great job.

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>It was just, you know, there's no bias there. He

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>just gives you a raft grade and he'll tell you

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:05.360
<v Speaker 1>why he doesn't like the Chargers in what they did.

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't like what they did with Justin Herbert, and he

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>had some thoughts prior to the draft on the Chargers

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>should have gone all the way up to three. You

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 1>know who had another good draft the Lions. And it's

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.360
<v Speaker 1>rare when we say that about the Lions. I thought

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the Lions did well, really did well. All Right, we'll

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>take a break, We'll talk some football. We've got some

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>phone calls. We got Reggie Miller a little later on,

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and we got a lot of topics to dive into

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty after the hour, just getting started on this Monday,

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Dan and the Dan It's Dan Patrick Show. Thanks for

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>listening to The Dan Patrick Show podcast. Be sure to

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>catch us live every weekday morning nine to noon Eastern

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>or six to nine Pacific on Fox Sports Radio. Find

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>your local station for The Dan Patrick Show at Fox

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio dot com, or stream us live every day

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 1>on the iHeartRadio app by searching f s R. Dan

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Show brought to you by Legal Zoom. No matter

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>what happens, you want to make sure your loved ones

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>are taken care of. That's why legal Zoom has made

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>it easy to set up the right estate plan. You

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 1>don't even have to leave your home, take care of

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>your family today the right estate plan at legal zoom

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Michael and Michigan joins us. Hey, Mike, what

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>do you have for me today? ADP first time, long

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>time six foot a meaty two fifteen. We want to

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>talk to you about this Packers pick. Man. I've been

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:25.680
<v Speaker 1>sitting for three days this here, and everyone talk about

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 1>the Packers and Jordan Love and oh my god, what

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>they do? You know? Honestly, Man, I gotta tell you

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>who's our backup quarterback when Rogers goes down? Longtime Packer fan,

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I've seen a lot of Super Bowl runs shut down

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>because we lose Rogers. Well, okay, okay, go back and

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>behind man. All right, here you go, Michael, thank you

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>for the phone call. If that's the case, then bringing

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton or bring in Cam Newton or bringing Jamis Winston.

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>If you're worried about who's our backup quarterback. I just

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't like the Jordan Love pick you went up to

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>get him. He's not going to play for at least

0:19:56.200 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>three years. You want that team friendly rookie quarterback contract,

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>like it just doesn't make sense. And I know he

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 1>might be the next Patrick Mahomes. We keep hearing that

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you needed to shore up your defense because the Niners

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:12.159
<v Speaker 1>gouged you, ran all over you, and you went you

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>were you were went away from the Super Bowl. I

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:18.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Mike Renner Pro Football Focus lead draft analyst,

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and did a great job in summing up the draft.

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>He had great opinions there and Mike joins this. Now, Mike,

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>good Morning, let me start with the Jordan Love trade.

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Explain it. Tell me the good of the Packers taking

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Love. Well, the good is with the rest of

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>their draft, I gotta ended up being their best pick. Actually,

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>so the good is that he has the tools. Like

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the Patrick Mahomes comparison that everyone wants to make. It's

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>not fair to him. He doesn't necessarily have that level

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:49.959
<v Speaker 1>of ability or even that level of performs at college,

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>but he has that natural arm talent. You saw it

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>on a tape at Utah State. We tracked these things

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>called big time throws here at PFF, which are special

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:00.040
<v Speaker 1>downfield throws with accuracy. You were still top five in

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the nation last year in that category despite play with

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of talent around him at Utah State.

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>So that's what you fall in love with with him

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 1>the pick though I can't get on board with the

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>national media. No one seems to be able to get

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:14.880
<v Speaker 1>on board it just because of Aaron Rodgers four years

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 1>left on his contract. Jordan Love up and down over

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the course of his career, almost made picks his touchdowns

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 1>last year. You better be right about this evaluation. If

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you're Brian Goodacoons or else, you just drafted a guy

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>who didn't even play at a big school, who wasn't

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 1>even good last year. To us, sir, if Aaron Rodgers,

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>do you like Jordan Love better than Justin Herbert, I'll

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 1>say I'd rather come away from the first round with

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Love than Justin Herbert because I think he can

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>get to that level, Like I think his ceiling could

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>be a top ten quarterback in the NFL. Justin Herbert,

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 1>for as much as you know the big arm that

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 1>evaluators fall in love with and looks the part and

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>looks great in shorts, he didn't have that level you know,

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>downfield accuracy or level of accuracy just in general. Now

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 1>he operated the offense are at organ state a little

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>bit better. He's a little bit more capable. Right at

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the moment, moment. But he's the same guy we saw

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>as a sophomore at Oregon. His grade actually peaked sophomore year.

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 1>The things you wanted to see improve more throws with touch,

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 1>more you know, improve an accuracy, more command of the offense,

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 1>you didn't see over the course of his career. So

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>usually when guys are four year stars in college, you

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>like it. But the fact that they didn't get any

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>better is almost a negative in r What should the

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.959
<v Speaker 1>Chargers have done? They should have moved up, I mean,

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly, I thought going in that that was their plan.

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>They were going to move up to get to a

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>tongue of Valoa because they need people to fill that stadium.

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:34.160
<v Speaker 1>They're laughing stock to be NFL not filling out an

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>MLS stadium. They need to sell tickets, you know, sell

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 1>season tickets. There two of the guy that moved the

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>needle personality wise, you know, with what he's done in

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the stats he had at Alabama, I think he's a

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>much much better quarterback prospect. I can't see how you

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>could evaluate both of them and not come to that conclusion.

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know what it would have taken for

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>them to move up. I don't think it would have

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 1>taken that much, because you know, anyone they would have

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 1>moved up with would have gotten the same guy. So

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:00.120
<v Speaker 1>crazy to me that they didn't and stuck and got her.

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 1>When you look at your draft strategy, when you apply

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>these grades, how do you come up with your formula

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to give somebody an A or an

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 1>A plus or give somebody a C minus. So that

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>part is not as scientific as some of the draft board. Actually,

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that one's more a little subjective, okay, but we do

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:21.239
<v Speaker 1>it is based on where they we valued them on

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 1>our draft board. And more so, what we factor into

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>our draft board that a lot of people might not

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.160
<v Speaker 1>is the positional value that you're getting with these picks.

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:31.640
<v Speaker 1>If you're drafting or running back in the second round,

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you're just not going to recoup your value the way

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 1>you could with say a cornerback, with a pass rusher

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>or something at that point in the draft. So that's

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>one thing we factor in heavily here at Pro Football

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>flore But you have the Chiefs taking a running back

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the first round, and it's not

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>who they take, it's when they taken. Because then the

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Lions take swift in the second round, So that which

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>one's smarter or explain your philosophy on that. So running backs,

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the biggest thing is I mean, the chief saw themselves.

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>You've got a guy off the street who was damn

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>near Super Bowl MVP. Because what matters at the running

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>back position in terms of production is not necessarily skill.

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Look like, the evaluation of the skill level is one

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 1>of the least important things in terms of how many

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry they get and how productive your rushing

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>offense is. It's much more play calling, it's much more

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the quality of your offensive lind that matters to those things,

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to the success or not success of your running game.

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>The running backs a small cog in that part in

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that puzzle. And the fact of the matter is there's

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>just a lot of guys who are dynamic running threats

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 1>at the position. There's a lot of running backs who

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 1>are talented. And so that's why you see a guy

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 1>like Philip lindsay as a UDFA and have a higher

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry over the first two years of his career.

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>That's a Quon Barkley who went number two overall. That's

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>just that's a fact of life in the NFL, and

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 1>so we don't want to be taking the ball out

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of Patrick mahomes hands. We think he's that good. We

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 1>think that passing offense is that dynamic that if you

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>draft a guy in the first round in Clyde Edwards Hilaire,

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 1>you almost have to give him carries to just to

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 1>fy that pick, and that's taking the ball out Patrick

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:05.359
<v Speaker 1>mahomes hands. All right, Well, then, using that philosophy or

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>those opinions, if I go back, obviously, Leonard Fournette then

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 1>is a bad draft pick for Jacksonville no matter what

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>he did. Sae Quon Barkley is a bad the draft

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.360
<v Speaker 1>pick for the Giants considering where they took him. I

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>believe so. And it's the opportunity to cost what you

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>gave up with a number two overall pick, you could

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>have drafted guys and I'm trying to think back to

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that draft. Who was all on the board. You could

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:31.199
<v Speaker 1>have drafted obviously a quarterback, well, Clinton Nelson, Yeah, you

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:33.360
<v Speaker 1>could have drafted a Garden Quinton Nelson. And you look

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>at the Colts offensive. Then the rushing game over the

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 1>past two years has been better than the Giants rushing

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>game over the past two years because that offensive line

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>is what matters to the running game, and they also

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:45.919
<v Speaker 1>when you invest in that offensive line and you know,

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:48.160
<v Speaker 1>draft those guys up front, it also has an added

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>effect to the passing game because the best run blockers

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 1>are also usually the best pass protectors. So that's where

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to invest if I do want to improve

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>my running game. There were a couple of teams that

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I liked with what they did, and then I sort

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of changed my opinion after I read what Pro Football

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Focus was talking about. You know, did the Ravens have

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a good draft? Felt like the Cowboys had a good draft.

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 1>I like what the Lions did. I'm still got a

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>question mark with the Dolphins because I got a question

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 1>with Tua and even Austin Jackson who they took later

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>in the first round as a project. So grade my grade,

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I will say the Dolphins they win just because two.

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Talking about Looa at number five is a slam dunk

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and any other year he doesn't have the hip whatever

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>he goes number one overall. Joe Bird doesn't exist. We're

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about him as the number one overall pick right now,

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>so that getting him at fifth when usually a guy

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>like that goes either first or second in every single

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:42.679
<v Speaker 1>draft is a massive win for them. Not having trade up.

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:45.919
<v Speaker 1>The Austin Jackson pick. First round is not where you

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>take projects on the offensive tackle position because athletic tools

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>at offensive tackle don't necessarily translated. We look at, you know,

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:55.639
<v Speaker 1>combined data. The combined data at the offense tackle position

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>is not nearly as predictive too future success as it

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 1>is for a lot of about positions. So you can

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>chase guys who have the athleticism, that doesn't mean they're

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be good pros. And Austin Jackson, his tape

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 1>at USC was not great. I mean he got beaten

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot, especially look at the bowl game against Iowa

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and aj F and SA three sacks he allowed that game,

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>So not great there. So I go back and forth.

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:18.919
<v Speaker 1>Still a good draft getting your franchise quarterback, though the

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Ravens is the one where yes, who love the linebacker

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 1>pick and some of the ones later on, But they

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:25.879
<v Speaker 1>had Gus Edwards averaging five and a half yards for

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:28.719
<v Speaker 1>carrying a UDFA. Going back to that running back conversation,

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:31.879
<v Speaker 1>didn't necessarily need to get a JK. Dobbins there. I'm

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:34.239
<v Speaker 1>not sure what he brings to the table that they

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't necessarily already have Cowboys though. I like what the

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys did. I think it was a smart you know,

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Jerry usually has that Jerry the owner has the temptation

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to do something crazy. You know. It felt like Jerry

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the GM and Jerry the Owner were on the same page.

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I love the Cowboys draft. One of the four a

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>pluses we gave out was Dallas's and the Seedee Lamb pick.

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:58.719
<v Speaker 1>While it may seem decadent to get that third receiver

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 1>in there, Mike McCarthy, you three wide receivers. That was

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>like his mo in Green Bay was he never took

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>those three receivers off the field. It was like ninety

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>plus percent of their snaps. So that means Cede Lance

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to start. It means from day one he's going to

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 1>be playing for them. And we had him as the

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 1>sixth overall player in this draft class. We love that pick.

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>And then to get Treyvon Diggs in the second round,

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the Alabama cornerback second longest wingspan of any cornerback in

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>this draft class. He only allowed one hundred and sixty

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>yards all season long, outside of that LSU game that

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone remembers from getting Torch, but the rest of the

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 1>year he dominated. People thought they might have taken him

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 1>in the first round, took him all the way in

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the second. So to slam dunk those first and second

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>round picks at valuable positions. In our eyes, Cowboys one

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 1>of the best drafts. Okay, so Cowboys get an eight plus?

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Did you give the Dolphins an eight plus? I did not.

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember off the top of my head. With

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 1>getting Dolphins. The other eight pluses were the Cleveland Browns.

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>They got three guys. Their first three picks were top

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>seventy five or top twenty five players on our draft

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>board in Jordan Elliott, Grant Delpit and Jedrick Wills there

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>in the first round. Also the Arizona Cardinals who got

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Isaiah Simmons in the first Josh Jones. And the third,

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>which in my opinion, was the steal of the draft,

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the Houston offensive tackle, the fourteenth player on our draft board.

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 1>They needed offensive line help, thought they'd go there in

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the first round. To get that guy in the third

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>was crazy, And you got a factor in the DeAndre

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins trade, like the second round pick. To flip that

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>into DeAndre Hopkins, massive win for them. And then the

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>last a plus for us was the gosh off the

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>top about him blanking new demo Bronco Scots. Yeah, and

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>so Jerry Judy kJ Hamdler. They had a theme of

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>this draft and that was to get you locked the

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>weapons he needs, the speed he needs. And then also

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Alberto at tight end who ran a four to four nine.

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna they're gonna go toe to toe with the

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Kenton State Chiefs in terms of speed and out in

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the AFC West and give through a lock every chance

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>he needs to succeed there. The worst grade that you

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>handed out was it's the Green Bay Packers. And like

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I said, for Jordan Love to be their best selection

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>was crazy to be. If I would have told you

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that after the first day, you would have said I

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 1>was dead wrong. But then they draft a running back,

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a backup running back by you in the second round

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and a fullback in the third round. They drafted like

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>it was nineteen eighty nine. It was good stuff. Mike.

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I really enjoyed reading it, and we appreciate you coming

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 1>on for sure day. Thanks for having me out. It's

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Mike Renner, Pro Football Focus Lead Draft to analysts, and

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you know you start to read these analysis you're starting

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to read and you hear grades, and then you're like,

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, what are they basing this on? And then

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you get their information and what they've been, you know,

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 1>what they program, what they put into their computers, and

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>so you may not agree with all of it, but

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I found it interesting with the Chargers should have moved

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 1>up that justin Herbert has not in the same category

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>as Jordan Love didn't like the Jordan Love trade. Cowboys

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>did well. Broncos are basically saying, we see your you know,

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a copycat league. We see your formula in Kansas City,

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to try to match that. And that's

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 1>what they did, bringing in these wide receivers there. You know,

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore taking a running back. Dobbins is you know, a

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>rate running back? But is he does it make sense

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to take a running back? You know, the Cowboys or

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the Packers had a running back, and then you take

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a running back and then you're taking a fullback. Like

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 1>there are just things that and look, you know, I

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 1>could sound silly in a couple of years when we

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>look back and go, yeah, weren't you the one I

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't like Jordan Love he may be great. He may be,

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>but by the time he's great, he's going to be

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>ready to sign a contract that's going to pay him

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>forty million dollars a year. He's not helping you win

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>in the next two years or three years unless you go, well,

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Rogers is injury prone. Okay, that's it. Carson Wentz is

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, injury prone. But all I would do is

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>get a high end backup instead of using that draft

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 1>pick on a quarterback that I don't think is going

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to help me in the next couple of years. If

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you can get Andy Dalton to be the backup quarterback,

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 1>to me, that makes more sense than it does using

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a first round draft pick where you trade up on

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback who will not help you in the next

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. Play of the Day is up next.

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Your phone calls as well. We'll settle on a poll question.

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Peter King will join us. Coming up next hour Reggie

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Miller in the final hour of the program, Dan and

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>The Danas dan Patrick Show. Thanks for listening to The

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Dan Patrick Show podcast. Be sure to catch us live

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>every weekday morning nine until noon eastern six to nine

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Pacific on Fox Sports Radio, and you can find us

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>on the iHeartRadio app at FSR or stream us live

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>every day at YouTube dot com slash The Dan Patrick Show. McLevin,

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 1>would you explain that to me that you're drafting a

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 1>quarterback because is that what the Packers did? They drafted

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Love because they're worried that Aaron Rodgers is going

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to get the coronavirus. Well, there's a lot of people

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:45.959
<v Speaker 1>have been talking about this is say your quarterback does

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 1>get the coronavirus, even if he has light symptoms, he'll

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>have it for two to five weeks and then he'll

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>have to do two more weeks. You could lose a

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 1>quarterback for seven weeks in the prime of the season

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and then but I think that you'll probably lose the

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 1>whole locker room too. So that's that was a custom

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>was happening over the weekend on Twitter with like a

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of real NFL writers. That seems silly. Why is that? Well, okay,

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 1>so is Jalen Hurts immune to this? No, no, no,

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>But you want to make sure you have a backup plan.

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>But you're exactly right. If the backup plan is my

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.479
<v Speaker 1>backup and he's a rookie, and then I'm worried if

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>he gets the coronavirus or now I'm going to put

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>him in because my starting quest I Okay, maybe that's

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the case. Maybe somebody told that to Adam Schefter, but

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I don't understand that philosophy. Yeah, and they're

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>in the same room for months. You know, the quarterbacks

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>all hang out together, so there's no way that Jalen

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Hurts wouldn't get it. You're absolutely right, Drew, and Tampa

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>joins us Hi. Drew, what's on your mind today? How

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>we're doing? Dan, first time call a long time listener.

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Six foot two h five. Um, well my foot of

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 1>eagles on the clock? Fifty three love the draft? Um,

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 1>nice breakaway from what's going on in the real world. Um,

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that's fifty three. You know I got my uh, you know,

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I got holes over the field. Oh line, little bit up,

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe some corner help, you know. Jayla Hurts was very

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 1>surprising to me just even wentz the four year deal.

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I was just super surprised at fifty three. We would

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:13.720
<v Speaker 1>take a backup, QB. I mean maybe we have some plans.

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I could take some Hill type deal. I just want

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:18.239
<v Speaker 1>to know your opinion on that pick and did you

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>like it or not? I like Jalen Hurts. I wasn't.

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I was surprised that he went to Philadelphia. But I

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know if this pick is more about Carson Wentz

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and his playing style. He played all sixteen games. He

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 1>got concussed in the postseason, but maybe his style has

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:37.760
<v Speaker 1>been modified and he won't take these risks. That's always

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>been my knock on him that I you know, you're

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 1>not at North Dakota State. You can't take these chances.

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 1>And I like Jalen Hurts, but do they have other needs? Yes,

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I was surprised the Eagles went there. Yes, the club.

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 1>There was another theory that they picked him to push

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz, to sort of try and make him better

0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 1>and make it give him some motivation. Yeah, but I

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I want him to be pushed with a guy who

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 1>has a different style. I don't want Carson Wentz to go, Oh,

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you think Jalen's good at doing that? Watch me? No, No,

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that I don't. I don't want Carson Wentz doing what

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts did in college. That's part of the problem.

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 1>That's how we got here in the first place. Don't

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>like that. I got a stat of the day. Here.

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes in his last two seasons at Texas Tech

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:30.839
<v Speaker 1>through twenty five interceptions, fourth most in the FBS over

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>those two seasons. He goes, no, I'm not done yet,

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:38.880
<v Speaker 1>that's not prematernity. Yes, he goes to Kansas City sits

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 1>one year behind Alex Smith, who has the eighth lowest

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 1>interception rate of all time, and Mahomes turns into an MVP. No,

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not done yet. Jordan Love seventeen interceptions last season,

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 1>most in the FBS. Now he'll sit behind Aaron Rodgers,

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 1>who has the lowest interception ratio of all time. A

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>little theme there, hit the music, stead of the day,

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:07.879
<v Speaker 1>stat of the day, dot best out of the day,

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 1>stat of the day. Here comes that one stat of

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:18.919
<v Speaker 1>the day. So maybe you sit behind somebody and you're

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:22.800
<v Speaker 1>going to buy proxy get better. Jamis Winston with Drew Brees,

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Love with Aaron Rodgers. We saw that with Patrick

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes and Alex Smith. Maybe maybe there's a theme there,

0:36:29.320 --> 0:36:31.879
<v Speaker 1>but I just I don't see that being a smart

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 1>pick for the Packers for the reasons I told you

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:37.400
<v Speaker 1>this program brought to you by Mercedes AMG. Be prepared

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 1>for whatever comes your way. It's the all new GT

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 1>four door coop because life is a raised Vizier local

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:44.799
<v Speaker 1>dealership for a test drive today. If you missed any

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of our interviews from the Mercedes AMG Man Cave, go

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Dan Patrick Shell app watch and listen from

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:55.359
<v Speaker 1>inside the Mercedes AMG Man Cave Mercedes AMG Driving Performance. Yes, Paul,

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:58.200
<v Speaker 1>When the rumor was out there that Jameis Winston's signing

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:00.399
<v Speaker 1>with the Saints, a lot of people had the same joke. Well,

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Jamis has used to throwing the ball to Saints players,

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 1>so it was too easy. But mean spirit Yeah, everyone

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:07.280
<v Speaker 1>had it mean spirited. He got a lot of talent,

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:10.360
<v Speaker 1>but it comes down to decision making. For me with

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Jamis Winston, I think he thinks he's better than what

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:17.760
<v Speaker 1>he is. I'll take less talent for somebody to be smarter.

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Because if you have all of those interceptions and you

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:24.359
<v Speaker 1>took away half of those interceptions with the Buccaneers, they're

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a playoff team and that's where you bring in Tom Brady.

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Now that's where Jameis Winston could learn from Tom Brady.

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:33.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, you don't want to pay him anywhere near

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:35.279
<v Speaker 1>that money that he wants. I don't know what he's

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>going to get from the Saints, but you know that

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a smart I think it's a smart business decision

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to bring him in. He knows the division, and he

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 1>can give you your scouting report. They're scouting report on you,

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:51.399
<v Speaker 1>and he's played against these other teams. Not that Drew

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 1>needs that, but certainly getting the Tampa Bay aspect of this,

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and you got a legitimate backup quarterback and you still

0:37:58.120 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 1>have Taysom Hill. Yeah. Pot maybe it'll help your defense

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and practice. They'll get their confidence because they'll pick them

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:06.840
<v Speaker 1>off somebody once again a motivational to a mean spirited,

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:11.319
<v Speaker 1>mean spirit. Yeah, no offense, all right, McLevin, you gotta

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 1>pull question for me. Yeah. I put up what was

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the biggest surprise of the draft weekend? And a runaway

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 1>winner was the Packers taking qut and no wide receivers.

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 1>The second place was that there were no major technical glitches. Yeah.

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I thought that they did a really good job with it.

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:27.839
<v Speaker 1>They kept it simple, which is that's what you want

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.399
<v Speaker 1>to do. You want to keep it simple. You don't

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 1>want to do Usually what happens you try to do

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 1>so much and there's always that risk and reward if

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you just go, look, it's gonna be simple. Here's the camera.

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:43.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll do some interviews here. You know, you had some

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:46.640
<v Speaker 1>virtual hugs as well. I always worried that every time

0:38:46.719 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Tom Rinaldi came on, somebody was going to die, Like,

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I just go, there's Tom Rinaldi. Somebody died. I didn't

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 1>like the draft profile, and then they always had something

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 1>tragic at the bottom, like I felt bad for the

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:03.000
<v Speaker 1>guy that nothing happened to him. So he's just a

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:06.440
<v Speaker 1>regular guy, like like nothing, Like somebody didn't steal your

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 1>bike when you were seven. So you have both parents

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and their health is intact. What is wrong with you? Yeah? Right.

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 1>They even got Maria Taylor in on it, like every

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:17.759
<v Speaker 1>time they went to her, you knew a sibling was

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in trouble. Yeah. Yeah, boy, let's go to tom Rinaldi. No, no,

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 1>somebody's dying. The tragic Hedge Clipper accident in nineteen eight

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 1>ninety five. Yes, yeah, they had like a forty three

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 1>inch broad jump on one line. The next line was

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 1>like an uncle who was addicted to something. Yeah, it

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 1>made no sense. It was like a stack. Yes, yeah,

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't need to know that much about my draft picks.

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I didn't. Yeah. Yeah, there's a lot of criticism on

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the graphic for te Higgins's about his mom battling alcoholism,

0:39:46.160 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that that might have been a little too much to

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to make that one of the points on a graphic.

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:53.080
<v Speaker 1>It might have been, No, it was might have been. Yeah,

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:57.880
<v Speaker 1>it was too much information, like He've always been around

0:39:57.920 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 1>people and then they start to tell you stories and

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you it's way too much information. It felt like, hey,

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna tell you everything about this draft pick, and

0:40:06.239 --> 0:40:08.719
<v Speaker 1>I went, now, not too much information. I don't need

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 1>to know that. We can get to that point. But

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it felt like everybody had a bad bottom line there. Yeah, Paul,

0:40:16.040 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 1>do you overcompensate next year? You know Ted Smith and

0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Nebraska runs a four three forty. Dad pays taxes early, No,

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:26.759
<v Speaker 1>really positive normal bland stuff. No, No, it would be dad.

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Dad didn't pay taxes on the lamb from the irs. Okay,

0:40:32.080 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 1>are there going to be white collar crimes that we're

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:41.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna put in here? Cuts tags off mattresses? Oh, I remember,

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you could go to jail for that or get arrested.

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Last Dance Parts three and four will discuss and the

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:51.400
<v Speaker 1>hatred that still exists between the bulls and the pistons.

0:40:51.480 --> 0:40:53.759
<v Speaker 1>Reggie Miller will join us, Peter King will join us,

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Coming up as well Seaton Paul, Fritzie mclovin. Yours truly

0:40:57.280 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 1>here on the Dan Patrick Show. Our one in the books.

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Two more to go on this Monday, Dan Patrick's Show