1 00:00:00,680 --> 00:00:04,200 Speaker 1: Hi, I'm Molly John Fast and this is Fast Politics, 2 00:00:04,400 --> 00:00:07,160 Speaker 1: where we discussed the top political headlines with some of 3 00:00:07,200 --> 00:00:12,440 Speaker 1: today's best minds and Donald Trump said he'll deport protesters. Yes, 4 00:00:12,760 --> 00:00:16,599 Speaker 1: mass deportations, go aheads what everybody wants. We have such 5 00:00:16,600 --> 00:00:20,280 Speaker 1: a great show for you today. Deputy editor for Balls 6 00:00:20,440 --> 00:00:25,000 Speaker 1: and Strikes, Medeeba Danny joins us to talk about her 7 00:00:25,040 --> 00:00:30,160 Speaker 1: new book, The Originalism Trap, how extremist stole the Constitution 8 00:00:30,720 --> 00:00:33,760 Speaker 1: and how we the people can take it back. Then 9 00:00:33,840 --> 00:00:37,760 Speaker 1: we'll talk to Newsguards founder Steve Brill about his new book, 10 00:00:37,880 --> 00:00:40,400 Speaker 1: The Death of Truth. How social media and the Internet 11 00:00:40,479 --> 00:00:45,440 Speaker 1: gave snake oil salesman and demagogues the weapons they need 12 00:00:45,479 --> 00:00:48,279 Speaker 1: to destroy trust and popolarize the world, and what we 13 00:00:48,320 --> 00:00:51,320 Speaker 1: can do. But first we have former Senator and host 14 00:00:51,360 --> 00:00:54,440 Speaker 1: of the Al Franken podcast, The One the Only Al Franken. 15 00:00:54,720 --> 00:00:57,520 Speaker 1: Welcome back to Fast Politics, Al Franken. 16 00:00:58,120 --> 00:00:59,760 Speaker 2: Thank you, Mollie. Great to be back. 17 00:01:00,000 --> 00:01:03,720 Speaker 1: Always a delight to have you. Dick Durbin is he 18 00:01:03,800 --> 00:01:04,559 Speaker 1: a friend of yours? 19 00:01:04,640 --> 00:01:05,600 Speaker 2: Let's yeah. 20 00:01:05,640 --> 00:01:07,080 Speaker 1: Are you and Dick Durbin buddies? 21 00:01:07,840 --> 00:01:09,960 Speaker 2: I don't know for buddies, but you we're friends? 22 00:01:10,160 --> 00:01:17,679 Speaker 1: Sure, Dick Durbin is the chair of Judiciary Samuel Alito. 23 00:01:17,720 --> 00:01:21,280 Speaker 1: Perhaps you've heard of him. Yes, he recently got a 24 00:01:21,400 --> 00:01:26,600 Speaker 1: Trump Truth, which is Trump's version of Twitter, and Trump untruthed. 25 00:01:26,800 --> 00:01:28,360 Speaker 1: Let's just say untruth because he's it. 26 00:01:28,480 --> 00:01:30,920 Speaker 2: Okay, well that's the biased I think that's biased. 27 00:01:31,000 --> 00:01:35,760 Speaker 1: But yes, fiaus, Trump untruthed about how happy he was 28 00:01:35,800 --> 00:01:39,199 Speaker 1: that Alito was not going to recuse and how good 29 00:01:39,240 --> 00:01:42,920 Speaker 1: it was that he had Justice Alito on his team. 30 00:01:43,480 --> 00:01:45,880 Speaker 1: Is that how the Supreme Court is supposed to work? 31 00:01:46,520 --> 00:01:51,960 Speaker 2: No? Now, I was on the Judiciary Committee and we 32 00:01:52,040 --> 00:01:55,280 Speaker 2: had we had rules about how it was supposed to work, 33 00:01:55,360 --> 00:01:58,000 Speaker 2: and that wasn't one of them. He didn't even nominate Alito. 34 00:01:58,520 --> 00:02:01,200 Speaker 1: Right, what is the solve for this? Like, doesn't the 35 00:02:01,320 --> 00:02:06,680 Speaker 1: Judiciary Committee have more power than just a strongly worded letter. 36 00:02:07,040 --> 00:02:10,240 Speaker 2: I suppose they could subpoena him. The committee could, and 37 00:02:10,240 --> 00:02:12,360 Speaker 2: then I don't know what happens, right. 38 00:02:12,360 --> 00:02:14,960 Speaker 1: I mean they could subpoena him, They could hold hearings. 39 00:02:15,280 --> 00:02:17,200 Speaker 2: Hearings are easy to do. I mean you could do 40 00:02:17,280 --> 00:02:19,680 Speaker 2: that because they're in the majority, and they have majority 41 00:02:19,720 --> 00:02:22,600 Speaker 2: on the committee, right, right, So yeah, they could have 42 00:02:22,639 --> 00:02:25,080 Speaker 2: hearings on this and I don't know if the Republicans 43 00:02:25,080 --> 00:02:27,840 Speaker 2: would show up or not, but so what right? 44 00:02:27,960 --> 00:02:30,840 Speaker 1: So why do you think they're not holding hearings on this, 45 00:02:31,160 --> 00:02:34,760 Speaker 1: because like if Ruth Bader Ginsburg was flying an Antifa 46 00:02:34,840 --> 00:02:39,640 Speaker 1: Forever flag in her house and Nantucket, I think that 47 00:02:39,840 --> 00:02:46,080 Speaker 1: Republicans would be upset, and Republicans controlled the Senate. I 48 00:02:46,120 --> 00:02:49,080 Speaker 1: think Ted Cruz would march her in. 49 00:02:49,440 --> 00:02:53,240 Speaker 2: I don't know that Antifa flag. I haven't. I haven't 50 00:02:53,280 --> 00:02:54,320 Speaker 2: seen it. 51 00:02:54,320 --> 00:02:54,880 Speaker 1: It's tied. 52 00:02:54,960 --> 00:02:58,920 Speaker 2: I oh, okay, was it flown in Portland when. 53 00:02:58,919 --> 00:03:01,840 Speaker 1: Ruth bader Ginsburg big Antifa person? I don't know if 54 00:03:01,880 --> 00:03:05,320 Speaker 1: you know this very into spray painting things. 55 00:03:05,560 --> 00:03:08,720 Speaker 2: Yeah, well they can't call her little known fact. They 56 00:03:08,760 --> 00:03:11,760 Speaker 2: can't call her in. These are all good questions. I 57 00:03:11,880 --> 00:03:15,440 Speaker 2: don't know if Sheldon, if you were the chairman, would 58 00:03:15,480 --> 00:03:19,120 Speaker 2: be doing something different than than Durbin. Is Sheldon White House? 59 00:03:19,120 --> 00:03:19,480 Speaker 2: Of course? 60 00:03:19,720 --> 00:03:22,680 Speaker 1: Yeah? Yeah? I mean, don't you think you'd be pushing harder? 61 00:03:22,919 --> 00:03:24,520 Speaker 2: I do. I don't know why Dick isn't. 62 00:03:24,720 --> 00:03:28,640 Speaker 1: Yeah, And I feel like, so here's a question for you. 63 00:03:28,840 --> 00:03:32,280 Speaker 1: It feels like we maybe, look, we don't know what's 64 00:03:32,280 --> 00:03:35,720 Speaker 1: going to happen in November. I continue to be a 65 00:03:35,840 --> 00:03:40,400 Speaker 1: cock eyed optimist. But if Democrats have a moment here 66 00:03:41,080 --> 00:03:44,000 Speaker 1: to protect democracy, shouldn't they be doing that? 67 00:03:44,680 --> 00:03:47,000 Speaker 2: Yes? And no, I don't know what they do. Frankly, 68 00:03:47,040 --> 00:03:49,680 Speaker 2: I don't know what the committee can do because all 69 00:03:49,760 --> 00:03:52,920 Speaker 2: I would happen is is that Alito wouldn't show up, right. 70 00:03:53,160 --> 00:03:55,920 Speaker 1: But I mean even that, like, don't you think the 71 00:03:56,000 --> 00:03:57,960 Speaker 1: more they can protect norms the better? 72 00:03:58,320 --> 00:04:00,600 Speaker 2: What are the norms? The norms are not to fly 73 00:04:02,120 --> 00:04:04,440 Speaker 2: a flag upside down, I mean. 74 00:04:05,280 --> 00:04:08,600 Speaker 1: Well, ruling on cases and then to have another flag 75 00:04:08,680 --> 00:04:11,480 Speaker 1: at your beach house. Your beach house flag is a 76 00:04:11,600 --> 00:04:18,440 Speaker 1: Christo fascisty flag. Yeah, it's a Christian Christian fundamentalist. Yeah. 77 00:04:18,839 --> 00:04:23,159 Speaker 1: Also favored by the Speaker of the House, Donald Trump's favorite, 78 00:04:23,320 --> 00:04:24,040 Speaker 1: Mike Johnson. 79 00:04:24,120 --> 00:04:25,679 Speaker 2: Well, that legitimizes it. 80 00:04:25,800 --> 00:04:27,279 Speaker 1: Yeah, it makes me feel much. 81 00:04:27,400 --> 00:04:28,880 Speaker 2: I mean it goes like, hey, the Speaker of the 82 00:04:28,880 --> 00:04:30,919 Speaker 2: House has it in front of his office. Isn't that 83 00:04:30,920 --> 00:04:31,480 Speaker 2: where he has it? 84 00:04:32,560 --> 00:04:32,960 Speaker 1: Yes? 85 00:04:33,839 --> 00:04:36,640 Speaker 2: But these were flags that both the upside down American 86 00:04:36,680 --> 00:04:39,000 Speaker 2: flag and what's it the heaven? 87 00:04:39,320 --> 00:04:42,320 Speaker 1: It's the appeal to have in flag capital letters above 88 00:04:42,360 --> 00:04:45,080 Speaker 1: the tree. The pine tree is a symbolization is the 89 00:04:45,120 --> 00:04:48,239 Speaker 1: symbol of New York's of New England. The phrase appeal 90 00:04:48,320 --> 00:04:52,040 Speaker 1: to have it appears in John Locke's second Treatis on Government. 91 00:04:52,600 --> 00:04:55,760 Speaker 2: So originally it wasn't the fascist flag. 92 00:04:55,640 --> 00:05:00,640 Speaker 1: Where it is used to describe the right of evolution. 93 00:05:02,160 --> 00:05:05,120 Speaker 1: Stemmed from the belief that God would deliver the colonists 94 00:05:05,120 --> 00:05:06,000 Speaker 1: from tyranny. 95 00:05:06,279 --> 00:05:08,159 Speaker 2: Oh okay, that's where the religion comes in. 96 00:05:08,279 --> 00:05:10,240 Speaker 1: It's kind of it gets kind of dark in there. 97 00:05:10,320 --> 00:05:11,320 Speaker 2: Yeah. 98 00:05:10,680 --> 00:05:14,039 Speaker 1: Right, at first you're like, oh, it's a little green tree, 99 00:05:14,240 --> 00:05:19,039 Speaker 1: New England Bucolic, and then they're like, God free us. 100 00:05:19,640 --> 00:05:24,360 Speaker 2: Well, you know, some of the founders evoked God, right 101 00:05:24,560 --> 00:05:28,000 Speaker 2: or invoked God, and God we trust is on our money, 102 00:05:28,080 --> 00:05:29,479 Speaker 2: and so we're. 103 00:05:29,320 --> 00:05:31,520 Speaker 1: Back to this textureless thing, right. 104 00:05:31,720 --> 00:05:37,680 Speaker 2: Alito is always a what's the word dick? I know, 105 00:05:37,920 --> 00:05:45,520 Speaker 2: I mean so, And of course he when Barack Obama 106 00:05:46,120 --> 00:05:51,000 Speaker 2: spoke out against Citizens United, remember, right, he mouthed not true. 107 00:05:51,040 --> 00:05:53,520 Speaker 2: And then he hasn't come to ah. I don't think 108 00:05:53,560 --> 00:05:55,920 Speaker 2: he's come to a State of the Union address. Sense. 109 00:05:56,279 --> 00:05:58,320 Speaker 1: I heard when I was in DC this weekend, I 110 00:05:58,320 --> 00:06:02,799 Speaker 1: heard lots of like bad stories people complaining about Alito. 111 00:06:03,200 --> 00:06:05,279 Speaker 2: Yeah, and then there's the trips and the money and 112 00:06:05,320 --> 00:06:06,080 Speaker 2: all that stuff. 113 00:06:06,440 --> 00:06:10,920 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, he didn't get an RV, so it's 114 00:06:10,960 --> 00:06:14,080 Speaker 1: not the RV. What I do think is interesting. You know, 115 00:06:14,120 --> 00:06:17,719 Speaker 1: you have two justices and this is like not a 116 00:06:18,080 --> 00:06:20,360 Speaker 1: left leaning court at all, but you have two justices 117 00:06:20,640 --> 00:06:23,719 Speaker 1: who are like expressly in the tank for Trump, right, 118 00:06:23,760 --> 00:06:26,640 Speaker 1: Alito and Thomas are basically like you know, and then 119 00:06:26,640 --> 00:06:28,039 Speaker 1: you have Thomas writing things. 120 00:06:28,279 --> 00:06:32,960 Speaker 2: Thomas has his wife that's very involved in trying to write. 121 00:06:32,760 --> 00:06:36,360 Speaker 1: The wife who was involved and yeah, trying to overturn 122 00:06:36,440 --> 00:06:39,080 Speaker 1: the election. Then you have Alito, who is the wife 123 00:06:39,080 --> 00:06:41,760 Speaker 1: who's flying the upside down flag. So clearly the real 124 00:06:41,800 --> 00:06:44,120 Speaker 1: housewives of the Supreme Court are not. 125 00:06:44,680 --> 00:06:48,520 Speaker 2: Okay, I would like to see that series. 126 00:06:48,839 --> 00:06:53,120 Speaker 1: You would not. Can you imagine? It's like it's like 127 00:06:53,320 --> 00:06:57,280 Speaker 1: missus Alito drinking and fighting with her neighbor. 128 00:06:58,720 --> 00:07:02,080 Speaker 2: And of course you know one of the liberal justices 129 00:07:02,600 --> 00:07:03,279 Speaker 2: have wives. 130 00:07:03,600 --> 00:07:05,640 Speaker 1: Yes, that's right, none of them have wives, and now 131 00:07:05,640 --> 00:07:09,160 Speaker 1: others mark against them no wives, but it would be 132 00:07:09,240 --> 00:07:12,320 Speaker 1: funny to have the spouses. But yeah, I mean, what 133 00:07:12,320 --> 00:07:14,160 Speaker 1: do you do with the problem like the Supreme Court? 134 00:07:14,200 --> 00:07:16,680 Speaker 1: I mean, I know what I would do if Biden 135 00:07:16,800 --> 00:07:19,600 Speaker 1: wins again, which all he wants is to not have 136 00:07:19,680 --> 00:07:21,679 Speaker 1: to do this, but he's going to have to fucking 137 00:07:21,720 --> 00:07:24,160 Speaker 1: put in term limits in the Supreme Court. 138 00:07:24,400 --> 00:07:27,160 Speaker 2: First of all, he won't be able to unless we 139 00:07:27,280 --> 00:07:30,160 Speaker 2: have And this is what the importance of the election is. 140 00:07:30,200 --> 00:07:33,120 Speaker 2: One he has to win and two we have to 141 00:07:33,120 --> 00:07:36,200 Speaker 2: hold fifty in the Senate and we have to win 142 00:07:36,240 --> 00:07:39,600 Speaker 2: the House. That's all we have to do. 143 00:07:41,000 --> 00:07:42,440 Speaker 1: It should be no big deal. 144 00:07:42,840 --> 00:07:44,679 Speaker 2: Yeah, right now things are looking great. 145 00:07:44,840 --> 00:07:50,560 Speaker 1: And this is the laugh to knock hery thing. 146 00:07:51,000 --> 00:07:54,440 Speaker 2: The thing is about invoking term limits. First of all, 147 00:07:54,800 --> 00:07:56,880 Speaker 2: if you can do that, if you're the one who 148 00:07:56,880 --> 00:07:59,360 Speaker 2: can do that, it's because you have both the House 149 00:07:59,360 --> 00:08:02,560 Speaker 2: and the Senate and the White House. And if you 150 00:08:02,680 --> 00:08:06,680 Speaker 2: have both the Senate and the White House, then you 151 00:08:06,840 --> 00:08:12,080 Speaker 2: presumably have may have an appointment if either Thomas or 152 00:08:12,120 --> 00:08:16,040 Speaker 2: Alito retire, which they won't with a Democratic president, but 153 00:08:16,520 --> 00:08:20,560 Speaker 2: if they were to, you know, if Biden wins, that 154 00:08:20,640 --> 00:08:24,480 Speaker 2: means he's president for the next four years. And those 155 00:08:24,480 --> 00:08:29,480 Speaker 2: guys hang on and Biden waits until he gets an appointment, 156 00:08:29,520 --> 00:08:32,200 Speaker 2: which he won't get unless one of those guys passes on. 157 00:08:32,720 --> 00:08:35,240 Speaker 1: But the whole thing with in my mind is like 158 00:08:35,320 --> 00:08:38,160 Speaker 1: they have to try, right, The American people have put 159 00:08:38,160 --> 00:08:42,319 Speaker 1: these these guys in office to try and whether or 160 00:08:42,400 --> 00:08:45,680 Speaker 1: not it works. I mean, like you'll say, say one 161 00:08:45,679 --> 00:08:50,080 Speaker 1: thing about Republicans, they have this insane base, but they 162 00:08:50,240 --> 00:08:54,480 Speaker 1: serve their fucking base, right, Republicans like Marjorie Taylor Green, 163 00:08:54,880 --> 00:08:57,920 Speaker 1: you know, has been trying to impeach Joe Biden for 164 00:08:58,080 --> 00:09:01,760 Speaker 1: fifty five million years, right, I mean she basically is like, 165 00:09:02,440 --> 00:09:06,080 Speaker 1: I mean, these people will do anything for their base. Meanwhile, 166 00:09:06,160 --> 00:09:09,240 Speaker 1: you have Democrats who are like, their base is writing 167 00:09:09,679 --> 00:09:13,640 Speaker 1: little postcards. They're begging them, they're saying please, And Democrats 168 00:09:13,640 --> 00:09:17,720 Speaker 1: are like, you know, I mean, it is kind of 169 00:09:17,760 --> 00:09:19,400 Speaker 1: amazing how little. 170 00:09:19,120 --> 00:09:21,439 Speaker 2: Wait a minut who's begging whom to write postcards. 171 00:09:21,520 --> 00:09:25,440 Speaker 1: I'm saying, the Democratic base does all this stuff, and 172 00:09:25,760 --> 00:09:29,600 Speaker 1: Democratic electeds are sort of like, yeah, well it might 173 00:09:29,600 --> 00:09:32,400 Speaker 1: not work. I mean, like, I think they should try. 174 00:09:32,760 --> 00:09:35,480 Speaker 1: I think the base would be pleased to see. And 175 00:09:35,520 --> 00:09:38,920 Speaker 1: it's not even about pleasing them, it's about keeping American 176 00:09:38,920 --> 00:09:41,600 Speaker 1: democracy going, which strikes me as a good cause. 177 00:09:41,920 --> 00:09:44,960 Speaker 2: So you're saying that Biden and a Democratic Senate and 178 00:09:45,000 --> 00:09:48,600 Speaker 2: a Democratic House should pass term limits, even though Biden 179 00:09:48,720 --> 00:09:50,600 Speaker 2: might be the one that get the first apployment. 180 00:09:50,720 --> 00:09:53,440 Speaker 1: Yes, aps of fucking lily. And I'm saying that, like, 181 00:09:53,679 --> 00:09:55,760 Speaker 1: even though Marjorie Taylor Green. 182 00:09:55,840 --> 00:09:58,160 Speaker 2: So, isn't that us shooting ourselves in the foot in 183 00:09:58,200 --> 00:10:02,400 Speaker 2: a sense, because then our guy who we get in 184 00:10:02,679 --> 00:10:05,400 Speaker 2: or our woman who we get in will be the 185 00:10:05,440 --> 00:10:07,679 Speaker 2: first one to have an eighteen year term limit. 186 00:10:08,000 --> 00:10:10,640 Speaker 1: No, make everybody be like, this is it? You know 187 00:10:10,880 --> 00:10:12,920 Speaker 1: we're going to start them now? I mean, here are 188 00:10:12,960 --> 00:10:16,600 Speaker 1: the choices, right you expand the court, you put in 189 00:10:16,720 --> 00:10:19,200 Speaker 1: term limits. I mean, there are just not a ton 190 00:10:19,240 --> 00:10:22,640 Speaker 1: of great choices at least term limits. And even if 191 00:10:22,679 --> 00:10:25,920 Speaker 1: you expand them five years for everyone, you know whatever, 192 00:10:26,000 --> 00:10:29,000 Speaker 1: you give eighteen years to everyone on the court right now, 193 00:10:29,120 --> 00:10:30,160 Speaker 1: or you do. 194 00:10:30,080 --> 00:10:30,320 Speaker 3: What I. 195 00:10:31,800 --> 00:10:37,079 Speaker 1: Mean, I just think that there's no reason to I 196 00:10:37,120 --> 00:10:37,680 Speaker 1: don't know. 197 00:10:38,080 --> 00:10:41,840 Speaker 2: You know who would have to maybe test the constitutionality 198 00:10:41,840 --> 00:10:48,520 Speaker 2: of that who the Supreme Court? Yes, that would be 199 00:10:48,679 --> 00:10:49,440 Speaker 2: very interesting. 200 00:10:50,320 --> 00:10:54,040 Speaker 1: I'm saying that trying that it's important to try. 201 00:10:54,800 --> 00:10:58,680 Speaker 2: I can just see, like, only Democrats with the President 202 00:10:58,960 --> 00:11:02,040 Speaker 2: and with the Senate and a chance to appoint someone 203 00:11:02,280 --> 00:11:08,160 Speaker 2: if Thomas or if Alido retires or passes on, only 204 00:11:08,200 --> 00:11:10,920 Speaker 2: Democrats to be the one to be able to choose 205 00:11:10,920 --> 00:11:14,360 Speaker 2: a justice and make that the first justice to have 206 00:11:14,400 --> 00:11:18,000 Speaker 2: an eighteen year limit, right, No, I know, and then 207 00:11:18,000 --> 00:11:20,480 Speaker 2: it'd be like, way to go, Democrats. You get a 208 00:11:20,520 --> 00:11:22,079 Speaker 2: gun and you shoot yourself in the foot. 209 00:11:22,160 --> 00:11:24,559 Speaker 1: What I'm saying here is that the Democrats have an 210 00:11:24,559 --> 00:11:29,440 Speaker 1: opportunity to behave more like Republicans, and they should take it. 211 00:11:29,720 --> 00:11:32,720 Speaker 2: I don't know. I understand you're saying play hardball, and 212 00:11:32,800 --> 00:11:36,080 Speaker 2: I understand that, yes, and that is a Sheldon white 213 00:11:36,120 --> 00:11:38,679 Speaker 2: House proposal, And a lot of people have proposed this, 214 00:11:38,800 --> 00:11:41,560 Speaker 2: the eighteen year thing, and that makes sense that and 215 00:11:41,800 --> 00:11:44,439 Speaker 2: starting with the first time you do it, then every 216 00:11:44,640 --> 00:11:47,280 Speaker 2: president gets I guess to a term. 217 00:11:47,480 --> 00:11:50,679 Speaker 1: The idea here is that Democrats should be obstreperous and 218 00:11:50,720 --> 00:11:54,480 Speaker 1: they should do whatever they can do to save American 219 00:11:54,520 --> 00:11:56,080 Speaker 1: democracy whatever that looks like. 220 00:11:56,440 --> 00:11:58,720 Speaker 2: Yes, and I'm saying the irony would be to save 221 00:11:58,800 --> 00:12:01,680 Speaker 2: democracy the first you know, the. 222 00:12:01,640 --> 00:12:04,439 Speaker 1: First, right, But I'm I think you're getting too stuck 223 00:12:04,600 --> 00:12:08,280 Speaker 1: on this idea of what of the like specifics of 224 00:12:08,280 --> 00:12:11,880 Speaker 1: what I'm saying. I'm saying that they should hold hearings 225 00:12:11,920 --> 00:12:15,160 Speaker 1: and make a rackus and do the kind of things 226 00:12:15,200 --> 00:12:19,040 Speaker 1: that people like Ted Cruz do, right, except do it 227 00:12:19,080 --> 00:12:23,520 Speaker 1: for the good Democrats continually they bring a stuffed animal 228 00:12:23,559 --> 00:12:26,520 Speaker 1: to a fucking knife fight every time. You know, Dick 229 00:12:26,559 --> 00:12:29,640 Speaker 1: Durbin has a strongly worded letter, the guy is like 230 00:12:30,040 --> 00:12:32,160 Speaker 1: Donald Trump is like, Alito, I'm so glad I have 231 00:12:32,240 --> 00:12:36,160 Speaker 1: you on my team, Like a strongly worded letter versus Alito, 232 00:12:36,200 --> 00:12:38,920 Speaker 1: I'm so glad you're on my team. Like this is 233 00:12:38,960 --> 00:12:42,800 Speaker 1: where American democracy dies. It's like one side is collegial 234 00:12:43,200 --> 00:12:45,400 Speaker 1: and the other side is like, I'm really glad we 235 00:12:45,440 --> 00:12:46,400 Speaker 1: have this all wrapped up. 236 00:12:46,800 --> 00:12:48,760 Speaker 2: Let me ask you when you said write letters. 237 00:12:49,120 --> 00:12:52,880 Speaker 1: You have these democratic base they write postcards to get 238 00:12:52,920 --> 00:12:57,040 Speaker 1: people to isolate, and that's good. I mean they kill themselves, 239 00:12:57,200 --> 00:12:57,560 Speaker 1: you know. 240 00:12:57,920 --> 00:13:00,400 Speaker 2: Well I would encourage people to do that and also 241 00:13:00,480 --> 00:13:01,760 Speaker 2: encourage people to door knock. 242 00:13:02,080 --> 00:13:05,800 Speaker 1: Yeah, but their fucking representatives should be killing themselves too, Like, 243 00:13:05,880 --> 00:13:08,440 Speaker 1: if you're working so hard to get these people elected, 244 00:13:08,920 --> 00:13:09,560 Speaker 1: they should be. 245 00:13:09,640 --> 00:13:09,880 Speaker 4: I mean. 246 00:13:10,000 --> 00:13:12,920 Speaker 1: The thing about Marjorie Taylor Green is that she's a 247 00:13:12,960 --> 00:13:16,840 Speaker 1: complete lunatic and not very smart. But imagine if we 248 00:13:16,880 --> 00:13:20,600 Speaker 1: had someone on the left, if we had Democrats who 249 00:13:20,679 --> 00:13:23,720 Speaker 1: were doing things like that, who were pushing so hard 250 00:13:24,400 --> 00:13:29,760 Speaker 1: and filing resolutions and you know, holding hearings and doing 251 00:13:29,840 --> 00:13:34,080 Speaker 1: all of those things. But for American democracy. 252 00:13:33,640 --> 00:13:36,200 Speaker 2: Well, I do think that if Sheldon white House were 253 00:13:36,280 --> 00:13:38,679 Speaker 2: the chairman, that you would be having hearings right now. 254 00:13:39,000 --> 00:13:42,240 Speaker 1: Yes, and you know, let Republicans not show up. You know, 255 00:13:42,360 --> 00:13:44,760 Speaker 1: that says as much as anything. I mean, look, the 256 00:13:44,840 --> 00:13:48,400 Speaker 1: one thing that Donald Trump has done that has been 257 00:13:48,760 --> 00:13:51,480 Speaker 1: I don't want to say brilliant because it's going to 258 00:13:51,520 --> 00:13:55,760 Speaker 1: destroy American democracy ultimately very likely, is that he has 259 00:13:55,800 --> 00:13:59,000 Speaker 1: not acted within the kind fines of the American government. 260 00:13:59,120 --> 00:14:03,640 Speaker 1: Right every He's taken his situation to his base. So 261 00:14:03,679 --> 00:14:05,960 Speaker 1: he said, you know, they're trying to impeach me, but 262 00:14:05,960 --> 00:14:08,760 Speaker 1: they're really trying to impeach you. Everyone thought, oh, it's 263 00:14:08,800 --> 00:14:11,800 Speaker 1: too stupid to work, but in fact his people are like, 264 00:14:11,840 --> 00:14:15,679 Speaker 1: they're trying to impeach us. So obviously it has worked 265 00:14:15,960 --> 00:14:17,599 Speaker 1: not to get too obstreperous. 266 00:14:17,840 --> 00:14:20,800 Speaker 2: It worked that the last one was the one that 267 00:14:21,160 --> 00:14:24,360 Speaker 2: is the tragedy that McConnell took the position he took, 268 00:14:24,640 --> 00:14:27,480 Speaker 2: which was he did one of those speeches where the 269 00:14:27,600 --> 00:14:31,000 Speaker 2: keyword was butt, you know, because it was like, there's 270 00:14:31,080 --> 00:14:34,400 Speaker 2: no doubt that you know that Donald Trump is responsible 271 00:14:34,400 --> 00:14:37,640 Speaker 2: for what happened on January sex and then blah blah 272 00:14:37,640 --> 00:14:39,840 Speaker 2: blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. 273 00:14:39,840 --> 00:14:43,440 Speaker 2: But and that's the most important word. I think Howard 274 00:14:43,480 --> 00:14:46,240 Speaker 2: Feynman taught me that that's the most important word in 275 00:14:46,280 --> 00:14:49,760 Speaker 2: the speech is but. And then, of course he completely 276 00:14:49,920 --> 00:14:54,200 Speaker 2: negated the argument on immunity by saying, you know, this 277 00:14:54,240 --> 00:15:00,200 Speaker 2: can be adjudicated in court. And now, of course they 278 00:15:00,200 --> 00:15:03,560 Speaker 2: were trying to get Alito to recuse himself on this 279 00:15:03,600 --> 00:15:05,280 Speaker 2: immunity thing, and of course he won't. 280 00:15:05,600 --> 00:15:09,520 Speaker 1: Right, It's shocking that Alito won't do the right thing 281 00:15:10,040 --> 00:15:14,240 Speaker 1: despite the fact that he has got every point. I mean, 282 00:15:14,240 --> 00:15:16,960 Speaker 1: if you listen to those oral arguments, like you know, 283 00:15:17,280 --> 00:15:21,760 Speaker 1: both oral abortion arguments, you immediately have Alito and Thomas 284 00:15:21,800 --> 00:15:24,560 Speaker 1: and they're being like, well, what about the section three 285 00:15:24,720 --> 00:15:28,480 Speaker 1: four seven six the Comstock Act, which hasn't been has 286 00:15:28,520 --> 00:15:32,080 Speaker 1: been dormant since eighteen sixty four. What about that? Because 287 00:15:32,160 --> 00:15:36,200 Speaker 1: people have fucking plans and designs on American democracy and 288 00:15:36,560 --> 00:15:38,760 Speaker 1: we're writing strongly worded letters. 289 00:15:39,080 --> 00:15:42,200 Speaker 2: Yep, Well, let's talk about something more optimistic. How about 290 00:15:42,360 --> 00:15:44,320 Speaker 2: you know, I've been following the trial, and I know 291 00:15:44,480 --> 00:15:47,520 Speaker 2: that there's been a lot, a lot of coverage of 292 00:15:47,560 --> 00:15:52,160 Speaker 2: this on MSNBC, and yet as much as I watch, 293 00:15:52,200 --> 00:15:55,800 Speaker 2: I've still confused about like what the original crime was, 294 00:15:55,960 --> 00:15:59,320 Speaker 2: et cetera. But I think he's going to be convicted. 295 00:16:00,040 --> 00:16:03,360 Speaker 2: Shocked if he was acquitted, but there could be hung. 296 00:16:03,240 --> 00:16:05,400 Speaker 1: Jury or mix split charges. 297 00:16:05,520 --> 00:16:09,000 Speaker 2: But let's say he does get convicted. I asked my 298 00:16:09,040 --> 00:16:12,560 Speaker 2: wife this, asked Franny, what would you sentence him to 299 00:16:12,720 --> 00:16:15,560 Speaker 2: if you were the judge? And my wife said five years, 300 00:16:16,160 --> 00:16:19,600 Speaker 2: which one the maximum is four years in this But 301 00:16:19,880 --> 00:16:21,480 Speaker 2: so this is what I said, thirty days. 302 00:16:21,840 --> 00:16:23,680 Speaker 1: Thirty days, Okay. 303 00:16:24,200 --> 00:16:26,720 Speaker 2: The reason for that is I think he has to 304 00:16:26,760 --> 00:16:29,280 Speaker 2: go to jail. Now, not everyone who gets convicted of 305 00:16:29,320 --> 00:16:33,720 Speaker 2: this crime evidently goes to prison, and in fact most don't, 306 00:16:34,040 --> 00:16:37,120 Speaker 2: but I feel like he should go. But I think 307 00:16:37,160 --> 00:16:41,080 Speaker 2: that anything maybe beyond ninety days or something like that 308 00:16:41,240 --> 00:16:46,600 Speaker 2: is just seems punitive and political. So I thought thirty days, 309 00:16:47,000 --> 00:16:50,200 Speaker 2: which I can imagine he could do without going crazy. 310 00:16:50,480 --> 00:16:53,040 Speaker 2: I mean, he's not going to jail, that's what you're saying. 311 00:16:53,240 --> 00:16:54,200 Speaker 1: Yeah, there's no way. 312 00:16:54,120 --> 00:16:55,560 Speaker 2: So that there's no sentence of this. 313 00:16:55,560 --> 00:17:00,480 Speaker 1: This is Look, why it's good it is because you 314 00:17:00,600 --> 00:17:04,879 Speaker 1: do crimes, you should be treated like other people who 315 00:17:04,960 --> 00:17:09,200 Speaker 1: do crimes. We don't have special justice for affluent white guys. 316 00:17:09,240 --> 00:17:11,880 Speaker 1: I mean, we actually do, but we shouldn't. 317 00:17:12,200 --> 00:17:13,800 Speaker 2: It's always in the opposite direction. 318 00:17:14,280 --> 00:17:16,800 Speaker 1: Yes, he's just not going to jail. It's not going 319 00:17:16,880 --> 00:17:22,199 Speaker 1: to happen. I think there's a scenario where he loses reelection, 320 00:17:22,800 --> 00:17:26,920 Speaker 1: and you know, remember he is running for reelection basically 321 00:17:26,920 --> 00:17:29,320 Speaker 1: to stay out of jail. That's not me saying that. 322 00:17:29,320 --> 00:17:32,040 Speaker 1: That's well heard. So what I think I think a 323 00:17:32,280 --> 00:17:34,600 Speaker 1: likely scenario. And by the way, this is not some 324 00:17:34,720 --> 00:17:37,320 Speaker 1: contrary thought. I mean pretty much everyone. You know he 325 00:17:37,359 --> 00:17:41,239 Speaker 1: announced in the hopes of not getting indicted, and if 326 00:17:41,280 --> 00:17:43,840 Speaker 1: the Justice Department had moved a little faster, none of 327 00:17:43,880 --> 00:17:46,080 Speaker 1: us would be here right now. You know, Biden would 328 00:17:46,080 --> 00:17:49,200 Speaker 1: be running against Nikki Haley. And you know, while a 329 00:17:49,280 --> 00:17:52,040 Speaker 1: lot of us don't like Nikki Haley, she is not 330 00:17:52,080 --> 00:17:55,840 Speaker 1: going to end American democracy, not in those heels. So, 331 00:17:56,440 --> 00:17:59,520 Speaker 1: by the way, one last thing about Nikki Haley. She's 332 00:17:59,520 --> 00:18:01,679 Speaker 1: always like underestimate me. That you know, there are all 333 00:18:01,760 --> 00:18:04,240 Speaker 1: these like Nikki Haley tweets that are like underestimate me. 334 00:18:04,359 --> 00:18:06,760 Speaker 1: That'll be fun. I'm like, I actually thought you had 335 00:18:06,800 --> 00:18:10,000 Speaker 1: a spine. And now I know you don't, so that's 336 00:18:10,040 --> 00:18:12,840 Speaker 1: not underestimated. That's like overestimating. 337 00:18:12,960 --> 00:18:16,840 Speaker 2: I don't know why she endures Trump other than she maybe, 338 00:18:17,160 --> 00:18:18,640 Speaker 2: you know, speaking circus, she. 339 00:18:18,560 --> 00:18:19,960 Speaker 1: Wants to be HUD secretary. 340 00:18:20,320 --> 00:18:22,760 Speaker 2: Really, no fucking with you. 341 00:18:24,160 --> 00:18:29,440 Speaker 1: We got away over time. But yes, but you're fun. 342 00:18:29,560 --> 00:18:31,160 Speaker 1: We're fun. We're all fun. 343 00:18:31,440 --> 00:18:32,320 Speaker 2: You're fun. I'm not. 344 00:18:32,440 --> 00:18:37,720 Speaker 5: We're depressed. We're pretty depressed. What's there to be depressed about? 345 00:18:37,840 --> 00:18:41,399 Speaker 5: Really nothing. We got a good six months left on 346 00:18:41,520 --> 00:18:43,040 Speaker 5: American democracy. 347 00:18:43,080 --> 00:18:47,000 Speaker 2: We didn't even get into Gaza, so yeah, yeah, there 348 00:18:47,040 --> 00:18:48,640 Speaker 2: we go. So there's nothing. 349 00:18:48,760 --> 00:18:58,840 Speaker 1: Nothing to be depressed about. Alf Franken, thank you. Spring 350 00:18:58,960 --> 00:19:01,520 Speaker 1: is here, and I bet you are trying to look fashionable, 351 00:19:01,840 --> 00:19:05,560 Speaker 1: so why not pick up some fashionable all new Fast 352 00:19:05,640 --> 00:19:09,600 Speaker 1: Politics merchandise. We just opened a news store with all 353 00:19:09,840 --> 00:19:13,600 Speaker 1: new designs just for you. Get t shirts, hoodies, hats, 354 00:19:13,920 --> 00:19:18,960 Speaker 1: and top bags. To grab some, head to fastpolitics dot com. 355 00:19:19,480 --> 00:19:23,040 Speaker 1: Medeeba Denny is deputy editor for Balls and Strikes and 356 00:19:23,280 --> 00:19:28,440 Speaker 1: author of The Originalism Trap. How extremists Stole the Constitution 357 00:19:29,160 --> 00:19:30,960 Speaker 1: and how we the people can take it back. 358 00:19:31,320 --> 00:19:35,920 Speaker 6: Welcome to Fast Politics. Medeeba its Hello there. 359 00:19:36,080 --> 00:19:39,040 Speaker 1: Very excited to have you one of the things when 360 00:19:39,040 --> 00:19:44,119 Speaker 1: you listen to this Supreme Court, this insane Supreme Court, 361 00:19:44,520 --> 00:19:48,560 Speaker 1: is that you hear a lot of the time that 362 00:19:48,600 --> 00:19:53,879 Speaker 1: the conservative justices, but especially Alito and Thomas, have embraced 363 00:19:54,280 --> 00:20:02,239 Speaker 1: this very insane the school of thought which is called originalism. 364 00:20:02,320 --> 00:20:05,359 Speaker 1: So talk to me about this book and explain to 365 00:20:05,440 --> 00:20:10,800 Speaker 1: us what originalism is if you can, please sure well. 366 00:20:10,920 --> 00:20:15,320 Speaker 6: Originalism, like you said, is the idea that the conservative 367 00:20:15,400 --> 00:20:19,840 Speaker 6: legal movement has really embraced to justify all of said 368 00:20:19,880 --> 00:20:23,760 Speaker 6: bad decision making. The idea of originalism is that the 369 00:20:23,800 --> 00:20:27,800 Speaker 6: meaning of the Constitution is fixed in time. It's frozen 370 00:20:27,960 --> 00:20:31,320 Speaker 6: at the moment of enactment. And most originalists will say 371 00:20:31,359 --> 00:20:35,560 Speaker 6: that the way we understand the Constitution today has to 372 00:20:35,600 --> 00:20:39,000 Speaker 6: be how the public would have originally understood it when 373 00:20:39,040 --> 00:20:40,840 Speaker 6: the Constitution was ratified. 374 00:20:41,119 --> 00:20:45,840 Speaker 1: Tell us what America looked like when the Constitution is ratified. 375 00:20:46,240 --> 00:20:51,560 Speaker 6: Not great, molly. It was not a good time for 376 00:20:51,840 --> 00:20:56,240 Speaker 6: the majority of the population. Political and economic and social 377 00:20:56,320 --> 00:21:00,760 Speaker 6: power was really concentrated in the hands of a elite 378 00:21:00,800 --> 00:21:04,880 Speaker 6: class of wealthy white men who were landowners, right, Yeah, 379 00:21:04,920 --> 00:21:08,440 Speaker 6: that's where the wealth came from, and everyone else had 380 00:21:08,600 --> 00:21:11,720 Speaker 6: little to no rights to speak of and so when 381 00:21:11,760 --> 00:21:18,119 Speaker 6: you are linking the upper bounds of constitutional interpretation to 382 00:21:18,400 --> 00:21:22,679 Speaker 6: those historically low standards, it basically sets most of the 383 00:21:22,720 --> 00:21:25,960 Speaker 6: country up for failure because they're not going to be 384 00:21:26,040 --> 00:21:28,600 Speaker 6: able to exercise equal rights. 385 00:21:28,800 --> 00:21:33,639 Speaker 1: Can you explain to us how originalism got going and 386 00:21:33,720 --> 00:21:37,359 Speaker 1: how it sort of became the thing that Thomas and 387 00:21:37,359 --> 00:21:40,000 Speaker 1: Alito pretty much hitting their hats on for everything. 388 00:21:40,400 --> 00:21:44,439 Speaker 6: Sure, well, the idea that you can use history and 389 00:21:44,520 --> 00:21:47,840 Speaker 6: tradition or what we think might be the original public meaning. 390 00:21:47,960 --> 00:21:50,480 Speaker 6: I'm saying we think might be because there's a lot 391 00:21:50,560 --> 00:21:55,240 Speaker 6: who knows, yes, that idea has been pretty long standing 392 00:21:55,280 --> 00:21:57,760 Speaker 6: that you could look to these things. It's a very 393 00:21:57,960 --> 00:22:02,440 Speaker 6: modern recent innovation that the only way you can say 394 00:22:02,440 --> 00:22:05,560 Speaker 6: what the Constitution means is by looking at the purported 395 00:22:05,600 --> 00:22:10,360 Speaker 6: original public meeting. That's something that didn't really develop until 396 00:22:10,640 --> 00:22:14,119 Speaker 6: as a backlash the Civil rights movement, we saw that 397 00:22:14,359 --> 00:22:18,399 Speaker 6: the Ronald Wakens Justice Department was really pushing back and 398 00:22:18,480 --> 00:22:23,040 Speaker 6: working to formalize this new idea of originalism. It didn't 399 00:22:23,040 --> 00:22:25,480 Speaker 6: even really have a name back then. It was in 400 00:22:25,640 --> 00:22:28,200 Speaker 6: the seventies and eighties that they began using the term 401 00:22:28,280 --> 00:22:32,399 Speaker 6: originalism and the express goal of it basically was to 402 00:22:32,440 --> 00:22:36,800 Speaker 6: push back against the perceived excesses of the Warren Court era, 403 00:22:37,000 --> 00:22:40,440 Speaker 6: which gave us some of the major decisions like Brown 404 00:22:40,560 --> 00:22:43,000 Speaker 6: view Board that we cherished today, or at least that 405 00:22:43,080 --> 00:22:44,240 Speaker 6: most of us shariesh today. 406 00:22:44,440 --> 00:22:49,560 Speaker 1: Right, I shouldn't laugh because this is like when I 407 00:22:49,680 --> 00:22:53,080 Speaker 1: laugh when I'm so depressed, and not because it's funny, 408 00:22:53,080 --> 00:22:55,679 Speaker 1: because it's not funny. And will you just explain for 409 00:22:55,760 --> 00:22:59,520 Speaker 1: our listeners why brownby board is back in the vernacular. 410 00:23:00,080 --> 00:23:03,240 Speaker 6: Yeah, there are a couple different reasons why. But most recently, 411 00:23:03,400 --> 00:23:06,240 Speaker 6: in a decision the Supreme Court handed down a few 412 00:23:06,320 --> 00:23:11,400 Speaker 6: days ago where the Court is effectively blessed racial jerrymandering. 413 00:23:11,960 --> 00:23:15,160 Speaker 6: Justice Thomas wrote a concurring opinion in that case where 414 00:23:15,240 --> 00:23:17,840 Speaker 6: he said that he doesn't think that the Court has 415 00:23:17,960 --> 00:23:22,000 Speaker 6: any role admunicating cases about racial jerrymandering, and he said 416 00:23:22,040 --> 00:23:25,080 Speaker 6: that this sort of remedy that the Court was using 417 00:23:25,280 --> 00:23:28,280 Speaker 6: really stems out of brownview Board, and that that type 418 00:23:28,280 --> 00:23:31,520 Speaker 6: of grand equitable relief that the Court at the Court 419 00:23:31,520 --> 00:23:33,760 Speaker 6: had used then, and his wording it was something to 420 00:23:33,800 --> 00:23:37,199 Speaker 6: the effect of this may have been necessary then, but 421 00:23:37,320 --> 00:23:40,119 Speaker 6: it is not necessary now. So, first of all, the 422 00:23:40,160 --> 00:23:44,080 Speaker 6: idea that it may have been like like, he's unsure 423 00:23:44,160 --> 00:23:47,159 Speaker 6: about whether or not Brownvie Board was above board, so 424 00:23:47,240 --> 00:23:49,879 Speaker 6: to speak. And then the second part of that is 425 00:23:49,880 --> 00:23:54,040 Speaker 6: saying even if it was necessary, then it's not necessary now. 426 00:23:54,400 --> 00:23:57,479 Speaker 6: And so yeah, this is part and parcel of the 427 00:23:57,560 --> 00:24:01,800 Speaker 6: Court's work to de faying all of the teeth that 428 00:24:01,840 --> 00:24:05,720 Speaker 6: the civil rights movement had and take away all of 429 00:24:05,760 --> 00:24:11,280 Speaker 6: the whether constitutional or statutory protections for marginalized people that 430 00:24:11,440 --> 00:24:14,680 Speaker 6: folks have fought for over the last few hundred years. 431 00:24:15,040 --> 00:24:19,200 Speaker 1: And we recently learned that just as Sodomaya goes to 432 00:24:19,240 --> 00:24:23,920 Speaker 1: her office to cry after some decisions, which yeah. 433 00:24:23,400 --> 00:24:25,280 Speaker 6: She is not the only one. 434 00:24:25,760 --> 00:24:28,679 Speaker 1: I was wondering if you could explain to us a 435 00:24:28,680 --> 00:24:31,800 Speaker 1: little bit about so sort of there have been a 436 00:24:31,960 --> 00:24:36,120 Speaker 1: number of truly insane decisions out of this court. Their 437 00:24:36,200 --> 00:24:40,920 Speaker 1: decision that racial jurymandering is a okay with them overturning Row. 438 00:24:41,400 --> 00:24:44,800 Speaker 1: Now they're looking at bringing back the Comstock Act. I mean, 439 00:24:45,119 --> 00:24:48,040 Speaker 1: explain to us where originalism fits in with this. 440 00:24:48,760 --> 00:24:54,160 Speaker 6: Yeah, well, originalism by its own terms is like focused 441 00:24:54,200 --> 00:24:58,720 Speaker 6: on this idea of history based on resetting our understanding 442 00:24:58,720 --> 00:25:03,679 Speaker 6: of the Constitution. To however, conservatives say basically it was 443 00:25:03,800 --> 00:25:07,800 Speaker 6: understood two hundred years ago. It's a jurisprudence of rolling 444 00:25:07,840 --> 00:25:11,560 Speaker 6: back the clock. That's been the through line of all 445 00:25:11,600 --> 00:25:14,240 Speaker 6: of these sorts of cases that you mentioned, whether undoing 446 00:25:14,400 --> 00:25:19,400 Speaker 6: voting rights protections, or taking away the constitutional right to abortion, 447 00:25:20,040 --> 00:25:24,840 Speaker 6: or reinvigorating the Undead Comstock Act. The idea here with 448 00:25:24,960 --> 00:25:28,240 Speaker 6: all of these is putting things as we think they 449 00:25:28,280 --> 00:25:33,320 Speaker 6: once were are sort of idealized, nostalgic version of the past, 450 00:25:33,800 --> 00:25:39,200 Speaker 6: where the hierarchies that they care about, hierarchies of patriarchy 451 00:25:39,240 --> 00:25:42,880 Speaker 6: and racism and capitalism, where all of these structures were 452 00:25:43,600 --> 00:25:48,080 Speaker 6: more enforced, and where the government didn't have, or rather 453 00:25:48,320 --> 00:25:52,320 Speaker 6: unless say they didn't have, didn't utilize tools to address these. 454 00:25:52,440 --> 00:25:56,120 Speaker 6: I think that's a really cool part, is that there 455 00:25:56,200 --> 00:26:00,720 Speaker 6: are tools that we can use. The reconstruction and men exist. 456 00:26:00,920 --> 00:26:03,320 Speaker 6: The whole purpose of the post Civil War and members 457 00:26:03,400 --> 00:26:06,600 Speaker 6: to the Constitution was to rid the country of its 458 00:26:06,640 --> 00:26:12,520 Speaker 6: government sanctioned and mandated subordination and creating an inclusive democracy 459 00:26:12,600 --> 00:26:15,159 Speaker 6: for the first time that worked for everybody. That was 460 00:26:15,200 --> 00:26:18,560 Speaker 6: the whole point. And so I would argue that we 461 00:26:18,760 --> 00:26:23,280 Speaker 6: have these tools there, and the conservative legal movement is 462 00:26:23,440 --> 00:26:27,199 Speaker 6: desperately trying to ensure that we don't use them and 463 00:26:27,200 --> 00:26:29,320 Speaker 6: that they cut off access to those tools. 464 00:26:29,480 --> 00:26:32,679 Speaker 1: It's funny because I think trump Ism is this last 465 00:26:32,840 --> 00:26:35,400 Speaker 1: gasp against a multi racial democracy. 466 00:26:35,560 --> 00:26:35,760 Speaker 2: Right. 467 00:26:36,240 --> 00:26:39,159 Speaker 1: It's like, you know, we're on the cost of it, 468 00:26:39,359 --> 00:26:42,200 Speaker 1: and trump Ism is like, oh no, what your talking 469 00:26:42,200 --> 00:26:45,200 Speaker 1: about is so important and it really does speak to reconstruction. 470 00:26:45,320 --> 00:26:48,919 Speaker 1: Can you talk about where reconstruction figures into this a 471 00:26:48,920 --> 00:26:49,480 Speaker 1: little more? 472 00:26:49,720 --> 00:26:54,000 Speaker 6: Yeah, to briefly review what their reconstruction amendments were. 473 00:26:54,160 --> 00:26:56,399 Speaker 1: Yes, please, And you could even if you want to 474 00:26:56,400 --> 00:26:59,720 Speaker 1: give even a little more backstory on sort of the 475 00:27:00,040 --> 00:27:04,320 Speaker 1: detail on reconstruction and exactly how it influenced the law. Right. 476 00:27:04,480 --> 00:27:07,080 Speaker 6: So the idea like reconstruct is in the name, right, like, 477 00:27:07,119 --> 00:27:09,800 Speaker 6: we had to rebuild the nation in the wake of 478 00:27:09,840 --> 00:27:15,680 Speaker 6: the Civil War and construct a new foundation for law 479 00:27:15,920 --> 00:27:19,520 Speaker 6: that would apply equally across the country, regardless of race, 480 00:27:19,920 --> 00:27:24,159 Speaker 6: no longer the explicit subjugation that had existed before. And 481 00:27:24,240 --> 00:27:28,640 Speaker 6: so you had the thirteenth Amendment, which finally formally abolished slavery, 482 00:27:28,720 --> 00:27:31,840 Speaker 6: with the notable exception as for punishment for a crime. 483 00:27:32,320 --> 00:27:36,399 Speaker 6: You got the Fourteenth Amendment, which created birthright citizenship. It 484 00:27:36,680 --> 00:27:40,919 Speaker 6: established equal protection under law, do process under law. You 485 00:27:40,960 --> 00:27:45,000 Speaker 6: have the fifteenth Amendment, which prohibited racial discrimination in voting. 486 00:27:45,400 --> 00:27:49,840 Speaker 6: Like all of these things came together to create a 487 00:27:49,960 --> 00:27:53,199 Speaker 6: new multi racial democracy, like to actually establish that for 488 00:27:53,280 --> 00:27:58,360 Speaker 6: the first time in the nation's charter. And they should 489 00:27:58,400 --> 00:28:04,280 Speaker 6: be viewed as reframing and recontextualizing the whole Constitution. We've 490 00:28:04,280 --> 00:28:08,320 Speaker 6: been seeing this really chipped away in the past month actually, 491 00:28:08,320 --> 00:28:10,080 Speaker 6: as we say, the past several decades, but really as 492 00:28:10,119 --> 00:28:12,560 Speaker 6: soon as they were made, folks tried to undercut them. 493 00:28:13,040 --> 00:28:16,199 Speaker 6: They just had a lot of successes recently. Reconstruction is 494 00:28:16,240 --> 00:28:21,040 Speaker 6: important because those amendments are at the heart of so 495 00:28:21,240 --> 00:28:24,639 Speaker 6: many of the major civil rights victories that folks care about, 496 00:28:24,880 --> 00:28:28,280 Speaker 6: Like brownree Board was a fourteenth Amendment decision. Roby Wade 497 00:28:28,359 --> 00:28:31,240 Speaker 6: was a fourteenth Amendment decision. Oberga Felipe Holdgius was a 498 00:28:31,280 --> 00:28:34,920 Speaker 6: fourteenth Amendment decision. So all of these things have their 499 00:28:35,000 --> 00:28:40,800 Speaker 6: source in the liberatory mission of the Reconstruction Amendments, and 500 00:28:40,840 --> 00:28:44,000 Speaker 6: that's why there is such a resistance to them and 501 00:28:44,600 --> 00:28:48,000 Speaker 6: an unwillingness to apply them as they should. I think 502 00:28:48,160 --> 00:28:52,920 Speaker 6: Sherilyn Eiffel, the former director BET and WAZP Legal Defense Fund, 503 00:28:53,320 --> 00:28:56,360 Speaker 6: I think She described this someone recently as a fear 504 00:28:56,480 --> 00:29:00,360 Speaker 6: of the fourteenth Amendment. That people are afraid of how 505 00:29:00,480 --> 00:29:03,840 Speaker 6: radical and how good the amendments are, which is why 506 00:29:03,880 --> 00:29:06,400 Speaker 6: we haven't seen them apply it as they should be. 507 00:29:06,680 --> 00:29:13,719 Speaker 1: It really is this fear of giving everyone the same right. Yeah, no, 508 00:29:13,880 --> 00:29:18,160 Speaker 1: I think that's correct. We are in this insane Supreme 509 00:29:18,200 --> 00:29:21,360 Speaker 1: Court season. It is almost June, which is like the 510 00:29:21,400 --> 00:29:24,040 Speaker 1: month I dread the most because time of the year, 511 00:29:24,640 --> 00:29:27,360 Speaker 1: you know they're going to just do insane stuff. I 512 00:29:27,440 --> 00:29:29,960 Speaker 1: do feel like sometimes I'll have one decision come out 513 00:29:29,960 --> 00:29:32,440 Speaker 1: and you'll be like, this isn't so bad, and then 514 00:29:32,520 --> 00:29:35,440 Speaker 1: you know the next one is going to be like 515 00:29:35,720 --> 00:29:37,479 Speaker 1: just shockingly bad. 516 00:29:37,640 --> 00:29:40,520 Speaker 6: Don't you feel like that's kind of what happened. Oh, definitely, 517 00:29:40,880 --> 00:29:44,000 Speaker 6: if I'm remembering correctly, I think that one of the 518 00:29:44,560 --> 00:29:48,960 Speaker 6: positive gay rights decisions a decade and change ago came 519 00:29:49,000 --> 00:29:51,280 Speaker 6: out like right around the same time as one of 520 00:29:51,320 --> 00:29:54,200 Speaker 6: the worst voting rest decisions, and I really felt like 521 00:29:54,240 --> 00:29:56,480 Speaker 6: the Court was sitting in chambers and was like, all right, 522 00:29:56,560 --> 00:29:58,200 Speaker 6: you know, we'll get them a little on this one, 523 00:29:58,520 --> 00:30:01,640 Speaker 6: but we'll hold this one back, like we'll do a 524 00:30:01,680 --> 00:30:04,880 Speaker 6: little tradz ease and hopefully we can keep things calm 525 00:30:04,960 --> 00:30:08,440 Speaker 6: if they have one ruling. We have Flaggate for Alito. 526 00:30:08,720 --> 00:30:13,840 Speaker 1: We have January six Gate for Thomas and his wife's involvement, 527 00:30:13,960 --> 00:30:18,040 Speaker 1: and stop this deal. These are two pretty large things. 528 00:30:18,280 --> 00:30:21,720 Speaker 1: They have been asked to recuse. Neither will recuse. 529 00:30:22,000 --> 00:30:25,480 Speaker 6: I mean, were you a u United States senator, what 530 00:30:25,560 --> 00:30:29,360 Speaker 6: would you do here? M It's an interesting question. I mean, 531 00:30:29,360 --> 00:30:32,640 Speaker 6: if I were a United States Senator, I would have 532 00:30:32,760 --> 00:30:37,880 Speaker 6: them hauled to Congress. Yeah, I think I would be Yeah, 533 00:30:37,960 --> 00:30:40,360 Speaker 6: I would be holding hearings. And if they refuse to 534 00:30:40,360 --> 00:30:42,520 Speaker 6: be hauled to Congress, I would show up at their door. 535 00:30:43,400 --> 00:30:46,480 Speaker 6: That's all I would play it. It's very clear that 536 00:30:46,800 --> 00:30:51,120 Speaker 6: the Supreme Court, particularly the far right members of the 537 00:30:51,160 --> 00:30:54,680 Speaker 6: Supreme Court, think that they're untouchable, of which there are 538 00:30:54,720 --> 00:30:58,160 Speaker 6: five right, but there are two who are old. Yes, 539 00:30:58,280 --> 00:31:01,160 Speaker 6: there's a super majority of them, and two in particular 540 00:31:01,240 --> 00:31:03,400 Speaker 6: who are just wildin ow at a class of their own. 541 00:31:03,560 --> 00:31:07,360 Speaker 6: And I think that the reason why they do that 542 00:31:07,600 --> 00:31:11,480 Speaker 6: is because they believe they can. They believe nothing is 543 00:31:11,520 --> 00:31:13,520 Speaker 6: going to happen to them, They're not going to face 544 00:31:13,600 --> 00:31:17,880 Speaker 6: any consequences, and so it's incumbent on the other branches 545 00:31:17,920 --> 00:31:22,760 Speaker 6: of government to impose consequences and to exercise its powers 546 00:31:22,880 --> 00:31:27,800 Speaker 6: to perform the court and also exercise basic accountability and oversight. 547 00:31:28,080 --> 00:31:31,960 Speaker 1: Let's just play pretend here. Let's say that Joe Biden wins, 548 00:31:32,680 --> 00:31:35,800 Speaker 1: they keep the Senate, and they flip the House. 549 00:31:35,880 --> 00:31:39,200 Speaker 6: Okay, say there's a trifecta. Yes, go along with me. 550 00:31:39,480 --> 00:31:41,840 Speaker 1: What should Joe Biden do about the Supreme Court? And 551 00:31:41,880 --> 00:31:43,600 Speaker 1: by the way, he's not going to want to, But 552 00:31:44,120 --> 00:31:47,440 Speaker 1: what would you if you were there? What would you 553 00:31:47,760 --> 00:31:50,480 Speaker 1: tell him to do? And how would you solve a 554 00:31:50,560 --> 00:31:52,160 Speaker 1: problem like the Supreme Court? 555 00:31:52,440 --> 00:31:54,840 Speaker 6: In an ideal world, if you had all of those 556 00:31:54,920 --> 00:31:58,400 Speaker 6: tools available, like you said, both Chambers of Congress and 557 00:31:58,520 --> 00:32:01,880 Speaker 6: have the White House a clear chance you have to 558 00:32:01,920 --> 00:32:06,680 Speaker 6: take to implement structural reforms. That's where you can do 559 00:32:06,760 --> 00:32:12,560 Speaker 6: things like expanding the court, establishing term limits, implementing an actual, 560 00:32:12,920 --> 00:32:16,360 Speaker 6: binding and forcible code of ethics. That's a chance you 561 00:32:16,400 --> 00:32:20,200 Speaker 6: could be reconsidering what kinds of cases the Court easie 562 00:32:20,320 --> 00:32:23,280 Speaker 6: has jurisdiction over. I would also add, and this is 563 00:32:23,680 --> 00:32:26,520 Speaker 6: what I really talk about in my book, that in 564 00:32:26,520 --> 00:32:29,560 Speaker 6: addition to changing, I'm talking about like what the court 565 00:32:29,640 --> 00:32:32,440 Speaker 6: looks like, what the core is capable of doing, and 566 00:32:32,480 --> 00:32:35,760 Speaker 6: in the book I lean into how the Court should 567 00:32:35,800 --> 00:32:38,720 Speaker 6: do what it does, because we talked a little about 568 00:32:38,800 --> 00:32:43,959 Speaker 6: originalism earlier as being this nonsensical way the Court uses 569 00:32:44,080 --> 00:32:47,680 Speaker 6: to justify as decisions. But even if the Court did 570 00:32:47,800 --> 00:32:51,560 Speaker 6: have three more, four more, shoot five more and justic 571 00:32:51,560 --> 00:32:55,440 Speaker 6: sys tomorrow, they would still need guidance on what to 572 00:32:55,520 --> 00:32:58,920 Speaker 6: do beyond not that. Something I try to do in 573 00:32:58,960 --> 00:33:03,080 Speaker 6: the book is l out this vision of what courts 574 00:33:03,120 --> 00:33:07,320 Speaker 6: should be doing a different model of interpretation, and also 575 00:33:07,400 --> 00:33:09,200 Speaker 6: calling on the public to be a part of that 576 00:33:09,280 --> 00:33:12,880 Speaker 6: as well. In the same way that we saw jurisprudence 577 00:33:12,920 --> 00:33:16,400 Speaker 6: shift so rapidly in all of these types of issues 578 00:33:16,400 --> 00:33:19,720 Speaker 6: that we care about. It's extremely demoralizing on one hand, 579 00:33:19,840 --> 00:33:21,480 Speaker 6: but I think on the other hand, it should be 580 00:33:21,560 --> 00:33:25,360 Speaker 6: a reminder that change is possible and that people make 581 00:33:25,520 --> 00:33:28,320 Speaker 6: change possible. These are things that we should be very 582 00:33:28,360 --> 00:33:33,320 Speaker 6: attuned to and demand that the Court interpret the Constitution 583 00:33:33,360 --> 00:33:35,640 Speaker 6: in a different way. And I think that's something that 584 00:33:35,720 --> 00:33:39,800 Speaker 6: the elected branches like Congress and the Executive, if they 585 00:33:39,800 --> 00:33:42,120 Speaker 6: can make a point of that as well. They too 586 00:33:42,240 --> 00:33:45,800 Speaker 6: have a role in saying what they think the Constitution 587 00:33:46,080 --> 00:33:49,040 Speaker 6: means and what they think the right way of interpreting 588 00:33:49,040 --> 00:33:51,800 Speaker 6: the Constitution is. It wouldn't be the first time that 589 00:33:51,880 --> 00:33:53,840 Speaker 6: Congress or the President did that, and I'm sure it 590 00:33:53,840 --> 00:33:57,480 Speaker 6: won't be the last either. But we've seen recently the 591 00:33:57,560 --> 00:34:02,160 Speaker 6: Supreme Court accumulate more and more power and acting as 592 00:34:02,160 --> 00:34:05,680 Speaker 6: if it has this exclusive domain to have any say 593 00:34:05,760 --> 00:34:08,200 Speaker 6: over what the law means. And I think that the 594 00:34:08,320 --> 00:34:12,399 Speaker 6: public and elected officials all need to say that. I'll 595 00:34:12,440 --> 00:34:15,280 Speaker 6: have to say not so and put forth a different 596 00:34:15,320 --> 00:34:20,160 Speaker 6: idea of thinking about the Constitution instead. So interesting, so important. 597 00:34:20,640 --> 00:34:23,560 Speaker 1: Just to really appreciate you and the work you're doing 598 00:34:23,600 --> 00:34:24,640 Speaker 1: at the Brennan Center. 599 00:34:24,800 --> 00:34:28,400 Speaker 6: So thanks for coming on. Thank you. Yeah, I was 600 00:34:28,880 --> 00:34:31,840 Speaker 6: at the Brennan Center in a previous list. I'm currently 601 00:34:32,000 --> 00:34:35,640 Speaker 6: the deputy editor and senior contributor at Balls and Strikes. 602 00:34:35,800 --> 00:34:38,480 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's Balls and Strikes. We love Balls and Strikes. 603 00:34:38,600 --> 00:34:40,239 Speaker 1: Thank you so much for coming on. 604 00:34:40,640 --> 00:34:43,319 Speaker 6: Yeah, thank you. 605 00:34:43,360 --> 00:34:47,000 Speaker 1: Steve Brell is the founder of NewsGuard and author of 606 00:34:47,080 --> 00:34:49,880 Speaker 1: the Death of Truth. How social media in the Internet 607 00:34:49,960 --> 00:34:55,600 Speaker 1: gave snake oil salesmen and demigogs the weapons they needed 608 00:34:55,840 --> 00:34:59,000 Speaker 1: to destroy trust and polarize the world, and what we 609 00:34:59,080 --> 00:35:01,279 Speaker 1: can do. Welcome ast politics. 610 00:35:01,480 --> 00:35:04,160 Speaker 3: Steve Brell, thank you, glad to be here. 611 00:35:04,239 --> 00:35:07,120 Speaker 1: I'm very excited to have you because you have such 612 00:35:07,120 --> 00:35:11,800 Speaker 1: an interesting story and you have done so many cool things. 613 00:35:12,120 --> 00:35:14,960 Speaker 1: Can we do a minute or two on Court TV? 614 00:35:15,480 --> 00:35:18,480 Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean we absolutely should, because I'll tell you, 615 00:35:18,520 --> 00:35:21,920 Speaker 3: it drives me nuts that there aren't cameras in the 616 00:35:21,960 --> 00:35:22,680 Speaker 3: Trump corporate. 617 00:35:22,960 --> 00:35:26,719 Speaker 1: Explain to us how you started Court TV. How that happened. 618 00:35:27,080 --> 00:35:28,280 Speaker 1: I'm quite interested. 619 00:35:28,520 --> 00:35:32,319 Speaker 3: Well, I was running a legal publication that I had 620 00:35:32,360 --> 00:35:36,240 Speaker 3: started years before, called The American Lawyer, which was for lawyers, 621 00:35:36,440 --> 00:35:40,439 Speaker 3: and it was quite successful, and a bunch of publishers 622 00:35:41,320 --> 00:35:45,080 Speaker 3: Conde Nassharst, the New York Times had come to me 623 00:35:45,120 --> 00:35:48,919 Speaker 3: and said, why don't you start a consumer magazine about law? 624 00:35:49,280 --> 00:35:51,400 Speaker 3: And every time I thought about it, I thought it 625 00:35:51,440 --> 00:35:55,319 Speaker 3: was really a stupid idea because the only thing you 626 00:35:55,360 --> 00:35:58,399 Speaker 3: would do would be you cover true crime stuff, which 627 00:35:58,440 --> 00:36:01,200 Speaker 3: I thought would just get really sleazy, or you would 628 00:36:01,239 --> 00:36:03,680 Speaker 3: do things like what to do when You're arrested for 629 00:36:03,800 --> 00:36:07,080 Speaker 3: drunk driving and going to buy a magazine about what 630 00:36:07,120 --> 00:36:09,879 Speaker 3: to do when you're arrested for drunk driving except at 631 00:36:09,920 --> 00:36:11,839 Speaker 3: two or three in the morning on a Saturday night, 632 00:36:11,880 --> 00:36:14,320 Speaker 3: when you get pulled up a cop and there is 633 00:36:14,360 --> 00:36:18,040 Speaker 3: in a magazine store open. But I did think because 634 00:36:18,080 --> 00:36:20,360 Speaker 3: I had spent a lot of time over the years 635 00:36:20,440 --> 00:36:26,120 Speaker 3: interviewing jurors in important, high profile cases, and jurors always 636 00:36:26,200 --> 00:36:29,239 Speaker 3: came away with one thing in common, which is they 637 00:36:29,239 --> 00:36:32,400 Speaker 3: were fascinated by the system of the legal system and 638 00:36:32,480 --> 00:36:35,480 Speaker 3: had more confidence in the legal system as a result 639 00:36:35,600 --> 00:36:38,520 Speaker 3: of having served on a jury. They thought it really worked, 640 00:36:39,000 --> 00:36:44,080 Speaker 3: interesting and fascinating, even if the trial itself had its long, 641 00:36:44,360 --> 00:36:47,520 Speaker 3: boring moments. So I'm sitting in the back of a 642 00:36:47,600 --> 00:36:51,560 Speaker 3: cab one day and the cab driver has this radio 643 00:36:51,680 --> 00:36:54,720 Speaker 3: on and it's playing a sound clip from a trial 644 00:36:54,840 --> 00:36:59,080 Speaker 3: because the courts in New York had just allowed trials 645 00:36:59,120 --> 00:37:01,960 Speaker 3: to have, you know, audio, And I said to myself, 646 00:37:02,000 --> 00:37:04,400 Speaker 3: that's the idea, That's what I should do. And I 647 00:37:04,440 --> 00:37:07,479 Speaker 3: went to Steve Ross, who was the chairing of Want 648 00:37:07,480 --> 00:37:10,240 Speaker 3: of Communications at the time, was someone that I knew, 649 00:37:10,360 --> 00:37:13,239 Speaker 3: and I said, I have this really crazy idea to 650 00:37:13,280 --> 00:37:19,200 Speaker 3: a combination of c span and tabloid journalism. And he said, oh, 651 00:37:19,239 --> 00:37:22,120 Speaker 3: you want to start a cable channel with cameras. In 652 00:37:22,160 --> 00:37:23,920 Speaker 3: the course, I said, well, how'd you know that? Anyway, 653 00:37:24,000 --> 00:37:26,680 Speaker 3: long story short, that's what we started, and the whole 654 00:37:26,719 --> 00:37:31,840 Speaker 3: idea was to show people at home what jurors were seeing. 655 00:37:32,160 --> 00:37:34,960 Speaker 3: Not a lot of spin, you know, not defendants or 656 00:37:35,160 --> 00:37:37,600 Speaker 3: lawyers you know, coming out of the courtroom and talking 657 00:37:37,600 --> 00:37:39,759 Speaker 3: about how great the day was for them or how 658 00:37:40,160 --> 00:37:44,160 Speaker 3: outrageous the judge was, but what the jury was actually 659 00:37:44,200 --> 00:37:47,799 Speaker 3: seeing in the court room, which takes us to you know, 660 00:37:47,880 --> 00:37:51,480 Speaker 3: the week we've all been experiencing where it's a major 661 00:37:51,520 --> 00:37:54,920 Speaker 3: trial going on in case you didn't know, and nobody 662 00:37:55,040 --> 00:37:58,319 Speaker 3: seeing what's happening in the courtroom. What they're seeing is 663 00:37:58,520 --> 00:38:02,840 Speaker 3: the spin that the defending is putting on what's happening courtroom. 664 00:38:03,400 --> 00:38:06,400 Speaker 3: And my belief is that no matter what the verdict is, 665 00:38:06,560 --> 00:38:08,919 Speaker 3: we're all going to be debating it, you know, from 666 00:38:08,960 --> 00:38:13,080 Speaker 3: now until forever. Whereas that debate would be different if 667 00:38:13,120 --> 00:38:16,120 Speaker 3: people were debating from the same set of facts, which 668 00:38:16,200 --> 00:38:19,680 Speaker 3: is what did the jury see and hear in the courtroom. 669 00:38:19,920 --> 00:38:22,600 Speaker 3: And the world that I now live in, which is 670 00:38:23,000 --> 00:38:26,600 Speaker 3: NewsGuard where we rate the reliability of the news and 671 00:38:26,600 --> 00:38:31,560 Speaker 3: information online, is the opposite world. It's a world where 672 00:38:31,719 --> 00:38:35,359 Speaker 3: you know, social media platforms, you have no idea what 673 00:38:35,400 --> 00:38:38,520 Speaker 3: the credentials are of the people who are to tell 674 00:38:38,520 --> 00:38:42,160 Speaker 3: you these things. It's all rumor, it's hearsay, it's made up. 675 00:38:42,320 --> 00:38:45,880 Speaker 3: Whereas in a courtroom, the witnesses are carefully screened by 676 00:38:45,920 --> 00:38:49,160 Speaker 3: the judge, they're challenged by the opposite side, you know, 677 00:38:49,200 --> 00:38:52,640 Speaker 3: what their credentials are. The evidence that's put into play 678 00:38:53,200 --> 00:38:56,200 Speaker 3: is vetted first. It's the total opposite of what you 679 00:38:56,280 --> 00:38:59,880 Speaker 3: see online. So that's why I'm really frustrated that the 680 00:39:00,160 --> 00:39:03,719 Speaker 3: world hasn't been able to see what happened in the courtroom, 681 00:39:03,880 --> 00:39:06,280 Speaker 3: and it's just going to debate it, you know, endlessly, 682 00:39:06,360 --> 00:39:09,279 Speaker 3: without having seen it, and without having seen what the 683 00:39:09,400 --> 00:39:11,400 Speaker 3: jury saw when they made their decisions. 684 00:39:11,560 --> 00:39:14,359 Speaker 1: I could not agree with you more. And in fact, 685 00:39:14,480 --> 00:39:17,200 Speaker 1: every time I talk to anyone who's in that courtroom, 686 00:39:17,719 --> 00:39:20,319 Speaker 1: I always say, like, you know, people say, well, I 687 00:39:20,360 --> 00:39:22,600 Speaker 1: was in the overflow room, I wasn't in the courtroom, 688 00:39:22,640 --> 00:39:25,120 Speaker 1: and I was like, I think being able to see 689 00:39:25,160 --> 00:39:29,160 Speaker 1: the jury, I mean, like, how are they responding to 690 00:39:29,320 --> 00:39:32,840 Speaker 1: the witnesses Like that seems so relevant to me. 691 00:39:33,440 --> 00:39:36,400 Speaker 3: Well, even more so than the jury, the witnesses themselves. 692 00:39:36,440 --> 00:39:39,920 Speaker 3: I mean, the whole constitutional idea of being able to 693 00:39:39,960 --> 00:39:45,600 Speaker 3: confront your accuser is that the defendant, and the public 694 00:39:45,960 --> 00:39:48,399 Speaker 3: has a right to see what happens in a court. 695 00:39:48,719 --> 00:39:52,960 Speaker 3: One hundred years ago, courtrooms were built with giant places 696 00:39:52,960 --> 00:39:55,200 Speaker 3: for the audience. You know, it used to be the 697 00:39:55,239 --> 00:39:58,480 Speaker 3: courtroom was the center of town and people would go 698 00:39:58,560 --> 00:40:02,480 Speaker 3: to town and go in to the courtroom and watch the trial. 699 00:40:02,800 --> 00:40:05,759 Speaker 3: So a camera there is simply a substitute for that. 700 00:40:06,000 --> 00:40:06,200 Speaker 4: You know. 701 00:40:06,239 --> 00:40:08,840 Speaker 3: You don't have to have lights and noise or anything. 702 00:40:08,840 --> 00:40:12,759 Speaker 3: It's just one unobtrusive camera. In fact, that courtroom, if 703 00:40:12,760 --> 00:40:15,399 Speaker 3: it's like most other courtrooms in the United States, has 704 00:40:15,400 --> 00:40:17,600 Speaker 3: a security camera there already. You woudn't even have to 705 00:40:17,600 --> 00:40:20,239 Speaker 3: put a camera there, it's already there. But anyway, it's 706 00:40:20,280 --> 00:40:23,160 Speaker 3: the it's the opposite of the world that I now 707 00:40:23,239 --> 00:40:26,279 Speaker 3: live in. And that world you know, as you know, 708 00:40:26,520 --> 00:40:29,200 Speaker 3: is captured in the book that I've written, which is 709 00:40:29,239 --> 00:40:31,520 Speaker 3: The Death of Truth. And the Death of Truth is 710 00:40:31,600 --> 00:40:35,919 Speaker 3: really about the fact that people debate opinions and they 711 00:40:36,000 --> 00:40:38,600 Speaker 3: don't work from the same set of facts. 712 00:40:38,880 --> 00:40:42,520 Speaker 1: Yes, and this is something that I am obsessed with. 713 00:40:43,080 --> 00:40:45,960 Speaker 1: One of the things that I noticed is where this 714 00:40:46,120 --> 00:40:49,680 Speaker 1: enormous country, three hundred and thirty three hundred and fifty 715 00:40:49,760 --> 00:40:54,040 Speaker 1: million people, maybe twenty million people read the newspaper, maybe 716 00:40:54,120 --> 00:40:59,200 Speaker 1: last where and you know some percentage, watch cable news, 717 00:40:59,440 --> 00:41:03,000 Speaker 1: watch local. Where are the three hundred million other people 718 00:41:03,000 --> 00:41:03,840 Speaker 1: getting their news? 719 00:41:04,080 --> 00:41:09,360 Speaker 3: TikTok, YouTube, Facebook, all the places you arguably would not 720 00:41:09,520 --> 00:41:13,800 Speaker 3: want people to get news, and on those platforms. Everything 721 00:41:13,920 --> 00:41:17,680 Speaker 3: is a matter of opinion. Everything is debated. My book 722 00:41:17,719 --> 00:41:21,319 Speaker 3: opens with a story from thirty years ago when our 723 00:41:21,440 --> 00:41:24,200 Speaker 3: daughter was in the sixth or seventh grade at a 724 00:41:24,239 --> 00:41:27,759 Speaker 3: private school in Manhattan, and it was a parent's visiting day, 725 00:41:27,840 --> 00:41:29,960 Speaker 3: and we're staying in the back of the room and 726 00:41:30,000 --> 00:41:32,919 Speaker 3: the teacher asked one of the kids, luckily not my daughter, 727 00:41:33,080 --> 00:41:36,000 Speaker 3: how much is six times seven? And the kid says 728 00:41:36,120 --> 00:41:42,919 Speaker 3: it's forty one, And the teacher says, I disagree. Disagreeable. Well, 729 00:41:43,080 --> 00:41:46,040 Speaker 3: that is the state of the world today. We disagree 730 00:41:46,280 --> 00:41:49,280 Speaker 3: over who got the most votes. We disagree over whether 731 00:41:49,360 --> 00:41:53,000 Speaker 3: the COVID vaccine is killing people or not killing people. 732 00:41:53,400 --> 00:41:56,279 Speaker 3: Fifty one percent of all the people in the United 733 00:41:56,320 --> 00:42:00,000 Speaker 3: States who refused to get vaccinated for COVID fifty one percent, 734 00:42:00,000 --> 00:42:02,360 Speaker 3: saying up those people in them were high percentage. It 735 00:42:02,520 --> 00:42:06,319 Speaker 3: was something like twenty five percent of adults refused to 736 00:42:06,320 --> 00:42:10,640 Speaker 3: get vaccine. More than half of them believed that Bill 737 00:42:10,719 --> 00:42:14,560 Speaker 3: Gates had planned it a microchip in the vaccine in 738 00:42:14,680 --> 00:42:18,839 Speaker 3: order to control their minds. Fifty one percent. Just as 739 00:42:19,040 --> 00:42:21,560 Speaker 3: you know, a very high percentage of Republicans and in 740 00:42:21,600 --> 00:42:26,120 Speaker 3: fact the country don't believe that Trump lost the last election. 741 00:42:26,640 --> 00:42:28,480 Speaker 3: One of the seats in my book that I just 742 00:42:28,560 --> 00:42:31,600 Speaker 3: keep coming back to is I wrote a story just 743 00:42:31,719 --> 00:42:37,440 Speaker 3: before the twenty sixteen election about Trump University. Remember Trump University, 744 00:42:38,560 --> 00:42:41,120 Speaker 3: You know it was a total fraud. For thirty five 745 00:42:41,200 --> 00:42:43,680 Speaker 3: thousand dollars, you were going to learn the secrets of 746 00:42:43,760 --> 00:42:48,239 Speaker 3: Trump's real estate genius. And everybody who enrolled. There are 747 00:42:48,239 --> 00:42:51,800 Speaker 3: lots of people who envolved decided the thirty five thousand 748 00:42:51,800 --> 00:42:54,239 Speaker 3: dollars later they had learned nothing and the whole thing 749 00:42:54,320 --> 00:42:57,239 Speaker 3: was a scam, and they sued they were about to 750 00:42:57,360 --> 00:43:00,839 Speaker 3: win when Trump was settled by basically giving them all. 751 00:43:00,760 --> 00:43:01,479 Speaker 2: Their money back. 752 00:43:01,680 --> 00:43:04,919 Speaker 3: This is just before the election. Well, I found two 753 00:43:04,960 --> 00:43:07,840 Speaker 3: of the plainers. These are people who swore out the complaint, 754 00:43:07,880 --> 00:43:10,880 Speaker 3: who said they would defrauded, and they were a retired 755 00:43:10,960 --> 00:43:14,280 Speaker 3: couple who had spent their last thirty five thousand dollars 756 00:43:14,719 --> 00:43:18,160 Speaker 3: us on university. And I'm talking to them, and they're 757 00:43:18,160 --> 00:43:20,239 Speaker 3: telling you about how awful this was. And then sort 758 00:43:20,280 --> 00:43:22,560 Speaker 3: of just as an afterthought, this is just before the election. 759 00:43:22,800 --> 00:43:24,560 Speaker 3: I said, well, you know, I guess you're not going 760 00:43:24,600 --> 00:43:27,359 Speaker 3: to vote for Trump and they said, oh no, we're 761 00:43:27,440 --> 00:43:29,320 Speaker 3: voting for it. I said, what are you talking about. 762 00:43:29,440 --> 00:43:32,160 Speaker 3: You know, you swore in a document that he defrauded you. 763 00:43:32,480 --> 00:43:34,440 Speaker 3: And they said, yeah, well we since you know, we've 764 00:43:34,520 --> 00:43:37,400 Speaker 3: learned on social media. And he said he really didn't 765 00:43:37,400 --> 00:43:39,920 Speaker 3: have anything to do with that university. He lent his 766 00:43:40,000 --> 00:43:42,239 Speaker 3: name into it, but you know, he really wasn't part 767 00:43:42,280 --> 00:43:44,800 Speaker 3: of it, and he's a good guy and he's really 768 00:43:44,840 --> 00:43:47,120 Speaker 3: going to fight for us. These are people who were 769 00:43:47,200 --> 00:43:50,200 Speaker 3: swindled by it, who were voting for it. And the 770 00:43:50,360 --> 00:43:53,600 Speaker 3: other incident like that, which I think demonstrates that there 771 00:43:53,760 --> 00:43:56,719 Speaker 3: is the death of truth, is there's a patient in 772 00:43:56,760 --> 00:44:00,680 Speaker 3: a hospital who's on a respirator. He's breathing his last 773 00:44:00,960 --> 00:44:04,840 Speaker 3: breaths because he has COVID, and just as he's about 774 00:44:04,880 --> 00:44:07,880 Speaker 3: to die, he takes the respirator off and says to 775 00:44:08,040 --> 00:44:11,399 Speaker 3: his doctor, this COVID thing is all bullshit. Now Here's 776 00:44:11,800 --> 00:44:15,000 Speaker 3: doesn't even believe his own lungs. He thinks that COVID 777 00:44:15,080 --> 00:44:17,520 Speaker 3: is a matter of opinion. You think there's COVID. I 778 00:44:17,520 --> 00:44:21,120 Speaker 3: don't think there's COVID. There's no fact, there's no shared 779 00:44:21,600 --> 00:44:22,440 Speaker 3: set of facts. 780 00:44:22,800 --> 00:44:25,799 Speaker 1: Yeah, no, I agree. I mean it's just such an 781 00:44:25,800 --> 00:44:29,480 Speaker 1: insane moment in American life. So what do you think 782 00:44:29,560 --> 00:44:30,759 Speaker 1: this solve is for this? 783 00:44:31,200 --> 00:44:34,400 Speaker 3: There are a couple of solves in different areas. On 784 00:44:34,440 --> 00:44:39,840 Speaker 3: the technology front. The two biggest inventions were advances in 785 00:44:39,920 --> 00:44:42,799 Speaker 3: technology that have to do with information. First of the 786 00:44:42,800 --> 00:44:46,759 Speaker 3: social media platforms, which were given an exemption from any 787 00:44:46,800 --> 00:44:50,120 Speaker 3: liability before they were social media platforms. This was a 788 00:44:50,200 --> 00:44:53,240 Speaker 3: law passed in called Section two thirty, which was part 789 00:44:53,280 --> 00:44:57,600 Speaker 3: of a massive telecommunications reform law in nineteen ninety six, 790 00:44:58,040 --> 00:45:01,120 Speaker 3: and it was really aimed at giving what were then 791 00:45:01,400 --> 00:45:05,400 Speaker 3: America Online and Prodigy and Compuser, which are three companies 792 00:45:05,440 --> 00:45:06,520 Speaker 3: you may not have ever heard of. 793 00:45:06,960 --> 00:45:11,000 Speaker 1: We're actually compuserved years all with Jesse and I. 794 00:45:11,120 --> 00:45:14,399 Speaker 3: They got exempted from liability if someone went into one 795 00:45:14,400 --> 00:45:17,880 Speaker 3: of their chat rooms related to finance or sports or 796 00:45:18,040 --> 00:45:22,279 Speaker 3: you know whatever and said something, you know, defamatory. So 797 00:45:22,719 --> 00:45:26,520 Speaker 3: the idea was to protect them from that kind of liability, 798 00:45:27,040 --> 00:45:29,680 Speaker 3: but had nothing to do with the social media platforms 799 00:45:29,680 --> 00:45:33,279 Speaker 3: as we now know them, who are exempt from any liability. 800 00:45:33,440 --> 00:45:35,520 Speaker 3: But it turns out, as I explained in the book, 801 00:45:35,840 --> 00:45:38,239 Speaker 3: you don't have to amend the Walk. Congress doesn't have 802 00:45:38,280 --> 00:45:40,879 Speaker 3: to do anything because right now, Molly, when we get 803 00:45:40,920 --> 00:45:44,360 Speaker 3: off this conversation, you go to your Facebook account or 804 00:45:44,400 --> 00:45:47,120 Speaker 3: your Twitter account and look at the terms of service. 805 00:45:47,640 --> 00:45:52,080 Speaker 3: The terms of service say that Facebook will not tolerate 806 00:45:52,520 --> 00:46:00,319 Speaker 3: harmful misinformation or disinformation or other harmful speech, bullying, hates, etc. 807 00:46:00,600 --> 00:46:02,640 Speaker 3: They say, we will not tolerate it. That's a term 808 00:46:02,680 --> 00:46:05,960 Speaker 3: of service. That's a contract. They are not living up 809 00:46:05,960 --> 00:46:09,239 Speaker 3: to their contract. The FTC or you as an individual, 810 00:46:09,280 --> 00:46:11,879 Speaker 3: but the FTC on behalf of you and everybody else 811 00:46:12,120 --> 00:46:15,680 Speaker 3: today could sue them for violating their terms of service. 812 00:46:16,000 --> 00:46:19,520 Speaker 3: The terms of service don't say, well, we don't like 813 00:46:19,880 --> 00:46:23,200 Speaker 3: misinformation and disinformation, we don't like hate speech, but you 814 00:46:23,239 --> 00:46:27,239 Speaker 3: know so many people post online to us that we 815 00:46:27,440 --> 00:46:29,279 Speaker 3: really can't. You know, we don't want to cut into 816 00:46:29,360 --> 00:46:33,040 Speaker 3: our profit margins by limiting people can post or by 817 00:46:33,160 --> 00:46:36,400 Speaker 3: hiring more people to screen it. So it's just going 818 00:46:36,480 --> 00:46:38,759 Speaker 3: to get through. The terms of service doesn't say that. 819 00:46:39,200 --> 00:46:42,440 Speaker 3: It says we don't tolerate it, and that's a promise 820 00:46:42,480 --> 00:46:45,040 Speaker 3: they are not keeping, and that promise is a contract. 821 00:46:45,040 --> 00:46:47,319 Speaker 3: So that's one thing you could do. The second thing 822 00:46:47,360 --> 00:46:52,280 Speaker 3: has to do with another technological advance, which is programmatic advertise. 823 00:46:52,719 --> 00:46:57,080 Speaker 3: Advertising today is placed by algorithm. It's not you know 824 00:46:57,160 --> 00:46:59,360 Speaker 3: the days of mad Men where people go out to 825 00:46:59,440 --> 00:47:02,279 Speaker 3: lunch and to side. Do I want to advertise on 826 00:47:03,080 --> 00:47:07,120 Speaker 3: you know, Vanity Fair or Wired, or would I want 827 00:47:07,160 --> 00:47:10,759 Speaker 3: to be on NBC or CBS. It's all done by 828 00:47:10,840 --> 00:47:14,840 Speaker 3: algorithm with no regard for the content where the head appears, 829 00:47:15,280 --> 00:47:20,040 Speaker 3: and that has ended up financing the worst kinds of 830 00:47:20,080 --> 00:47:25,000 Speaker 3: misinformation and disinformation without the advertisers even knowing it. That's 831 00:47:25,040 --> 00:47:28,000 Speaker 3: probably the most eye opening chapter in the book, which 832 00:47:28,120 --> 00:47:32,040 Speaker 3: opens with the following, which is a couple of years ago. 833 00:47:32,840 --> 00:47:37,680 Speaker 3: Guess who the biggest single advertiser was on Spotnik, which 834 00:47:37,719 --> 00:47:40,880 Speaker 3: is the Russian uh, you know aganda hand. Guess to 835 00:47:40,960 --> 00:47:45,080 Speaker 3: the biggest advertizments Warren Buffett. Now it's not like Warren 836 00:47:45,080 --> 00:47:47,400 Speaker 3: Buffett wakes up every morning and says, how do I 837 00:47:47,440 --> 00:47:51,480 Speaker 3: send more money to Vladimir Putin? It He owns Geico, 838 00:47:52,160 --> 00:47:56,440 Speaker 3: and Geico does a programmatic advertising and a lot of 839 00:47:56,440 --> 00:47:58,960 Speaker 3: it ends up on spot Neck, it ends up on 840 00:47:59,120 --> 00:48:03,440 Speaker 3: stop the Steel sites, it ends up on COVID misinformation sites, 841 00:48:03,480 --> 00:48:07,120 Speaker 3: it ends up sites that say that the October seventh 842 00:48:07,200 --> 00:48:11,080 Speaker 3: attack was a false flag by Israel. So billions of 843 00:48:11,120 --> 00:48:15,480 Speaker 3: dollars is going to support the misinformation and disinformation that 844 00:48:15,600 --> 00:48:18,760 Speaker 3: I really outlined the look. So that's the second tech 845 00:48:19,160 --> 00:48:22,120 Speaker 3: great advance that is booberrang Dogs. 846 00:48:22,560 --> 00:48:25,919 Speaker 1: Yeah, so it sounds like some of the problem here 847 00:48:26,120 --> 00:48:31,440 Speaker 1: is that we just have a social media ecosystem that 848 00:48:31,719 --> 00:48:34,600 Speaker 1: has no content moderation, right. 849 00:48:34,440 --> 00:48:37,840 Speaker 3: And I'm not talking about content censorship, you know, far 850 00:48:37,880 --> 00:48:41,160 Speaker 3: from it. I'm talking about content moderation in the sense 851 00:48:41,200 --> 00:48:45,400 Speaker 3: that what NewsGuard does is we assess the reliability and 852 00:48:45,480 --> 00:48:50,279 Speaker 3: credibility of online sources, so if something is owned by 853 00:48:50,280 --> 00:48:53,160 Speaker 3: the Russians. I mean, we just did a report this 854 00:48:53,239 --> 00:48:58,839 Speaker 3: week that identified a Russian disinformation operative in Moscow who 855 00:48:59,040 --> 00:49:02,399 Speaker 3: used to be a sheriff in Florida but fled after 856 00:49:02,440 --> 00:49:05,840 Speaker 3: he was tided. This guy has set up one hundred 857 00:49:05,920 --> 00:49:10,640 Speaker 3: and sixty seven one hundred and sixty seven fake local 858 00:49:10,719 --> 00:49:14,759 Speaker 3: news sites in the United States that he has set up. 859 00:49:14,800 --> 00:49:19,080 Speaker 3: He's a Russian disinformation operative. Jesus and those local news 860 00:49:19,080 --> 00:49:24,800 Speaker 3: sites are feeding all kinds of Russian propaganda, pro Trump 861 00:49:25,160 --> 00:49:29,440 Speaker 3: propaganda on sites throughout the United States that are posing 862 00:49:29,480 --> 00:49:33,560 Speaker 3: as legitimate local news, so that disorients everybody. No one 863 00:49:33,680 --> 00:49:37,600 Speaker 3: knows what to believe anymore, because it's just you know, 864 00:49:37,760 --> 00:49:43,040 Speaker 3: it's a cesspool of you know, chaos and misinformation. If 865 00:49:43,920 --> 00:49:48,680 Speaker 3: the platforms had to identify who owns various sites, who 866 00:49:48,680 --> 00:49:49,920 Speaker 3: owns them, just. 867 00:49:50,000 --> 00:49:53,959 Speaker 1: That little fix might solve, right, because if you could 868 00:49:54,000 --> 00:49:58,080 Speaker 1: see something was owned by a company in Russia, right, 869 00:49:58,080 --> 00:49:59,840 Speaker 1: wouldn't that solve a lot of problems? 870 00:50:00,080 --> 00:50:02,319 Speaker 3: It would sure help, And wouldn't you like to know that? 871 00:50:02,800 --> 00:50:06,520 Speaker 1: Listen, all I do is think about why, you know, 872 00:50:06,600 --> 00:50:11,480 Speaker 1: our percentage of the country doesn't seem to be interfacing 873 00:50:11,520 --> 00:50:14,800 Speaker 1: with normal news and wondering where they've gone. 874 00:50:15,280 --> 00:50:18,480 Speaker 3: Well, just think of that couple that retired eighty year 875 00:50:18,760 --> 00:50:22,800 Speaker 3: old plus couple in New Jersey who enrolled in Trump 876 00:50:22,920 --> 00:50:25,880 Speaker 3: University and got swindled and are still voting for you. 877 00:50:26,080 --> 00:50:26,560 Speaker 2: Think about that. 878 00:50:26,600 --> 00:50:29,200 Speaker 3: I mean, just that is the state of you know, 879 00:50:29,360 --> 00:50:33,480 Speaker 3: the chaos of the information ecosystem. They're voting for him 880 00:50:33,520 --> 00:50:36,440 Speaker 3: because they heard online that he really wasn't responsible. 881 00:50:36,840 --> 00:50:39,320 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, that's so nuts. One of the things 882 00:50:39,360 --> 00:50:42,920 Speaker 1: that I've been struck by is that it feels like 883 00:50:43,360 --> 00:50:47,319 Speaker 1: the government really fell down on regulation. You clearly have 884 00:50:47,400 --> 00:50:48,960 Speaker 1: thought about this more than I have. 885 00:50:49,239 --> 00:50:51,680 Speaker 3: No I think it's more the private sector. I mean, 886 00:50:51,719 --> 00:50:54,040 Speaker 3: you know, I don't want the government regulating speech, but 887 00:50:54,120 --> 00:50:58,520 Speaker 3: I want the government to regulate in a content neutral 888 00:50:58,520 --> 00:51:02,239 Speaker 3: way what people know about speech, the informat what they 889 00:51:02,280 --> 00:51:05,000 Speaker 3: know about their sources of information. And I want the 890 00:51:05,040 --> 00:51:08,719 Speaker 3: government to regulate the way they typically do when when 891 00:51:08,760 --> 00:51:12,440 Speaker 3: a private company, you know, promises that you're going to 892 00:51:12,520 --> 00:51:15,680 Speaker 3: have a safe experience with their product, that they keep 893 00:51:15,719 --> 00:51:18,920 Speaker 3: that promise. I mean, Elon Musk right now, would not 894 00:51:19,040 --> 00:51:21,920 Speaker 3: be allowed to say that so many people want to 895 00:51:21,920 --> 00:51:24,400 Speaker 3: buy a Tesla that he has to step up production. 896 00:51:24,800 --> 00:51:27,320 Speaker 3: And stepping up production, he's not going to have time 897 00:51:27,400 --> 00:51:30,400 Speaker 3: to mess around with pesky things like air bags and 898 00:51:30,520 --> 00:51:33,560 Speaker 3: seat belts, because you know that slows down production and 899 00:51:33,640 --> 00:51:35,839 Speaker 3: costs more money. They would never let him do that. 900 00:51:36,120 --> 00:51:38,080 Speaker 3: But look at what they let him do on his 901 00:51:38,160 --> 00:51:39,200 Speaker 3: social media pledge. 902 00:51:39,600 --> 00:51:42,360 Speaker 1: Yeah, because there's no government regulation right. 903 00:51:42,600 --> 00:51:45,319 Speaker 3: Right, there's no government regulation, And in the case of 904 00:51:45,400 --> 00:51:49,440 Speaker 3: advertisers who are supporting it, they have done nothing, almost 905 00:51:49,440 --> 00:51:53,160 Speaker 3: nothing but to worry about where their ads appear, and 906 00:51:53,520 --> 00:51:55,640 Speaker 3: all of that has happened in a world in which 907 00:51:55,640 --> 00:51:58,520 Speaker 3: where if you have you know, partisan gerrymandering. I know 908 00:51:58,560 --> 00:52:01,440 Speaker 3: I'm coming off the subject, but if you have partisan 909 00:52:01,520 --> 00:52:05,640 Speaker 3: gerrymandering and a primary system in most states where the 910 00:52:05,680 --> 00:52:09,719 Speaker 3: Republicans you know, fire to be the furthest right Republican 911 00:52:09,800 --> 00:52:12,960 Speaker 3: and the Democrats by to be the furthest left Democrat, 912 00:52:13,160 --> 00:52:16,760 Speaker 3: you have a polarized electorate. And that is a formula 913 00:52:16,840 --> 00:52:19,920 Speaker 3: for what we have today, which is again, you know, 914 00:52:20,120 --> 00:52:23,160 Speaker 3: the death of truth. No one is signing on to 915 00:52:23,239 --> 00:52:25,840 Speaker 3: believe in a common set of facts or to believe 916 00:52:25,920 --> 00:52:29,839 Speaker 3: in you know, institutions and people. We used to believe it. 917 00:52:30,000 --> 00:52:32,360 Speaker 3: We used to believe in as a country that you know, 918 00:52:32,480 --> 00:52:35,920 Speaker 3: people you know working on election day at polling centers 919 00:52:36,080 --> 00:52:39,960 Speaker 3: were honest people, They were honest referees. Now a certain 920 00:52:40,000 --> 00:52:42,680 Speaker 3: segment of the population thinks these people are you know, 921 00:52:42,960 --> 00:52:46,560 Speaker 3: crooks or hustlers. We used to believe in doctors. Now 922 00:52:46,760 --> 00:52:51,480 Speaker 3: more people get their medical information online than they get 923 00:52:51,600 --> 00:52:56,000 Speaker 3: from you know, real doctors. We used to believe in judges. 924 00:52:56,640 --> 00:52:59,880 Speaker 3: Now you know, people being told that every judge is 925 00:53:00,520 --> 00:53:04,120 Speaker 3: on the take, is biased, is on one side of 926 00:53:04,200 --> 00:53:07,040 Speaker 3: the other. So it has undermine our belief in the 927 00:53:07,280 --> 00:53:12,399 Speaker 3: you know, in basic American institutions, whether it's medicine or elections, 928 00:53:12,840 --> 00:53:15,440 Speaker 3: everything is a matter of opinion. Who got the most votes. 929 00:53:15,480 --> 00:53:18,600 Speaker 3: That's your opinion versus someone else's. It never used to 930 00:53:18,600 --> 00:53:20,239 Speaker 3: be that way. It shouldn't be that one. 931 00:53:20,480 --> 00:53:23,520 Speaker 1: Steve Brill, thank you, thank you, thank you. 932 00:53:24,560 --> 00:53:25,359 Speaker 3: Happy to do it. 933 00:53:27,719 --> 00:53:30,359 Speaker 2: No moment, we. 934 00:53:30,440 --> 00:53:33,920 Speaker 1: Have a special surprise appearance from the one, the only, 935 00:53:34,080 --> 00:53:37,320 Speaker 1: Rick Wilson. He has come for a moment of fuckery 936 00:53:37,360 --> 00:53:40,239 Speaker 1: because everything old is new again when it comes to 937 00:53:40,280 --> 00:53:44,959 Speaker 1: Donald Trump and racial slurs. Let's get going. 938 00:53:45,360 --> 00:53:49,799 Speaker 4: We have heard this story for a decade now that 939 00:53:50,160 --> 00:53:53,759 Speaker 4: somewhere in the bowels of Mark Burnett's media empire are 940 00:53:53,840 --> 00:53:57,040 Speaker 4: the outtakes of Donald Trump saying the inWORD. Now, anyone 941 00:53:57,120 --> 00:53:59,920 Speaker 4: who doesn't think that the guy who took two weeks 942 00:54:00,080 --> 00:54:02,600 Speaker 4: denounced David Duke might not have said the inWORD. I 943 00:54:02,680 --> 00:54:05,360 Speaker 4: have many bridges to sell you. But what has happened 944 00:54:05,360 --> 00:54:07,480 Speaker 4: now is a producer who was on the team. His 945 00:54:07,600 --> 00:54:10,279 Speaker 4: NDA has expired, and because his NDIA has expired, he 946 00:54:10,320 --> 00:54:13,240 Speaker 4: is now saying, why, yes, he did say the inWORD 947 00:54:13,320 --> 00:54:17,160 Speaker 4: it's on tape. Now Mark Burnett, who is a major winger, 948 00:54:17,360 --> 00:54:21,239 Speaker 4: and his wife who was a major winger, she's a 949 00:54:21,360 --> 00:54:24,879 Speaker 4: queen Trumper. All this has added up to this really 950 00:54:25,000 --> 00:54:28,920 Speaker 4: ugly moment where the guy saying the inWORD on tape 951 00:54:29,000 --> 00:54:33,560 Speaker 4: has now had somebody, another eyewitness who was verifiably on 952 00:54:33,760 --> 00:54:36,319 Speaker 4: the show come out and say, yep, I heard it. 953 00:54:36,480 --> 00:54:37,719 Speaker 2: I heard it. He said it. 954 00:54:37,840 --> 00:54:41,040 Speaker 1: And one of the things about this particular moment of 955 00:54:41,080 --> 00:54:43,640 Speaker 1: fuck ray is that Rick and I talked to Tom 956 00:54:43,760 --> 00:54:48,120 Speaker 1: Arnold in the first season of Trump Ruining America twenty 957 00:54:48,200 --> 00:54:54,280 Speaker 1: twenty during a pandemic Trump Ruins America Season one pandemic pandemic, 958 00:54:54,680 --> 00:54:57,000 Speaker 1: and Tom Arnold told us that there was a tape 959 00:54:57,120 --> 00:55:00,520 Speaker 1: of Trump saying the N word. We were unable to 960 00:55:01,120 --> 00:55:02,799 Speaker 1: have enough sources to back that up. 961 00:55:02,840 --> 00:55:04,760 Speaker 2: We couldn't go with it because. 962 00:55:04,719 --> 00:55:07,800 Speaker 1: We weren't able to track it down. But Donald Trump 963 00:55:08,000 --> 00:55:10,640 Speaker 1: saying the N word and all of America non finding 964 00:55:10,680 --> 00:55:15,480 Speaker 1: out about it for eight years is our moment of fuckery. 965 00:55:15,719 --> 00:55:18,280 Speaker 4: That's down to you, Mark Burnett. Your moment of fuckery 966 00:55:18,360 --> 00:55:20,759 Speaker 4: has arrived. But then again, what do we know about 967 00:55:20,760 --> 00:55:23,720 Speaker 4: people in the MAGA right now? None of that stuff matters. 968 00:55:23,840 --> 00:55:26,680 Speaker 4: Only winning matters to them. I mean, Donald Trump could 969 00:55:26,719 --> 00:55:30,399 Speaker 4: say things one hundred times worse because he allegedly said 970 00:55:30,440 --> 00:55:33,520 Speaker 4: on the tape, how will America feel about the inward 971 00:55:33,600 --> 00:55:36,520 Speaker 4: winning or a inward winning? I mean, I don't care. 972 00:55:36,680 --> 00:55:39,040 Speaker 4: I promise you they will go through the normal phases 973 00:55:39,080 --> 00:55:41,680 Speaker 4: of trump Ism. It's a lie by the mainstream media. No, 974 00:55:41,840 --> 00:55:44,959 Speaker 4: it never happened. No, he never said that. No, Joe 975 00:55:44,960 --> 00:55:47,160 Speaker 4: Biden's the one who actually said that they're going to 976 00:55:47,200 --> 00:55:50,200 Speaker 4: do the whole thing they always do. And of course 977 00:55:50,320 --> 00:55:52,560 Speaker 4: we'll end up getting headlines in the Times in places 978 00:55:52,640 --> 00:55:55,000 Speaker 4: like both Trump and Biden have faced racial issues. 979 00:55:56,040 --> 00:56:01,520 Speaker 1: Rick Wilson, thanks anytime. That's it for this episode of 980 00:56:01,560 --> 00:56:05,360 Speaker 1: Fast Politics. Tune in every Monday, Wednesday and Friday to 981 00:56:05,400 --> 00:56:08,279 Speaker 1: hear the best minds in politics makes sense of all 982 00:56:08,400 --> 00:56:11,879 Speaker 1: this chaos. If you enjoyed what you've heard, please send 983 00:56:11,880 --> 00:56:15,000 Speaker 1: it to a friend and keep the conversation going. And again, 984 00:56:15,239 --> 00:56:16,200 Speaker 1: thanks for listening.