WEBVTT - Fed Won't Have Your Back, Salient's Hunt Says

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Well,

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>what's real about this market is that many investors have

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>really neglected to get in on the advance in share prices.

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>But here to tell us perhaps why is Ben Hunt.

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:46.520
<v Speaker 1>He is the chief investment strategist for Salient and they're

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>based in Houston, but he joins us here in our studio.

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much for being here. Been great to be here,

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me. Maybe you can sort of unpack

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>my very short description of what is going on. This

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>is a rally in stocks, dows at a record today

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>SMP two. Uh. No one likes this rally somehow? What? Why?

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Why is that there's no feeling of exuberance? Is there? No,

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>there's no feeling of exuberance, And I'll tell you why.

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>It's It would be as if you had a housing

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>market that was just going gangbusters. And an all time

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>high and housing prices and housing activity, and yet real

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>estate agents were having a miserable time. But that's the

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>situation we have now because we have the markets at

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>all time highs. And yet and yet anyone who's been

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in this business for really more than a nanosecond doesn't

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>trust it. They don't like it. Why not because it

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't depend on fundamental factors, right, The plain truth of

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the matter is that fundamentals right, what what I'll call

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>stock picking, buying good stuff and avoiding the bad stuff.

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>That hasn't worked for eight years. It hasn't worked since

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>March of two thousand and nine, when the when the Feds.

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>When you say it hasn't worked, and what has it

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>not worked? I mean because you think about companies like Facebook, like, uh,

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I pick a Microsoft for example. I mean,

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>there are companies that have returned. But no, No, My

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>point is that everything is up right. So the SNP

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>has tripled over the last eight years. But if you

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.119
<v Speaker 1>look at you know, you can the bad with the good,

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the bad with the good, right, because this this massive

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 1>amount of buying that's been going on right right now,

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Exchange traded funds that are typically packed with not just

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>one stock obviously. Well, well, well that's true. Let me

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>let me let me come back on the whole et

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>F question, because they're there there. I think there are

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>two main factors here that make this such an unloved market.

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's an unloved market by stock pickers because against

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>stock picking hasn't worked. Trying to pick the good from

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the bad on what we've all been trained to believe

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>should be the deciding factors between the good and the bad.

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>That hasn't worked right. It used to work, It really

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 1>did right, So you can look at all these actors

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>like quality and value and the like. It it was

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>able to you were able to to to pick one

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>set of stocks avoid another set of stocks. That doesn't

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>work when everything goes up together. And that's been that

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>rising tide that lifts all boats. That's come from this

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 1>massive wall of money that central banks have plunged into markets.

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>About fourteen trillion dollars that's how much the central bank

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>balance sheets are today, and they're adding about two trillion

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year, so it's it's a massive amount of

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>money now. But here's the thing. Something changed last Wednesday

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>with the fat announcement. What what we're really seeing is

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that the FED is changing and I'll use a ten

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>dollar word, their reaction function. And basically what that means

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>is the FED going forward. I don't think they're going

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to be your best friend like they have been for

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the past eight years. What leads you to believe that

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>just because they might raise rates what two maybe three times? Well,

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's a it's a whole different, uh way

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of looking at the world. And that's what I mean

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>by this, this this economist phrase, right, reaction function? What what?

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean? It means that what sort of

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>data is the FED looking at? What do they say

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that they're looking at, and how do they react that

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>new data? So what we've had so far this year

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>is actually pretty not so good data from what they

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>typically look at, things like inflation, things like industrial production,

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>all those have been pretty pretty not so good. Right,

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Employment is good though, This is the thing, and this

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:33.839
<v Speaker 1>is this is the shift, Right, So the shift is

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>now really focused on the unemployment rate. The shift is

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>really focused on the potential for wage inflation. And so

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>this is why the FED gave a very hawkish talk,

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>uh not just in what they announced, but then in

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the press conference afterwards. So what what I'm saying is

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that this this, this pattern that we've been so well

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 1>trained to respond to over the last eight years, of

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 1>the FED and the other Central b is doing more

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 1>and more and more, that pattern shifts has shifted, and

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it's it's look, this this is what always so how

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and I want to give you the time to do this.

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>It explained how investors should shift their thinking in order

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:18.679
<v Speaker 1>to accommodate this situation well to to respects. The first

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>is that that the FED is not going to have

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>your back anymore in the way that it has. So

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:26.559
<v Speaker 1>what we've we've been really well trained over the last

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>eight years, and whenever there's some sort of scary moment,

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>right then the response has always been, oh, the FED

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>will do more, they'll buy more, they will lower interest rates.

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 1>If it's not here, maybe it's the ECB. So I'm

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:45.799
<v Speaker 1>saying that's changed. What's the second thing? Give you thirty

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 1>seconds there. So the second thing is this, when everything

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>was going up together, stock picking, active management didn't matter, right,

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>and so that's why you saw all this money go

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>away from i'll call ittively managed mutual funds into e

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:04.799
<v Speaker 1>t s and the like, because it really didn't matter.

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>When this rolls over with the the fat not being

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>your best friend, it matters again, and it's just at

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:16.599
<v Speaker 1>the moment of maximum capitulation both by practitioners and investors

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 1>here in this market. I want to thank you very

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>much for your insight. Very interesting. Ben Hunt is the

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>chief investment strategist for Salient. They are based in Houston, Texas,

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and you can follow a Ben on Twitter at epsilon

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 1>Theory and you'll be able to find out exactly all

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 1>the details about how that theory is put together and

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>how it applies to professional investing. Well done, Thanks very much,

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Ben Hunt. I want to bring in Stephen Gandal. He

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>is a columnist for Bloomberg gad fly covering equity markets.

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>He can be followed on Twitter at Stephen Gandal g

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>A M. D. E. L. Alright, so tell us, Mr

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>gad flyer, what about this deal that Amazon taking over

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the Whole Foods. What effect do you believe that that

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>has on the grocery store industry? But I want you

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to see if you can connect that with this initial

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>public offering that we've been speaking about Blue Apron, which

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>is the prepared recipe, base delivery, cook at home food business.

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>So clearly market thinks it's gonna have a lot of

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>effect on the grocery business. All the stocks fell uh

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>if you look at it, and and and so some

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>people use that to bridge to say that maybe the

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>government's gonna look at this anti trust if if investors

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>are so worried about Kroger's and Safe Supervalue and some

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of the other ones. But I don't think that's really case.

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>It's very It's relatively small. The the in terms of

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>sixteen billion. I think in terms of sales uh food

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>food right right have eight hundred billion in the grocery

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>business and billion for Amazon at a twollions for Amazon.

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>But Amazon has eight billion in the in the grocery business.

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's still small. It's a bigger portion of the

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>online grocery online business. But because that's because you have

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to if you broadly define what Amazon, because Amazon sells

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>everything online. If you say everything that could show up

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>in a grocery store, called that Amazon's online grocery business,

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of stuff that maybe isn't they've never

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>really thought of. It's not Amazon Fresh, they've really ever

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>thought of that as kind of grocery delivery. So but

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>clearly the the market is concerned about that. I'm not

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>sure how concerned they should be about in what way

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:44.319
<v Speaker 1>the stocks all felt, I mean the competing groceries, the

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>competing grocer stores right, a little bit up today, but okay, yeah,

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a little rebound on let's say Krogra for example, right exactly.

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:53.319
<v Speaker 1>So for for Blue Apron, this comes at a very

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>bad time, right, because they're trying to price their I

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>p O. You can imagine that Whole Foods would do

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a service of whole meals where a customers would get

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>free delivery, and that is uh and and also Whole

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Foods is seen as a premium fresh food brand. So

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you can see there's a big negative for for Blue Apron.

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I keep thinking of one word, and I don't know

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>whether it should be one word, but it's called peepot.

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:21.959
<v Speaker 1>Remember peepod. Yeah, well, originally it was a victim of

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the dot com bust. There was an operation that was

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>designed to deliver food to your home in just this manner.

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>And well I think peopot still around. There was a

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:34.319
<v Speaker 1>web in well they have a new a new version

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of anyway, The point being that what has changed in

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the food preparation and delivery business that makes this a

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>good business now, whereas let's say, seventeen years ago, it

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>wasn't such a good business. I'm not sure. I mean

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Amazon was first of all, Whole Foods did not think

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>this was a good business. They weren't in it. They

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>partnered with instant Cart, so they said, you know, we'll

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>let someone else kind of do this part of the busines.

0:09:56.880 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Instat Cart is a delivery another delivery service that it

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>or two uh Amazon Fresh or what people think Amazon's

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 1>gonna do with Whole Foods. So hope it said they

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 1>didn't really want to be in this business and and

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Amazon had trouble getting into it. I mean they they

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>they have kind of dabbled in it for a few

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 1>years and then kind of decided, I guess with this

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.679
<v Speaker 1>that couldn't do it on their own. Blue Apron has

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 1>made the case of this is a really good business,

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.559
<v Speaker 1>but they haven't really shown that it can be. I mean,

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the idea with the commerces that it can bend the

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>cost structure, right, you don't have to have stores, you

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>have to distribution. We've done in their short stories. You

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 1>can be a lot more profitable. But that doesn't really

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the case in in groceries because the inventor you have

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>goes bad. Right, the main problem with the grocery store

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>is that your food is always spoiling. And and Amazon

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 1>or Blue Apron sorry, hasn't been able to show that

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>they can hold lower inventory than their traditional grocer. Right.

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Their inventory is going up, has been going up, it

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been as a presentage of and spoilage costs have

0:10:55.960 --> 0:11:00.199
<v Speaker 1>been going up. So it's not clear that, uh, when

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>it comes to grocery business, the e commerce is really

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a better business model. So having said that, what makes

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Amazon dot Com think? Do you believe that this is

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>a growth business or is it just to take more

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>market share? And then you know, you'll read a recipe

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>in the Washington Post, which is owned by Jeff Bezos,

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and you'll be able to order it through some app

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that will automatically connect you with content. I mean, all

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>these marketing options, right, I Mean, one thing you could

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>say is just this is a bigger test. You know,

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>He's it's not much money for Amazon, as you said that,

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the market kept, it's not very big.

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>So they're just they're doing another test. They tried with

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>on their own for a test. This is a bigger one.

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's one way to look at the other way

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>look at it, I would think is the play is

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:47.679
<v Speaker 1>that Amazon just wants to be more and more part

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>of your life. Right you wake up? I wake up

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 1>every morning and say Alexa, good morning. Right, And so

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>if I'm getting my groceries from Amazon to even if

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not producing a lot of profits for them, you

0:11:57.400 --> 0:11:59.839
<v Speaker 1>can see how they want to continue to integrate and

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>is on into your daily life. And if you get

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 1>your food from Amazon, that's a big part of it.

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.839
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that there's a greater risk of a

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 1>food delivery company versus a restaurant company? And I'm thinking

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>about the food scare that took place with Chipultle over

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years and how that really knocked

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>their stock and caused the whole bunch of problems for

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the company that they are still struggling with. I think

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 1>whenever you're trying to do fresh on a mass scale,

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>uh and again Blue Apron, if you look at them,

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:33.079
<v Speaker 1>they've had inventory issues, problems trying to get the food

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 1>fast enough to um consumers before it spoils. I think

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you're you're you're going to run into this problem the

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:40.959
<v Speaker 1>same way Bold they ran into the problem. So yeah,

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's an issue, and I think if you again,

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the Amazon deal for Whole Foods comes at a bad

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>time for the Blue Apron because Blue Apron, it's supposed

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to have a higher profit margins, so they're they're multiple

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to be a premium, but they have about

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the same profit margins as Whole Foods, and Amazon's only

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>paying is paying like a little bit less than one

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:03.959
<v Speaker 1>time sales. Blue Apron today announcing their I p O.

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>They want to go in about four times sales right

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.679
<v Speaker 1>that they really have to uh and some of that

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>because the Blue Aprons construct uh sorry growth, but they

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>really have to ben that cross structure and show they can,

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 1>which they haven't to say that we're worth four times

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:21.079
<v Speaker 1>whereas Whole Foods only with less than one. But I'm

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>just wondering if you there's a Devil's Advocate position to take,

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>which is that this is actually a good thing for

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Blue Apron because it confirms that there is big money

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 1>behind the food delivery business, and Whole Foods of course

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>comes with its store footprint, which something that blue Apron

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:40.559
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have is either a plus or a minus. I

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>agree there is some validation to it, but there's validation

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>at a quarter of the price, and with that validation

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>comes a very big competitor after you. Yeah, and just

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>want to have you tried any of these home delivery

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>fresh Direct in New York. I sort of like it

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of boxes, like so, so you lose

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 1>is the time of shopping at the store, but you

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>um or you don't have that time, but you do

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>have the time of cutting up boxes and uh, at

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:10.959
<v Speaker 1>least in New York City, uh, tying together so you

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 1>can get the guardsman to take them away. Well, well done,

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you, and good for you for being so uh

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>environmentally conscious. Thanks very much. Stephen again del He is

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a columnist covering equity markets for Bloomberg Gadfly. Go ahead

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and follow him on Twitter at Stephen Gandal g A

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>N D E L. I want to bring in Alex Brinka,

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>our initial public offerings reporter, to sort of add into this,

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>because you're not necessarily going to take a company that

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>is losing money. I think it's doing about seven dred

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and eighty million in revenue. Uh, this is a food

0:14:55.400 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>delivery home preparation company called Blue Apron scoring public alex

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>A pleasure tell us what you know about this I

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>p O. I think it's gonna They said, what five

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>seven million, including the overlap montunder writers, right, so right

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>now they're marketing slower, They're they're marketing sorry you know,

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm in the weeks that I relate, I

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>get excited pim um. They're marketing thirty million shares um

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>for fifteen dollars to seventeen dollars each. That's according to

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the filing that they updated us when they filed this morning,

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>basically announcing to the world that they're going on the

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>road show for this I p O. Interesting timing though,

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and not necessarily Blue Apron's fault. So they they operate

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in the food delivery industry. As you said, they send

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>boxes Amazon exactly. You know where I'm getting Amazon Amazon,

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Amazon exactly. So they send food and you remember last

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>week Amazon agreed to buy Whole Foods for about fourteen

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. So that kind of big looming specter over

0:15:56.320 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>this whole grocery industry is out of the control all

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of Blue Apron. They've got to get this deal done.

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know that happened just last week. Now they're

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>going to have to go out in front of investors

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:10.359
<v Speaker 1>for the next two weeks and answer questions about the industry,

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>about where their competitive edge is, and you've got to

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of those questions are going to include

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that word Amazon. I'm wondering if you could just speak

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the people or about some of

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the details of the company, because I was reading the

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>s one and these are very accomplished executives who are

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>running it the albeit many of them in their thirties

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and forties. It is a young company. It's a New

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>York based company. UM. It was founded by Matt Salzburg.

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>He used to work at Bessemer Venture Partners in exactly,

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's one of the early investors in Blue Apron

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>as well. UM. He's been around the block for a

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>while UM in the tech kind of startup space. He

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>also worked for Blackstone. The CFO came from under Armor

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>UM where he was of the VP of account exactly

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Bradley Dickerson. So they there is some big name experience here. Again,

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the constant question is going to be for a lot

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of these companies, this one will only be valued at

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 1>three point two billion dollars if it sells its shares

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:13.159
<v Speaker 1>at the high end of that range compared to you know,

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the giants out there. The question will continue to be

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>in this space. It's an eight hundred billion dollar grocery market.

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>How what's the market? What's your target audience for getting

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 1>these home kits delivered to you? Is that enough? Is

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 1>there growth? There? Is that enough? Well in the S

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>one and DA if you can even come in on this,

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, looking at the charts that they show that

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:35.679
<v Speaker 1>are going to be part of the road show, it

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>has you know, a nice big bar chart that shows

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 1>that the biggest demographic is the youngest age group cohort

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and that I think something like or the total customer

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 1>base is made up of these young people and maybe

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>they just don't know how to cook. And that's you know,

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 1>that's the book case and that's what they're pitching, and

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:54.959
<v Speaker 1>that will be so important for these deals for these

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>companies that are losing a lot of money. Investors want

0:17:57.520 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to know where is the growth? Why do I trust

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>my money with you at this young age? Where is

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the growth going to be? They say? Blue Aprin says,

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>they only address less than one percent of the total

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:10.360
<v Speaker 1>addressable market for customers in the US, so you can

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.679
<v Speaker 1>see there that there is room for improvement. But the

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>bear case, I still got to say those millennials, I'm

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of the category we're still buying on Amazon. I was

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>going to ask you have you had a Blue Apron

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I have. I've tried to be a good reporter. I've

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>tried Blue Aprin. I've tried sun Basket, which is another

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 1>company that, according to our sources, has hired underwriters for

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>a potential I p O moving to go public. So

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you can see there are some copycats here. So competition

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the key word thinking copycats uber

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>left Gee, it's an interesting tech economy. Thank you very much,

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Alex Brinka, our initial public offerings reporter, and you'll be

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>following Blue Apron Force and Dave Wilson Bloomberg Stocks. Colmus,

0:18:48.560 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. Let's turn our attention now to

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>banks and the potential payout of thirty billion dollars here

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>to tell us more as our senior writer for Banking

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and Finance, y'am an owner on for Bloomberg News. Yeahm

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and always a pleasure to see you. Thirty billion dollars.

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>That's Um, that's real money, isn't it. Yes, it is?

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 1>And where does it come from? And where can it go?

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's not new money. It's not more money

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that that the banks are going to make as profits.

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.959
<v Speaker 1>But it's the money that they will be able to

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>uh distribute to their shareholders in addition to what what

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>they did last year. So this is just an increase

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>individends and buy backs. And that's crucial for shareholders of

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>banks because, um, you know, many years after the crisis,

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 1>they really were so stingy. The banks were stingy. They

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 1>had to be stingy. The regulators didn't really let them

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>distribute any of the money they kept holding onto them

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and improving their capital levels. Now finally those payouts are

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>slowly inching up. We'll tell us about Stephen Manuch in

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury secret terry and his role in this topic. Um,

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you know that this sort of the easing of the

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>stress test where where this you know, this is why

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>some some of the banks are increasing their payouts. It

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of predates Trump and munition things. Things started happening

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 1>even last year because partly because banks have managed to

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>increase their capital levels over the years, so it's not

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>as bad as it used to be uh, and regulators

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.400
<v Speaker 1>have have sort of eased up on them. But munition

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>under Trump's executive order is reviewing all the all the

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 1>bank regulations and and in his recommendations that came out

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 1>last week, he suggested that they should get even you know,

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>easier on the banks during the stress tests and and

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>make them ever two years you know, dropped the qualitative

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 1>uh portion of it, which is very tough. So so

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>going forward under regulators approved appointed by Trump, things are

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna get even better for the banks. Now. The

0:20:55.640 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>regulators that actually administer these stress tests they from the

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve. Yes, this is a federal reserve institution. It

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>has become. They started in two thousand nine. Um. I

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>mean it was very much hand in hand um with

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the government at the time who wanted to to restore

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 1>confidence in the US banking system. Um. But then it

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:22.400
<v Speaker 1>became a big, big federal reserve institution and um. Dan Trullo,

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>who was in charge of regulation at the Federal Reserve

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 1>was a big proponent of this and and led this

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>effort for years. So he is out. Um. There will

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>be new people appointed by Trump to the Fed Um,

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 1>so if those people are are more industry friendly, you know,

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>this could get even easier. When you say get even easier,

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you mean to actually change the terms of the stress test.

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>For example, have it done every other year for example?

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>That is one way and um other ways are um.

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, banks have complained a lot about how untransparent

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>some portions of this. In other words, that you know

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>everybody does their own stress test. They say, okay, if

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:08.640
<v Speaker 1>there was a big crisis financial economic meltdown, how would

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.120
<v Speaker 1>be fair? And then the FED takes those and then

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 1>runs its own calculations using its own secret models. They

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.719
<v Speaker 1>don't tell anyone, and and the banks keep saying, we

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:22.120
<v Speaker 1>never know what you're really looking at, and so more transparency,

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>for example, that the Fed starts giving about these things,

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the banks would like that. Well, one thing that we

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>know that is transparent is that if you have two

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty billion dollars in assets or less, you

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 1>can be exempt from this from parts of it, I

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>mean the qualitative section that that I mentioned. The qualitative

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>section is where not only the numbers, but they looked

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>at every risk management tool that the bank's had and

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>really cracked down on them, on on small little things

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:54.479
<v Speaker 1>that they found lacking, which again the banks hated. Uh

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>dotcha banks. Trust Bank, which is a very small subsidiary

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 1>in the US, kept failing that portion for a few years. Um,

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to be in it this year. But

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Dortche Bank and other big European banks are gonna be

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 1>um consolidated. I mean they have consultated all their US

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>operations under one roof according to other federals. And so

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>those big consolidated entities in the US will actually come

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:20.719
<v Speaker 1>under the stress test next year. So it will be

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 1>tough for them again. So they will be under the

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>spotlight once more. Um, and and they might then we

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>might see failures there next year. UM. But still as

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>we go forward, you know these things are not gonna

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>miss harsh. There will be more transparency and the banks

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>will probably know better how to deal with them or

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>game them. Well. Thanks very much, I know you're gonna

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:44.919
<v Speaker 1>be watching both of those potential scenarios, y'all. I'm an

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>owner on senior writer Banking and Finance for Bloomberg News,

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>speaking about less stressful tests how thirty billion dollars could

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:58.159
<v Speaker 1>be unlocked for bank shareholders. Thanks for listening to the

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:09.439
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox.

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo wits one. Before the podcast,

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio