WEBVTT - Space Debris (featuring Dr. Jonathan McDowell)

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:09.160
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen sixty two, the United States detonated a one

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>point four megaton hydrogen bomb four hundred kilometers above the

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>surface of the Earth. This was part of a project

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>called Operation fish Bowl. Not Surprisingly, it created a huge

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>explosion which lit up the sky and disrupted radio transmissions.

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>It also knocked out street lights in Hawaii, which may

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>have worried partygoers who, according to Smithsonian magazine, were gathering

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>on hotel rooftops for h bomb explosion viewing parties. It

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>also messed up six different satellites, whour belonged to Americans,

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.639
<v Speaker 1>one was Russian, and it also messed up the very

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>first British satellite. The Soviet Union was conducting similar tests

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of nuclear weapons in space at the same time. This

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't bode well for the future of satellites in space.

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>This amazing new technology of satellites held a lot of promise,

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>but who would want to invest in it? If the

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>United States and the Soviet Union kept making satellites inoperable

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:07.119
<v Speaker 1>with nuclear weapons tests in space, well lucky for all

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of us. In nineteen sixty three, both nations agreed to

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>stop screwing up space for the rest of us and

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>signed the Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, which banned the

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>test of nuclear weapons in some places, including space. In

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>this year, you also get a UN resolution saying weapons

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of mass destruction can't be orbited in space. And you

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.559
<v Speaker 1>get a United Nations Outer Space Treaty which comes into

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>force in nineteen sixty seven, which reiterated all of these

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 1>points for other nations as well.

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 2>New Now satellites are safe, right, well, probably well, space

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 2>is really vast. We've put a lot of stuff in

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 2>orbit around Earth, and the pace at which we're sending

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 2>stuff up is ever increasing as the cost of sending

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 2>that stuff up drops.

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Could it get too crowded up there? Could some of

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the space litter we've left behind smash into the stuff

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>we're still trying to use. I'd be really bummed out

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>if I couldn't watch cat videos using my Starlink satellite

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>provided internet. To answer some of these questions about the

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>risks of stuff bumping into each other in space, we're

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>interviewing doctor Jonathan McDowell, who has been tracking objects sent

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to space since nineteen sixty one, when the Soviet Union

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>sent up Sputnick, the first ever satellite in space. Welcome

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>to Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe.

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist, and I feel

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 3>like my house is constantly filling up with junk.

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm Kelly Winer Smith. I'm a parasitologist and I have

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>felt that way since I married Zach. And the rate

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:54.799
<v Speaker 1>at which the junk has been increasing has exponentiated since

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>we had children. So we might have a Kessler syndrome

0:02:57.720 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>situation happening in our house in the near future.

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 3>That's only if your children collide with each other and

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 3>make more children or something.

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>The biologist in me is not okay with that metaphor.

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 3>No, that was bad. So which of you is the

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:13.919
<v Speaker 3>cleaner upper or are you both contributing to the junk?

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I am the cleaner upper. I am also the less

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:21.119
<v Speaker 1>bringer stuffer into the houser. I don't like to buy

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of new stuff, but that's not my husband's

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>attitude about stuff. What about in your family.

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:31.799
<v Speaker 3>I'm the thrower away. I'm the person constantly carding out

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 3>bags of junk in the house, whereas my wife and

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 3>daughter like going thrift store shopping and so they're bringing

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 3>stuff in, and then I'm like taking trips to the

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 3>thrift store. When I take a trip to the thrift store,

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 3>for example, it's a negative impact on our house, and

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 3>they have the opposite effects. So we have like a

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 3>thrift circuit going.

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 4>Man.

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>So I've gotten myself in trouble for being the person

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>who throws stuff out in the house because my daughter

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>will not let go of things, and Zach doesn't want

0:03:57.720 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to let go of things either, and I got in

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>trouble once. I was like, well, if I just throw

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>it out, they won't notice. But then they notice, And

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>so for a while I moved everything to a storage unit.

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>You might be noticing it's a whole thing, Yes, the

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>whole thing.

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 3>I see. See, you've moved to the multi stage throwout techniques.

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna put it over here, and then when nobody notices,

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 3>I'll move it over there, and then eventually I get

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 3>to throw it away.

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I have a whole farm. I've got

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 1>lots of spots to squirrel their junk away. Oh and

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I just remembered that Zach has been listening to the podcast,

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>which is so nice of him. Don't check the tenant house.

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Well. The danger of moving on to a farm in

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 3>a big house is the more space you have, the

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 3>more junk you get. I feel like we have a

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 3>constant density of junk, and if we lived in a

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:43.919
<v Speaker 3>smaller space, we would have less stuff.

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:46.039
<v Speaker 1>The belief has been that because we have all of

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>this space, we can get more stuff. But I don't

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 1>want the junk outside. I don't want more stuff. I

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 1>don't want more stuff.

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Space is more valuable than almost any stuff. Whenever

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 3>we throw something away, I'm like, Ah, look at all

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 3>that empty space. It's wonderful.

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, right, isn't it nice?

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>So when when you come home with like a bag

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in your hand and to just be able to like

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>put it on the counter because there's clear space on

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the counter and not like have to elbow cups out

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>of the way.

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 3>Ah, agree with you? All right?

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 1>All right, team clean over here.

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 3>And if we were in charge of the atmosphere around Earth,

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 3>maybe you and I we keep it pretty clean.

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, But the people that we keep interacting with would

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>be like, well, there's a lot of space, so we're

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>just gonna move it somewhere else, you know, And then

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the graveyard orbit would get all crowded. And I don't know,

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:32.039
<v Speaker 1>I'm a pessimist, Daniel.

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:35.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Zach and Katrina would fill the universe with junk.

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>There's there's room. Don't worry. Buy more books, buy more books. Well,

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't have to keep them. We're not going to

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 1>read them again. No, I can't let go of a book.

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:46.039
<v Speaker 1>Books gotta stay forever.

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 3>Zach, you can keep all your books in orbit near Pluto.

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 3>M I love you, And today on the podcast, we're

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 3>going to be talking about junk and space junk with

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 3>somebody who has spent their whole career thinking and tracking

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 3>bits of garbage in space.

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I have loved interacting with Jonathan McDowell on Twitter. When

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>we were writing A City on Mars. He was my

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>go to person where I was like the needles from

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 1>Project west Ford, are they still in space? Jonathan, the

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:15.919
<v Speaker 1>glove that got lost during the EVA number five hundred

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and forty three, is that still in space? He knows

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the answer to all of these questions. He is the guy.

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>We're excited to have him on the show today, So

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>let's jump right in. On today's show, we have doctor

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:36.119
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan McDowell. He's an astrophysicist at the Harvard Smithsonian Center

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts. He's also the editor of

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:43.919
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan's Space Report, a free internet newsletter founded in nineteen

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine which provides technical details of satellite launches. His

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>website provides the most comprehensive historical list of satellite launch information,

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>starting with Sputnik. And he's a fellow of the Royal

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Astronomical Society, an American Astronomical Society fellow, and he has

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>an astro named after him forty five eighty nine McDowell.

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 1>So he's now officially the second person on the show

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>who has an asteroid named after him. Martin Elvis beat

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you by a few months there.

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 4>My old boss. Yes, he was your old boss. He's

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 4>the one who conned me into crossing the pond and

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 4>coming to work at Harvard instead of staying in England,

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 4>which I'm now sort of regretting. Yes, no, Martin, I

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 4>go back away.

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Ah, wonderful. Well, he's absolutely lovely. And he talked to

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>us about asteroids. We're talking to you about stuff that's

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>floating around in space. So we had a listener who

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>asked a question, and we're going to play the question

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later. But that got us interested in

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>space debris. So I think for starters let's just talk

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>about what kind of stuff we have up there, debris

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>or otherwise that's orbiting the Earth right now.

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 4>So there are about twenty five thousand objects that the

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 4>Space Force radars are tracking every day.

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot.

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Twenty five thousand. Wow, that's an incredible number.

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 4>That's just the ones big enough to see. Right. They

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:02.559
<v Speaker 4>go from the four hundred and fifty ton International Space

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 4>Station down to little shards of debris that are only

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 4>about five or ten centimeters across to aally bit about

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 4>where they come from. But below that, between like say

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 4>one centimeter and ten centimeters, we think there might be

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 4>as many as a million pieces of debris that we

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 4>don't even know about because they're too small for the

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 4>radars to see. So now space is big, but everything

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 4>in space, because of Kepler's laws, is traveling like seventeen

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 4>thousand miles an hour. And so you know, it's pretty

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:39.559
<v Speaker 4>crazy up there. And we have now ten thousand working satellites.

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 4>Just five years ago it was only one thousand. Now

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 4>it's gone up to ten thousand. Is that all starlink,

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 4>well about half of them a starlin Ghia. And so

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 4>there's Internet relay, there's Internet of things relay, there's ship

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 4>and the airplane tracking. There's weather satellites, there's SPIC satellites,

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 4>resource monitoring satellites, those intelligence which is like intercepting communications

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 4>and radio signals for the military, and of course a

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 4>few science satellites. People often think that space is like, oh,

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 4>that's science, but science is a pretty small fraction of

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 4>what's going on and what can happen is every time

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 4>you launch a satellite, you use a rocket to do it,

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 4>and to put it in orbit. The upper rocket stage

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 4>has to get into orbit along with the satellite. So

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 4>now you've launched your satellite, but you've also made a

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:31.559
<v Speaker 4>piece of space junk the rocket stage. And nowadays, if

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 4>you're like prudent, you have a restartable engine. You can

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 4>bring the rocket stage down in the ocean afterwards. But

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 4>we didn't used to even bother to do that. So

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 4>if you look in the catalog of there's now over

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 4>sixty thousand objects in the Space Object catalog, including all

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 4>the re entered ones. The second entry in the catalog

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 4>is Sputnik, Russia's first satellite, but the first entry satellite

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 4>number one is actually the rocket stage that puts Putnik

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 4>in orbit and so the very first entry in the

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 4>catalog is a piece of space jump.

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's interesting and depressing.

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, what's worse if you leave a little extra fuel

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 4>in the tank of your rocket stage, which you can

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 4>tend to do because you don't want to arrive at

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 4>your destination running on empty rocket stages? Have you know

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 4>fuel and oxidizer that combine to burn to make the flame,

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 4>but they're in separate tanks, separated by often like a

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 4>rubber gasket or something like that, which over years can erode.

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 4>The two can get together and depending on your mix

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 4>of propellant, ten years after you abandon your rocket stage

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 4>in Earth orbit, the fuel and oxidizer can have a

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 4>party and suddenly you don't have a rocket stage. You

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 4>have three hundred pieces of space to breathe.

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god. So you're saying they explode?

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 4>That will be the technical term, yes, whereas the space

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 4>guys like to say an RUD a rapid unplanned disassembly.

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 4>We have all kinds of euphemisms right for the bad

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 4>things that can go wrong in sp It's another one

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 4>of my favorites. Say is you know ICIBM into continent

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 4>balistic missile, But do you know IOBM, which is in

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 4>ocean by mistake.

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, So what's the sort of natural context, Like

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 3>we are creating these little bits of space junk, But

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 3>was the near Earth atmosphere sort of empty before that?

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 3>Or are there are like a lot of natural things

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 3>floating out there.

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 4>So within the orbit of the Moon, we do have

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 4>like meteors coming in on escape trajectories. Right, they're not

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 4>orbiting the Earth. They have escape colostoy respect to the Earth.

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 4>They're going much much faster than satellites, and so they

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 4>come in, they burn up, they're gone. They don't hang

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.559
<v Speaker 4>out in Earth orbit. The only piece of natural space

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 4>junk we have orbiting the Earth is the Moon.

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 3>You can't call the moon junk.

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 4>Come on, you know, it's a big love huston. You know.

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:57.839
<v Speaker 4>We added to that with Spootnak and we've added ever since.

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 4>Again not just rocket stages blowing up, but also satellite's

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 4>hitting each other. So in two thousand and nine and

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 4>an Iridium communication satellite hit an old Soviet dead communication

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 4>satellite at about twenty thousand miles an hour in orbit.

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:16.079
<v Speaker 4>And to give you an idea of the kinetic energy

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 4>involved in that, right, I mean it's like some number

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 4>of gigajuls. And now you don't have a feel for that.

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 4>So I calculated in terms of my unit of how

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 4>hard something hurts is. Imagine being hit by a one

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 4>ton truck. You can kind of sense how much that

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 4>would hurt. The energy involved in one of these orbital

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 4>collisions is about fifty thousand times that.

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Wow, wow, oh my gosh.

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 4>And so what happens is a hypersonic shockwave goes through

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 4>both spacecraft, reducing them to shrapnel. The clouds of shrapnel

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 4>passed through each other largely unchanged, and you end up

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 4>with them in the original orbit, but many many little

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 4>pieces instead of one big one. So we don't like that.

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 4>That's bad. It can cause it. Ultimately, if you have

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 4>enough of those, you can get a chain reaction called

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 4>the Kestler syndrome that could make space unusable. And then,

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, some people think it's fun to fire a

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 4>missile at one of their own satellites and blow it

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 4>up just to show how powerful they are anti satellite weapons,

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 4>and that causes yet there's more debris due to that.

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 4>There's been a move in recent years to go, you know, guys,

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 4>that's probably not a good idea.

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's stick into that a little bit more so.

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I know that the Soviet Union, the United States, India, China, right,

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>they've all blown their own satellites up in space, is

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:37.079
<v Speaker 1>that right?

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.199
<v Speaker 4>That is correct? Fortunately, so far they've only been tests

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 4>on their own satellites and not attacking somebody else's.

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>So for our audience who's maybe not familiar with this,

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>why are countries blowing up their own satellites.

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 4>Right, it's to prove that they could blow up your

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 4>satellites if they want it. And so the idea, you know,

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 4>what people may not appreciate is so much of our

0:13:56.600 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 4>lives today actually invisibly depends in space technology. I mean

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 4>the most obvious case, of course is GPS. I actually

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 4>know how to read a map, but the younger generation

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 4>are going to be really hosed if GPS ever goes down.

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 4>They're not going to be able to get home. And

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 4>that was originally a military system to target CRUISMUSS and

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 4>so that's in a war, taking out the GPS satellites

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 4>would be something that an attacker might want to do. Similarly,

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 4>military allund space communications. There are missile warning satellites that

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 4>spot when a missile is launched, and that's you know,

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 4>how you get that warning. And there are these sort

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 4>of very spic satellites, right, and so the military, even

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 4>more than normal people, are so very invested in space.

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 4>Their systems are integrated with space systems, and so in

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 4>a war, those space systems are obvious targets. And so

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 4>the idea of anti satellite weapons has been around for

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 4>a long time. The first attempt that I'm aware of

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 4>was in nineteen fifty nine when they fired a test

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 4>missile against the Explorer six satellite and missed it. But

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 4>it's not a new idea, that's what I'm saying. So

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 4>all of these things, you know, very early. The fifties

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 4>were a crazy time, man, They tried all kinds of

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 4>stuff very early.

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 3>And so every time we blow up a satellite, you

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 3>go from one object in space to like a million

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 3>objects in space. Do we then track all of those

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 3>individual components?

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, the ones above ten centimeters we track. And

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 4>so sometimes people talk about shooting down a satellite, but

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 4>I hate that phrase because you don't actually shoot it down.

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 4>You add energy, you especially in the pieces, but those

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 4>pieces still have orbital velocity and they stay in limit.

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 4>And so if you have a satellite that's say in

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 4>a five hundred kilometer circular orbit. The pieces are in

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 4>elliptical orbits that are one end is five hundred and

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 4>then the other end might be lower, or it might

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 4>be higher, as much as one thousand kilometers or two

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 4>thousand kilometers coming down to the ones that go down

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 4>where you know we'll re enter quickly. The ones that

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 4>go up will stay up for a long time. And

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 4>so the worst one was a China Ease anti satellite

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 4>test in two thousand and seven, and that created three

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 4>thousand pieces of tracked debris. And so in my catalog

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 4>that I have on my website is each one of

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 4>those three thousand pieces has a catalog number from the

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 4>Space Force, It has orbital parameters that are updated every day.

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 4>It's quite a tusk keeping track of these things.

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 3>So there's some random chunk of a satellite that has

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 3>like a name and a place in your database, and

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 3>you're tracking and it's just like a hunk of metal

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 3>floating through.

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 4>Space that's exactly right. And you know, every now and again,

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 4>for example, the International Space Station has to dodge one

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 4>of these things. So the Space Force tressing goes, oh hey, guys,

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 4>about twenty four hours from now, this chunk of metal

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 4>is going to go within a few hundred meters of

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 4>the space station.

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Wait before we get to the ISS, how do we

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 3>track all these things? Like who is tracking this random

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 3>chunk of Chinese satellite? How do we monitor these things?

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 4>So mostly it's the US Space Force route. For low

0:16:55.520 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 4>orbit satellites, they use radars, so you bounce radar radio

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 4>energy off the satellite and the echo gives you its

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:07.199
<v Speaker 4>position and velocity. But it's a problem because if you

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 4>have like say one hundred new pieces that you're tracking,

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 4>so you see them come over, Okay, you get measurements

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 4>of one hundred pieces. An hour and a half later,

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 4>they've orbited the Earth. You look again, you've got another

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 4>one hundred pieces. But matching up which one goes with

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:24.919
<v Speaker 4>which one is very non trivial. Yeah, and so it

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 4>takes a long time to catalog the debris, and that's

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 4>a period you're not getting warnings from those new objects.

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 4>So that's why new debris is very bad. Radars are

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 4>great up to about one thousand kilometers. A few thousand kilometers,

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 4>they're a one over art of the fourth law. If

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 4>the thing is ten times further away, it's ten thousand

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 4>times weaker reflected single. So for high orbit satellites, radars

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 4>really aren't the way to go, and we've been using

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 4>regular optical telescopes to observe the objects. And now we're

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 4>actually starting to deploy satellites in high orbit whose job

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 4>is to catalog all the other satellites and keep track

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 4>of them.

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 3>Why is it one over out of the fourth? Is

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 3>it because you get one of our r squared from

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 3>your signal and then one of o are squared from

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 3>the bounce.

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 4>Exactly right, it's one of our squared each way.

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.919
<v Speaker 3>Wow, I see. So that's difficult. It seems to be

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 3>like a really hard problem, even if you know where

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 3>everything is, even if there's nothing new, because radar is

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 3>just giving you locations, right, it doesn't measure velocities.

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 4>Yes, there's a dopplers, but it's only one component. Oh right, okay, right,

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 4>you have arrange an arrange rate, and then you only

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 4>have a very approximate angular position on the sky because

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 4>the radar is very sharp, and so you need multiple

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 4>observations to kind of resolve that and do it. So again,

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:42.880
<v Speaker 4>this is something they've been doing since the nineteen fifties,

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.640
<v Speaker 4>and it was kind of manageable back then, and there

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 4>weren't that many satellites, and now it's getting a really

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 4>tough problem and you can see them struggling. There was

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 4>a recent Chinese satellite launch. Eighteen satellites went up about

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 4>a month ago, and it was only yesterday that Space

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 4>Farce started issuing orbital for them because it took them

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 4>that long to sort it out. It's a fascinating problem

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 4>and really technically challenging, and in the circumstances they do

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 4>a pretty good job, but it's not really good enough

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 4>for what we need today.

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:14.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it seems like a lot of compute is required.

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 3>You have to know all these trajectories, predict where they are,

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 3>get the new data, update the trajectories if they are

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 3>dev from your prediction. I'm wondering about the security here,

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Like there must be things in space that are like

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 3>secret spy satellites. Are those parts of your database? Is

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 3>the NSA watching you to see if you're tracking that stuff.

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 4>If they're not, they're not doing their job.

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>You've really acclimated to life in the United States Johnson, Yeah.

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 4>Right, exactly. The secret satellites are tracked by the Space Force.

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 4>The US secret satellites, they don't release the orbital data

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:51.120
<v Speaker 4>for that publicly. The Russian and Chinese secret satellites they do.

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 4>The Israeli and French ones they sometimes do sometimes that

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:57.879
<v Speaker 4>so our friends they keep the cle one secret. But

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 4>for people we don't like, we just publish them. Very recently,

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 4>there was maybe one hundred or so secret US and

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:08.679
<v Speaker 4>Allied satellites, and most of them were pretty big. Some

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 4>of the old big Bird Spy satellites are like ten

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 4>tons right in low orbit, and so they're as bright

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 4>as the brightest stars in the sky. And so in

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 4>order to get their orbits, all you really need are

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:24.640
<v Speaker 4>binoculars in the Stopwatch, sometimes not even binoculars.

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 3>So it's in this category of like officially secret but

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 3>totally obvious exactly.

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 4>So, you know, we figure that a bunch of amateurs

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 4>whose hobby is to fill in the holes and let

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 4>the orbits of the satellites that aren't meant to be public,

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 4>and we feel fine about that because we figure that

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 4>if a bunch of amateur astronomers with binoculars can figure

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 4>out these orbits, the North Koreans can too, you know.

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 4>And so I think for a long time, the space

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 4>force were a bit of denial. The air forces was

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.360
<v Speaker 4>there were a bit of denial that they would ask us,

0:20:56.640 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 4>what sensors are you using to detect our satellites up? Oh,

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 4>we look up, it's come on overhead. There it is.

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:08.400
<v Speaker 4>And so I think now there's more of a realization

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 4>that actually pretty fruitless trying to keep these orbits secret.

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 4>And I think in the long run for safety of

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 4>space operations so that other people know not to bump

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 4>into them, the era of making the orbit data secret

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 4>has got to end, I think, and that's an active discussion.

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 3>Have we ever had a secret satellite blow up or

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 3>turn into secret space debris?

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, absolutely secret space junk.

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 3>I never heard of that before.

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 4>I think the most common case is the upper stage

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 4>from one of these satellites blew up and created a

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 4>lot of debris. And so for a long time those

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 4>orbital data were secret classified. But they kind of wised

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.719
<v Speaker 4>up eventually and released that. So that's good. There's been

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 4>some improvements lately in the transparency of the system, which

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm pleased to see that slowly. Know, there was a

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 4>lot of like Cold War mentality, and now it's sort

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 4>of even though we may be going to another Cold

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 4>War or whatever. But see, one of the big things

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 4>that's changed in the past ten years. As it used

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 4>to be I would give talks, I would say space

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 4>is about one third civilian government, one third military, and

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:15.199
<v Speaker 4>one third commercial. Those days are gone. Now space is

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 4>overwhelming the commercial and that means that the incentives at

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 4>the government level right are to support the commercial industry,

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 4>and that means more transparency in terms of not having

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 4>to worry about being hit by secret satellite. There's other

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 4>transparency issues because companies want to keep their plans secret

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.199
<v Speaker 4>and things like that for commercial reasons. So that's a

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 4>whole other issue. So times have really changed the last

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 4>five to ten years. It's been a dramatic shift towards

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 4>this new era of commercial space.

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 3>And what's your interest in it? I mean, you're an astrophysicist.

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Are you curious about this because you're just curious about

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 3>anything in space? Or is this like political advocacy where

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 3>you feel like, hey, space is for everyone and we

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 3>should all know what's up there.

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's changed recently. So yeah, I've had this

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:02.439
<v Speaker 4>separate life since I was a kid of wanting to

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 4>know what was going on in space. And you know,

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 4>I found this list of the year's satellite launches when

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 4>I was about twelve, and I very quickly realized after

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 4>copying it down that it wasn't really that grain of list.

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 4>They could do better. And so fifty years later I

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 4>have the best list because I'm obsessive like that, and

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 4>so that was sort of my original impetus. And I've

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.479
<v Speaker 4>got more and more dragged into the policy side. And

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 4>then as space has started to become so busy that

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 4>we humans are starting to have an impact on the

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 4>space environment, and part of that is an impact on astronomy.

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 4>My two lives of astronomer and space pundit have kind

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:50.719
<v Speaker 4>of merged and very much now are becoming advocacy and

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 4>becoming the Cassandra saying, hey, guys, we've got a problem

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 4>here with the overwhelming effect that we are now having

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 4>the space environment in a lot of different ways, and

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:06.959
<v Speaker 4>the need for new regulation to adapt to the new

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 4>environment that we're in.

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's take a quick break and when we get back,

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about policy and impacts. And we're back. So

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 1>there's all this junk floating around in space, and I'm

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 1>under the impression that part of why it's hard to

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>remove the junk from space is because there's policies that

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:42.919
<v Speaker 1>make it difficult to take someone else's junk out of

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>space without like getting their permission first. Is that correct?

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>And what's holding us back from removing all of that

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>junk from space?

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 4>Right? That is hard of it? And so yes, the

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 4>Outer Space Treaty says that unlike say, stuff abandoned in

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 4>the ocean, stuff in space you can't abandon it. It's

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 4>still your problem. And the outer space you didn't have

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 4>an idea of companies or anything like that. And so

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 4>if you want to put something in space your like SpaceX,

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 4>for example, you've got to get a license from your

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 4>government in this case of the US, and part of

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 4>that license is then the US as a country takes

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:20.919
<v Speaker 4>on the duty of jurisdiction and the control of that satellite.

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 4>And so that means if there's an old Russian rocket

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 4>stage orbiting that's been abandoned for thirty years, I can't

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 4>go up and take it without getting Russian permission because

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 4>it's still theirs. And so that is seen by the

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 4>space lawyers, particularly in the US, as a big, big

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 4>problem that they don't want to they kind of run

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:47.679
<v Speaker 4>and hide whenever you bring it up. I do feel

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 4>this is a solvable problem that no one wants the

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:53.639
<v Speaker 4>space junk. One thing I'm encouraged by. So there's a

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 4>company called Astroscale which is based in Tokyo and in

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:01.239
<v Speaker 4>the UK, and they've been recently through satellite around a

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 4>big old Japanese rocket stage, observing it as sort of

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 4>a preparatory mission to having the technology to remove it

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 4>from orbit. And I think companies like that that are

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.439
<v Speaker 4>sort of have an international basis. If you can do

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 4>sort of bilateral thing where say a European mission takes

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 4>out a Japanese piece of space junk with both countries agreement,

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 4>you can sort of set a tone that you can

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 4>then grow later to go okay, so we've done this,

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:30.400
<v Speaker 4>you see, we're not doing anything that fair. Yes, we're

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 4>cleaning out the orbit. Hey, Russian guys, can you join

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:36.880
<v Speaker 4>us and help us get rid of your junk too?

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's the way forward. But you know, obviously,

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 4>in the world political situation as it is, it's not trivial.

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>And I was talking to someone the other day who

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>was saying that one of the problems with these technologies

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:50.119
<v Speaker 1>for clearing out space junk. Is that you can say like, oh,

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:51.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm going out there for space junk, and that's why

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 1>I've got the laser, and that's why I've got this

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:55.199
<v Speaker 1>arm so that I can grab your space junk and

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>throw it down so it'll burn up in the atmosphere.

0:26:57.640 --> 0:26:59.959
<v Speaker 1>But that's all dual use. That laser can be us

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to destroy someone else's satellite. That grappling arm you can

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 1>throw someone else. And that is that actually holding anything back?

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Or are people just willing to accept that when you

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>develop the technology to remove stuff from space, maybe you're

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>also developing some dual use stuff to get used down

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the road.

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 4>I think it's an issue that people bring up. I

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:19.239
<v Speaker 4>mean personally, I think that's good. I hate the term

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 4>dual use. It's like everything is dual used. You know,

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 4>I can stab you with my pen, yeah, I mean yes,

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:29.919
<v Speaker 4>of course, any satellite that's maneuverable can be maneuvered to

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 4>kind of you know, smash into your satellite, right, yeah,

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 4>and principle, And so I think that's just an excuse

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 4>for not doing anything, okay, or just an expression of mistrust.

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, that is gettable over in my opinion, but

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 4>it's going to take a while, so I think, you know,

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 4>the last ten years, we've seen a bunch of experiments.

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 4>The British in particular did a fun set of experiments

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 4>where they sent a harpoon at a target to try

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 4>and catch it. They threw a net around the satellite

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 4>to reel it in and catch it. So people are

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:04.959
<v Speaker 4>trying crazy stuff, and we're sort of starting to settle

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 4>on Okay, what are the approaches that will actually work,

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 4>And I think then the next step is to go

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 4>and actually do it for real and starting. The first

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 4>people to do this were actually, surprisingly the Chinese. The

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 4>Chinese a couple of years ago, they had this navigation

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 4>satellite in geostationary orbit that had died and was just

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:27.680
<v Speaker 4>drifting in the traffic lane, you know, And so they

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:30.479
<v Speaker 4>sent up another satellite that went and locked onto it,

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 4>probably with a robot arm or something, and brought it

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:37.159
<v Speaker 4>up three hundred kilometers into what we call the graveyard,

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 4>a sort of a space junk yard, and released it

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 4>there and then went back down to go look for

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:45.719
<v Speaker 4>other target. And that was the first time that anyone

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 4>had actually done kind of garbage truck space debris removal

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 4>for real with a real piece of space debris, and

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 4>so you know the fact that the US hasn't done

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 4>that yet is frankly a little bit of better.

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it would be nice for leading the cleanup.

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 3>I have a sort of naive question as a physicist,

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 3>like if the natural environment is just the Moon, that

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 3>suggests that there's some process of clearing the near Earth

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:15.959
<v Speaker 3>orbit of bits like that if you had rocks coming in,

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 3>they would naturally gravitate together or something. What is the

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 3>sort of timescale for nature to take care of this itself,

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 3>for it to like form a ring or to pull

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 3>together into a new moon made of space junk.

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 4>If you just leave the satellite population as it is, yeah,

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 4>what happens? And yeah, let's say if the Earth were

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 4>a perfectly round, you know, point source, and the Moon

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 4>and the Sun didn't exist, then things were just orbit

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 4>forever without changing their orbital prepence. The Earth has an atmosphere,

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 4>and so below about one thousand kilometers there's just enough

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 4>atmosphere to have a headwind at all glo velocities that

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 4>will eventually bring stuff back down into the atmosphere, and

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 4>that timescale is every eleven years. We have the famous

0:29:57.360 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 4>solar cycle, the solar maximum that makes the atmosphere more dense,

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 4>and that basically clears out everything below five hundred kilometers

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 4>in one or two cycles. So if you blow five

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 4>or six hundred kilometers, you're going to re enter the

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 4>Earth's atmosphere within twenty something years. But if you're between

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:18.719
<v Speaker 4>like six hundred kilometers and ten thousand kilometers, you're going

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 4>to stay orbiting for centuries to millennia. There really isn't

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 4>that much affecting you. The Moon's far enough out that

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 4>it's not really bothering you. Once you get beyond like

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 4>one hundred thousand kilometers, now you have to start worrying

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 4>about the gravity of the Moon and the Sun, and

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 4>that will squeeze and turn your orbit and it's fun. Actually,

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 4>there are weird things like the Kosi effect that exoplanet

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 4>astronomers are really into, but also apply in Earth satellite stuff.

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot of parallels in the math.

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 1>The bail just wants to know what's the Cose effect.

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 4>So what it is is if you have an elliptical

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 4>orbit and there's another body like the Moon, tugging on you,

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 4>what it does is it's wheezes and stretches the orbit,

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 4>so it becomes more and less elliptrical in a periodic way,

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 4>and at the same time tilts the orbit relative to

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 4>the equator. So the satellite I work on, Shander is

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 4>in an orbit like that, and over a decade or so,

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 4>it goes from almost equatorial to almost polar and back again.

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 4>And the low point of the orbit started off with

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 4>ten thousand kilometers, it goes up to like fifteen thousand,

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 4>comes down to five thousand, back up again. And if

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 4>you get the Sun and Moon aligne you could even

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 4>have the low point go negative, which would be the

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 4>end of the mission because then you try to orbit

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 4>through the surface of the Earth. Doesn't work very well.

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 4>And so that's just one example of all the funky

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 4>stuff that can happen. The flattening of the Earth can

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 4>be important.

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 3>What about the gravitation between the objects? Like I understood

0:31:47.800 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 3>that if you have some huge set of debris in

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 3>orbit around a planet, if it's close below the roach limit,

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 3>the tidal forces will keep it from coalescing. For listeners

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 3>who aren't familiar, the Roche limit is how close you

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 3>can get to a planet before its tidal forces will

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:05.719
<v Speaker 3>pull you apart. We have tidal forces from planets because

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 3>the planet's gravity pulls on the closer bit harder than

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 3>on the further bit. But if you're far enough away

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 3>from the planet, your internal structure can still hold you together.

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 3>But if a moon, for example, gets too close to

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 3>a planet, those tidal forces will pull it apart, shred it,

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 3>and turn it into a ring. But if it's far

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 3>enough away, the self gravity will eventually pull it together

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 3>into a new moon. Could that happen eventually with all

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 3>of our space junk?

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 4>I haven't done that math. I doubt it. I think

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 4>the total mass isn't enough to get self gravitating. We've

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 4>launched maybe twenty tons of stuff.

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 3>That sounds like a lot, but I guess it's not

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 3>compared to an astronomical object yet.

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, not compared to even a fairly small moon. My

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 4>guess is that that would not happen.

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Maybe we should use a moon as a unit of

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 3>measuring how much space junk we put into this otter,

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 3>because it makes us feel better about it.

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 4>The International standard Moon. Yeah, okay, I'll take that out

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 4>a consideration. Daniels.

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, so when you were describing Chandra's orbit, it's

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>becoming even more clear to me how hard it must

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>be to track all of these objects because they're all

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 1>doing their own sort of things while they're out there.

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 1>So we've got all of this junk that's sort of

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 1>hard to track, do you It sort of touched on

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the Kessler syndrome. Let's dive into that a little bit more.

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 4>So.

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Space is huge. How big of a risk is it

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to start getting these feedbacks where everything

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 1>runs into each other. Let's talk about that.

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 4>So space is huge, but lower orbit isn't that huge, right,

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 4>So if we focus on the busiest part of space

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 4>right now from the human point of view, which is

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 4>all the satellites between the bottom of the US atmosphere

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 4>and about two thousand kilometers, there's a lot of stuff there.

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 4>The average distance between any two objects it's about one

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 4>hundred kilometers, but you're going at twenty five thousand kilometers

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 4>an hour. So the analogy I always use is, you know,

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 4>if you're driving on the highway, we're always reminded the

0:33:56.640 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 4>faster you go, the further you have to the distance

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 4>from the car in front of you. Right, So when

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 4>you're traveling at twenty five thousand kilometers an hour. You

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 4>don't have a lot of dotch time in one hundred kilometers, right,

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 4>And so we do get collisions, and we're seeing them.

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:16.800
<v Speaker 4>We're seeing small collisions that are maybe not destroying a

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:20.359
<v Speaker 4>satellite entirely, but kind of breaking stuff off it. And

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 4>the trouble is that the collision rate goes as the

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:25.239
<v Speaker 4>square of the number of satellites. So if you have

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:28.320
<v Speaker 4>ten times as many satellites, you have one hundred times

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 4>as many collisions. So right now, the collision rate is

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:36.360
<v Speaker 4>not that bad. Even so if you stop launching everything today,

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:40.239
<v Speaker 4>the collision rate is high enough that eventually, on timescales

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 4>of a century, you would start to get this runaway

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:44.320
<v Speaker 4>chain reaction.

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 3>What's the collision rate like now, how many collisions do

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 3>we see per day or per year?

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:51.319
<v Speaker 4>I think we see two or three small ones per year, Okay,

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:54.839
<v Speaker 4>maybe one big one a decade of order. And so

0:34:55.560 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 4>that is amplified by what we call breakup events. There's

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 4>not one satellite dumping another, but when the rocket stage

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 4>blows up, for example, and things like that, and we

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 4>have several of those a year, adding hundreds of objects

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:14.280
<v Speaker 4>to the catalog each year from that kind of source

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 4>the number of debriogis is increasing. It's not like in

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 4>the movie Gravity, right, where everything goes to hell in

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 4>about half an hour. Right, this is something that plays

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 4>out as with most environmental things. Right, you slowly drown

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:32.840
<v Speaker 4>in your own waste. Right, every year, it's a little

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:34.839
<v Speaker 4>bit worse and a little worse.

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 3>But it accelerates.

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 3>You were saying that the collision rate depends on the

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:40.799
<v Speaker 3>number of objects squared. So every time you have an

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:43.319
<v Speaker 3>object that breaks into two, you've increased the number, which

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 3>you know increases the rate of collisions. And that's the

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 3>feedback loop.

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Right, That's exactly correct, yes, And is this all going

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to be exacerbated even more by additional constellations of satellite?

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:58.279
<v Speaker 1>So SpaceX has their Starlink, but I think China is

0:35:58.320 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 1>planning something similar.

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 4>I has made the first two launches of its Kianfan

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:07.760
<v Speaker 4>thousand sales satellites. And you know, people have seen the

0:36:07.800 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 4>success of Starlink in providing communications in Ukraine, and so

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:16.400
<v Speaker 4>all the militaries in all the countries want their own.

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 4>We must have control over it ourselves, Starling constellation. And

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 4>so I think in addition to the commercial interests, there's

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 4>military interests, and so yeah, we're going to see more

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:30.440
<v Speaker 4>and more of these constellations come along. Amazon have started

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 4>deploying theirs. There's a company called e Space that wants

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 4>to launch hundreds of thousands of satellites. So this is

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 4>really happening. You know. What SpaceX will tell you is

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 4>they have this Wizzo algorithm that will fix it in software.

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:50.719
<v Speaker 4>Basically that the satellites have these argone electric thrusters. They

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:55.279
<v Speaker 4>accelerate argon atoms with electric potential from solar panels to

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 4>provide low thrust but very many miles per gallon rocket

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:04.279
<v Speaker 4>engine that can do slow dodges, not fast dodges. And

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:08.400
<v Speaker 4>so they're always calculating. You know, they're doing thousands and

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 4>thousands of small maneuvers to avoid each other and other

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 4>people's satellites, and they're like, we got this, you know,

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 4>we know how to do this. I think their math

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:24.760
<v Speaker 4>works out if you assume that the you know, errors

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 4>are always Bell curve and you know, but that's not reality.

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 4>The reality is that, as we say in the trade,

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:36.720
<v Speaker 4>errors are non Gaussian. They're not like random that someone

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 4>screws up and something goes very wrong and it only

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 4>takes two people and two different constellations to screw up

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:47.160
<v Speaker 4>in the right way, as it were, for your algorithms

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 4>to just totally fail and you have a collision. And

0:37:50.880 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 4>so we've been lucky so far. But I think if

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 4>you up the number of satellites by another factor of

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 4>ten or so, the chances are that we're going to

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:03.320
<v Speaker 4>start seeing collisions. Space has been quite careful. They're actually

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:07.759
<v Speaker 4>retiring now about three hundred of their satellites that have

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:11.240
<v Speaker 4>components that they feel a dodgy and might cause a failure,

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:13.799
<v Speaker 4>and so they're bringing them down under control while they're

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 4>still working and incinerating them in the atmosphere, which is

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 4>a whole other environmental problem that's just emerging because you know,

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 4>messing with the chemistry the upper atmosphere, what could possibly

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 4>go wrong?

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>That's worth trying for us so far.

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:29.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, right, But putting that aside for a second, you know,

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 4>they're trying to be what they feel is responsible bringing

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 4>these satellites down, but not all companies maybe are going

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:37.880
<v Speaker 4>to do that. And for example, of the first batch

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 4>of can Fan satellites, seventeen of the eighteen have started

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 4>raising the orbits. One of them looks like it may

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 4>have failed in SIH and Tolmerle, which will leave it

0:38:47.160 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 4>up there for a century. If you're launching ten thousand

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:54.240
<v Speaker 4>satellites and you have a one percent failure rate, say

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 4>that's one hundred failed satellites added to the mix. And

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, so it doesn't take too any of those

0:39:00.560 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 4>to kind of exacerbate the problems.

0:39:03.160 --> 0:39:05.719
<v Speaker 3>But these companies must be incentivized to solve this problem,

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 3>right They don't want to invest billions in their network

0:39:08.120 --> 0:39:10.719
<v Speaker 3>and then have them all be destroyed. They must be

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 3>clear out about it.

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:14.440
<v Speaker 4>If anything will save us, that's it. It's the bottom line,

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 4>and it's the used environment story that they will do

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 4>not enough about the problem until it starts getting bad

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 4>enough that they actually see economic losses due to the problem,

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 4>and then they will scramble to self regulate and do

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:31.719
<v Speaker 4>something that will improve it.

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 1>And on that positive note, let's take a break and

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 1>when we come back, we'll talk about implications for astronomy. Okay,

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 1>so you mentioned a little bit earlier in the show

0:39:56.920 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that all of the starlink satellites, for example, are making

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 1>astronomy difficult. What is the magnitude of this problem right

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:05.400
<v Speaker 1>right now?

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 4>It's an annoying nuisance. But again, up things by another

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:12.440
<v Speaker 4>factor of ten, and it becomes really difficult to do

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:14.759
<v Speaker 4>certain kinds of science. And so the problem is this,

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:17.719
<v Speaker 4>there are two problems. They're different for lower bit satellites

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:21.360
<v Speaker 4>and high orbit satellites. For low orbit satellites they're so

0:40:21.480 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 4>low that in the middle of the night they can't

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:25.360
<v Speaker 4>see the sun. They shine by your affected light, and

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 4>so they're dark, and so they're not really a problem

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:29.880
<v Speaker 4>for astronomers in the middle of the night. They are. However,

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:31.960
<v Speaker 4>if you have enough of them. For example, if this

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:35.759
<v Speaker 4>espace company I mentioned really launches like one hundred thousand satellites,

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:39.360
<v Speaker 4>you could get to a situation where there are more

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:43.240
<v Speaker 4>visible satellites in the sky than visible stars.

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh my god.

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:48.240
<v Speaker 4>Especially like just at the limit of visibility, the sky

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:50.400
<v Speaker 4>instead of being nice and dark, will be kind of

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 4>seething in this nauseous way. And then the brighter ones

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:56.440
<v Speaker 4>will make it very hard to kind of recognize the

0:40:56.480 --> 0:40:58.920
<v Speaker 4>constellations because it's going to be so much traffic. It's

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 4>going to be like in the flight plat hat a know,

0:41:01.239 --> 0:41:02.360
<v Speaker 4>logan airport or whatever.

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 3>But why these things bright? I mean, they don't have

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:06.719
<v Speaker 3>lights on them, right, are they just reflecting the sun.

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 4>They reflect sunlight, and they're big. They're big and low

0:41:10.000 --> 0:41:13.960
<v Speaker 4>and they reflect sunlight. The current Starlink satellites are thirty

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:17.799
<v Speaker 4>meter span Oh my god, panels. They're not small. These

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:21.879
<v Speaker 4>are not tiny CubeSats. They're one ton ish satellites. So

0:41:21.920 --> 0:41:25.240
<v Speaker 4>it's it's really a change in the environment for everyone

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 4>in the world, right, even if you're not a space

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 4>faring country, but you're like looking up at the sky,

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 4>you maybe have cultural connections to the sky, and now

0:41:32.480 --> 0:41:35.880
<v Speaker 4>suddenly you're seeing the sky changing. And one of my

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:38.919
<v Speaker 4>colleagues was just out hiking in the wilds of Canada said,

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:41.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, they saw like so many satellites now that

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 4>they would never have seen it a few years ago.

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 3>Can they do something on the satellites to reduce the reflectivity,

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:49.120
<v Speaker 3>like have an anti reflective coating or a sunshade.

0:41:49.280 --> 0:41:51.839
<v Speaker 4>To SpaceX's credit, they are doing a number of things

0:41:51.920 --> 0:41:54.319
<v Speaker 4>that have reduced the brightness of the satellite. But then

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:56.439
<v Speaker 4>they came up with this new model of satellite where

0:41:56.480 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 4>they had these fancy new mitigations, but they were also

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 4>twice as big, so it kind of canceled out. To

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:05.239
<v Speaker 4>their credit, they've done a lot of work, but there's

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:07.799
<v Speaker 4>still more that needs to be done. So then the

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:10.879
<v Speaker 4>second problem is the high orbit satellites. They are too

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 4>faint because they're high up, they're too faint to be

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 4>seen by the average person looking at in the evening

0:42:16.440 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 4>of the constellations, but they leave trails on astronomical images,

0:42:21.880 --> 0:42:24.319
<v Speaker 4>and they're way way brighter than the distant galaxies that

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 4>we're looking at. And so you take this picture of

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 4>some you know, distant galaxy and you've got a big

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:32.520
<v Speaker 4>streak going across the image, and you know, we're not

0:42:32.560 --> 0:42:34.720
<v Speaker 4>just trying to take pretty pictures. We're trying to measure

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 4>brightnesses of stars to like one or two percent accuracy,

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:42.279
<v Speaker 4>and so just photoshopping out the trail doesn't entirely solve

0:42:42.280 --> 0:42:46.040
<v Speaker 4>the problem. And even if that works, if you have

0:42:46.120 --> 0:42:48.239
<v Speaker 4>one trail every five images, you do what we call

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:51.400
<v Speaker 4>medium filtering. Basically you throw away the bad ones and

0:42:51.480 --> 0:42:53.520
<v Speaker 4>you just have to observe for longer than you otherwise

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 4>would have. So it's attacks, but it's workable. But then

0:42:57.000 --> 0:42:58.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, if you up the number right so that

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:03.160
<v Speaker 4>it's like streaks on every image going crisscrossing, going every way,

0:43:03.719 --> 0:43:07.959
<v Speaker 4>that becomes pretty impossible to analyze in an automated way.

0:43:08.040 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 4>If you have, like you know, ten thousand images of

0:43:10.200 --> 0:43:13.560
<v Speaker 4>galaxies and you're trying to analyze them remote with an algorithm,

0:43:14.040 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 4>and trying to distinguish between the crisscrossing satellite streaks and

0:43:17.840 --> 0:43:22.000
<v Speaker 4>actual astronomical phenomena is going to get pretty impossible. You know,

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:24.239
<v Speaker 4>there are some science that's going to be affected worse

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:28.960
<v Speaker 4>than others. The Magellanic clouds our nearest galaxies are visible

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:34.440
<v Speaker 4>high in the southern sky in southern Midsummer. Southern midsummer

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:37.479
<v Speaker 4>is the worst for this because that's when the sun

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 4>isn't that far below the horizon. The satellites get illuminated

0:43:40.560 --> 0:43:44.759
<v Speaker 4>all night long, and in plausible scenarios five or ten

0:43:44.840 --> 0:43:49.399
<v Speaker 4>years from now, there are several thousand illuminated satellites all

0:43:49.440 --> 0:43:53.920
<v Speaker 4>the time in the sky throughout the night in midsummer.

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 4>We may be able to work around it with new

0:43:56.320 --> 0:44:00.560
<v Speaker 4>kinds of cameras that can turn their shutters off for

0:44:00.680 --> 0:44:03.800
<v Speaker 4>brief modes of time while the satellite is passing, triggered

0:44:03.840 --> 0:44:06.719
<v Speaker 4>maybe by a finer camera that spots the satellite coming over.

0:44:07.280 --> 0:44:10.400
<v Speaker 4>It's not trivial. That's money, right, that's money that we

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:13.040
<v Speaker 4>don't have to re equip the observer trees.

0:44:13.680 --> 0:44:16.680
<v Speaker 3>So Musk said, quote, I am confident that we will

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:21.800
<v Speaker 3>not cause any impact whatsoever in astronomical discoveries zero. How

0:44:21.880 --> 0:44:23.880
<v Speaker 3>confident are you that that's the case.

0:44:24.000 --> 0:44:26.359
<v Speaker 4>I am one hundred percent confident that he is wrong

0:44:26.400 --> 0:44:31.920
<v Speaker 4>about that. Okay, there are subtleties, right, and so for example,

0:44:32.320 --> 0:44:35.000
<v Speaker 4>there was a report of a flare in a red

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:38.799
<v Speaker 4>shift eleven galaxy that was super scientifically exciting until it

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:40.920
<v Speaker 4>turned out to be actually a satellite passing through the

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:43.560
<v Speaker 4>field of view the telescope at the time. If you've

0:44:43.600 --> 0:44:46.000
<v Speaker 4>just got like an optical fiber on the sky that

0:44:46.040 --> 0:44:49.320
<v Speaker 4>you're taking a spectrum, right, you don't have an image

0:44:49.320 --> 0:44:51.319
<v Speaker 4>of the sky, it's hard to figure out that that

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:54.360
<v Speaker 4>was a satellite. So there's all kinds of ways in

0:44:54.400 --> 0:44:57.520
<v Speaker 4>which this is like a new kind of contamination factor

0:44:58.200 --> 0:45:03.960
<v Speaker 4>that ranges from mild annoying to oh, we accidentally published

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:08.000
<v Speaker 4>a wrong exciting result because there was no way to

0:45:08.080 --> 0:45:10.640
<v Speaker 4>tell that it was caused by satellite contamination.

0:45:10.920 --> 0:45:12.799
<v Speaker 3>So if you were a dictator of the Earth and

0:45:12.840 --> 0:45:14.440
<v Speaker 3>you were in charge of this and everybody had to

0:45:14.440 --> 0:45:17.759
<v Speaker 3>follow your instructions, what would you do to allow us

0:45:17.800 --> 0:45:22.080
<v Speaker 3>to have this amazing space technology and worldwide network and

0:45:22.120 --> 0:45:23.160
<v Speaker 3>also do astronomy.

0:45:23.760 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's the challenge. I think we just need a

0:45:26.680 --> 0:45:30.240
<v Speaker 4>cat on the number of active satellites of a given

0:45:30.280 --> 0:45:33.960
<v Speaker 4>brightness at a given altitude. You know, we have caps already,

0:45:34.080 --> 0:45:37.240
<v Speaker 4>Like in geostationary orbit, there's orbital slots that get assigned

0:45:37.239 --> 0:45:40.680
<v Speaker 4>by the International Telecommunications Union. You can't just launch as

0:45:40.680 --> 0:45:44.080
<v Speaker 4>many geostationary satellites as you like. I think we're going

0:45:44.160 --> 0:45:45.719
<v Speaker 4>to have to go to that. In lower th orbit,

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:47.320
<v Speaker 4>We're going to have to have some kind of orbital

0:45:47.360 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 4>slot thing, and that will then change the design trade

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:54.800
<v Speaker 4>so that instead of launching ten thousand small satellites, maybe

0:45:54.800 --> 0:45:58.359
<v Speaker 4>you launched one thousand bigger satellites and that helps with

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 4>not bumping into each other as well. So I think

0:46:01.600 --> 0:46:08.040
<v Speaker 4>it's a matter of finding regulation that will yes, absolutely

0:46:08.960 --> 0:46:13.879
<v Speaker 4>let the space technology develop, but not in a complete

0:46:14.200 --> 0:46:18.000
<v Speaker 4>free for all way, and manage the resources that we

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:20.759
<v Speaker 4>have in a sustainable way and in a way that

0:46:20.880 --> 0:46:25.160
<v Speaker 4>doesn't impact the environment and astronomy more than a certain amount.

0:46:25.160 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 4>And where I mean absolutely it's going to be worse

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:30.000
<v Speaker 4>for us than it used to be. But I do

0:46:30.120 --> 0:46:33.080
<v Speaker 4>believe there's a happy medium where the astronomers could just

0:46:33.120 --> 0:46:35.839
<v Speaker 4>about kind of survive and the satellites can still make

0:46:35.880 --> 0:46:36.800
<v Speaker 4>bunches of money.

0:46:37.160 --> 0:46:39.399
<v Speaker 1>So let's wrap up the show by asking the two

0:46:39.480 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 1>questions that we got from a listener. So Josh sent

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:43.960
<v Speaker 1>us two questions.

0:46:44.239 --> 0:46:48.400
<v Speaker 5>Here we go, Besides the stuff that just orbits the Earth,

0:46:49.040 --> 0:46:52.920
<v Speaker 5>what happens to all the other stuff? Does it just

0:46:53.040 --> 0:46:57.600
<v Speaker 5>go off into space, run into planets, moons and stars?

0:46:58.560 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 5>And parenthetically thinking that if they do hit planets and moons,

0:47:02.440 --> 0:47:06.080
<v Speaker 5>they just sit there forever, and if they hit stars,

0:47:06.239 --> 0:47:08.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm assuming they melt away.

0:47:08.680 --> 0:47:10.480
<v Speaker 4>Right Well, even if they hit a planet, you know,

0:47:10.600 --> 0:47:13.319
<v Speaker 4>the typical planet hitting speed is going to be more

0:47:13.320 --> 0:47:16.880
<v Speaker 4>than enough to pulbarize you. We have, in addition to

0:47:16.960 --> 0:47:20.840
<v Speaker 4>the twenty five something thousand objects currently in orbit, the

0:47:20.920 --> 0:47:24.000
<v Speaker 4>sixty thousand objects that have been in orbit since Futnik,

0:47:24.600 --> 0:47:28.040
<v Speaker 4>there's about one to two thousand objects that we have

0:47:28.160 --> 0:47:32.160
<v Speaker 4>sent beyond Earth orbit, either to the Moon or into

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:35.480
<v Speaker 4>orbit around the Sun. And they're poorly documented. I've been

0:47:35.480 --> 0:47:38.160
<v Speaker 4>trying to make a catalog of them, figure out where

0:47:38.160 --> 0:47:40.640
<v Speaker 4>they all are. Most of them will just orbit the

0:47:40.680 --> 0:47:43.920
<v Speaker 4>Sun forever, I say, forever. After a million years, there

0:47:43.920 --> 0:47:46.320
<v Speaker 4>are various effects that will cause them, probably the spiral

0:47:46.360 --> 0:47:48.640
<v Speaker 4>into the Sun or to hit a planet. But you

0:47:48.680 --> 0:47:51.799
<v Speaker 4>know we're talking million year timescales. These things are going

0:47:51.800 --> 0:47:53.880
<v Speaker 4>to be out there for a while, unless you know,

0:47:53.920 --> 0:47:56.560
<v Speaker 4>the Smithsonian goes and clangs them or something.

0:47:56.400 --> 0:47:57.720
<v Speaker 1>With their gigantic budget.

0:47:58.000 --> 0:48:00.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Well, you know, a thousand years from hopefully it

0:48:00.600 --> 0:48:03.319
<v Speaker 4>will have ejective or one hundred thousand years from now.

0:48:04.200 --> 0:48:06.600
<v Speaker 4>We do have stuff in orbit around Mars. We have

0:48:06.680 --> 0:48:09.640
<v Speaker 4>stuff in orbit around Jupiter, and we have stuff on

0:48:09.680 --> 0:48:10.760
<v Speaker 4>the surface of the planets.

0:48:11.160 --> 0:48:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Stuff you mean on purpose or space junk or both.

0:48:13.920 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, both, right, So we try not to have the

0:48:17.160 --> 0:48:21.120
<v Speaker 4>space junk hit Mars because and so what we do

0:48:21.239 --> 0:48:23.520
<v Speaker 4>is when we send stuff out in the direction of Mars,

0:48:24.000 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 4>we actually sterilize the probe, sort of bake it so

0:48:27.680 --> 0:48:29.719
<v Speaker 4>that there's hopefully no bacteria on it, so that we

0:48:29.760 --> 0:48:34.640
<v Speaker 4>won't contaminate the search for Martian life with bugs from Florida.

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:38.279
<v Speaker 4>And then when we launch it, we actually deliberately aim

0:48:38.320 --> 0:48:41.080
<v Speaker 4>it away from Mars a little bit. We deliberately miss

0:48:41.080 --> 0:48:44.040
<v Speaker 4>a bit separate from the rocket stage. So now the

0:48:44.120 --> 0:48:46.320
<v Speaker 4>rocket stage is in an orbit that doesn't go close

0:48:46.360 --> 0:48:50.160
<v Speaker 4>to Mars, and then we make a course correction to

0:48:50.160 --> 0:48:52.920
<v Speaker 4>put the probe on course from Mars, and so that

0:48:53.000 --> 0:48:56.680
<v Speaker 4>way we avoid having the big sort of space junk

0:48:56.680 --> 0:48:59.520
<v Speaker 4>pieces that we launch an orbit around the Sun hit

0:48:59.680 --> 0:49:02.600
<v Speaker 4>Mars at least on the first time round. You can't

0:49:02.640 --> 0:49:04.959
<v Speaker 4>sort of predict far enough in advance to guarantee it'll

0:49:04.960 --> 0:49:07.640
<v Speaker 4>never hit, but hopefully the buzz will be done by then.

0:49:08.000 --> 0:49:09.759
<v Speaker 4>So that is, you know, this whole issue of you know,

0:49:09.800 --> 0:49:13.080
<v Speaker 4>protecting the environment of the other planets is certainly something

0:49:13.160 --> 0:49:15.520
<v Speaker 4>that people give a lot of thought to, but there is, Yeah,

0:49:15.560 --> 0:49:18.400
<v Speaker 4>there's a bunch of junk orbiting the Sun. One of

0:49:18.400 --> 0:49:21.160
<v Speaker 4>the things that I've been involved in is movement to

0:49:21.239 --> 0:49:24.960
<v Speaker 4>try and regulate this better and at least get people

0:49:25.000 --> 0:49:27.560
<v Speaker 4>to say what orbit they put their junk in so

0:49:27.600 --> 0:49:30.680
<v Speaker 4>that we can find it later. Occasionally we've accidentally catalog

0:49:30.760 --> 0:49:34.799
<v Speaker 4>space junk. Is, oh, we discovered an asteroid, and then well,

0:49:35.200 --> 0:49:37.759
<v Speaker 4>never mind that asteroid is on an asteroid, it's a

0:49:37.840 --> 0:49:40.880
<v Speaker 4>rocket stage. We would like you please, if you launch

0:49:40.920 --> 0:49:43.640
<v Speaker 4>something in the orbit around the Sun, give us the

0:49:43.760 --> 0:49:47.080
<v Speaker 4>orbital elements so that we can you know, disambiguate it

0:49:47.120 --> 0:49:50.759
<v Speaker 4>from asteroids. There's an asteroid mining company that's explicitly said

0:49:50.760 --> 0:49:53.360
<v Speaker 4>it wants to launch this survey probe next year and

0:49:53.400 --> 0:49:55.239
<v Speaker 4>they're not going to tell us which asteroid is going

0:49:55.239 --> 0:49:58.880
<v Speaker 4>to because that's proprietary information. Right. I think that's just

0:49:58.960 --> 0:50:02.040
<v Speaker 4>not okay. If you're flying a light plane in the US,

0:50:02.040 --> 0:50:03.440
<v Speaker 4>you have to file a flight plan. You should have

0:50:03.520 --> 0:50:05.840
<v Speaker 4>a file a flight plan. If you go to the asteroids,

0:50:06.560 --> 0:50:10.400
<v Speaker 4>that's public interest information. And so the American Astronomical Society

0:50:10.400 --> 0:50:14.000
<v Speaker 4>has issued a statement saying that we think that interplanetary

0:50:14.080 --> 0:50:16.840
<v Speaker 4>orbits like we're like those solar systems are area and

0:50:17.040 --> 0:50:18.520
<v Speaker 4>if you're going to be in it, we think you

0:50:18.560 --> 0:50:22.640
<v Speaker 4>should publish your orbital data and not keep it secret.

0:50:22.719 --> 0:50:25.120
<v Speaker 4>So we'll see if we can make that stick. But

0:50:25.320 --> 0:50:29.080
<v Speaker 4>that's going to be an area of discussion in the

0:50:29.160 --> 0:50:31.880
<v Speaker 4>years to come as more and more activity. You know,

0:50:31.920 --> 0:50:35.040
<v Speaker 4>it used to be that the deep space arena was

0:50:35.440 --> 0:50:40.839
<v Speaker 4>just NASA, JPL and the Soviets, right, and now it's

0:50:40.920 --> 0:50:44.440
<v Speaker 4>all kinds of developing countries. The UAE has a Mars orbiter,

0:50:44.920 --> 0:50:49.560
<v Speaker 4>India has a Moon Landers and private companies like SpaceX

0:50:50.000 --> 0:50:53.319
<v Speaker 4>are launching stuff to the Moon and Mars and so

0:50:53.400 --> 0:50:55.880
<v Speaker 4>we really need to do a better job of keeping

0:50:55.920 --> 0:50:57.000
<v Speaker 4>track of what's out there.

0:50:57.160 --> 0:50:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And speaking of keeping track of what's out there,

0:50:59.560 --> 0:51:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Josh is the second question is right on point there.

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:05.560
<v Speaker 5>This is probably more speculative and harder to answer. But

0:51:05.719 --> 0:51:10.600
<v Speaker 5>in the event of the existence of advanced extraterrestrial beings,

0:51:11.080 --> 0:51:14.719
<v Speaker 5>what might they into it about us? If or when

0:51:14.800 --> 0:51:19.440
<v Speaker 5>they do find the random fastener or rocket booster or

0:51:19.520 --> 0:51:24.760
<v Speaker 5>humanoid poop? Would they be curious? Would they be bored?

0:51:25.480 --> 0:51:28.920
<v Speaker 5>Would they be disappointed? We were so wasteful with the

0:51:28.960 --> 0:51:32.320
<v Speaker 5>stuff we ejected into the space trash can.

0:51:33.160 --> 0:51:36.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think they're out of you is going to

0:51:36.080 --> 0:51:38.800
<v Speaker 4>be well, what those guys went extinct?

0:51:43.640 --> 0:51:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm hoping our clean up methods really get much

0:51:46.200 --> 0:51:47.520
<v Speaker 1>better in the coming decades.

0:51:47.680 --> 0:51:48.600
<v Speaker 4>Yep, you and me both.

0:51:48.760 --> 0:51:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, fingers crossed.

0:51:50.400 --> 0:51:52.600
<v Speaker 3>Have we had elements of space junk that we think

0:51:52.640 --> 0:51:56.400
<v Speaker 3>have gone interstellar, that have left the Solar System? You know,

0:51:56.440 --> 0:51:59.160
<v Speaker 3>basically the inverse version of Abilobe's omuamua.

0:51:59.640 --> 0:52:03.400
<v Speaker 4>Yep. Absolutely. There are a couple of pieces of the

0:52:03.440 --> 0:52:07.640
<v Speaker 4>New Horizons probe, one of the rocket stages, and a

0:52:07.680 --> 0:52:10.759
<v Speaker 4>couple of there are things called d spin weights that

0:52:10.840 --> 0:52:13.120
<v Speaker 4>are like you have a spinning rocket stage, you want

0:52:13.160 --> 0:52:17.560
<v Speaker 4>to slow it down, you unspool two weights on a wire,

0:52:17.800 --> 0:52:19.960
<v Speaker 4>kind of like a yo yo kind of thing, and

0:52:20.000 --> 0:52:22.080
<v Speaker 4>then they float off and take the angle the momentum

0:52:22.080 --> 0:52:25.800
<v Speaker 4>with them. And so that's like another class of space jungle.

0:52:25.840 --> 0:52:28.120
<v Speaker 4>That's like little pieces of space chapment. Just okay, they're

0:52:28.120 --> 0:52:30.359
<v Speaker 4>on their way out the Solar system, all right.

0:52:30.400 --> 0:52:33.640
<v Speaker 1>So to wrap up, are you feeling optimistic about the future?

0:52:33.920 --> 0:52:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to get those caps on satellites? What

0:52:36.200 --> 0:52:36.880
<v Speaker 1>do you think.

0:52:36.880 --> 0:52:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Before we go extinct?

0:52:38.239 --> 0:52:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:52:38.719 --> 0:52:42.160
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, Kelly. I think that there is you know,

0:52:42.239 --> 0:52:44.120
<v Speaker 4>even in the companies, right, I don't want to paint

0:52:44.120 --> 0:52:47.239
<v Speaker 4>them as unfeeling corporate. You know, money is a little thing.

0:52:47.320 --> 0:52:50.399
<v Speaker 4>They do care about space, and so I think there

0:52:50.520 --> 0:52:54.440
<v Speaker 4>is interest in being responsible space citizens, and that, you know,

0:52:54.560 --> 0:52:57.279
<v Speaker 4>gets balanced against all the pressures that are pushing them

0:52:57.320 --> 0:53:00.319
<v Speaker 4>to be careless. And so I think it could go

0:53:00.360 --> 0:53:03.040
<v Speaker 4>either way. It's the usual environmental thing. It will get

0:53:03.200 --> 0:53:06.160
<v Speaker 4>bad enough that something will have to be done, and

0:53:06.160 --> 0:53:08.440
<v Speaker 4>then there'll be a scramble to try and fix in.

0:53:09.000 --> 0:53:11.719
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a very realistic take on things, all right.

0:53:11.840 --> 0:53:13.759
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for being here. Today, Jonathan, we

0:53:13.840 --> 0:53:14.360
<v Speaker 1>had a lot.

0:53:14.200 --> 0:53:16.440
<v Speaker 4>Of fun hide Vice. Thank you for having me, good

0:53:16.480 --> 0:53:17.440
<v Speaker 4>luck tracking everything.

0:53:17.760 --> 0:53:21.720
<v Speaker 3>Thank you and listeners. If your planning to launch anything

0:53:21.760 --> 0:53:23.880
<v Speaker 3>in order to please please let Jonathan know.

0:53:31.400 --> 0:53:35.239
<v Speaker 1>Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe is produced by iHeartRadio. We

0:53:35.280 --> 0:53:37.680
<v Speaker 1>would love to hear from you, We really would.

0:53:37.840 --> 0:53:40.480
<v Speaker 3>We want to know what questions do you have about

0:53:40.480 --> 0:53:42.480
<v Speaker 3>this Extraordinary Universe.

0:53:42.600 --> 0:53:45.560
<v Speaker 1>We want to know your thoughts on recent shows, suggestions

0:53:45.560 --> 0:53:48.560
<v Speaker 1>for future shows. If you contact us, we will get

0:53:48.600 --> 0:53:49.040
<v Speaker 1>back to you.

0:53:49.239 --> 0:53:52.719
<v Speaker 3>We really mean it. We answer every message. Email us

0:53:52.800 --> 0:53:55.600
<v Speaker 3>at Questions at Danielankelly dot.

0:53:55.440 --> 0:53:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Org, or you can find us on social media. We

0:53:57.320 --> 0:54:02.040
<v Speaker 1>have accounts on X, INSTAGRAMY and on all of those platforms.

0:54:02.040 --> 0:54:04.960
<v Speaker 1>You can find us at D and K Universe.

0:54:05.120 --> 0:54:06.640
<v Speaker 4>Don't be shy, write to us