WEBVTT - The Skylight Caper: Canada's Biggest Unsolved Art Heist

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Criminalia, a production of Shonda Land Audio in

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>partnership with I Heart Radio, called the largest art theft

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 1>in the country's history by the Journal Canadian Art in

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>The Skylight Caper, as it's been nicknamed, was a major

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>news event in its own right, but it was just

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>one of several major news stories to occur over the

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Labor Day weekend of seventy two in Montreal, Canada, and

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 1>it got a little bit lost in the shuffle. On

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Friday that weekend, three men were refused entry to Montreal's

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Wagon Wheel a country in Western bar and in retaliation,

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>set fire to a rear staircase. The blaze ultimately consumed

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the building and killed thirty seven people. The next day,

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Canada lost the opening game of the nineteen seventy two

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Summit Series to the Soviet Union at the Montreal Forum,

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and hockey was all that the media and really almost

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 1>everyone could talk about. The seventy two hockey series has

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>since been called the greatest event in Canadian sports. By

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.279
<v Speaker 1>the time the Skylight Caper unfolded in the early morning

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>hours on Monday, Canada was immersed in the games, and

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>internationally attention was focused on the unfolding Munich Olympics hostage crisis,

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and what went down was an art heist that left

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>dozens of paintings and objects missing and most still are today.

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.759
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to criminal lya, I'm Maria trum Marquis and I'm

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Holly Frying. One of the world's greatest unsolved art thefts,

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>which included De la Croix, Rubens and Rembrandt, happened in Montreal, Quebec,

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Canada in ninety two. Seventeen paintings remain missing, and the

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>cat burglars behind the incident have never been apprehended. This

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>story outs a lot like a Hollywood script. Just after

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>midnight on September four, under the cover of darkness, a

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>man wearing climbing spurs, you know the kind that are

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>used by telephone linemen, scaled one of the trees on

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the property between the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts and

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the Church of St. Andrew and St. Paul. Gaining access

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to the museum's roof, he lowered a construction cruise ladder

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to two men who were waiting below. The three men

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>then entered the building through the one skylight that was

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>under repair. Its alarm was deliberately disarmed for construction. They

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:40.239
<v Speaker 1>repelled through the skylight with fifty ft or fifteen meter

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>fixed nylon ropes into the galleries of the museum's second floor.

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Katherine Scofield says Kim, contributor to the Association for Research

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>into Crimes Against Art, said what we are all thinking quote,

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:58.799
<v Speaker 1>it was a very cinematic theft on the second floor

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of the museum that the thieves, donning ski masks, spent

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>roughly thirty minutes or so gathering paintings and other objects

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>before they encountered a security guard crossing paths with them

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>either in or nearby the kitchen. The thieves were armed.

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>At least one had a twelve gage shotgun and another

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>may have had a revolver. One thief fired a warning

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>shot from that shotgun into the ceiling, not really to

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.239
<v Speaker 1>cause harm, but as an indication of who was in

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>charge here. The two other night guards on duty heard

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the gunfire, and though they responded, they were overwhelmed. Security

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>staff were bound, gagged and locked in a lecture hall

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>on the first floor. The guards later described to police

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that the thieves were two men with longish hair, wearing

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>ski masks and armed with guns. One spoke French and

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>another spoke English. They heard the voice of a third

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>man who also spoke French, though they never saw him.

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Police never recovered the shotgun or revolver that were said

0:03:59.880 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to have been at the scene. The thieves had planned

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to exit the museum through the same skylight that they

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>had entered, and they had actually mcgivered quite an elaborate

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>pulley system to hoist the artworks up to the roofs

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>so that they could then take them away, but they

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>ultimately gave up on this pulley plan, instead collecting the

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>artworks and other items at the museum's loading dock to

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>escape in the museum's small cargo van, But when one

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:29.239
<v Speaker 1>of the men triggered the alarm while exiting the side

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>entrance of the museum, the trio just decided to leave

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 1>with whatever they could carry. They fled on foot with

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>eighteen paintings and thirty nine smaller pieces, mainly jewelry, down

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Sherbrooke Street. Among the paintings were works by Caro Corbet

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>de Lacroix, Broigel, the Elder Rubens, and a Rembrandt that

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>was then valued at one million dollars. Among the objects

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>were to seventeenth century Spanish pendants, and an eighteenth century

0:04:56.880 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>gold watch that had once been owned by Montreal's first mayor,

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Jacques via It's reported it took the museum guards about

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>an hour to free themselves after the thieves left, at

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>which point they contacted Well. No, they did not contact

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the police. They contacted the highest ranking available member of

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the museum's staff that they could think of, the then curator,

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 1>Ruth Jackson, who then instructed them to contact the police.

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Jackson was among the first museum staff at the scene

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of the crime, and reports she found the gallery rants

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>act shattered display cases, torn backing, and many hundred year

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 1>old frames cracked to pieces. There was a stack of

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>about twenty paintings left behind, which contained a Picasso and

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>al Greco, two goyas, a Renoir, and another Rembrandt. We

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>talk a lot about the masters and their works, but

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>museum officials noted that thieves did also select works from

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>lesser known artists and works from more obscure collections. Those

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 1>paintings had value that would be considered more academic or

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>historic in nature rather than obvious. Jackson later told the

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Montreal Gazette quote with what they'd proposed to remove. It

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>was just like they meant a general clear out of

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:15.599
<v Speaker 1>the museum. News of the robbery and the names of

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the stolen works were printed in newspapers across North America

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and eventually around the world. Museum spokesperson at the time,

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Bill Banti told the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation or CBC quote,

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>they were discriminating thieves and had a fairly good idea

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>of what they were looking for. The thieves got away

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>with these eighteen paintings. Number one Landscape with Vehicles and Cattle.

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>This painting, which was subsequently recovered during ransom negotiations, had

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:47.559
<v Speaker 1>been attributed to Jan Breigel the Elder, but was later

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>determined to have been the work of his students. We're

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk a little bit more about this one in

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a minute. To Landscape with buildings and Wagon by Joan

0:06:55.839 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 1>Broigel the Elder. Three Laavosa la Fontaine or the Dreamer

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>at the Fountain by Jean Baptiste Camille Corot for Jean

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>fame Ach or young girl leaning on her left arm

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>by Jean Baptiste Camillo Caro. Five Landscape with Rocks and

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>stream by Gustave Courbet. Six Head by honore A Daumier seven,

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Lioness and Lion in a Cave by Eugene Delacroix. Eight,

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>The Sorceress by Narcis Virgilio Diaz de la Pa nine.

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Portrait of Brigadier General Sir Thomas Fletcher by Thomas Gainsborough.

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Ten Vanitas, still Life with books, a globe, a skull

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of violin and a fan by Jon David zund Him eleven,

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>still Life with a fish by Jon David zund Him twelve.

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Laboratus or young Woman churning by Jean Francois Millay thirteen,

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Portrait of Madame Milais by Jean Francois Mela fourteen. Portrait

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of a Man, possibly a self portrait by Giovanni Battista Piazetta. Fifteen,

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Landscape with cottages by Rembrandt von Riene sixteen, Head of

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>a young Man by Peter Paul Rubens seventeen, Portrait of

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a Lady by Francois le Vensson. Eighteen Portrait of a

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Man by francoisanble Vinson. Police later concluded that the works

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>on this list were all small enough to be easily

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>stacked together for a quick getaway, and the same could

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>not be said for the pile of art that had

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>been left behind. This all made sense knowing that the

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>thieves fled on foot and fast Montreal investigators contacted Interpol

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>as well as the Art Dealers Association and the International

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:48.959
<v Speaker 1>Art Registry to help in the investigation and art recovery process.

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Customs officials at border checkpoints were also alerted to be

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>on the watch for the stolen works. Investigators initially stated

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 1>they were looking for at least suspect a man between

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the age of thirty five and forty. There really wasn't

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:06.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot of information to work with, but they did

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>broaden their search details to include three men, two of

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 1>whom were approximately five ft six and had long hair,

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and two of whom spoke French while the third spoke English.

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 1>And that was it. Those were the details. We're going

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to take a break for a word from our sponsor,

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and when we're back we'll answer the question, just how

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:44.199
<v Speaker 1>did those thieves know which skylight to enter? Welcome back

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to Criminalia. Let's talk about what happened when the alleged

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>thieves tried to collect ransom. The two art heist wasn't

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 1>actually the first time thieves targeted the Montreal Museum of

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Fine Arts. In nine teen thirty three, a man removed

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a dozen paintings from the gallery space through an open

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 1>bathroom window, eventually holding the works for ransom. We've seen

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that bathroom window business before. You know, there are clear patterns.

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen sixty, thieves were foiled while trying to rob

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a Vincent van Gogh exhibit. More recently, in eleven, two

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>artifacts were stolen from the museum's permanent collection in broad daylight.

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it happened during visiting hours on the anniversary

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>of the nineteen seventy two crime. One of those two pieces,

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a fragment of a Persian bab relief dating from the

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>fifth century b c E, was recovered by the Surate

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>di Quebec in Edmonton three years later. The second piece,

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:52.199
<v Speaker 1>a Roman marble statuette dating from the first century CE,

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>has never been recovered. As their investigation began, authorities were

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 1>suspicious how that thieves knew there was one skylight with

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a deactivated alarm, and investigators considered the possibility the theft

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>was actually an inside job. However, after interviewing museum staff,

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>they determined this to be inconclusive. Plus, would someone from

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the inside have tripped an alarm, they wondered. Many museum

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>employees reported they'd seen in the weeks preceding the theft,

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>men sitting unfolding chairs on the rooftop of an adjacent building,

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>smoking cigarettes, and apparently watching the museum's renovations very closely.

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>What followed the heist was a series of seemingly arbitrary

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>yet related events. Not long after the theft, someone claiming

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>responsibility for it directed museum officials to go to a

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>pay phone outside McGill University's rotic gates, where they could

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 1>expect to find a discarded cigarette package on the ground.

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Officials did as this tip told them, and inside that

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>package they found appendant, which was one of the stolen items. Then,

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in late October of nineteen two, museum officials received a

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>brown envelope labeled Ports of Montreal. The contents were photos

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of the missing paintings with a requested ransom of five

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars for both paintings and objects. In correspondence with

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the alleged thieves, which happened through phone calls and mail,

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the director of the museum suggested returning one of the

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>taken paintings as a sign of good faith, a painting

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>was selected, landscape with vehicles and cattle, which was at

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the time attributed to young Broygal the Elder. It was

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>returned by those who had taken it, left in a

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>locker at Central Station unharmed as part of the act

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of good faith during negotiations. When inspected upon its recovery,

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 1>though experts found well, they uncovered a few problems. The

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 1>painting and the signat sure were inconsistent with Brogel, the

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>artist the piece had been attributed to since it was

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:09.959
<v Speaker 1>painted in the mid sixteen hundreds. The work was determined

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to be misattributed, and that means it was determined unlikely

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>by museum experts to have been painted by this great master.

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>It was instead concluded to be a copy of the

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>original painted by students in Brogel's workshop. Did the thieves

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>know that the painting they returned in a show of

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>good faith was actually a fake? That we will never know.

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>The museum did not pay the ransom, and the thieves

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:42.559
<v Speaker 1>continued to bargain. They dropped their price, though, from half

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>a million to two hundred fifty thousand dollars. Instead, the

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>museum requested another show of good faith they wanted another painting.

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Using an undercover officer, police carried on and attempted to

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>exchange cash for another of the missing paintings, but an

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>unexpected and unrelated appearance of a squad car near the

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>scene where they were supposed to make this exchange put

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>a stop to the handoff. In that moment, that show

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of good faith fell apart, and the alleged thieves called

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>museum officials the next morning, claiming that the whole thing

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>had been a trap and a police set up. There

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>were alleged plans for a secret meeting between museum officials

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and the thieves, but in the end, whether that meeting

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>happened or not, because after all, it was a secret,

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>nothing more was recovered from this heist, and no one

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>was arrested for the matter. Communications ceased shortly after the

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Broigel debacle. A last apparent effort to exchange artwork for

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>cash came in the summer of nine three, when an

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>anonymous caller contacted the museum offering information that could lead

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to the missing paintings in exchange for ten thousand dollars.

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>So they followed this lead an insurance a jester contracted

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of the museum when on what became really

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a fourteen hour wild goose chase across the city, they

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>followed tips from pay phone to pay phone before finally

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>being instructed to drop the payout under a sign in

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a vacant law in Laval, a suburb of Montreal. But

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing was bullshit actually, and the paintings were

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>never recovered, and this seems to have been really the

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>final recovery effort, or at least the final one that

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>gained any news coverage. Within days of the heist, the

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Montreal Gazette reported that there was in fact actually a

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>second art heist that had taken place that same week,

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>as fifty thou dollars worth of paintings were stolen from

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the summer home of Agnes Meldrum, who ran a successful

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>trucking and storage business in the city. Authorities tried to

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>link that event to the same thieves. Both were said

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to have involved three armed men, to who spoke French

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and a third who spoke English. At the Meldrum crime scene.

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Ropes were also used here to scale a six foot

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>cliff from a waiting motor boat on the Lake of

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Two Mountains in order to gain access to the home. Ultimately,

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>though police noted similarities between the crimes, they considered these

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>circumstances to be coincidental. We are now going to take

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>a break for a word from our sponsor, and when

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>we're back we will talk about one theory that art

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>students may have been involved in the heist. Welcome back

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to Criminalia. Let's meet the Columbo of the art world,

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a man named Alain la Courtier, who may have gotten

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the closest to solving this cold case. Advice for thieves

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen again and again this season is lalo

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>for a few years. If you've nicked some high profile work,

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>they need to cool off before they're transported or they're sold.

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Two items, one of two stolen burgles and dependant were

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>returned to the museum during the initial ransom and negotiations,

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:17.360
<v Speaker 1>all within weeks of the crime. But fifty years later,

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>nothing else has resurfaced. Nothing has been inadvertently brought to auction,

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>nothing has been intercepted or discovered during police raid at

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:30.199
<v Speaker 1>the home of some criminal kingpin. There are still no leads,

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and still no one has been implicated in the theft.

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Evidence little there ever was was reportedly improperly stored and

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>has degraded over time as well, and the museum's insurers

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>settled the claim, which means the paintings aren't museum property anymore. Technically,

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>if they were to be returned, they would belong to Lloyd's.

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>But not everyone has given up on this case. Allain

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>le Courtier is today an art praiser, but is a

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>former art investigator from Montreal and Quebec police forces. He's

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.640
<v Speaker 1>known as the Columbo of art for his successful efforts

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:13.439
<v Speaker 1>in investigating other cold case art thefts in Quebec, and

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 1>he took on the Skylight caper as something of a

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>pet project during the nineteen nineties. Every solid lead or

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 1>theory that authorities had in the nineteen seventies fell apart,

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and Allen has gone on record with his frustrations over

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the sloppy way with which the investigation was initially handled.

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Early in the investigation, police put some of their focus

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 1>on the possibility that the theft was committed by art students,

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and they surveiled five students for just shy of two

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:46.360
<v Speaker 1>weeks before they gave up on the lead. Elaine, decades later,

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 1>picked up that lead and began looking into students who

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:53.199
<v Speaker 1>were at the Cold Bozao in the nineteen seventies, and

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I apologize for what I just did to the name

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>of that school, the Fine Arts Institute in Montreal, LA

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 1>And ultimately, like those before him, could not crack this case,

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>but he did develop some interesting theories about what may

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 1>have happened. About thirty years after the theft, Elane struck

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 1>up a conversation with a man he would come to

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 1>nickname Smith, a man who was an art student in

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Montreal at the time of the heist. Smith was not

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the five suspects initially surveilled by police, though

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>he liked to hint he may have been one of them.

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Smith was interesting because he knew details of the crime

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 1>that had never been made public. Smith also seemed to

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>have come into a considerable amount of money shortly after

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 1>graduating from school and had become an art collector. Elan

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>always maintained that in his gut he knows Smith had

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to have been involved somehow, but Smith, though he may

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>have teased otherwise, always denied any involvement. And now we'll

0:19:54.359 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>never know because Smith passed away in or The museum,

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>as we mentioned earlier, settled with insurers, and with part

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of the payout in nineteen seventy five, purchased Reubens The

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Leopards in a show of extraordinary bad luck, though and

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>adding insult to injury, A conservationist who examined the painting

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 1>after its purchase determined that it, like that Breugel's landscape

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>with vehicles and cattle before, it was not what it

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be. Leo Rossandler, the museum's deputy director in

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy five, is quoted as saying fake is a

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>harsh word. But the painting is not by the person

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>who was said to have painted it, but probably by

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>his studio. The work was not by Reubens but by

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>his apprentices, and it has not been exhibited since. A

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>subsequent review of the museum's files on the stolen paintings,

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>as reported in the Journal of Art Crime in twenty eleven,

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>revealed that there had been doubts about the authenticity or

0:20:55.480 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the attribution of seven paintings in the museum's possession, and

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.919
<v Speaker 1>it couldn't be blamed on the heist or sleight of

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>hand knockoffs returned in so called good faith by thieves.

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>In some cases, the records dated back to at least

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 1>six years before these thefts even took place. It's reported

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that the estimated value of most of the missing pieces

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>has dramatically increased since nineteen seventy two, in particular the Rembrandt,

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:24.360
<v Speaker 1>which some art experts and dealers believe could be worth

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>as much as twenty times more than it was when

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>it went missing. Today, though there is limited interest among

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a limited group to continue this investigation, the theft is,

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 1>for all intents and purposes, a cold case. On the

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>fiftieth anniversary of the heist in two, spokesperson a Unique

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.679
<v Speaker 1>de Repentinee of the Montreal Police Department, when asked for

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>comment about the unsolved theft, stated that the case is

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 1>still considered open, but offered no further comment. Stated Maud

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 1>belan media relations officer for the museum, quote, any ore

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>it works. Theft is a tragedy as it deprives society

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of the benefits of art and knowledge. Of course, we

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>would love to have them back. Unfortunately we do not

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>have any new information. This one makes me sad because

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it was just early enough in history that there were

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of great photographs of these paintings. So

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>for some of them, it's what did that look like?

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Their descriptions so they're black and whites. Let me draw

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>you a quick little piece that you can compare it to.

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I know, like we did a show earlier in the

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>season where I believe it was considered the first art

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 1>theft and it was Pirates, which makes sense. But it's

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>not like you're alarming. Anything like that. Doesn't really happen

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>until centuries later, and then sometimes not at all. Tip

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>up a little heist hoods to guys who seem to

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>have gotten away. I'm ready for heist hooch, but you

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>have to make a deal with me where you won't

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>be pedantic about the time of day this heist took place.

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:14.880
<v Speaker 1>We know, we know, I love my Dayton High. This

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>one will have daytime lighting, not night time. You know

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>it came up on our last episode. But this one

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>is so intense, the whole skylight maneuver, and so I

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted to make a drink inspired by a skylight entry.

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:30.959
<v Speaker 1>That's fantastic. I can't wait to see what this is.

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 1>And this one is called Skylight and you'll see that

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>it references the sky. It's a pretty easy drink to

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>put together. There is a little trick in execution, but

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I will give you my trick on how to do it.

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>And I am not particularly graceful in this regard. So

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>if I can do it, I think probably most people

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>can as well. This starts with a very simple bass

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to the drink. It is three quarters of an ounce

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 1>of lemon cello, and then you're going to pour that

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>over ice into like a rocks class and then top

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 1>it with ginger rerail. You pour in that ginger real second,

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you kind of get them to mix on their own.

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to do a whole lot of work.

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Then into a shaker, you're gonna combine a half ounce

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of blue curos ow three quarters of an ounce of vodka,

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and you're going to give that a dry shake, meaning

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have ice in it. You just want to

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 1>combine those two things so that you thin out the

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 1>blue curos ow a little bit. Because we're going to

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 1>do a floater. I feel we have not done this

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in a while. We haven't. And the thing is right,

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>we talked about it many moons ago. But if you're

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>going to try to float any liquid on top of

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>another liquid, the one on top has to be a

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:39.880
<v Speaker 1>lower density, or it will just fall to the bottom

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 1>and blue curos ow because it is so surrupy and

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>it has that sugar content is heavy. That's why we're

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:47.360
<v Speaker 1>mixing it with vodka to thin it out and make

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it a little bit like lighter in its volume. So

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>then you're gonna take here's the trick. You need a

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>bar spoon with one of those flat bottoms at the end,

0:24:57.640 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean. Some of them have the

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:01.880
<v Speaker 1>tear drops and some of them have just like literally

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>it sits on a little disk, and those are your friends,

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>because that disc will allow you to pour your mixture

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>of blue Curius sound vodka down the spirally shape of

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the spoon and onto that little disk, and then it

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 1>floats out over the top of the rest of the

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>drink and it doesn't drop to the bottom, and you

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:26.439
<v Speaker 1>get a really beautiful blue stripe across the top of

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.400
<v Speaker 1>your beverage. And it looks very pretty and it makes

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you think of the sky. Now, I will say, to

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>drink it. This is a presentation thing. You probably want

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to mix it for because all your spirits sitting on

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 1>top right, but it looks pretty right up until the

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>moment that you do. Yes, I have definitely been with

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 1>people who don't realize that sometimes you gotta mix in

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a floater like on Classic Matie. Sometimes they'll have that

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:53.400
<v Speaker 1>dark rum floated on top, and if you just sip that,

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 1>you're in trouble. I don't like to mix them together.

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I do and I will, but I'm like the presentation.

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>The visual is nice. The visual is nice. I will

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>say with this one. The nice thing is when you

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>mix them together, it's still quite a pretty color. Good.

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>So that's the skylight. The good thing about the skylight

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 1>is that it's really easy to do a non alcoholic

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:20.160
<v Speaker 1>version here. Also, I should mention when you do your

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>ginger ale for this one. You know how I always go, oh,

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I like a low sugar ginger ale, Not for this.

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>You want the ginger ale to have that sugar and density,

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:30.640
<v Speaker 1>so it makes it easier to float something on top

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:32.479
<v Speaker 1>of There's no way, who are you? It's like all

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I've been possessed, right, been possessed by sugar a ginger ale.

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Because there is enough sugar in that ginger ale and

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you're using two liqueurs. I don't feel like you need

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to add any sweetener to this, and there's plenty of citrus,

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 1>so you don't need a citrus thing. It's pretty easy

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to do this, this simple thing. So for the non

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>alcoholic version, I would just toss a little bit of

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:01.399
<v Speaker 1>lemon juice into your ginger ale and then we've mentioned

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 1>it on the show before, you can get a non

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:08.199
<v Speaker 1>alcoholic blue Curas house syrup. I can get it in

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>my grocery store, and I live in a place where

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you can't have hard liquor in the grocery store, so

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I feel like if our store has it, almost anyone

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>could get it pretty easily. I do not have easy

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>access to most foods in most grocery shoes are much

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>more rural than you are. But I guarantee you it

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>would only take me two to three days to get

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that online. And at that point you can just thin

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that out with a little bit of water if you want,

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>or you can do a little bit of lemon juice

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:36.160
<v Speaker 1>with it if you want. You just want to thin

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 1>it out so that it, like I said, is a

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 1>lower density than that ginger ale base, and then you're

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you're all set. It's a very refreshing sip in either

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 1>version because it is so citrusy and bright and like

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>citrus plus ginger ale is just always going to be

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of a yummy, easy breezy combo delicious, and we're

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:57.439
<v Speaker 1>calling that the Skylight. Please do not drink it and

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>then repel fifty ft into the gallagh. Just don't repel

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty feet into a gallery. I think we hope that

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>you have enjoyed us not getting into trouble at all today,

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:13.199
<v Speaker 1>and that you maybe enjoy these little SIPs if you

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 1>give them a try, and that you will come back

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and hang out with us again next week where we

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>will have more fun Criminalia and more Bevrage time for you.

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Criminalia is a production of Shonda land Audio in partnership

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>with I Heart Radio. For more podcasts from Shonda land Audio,

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 1>please visit the I heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen to your favorite shows,