1 00:00:02,720 --> 00:00:13,960 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. 2 00:00:18,520 --> 00:00:22,040 Speaker 2: Hello and welcome to another episode of The Odd Laws podcast. 3 00:00:22,120 --> 00:00:24,360 Speaker 3: I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway. 4 00:00:24,720 --> 00:00:27,760 Speaker 2: Tracy, I love doing the podcast, but I'm kind of 5 00:00:27,840 --> 00:00:32,479 Speaker 2: thinking about becoming a PhD level AI researcher if I 6 00:00:32,520 --> 00:00:33,519 Speaker 2: do a career pivot. 7 00:00:33,600 --> 00:00:37,000 Speaker 3: It seems something. Have you seen? 8 00:00:37,920 --> 00:00:41,080 Speaker 2: Have you seen like the salaries supposedly I still don't 9 00:00:41,080 --> 00:00:43,640 Speaker 2: actually believe them, But have you seen like the salaries 10 00:00:44,080 --> 00:00:47,200 Speaker 2: and comp packages that supposedly Meta and a few others 11 00:00:47,240 --> 00:00:47,839 Speaker 2: are paying for it. 12 00:00:47,960 --> 00:00:50,800 Speaker 4: I have seen some of the headlines. I have also 13 00:00:50,960 --> 00:00:54,320 Speaker 4: learned a bunch of new words like exploding offer and 14 00:00:54,440 --> 00:00:58,800 Speaker 4: acquahireh exploding offer sounds dangerous. What you want is an 15 00:00:58,800 --> 00:01:00,840 Speaker 4: explosive offer that you can't turn down. 16 00:01:01,000 --> 00:01:02,840 Speaker 2: I take it the exploding hire is like one that 17 00:01:02,960 --> 00:01:03,880 Speaker 2: lasts like five minutes. 18 00:01:04,000 --> 00:01:05,839 Speaker 4: Yeah, so you have to make a decision right away, 19 00:01:05,959 --> 00:01:09,319 Speaker 4: and the company that you're currently working for can't counteroffer. 20 00:01:09,640 --> 00:01:12,680 Speaker 2: So I read these headlines about some engineer something getting 21 00:01:12,680 --> 00:01:14,559 Speaker 2: paid one hundred million or two hundred and fifty million. 22 00:01:14,920 --> 00:01:17,320 Speaker 2: I actually literally don't believe them, Like I actually literally 23 00:01:17,360 --> 00:01:19,880 Speaker 2: think that's fake notes. Really, no but I. 24 00:01:19,840 --> 00:01:21,560 Speaker 4: Kind of just think it's probably made up of like 25 00:01:21,640 --> 00:01:23,399 Speaker 4: all this weird equity structure. 26 00:01:23,760 --> 00:01:26,559 Speaker 2: But I'm sure it's not all upfront anyway. We sort 27 00:01:26,600 --> 00:01:28,360 Speaker 2: of seem to be in a moment and it's actually 28 00:01:28,360 --> 00:01:33,000 Speaker 2: not just AI. I would say journalism, finance, et cetera, 29 00:01:33,400 --> 00:01:37,080 Speaker 2: where it's like the sportsification of a lot of different industries, 30 00:01:37,240 --> 00:01:42,880 Speaker 2: individual talent, the demand for individual superstars, and anything doing 31 00:01:43,040 --> 00:01:43,479 Speaker 2: very well. 32 00:01:44,000 --> 00:01:46,440 Speaker 4: I have a bunch of questions when it comes specifically 33 00:01:46,480 --> 00:01:50,520 Speaker 4: to AI, such as what makes an AI talent because 34 00:01:50,520 --> 00:01:53,160 Speaker 4: I assume if you're Mark Zuckerberg and you're trying to 35 00:01:53,200 --> 00:01:56,360 Speaker 4: assemble your AI dream team or something, Okay, sure you 36 00:01:56,400 --> 00:01:59,240 Speaker 4: have like a level of technical insight, and maybe you 37 00:01:59,280 --> 00:02:02,280 Speaker 4: hear people talk talking about, oh, this one guy is fantastic, 38 00:02:03,040 --> 00:02:04,840 Speaker 4: But I assume it's not like you can look at 39 00:02:04,880 --> 00:02:08,400 Speaker 4: their like individual levels of code. You can't see what 40 00:02:08,400 --> 00:02:10,680 Speaker 4: they're doing on like a daily basis. I don't know. 41 00:02:11,080 --> 00:02:13,000 Speaker 2: I don't know either. I don't know anything about this stuff, 42 00:02:13,040 --> 00:02:14,960 Speaker 2: but I'm really excited to say we do have the 43 00:02:15,000 --> 00:02:17,600 Speaker 2: perfect guests, A couple of guys who are right in 44 00:02:17,639 --> 00:02:20,280 Speaker 2: the middle of all of this and also who have 45 00:02:20,400 --> 00:02:23,000 Speaker 2: sort of been ahead of the curve in terms of this, 46 00:02:23,440 --> 00:02:26,880 Speaker 2: like I said, the sportification of the industry. We're going 47 00:02:26,919 --> 00:02:29,799 Speaker 2: to be speaking with John Coogan and Jordie Hayes. They 48 00:02:29,840 --> 00:02:33,799 Speaker 2: are the co hosts of TBPN. It's a live show podcast. 49 00:02:33,840 --> 00:02:38,640 Speaker 2: It's become one of my favorite new media properties. It exists, 50 00:02:38,639 --> 00:02:40,880 Speaker 2: and I'm really excited we have them both in the 51 00:02:40,960 --> 00:02:43,600 Speaker 2: studio here with us today. So John and Jordi, thank 52 00:02:43,639 --> 00:02:45,440 Speaker 2: you so much for coming on aut Loots. 53 00:02:45,560 --> 00:02:46,320 Speaker 5: Thanks for having us. 54 00:02:46,400 --> 00:02:47,519 Speaker 3: We're so excited to be here. 55 00:02:47,720 --> 00:02:49,160 Speaker 2: I love by the way you guys like make these 56 00:02:49,200 --> 00:02:51,960 Speaker 2: like baseball cards every time, So it's so clever for 57 00:02:51,960 --> 00:02:54,560 Speaker 2: those who are not paying attention. Why do you sort 58 00:02:54,600 --> 00:02:57,280 Speaker 2: of give the high level overview of like what you 59 00:02:57,320 --> 00:03:00,919 Speaker 2: see happening in this like crazy talent for people who 60 00:03:00,919 --> 00:03:03,600 Speaker 2: don't know about this, what is actually going on? This 61 00:03:04,040 --> 00:03:07,400 Speaker 2: talent war for people who know how to do AI 62 00:03:07,560 --> 00:03:09,360 Speaker 2: or train a model or whatever it is. 63 00:03:09,680 --> 00:03:12,760 Speaker 5: Yeah, the League or the mag seven the serious teams 64 00:03:12,800 --> 00:03:16,400 Speaker 5: are all worth over a trillion dollars. Tesla's in a 65 00:03:16,440 --> 00:03:19,040 Speaker 5: different kind of boat some days, but pretty much there's 66 00:03:19,080 --> 00:03:22,840 Speaker 5: multiply seven trillion plus dollar companies now, so there is 67 00:03:22,840 --> 00:03:25,760 Speaker 5: an inordinate amount of money to flow around. And if 68 00:03:25,800 --> 00:03:29,520 Speaker 5: you think about investing zero point one percent of your 69 00:03:29,520 --> 00:03:33,240 Speaker 5: market cap to make your business potentially five percent better, 70 00:03:33,280 --> 00:03:35,880 Speaker 5: that's a trade you take all day. The number is staggering, 71 00:03:36,200 --> 00:03:41,040 Speaker 5: but now you're seeing companies pay hundreds of millions of dollars. 72 00:03:41,040 --> 00:03:42,960 Speaker 5: I think you mentioned that. You know, there's a lot 73 00:03:42,960 --> 00:03:45,200 Speaker 5: of debate over whether that was fake news or not. 74 00:03:45,640 --> 00:03:47,920 Speaker 5: They seem like they are very real offers and they 75 00:03:47,960 --> 00:03:49,920 Speaker 5: are indeed happening, and there's a whole bunch of different 76 00:03:49,920 --> 00:03:52,080 Speaker 5: ways that you can kind of underwrite that. But we 77 00:03:52,080 --> 00:03:55,600 Speaker 5: could start with going through just a little bit of 78 00:03:55,640 --> 00:03:58,360 Speaker 5: the history here of how we got into this place 79 00:03:58,440 --> 00:04:01,000 Speaker 5: or what these AI researchers are actually doing. I'm happy 80 00:04:01,040 --> 00:04:02,520 Speaker 5: to kind of answer any question. 81 00:04:03,000 --> 00:04:05,560 Speaker 4: Okay, well, why don't we start with the baseball analogy? 82 00:04:05,840 --> 00:04:10,960 Speaker 4: Then if I was collecting AI engineer cards, who's the 83 00:04:10,960 --> 00:04:13,360 Speaker 4: most valuable? Like who do I actually want to have? 84 00:04:13,560 --> 00:04:15,840 Speaker 4: And then secondly, what are the stats that are. 85 00:04:17,040 --> 00:04:18,960 Speaker 6: So taking a little bit of a step back talking 86 00:04:18,960 --> 00:04:22,320 Speaker 6: about kind of the sportsification of tech and business, which 87 00:04:22,360 --> 00:04:25,640 Speaker 6: has been a huge catalyst for our show. I think 88 00:04:25,680 --> 00:04:29,640 Speaker 6: we realized early on people would call TVPN the Sports 89 00:04:29,640 --> 00:04:32,920 Speaker 6: Center for Tech or some analogy like that. We were 90 00:04:32,960 --> 00:04:34,919 Speaker 6: a little bit it sounded cool. We didn't really know 91 00:04:34,920 --> 00:04:37,720 Speaker 6: what that meant. John and I don't watch sports at all, 92 00:04:37,920 --> 00:04:43,400 Speaker 6: but for basically, for basically like two decades now, I'm 93 00:04:43,440 --> 00:04:47,279 Speaker 6: in my late twenties, John mid thirties, and we've followed 94 00:04:47,320 --> 00:04:50,279 Speaker 6: tech in business the way that our college friends follow sports. 95 00:04:50,360 --> 00:04:56,960 Speaker 6: So in sports you have players, personalities, coaches, managers, leagues, teams, 96 00:04:57,120 --> 00:05:01,000 Speaker 6: and people obsess over all the details. Fully understood that, 97 00:05:01,040 --> 00:05:03,560 Speaker 6: I mean, I understood kind of the draw, but it 98 00:05:03,640 --> 00:05:05,560 Speaker 6: just was never for me. Whereas John and I would 99 00:05:05,560 --> 00:05:08,680 Speaker 6: pick up the newspaper as teenagers and we were tracking 100 00:05:08,720 --> 00:05:13,960 Speaker 6: the talent, the CEOs, the companies, the markets, the industries, 101 00:05:14,520 --> 00:05:17,560 Speaker 6: and it's just something that we obsessed over. And so 102 00:05:18,360 --> 00:05:21,120 Speaker 6: this year has been amazing. As these AI researchers have 103 00:05:21,279 --> 00:05:24,560 Speaker 6: been getting these sort of superstar max contracts, which is 104 00:05:24,560 --> 00:05:27,039 Speaker 6: what we would call them, we would start joking on 105 00:05:27,080 --> 00:05:29,400 Speaker 6: the show and be like, look, this guy just went. 106 00:05:29,279 --> 00:05:29,840 Speaker 3: Over to Meta. 107 00:05:29,880 --> 00:05:33,040 Speaker 6: It's probably you know, four year contracts, you know, one year, Cliff. 108 00:05:33,240 --> 00:05:35,200 Speaker 6: And it just got more and more and more real 109 00:05:35,760 --> 00:05:39,960 Speaker 6: as the kind of demand for world class AI researchers 110 00:05:40,000 --> 00:05:43,680 Speaker 6: completely outstripped the supply, and we actually put out something 111 00:05:44,120 --> 00:05:46,200 Speaker 6: a couple of days ago called the Metas List, and 112 00:05:46,320 --> 00:05:48,440 Speaker 6: John can go a little bit more into into the 113 00:05:48,520 --> 00:05:51,039 Speaker 6: name behind that. It was kind of our take on 114 00:05:51,080 --> 00:05:53,600 Speaker 6: the Midas List, which is, we built a list of 115 00:05:54,160 --> 00:05:57,200 Speaker 6: top roughly one hundred AI researchers and rank them on 116 00:05:57,240 --> 00:05:58,960 Speaker 6: a bunch of different factors. And so when you talk 117 00:05:59,000 --> 00:06:03,640 Speaker 6: about what goes into what makes a great AI researcher, 118 00:06:03,920 --> 00:06:06,280 Speaker 6: there's a bunch of different factors. One that you can 119 00:06:06,320 --> 00:06:08,800 Speaker 6: get right into the numbers with is like citations. So 120 00:06:09,240 --> 00:06:12,479 Speaker 6: if somebody is a researcher, they've been publishing, you know, studies, papers, 121 00:06:12,520 --> 00:06:14,560 Speaker 6: et cetera for quite a while at this point, and 122 00:06:14,600 --> 00:06:18,400 Speaker 6: you can just see quantitatively what their contributions have been 123 00:06:18,440 --> 00:06:19,080 Speaker 6: to the industry. 124 00:06:19,080 --> 00:06:21,560 Speaker 3: And so that's like a good starting point to understand. 125 00:06:21,600 --> 00:06:26,599 Speaker 6: And historically Elon even said earlier this week, honestly, it 126 00:06:26,680 --> 00:06:28,600 Speaker 6: was like an hour after we posted the Metaalist. 127 00:06:28,680 --> 00:06:30,160 Speaker 3: Probably unrelated, but who knows. 128 00:06:30,600 --> 00:06:34,320 Speaker 6: He's basically saying that AI researchers a and engineers, We're 129 00:06:34,360 --> 00:06:36,560 Speaker 6: just going to call them engineers now, and that makes 130 00:06:36,600 --> 00:06:39,279 Speaker 6: a lot of sense for someone like Elon to do 131 00:06:39,360 --> 00:06:43,680 Speaker 6: as somebody who's always been very engineering focused, less focused 132 00:06:43,720 --> 00:06:48,320 Speaker 6: on you know, entirely net new innovation. More so, how 133 00:06:48,320 --> 00:06:52,600 Speaker 6: do we make the best possible versions of products that exists. 134 00:06:52,640 --> 00:06:55,440 Speaker 6: And it's not to say that he hasn't innovated in 135 00:06:55,480 --> 00:06:58,839 Speaker 6: a bunch of different ways, but it is a really 136 00:06:58,880 --> 00:07:01,400 Speaker 6: wild moment in time, and it's been a fun moment 137 00:07:01,520 --> 00:07:05,360 Speaker 6: because historically you hear about this minas list investor, you know, 138 00:07:05,640 --> 00:07:08,240 Speaker 6: making two billion dollars of carry on some deal, or 139 00:07:08,279 --> 00:07:10,600 Speaker 6: this founder you know I p O ing. Today we 140 00:07:10,680 --> 00:07:13,120 Speaker 6: have you know, the Pigma I p O and uh, 141 00:07:13,360 --> 00:07:15,400 Speaker 6: you know there's a bunch of people that are going 142 00:07:15,480 --> 00:07:18,160 Speaker 6: to make billions of dollars there, But you don't hear 143 00:07:18,240 --> 00:07:22,160 Speaker 6: about the hundredth engineer that was hired, yeah, making you 144 00:07:22,240 --> 00:07:26,400 Speaker 6: start a one hundred million dollars signing bonus. And all 145 00:07:26,440 --> 00:07:28,400 Speaker 6: of this makes a ton of sense in the context 146 00:07:28,400 --> 00:07:30,960 Speaker 6: of what John said, because you look metas up I 147 00:07:31,200 --> 00:07:33,960 Speaker 6: checked this morning one hundred and ninety five billion dollars 148 00:07:34,280 --> 00:07:37,520 Speaker 6: new market cap and think about how many one hundred 149 00:07:37,520 --> 00:07:40,520 Speaker 6: million dollars signing bonuses you can make against that kind 150 00:07:40,520 --> 00:07:41,080 Speaker 6: of market cap. 151 00:07:41,120 --> 00:07:44,160 Speaker 3: Should we answer your question, yes, who the who's the bus? 152 00:07:44,240 --> 00:07:49,000 Speaker 5: Who's the whale? To have the who is the light whale? 153 00:07:51,240 --> 00:07:56,280 Speaker 4: Don't say anything about whales or whale products or hunting. 154 00:07:56,160 --> 00:07:59,840 Speaker 2: Large is the way. 155 00:08:00,240 --> 00:08:02,760 Speaker 5: Perhaps he is the Michael Jordan of AI researcher, but 156 00:08:03,320 --> 00:08:06,080 Speaker 5: Ilias Sitskiver is really He's at the top of our 157 00:08:06,160 --> 00:08:09,880 Speaker 5: list for a variety of reasons. And if you're not 158 00:08:09,920 --> 00:08:13,120 Speaker 5: familiar with Ilias Sutzkiver, he is an AI researcher who 159 00:08:13,320 --> 00:08:16,600 Speaker 5: was at open AI for a long time, and there's 160 00:08:16,640 --> 00:08:19,280 Speaker 5: a few different ways to characterize him. He is both 161 00:08:19,320 --> 00:08:23,640 Speaker 5: coming up with new ways to implement AI algorithms the 162 00:08:23,680 --> 00:08:26,720 Speaker 5: way you train the model, but he's also very good 163 00:08:26,840 --> 00:08:32,040 Speaker 5: at for a long time identifying which the shortest path 164 00:08:32,120 --> 00:08:35,160 Speaker 5: in the tech tree. So there are branches of choices 165 00:08:35,200 --> 00:08:38,000 Speaker 5: that you need to make as you develop the new 166 00:08:38,440 --> 00:08:42,440 Speaker 5: AI models, and he was very early at while he 167 00:08:42,520 --> 00:08:45,160 Speaker 5: was at open AI, he identified that the transformer paper 168 00:08:45,200 --> 00:08:48,000 Speaker 5: from Google. He didn't invent that it was at Google, 169 00:08:48,320 --> 00:08:51,920 Speaker 5: but the transformer technology was extremely important and that it 170 00:08:52,080 --> 00:08:55,679 Speaker 5: had the ability to do remarkable things once scaled up massively, 171 00:08:56,080 --> 00:08:59,120 Speaker 5: and so he was the driving force between kind of 172 00:08:59,200 --> 00:09:03,040 Speaker 5: identifying the transformers as the correct path. Now we look 173 00:09:03,120 --> 00:09:05,079 Speaker 5: back on Attention as All you Need, which is the 174 00:09:05,160 --> 00:09:07,959 Speaker 5: name of the paper that defines the architecture that is 175 00:09:08,080 --> 00:09:10,719 Speaker 5: used in these modern large language models that you use 176 00:09:10,720 --> 00:09:11,200 Speaker 5: when you're. 177 00:09:11,080 --> 00:09:11,880 Speaker 3: In chat GPT. 178 00:09:12,520 --> 00:09:15,880 Speaker 5: There were twenty five other potential paths that we could 179 00:09:15,880 --> 00:09:19,280 Speaker 5: have gone down. You know, the story goes is that 180 00:09:19,480 --> 00:09:22,240 Speaker 5: he really identified that and said, let's go really really 181 00:09:22,280 --> 00:09:22,760 Speaker 5: hard on that. 182 00:09:22,880 --> 00:09:26,120 Speaker 4: So he can sort of identify the innovation, what's new, 183 00:09:26,240 --> 00:09:29,560 Speaker 4: and then also identify the most efficient path to actually 184 00:09:29,559 --> 00:09:30,080 Speaker 4: execute on. 185 00:09:30,240 --> 00:09:32,640 Speaker 5: Yes, and if you're familiar with what the more the 186 00:09:32,640 --> 00:09:37,319 Speaker 5: more modern, So the first arc of LMS and these 187 00:09:37,440 --> 00:09:41,360 Speaker 5: chatbots scaling up where really this tack the transformer paper, 188 00:09:41,559 --> 00:09:44,160 Speaker 5: understand that that's the correct architecture, and then scale it 189 00:09:44,240 --> 00:09:45,880 Speaker 5: up really really big. So you need to be able 190 00:09:45,920 --> 00:09:48,600 Speaker 5: to not just write the code to implement that that 191 00:09:48,679 --> 00:09:52,160 Speaker 5: particular algorithm. You need to marshal the capital to say 192 00:09:52,320 --> 00:09:54,120 Speaker 5: we're going really really big and we're going to build 193 00:09:54,120 --> 00:09:55,400 Speaker 5: the big data center. We're going to spend a lot 194 00:09:55,400 --> 00:09:56,920 Speaker 5: of money, but it's going to be worth it because 195 00:09:56,920 --> 00:10:00,480 Speaker 5: we understand the trade offs here. Then the second kind 196 00:10:00,480 --> 00:10:04,160 Speaker 5: of innovation or correct call he had was during the 197 00:10:04,200 --> 00:10:07,600 Speaker 5: sam Altman, Ouster and return. He was working on a 198 00:10:07,600 --> 00:10:10,480 Speaker 5: project that was code named q Star, and there was 199 00:10:10,520 --> 00:10:13,960 Speaker 5: a lot of speculation about what q star was. Was 200 00:10:13,960 --> 00:10:15,719 Speaker 5: it the secret super intelligence thing? 201 00:10:15,760 --> 00:10:16,680 Speaker 3: What did Ilius see? 202 00:10:16,880 --> 00:10:19,440 Speaker 5: Yes, yeah, because he was going back and forth in 203 00:10:19,480 --> 00:10:22,120 Speaker 5: support of Sam Altman and then leaving and then and 204 00:10:22,160 --> 00:10:23,600 Speaker 5: then it was back and forth, and there's a lot 205 00:10:23,640 --> 00:10:25,959 Speaker 5: of drama there. Always keep them guessing, Always keep them 206 00:10:25,960 --> 00:10:28,599 Speaker 5: guessing for sure, and so there was there was a 207 00:10:28,600 --> 00:10:30,560 Speaker 5: lot of rumors, but what it wound up being was 208 00:10:30,679 --> 00:10:34,200 Speaker 5: just reasoning, which is now what is available in UH 209 00:10:34,280 --> 00:10:37,240 Speaker 5: if you use any of the three models in chat GPT, 210 00:10:37,679 --> 00:10:41,320 Speaker 5: or you use deep SEKR one and it's it goes 211 00:10:41,360 --> 00:10:43,920 Speaker 5: by a number of different names. The project was rebranded 212 00:10:44,040 --> 00:10:47,120 Speaker 5: Strawberry and then the O series, And you can think 213 00:10:47,160 --> 00:10:50,400 Speaker 5: about this as the test time. Inference is the other buzzword, 214 00:10:50,440 --> 00:10:54,400 Speaker 5: but basically the LM, you're using the same foundation model, 215 00:10:54,640 --> 00:10:56,880 Speaker 5: but you're running it a ton more to come up 216 00:10:56,920 --> 00:10:59,520 Speaker 5: with a bunch of potential answers to questions and then 217 00:10:59,679 --> 00:11:04,880 Speaker 5: narrowing that down and essentially applying what's called reinforcement learning 218 00:11:05,040 --> 00:11:08,559 Speaker 5: to the transformer architecture and the pre training that's happening, 219 00:11:08,559 --> 00:11:11,080 Speaker 5: and so he was very critical in leading that project, 220 00:11:11,240 --> 00:11:14,040 Speaker 5: and so that's allowed him to eventually, once he left 221 00:11:14,080 --> 00:11:17,760 Speaker 5: open ai, go start a new company called Safe Superintelligence SSI, 222 00:11:18,040 --> 00:11:20,480 Speaker 5: and he's gotten that company to what a thirty billion 223 00:11:20,520 --> 00:11:23,120 Speaker 5: dollar evaluation, thirty two billion dollar valuation. 224 00:11:22,880 --> 00:11:26,199 Speaker 6: Which ties into the talent war because I think it's 225 00:11:26,440 --> 00:11:28,480 Speaker 6: I don't know that it's been officially announced yet, but 226 00:11:28,720 --> 00:11:33,400 Speaker 6: people are expecting Daniel Gross to join Meta, who. 227 00:11:33,280 --> 00:11:37,040 Speaker 5: Was the CEO and co founder of that company. Side 228 00:11:37,040 --> 00:11:40,160 Speaker 5: and so back to your back to the white dynamic. 229 00:11:40,320 --> 00:11:42,640 Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, if you guys get together, they start. 230 00:11:42,400 --> 00:11:45,360 Speaker 6: A company within a year, it's worth thirty two billion dollars, 231 00:11:46,040 --> 00:11:48,240 Speaker 6: and one of the people on that team decides to 232 00:11:48,280 --> 00:11:53,320 Speaker 6: actually leave and join Meta. It sounds insane, probably leaving 233 00:11:53,360 --> 00:11:56,240 Speaker 6: billions of dollars on the table, but you can kind 234 00:11:56,240 --> 00:11:59,480 Speaker 6: of trace the this talent war actually back to the 235 00:11:59,480 --> 00:12:02,680 Speaker 6: open ai founding team. When you think about all the 236 00:12:02,679 --> 00:12:05,960 Speaker 6: different players, right, you have Mira Murti who's now with 237 00:12:06,040 --> 00:12:08,680 Speaker 6: Thinking Machines, she was a CTO of open Ai. You 238 00:12:08,760 --> 00:12:12,640 Speaker 6: have Ilia Sutskiverer with SSI, you have Elon with XAI, 239 00:12:13,080 --> 00:12:15,160 Speaker 6: and not to mention, you have these sort of hyperscalers 240 00:12:15,160 --> 00:12:17,800 Speaker 6: who are also competing for the same talent. So yeah, 241 00:12:17,800 --> 00:12:20,959 Speaker 6: that's really kind of the origin story in the genesis, 242 00:12:21,040 --> 00:12:24,160 Speaker 6: And it's been amazing to see open AI's progress despite 243 00:12:24,559 --> 00:12:27,400 Speaker 6: you know, the recent reporting is around you know, losing 244 00:12:27,400 --> 00:12:30,439 Speaker 6: a bunch of top researchers, which is real, but it 245 00:12:30,600 --> 00:12:33,440 Speaker 6: wasn't that long ago that they lost like two very 246 00:12:33,640 --> 00:12:38,120 Speaker 6: very very key senior execs in Ilia and Mira. 247 00:12:53,720 --> 00:12:55,960 Speaker 2: So a few stats were recording this. By the way, 248 00:12:56,120 --> 00:12:59,280 Speaker 2: July thirty first, Meta came out with earnings last night. 249 00:12:59,320 --> 00:13:01,160 Speaker 2: The stock is up like ten percent on stuff like 250 00:13:01,200 --> 00:13:04,360 Speaker 2: one hundred and fifty billion more dollars. The other thing is, 251 00:13:04,760 --> 00:13:08,360 Speaker 2: and I think this gets ties into the logic behind 252 00:13:08,360 --> 00:13:10,320 Speaker 2: the comp so they're going to spend like something like 253 00:13:10,360 --> 00:13:13,520 Speaker 2: another seventy billion on capac some stuff like that. So 254 00:13:13,559 --> 00:13:17,640 Speaker 2: we know these are incredibly computationally intensive things. They're electricity 255 00:13:18,240 --> 00:13:23,920 Speaker 2: intensive things. You mentioned paper citations, but also actually having 256 00:13:23,960 --> 00:13:26,640 Speaker 2: the experience of one of these runs, and it does 257 00:13:26,679 --> 00:13:29,160 Speaker 2: seem very highly intuitive to me that if you've done 258 00:13:29,200 --> 00:13:32,120 Speaker 2: it before, and if you could even cut down the 259 00:13:32,160 --> 00:13:35,320 Speaker 2: cost of a training run or set up a big 260 00:13:35,600 --> 00:13:39,240 Speaker 2: computer rack for you can pay five very quickly you 261 00:13:39,320 --> 00:13:44,079 Speaker 2: have five percent less, right, exactly happened. Instantly pay then 262 00:13:44,080 --> 00:13:46,439 Speaker 2: you instantly pay for your salary, I could say, because 263 00:13:46,520 --> 00:13:49,079 Speaker 2: and this is different from the B to B SaaS yer, right, 264 00:13:49,400 --> 00:13:52,240 Speaker 2: because you can there's these huge kpax costs if you 265 00:13:52,240 --> 00:13:55,400 Speaker 2: could just marginally improve the efficiency that that pays that 266 00:13:55,440 --> 00:13:57,000 Speaker 2: one hundred million sellar salary. 267 00:13:57,280 --> 00:14:00,680 Speaker 5: And so this this literally just happened right before Mark 268 00:14:00,760 --> 00:14:03,760 Speaker 5: Zuckerberg went on the talent acquisition spray that he's been 269 00:14:03,800 --> 00:14:07,920 Speaker 5: on for the last few months. Meta's main AI model 270 00:14:08,000 --> 00:14:11,800 Speaker 5: is called Lama and they've released a series of versions 271 00:14:11,920 --> 00:14:15,320 Speaker 5: of that model, and Lama four was the latest and greatest, 272 00:14:15,679 --> 00:14:18,880 Speaker 5: and it didn't go very well. And the rumors about 273 00:14:18,920 --> 00:14:23,320 Speaker 5: why it kind of failed to deliver on expectations was 274 00:14:23,360 --> 00:14:25,880 Speaker 5: that they kind of went down the wrong path in 275 00:14:25,920 --> 00:14:28,400 Speaker 5: the tech tree and they focused a little bit too 276 00:14:28,480 --> 00:14:34,120 Speaker 5: much on scale insanely costly. So they've released a part 277 00:14:34,240 --> 00:14:37,160 Speaker 5: of Lama four, but they have yet to release Malama 278 00:14:37,200 --> 00:14:40,000 Speaker 5: for Behemoth, which is their biggest model, the most the 279 00:14:40,040 --> 00:14:44,760 Speaker 5: most aggressive, and they had just little details in the implementation, 280 00:14:44,880 --> 00:14:48,120 Speaker 5: little choices of how you chunk the attention in the 281 00:14:48,160 --> 00:14:50,560 Speaker 5: transformer model, you know, we're operating in this level of 282 00:14:50,560 --> 00:14:54,480 Speaker 5: abstraction up here talking about you know, it's a prediction model, 283 00:14:54,520 --> 00:14:56,520 Speaker 5: and then we talk about transformers a little bit. There 284 00:14:56,520 --> 00:15:00,240 Speaker 5: are sub algorithms within these systems that you make the 285 00:15:00,240 --> 00:15:03,160 Speaker 5: wrong decision and you could get a vastly different. 286 00:15:03,160 --> 00:15:05,120 Speaker 2: Electricity bill goes up by one hundred. 287 00:15:04,920 --> 00:15:07,040 Speaker 5: Many exactly, so all of that money that was spent 288 00:15:07,080 --> 00:15:09,840 Speaker 5: on that electricity and then build out of course that 289 00:15:09,960 --> 00:15:12,360 Speaker 5: it can absorb that. But when you think about the 290 00:15:13,040 --> 00:15:14,640 Speaker 5: cost of getting correct. 291 00:15:14,400 --> 00:15:17,320 Speaker 6: One thing is is a lot of these projects will 292 00:15:17,320 --> 00:15:20,480 Speaker 6: be energy constrained too, So efficiency is going to matter 293 00:15:20,640 --> 00:15:23,080 Speaker 6: a lot. Oh, it hasn't been the core focus today. 294 00:15:23,320 --> 00:15:25,600 Speaker 6: If you talk to anybody at the big labs, they 295 00:15:25,640 --> 00:15:29,120 Speaker 6: are focused on maxing out intelligence at the cost of 296 00:15:29,160 --> 00:15:31,640 Speaker 6: efficiency because they know they can. You know, you want 297 00:15:31,680 --> 00:15:33,200 Speaker 6: to be on the bleeding edge. You want to have 298 00:15:33,240 --> 00:15:34,040 Speaker 6: the smartest model. 299 00:15:34,080 --> 00:15:34,560 Speaker 3: You want to be. 300 00:15:35,000 --> 00:15:38,400 Speaker 6: You know, there's debates around which benchmarks actually matter, how 301 00:15:38,440 --> 00:15:43,080 Speaker 6: important AI benchmarks really are. But energy is going to 302 00:15:43,400 --> 00:15:45,640 Speaker 6: you know, a lot of people are saying Zuck won't 303 00:15:45,640 --> 00:15:47,600 Speaker 6: even be able to spend as much as he wants 304 00:15:47,640 --> 00:15:50,840 Speaker 6: to spend on data center development purely because of the 305 00:15:51,000 --> 00:15:51,760 Speaker 6: energy constraint. 306 00:15:52,720 --> 00:15:55,560 Speaker 4: Can you talk a little bit about what happened with Windsurf, 307 00:15:55,640 --> 00:15:57,760 Speaker 4: because this is this is the one that seems to 308 00:15:57,760 --> 00:16:01,080 Speaker 4: have like captured everyone's attention, in part because there was 309 00:16:01,240 --> 00:16:03,720 Speaker 4: the drama. It almost seemed like it came out of 310 00:16:03,760 --> 00:16:06,880 Speaker 4: like a Silicon Valley the show script or something where 311 00:16:07,080 --> 00:16:09,960 Speaker 4: all the employees were gathering expecting to hear that they 312 00:16:09,960 --> 00:16:11,920 Speaker 4: were going to be bought by Open Ai, and then 313 00:16:11,920 --> 00:16:14,680 Speaker 4: they find out that actually their CTO has just been 314 00:16:14,680 --> 00:16:17,120 Speaker 4: bought by someone else completely different, and they're sort of 315 00:16:17,200 --> 00:16:18,360 Speaker 4: left in the lart ceo. 316 00:16:18,880 --> 00:16:21,560 Speaker 3: Oh is top CEO in top fifty? 317 00:16:21,640 --> 00:16:24,880 Speaker 5: Well, how about I give some prehistory on acquires and 318 00:16:24,880 --> 00:16:26,920 Speaker 5: you can take take us through that actual weekend. So 319 00:16:27,360 --> 00:16:30,560 Speaker 5: there has been a trend of sort of these zombie 320 00:16:30,560 --> 00:16:34,440 Speaker 5: aqua hires. Everyone has different names for this, but effectively, 321 00:16:34,640 --> 00:16:37,320 Speaker 5: when a very large company, usually a hyperscaler, wants to 322 00:16:37,360 --> 00:16:41,040 Speaker 5: go and acquire a company that has AI talent, they 323 00:16:41,120 --> 00:16:42,760 Speaker 5: used to just buy the whole company. And this was 324 00:16:42,800 --> 00:16:45,560 Speaker 5: part of the Silicon Valley social contract that even if 325 00:16:45,600 --> 00:16:50,120 Speaker 5: I am in operations or sales or finance or HR, 326 00:16:50,480 --> 00:16:52,800 Speaker 5: if I join a hot startup and it gets acquired 327 00:16:52,840 --> 00:16:54,920 Speaker 5: I'm coming along for the ride to exit and I 328 00:16:54,960 --> 00:16:56,720 Speaker 5: get the job at Google at least for a little bit. 329 00:16:56,760 --> 00:17:00,480 Speaker 5: And then yeah, if I underperform Google or Meta Amazon, 330 00:17:00,480 --> 00:17:03,280 Speaker 5: they might lay me off. But even if I'm somewhat redundant, 331 00:17:03,320 --> 00:17:05,240 Speaker 5: I'm coming along for the ride and my cashing out 332 00:17:05,240 --> 00:17:07,639 Speaker 5: my shares, and these the reason that you go and 333 00:17:07,680 --> 00:17:09,720 Speaker 5: take the risk and take the little bit of the 334 00:17:09,800 --> 00:17:12,159 Speaker 5: rougher ride that is a startup. You don't get as 335 00:17:12,160 --> 00:17:14,199 Speaker 5: many amenities, but you get the lottery tickets in the 336 00:17:14,240 --> 00:17:17,960 Speaker 5: form of stock options that hopefully pay out. But there's 337 00:17:18,000 --> 00:17:20,720 Speaker 5: a big question about how much of this is the 338 00:17:20,760 --> 00:17:23,760 Speaker 5: acquirer just not wanting to deal with the d duplication 339 00:17:23,920 --> 00:17:27,280 Speaker 5: of the back office. There's also the question of the FTC. 340 00:17:27,680 --> 00:17:30,280 Speaker 5: A lot of the FTC rulings have made it much 341 00:17:30,400 --> 00:17:34,560 Speaker 5: harder to get these these big acquisitions across the finish line. 342 00:17:34,680 --> 00:17:37,639 Speaker 5: And even if they even if the FDC does approve, 343 00:17:37,680 --> 00:17:39,280 Speaker 5: they can often hold it up for six months. And 344 00:17:39,320 --> 00:17:41,400 Speaker 5: we're in a race where if you deliver the best 345 00:17:41,440 --> 00:17:43,480 Speaker 5: model today, you're going to make more money. You're going 346 00:17:43,520 --> 00:17:45,280 Speaker 5: to be the hot company, you're going to acquire. It's 347 00:17:45,280 --> 00:17:48,720 Speaker 5: all this big snowball so companies. This started with the 348 00:17:48,800 --> 00:17:50,800 Speaker 5: very few, but character Ai was the big one with 349 00:17:50,840 --> 00:17:51,960 Speaker 5: Noam Shazir. 350 00:17:51,840 --> 00:17:55,399 Speaker 6: Who was in a very very interesting situation where so 351 00:17:55,560 --> 00:17:58,840 Speaker 6: Nome wanted to go back to Google, which made sense. 352 00:17:58,920 --> 00:18:02,600 Speaker 6: Google wanted him there as well researches of a yes, 353 00:18:02,640 --> 00:18:04,840 Speaker 6: and so having him go back there made a lot 354 00:18:04,840 --> 00:18:05,160 Speaker 6: of sense. 355 00:18:05,160 --> 00:18:06,480 Speaker 3: I think he had built this platform. 356 00:18:06,520 --> 00:18:10,080 Speaker 6: He built like the first at scale AI companionship platform. 357 00:18:10,119 --> 00:18:13,639 Speaker 6: If you look at character AI's site traffic today, I 358 00:18:13,680 --> 00:18:16,000 Speaker 6: mean it's it's one of the largest sites on the 359 00:18:16,040 --> 00:18:18,760 Speaker 6: internet still, which is wild. But I think he realized, 360 00:18:18,960 --> 00:18:20,800 Speaker 6: I want to work on AI research. I don't want 361 00:18:20,800 --> 00:18:24,280 Speaker 6: to work on AI girlfriends, boyfriends, that that kind of thing. 362 00:18:24,800 --> 00:18:26,359 Speaker 3: And as part of that. 363 00:18:26,320 --> 00:18:32,080 Speaker 6: Deal, character Ai effectively became entirely employee owned and they 364 00:18:32,080 --> 00:18:34,000 Speaker 6: had a really strong balance sheet. They had a crazy 365 00:18:34,119 --> 00:18:37,160 Speaker 6: amount of users. They weren't monetizing maybe that well yet. 366 00:18:37,160 --> 00:18:38,879 Speaker 6: But I think a lot of the employees in that 367 00:18:38,920 --> 00:18:41,160 Speaker 6: situation where like this is pretty cool. We're basically running 368 00:18:41,160 --> 00:18:43,000 Speaker 6: a co op where we all own a lot of 369 00:18:43,040 --> 00:18:43,520 Speaker 6: this company. 370 00:18:43,520 --> 00:18:43,960 Speaker 3: We don't have. 371 00:18:43,920 --> 00:18:47,040 Speaker 6: Investors, we don't have the same kind of pressure to perform, 372 00:18:47,359 --> 00:18:51,360 Speaker 6: and that space is competitive, right, even Elon is competing 373 00:18:51,400 --> 00:18:54,640 Speaker 6: there now Chat GPT gets used as a companion, but. 374 00:18:55,000 --> 00:18:56,600 Speaker 3: Not competitive like Cogen. 375 00:18:56,720 --> 00:18:58,800 Speaker 6: And so that was the dynamic here that was insane 376 00:18:59,160 --> 00:19:04,360 Speaker 6: because Google clearly cares about code generation. They see anthropic adding. 377 00:19:04,520 --> 00:19:07,400 Speaker 6: They went from one to four billion dollars in run 378 00:19:07,480 --> 00:19:11,480 Speaker 6: rate this year. They're pacing to be somewhere around ten 379 00:19:11,680 --> 00:19:13,199 Speaker 6: at the end of the year, and so that's a 380 00:19:13,200 --> 00:19:16,080 Speaker 6: Google size market, right. Google is going to ultimately care 381 00:19:16,080 --> 00:19:18,639 Speaker 6: about Cogen, So it made sense for them to say, hey, 382 00:19:18,720 --> 00:19:23,280 Speaker 6: let's get you know, fifty more hyper talented engineers. This 383 00:19:23,320 --> 00:19:25,840 Speaker 6: is winter we're talking about. The issue though, is if 384 00:19:25,880 --> 00:19:28,480 Speaker 6: you didn't get brought over to the Google ship, you 385 00:19:28,520 --> 00:19:30,600 Speaker 6: were on what I what I was calling a ghost ship. 386 00:19:31,240 --> 00:19:31,440 Speaker 3: John. 387 00:19:31,720 --> 00:19:34,520 Speaker 5: Everyone who was pro the strategy, they would call it 388 00:19:34,520 --> 00:19:36,720 Speaker 5: the remain co I was. 389 00:19:38,119 --> 00:19:40,439 Speaker 6: But imagine you're at a company and the dynamic with 390 00:19:40,480 --> 00:19:43,120 Speaker 6: Windsurf was fascinating because the company, if you had joined 391 00:19:43,160 --> 00:19:46,199 Speaker 6: in August of last year Windsurf, you could have the 392 00:19:46,240 --> 00:19:49,160 Speaker 6: product hadn't launched it, so you could have worked and 393 00:19:49,520 --> 00:19:52,159 Speaker 6: worked up to the product launch launched it. Seeing this 394 00:19:52,280 --> 00:19:54,880 Speaker 6: meteoric growth, the last reported number they had with some 395 00:19:54,880 --> 00:19:57,240 Speaker 6: something like eighty million of air R. You have a 396 00:19:57,440 --> 00:20:00,360 Speaker 6: term sheet to get acquired from open Ai for three 397 00:20:00,400 --> 00:20:03,960 Speaker 6: billion dollars and that falls through, and then all these 398 00:20:03,960 --> 00:20:05,800 Speaker 6: employees are looking around and they're like, wait, I didn't 399 00:20:05,800 --> 00:20:08,280 Speaker 6: even hit my I haven't even hit my one year cliff. 400 00:20:08,359 --> 00:20:12,000 Speaker 6: Yet I don't actually have a right to. I mean, 401 00:20:12,720 --> 00:20:16,520 Speaker 6: they might technically own shares or options depending on how 402 00:20:16,560 --> 00:20:20,000 Speaker 6: it was structured, but they as I'm sure everyone here 403 00:20:20,240 --> 00:20:25,280 Speaker 6: knows you, oftentimes, like sometimes founders would would try to 404 00:20:25,320 --> 00:20:28,720 Speaker 6: accelerate their employees, get them compensated as part of a 405 00:20:28,760 --> 00:20:31,560 Speaker 6: transaction like that, but there's not necessarily a contractual right 406 00:20:31,600 --> 00:20:33,840 Speaker 6: to do that, and it's part of a negotiation. And 407 00:20:33,880 --> 00:20:36,800 Speaker 6: so in this case, you have this team that's effectively 408 00:20:36,880 --> 00:20:39,920 Speaker 6: split up. And we were covering the whole thing live 409 00:20:39,960 --> 00:20:42,520 Speaker 6: because we were hearing that. You know, employees that Friday 410 00:20:42,520 --> 00:20:45,480 Speaker 6: were like crying, and there was a ton of confusion 411 00:20:45,520 --> 00:20:48,440 Speaker 6: and chaos and everybody was learning facts kind of over 412 00:20:48,480 --> 00:20:52,120 Speaker 6: that forty eight hour period. Luckily, our friend Scott Wu 413 00:20:52,320 --> 00:20:55,639 Speaker 6: at Cognition, the company that ultimately bought the remain co, 414 00:20:56,359 --> 00:20:59,520 Speaker 6: flew to meet the Windsurf team, the new CEO Windsurf 415 00:20:59,560 --> 00:21:02,520 Speaker 6: and Basic. They spent the weekend doing this insane deal 416 00:21:02,520 --> 00:21:04,680 Speaker 6: and it ended up being a great outcome, I think 417 00:21:04,680 --> 00:21:05,760 Speaker 6: for everybody. 418 00:21:05,560 --> 00:21:09,560 Speaker 4: Didn't involve Windsurf have their like marketing department in the 419 00:21:09,640 --> 00:21:13,440 Speaker 4: room or something. When they made the announcement, the initial announcement, 420 00:21:13,480 --> 00:21:15,560 Speaker 4: and everyone was like because they were expecting to be 421 00:21:15,600 --> 00:21:17,760 Speaker 4: bought by open Ai, right, They're like, we're going to 422 00:21:17,840 --> 00:21:20,800 Speaker 4: film this for posterity, and then it turns out to 423 00:21:20,800 --> 00:21:21,160 Speaker 4: be something. 424 00:21:21,920 --> 00:21:24,000 Speaker 5: Yeah. Yeah, I believe the timeline is that, you know, 425 00:21:24,080 --> 00:21:28,320 Speaker 5: Windsurf launches a year ago, is in a knockout, drag 426 00:21:28,440 --> 00:21:32,200 Speaker 5: out fight with Cursor. Cursor's doing very well. They're also 427 00:21:32,240 --> 00:21:34,720 Speaker 5: going to eighty million or so opening. 428 00:21:34,560 --> 00:21:37,000 Speaker 3: Cursors in the hundreds of millions of revenue. 429 00:21:37,119 --> 00:21:39,800 Speaker 6: Yeah, Windsurf was very clearly the number two player in 430 00:21:39,840 --> 00:21:41,160 Speaker 6: the AI id E mark. 431 00:21:41,280 --> 00:21:45,240 Speaker 5: Yeah, and so Cursor is staying independent, but open Ai 432 00:21:45,359 --> 00:21:48,399 Speaker 5: wants to continue to get a foothold in this space, 433 00:21:48,440 --> 00:21:52,679 Speaker 5: so they make an offer that falls through. The rumor 434 00:21:52,840 --> 00:21:57,280 Speaker 5: was because Microsoft would have had ip look through exposure 435 00:21:57,800 --> 00:22:00,760 Speaker 5: via the more complex open ai structure. 436 00:22:00,400 --> 00:22:02,760 Speaker 3: Which is ongoing, which is continuous. 437 00:22:02,760 --> 00:22:06,200 Speaker 5: Be ongoing, and then when when Google came through, they 438 00:22:06,560 --> 00:22:08,920 Speaker 5: said that they wanted just to buy the team leave 439 00:22:08,960 --> 00:22:12,879 Speaker 5: the remain co because it's potentially cleaner from an FTC perspective. 440 00:22:13,160 --> 00:22:14,639 Speaker 5: But there's a whole bunch of different reasons and no 441 00:22:14,680 --> 00:22:18,520 Speaker 5: one really comments on exactly what happens. But when these 442 00:22:18,560 --> 00:22:22,160 Speaker 5: deals happen. This just happened with SCALEAI and Meta. The CEO, 443 00:22:22,400 --> 00:22:26,240 Speaker 5: even though there's some sort of amorphous FTC risk, the 444 00:22:26,600 --> 00:22:28,960 Speaker 5: CEO if they're going through one of these zombie acquisitions, 445 00:22:29,200 --> 00:22:33,000 Speaker 5: does have the ability to kind of set the team 446 00:22:33,200 --> 00:22:36,639 Speaker 5: up with certain expectations and say, hey, we're going to 447 00:22:36,720 --> 00:22:39,000 Speaker 5: take care of you. Trust me. You're going to get 448 00:22:39,000 --> 00:22:41,760 Speaker 5: a check that you would expect based on your ownership. 449 00:22:41,800 --> 00:22:44,200 Speaker 5: So if you own point zero one percent of the company, 450 00:22:44,240 --> 00:22:46,520 Speaker 5: you would expect that you get x of the headline number, 451 00:22:46,560 --> 00:22:49,080 Speaker 5: and yes, it's coming to you. The weird thing about 452 00:22:49,119 --> 00:22:52,840 Speaker 5: the Windsurf deal was that that was not messaged and 453 00:22:52,880 --> 00:22:55,680 Speaker 5: so there was like this z the zombie ship was 454 00:22:55,720 --> 00:22:56,560 Speaker 5: more zombie five. 455 00:22:57,119 --> 00:22:59,760 Speaker 6: So like yeah, and and imagine, imagine you're a you're 456 00:22:59,760 --> 00:23:02,840 Speaker 6: an hyper competitive market where you're competing with Google and 457 00:23:02,920 --> 00:23:06,640 Speaker 6: Anthropic and Cursor and all these different players, and then 458 00:23:06,760 --> 00:23:09,960 Speaker 6: you lose your CEO and your top fifty engineers, and 459 00:23:09,960 --> 00:23:12,960 Speaker 6: they're like, and you guys are gonna do against don't worry. 460 00:23:12,960 --> 00:23:15,359 Speaker 6: You guys have a strong balance sheet. You guys are 461 00:23:15,359 --> 00:23:17,200 Speaker 6: going to do great. And we're also gonna be We're 462 00:23:17,200 --> 00:23:20,639 Speaker 6: also gonna be competing with you at at at at Google, 463 00:23:20,760 --> 00:23:22,560 Speaker 6: But you guys are gonna be fod luck guys and 464 00:23:22,600 --> 00:23:23,240 Speaker 6: so and. 465 00:23:23,400 --> 00:23:26,399 Speaker 2: Thanks, thanks for the help. But this break but like, okay, 466 00:23:26,800 --> 00:23:29,600 Speaker 2: cognition came in. It sounds like all the employees will 467 00:23:29,600 --> 00:23:31,679 Speaker 2: get something. It's something in the world because there was 468 00:23:31,720 --> 00:23:34,520 Speaker 2: cash on the balance but it didn't have to be 469 00:23:34,720 --> 00:23:37,840 Speaker 2: that outcome. And so there's two things here that strike me. 470 00:23:38,040 --> 00:23:41,359 Speaker 2: One is, again, this does not seem like the B 471 00:23:41,440 --> 00:23:44,000 Speaker 2: to B SaaS era, where it's like, if you created 472 00:23:44,040 --> 00:23:47,639 Speaker 2: the hottest building product for dentist offices and that was 473 00:23:47,680 --> 00:23:50,159 Speaker 2: great gathering traction, no one would like just buy the 474 00:23:50,200 --> 00:23:52,920 Speaker 2: talent that built that. So that's really different, right, because 475 00:23:53,119 --> 00:23:56,119 Speaker 2: so the the ability to take value out via the 476 00:23:56,119 --> 00:23:59,320 Speaker 2: talent channel rather than buying the product itself. But then 477 00:23:59,359 --> 00:24:01,920 Speaker 2: also and I'm you know, the knock on effects. Okay, fine, 478 00:24:02,080 --> 00:24:05,280 Speaker 2: the Windsurf employees did fine, but going forward, there's no 479 00:24:05,320 --> 00:24:07,680 Speaker 2: guarantee that they could have. And so I'm wondering, from 480 00:24:07,800 --> 00:24:11,320 Speaker 2: either a VC perspective or a future employees perspective, how 481 00:24:11,440 --> 00:24:13,879 Speaker 2: this is going to change the sort of calculation that 482 00:24:13,960 --> 00:24:17,399 Speaker 2: anyone makes when participating in a new AI startup, the 483 00:24:17,440 --> 00:24:20,200 Speaker 2: fact that the enterprise may not be where the value 484 00:24:20,200 --> 00:24:20,679 Speaker 2: actually is. 485 00:24:20,800 --> 00:24:24,000 Speaker 5: So the first question is, like, this kind of is 486 00:24:24,119 --> 00:24:26,919 Speaker 5: the example you gave of, like buying the team that 487 00:24:26,960 --> 00:24:30,240 Speaker 5: built the dentist B to B SaaS because Windsurf does 488 00:24:30,280 --> 00:24:34,280 Speaker 5: not train foundation models and Google is exceptional in training 489 00:24:34,320 --> 00:24:37,480 Speaker 5: foundation models. With Gemini and deep Mind, the deep Mind 490 00:24:37,480 --> 00:24:42,400 Speaker 5: team is extremely well staffed on AI researchers and continually 491 00:24:42,880 --> 00:24:46,960 Speaker 5: seems to push the frontier both the qualitative and quantitative metrics. 492 00:24:47,160 --> 00:24:49,760 Speaker 5: And if they were weak anywhere, it was maybe products exactly. 493 00:24:49,840 --> 00:24:52,000 Speaker 5: And so this is the like, I don't want to 494 00:24:52,080 --> 00:24:54,960 Speaker 5: be like they're just product people. Sure, Windsurf has some 495 00:24:55,000 --> 00:24:59,320 Speaker 5: amazing AI researchers, some amazing AI engineers, but what Windsurf 496 00:24:59,520 --> 00:25:02,040 Speaker 5: really did. They did not train a frontier model that 497 00:25:02,440 --> 00:25:07,160 Speaker 5: was about to disrupt Gemini go deep minds foundation model 498 00:25:07,359 --> 00:25:10,280 Speaker 5: they were going after. You know, would you use a 499 00:25:10,320 --> 00:25:13,679 Speaker 5: Google product, No, you would use Windsurf on top of 500 00:25:13,720 --> 00:25:16,000 Speaker 5: anthropy person or another foundation model. 501 00:25:15,800 --> 00:25:16,960 Speaker 3: And ultimately don't. 502 00:25:17,000 --> 00:25:20,880 Speaker 6: I don't think it's a systemic risk to the social 503 00:25:21,000 --> 00:25:24,639 Speaker 6: contract of our industry. And the reason for that is 504 00:25:24,680 --> 00:25:27,800 Speaker 6: that when you see a deal like the Google Windsurf 505 00:25:27,880 --> 00:25:29,840 Speaker 6: deal get done, it was very concerning. A lot of 506 00:25:29,840 --> 00:25:32,960 Speaker 6: people were extremely angry. It ended up being a good outcome. 507 00:25:33,119 --> 00:25:36,919 Speaker 6: A lot of employees were looking around, probably concerned about 508 00:25:37,200 --> 00:25:39,840 Speaker 6: you know, is the million dollars of stock that I've 509 00:25:39,880 --> 00:25:42,159 Speaker 6: been working for for years worth anything at all? I 510 00:25:42,160 --> 00:25:44,520 Speaker 6: think that was a good question to ask. But I 511 00:25:44,520 --> 00:25:48,399 Speaker 6: think there's two things. One is is AI is a category, 512 00:25:48,440 --> 00:25:51,240 Speaker 6: and of course it's touching kind of every category of 513 00:25:51,320 --> 00:25:54,560 Speaker 6: venture in the private markets. But we're not seeing You're 514 00:25:54,560 --> 00:25:58,040 Speaker 6: not seeing a defense tech founding team or engineering group 515 00:25:58,440 --> 00:25:59,960 Speaker 6: get There's no real. 516 00:25:59,760 --> 00:26:01,080 Speaker 3: Act hire value there. 517 00:26:01,119 --> 00:26:04,400 Speaker 6: The acquihires that are getting done in hard tech are hey, 518 00:26:04,440 --> 00:26:08,119 Speaker 6: you clearly have good engineering capabilities. We're happy to have 519 00:26:08,119 --> 00:26:11,400 Speaker 6: you join the team, but there's no real premium being 520 00:26:11,440 --> 00:26:13,879 Speaker 6: placed on that kind of talent. Might be able to 521 00:26:13,920 --> 00:26:17,080 Speaker 6: get a great comp packages, but they're certainly not getting 522 00:26:17,080 --> 00:26:19,840 Speaker 6: these sort of multi hundred million dollar premiums. The other 523 00:26:19,880 --> 00:26:23,280 Speaker 6: factor here is, like we have a set like right now, 524 00:26:23,440 --> 00:26:25,760 Speaker 6: if you are one of the top one hundred AI researchers, 525 00:26:25,800 --> 00:26:28,959 Speaker 6: you could probably get one hundred million dollar comp package 526 00:26:29,080 --> 00:26:31,040 Speaker 6: like within a week if you really wanted it, right, 527 00:26:31,080 --> 00:26:33,440 Speaker 6: And there's even people that are at Thinking you know, 528 00:26:33,520 --> 00:26:35,679 Speaker 6: the reporting from this week was that and it was 529 00:26:35,760 --> 00:26:38,360 Speaker 6: kind of hotly debated, but that people at Thinking Machines, 530 00:26:38,440 --> 00:26:43,080 Speaker 6: Miramrati's company, former CTO of Open AI, we're turning down 531 00:26:43,080 --> 00:26:45,440 Speaker 6: these sort of one hundred million, multi hundred million dollar 532 00:26:45,840 --> 00:26:47,639 Speaker 6: There was a rumor that somebody had turned down a 533 00:26:47,680 --> 00:26:53,040 Speaker 6: billion dollar five year contract. And I don't believe that 534 00:26:53,280 --> 00:26:56,719 Speaker 6: those deals will be getting done in three years now. 535 00:26:56,760 --> 00:26:58,520 Speaker 6: I might be wrong, and there's going to be like 536 00:26:58,600 --> 00:27:03,520 Speaker 6: probably some exceptions, but the idea that the thirtieth AI 537 00:27:03,600 --> 00:27:05,720 Speaker 6: researcher on your team is going to make more than 538 00:27:05,800 --> 00:27:09,560 Speaker 6: a mags Heaven CEO, like that doesn't feel hyper. 539 00:27:09,800 --> 00:27:10,800 Speaker 3: Something has to change either. 540 00:27:10,840 --> 00:27:12,560 Speaker 5: Tim Cook has to make more money. 541 00:27:13,600 --> 00:27:14,920 Speaker 3: Tim Cook is looking. 542 00:27:15,000 --> 00:27:17,479 Speaker 2: For assistances on Wall Street were like a top trader 543 00:27:17,600 --> 00:27:20,880 Speaker 2: to consistently make more than or will often make more 544 00:27:20,920 --> 00:27:23,200 Speaker 2: than the CEO, absolutely because. 545 00:27:22,960 --> 00:27:39,520 Speaker 4: They're the ones that got the money in the door. Yeah, 546 00:27:40,000 --> 00:27:42,240 Speaker 4: can you talk a little bit more about I guess 547 00:27:42,240 --> 00:27:46,040 Speaker 4: the fungibility of the IP here in both the practical 548 00:27:46,080 --> 00:27:49,239 Speaker 4: and legal sense. So if I'm a VC or some 549 00:27:49,280 --> 00:27:53,040 Speaker 4: sort of investor, I invest in an AI company because 550 00:27:53,080 --> 00:27:56,480 Speaker 4: I get to own that technology, that intellectual property. But 551 00:27:56,600 --> 00:27:59,240 Speaker 4: then let's say the main guy walks out the door, 552 00:27:59,320 --> 00:28:02,840 Speaker 4: gets hired by Google or whoever, Like, how much of 553 00:28:02,880 --> 00:28:06,560 Speaker 4: what he learned at his original firm or developed is 554 00:28:06,600 --> 00:28:08,720 Speaker 4: immediately going to be replicated at Google? 555 00:28:08,760 --> 00:28:09,840 Speaker 3: I bite almost all of it. 556 00:28:10,000 --> 00:28:12,400 Speaker 5: Yeah, I guess this is like, well, that's exactly why 557 00:28:12,400 --> 00:28:13,439 Speaker 5: they're paying that much money. 558 00:28:13,480 --> 00:28:15,880 Speaker 4: This is a lot more way of saying how many 559 00:28:15,960 --> 00:28:18,840 Speaker 4: lawsuits are we going to get after all these aquhiers? 560 00:28:19,080 --> 00:28:21,479 Speaker 6: So I think one way you can look at some 561 00:28:21,560 --> 00:28:24,679 Speaker 6: of Zuck's deals are like unauthorized aquhiers. It's like the 562 00:28:24,720 --> 00:28:26,919 Speaker 6: other CEO is not even participating in the deal. But 563 00:28:27,200 --> 00:28:28,840 Speaker 6: you know, Zuck is able to come in and be like, 564 00:28:29,040 --> 00:28:32,119 Speaker 6: would I pay if this, if these ten people were 565 00:28:32,400 --> 00:28:34,960 Speaker 6: working on a company independently, would I pay a billion 566 00:28:35,000 --> 00:28:37,840 Speaker 6: dollars to bring them onto my team? One hundred percent? Okay, 567 00:28:37,920 --> 00:28:39,560 Speaker 6: let's see the deal. It doesn't matter that you're kind 568 00:28:39,560 --> 00:28:42,520 Speaker 6: of piecing it all up from a. I think going 569 00:28:42,560 --> 00:28:44,720 Speaker 6: back to like the kind of Wall Street example of 570 00:28:44,760 --> 00:28:47,120 Speaker 6: like a top trader who maybe is like putting up 571 00:28:47,280 --> 00:28:51,320 Speaker 6: consistently incredible returns with some sort of like differentiated approach, 572 00:28:51,560 --> 00:28:53,240 Speaker 6: that person can go and as long as they have 573 00:28:53,280 --> 00:28:55,160 Speaker 6: capital at the new company, they're going to be able 574 00:28:55,200 --> 00:28:58,720 Speaker 6: to imagine to continue to just follow that same type 575 00:28:58,720 --> 00:29:02,080 Speaker 6: of strategy. I do think that AI and large language 576 00:29:02,080 --> 00:29:04,560 Speaker 6: models are somewhat different in that you have to look 577 00:29:04,600 --> 00:29:07,560 Speaker 6: at what is the AI product that these companies are 578 00:29:07,600 --> 00:29:09,360 Speaker 6: going to sell. How much of an impact is that 579 00:29:09,440 --> 00:29:12,920 Speaker 6: individual engineer researcher are going to have. And you know, 580 00:29:12,960 --> 00:29:15,720 Speaker 6: it's fairly obvious with open Ai their consumer tech company, 581 00:29:15,800 --> 00:29:18,880 Speaker 6: right they sell subscriptions to chat GBT, they have some 582 00:29:18,960 --> 00:29:23,080 Speaker 6: other use cases. It's obvious that companies like Anthropic, where 583 00:29:23,160 --> 00:29:25,640 Speaker 6: they're in the cogeneration business, they don't really have a 584 00:29:25,720 --> 00:29:28,520 Speaker 6: consumer business. And at Meta it's a little bit less 585 00:29:28,520 --> 00:29:31,400 Speaker 6: clear right now because the sort of ongoing product strategy 586 00:29:31,480 --> 00:29:35,200 Speaker 6: is not entirely clear yet. The thing that is obvious 587 00:29:35,320 --> 00:29:38,440 Speaker 6: is that if you can make a twenty billion dollars 588 00:29:38,440 --> 00:29:41,640 Speaker 6: training around more efficient than you pay for yourself, pretty quickly, 589 00:29:41,760 --> 00:29:42,440 Speaker 6: we should. 590 00:29:42,160 --> 00:29:44,560 Speaker 4: Just point out the Wall Street analogy is not perfect, right, 591 00:29:44,600 --> 00:29:47,120 Speaker 4: because if you're a high flyer at a Wall Street firm, 592 00:29:47,160 --> 00:29:50,000 Speaker 4: either client facing or if you're trading, if you join 593 00:29:50,080 --> 00:29:53,400 Speaker 4: someone else, you usually have a non compete agreement in 594 00:29:53,440 --> 00:29:56,080 Speaker 4: one form or another. You can't take all your existing 595 00:29:56,120 --> 00:29:59,200 Speaker 4: clients with you and then be you're often on an 596 00:29:59,320 --> 00:30:02,920 Speaker 4: enforced garden for a really long time. Yeah, I imagine 597 00:30:02,960 --> 00:30:05,400 Speaker 4: in the massive race that is AI at the moment, 598 00:30:05,840 --> 00:30:06,640 Speaker 4: there's no gardening. 599 00:30:06,760 --> 00:30:09,800 Speaker 5: Also, the nature of the intellectual property I believe is 600 00:30:09,840 --> 00:30:12,360 Speaker 5: a little bit different still. I think of this. I 601 00:30:12,400 --> 00:30:15,920 Speaker 5: think it's a twenty twelve example from Citadel in Chicago 602 00:30:15,960 --> 00:30:20,120 Speaker 5: where a hygh ferquency trader stole some code and they 603 00:30:20,200 --> 00:30:22,920 Speaker 5: sent and he had it on his hard drive. You 604 00:30:22,960 --> 00:30:24,720 Speaker 5: know this story, Yes, it was really. 605 00:30:24,600 --> 00:30:26,600 Speaker 4: Famous when it happened. He like sent it to himself 606 00:30:26,640 --> 00:30:27,120 Speaker 4: for yeah. 607 00:30:27,200 --> 00:30:30,800 Speaker 5: Yeah, So he expltraded some code, some very you know, 608 00:30:30,920 --> 00:30:33,440 Speaker 5: definitive code of how to make money in the market 609 00:30:33,520 --> 00:30:36,520 Speaker 5: and get an edge, and they he figured out that 610 00:30:36,560 --> 00:30:38,800 Speaker 5: they were on his trail, and he threw his hard 611 00:30:38,880 --> 00:30:41,080 Speaker 5: drive into the river and they sent scuba divers into 612 00:30:41,080 --> 00:30:42,000 Speaker 5: the river and got it back. 613 00:30:42,080 --> 00:30:42,240 Speaker 3: Here. 614 00:30:43,400 --> 00:30:47,120 Speaker 6: The other high profile SV example was the guy going 615 00:30:47,200 --> 00:30:50,080 Speaker 6: from Google self driving to yes. 616 00:30:50,360 --> 00:30:52,920 Speaker 5: Yeah and so and so taking specific code. 617 00:30:53,040 --> 00:30:53,880 Speaker 3: That's not happening. 618 00:30:53,920 --> 00:30:56,200 Speaker 5: I mean, there's probably going to be like one example 619 00:30:56,200 --> 00:30:58,840 Speaker 5: of this that pops up, but mostly it's just you 620 00:30:58,880 --> 00:31:02,640 Speaker 5: get someone who says, I understand that at my previous job, 621 00:31:02,840 --> 00:31:05,400 Speaker 5: we scaled up the transformer a little too far and 622 00:31:05,440 --> 00:31:07,960 Speaker 5: we didn't focus on reasoning enough, and so we need 623 00:31:07,960 --> 00:31:11,360 Speaker 5: to shift this spend to test time inference. And it's 624 00:31:11,400 --> 00:31:14,560 Speaker 5: almost like you're leaving you're leaving a company and you're 625 00:31:14,640 --> 00:31:16,760 Speaker 5: and you're just you're you're leaving with like a mindset 626 00:31:16,800 --> 00:31:19,840 Speaker 5: of like the right balance of capex toopics or something. 627 00:31:19,920 --> 00:31:22,480 Speaker 6: What was the recent Jane Street example that came out 628 00:31:22,480 --> 00:31:23,720 Speaker 6: in that lawsuit around it? 629 00:31:23,760 --> 00:31:25,400 Speaker 3: Was it the strategy? 630 00:31:25,800 --> 00:31:26,000 Speaker 4: Yeah? 631 00:31:26,120 --> 00:31:28,040 Speaker 3: It only we we only really all. 632 00:31:27,960 --> 00:31:31,320 Speaker 6: Learned what was happening because there was this lawsuit over 633 00:31:31,880 --> 00:31:35,720 Speaker 6: over basically the team bringing over some type of IP 634 00:31:36,200 --> 00:31:37,080 Speaker 6: or methodology. 635 00:31:37,360 --> 00:31:38,560 Speaker 5: Yeah, can we talk. 636 00:31:38,440 --> 00:31:42,440 Speaker 2: About later the broader sort of economic world right now, 637 00:31:42,440 --> 00:31:44,480 Speaker 2: because there's a bunch of other sort of things going 638 00:31:44,520 --> 00:31:46,280 Speaker 2: on and things that you talk about. 639 00:31:46,320 --> 00:31:49,320 Speaker 6: Touch on them last thing, because I think it's pretty interesting. 640 00:31:49,360 --> 00:31:51,960 Speaker 6: So we put out the metaslist I think it was Monday, 641 00:31:52,480 --> 00:31:55,080 Speaker 6: and we immediately had a ton of inbound from a 642 00:31:55,080 --> 00:31:59,400 Speaker 6: lot of these researchers basically like critiquing like the ranking right, 643 00:31:59,440 --> 00:32:02,160 Speaker 6: and the ranking was like we got we got people that. 644 00:32:02,240 --> 00:32:04,120 Speaker 3: Work in AI to kind of like rank them. We 645 00:32:04,520 --> 00:32:10,680 Speaker 3: the beauty of ranks? Do you get so much the beauty? 646 00:32:11,040 --> 00:32:13,680 Speaker 6: And there's one uh, there was one example that was 647 00:32:13,680 --> 00:32:17,000 Speaker 6: interesting where somebody that was ranked fairly high that I 648 00:32:17,040 --> 00:32:19,920 Speaker 6: know has gotten one of these nine figure comp packages 649 00:32:20,520 --> 00:32:24,479 Speaker 6: and somebody that worked with him basically said this person 650 00:32:24,680 --> 00:32:27,239 Speaker 6: was kicked off of every team they worked on and 651 00:32:27,360 --> 00:32:32,160 Speaker 6: just like effectively like over multi year period, like consistently. 652 00:32:31,760 --> 00:32:33,720 Speaker 3: Demoted over and over and over. 653 00:32:34,200 --> 00:32:38,080 Speaker 6: And now now like got you know this incredible. 654 00:32:37,680 --> 00:32:40,719 Speaker 4: And soft skills in ranking? 655 00:32:40,920 --> 00:32:42,920 Speaker 3: Well yeah, and it was it was more of like 656 00:32:42,960 --> 00:32:44,200 Speaker 3: a technical ability thing. 657 00:32:44,280 --> 00:32:47,760 Speaker 6: It was not even because I think skills are getting 658 00:32:47,760 --> 00:32:51,280 Speaker 6: a little bit uh you know, they don't they don't. 659 00:32:51,480 --> 00:32:53,440 Speaker 6: You don't care that Lebron James like might get a 660 00:32:53,480 --> 00:32:56,960 Speaker 6: little angry at somebody if they underperform, right, No. 661 00:32:56,800 --> 00:33:00,120 Speaker 2: No, no, no, no, there's so this phenomenon of like superstars, 662 00:33:00,160 --> 00:33:02,440 Speaker 2: like it's not just it's not just in tech and 663 00:33:02,480 --> 00:33:05,720 Speaker 2: like we see it. I mentioned in journalism, where you know, 664 00:33:05,800 --> 00:33:09,120 Speaker 2: the sort of like median reporter job in a newsroom. 665 00:33:09,120 --> 00:33:11,800 Speaker 2: A lot of that's hollowing out, but you have some 666 00:33:11,840 --> 00:33:15,480 Speaker 2: people who become insanely well compensated, either because they're really 667 00:33:15,520 --> 00:33:17,880 Speaker 2: smart and they write a great newsletter, or they're really 668 00:33:17,920 --> 00:33:21,120 Speaker 2: good looking and they can do front facing video, et cetera, 669 00:33:21,400 --> 00:33:23,680 Speaker 2: or you know, like the four of us, you know, 670 00:33:23,880 --> 00:33:26,560 Speaker 2: like can do something on video or something like that. 671 00:33:26,760 --> 00:33:29,000 Speaker 2: You see it in the range of areas. And then 672 00:33:29,080 --> 00:33:31,360 Speaker 2: like the amount of betting that's going on, which of 673 00:33:31,400 --> 00:33:33,560 Speaker 2: course adds to this, and so the fact that all 674 00:33:33,600 --> 00:33:36,200 Speaker 2: of these events there's some market out there that you 675 00:33:36,240 --> 00:33:38,880 Speaker 2: can bet on that. And I'm curious, like from your coast, 676 00:33:39,040 --> 00:33:40,920 Speaker 2: you know, you're here in New York, but from your coast, 677 00:33:41,160 --> 00:33:43,520 Speaker 2: what does the world look like in terms of just 678 00:33:43,560 --> 00:33:45,360 Speaker 2: like the state of this economy. 679 00:33:45,520 --> 00:33:48,520 Speaker 5: Yeah, there's something interesting going on in tech where the 680 00:33:48,600 --> 00:33:50,760 Speaker 5: idea of a company going from one hundred billion to 681 00:33:50,800 --> 00:33:54,360 Speaker 5: a trillion seemed unfathomable. Yeah, and there's this take that 682 00:33:54,440 --> 00:33:56,680 Speaker 5: in fact, that was the easiest ten X of all, 683 00:33:57,360 --> 00:34:01,120 Speaker 5: where the hardest ten X was going from zero to one. 684 00:34:01,320 --> 00:34:04,160 Speaker 5: From going to zero to a million dollars and getting 685 00:34:04,200 --> 00:34:07,680 Speaker 5: these systems, inventing PageRank, and then once you had Google 686 00:34:07,760 --> 00:34:10,200 Speaker 5: humming at one hundred billion dollar market cap getting to 687 00:34:10,239 --> 00:34:12,279 Speaker 5: a trillion, not to you knock of the work that 688 00:34:12,280 --> 00:34:15,400 Speaker 5: they did to get that, but these the numbers have 689 00:34:15,480 --> 00:34:18,480 Speaker 5: just kept growing and growing at Internet scale, at Internet speed, 690 00:34:18,800 --> 00:34:22,680 Speaker 5: and so the leverage that you're getting from an AI 691 00:34:22,719 --> 00:34:26,680 Speaker 5: researcher is ever more increasing, and it just adds ten 692 00:34:26,920 --> 00:34:29,120 Speaker 5: x every couple of years. And so ye seeing the 693 00:34:29,200 --> 00:34:30,920 Speaker 5: compackages and increase that way, have. 694 00:34:31,080 --> 00:34:33,080 Speaker 6: A couple of things like the Internet is the greatest 695 00:34:33,160 --> 00:34:37,600 Speaker 6: distribution engine for information and digital products and apps and 696 00:34:37,640 --> 00:34:41,520 Speaker 6: services ever and so at least in venture, that just 697 00:34:41,600 --> 00:34:43,439 Speaker 6: means that everything is faster now. 698 00:34:43,520 --> 00:34:44,440 Speaker 3: Even in media too. 699 00:34:44,480 --> 00:34:47,480 Speaker 6: If you're if you are somebody's working at a at 700 00:34:47,520 --> 00:34:50,040 Speaker 6: a legacy media company and they set up a sub stack, 701 00:34:50,239 --> 00:34:53,520 Speaker 6: they can get a million dollars of ARR on the 702 00:34:53,520 --> 00:34:56,120 Speaker 6: first day that they launch. If somebody is working at 703 00:34:56,120 --> 00:34:58,239 Speaker 6: a media company and really good at a certain type 704 00:34:58,239 --> 00:35:02,080 Speaker 6: of YouTube video, they can launch and immediately the YouTube 705 00:35:02,120 --> 00:35:05,920 Speaker 6: algorithm will serve that video to all of their fans 706 00:35:06,080 --> 00:35:09,000 Speaker 6: within the first week. And that what that does is 707 00:35:09,000 --> 00:35:12,279 Speaker 6: it just changes. You know, the power dynamic between media 708 00:35:12,320 --> 00:35:13,520 Speaker 6: companies you see is. 709 00:35:13,600 --> 00:35:17,000 Speaker 5: Leverage come in through financial markets. If you can lever 710 00:35:17,200 --> 00:35:20,320 Speaker 5: up or just marshal more capital one idea can generate 711 00:35:20,360 --> 00:35:23,120 Speaker 5: billions of dollars in value. Same thing in technology, but 712 00:35:23,200 --> 00:35:26,320 Speaker 5: we aren't seeing it everywhere. I don't think we're seeing 713 00:35:26,360 --> 00:35:29,839 Speaker 5: it in hard skills would working like unless you get 714 00:35:29,840 --> 00:35:32,560 Speaker 5: into true like art territory. But there is this interesting 715 00:35:32,640 --> 00:35:34,839 Speaker 5: question about like what's up next, and we were kind 716 00:35:34,840 --> 00:35:38,280 Speaker 5: of noodling on like there might be a law firm 717 00:35:38,400 --> 00:35:41,279 Speaker 5: in the future that's extremely high leverage in the same 718 00:35:41,320 --> 00:35:44,240 Speaker 5: sense that you might have a lawyer who's so good 719 00:35:44,680 --> 00:35:47,279 Speaker 5: at what they do and they are so good at 720 00:35:47,280 --> 00:35:50,279 Speaker 5: resolving these and the and the connections and everything that 721 00:35:50,320 --> 00:35:53,600 Speaker 5: they're doing. They're making billions, but they have a very 722 00:35:53,680 --> 00:35:55,799 Speaker 5: very lean team. And so you see a much a 723 00:35:55,880 --> 00:35:59,160 Speaker 5: much steeper power law in law. And there's a there's 724 00:35:59,200 --> 00:36:01,839 Speaker 5: a number of other professional services that are going through 725 00:36:02,000 --> 00:36:07,160 Speaker 5: like a transformation with technology bringing increased leverage to the 726 00:36:07,200 --> 00:36:09,960 Speaker 5: profession and that could drive more of that power li 727 00:36:10,000 --> 00:36:11,000 Speaker 5: outcome in terms of earning. 728 00:36:11,080 --> 00:36:13,279 Speaker 6: Yeah, the thing you know in the private markets on 729 00:36:13,600 --> 00:36:16,560 Speaker 6: the West Coast, which is the dynamic right now that's 730 00:36:16,600 --> 00:36:18,440 Speaker 6: fascinating is like, I feel like a lot of people 731 00:36:18,480 --> 00:36:20,960 Speaker 6: have like a little bit of PTSD from the twenty 732 00:36:21,280 --> 00:36:25,239 Speaker 6: twenty to twenty twenty two era, where many of the 733 00:36:25,280 --> 00:36:28,799 Speaker 6: things that in hindsight were incredible top signals are like 734 00:36:28,880 --> 00:36:31,480 Speaker 6: all pop popping up again right now, and like we like, 735 00:36:31,760 --> 00:36:34,319 Speaker 6: we like trap, we track them just for fun. We 736 00:36:34,400 --> 00:36:36,520 Speaker 6: are not in the business of like calling the top 737 00:36:36,600 --> 00:36:38,840 Speaker 6: or anything like that. And in many ways it feels like, 738 00:36:39,400 --> 00:36:43,120 Speaker 6: you know, there's so many positive indicators. But the interesting 739 00:36:43,200 --> 00:36:46,240 Speaker 6: dynamic and in venture is like, as an angel investor, 740 00:36:46,239 --> 00:36:50,000 Speaker 6: I've invested in probably sixty five or so different companies 741 00:36:50,040 --> 00:36:53,120 Speaker 6: at the pre seed to Series A stage, and there 742 00:36:53,160 --> 00:36:54,640 Speaker 6: was a bunch of deals that I did in twenty 743 00:36:54,680 --> 00:36:57,400 Speaker 6: twenty one twenty twenty two that ultimately like I paid 744 00:36:57,440 --> 00:37:01,359 Speaker 6: too much or just like the team wasn't good enough 745 00:37:01,400 --> 00:37:03,719 Speaker 6: to execute against the vision they had. But there was 746 00:37:03,760 --> 00:37:05,560 Speaker 6: also just like a handful of deals that I did 747 00:37:05,560 --> 00:37:08,520 Speaker 6: that that have been you know, performed so well that 748 00:37:08,560 --> 00:37:10,600 Speaker 6: it doesn't matter that I did a bunch of silly deals. 749 00:37:10,640 --> 00:37:13,239 Speaker 6: And so venture right now is this interesting kind of 750 00:37:13,320 --> 00:37:16,440 Speaker 6: dynamic where everybody knows that it's crazy, Right, you have 751 00:37:16,640 --> 00:37:19,759 Speaker 6: hundreds of billions of dollars of value created in the 752 00:37:19,760 --> 00:37:22,520 Speaker 6: private markets that there's a lot of real revenue growth, 753 00:37:22,520 --> 00:37:24,440 Speaker 6: but there's also hundreds of billions of dollars of value 754 00:37:24,480 --> 00:37:27,200 Speaker 6: tied to zero revenue, right. And I think that there's 755 00:37:27,280 --> 00:37:30,520 Speaker 6: something that we've been tracking is like this underlying kind 756 00:37:30,560 --> 00:37:34,080 Speaker 6: of feeling from people that are maybe under thirty of 757 00:37:34,320 --> 00:37:36,880 Speaker 6: there's like this meme that's become very prevalent, and I 758 00:37:36,880 --> 00:37:40,879 Speaker 6: think it explains a lot of economic activity today, which 759 00:37:40,960 --> 00:37:44,200 Speaker 6: is young people feel that they have two years to 760 00:37:44,320 --> 00:37:48,239 Speaker 6: accumulate capital to escape the permanent underclass. And so I 761 00:37:48,239 --> 00:37:52,680 Speaker 6: think that drives a lot of investing activity today in 762 00:37:52,719 --> 00:37:55,520 Speaker 6: that you know, you'll see young people on the timeline 763 00:37:55,560 --> 00:37:58,560 Speaker 6: saying that like you'd be stupid not to use leverage, 764 00:37:58,640 --> 00:38:00,480 Speaker 6: you know, and they're and they're just like, you know, 765 00:38:00,560 --> 00:38:01,880 Speaker 6: they're not a professional. 766 00:38:01,520 --> 00:38:04,200 Speaker 3: Investor in any capacity. Don't do it. 767 00:38:05,880 --> 00:38:08,440 Speaker 6: And you know, any anytime you have people in venture 768 00:38:08,640 --> 00:38:13,160 Speaker 6: making public market stock predictions, we get a little concerned. 769 00:38:13,719 --> 00:38:16,960 Speaker 4: Are we going to get AI talent agents? Not AI agents, 770 00:38:16,960 --> 00:38:19,640 Speaker 4: We have those already, but AI talent agents because like. 771 00:38:19,560 --> 00:38:22,400 Speaker 5: We do so we do they're called venture capitalists. 772 00:38:22,560 --> 00:38:26,680 Speaker 4: Oh well, but yes, this was going to be a sentence. 773 00:38:26,880 --> 00:38:29,719 Speaker 4: So if the money is no longer in, you know, 774 00:38:29,760 --> 00:38:32,240 Speaker 4: I invest in a startup and eventually they get the exit, 775 00:38:32,360 --> 00:38:34,520 Speaker 4: they get acquired, or they list or whatever. If the 776 00:38:34,560 --> 00:38:38,400 Speaker 4: money is in, eventually the guy that started the startup 777 00:38:38,520 --> 00:38:42,520 Speaker 4: gets bought by someone like Meta or whoever. Wouldn't I 778 00:38:42,520 --> 00:38:45,200 Speaker 4: invest my money in that person versus in the startup 779 00:38:45,280 --> 00:38:46,080 Speaker 4: inventure service? 780 00:38:46,160 --> 00:38:48,480 Speaker 5: Yes, yeah, you can't quite do that, but there are 781 00:38:48,520 --> 00:38:51,200 Speaker 5: a ton of roles that are indexed to these high 782 00:38:51,200 --> 00:38:54,120 Speaker 5: performance packages. And yes, there are people right now in 783 00:38:54,160 --> 00:38:57,360 Speaker 5: Silicon Valley who are effectively talent agents who get a 784 00:38:57,440 --> 00:39:00,000 Speaker 5: cut of those big packages and they help me get 785 00:39:00,160 --> 00:39:01,160 Speaker 5: siate just. 786 00:39:01,440 --> 00:39:04,799 Speaker 3: Called just talent, called the venture capitalists. No, no, so so 787 00:39:05,000 --> 00:39:05,359 Speaker 3: you can. 788 00:39:05,440 --> 00:39:10,800 Speaker 5: You can you find a great researcher and you think that, okay, 789 00:39:11,120 --> 00:39:13,120 Speaker 5: maybe they will build a business, but I'm sure that 790 00:39:13,160 --> 00:39:15,040 Speaker 5: they are going to be worth hundreds of millions of 791 00:39:15,040 --> 00:39:17,560 Speaker 5: dollars a year, and you can just invest in their company. 792 00:39:17,800 --> 00:39:20,840 Speaker 5: You will almost certainly see a good return on that investment, 793 00:39:20,880 --> 00:39:23,640 Speaker 5: even if the product never gets to scale, because when 794 00:39:23,640 --> 00:39:26,000 Speaker 5: they get an ACQUA higher, you will get a. 795 00:39:25,920 --> 00:39:31,560 Speaker 2: Payout, not going there unlike the. 796 00:39:33,560 --> 00:39:36,360 Speaker 6: Are like, oh absolutely no, it's now it's now so 797 00:39:36,560 --> 00:39:40,160 Speaker 6: normalized to invest in college dropouts that you actually see 798 00:39:40,640 --> 00:39:42,799 Speaker 6: people like investing in high school. 799 00:39:43,400 --> 00:39:45,239 Speaker 5: I'm not kidding about this. So the Iomo Gold Medal 800 00:39:45,320 --> 00:39:49,080 Speaker 5: is the math Olympiad, and there are venture capitalists who 801 00:39:49,120 --> 00:39:52,120 Speaker 5: will give calls to every single student that performs well 802 00:39:52,120 --> 00:39:53,960 Speaker 5: on them on the math Olympiad. And these are high 803 00:39:53,960 --> 00:39:54,560 Speaker 5: school students. 804 00:39:54,600 --> 00:39:57,560 Speaker 4: So do they what are these investments? Exactly like, are 805 00:39:57,640 --> 00:39:59,359 Speaker 4: you're funding their tuition or no? 806 00:39:59,360 --> 00:40:02,240 Speaker 5: No, no, it's it's it's I am taking ten or twenty 807 00:40:02,239 --> 00:40:05,080 Speaker 5: percent of a company of a Delaware c core. Most 808 00:40:05,160 --> 00:40:08,719 Speaker 5: likely that you will build something in and who knows 809 00:40:08,760 --> 00:40:11,360 Speaker 5: where it goes. Maybe it turns into a great business, 810 00:40:11,440 --> 00:40:15,160 Speaker 5: maybe it turns into aquhire. But the downside is extremely 811 00:40:15,239 --> 00:40:18,560 Speaker 5: limited because there's always this at least right now, there's 812 00:40:18,600 --> 00:40:21,920 Speaker 5: this aqui hire, there's this AQUHIRER on the table where 813 00:40:22,440 --> 00:40:23,040 Speaker 5: it used to be. 814 00:40:23,080 --> 00:40:25,520 Speaker 6: That to be clear that it is only an AI 815 00:40:25,920 --> 00:40:29,960 Speaker 6: yes only for the people that you would consider to 816 00:40:29,960 --> 00:40:32,480 Speaker 6: be the top five hundred yes in there industry. 817 00:40:32,480 --> 00:40:35,239 Speaker 5: So to go back to look at Cursor windsurf thing 818 00:40:35,520 --> 00:40:38,040 Speaker 5: like Instagram was the power law winner got the billion 819 00:40:38,080 --> 00:40:42,640 Speaker 5: dollar acquisition from Meta Hipstomatic was the second largest photo 820 00:40:42,680 --> 00:40:47,000 Speaker 5: filtering app, did not get a billion dollar aquhier from Google. Right, 821 00:40:47,239 --> 00:40:49,560 Speaker 5: But now we're in the market where if there's a 822 00:40:49,680 --> 00:40:51,839 Speaker 5: leading product with a bunch of AI researchers over here, 823 00:40:51,840 --> 00:40:54,280 Speaker 5: and they get a multi billion dollar acquisition for the product, 824 00:40:54,280 --> 00:40:56,000 Speaker 5: and the product's working and it's growing and it is 825 00:40:56,000 --> 00:40:57,960 Speaker 5: a great business, and you buy it for the value 826 00:40:57,960 --> 00:41:00,960 Speaker 5: of the business, then the second best team might get 827 00:41:00,960 --> 00:41:04,000 Speaker 5: acquired just for talent, which is a completely different downside protection. 828 00:41:04,280 --> 00:41:08,319 Speaker 6: Yeah, and there's a lot of talent acquisitions traditional acquires 829 00:41:08,440 --> 00:41:11,799 Speaker 6: where it's only the talent that benefit, right in the 830 00:41:11,840 --> 00:41:14,120 Speaker 6: sense that they get basically a job offer at the 831 00:41:14,160 --> 00:41:17,520 Speaker 6: new company, and vcs get some capital back or in 832 00:41:17,560 --> 00:41:19,280 Speaker 6: some cases a small amount of money. 833 00:41:19,920 --> 00:41:23,960 Speaker 2: Can I ask a TVPN question This should be like 834 00:41:24,000 --> 00:41:27,000 Speaker 2: the ultimate compliment, which is that I got a d 835 00:41:27,120 --> 00:41:29,319 Speaker 2: M from some random person I've never seen them the 836 00:41:29,360 --> 00:41:34,319 Speaker 2: other day and he said I can build tvpns for X, 837 00:41:34,640 --> 00:41:37,319 Speaker 2: So like that's that's deck. That's sort of which means 838 00:41:37,320 --> 00:41:39,920 Speaker 2: it's sort of like it's become like Kleenex or one 839 00:41:39,960 --> 00:41:43,080 Speaker 2: of these things where it's like a category and where 840 00:41:43,120 --> 00:41:44,680 Speaker 2: are you going with it? What are your playing? 841 00:41:44,960 --> 00:41:48,000 Speaker 6: It's so funny that people are calling it TVPN for 842 00:41:48,280 --> 00:41:51,560 Speaker 6: X because our show, while it's unique in a variety 843 00:41:51,600 --> 00:41:56,000 Speaker 6: of ways, looks very much like traditional is interesting, and so. 844 00:41:56,520 --> 00:41:59,840 Speaker 3: We can't we can't take credit for we held it. 845 00:42:00,400 --> 00:42:03,560 Speaker 5: We invented media, we invented live streaming. 846 00:42:03,640 --> 00:42:06,600 Speaker 2: Of course, course normally it doesn't really I don't know, 847 00:42:06,880 --> 00:42:08,560 Speaker 2: why would I watch cable news on. 848 00:42:09,280 --> 00:42:11,840 Speaker 6: I think thing that's exciting is that in the private 849 00:42:11,880 --> 00:42:15,560 Speaker 6: markets and venture and tech, if you had a podcast, 850 00:42:15,640 --> 00:42:18,080 Speaker 6: there was one format which was a once a week 851 00:42:18,440 --> 00:42:22,600 Speaker 6: interview show, and it was a great strategy to do 852 00:42:22,640 --> 00:42:25,120 Speaker 6: that ten years ago, around the time that you guys. 853 00:42:26,560 --> 00:42:30,640 Speaker 3: It locked established. 854 00:42:30,960 --> 00:42:33,000 Speaker 5: But if we if we tried to clone this, yeah, 855 00:42:33,080 --> 00:42:34,839 Speaker 5: everyone would be like, why is that a knockoff? There's 856 00:42:34,840 --> 00:42:37,759 Speaker 5: nothing new about this, nothing fresh about this, Like why 857 00:42:37,840 --> 00:42:39,440 Speaker 5: do I want to go on your knockoff? I just 858 00:42:39,480 --> 00:42:40,120 Speaker 5: go on the real thing. 859 00:42:40,280 --> 00:42:40,560 Speaker 3: Yeah. 860 00:42:40,760 --> 00:42:43,920 Speaker 6: And so our edge in launching the show at the 861 00:42:43,960 --> 00:42:47,839 Speaker 6: beginning of the year is that media is not zero sum. 862 00:42:48,280 --> 00:42:49,480 Speaker 3: Content is not zero s. 863 00:42:49,719 --> 00:42:52,000 Speaker 6: We have a friend that jokes that he's so competitive 864 00:42:52,000 --> 00:42:55,160 Speaker 6: he wishes he wishes media zero sum it was truly 865 00:42:55,239 --> 00:42:58,560 Speaker 6: zero s. But our edge early was that we just 866 00:42:58,600 --> 00:43:01,359 Speaker 6: took it ten times more seriously than anyone else. So 867 00:43:01,680 --> 00:43:04,239 Speaker 6: everybody that was creating content for the private markets was 868 00:43:04,280 --> 00:43:07,160 Speaker 6: doing it as a part time gig, and we were 869 00:43:07,400 --> 00:43:09,399 Speaker 6: happy to compete with a bunch of people that were 870 00:43:09,480 --> 00:43:09,959 Speaker 6: part time. 871 00:43:10,560 --> 00:43:12,920 Speaker 2: You know what, Actually, I was wondering in twenty twenty 872 00:43:12,960 --> 00:43:17,400 Speaker 2: one or twenty twenty two that craziness. Someone once reached 873 00:43:17,440 --> 00:43:20,239 Speaker 2: out to me and they're like, you know what, you 874 00:43:20,280 --> 00:43:26,640 Speaker 2: should like, no direct, it's probably the no, but this 875 00:43:26,760 --> 00:43:28,680 Speaker 2: was this was the interesting thing. He said, you should 876 00:43:28,680 --> 00:43:30,920 Speaker 2: go independent and what you should do is attach a 877 00:43:31,000 --> 00:43:33,680 Speaker 2: VC armed to it, and because of the quality of 878 00:43:33,680 --> 00:43:35,760 Speaker 2: the guests that you could get, you would get really 879 00:43:36,200 --> 00:43:38,720 Speaker 2: good access to deal flow. But it seems like basically 880 00:43:39,520 --> 00:43:41,360 Speaker 2: it's very uncomfortable to me because I'm not going to 881 00:43:41,719 --> 00:43:45,800 Speaker 2: highlight startup founders and say, oh, you're the perfect guest. 882 00:43:46,040 --> 00:43:47,880 Speaker 2: And it's like because like I have like five percent. 883 00:43:48,640 --> 00:43:51,600 Speaker 2: But I'm curious about because you mentioned doing Angel the 884 00:43:51,680 --> 00:43:54,959 Speaker 2: sort of link of the TVPN at some point, like, yeah, 885 00:43:55,080 --> 00:43:57,600 Speaker 2: so an investing. 886 00:43:57,160 --> 00:44:01,000 Speaker 6: Platform Angel investing. I look at it as a hobby. 887 00:44:01,200 --> 00:44:04,000 Speaker 6: It's not a great financial activity, right, locking up, I've 888 00:44:04,040 --> 00:44:06,720 Speaker 6: heard locking out. I mean, like you can generate great returns, 889 00:44:06,719 --> 00:44:09,959 Speaker 6: but it's not the most logical way to invest your time. 890 00:44:10,000 --> 00:44:13,480 Speaker 6: But it's really fun. Like we just enjoy supporting founders 891 00:44:13,719 --> 00:44:15,839 Speaker 6: early when it's an idea and a team and it's 892 00:44:16,200 --> 00:44:20,080 Speaker 6: just it is genuinely addicting. I always joke about people 893 00:44:20,120 --> 00:44:23,560 Speaker 6: in San Francisco with Angel. You know, people across the country, 894 00:44:23,560 --> 00:44:28,160 Speaker 6: sports betting addictions san Francisco, you know, Angel investing addictions 895 00:44:28,160 --> 00:44:32,080 Speaker 6: are I think real. But for us, for us, that was, 896 00:44:32,160 --> 00:44:35,040 Speaker 6: you know, as we started having some success a lot 897 00:44:35,040 --> 00:44:38,040 Speaker 6: of people, they would probably get a message today, when's 898 00:44:38,040 --> 00:44:40,560 Speaker 6: the fun coming, when's the fund coming? And that's been 899 00:44:40,600 --> 00:44:44,239 Speaker 6: a way to monetize an audience within tech. If you 900 00:44:44,320 --> 00:44:47,080 Speaker 6: have an audience, go raise one hundred million dollar fund, 901 00:44:47,360 --> 00:44:49,719 Speaker 6: you get the fee streams do that, you get a 902 00:44:49,719 --> 00:44:54,160 Speaker 6: bunch of upside. And we joke because we have the shows. 903 00:44:54,160 --> 00:44:56,719 Speaker 6: Every single day we go live at eleven. We have 904 00:44:56,840 --> 00:45:00,440 Speaker 6: to eat, we have to work out, we have to 905 00:45:00,440 --> 00:45:02,880 Speaker 6: prep the show, we have to talk with partners, we 906 00:45:02,960 --> 00:45:05,600 Speaker 6: have to manage our team. There's all these different things 907 00:45:06,120 --> 00:45:09,640 Speaker 6: and so somebody might immediately think, Okay, these guys talk 908 00:45:09,719 --> 00:45:13,319 Speaker 6: to six founders and investors a day. They have this 909 00:45:13,440 --> 00:45:17,080 Speaker 6: like media property that like, I think everybody in ventured 910 00:45:17,160 --> 00:45:19,160 Speaker 6: now is going to see our content like once a 911 00:45:19,160 --> 00:45:22,000 Speaker 6: week in some form or another if they're if they're online. 912 00:45:22,520 --> 00:45:25,000 Speaker 6: But I joke with them, I'm like, so we're live 913 00:45:25,160 --> 00:45:27,920 Speaker 6: for three hours every single day during the middle of 914 00:45:28,000 --> 00:45:31,360 Speaker 6: the day. And so if you think that we with 915 00:45:31,440 --> 00:45:35,640 Speaker 6: a show would would effectively compete at VC is about 916 00:45:35,640 --> 00:45:39,640 Speaker 6: winning allocation, right. You can be cool and connected and 917 00:45:39,640 --> 00:45:41,760 Speaker 6: have an audience that might get you one hundred K allocation, 918 00:45:42,040 --> 00:45:43,680 Speaker 6: but if you have one hundred million dollar fund, you 919 00:45:43,719 --> 00:45:47,160 Speaker 6: need to be putting size into deals. And so I 920 00:45:47,239 --> 00:45:49,560 Speaker 6: know that if John and Jordi have a VC fund 921 00:45:49,640 --> 00:45:51,640 Speaker 6: and we're competing with these other guys that have a. 922 00:45:51,600 --> 00:45:53,520 Speaker 3: Live show that they're live for three hours a day 923 00:45:53,520 --> 00:45:53,960 Speaker 3: and they have. 924 00:45:53,920 --> 00:45:56,800 Speaker 6: A VC fund, we'd smoke them because we'd be like, Okay, 925 00:45:56,840 --> 00:45:58,520 Speaker 6: well they're live. I'm going to fly to the founder, 926 00:45:58,520 --> 00:46:00,480 Speaker 6: I'm gonna meet with them, and I'm we're gonna win 927 00:46:00,480 --> 00:46:01,920 Speaker 6: this deal, and we're gonna be like, yeah, why why 928 00:46:01,920 --> 00:46:03,640 Speaker 6: don't you let them put in like two hundred k. 929 00:46:03,880 --> 00:46:06,640 Speaker 4: So the thing to watch out for when the VC 930 00:46:06,760 --> 00:46:09,480 Speaker 4: fund is coming, is when you start reducing your live hours, 931 00:46:09,680 --> 00:46:10,359 Speaker 4: that'll be the same. 932 00:46:11,440 --> 00:46:11,640 Speaker 1: Yeah. 933 00:46:11,760 --> 00:46:13,799 Speaker 6: I think I think we we didn't get into this 934 00:46:13,960 --> 00:46:15,520 Speaker 6: to start a fund, and I think there's a lot 935 00:46:15,520 --> 00:46:17,680 Speaker 6: of people that get into content because they see it 936 00:46:17,680 --> 00:46:20,359 Speaker 6: as a way to do that and we just love 937 00:46:20,480 --> 00:46:21,239 Speaker 6: talking about tech. 938 00:46:21,440 --> 00:46:24,520 Speaker 5: It actually was the key insight was that not enough people. 939 00:46:24,680 --> 00:46:27,360 Speaker 5: Yeah it's very fun, but not but very few people 940 00:46:27,360 --> 00:46:30,359 Speaker 5: in tech were actually taking media seriously. Yeah, it was 941 00:46:30,560 --> 00:46:33,200 Speaker 5: everyone had a fund, everyone that was the high status thing, 942 00:46:33,520 --> 00:46:36,439 Speaker 5: and doing media was like lower status or people didn't 943 00:46:36,480 --> 00:46:38,239 Speaker 5: think we could have as much of a power all 944 00:46:38,360 --> 00:46:41,520 Speaker 5: outcome as it very clearly can. And so this idea 945 00:46:41,640 --> 00:46:45,400 Speaker 5: of of just what if you actually took it completely 946 00:46:45,440 --> 00:46:47,320 Speaker 5: seriously and just made it the main. 947 00:46:47,200 --> 00:46:49,160 Speaker 6: Thing, and when you were We've had a bunch of 948 00:46:49,200 --> 00:46:54,040 Speaker 6: people copy our format, you know, major legacy media companies 949 00:46:54,160 --> 00:46:57,839 Speaker 6: all the way through friends of ours. It doesn't really 950 00:46:57,880 --> 00:47:00,080 Speaker 6: bother I mean it bothers me more than John. But 951 00:47:00,120 --> 00:47:02,760 Speaker 6: at the end of the day, if you want to 952 00:47:02,800 --> 00:47:07,200 Speaker 6: spend the tracy, yeah, I totally got it. And so 953 00:47:07,239 --> 00:47:09,600 Speaker 6: it's like it doesn't basically know so so John and 954 00:47:09,680 --> 00:47:13,000 Speaker 6: I John and I basically hang out for twelve hours 955 00:47:13,040 --> 00:47:17,080 Speaker 6: a day, and the entire time, the entire time we're thinking, 956 00:47:17,120 --> 00:47:20,320 Speaker 6: we're thinking about the show, we're just talking about the 957 00:47:20,360 --> 00:47:22,920 Speaker 6: show doesn't look very different than when we're hanging out offline. 958 00:47:23,320 --> 00:47:25,319 Speaker 6: And so I just joke, I'm like, Okay, if you 959 00:47:25,320 --> 00:47:27,480 Speaker 6: want to compete with us and you're willing to put 960 00:47:27,480 --> 00:47:30,800 Speaker 6: it one hundred hours a week in god by all means, 961 00:47:31,080 --> 00:47:33,399 Speaker 6: go for it like this probably your life's work. 962 00:47:33,600 --> 00:47:35,879 Speaker 3: But if it's not good luck, it doesn't matter. 963 00:47:36,239 --> 00:47:39,120 Speaker 2: John Cougan, Jordie Hayes, thank you so much for coming 964 00:47:39,120 --> 00:47:43,239 Speaker 2: on Odd Loss that's in good luck and looking forward 965 00:47:43,280 --> 00:47:45,520 Speaker 2: to continue watching TVPM. 966 00:47:45,640 --> 00:47:52,080 Speaker 7: We'll be live from Nicey later Odd Lots in the 967 00:47:52,120 --> 00:47:57,279 Speaker 7: same day and in the wake of meadow winch mech 968 00:47:57,360 --> 00:47:58,040 Speaker 7: me a. 969 00:47:58,400 --> 00:48:13,480 Speaker 3: Thank you for having us. Thank you so much, Tracy. 970 00:48:13,560 --> 00:48:14,279 Speaker 3: That was a lot of fun. 971 00:48:14,640 --> 00:48:17,040 Speaker 4: It was a little bit media naval gazing, a little 972 00:48:17,080 --> 00:48:17,719 Speaker 4: bit fun. 973 00:48:17,719 --> 00:48:20,239 Speaker 2: A little bit media naval gazing. I mean, there is 974 00:48:20,280 --> 00:48:23,160 Speaker 2: this thing that's happening. It's been happening in media for 975 00:48:23,200 --> 00:48:26,880 Speaker 2: a while, and of course it happens in Wall Street 976 00:48:27,800 --> 00:48:30,600 Speaker 2: and now happening in AI where you just have a 977 00:48:30,640 --> 00:48:34,840 Speaker 2: lot of talented people, and they wonder about the degree 978 00:48:35,000 --> 00:48:38,239 Speaker 2: to which they need their existing platform there. You know, 979 00:48:38,400 --> 00:48:40,960 Speaker 2: like a star banker can take a book of business, 980 00:48:41,040 --> 00:48:43,320 Speaker 2: or a star lawyer can take a book of business. 981 00:48:43,800 --> 00:48:45,640 Speaker 2: And in the case of a it's not taking a 982 00:48:45,640 --> 00:48:47,719 Speaker 2: book of business, right because they don't have like their 983 00:48:47,760 --> 00:48:52,200 Speaker 2: individual clients. But it's this knowledge and transport it and 984 00:48:52,239 --> 00:48:54,839 Speaker 2: it's instantly worth a lot of money for someone somewhere else. 985 00:48:54,920 --> 00:48:57,200 Speaker 4: The thing I thought was really interesting about that discussion 986 00:48:57,280 --> 00:49:01,080 Speaker 4: was the emphasis on how capital intent all of AI 987 00:49:01,320 --> 00:49:04,360 Speaker 4: is and so that kind of changes the economics of 988 00:49:04,400 --> 00:49:07,719 Speaker 4: why you're paying such a massive money for someone who's 989 00:49:07,800 --> 00:49:10,319 Speaker 4: able to eke out even a slight efficiency. 990 00:49:10,560 --> 00:49:12,760 Speaker 3: This is huge. 991 00:49:13,000 --> 00:49:16,040 Speaker 2: This was like this It suddenly is what made it 992 00:49:16,080 --> 00:49:19,000 Speaker 2: all made sense to me, right, because we know about 993 00:49:19,040 --> 00:49:22,879 Speaker 2: like how costly one training run is, right, and we 994 00:49:22,960 --> 00:49:26,200 Speaker 2: know just the insane numbers for data center set up, 995 00:49:26,239 --> 00:49:28,640 Speaker 2: et cetera. And I'm sure there's progress being made on 996 00:49:28,680 --> 00:49:33,920 Speaker 2: the literal design of like how you string together in video, GPS, 997 00:49:33,960 --> 00:49:36,080 Speaker 2: et cetera. And so if you could get some margin, 998 00:49:36,239 --> 00:49:37,960 Speaker 2: if you know have that know how to get some 999 00:49:37,960 --> 00:49:40,879 Speaker 2: marginal improvement out of it, And this is fundamentally what was. 1000 00:49:40,960 --> 00:49:42,720 Speaker 4: One trillion dollars for you? 1001 00:49:42,760 --> 00:49:45,680 Speaker 2: Maybe not a trill No, not a trilliont but like 1002 00:49:45,920 --> 00:49:49,359 Speaker 2: this was not the case when tech was not so 1003 00:49:49,440 --> 00:49:53,160 Speaker 2: capital intensive in the twenty tens. Where yeah, I'm sure 1004 00:49:53,200 --> 00:49:55,279 Speaker 2: talented people always made a lot of money and there's 1005 00:49:55,280 --> 00:49:59,040 Speaker 2: always improvements, but where it's so that link between some 1006 00:49:59,080 --> 00:50:02,160 Speaker 2: sort of efficiency gain and instant cost savings is so 1007 00:50:02,320 --> 00:50:04,080 Speaker 2: linear and so straightforward. Yeah. 1008 00:50:04,200 --> 00:50:06,840 Speaker 4: And I take their point that, Okay, vcs exist and 1009 00:50:06,840 --> 00:50:09,680 Speaker 4: they're already investing in some ways and specific talent. But 1010 00:50:09,719 --> 00:50:11,239 Speaker 4: I do kind of wonder if you're going to get 1011 00:50:11,239 --> 00:50:14,920 Speaker 4: some sort of like specialized headhunters at the very least, 1012 00:50:14,960 --> 00:50:17,040 Speaker 4: who are going to like seek out these big AI 1013 00:50:17,160 --> 00:50:19,640 Speaker 4: talents and try to like graft themselves onto them. 1014 00:50:19,719 --> 00:50:25,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, just people whose expertise is in reading through under cited, 1015 00:50:26,520 --> 00:50:28,719 Speaker 2: under cited AI research papers. 1016 00:50:29,160 --> 00:50:30,080 Speaker 3: Yeah, AI research. 1017 00:50:30,280 --> 00:50:32,480 Speaker 2: Well, we can't give you Sam Altman, but what if 1018 00:50:32,480 --> 00:50:34,400 Speaker 2: we could replace Sam Altman in the egg. 1019 00:50:34,280 --> 00:50:38,120 Speaker 4: Guy has fifty citations in the following papers? Should we 1020 00:50:38,160 --> 00:50:38,520 Speaker 4: leave it there? 1021 00:50:38,560 --> 00:50:39,239 Speaker 3: Let's leave it there. 1022 00:50:39,400 --> 00:50:41,640 Speaker 4: This has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast. 1023 00:50:41,719 --> 00:50:44,959 Speaker 4: I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway and. 1024 00:50:44,880 --> 00:50:47,560 Speaker 2: I'm Jill Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart, 1025 00:50:47,719 --> 00:50:50,520 Speaker 2: follow our guest Jordi Hayes He's at Jordi Hayes, and 1026 00:50:50,640 --> 00:50:54,760 Speaker 2: John Cougan at John Coogan, and check out TBPN at TBPN. 1027 00:50:55,080 --> 00:50:58,040 Speaker 2: Follow our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen Arman, dash Ol 1028 00:50:58,040 --> 00:51:00,880 Speaker 2: Bennett at dashbod and kel Brooks at Kale Brooks. And 1029 00:51:00,920 --> 00:51:03,520 Speaker 2: from our Odlots content good to Bloomberg dot com slash 1030 00:51:03,520 --> 00:51:06,239 Speaker 2: odd lots were the daily newsletter and all of our episodes, 1031 00:51:06,440 --> 00:51:08,319 Speaker 2: and you can chat about all of these topics twenty 1032 00:51:08,360 --> 00:51:11,720 Speaker 2: four to seven in our discord Discord dot gg slash 1033 00:51:11,760 --> 00:51:12,440 Speaker 2: od loots. 1034 00:51:12,600 --> 00:51:14,759 Speaker 4: And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like it 1035 00:51:14,800 --> 00:51:18,359 Speaker 4: when we talk about the sportification of AI talent, then 1036 00:51:18,360 --> 00:51:21,520 Speaker 4: please leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. 1037 00:51:21,680 --> 00:51:24,520 Speaker 4: And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can 1038 00:51:24,560 --> 00:51:27,879 Speaker 4: listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free. All 1039 00:51:27,920 --> 00:51:29,680 Speaker 4: you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel on 1040 00:51:29,719 --> 00:51:33,200 Speaker 4: Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening. 1041 00:52:04,200 --> 00:52:04,239 Speaker 4: H