Speaker 1: If you're gonna run a great business, you've got to
Speaker 1: have great people, and finding them is a huge part
Speaker 1: of that puzzle. Zip recruiter is the smartest way to hire.
Speaker 1: Zipp recruiter dot com has a platform that finds the
Speaker 1: right job candidates for you. It identifies people with the
Speaker 1: right experience and invites them to apply to your job.
Speaker 1: Of employers who post a job on zipp recruiter get
Speaker 1: a quality candidate through the site in just one day.
Speaker 1: The right candidates are out there, you can find them.
Speaker 1: But zip recruiter is how right Now My listeners can
Speaker 1: try zip recruiter for free. That's right free. Just go
Speaker 1: to zip recruiter dot com, slash buck. That's zipp recruiter
Speaker 1: dot com, slash buck. One more time, tryed for free.
Speaker 1: Zip recruiter dot com, slash buck, zip recruiter. It's the
Speaker 1: smartest way to hire. Once you check out their interface
Speaker 1: and you see those candidates come right into your inbox,
Speaker 1: you're gonna realize that's a great choice. Zipp recruiter dot com,
Speaker 1: slash buck. You are entering the freedom hunt. A week
Speaker 1: of unhinged Democrats continues on. They are saying all kinds
Speaker 1: of crazy stuff. After all of the propaganda they've been
Speaker 1: putting out on immigration, turns out that some of them
Speaker 1: are willing to finally say, oh yeah, open borders. Maybe
Speaker 1: that's the thing we do want. I know. By the way,
Speaker 1: if you support Trump, they actually do hate you. We
Speaker 1: will dig into that and much more on a Freestyle
Speaker 1: Friday coming up. This is the bus Sexton Show, where
Speaker 1: the mission or mission is to decode what really matters
Speaker 1: with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American Great, You're a
Speaker 1: great American Again The buck Sexton Show begins. SETI no
Speaker 1: Welcome to the buck Sexton Show team. Thank you so
Speaker 1: much for being here. Great to have you with me.
Speaker 1: Freestof Friday from the Swamp no less and oh my,
Speaker 1: it is indeed swampy, swampy weather, swampy day. Feels like
Speaker 1: we've been through a lot here in the Hut over
Speaker 1: the last few days. The Left, the assault on on truth,
Speaker 1: the assault on honesty has been ferocious, and we find
Speaker 1: out today that much of what I've been telling you
Speaker 1: you knew it was true, but now we have further proof.
Speaker 1: For one some of the most powerful imagery, some of
Speaker 1: the most powerful imagery from the UH entire border crisis
Speaker 1: situation was misleading, say the least. The Honduran government has
Speaker 1: confirmed that the crying girl photo. Those of you who
Speaker 1: haven't seeing it, if you just look at some immigration stories,
Speaker 1: they're using this all over the place, the crying girl
Speaker 1: photo from the border. Turns out she wasn't separated from
Speaker 1: her mom ever, never separated. Now people are gonna say,
Speaker 1: but Buck, they didn't say. They didn't say as she
Speaker 1: was separated. They just showed her crying, and it's true. Okay,
Speaker 1: Well just I don't have any kids, but kids do
Speaker 1: cry a lot. Okay, this is the thing that I've seen.
Speaker 1: And I would also say that using that photo of
Speaker 1: a young girl in that way was clearly meant to illustrate,
Speaker 1: or you were supposed to take away from it that
Speaker 1: she was one of the ones who had been separated
Speaker 1: from her family. Turns out it wasn't true, and also
Speaker 1: was used as the cover of Time magazine, which is
Speaker 1: still a thing apparently, and they photo shop Donald Trump
Speaker 1: staring down at her. This is meant to convey a
Speaker 1: very specific message. You know, adorable little girl crying separated
Speaker 1: from her parents and big mean monster Trump staring down
Speaker 1: at her. This is incredibly dishonest and unfair. But that's
Speaker 1: what they did. And now we find out some facts.
Speaker 1: Oh it's so weird that the meat out. They're saying, Oh,
Speaker 1: but you know, we didn't know. Oh what a surprise.
Speaker 1: I don't think they wanted to know. I don't think
Speaker 1: they really cared all that much to get to the facts.
Speaker 1: But this young girl, her father is in Honduras and
Speaker 1: her father is very upset that she was taken by
Speaker 1: the mother across the border. Turns that the father has
Speaker 1: a job and a stable life and the mother just
Speaker 1: decided to take the daughter across the border, and he's
Speaker 1: mad because she was put He felt like she was
Speaker 1: putting the daughters putting jeopardy by this pay thousands of
Speaker 1: dollars to a coyote, and she was caught trying to
Speaker 1: smuggle herself and her daughter into the United States. So,
Speaker 1: you know, the dad apparently doesn't think that they need
Speaker 1: asylum and that they're fleeing certain death or anything that's
Speaker 1: based on the stories that we've seen. That's not the
Speaker 1: case at all. She decided, the mom decided that she
Speaker 1: was going to do this and and very clearly made
Speaker 1: a decision two break us law. And this is why
Speaker 1: when presidents, when President Trump says the Democrats are telling
Speaker 1: phony stories of sadness and grief, you know, they're certainly
Speaker 1: exaggerating and misleading with some of these stories, no question
Speaker 1: about that now. And we knew this was going to
Speaker 1: be the case all along, and they've been doing this
Speaker 1: for weeks. I told you here on this show about
Speaker 1: the quote prison buses for babies also known as child
Speaker 1: restraint seats for babies that were take into field trips
Speaker 1: and put in those seats at taxpayer expense, by the way,
Speaker 1: so that they could you know, get out and about it,
Speaker 1: but that they could be safe when they were in
Speaker 1: the vehicle. But oh, it was a as a prison
Speaker 1: bus for babies. That was a photo making the rounds
Speaker 1: went viral, and yeah, I mean it's it's a prison
Speaker 1: bus for babies. The same way all of you listening,
Speaker 1: who you know, drive around in a minivan and have
Speaker 1: a child seat in the back that you know, restrains
Speaker 1: the child so doesn't get hurt if you have to
Speaker 1: stop short or something. You know, I guess you're also
Speaker 1: operating a prison van for babies. That's all. It was
Speaker 1: the cages that we saw the cages that the kids
Speaker 1: are put in. Turns out that was from the Obama administration.
Speaker 1: But you know Obama's administration putting kids in cages not
Speaker 1: nearly as big a deal, it seems as this administration. Uh.
Speaker 1: And by the they're not in cages, there in fenced
Speaker 1: in enclosed areas. There there is a different But the
Speaker 1: woman who crossed, and so that the mom of the
Speaker 1: little girl in the now iconic photo of crying little
Speaker 1: girl at the border, the mom, as I see here,
Speaker 1: was not a first time crosser, never separated from her child.
Speaker 1: The child was put in danger by the decision to cross,
Speaker 1: and was part of a This was all part of
Speaker 1: a human smuggling operation with thousands of dollars paid to
Speaker 1: a coyote, human smuggler. Did you get did you get
Speaker 1: any of that? Why did all that information? It didn't
Speaker 1: come out until Friday. We had had all week this
Speaker 1: this photo making the rounds all over the world. You know,
Speaker 1: the the visual became the story. And now we find
Speaker 1: out that the visual was in fact misleading and not
Speaker 1: what we were led to believe, which is not surprising
Speaker 1: to you or me, but we should we should remember
Speaker 1: that now. Also on the point about what's really at
Speaker 1: work here. I've been saying, why don't they just advocate
Speaker 1: for open borders? Why not, just to be honest, why
Speaker 1: can't Democrats just say we want open borders. Well, the
Speaker 1: reason is because they loose. The reason is because it's
Speaker 1: actually politically a losing issue for them, and there is
Speaker 1: some recognition of that fact. They're trying to change the
Speaker 1: American electorate without the American electorate figuring that out. The
Speaker 1: latest economist you gov poll, for example, shows, in response
Speaker 1: to the following about this immigration crisis, release the families
Speaker 1: and have them report back for an immigration hearing at
Speaker 1: a later date. You know how many people want that,
Speaker 1: just which means catch and release. Just think of a
Speaker 1: number in your head, what percentage according to this member.
Speaker 1: This is an economist pole. This is not old, it's
Speaker 1: a royal wingpole. Economist adults less than a fifth and say, yeah,
Speaker 1: I just released the family because that just means that
Speaker 1: they stay in the country. That just means that this
Speaker 1: is a giant open door for illegal aliens into the
Speaker 1: United States. In fact, what it does is it makes
Speaker 1: the border patrol and Immigrations and Customs enforcement complicit in
Speaker 1: this illegal entry. System, because they gotta take them in,
Speaker 1: process them and then let them loose in the in
Speaker 1: the United States, that's what happens, uh, in terms of
Speaker 1: holding families together in detention facilities. Well, then the American
Speaker 1: people are much more willing to you know, willing to
Speaker 1: go along with that. You got forty seven percent of Republicans,
Speaker 1: forty that a Democrats people are like, okay, fine, let's
Speaker 1: not separate families. Let's keep it, but we have to
Speaker 1: verify that their families, verify the children are in danger,
Speaker 1: and make sure these are actually their parents and not
Speaker 1: a human smuggler that as soon as they're released with
Speaker 1: them is going to turn them over to you know,
Speaker 1: an unspeakably horrific situation with the human smuggling network. Um.
Speaker 1: But you know it's really, you know, really interesting when
Speaker 1: you see the actual numbers here in response to this statement,
Speaker 1: arrest the adults, send them to jail, to a way
Speaker 1: to criminal trial, and send any minor children to shelters
Speaker 1: run by h h S. You know, you got of
Speaker 1: Republicans want that five percent of Democrats so that people
Speaker 1: aren't saying do that. But the really important thing is,
Speaker 1: I just when you look at this a vast majority
Speaker 1: of Americans do not want the policy that the Democrat
Speaker 1: media has been advocating for all week, which is the
Speaker 1: Obama policy released the families tell them to have an
Speaker 1: immigration hearing. That's what Obama did. Eight percent of us
Speaker 1: opposed that, and I would guess the real, real number,
Speaker 1: when people know what's going on, would be even higher
Speaker 1: because all that is is illegal immigration under another name.
Speaker 1: That's all it is. They come into the country with
Speaker 1: with this kind of uncertain staffs, and then you know,
Speaker 1: it's almost like uh, you know, writing a fraudulent check.
Speaker 1: You know you're right the check, it's fine, but if
Speaker 1: you don't have the money in the account you find
Speaker 1: out a few days later, well, then you're committing a fraud, right,
Speaker 1: They're committing immigration fraud. It's just there. In the first
Speaker 1: few days of it, they're saying, oh, no, we'll we'll
Speaker 1: show up for that hearing. They have no intention of
Speaker 1: showing up for the hearing. It is illegal immigration that
Speaker 1: the Obama administration was incentivizing, even though they said they weren't.
Speaker 1: Their policy made it made it so that clearly people
Speaker 1: the word was out and people were like, yeah, you
Speaker 1: know what, I'm gonna get to stay in America. That's
Speaker 1: that's the thing I gonna do. But then just on this,
Speaker 1: on this point about open borders, you know, they say, oh,
Speaker 1: we don't want that, we don't want that. D n
Speaker 1: C Deputy chairman photographed here saw this on Twitter wearing
Speaker 1: a T shirt reading, I don't believe in borders. I
Speaker 1: feel like, I feel like that's open borders. If you
Speaker 1: don't believe in borders, fair to say that you're for
Speaker 1: open borders, I think so. You know, keep in mind
Speaker 1: that the whole concept of open borders is up to
Speaker 1: this point really if affiction. It has not existed, It
Speaker 1: does not exist in the modern nation state system. There
Speaker 1: is no country where you just like come and go
Speaker 1: as you please. Not a single country on Earth allows that.
Speaker 1: I mean maybe an Antarctica or something, but you know,
Speaker 1: you're you'll be very cold. I mean no, but really,
Speaker 1: no country would accept that because of what it does
Speaker 1: to undermine the fundamental integrity of the state. And you've
Speaker 1: got Democrats that are around acting like this is a
Speaker 1: solution of things, and it just goes more and more
Speaker 1: to why do we have Trump? Why was Trump so powerful?
Speaker 1: Why did his message resonate? We have been taught by
Speaker 1: the left wing elites in this country, and it has
Speaker 1: been force fed to us by a a complicit Democrat
Speaker 1: media apparatus that immigrants are illegal. Immigrants are illegal aliency.
Speaker 1: You know, I gotta get the terminology right. Illegal aliens
Speaker 1: are actually better than we are. We have an obligation
Speaker 1: to take them in and help them. And if we
Speaker 1: have any problems with that, we're bad people. That's what
Speaker 1: we've been told. And we're rejecting that narrative. American people
Speaker 1: are rejecting the narrative at least a lot of us are.
Speaker 1: I mean, the media insanity this week and the stuff
Speaker 1: that people are saying with the Aush, with the Aush
Speaker 1: Fitz and the book involved and Nazi concentration camps. Anyone,
Speaker 1: anyone who who says that what's going on at the
Speaker 1: border is in any way similar to Nazism or fascism
Speaker 1: is a moron or they or they've lost touch with
Speaker 1: reality such that they are moronic on this issue. It
Speaker 1: is idiocy to say that it's not a this isn't
Speaker 1: a hey, I'm here, you're there. You know, we gotta
Speaker 1: meet in the middle thing. It is idiocy to say it.
Speaker 1: But people were saying it all over the place. They're
Speaker 1: getting airtime on TV. You know, that's one of the
Speaker 1: faith speaking about the tactics of the Faith News. One
Speaker 1: of the things I'm gonna continue to hear in the
Speaker 1: show is break apart how the fake news does what
Speaker 1: it does, because it's more than just running fake stories.
Speaker 1: That's too obvious. That's not very effective. It's not effective propaganda. Remember,
Speaker 1: propaganda has to be believable and has to have some
Speaker 1: truth to it. If it's just completely if it's you know,
Speaker 1: unicorns and unicorns landed yesterday and took over the country,
Speaker 1: that's not good propaganda. You have to be more subtle.
Speaker 1: It has to be more effective than that, or it
Speaker 1: has to be more believable for it to be effective.
Speaker 1: And you know, I'll continue to hammer on this because
Speaker 1: I think that it's so important that we don't allow
Speaker 1: them to get away with the the fake news messaging
Speaker 1: on immigration eight four four to five, eight four four nine, Buck,
Speaker 1: I would love to hear your thoughts on all the
Speaker 1: things that are going on here. Do tell us what
Speaker 1: you think about all this. And Uh, it's a Friday,
Speaker 1: my friend, so let's let it up. We'll be right back.
Speaker 1: What has to happen now. This can no longer be
Speaker 1: about who Trump is. It has to be about who
Speaker 1: we are. If we're working towards November, we can no
Speaker 1: longer say Trump's the bad guy. If you vote for Trump,
Speaker 1: you're the bad guy. If you vote for Trump, you
Speaker 1: are ripping children from parents onto The mistake that we've
Speaker 1: made in the past is look at that bad guy
Speaker 1: over there, Look at that bad guy. What the Democrats
Speaker 1: have to do is make the next election a referendum.
Speaker 1: I'm not who Trump is, but who you are. If
Speaker 1: you vote for a Trump, then you the voter, You
Speaker 1: not Donald Trump, are standing at the border like Nazis,
Speaker 1: go you here, you here. And I think we now
Speaker 1: have to flip it. And it's a given the evilness
Speaker 1: of Donald Trump. But if you vote, you can no
Speaker 1: longer separate yourself. You can't say, well, he's okay. But
Speaker 1: and I think gymnastics and I think that jru jitsu
Speaker 1: has to happen. So Donnie Deutsch of MSNBC is outrageously stupid.
Speaker 1: Apparently that's a good thing to know. I didn't not
Speaker 1: really familiar with the guy's work, very forgetful until now,
Speaker 1: but that was one of the dumbest rants I've ever
Speaker 1: heard on television. Okay, Donny, yeah, you're right. Let's let's
Speaker 1: vote for Democrats. Let's put let's put people in office
Speaker 1: who think that a baby that's, you know, eight months,
Speaker 1: three weeks and five days old, should be able to
Speaker 1: be taken and out of the mother with a vacuum
Speaker 1: cleaner and cut up into pieces and like. And the
Speaker 1: Democrats are proud of that. That's why I like this guy,
Speaker 1: Steve Schmidt, who says he's now a Democrat. Really, if
Speaker 1: you want to withdraw from the process, if you can't
Speaker 1: support Trump, you know, that's on you. But at least
Speaker 1: at least that I can fathom. But you're gonna tell
Speaker 1: me you're you know, Schmitt's gonna say he's been a
Speaker 1: conservative his whole life, for Republican his whole life, and
Speaker 1: now he's now he's with the other team. At this
Speaker 1: stage of the game, it just looks like opportunism and
Speaker 1: it looks like sour grapes and whininess to me. Ah, man,
Speaker 1: it's ridiculous. If you vote for Trump what that guy
Speaker 1: just said on national TVs. If you vote for Trump,
Speaker 1: you know you're you're basically a Nazi too. Have you
Speaker 1: voted for Trump? And now look Trump isn't on the
Speaker 1: He's not even on the ballot this fall, right, So
Speaker 1: what they mean by if you vote for the Republican
Speaker 1: Party because Trump is the day facto ahead of the
Speaker 1: Republican Party right now, folks understand this that they don't
Speaker 1: disagree with your policies that they want they want to
Speaker 1: create the perception that you're a bad person. That's why
Speaker 1: this show is so necessary for me. I get to
Speaker 1: talk to all of you. This is my sanity. You
Speaker 1: are my sanity. I got to talk to all of
Speaker 1: you across the country and then read all your messages
Speaker 1: and talk to you on the phone, and you know,
Speaker 1: interact with you on Twitter and everything. And it's just
Speaker 1: good to know I'm not alone. I am deep in
Speaker 1: the swamp here behind enemy lines, and I hear this stuff.
Speaker 1: These people that are multi millionaires, I mean, otch the guys.
Speaker 1: I think I like a mansion that will make Louis
Speaker 1: of fourteen blush out in the Hampton's right. Oh, but
Speaker 1: you know he's gonna lecture us all about how how
Speaker 1: much he cares about people. The board crap, These people
Speaker 1: are so full of it. I don't care about anybody
Speaker 1: at the border. They send there. They send their own
Speaker 1: kids to the least full of asylum seeking kids schools
Speaker 1: they can possibly find, will pay top dollar for it.
Speaker 1: But then they want to make sure that you know,
Speaker 1: if you have any questions about whether your school district
Speaker 1: should be overhelm with non English speakers who just got
Speaker 1: here from traumatized countries after being put through human trafficking pipelines,
Speaker 1: because the Obama administration is like, hey, human trafficking, it
Speaker 1: works these days. If you want to get into the country,
Speaker 1: good luck with it. But if you if you see
Speaker 1: all this for what it is, you're a bad person.
Speaker 1: That's what they want you to know. You know, how
Speaker 1: often do I come here on the show and I
Speaker 1: just said, yeah, you know, I disagree with this person
Speaker 1: on tax or immigration policy or something. They're a bad
Speaker 1: human being, bad human being. Yes, you know, Cecil Richards
Speaker 1: whatever her name is from plant parent, bad person, bad person.
Speaker 1: I don't let me. I'll say that, you know, and
Speaker 1: certain other folks out there I could think of and
Speaker 1: talk about in the media, and even some of their
Speaker 1: you know, some of the people that they're very close
Speaker 1: to that are pushing that kind of policy, pushing for
Speaker 1: planned paradise. Yeah, yeah, they're they're doing evil, I will
Speaker 1: say that. But an immigration it's a very complicated subject.
Speaker 1: It is. But to suggest that if you disagree with
Speaker 1: somebody you're a bad person, that's just it's a disgrace.
Speaker 1: But you have not any doing. The intellectual level of
Speaker 1: commentary over at MSNBC these days is it's it's an embarrassment.
Speaker 1: It's an embarrassment. It just is. And these people are
Speaker 1: going way overboard eight four or four nine buck, Do
Speaker 1: you want to chat? We've got some lines. Lit we
Speaker 1: take another call or two, we'll get into it. And
Speaker 1: also what Trump had to say about m S thirteen
Speaker 1: in just a moment, he's holding the line for America
Speaker 1: Bucks sexting is back of these children and teenagers that
Speaker 1: we're talking about overe came here on their own, about
Speaker 1: forty thousand this year by themselves, and you just cannot
Speaker 1: accept and when you and I've been on the border
Speaker 1: many times, you can't accept that these are the real parents. Um,
Speaker 1: you know, the drug cartels control the border. They make
Speaker 1: as much money, or a lot of money on smuggling
Speaker 1: people as much as they do drugs. So right now,
Speaker 1: the drug cartels are looking in America and they're laughing.
Speaker 1: The President is right on this. No one wanted to
Speaker 1: separate these kids, but he was following the law. Obama
Speaker 1: did the same thing. We know all that now and
Speaker 1: that's in the past. We need to move forward. Did
Speaker 1: you get that sense from the news reports this week, folks?
Speaker 1: Were they telling you that how many of these news anchors,
Speaker 1: oh my god, the children, how many of them were,
Speaker 1: just so you're clear on all the facts, right, just
Speaker 1: so they're presenting you with the facts. How many of
Speaker 1: them are saying that this is a huge money maker
Speaker 1: for the drug cartels, same drug cartels that are flooding
Speaker 1: our streets with heroin, part of the opioid epidemic, and also,
Speaker 1: by the way, selling fentonel illegally, killing tens of thousands
Speaker 1: of our fellow Americans. Did you was there any talking
Speaker 1: about that, how smuggling is a huge cash cow for
Speaker 1: the cartels, The same cartels that not only used those
Speaker 1: smuggling routs to make money, but also used those smuggling
Speaker 1: routs to bring drugs into this country. In fact, some
Speaker 1: of the people they smuggle in they use as mules
Speaker 1: for the drugs. Was that ever a part of the
Speaker 1: conversation as you were seeing it on TV and in
Speaker 1: the New York Times? And oh, it's all It was
Speaker 1: all about how terrible Trump was, how much Trump hates babies.
Speaker 1: That's what it was. Trump's are racist, who hates babies?
Speaker 1: That was the main story. They're running with it all
Speaker 1: these different news outlets. Did were you told that that
Speaker 1: seventy percent of the under eighteen population, under eighteen years
Speaker 1: old that showed up the border came alone. Why would
Speaker 1: they do that? Oh, it's right because the Obama administration
Speaker 1: was just letting them stay in the country. It was
Speaker 1: open border. If you're under eighteen, show up, bring you
Speaker 1: into the interior, tell you to show up for an
Speaker 1: immigration hearing, never show up, never get deported. Dangerous though
Speaker 1: for those kids. Dangerous to those kids making money for
Speaker 1: the cartels. But these are the these are the important facts,
Speaker 1: the the background and really the the center ground of
Speaker 1: this discussion that was just somehow left out, just left out. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we didn't really get that sense, do we? And I
Speaker 1: really ask you this, did you did you ever hear
Speaker 1: until I just played it for you? Now on all
Speaker 1: with all the coverage of this that sevent of the
Speaker 1: miners at the border weren't even with parents. Because these
Speaker 1: parents care so much about these kids, I guess that
Speaker 1: they're willing to send them into one of the most
Speaker 1: dangerous parts of the Western hemisphere right now. Mexico, by
Speaker 1: the way, last year had its worst year in history
Speaker 1: for murders. The drug cartels are on a rampage, and
Speaker 1: the drug cartels are also killing thousands of Americans through
Speaker 1: drug overdoses, targeting people who are addicted to substances are
Speaker 1: the most addictive substances ever known to mankind. And this
Speaker 1: is all tied into a legal immigration It's all tied
Speaker 1: into our unsecure border. And all we hear about is
Speaker 1: Trump hates babies, and Trump isn't nice to Trump isn't
Speaker 1: nice to you know, Hispanic people, and he hates Hispanic babies.
Speaker 1: That's that was the sum total of what you're getting
Speaker 1: from me this week. They're disgrace. CNN is the enemy
Speaker 1: of truth. They are an utter disgrace. They have no
Speaker 1: honor and no ethics. MSNBC not really better, but at
Speaker 1: least we know where they stand on this stuff. At
Speaker 1: least you can you can expect leftist propaganda and leftist
Speaker 1: adget prop from them, But even the major networks in
Speaker 1: the New York Times, Washington Post, they're no better. It
Speaker 1: was all about will Trump back down? Will Trump back down.
Speaker 1: They made it seem like they were just babies, and
Speaker 1: babies showing up, you know, swaddled by by mother's you know,
Speaker 1: shivering in the cold, just just begging to come into
Speaker 1: America because they've because they're they're fleeing certain death at home.
Speaker 1: Now we find out, well, actually some of them have
Speaker 1: like husbands at home that are making a living. And
Speaker 1: they're like, I didn't want her to take the kid
Speaker 1: across the border. That's really dangerous. She paid smugglers, she
Speaker 1: paid the cartels off. That's terrible. We shouldn't do that.
Speaker 1: She could have lost my baby. And that story, I'm
Speaker 1: telling you, that's from the main photo they've been using
Speaker 1: to emotionally manipulate all of us into thinking that this
Speaker 1: crisis is all Trump's fault. There's no bigger story at
Speaker 1: work here. It's like that's what we're up against, though,
Speaker 1: And they got us to stop talking about the IG report,
Speaker 1: which proves beyond any reasonable doubt the deep state is
Speaker 1: real and tried to stop Trump from being elected and
Speaker 1: has tried to take him out of office since Man,
Speaker 1: all right, every line is lip, which means we've got
Speaker 1: a lot of a lot of talking to you with
Speaker 1: the team. Let's get into some of this. We have
Speaker 1: hold on one second, Buck in Mobile, Alabama, because he's
Speaker 1: got the best name known to man. What's up, Buck,
Speaker 1: what's going on? Ma Hey, I'm good, thanks for calling
Speaker 1: shieldsi Oh chills out very Oh no, Man, I was
Speaker 1: just going because I heard the first time hearing about it. Uh,
Speaker 1: the MSNBC guy talking about how people have voted for
Speaker 1: Trump or evil and that they've got to do something
Speaker 1: about it. All that kind of stuff, which is is
Speaker 1: is really ridiculous to me personally, because they're sitting up
Speaker 1: there in the Capitol not having to see none of
Speaker 1: this firsthand or or anything like that, and they just
Speaker 1: think they're all high and mighty, and uh, they just
Speaker 1: need to get knocked off the high horse, you know,
Speaker 1: they need to actually go down there and try to
Speaker 1: do something instead of just talking about it. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: it's all it's all virtue signaling. Buck, It's it's just
Speaker 1: them trying to look like they are on TV for
Speaker 1: their liberal urban elite audiences that that pretend to care
Speaker 1: about immigration, but really it's just about how much they
Speaker 1: want to tell everybody how great they are. Thanks for
Speaker 1: calling in. I gotta say one thing about talking to
Speaker 1: Buck is that it does make me feel like I'm
Speaker 1: having some kind of out of body experience. I'm like,
Speaker 1: good point buck Well said Buck, It's fun. It's fun
Speaker 1: when I get a caller named Buck, because clearly Buck
Speaker 1: is brilliant. Buck's done his homework. Buck also has a
Speaker 1: good voice. Buck is See it gets weird, right, I
Speaker 1: was talking about our caller, but it sounds like I'm
Speaker 1: having some kind of some kind of self indulgent meltdown
Speaker 1: here on the show. All right, let's get into our
Speaker 1: next caller. We've got Glenn in destin Florida, who's a
Speaker 1: retired Special Forces guy. Glenn, Thanks for calling. Thank you,
Speaker 1: Buck Shields, Hi Shields. The President not long ago that
Speaker 1: great speech to the nation on Iran. Of course a
Speaker 1: similar speech on the border situation and immigration and how
Speaker 1: important it is to all Americans and shaping our country, etcetera.
Speaker 1: But of course, uh, at the same time, one can
Speaker 1: address the tremendous amounts of money we spend in foreign
Speaker 1: aid to these various countries that are being destabilized because
Speaker 1: we don't have secure borders so that the kidnappings can continue.
Speaker 1: The tiers on the border will drive at the tears
Speaker 1: in those countries that are being undermined by this will
Speaker 1: not Um, you hit all the talking points, so I won't,
Speaker 1: but someone like yourself could certainly develop a narrative for
Speaker 1: the president or someone to have his great speech writers
Speaker 1: plug it in. Can you imagine a television addressed to
Speaker 1: the nation with a screen in the back where you
Speaker 1: can flash statistics how many murders have taken place because
Speaker 1: of this or that? Uh, how many assassinations of government official?
Speaker 1: On and on. Yeah, I mean Trump is the only one.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, I'm yeah, Glenn. I just said Trump is
Speaker 1: the only one who in the GOP right now, Ken
Speaker 1: and is willing to make the argument that there's a
Speaker 1: real cost to illegal immigration. By the way, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: get to the his his meeting with the angel parents
Speaker 1: in just a moment. I mean, I've already I've already
Speaker 1: um prepared for that in the show today where Okay,
Speaker 1: so we're gonna talk about crying babies the board. Do
Speaker 1: we also talk about crying parents that lost their kids
Speaker 1: to MS thirteen gang members who are here because of
Speaker 1: the asylum loophole that Obama opened up. Do we get
Speaker 1: to talk about that loss? You know, the rapes, the murders,
Speaker 1: the stabbings to death and such that have happened that
Speaker 1: because of MS thirteen, some of them. By the way,
Speaker 1: a ten or fifteen minute try from where I'm doing
Speaker 1: this radio broadcast right now, so you know, it's not
Speaker 1: like this is located in just one area. It's in
Speaker 1: many places across the country. Glenn. You know it's it's
Speaker 1: always one of the great lies of illegal immigration that
Speaker 1: has been rammed down our throats for decades now is
Speaker 1: there's no downside to it. There's only upside. That is
Speaker 1: a lie. But they've been perpetuating that big life for
Speaker 1: a long time. Thank you for calling in, And you know,
Speaker 1: I agree with you that the the Trump administration is
Speaker 1: able to make this case in a way that and
Speaker 1: I'd like them to see make the case even more.
Speaker 1: I mean, get out there and really talk to peop
Speaker 1: about this. I read to you the poem before just
Speaker 1: a we're all clear what the Democrats once Trump signed
Speaker 1: that executive or said keep families together. The next day
Speaker 1: Democrats were, yeah, we should go back to what we
Speaker 1: had before. Americans overwhelmingly reject that. We do not want
Speaker 1: illegal immigration. We don't want it the liberal elites wanted,
Speaker 1: and yes, some Republican sellouts wanted to. Speaking of sellouts,
Speaker 1: I'm just seeing here now, George Will has written a column.
Speaker 1: You see this, George Will has written a column saying
Speaker 1: that they people should vote against the GOP this November.
Speaker 1: What what is what is wrong with people? They what
Speaker 1: they're they're hating the exposing They're they're hating that Trump
Speaker 1: is exposing the lies of the left wing media apparatus
Speaker 1: there there. They hate that Trump fights back on these
Speaker 1: issues and doesn't just sit there like you know, look,
Speaker 1: it was embarrassing for me for a while when I
Speaker 1: was the c i A and I wasn't really openly political.
Speaker 1: You know, Bush would just he would just get a nihil.
Speaker 1: You know, Bush is a moron. Bushes. You know, his
Speaker 1: eyes are so close together it is clearly inbreeding there
Speaker 1: and all that. I mean, they'd say all this horrible
Speaker 1: stuff about Bush all the time, and he just you know,
Speaker 1: sit there like yeah, it is. You know, I'm the president.
Speaker 1: I can't. I'm sorry. It wasn't It wasn't a good
Speaker 1: thing to just sit there and get humiliated and call
Speaker 1: the war criminal and you know, all the you know,
Speaker 1: a greedy monster and all this stuff is terrible because
Speaker 1: you've seen it doesn't matter whether it's Romney or Trump,
Speaker 1: they're gonna say the same kind of stuff, right, Romney
Speaker 1: would is like the the dog abusing, you know, wedgie
Speaker 1: giving in high school, cancer handing out greedy capitalist pig. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: everyone knows Romney is like he's he is like a
Speaker 1: grown up boy scout, nicest guy, imaginable, totally trustworthy, family man,
Speaker 1: you know, as clean as they come. In his background.
Speaker 1: I mean, it didn't matter. It didn't matter because they
Speaker 1: played dirty because they're disgrace because Democrats are are Look,
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party has been overtaken by a mania that
Speaker 1: is that is concerning. Let me be honest with you.
Speaker 1: I'm hearing things from people that I usually think are
Speaker 1: pretty saying they're like, yeah, maybe we should just track
Speaker 1: down officials we disagree with, the screaming their faces in
Speaker 1: front of their children until they do what we want.
Speaker 1: I'm like no, that's not that's not okay, that's that's
Speaker 1: not the way they should go. But you know, you
Speaker 1: know what, let me let me take We're gonna get
Speaker 1: to the MS thirteen, the Angel family. Gotta talk about that,
Speaker 1: gotta talk about gonna gonna get into that in some
Speaker 1: detail the next hour. I want to deal with this
Speaker 1: issue though, of these GOP. Look, MSNBC's lining their you know,
Speaker 1: MSNBC is is writing their checks now, so I get
Speaker 1: it right. There's a lot. There's this whole GOP and exile.
Speaker 1: You know, the people that gave us the Iraq War
Speaker 1: and and the the failed effort to rebuild that member
Speaker 1: the Afghan War one. But the rebuilding effort has not
Speaker 1: been a success. Uh. And the people that gave us
Speaker 1: all that they gave us, Nancy Pelosi a Speaker of
Speaker 1: the House, and eight years of Obama, they want to
Speaker 1: stand around and lecture all of us on foreign policy,
Speaker 1: on economics, on And I'm like, no, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: you you you took a country that was had a
Speaker 1: clear conservative lean and threw it way in the opposite
Speaker 1: direction and gave us eight years of obamasm and now
Speaker 1: you're gonna lecture all the rest of us. You know, now,
Speaker 1: Steve Schmidt and George Will and these other GOP establishment types,
Speaker 1: they're not only gonna lectures. Look if they would be
Speaker 1: p I have friends who hate Trump, and I I
Speaker 1: can listen to them. I can't agree with them, but
Speaker 1: I can listen them. But the moment it goes from
Speaker 1: I hate Trump too, I'm gonna vote for Democrats. That
Speaker 1: is just that's actually like break, a break with reality.
Speaker 1: That's delusional. It's counterproductive, and I think it's weak, I
Speaker 1: really do. I think it's cowardly. You want to withdraw
Speaker 1: you can't support Trump and call you and you're gonna
Speaker 1: call yourself a conservative, but you're not. Fine. I disagree,
Speaker 1: but we can talk about that. You're gonna vote for
Speaker 1: the other side. You're a turn coat. You're you're an
Speaker 1: ideological turn coat. You just are. So we should talk
Speaker 1: about this here. That's out of the break. Stay with me.
Speaker 1: The George Will, somebody formerly thought of as a I
Speaker 1: don't know, a leading conservative editorial writer opinion writer. He
Speaker 1: he writes the following, Now vote against the GOP this November,
Speaker 1: amid the carnage of Republican MR rule in Washington, there
Speaker 1: is glimmer. There's this glimmer of good news. The family
Speaker 1: shredding policy along the southern border, the most telegenic recent
Speaker 1: example of misrule clarified something occurring less than a hundred
Speaker 1: and forty days before elections that can reshape Congress, the
Speaker 1: policy that has given independence and temperate Republicans, these are
Speaker 1: probably expanding and contracting cohorts respectively, fresh if redundant, evidence
Speaker 1: for the principle by which they vote. You know, I
Speaker 1: think this guy is not actually as good a writer
Speaker 1: as people think he is. I'm just gonna put that
Speaker 1: out there. A lot of uh, his writing is very showy.
Speaker 1: I would say that. You could even you could even
Speaker 1: say it's a little a little pedantic. That's that's what
Speaker 1: That's how I would for for anyone who cares. That's
Speaker 1: what I would say about it. Um, you could even
Speaker 1: say it's meretricious. That's right. Let's bust out some SA
Speaker 1: T words to talk about how this guy uses too
Speaker 1: many s A T words. That's what chicole irony. So
Speaker 1: here here we go. We got we got Will writing
Speaker 1: this stuff, and I just I got so many questions
Speaker 1: I'd love to ask Will, but they won't have me
Speaker 1: over an MSNBC to ask them, um, what misrule? What
Speaker 1: what are Republicans so upset about right now? You know what?
Speaker 1: What what problem do they have with what's going on?
Speaker 1: The tax cut? No, okay, that's Republicans always want tax cuts, right,
Speaker 1: They've got a fever and the only prescription is more
Speaker 1: tax cuts. So that's not it, Gorsage. No, Corsage is
Speaker 1: as good as justice in the Supreme Court as any
Speaker 1: conservative could ever make the case for anywhere in the country. Okay,
Speaker 1: it's not Gorsige. Uh, federal judiciary getting conservative judges put
Speaker 1: in all over the place, rebalancing the court after Obama
Speaker 1: did a progressive court packing with thirty of the federal
Speaker 1: judiciary being picked by the Obama administration. So we don't
Speaker 1: want that, you know, hashtag resistance judiciary and effect we
Speaker 1: don't want that. So fighting with the fake news media,
Speaker 1: letting American who will open their eyes and ears know
Speaker 1: that it's okay to say that CNN is a effectively
Speaker 1: a an enterprise of intellectual fraud on a grand scale,
Speaker 1: and that the people and the worst defenders of those
Speaker 1: who are Look, I'm just an objective journalist. The worst
Speaker 1: ones are the coopers and the tappers and the rest
Speaker 1: of them, because they're just Democrats pretending to be something else.
Speaker 1: That's all that's going on there on a wardis journalist.
Speaker 1: Yeah right, we're not idiots. The whole thing is dishonest.
Speaker 1: Is that a bring problem for a but I hope
Speaker 1: not so. So what is the big problem? Exactly that
Speaker 1: he throws a little bs around sometimes in order to
Speaker 1: you know, make a case about something, or that he
Speaker 1: exaggerates a little or he is imprecise in his language.
Speaker 1: I just what makes them so upset. See what I
Speaker 1: think makes them so upset is that you've got a
Speaker 1: roaring economy, record low unemployment, GDP growth finally getting back
Speaker 1: to what it should be in this country. Businesses at
Speaker 1: like eighty year highs for ms UM and and they
Speaker 1: were all telling us that this guy wouldn't be able
Speaker 1: to tie his shoes and get the first base, never
Speaker 1: mind be a successful president. So they just can't handle it.
Speaker 1: You've got Republicans who just can't handle the fact that
Speaker 1: they were deeply and utterly wrong. You've got a yard,
Speaker 1: you got a fence. You know that it helps a lot,
Speaker 1: keeps your dogs inside, keeps predators out of your yard.
Speaker 1: But it doesn't cover everything, doesn't go deep enough underground.
Speaker 1: If your pet digs, guess what he can get under
Speaker 1: your fence. That's why you need dig Defense. It is genius.
Speaker 1: It solves the problem that pet owners have of having
Speaker 1: to deal with dogs who dig. And it's so easy
Speaker 1: to install. Comes with a bunch of different sizes, different models.
Speaker 1: You can use a hammer and a pair of gloves
Speaker 1: and you're done. It extends the protection of your fence underground.
Speaker 1: So if you got pets digging under the fence, check
Speaker 1: out dig Defense right now. It's available online at Loews Menards,
Speaker 1: Wayfair and stop the dig dot com again. Dig Defense
Speaker 1: is the solution to pat's digging under the fence and
Speaker 1: getting out. We're letting creditors in stop the dig dot com.
Speaker 1: That's stop the dig dot com for dig Defense, keep
Speaker 1: those dogs in. Buck Sexton permission decoding the news and
Speaker 1: disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Magnorma stake American. You're a
Speaker 1: great American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show. Is Sexton. No,
Speaker 1: none of our kids had a minute to say goodbye.
Speaker 1: We were lucky enough to be separated for five days
Speaker 1: or ten days were separated permanently. My separation is permanent.
Speaker 1: Sarah is never coming home. I never get to take
Speaker 1: a selfie with her again. They could fill this stage
Speaker 1: up every day for the next five months of victims
Speaker 1: of the illegal alien crime, and it would just keepeen.
Speaker 1: So remember when you go home, and how do your
Speaker 1: kids that there are many of us, thousands of us
Speaker 1: who don't get to do that anymore. He shouldn't have
Speaker 1: been there, and we had many opportunities to to get
Speaker 1: him out. Welcome back the buck Sex and show that
Speaker 1: you're just hearing there from some of the parents, the
Speaker 1: angel parents of those who have been killed by illegal aliens,
Speaker 1: whether legal aliens driving intoxicated without a license, or legal
Speaker 1: aliens who are members of MS thirteen, you know, murdering
Speaker 1: people with machetes in suburban and urban neighborhoods all across
Speaker 1: the country. Now, I mean it just happens wherever there's
Speaker 1: a pocket of MS thirteen. You could have a a
Speaker 1: terrible atrocity, and there have been atrocities. And you have
Speaker 1: these parents who are standing up and saying, you know,
Speaker 1: there is a cost to all this illegal immigration and
Speaker 1: the notion that illegals are less likely to commit crimes
Speaker 1: and Americans doesn't bring First of all, it's not true,
Speaker 1: and I don't care what anyone says, it's just not true.
Speaker 1: But it also doesn't bring any comfort to the families
Speaker 1: of those who look at the government and say, you
Speaker 1: failed my son or my daughter, You failed to enforce
Speaker 1: the law and my son or daughter is now dead,
Speaker 1: or my husband or my wife or media doesn't. Media
Speaker 1: doesn't you know, no big anchors on the different channels
Speaker 1: tearing up over this one, none of them spending their
Speaker 1: time h crying on camera about these are people member
Speaker 1: who are murdered. Okay, once more serious, ten year old
Speaker 1: that doesn't see mom for two days while he's tended
Speaker 1: to by authorities of the state because mom decided to
Speaker 1: bring him via coyotes to the border illegally by the way,
Speaker 1: or being murdered. I think we all know the answer
Speaker 1: to that. But that's that's not We're not allowed to
Speaker 1: look at that as a cost of illegal immigration. We're
Speaker 1: not allowed to think about that. They're even they'll lie
Speaker 1: to us about this. I mean Hillary Clinton. When I
Speaker 1: was on Fox earlier in the week, Brett Bart asked
Speaker 1: me the actually said, do you think about Hillary saying
Speaker 1: crime is dropping in Germany. Yeah, it has been dropping
Speaker 1: over the last thirty years, been dropping across the whole
Speaker 1: western hemisphere of the Western world. But that's largely a function,
Speaker 1: as I say, of technology more than anything else. I
Speaker 1: don't know. People say, oh, no, but it is. But
Speaker 1: but also it ignores that there's been a temper cent
Speaker 1: spike in murders in Germany, almost entirely attributable to the
Speaker 1: surge of migrants that have come from war torn in
Speaker 1: Middle Eastern countries, from majority Muslim countries that have now
Speaker 1: brought a whole lot of people into societies that they
Speaker 1: are having some trouble assimilating into. I mean, this is
Speaker 1: you know, you can see this with How are we
Speaker 1: really supposed to believe that it's going to be just
Speaker 1: as as easy and just as beneficial for Americans to
Speaker 1: bring in a a a Pakistani immigrant from the Northwest
Speaker 1: Front Tier province who is a hard line Islamist who
Speaker 1: speaks no English but has some relative in the United
Speaker 1: States or claims a Solamn or something that that person
Speaker 1: will assimilate every bit as well as a you know,
Speaker 1: a Ghanaian English speaking doctor. The answer is no, the
Speaker 1: Ghanaian English speaking doctor is going to do way better
Speaker 1: nine times out of ten than the illiterate Pakistani immigrant
Speaker 1: from the Northwest Frontier Province who is claiming asylum right.
Speaker 1: But our immigration system and our immigration discussion is not
Speaker 1: even allowed to take this into account. We're supposed to
Speaker 1: pretend that all cultures are the same, all backgrounds are
Speaker 1: the same, and all people are going to contribute equally
Speaker 1: to American society. Just not true. It is obviously untrue.
Speaker 1: But there's a moral blackmail to this. They yell racist,
Speaker 1: they yell xenophope, they yelled bigot, they yelled child hater.
Speaker 1: Now all of this and then they have no response,
Speaker 1: nothing to say when we point out, well, hold on
Speaker 1: a second, what about the what about the people that
Speaker 1: have been killed by immigrant who have been deported many
Speaker 1: times and keep coming back into the country. One of
Speaker 1: the great, uh, great big lies of the media is
Speaker 1: that they really don't want people to figure out how
Speaker 1: large a role illegal immigrants smuggling and cartels from south
Speaker 1: of our border, from Mexico and from Central American countries,
Speaker 1: the role that Mexican drug cartels and Mexican illegals have
Speaker 1: played in what is a mass slaughter of Americans via
Speaker 1: addiction to drugs? That yes, I know, people say, you
Speaker 1: make a choice to get on drugs. These drugs are
Speaker 1: more potent, more dangerous, and more addictive than anything else
Speaker 1: known to man. You can die from trying them once. Okay,
Speaker 1: they are straight up poison. Media doesn't want to talk
Speaker 1: about this. Oh yeah, the opios you notice, they'll they'll
Speaker 1: cover are how big and bad and even the pharmaceutical
Speaker 1: companies are. Meanwhile, a lot of people live with chronic
Speaker 1: pain actually do need drugs to help manage the pains.
Speaker 1: They can go about their lives. It's not like the
Speaker 1: pharmaceutical companies are are making up that people are in
Speaker 1: pain or making up that these drugs work. They do work.
Speaker 1: But the cartels are targeting people and haven't targeting people
Speaker 1: that live in now, you know, small town America. No
Speaker 1: connective tissue established between what's going on south the border,
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants and the sixty thousand plus dead Americans from
Speaker 1: opioid overdoses last year. I think of sixty three or
Speaker 1: sixty four thousand total. No one talks about that. Why
Speaker 1: is that that seems like a pretty big cost of
Speaker 1: illegal immigration to me, it seems like a pretty worth
Speaker 1: considering that life expectancy is dropping in some areas because
Speaker 1: of that, I think that that's a should be higher
Speaker 1: up on our list. But no, no, no, you see,
Speaker 1: if you talk about that, you must hate crying babies
Speaker 1: and not with them to be with their mothers. Think
Speaker 1: of just how dishonest the whole argument is too. And
Speaker 1: what's terrifying is you see Donnie Deutsch and these other
Speaker 1: idiots out there, these other overpaid clowns on TV who
Speaker 1: have no real wisdom, no real knowledge to share with
Speaker 1: the public. It's just all pomposity in the guy in
Speaker 1: the guise of professionalism. A very frustrating, it really is,
Speaker 1: you know. And we've got so few media outlets out
Speaker 1: there that will even tell the truth about this stuff,
Speaker 1: you know. You know, CNN should just have a total
Speaker 1: It should just be scrapped top to bottom and just
Speaker 1: restarted from the ground up. I mean, give us a
Speaker 1: real conservative I mean, sorry, give us a real cable
Speaker 1: news network conservatives not where we're great too, I take
Speaker 1: that too, But anything but this, this uh, this vile
Speaker 1: dishonest propaganda mills. All right. We got a lot of
Speaker 1: calls which I do. I do want to get too
Speaker 1: as well. But but first you know this, Uh Trump
Speaker 1: is out there, He's making the case about this, and
Speaker 1: God bless him, for nobody else will do this. You'll
Speaker 1: notice there's really no there's not a lot of other
Speaker 1: Republicans that are willing to make the case and capable
Speaker 1: of making the case and fighting back on this. You know,
Speaker 1: the rest of them, they get steam rolled. Oh yeah, Amnesty, sure, DOCTA, yeah, Dreamer, sure,
Speaker 1: they're just undocumented, they're not illegal. I mean, Rebublicans get
Speaker 1: steam rolled on this issue all the time. Trump doesn't
Speaker 1: get steam rolled on it. Play eleven. Our first duty
Speaker 1: and our highest loyalty is to the citizens of the
Speaker 1: United States. We want safety in our country. We want
Speaker 1: border security. We don't want people in our country that
Speaker 1: don't go through a process. We want people in our
Speaker 1: country based on merit, not based on a draw where
Speaker 1: other countries put their absolute worst than a bin. And
Speaker 1: they start drawing people, Well, you think they're gonna put
Speaker 1: their good ones. They don't put their good ones, they
Speaker 1: put their bad ones. And then when they commit crimes,
Speaker 1: were so surprised. Well, not rest until our border is secure,
Speaker 1: our citizens are safe and we finally end the immigration
Speaker 1: crisis once central all. We want safety in our country.
Speaker 1: We want strong borders. What part of what Donald Trump
Speaker 1: said there doesn't make perfect sense because I failed to
Speaker 1: I failed to see what he's saying that isn't not
Speaker 1: only sound but obvious. And he's he's they think he's
Speaker 1: a monster on this issue. George will vote for the
Speaker 1: Democrats because of Trump. Steve Schmidt, who was best known
Speaker 1: as the guy that brought us Sarah Pale and that
Speaker 1: disastrous elected Yeah, I mean it was a disaster. Okay,
Speaker 1: I know people like Sarah Pale and that's fine. So
Speaker 1: she's a lovely person. Not the right choice for vice president. Okay,
Speaker 1: sorry brought us that whole situation. But all you have
Speaker 1: to know is he's the only guy who's the HBO
Speaker 1: documentary or not documented HBO movie makes look good. So
Speaker 1: you know there's a problem when you're the only Republican
Speaker 1: in an HBO movie that looks good and is played
Speaker 1: by Woody Harrelson. Uh, there's something up. They like you.
Speaker 1: They they like you too much. On the other side,
Speaker 1: it's just it's just true. It's obvious. You've got these
Speaker 1: people that are saying I vote vote for the other
Speaker 1: side now because of Trump, and I sit here and
Speaker 1: I go Trump's young one is willing to speak honestly
Speaker 1: about what's really happening here at the border. And they'll say, oh,
Speaker 1: he's a liar because you know he got a number wrong,
Speaker 1: he said this, or he said that, you know he
Speaker 1: was changing his mind on that or And I say, well,
Speaker 1: on the most important questions, he seems to be the
Speaker 1: only one who gets it and the only one who
Speaker 1: will speak honestly about it. That matters a lot. Matters
Speaker 1: a lot to me. I think it should matter a
Speaker 1: lot to the whole country. But you know, we're fighting
Speaker 1: an uphill battle here. That is to be sure. One
Speaker 1: more thing. You get one of these parents, Steve Ronaback,
Speaker 1: who had some words about the president re Ember, this
Speaker 1: is somebody who lost a child to an illegal immigrant. Okay,
Speaker 1: his child has gone forever, not for a few hours,
Speaker 1: not didn't have nice enough toys to play with, gone forever, killed, murdered.
Speaker 1: Here's what Steve ron about had to say, Place six
Speaker 1: and uh, I want to thank you for that. To me,
Speaker 1: this is a sign of integrity. I wish some of
Speaker 1: our media had the same integrity as our president, our
Speaker 1: vice president, Director Home in all of you in law enforcement.
Speaker 1: I wish some of our media had the same integrity,
Speaker 1: and I want to thank all of you, especially our
Speaker 1: law enforcement, for what you do. Mr President, Mr Vice President,
Speaker 1: Thank you. Sixty thousand Americans since nine eleven have been
Speaker 1: killed by illegal aliens. This isn't a problem that's going away.
Speaker 1: It's getting bigger. Thank you, sixty three thou Americans. He says,
Speaker 1: that's a lot, folks, that's a lot lives, family shattered,
Speaker 1: lives taken away. But you know they do the jobs
Speaker 1: Americans won't do. So let's not talk about it. Okay.
Speaker 1: Thanks media, As they go back to their gated to
Speaker 1: states and this suburbs of d C or their Park
Speaker 1: Avenue Doorman apartments in New York City, they don't deal
Speaker 1: with this problem and they just pretend to care. Eight
Speaker 1: four buck. You've got thoughts on this one, eight four
Speaker 1: to five. We have much much more common stay right there.
Speaker 1: The FBI knows this. You should know it. To home.
Speaker 1: Title theft is one of the fastest growing crimes out there,
Speaker 1: and it is like credit card theft times ten, my friends,
Speaker 1: it is so much worse and I've been through credit
Speaker 1: card theft. Before you feel violet of there, imagine the
Speaker 1: bad guys. Instead of stealing a credit card from your
Speaker 1: your number, they get access to your home title information.
Speaker 1: They replace your name with an alias, and then they
Speaker 1: take out massive loans against the equity in your home
Speaker 1: and you get the payments and you don't know about
Speaker 1: this until the payment notices arrived. Folks, it can happen,
Speaker 1: it does happen. Protect yourself from this for just pennies
Speaker 1: a day, Home title Lock protects my most viable asset,
Speaker 1: my family home. Register now for a free analysis and
Speaker 1: discover if your home's title has been compromised. That's a
Speaker 1: sixty dollar value, totally free. Visit home title lock dot
Speaker 1: com again, that is home title lock dot com for
Speaker 1: a free analysis. We want to tell you a little
Speaker 1: bit today about Josh. He was brutally tortured, um strangled
Speaker 1: over and over. He was set on fire after death.
Speaker 1: His last hours were was brutal as and everyone is
Speaker 1: standing up here. None of our kids had a minute
Speaker 1: to say goodbye. We weren't lucky enough to be separated
Speaker 1: for five days or ten days, were separated permanently. Any
Speaker 1: time we want to see or be close to our kids.
Speaker 1: We go to the cemetery because that's where there are.
Speaker 1: We can never speak to him, we can't skype with them.
Speaker 1: And I want to thank you so much in this
Speaker 1: room for what you're doing to understand. You guys know
Speaker 1: the permanent separation. It's the media that won't share it
Speaker 1: with other people. Uh, it's permanent. We can never have
Speaker 1: him back on this this earth. Thankfully, I'll see him
Speaker 1: again in heaven. But I want to thank you Mr
Speaker 1: Trump and Vice President Trump for um, I mean Vice
Speaker 1: President Pence, for keeping their commitment to us. It's it's
Speaker 1: been ongoing, it continues on, and please understand there are
Speaker 1: so many more of us. And then what you see
Speaker 1: here are you here the other side? You'd never hear
Speaker 1: this side. These are the American citizens permanently separated from
Speaker 1: their loved ones, the word permanently being the word that
Speaker 1: you have to think about. Permanently. They're not separated for
Speaker 1: a day or two days. They are permanently separated because
Speaker 1: they were killed by criminal, illegal aliens. These are the
Speaker 1: families the media ignores, They don't talk about them. These
Speaker 1: are the stories that democrats and people that are weak
Speaker 1: on immigration. They don't want to discuss. They don't want
Speaker 1: to hear, they don't want to see. They don't want
Speaker 1: to talk about. No major networks and cameras to their
Speaker 1: homes or display the images of their incredible loved ones
Speaker 1: across the nightly news. They don't do that. They don't
Speaker 1: talk about the death and destruction caused by people that
Speaker 1: shouldn't be here, people that will continuously get into trouble
Speaker 1: and do bad things. Heart wrenching stuff, isn't it. You know,
Speaker 1: it really affects you when you hear it from these parents.
Speaker 1: But me, he didn't want to cover that. When was
Speaker 1: the last time you saw the the parents of a
Speaker 1: child lost to violence at the hands of illegal alien
Speaker 1: ms there team members on on a news network that
Speaker 1: wasn't Fox. I can't maybe it's happened. I've never seen it.
Speaker 1: I've never seen it. Mike hasn't seen it either. Morgan,
Speaker 1: You've been very patient down the Gulf Coast to Mississippi.
Speaker 1: Thanks for calling in, Hey, Buck feel high Field sigh.
Speaker 1: I'm a millennial and I really enjoy listening to you.
Speaker 1: First of all, I I with me when I work
Speaker 1: and it um I just this my first time ever
Speaker 1: calling in. But uh, I really wanted to touch on
Speaker 1: the theme of the left going completely out of their
Speaker 1: minds about this sake narrative of the child separations and everything. Um,
Speaker 1: I actually got an email. My my aunt is an
Speaker 1: elitist left college professor, and I actually got an email
Speaker 1: from her. I worked as a team stress and an artist.
Speaker 1: And what's funny is she actually contacted me asking me
Speaker 1: to create a costume for a protests that she was
Speaker 1: going to. And she actually wanted me to make the
Speaker 1: biblical you know, fat cloth and ashes for her to wear.
Speaker 1: And um, she went on to life basically just say that,
Speaker 1: you know, the usual line about how Trump is hitler,
Speaker 1: and you know, she she knows that I'm a Trump supporter,
Speaker 1: and we've purposely never talked about politics because I just
Speaker 1: didn't want to go there because I know, you know,
Speaker 1: I know what she believes, and I didn't want to
Speaker 1: be rude to her. But it's it's true what you're
Speaker 1: saying about. It's not about just disagreeing with your politics.
Speaker 1: It's about casting you as a bad person. M Yep,
Speaker 1: that's the that is the that's the tactic, that's the narrative. Yeah, exactly.
Speaker 1: It's very it's it's very destructive by the way. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's actually over enough time. It really dehumanizes the other
Speaker 1: side of a of a political disagreement. This is not
Speaker 1: good stuff. Right when you start saying that people are
Speaker 1: bad people because they disagree with you, I reserve that
Speaker 1: through very very few subjects. Right, if people think that
Speaker 1: we should have higher taxes in a bigger social welfare state,
Speaker 1: I say they're wrong. I don't say they're bad. They
Speaker 1: say I'm bad for opposing it though. That's the problem. Yeah, well,
Speaker 1: thank you so much Morgan for calling in. I appreciate
Speaker 1: the chance to get the child they shields high. Dr Rick.
Speaker 1: We got about a minute and change. But I want
Speaker 1: to get your diagnosis of the current craziness. Um. I
Speaker 1: think it is apt. I think it's absolutely purposeful, trying
Speaker 1: to manipulate people's impressions. I think this is you know,
Speaker 1: almost could be sty ops. It is that concerning. They
Speaker 1: are ginning up violence against us. It's not that we're
Speaker 1: thinking correctly. We're evil to them. And this is very concerning. Doc.
Speaker 1: How do you how do you actually test I mean,
Speaker 1: what what what's the what are the standards for knowing
Speaker 1: if someone's actually delusional, Like, how do you how do
Speaker 1: you walk them through to figure out if someone's delusional?
Speaker 1: Now you realize this is this is a mass delusion
Speaker 1: fully adu um with with people in my field and others.
Speaker 1: I mean, basically, it is a lack of contact for reality.
Speaker 1: But you know, I use a tongue in cheek because
Speaker 1: these folks don't have the facts. They're being manipulated and
Speaker 1: you can only operate and emote to the facts at hand.
Speaker 1: And and the press over and over again, this gaslighting
Speaker 1: of of absolute errors. Um, and no one is except
Speaker 1: for Trump. And by the way, I think people like
Speaker 1: George Will, they're like the v she government, Um, this is,
Speaker 1: this is it would be absolutely asymmetrical warfare if it
Speaker 1: weren't for Trump. We need to bump up our game.
Speaker 1: I look, I think you're right man, I'm Trump. Trumps
Speaker 1: has been incredible so far and the country is doing well.
Speaker 1: This is so amazing. These people are so angry at Trump.
Speaker 1: I'm like, they hate all the all the prosperity, the
Speaker 1: lack of unnecessary wars and and you know, well what's
Speaker 1: the big problem. I mean, it's like people hate being
Speaker 1: happy or something I don't know. Dr Rick, good to
Speaker 1: talk to you, man. Thank you all right, see much
Speaker 1: more coming. Um. Please do download the Freedom Hume with
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton podcast. By the way, if you haven't already
Speaker 1: going the Apple Store, type search in the search the
Speaker 1: Freedom Hunt. Check it out. White House Senior advisor Stephen Miller,
Speaker 1: congressman reportedly called fascist when he was out at dinner
Speaker 1: Homeland Security Secretary Nielsen accosted while eating out this week,
Speaker 1: and then speaking of crafts behavior. Actor Peter Fonda tweeted
Speaker 1: it in part, I mean, it's horrible to even read this, Congressman.
Speaker 1: We should rip Baron Trump from his mother's arms and
Speaker 1: put him in a cage with pedophiles and see if
Speaker 1: mother will stand up against the giant a hole she
Speaker 1: is married to. And then Robert de Niro is the
Speaker 1: F word to refer to the President of the United
Speaker 1: States of the Tony Awards. I mean, stuff is vile
Speaker 1: our Democrats and the opposition to Trump suping too low,
Speaker 1: too well, Aaron. When you separate a baby from its
Speaker 1: breastfeeding mother and put that child in a cage, you're
Speaker 1: going to see emotion. The president has to be, you know,
Speaker 1: confronted about what he's doing. He has shown no empathy
Speaker 1: at all on this. The only reason he changed the
Speaker 1: policy errand is because it was unpopular, not because it
Speaker 1: was the wrong thing to do. And it seems that
Speaker 1: getting the American people to speak up, call their Congress,
Speaker 1: their members of Congress, tweet, show up at rallies, that's
Speaker 1: the only thing that gets as President's attention. If so,
Speaker 1: that's a congressman who's basically saying that all the disgusting
Speaker 1: stuff that Democrats have been doing the last week or
Speaker 1: so kind of justified because you know Trump. Isn't it
Speaker 1: interesting that they don't seem to understand that you can't
Speaker 1: have no standards and then insist that others have standards.
Speaker 1: That doesn't work. You can't call for decency when you
Speaker 1: yourself are being consistently completely indecent. That's what's going on here.
Speaker 1: You know, calling Stephen Miller a fascist when he's trying
Speaker 1: to have dinner is not helping anyone or anything. It
Speaker 1: just reminds Stephen Miller that the opposition is a bunch
Speaker 1: of lunatics, you know, and I don't even do we
Speaker 1: We don't have the audio of Kirsten Nielsen outside the house,
Speaker 1: do we because they they've they've gathered, they gathered together
Speaker 1: outside of Kirsten Nielsen of DHS, she's a secretary. They
Speaker 1: got protesters outside of her house and they're blasting the
Speaker 1: sound of crying babies, you know, essentially doing like a
Speaker 1: psychological terror operation against her. I mean, this is this
Speaker 1: is really uh, it's just gross stuff that we're seeing.
Speaker 1: It's really unacceptable. And the fact that they don't seem
Speaker 1: to uh, they don't seem to care about this, and
Speaker 1: just the amount of nastiness that they will justify at
Speaker 1: this point now is just crazy to me. It's just crazy. Um,
Speaker 1: you know, so I'm really one. Oh we do have
Speaker 1: oh yeah, here Ted Lou, Representative Lou. He's out there.
Speaker 1: He's trying to make a big name for himself off
Speaker 1: of this whole manufactured crisis. Play thirteen. Imagine being ripped
Speaker 1: away from your mother or father and not knowing if
Speaker 1: you're ever going to see them again, and then being
Speaker 1: placed in a detention facility with strangers. Must that sound
Speaker 1: like the Gentleman will suspend for one reason, Madam Speaker,
Speaker 1: The gentleman is in breach of the quorum. Cite the
Speaker 1: rule of Adam Speaker Rules seventeen of the House. The
Speaker 1: gentleman will suspend you. So he's breaking House rules, Congressman
Speaker 1: lou so he can stand on the on the floor
Speaker 1: of the House of Representatives and play audio of babies crying.
Speaker 1: But this is this is the new Democrat tactic. I've
Speaker 1: been saying that use kids, use kids as a political
Speaker 1: weapon too. Pray And this is what bothers me about
Speaker 1: so much. To pray upon the goodwill and kindness and
Speaker 1: decency of the other side and use it against them.
Speaker 1: It's one of the favorite things of the of the
Speaker 1: progressive left. Right, you know, don't you want to help
Speaker 1: poor people? Let everybody camp out on the street in
Speaker 1: front of your house, Try to walk your eight year
Speaker 1: old to school while guys are urinating on the street
Speaker 1: in front of them, and you know, and uh, engaging
Speaker 1: in all kinds of drug use and gross behavior. Right,
Speaker 1: But but don't you care about poor people? Well? Wait, yeah,
Speaker 1: I care about poor people. But do I have to
Speaker 1: Am I not allowed to be upset about the open
Speaker 1: air homeless shelter outside of my house? Oh no, you're
Speaker 1: so mean, You're This is what they do. This is
Speaker 1: what they This is just who they are, folks. This
Speaker 1: is what the ideology of the Democrat Party has become.
Speaker 1: This isn't like we're arguing over like what the perfect
Speaker 1: marginal tax rate is, or you know, how how much
Speaker 1: healthcare the government should subsidize for retirees or something. No, no, no,
Speaker 1: Well we have split apart culturally in a way that
Speaker 1: I just don't think. I don't know, I don't think
Speaker 1: that this is sustainable over the long term. I really
Speaker 1: start to worry about this because when you have such
Speaker 1: an acceptance of using children as a as a political
Speaker 1: weapon in this way. We saw this with the parklandids.
Speaker 1: Now we're seeing it with the babies at the border.
Speaker 1: And the dishonesty that's around all of this is all
Speaker 1: premised on I guess we don't care about kids. I guess,
Speaker 1: you know, we're not nice the way that they're nice,
Speaker 1: you know, the way the Democrats are nice, and and
Speaker 1: therefore we're also kind of evil. We must be sort
Speaker 1: of monsters. So they should just be terrible to us
Speaker 1: in public, and they should shout fascist and shame at
Speaker 1: us and park outside of our homes and create disturbances,
Speaker 1: and well, you know what about Kirsten Nielsen's family. By
Speaker 1: the way, is she allowed to She's she's allowed no
Speaker 1: peace and quiet for being a government employee. Us is
Speaker 1: doing her job. No, By the way, I told you,
Speaker 1: I've talked to people. I've seen a lot of commentary
Speaker 1: about this. They're like, not, well, children are crying at
Speaker 1: the border. I'm like, what about the children were crying
Speaker 1: at the border in the Obama administration, none of this
Speaker 1: was happening. I mean that thing I played for you
Speaker 1: yesterday with that well, who was that senator from Wisconsin?
Speaker 1: Just a complete, complete imbecile. I can't remember what her
Speaker 1: name is right now the top of my head, but
Speaker 1: you know where she gets asked and did you care
Speaker 1: about this? Under Obama? You know nothing, nothing, because they
Speaker 1: don't have answers for this. They don't have they don't
Speaker 1: have a reasoned argument. They just want to play audio
Speaker 1: of children crying and say that anyone who doesn't agree
Speaker 1: with them is mean, as terrible, as nasty. You know,
Speaker 1: I know others have been saying this to folks. We've
Speaker 1: already had violence out there as a result of the
Speaker 1: climate that's been created by the media on this stuff,
Speaker 1: by the media, and you've got you know, Swallwell, this
Speaker 1: this member of Congress, he's trying to become a hashtag
Speaker 1: resistance hero. And you know what what is not justifiable
Speaker 1: in their eyes in the left view, When you when
Speaker 1: it's all about traumatized children, you know what are they
Speaker 1: not willing to do? You start asking that question? Gets
Speaker 1: pretty scary? You know? Are they They're willing to protest? Fine,
Speaker 1: They're willing to shout people down in public who haven't
Speaker 1: done anything them. Not fine. They're willing to humiliate people
Speaker 1: in front of their families in public. Not fine. They're
Speaker 1: willing to go to people's homes and wait outside and
Speaker 1: try to intimidate them with their families. No, that's not fine.
Speaker 1: Doing to write things, in the case of Peter Fonda,
Speaker 1: that are completely disgusting. And if if a conservative, and
Speaker 1: if anyone on the right had written anything like Fonda
Speaker 1: did about a member of Obama's family, that person not
Speaker 1: only would never work in media again, I don't think
Speaker 1: they'd be employable anywhere. Uh. But the the double standard
Speaker 1: is is obvious to all of us. We see this
Speaker 1: happening all the time, and I just get so sick
Speaker 1: of the moral blackmail. Right, can't they just can't the
Speaker 1: left just make an argument without it being you know,
Speaker 1: w are you so mean? W are you so terrible?
Speaker 1: Why don't you care about dead children? Why don't you
Speaker 1: care about traumatized children? Like, of course we care about
Speaker 1: traumatized children and dead children. Why do you use them
Speaker 1: as props? Why don't you address the fact that your
Speaker 1: stupid policies, like the Obama administrations, Yeah, show up with
Speaker 1: a kid, show up with a kid. You know, we'll
Speaker 1: let you in. That's a really, really bad idea, And
Speaker 1: as we've been discussing here, put kids in danger. In fact,
Speaker 1: you could make a very you could make a very
Speaker 1: honest and straightforward case that because of the Obama administration's
Speaker 1: decisions at the border when it came to unaccompanied miners,
Speaker 1: kids probably died. Do we do we ever talk about
Speaker 1: the blood on the hands of the Obama administration, because
Speaker 1: we know there have been kids that have died from
Speaker 1: exposure in the desert, kids have been kidnapped, kids have
Speaker 1: been and by the way, we don't even we're just
Speaker 1: going based on what we what's been reported. I've been,
Speaker 1: trust me, there's all kinds of stuff that's happened that
Speaker 1: we never even get to know about. But they set
Speaker 1: up this incentive, and what it really was was an
Speaker 1: incentive for adults to exploit children, the adults being these
Speaker 1: asylum seekers. I by the way, that's not even their
Speaker 1: illegal aliens. They're not really asylum seekers, okay, all all
Speaker 1: that they've done. And by the way, that's another way
Speaker 1: of exploiting our good will and good intentions, saying oh,
Speaker 1: I'm here for asylum. No, just because your country is
Speaker 1: crappy doesn't mean you get to claim asylum. That's just
Speaker 1: that's not how it works. There are a lot of
Speaker 1: crappy countries in the world, and if everybody from a
Speaker 1: crappy country gets to claim asylum in this country, this
Speaker 1: country will eventually also be a crappy country because our
Speaker 1: political union, our political culture, will over time dissolve. It's unsustainable.
Speaker 1: If people just show up break the law, it doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: I don't care. And we have no shared history of
Speaker 1: of language, no shared history of rule of law, no
Speaker 1: shared history of American nous man. It's been it's just
Speaker 1: been a week of week of out and out propaganda
Speaker 1: from the life. It really has, and I am frustrated
Speaker 1: and how effective they've been in getting us off that
Speaker 1: i G report. You know, I talked about the IG
Speaker 1: Report of fair amount here, but that the deep state,
Speaker 1: my friends, is real. It is. It has proven. Now, Okay,
Speaker 1: you have the most powerful people of the Department of
Speaker 1: Justice and the FBI working for Hillary and against Trump
Speaker 1: during an election. That's what happened. And that narrative somehow,
Speaker 1: it doesn't really you know, it hasn't really gotten out there.
Speaker 1: It's been suppressed, it's been glossed over. And this is
Speaker 1: the problem Democrats, because they have no scruples. They're really
Speaker 1: good at propaganda because they'll say anything that's useful to
Speaker 1: them and then they'll just move on to something else
Speaker 1: the next day. They managed to do a lot of
Speaker 1: brainwashing of the public. We moved on that from that
Speaker 1: IG report quick so we could talk about this crisis
Speaker 1: that's been largely manufactured and that has also involved a
Speaker 1: lot of half truth and exaggeration, not the least of
Speaker 1: which is we've because we've been discussing, is that some
Speaker 1: of the imagery that's at the very forefront of this
Speaker 1: entire movement, some of the imagery is if not fake,
Speaker 1: at least misleading. It's misleading. See, this is what One
Speaker 1: of the things that fake news has been doing more
Speaker 1: and more of now is don't go with all out fabrication,
Speaker 1: because you have to retract stories that looks bad, even
Speaker 1: for the fake news, even for CNN. Go with misleading things,
Speaker 1: you know, go with oh it's trying, like the whole
Speaker 1: border situation as Trump's fault. I saw that on CNE
Speaker 1: on this week. You know, that was a in the
Speaker 1: in the bottom of the screen. You know, well, you know,
Speaker 1: Trump reversing his bad policy was basically what they were saying.
Speaker 1: I forget what the exact wording was, and I mean,
Speaker 1: is that can you prove it They're completely wrong on that. No,
Speaker 1: But the point is that they're not letting anybody figure
Speaker 1: out that the Obama administration was the one that actually
Speaker 1: set in motion this chain of of events that led
Speaker 1: to these kids seeking asylum, and just the whole situation
Speaker 1: is has been so misreported and it's so the whole
Speaker 1: thing is so dishonest. It really made me angry. Immigration though,
Speaker 1: we there is an institutional media bias towards lying when
Speaker 1: it comes to immigration. This is what they do there
Speaker 1: their neutral position on immigration or or they're just neutral
Speaker 1: reporting line is used words that are misleading, use falsehoods,
Speaker 1: just lie your butts off. That's what the media does
Speaker 1: on this topic. Alright, We actually have a a guest
Speaker 1: join us a moment who is a sponsor of the
Speaker 1: show and tell us about his book. So stay with
Speaker 1: me for that. Hey, team, you know that we have
Speaker 1: been talking to you about a wonderful sponsor here on
Speaker 1: the show, and it's actually a novel. The novel a
Speaker 1: New Biss that is the latest work of Eric Anderson,
Speaker 1: who is a former undercover US intelligence agent. He has
Speaker 1: joined us now live here on the phone to talk
Speaker 1: to us about his opus. Eric. Great to have you man,
Speaker 1: Thanks for calling in. Good to be on Buck. I
Speaker 1: appreciate your time. So first, just tell me a little
Speaker 1: bit about your background, because I think you may be
Speaker 1: my my my brother from another mother, so to speak,
Speaker 1: in terms of what we've done in life. Tell me
Speaker 1: where you come from. You know what I chuck out.
Speaker 1: I tell people I'm a failed academic. I finished my
Speaker 1: doctorate at the University of Missouri, taught for a couple
Speaker 1: of years and walked out the door. And when I
Speaker 1: walked out the door, the Air Force hired me to
Speaker 1: be an intelligence officer. And after ten years of active duty,
Speaker 1: I get picked up by the intelligence community in Washington,
Speaker 1: d C. And spent the last fourteen years holding hands
Speaker 1: with them in various guises. So I've had an interesting
Speaker 1: career to say, at least, all right, sounds interesting to
Speaker 1: me for sure. So tell me a bit about this
Speaker 1: book A Nubis, which we've been talking about on the show. Here,
Speaker 1: you've got a president's dad, you got isis attacking? Tell
Speaker 1: me a bit about the story, and then we'll talk
Speaker 1: about how you came up with it. What I'm trying
Speaker 1: to do is push people into thinking about ISIS and
Speaker 1: the way that it evolves outside the standard newspaper dialogue
Speaker 1: that we get where it's we've defeated them, they're on
Speaker 1: the run, they're going out of Syria, and therefore they
Speaker 1: won't be problem any longer. We win. And what I'm
Speaker 1: doing insteady is suggesting that we have something that's morphing
Speaker 1: into what I would call a stage four cancer, and
Speaker 1: that is it is spread throughout the globe, is immediately
Speaker 1: contactable via the Internet and can be used to target
Speaker 1: anything from the Washington Mall to the cities of Paris,
Speaker 1: Berlin and bottom Uh and so you have a very
Speaker 1: very unpleasant situation on your hands. What do you think
Speaker 1: about the state of Isis today? If I may ask,
Speaker 1: are you feel like it's going to rebound soon? Or
Speaker 1: you think that we've got it pretty well suppressed right
Speaker 1: now into the Trump administration, I think that the proper
Speaker 1: administration is living in delusion if he believes that they've
Speaker 1: got Isis at hand. You know that the comment that
Speaker 1: I make with people is you have almost an endless
Speaker 1: recruiting potential here, and that you have, you know, the
Speaker 1: change refer to their hundred years of humiliation from the
Speaker 1: Opium Wars till the time that Mile takes over the country.
Speaker 1: In the Islamic faith, I would argue is suffered a
Speaker 1: thousand years of humiliation starting with the Crusades through this
Speaker 1: present day, and it makes for ripe recruiting materials. And
Speaker 1: and there are a fair number of young men and
Speaker 1: young women who have nothing else to do but to
Speaker 1: go forth and try to bring honor back to their
Speaker 1: their faith. And this is where I stands. So while
Speaker 1: we can claim that we've bombed them into a Bolivian
Speaker 1: in Broca, in Syria, we we certainly have not eliminated
Speaker 1: all the various talent pools that they are sitting out there,
Speaker 1: who have been recruited, have been trained, and are just
Speaker 1: simply being waited told execute a mission. Our folks gonna
Speaker 1: learn a lot about things that are actually going on
Speaker 1: if they read a Nubis. What do you want people
Speaker 1: to take away from your work? What I want people
Speaker 1: to take away from the work is one of This
Speaker 1: isn't shades of black and white. This is five shades
Speaker 1: of gray. Uh. And I've I've spent a lot of
Speaker 1: time going through for instance, Mr bagh Daddy, who is
Speaker 1: the caliph keeper him, the man who is the head
Speaker 1: of isis is best we know and self proclaimed that.
Speaker 1: But it's not because he's even incarnate, but rather because
Speaker 1: he has his own objectives that he seeks to accomplish
Speaker 1: and he believes that he's doing so in an honorable manner.
Speaker 1: And if it leaves us wanting, that's something you need
Speaker 1: to take into consideration. And we are in some senses
Speaker 1: we are no better. We we play the game with
Speaker 1: an equal affinity for hardball. Uh. And so what we
Speaker 1: can destroy from five thousand feet in the area flying
Speaker 1: a drone out of Idaho or out of the location
Speaker 1: just north of so or Las Vegas. The the Isis
Speaker 1: continuum can accomplish by setting loose. It's do you know
Speaker 1: how the warriors any places on the planet? All right?
Speaker 1: Our sponsor this our folks, Anubis the novel. You can
Speaker 1: check it out. We have the author we just joined
Speaker 1: us now, Eric Anderson. Anubis available on Amazon dot com
Speaker 1: or at done books dot com. Um, Eric, thank you
Speaker 1: for stopping by the hut. No I appreciate it. Thanks
Speaker 1: so much. Game our three coming up. If you want
Speaker 1: to succeed in business, and you want to protect yourself
Speaker 1: from making bad decisions that can really hurt your bottom line,
Speaker 1: you need the best info possible about new hires, about
Speaker 1: prospective tenants, about possible business partners. You need background investigations
Speaker 1: and vetting. You can count on that you can trust.
Speaker 1: Global Verification Network can handle all of your need. They
Speaker 1: work with startup companies all the way up to the
Speaker 1: biggest companies in the country. They're also independently certified as
Speaker 1: a veteran owned small business federally certified as a veteran
Speaker 1: owned Small business as well. You should check them out,
Speaker 1: my friends. You will see that the quality of service
Speaker 1: and their protection of your data and the way they
Speaker 1: handle their cases is the best in the industry. Go
Speaker 1: to my GVN dot com. That's my GVN dot com
Speaker 1: or called eight seven seven six nine, that's eight seven
Speaker 1: seven six nine five one one seven nine. Pretty big
Speaker 1: Supreme Court decision came down today, folks. It's going to affect.
Speaker 1: One of those things I've been telling you about for
Speaker 1: quite a while has to do with can they track
Speaker 1: your GPS locational information based on where your phone is
Speaker 1: pinging off of a cell tower? And as of now,
Speaker 1: by a five four decision, turns out that Supreme Court
Speaker 1: says no. In fact, it can't just be a a
Speaker 1: reasonable suspicion. Sometimes they have different terminology for this, but
Speaker 1: lower than probable costs. It means that they they can't
Speaker 1: just say, you know, we'd like to know where this
Speaker 1: person was, so we can know where this person was,
Speaker 1: because that had been the law enforcement standard previously. Now
Speaker 1: I'm gonna tell you something. My friends in law enforcement
Speaker 1: and I worked alongside some of them for a period
Speaker 1: at the m y p D on kunter terrorism specific cases,
Speaker 1: but similar tactics are often used for counter terrorism cases,
Speaker 1: as you see on big drug cases, major white collar
Speaker 1: conspiracies even Uh, what ended up happening was that, or
Speaker 1: what ends up happening is that they will bring somebody
Speaker 1: in and they want to know who's gonna lie to them.
Speaker 1: They want to know who is going to lie. And
Speaker 1: a great way to do that is just to test
Speaker 1: somebody in. By the way, I'm not giving away anything here,
Speaker 1: r especially because they can't do this anymore without a warrant. Uh,
Speaker 1: this is this is very very well known. But they
Speaker 1: can sit you down and say, you know, so where
Speaker 1: were you Tuesday night? We're just wondering if you can
Speaker 1: help us put where this other guy is, you know,
Speaker 1: And so they make it seem like you're not really
Speaker 1: under suspicion. So hey, can you tell us where in
Speaker 1: the last Tuesday did you see Bob at this place?
Speaker 1: Or or were you at home? And you go, oh, no,
Speaker 1: I didn't see Bob because it's all about him, right,
Speaker 1: I was at home. They know you weren't at home.
Speaker 1: They've already pulled your location on from A and the
Speaker 1: moment that they know that you lie about it, then
Speaker 1: then then they just drill down from there. Then they
Speaker 1: know to focus resources on you didn't get you, so
Speaker 1: it's a really use it's a really useful tool for
Speaker 1: law enforcement to have this. But in our digital era,
Speaker 1: with all the privacy concerns that exist, they decided that
Speaker 1: the Supreme War decided with Roberts joining the Liberals on
Speaker 1: the court. The Conservatives actually were opposed to this one.
Speaker 1: These side you actually need to get a warrant to
Speaker 1: track someone's phone. And I gotta tell you, I think
Speaker 1: that the I think that the pendulum swinging back in
Speaker 1: the direction of privacy is generally a good thing. Um.
Speaker 1: I I tend to be someone who feels like there's
Speaker 1: way too much information on all of us that's out there,
Speaker 1: and it's now become too accessible for law enforcement. And
Speaker 1: when you think back to the Founding and how the
Speaker 1: Founders viewed things like general warrants, which you know, you
Speaker 1: could have taken the position with the British under the
Speaker 1: British Crown. What's the problem to general war. They're just
Speaker 1: gonna come and look at your stuff. If you're not
Speaker 1: breaking a loll there's no there's no issue, right, But
Speaker 1: a general warrant was particularly for customs houses in Boston
Speaker 1: and the colonies. They can has looked through all your stuff,
Speaker 1: they can just do a fishing expedition. So that was
Speaker 1: one of the main beefs that we had with the
Speaker 1: Brits when we decided to tell King George to send
Speaker 1: himself packing where we sent him packing. Uh, thanks g W. Anyway,
Speaker 1: this is I think a good thing, and it's one
Speaker 1: of these rare times when I when I feel like
Speaker 1: I'm I'm actually with the actually agreeing. Well, Roberts went
Speaker 1: with me on this one, but the Libs we're the
Speaker 1: ones that that I think agree with me, you know,
Speaker 1: because we we want there to be certain hurdles in
Speaker 1: place for tracking people. And you know, when you start
Speaker 1: to think think about it this way, given what we've
Speaker 1: seen with the FBI, and given what we've also found
Speaker 1: out about the you know, the I R S. This
Speaker 1: whole McCain's McCain staffer who said, you know, I want
Speaker 1: you do well, he wanted the I r S, in
Speaker 1: a meeting with the I R S to just annihilate
Speaker 1: all these basically tea party groups, right, these political groups
Speaker 1: that had that sprung up five oh one C three's
Speaker 1: And don't you want there to be greater hurdles for
Speaker 1: the use of law enforcement power against you? I think,
Speaker 1: or at least some pretty secure hurdles in place for
Speaker 1: the use of law enforcement power against you. I just
Speaker 1: think that's a good idea. I think that it's become
Speaker 1: far too easy to get way too much information on
Speaker 1: all of us. I know some of you're gonna disagree
Speaker 1: with me on this, and I look, I understand that
Speaker 1: there is a very very useful um a very very
Speaker 1: useful law enforcement tool. As I was saying to you,
Speaker 1: it's just one of the easiest things ever. All you
Speaker 1: have to do is figure out who's lying to you,
Speaker 1: and then you know you've got something and if when
Speaker 1: you can find out when someone's Oh and by the way,
Speaker 1: you also can figure out everyone who's in the area.
Speaker 1: So someone get shot somewhere, you know you can do
Speaker 1: pull all the phone data who was near there, and
Speaker 1: you you know, you be actually you wouldn't be surprised.
Speaker 1: A lot of people that are willing to shoot people, uh,
Speaker 1: don't leave their phones at home. They they're they don't
Speaker 1: they don't think this one through. You know, they're not.
Speaker 1: They're not highly trained assassins. And so you know, you
Speaker 1: could just pull the phone data for where when the
Speaker 1: shooting was and you got a pretty good sense of
Speaker 1: who's around. By the way, that's how this happened. They
Speaker 1: got this guy on armed robberies. I think the one
Speaker 1: was in Ohio and the other one was in another state,
Speaker 1: and they were just pulling phone data and they tracked
Speaker 1: him down. So they look it's but now you're gonna say, Okay, well,
Speaker 1: can they get a warrant for the phone data in
Speaker 1: area and drill down from there? I mean, I think
Speaker 1: that there are ways now to still they're still gonna
Speaker 1: use the technology. And I would note for for emergency situations,
Speaker 1: the abduction of a child, a life or debt situation,
Speaker 1: they can they still can just pull the phone data
Speaker 1: so that stays in place. This is just for investigatory purposes.
Speaker 1: This is still and so that's why it really just
Speaker 1: means there's another another check on the one. Uh, you know,
Speaker 1: another check on this one. So that's something I think
Speaker 1: is good. Here's from the the Chief Justice Roberts here
Speaker 1: speaking or not speaking writing on this one. Quote a person.
Speaker 1: This is from the majority opinion Carpenter of United States.
Speaker 1: A person does not surrender all Fourth the Amendment protection
Speaker 1: by venturing into the public sphere to the contrary, what
Speaker 1: one seeks to preserve as private, even in an area
Speaker 1: accessible to the public, may be constitutionally protected. A majority
Speaker 1: of the court has already recognized that individuals have a
Speaker 1: reasonable expectation of privacy in the whole of their physical movements.
Speaker 1: Prior to the digital age, law enforcement might have pursued
Speaker 1: as suspect for a brief stretch, but doing so for
Speaker 1: any extended period of time was difficult and costly, and
Speaker 1: therefore rarely undertaken. For that reason, society's expectation has been
Speaker 1: that law enforcement agents and others would not, and indeed,
Speaker 1: in the main simply could not, secretly monitor and catalog
Speaker 1: every single movement of an individual's car for a very
Speaker 1: long period. UH. Allowing government access to sell site records
Speaker 1: contravenes that expectations. Yep, I agree with Roberts here. I
Speaker 1: think it's I think it's the right move because this
Speaker 1: just means that the government can know where you are
Speaker 1: all the time for all reasons. By the way, don't
Speaker 1: think they're just gonna use this to stop kidnappings and
Speaker 1: robberies and murders. Oh no, you know who else could
Speaker 1: use this information? I r S what states were you
Speaker 1: doing business in Yeah, you say, buck, but I have
Speaker 1: a lot of the I R s well, of course,
Speaker 1: and neither do I. But do you know what the
Speaker 1: thing with the I R s is? They can pull information.
Speaker 1: They can make your life miserable. And I know people
Speaker 1: they've done this too, And just keep having you prove
Speaker 1: where were you? Where were you when you did this?
Speaker 1: Were you in this state or that state? You give
Speaker 1: them more information where you in this state or that state?
Speaker 1: You get, the more information they can pull sell side
Speaker 1: records that make your life difficult. You know. It's just
Speaker 1: there should be a higher level of scrutiny for being
Speaker 1: able to know every movement, which is what cell tower
Speaker 1: records allow, every movement that a person in gage in.
Speaker 1: So I think it's a good thing. It's a good thing.
Speaker 1: It's gonna change stuf though. By the way, you know,
Speaker 1: they used to be able to, on reasonable suspicion, get
Speaker 1: your email if it was older than ninety days too.
Speaker 1: I tell people that, and their their minds are always blown.
Speaker 1: They could get your emails, folks, because older than ninety
Speaker 1: days weren't protected. So you have to update these digital
Speaker 1: privacies or else there are no digital There is no
Speaker 1: digital privacy. So you know, I think, here we go
Speaker 1: a little victory for a little victory for personal liberty,
Speaker 1: if I may say, So, there you go exciting stuff.
Speaker 1: Uh so, So we've got that going for us. I
Speaker 1: got a lot more coming your way. Team, We're gonna
Speaker 1: talk about Mick mulvaney and budgets. But it's gonna be fun.
Speaker 1: Mick goes wild. He's in fuego after this break. I've
Speaker 1: just got some new nyline apparel coming in next week.
Speaker 1: I'm very excited to wear it around the office here
Speaker 1: and show people that I not just support a great
Speaker 1: veteran owned and operated company, but also like to show
Speaker 1: a little bit of pro America flare around the office.
Speaker 1: Nine Line Apparel makes fantastic gear. It is a patriotic
Speaker 1: lifestyle brand for all of your T shirts and hoodies
Speaker 1: and polos and whatever gear you want. Check out nine Line.
Speaker 1: Get it from them. It is top quality. It's done
Speaker 1: here in the States, and they're also taking stands on
Speaker 1: issues with their designs and with their company motto that
Speaker 1: will be in line with so much of what you
Speaker 1: believe and so much of what you care about. Visit
Speaker 1: nine Line Apparel dot com. Use a coupon code buck
Speaker 1: to zero to save off again nine and I n
Speaker 1: e Line apparel dot Com coupon code buck twenty to
Speaker 1: save twenty percent off your next order. Check it out.
Speaker 1: One of my favorite people in this administration is Mick mulvaney.
Speaker 1: That guy, he is like a numbers super nerd. You know,
Speaker 1: he really gets into he gets fired up over trying
Speaker 1: to just trim the budget here and there. It's it's
Speaker 1: good stuff, I gotta say. Usually I would think the
Speaker 1: guy who's in charge of O m B would be
Speaker 1: among the most boring human beings on the planet. Like
Speaker 1: there was a there was a movie made in France
Speaker 1: many years ago, and it was all it was based
Speaker 1: on who could bring the most boring guests to a
Speaker 1: dinner and and it turned into a competition who could
Speaker 1: bring the most boring person to this dinner party. And
Speaker 1: then I think they tried to make they made it
Speaker 1: an American remakeup it called Dinner for Schmucks later on,
Speaker 1: which was not um not good from what I recall
Speaker 1: seeing a little bit of an HBO. Anyway, mulvaney would
Speaker 1: not be invited to the boring dinner because he's actually
Speaker 1: he's actually got he's got some game. When he's talking
Speaker 1: about numbers, rolling up his sleeves, putting on the green
Speaker 1: ice shade, looking into all of it. You know he's
Speaker 1: he's a fun dude. He he talked today in front
Speaker 1: of they had a Drain the Swamp Cabinet meeting. I
Speaker 1: mean that he even called it that, and he went
Speaker 1: on a tear about government regulation and just how crazy
Speaker 1: it is that I think you could only describe as epic.
Speaker 1: Play four teen. Please, Mr President, of a lot of
Speaker 1: folks around this table have worked a long time, almost
Speaker 1: says huge, look over, uh, to show you what's to
Speaker 1: to get you where you are today at this meeting.
Speaker 1: I call this the Drain the Swamp Cabinet meeting. I
Speaker 1: know we talked about that during the campaign, you've talked
Speaker 1: about it since you've been here today as we're introducing
Speaker 1: the actual actions that follow up on those words. Now,
Speaker 1: the other way around, I always get these backwards. If
Speaker 1: you make a cheese pizza, it's governed by the Food
Speaker 1: and Drug Administration. If you put a pepperoni on it,
Speaker 1: that's governed by the U. S d A. If you
Speaker 1: have a chicken, it's governed by the U. S d A.
Speaker 1: If that chicken lays an egg, it's governed by the FDA.
Speaker 1: But if you break the egg and make it into
Speaker 1: an omelet, that is now covered again by the U. S.
Speaker 1: D A. If you have an open faced roast beef sandwich,
Speaker 1: that's one or the other. But you put it put
Speaker 1: the bread on top of it, it's the other one.
Speaker 1: The hot dog. The hot dog meat is governed by one.
Speaker 1: You put it in a bunte's governed by another. One
Speaker 1: of my favorites. If you have a salt water fish,
Speaker 1: you have a salmon, and it's in the ocean, it's
Speaker 1: governed by the Department of Commerce. Once it swims up river,
Speaker 1: it's governed by the Department of Interior. And to get
Speaker 1: there it has to go up a fish ladder governed
Speaker 1: by the US Army Corps of Engineers. Um, this is stupid.
Speaker 1: This is stupid. I like it. I like it. You know,
Speaker 1: he's dropping and dropping knowledge bombs about pepperoni pizzas and
Speaker 1: whether cheese pizza is you know, all these different departments,
Speaker 1: the Army Corps Engineers and their role in the lives
Speaker 1: of migratory salmon. You know all this stuff that's he
Speaker 1: but he's illustrating the point. Right, you have all these
Speaker 1: different government agencies. So there's this budget. The people get
Speaker 1: bored your buckets Friday, you're talking abou budget. Yeah, I'm
Speaker 1: talking about the budget because you look at all these
Speaker 1: government agencies and the the knee jerk reaction you get
Speaker 1: from from the left, from Democrats anytime you talk about
Speaker 1: even streamlining agencies. So just like merge two agencies together
Speaker 1: and try to make it more efficient. They think that
Speaker 1: you're trying, you're you're you're destroying civil society and you're
Speaker 1: an anarchist. You know, the moment you talk about any
Speaker 1: of this stuff, I mean the fact that they don't
Speaker 1: even know. I'm sure the history of where these agencies
Speaker 1: came from. How new many of them are. You know,
Speaker 1: Jimmy Carter put a whole bunch of these in Actually,
Speaker 1: you know Lyndon Johnson put some of these in action.
Speaker 1: You look at where these things come from. I think
Speaker 1: Lyndon Johnson was E. P. A. And you look at
Speaker 1: Department of Education and I think that was harder. But
Speaker 1: don't quote me on that. But these agencies are creations
Speaker 1: of the last call it fifty or so forty or
Speaker 1: fifty years. That's a blip on the radar. Folks. People
Speaker 1: act like, you know, George Washington crossed the Delaware and
Speaker 1: was like, whoa everybody, Before we do this whole thing
Speaker 1: with the British, Let's just be clear. Gotta have a
Speaker 1: Department of Commerce and a Department of agriculture. Let's not
Speaker 1: mix the two together. You know, it just strikes me
Speaker 1: as as nuts. But this is where you see the
Speaker 1: ideology at work. People go with what the you know,
Speaker 1: their their impulse is based upon their ideological predisposition. So
Speaker 1: if you're somebody who is a democrat, the government solves problems.
Speaker 1: The government is your friend. The government wants to give
Speaker 1: you a big, warm hug, Hello Government, I've missed you.
Speaker 1: Then then you don't want these agencies streamline. Then you
Speaker 1: actually don't believe that efficiency is something we should strive
Speaker 1: foreign government. You actually like the flabby folds of of bureaucracy.
Speaker 1: That can get a bit chafed because nothing's really going
Speaker 1: on except the flab rubbing against the flab gross image.
Speaker 1: I know, but you understand what I'm saying. People like
Speaker 1: the you know, the more government employees, the better they're
Speaker 1: all gonna be solidly middle class in terms of their wages,
Speaker 1: and solidly democrat in terms of their voting. That's the
Speaker 1: truth of the federal bureaucracy. That's the truth of the
Speaker 1: government system we have. And that's why they're so protective
Speaker 1: of the Department of Education and and all the and
Speaker 1: all these other agencies. And Mulvaney's thinking about streamlining. But
Speaker 1: it's a real problem for businesses. You know, I have
Speaker 1: an entrepreneur in my family, and and he tells me
Speaker 1: about the stuff that he has to deal with, and
Speaker 1: I just look at on my I don't get it.
Speaker 1: You know, you're having a rite checks to deal with,
Speaker 1: you know, this state taxing authority, that state regulatory authority.
Speaker 1: Because you know, even if you don't have to write
Speaker 1: them a check for some kind of government, it's hand
Speaker 1: in your pocket. You have to write a check to
Speaker 1: lawyers to deal with the regulations, to sign off on
Speaker 1: the paperwork that it's just a nightmare. And once you
Speaker 1: start looking at licensing requirements in different states and the whole,
Speaker 1: the whole thing, the whole, it's just so much of
Speaker 1: it strikes me as a scam. Uh And and people
Speaker 1: just don't really, they don't really understand that this is
Speaker 1: not good. It's not good for the economy. By the way,
Speaker 1: I just caught I just caught a glimpse because we've
Speaker 1: got a video feed here set up so I can
Speaker 1: always see my my team in New York. I caught
Speaker 1: a glimpse of the one and only, the the unofficial
Speaker 1: official Team Buck mascot known as Cash. Who who is
Speaker 1: he named for? Again? Some kind of a boxer or something?
Speaker 1: What is it? Well, this technical name is Cash Clever Lang,
Speaker 1: after Clever Lang in hockey. Okay, y, yeah, that's what
Speaker 1: I won the name of Clever Lang. But he they
Speaker 1: had already give him in the name Cash, and he
Speaker 1: was sort of responding to it. I felt bad changing
Speaker 1: his name. Was this like a marketing employ like they
Speaker 1: wanted to sell you a dog, and so they just
Speaker 1: called him Cash to kind of get inside your head,
Speaker 1: like maybe I thought the name sort of was cool,
Speaker 1: and he responded to it, and it was rescuing. You know,
Speaker 1: it's weird. In my building that I'm moving into in
Speaker 1: d C, they banned Bernice Mountain dogs along with like
Speaker 1: pit bulls and rott Wilders and things like that. I'm like,
Speaker 1: why Breeze Mountain they're like sweethearts. I don't know. I
Speaker 1: guess it's a size thing. But there are other big dogs.
Speaker 1: What I'm saying, here's a lot of a lot of
Speaker 1: dog discrimination and some of these buildings, you know, you
Speaker 1: know pit bulls by the way now really hard to
Speaker 1: get them into a lot of buildings. Uh, they're just people.
Speaker 1: People freak out about it now. And you know, Miss
Speaker 1: Molly's family has a pit bull that she rescued off
Speaker 1: the street from a cardboard box and she goes she
Speaker 1: does not like it when people say because he is
Speaker 1: a sweetheart, he does not like when people say pit
Speaker 1: bulls are mean. Yeah, it doesn't help. Then you see
Speaker 1: these stories that just surface every once in a while,
Speaker 1: and then it's always a pit bull when you hang
Speaker 1: out with Molly, like, you can't tell her that she's
Speaker 1: She's like, those are just the bad ones. You can't
Speaker 1: judge all pitbulls by the mean ones. I'm dude, I know.
Speaker 1: I look at it when when you look at when
Speaker 1: you look at the scary dog attack stories out there, Uh,
Speaker 1: it's there are really three breeds that come up again
Speaker 1: and again and again, and it's pit bulls, German shepherds
Speaker 1: and Rottweilder's subway like a couple weeks ago. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: heard about that, but not nearly as I mean, none
Speaker 1: of this is as scary as the twenty four ft
Speaker 1: long python that ate somebody. You saw that, right, This
Speaker 1: is like the stuff of my nightmares. I did not
Speaker 1: see that, but yeah, dude, check it out. You won't
Speaker 1: sleep tonight. It's the scary because they have video. They
Speaker 1: have video all of the pipe, like you see the
Speaker 1: it's dude, it's not do know. If you've got kids, guys,
Speaker 1: don't let them see this. This is not like the
Speaker 1: Jungle Book. It is not all cute cartoon stuff. It
Speaker 1: is Look, this woman died. This python constricted her, but
Speaker 1: then it swallowed her whole. And it's on video. Terrifying things.
Speaker 1: These are the important conversations, the ones that we have
Speaker 1: on Fridays, guys. These are the ones that These are
Speaker 1: the ones that really matter. So somehow I got stuck
Speaker 1: on pit bulls and pythons. I was talking to you
Speaker 1: about the budget of Mick mulveny. Point here is government
Speaker 1: is not the perfect size right now, and trying to
Speaker 1: shrink government just not me and your anarchist who hates
Speaker 1: all government. But just watch how they all the Democrats
Speaker 1: all lose their minds on Mick mulveney. And I'm hoping
Speaker 1: to get Mick on our on Rising soon. We're actually
Speaker 1: we're making this some some inquiries about that, and those
Speaker 1: of you who are original Real News fans from back
Speaker 1: in the Blaze days. By the way, I'm trying to
Speaker 1: get the band back together and get as many of
Speaker 1: our old Real News friends and guests as possible to
Speaker 1: join to join in on the new show Rising dot Tv.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, Hill, Gosh, Buck, you gotta know you're on
Speaker 1: you r L Hill dot tv. Slash Rising the most
Speaker 1: important thing right now, those that you all download the
Speaker 1: Them What podcast. Darn it. It's on Apple in the
Speaker 1: Apple Store Freedom Hut podcast with Buck Sexton. Check it out.
Speaker 1: You right back. The show ain't over yet, folks. It's
Speaker 1: time for roll call. Indeed, it is a double roll
Speaker 1: call Cousin's Friday, and I like to hear from all
Speaker 1: of you extra extra special amounts on Friday. And it's
Speaker 1: a gloomy, rainy, crappy weather day here in the swamp,
Speaker 1: so there's that. Plus I don't know if you saw
Speaker 1: this story, but they are like thousands of bottles of
Speaker 1: bourbon that we're destroyed in some kind of bourbon factory collapse.
Speaker 1: So that's very sad. That's very sad. But this is
Speaker 1: gonna put me in a good mood. Now. We're getting
Speaker 1: into the role called face book dot com slash Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton in the roll call. By the way, if you're
Speaker 1: listening to this, please do download The Freedom Hunt with
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton. It is available on it tunes. Producer Mike
Speaker 1: is it up on? Is it up on Stitcher yet?
Speaker 1: We get it on Stitcher. We're going to not not yet,
Speaker 1: will be up there this weekend. Gosh, somebody needs a
Speaker 1: code read alright, So we're gonna get this done. We're
Speaker 1: gonna get this done. Oh gosh, what's it like? You
Speaker 1: take the soapbar, you put it in the pillow case
Speaker 1: right that way. It's like only internal damage. Anyway, Good talk, Buck.
Speaker 1: We're gonna get it up there folks, Stitcher and all
Speaker 1: the other platforms too. I just felt really strongly we
Speaker 1: had to get it up this week, and the more
Speaker 1: numbers we get, the more interest we'll have from the
Speaker 1: folks that make decisions about, you know, putting it on platforms.
Speaker 1: And all that other good stuff resource decisions. So please
Speaker 1: the Freedom Hunt with Buck Sex and go check it out.
Speaker 1: It's also I'll put it another link today up on
Speaker 1: my Facebook page to it so that we have that, Mike. Actually,
Speaker 1: we do that, we throw it, throw it on the
Speaker 1: Facebook page while I'm here on the air before I
Speaker 1: forget Alright, four roll call. Now we have. Jeffrey writes, Hey, Buck,
Speaker 1: I really like your show, and I would like to
Speaker 1: let you know you're doing a better job of keeping
Speaker 1: your mouth off close to the mic. Okay, thank you,
Speaker 1: uh but also I'm sorry you're a whimp on Hill TV.
Speaker 1: Come on, toughen up, Jeffrey. You know, man, Look you're
Speaker 1: completely inteldier opinion and if you want, if you want
Speaker 1: a throw down, that is not the mission of the show. Okay.
Speaker 1: I'm sitting next to a far left progressive female who's
Speaker 1: a who's a friend and a very good person. We're
Speaker 1: trying to have political conversations across the aisle. If I
Speaker 1: show up every morning and I'm like, well, that's just crazy,
Speaker 1: the show is gonna blow up in my face. It's
Speaker 1: not gonna be fun to watch. Or you can't do
Speaker 1: you can't do a daily show with somebody where you're
Speaker 1: trying to crush their argument. You can try to win
Speaker 1: the argument, but you can't try to crush the argument.
Speaker 1: So look, if it's not for you, it's not for you,
Speaker 1: my friend. I just hope you keep listening to the
Speaker 1: radio show, because here we do crush. We crushed the
Speaker 1: lib We crush them. That's that's what we do. I
Speaker 1: kind of miss Bora. I thought Bora was a great
Speaker 1: character and went away. He went away way too fast.
Speaker 1: I think part of the reason he went away is
Speaker 1: because everybody was running around. Every frat bro in the
Speaker 1: country is running around like yigshumist. It's it's kind of
Speaker 1: an easy accent to do, and so everybody you know
Speaker 1: it will take power. Um. One thing I was thought
Speaker 1: was interesting with the Bora phenomenon was that no one
Speaker 1: seemed to recognize that Kazakhstan is a Muslim majority country.
Speaker 1: But it never touched upon the fact that Borat you
Speaker 1: would have to I think you would assume most likely
Speaker 1: come came from I mean, I know it's a fake character, right,
Speaker 1: but he kind of he kind of was able to
Speaker 1: pull it off and get away with what I think
Speaker 1: would today get him into some trouble. That's all I'm saying.
Speaker 1: Brian writes, I went to your stomping grounds for Father's Day.
Speaker 1: I saw Springsteen on Broadway and Black Panther on the plane.
Speaker 1: Great entertainment. To support our wonderful president. I stayed in
Speaker 1: the Trump Towers and for Father's Day breakfast, the family
Speaker 1: net to me stated loudly, if it wasn't for this restaurant, uh,
Speaker 1: they would be very very opposed to Trump. What is
Speaker 1: that his employees should? Okay, Briant, thank you. I'm glad
Speaker 1: you had fun in New York. Much appreciated. Rachel rites
Speaker 1: congrats on Hill Dot TV. I been watching one. I
Speaker 1: can good info. Not quite sure. I like your co host,
Speaker 1: but I'm obviously biased. I love the office space reference.
Speaker 1: He he he. Also, you're a bomb. Impression yesterday made
Speaker 1: me crack up. Shield's high friend Rachel Blanker, Well, I sure, though,
Speaker 1: you know you can always hear Obama. I ain't tell
Speaker 1: me what on the box stroll. That's what it does.
Speaker 1: You're sure what? And he speaks like this really slowly
Speaker 1: and everyone takes it's brilliant because that's what I'm at.
Speaker 1: What else? Uh? Uh? Let us. Uh uh, obviously exaggering
Speaker 1: that one a little bit at the end. Alrighty, what
Speaker 1: do we have next? Here? We have Michael. Michael rites
Speaker 1: to us, just figured out how you can do both
Speaker 1: jobs and work less. Since you're now effectively a TV anchor,
Speaker 1: why not work like one. Coming thirty minutes before air,
Speaker 1: drink your coffee, get your makeup done, get your scripts,
Speaker 1: head to set, get a couple of hours more sleep,
Speaker 1: and also your jackets back on. What's up with that?
Speaker 1: You know, Michael, we're trying different stuff with the wardrobe. Also,
Speaker 1: I still have to move some of my clothing from
Speaker 1: New York to d C. As to the anchor, yeah,
Speaker 1: I agree most most TV news anchors, it's like the easiest.
Speaker 1: It's a hard job to get, but it's the easiest
Speaker 1: job in the world to do. So yeah, I don't
Speaker 1: know if I could get away with with it fully,
Speaker 1: but it's worth a shot. Kelly. Right. So, wasn't it
Speaker 1: just a month ago that the left was saying that
Speaker 1: MS thirteen aren't animals, that, according to Jorry Reid, the
Speaker 1: only people who ever heard of them were Fox News watchers. Well,
Speaker 1: now we have an immigration crisis, and guess what here's
Speaker 1: an article from NBC setting m S thirteen violence as
Speaker 1: one of the reasons people are fleeing certain countries and
Speaker 1: headed for the US. So is MS thirteen real now
Speaker 1: because they say they are? And our MS thirteen animals now, Kellyer,
Speaker 1: I mean the the way the media treats the MS
Speaker 1: thirteen phenomenon, that there's a lot of there's a lot
Speaker 1: of politics around whether they will cover it, how often
Speaker 1: they will cover it. They don't find an interest. See,
Speaker 1: here's the thing. The liberal media thinks that when you
Speaker 1: cover MS thirteen, you are maligning all immigrants. The rest
Speaker 1: of us think when you cover MS thirteen, you're telling
Speaker 1: a story about vicious crime that's going on in cities
Speaker 1: and towns across the country that people need to know about,
Speaker 1: and you're showing that there is a downside to unrestricted
Speaker 1: or only uh moderately restricted illegal immigration. So that's how
Speaker 1: we see it. And also facts. We like the facts
Speaker 1: because that's if it's happening and it's a story, we
Speaker 1: should hear about it. It shouldn't be suppressed because people
Speaker 1: don't like to tell the narrative. So that's what that's
Speaker 1: where I come down on that one. Uh Jen, Right, Hey, Buck,
Speaker 1: can I be honest with you? Well, Jenn, you're writing
Speaker 1: to me on roll call, so sure. I am so
Speaker 1: sick of the immigration conversation. We all know this isn't
Speaker 1: Trump's mess, and this is really employed by the Damns
Speaker 1: to hijack the media coverage off the I G hearing,
Speaker 1: which is working. By the way, can we move on now?
Speaker 1: I love your show, Thanks for all you do. Bs.
Speaker 1: I think the dams are gonna highlight healthcare next an
Speaker 1: effort to sweep the mid terms. Jen, I think you're right.
Speaker 1: And there was the timing of the story, uh, because
Speaker 1: this was all manufactured, that the stuff going on the
Speaker 1: border has been going on for for months, but it
Speaker 1: all came to ahead at the same time. I don't
Speaker 1: wonder how that happened, right, Trust me, these people, these networks,
Speaker 1: the executives who run them, the journalists who were there,
Speaker 1: main writers that they all talked to each other, um.
Speaker 1: And we did lose sight of the I G story
Speaker 1: because of all the immigration stuff this week. That that
Speaker 1: is a thing that happened, which is frustrating to me.
Speaker 1: I can assure you. So there you have it, um,
Speaker 1: But yeah, Jen, we'll we'll keep you know, the immigration
Speaker 1: stories is important because even if we don't want to
Speaker 1: talk about it, it kind of puts us on defense,
Speaker 1: and so you gotta fight back. And there you have it.
Speaker 1: Next up here we have Jason, who writes good idea
Speaker 1: for a Trump campaign ad. Lots of clips of Democrats
Speaker 1: speaking out against integration, like your montage throw in the
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi bit during the Obama administration, then followed up
Speaker 1: with Trump saying I'm glad we all finally agree. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I look, I think right. I mean, producer Mike, Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi is a very effective advocate for vote for Vote
Speaker 1: GOP in the fall. I think she's doing a great
Speaker 1: job for us, Mike's and Mike's and Nancy fan he
Speaker 1: thinks I'm not here here here reminds here, reminds Mike
Speaker 1: of this nice old lady who lived down the I'm
Speaker 1: just making stuff up. Yeah, but you think she's good
Speaker 1: for the I think she's good for the Republicans, no doubt.
Speaker 1: I hope she keeps going. UM, I hope Hillary keeps going. Um.
Speaker 1: The more they talk, the more votes we get. I
Speaker 1: love it. I think it's absolutely the case. So we'll see,
Speaker 1: we'll see what ends up happening. Uh, you know, I
Speaker 1: will well stories for another stories. I've got some Pelosi
Speaker 1: stories for another day. I don't have time for them
Speaker 1: right now. I gotta keep you guys on the edge
Speaker 1: your seat, keep keep you uh engaged. Next up, we
Speaker 1: have Hey, I decided to check out nine Line apparel,
Speaker 1: but none of these codes are accepted by the website.
Speaker 1: You might want to check on that. Um Yo, what's
Speaker 1: going on? Do we not have a we prucer? Mike?
Speaker 1: He's saying that we don't have a buck twenty percent off?
Speaker 1: Or we not have a do we not have a
Speaker 1: discount code anymore? Did we get did our discount code
Speaker 1: get pulled? We gotta figure this out. Yeah, I'm not sure.
Speaker 1: I'll check in that. Yeah. Well, hey Jeremy, thanks for
Speaker 1: the heads up. Yeah, look, nine Line the gear is
Speaker 1: great anyway, but yeah, we we do like when team
Speaker 1: Buck gets credit. And that's that's why whenever I tell
Speaker 1: you the police put in that discount code, it's so
Speaker 1: important because that shows our ad partner that you fo
Speaker 1: heard about them here and are taking action based on
Speaker 1: this show, um and getting a great product in the process.
Speaker 1: So we'll make sure we look into that and also
Speaker 1: Jeremy says he wrote to feedback and Investor Hour and
Speaker 1: Shields High. Well, thank you, Jeremy. Guys want to take
Speaker 1: a quick pause here, we'renna come right back with so
Speaker 1: much more roll call. It's the best way to get
Speaker 1: ready and rocking for your weekend. Stay with me, all right,
Speaker 1: and we're back with more of the roll call. Facebook
Speaker 1: dot com slash buck Sexton if you want that roll
Speaker 1: call action, also, please do follow the page. It's a
Speaker 1: fun place for us to post all kinds of things
Speaker 1: and we will continue doing that. All right. Um, we
Speaker 1: have t J who writes, well, here we go, awesome
Speaker 1: rising episode this morning. But wait, is that John Yarmouth
Speaker 1: guy actually think that so security and Medicare are sustainable entitlements.
Speaker 1: They will be the death of this nation. No amount
Speaker 1: of new workers will ever offset the destruction that those
Speaker 1: two entitlements have caused to our national debt. I know
Speaker 1: this is one thing that Trump will never touch, unfortunately,
Speaker 1: but what are the chances we actually do something productive
Speaker 1: about this in the near future, get rid of war
Speaker 1: or both of these entitlements. Financially speaking, this is one
Speaker 1: of the biggest conversations that come up between my wife
Speaker 1: and I when we talk about saving for our retirement,
Speaker 1: we do not we do not plan on having Social
Speaker 1: Security as a supplement. Honestly, at this point, I'd be
Speaker 1: happy with closing it for people born after a certain
Speaker 1: year and getting back maybe an eighth to a quarter
Speaker 1: of what I've put into it, if that means we
Speaker 1: get rid of it. Uh yeah, man t J. It's entitlements.
Speaker 1: No one wants touch them because politically they're popular. But
Speaker 1: the problem is you can't hide from math. No, numbers
Speaker 1: don't lie, you know. Scoreboard don't lie, right, Mike, Scoreboard
Speaker 1: don't lie. Sometimes I talk to Mike and he's like
Speaker 1: in the midst of making sure the rest of the
Speaker 1: show is working smoothly, and it's really unfair, you know,
Speaker 1: because it has this mode. It's like when you're in
Speaker 1: a like a forum class, you know in uh you're
Speaker 1: in the auditorium in college and the professor's like looking
Speaker 1: around the room and when you're taking notes and he's like,
Speaker 1: Mr Michael, what do you think about that thing I
Speaker 1: just said, which I know you did not hear because
Speaker 1: you were writing something down on you all know. Pad
Speaker 1: does shake my head. I'm like yeah, yeah, that's right. Whatever,
Speaker 1: I whatever. That's why I usually go to Mike, Hey, Pruce,
Speaker 1: Mike right right. He's like yeah yeah, He's like, dude,
Speaker 1: I'm I'm running your phones, your social media, the show,
Speaker 1: dealing with affiliates, all these things. But thanks for throwing
Speaker 1: random things my way in a Friday afternoon on the fly. Mike.
Speaker 1: You can handle it though. That's the thing. Mike's a
Speaker 1: Mike's a radio Ninja as his brand, and Brandon's really are.
Speaker 1: Brandon and John are a resident DJs. They're just spinning
Speaker 1: disks of freedom manning the control room. So that's it. Man.
Speaker 1: We're we're we're three man band. Here were three man band,
Speaker 1: all right. Next up here we have lev a right
Speaker 1: steer Buck Love the Freedom Hut. Love Commy Bear as
Speaker 1: an evil as an immigrant from the Evil Empire, he
Speaker 1: is my favorite. I proudly wear a Commy Bear T
Speaker 1: shirt that I had for years since you've been on
Speaker 1: the Blaze shields high leve Well, Lev, thank you so much.
Speaker 1: Commy Bear is back, baby, and the Freedom Hunt is
Speaker 1: his new home. And so I'm looking forward to uh
Speaker 1: getting that going and building that out. So you have it, uh,
Speaker 1: and thank you for that, by the way, and please do,
Speaker 1: please do share that podcast. Guys, we're showing some pretty
Speaker 1: strong numbers. It will grow as we do more episodes
Speaker 1: of the show, but I want that to be a
Speaker 1: real signature of what we're doing here because I can
Speaker 1: really experiment have some fun with it. Um. And it's
Speaker 1: one of these things whereas I've been telling you, the
Speaker 1: more the more folks know about it, the more folks
Speaker 1: download it, the more stuff I can do in it,
Speaker 1: because I can draw in resources from this show for
Speaker 1: that podcast. So that's that's just how these things work
Speaker 1: these days. That's the reality of this digital world we
Speaker 1: live in. James, next up here in response to your
Speaker 1: last night's show when you were talking about liberal saying
Speaker 1: Americans won't do the jobs that illegals will do. Uh,
Speaker 1: they are wrong. To your last Colors response, I cleaned
Speaker 1: toilets at a healthcare clinic. I've been cleaning and I've
Speaker 1: been a cleaning jobs for years. The Democrats are liars
Speaker 1: about saying Americans do not want to do the jobs
Speaker 1: that illegals would do. I listened to you every night
Speaker 1: on your radio show and remind me of Mark Levine.
Speaker 1: His show used to be on, but you took his
Speaker 1: spot when it were play at eight p m. And
Speaker 1: W G y uh in New York. I love listening
Speaker 1: to all the conservatives talk because they point out the facts.
Speaker 1: It is sad how much all the liberals are going crazy,
Speaker 1: and they sure do have a mental disorder, and we
Speaker 1: are trying to give the help they need, but they
Speaker 1: cannot handle the doctor's orders, which is reality shields high
Speaker 1: about keep up the good work and drain the swamp.
Speaker 1: Hashtag CNN sucks. James great message. I thought maybe I
Speaker 1: was gonna get somebody to get mad at me for
Speaker 1: saying that Americans will do but James is like, no, no,
Speaker 1: not just will Americans do jobs. He's doing a job
Speaker 1: that needs to be done right. People who need cleaning, custodio.
Speaker 1: These are these are professions that people get paid to do.
Speaker 1: These are necessary roles in our lives. And this notion
Speaker 1: that they're only these are jobs that are only going
Speaker 1: to be done by illegals working in kitchens, cleaning up uh,
Speaker 1: you know, landscaping, war construction work. It's just not true.
Speaker 1: It's just not true, but they keep saying it. And
Speaker 1: I also think there's a bit of sneering from the
Speaker 1: coastal elites about well, you know, Americans won't do those
Speaker 1: jobs and and and shouldn't do those jobs. Like no, actually,
Speaker 1: you know, doing doing any job where you are providing
Speaker 1: a service, you know, an honest service in return for
Speaker 1: for a decent wage. He's an honorable thing. And I
Speaker 1: think that that's lost among the coastal elites and certainly
Speaker 1: among the overpaid pompous media pundit set going on TV
Speaker 1: and making millions of dollars to do a job that
Speaker 1: they could. So that's really an amazing thing that the
Speaker 1: economics of TV news. You've got these people that have
Speaker 1: shows CNN comes to mind. You could replace him tomorrow,
Speaker 1: the ratings would be the same. Nobody cares. So these
Speaker 1: guys aren't worth millions of dollars. They're just paid that
Speaker 1: because the people that run the organization we're like, yeah,
Speaker 1: we'll give you millions of dollars. Monica next up here,
Speaker 1: she writes, Bacon. Okay, thanks, Um. I think is a
Speaker 1: great way to get your attention. Uh, you said today
Speaker 1: you need to catch up on the Civil War. I
Speaker 1: thought about the Shelby foot books Shields High from Team
Speaker 1: buck Okin. Now, well, thank you, Monica. I will check
Speaker 1: that out, and yes, Bacon does get my attention. You
Speaker 1: are correct, Carrie hey Buck. I'm not the language police,
Speaker 1: but I agree with listener do who brought up the
Speaker 1: use of the crude word freaking. I vote against using
Speaker 1: this as a substitute for the F word, as it's
Speaker 1: basically the same. Colonel Jeff Cooper used to say, profanity
Speaker 1: is a sign of a weak mind. With your great vocabulary,
Speaker 1: I know you can express yourself without vulgarity. Keep bringing
Speaker 1: the truth shields high. No, I'm sorry, I look you
Speaker 1: are absolutely uh Joey, You're entitled your opinion. I gotta
Speaker 1: say I disagree on this one. You know, if I say,
Speaker 1: you know, sugar honey, iced tea, that's not the same
Speaker 1: as saying the word dude. I don't know. You know
Speaker 1: if you say, um ah, there's a whole bunch, you know,
Speaker 1: kick him in the But it's different than the other
Speaker 1: thing you could say. So I gotta disagree here, but
Speaker 1: we'll leave it there for now. Thank you for joining
Speaker 1: See you on Monday. Shield High