WEBVTT - Post-100 Ranked Dynasty Targets (Ep. 749)

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:08.559
<v Speaker 1>What's up, friends, and welcome into the Fantasy Pros Dynasty

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Baseball Podcast. I am your host, Chris Welsh. You can

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>find me on Twitter at is It the Welsh, same

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>on the Instagram. But I've got a very exciting episode

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>installed for you here for this Dynasty podcast. James Anderson

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:22.120
<v Speaker 1>from Roda Wire is going to be joining me, one

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of the premier Dynasty voices in the space, and we're

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be talking about deeper Dynasty targets. Now, this

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>series has led us up into the top one hundred.

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>We're now one hundred and even a little bit further.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>So you know, how deep are you really going? Well,

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>this isn't like deep deep deep, but this is when

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>you're getting outside the top one hundred. Deeper Dynasty targets

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you're going to want to pay attention to. And as

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:47.200
<v Speaker 1>we've always said, these guys can be to different varying

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>degrees whether you are you are playing in like a

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>win now or you're simply trying to rebuild. We're going

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to talk a lot about similar strategies we've been talking

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>about in the construction and the building of Dynasty. And

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>as many people know, I have a long history James

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>James and I have done many, many prospect podcasts, of

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>this one will be solely dedicated to Dynasty and a

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit deeper. So I think you guys are going

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to enjoy that. We're going to do that here in

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a second. But before we get into it, I do

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>want to tell you guys about Fantasy Pros and the

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>premier tools that they've got. They've had some great deals

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>going on pending. When you're listening to this you might

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>be able to take advantage of those. But if you

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>go to Fantasy Pros and you check out their premium tools,

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:26.119
<v Speaker 1>they're going to get you set for the twenty twenty

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>four baseball season. Whether it's the aggregated ranks, the projections,

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the roster management is top notch. You can actually put

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>like all of your teams in different places into one

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>spot giving you lineup suggestions. The Draft Wizard once that

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>opens up, is an insanely great tool. Go and check

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 1>out the premium product over at Fantasy Pros. Can also

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>get into the Fantasy Pros discord channel where we'll be

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>doing the home run contest this year. So, like I said,

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>no promises on the deal, but they have some insane

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>deals that have been going on, So go and check

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that out over at Fantasy Pro fantasypros dot com slash Premium,

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I believe is what you want to check out. All Right,

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get into the episode. We got a lot

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. So here he is from RODA Wire

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Real j R. Anderson, James Anderson talking some Dynasty with me. James,

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>what's up, buddy?

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Thanks? He haming Man, looking forward to Dynasty?

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Is your specialty done? Lots of have different variations of leagues,

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 1>and you play in some of the big hardcore ones,

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>so you're definitely the premier guy to talk about. And

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>when we get outside the top one hundred, I very

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>loosely use the idea of like deeper dynasty targets. But

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you know we've talked about in these episodes, construction of

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>dynasty is just it's very nuanced of like you new draft,

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>who are you? Are you a win? Now? Are you

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of towing both sides? You playing for the future.

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:48.959
<v Speaker 1>Not everything is equal, but outside the top one hundred,

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>things just open up. And we've been focusing on ranks

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's kind of the unique thing about this entirety

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>is everything just opens up as far as values go.

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 1>So I've taken a look at some your dynasty ranks

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>some of mine, and picked apart some players that go

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit deeper when we get outside the top

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>one hundred to talk about. And the first one I

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>wanted to bring up was, actually, I believe he's number

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>one hundred for you, Hassun Kim, who was a first

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>year disappointment from a couple of years ago and then

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>absolutely blew up this past year and has kind of

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>redefined his overall value. But I think there are still

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>major questions about who is Hasung Kim from a year

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to year basis, and how do we value Hassung Kim

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>for the foreseeable future. Twenty eight years old, coming off

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>of a seventeen homer, thirty eight stolen based season, sub

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty K percentage, so he teeters right at the top

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>one hundred space and dynasty. So talk to me about

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Hassung Kim and how you value him.

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I like Kim.

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 3>He's got I think he's got a really high floor

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 3>because of how good of a defender he is, and

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, you just you kind of know that he's

0:03:56.280 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 3>going to be playing pretty much every day somewhere on

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 3>the diamond because of that defense and his ability to

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 3>kind of move around.

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 2>I think last.

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 3>Offseason was the time to get Kim in dynasty leagues,

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 3>like obviously, but like I don't think now is the

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 3>time to acquire Kim, you know, I think that there

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:23.239
<v Speaker 3>are other players like Andres Jimenez with the Guardians where

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 3>they just they didn't have quite as loud of a

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 3>year this past year and are a little under the Raider,

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 3>but they kind of give you the same type of thing.

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 3>Just kind of a lot of guys like this, especially

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 3>at second base and short step, where it's just you

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 3>know you're getting with the new rules and everything, you're

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 3>hoping for around thirty steals and then double digit homers,

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 3>but you're not exactly sure how many homers you're getting.

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:49.840
<v Speaker 3>And so I think like of that group of players,

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 3>Kim might have the most trade value, right or like

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 3>you'd have to trade the most to acquire him, just

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 3>based off how big his year was last year. So

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, I like the floor. I think he's a

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 3>great guy to have, but I do think this might

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 3>be a career best fantasy season that.

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>He also, Yeah, it's also interesting like if you take

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a look at like guys that steal thirty bases and

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>also can give you fifteen plus homers. You usually don't

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>see those guys outside the top one hundred Redraft or Dynasty,

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of few and far between. Dynasty it opens

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>up because now you can throw them in these pools

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of these prospects that could be here or there. And

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what makes him kind of fascinating. How

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:36.239
<v Speaker 1>are you also, especially in Dynasty, I think we're tackling

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>some of this in Redraft. How are you approaching the

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>uptick and stolen bases? I think a relatively common thing

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of people is like, okay, well stolen

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 1>bases have ticked up, so premium power. That's the thing

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that has to be a little bit more of a

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>target here. You look at thirty stolen bases outside the

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 1>top one hundred, and people would you know, flock over it.

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>But are you maybe downgrading stolen bases a tiny bit

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>in Dynasty or do you still think there's there as

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 1>as valuable as ever, especially when paired with like a

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>solid average and serviceable homers. You know, over fifteen homers

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>is like very doable.

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:16.799
<v Speaker 2>I think stolen bases are They've always been my least

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 2>coveted of the five hitting stats in Dynasty, just because

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 2>they don't correlate the same way the other ones.

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 4>Do.

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, when you hit a home run, you're also

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 3>getting the run in the RBI. Obviously it's helping your

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 3>batting average. Whereas you know, a lot of the guys

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 3>that steal a bunch of like I have zero interest

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 3>in like Aestuariuizan Dynasty, for instance, But once you get

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 3>into the kind of like the guys that are stealing

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 3>bases and helping your average and hitting double legit home runs, like,

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 3>obviously those are great players to have several of on

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 3>your roster. And I, you know, redraft Dynasty doesn't really

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 3>matter what it is. I like, I always want to

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 3>be averaging double digit steals from my middle infield spots,

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 3>from my outfield spots. That doesn't mean you can't find

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 3>room for like a Corey Seeger or a Nick Cassianos

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 3>type of guy. But like, if you're if you're going

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 3>to start Corey Seger, I want to be getting extra

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 3>solen bases from like maybe my third basement, or I

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 3>want to be getting you know, one of those guys

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 3>like Kyle Tucker or Huiar Rodriguez, Cordin Carrol in the

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 3>first round, so that I'm getting just a ton of

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 3>steals to open that up.

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>There's also like there's so many middle infielders whatever you

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>want to call it, Like Hassun Kim definitely has some

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>position flexibility. Should be a short second third still, at

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>least that's where early fan tracks is. I haven't gone

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to look at the positional stuff, but there's like so

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>many in Dynasty or Redraft shortstops from the seegers, the

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>lindoors to banking back on O'Neill cruises, to adding Matt

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>mcclein's in, and then you get you know, the prosly

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Jackson holiday and stuff like that. We're doing a we're

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>undertaking currently this Dynasty mock draft that we're doing with

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the tool Shed guys. Rounds eight through ten there were

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>five total middle infielders taken, which I thought was interesting.

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Hassun Kim was in there. There's one process beck Jet Williams,

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>who I know you love, a couple older guys, and

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>then the next guy wanted to bring up Bryson Stott,

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>who Bryson Stott actually went higher than everybody I just

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Hassan Kim, Swanson Bogart's Jet Williams. He went higher,

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>he went in the eighth round. How do you compare that,

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe a Bryson Stott who did similar things as Hassan

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Kim and a little bit younger. Thirty one stolen bases

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>fifteen homers, hit two eighty, which was even better even

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>lower strikeout percentage. But I think there are real questions

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>about the power. Steamer projection still have them at fifteen

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 1>homers though, but the stolen base is coming down fifteen

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to twenty Steamer projection this year. Hassan Kim versus Bryson Stott.

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 2>For you, I mean, I think they're basically the same guy.

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 3>I just you know, whichever one I guess is I

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 3>will not, like in a Redrafter Dynasty league, like if

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 3>both those guys are available, like if you've got you know,

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Andresa Menez, like the Tommy Edmond type's all still available,

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to be the one that takes the

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 3>first guy just because it's it's just a it's a

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 3>it's a combination of stats that I don't think is

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 3>incredibly unique. It's it's valuable, but there's multiple guys at

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:13.959
<v Speaker 3>the same position that kind of give you the same thing.

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 3>So I just don't want to necessarily take the first guy.

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 3>But very similar story with him in Dynasty. Just the

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 3>defense gives him such a high floor. You know, you

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 3>love that you're getting the speed without him taking a

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 3>ton of other stats off the table. But I do

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 3>think you know, last offseason was the season to buy

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 3>an on Bryson Staff.

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and the thing I would throw with Bryson maybe

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>two years younger. Just you know, if you're taking a

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 1>look and you want to pair those values outside the

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 1>top one hundred. This also is why it was very

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>appropriate to have you on here as well. Opens up

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:47.679
<v Speaker 1>the prospect conversation even more. I think there's a lot

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of people that get very finicky about taking prospects inside

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the top one hundred of Dynasty or further by the way,

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>there's plenty of people that are just like, not, just

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>give me a redraft list. That's how I'm gonna attack Dynasty.

0:09:57.640 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>You get outside the top one hundred. I think this

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>open up even more. There are two very fascinating players

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>that I would want invested in out just outside your

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>top one hundred, and these guys with playing time this year.

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Could this could be one of those things You've said

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>this twice now you're like, hey, this is the time

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to buy in on this guy. This might be the

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:18.719
<v Speaker 1>time to buy in on these guys because I think

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>their values are lower than where you have them rank.

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Manzardo and Kobe Mayo two great young bats to

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>bet on. Manzarto with a bigger name out here in

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the AFL, Kobe Mayo with one of the sneaky and

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that's not even sneaky but unless you like really pay

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>attention to it, just insanely good season across the board.

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Talk to me about valuing these guys right outside the

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>top one hundred and fitting them on more win now teams.

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, I think this is a really good

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 3>season to trade for Kobe Mayo specifically of those two,

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 3>because he doesn't have the clear path to playing time

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 3>like Kyle Manzardo. So whoever has Kobe Mayo in Dynasty

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:01.439
<v Speaker 3>right now, I'm sure they love his bat and they're

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 3>they're high on him and everything, but they don't know

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 3>exactly what type of production they're getting from him in

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four. So I think buying Kobe Mayo before

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 3>there's like a clear spot for him. I mean, I

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 3>am very confident that Baltimore will be sniffing around consolidation trades.

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 3>That doesn't mean they'll be able to find one, Like

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 3>they're not going to just give Ryan Mountcastle away, but

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 3>like I think they would love to trade, you know,

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 3>a Ramon Urius along with like a Ryan Mountcastle for

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 3>a starting pitcher or something like that, maybe just a reliever.

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 3>And if a move like that happens and then the

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 3>pieces start kind of moving around and then you clearly

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:50.199
<v Speaker 3>see this is how Kobe Meo fits in, then I

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 3>think it'll be harder to trade for him. And really,

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 3>if you kind of look at just all the minor

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 3>leagues last year of hitters that spent the whole year

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 3>kind of in the upper the miners, Kobe Mayo's production

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:07.199
<v Speaker 3>and just kind of dominance is up there with anyone's.

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 3>You know Whyite Langford probably more on like a per

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 3>game basis, but he got you know, he wasn't there

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 3>the whole season like Kobe Mayo was. Manzarto had that

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 3>type of year a year ago and then obviously had.

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Just you know it.

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to say like last season. But I

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 3>do think you can throw out a lot of what

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 3>he was doing with Tampa Bay before the trade. Obviously

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 3>was was solid in the AFL, was really solid in

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 3>the miners after that trade. And the main question I

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 3>guess for me with Manzarto is are the Guardians gonna

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 3>be okay playing him against lefties right away? You know,

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 3>they do have like someone like gabrielle Arius maybe that

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 3>they could give playing time to at first base against lefties,

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 3>but I think Josh Naylor plays every day. I think

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Manzarto makes the team out of spring training as someone

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 3>who's going to be playing against right handed pitchers at least,

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:04.319
<v Speaker 3>so Manzaro probably helps you more in the short term.

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 3>But I love the idea of trying to acquire Kobe

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 3>Mayo this season.

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I do two and if if you're an already established team, like,

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>how do you think you go about like fitting Kobe Mayo?

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Because Mayo is not going to be cheap, nor would Manzarto,

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Like I think from a drafting perspective, this might be

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 1>just an easier question. Older guys fall if you're starting

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a new dynasty, Kobe Mayo should be someone when you

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>get to the and Manzarto. When you get to the

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>one hundred one fifty range, your site should be set

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>on Kobe Mayo that high of an investment. Okay, how

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>do you make that work if you want to win Now? Well, again,

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>there's just these old dudes that are going to be

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:46.319
<v Speaker 1>falling the You know JD. Martinez and I know he's

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>not for space, but Jad's Martinez is of the world.

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>They're going to fall quite a bit in drafts, as

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>are a litany of other solid guys. But if you

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>are a competing team right now, like, what what do

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:00.199
<v Speaker 1>you think the asset give up? If you're in a

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 1>trade for Kobe Mayo? Looks like without compromising a win

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Now team, because I could ask you, like, what would

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you trade Hassan Kim for Kobe Mayo and or Bryson

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Stop for Kobe Mayo if you're in win Now. I mean,

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you can do that, but I mean

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you tell me otherwise.

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I don't think.

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't think the win Now team is trading Kim

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 3>or Stott for Mayo. I think if you're the rebuilding team, if.

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 2>You like, if you.

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Have Stott or you have Kim and you're you're looking

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 3>at your roster and you just don't really see a

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 3>viable path to you competing in twenty twenty four.

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Then I think that trade starts to make some sense.

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, like if if you.

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 3>Have, say, like a Nick Castellanos or like an Anthony Santander,

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 3>like a player like that, maybe that's the type of player,

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 3>uh that you trade for for Kobe Mayo or trying

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 3>to trade for Kobe Mayo because those players are closer

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 3>to kind of aging out of their prime, whereas Kim

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 3>and Stott, I think you still have another four years

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 3>of their prime.

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I feel like Castillanos might be able to like get

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that done. That might be something that's able to get

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it done. But you know, you could start looking at

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>like here's another I'm just throwing this out here, Like

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>what about like Andrew Vaughan. He hasn't cashed out of

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>his time period, but maybe we really know who he is.

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>It's like, even if your win now, you think you're

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>losing too much with whatever replacement you could get, if

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you move to Vaughan to get Mayo.

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean I would take Mayo for Vaughn kind

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 3>of regardless of my team situation.

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's whar I's getting out.

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, like you're he's just not he's not hurting you

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 3>enough in the short term.

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>But he's like twenty six, and people might still keep

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at that and be like, Okay, maybe that's something

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that I can Maybe there's something else that I want

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to do. Speaking of prospects, what other prospects are you

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>considering in this one hundred to two hundred You can

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>open up to two fifty range. Obviously there's a lot,

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>but targh prospects that make sense to you in your mind.

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>One hundred to two hundred ish reigns kind of think like,

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I think if you're rebuilding, all prospects should be in

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>mind here. But if you're kind of like either in

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a middle window or you're in the competing like, what

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>prospects are you looking at to invest in in dynasty?

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 3>Sure, I'll give you a give you a hitter and

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 3>a pitcher, and they both have reached the big leagues,

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 3>So I think that there are guys that could help

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 3>you this upcoming season, but also long term for a hitter.

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Parker Meadows, I think is a great name to go

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 3>after both short term long term. I think he's what

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 3>he showed last year kind of more than anything. To

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 3>me was just I think he's clearly their center fielder

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 3>of the future, just based on how solid his defense

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 3>was in the big leagues.

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, he's got speed, he's got.

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 3>A really good arm, he doesn't have pronounced splits, so

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 3>I think Arka Metos could be the Tigers leadoff hitter

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 3>all season. And you know he likes to steal bases.

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 3>I think he's a decent bet to steal twenty plus

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 3>bases as a rookie power. You know, k America is

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:18.959
<v Speaker 3>not a good place to try to hit for power.

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 3>I think that'll affect Meadows to the point where maybe

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 3>he's kind of like a fifteen to twenty homer guy.

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 3>But he's six foot five. He could just be kind

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 3>of scratching the surface there, hits the ball hard. So

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 3>there's a chance that he's just like a twenty twenty guy,

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 3>maybe even better than that.

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 2>And I just don't think he gets valued that way.

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 3>Was never really kind of ranked in that sort of

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 3>high range before he came up, and then I think

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 3>he showed some promising stuff in the majors, and then

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 3>on the pitch just.

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:52.159
<v Speaker 1>Want to throw in real quick hitting in front of

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Riley Green and Torklesen two like the run opportunities for meadows.

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:58.360
<v Speaker 1>If he is in that spot, that is where it's

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:01.959
<v Speaker 1>even more intriguing. So I like that name. Sorry pitching.

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and then aj Smith Shawber.

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think it's really it's really just impressive

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 3>as hell that he got up last year. That was

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 3>his age twenty season, and he just dominated at in

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 3>like a handful of starts at high in Double A,

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 3>and then he just kind of spent the rest of

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 3>his age twenty season going back and forth between Triple

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 3>A and the big leagues, and the results weren't always great.

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 3>But we know he's got that plus fastball mid nineties,

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 3>touches ninety eight, He's touched even higher than that in

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 3>the past. He's got a full repertoire four pitches. You

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 3>I think that the curveball and slider flash plus last year.

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 3>Still needs to work on his command and control and

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 3>his sequencing and stuff. But you know, this is one

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 3>of the premium teams to have a young pitcher on

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 3>just if you're trying to get wins, always going to

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 3>have a solid defense behind him. So I just I

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 3>love the situation for Smith shawv Or. I think he's

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 3>just kind of scratching the surface. Obviously anything, you know,

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.360
<v Speaker 3>anything can go wrong with pitching prospects, but I think

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 3>he's a devalued asset right now in dynasty.

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I like it. We have been dismissive when we as

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:24.640
<v Speaker 1>we've worked through the top one hundred about closers and

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>they just kind of moved down in general. So now

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:30.439
<v Speaker 1>that we're talking about this is obviously like a deeper conversation.

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>But where do closers lie for you, especially when we

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>are ranked outside the top one hundred, Maybe ifew fly inside,

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>what is your dynasty valuation of what closers outside the

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>top one hundred are on top of your mind?

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think I think elite closers are actually underrated

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 3>in dynasty leagues. They're at least they're always going to

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 3>to me be underrated on any kind of like a

0:19:56.080 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 3>dynasty mock draft, any kind of dynasty ranking. They're probably

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 3>under ranked just in terms of what does it actually

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 3>take to acquire these guys in a dynasty league in

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:11.360
<v Speaker 3>season if you're trying to win a title like Edwin Diaz,

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 3>Emmanuel Classe Camilo Duvall, Devin.

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Williams, you know, even like Josh.

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 3>Hater, I know he's getting old, but really like Edwin Diaz,

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 3>class A, Camillo Daval, like maybe like David Bednar. These

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 3>guys not only are they giving you thirty plus saves,

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 3>but they're giving you elite ratios. They're giving you, you know,

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 3>in some cases maybe like thirty to forty more strikeouts

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 3>than just your kind of generic closer.

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 2>And you need saves to win a dynasty league.

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:51.679
<v Speaker 3>And the best way to have reliable saves year to

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 3>year is to have an elite closer. If you're able to,

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 3>if you're really good at picking up you know, your

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:02.479
<v Speaker 3>advert alzolet types, or you know, maybe we're stashing yaniar

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Cano when Bautista went down, or if you're just good

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 3>at finding saves on the cheap, then then definitely go

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 3>that route. But I just you know, once we start

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 3>getting into like starting pitchers, like I'm looking at this

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:18.199
<v Speaker 3>mock draft we're doing, yeah, you know, we got like

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 3>Nick Ladolo, Hunter Brown, Mason Miller, guys like that going

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.360
<v Speaker 3>off the board and the tenth round here, while Camilla

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 3>Devall's just sitting there, like, give me davall over those

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 3>guys just easily.

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, you're getting better ratios from him.

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he's probably gonna throw more innings than Mason

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 3>Miller in twenty twenty four. So, like, I just I

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 3>think once you kind of get past that really kind

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 3>of high end level of starting pitcher, give me the

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 3>high end reliever.

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think the second biggest discrepancy in dynasty drafting

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:57.199
<v Speaker 1>to in season dynasty values is starting pitching. That's the

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:01.479
<v Speaker 1>second biggest discrepancy. People will push down pitching in dynasy

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>they'll still go. I don't want to say they're not

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>going to go, but pitchers move down to and then

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:08.360
<v Speaker 1>trading for pitching in dynasty it's tough because now you're

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 1>getting back to like you know, well, no, this is

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the important catalyst. This is redraft values. The number one

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 1>biggest discrepancy between dynasty drafting and in season closers, because

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.120
<v Speaker 1>like you said, we are almost at pick one point

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty and Josh Hater and Camilla daval are both still

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:28.880
<v Speaker 1>on the board. Alexis Diaz, Jordan Romano. I'm just kind

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of going through Paul Sewald. You took Edwin Diaz in

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the ninth round. That's huge. Devin Williams

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and Jan Durant went in the tenth round. I think

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>you started the first closer in the ninth round. So

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to talk about discrepancy of drafting to actual value,

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 1>it's closers. Now, maybe closers are easier, a little easier

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to trade for in Dynasty because when a team is

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>out of it, I think one of the first things

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>are willing to trade our closers, So you could do that.

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:01.360
<v Speaker 1>But this is the biggest discrepancy. I mean, is this

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>mock draft we're doing, is this representative of how you

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>would attack closers or do you think like you might

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>even take closers a little bit early because in that

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>draft you took Suzuki and the eighth Bratish and the

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>seventh Bratish was a great value, Like, do you think

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you might even attack those closers a little bit early

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>if you were playing this out in Dynasty.

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 3>I just think I think you have to you have

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 3>to let the kind of if you're doing like a

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 3>startup draft, I think you just kind of let the

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:29.239
<v Speaker 3>board dictate things to some extent, like I did. I

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 3>took Edwin Diaz like I kind of started. I I

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 3>didn't even start a run. I took him in the

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 3>ninth round. I just thought he was too good of

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 3>a value to pass up there. But I like, you know,

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 3>I think if this was a real startup draft, I

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 3>think you would have just seen these guys go a

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 3>little sooner.

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I do.

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 3>It's just it's not nobody's excited to take a closer

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 3>and a dynasty mock draft, you know. But I just

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 3>I think it's it's really nice to have one of

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 3>the really elite guys.

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.439
<v Speaker 2>You Definitely, I don't think you want to overdo it.

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Like, uh, you don't want to just win saves going away,

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 3>because then you're leaving value on the table just having

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 3>a steady closer and then trying to find that second

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 3>guy on the cheap.

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 2>I think that's probably the way to go.

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I don't really think you're going to see

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 3>kind of accurate representation of closer value in a mock

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 3>draft necessarily or rank once you're in the once you're

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:30.920
<v Speaker 3>in the mix. Like if there's a startup draft going

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 3>and you see kind of a closer run starting, I

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 3>don't really think there's anything wrong with getting in there.

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I also think ranks. A lot of people that rank

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Dynasty just closers, just get thrown towards the bottom. And

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to your point, I don't think it's necessarily representative of

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:49.199
<v Speaker 1>value us going into starting pitching. Here we're outside the

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>top one hundred. I believe I saw these guys next

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to each other, and I wonder if they're completely different

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>spectrums of value. And I think both of these are

0:24:56.800 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 1>wildly big topics in Dynasty, especially for this year. Walker

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Buehler versus Cole Reagans. Cole Reagans with the absolute big

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>breakout over to the Royals. Walker Bueller missed the entire

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>season going to be I think he's twenty nine years old,

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>closing into thirty. He's coming back this year. Dodgers need him,

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and had he not been injured, Walker Bueler would probably

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>live in the worlds of the Tyler Glass nails and higher.

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>So Walker Buehler versus Cole Reagan's post one hundred Dynasty ranks.

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:26.919
<v Speaker 1>What side, how do you rank and how do you value?

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's a good one because they both just have

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 3>extreme durability concerns. Double Timmy John Surgery's a piece. I'll

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 3>go Reagan's just because I don't think you get like,

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 3>I think Reagan's is incredibly risky from a inning standpoint,

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 3>but I don't think Buehler is the test case where

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 3>you take a safer option. I think I'll take the

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 3>guy who we saw with just electric monster stuff to

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:02.680
<v Speaker 3>close last year.

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 2>And just hope that is. I hope that he stays

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:07.400
<v Speaker 2>healthy for as long as possible.

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 3>But like, we haven't seen Buehler make it all the

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 3>way back and get big league hitters out, and I

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 3>don't even think pre injury. I don't think Buehler's stuff

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 3>was as good as Reagan's stuff at the end of

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 3>last year. So obviously loved the team context more with

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 3>with Buehler, but you know, good home park for Reagan's.

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 3>I just think he's got slightly higher ceiling based on

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 3>the stuffy showed last year.

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you think the are these guys that you want

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to target when you get outside there, I could feel

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you not wanting to target Bueler. I wasn't sure if

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>these were the guys in general.

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 2>No, Yeah, I just don't.

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 3>I'm really trying to, you know, I'm going after I

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 3>don't mind getting a little risky, you know, like I

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 3>I'll take like a tyler glass now, like I'll take

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 3>like an Uri Perez if the price is right, or

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 3>like to Greek scooble. You know, there's questions about his

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 3>innings and stuff, but to me, Reagan's and Bueler are

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of passed some imaginary line to me in terms

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:10.120
<v Speaker 3>of just the risk profile.

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:13.159
<v Speaker 1>So if you're gonna invest, you're gonna invest probably in

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot safer pitching. So then we'll put this to

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:17.679
<v Speaker 1>the test. These are guys that are that hover that

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>top one hundred and one got there, I think due

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>to the playoff run the other just a constant season

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Fought versus Tanner Biby, who I think I noticed

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you had in a very similar range as well. Obviously,

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Tanner Bibby season sub three ERA almost nine k per nine,

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>getting to just under one hundred and fifty innings with

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:40.640
<v Speaker 1>ten wins. Brandon Fought's season didn't look quite as good though.

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>He then went out, changed who he was, moved the mound,

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, changed the rubber, and was a playoff darling.

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Still a home run issue, but he looked like a

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 1>completely different pitcher, especially adding in that sinker. So the

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 1>question is is are these guys you want to invest

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>in Dynasty and what side do you pick? Brandon Fought Tanner, Biby.

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just I love Brandon Fott, but I mean

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 3>I gotta I gotta go beat Biby over FOT, just

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 3>based on the like that the floor with Bibby just

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:14.159
<v Speaker 3>feels higher just he showed it kind of over a

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 3>longer stretch. Apologize for the fighter jet flying over my

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:20.640
<v Speaker 3>house right now, but.

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:22.159
<v Speaker 1>I have one of those too, I have I have

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:23.399
<v Speaker 1>a military base right near me.

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 2>They yeah, I mean, like so I love FOT.

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:31.640
<v Speaker 3>I think he's a like I'm buying what Like, Usually

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 3>what someone does in the playoffs, like I just don't

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:36.919
<v Speaker 3>even care, like, especially if it's just like an older player.

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 3>But with FOT, I think it's actually very important to

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 3>look at what he did in the playoffs because you know,

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 3>he's still getting his feet wet against big league hitters,

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 3>and he's still kind of figuring out what works and

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 3>what doesn't work. So for him to kind of find

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 3>some stuff against really good offenses in that type of

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 3>atmosphere just gives me so much more confidence in him

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:02.959
<v Speaker 3>heading into twenty twenty four. But I do still think

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 3>just Byby, I think I think he showed enough. It's

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 3>a good park.

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 2>They usually have a pretty good defense behind him.

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 3>So slight nod to Bibby, and you know, to that point,

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 3>Bybey went in the eighth round. We're in the eleventh round.

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Fought still hasn't gone in this mock, so I think

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 3>the market bears that out, although I do think Fought

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 3>should have gone by now.

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, and I think you just made a great

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>point here, because I think Tanner Biby's a safe option,

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>like you mentioned. Interestingly enough, though Brendan Fott had a

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>lower walk per nine than Tanner Biby did. But Tanner Biby,

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he can eat innings. It's a good strikeout option.

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Multi pitch is gonna pick up wins, can go deep

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>into games. But I don't think the market, like you said,

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>has caught up to Brandon Fought, which makes him a

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>very fascinating target. I like both of these guys for

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Dynasty Post one hundred targets for your sps. All right,

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a couple of our kind of quick hitterish ones. This one,

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess isn't as quick hit, but you don't have

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:59.959
<v Speaker 1>to go nuts with it, do we still want them? Addition,

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 1>do we still want Dylan ce So you don't have

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to go nuts with the answers here, But do you

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>still want Dylan Ceaeson Dynasty?

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Uh? I'm worried. I'm worried about the Walks.

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't think you trade Dylan Cees this offseason. I

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 3>think you kind of just try to ride it out

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 3>and hope for the best.

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 3>It just that that whole White Sox situation, it just

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 3>seems like such a tire fire. Like I I'm worried

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 3>about most of their players, but I I just think

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:38.479
<v Speaker 3>his value is too low right now to trade him

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 3>in Dynasty. But I'm still worried.

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you still want Willie Adamas?

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes? I think he's a great BiLaw great bylow.

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 1>You think the average bounces back.

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, if you if you have your expectations in check,

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Like just you kind of look at what he was

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 3>expected to do last year, and I think that's basically

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 3>what he'll do this up coming year. Although you don't

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 3>know like whether the Brewers might pivot to like a

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 3>full on rebuild at some point, so, like, you know,

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 3>his his RBI and runs scored totals from like twenty

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 3>twenty two, that might be kind of a high water mark.

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't think we get back there.

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 2>But.

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think he was just unlucky with the batting

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 3>average by far the lowest babbup of his career. Last

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 3>year he was He was in a pretty big slump

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 3>throughout the summer and I think it started getting into

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 3>his head a little bit. But I think he showed

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 3>some strong flashes towards the end of the year. And

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 3>he's just an elite shortstop, so I don't see him

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 3>coming out of the lineup. He wasn't bad enough last

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 3>year for them to even consider something like that, So

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 3>I just I think he is just going to be

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 3>the exact guy that you know he's generally been from

0:31:57.640 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty through twenty twenty two.

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 2>So great bylow.

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Do we still want Eloy Jimenez?

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 3>I I elo is the type of guy where I

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 3>would trade him, Like as soon as I felt like

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 3>someone was actually legitimately interested in trading for him, I

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 3>would try to find a fit with that manager. I

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 3>just think, you know, what are you projecting in terms

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 3>of games played with the guy like that and he's

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 3>ut only now, Like I would everything I'm saying about Elo,

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 3>I would say about Byron Buxton too. Once they get

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 3>to ut only, it just gets really tough because you

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 3>just you can't count on them at all, Like you

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 3>can't you can set your line up on Monday, and

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 3>you can't complain when Wednesday comes in, they're out for.

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 2>The rest of the week. You know.

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 3>I just don't get a sense from Eloi, especially that

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 3>he puts any time in in terms of the off season,

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 3>with his conditioning, with his skill development, with anything like that,

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 3>like he might have peaked as a baseball player at

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 3>like age twenty two, twenty three.

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Like I just I think he's he's just kind of

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 2>a shell of himself.

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 1>If you had if you had to pick one, by

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the way, Eloyo or Buxton.

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Ela.

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, oh my god, last one of this. Do we

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 1>still want Carlos Korea?

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 2>M I mean, I've I've never really been a Korea guy.

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't want him.

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 3>No, you're not getting you know, having a shortstop where

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 3>you're not getting any speed, Like they better be bringing

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 3>it somewhere else, Like there better be a chance for

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 3>thirty homers. There better be a chance for like a

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 3>high batting average, like you know, I just don't think

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 3>you're getting enough upside with Korea to deal with the fact.

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 3>And you know, he had a planner fasciitis, like all

0:33:56.640 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 3>your last year his contract fell through with the That's

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 3>like there's just a lot a lot of red flags

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 3>from a durability standpoint, and I just don't think the

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 3>ceiling is high enough when he's fully healthy and going

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:10.319
<v Speaker 3>right to deal with it.

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Always been overrated, all right, last two These are the

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 1>quick hitters. Your favorite non old guy Deep Target Edition

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Deep Dynasty targets, not super old guy addition here anywhere,

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, post one fifty, post two hundred, just just

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a couple of names you might.

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:31.360
<v Speaker 3>Have favorite Deep targets. You know, I love Jordan Westberg

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:36.720
<v Speaker 3>and zach Neto. They're not older guys, but just they

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:38.239
<v Speaker 3>stand out to me as guys that I want and

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:42.799
<v Speaker 3>in every Dynasty league if I can get them kind

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:43.720
<v Speaker 3>of similar reasons.

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 2>They're just really really good players.

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Zach Netto, I think is a really nice breakout candidate

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 3>this year. He's going to play a ton He's gonna

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 3>play every day. Obviously, he's gonna steal bases, He's gonna

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:02.719
<v Speaker 3>hit for power. Westburg just love the middle endfield, corner

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 3>endfield combination. You know, I think the park is going

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:10.239
<v Speaker 3>to cap Westburg's power to a certain extent, but he's

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:11.840
<v Speaker 3>gonna hit for a high average, he's gonna have a

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 3>high OVP. He's gonna steal ten to twelve bases. So

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:21.240
<v Speaker 3>just just really like his situation. And then just one

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 3>one older guy, uh for you. I think John Means

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:29.360
<v Speaker 3>is a little interesting. He got you know, I'm a

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:31.879
<v Speaker 3>little worried that they kind of shut him down after

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:33.879
<v Speaker 3>he came back, but I think they were just being

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 3>overly careful with him. Baltimore has one of the better

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 3>team contexts in the game. Like they're gonna be threatening

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 3>for one hundred wins every year, They've got a great

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 3>home park. You're throwing to Adley Ritchman. I just I

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 3>thought John Means looked better than his numbers looked last year,

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 3>Like he didn't strike a ton of guys out. But

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 3>I actually thought he looked really good when he came back.

0:35:58.239 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 3>And you can probably ge him pretty cheap.

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:04.759
<v Speaker 1>There you go, James Anderson Dynasty. There's so much to it.

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy with values and players and you know, you

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 1>really you will get to an hour podcast on the

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 1>like groups of ten. You really could real j R.

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Anderson on Twitter at road a Wire. What do you

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 1>got to plug? What's going down here in the near

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:21.319
<v Speaker 1>future as far as Dynasty content, you're always plugging out

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You've got the articles, You've got ranks. The

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 1>road a Wire ranks are totally invaluable, so you should

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:28.919
<v Speaker 1>check those out. But what do you want to plug?

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we're just working on getting everything ready for the

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four season. I'm writing outlooks on prospects every day.

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Those will go live on the site fairly soon. Got

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:44.359
<v Speaker 3>the Dynasty ranks, got the prospect ranks, have a ton

0:36:44.400 --> 0:36:49.239
<v Speaker 3>of first year player draft content coming in January, and

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 3>then my big prospect rankings update for the off season

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 3>will be right after the international guys sign in mid January.

0:36:57.040 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 2>So just sign up for Road a Wire and on

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 2>lookout for all this.

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:02.839
<v Speaker 1>James, thank you so much for your time, man, thanks

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 1>for having me there. He is James Anderson. What do

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:07.360
<v Speaker 1>we got in store?

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Where?

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:10.440
<v Speaker 1>We've got more episodes coming up for you. We're going

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to be doing some Dynasty buys and some Dynasty cells.

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 1>That's right, the buys and cells. But we're gonna do

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:19.359
<v Speaker 1>them in different episodes. Plus, we've got a Dynasty mock

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be coming here in the near future,

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and I may just be setting that up with the

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros Discord, so be on the lookout for that

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 1>here in the near future. Dynasty buys Dynasty cells over

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the next couple so make sure you are subscribed to

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the podcast so you don't miss any of it. Hey,

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:36.920
<v Speaker 1>here's the other cool thing. These episodes are currently on

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the Leading Off feed, so when you subscribe, when baseball

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>season hits, all the draft prep, you're already there for

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Leading Off, whether it's the n season draft prep episodes

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 1>or we're doing the daily show, which hopefully you guys

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:50.759
<v Speaker 1>will be joining us. Make sure to check out the

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:53.319
<v Speaker 1>premium tools over at Fantasy Pros to get you hooked up,

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter at is It the Welsh and

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 1>hopefully we made you a little bit more comfortable with

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 1>dynas and we won't stop right here on the Fantasy

0:38:00.600 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Pros Dynasty Baseball Podcast.

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:05.880
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball Podcast.

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 4>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 4>us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 4>or Spotify. Follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at

0:38:15.239 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 4>Fantasy Pros, and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube

0:38:18.200 --> 0:38:20.520
<v Speaker 4>dot com Slash Fantasy Pros MLB