WEBVTT - Quick, Open Twitter, Save the Painting!

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:05.770
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio at the

0:00:05.809 --> 0:00:10.050
<v Speaker 1>George Washington Broadcast Center. Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

0:00:10.250 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:17.300
<v Speaker 3>And now, here's Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:26.770
<v Speaker 4>And finally, KFC has partnered with cereal brand Surreal to

0:00:26.829 --> 0:00:30.970
<v Speaker 4>introduce a new Kentucky fried chicken flavored cereal. This news

0:00:31.050 --> 0:00:36.150
<v Speaker 4>first reported at the United Nations. We have big things

0:00:36.190 --> 0:00:37.050
<v Speaker 4>that are happening.

0:00:38.780 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 5>Finally, KFC just released a new cereal that tastes like

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 5>fried chicken. And they recommended topping it with gravy instead

0:00:45.780 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 5>of milk. They even have a good slogan for it,

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:50.860
<v Speaker 5>make your arteries snap, crackle, and pop.

0:00:52.590 --> 0:00:56.650
<v Speaker 3>The gravy's a joke, but KFC flavored cereal. I will 100%

0:00:56.650 --> 0:00:59.569
<v Speaker 3>try that. First time I see it, I will.

0:01:00.450 --> 0:01:03.250
<v Speaker 6>A bowl full of chicken, yes. Welcome to the Armstrong

0:01:03.310 --> 0:01:03.870
<v Speaker 6>and Getty Show.

0:01:03.910 --> 0:01:06.010
<v Speaker 3>Joe Getty, he's half of the name of the show. So,

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:08.420
<v Speaker 3>you know, you paid for the whole thing. You should

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:10.979
<v Speaker 3>get the whole thing.

0:01:11.300 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>You know this about me. I'm a conscientious objector when

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>it comes to stunt foods. I won't acknowledge their existence.

0:01:17.060 --> 0:01:20.390
<v Speaker 1>I'm against them in principle. It's part of the degeneration

0:01:20.410 --> 0:01:22.270
<v Speaker 1>of Western society, stump foods.

0:01:23.050 --> 0:01:24.350
<v Speaker 6>I don't know if that's a stump food, if they're

0:01:24.370 --> 0:01:25.310
<v Speaker 6>actually going to sell it.

0:01:28.250 --> 0:01:31.010
<v Speaker 1>You know, I was listening to whichever joke included the

0:01:31.069 --> 0:01:34.030
<v Speaker 1>gravy reference. I thought, well, do you just eat chicken then?

0:01:34.940 --> 0:01:36.300
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:01:36.420 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Hey, we were just, during news, we were on that

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 3>topic of wine. Another one of your really big been-around-for-generations

0:01:46.420 --> 0:01:48.300
<v Speaker 3>wineries announced they're closing down.

0:01:49.590 --> 0:01:53.070
<v Speaker 6>And so I have a theory on that.

0:01:53.090 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 3>We all know young people are drinking less, but did

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.460
<v Speaker 3>wine have the same thing happen to it that happened

0:01:59.500 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 3>to golfing and Harleys, where it got really, really popular

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:07.900
<v Speaker 3>for a while, and then just for whatever reasons of

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 3>changing tastes and attitudes, it got less popular?

0:02:12.590 --> 0:02:14.690
<v Speaker 2>Boy, you know, that's an interesting theory.

0:02:14.750 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you, golf is... every bit as popular now,

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.019
<v Speaker 1>like watching golf on TV, the tiger days, those are gone.

0:02:22.060 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>But in COVID just every golf club in America filled

0:02:25.250 --> 0:02:30.310
<v Speaker 1>up huge waiting lists. Um, but you know, that's an

0:02:30.350 --> 0:02:36.220
<v Speaker 1>interesting question. I just, I think alcohol consumption is so

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>just notably, shockingly down among, you know, the under 40 crowd.

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:45.139
<v Speaker 1>It's just killing the industry. Whether there was some sort

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:48.489
<v Speaker 1>of artificial bubble. I know that's true of bourbon. I'm

0:02:48.530 --> 0:02:52.190
<v Speaker 1>aware of the bourbon craze where it used to be

0:02:52.210 --> 0:02:55.690
<v Speaker 1>the bottom shelf whiskey. It's corn liquor. And all of

0:02:55.750 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, I don't know, and I don't want to

0:02:58.180 --> 0:03:00.460
<v Speaker 1>be too harsh in case some of my bourbon enthusiasts

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:03.060
<v Speaker 1>friends are listening, but everybody started acting like he was

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:03.919
<v Speaker 1>the nectar.

0:03:03.620 --> 0:03:05.139
<v Speaker 3>Of the gods, and it's just not.

0:03:06.020 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 6>And so finally, everybody figured that out.

0:03:09.740 --> 0:03:12.630
<v Speaker 1>Now there's bourbon companies that, you know, geared up for

0:03:12.650 --> 0:03:17.370
<v Speaker 1>the bourbon craze. They have 10 years of stock sitting

0:03:17.450 --> 0:03:19.649
<v Speaker 1>in their warehouses and barrels, and they have no idea

0:03:19.669 --> 0:03:20.270
<v Speaker 1>what to do with it.

0:03:21.150 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so that's tough for the whole wine thing. We've

0:03:25.180 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 3>talked about this many times before, but I don't remember

0:03:27.260 --> 0:03:28.980
<v Speaker 3>if there are stats on this. Did a lot of,

0:03:29.100 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 3>did a lot, but enough people start smoking pot instead?

0:03:34.060 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>That's got to be a factor.

0:03:35.620 --> 0:03:36.780
<v Speaker 6>I would think so.

0:03:36.780 --> 0:03:38.820
<v Speaker 1>2% or 7%. I have no idea, but it's a

0:03:38.860 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>factor for sure. I just want to tell the good

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>folks in Napa Valley, Sonoma, Paso Robles, Amador County, all

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:51.900
<v Speaker 1>over California's wine regions, by God, we did our best

0:03:51.980 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>last night to support y'all. We struck a blow, okay?

0:03:57.020 --> 0:04:00.220
<v Speaker 6>Fantastic. Maybe you can keep a winery open on your own.

0:04:02.850 --> 0:04:04.290
<v Speaker 1>I'm accepting offers. Yeah.

0:04:04.530 --> 0:04:07.820
<v Speaker 3>This is where you have been missed over the last

0:04:07.860 --> 0:04:11.300
<v Speaker 3>couple of days on this topic, because I am actually

0:04:11.340 --> 0:04:13.980
<v Speaker 3>the Wall Street Journal editorial board seemed to agree with

0:04:14.020 --> 0:04:14.620
<v Speaker 3>me on Monday.

0:04:15.410 --> 0:04:16.230
<v Speaker 6>All this U.N.

0:04:16.290 --> 0:04:19.529
<v Speaker 3>Talk and the white tie dinner dinner that Trump's having

0:04:19.570 --> 0:04:24.570
<v Speaker 3>a sheet, mostly fluff. Very, very, very little comes out

0:04:24.620 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 3>of these things.

0:04:25.300 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 6>Tell me I'm wrong.

0:04:27.010 --> 0:04:29.330
<v Speaker 1>Well, one at a time. The UN, I would just

0:04:29.450 --> 0:04:34.310
<v Speaker 1>like to... Hang on, let me flip to it. I

0:04:34.330 --> 0:04:40.900
<v Speaker 1>just hear Millet, my libertarian Argentinian dog-cloning hero, who I'm

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:41.860
<v Speaker 1>sure you've quoted.

0:04:42.230 --> 0:04:44.410
<v Speaker 6>I haven't today. I forgot about that. Yes, that's a

0:04:44.430 --> 0:04:44.770
<v Speaker 6>good one.

0:04:45.630 --> 0:04:48.390
<v Speaker 3>He said basically what I've been saying about the UN yesterday.

0:04:49.190 --> 0:04:49.690
<v Speaker 2>I've got it.

0:04:50.350 --> 0:04:53.940
<v Speaker 1>Let's see. Well, he said that the UN has broken

0:04:53.980 --> 0:04:56.540
<v Speaker 1>its covenant. It's not what it claimed to be. A

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>bunch of noble words. That's to say it has become

0:04:59.339 --> 0:05:02.789
<v Speaker 1>a useless organization whose only purpose is to sustain a

0:05:02.850 --> 0:05:07.870
<v Speaker 1>cast of fatally arrogant parasites masquerading as well-intentioned bureaucrats.

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:09.350
<v Speaker 4>Booyah!

0:05:10.770 --> 0:05:15.109
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that's, you know, that's exciting language and everything

0:05:15.150 --> 0:05:16.909
<v Speaker 3>like that, but it's also just very, very true.

0:05:18.130 --> 0:05:20.310
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you know the funny thing, I was thinking

0:05:20.330 --> 0:05:22.150
<v Speaker 1>about how great the speech was, and he went on

0:05:22.170 --> 0:05:25.700
<v Speaker 1>and on. He absolutely blasted COVID shutdowns, which I thought

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>was wonderful. Then it occurred to me, these, again, to

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>quote him, fatally arrogant parasite, he is well-intentioned bureaucrat, they

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.049
<v Speaker 1>hear that stuff and they laugh, and they go back

0:05:37.060 --> 0:05:38.070
<v Speaker 1>to their cocktail parties.

0:05:38.460 --> 0:05:38.620
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:05:39.770 --> 0:05:41.990
<v Speaker 3>And the number of people that heard that speech would

0:05:42.050 --> 0:05:45.050
<v Speaker 3>be less than one percent.

0:05:44.790 --> 0:05:45.470
<v Speaker 6>Would be my guess.

0:05:46.230 --> 0:05:47.770
<v Speaker 1>Oh, yeah.

0:05:47.910 --> 0:05:50.150
<v Speaker 6>I almost dropped my phone. Yeah. Yeah.

0:05:50.190 --> 0:05:50.790
<v Speaker 1>Very, very small.

0:05:51.210 --> 0:05:52.220
<v Speaker 6>And the the.

0:05:52.190 --> 0:05:55.900
<v Speaker 1>Welcome my good close pal Xi Jinping to this white

0:05:55.960 --> 0:06:02.460
<v Speaker 1>tie dinner thing. Speaking of percentages, will that make 1%

0:06:02.460 --> 0:06:04.750
<v Speaker 1>of a difference in the relationship with China going forward?

0:06:04.770 --> 0:06:06.530
<v Speaker 3>God, I don't think so. I just find it hard

0:06:06.550 --> 0:06:09.830
<v Speaker 3>to believe. They got a 100-year plan of things they're

0:06:09.870 --> 0:06:11.570
<v Speaker 3>going to do, and they're going to keep doing them.

0:06:11.630 --> 0:06:16.850
<v Speaker 3>And whether they have roasted sea bass, I think they're having,

0:06:16.970 --> 0:06:19.950
<v Speaker 3>or something different, or Trump meets him on the tarmac,

0:06:20.010 --> 0:06:21.349
<v Speaker 3>or meets him in front of the White House, none

0:06:21.370 --> 0:06:23.770
<v Speaker 3>of that stuff I can imagine matters at all.

0:06:25.290 --> 0:06:29.550
<v Speaker 1>I recommend a nice California Sauvignon Blanc with that sea bass. But, yeah,

0:06:29.570 --> 0:06:31.940
<v Speaker 1>the idea that Xi Jinping would go to the Politburo

0:06:32.390 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 1>and say, you know, that whole we've got to take

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>over the globe and subjugate the U.S. and instill communism

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:40.940
<v Speaker 1>all over the world. We've got to forget about that

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>because that Donald Trump was really nice to me.

0:06:43.700 --> 0:06:49.390
<v Speaker 6>I mean, come on. Don't even. So there's that. Trump

0:06:50.089 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 6>was again. I had something else I was going to say.

0:06:52.089 --> 0:06:52.510
<v Speaker 6>I don't remember.

0:06:52.650 --> 0:06:56.070
<v Speaker 3>Oh, the Iranians. So this is fairly new information. One

0:06:56.089 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 3>of your top Iranian dudes, because they're there in. New

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:04.020
<v Speaker 3>York and getting interviewed around the whole United Nations thing

0:07:04.060 --> 0:07:06.610
<v Speaker 3>this week. One of your top Iranians just said the

0:07:06.930 --> 0:07:09.910
<v Speaker 3>United States has four to five days to follow through

0:07:10.150 --> 0:07:12.770
<v Speaker 3>on the things we've demanded, which sounded more like a

0:07:12.830 --> 0:07:15.050
<v Speaker 3>threat than anything anybody's heard out of Iran in a

0:07:15.070 --> 0:07:17.490
<v Speaker 3>long time. We have four to five days to follow

0:07:17.510 --> 0:07:19.910
<v Speaker 3>through on the things you want or what he didn't say.

0:07:21.860 --> 0:07:23.940
<v Speaker 1>Oh, my God. I'm sure they're going to send their

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>latest batch of missiles that they've hastily constructed toward our

0:07:26.740 --> 0:07:31.020
<v Speaker 1>military bases. I hope we've hardened our defenses somehow.

0:07:30.700 --> 0:07:33.850
<v Speaker 6>To protect our guys. Yeah.

0:07:33.870 --> 0:07:36.489
<v Speaker 1>Well, that one feels like it's on hold, too. I mean...

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:41.710
<v Speaker 1>Where's the progress directionally? Well, I guess the answer is

0:07:42.170 --> 0:07:44.690
<v Speaker 1>we're still choking their economy, and it's getting worse and worse,

0:07:44.770 --> 0:07:48.010
<v Speaker 1>and you just kind of wait for that to play out.

0:07:48.670 --> 0:07:50.470
<v Speaker 3>Well, I was going to get into some polling a

0:07:50.510 --> 0:07:53.610
<v Speaker 3>little bit later from one of your top internal pollsters

0:07:53.630 --> 0:07:56.590
<v Speaker 3>that Mark Halpern actually said he got the permission to

0:07:56.650 --> 0:08:01.460
<v Speaker 3>print out yesterday. Republicans view of the war with Iran

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:06.190
<v Speaker 3>is really in the toilet. And this is like this

0:08:06.330 --> 0:08:09.870
<v Speaker 3>is like what the bailout was for Obama in the

0:08:09.910 --> 0:08:13.030
<v Speaker 3>rise of the Tea Party level. People are unhappy in

0:08:13.070 --> 0:08:15.330
<v Speaker 3>the Republican Party, the war with Iran for all kinds

0:08:15.350 --> 0:08:17.490
<v Speaker 3>of different reasons. I mean, it is just really gone

0:08:17.530 --> 0:08:20.780
<v Speaker 3>off a cliff in recent weeks. It was already unpopular,

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:22.700
<v Speaker 3>but it's gotten way more unpopular.

0:08:23.750 --> 0:08:24.620
<v Speaker 6>Right, right.

0:08:25.420 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll be interested to hear the results of that poll,

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and particularly if they drill down a little bit into

0:08:30.050 --> 0:08:33.709
<v Speaker 1>the why's people believe what they believe, because not everybody

0:08:33.750 --> 0:08:37.089
<v Speaker 1>has a radio show slash podcast. And, you know, their

0:08:37.250 --> 0:08:39.650
<v Speaker 1>actual view might be a little nuanced, but when you're

0:08:39.670 --> 0:08:42.490
<v Speaker 1>just asked thumbs up or thumbs down and you just

0:08:42.630 --> 0:08:45.460
<v Speaker 1>hate the way the wars, the prosecutor, how it's going,

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:47.980
<v Speaker 1>you're going to say thumbs down, even if you agree

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:49.300
<v Speaker 1>that Iran can't get a nuke.

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 6>So, yeah. Wow.

0:08:51.140 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd heard the numbers were pretty miserable, but, you know, well,

0:08:55.100 --> 0:08:56.939
<v Speaker 1>the the the.

0:08:56.660 --> 0:08:59.130
<v Speaker 3>The percentage of people who think there is no plan

0:08:59.190 --> 0:09:03.089
<v Speaker 3>for ending this, for instance, it's like 80 percent of Republicans.

0:09:03.590 --> 0:09:08.610
<v Speaker 3>And I think the constant, I'm going to obliterate them,

0:09:08.809 --> 0:09:11.570
<v Speaker 3>then you back off at midnight tonight, I'm going to,

0:09:11.650 --> 0:09:14.230
<v Speaker 3>then an hour before you stop. I think that over time,

0:09:14.290 --> 0:09:17.830
<v Speaker 3>the cumulative effect of that is, okay, this is just ridiculous,

0:09:17.990 --> 0:09:19.210
<v Speaker 3>is where we've landed.

0:09:20.250 --> 0:09:24.890
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, clearly I have chatted with conservatives from very,

0:09:24.929 --> 0:09:30.500
<v Speaker 1>very Trumpy to kind of never Trumpy. the same reaction

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to that stuff just rolling their eyes and shaking their

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>heads and saying what the hell is that.

0:09:35.620 --> 0:09:38.650
<v Speaker 3>I don't know yeah i i honestly i don't even

0:09:38.690 --> 0:09:41.710
<v Speaker 3>really have a guess what kind of an adult you

0:09:41.730 --> 0:09:44.610
<v Speaker 3>know who's been around the world and particularly a business

0:09:44.690 --> 0:09:48.089
<v Speaker 3>guy who's had so many negotiations in his life goes

0:09:48.130 --> 0:09:50.449
<v Speaker 3>around making threats like that all the time and then

0:09:50.510 --> 0:09:54.069
<v Speaker 3>not following through it's just it's i'm i'm as mystified

0:09:54.130 --> 0:09:57.010
<v Speaker 3>by that as practically anything any president has ever done.

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.890
<v Speaker 1>I guess we could get into psychoanalyzing him. but that's

0:10:01.950 --> 0:10:05.429
<v Speaker 1>a muddy, mucky field you get stuck in. Is it

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>because when you're doing a hotel, if you intimidate the

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>plumbing contractor once, you don't have to deal with them again?

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:16.650
<v Speaker 1>You're on to another project? I don't know. But it's odd.

0:10:16.730 --> 0:10:20.309
<v Speaker 1>And I get that people are disgusted, even if, again,

0:10:20.870 --> 0:10:23.330
<v Speaker 1>they're hardcore that the mullahs can't have a nuke, which

0:10:23.390 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I think most of humanity agrees on.

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh, yeah.

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 6>I'm looking up at the TV.

0:10:28.110 --> 0:10:32.209
<v Speaker 3>They're reviewing that Elizabeth Holmes documentary we were talking about

0:10:32.250 --> 0:10:34.790
<v Speaker 3>last hour. Man, that looks good. I just saw all

0:10:34.809 --> 0:10:39.699
<v Speaker 3>the reviews of that. People say it's fantastic. And we

0:10:39.740 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 3>played the clip from it a couple of weeks ago,

0:10:42.179 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 3>but I hadn't watched the video.

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:47.290
<v Speaker 6>The video. Holy crap. What is the deal with her?

0:10:48.260 --> 0:10:50.189
<v Speaker 1>She looks like she's possessed, doesn't she?

0:10:50.309 --> 0:10:50.710
<v Speaker 6>She does.

0:10:50.730 --> 0:10:54.890
<v Speaker 1>She's got her eyes wide and giving you that insane

0:10:54.990 --> 0:10:55.830
<v Speaker 1>look constantly.

0:10:55.870 --> 0:10:59.890
<v Speaker 6>She never blinks. She looks like she thinks she can

0:10:59.950 --> 0:11:01.350
<v Speaker 6>control you with her eyeballs.

0:11:02.309 --> 0:11:02.709
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:11:03.850 --> 0:11:04.230
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:11:04.890 --> 0:11:07.830
<v Speaker 3>And apparently she can because she met with people around

0:11:07.890 --> 0:11:11.819
<v Speaker 3>the world and raised billions of dollars on a phony thing.

0:11:11.860 --> 0:11:13.719
<v Speaker 3>So maybe she could look at you with those big

0:11:13.860 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 3>eyes and get you to do all kinds of weird stuff.

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:16.340
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:11:17.450 --> 0:11:19.290
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'd just find it off-putting.

0:11:20.250 --> 0:11:21.660
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it would have creeped me out. I'd have been like,

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:22.620
<v Speaker 6>why are you looking at me like that?

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:25.500
<v Speaker 1>I'd have found myself looking away a lot.

0:11:25.740 --> 0:11:26.500
<v Speaker 2>Oh, right. Yeah.

0:11:26.700 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 6>Somebody who has too much eye contact, and you're like,

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.310
<v Speaker 6>I gotta look away. You're weirding me out here, dude.

0:11:32.370 --> 0:11:35.050
<v Speaker 1>You know, you make a good point, though. Because in

0:11:35.070 --> 0:11:37.810
<v Speaker 1>the documentary, she comes off as completely looney tunes, but...

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:42.939
<v Speaker 1>And she was duping, allegedly, you know, like super heavyweights

0:11:43.020 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of world diplomacy and industry.

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:11:48.070 --> 0:11:50.209
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it wasn't that she went out there and she

0:11:50.309 --> 0:11:53.209
<v Speaker 3>fooled dumb people like with a Ponzi scheme or something

0:11:53.230 --> 0:11:55.870
<v Speaker 3>like that. She was convincing some of the smartest people

0:11:55.910 --> 0:11:57.670
<v Speaker 3>in the world so she can look at you with

0:11:57.710 --> 0:12:00.130
<v Speaker 3>those big eyes. Anyway, I'm going to watch that documentary

0:12:00.150 --> 0:12:00.810
<v Speaker 3>the moment it hits.

0:12:02.830 --> 0:12:07.020
<v Speaker 1>To me, it's more like. coming on to men in

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>high-dollar hotels and then rolling them when they get to

0:12:10.300 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the room. She strikes me as more like that than

0:12:14.220 --> 0:12:16.939
<v Speaker 1>bilking former secretaries of state out of millions of dollars,

0:12:16.980 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 1>but go figure. Yeah, it'll be an interesting watch.

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:21.420
<v Speaker 6>So you're back in the studio tomorrow, correct?

0:12:22.370 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 3>That is correct, yeah.

0:12:23.110 --> 0:12:25.430
<v Speaker 1>One more day of golf today at the scenic and

0:12:25.470 --> 0:12:29.190
<v Speaker 1>gorgeous Monterey Peninsula Country Club, and then back to work.

0:12:29.790 --> 0:12:31.610
<v Speaker 3>And is this the sort of place other people can play,

0:12:31.630 --> 0:12:33.929
<v Speaker 3>or is this not someplace you've got to know somebody?

0:12:34.860 --> 0:12:36.900
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you got to be a guest of a member.

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:40.450
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, yeah, yeah. And how exclusive is it?

0:12:40.500 --> 0:12:42.179
<v Speaker 3>Is this the sort of thing like when you tell

0:12:42.220 --> 0:12:42.980
<v Speaker 3>other golfers, you're.

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:45.210
<v Speaker 6>Like, oh, my God, you get to play there? A

0:12:45.230 --> 0:12:45.810
<v Speaker 6>little bit, yeah.

0:12:46.130 --> 0:12:46.410
<v Speaker 2>Oh, cool.

0:12:46.970 --> 0:12:47.170
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:12:47.530 --> 0:12:48.689
<v Speaker 6>And then do you lord it over them?

0:12:51.090 --> 0:12:54.689
<v Speaker 1>No, I act as if it's no big deal, which

0:12:54.770 --> 0:12:56.650
<v Speaker 1>is the best kind of lording it over them.

0:12:56.870 --> 0:12:59.050
<v Speaker 6>Yes. Take that, little people.

0:12:59.090 --> 0:13:01.150
<v Speaker 7>Take that.

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 6>Okay, perfect. Well, thanks for calling in. We will talk

0:13:03.540 --> 0:13:03.980
<v Speaker 6>to you tomorrow.

0:13:04.990 --> 0:13:06.630
<v Speaker 1>Of course. Sorry to abandon the show in a time

0:13:06.950 --> 0:13:07.929
<v Speaker 1>of need. I'll see you tomorrow.

0:13:07.970 --> 0:13:11.550
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the time of need during the UN conference. Yeah,

0:13:11.570 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 3>that is the best way to lord it over somebody

0:13:13.220 --> 0:13:14.439
<v Speaker 3>like that. Oh, yeah, yeah, I play there.

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:17.179
<v Speaker 6>I play there a lot. Yeah, why? You wanted to

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:18.220
<v Speaker 6>play there? Oh, I'm sorry you haven't.

0:13:22.450 --> 0:13:24.650
<v Speaker 3>Speaking of the kind of people that probably play at

0:13:24.690 --> 0:13:27.170
<v Speaker 3>that golf course, mostly the suit and tie crowd. If

0:13:27.190 --> 0:13:30.170
<v Speaker 3>you think financial planning is only for those people, you

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:32.179
<v Speaker 3>should think again. We want to tell you about blue

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:36.540
<v Speaker 3>collar dollar, small business owners, farmers, hardworking people who build

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:39.059
<v Speaker 3>this country that get ignored by Wall Street, but making

0:13:39.100 --> 0:13:39.660
<v Speaker 3>good money.

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:41.740
<v Speaker 6>Just it's a different crowd.

0:13:41.780 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 3>We all know that I grew up with this crowd.

0:13:44.140 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 3>A blue collar dollar really changes the game, providing high

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:49.140
<v Speaker 3>level retirement strategies for the men and women who do

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:49.819
<v Speaker 3>the heavy lifting.

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:51.680
<v Speaker 6>No jargon, no corporate fluffer.

0:13:51.700 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 3>If you're over 55 and you've put aside at least

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:58.020
<v Speaker 3>$ 250, 000 for retirement, blue collar dollar has an offer for you.

0:13:58.380 --> 0:14:00.660
<v Speaker 3>Pick up your phone right now, dial pound 250 and

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 3>say the keyword blue collar dollar. If you're a complimentary

0:14:03.980 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 3>financial review from a licensed talent advisor, that's pound 250

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:09.110
<v Speaker 3>blue collar dollar.

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Paid endorsement armstrong and getty are not talent clients and

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:13.620
<v Speaker 1>receive compensation for promoting talent creating a conflict of interest

0:14:13.660 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>investment advisory services offered through talent llc and sec registered

0:14:16.100 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>investment advisor for more additional disclosures visit bluecollar.com paid for

0:14:18.660 --> 0:14:22.130
<v Speaker 1>by epic financial armstrong and getty.

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:29.900
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's become the most famous bar in America, The

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 3>Last Ditch, there in Greenfield, Massachusetts. That's the lesbian bar

0:14:35.100 --> 0:14:39.150
<v Speaker 3>that drops its mask mandate and people go crazy there,

0:14:39.210 --> 0:14:42.670
<v Speaker 3>some of the patrons. It's gotten a ton of attention

0:14:42.690 --> 0:14:44.470
<v Speaker 3>in the last couple of days. Well, the free press

0:14:44.490 --> 0:14:46.970
<v Speaker 3>has got a great piece on it today that we'll

0:14:47.010 --> 0:14:49.250
<v Speaker 3>have to get to later this hour. It's such an

0:14:49.330 --> 0:14:54.250
<v Speaker 3>interesting story about the woke crowd and them eating themselves. Again,

0:14:54.330 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 3>later this hour. Also, we got a great guest. We're

0:14:56.300 --> 0:14:58.030
<v Speaker 3>going to talk to Bill Gertz about China coming up.

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 3>We've talked to him before. He's really good, if you

0:15:00.180 --> 0:15:03.570
<v Speaker 3>haven't heard his act on Trump and Xi and the

0:15:03.590 --> 0:15:07.410
<v Speaker 3>real particulars of the issues between the United States and China.

0:15:08.130 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 3>This is from Bill Maher. He had Terry Bradshaw on

0:15:11.940 --> 0:15:14.700
<v Speaker 3>his show. If you're old enough, you remember Terry Bradshaw

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.500
<v Speaker 3>was Tom Brady before Tom Brady was Tom Brady. He

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:19.940
<v Speaker 3>won four Super Bowls back in the 70s. Terry Bradshaw

0:15:19.980 --> 0:15:22.270
<v Speaker 3>is a quarterback. Anyway, Bill Maher was talking to him

0:15:22.330 --> 0:15:26.540
<v Speaker 3>about football then and now. You took hits that no

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:28.370
<v Speaker 3>quarterback today takes.

0:15:28.450 --> 0:15:30.500
<v Speaker 6>It was a different game in the 70s.

0:15:30.570 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 3>That's why I'm against comparing statistics. You cannot, as great

0:15:34.630 --> 0:15:37.660
<v Speaker 3>as the quarterbacks are today, they don't, and I'm glad

0:15:37.700 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 3>that they protect them more.

0:15:39.500 --> 0:15:40.980
<v Speaker 6>They just did not live in the world. But don't

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:43.140
<v Speaker 6>sit here and tell me that they're better than we were.

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 3>In the 70s or the 60s because they didn't play

0:15:45.370 --> 0:15:46.100
<v Speaker 3>under the same.

0:15:45.970 --> 0:15:47.630
<v Speaker 6>Rules where you got slapped in the face. That's what

0:15:47.650 --> 0:15:48.610
<v Speaker 6>I'm saying. Body slammed.

0:15:48.630 --> 0:15:49.010
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah.

0:15:49.170 --> 0:15:50.990
<v Speaker 6>And knocked all over the place and you couldn't throw.

0:15:51.010 --> 0:15:53.090
<v Speaker 6>They played bump and run. You couldn't just stand back

0:15:53.110 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 6>there and throw it all.

0:15:53.970 --> 0:15:55.410
<v Speaker 5>Oh, he's the greatest player that ever played.

0:15:55.450 --> 0:15:56.730
<v Speaker 6>No, he isn't the greatest player.

0:15:56.930 --> 0:16:00.530
<v Speaker 7>He's maybe the greatest of his decade, but not ever.

0:16:00.610 --> 0:16:02.340
<v Speaker 6>I don't ever use ever.

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, that's true about all the sports comparisons over time. Everything,

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 3>the ball in baseball or the way they, the three-point

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:13.290
<v Speaker 3>line in the NBA or the way they call fouls

0:16:13.350 --> 0:16:15.170
<v Speaker 3>and then the football, all kinds of different stuff.

0:16:15.190 --> 0:16:18.410
<v Speaker 6>But anyway, Terry Bradshaw goes on. Now we have high def.

0:16:19.530 --> 0:16:23.350
<v Speaker 5>We have where we can, where we have 20 tape machines,

0:16:23.350 --> 0:16:24.590
<v Speaker 5>30 cameras.

0:16:25.070 --> 0:16:27.729
<v Speaker 6>Let's slow it down. We're even under the ball where

0:16:27.770 --> 0:16:32.190
<v Speaker 6>they fall down, and we got in slow motion. Oh,

0:16:32.230 --> 0:16:33.050
<v Speaker 6>my God.

0:16:34.030 --> 0:16:38.910
<v Speaker 5>That looks like his jersey moved. And they go, it

0:16:38.930 --> 0:16:40.930
<v Speaker 5>wasn't the fact that we have a perfect game, which

0:16:40.990 --> 0:16:42.930
<v Speaker 5>is what they're trying to get. What made it great

0:16:42.980 --> 0:16:45.900
<v Speaker 5>was collision and pass interference.

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:51.260
<v Speaker 6>And bad calls and the fans being mad. I don't

0:16:51.300 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 6>know about that.

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm against the replays constantly, but everybody else seems to

0:16:56.460 --> 0:16:59.910
<v Speaker 3>like it. Yesterday was a major moment in NFL history,

0:16:59.950 --> 0:17:01.710
<v Speaker 3>and then I will move off sports because I know

0:17:01.770 --> 0:17:03.770
<v Speaker 3>it makes some of you mad, but it was 25

0:17:03.770 --> 0:17:09.070
<v Speaker 3>years ago yesterday that Drew Bledsoe, who was the starting

0:17:09.150 --> 0:17:13.619
<v Speaker 3>quarterback for the Patriots, got blasted and hurt. So they

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:17.460
<v Speaker 3>had to put in their backup some sixth-round draft pick,

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:21.430
<v Speaker 3>Tom Brady, who Which is the only reason Tom Brady

0:17:21.450 --> 0:17:23.730
<v Speaker 3>got to play is because Drew Bledsoe got hurt and

0:17:23.750 --> 0:17:26.310
<v Speaker 3>they put in Tom Brady and they went on to win.

0:17:26.350 --> 0:17:27.790
<v Speaker 3>I think they won the Super Bowl that year and

0:17:27.810 --> 0:17:32.210
<v Speaker 3>then Tom Brady won seven Super Bowls. So much for

0:17:32.270 --> 0:17:35.010
<v Speaker 3>people being able to evaluate talent if you got Tom

0:17:35.030 --> 0:17:41.859
<v Speaker 3>Brady on the sideline waiting. Game tonight, by the way, Falcons-Packers.

0:17:42.060 --> 0:17:44.120
<v Speaker 3>I have to pick a team to win that game

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:46.460
<v Speaker 3>because I'm in a pool now and I'm actually winning

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:49.139
<v Speaker 3>the pool with a bunch of my family. I'm winning

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:53.340
<v Speaker 3>after two weeks. I don't know anything. I know some,

0:17:53.420 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 3>but just like a couple of teams and barely. I

0:17:56.300 --> 0:17:59.790
<v Speaker 3>don't watch any games. Like, I'll guess tonight based on nothing.

0:17:59.850 --> 0:18:02.169
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't name a single player on either team, and

0:18:02.210 --> 0:18:04.540
<v Speaker 3>I will pick one. But anyway, I'm currently winning. We're

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:07.730
<v Speaker 3>going to learn more about the relationship between China and U.S.

0:18:07.869 --> 0:18:09.650
<v Speaker 3>And is it going the right way or the wrong way?

0:18:09.710 --> 0:18:11.109
<v Speaker 3>Or is it going to get any better because of

0:18:11.150 --> 0:18:12.910
<v Speaker 3>the dinner tonight with Trump and Xi?

0:18:12.950 --> 0:18:13.389
<v Speaker 6>I doubt it.

0:18:13.390 --> 0:18:15.810
<v Speaker 3>We'll talk to Bill Gertz next. He's super interesting if

0:18:15.830 --> 0:18:17.210
<v Speaker 3>you haven't heard him. If you miss him, get the

0:18:17.250 --> 0:18:18.790
<v Speaker 3>podcast Armstrong and Getty on demand.

0:18:19.490 --> 0:18:20.619
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty.

0:18:22.250 --> 0:18:25.010
<v Speaker 8>Not content to wait at the White House, President Trump

0:18:25.109 --> 0:18:28.810
<v Speaker 8>choppered to Joint Base Andrews this afternoon to greet Chinese

0:18:28.869 --> 0:18:32.930
<v Speaker 8>President Xi Jinping. It's the first time a US president

0:18:32.970 --> 0:18:35.570
<v Speaker 8>has made that gesture for a foreign head of state

0:18:35.950 --> 0:18:36.310
<v Speaker 8>since 1962.

0:18:36.310 --> 0:18:40.580
<v Speaker 6>We're doing very well with China. President Xi and I

0:18:40.619 --> 0:18:43.620
<v Speaker 6>have a good relationship. We're doing very well with China.

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:48.710
<v Speaker 3>And that being the first time in six 60-whatever years

0:18:49.340 --> 0:18:52.060
<v Speaker 3>that a president has met the Chinese leader on the tarmac,

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 3>that and $ 5 will get you a cup of coffee.

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 6>Who cares?

0:18:56.040 --> 0:19:00.340
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, the chairman of the Armed Services Committee, his name is.

0:19:00.380 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 6>Wicker, said, Mr.

0:19:02.420 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 3>President, during every minute of dialogue, our commander-in-chief should keep

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:08.460
<v Speaker 3>in mind that his guest is a brutal, unelected, and

0:19:08.500 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 3>oppressive dictator who seeks to dominate his neighbors and whose

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:15.940
<v Speaker 3>massive military arsenal is aimed directly at the United States

0:19:15.980 --> 0:19:19.910
<v Speaker 3>of America. Yeah, it's interesting that we give Xi such

0:19:19.970 --> 0:19:22.670
<v Speaker 3>a royal treatment, given the fact that all of that

0:19:22.790 --> 0:19:25.710
<v Speaker 3>is very true. We welcome to the Armstrong and Getty

0:19:25.750 --> 0:19:28.550
<v Speaker 3>Show Bill Gertz again to talk about China. He's a

0:19:28.570 --> 0:19:31.590
<v Speaker 3>columnist and reporter with The Washington Times and knows a

0:19:31.630 --> 0:19:32.830
<v Speaker 3>lot about this topic.

0:19:32.869 --> 0:19:35.910
<v Speaker 6>Bill, welcome back to the Armstrong and Getty Show. Hi,

0:19:35.950 --> 0:19:36.970
<v Speaker 6>good to be on the program.

0:19:37.330 --> 0:19:39.290
<v Speaker 3>Do you think we should have invited Xi and treat

0:19:39.310 --> 0:19:41.780
<v Speaker 3>him like this, or is it possible you get something

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:42.100
<v Speaker 3>out of it?

0:19:43.730 --> 0:19:47.419
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm very skeptical of the idea of allowing a

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 2>brutal communist dictator. I agree with Senator. Wicker. This is

0:19:51.980 --> 0:19:55.420
<v Speaker 2>a longstanding thing. I think the president is trying to

0:19:56.240 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 2>take a page out of the playbook of Teddy Roosevelt.

0:20:01.650 --> 0:20:04.609
<v Speaker 2>Talk softly and carry a big stick. He's trying to

0:20:04.690 --> 0:20:08.330
<v Speaker 2>schmooze the Chinese leader, and there's lots of differences between

0:20:09.150 --> 0:20:12.909
<v Speaker 2>and mostly over trade and also, again, the military and,

0:20:12.950 --> 0:20:16.820
<v Speaker 2>of course, the human rights violations. And, hey, let's not forget,

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 2>China unleashed the COVID virus on the world and killed six,

0:20:21.100 --> 0:20:25.670
<v Speaker 2>seven million people, and they've never been held accountable to that. So, yeah,

0:20:25.890 --> 0:20:29.430
<v Speaker 2>it's a mixture of trying to schmooze this leader with pageantry.

0:20:29.450 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't expect much substance to come from the summit.

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:33.859
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, neither do I.

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 3>And Senator Wicker specifically mentioned the very recent occurrence of

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 3>China's helping Iran. We're at war with Iran. China's helping

0:20:42.900 --> 0:20:45.139
<v Speaker 3>the opponent. I hope that comes up.

0:20:46.530 --> 0:20:51.390
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that was a good point. He basically confirmed what

0:20:51.470 --> 0:20:54.910
<v Speaker 2>was on background in news reports that China had provided

0:20:55.430 --> 0:20:59.490
<v Speaker 2>satellite imagery to Iran that was used by Iran to

0:20:59.530 --> 0:21:03.610
<v Speaker 2>conduct missile attacks on U.S. facilities in the Middle East.

0:21:03.770 --> 0:21:07.990
<v Speaker 2>So clearly, we're at war with Iran. They're helping Iran.

0:21:08.490 --> 0:21:11.870
<v Speaker 2>And why should we be giving this dictator all this

0:21:12.050 --> 0:21:15.730
<v Speaker 2>lavish praise and a White House state dinner tonight?

0:21:16.270 --> 0:21:18.980
<v Speaker 3>This is a minor point, but I've never understood why

0:21:19.100 --> 0:21:22.620
<v Speaker 3>our national media refers to these people as presidents, why

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:25.909
<v Speaker 3>you refer to President Putin as president or President Xi

0:21:25.950 --> 0:21:29.909
<v Speaker 3>as president. An act like that is a meaningful term.

0:21:29.970 --> 0:21:30.869
<v Speaker 3>Why do we even do that?

0:21:32.060 --> 0:21:36.830
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's really interesting. From a news perspective, as a

0:21:36.869 --> 0:21:41.389
<v Speaker 2>newspaper reporter, the problem comes with the Associated Press and

0:21:41.510 --> 0:21:45.790
<v Speaker 2>other outlets that set the agenda for how to describe

0:21:45.850 --> 0:21:52.030
<v Speaker 2>foreign leaders. It's called the newspaper style. Clearly, Xi Jinping

0:21:52.170 --> 0:21:56.310
<v Speaker 2>should be referred to as the general secretary of the

0:21:56.350 --> 0:22:00.430
<v Speaker 2>Chinese Communist Party, the chairman of the Central Military Commission,

0:22:00.540 --> 0:22:03.020
<v Speaker 2>and then lastly, as president of China.

0:22:03.980 --> 0:22:06.700
<v Speaker 3>So the style book says whatever they call themselves, we're

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 3>supposed to call them that?

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:08.500
<v Speaker 6>Is that the rule?

0:22:10.530 --> 0:22:13.550
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I mean, the style book is, it's very,

0:22:14.109 --> 0:22:16.410
<v Speaker 2>you know, I mean, they can do a lot of things.

0:22:16.490 --> 0:22:19.170
<v Speaker 2>It has a lot of political power. If you control

0:22:19.210 --> 0:22:21.710
<v Speaker 2>the language, you can control the narrative on a lot

0:22:21.730 --> 0:22:22.010
<v Speaker 2>of these.

0:22:22.570 --> 0:22:25.970
<v Speaker 3>Heck yeah, obviously that gives him some legitimacy. It kind

0:22:26.020 --> 0:22:28.460
<v Speaker 3>of puts in people's minds who don't really pay that

0:22:28.500 --> 0:22:31.300
<v Speaker 3>close attention that, you know, he runs for office and.

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 6>Is elected by the people like our president.

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:36.740
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and the problem with China is that it is

0:22:36.859 --> 0:22:41.969
<v Speaker 2>not a normal state like Japan or Germany. It's a

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:47.810
<v Speaker 2>communist state. party-run state. So the Chinese Communist Party has

0:22:47.890 --> 0:22:51.950
<v Speaker 2>basically converted all government elements, whether it's their foreign ministry

0:22:52.090 --> 0:22:56.350
<v Speaker 2>or their commerce ministry. It's all tightly controlled by a

0:22:56.410 --> 0:23:00.350
<v Speaker 2>political party. And it's not the same as a normal nation.

0:23:00.530 --> 0:23:04.060
<v Speaker 2>And people do not understand. And what we really need

0:23:04.100 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 2>to understand is the ideology behind the Chinese Communist. Xi

0:23:09.700 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Jinping is a hardcore Marxist-Leninist. He's not going to be

0:23:14.780 --> 0:23:21.570
<v Speaker 2>a normal foreign leader, again, like somebody like Takayuchi from Japan. Basically,

0:23:21.730 --> 0:23:26.870
<v Speaker 2>he has an agenda. His agenda is world domination under communism.

0:23:27.390 --> 0:23:30.940
<v Speaker 2>And the main obstacle to that agenda is the United States.

0:23:31.100 --> 0:23:31.899
<v Speaker 6>And he's working.

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 2>feverishly, behind the scenes, covertly, to subvert the United States,

0:23:37.300 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 2>weaken it, and ultimately destroy it so that China has

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:44.690
<v Speaker 2>a clear path down the field to take over the world.

0:23:45.369 --> 0:23:47.830
<v Speaker 3>You write for The Washington Times. I probably shouldn't bring

0:23:47.890 --> 0:23:50.890
<v Speaker 3>up another newspaper, but George Will, who writes for another

0:23:50.930 --> 0:23:53.129
<v Speaker 3>Washington newspaper, had a great article the other.

0:23:53.030 --> 0:23:55.370
<v Speaker 6>Day about.

0:23:55.800 --> 0:24:00.340
<v Speaker 3>The realities of if China moves on Taiwan, say, next year.

0:24:01.030 --> 0:24:03.500
<v Speaker 3>as President Xi had told the military to be ready

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.109
<v Speaker 3>to do, there aren't a lot of good options, are there?

0:24:07.750 --> 0:24:10.910
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, I've talked to the commander of the U.S.

0:24:10.950 --> 0:24:15.210
<v Speaker 2>Pacific Command, Admiral Sam Paparo, and he's pretty convinced he

0:24:15.290 --> 0:24:18.550
<v Speaker 2>could defeat the Chinese, but at a great cost. In

0:24:18.609 --> 0:24:23.909
<v Speaker 2>other words, in lives and in resources. But it is

0:24:24.470 --> 0:24:29.290
<v Speaker 2>the Taiwan Strait, the 100 mile wide strait separating Taiwan

0:24:29.310 --> 0:24:34.120
<v Speaker 2>from the mainland, is clearly the hottest flashpoint in U.S.-China relations.

0:24:34.230 --> 0:24:37.700
<v Speaker 2>And yes, Xi Jinping has ordered the PLA to be

0:24:37.780 --> 0:24:41.719
<v Speaker 2>ready to take Taiwan by next year. Now, that said,

0:24:41.859 --> 0:24:46.949
<v Speaker 2>and in line with that, they've conducted massive military operations

0:24:47.050 --> 0:24:50.770
<v Speaker 2>over the last three years to encircle Taiwan, to practice

0:24:51.450 --> 0:24:57.410
<v Speaker 2>invasions against the island. And it is really a democratic movement.

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:03.060
<v Speaker 2>stronghold in Asia. It shows the Chinese that democracy can

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:06.859
<v Speaker 2>work within the Chinese culture, and this is one of

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 2>the reasons that China is so bent on taking over

0:25:10.619 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 2>that island.

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:15.139
<v Speaker 3>Well, one of the concerns is that the way they

0:25:15.180 --> 0:25:17.350
<v Speaker 3>do it is a blockade, and then it would be

0:25:17.420 --> 0:25:20.870
<v Speaker 3>basically challenging us, are you going to come break this

0:25:20.930 --> 0:25:22.150
<v Speaker 3>blockade or not?

0:25:24.130 --> 0:25:28.930
<v Speaker 2>Very good question. Yeah, Trump has held his cards close

0:25:28.950 --> 0:25:33.050
<v Speaker 2>to the vest on that. His view is that he

0:25:33.250 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't say he should leave the ambiguity. And there is

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:42.260
<v Speaker 2>a lot of concern, especially in Washington, on both sides

0:25:42.300 --> 0:25:45.340
<v Speaker 2>of the political aisle, by the way, that the U.S.

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 2>could perhaps make a deal with China over Taiwan. And

0:25:51.250 --> 0:25:54.949
<v Speaker 2>three senators, Mitch McConnell and two others, wrote to the

0:25:54.990 --> 0:25:59.630
<v Speaker 2>president recently saying, hey, let's get going with this $ 14

0:25:59.530 --> 0:26:03.300
<v Speaker 2>billion arms package, which the Trump administration has held up

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:09.460
<v Speaker 2>for Taiwan, basically at the request of the Chinese. So

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:13.150
<v Speaker 2>at the summit, which is going on right now, Xi

0:26:13.170 --> 0:26:17.450
<v Speaker 2>Jinping is going to press harder on the Trump administration

0:26:17.609 --> 0:26:22.250
<v Speaker 2>not to provide weapons to Taiwan. And that's key. Providing

0:26:22.290 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 2>those weapons provides a deterrence capability. If you can increase

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 2>the cost to China's military of conducting an operation over

0:26:31.060 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 2>the Taiwan Strait, they'll think twice about doing it.

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:40.140
<v Speaker 3>Are we going to continue to not allow Chinese electric

0:26:40.180 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 3>cars into our country?

0:26:42.609 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 2>That's a big question. I know American carmakers are worried

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:50.780
<v Speaker 2>about that. From a competitive standpoint, from a national security standpoint,

0:26:51.460 --> 0:26:56.020
<v Speaker 2>those cars are wired to the Chinese system. And again,

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:59.530
<v Speaker 2>the China system is not, they don't have private companies there.

0:26:59.970 --> 0:27:03.650
<v Speaker 2>They have something called the military fusion system. So every

0:27:03.730 --> 0:27:08.310
<v Speaker 2>company in China is required under Chinese Communist Party rules

0:27:08.690 --> 0:27:12.580
<v Speaker 2>that they have to cooperate with both the military and

0:27:12.619 --> 0:27:18.429
<v Speaker 2>the intelligence services. So unleashing Chinese electric cars in the

0:27:18.510 --> 0:27:22.030
<v Speaker 2>United States, to me, would be a great national security threat.

0:27:22.570 --> 0:27:22.970
<v Speaker 6>Wow.

0:27:23.670 --> 0:27:27.900
<v Speaker 3>And then there's the issue of AI, which every news

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 3>outlet is claiming is front and center with the conversations

0:27:31.420 --> 0:27:34.740
<v Speaker 3>with the Trump White House and President Xi's team.

0:27:35.369 --> 0:27:36.430
<v Speaker 6>Anything to gain there?

0:27:38.619 --> 0:27:41.490
<v Speaker 2>I don't think much will come from the summit on

0:27:41.609 --> 0:27:47.330
<v Speaker 2>artificial intelligence. Basically, the Chinese want the U.S. to loosen

0:27:47.530 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 2>export controls on advanced chips from those NVIDIA chips, which

0:27:51.859 --> 0:27:56.909
<v Speaker 2>are really the computer power behind AI. We're in an

0:27:56.990 --> 0:28:01.470
<v Speaker 2>AI race with China. I don't agree with the corporate people,

0:28:01.510 --> 0:28:03.590
<v Speaker 2>the tech people that want us to slow down. I

0:28:03.750 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 2>think that would only advantage China. And we definitely should

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:11.780
<v Speaker 2>not do anything that would allow China to gain an

0:28:11.940 --> 0:28:14.419
<v Speaker 2>edge in the AI race. I think that would be

0:28:14.460 --> 0:28:17.879
<v Speaker 2>a huge mistake for the United States. Because what's at

0:28:17.940 --> 0:28:21.690
<v Speaker 2>stake is the free and open democratic system. The Chinese

0:28:21.710 --> 0:28:27.570
<v Speaker 2>government Their AI is constrained under Marxist-Leninist rules. They cannot

0:28:27.970 --> 0:28:31.490
<v Speaker 2>tell the truth. One of the key features of communism,

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 2>I've learned this over 40 years, is lies and deception.

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 2>And they will incorporate those lies and deception into their AI.

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 2>And if their AI models become the world standard, we're

0:28:43.940 --> 0:28:46.380
<v Speaker 2>going to lose a great amount of freedom.

0:28:47.910 --> 0:28:51.750
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's been some belief read a lot about the

0:28:51.790 --> 0:28:54.430
<v Speaker 3>whole AI thing and the battle between us and China

0:28:54.470 --> 0:28:58.790
<v Speaker 3>that President Xi is more afraid of artificial general intelligence

0:28:58.850 --> 0:29:01.630
<v Speaker 3>than we are because of the fact that maybe he

0:29:01.670 --> 0:29:04.610
<v Speaker 3>can't control it once it becomes too smart and keep

0:29:04.650 --> 0:29:08.100
<v Speaker 3>it from, you know, telling the truth, for instance.

0:29:09.350 --> 0:29:11.550
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I wrote a story about this in the Washington

0:29:11.570 --> 0:29:15.730
<v Speaker 2>Times recently. The head of the Chinese intelligence system, the

0:29:15.790 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Ministry of State Security, wrote an article recently which said

0:29:20.020 --> 0:29:25.340
<v Speaker 2>that AI could pose an existential threat to the Chinese

0:29:25.380 --> 0:29:29.900
<v Speaker 2>Communist Party rule. I say, hey, this is a roadmap

0:29:30.020 --> 0:29:34.950
<v Speaker 2>for how to defeat AI. this despised political party which

0:29:35.450 --> 0:29:38.510
<v Speaker 2>has been responsible for the deaths of more than 60

0:29:38.510 --> 0:29:43.390
<v Speaker 2>million Chinese people. So yeah, I think it's a two-edged sword,

0:29:44.030 --> 0:29:47.270
<v Speaker 2>and I think that the United States hopefully will use

0:29:47.450 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 2>AI to bring about a political reform within China, and

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:55.780
<v Speaker 2>that can only happen if the Chinese Communist Party is

0:29:55.820 --> 0:29:59.820
<v Speaker 2>defeated like its predecessor, the Soviet Communist Party.

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:02.540
<v Speaker 3>Since you don't see a lot of movement with this

0:30:03.340 --> 0:30:06.420
<v Speaker 3>get-together between Trump and Xi and a lot of positive,

0:30:06.530 --> 0:30:10.570
<v Speaker 3>is the best positive we can get with China... Their demographics,

0:30:10.650 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 3>their economy, just the situation their country is in right now.

0:30:17.460 --> 0:30:20.900
<v Speaker 2>They have a lot of problems. Xi Jinping is facing problems.

0:30:20.980 --> 0:30:25.510
<v Speaker 2>I'd say the two most significant problems within China are

0:30:25.690 --> 0:30:29.170
<v Speaker 2>the fact that they have a military that's been devastated

0:30:29.250 --> 0:30:32.110
<v Speaker 2>by corruption or political purges.

0:30:32.190 --> 0:30:33.090
<v Speaker 6>We don't really know.

0:30:33.150 --> 0:30:37.660
<v Speaker 2>There's so much secrecy there. But basically, the entire Central

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:41.300
<v Speaker 2>Military Commission, except for one other officer in And Xi

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:45.190
<v Speaker 2>Jinping has been completely removed. And now the ostensible reason

0:30:45.290 --> 0:30:49.030
<v Speaker 2>is it's for some type of corruption. But more likely,

0:30:49.510 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 2>there's a very strong political factions within the Chinese Communist Party.

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:59.300
<v Speaker 2>And somehow Xi Jinping feels threatened that the military is

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 2>somehow posing a threat.

0:31:01.750 --> 0:31:02.530
<v Speaker 6>To his rule.

0:31:03.050 --> 0:31:05.870
<v Speaker 2>And the second thing is the Chinese economy. They've got

0:31:05.890 --> 0:31:11.130
<v Speaker 2>huge internal economic problems, primarily as a result of President

0:31:11.150 --> 0:31:15.690
<v Speaker 2>Trump's tariffs. They're basically fighting to keep their economy afloat.

0:31:16.450 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Back maybe 10, 15 years ago, they loosened up. They

0:31:21.340 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 2>basically had a quasi-capitalist system, which was marginally controlled by

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:31.060
<v Speaker 2>the Communist Party. Now, under Xi Jinping, he has definitely

0:31:31.540 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 2>reined in all the private sector and tried to bring

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:39.479
<v Speaker 2>it back under tight Chinese Communist rule control. And the

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:42.510
<v Speaker 2>result is their economy is going down the tubes.

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:47.710
<v Speaker 3>That is super interesting stuff. I'm glad I brought that up.

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much, Bill Gertz, columnist and reporter of

0:31:50.820 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 3>The Washington Times. We'll keep an eye on the summit,

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:55.770
<v Speaker 3>but I, like you, don't expect a lot. Thanks for

0:31:55.810 --> 0:31:56.380
<v Speaker 3>your time today.

0:31:57.570 --> 0:31:58.460
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much.

0:31:59.190 --> 0:32:00.690
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:32:02.110 --> 0:32:04.050
<v Speaker 3>China's not going to change what they want to do.

0:32:04.090 --> 0:32:06.090
<v Speaker 3>They want to take over the world. That's their goal.

0:32:06.250 --> 0:32:09.010
<v Speaker 3>They're going to do everything they can to accomplish that.

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't understand why more people don't realize there's no

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:16.020
<v Speaker 3>such thing as a Chinese company that isn't part of

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:18.980
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese Communist Party. You're not allowed to have a

0:32:19.020 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 3>business or a company that's not part of, as he said,

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:26.230
<v Speaker 3>their military fusion or whatever it's called, whether it's TikTok

0:32:26.270 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 3>or a shoe company or whatever the heck it is.

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:31.300
<v Speaker 6>I was just talking about.

0:32:31.420 --> 0:32:34.110
<v Speaker 3>How I'm leading with a pool that I'm in with

0:32:34.130 --> 0:32:35.990
<v Speaker 3>the football games, even though I didn't know anything about it.

0:32:35.990 --> 0:32:38.190
<v Speaker 3>The football season is heating up, and every week feels

0:32:38.230 --> 0:32:42.010
<v Speaker 3>bigger with DraftKings. DraftKings is now live in all 50 states.

0:32:42.130 --> 0:32:46.500
<v Speaker 3>One app, all the football nationwide. DraftKings customers, if you're new,

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:49.460
<v Speaker 3>sign up with the code ARMSTRONG. Spend $ 5 to get

0:32:49.460 --> 0:32:53.060
<v Speaker 3>$ 150 in rewards within 14 days, including all markets. That

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:56.459
<v Speaker 3>code is ARMSTRONG. In partnership with DraftKings, the crown is yours.

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:57.870
<v Speaker 6>Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.

0:32:58.990 --> 0:32:59.910
<v Speaker 7>1-800-MY-RESET.

0:32:59.950 --> 0:33:01.170
<v Speaker 6>Connecticut. Call 888-789-7777.

0:33:01.350 --> 0:33:06.730
<v Speaker 7>Visit ccpg.org. On behalf of Boot Hill Casino in Kansas,

0:33:06.810 --> 0:33:09.210
<v Speaker 7>bet tax pass-through may apply in Illinois.

0:33:09.210 --> 0:33:09.670
<v Speaker 6>21 plus.

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 7>Void in Canada. Bet with DraftKings Sportsbook to get bonus

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 7>bets that expire in seven days or trade with DraftKings

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:18.180
<v Speaker 7>Predictions to get predictions dollars that expire in one year.

0:33:18.340 --> 0:33:21.340
<v Speaker 7>Event contract trading involves risk of loss. Predictions offer void

0:33:21.380 --> 0:33:25.230
<v Speaker 7>in New York. Non-withdrawable rewards issued as $ 50 click-to-claims every

0:33:25.270 --> 0:33:29.510
<v Speaker 7>seven days for 21 days. Terms at dkng.co slash offer.

0:33:29.610 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 7>Limited-time offer. Nationwide based on sportsbook predictions and free-to-play sports

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 7>contest availability. Varies by state. Armstrong and Getty.

0:33:43.900 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 4>A bakery in Soho has gained attention online for offering

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 4>a loaf of sourdough bread that costs $ 60, which sounds

0:33:51.380 --> 0:33:55.500
<v Speaker 4>like a lot, but instead of butter, it comes with $ 52.

0:33:54.900 --> 0:34:05.550
<v Speaker 3>So, Kirsten Sinema's ex-boyfriend went nuts and threw all.

0:34:05.490 --> 0:34:08.070
<v Speaker 6>Her paintings in the pool. If you don't remember who

0:34:08.110 --> 0:34:08.410
<v Speaker 6>she is.

0:34:09.930 --> 0:34:14.810
<v Speaker 3>She was the bisexual senator from Arizona, U.S.

0:34:14.850 --> 0:34:15.210
<v Speaker 6>Senator.

0:34:15.270 --> 0:34:19.650
<v Speaker 3>She was the first bisexual person or openly bisexual person

0:34:20.610 --> 0:34:23.270
<v Speaker 3>admitted to the elected to the U.S.

0:34:23.290 --> 0:34:23.529
<v Speaker 2>Senate.

0:34:26.830 --> 0:34:29.370
<v Speaker 3>Wore the like thigh high boots with her short skirts

0:34:29.410 --> 0:34:30.069
<v Speaker 3>and stuff like that.

0:34:30.469 --> 0:34:33.859
<v Speaker 6>Anyway, she and I liked her politics. I don't care

0:34:33.900 --> 0:34:35.020
<v Speaker 6>what she does in her personal life.

0:34:35.100 --> 0:34:37.460
<v Speaker 3>None of my business. I'm not dating her. Wasn't not

0:34:37.500 --> 0:34:38.969
<v Speaker 3>married to her or whatever. I don't care what she

0:34:38.989 --> 0:34:41.969
<v Speaker 3>does in personal life. I liked her politics. Remember with

0:34:42.010 --> 0:34:44.670
<v Speaker 3>Joe Manchin, she held firm on not blowing up the

0:34:44.710 --> 0:34:48.290
<v Speaker 3>filibuster and a couple other crazy things the Democrats wanted

0:34:48.330 --> 0:34:50.140
<v Speaker 3>to do that they would have done. And she was

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:54.339
<v Speaker 3>a Democrat senator from Arizona, eventually switched to independent. So

0:34:54.380 --> 0:34:56.259
<v Speaker 3>I liked her politics, but man, her personal life was

0:34:56.300 --> 0:35:01.280
<v Speaker 3>a mess. So she's currently being sued under North Carolina's

0:35:01.450 --> 0:35:05.489
<v Speaker 3>homewrecker laws. How do we feel about homewrecker laws if

0:35:05.530 --> 0:35:10.589
<v Speaker 3>you lean libertarian slash conservative? I go back and forth

0:35:10.630 --> 0:35:16.069
<v Speaker 3>on a lot of these different topics. The idea is that, well,

0:35:16.110 --> 0:35:18.469
<v Speaker 3>I can tell you specifically what is going on here.

0:35:19.340 --> 0:35:22.840
<v Speaker 3>So if you remember, Kyrsten Sinema had a scandal toward

0:35:22.860 --> 0:35:27.299
<v Speaker 3>the end of her being a U.S. senator where it

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:29.180
<v Speaker 3>was found out that she was having an affair with

0:35:29.219 --> 0:35:33.300
<v Speaker 3>her bodyguard. And she and her bodyguard were having sex

0:35:33.580 --> 0:35:37.700
<v Speaker 3>at hotels, on business trips, government trips all across the country.

0:35:38.020 --> 0:35:41.220
<v Speaker 3>All of this came out in testimony because they have

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:44.950
<v Speaker 3>homewrecker laws in North Carolina where her bodyguard was married

0:35:45.390 --> 0:35:49.850
<v Speaker 3>and the bodyguard's wife— he was married— is the bodyguard's wife

0:35:50.090 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 3>is suing Kyrsten Sinema under this homewrecker law, and the

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:56.140
<v Speaker 3>idea is that we had a family, which is also

0:35:56.219 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 3>a business, but we had a happy family, me, him,

0:35:58.780 --> 0:36:01.529
<v Speaker 3>and kids, and stuff like that, and you came along

0:36:01.950 --> 0:36:02.830
<v Speaker 3>and got in the.

0:36:02.850 --> 0:36:04.730
<v Speaker 6>Middle of that and wrecked our.

0:36:05.170 --> 0:36:06.430
<v Speaker 3>The way I look at it, and this is one

0:36:06.469 --> 0:36:08.730
<v Speaker 3>of the reasons I think the laws make sense to me,

0:36:09.070 --> 0:36:12.980
<v Speaker 3>you came along and wrecked our business. By getting involved

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 3>with my husband. You knew I was in a business

0:36:15.420 --> 0:36:19.219
<v Speaker 3>and you wrecked my business. There's only five states that

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:21.739
<v Speaker 3>have these laws. I don't know what I think about it.

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:23.759
<v Speaker 3>I'd like to hear a debate about this. But it's

0:36:23.820 --> 0:36:27.589
<v Speaker 3>North Carolina, Mississippi. So you're thinking, okay, the South. But

0:36:27.630 --> 0:36:32.180
<v Speaker 3>it's South Dakota, Hawaii, and Utah. So it's quite the

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 3>mishmash of states there that have these homewrecker laws. Anyway,

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:37.660
<v Speaker 3>because of the lawsuit under the homewrecker law, we found

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:40.860
<v Speaker 3>out all about this stuff of her having sex up

0:36:40.900 --> 0:36:43.900
<v Speaker 3>this bodyguard, and they were in an affair. Well, he

0:36:43.940 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 3>went nutso the other day, for whatever reason. We don't

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:51.730
<v Speaker 3>exactly know why. And went to her house, broke in,

0:36:52.010 --> 0:36:56.990
<v Speaker 3>and started damaging stuff. He caused more than $ 200, 000 in damage,

0:36:57.090 --> 0:37:01.130
<v Speaker 3>tossed dozens of valuable paintings into her pool. threatening that

0:37:01.170 --> 0:37:03.850
<v Speaker 3>he would throw a piece of artwork in the pool

0:37:04.030 --> 0:37:07.530
<v Speaker 3>every 10 minutes if she didn't concede to his demands

0:37:07.590 --> 0:37:10.529
<v Speaker 3>and make a post to Twitter. We don't know what

0:37:10.550 --> 0:37:13.690
<v Speaker 3>the post to Twitter was going to be. Post that

0:37:13.750 --> 0:37:15.890
<v Speaker 3>on Twitter. I'm throwing another painting in the pool. The

0:37:15.910 --> 0:37:18.859
<v Speaker 3>police finally showed up. There's like 12 pieces of artwork,

0:37:19.020 --> 0:37:21.180
<v Speaker 3>pieces of artwork at the bottom of the pool. The

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 3>guy went nuts. He's in a mental facility right now.

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:26.359
<v Speaker 3>But there's your Kyrsten Sinema update, if you were looking

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:26.739
<v Speaker 3>for one.

0:37:28.060 --> 0:37:29.140
<v Speaker 7>Armstrong and Getty.