WEBVTT - Hackers Exploit Microsoft SharePoint as Firm Works to Patch 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Stay in in the TMT space if you will. We're

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 2>going to talk about check in with anorog Ronnie. He's

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 2>a Bloomberg senior tech analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence ANRAG. You know,

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Microsoft as well as anybody put into context for us,

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 2>this cybersecurity attack has been certainly at the top of

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 2>the news here this morning, and it just kind of,

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 2>I think, at least to me, is surprising that a

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 2>company with the resources and the technology expertise of Microsoft

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 2>that they could in fact still be subject to this

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 2>type of risk. How should we think about it?

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Paul, when it comes to almost all the major

0:00:56.440 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 3>tech companies, this is probably the most important and biggest

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 3>risk for them. And again, you know, whether it's Microsoft

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 3>or Amazon or Google, you know, this is one of

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 3>the biggest worries for all of us. Is you know,

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 3>you wake up one morning and you see a big

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 3>outage out there, I mean almost a year ago. We

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 3>remember that CrowdStrike problem and what it did to you know,

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 3>airports and all the other things. Now, but in this

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 3>particular case, I think it's a lot less problematic than

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 3>what we saw a year ago. This is primarily based

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 3>on certain on premise software. I mean, there is an

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 3>on premise version of scarepoint software that they have. This

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 3>is the it's only affecting those particular workloads, so it's

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 3>not as widespread as some of the other areas we

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 3>have seen.

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 4>Now, what does this mean for cybersecurity companies?

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's a good thing for them. They are

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean to be honest, over the last fifteen years

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 3>that I can remember, they're probably the one area it

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 3>doesn't matter what the macro environment is, they continue to grow,

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, bigger and bigger. That's because there's so many

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 3>little nuances that I have to be protected. These networks

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 3>have multiple software from multiple vendors, and a lot of

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 3>these companies do some unique things go prevent them endpoints security,

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, analytics, you'd name it. I mean, there is

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 3>no shortage off I would say funding for a lot

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 3>of those companies.

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 2>So how do you characters or how do investors characterize

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 2>just cyber crime risk for some of the big tech

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 2>names that you know, the MAGS seven names are just

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 2>a big tech names in general. It's something that we

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 2>don't really talk about too often, do.

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 3>We No, In fact that as I said, I mean,

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 3>I've always said that this is probably the biggest risk

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 3>that faces all of us because remember, now think about it,

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 3>like AWS takes care of a lot of startups site.

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Now you see a problem with that network, the rest

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 3>that then go down. Same thing you could say with

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Google Cloud platform, Microsoft's cloud platform. This particular incidence is

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 3>only for the on premise applications, so you know, in

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 3>a roundabout way, maybe this helps Microsoft in the long

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 3>run that those customers say, you know what, I need

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 3>to move online. I need to move more worklows to

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 3>the cloud. But in totality, I mean you look at

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 3>it from a cyber insurance point of view, insurance companies

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 3>don't even want to go down that route. I mean,

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 3>this is a I mean one of the biggest hidden

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 3>risks for all of us, especially as most of our

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:15.519
<v Speaker 3>savings are you know, digital and you know placed in

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 3>not in you know, safe boxes, but in investments somewhere.

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 4>Digitally and honor again the text banks. We also had

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 4>some IPO news. You had fig Mal looking to raise

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 4>about a billion dollars us ipo.

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 5>What is Figma?

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 6>What do they do?

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 4>What's their market value?

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:32.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I was, you know, this is probably one of

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 3>the more interesting companies that I have come across in

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 3>a long while. A few years ago, Adobe made around

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 3>for them, you know, paid twenty billion dollars to buy them,

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 3>that didn't deal didn't go through. They you know, Adobe

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 3>ended up paying pigma billion dollars as sort of breakup fee.

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 3>But now they're going public, so very unique software in

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 3>their market. What they do nobody else does it so well.

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 3>They help you design application all the way from ideation

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 3>to you know, publish applications or you could say, issuing

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 3>applications out there for people. So, you know, we own

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 3>a white boat. You want to discuss this idea with

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 3>a team. Phenomenal software. It has very high market share

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 3>and at this point, to be honest, I do we

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 3>had one product that had some overlap with them, but

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 3>frankly speaking, there isn't a large company out there that's

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 3>a credible competitor for them. So we think this is

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 3>going to be an area where see strong interest. We

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 3>anticipate sales growth north of forty percent both for this

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 3>year and next year. We think revenue could be one

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 3>point six billion by the end of next year. And

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, our analysis indicates post evaluation somewhere between you know,

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:40.359
<v Speaker 3>nineteen and twenty three billion dollars or twenty one billion

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 3>at the midpoint.

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 2>And propose stock symbol for this pending IPOs FIG Bankers

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 2>and Morgan Stanley Goldman Sachs all in a company and

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 2>JP Morgan, so the blue chippers there for that deal

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 2>and anag in your software space. We've had a couple

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 2>of pretty good deals this year. Circle Internet Group wore

0:04:57.480 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 2>we've I mean, do you expect more?

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 3>I think that. I mean, if you have the capacity

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 3>to go out in this market and raise capital, this

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 3>is really good valuations. I'm very nice right now. I mean,

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 3>I would strongly encourage if there is somebody who's looking

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 3>at it. But at the same time, you know there

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:15.720
<v Speaker 3>is an issue about do you want to go and

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 3>see your work being scrutinized. Public funding is also very good.

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 3>There is so much private capital out there, so it

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 3>really depends on what somebody is doing. Last year, we

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.280
<v Speaker 3>saw an IPO came out Service Tit and just in

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 3>the first two months or first two quarters of there

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 3>coming out as an IPO, they actually thought demand go

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 3>because people recognize what this company has. I think the

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 3>same could happen to Figma when you know a lot

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 3>of people don't know what these guys do, and you

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 3>know that recognizes the value of the software or the

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 3>company just by going public.

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, very good. Anna Agarana, Senior Technology Channels, Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 2>He's in a Chicago. You were talking about a little

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 2>bit about MICROSOFTIC at the cyber security issue that it

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 2>is dealing with. Plus we got some IPOs in the

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 2>software space picking back up. It's always a good sign here.

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:10.799
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarcklay and Android Auto

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 4>All right, we're earlier this morning of Verizon CEO Hans Vestsberg.

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 4>He talked to us, talked to Bloomberg Shinali boss Sake

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 4>about some of the things that the company is doing

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 4>right now. They just had their earnings report, but now

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 4>we want to get the analyst view on that. So

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 4>for that we'll bring in John Butler. He's Bloomberg Intelligence

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 4>senior telecom analyst on these Verizon earnings. So John, good

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 4>beat second quarter revenue, raise the profit outlook, what's making

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:41.720
<v Speaker 4>the company so optimistic?

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 7>So I would characterize when I look at Verizon, I

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 7>think of the phrase game of the inches, right. I

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 7>think the improvements here quartering and quarter rout are incrementally better.

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:02.479
<v Speaker 7>They're edging towards that acquisition of Frontier, which is really

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 7>going to change the game for them. But in the meantime,

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 7>they put a lot of changes in place in terms

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 7>of their go to market strategy, how they're combating promotions

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 7>coming from T Mobile and AT and T and on

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 7>the margin quarter in and quarter out, I just see

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 7>them doing a better and better job. I think all

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 7>the actions they've taken are starting to work. And so

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 7>taking the long view here, I really think Verizon is

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 7>improving just quarter and in quarter out. And this was

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 7>another quarter where you could look at it in isolation

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 7>and say, you know, it was a solid quarter, a

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 7>little bit mixed on some of the metrics, But I

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 7>think I'm balanced better than last quarter in last year.

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 2>John, what's kind of the positioning of Verizon in the marketplace? Like,

0:07:57.280 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 2>I've been a long time Verizon wireless customers since the

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 2>beginning of service, actually, and I guess I was initially

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 2>drawn to it because I thought they had the best network.

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 2>So quality, is that still the case because it seems

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 2>like T Mobile's gotten a lot better in quality and

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 2>AT and T. I don't know.

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, you know, Paul, you bring up a good point.

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 7>I think there's a question mark out there as to

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 7>whether Verizon still has the best network versus T Mobile

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 7>and AT and T. But I think they have a

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 7>slight edge they are in terms of coverage. And it's

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 7>interesting a lot of people ask me about wireless, who

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 7>was the best network? Who should I choose? And the

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 7>one thing that people are always asking about is how's

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 7>their coverage? I think coverage is very important to people,

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 7>and I think when you think on that metric. In

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 7>terms of that metric, for Rizon delivers the bars on

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 7>your smartphone probably more than T Mobile and AT and

0:08:55.840 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 7>T in terms of download speeds, though I suspect that

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 7>T Mobile probably is gaining the edge here now.

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 4>What about prices. Did did did Verizon increase their prices?

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 4>If so, did that help?

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 2>So?

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 7>We did see in all the carriers are increasing prices

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 7>right now as the market matures and new user growth

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 7>is slowing considerably. The only way you're going to grow

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 7>that important service revenue metric is by raising prices. They

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 7>tend to do it on older plans. For Verizon, stunt

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 7>it over the past six months. As if you look

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 7>over the past year so as AT and T and

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 7>T Mobile, that's flowing through and it's helping to boost

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 7>the service revenue. I think over time they're adding in

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 7>those little extras like you know, device insurance and perks

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:53.079
<v Speaker 7>like you know, added content that you can purchase at

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 7>a discount through through Verizon, and I think all that

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 7>together is going to continue to provide a lift to

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 7>service revenue. It's nothing special. Again, I'm looking forward to

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 7>that Frontier acquisition where they're going to buy you access

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 7>to two million fiber broadband subscribers and eight million fiber

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 7>homes passed, because once they get a Frontier under the hood,

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 7>they're going to be able to bundle that wireless service

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 7>with fiber and I think that's going to help to

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 7>really drive renewed subscriber growth.

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 2>So, John, use of cash heer, how do they kind

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.319
<v Speaker 2>of allocate it between debt reduction. They've got a lot

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 2>of debt on their balance sheet versus funding that big

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 2>juicy six percent plus dividen yield, so.

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 7>They're doing both. Paul, I think free cash flow is

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 7>going to get a lift from HR one, the new

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 7>tax legislation. It's also a very cash flow rich business.

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 7>As we exit the year. This year, they'll have most

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 7>of their celves sites upgraded with the new C band

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 7>midband spectrum, which again is improving network speeds and enhancing

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 7>their coverage. So that whole project is going to begin

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 7>to wind down a bit as we get to your end,

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 7>so they'll be able to sort of maintain spending without

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 7>having to increase, which is constructive to free cash flow growth.

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 2>All right, John, thanks so much. We appreciate it as always.

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 2>John Butler, Senior telecom analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts. Or watch us live on YouTube. Let's

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>go back to the car business and we talk about

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a name. We don't talk I don't think enough about

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>or as much as maybe we could. And that is Stillantis.

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 2>I think about the old Chrysler with Fiat and all

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 2>that kind of stuff. I'm not sure what all the

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 2>brands are there, but they at two point seven billion

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 2>dollar charge. Here Steve Manner, Global Autos and Industrials Research

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Channels for Bloomberg Intelligence. He joins us. Here, Steve, what's

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 2>going on with our friends at Stalantis.

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so they reported the preliminary first half numbers today.

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 6>They booked a loss and a charge of three point

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 6>three billion. A lot of that is, you know, canceling

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 6>the fuel cell R and D business. They're canceling like

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 6>an EV from Maserati, taking some other charges on recalls

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 6>in tariffs. So overall, at the end of the day,

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 6>I think the if you listen to the call, there's

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 6>really no new bad news, which is good news for

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 6>the company. I don't think it can get any any worse.

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:53.839
<v Speaker 6>So then that's why the stock's actually reacting positively at

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 6>the moment.

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 4>Steve, what about the president's efforts to dial back the

0:12:57.080 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 4>sport for evs is that affecting them as well.

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 6>You know, they are revisiting the EV business, not dialing back,

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 6>not so much in Europe, but revisiting it definitely in

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 6>North America. And one thing that it's it's really bad

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 6>for the quarter for them was really their North American business.

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 6>Their North American business drives most of the profit. Shipments

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 6>were down twenty five percent in the first half year

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 6>on year, and a lot of that is controllable. One

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 6>of the things, a couple of things that they are

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 6>doing to kind of arrest that decline is not only

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 6>cutting back on production, but they're relaunching a couple of

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 6>popular models that they've they discontinue. One of them is

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 6>the jeep Jaer Cherokee. It's going to come back later

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 6>this year. And more importantly to stop market share loss

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 6>on their RAM trucks is they're going to reintroduce the

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 6>V eight, so you know, they can't you know, they delayed,

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 6>they didn't really stay canceled, but the delay the EV

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 6>product for the Ram trucks. But now in reintroducing, uh,

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 6>the V eight, which is you know, the biggest engines

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 6>you can get for a gasoline engine you can get

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 6>on a on a truck.

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 2>So where is stalanthis in the world of big auto

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:15.319
<v Speaker 2>how do you how do they position themselves? I think

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 2>the four GM, Volkswagen, the Chinese players. I'm just not

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 2>sure where to put Stalantis these days.

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think, I mean, they do have an important

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 6>role to play in the auto market. They're really strong

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 6>in Europe's particularly in there what they call the B

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 6>and C segment, which is the hatchback the compacts up

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 6>compact segment.

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 7>Uh.

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 6>They also have really high market share in their commercial

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 6>vehicle business. This is like their Ram transit man that

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 6>you see. You know, a lot of contractors use. You know,

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 6>they have thirty percent market share in Europe. But and

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 6>then again Ram truck is one of the most popular

0:14:56.360 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 6>pickup trucks in the US market. Unfortunately, you know, for

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 6>and GM has taken share from them because they didn't

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 6>have the V eight when they talked about EV's and

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 6>in more few efficient trucks. But you know, the US

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 6>market is quite different. Commercial users do love the power

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 6>the torque, so they're reintesting reintroducing the V eight just

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 6>to try to bring a game more market share back.

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 4>And they have a new CEO and Tonio Foaloza. He's

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 4>in office for roughly a month, so he's just getting there.

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 4>What are some of the top items on his agenda?

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 4>Has he talked about it?

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 6>No, but we'll hear more about it on July twenty ninth.

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 6>So today's call was just a proliminary, proliminary, preliminary call

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 6>on first half. We're going to hear from the new

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 6>CEO on the twenty ninth, And I think a lot

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 6>of the questions still in the air is, you know,

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 6>what is the strategic direction for the company in terms

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 6>of evs, How are they going to manage the tariffs,

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 6>which is still a big unknown because because you know,

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 6>negotiation is still ongoing with Europe. And then you know,

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 6>what is what are they going to do do with

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 6>some of the kind of slower performing brands like Maserati,

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 6>which is really draining a lot of their cash.

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 2>All right, Steve, thanks so much. Appreciate that Global autos

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Research channels for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts or watch us live on YouTube.

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 2>All right, at least Mitello Paul Sweeney live here on

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 2>our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio streaming live on YouTube as well.

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 2>I consider myself a pizza aficionado, So by definition, I'm

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 2>not really a Domino's person because I live in a

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 2>world where there's great local yes, but for a lot

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 2>of the world that's not the case. And so they

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 2>depend on the Dominoes of the world. And they came

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 2>out and you saw that in the number study, some

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 2>pretty good numbers. Let's break it down with Michael Halem,

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Senior Restaurant and Foods are analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. So

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 2>some pretty good news out of Domino's, Mike, what'd you

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 2>take away?

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, listen, they've they have some nice tailwinds this year.

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 3>Stuff.

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 5>Gross Pizza has done really well. It's it's really driven

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 5>some strong same star sales here in the first half.

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 5>You know, the industries about flat in the US, and

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 5>you know, they drove are almost three and a half

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 5>percent comp here in the second quarter, so outperforming the

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 5>market by a pretty significant margin. And they also rolled

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 5>out door dash to all their stores in this second quarter.

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 5>And so they're going to start ramping up the marketing

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 5>there and that should give a nice, nice boost the

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 5>shares over the next twelve months or so and maybe beyond.

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 5>And so yeah, for those two reasons, you know, we

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 5>expect them to continue to outpace their QSR Pizza and

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 5>QSR Burger competitors throughout the year end.

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 4>What about their loyalty programs, they know, a lot of

0:17:57.200 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 4>analysts were saying, you know what, this is going to

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:00.880
<v Speaker 4>be a big, big boost for them. Did it help

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 4>out we're doing.

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's been they that was the other thing they cited.

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 5>And so, you know, they they rely heavily on households

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:14.120
<v Speaker 5>making you know, fifty sixty thousand dollars a year and below.

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 5>And so you know, as everyone knows, that's been a

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 5>very weak segment of the restaurant industry for the last

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 5>few years due to all the inflation, right, and so

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 5>to bring people back in, they started lowering the redemption

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 5>the number of points needed to make redemptions on the

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 5>loyalty program, and it's been successfully bringing in more carry

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 5>out consumers, which are typically lower income, right, And so

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 5>by bringing those consumers in, you know, it's definitely given

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:45.959
<v Speaker 5>a boost to their traffic over the last three quarters

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 5>or so.

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 2>So, what's Dominoes and some of the other restaurant chains

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 2>that you cover, Mike, what are they saying about tariffs

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 2>and how that might impact their costs and how much

0:18:57.480 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 2>of their costs will they take in margin versus pest

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.679
<v Speaker 2>along to consumers? Is their consensus building?

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 5>It depends on the chain. But you know, luckily, restaurants

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 5>source a large majority of their product in the in

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 5>the country in which they're operating, right, So Dominoes operates

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 5>in over eighty markets, and and all of their products,

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 5>you know, all of their countries largely source everything domestically, right,

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 5>And so restaurants are in a good space, you know,

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 5>the restaurants companies, the stocks got hammered back in April.

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:32.919
<v Speaker 5>You know, I think that was largely a case of

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:36.360
<v Speaker 5>the baby being thrown out with the bathwater, because restaurants

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 5>have very low exposure to tariffs, and I think we've

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 5>seen that in the rebound since April. You know, some

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 5>of the restaurant names we cover, you know, two ones

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 5>that we like, Shakeshack and Crackerball. They've rallied one hundred

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 5>percent over the last couple months. And I think they're

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 5>in a good place because you know, if people do

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:59.679
<v Speaker 5>recognize some price increases at retail, at the mall, stuff

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.479
<v Speaker 5>like that, at whatever it is, fifteen to twenty percent,

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 5>they're not going to see those same increases in restaurants

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 5>and may you know, look at as a better value.

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 4>So people are still dining out as much as they

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 4>used to because I know, I consider myself thrifty. So

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 4>I cook the entire week and then we pick one

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 4>night where we go out to eat. It's a Friday,

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:21.959
<v Speaker 4>you know, because Mama don't cook on Fridays. So are

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 4>more do you see that kind of a change in

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 4>the habits of the people who are going to eat out?

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 5>Well, we've seen that, there's no doubt, especially due to

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 5>all the inflation. We've seen traffic decline now for several

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 5>years in a row. But restaurants have been able to,

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:41.199
<v Speaker 5>you know, the ones that are doing well have been

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 5>able to more than offset that with price increases. Right

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 5>and obviously the best performers of the bunch are absolutely

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 5>able to drive traffic. And it's that's really about providing

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 5>a very good experience. Right now, people are very discerning

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 5>about where they're going to spend their restaurant dollars when

0:20:57.280 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 5>they go out. They want to make sure they're not

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 5>going to have a bad experience, and so they're continuing

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 5>to go to places. You know, think Texas Roadhouse is

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 5>one that really stands out. They're going to a place

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 5>where they know they can get good value on the

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 5>plate for what they pay, a very consistent experience, right,

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 5>And because of that, you're seeing a wider divergence between

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 5>the winners and losers in the restaurant space.

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 2>Mike, how about labor? President Trump has effectively shut the

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 2>southern border. Have your companies who typically who rely to

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:32.640
<v Speaker 2>some degree on that labor force, are they seeing it yet?

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you know, everybody's logged onto e verify and most

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 5>of our chains, you know, are making sure that their

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 5>employees are have papers and are operating legally. It's more

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 5>of an impact to I would say, the independent restaurants

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 5>in the country. But then you know what happens is

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:57.919
<v Speaker 5>that ends up being a price competition, and so it

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 5>drives up prices for labor. And we're seeing another year

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 5>of about four to five percent wag ery inflation in

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 5>the restaurant industry this year.

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 4>And are we changing how people are changing how they eat. Right, So,

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:12.199
<v Speaker 4>in the last thirty seconds or so, GLP ones. Our

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 4>restaurant's cutting back on those portions, making things smaller, you know,

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 4>less on your plate.

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 5>Well they are, but mainly because of inflation.

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 3>Well there you go.

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 5>You know, GLP ones, you know over time, you know,

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 5>we expect that to be the biggest way to combat

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 5>that is to decrease the portion sizes and to make

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 5>sure you have some healthy options on the menu.

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Michael Helen, Thanks, We always appreciate chatting with you. Getting

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 2>the lay of the land in the restaurant business. Again Domino's,

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:43.880
<v Speaker 2>but got some good numbers here today, so good for them.

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Michael Helen a senior restaurant in food service analyst or

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence. He's based down there in our Princeton office.

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:10.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal