WEBVTT - Social Media Faux Pas

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology? With

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff from how stuff works dot coming. Hello again, everyone,

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech stuff. My name is Chris Palette,

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>and I'm an editor at how stuff works dot Com.

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Sitting across from me as usual as senior writer Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not shouting, all right, I am. I'm shouting. I'm shouting.

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm shouting. You know, I'll have to ask you where

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you picked that one up because I don't know that one.

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>You don't know that one? Now, I don't know. Okay,

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that was That was a classic film from the eighties. Actually,

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if it's got to be one you've seen.

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>If you have not seen this movie, you will have

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to watch it. Okay, but we'll talk about it afterwards. Okay,

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about what we're going to actually address today. Okay,

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>so today we're going to talk about some some mistakes

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>people have made utilizing social media in its various forms

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and social networking. I see, so I thought I thought

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>before we actually get into any cases, we can kind

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of talk a little bit about why this has become

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a problem sort of from an armchair psychology way right,

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 1>good because I only I went to the school of

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>armchair psychology. Yeah, yeah, I I have a degree in

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>lazy boy psychiatry actually, so I can. I never mind anyway.

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>So what my theory about why social media and social

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>networking has given rise to a lot of people making

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 1>goofy mistakes is that it allows you to voice your

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>thoughts to essentially a global audience almost immediately allows you nay,

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I say, encourages you to do this. It tasks me,

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>um it, Oh there's something going on I should write

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>about that. Now I have had a thought, let me

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>express it to everyone I know and to people I

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know as well. Yeah, especially with things like like

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>cell phones and smartphones tying into this technology, it's really

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>given us the opportunity to express a thought almost instantaneously. Yes,

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and in some cases, depending on what it is that

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you're doing, I would say that it, uh, you're you're

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:26.679
<v Speaker 1>trying to scoop everyone else. If you see something happening

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:30.639
<v Speaker 1>that that could be uh, you know, m historical event

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.080
<v Speaker 1>or just something compelling where you'd like to, you know,

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 1>get the jump on everyone else. Tweeting it's like, hey,

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>there goes somebody famous down the sidewalk. I should tweet that, right,

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>And also it gives you this feeling that, uh, you know,

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not that far removed from text messaging, right, but

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>when you're seeing a text message, you're sending it to

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a specific person, it's not going out to the public

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>at large, and you get this idea. It's kind of

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>like when you're chatting with friends. You know, you don't

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>expect the things you say to friends, as long as

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not directly about them or their significant others. You

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>don't expect that stuff to come back and kick you

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>in the butt. True, right, like you can get with

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>your friends and complain about your job. That's that's true.

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's funny because you figure, well, I don't know

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you do, but some people might think, you know, hey,

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I've only got twenty three followers. Only those twenty three

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>people are going to read my Twitter account. But unless

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:30.079
<v Speaker 1>you've locked it down in your privacy settings, that's not

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the case necessarily. And you know, the Library of Congress

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>is archiving these things, so there's a public records, a

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>public record of what you're doing, at least on Twitter.

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>But but This is the case for various venues, not

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>just Twitter, but we're also going to talk about Facebook

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and probably YouTube, and there's even a Craigslist story in here. Really, yeah,

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that when you're talking about yes you do, Oh,

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>yes I do, Yes you do, it's funny. Okay. So

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>we've got some story is to share about some fairly

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>famous or at least infamous misuses of social networking. And

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>really the reason why we're doing this it's kind of

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:12.839
<v Speaker 1>a cautionary tale, right. It's letting people know you need

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to be careful with what you say on the Internet

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>because it can have real life consequences further down the road,

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>even if you were just being silly or joking. And

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I can say from personal experience, I mean I've been

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>guilty of sending something on Twitter or posting posting something

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook that I intended to be expressed one way,

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>but due to either of my failing because I worded

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it incorrectly or because of the the way people inferred

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>what I meant, it kind of um didn't go the

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 1>way I hadn't anticipated. It also does not help that

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>if you get angry, you know, you should make sure

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 1>that you're as far away from a computer or smartphone

0:04:55.760 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>as humanly possible, because you will your your inner sir,

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>your inner editor tends to take little breaks whenever you

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>get ticked off, and the next thing you know, you're

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>sending out ah an obscenity laden tweet that particularly points

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the finger at specific individuals in your life, and then

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 1>you will have a reckoning. So, um, should we tell

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone which tweet it was that made us think this

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:27.840
<v Speaker 1>would be a good time to do this episode? Go

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>for it? So fashion designer Kenneth Cole. And and now

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>we don't really need to say anything else because this

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.359
<v Speaker 1>is pretty close in proximity to when we're recording it,

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'll probably release fairly close to that too. You. Um,

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Kenneth Cole has a history of trying to demonstrate that

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>he's with it. He knows what's going on in the world.

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 1>He pays attention to world events. Yeah, and if you

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know who Kenneth Cole is, he's a fashion designer.

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Didn't I say a fashion designer? You probably did and

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I just zoned out. Um, I haven't had my coffee yet,

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>so if I if I missed it anyway, that's good

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to point out Uh, well, he's uh. He apparently is

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>uh one of the people at his company that has

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 1>access to his company's Twitter account, or at least he

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 1>used to Yeah, well, or or somebody tweeted and and

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>attributed it to him because they put their um uh,

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>they put their initials casey by by this, so we

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>assume that it is in fact kennethic goal and he

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>did in fact apologize for it later. But um as

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the uh, I guess is it safe to call it

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a revolution in Egypt? A lot of Egyptian people call

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.799
<v Speaker 1>it a revolution, so I guess if they're the authorities

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 1>on this um they a few days after the protests

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>had begun in Egypt, Mr Cole apparently quoted tweeted and

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I quote millions are in uproar in Cairo in hashtag

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Cairo rememor is they heard our new spring collection is

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>now available online at and put the r L right now.

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Using the hashtag Cairo means that if you were to

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>use Twitter search to find out the latest information of

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>what was going on in Cairo and use that hashtag,

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>this would be one of the messages that would pull up,

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>depending on you know, how long after you were looking

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>it up because there was a lot of stuff happening, right,

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>So I mean clearly that that list would be filling

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>up quickly. But it means that this, this promotional tweet

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>would appear in the middle of all these messages that

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>were about social change, and a lot of people thought

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that this was in bad taste, and Chris You pointed

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>out that it was also a case of just incredibly

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>poor timing, because not only was it in poor taste,

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>just to start with um, when Kenneth Cole posted this message,

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>it was when the protests were still relatively peaceful, right,

0:07:56.600 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>And so it happened to be hosted the same day

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that some of the protests began to turn violent, that

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>there was violence enacted upon the protesters, and so then

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>it went from poor taste to astonishingly poor taste. And

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing about the internet. The Internet is kind

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of like a big brother, right. Big brothers tend to,

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, bully their their younger siblings around a little

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>bit every now and then. But if someone else picks

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>on that younger sibling, big brother gets really mad and

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:34.559
<v Speaker 1>then may lash out in a way that is not

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 1>necessarily equivalent to whatever the slight was so in other words,

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>if you were to insult my little sister and I

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:45.079
<v Speaker 1>have one, I might punch you in the mush and uh.

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>And so the Internet punched Kenneth Cole in the mush

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>so hard. There were tons of of parody and satirical

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>tweets that came out, supposedly attributed to Kenneth Cole that

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>were about other major events being belittled, essentially as part

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:08.439
<v Speaker 1>of a marketing scheme. Um. And as Chris said, Kenneth

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Cole himself actually apologized on Facebook. I might add, and

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I have the quote for that if you would like

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>me to read it. I apologize to everyone who was

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>offended by my insensitive tweet about the situation in Egypt.

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:25.319
<v Speaker 1>I've dedicated my life to raising awareness about serious social issues,

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and in hindsight, my attempt at humor regarding a nation

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 1>liberating themselves against oppression was poorly timed and absolutely inappropriate.

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>So you have to admit he did not deflect this

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>in any way. He accepted responsibility, which that's an admirable thing,

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and we should all remember that there are times when

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 1>some of us will make a joke about a particularly

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>sensitive topic without fully considering the implications of that joke.

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I've done it in the past, but pretty much everyone has, right,

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>It's it's one thing to to do this, however, when

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you're around a couple of your friends by seeing a

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>news event on TV and making that joke, versus broadcasting

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>it on Twitter to the world, including a link a

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>much bigger forum too, you know, because then only is

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:17.439
<v Speaker 1>it a joke, it's a marketing ploy, right, So yeah,

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it was definitely a bad choice. He apologized for it. Um,

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd say that most of the fallout has pretty much

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>died down about around the time we're recording this. It's

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>been it's been a more than a week since, a

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks since uh that happened. But um, but yeah,

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>he was. He was raked over the virtual coals for

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:40.439
<v Speaker 1>quite some time for that, and that's that was really

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:44.319
<v Speaker 1>what kind of precipitated this discussion. Now, not not everything

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about here is necessarily something that

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>gets someone fired or gets them in trouble with their friends.

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>In some cases, it's just something that's bizarre and awkward,

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:56.439
<v Speaker 1>And I wanted to do one of those just to

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of give you the idea of what can happen

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>when taken to the extreme. Before I, before I really

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>get into this, this is about David Prager, who is

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>an executive with Revision three. Uh. Now, I have never

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>spoken with David. I have not met David, but I

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>know people who do know David, and they all say

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 1>that he's a great guy and is just a you know,

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a cool cat. That's the deal with David. Um. Now,

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>David did get a little bit of a heat put

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.319
<v Speaker 1>on him. A lot of jokes were made at his

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>expense for something that he did on Twitter a couple

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of years ago. Um. He was the victim of a

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>home invasion, more or less, and rather than calling the police,

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>he tweeted about it at length. I would like to

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>read to you a selection of the tweets he wrote,

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>keeping in mind, I cut out a lot of them,

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>so there when you sit there and think, wow, this

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 1>guy tweeted a lot. That's about maybe sixty percent of

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>what he actually said. So here's how it starts. Okay,

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe I should lock my door. I swear a random

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>dude just walked into my bathroom. And I can't believe

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I haven't freaked out next, and I can't believe I'm

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>tweeting about it while he's still here. I wonder if

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>he's sleepwalking or if maybe I should freak out. Then okay,

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>he's still in the bathroom. And now I'm thinking a

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>combo of hobo and drunk and sleepwalking dude. He seems

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>late twenties. What next? Next? Should I call the cops

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>like you guys have recommended, find a blunt object before

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>opening the door. My gut tells me he's harmless. Next,

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>but I could be wrong about the harmless assumption. Next, Okay,

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>about to make a move, putting shoes on first, Thank

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>god he tweeted that. Next, Okay, have weapon if I

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>need it, but don't plan on any confrontation with it.

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>About to go in Next, Okay, still haven't done anything.

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>He is still in there, Gonna set up a U

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>stream now I think stand by. So then he starts

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to live stream the home invasion with a webcam. If

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you haven't been watching my youth stream, the dude passed

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>out in my bathroom and I just dragged him out. Next,

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the drama is over. In truder is out

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>door is locked. I think I finally need some sleep,

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and that that's the conclusion. Keep in mind. Like I said,

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:30.079
<v Speaker 1>I cut out about the tweets he sent during that

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that whole thing, Now, David David got a little bit

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of joking at his expense for rather than reacting to

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a possible home invasion in a way that most of

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:43.679
<v Speaker 1>us would, which is that we'd call the cops and

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>perhaps lock our own bedroom door to make sure that,

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, we would remain safe, he decided to broadcast

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>it to the world. Uh, that's an unusual faux paw. Uh.

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>And like I said, from everything I've heard, he's actually

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a pretty cool guy. So thankfully it was a peaceful resolution,

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 1>I guess. And uh, maybe he locks his door now perhaps,

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>how how anyone in this world doesn't lock their door?

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 1>Of course I live in Atlanta. I can't even imagine,

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>not like like when I watch a show like Friends

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>where people just walk in and out of their their apartments.

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I think, what world is that? I can't imagine. I

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>would not be able to even sit down if I

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>knew my door was unlocked. Um, but we've got some

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>other ones. Here's here's um, here's a good way to

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>really mess up after a great job interview. Oh Cisco Fatty,

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, you got it exactly right. Connor Riley, also

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>known as the Connor on Twitter wrote, Cisco just offered

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>me a job. Now I have to weigh the utility

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of a fatty paycheck against the daily commute to San

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Jose and hating the work. All right, Guys, if you

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>interview for a job, don't slam the work immediately after

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the job interview. Don't sit there and say you're you're

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>debating on whether or not you're going to accept the position,

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>because especially if it happens to be a computer or

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 1>or i T type company, because there's a chance they're

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna notice. Yes, like the guy from Cisco who wrote,

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>who was the hiring manager, I'm sure they would love

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to know that you will hate the work. We hear

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>at Cisco are well versed in the web. Yeah, so

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>um burn and uh And this this particular tweet also

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>gave rise to lots of parodies and spoofs. People were

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>joking about Cisco fatty because he was talking about the

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>fatty paycheck. Uh. Yeah, you don't want that kind of reputation.

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>And keep in mind, like again, he was probably thinking

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that he was just posting that to his friends, but

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>because he didn't have a protected Twitter account, everyone got

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to see it. Um. And then there are other ways

0:15:54.200 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of having social social media faue pas as well, like Skittles, Skittles, yeah,

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>candy exactly, because not all of these are necessarily people

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>saying stupid things online and getting in trouble. In some cases,

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a company allowing people to say stupid things. Yeah.

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>What Skittles did was Skittles created and a little applet

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>on their web page that would automatically post Twitter messages

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that had the hashtag Skittles in them, And once people

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>figured that out, they began to have a little bit

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of fun uh using these Skittles hashtag. Here's one that

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>was posted by Baritunde Thurston, who is a comedian. This

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>is one of the few pretty much safer work ones,

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>although again tasteless humor. Here we go hashtag Skittles got

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>stuck in my mouth while I was driving, forced me

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to slam into orphanage, killing hundreds. I'll never eat them again.

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>So in that case, the faux pas is a company

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>thinking that people will be reasonable and not take advance

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>enag of a of a system to in order to

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 1>make tasteless jokes. Uh. Lesson learned one of the major

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 1>auto manufacturers here in the United States posted um UM

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:15.919
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to make your own commercial on their website

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>about suv s or utility vehicles, which are uh, very

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 1>useful vehicles, but they also consume a lot of gas

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>petroleum petrol um And so rather than making viral video

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:37.399
<v Speaker 1>videos that would extol the virtues of driving SUVs and

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:41.360
<v Speaker 1>o MG, aren't these fun, people started talking about how

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>much gas they were using and how they were destroying

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the planet. And I'm going to try to find the company.

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>If not, then you can write, but don't pause the

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 1>podcast now if when Jonathan's talking, I can't find it.

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>But that reminded me of that because I had forgotten

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>about the Skittles thing UM completely because it's been that's

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:02.120
<v Speaker 1>been a couple of years ago, hasn't it now now

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that we're recording in UM. But they are all sorts

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of other things. Politicians have been terrible about this. They um.

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Of course, they've been caught tweeting and emailing and doing

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of things in session when they're supposed to

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>actually be paying attention to what's going on during the

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>State of the Union address. Yes, UM but I was

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:32.199
<v Speaker 1>thinking of the United States representative from Michigan, Pete Hoekstra,

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 1>who who was on a UH state trip to Iraq

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and Afghanistan, except the military would have preferred that he

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't tell people where he was, and he was tweeting

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 1>about his whereabouts and saying that he had just landed

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in Iraq, and the Pentagon was really upset with him,

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 1>for it makes protecting a public servant much more difficult

0:18:56.640 --> 0:19:00.159
<v Speaker 1>when the public servant is broadcasting his position exactly. And

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>as we know, people in you know, everywhere in the

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>world at least did had access to these tools are

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>using them. So it is very likely that somebody who

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 1>may have wanted to remove him from the planet was

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>reading that right as he was tweeting it. Here's another

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>politico who who used social networking poorly, Virginia State Senator

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Frederick, member of the Republican Party. He tweeted about

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat named Ralph Northam who was considering uh leaving

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party. I remember this. Here's the Twitter message.

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 1>Big news coming out of Senate. Apparently one dem is

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>either switching or leaving the DEM Caucus. Negotiations for power

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 1>sharing underway now if he had done this after the switch,

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:54.919
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't have been such a big deal. But he

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>did it before, which gave the Democrats, who were paying

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>attention to the internet, the opportunity to find out who

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 1>was the person the person who was going to quote

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 1>unquote leave the Democratic Party and put a lot of

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 1>political pressure on that guy, Ralph Northam to stay a Democrat.

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>And that is exactly what happened, which means that Jeff

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Frederick managed to stick it to his own party. You know,

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:25.640
<v Speaker 1>they might have gained another uh you know, an ally,

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:30.439
<v Speaker 1>but because he got a little thumb happy on Twitter,

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.719
<v Speaker 1>that ended up not happening. Yeah. Actually, that's funny because

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>according to the information I saw now that the Senate

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>um in Virginia is has an even number of members,

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and so the lieutenant governor, uh, in the case of

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a tie vote in the Senate, is the tiebreaker. Now,

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the lieutenant governor was a Republican, and if if the

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 1>switch had been made, it would have been an even

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>split down the middle, which means that if there was

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a vote down party lines half Democrat half Republican, the

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>lieutenant governor, a Republican, would have been able to Basically

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>they would have been able to do anything they needed

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to do down party lines, because you know that that

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 1>one UH senator had switched, but leaving the Democrats at

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty one forty nine, um prevented that from happening. So

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that was probably not such a good move. Actually, I'm

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 1>not sure that it's there a hundred senators in Virginia,

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 1>so anyway it was, or however many of there are. UM.

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 1>So I was gonna say, if you are not supposed

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to tweet during jury duty, you should you should not

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>tweet during jury duty or or use Facebook, or use Facebook.

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm specifically thinking about you to date show anchorman or

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>weatherman alt Roker. Well, I like you, aut Roker. However,

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:01.679
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't tweet during jury duty. I don't even know

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 1>this story. Can you tell me a little more? Not

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot? But he he got busted for tweeting because well,

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the thing is, I mean, if you're in jury duty,

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:15.399
<v Speaker 1>you're not supposed to be discussing the details of the case.

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>It's supposed to be quiet. Um. Then again, you don't

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>often have media personalities and your jury pool at that

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>at that level, because if you don't live in the

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>United States, Mr Roker is a well known and pretty

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>well liked, uh celebrity on one of the morning news

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 1>shows Networks New Shows, and uh, yeah, I mean a

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 1>lot of lots and lots of people know who he is.

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>He's a he's a pretty personable guy and easy to

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 1>follow on Twitter, and yeah, that that draws a lot

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of attention. You would go, hey, how Roker's in jury

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>duty with me and he's tweeting about it. There was

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a juror in the United Kingdom who uh apparently was

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:59.399
<v Speaker 1>really confused over how she should side in the case,

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and so she used her Facebook profile to ask her

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>friends what she should do and essentially made a poll

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 1>over whether she should give a guilty or not guilty verdict.

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Needless to say, the judge was not amused and she

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 1>was removed from the jury pool. Uh so, yeah, that

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 1>was also not a very wise decision. I'm getting back

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to politicians for a second. We mentioned Craig's list briefly.

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:28.679
<v Speaker 1>I gotta I gotta tell this story though. Okay, so

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>here's the other thing about if if you are uh

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>if if you have decided that you are going to

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 1>have an affair, first of all, shame upon you. But secondly, Uh,

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you might want to make sure you're not leaving a

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>easily followable trail, or that you're talking to people who

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 1>might recognize who you are. That unfortunately happened with Christopher Lee,

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 1>who was a congressman who responded to a personal ad

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>on Craigslist of a woman who was looking for someone,

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and he claimed at that he was a thirty nine

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:06.400
<v Speaker 1>year old divorced lobbyist. He is actually a forty six

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>year old former congressman who was married and has kids. Um,

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:16.199
<v Speaker 1>And he posted he sent the lady a picture of himself, uh,

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>making a muscle man pose, wearing no shirt at all,

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:23.919
<v Speaker 1>and that has now become sort of his image on

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the web, which I think probably has heard his political future,

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>at least in the short term. Although this is America,

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you never know true true enough. Um, yeah, I mean

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that the you know, the United States has a a

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:45.439
<v Speaker 1>place where many entrepreneurs, you know, set out to strike

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>it rich. Like I'm thinking about Mark Cuban, who made

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot of money on an internet startup which

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>went big and then he bought the Dallas Mavericks started

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>complaining about the officiating on social media. Yeah, uh, tweeted

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 1>got fined twenty five thousand dollars complaining about the refs. Yeah, yeah, sports,

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>We've we've actually done a podcast about social media and

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:17.880
<v Speaker 1>sports and we talked about how the two don't necessarily

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:21.439
<v Speaker 1>go hand in hand and uh or how how you know.

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Some teams and some um stadiums have struggled with the

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:30.640
<v Speaker 1>ability of their employees to now reach a global audience

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>like it used to be that if you were a

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>player or if well, players are a little different because

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>they have access to too larger media outlets. But let's

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:45.159
<v Speaker 1>say that you're an employee with a stadium. Chances are

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>if you were complaining about things, you were just complaining

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 1>it to a small group of people and no one

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>really cared. But the Philadelphia Eagles Stadium cared when um UH,

0:25:56.920 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>an employee was critic sizing the team, the Eagles team

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook and the the stadium uh, the stadium brass

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>decided to fire him for that. Then, Actually, I guess

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Pennsylvania in general has problems with employees, sports employees and

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the internet. Because Andrew Kurtz, who and I love this,

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 1>was a Pittsburgh pirate Peroguey mascot was fired because he

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:31.199
<v Speaker 1>criticized team management of the Pittsburgh Pirates on Facebook, he

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>got he got canned. So you know, if you're a

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>paroguey just be careful about that social networking. Also, you're

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:46.439
<v Speaker 1>delicious what a spud uh, you know? And it doesn't

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>take a parogue to make a mistake on on Twitter though,

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you could, you know, tweet your personal phone

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>number to twenty one followers yikes? Like New York Times

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>tech columnists, well well well spected tech columnist David Hog,

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:05.119
<v Speaker 1>I think I think a lot of us have accidentally

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>put out a public tweet when we thought we were

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>doing a direct message. I know I have, and I've

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>seen others too. I remember there was there was one

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 1>where it was supposed to be Oh, I remember it

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>was pollen Storm paullen Storm, the musical group, sending a

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>message to Neil Gaiman because they were going up to

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>visit Neil Gaiman. And Neil Gaiman and Poullen Storm and

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Colton are all friends and Neil Gaiman's a very

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 1>well known author, and paullen Storm accidentally publicly tweeted the

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>location of the restaurant they were all going to have

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:43.440
<v Speaker 1>lunch at, and then immediately send on a message saying

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>please don't mob us. And because it was meant to

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>be a private message and it wasn't good times with

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 1>times also not necessarily a good idea to reveal that

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you were leaving your house. Um. Israel Himan uh tweeted

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to his I think he had around a couple of

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:08.679
<v Speaker 1>thousand followers at the time, that he was leaving his

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>house to go on vacation for a ten hour drive,

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and then he tweeted later that he made it um.

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 1>And then when he got home he found out that

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>his house had been broken into. And in the interview

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I read and uh, I got I got a lot

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:27.199
<v Speaker 1>of my ideas from from Keymate Houstner's story at ABC

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>News about tweet faux pause, the ones that I didn't

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 1>already know. I found some other juicy ones, and uh,

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 1>this is one of them. And in the interview they

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>did with him said, you know, my wife thinks it

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>may have been random, but I'm not so sure. That's

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a paraphrase. It wasn't exact quote, but he he essentially

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>said that, you know, I think that maybe that was

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>a really bad idea on my part, and yes, it

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 1>it really kind of is it's it's nice to have

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>these check in enabled systems like four squares and Wala,

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>but you have to be really careful because you really

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know. If people know who you are on there

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and they know where where you live and you've said,

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, hey, I'm across the country on a business trip,

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that's almost open advertising to come and get robbed. Now

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:17.479
<v Speaker 1>that being said, if you are careful about your private

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>information online and you can't necessarily find your address online,

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 1>then you're probably in okay shape. One way to test that,

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is to go to Google and type

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>your address and not your name, but your address, and

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>see if your name comes up in relation to your address.

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>And if so, then somewhere on the web, whether it's

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Facebook where you've got it public information there or somewhere else, uh,

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 1>there is a link between you and your address. So

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to make sure that those are clean. In fact, really,

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 1>as a general rule, you want to kind of if

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be interviewing for a job or if

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 1>you're entering the professional market, you really want to kind

0:29:57.360 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of scrub your social network stuff clean as much as possible,

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>especially for Facebook, you know, use those privacy settings make

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>sure that the people who have access to say, let's

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>let's say you're using Facebook to have fun with your friends.

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's also say that if you're going to do that,

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>make sure your privacy settings are set to a point

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>where not just anyone could log on and see the

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>photo of you, you know, drinking alcohol with your shirt

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>off and you know, uh uh a funny but obscene

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 1>word written across your chest. That's not something that your your, your,

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>your future employer is going to find very impressive. In

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 1>most cases, I will use the qualifier in most cases

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>because who knows I did make a joke the other

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 1>day that one day, the same people who are posting

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>these irresponsible pictures of themselves on Facebook without any privacy settings,

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 1>someday they will be the people in charge. And that's

0:30:54.960 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>when social moray's will crumble, institutions will fall, zombies will eyes,

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and Ghostbusters three will be in theaters. Thank you, So,

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're There are tons of other examples, but

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have to kind of wrap this up. I

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>did want to mention a few times, just because you

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 1>do make a mistake, or let's not even call it

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a mistake. Let's say that you're just expressing your opinion,

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>because there are lots of cases where people were either

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>fired or were um uh, were harassed just for expressing

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>an opinion on these social networking sites, not necessarily an

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 1>uninformed opinion, um and not. It doesn't always turn out badly,

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and we do have to walk a fine line between

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>making sure that we don't we're that we're not irresponsible

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>online and making sure that our freedom of speech and

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>our freedom of expression remains protected. You know, there's a

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a balance there. We're not telling you don't say

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 1>what you're thinking online. We're just saying think about it

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 1>first and think about the potential consequences before it's saying it.

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>And here's what I would close with. In Australia, there

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>was have you heard of the Facebook six um? You know,

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that I have. So in Australia, there

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>was the their corrections systems systems. So the prison system

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 1>in Australia UM was going through some some trouble and

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the hundreds of employees actually joined a Facebook

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>group where they could have discussions about the system, the

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 1>politics within the system, the troubles they perceived, the potential

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 1>solutions really a place to kind of not just suggest things,

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>but to gripe and grouse. I mean everyone occasionally needs

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to do that, right, just to go home and get

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>it out vent and say, God, it was just such

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>a bad day at work and blah blah blah blah.

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Not me because I love my job, but everyone else.

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, Anyway, the the commissioner for the Corrective Services

0:32:56.520 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Department in Australia UH singled out six particular employees among

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the hundreds that were using this Facebook group and said

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that they were using language that was public bullying and

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 1>so started to make the move to have them terminated

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 1>from their positions. Uh. The the six ended up having

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a suit against the Corrective Services Department and six months

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>later they won the suit, which essentially said that no,

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you can't fire them because they were criticizing the department.

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>And uh but I mean that's just another indication that

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 1>there are times where where if you express your opinion

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>there could be consequences. Now, hopefully if it's something like

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>this case and you have you have actual, you know,

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 1>case to support your your perspective, it'll all turn out

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>all right. But that's six months out of your life.

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 1>So again, it's the balance between being able to speak

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>your mind and knowing that there could be potential consequences

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 1>further down the road. So there's an element of bravery

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>there too. I mean, I'm sure that the people in

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Egypt who were using Twitter and Facebook in order to

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 1>criticize the government and to organize protests, they were doing that.

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure with the knowledge that if things went poorly,

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it could really come to haunt them later on. But

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 1>but they showed courage in that case. But there's a

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 1>difference between showing courage and a protest and calling your

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 1>employer a jerk, right, So just make sure you know

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that difference, because sometimes I don't. By the way, just

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to follow up, I never did find the the SUV company,

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 1>So I'm sure somebody if you would like to tell

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:44.840
<v Speaker 1>us on Facebook who that was. I can't remember for

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:46.759
<v Speaker 1>the life of me who it was. Um, And I

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:49.360
<v Speaker 1>looked at the outroker thing because I just basically pulled

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 1>it from my list. Um, he was actually taking pictures

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>and posting pictures of the prospective jurors. He said he

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:03.360
<v Speaker 1>got permission and U and the the court basically said

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 1>he was okay because somebody told him it was okay,

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 1>but it really wasn't okay to do that. But someone

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 1>had told him it was okay, so they weren't. It's like, well,

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, you got told something. It isn't incorrect, but

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you were actually told that, so it's not your fault.

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:20.239
<v Speaker 1>Even so, I don't do it. I can't imagine being

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 1>the person who told him, oh, sure you can do that. Yeah,

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and I I don't think i'd want to have the pictures,

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 1>but yes, that is. That is the more specific information

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 1>about about what he was doing. I'm sorry I didn't

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 1>have that earlier. I was just grabbing all kinds of

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>crazy things and I thought, oh, that's interesting. Yeah, like

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 1>we said, there are a lot more stories here. I mean,

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:42.919
<v Speaker 1>there's stories about companies that laid off, you know, more

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:46.800
<v Speaker 1>than a dozen employees, for creating a Facebook pro Facebook

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:50.719
<v Speaker 1>group page to talk about something or other. Ones of

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sports ones. There are a lot of

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 1>politician ones. There's the entire there's an entire sub genre

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:00.479
<v Speaker 1>for teachers. Because of course, teachers, you know, they're held

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to a very specific kind of standard and should they

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 1>have anything in their social media profiles that is somewhat

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 1>uh below that standard. They could suffer for it, and

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:15.800
<v Speaker 1>there's not a whole lot of sympathy offered to them

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 1>from most school boards, I would say, and uh oh.

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 1>And then there's the guy from best Buy who was

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 1>fired and then rehired by best Buy for creating the

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 1>YouTube video of the cartoon where it's the customer who

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>comes in wanting to buy an iPhone and the the

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:37.160
<v Speaker 1>best Buy representative is trying to convince the customer that

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the EVO is a superior product. That was the one

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that kind of launched all the the that that series

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:47.840
<v Speaker 1>of videos of all the cartoons with the robotic voices

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:51.359
<v Speaker 1>that wanted an iPhone. You know that kind of thing,

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I want an iPhone? Yes, exactly that video. There's that

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>guy too. So this does span things well beyond Twitter

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook. Guys, if you have any favorite stories, or

0:37:01.080 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 1>if you have a story of what happened to you

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 1>or to maybe someone you know who perhaps used Twitter

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 1>or Facebook in a moment of absent mindedness, let's say,

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and you want to share it. First of all, keep

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:17.799
<v Speaker 1>it clean, folks, but you can let us know on

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:21.879
<v Speaker 1>Facebook or Twitter are handle there is text stuff h

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 1>s W. Or you can shoot us an email That

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 1>address is tech stuff at how stuff works dot com,

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:30.359
<v Speaker 1>and Chris and I will talk to you again, hopefully

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:35.399
<v Speaker 1>when we think about it first really soon. For more

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>on this and thousands of other topics, visit how stuff

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 1>works dot com. To learn more about the podcast, click

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast icon in the upper right corner of

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 1>our homepage. The house stuff Works iPhone app has arrived.

0:37:47.320 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Download it today on iTunes, brought to you by the

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 1>reinvented two thousand twelve camera. It's ready, are you