WEBVTT - “Fart Digger” + “Fart Knocker” = 1 Cancelled TV Host 

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, it is Friday, February thirteenth, and we are

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>going to try our very best to get through this

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>episode without laughing because it's a very serious topic. It's

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>a very serious word. But we only get to all

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>the controversy if we get through fart knocker and fart digger.

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>And with that, welcome to this episode of Amy and

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>TJ Knocker and digger knocker and digger knocker and digger.

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Someone messed up those two words and can you imagine

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.480
<v Speaker 1>what words they came up with? And now she lost

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a job ro this You brought this to my attention,

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>this story is well.

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so if anyone is a fan of a very

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 2>popular and it was supposed to be coming back in

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 2>big fashion, this show called Rehab Addict. And we're not

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 2>talking about drugs, We're talking about rehabbing Holmes. This is HGTV.

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 2>I love a rehab show. It's so fun to watch.

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 2>I have I've watched this show, not recently because it's

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 2>been off the air for some time.

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 3>So this was a big deal.

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Nicole Curtis, the host of Rehab Addict, made this big

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 2>announcement they were coming back season ten nine or ten,

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 2>was it nine.

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Nine, but it hadn't been on since what twenty eighteen.

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 2>I believe, So this was a big deal and her

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 2>new series was supposed to air Wednesday, coming out, big deal.

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 2>She had it all over her Instagram, social media, and

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 2>then record scratch a video is leaked to a tabloid website.

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>In that video and the headlines will tell you that

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Nicole Curtis uses the inWORD. Nicole Curtis uses a racial

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>slur in video, and absolutely we can tell you she does.

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>She doesn't deny it. You hear it, absolutely clearly. So

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>it leaks and robes. HGTV reacted pretty.

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Immediately, immediately, they did not even I mean it was

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 2>an automatic response. Not only did they fire her, but

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 2>they literally scrubbed the entire series.

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>She never existed.

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 2>It's gone. So actually we do have their statement, just

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 2>to get it out there right now. HGTV was recently

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 2>made aware of an offensive racial comment made during the

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 2>filming of Rehab Addict. Not only is language like this

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 2>hurtful and disappointing to our viewers, partners, and employees, it

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 2>does not align with the values of HGTV. Accordingly, we

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 2>have removed the series from all HGTV platforms. We remain

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 2>dedicated to fostering a culture of respect and inclusion across

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 2>our content and our workplace. Here's the deal, though, she

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:45.239
<v Speaker 2>says that did not happen during the filming of rehab

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 2>atte Oh, that this was her own personal behind the

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 2>scenes video and it was shot there were just a

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 2>few people in the room, and it happened four years ago.

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Not a justification of any kind now at all, But

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>she's making a point a clarification here. AGTV said it

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>was during the filming of rehab Atic. She says, absolutely not.

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 1>So she pointed clarity. Fine, but we have video you

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>white lady saying the in word white lady on video canceled.

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Done nothing else to talk about.

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 4>Robes impossible to recover from. I would say, cannot and

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 4>then hold your horses. And this is why we should talk, folks.

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 4>There's context needed.

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>This is not a defense of what she did, but

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>there is an understanding robes and a conversation and just

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>pump of the breaks for a second and let's talk

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>about what happened. So in this video you see her

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and she is at her home. Yes, I believe doing

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>a renovation. I think she's going up on a ladder.

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.279
<v Speaker 3>She's a ladder okay, with a nail gun or something.

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>And she's doing her thing, does something and then blurts out.

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 2>What robes fart N word, which is not a phrase

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 2>people use. And then as soon as she says fart

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 2>N word, you can see her gasp and go, oh

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 2>my god, what did I just say?

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Why did I just say that?

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>And to help if you haven't seen it, you might

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>see it later, but it imagine making a mistake and

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you just go, oh shit. It's kind of how the

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 1>context she said, oh fart inward sounds ridiculous, sounds childish, sound,

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>sounds nothing made up. As soon as the in word

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>comes out of her mouth, probably it was a millisecond,

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>is that she said ooh?

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 2>She immediately gasped at herself, and that is clear on

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 2>the video.

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 3>What was your reaction to seeing it mine?

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I am still laughing at the phrase, oh fart inward?

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>What It's just silly, it's made up, doesn't make any sense. Look,

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the N word we've talked about this here, doesn't get

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>me worked up because anybody uses it towards me. I know,

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I've just won that fight because you're an idiot, so

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>that's just not a big deal. I don't get offended

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>hearing it is not the first thing I do is

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 1>to get outraged and oh my goodness, what does this

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>woman doing a stupid silly phrase. I am not defending

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that or getting onto HGTV for reacting how they did.

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>But Robes, I was so curious you. I think you

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>told me this, and I think Gabby Bernstein told you

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>this first. Get curious. What happens if you get curious

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>first and don't have your first reaction be emotional, and

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly our first emotions sometime I'll always say this country,

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 1>it's outrage. I was curious, what is this about? And

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 1>then once we start digging into it, Robes, the story

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>took a weird turn to me.

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 2>It did because and you actually have to dig define this.

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 2>I will say, her and we can get into her

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 2>official statements aren't about making excuses. She and we can

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 2>She says all the right things.

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I took an issue with a couple things. We'll get

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>into it. Oh yes, right, okay, okay.

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 2>But then upon digging you can hear some other reactions

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 2>that she gave. And I thought this one was really interesting.

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Because a lot of people say this that came out

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 2>of your mouth too easily, right, That was the first

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 2>thing a lot of folks said.

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Now, that is the first thing I went to because

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:03.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the things will say in her statement that

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>she it's not in her vocabulary. That is hard to

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 1>get your head around, because they're just all of us

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>have words in our lives that will not come out

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 1>of our mouths. We are just not programmed, and you

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>can't say it. I have some things. I have gay

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>friends that say things to each other. Ain't no way

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>in hell I could even accidentally slip up and say it.

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>You can't accidentally say the in word unless it was

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>in there.

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Correct, That is what everyone is saying. But listen to

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 2>what she said, and it's actually interesting And to your

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 2>point about getting curious. When I read this and we

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 2>read it together, all of a sudden, you felt a

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 2>little shift right in how you're feeling about her.

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 3>She said.

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 2>You ask, how did that just easily come out? I

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 2>don't have an answer for that. It did, and it

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 2>shocked me. As shown now you ask, what were you

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 2>even saying? I throw words to I throw together words.

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 2>This is documented on fifth teen years of TV interviews

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 2>posts of these random words, my most famous son of

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 2>a beehive digger, which took the place of SOB when

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 2>I became a mommy and could not swear on TV.

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 2>In recent years, I've added fart digger, fart knocker.

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 5>It's documented, here we go, here we go, fart digger,

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 5>fart knocker, fart bigger, fart knocker.

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>So they are claiming, and one of the problems I

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>had with some of the statements was one that came

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>from our team. But they were saying she was exhausted,

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it was a long day, and something came out of

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>her mouth, slipped up and it happened. Here's the thing, ropes.

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I've seen that happen to a bunch of people I have.

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>And you say that sometimes you say a word, not

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>even a word. I've seen it happen. That makes it.

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I am not excusing. I saw what happened, and I

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>see this white leg's saying the in word clear as day.

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>But context matters, right, There's a reason we have first degree,

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>second degree, third degree murder, and manslaughter. It's not all

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the same. She didn't look at somebody and called them

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the inn word. She wasn't making a reference to somebody

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>she said a very very stupid, silly, little nothing phrase.

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Now it's a convenient excuse, I think some would argue,

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>but it takes a little bite off of a headline

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that say she's fired for racial slur exactly.

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 2>And when she says that word is not a part

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:40.079
<v Speaker 2>of my vocabulary. When you hear her saying she basically

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 2>she's saying she accidentally conflated the two words, you could

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 2>understand why then she would say that word is not

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 2>a part of my vocabulary, because it doesn't make any

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 2>sense for her to have said that and for us

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 2>to have clearly heard her or hear her saying the

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 2>N word. Clearly it isn't her vocabulary because she said

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 2>it out loud. But when she explains that she conflated

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 2>two words, that maybe explains why she put it that way.

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Is that actually makes sense. I didn't like. We'll say

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>her first. Her statement from her team says she takes

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>responsibility regardless of context. She said what occurred was a

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>clear slip of the tongue, a mistaken version of one

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of her well known expressions, spoken after seventeen hours of

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>physically demanding work and very little sleep. Eh that's fine

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to try to explain. I don't like too much of

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the explaining away. This is what happened. She is sorry.

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Leave it at that. However, she was tired though, guys, Okay,

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>so she's tired, so slurs come out. Give her a break.

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>That's how I read. That's how I didn't like.

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 2>That is how it actually sounds. Yes, and that is

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 2>annoying and infuriating. I'm sure to many many people.

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't sleep much at all. You should hear the

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>slurs I throw around.

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 3>Like come on, no, no, because they didn't provide the context.

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 2>They said one of her well known phrases that didn't

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 2>really give the context that was needed to back up

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 2>what they were saying.

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:05.079
<v Speaker 1>Art digger and fart knocker.

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and so she has made some follow up statements

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 2>because as you can imagine, look, this all came to

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 2>a head yesterday, I believe, and she is saying we

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 2>are going to hear more from her today, so we

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 2>can get into that in just a bit. But she

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 2>has made some follow up statements, and she said there

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 2>is more to this, but my family comes first, and

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 2>I need to be mom right now more than anything else.

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 2>I will take the time to be as I've always

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 2>been with you, transparent and honest. TMZ called me as

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 2>I had just turned my phone on after being at school.

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 2>I said this briefly, but there is more. I am sorry.

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 2>I am filled with remorse and regret just as much

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 2>as I was one second after that word was said

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 2>four years ago.

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 3>In twenty twenty two.

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 2>I show this, I say this, and I realize you

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 2>are getting a limited view as what has been circulating

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 2>is a clip of my footage.

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:59.079
<v Speaker 3>It is that was stolen, then manipulated.

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>It is edited, oh.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 2>And sold to a tabloid to coincide with my return

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 2>to television, only to create this chaos of hate, anger

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 2>and disappointment.

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 3>And she is correct in the timing.

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>It does exactly what it feels like, and for whatever reason,

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 1>I sympathize with that. This is time to take this

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:26.559
<v Speaker 1>woman down. Now. My questions are about manipulated and edited.

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>What is she trying to suggest there? I mean, we

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>heard this come out of his mouth. That's a little okay,

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what that ends up being. But I don't

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 1>know what she could possibly mean by that. If there's

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>more context they've given us the context, I don't know

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>what else we need to understand.

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 2>She says she plans to release the full video from

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 2>the filming, which she said happened at her home.

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:49.479
<v Speaker 3>It was her footage.

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 2>She says she is going to release the full video

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 2>unedited on Friday, which is today. Then she says she

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 2>is going to go live on social media to address

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 2>the situation. She didn't give it time, but that is bold.

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, if you go on in Instagram live or

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 2>whatever she's planning, however she's planning to do it, you

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 2>got comments coming up, and so if you know she's

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 2>trying to do damage control at this point, I don't

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 2>know if it's going to work. Have you ever seen

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 2>anybody survive something like this.

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't know. You could survive being tried

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>for murder easier than you can survive a Twitter scandal.

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 1>And I I encourage this not a matter of defending her,

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>but I will be an advocate for context and patience

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and understanding and humanity and learning before we just react

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>with outrage. There was a headline that said, this woman

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>is fired. Bro, it's because she used a racial slur.

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>If your first reaction is hell, yeah, let me get online.

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.559
<v Speaker 1>Put in my two sense before you read and understand

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>exactly what happened. This is and some I hear this

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and say, TJ, you're a black man standing here defending

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a woman who said the N word. Yeah, what I'm

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>doing is defending the truth of the matter that we

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>always skim over, skip over because it doesn't fit into

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a two hundred and eighty character statement that we want

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.319
<v Speaker 1>to make. Context is important here, she messed up. I

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's in this woman's heart, but I'm not

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna assume it's the bad thing, and I'm not assuming

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>it's the good thing. I just don't know. So therefore, Robes,

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about it. Let's have proper context and move on.

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's so wonderful to hear you say something

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 2>like that, because that is what's needed in this instance

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 2>and in so many others, because we all just read headlines,

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 2>assume the worst, and love to demonize other people. It

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 2>just makes us feel superior morally, makes us feel better

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 2>than that person, and so we actually, I think psychologically,

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 2>just our egos just jump right on that headline and

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 2>just assume it's all true, because that makes us feel

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 2>less guilty about anything we've done.

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>In our lives, robes this one. I don't this here's

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the thing, never seen the show, didn't know her name,

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>finding out about her now she might be the worst human.

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>She might be dropping inwards left and right behind the

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>scenes for all these years. But all I know is

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>this one incident. And taking just this incident in context, robes,

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>we hear a lot of people make excuses when things happen.

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>We know how to read. Okay, they're trying to find

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a way out of it with this statement. This one's

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>from their lawyer, and this from the publicist. And we've

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>this is not that. This is not just came up

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>out of the blue with some stupid excuse. I don't

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>know how I said that word. She's actually got a

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>documented foolishness that comes out of her mouth. You had

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>me when you said part knocker and part digger.

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 6>We started laughing. Wait to what that just say? So

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 6>stay with us, ere, folks, We're not done.

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you the part of her statement that

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>did make my skin crawl just a little bit. Also,

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>let's finally say it out loud. Can you ever forgive

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a white person for being caught saying the in word.

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>We continue here on Amy and TJ coming back from

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the break talking about certainly the heaviness of a white

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>woman being caught on camera saying the in word. Every

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>time we come back from a commercial break here with

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Robot and I say, hey, you got anything? Who wants

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to start on this one? Robot is like, you take

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>it please.

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 2>And it's funny because you talked about and we haven't

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 2>had this conversation beforehand. What made your skin crawl? What

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 2>made you cringe when you read her statement? I knew

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 2>exactly what you were referencing. Anytime anyone a white person

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 2>references inner city or urban area, you know what they're

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 2>actually saying, and it's it's it probably should be avoided

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 2>at all costs.

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what, don't know her at all, don't

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>know where her head is, where her heart is, and

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>what she's done in her life. It's just this part

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>of the statement in which she is giving her black credentials,

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>if you will, She says, I'm here because I am

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 1>not okay with the fact that I said that. I

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>am and have been submerged in the African American community

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>my entire adult life. I'm a mom of two children.

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I chose to live and work in the inner cities

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of many major cities, but most famously Minneapolis and Detroit. Yes,

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I hear that word on a daily basis. People say

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>it all around me. I listen to it in music.

0:16:57.080 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not secluded to the I am the white, small

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>blonde in the neighborhood. Who knows that's a word that

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>represents evil, pain, torture, trauma when used by someone like me,

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:11.360
<v Speaker 1>And yet it came from me.

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, she's saying, Hey, I'm not you know, this white

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 2>woman who is in a suburban bubble of whiteness.

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 3>I actually live in a diverse community.

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm aware of the issues, but I don't even know

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 2>how that plays into any of this.

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 3>I understand she's in defense mode.

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 2>I understand being called a racist is something that you

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 2>actually almost never can undo, and so she's desperately trying

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 2>to say I have put myself in a diverse community

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 2>to be more aware. But that actually is completely beside

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 2>the point. If she actually just conflated words because she's

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:50.439
<v Speaker 2>a silly talker and she got frustrated a moment and

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 2>accidentally put in N where a D was supposed to be, Well, okay,

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 2>that I'll accept or it's not even for me to accept.

0:17:57.720 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 3>But it's understandable.

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 2>You can understand that there's no need to go into

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 2>a larger conversation about where she lives, who her friends are.

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 2>I got black friends. I live in a community, in

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:09.919
<v Speaker 2>a street where there are black people. I mean, that

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 2>is what she's saying, But that doesn't have it. She's

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 2>trying to defend her character and her integrity and that

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 2>she's not just this ignorant white person who doesn't associate

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:23.880
<v Speaker 2>with people of color. That's what she's trying to say.

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 2>Obviously it's cringing.

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the lady and them all of that

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 1>might be true. Yeah, felt it felt very icky to

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>be giving black credentials in this moment. But again, and

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe she's all that stuff is true, robes, but can

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you can we ever, ever, ever, can a white person

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 1>ever be forgiven? I don't know if white celebrity is

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>caught on video at a club singing and dancing to

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 1>a Kendrick Lamar song and just blurts out the N

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>word every time Kendrick says it, are you? Are you

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 1>going down for that as a racist? And that's a

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 1>serious hypothetical that I'm giving. Well, I think only what

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>can't what will society do to that person?

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't think a white person can answer that question.

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, the answer is I think society would absolutely come

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:12.120
<v Speaker 1>after that person, would absolutely persecute that person, would want

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to hear nothing else. And maybe that's the case. Can

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>a white person ever say the N word in any

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 1>type of context other than in a Quentin Tarantino movie

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and not be canceled?

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 3>Right because you're reading a script from a character that

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:24.199
<v Speaker 3>isn't you.

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 2>That would be the only way, and even then that

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 2>would be borderline.

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 3>The only person who I think could probably do it

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 3>is President Trump.

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Damn, oh my god. And again we're not suggesting he will,

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>but we're saying that is the most outlandish racial thing

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you can blurt out. Can you ever come back from that?

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>But to your point, rote so much about racism and

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 1>the talk of racism and things that are being allowed

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to be said. Now some people feel a freedom to

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>do so, they feel a comfort and doing so. And

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>how long does that bar keep moving to where now

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>this word becomes mainstream.

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 2>And to it well, that would be just so disturbing.

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 2>But to your point, this is going to be interesting.

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 2>We don't know how big this may blow up. It

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 2>may blow over not for her, she's almost certainly done,

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 2>but in her effort to try and redeem herself or

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 2>find some way to.

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 3>To uncancel herself.

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Will this be something that because of the political environment

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:35.440
<v Speaker 2>we're in and what we've been seeing over this past year,

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 2>will there be a rallying cry in her defense? Will

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 2>this become something more than it is right now?

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 2>I hope it doesn't, But I started thinking about that, like,

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 2>where does this story go from here? And she is

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 2>going to continue her defense today, and look, I think

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 2>she has every right to do so. I understand her

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 2>need to do so. And it's just we will be

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 2>watching to see where this conversation you just.

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I just sank because you just made me remember something

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that you'll remember as well. That woman raised about a

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>million dollars on whatever go fundme type website after she

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>was caught on video repeatedly calling a.

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 3>Child child.

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 2>And that is a very different story totally obviously than

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 2>the one we're talking about, and yet they're both lumped

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 2>into the same category.

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>She had defenders to the point they raised a million

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 1>dollars horrific for her horrific that is, I will never

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 1>now offend or say, well, let's look for some context

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>in that this other situation is not that at all.

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Be mad, Be okay, she got fired. No, I'm not

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>defending that word coming out of her mouth at all.

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 1>When I am attacking. Is the way the story is

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>being reported. The context that is me and sometimes robes

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 1>hour as society lack of willingness to understand and have

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>your first reaction be something other than outrage. I love

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the Gabby Bernstein thing you keep pointing to pass it along.

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>It's so it calms you when you hear something and

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 1>your first thing is to go is to be curious

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>before you're mad. Man.

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 2>It does wonders, It really does, and you can apply

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 2>it to almost everything in your life, even from someone

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 2>cutting you off in traffic. Get curious. Maybe his mom

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 2>is sick, maybe he just got fired. Maybe he is

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 2>racing to the hospital because he got word that his daughter.

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Was in an accident.

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 2>You don't know what people are going through, and so yes,

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 2>in this situation, in your personal situation, get curious instead

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 2>of immediately reacting with a fence and anger.

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Ultimately, world, I don't know what to do. What are

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:54.360
<v Speaker 1>we supposed to do with a lady that we hear

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>say the N word, but then has somewhat of a

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>plausible reason why she might have conflated words and that

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:04.679
<v Speaker 1>came out. What are we supposed to do? Am I

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 1>supposed to really just say? Well, then word came out

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of a white lady's mouth. Done with you? You're a racist.

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:16.639
<v Speaker 1>That can't be our reactions to everything and everyone. It

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>is great that we're talking about race. It is just

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>not that black and white. It's just nuts and we

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>have folks. We always appreciate you spending some time with us.

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:29.120
<v Speaker 1>For my dear Amy Robach, I am T. J. Holmes.

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:29.919
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk to y'allso