Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to another episode of The Markmas Show
Speaker 1: where we talk about the decentralized Revolution. And today I
Speaker 1: got a special show for you. I him sitting down
Speaker 1: with somebody very special, somebody that I'm excited to talk to,
Speaker 1: someone I know you're gonna be excited to talk to
Speaker 1: that continues to talk about how the world is changing.
Speaker 1: Is I like to talk about through the decentralized Revolution,
Speaker 1: But he talks about it from a place of comedy,
Speaker 1: from a place of humor, because if we can't laugh
Speaker 1: at ourselves, what can we even do? And so one
Speaker 1: of the best ways to break these things down is
Speaker 1: to poke fun at them. And so I'm talking about
Speaker 1: JP Sears. You might know him from his wonderful sketches
Speaker 1: on uh YouTube. And so we're gonna talk about freedom.
Speaker 1: We're gonna talk about why he's doing what he's doing,
Speaker 1: how he uses comedy to expose things. We're gonna talk
Speaker 1: about the world I can mcforhim. We're gonna talk about
Speaker 1: bick one, We're gonna talk about so many things. Let's
Speaker 1: just go ahead and just jump right into the interview
Speaker 1: with JP. The content is only one part of what
Speaker 1: I do. I mean, I am I have multiple businesses,
Speaker 1: um Advisor for a for a investment fund, UM started
Speaker 1: just another investment fund. I have all my personal investments,
Speaker 1: I have kids. I mean, I have all this other
Speaker 1: stuff um And a lot of times I just asked myself, like,
Speaker 1: why why am I doing this? I have to kind
Speaker 1: of go back to that. Well, I'm sure you do
Speaker 1: as well. So why is that that you keep doing
Speaker 1: this and putting that much time into it when you
Speaker 1: could certainly do two videos a week instead of five. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, I think for me, it's it's a passion
Speaker 1: for the message of sovereignty, critical thinking, and ultimately freedom,
Speaker 1: and there's obviously so much opposition in the world against that,
Speaker 1: so I think being very mission focused, it's the most motivating,
Speaker 1: energizing thing, way more energizing than caffeine, for example. So
Speaker 1: there's just like that natural energy to do a lot.
Speaker 1: And it's also pretty rewarding, and I mean extremely rewarding
Speaker 1: and fulfilling, just out of like a sense of un
Speaker 1: contributing to the greater good, which to me makes all
Speaker 1: the hard work and massive amount of time worth it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the only way. So, so what is the mission? Yeah,
Speaker 1: in a word, the mission is freedom to spread it,
Speaker 1: to spread the ideas, Yes, spread the ideas. And I
Speaker 1: think a wise man Ramdas once said, you can't get
Speaker 1: out of a jail you don't know you're in. And
Speaker 1: there's so much anti freedom, tyranny, authoritarianism in the world
Speaker 1: that's all packaged in the wrapping paper of gas lighting
Speaker 1: saying like, hey, we're trying to save democracy by banning
Speaker 1: free speech. So but because there's so much opposition in
Speaker 1: the world trying to take freedoms, and knowing about history
Speaker 1: like this is not the first time it happens, and
Speaker 1: we see where it will go if we allow it.
Speaker 1: So I think we're living in a very critical time
Speaker 1: in history, which just makes the mission of freedom internally
Speaker 1: and externally externally, Like obviously our social or national policies,
Speaker 1: let's let the constitution actually continue exist, that's important. But
Speaker 1: also I don't think we can have external freedom if
Speaker 1: we don't also have internal freedom of helping people be
Speaker 1: in touch with their own critical thinking um as well
Speaker 1: as people having the courage to act on what actually
Speaker 1: they think is true as well as what feels true
Speaker 1: in their heart. So there's just because we're at that
Speaker 1: critical time in history, I think it's really important to
Speaker 1: go all in, and you know, I look forward to
Speaker 1: the day, hopefully soon, where it's like, oh, you know,
Speaker 1: freedom is not like as in Jeopardy as it is now.
Speaker 1: It's relatively good. We don't want to take it for
Speaker 1: granted again. But I look forward to the day where
Speaker 1: it's like, dude, I don't think we need to make
Speaker 1: that much content anymore. And now we have to talk
Speaker 1: about other things. Yeah, yeah, let's let's or for me
Speaker 1: comedy world, like, let's come up with a funny video
Speaker 1: about coconut oil or just something stupid and frivolous like that,
Speaker 1: rather than kind of like the life and death scenario
Speaker 1: of freedom is in the ballast Yeah yeah, yeah, uh
Speaker 1: and what about using comedy for that? So um, in
Speaker 1: preparing for this, we were looking at some of the
Speaker 1: things that you've been talking about, um, and you talk
Speaker 1: a lot about things that I don't want to talk
Speaker 1: about right now because I want to put this on YouTube.
Speaker 1: And I can't imagine what those they had to do
Speaker 1: with the medicine and uh, you know, those types of things.
Speaker 1: But ye, costa but Corona beer, Yes, yeah, we'll talking
Speaker 1: about alcohol, but you get away with a lot of
Speaker 1: stuff because of the comedy side. Do you think it's
Speaker 1: because the algorithms don't pick that up? I do. I
Speaker 1: think there's a couple of components to it. One is
Speaker 1: the algorithms. They however, they're programmed. I don't think they're
Speaker 1: programmed to pick up satire. And when I like my
Speaker 1: we all have love language is probably heard about them
Speaker 1: like physical touch, gifts, words of affirmation. I think we
Speaker 1: also have humor languages. Some people like slapstick humors, some
Speaker 1: people like goofy, some people like raunchy. But satire is
Speaker 1: my natural humor language. So when you're beating satirical like
Speaker 1: you can like sarcastic, absolutely, So it's all in the
Speaker 1: tone of voice, the delivery, and the context. So if
Speaker 1: you read this script from one of my satirical news
Speaker 1: videos that I do, take out the body language, the tonality,
Speaker 1: and the context you're just reading the script, you'd be like, Oh,
Speaker 1: he's just literally saying the narrative. We approve of this.
Speaker 1: So I think the AI is reading words, it's not
Speaker 1: reading the human artistic elements. I'd imagine they're working on that,
Speaker 1: But I think that's a speaking the comedy language of
Speaker 1: satire helps dance through the rain drops of censorship. I
Speaker 1: also think you know me knowing what are the hot
Speaker 1: buttons that will get you d platform real quick talking
Speaker 1: about medicines in a way that's against the narrative. So
Speaker 1: the language of comedy helps open up other doors of expressions.
Speaker 1: So using metaphors and analogies, even acting out metaphors like, um,
Speaker 1: did you by chance to see the video I did
Speaker 1: on life jackets being mandated? The video wasn't about life jackets.
Speaker 1: We can use our imagination of what it was about.
Speaker 1: So if I don't wear my life jacket, then how
Speaker 1: how do I keep you from drowning? Absolutely, and these
Speaker 1: life jackets are proven to be safe and effective. People
Speaker 1: are drowning all the time. Some of the life jackets
Speaker 1: actually sink to the bottom, but we're not going to
Speaker 1: talk about that. So, uh, you know, unlike yourself where
Speaker 1: you know, I think the state of the world, people
Speaker 1: who are into retaining there's freedom, sovereignty, living as a
Speaker 1: decentralized person. I look at people like you and I
Speaker 1: and others who are speaking their messages in different ways.
Speaker 1: We're all playing in a symphony. We're playing different instruments.
Speaker 1: You know you're playing the instrument. You speak just amazing
Speaker 1: cutting edge information in a literal way. I'm speaking in
Speaker 1: a comedic way. So we're playing different instruments, but we're
Speaker 1: playing the same song. And I think we need all
Speaker 1: the instruments, and God help us if comedy was the
Speaker 1: only instrument. We need them all. And there's advantages to
Speaker 1: playing your instrument, advantages for playing mine. And I think
Speaker 1: when it comes to censorship, the language of comedy really
Speaker 1: helps open up door. Is where I have liberties with
Speaker 1: censorship that maybe you don't, where you have to be
Speaker 1: extra careful or it's like crap, I can't even cover
Speaker 1: this topic, but I can throw on a life jacket,
Speaker 1: act out this metaphor and I know it will connect
Speaker 1: with what people have in mind and they'll know what
Speaker 1: it's about, even though I'm not ever seeing the thing
Speaker 1: that it's about. So have you been getting strikes or warnings?
Speaker 1: Let's see, I got it. This was fun. On my
Speaker 1: second YouTube channel, it's called JP Reacts, where I'm doing
Speaker 1: more commentary, so it's much more straightforward, literal stuff that instrument.
Speaker 1: I I made a video about our good friend from Microsoft,
Speaker 1: the world's best doctor with no medical training, no no
Speaker 1: degree either Bill Gates, and and I compiled these clips
Speaker 1: of him speaking about depopulating the world and we're gonna
Speaker 1: do that through you know what, uploaded that video. It
Speaker 1: wasn't even published. That video got taken down and uh,
Speaker 1: not a strike but a warning against my channel. In
Speaker 1: my main YouTube channel, I had a strike come at
Speaker 1: me in January, of which I think was the tensest
Speaker 1: point we we've had in the past few years. You know,
Speaker 1: is between the election and the inauguration, everybody's losing their crap.
Speaker 1: So I had a strike on my channel for hate speech,
Speaker 1: like all right, let me look at this video, and
Speaker 1: I know all the videos I published. I'm like, well,
Speaker 1: this is this is frivolous. This there's nothing and they're
Speaker 1: so I repealed it, and luckily they granted me the repeal,
Speaker 1: took this strike down, and at the time there was
Speaker 1: a very well orchestrated cancel attempt towards me. So it
Speaker 1: was pretty obvious that this group of woke band that's
Speaker 1: got together simultaneously reported this video, and luckily YouTube just
Speaker 1: saw the facts of the matter of that video is
Speaker 1: not violating anything, even though their guidelines that are there
Speaker 1: to be violated, are completely frivolous in the first place. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they saw that video, didn't. So luckily I've been relatively
Speaker 1: unwounded during this time of heavy sense. I've heard Joe
Speaker 1: Rogan talk quite a bit about the problems that comedian
Speaker 1: comedians have these days, more on the woke culture side,
Speaker 1: their cancel culture side, right where you just can't say
Speaker 1: these things that used to be funny anymore, right, so
Speaker 1: um as a as a comedian, and then you see
Speaker 1: that as well. I'm guessing, well, well, I see it,
Speaker 1: but I disagree with Joe Rogan the sentiment of comedians
Speaker 1: can't get away with things. You can't say this or that. Yes,
Speaker 1: you can, certainly does. Chappelle certainly does. The difference between
Speaker 1: him and a lot of other people, including some other comedians,
Speaker 1: Chapelle has balls. He has what's called courage. I'll never
Speaker 1: forget the comedy club I've performed at a couple of
Speaker 1: times in Philadelphia. In the green room wall, there's a
Speaker 1: big picture of Dave Chappelle and he signed it. In
Speaker 1: above his signature, he wrote a little message. He said,
Speaker 1: dear comedians, you have one job, and that's to speak
Speaker 1: the truth, no matter what Dave Chappelle does that it
Speaker 1: takes courage. So this idea that comedians can't say things,
Speaker 1: they only can't say things if they consent to the
Speaker 1: tyranny of intimidation from the woke mob or the narrative.
Speaker 1: But you absolutely can say anything you want. It just
Speaker 1: takes courage to know I'm coming from my best discernment
Speaker 1: of truth, my intentions are in the right spot. Will
Speaker 1: you get hate? And yeah you will, but yuh. Something
Speaker 1: I've learned about cancel culture is they can't cancel you
Speaker 1: unless you consent to it. And part of the consenting
Speaker 1: process is based in fear, where you're afraid to lose
Speaker 1: what they can take away, what they can take away, approval,
Speaker 1: they can take away, you know, audience support, they can
Speaker 1: sway people to think you're a racist, transphob all the smears.
Speaker 1: But if you're not afraid to lose what they can
Speaker 1: take away, you are uncancellable. And Dave Chappelle, I'm not
Speaker 1: going to compare myself to him, because he's probably the
Speaker 1: greatest to ever live. That man is not afraid to
Speaker 1: lose anything. He's uncanceable. He's what, like Brett Weinstein would say,
Speaker 1: He's reached a and escape velocity point that I want
Speaker 1: to ask you about. He got to a point where
Speaker 1: he's bigger than the game. He doesn't need a game, yes, right, yeah, people,
Speaker 1: Um I I listened to Andrew Tate and he was
Speaker 1: talking about the difference. He was trying to compare himself
Speaker 1: and Logan Paul or Jake Paul are one of those guys,
Speaker 1: and he said the difference is I have fans and
Speaker 1: he has viewers. Because he's on YouTube, people watch him.
Speaker 1: He's like, I have fans and no matter where I go,
Speaker 1: those fans will follow. And I don't want to go
Speaker 1: into the whole thing about Andrew Tate, but it just
Speaker 1: made me think about the difference there, right, and so like, um,
Speaker 1: that's a great distinction. Yeah if if Dave Chappelle, like
Speaker 1: he has fans and those people will follow him, right,
Speaker 1: you have fans, people go search you out right, And
Speaker 1: so I think maybe that's the difference. And so back
Speaker 1: to the escape velocity, like, do you have to get
Speaker 1: big enough to a point where you're like like a
Speaker 1: Joe Rogan. I I don't listen to all his shows.
Speaker 1: If I see an episode, I want to listen to it, um,
Speaker 1: but I downloaded Spotify just so I could listen to
Speaker 1: Joe Rogan, right, um, so I followed him, and so
Speaker 1: he's uncancellable. He could go launch his own censorship or
Speaker 1: system place form and like people would go there. Yeah. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I think when you're at that mega Joe Rogan, Dave Chappelle,
Speaker 1: Jordan Peterson's status, it's easier to be uncancellable because, like
Speaker 1: your great distinction, they know they have fans, not just viewers,
Speaker 1: so they can whatever stream on their own website. They can.
Speaker 1: Dave Chappelle, he he wasn't even on social media until
Speaker 1: about two years ago, came on Instagram, still never posts there,
Speaker 1: but he sells out theaters in arenas like that, and
Speaker 1: he's not even on social media, but people find him.
Speaker 1: So I think it's easier for them. Not to say
Speaker 1: it doesn't take courage for them, because it does. But
Speaker 1: if you're a comedian or a commentator and you've got
Speaker 1: less than ten thousand viewers, it still applies to you.
Speaker 1: I think it just takes more courage because you're you're
Speaker 1: a If you allow your hope to be you're a
Speaker 1: little more dependent on the machine, the machine of social
Speaker 1: media the machine of the powers that be, And granted,
Speaker 1: like if you're kicked off, you're canceled. That's a pain
Speaker 1: in the butt, probably a career setback. Some people wouldn't
Speaker 1: have the ingenuity to recover from it. But in my opinion,
Speaker 1: the the decision to be uncancellable in the name of
Speaker 1: standing for your truth, it applies to everybody, just a
Speaker 1: little easier, probably a lot easier if you're a megastar.
Speaker 1: You know, when I when when we're listening at something
Speaker 1: I've been talking about quite a bit, and they'll get
Speaker 1: your take on this is that truth is being sucked
Speaker 1: out of the world right like it's it's obviously being censored,
Speaker 1: it's being changed, and two plus two is five and
Speaker 1: all these things. And it seems like, you know, like
Speaker 1: I said, this truth has been under attack. And as humans,
Speaker 1: I don't believe we want to live a lie. And
Speaker 1: but who will stand up and speak the truth? And
Speaker 1: so you mentioned to Jordan Peterson, who mentioned to Joe
Speaker 1: rogan Um and Andrew Tate, somebody who's willing to stand
Speaker 1: up and say that, A chapelle who's willing to stand
Speaker 1: up and say it, regardless of what happens seems to
Speaker 1: be right now, shooting higher because like everybody, yes, somebody
Speaker 1: said it, yes, right, And if you look at the
Speaker 1: way like movements start, like leaders typically are very polarizing
Speaker 1: because like if you're lukewarm, he's kind of okay, Well
Speaker 1: I don't hate him. I don't like him that much,
Speaker 1: it's kind of okay, right, But the polarizing people people
Speaker 1: hate them, but people love them, and then hey, I
Speaker 1: hate Chapelle. People hate him, but also people love him,
Speaker 1: and then they'll they'll they'll pack into theaters. Right. So
Speaker 1: I think for for people listening to content creators sitting
Speaker 1: there talking, I think that's one thing. I think one
Speaker 1: you said, we're all different instruments in orchestra, so there's
Speaker 1: everybody should have a voice because there's somebody out there
Speaker 1: that could resonate with that. It's a different instrument. But
Speaker 1: even more importantly, like don't be lukewarm, like be polarizing,
Speaker 1: like people hate you, you have a cancel mob against you,
Speaker 1: but also people love you, and so you get both
Speaker 1: sides of it. Yeah, man, I I I so agree
Speaker 1: with that, and you know, with being polarizing. For me,
Speaker 1: the main ingredient in that is be bold and unapologetic
Speaker 1: with how you see the truth. Polarizing doesn't mean you're
Speaker 1: you're raunchy, you're doing things for shock value. I think
Speaker 1: that's like artificially flavored polarizing. There was my original mentor
Speaker 1: pul Check. Remember being in his office in my early
Speaker 1: twenties and he had this big picture of Einstein on
Speaker 1: the wall with an Einstein quote that said great minds
Speaker 1: always encounter violent opposition. Now, back in the early two thousand's,
Speaker 1: I looked at that. I'm like, that's a cool quote,
Speaker 1: but I don't like get it here in the twenties, Oh,
Speaker 1: I get it. Dave Chappelle, Jordan Peterson encounters violent opposition.
Speaker 1: But those are the leaders that you mentioned. And in
Speaker 1: the also you mentioned like humans have this natural propensity
Speaker 1: to seek truth, and I truly believe that is in
Speaker 1: our just innate d n A niature nature. We seek
Speaker 1: truth just like the wisdom of animals out in like
Speaker 1: your backyard. You you have deer out there. They don't
Speaker 1: come up and try to eat your grill. They don't
Speaker 1: try to, you know, eat your chairs. They're seeking actual
Speaker 1: food nutrition that's in their d n A, that's their programming.
Speaker 1: I seek actual food, and to me, truth is food
Speaker 1: for our mind and probably our whole being. And you
Speaker 1: can fool us for a while. You can feed us
Speaker 1: artificially flavored arbage process stuff with such little nutritional value
Speaker 1: that it actually takes more nutrientside of your body to
Speaker 1: process that food than it actually delivers. You can fool
Speaker 1: people for a while, but not forever, and a lot
Speaker 1: of people will wake up and go after actual nutritious
Speaker 1: mind food much earlier. So that's why you know, it's
Speaker 1: what I might stands on freedom. It was never business motivated, Like, hey,
Speaker 1: I think like standing for freedom, that's gonna be a
Speaker 1: good business move. That wasn't the motivation. But looking at
Speaker 1: it and some of the examples you mentioned, like a
Speaker 1: Jordan Peterson Andrew Tate, people who speak truth, that is
Speaker 1: the best thing anyone can do for business because the
Speaker 1: lukewarm people, what they're really doing there in a fear
Speaker 1: based mindset of I'm trying to pay it play it safe,
Speaker 1: Like yeah, I like, I'll push the edge a little bit.
Speaker 1: I won't really push it too far. I'll say a
Speaker 1: little something here, but I'll pull back. Yeah, that's not
Speaker 1: someone emanating truth. That's someone who's afraid. Therefore they're trying
Speaker 1: to play it safe and please the masses rather than
Speaker 1: being a servant to the truth that wants to live
Speaker 1: through them. Yeah, I'm I'm not. I'm just not naturally
Speaker 1: a confrontational guy. So uh, you know, I don't get
Speaker 1: as polarizing or whatever as as it could be. Um,
Speaker 1: but it is. It is something to think about, and
Speaker 1: I think back to living the truth. I think, Um,
Speaker 1: you know, you look at how like these movements started
Speaker 1: to talk about the movement. But I'm sure you've seen
Speaker 1: the video or what the viewers have seen this video
Speaker 1: where like, um, there's like a concert like on a
Speaker 1: lawn section, and one person gets up and starts dancing,
Speaker 1: and everyone's like laughing and pointing, look at that idiot.
Speaker 1: Kind of a thing, right, And eventually another person gets
Speaker 1: up and then like they're still kind of laughing, not
Speaker 1: as many, and then the third and then next thing,
Speaker 1: you know, like everybody's dancing. So if one person can
Speaker 1: get up and defy the censorship and defy cancel culture
Speaker 1: and stand up and succeed, then look how any more
Speaker 1: people will be motivated to come and stand up and
Speaker 1: succeed with that? Right, absolutely, and the pioneers, we all
Speaker 1: owe them gratitude, the first ones to stand up like
Speaker 1: things I'm talking about now Jordan Peterson was talking about
Speaker 1: back in two thousand and fifteen or sixteen, and at
Speaker 1: the time, I'm like, dude, that I don't think that's relevant,
Speaker 1: and like you're catching all these arrows. He's just way smarter.
Speaker 1: He saw it way before I did. He's taken way
Speaker 1: more arrows. But those of us who follow in his trail, yeah,
Speaker 1: we'll catch arrows, but he's the one with the machete,
Speaker 1: hacking through the forest, taking the arrows head on. And
Speaker 1: you know, likewise speaking a common truth about really anything,
Speaker 1: whether it's what Black Lives Matter really stands for, embezzlement,
Speaker 1: or the medicines of our time. Those of us who
Speaker 1: were speaking truth to those things back in me we
Speaker 1: took a lot more arrows than people who either saw
Speaker 1: it completely differently or they were just scient silent. But
Speaker 1: now a lot of them are saying the same things
Speaker 1: we were saying back in and good for them, Like
Speaker 1: none of us are ever the first pioneer, the first
Speaker 1: one to crash through the wall, um, but when someone does,
Speaker 1: it makes it a lot easier for those to follow,
Speaker 1: whether you're in the second wave, third wave, or three
Speaker 1: years later, like like it's safer to say the actual
Speaker 1: intelligent things about what's going on now? Yeah, so what
Speaker 1: is going on now? Um? You you reference that you
Speaker 1: hope that at one point maybe it's not so urgent,
Speaker 1: but it is urgent now, right, and you see the
Speaker 1: urgency which gives you energy to pour into the mission,
Speaker 1: which is it gives you energy to do this content.
Speaker 1: So what is going on? We have the West? Uh,
Speaker 1: they've been meeting this last week. They've been talking about
Speaker 1: a lot of a lot of things that they've been
Speaker 1: talking about, and they just get scarier. Maybe, um, what
Speaker 1: are some of the things that you see that are
Speaker 1: so urgent that maybe we could kind of apply pressure
Speaker 1: back to Yeah, Well, first off, Mark, I think on
Speaker 1: camera you should admit to your audience that you are
Speaker 1: a member of the World Economic Forum. I should be,
Speaker 1: I should join, So I could I could be the
Speaker 1: enemy within you become the controlled opposition. Yeah. You know
Speaker 1: what's going on from my delusional perspective at a very
Speaker 1: high level, is there's really an attempt for global domination
Speaker 1: from people who probably had really wounded childhood experiences probably
Speaker 1: didn't feel love, so they're trying to compensate for that
Speaker 1: emptiness with a sense of control. And I think the
Speaker 1: World Economic Forum seems to be the star on top
Speaker 1: of that Christmas tree. Very poor analogy because that stands
Speaker 1: for something very different. But the there seems to be
Speaker 1: a very orchestrated attempt to erode people's freedoms away, install
Speaker 1: people in governments around the world who will facilitate that
Speaker 1: under the direction of the very unelected leader Klaus Schwabs,
Speaker 1: so high level. I think there's a very orchestrated attempt
Speaker 1: for global control over people. And then the fight is
Speaker 1: for individuals nations, yes, but at the heart of it,
Speaker 1: the cellular level of fight for individuals to retain their
Speaker 1: sovereignty and their human rights, and of course the attempt
Speaker 1: for global control. It's all packaged and lovely sounding wrapping
Speaker 1: paper paper like, yeah, we're gonna ban fertilizers to save
Speaker 1: the climate. Yeah it's starved to death. Yeah we see that.
Speaker 1: We're not going to talk about that. But the all
Speaker 1: we do to scare you about the climate. Guess what
Speaker 1: we also have the solution of that, you know, eat
Speaker 1: some crickets. Not meat. So I think part of the
Speaker 1: control there's deliberate attempts to weaken people mentally and physically.
Speaker 1: Weakening people mentally has to do with telling them what's
Speaker 1: true rather than letting them use the muscle of their
Speaker 1: own critical thinking. I think back to the New York
Speaker 1: Times article that was published on the dangers of critical thinking.
Speaker 1: Weakens people mentally. That's why the narrative is always coming
Speaker 1: at you twenty four seven, Because the more you just
Speaker 1: listen to that, that's like leaning on a mental crutch.
Speaker 1: You're not using your prefrontal cortex doing your own thinking,
Speaker 1: so people get weaker. And then physically, it seems like
Speaker 1: there's that attempt to weaken people at the physical level
Speaker 1: is very much there as well, where we see propaganda
Speaker 1: like James Cameron came out and said testosterone is a poison.
Speaker 1: I think that hormone is incredibly natural, incredibly healthy, and
Speaker 1: that literally makes you strong. And the propaganda about meat
Speaker 1: is bad. Meat's gonna cause hurricanes, so we're gonna out
Speaker 1: and said, what lucky charms is more more healthy than
Speaker 1: eggs cooked and butter. Absolutely, So you look at eggs
Speaker 1: cooked in butter, I eat that for breakfast almost every
Speaker 1: day I eat all I mean, these foods that adjectively
Speaker 1: make people stronger are the foods they're trying to scare
Speaker 1: you about and then eat crickets, eat lucky charms, these
Speaker 1: foods I don't even know if you call them foods,
Speaker 1: but these substances that certainly won't make you stronger, but
Speaker 1: I would say they would actually make you weaker and sicker. Yeah, so, um,
Speaker 1: it's funny. I was thinking about that don't do your
Speaker 1: own research, and and the dumbing down of people, you know.
Speaker 1: And at the same time, they're saying, we have to
Speaker 1: save democracy, to save democracy, to save democracy, so democracy
Speaker 1: would be everybody gets a voice, which will just be
Speaker 1: clear of the US is the United States was founded
Speaker 1: as a republic, not a democracy. They're saying the democracy
Speaker 1: because they want to change the narrative. We're not a democracy,
Speaker 1: so it' gonna be clear on that. But they want
Speaker 1: to say save the democracy, which means everybody gets a voice,
Speaker 1: and then it would be the will of the people.
Speaker 1: But people are dumb, and they're telling people not to
Speaker 1: do their research. Well, if they're telling people not to
Speaker 1: do their research, then why would we care about their opinion. Yeah,
Speaker 1: right it and not to mention like in our democracy
Speaker 1: everybody has a voice, like you mentioned, yet we're banning
Speaker 1: speech left and right obviously censorship. And then, um, I
Speaker 1: forget the lady's name, but at the beautiful Dean and
Speaker 1: Davos this week, there was a lady in the European
Speaker 1: Union who said, yeah, the freedom of press in the US,
Speaker 1: that's not going to be long lived because the dangers,
Speaker 1: there's so much hate speech and so, in other words,
Speaker 1: taking away the voice of the people in order to
Speaker 1: promote democracy, which gives everybody a voice, it is just gaslighting.
Speaker 1: It's double speak. Whatever they say, they're actually doing the opposite, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, our First Amendment not only gives us
Speaker 1: the right to free speech, but also specifically the right
Speaker 1: to freedom of press. And here's this European Union lady,
Speaker 1: not an American, not an elected representative in America, talking
Speaker 1: about how the US will put the clamps on freedom
Speaker 1: of press. How dare anybody saying anything? Mean? Yeah, over again,
Speaker 1: ever again, And it's just the ridiculous liessn't of that
Speaker 1: the gas lighting too? You know, when you look at
Speaker 1: the definition of gas lighting, I mean it's a form
Speaker 1: of psychological warfare or torture against somebody. And I think
Speaker 1: a lot of this also it's meant to demoralize, right,
Speaker 1: I'm sure you see it a lot. I see it
Speaker 1: a lot on my comments if you go through your comments. Um,
Speaker 1: but I see these comments of people are like, what what,
Speaker 1: we have no chance, we have no choice. Why should
Speaker 1: I even bother? Um, there's nothing we can do. And
Speaker 1: I constantly see that, you know, and and and the
Speaker 1: demoralization has worked. Um, I've started. You know, I talk
Speaker 1: a lot of you do a more lighthearted kind of way,
Speaker 1: a lot of stuff. I talk about the same topics,
Speaker 1: but it's it's more matter of fact. What's heavy? Um.
Speaker 1: And then it's too much doom and gloom all the time.
Speaker 1: And I try to like really kind of pivot back
Speaker 1: to and we're going to pivot back to some hope
Speaker 1: in this, but pivot back to some hope. Like, look,
Speaker 1: things are bad. I believe we can win if we
Speaker 1: do the hard work. And I believe that for my
Speaker 1: kids and in a few generations there's hope and prosperity.
Speaker 1: And just when I landed here in Austin, UM, I
Speaker 1: looked at a couple of comments that came through on
Speaker 1: I syndicate my videos out to channels where they don't
Speaker 1: get censored, so not just YouTube, so they go to
Speaker 1: like Odyssey and bit Shoot and Rumble and stuff like that.
Speaker 1: And I had a couple of comments and one said,
Speaker 1: hope and prosperity. What a buffoon. I'm an idiot for
Speaker 1: thinking that there could be hope and prosperity in the future.
Speaker 1: Apparently another person said there's no chance of hope. The
Speaker 1: FED has all the control essential bankers are gonna Like,
Speaker 1: I saw a couple of those comments come in, and
Speaker 1: I'm just like, maybe that's indicative of that audience that's
Speaker 1: on bit shoot, Like, but I'm just like, man, people
Speaker 1: are so demoralized. Yeah, and I I can empathize with that. Like,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of screwed up stuff going on in
Speaker 1: the world, a lot of unjust stuff going on, So
Speaker 1: I understand why someone can be to moralized. However, the
Speaker 1: spoiler alert that a demoralized person probably doesn't want to
Speaker 1: hear because they're sitting there. They probably agree with a
Speaker 1: lot of what you and I might say as far
Speaker 1: as the perspectives of what's going on in the world,
Speaker 1: but they sit there and have this message of but
Speaker 1: we're hopeless. Well, those people probably don't know, but they
Speaker 1: need to understand is they are being controlled by the tyrants.
Speaker 1: You know. That's that belief that we're hopeless. That's exactly
Speaker 1: their point. That's exactly where they want you to be.
Speaker 1: So you've entered the frame of the authoritarians. The moment
Speaker 1: you actually believe we are hopeless, I personally have tremendous hope.
Speaker 1: You look at cycles throughout history, and sometimes the tyrants
Speaker 1: do some really tyrannical stuff taken to the nth degree,
Speaker 1: but a lot of times freedom wins. You look at Hitler,
Speaker 1: his reign was I mean, he took it a long ways,
Speaker 1: but Hitler did not win. You look at the brave
Speaker 1: people in seventeen seventy six in the American Revolution. There
Speaker 1: they won against a very tyrannical regime who, by all rights,
Speaker 1: they should have won. And and I think there's a
Speaker 1: thousand more examples. Yeah, and I'll have moments of demoralization.
Speaker 1: I won't pretend like I don't. Luckily, they're just moments.
Speaker 1: They're not hours or days, their moments. And in those moments,
Speaker 1: I'll look at the measurables. Okay, the authoritarians, tyrants, the
Speaker 1: West Chinese Communist Party, the Biden regime. They control governments,
Speaker 1: they control trillions of dollars, they control all the mainstream media,
Speaker 1: they control big tech. We can, politician, we can't compete
Speaker 1: with that. What do we have? Then I start to read, member,
Speaker 1: we have two things. We have a massive amount of
Speaker 1: more people, and we have got on our side. And
Speaker 1: I'm not a religious scholar. I do believe in a
Speaker 1: higher power who I believe stands for truth. I think
Speaker 1: truth is based on the higher power. I think that
Speaker 1: is ultimate freedom. So evil people, and my definition of evil,
Speaker 1: just I don't sound abstract, is anyone who tries to
Speaker 1: control another person in a way that's not in their
Speaker 1: best interest. Evil people don't have GOT on their side.
Speaker 1: We do. Evil people don't have the masses on their side.
Speaker 1: We do. So we have things that are so powerful
Speaker 1: that they're beyond measure, largely everything that authoritarians have. They're
Speaker 1: not unpowerful, but they're powerless enough that you can measure
Speaker 1: them quantitatively, like, oh, how much money do they control?
Speaker 1: What are the governments they can troll? What's the media
Speaker 1: they control? So I have tremendous hope. And you know,
Speaker 1: you can be the most well resourced person, You can
Speaker 1: be the most well resourced group mentally, physically, capability wise.
Speaker 1: But if you don't have hope, your resources are useless
Speaker 1: and you you have lost before you even started the game.
Speaker 1: In my opinion, there's a line from Star Wars and
Speaker 1: it's something about rebellions are built on hope, and so, um, yeah,
Speaker 1: what revolution will ever happen? Who will ever stand up
Speaker 1: if they don't have hope that they can succeed? Who
Speaker 1: would start a business if they don't have hope they
Speaker 1: could succeed? Who would have a family if they wouldn't
Speaker 1: write them? And without hope, you're dead right, the people perish.
Speaker 1: I think the Bible says I hope that people perish.
Speaker 1: Um yeah. The other thing I would add to that
Speaker 1: and I agree with those things. Another thing I would
Speaker 1: add that we have on our side is that their
Speaker 1: plans do not work. And we know this because Sri
Speaker 1: Lanka was the school and look what happened in Sri Lanka.
Speaker 1: And so every time these types of central planning control policies,
Speaker 1: Viet money experiments, every time they've been applied and let
Speaker 1: run of course they fail, and so ultimately, if we
Speaker 1: just leave them a little long enough, they'll fell on
Speaker 1: their fall on their own. Nietzschi says that which is falling,
Speaker 1: shall ye also push So then I like to also
Speaker 1: push back a little bit, right, So, um, you have hope,
Speaker 1: which gives you some energy and strength and motivation to
Speaker 1: do something. So, where do you see some places that
Speaker 1: we can kind of push back for those that are
Speaker 1: feeling demoralized? Yeah, you know, I think the greatest there's
Speaker 1: many places, but I think the greatest pushback is taking
Speaker 1: sovereignty over our own lives. And and I'll throw out
Speaker 1: the term become decentralized in many senses of the word.
Speaker 1: The more you're decentralized as far as thinking cool now
Speaker 1: you are not dependent on the narrative, You are not
Speaker 1: outsourcing your information. You are a decentralized free thinker. You've
Speaker 1: got to start there. Become decentralized with your grow some
Speaker 1: of your own food. Sounds sort of minuscule, but it's
Speaker 1: huge because if you're dependent on the centralized food systems,
Speaker 1: you will be dependent on the people controlling those. You'll
Speaker 1: literally be enslaved unless you're willing to be to starve
Speaker 1: to death, become decentralized with finance. That's reason why I'm
Speaker 1: such a big fan of bitcoin. So I think, uh,
Speaker 1: how to become decentralized in all the ways, it comes
Speaker 1: down to self responsibility. Centralization is all based on someone
Speaker 1: else's responsibility. You do it for me, You produce the food,
Speaker 1: I'll go to the store and buy it. Cool. You
Speaker 1: do you fed, You run the monetary system. Cool, I'll
Speaker 1: just participate in that. Um. You tell me what's going
Speaker 1: on in the world, I'll just hear it and believe it.
Speaker 1: Raise my kids for me, take care of my education,
Speaker 1: give me healthcare. Absolutely, And there's not self responsibility in
Speaker 1: their very little amounts of it. But self responsibility. I
Speaker 1: think it's the greatest superpower of our time. And it's
Speaker 1: uncomfortable because it takes work, it takes effort, it takes
Speaker 1: mental energy to become more and more self responsible. Yet
Speaker 1: the more self responsible you are, truly, the more decentralized
Speaker 1: you are. You're not you're not contributing to the momentum
Speaker 1: of what's wrong in the world. You're taking your kinetic
Speaker 1: energy out of that and putting it into your own life.
Speaker 1: And probably the community around you, which is I think
Speaker 1: a much better place for our kinetic and mental energy
Speaker 1: to be energizing. So become independent, um, which means you're
Speaker 1: not depending on somebody else for all of those things.
Speaker 1: So being healthy and strong, then I don't have to
Speaker 1: depend as much on the medical system because I can
Speaker 1: my body is healthy. Right. My money with bitcoin, I
Speaker 1: can store it on my own. Nobody can manipulate it. Um,
Speaker 1: whether I and then even having money, even having money,
Speaker 1: because then money gives us options. So then I can
Speaker 1: gross some my food. I can buy food from other farmers,
Speaker 1: we could trade coop. So ways to become more independent,
Speaker 1: I guess is kind of what you're thinking. And then
Speaker 1: and then taking care of yourself first, um, and then
Speaker 1: becoming that example because then other people see that example
Speaker 1: and then they want to join in A hundred percent
Speaker 1: agree with that. And I think when it comes to
Speaker 1: be becoming independent, I think the best place to start
Speaker 1: is exactly where we're at and then take one step forward,
Speaker 1: because someone could like look at you, like, oh, mark,
Speaker 1: you you bought a ranch. That's like an incredible mark
Speaker 1: of independence. You've got land, you can grow your own food,
Speaker 1: You've got probably some major investment. So there's a degree
Speaker 1: of financial independence there. Mark that's fifty steps from where
Speaker 1: I'm at. So I'm hopeless that works for you. No, No,
Speaker 1: it's a continuum. So wherever you're at, whether you're making
Speaker 1: sixteen grand a year or sixteen million dollars a year,
Speaker 1: no matter what you have, you can take the next
Speaker 1: step of independence. And you know, my first step of
Speaker 1: independence was super small, but it was my first step.
Speaker 1: I remember back December, I'm like, dude, I don't know
Speaker 1: the poop might hit the fan. So I ordered a
Speaker 1: sixty days supply of nonperishable food from I think it
Speaker 1: was my Patriots Supply dot com. That's not the end
Speaker 1: all be all, but that was my first step. Second step,
Speaker 1: I bought my first firearm. So these are little steps
Speaker 1: that are helping take me where I want to go
Speaker 1: within my current financial means. And everybody considers what's my
Speaker 1: current financial means, but there's no excuse. We can take
Speaker 1: more steps. And taking one step towards independence, that is
Speaker 1: that's a great improvement. Once you're there, you can assess
Speaker 1: what's your next step. Yeah, and and to your point,
Speaker 1: and I made a couple of videos about this ranch
Speaker 1: and I got the comments, Oh, that's easy for you,
Speaker 1: you're rich, I don't have any money, blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: But um, to your point, uh, what's your own health? Like, yeah,
Speaker 1: is your health? Are you healthy? Because that's a step
Speaker 1: that you could certainly take. Right getting into the gym
Speaker 1: that is a mark of independent. Or you push ups,
Speaker 1: that's the mark of independence. And what about your education,
Speaker 1: like you're as you mentioned new sources and things like that,
Speaker 1: are you affecting? Are you changing your new sources? Like
Speaker 1: you can do that, and then you know, then the
Speaker 1: step like do you have thirty days worth of savings? Right?
Speaker 1: And if not, maybe you need to learn a new
Speaker 1: skill so you can make some more money. And then
Speaker 1: you know, have you ordered some frozen food or some
Speaker 1: m R E s or whatever? Right? And and then
Speaker 1: you know as far as the ranch, like, um, I've
Speaker 1: had a hard time out here, um finding good like
Speaker 1: ranch hand help, you know, and someone could easily come say, hey, Mark,
Speaker 1: I'll run your garden for you and grow a greenhouse
Speaker 1: and manage all your animals and like give me ownership
Speaker 1: of some of the fruit of my labor, the crops
Speaker 1: and the animals, and like I would gladly do that.
Speaker 1: And so those options are available so you can work
Speaker 1: your way to this. It doesn't have you don't need
Speaker 1: to have sixteen million, as you said, you could have
Speaker 1: sixteen thousand and you could just go off, hey, I'll
Speaker 1: do this for you. We share this with capitalism, So
Speaker 1: there's things people can do. Yeah, and doing those things
Speaker 1: that I love how you mentioned, like be creative and like, hey,
Speaker 1: if you had someone approach you to be a ranch hand,
Speaker 1: get a little share of the food that's produced. That's
Speaker 1: creative and that takes initiative and self responsibility because guess what,
Speaker 1: the the government doesn't have a online system that makes
Speaker 1: it easy to like, oh, I want to volunteer as
Speaker 1: a ranch hand and don't know that's on you. And
Speaker 1: just with a little creativity, you can find a lot
Speaker 1: of ways to improve your independence. Yeah, yeah, it doesn't.
Speaker 1: You don't need to have money. And and then each
Speaker 1: step leads to the next step, so then it builds, right,
Speaker 1: So good stuff. Um, you've so you've gone step after
Speaker 1: step after step starting with your m R. E. S.
Speaker 1: And now you have a ranch and now you're building
Speaker 1: that out. I saw you say something about one of
Speaker 1: videos you and maybe it was an off the cuff comment,
Speaker 1: but you said free range kids? So what is the
Speaker 1: free range kids? Yeah? Well, first you have to think
Speaker 1: what is the cage? What is the factory farm that
Speaker 1: children are oftentimes stuck in. I think public school system
Speaker 1: would probably be part of that. UM controlled thinking could
Speaker 1: be a part of that. TV is part of the cage,
Speaker 1: but also physical constraints. You know, the house we used
Speaker 1: to live in had a nice backyard, but it was
Speaker 1: really small. And now, being very blessed to live on
Speaker 1: a ranch, I see my little boy just watching him.
Speaker 1: That's where the term came from. I was just observing it, like, oh,
Speaker 1: he's a free range kid, which means the child is
Speaker 1: naturally expressing its true nature. He's he's running up to
Speaker 1: the trees. He can you know, the big yard. It's
Speaker 1: all fenced in so he can just roam. He's in
Speaker 1: the dirt, doing what a child is meant to do.
Speaker 1: And we don't have him stuck in front of the TV,
Speaker 1: caging in his mind, relying on something else for entertainment.
Speaker 1: That's getting to He's learning to generate his own entertainment
Speaker 1: out of his own being, curiosity, creativity. So that's basically
Speaker 1: what I mean, I want to bring it up. I
Speaker 1: think it's so important and so again, Um, you mentioned
Speaker 1: before that maybe maybe we have to fight for freedom
Speaker 1: more now than we have before. I'm constantly using a
Speaker 1: quote from Ronald Reagan. He says that freedom is never
Speaker 1: more than one generation away from being taken it. It
Speaker 1: wasn't passed to us but in the bloodline, but it
Speaker 1: must be fought for by every single generation. And so, um,
Speaker 1: I think about that the kids. It's all about the kids,
Speaker 1: right Like, I'm pouring back into the kids and making
Speaker 1: sure that they grew up the right way, making sure
Speaker 1: that they understand what's at stakes so they can continue
Speaker 1: to fight for freedom, because if we don't pass that
Speaker 1: down to them, then it's lost right there. And back
Speaker 1: to kind of what we were just talking about. Um,
Speaker 1: good job JP A years so rich. You can live
Speaker 1: on a ranch, But I'm stuck in an apartment in
Speaker 1: a city. What am I going to do? Well, we
Speaker 1: have parks. You could get on a bus and get
Speaker 1: out out of town and you know, out of the
Speaker 1: city suburban like let them run around in a park,
Speaker 1: or like hiking trails, like I mean, everyone has these
Speaker 1: types of options. Yeah, it's just where are you at
Speaker 1: and what's the next best option? Not fifty options from now?
Speaker 1: You know, walk outside on the sidewalk. That's way more
Speaker 1: free range than living room TV. It's maybe not the
Speaker 1: exact ideal true nature expression of a kid walking straightforward
Speaker 1: on the sidewalk, but it's way better than being in
Speaker 1: front of the TV or like the net. Next episode
Speaker 1: of the sidewalk, We're gonna go a few blocks or
Speaker 1: a couple of miles to the park where it's like
Speaker 1: much more three dimensional for the child to express. So, yeah,
Speaker 1: it's the only thing that can stop us from taking
Speaker 1: steps is us in our own excuses if we believe
Speaker 1: what our lower self thinks. And I think maybe to
Speaker 1: kind of kind of wrap this up and kind of
Speaker 1: put this message of hope, kind of going back to
Speaker 1: what you said, we have the masses, we have God
Speaker 1: on our side. You know, their plans, I said, I injected,
Speaker 1: the plans don't will fail. But really I love your
Speaker 1: message of kind of like empowering yourself and becoming decentralized
Speaker 1: first and fixing yourself first. And another thing I was
Speaker 1: kind of thinking about is we we have the masses,
Speaker 1: we have the power but um we have the power
Speaker 1: because at the end of the day, um Clap Schwab
Speaker 1: wants to promote this like public private partnership, which is
Speaker 1: uh fascism or corporatis um right, governments and corporations working together.
Speaker 1: But corporations actually serve people. They need us to buy
Speaker 1: their products. I saw today this morning. I was looking
Speaker 1: through the news headlines and there's like another big um
Speaker 1: boycott or walk out happening, you know, and it's like
Speaker 1: the people can just not go work there, and the
Speaker 1: people can just not buy those products. And so I
Speaker 1: think there's massive hope there. So what what is your
Speaker 1: kind of message of hope? And they're closing words here
Speaker 1: that we have for everybody. Words from Oscar Wilder, which
Speaker 1: I love. First off, why Oscar Wilder says life is
Speaker 1: too important to take seriously. So those are the people
Speaker 1: who are freedom lovers. They're taking action. If you do
Speaker 1: that and you're just serious all the time, seriousness, it's
Speaker 1: it's a symptom of fear. You you only take things
Speaker 1: seriously when there's an element of fear. Now I do that,
Speaker 1: I take things seriously. But if you're only doing that,
Speaker 1: you have to realize you're not living in a state
Speaker 1: of love. You're not living in a state of hope.
Speaker 1: You're living in a state of fear. Granted, could be
Speaker 1: well intentioned fear, but Oscar Wilder's words, life is too
Speaker 1: important to take seriously. So for me, I always need
Speaker 1: the reminder looking around what's going on in the world
Speaker 1: and like, oh my god, there's some heavy stuff going on.
Speaker 1: But also not take it too seriously. That levity, I
Speaker 1: think helps helps let hope rise to the surface little easier.
Speaker 1: Another common denominator I found between hopeless people and people
Speaker 1: filled with hope. Those who don't take action and contribute
Speaker 1: to the betterment of their lives and contribute to the
Speaker 1: betterment of lives around people. The inaction breeds hopelessness. But
Speaker 1: when you're taking action consistently, doesn't matter if it's small.
Speaker 1: It's like, dude, this is I'm raising my children in
Speaker 1: a freeway. Nobody else is going to see it, but
Speaker 1: that's why I'm doing. Or your Mark Moss, you're putting
Speaker 1: out great content every week, reaching a lot of people,
Speaker 1: or you're anywhere in between taking action consistently, many of
Speaker 1: those people are way more filled with hope. Why because
Speaker 1: they're literally becoming the change they want to see in
Speaker 1: the world. But if you're never doing anything, you have
Speaker 1: no that insance something can change because you're not contributing
Speaker 1: to change. So people are who are contributing way more hopeful.
Speaker 1: So if you feel hopeless, you have to ask what
Speaker 1: action can I start taking consistently because that, in my opinion,
Speaker 1: more powerfully than anything else. Not perspective or other information,
Speaker 1: but action consistently will help take your needle from hopeless
Speaker 1: too hopeful. I love it perfect way to end it too,
Speaker 1: I say action leads to clarity. So, um, if you
Speaker 1: don't know what action to take, just take any action
Speaker 1: if you don't know, so just start doing something. Just
Speaker 1: eat a little better, sleep a little more, talk to
Speaker 1: your kids a little I mean does anything. Yeah, even
Speaker 1: just being more honest with your perspectives. You know we
Speaker 1: talked earlier about the people who are uh just kind
Speaker 1: of playing it safe in there a little bit vanilla.
Speaker 1: It's don't be that like even like you're in the
Speaker 1: coffee shops, you run into a stranger, they bring up
Speaker 1: some pissing on the liberty of tyrants or pissing down
Speaker 1: the dreams of tyrants with my liberty but even just
Speaker 1: letting your your words still be respectful, but let your
Speaker 1: words just come from a place of truth rather than
Speaker 1: playing it safe and I'm afraid to offend people. That's
Speaker 1: a great contribution action to take. Yeah, awesome, um cool?
Speaker 1: Anything you want to bring attention to some of your
Speaker 1: shows or anything that you're working on. Oh man, As
Speaker 1: much as I love to be self serving and promotion,
Speaker 1: you know, nothing special. But for anybody who wants to
Speaker 1: get in touch with me, you can check out my
Speaker 1: website a wake Up with JP dot com. Uh, there's
Speaker 1: my line of freedom merge with things like wearing those
Speaker 1: shirts is doing something because you'll spark something. You'll spark something.
Speaker 1: That's my intention. That's why I created the Freedom line
Speaker 1: of shirts because it's like, this is a thought out
Speaker 1: of mine. It's honest, and if it can get in
Speaker 1: touch with at least one other person and help them
Speaker 1: unlock their permission to say like, oh that's what I think.
Speaker 1: And maybe now I can say it too because I
Speaker 1: saw it modeled by someone else. So anyway, you check
Speaker 1: out my website to wake Up with JP dot com
Speaker 1: if you'd like to get in touch with me, or
Speaker 1: check out anything I offer and we'll link at all
Speaker 1: in the notes. Thanks j P, Thank you Mark, appreciate
Speaker 1: your brother. All right, that's a rap. Hopefully enjoyed this
Speaker 1: interview with m JP s Heres and you saw a
Speaker 1: different side of him. He's well known for his comedy.
Speaker 1: Here is a more serious side. You can see his
Speaker 1: passion and what his mission is. We're gonna link to
Speaker 1: a stuff down below. Don't forget to give him a follow.
Speaker 1: He's a freedom fighter, he's a truth teller, and he's
Speaker 1: doing his part to save the world. And hopefully you
Speaker 1: are as well. I'd love to hear about it. And
Speaker 1: that's what I got. Thanks for listening to your success.
Speaker 1: I'm out