WEBVTT - Can Employers Segregate Unvaccinated Workers?

0:00:01.639 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>More than a dozen states quickly embraced new CDC guidelines

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that say fully vaccinated Americans can ditch their masks and

0:00:09.680 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>forego social distancing in most cases. But the sudden change

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>has led to questions and concerns from those who say

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>there's no easy way for businesses and others to determine

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>who's fully vaccinated and who's not. Joining me as Rob Fuller,

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a partner with Nelson Hardeman, so the new CDC guidance

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 1>came as a surprise to many health and state officials.

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:37.279
<v Speaker 1>Should it have been done so seemingly abruptly, well, I

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 1>think the guidance itself was science based. The problem, I

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:45.240
<v Speaker 1>think is messaging. You know, we're on the honor system

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 1>whether you've had a vaccination or The guidance, based on

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a study of four thousand healthcare workers, basically proved the

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>efficacy of the vaccines. Since the vaccination's work, they protect

0:00:56.600 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you against serious COVID disease, and so when compared to

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>additional safety you might get by continued mask wearing and

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>social distancing, uh, it was negligible. You're not measurable in

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the study. So the guidance did follow the sign Unfortunately,

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 1>like here in California, we don't have very many people vaccinated.

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>In the big scheme of things, more than six the

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>people remain unvaccinated. So it's confusing for business owners and

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:27.279
<v Speaker 1>everyone else that you know, if you let a hundred

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>people in your store, statistically you know that more than

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>sixty of them are unvaccinated, and so you, you know,

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>for the safety of your own workers, might well consider

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>continuing a mask mandate on your own regardless of what

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>is the public perceived CDC guidance that masks are no

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>longer necessary. Well, also, it seems like there are problems

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>because the state guidance is different from the CDC guidance.

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>So you mentioned California is one place where that is

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>true until today. New York is now going to lift

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>it's state mask mandate, But in other states there's a conflict.

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>So what do businesses do. Yeah, I think it's a

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>messaging conflict. But when they lift their mask guides in

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>New York today, for instance, it's still recommends that if

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you're unvaccinated that you continue to wear a mask. It

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't going to be a matter of requirement. Uh.

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>CDC guidance also continues mask wearing for public transportation and

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>plane travel. But a private business vers is in a

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>tough situation. Obviously you want to cater to the customer,

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>but you also, under OSHA and other laws, have a

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>duty to keep your workforce safe. And knowing that most

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>people are not vaccinated yet, you know, if you're a

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>business owner, you could just very sanely decide that that

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the best thing for now, for another month or two

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>is to continue to require masks. And of course that

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>produces what we see on TV with angry, uh maskless

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.639
<v Speaker 1>people being denied entrance to certain stores that have decided

0:02:56.680 --> 0:03:00.040
<v Speaker 1>to do that because of all the prior politicalization and

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, guidance shifting quickly. It is a messaging mess

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and leaves the individual business person in quite a laundry.

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:10.239
<v Speaker 1>The guidance from the CDC was rolled out on Thursday.

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>OSHA hasn't substantially changed its masking recommendations in almost four months.

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:20.399
<v Speaker 1>That's correct. OSHA will err on the side of work

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>for safety and will be much slower than the other

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>agencies and recommending discontinuation of masks. And I think you know,

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>common sense would tell you that if most people are

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>still unvaccinated, probably makes sense to keep masks on the

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>requirement list in the workplace for at least a little

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>while longer until most people become vaccinated, and then, you know,

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the the issue is that the masks work, you know,

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>despite the prior politicization of weather mask wearing was you know,

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>taking away my freedom and all that stuff. If you

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>look at any large Asian city, the deaths from COVID

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>are just a small fraction of what we experienced the

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>United States, New York City had deaths and Los Angeles

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>had twenty four thousand deaths. If you look the you know,

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong had two deaths, Singapore thirty one deaths. Even Tokyo,

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>which quote had a problem, is fewer than two thousand deaths,

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>less than one tenth of what Los Angeles experienced. So

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you know that it's kind of a large data point

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>that we have is that the masks and really work.

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 1>And I think the way to look at the CDC

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>guidance is that, Okay, once you're vaccinated, you've got just

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>as much protection as the mask, so you really don't

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>have to wear the mask. But they, in mind view

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 1>didn't emphasize enough that the vaccination was the key to

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:37.919
<v Speaker 1>be masking, and you know, the average person here is okay,

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>masks aren't required any more. CDCs says so, and they

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>skip over the point of whether you're vaccinated or not.

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's unfortunate, and that's what we're looking

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>at here. Do you think part of the reason for

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the new CDC guidance was to encourage people to get vaccinated. Yeah,

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that was part of the thinking from what the public

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>spokes person seven and Dr wilens that you know, okay,

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you can now discard the mask if you're vaccinated. And

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think that was a strong enough message.

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>It was there, but it should have been the headline,

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it should have been the lead, as they

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>used to say, and and not buried it. Really, I

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>think got buried that the trade off or no mask

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>is getting the shot. And there's no question in my

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>mind that's what they're trying to accomplish. And so they're

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to incent people to get the shot so then

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you can, even under the honor system, get yourself free

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of the mask. And Americans just aren't good at the

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>honor system or that smart, right. I think we've proved

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 1>that in really addressing these serious public health issues and

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>wearing the mask cool and they should have so I

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>think for any excuse not to where a mask, people

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>are going to do it. And if you're challenged there's

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>no vaccine passport, you just say, hey, I got vaccinated

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and you're good to go. But that's not really what

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>people should be doing. They should be very serious about

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>getting the shot before discarding the mask. Also, is the

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.359
<v Speaker 1>CDC guidance Is it a little confusing? Does it address

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, what you have to do when you're on

0:05:56.279 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>an airplane or schools or schools schools? They left local

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the areas that they There are three areas they said

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>you still needed to wear masks no matter what, airplanes,

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>health care facilities, and a public transportation And I think

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that's just a recognition that the vaccination rates are just

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 1>not high enough to support a full dy masking of

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the public at this point. But again I was disappointed

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 1>in the emphasis and the messenging that that that really

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't come through, at least to what I read and

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>heard over the last couple of days. The United Food

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and Commercial Workers Union criticized the CDC for failing to

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 1>consider how the new policy would affect grocery store workers

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>who have to deal with customers who are not vaccinated,

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>right and there's no way you can force them to

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>wear a mask. Really, if you know, if the store

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>management isn't going to make continue a firm masking policy

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>at the front door, which many of them are not.

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you have a thousand people go to

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>grocery store right now, six hundred of them at least

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 1>are unvaccinated. So there's going to be continued spread of

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>COVID and that exposes the workers. I mean, the only

0:06:57.560 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>good news for the workers is the same for everyone else.

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>If get your shot, the data show from the study

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:06.239
<v Speaker 1>that CDC relied on that you are extremely well protected

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 1>against serious disease. It's it's so kind of everyone for

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>themselves sort of thing right now this weekend walking around

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>in New York City. I'm fully vaccinated, and I assume

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other people are. But every time you

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>want to go into a store or somewhere, you have

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to put the mask on anyway, because most of the

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>stores are requiring masks. Still, it gets to be, well,

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>why even bother taking it off when I'm walking around outside. Yeah,

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>there is an element of that, and we're in a

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>transition period. And I just think, you know, if this

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>advice had come out, you know, a month from now

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>or or middle to late June, when maybe hopefully sixty

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty five seventy percent of the population is vaccinated. Uh,

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>then I think people would have felt a lot more

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>comfortable in going maskless, and businesses probably would have had

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>less of a requirement. But it's it's very, very conflicting

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>right now for a business owner when you know sixty

0:07:57.520 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>years so percent of the people are not vaccinated and

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you're supposing your your workforce and you you really can't

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>require your workforce to get vaccinated either, but you can

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>encourage everyone to get vaccinated, and that's not the best

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you can do, and it just is going to be

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>messy for another six weeks or so in my view.

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>So for employers and employers ask employees to give them

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>information about, you know, whether they've been vaccinated or not,

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>or does that impinge on their privacy rights? Yeah, that

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>varies by state. Uh. If the employer is paying generally

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>for healthcare, the employer under the federal law has the

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>right to know about the employee's health status just because

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>they're a pay or so there's there's you know, some

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>ability of the employer to gain information in that regard.

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Some states have more strict laws, however, and make it

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>on a need to know only basis. And right now,

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think employers can ask in most places,

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>but the employee isn't required to tell them or to

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>get the vaccination. And I think that's going to change. Um,

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's all but important differences to the status

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of the shots. Right now, none of the shots are

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>fully authorized by the FDA. They're they're under the emergency

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>use authorization, which is different from full accepted authorization. And

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>once the FDA moves and has full accepted authorization, then

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>there are jurisdictions in which employers will be able to

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>mandate that employees get the shot, or school districts will

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>be able to mandate that the youngsters get the shot

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>before going back to school. So that's coming. It's it's

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>just not quite there yet because the vaccinations are not

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>fully approved by the FDA at this point. You know,

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning, I heard a lot more talk about

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>herd immunity. Are they giving up on her immunity? No?

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean the problem with her immunity is that it's

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's neither her nor immune. You know, we we have, unfortunately,

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of virus that is highly mutigetic and their new variants

0:09:57.000 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>being created every day. So the number of people who

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 1>have to be fully vaccinated at a period of time

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:07.959
<v Speaker 1>when the virus is stable was thought maybe to be

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the but but what I've read recently,

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 1>it's more like, because the stability of the virus is

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>very short lived, is it mutates, and then the number

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of interactions that people have are given the transmissibility of

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the virus just overwhelmed. What's called the our number of

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the ability that transmitted. You know, if we could all

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>it's funny, but if we could all lock ourselves a

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>closet for fourteen days, this entire thing would go away. Yeah,

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>because it wouldn't be transmitted and the virus would die

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>in its hosts within fortune days. What about the variants, well,

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you know they're a big problem. I mean, that's that's

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the giant unknown. So that the two unknowns we have

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and why you shouldn't throw out your mass quite yet

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>are one. How long the antibodies UH and T cell

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>response from the vaccinations persists. Everyone's hoping it's years um,

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>but it may be only a few months, and we

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have that data point yet because people haven't been

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated that long. UM. They're hoping a robust T cell

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>response UH continues for years in the vaccinations and that

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>would be terrific nows, but we don't know yet. We

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>won't know for you know, year or two is what

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the persistence rate is. The second giant unknown is is

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>how the variants are going to affect both transmissibility and

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and the ability to create serious or fatal disease. And

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>so we have to be prepared that one of these

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>variants is going to skip over the protection of the

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>vaccine and basically set us you know, at day zero

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>again that it's like a new virus being spread. And

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem unvaccinated people is that they're like little

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>many laboratories formed for the mutation of the virus. Now,

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the the the silver lining in the virus that might

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 1>skip over the currentvaccines is that the scientists have done

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a darn fine job in creating these platforms and they

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>can quickly develop a booster shot or additional vaccine that

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>would be able to get on top of most any

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>variant that would come. You know our way. So it's

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I think going to become something like the flu shot situation,

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>where you get one every year. It's not a great match,

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>but it keeps you from getting really sick. And I

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>think the COVID situation is going to be a lot

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>like that where it's going to continue to flourish. You know,

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>their partial the world to have no vaccine seeing yet.

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:36.079
<v Speaker 1>So I mean there's literally hundreds of millions of people

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>who are able to get the disease transmitted and create

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>mutations and so new versions that are going to be

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>coming up for years to come at this rate, and

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to be a couple of years before

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>we get the vaccination worldwide in a significant number of

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>people to to get on top of it. And that's

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:57.959
<v Speaker 1>including keeping on top of variants. So you know, we're

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:00.439
<v Speaker 1>in a nice kind of we've been vaccine dye during

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a good spot right now and all the variants seem

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to be reactive to the existing vaccines um but that

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 1>could change and it's not the end of the world,

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 1>but we need to be vigilant and to uh, you know,

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>follow guidance if if it turns out one of these

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 1>variances is not captured by the existing vaccines. Well, do

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>we even know do we need to get booster shots

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>within six months? Are hearing different? That sort of is

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>another problem problem, you know, it's a big problem. But but

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>but I mean we've we've only i mean the first

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>person vaccine in the United States was in November, so

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is only six months right now. So

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>if we go find that person and take their blood

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and analyze it, we can kind of figure out how

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>much you know, persistence there is. But there's there's such

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a small group of people in November. It's really going

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to be more like the summer or this fall before

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:52.839
<v Speaker 1>we'll have enough people with the vaccines to be able

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to analyze how persistent the antibodies were and how persistent

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the T cell response was, So that that data point

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>as to how persist the stuff is will be coming

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>later this year, but again we'll only know that it's

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:06.959
<v Speaker 1>at least good for six months or at least good

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>for a year, and it will be an ongoing study.

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Is that you know how long you have to keep

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>going and whether you need boost shots. And my expectation

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:17.839
<v Speaker 1>is the anybodies are going to go away within a

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>year and we're all going to have to get, as

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I said, the annual shot, just like the flu shot,

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>vaccine passports. I mean, people were saying that wearing a

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>mask took away their liberty and their rights, and vaccine

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>passports seem to be even a step up from that.

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>But do you think that's the only way to really

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>tell because the honor system. I don't know about the

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>honor system, you know. I think think that the politicalization

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>of the masking and the and the passports is nonsense.

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's it's it's it's a health issue.

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Either you've got to take care of yourself or not

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>if you don't want to find I'm not going to

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>think a whole lot less of you, but it's pretty

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>dumb even that there's a fatal disease out there that

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you can prevent. But I have got no question in

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>my mind if if President Trump has sort of and said,

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, folks, we have a situation here. We all

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>got to wear masks and socially distant for a few

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>months while the scientists got on top of this, we

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>would have had a much different outcome in the United States.

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:11.119
<v Speaker 1>We would have had hundreds of thousands of fewer deaths.

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's as simple as that. You know, he enabled

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of people into frankly some not great

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>thinking on the problem that this was somehow elimination of freedom.

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have that problem in nineteen eighteen with the

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>flu that came through, people all mask up and wanted

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to mask up and wanted to, you know, keep themselves healthy.

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>You know this this this nonsense that you you're entitled

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to not keep yourself healthy. Okay, fine, but that's that's

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of a silly thought, right. I mean, you just

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>go out and step in the street and hope the

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>bus doesn't rend you over just because well, I'm I'm

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>got to be free to walk in the street. No,

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>there's there's sensible limitations on what you can and can't do,

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and wearing a mask during a time of pandemic as

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a sensible limitation in my view. And and it's got

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with freedom. It's got to do with

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>sensible taking care of yourself and takeing care of others.

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>But enough for the message. But it's it's it's gonna

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>be a problem because it's always going to be unvaccinated

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>people who look into and new two as I said,

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>generate these mutations of the of the virus. Finally, some

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>states are offering, like Ohio offering to give a million

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 1>dollars to five vaccinated lottery winners, and New Jersey was

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>offering a beer with a vaccination. Do you approve of those? Yeah? Absolutely,

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>anything to get shots in arms. It's it's only going

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to be to our our global benefit. I mean, we

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>we have to get shots in our own arms. We

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>have to get shots and all the arms in Africa

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and Asia, you know, And it's going to be a

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>multi year project. This virus will persist long after, you know,

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the next few weeks, and it's the next few weeks

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to be confusion in America as as shop

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>owners and business owners trying to figure out what the

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>bring workforces back and what the rules of the road

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>are going to be. But the only way to really

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>get on top of it is to get you know,

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of the population vaccinated against this thing. Thanks Rob.

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>That's Rob Fuller, Apartment Nelson Hardeman Cat Employers legally separate

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated and unvaccinated workers by shift or floor, for example,

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and if they can, is it a good idea? Joining

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>me is Bloomberglan Labor and Employment reporter Paige Smith. Can

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>employers generally require workers to get a COVID nineteen vaccine? Yes, absolutely,

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 1>so I think that, you know, as more vaccines become

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:29.360
<v Speaker 1>widely available, generally and legally, most employers really can require

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:33.639
<v Speaker 1>workers to receive the vaccine upon returning to to work.

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I would say that those mandates have

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>been sort of rare um and there are a lot

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of workplaces that are going to continue to have a

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of mix of vaccinated workers and unvaccinated workers. But

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 1>legally employers can require that. So now the question can

0:17:54.240 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>employers legally separate vaccinated and unvaccinated workers? Definitely. So we've

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>been hearing from a number of attorneys that they've been

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:07.239
<v Speaker 1>feelding requests from employers about whether they could segregate you know,

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated from unvaccinated workers. So we decided to sort of

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:13.679
<v Speaker 1>dig into it with with this. But the answer that

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>we sort of found was that yes, employers can legally

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:22.120
<v Speaker 1>separate vaccinated workers from unvaccinated workers, whether it's by you know,

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>having a shift that is of unvaccinated workers or having

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a floor for vaccinated workers. There are sort of a

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 1>few ways that people could feasibly do that. But UM,

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>what we also found is that folks are sort of

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>cautioning against it, and there has been recent guidance that

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>says that fully, if you're fully inoculated against COVID nineteen,

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 1>folks can mostly shed their mass in the workplace. But UM, legally, yes,

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>workers can be separated based on their vaccination status. So

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>now are there any risks? For example, if a worker

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>won't get vaccinated because of religious reasons or religious objections,

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>could that worker then file some kind of lawsuit if

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 1>that worker is segregated. So any sort of decision like

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>this UM in the workplace comes with some comes with

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>some legal risks. But I think that in this situation,

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>segregating workers definitely poses some UM discrimination risks because there

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>are workers who can't get vascinated because of health reasons

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 1>or for because of religious objections for example. So you know,

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>if you have a worker who won't receive the shop

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 1>based on disability or religious belief UM, then they could

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>theoretically come back and say to the employer, you know

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you're discriminating against me being because of UM. Because of

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that or UM. If those workers I should be clear,

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>if those workers suffer negative consequences as a result of

0:19:56.280 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>being segregated because of their disability or religious um belief.

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>For example, they could bring allegations of discrimination against an employer.

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>So one lawyer told you that any company contemplating even

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:16.919
<v Speaker 1>contemplating a separation policy should survey workers. What kind of

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 1>survey would you do? That's a good question, I think

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>part of it as well as were We're not totally

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>sure at this point in time how many employers have

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>contemplated separating workers based on vaccination status. Um. We haven't

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>heard of this sort of being a widely implemented policy,

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 1>So I can't speak exactly to what sort of survey

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>would be conducted, But we do know that employers are

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>thinking about this and that they have asked their attorneys

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 1>how they should proceed. And employers are allowed to ask

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 1>employees if they've been vaccinated. Correct? Correct. If employers wish

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>to ask employees whether they've been backcinated, they need to

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>do so in a way that asked all employees that

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, you sort of can't single out one or

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 1>two employees. Mac have you been vaccinated? Needs to be

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 1>sort of a company wide and business related inquiry. You

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:20.120
<v Speaker 1>talked to Nicole Greason, director of occupational Hygiene and Safety

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.439
<v Speaker 1>for the Duke University Health System, said it's just not

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>worth the logistical hassle of trying to separate vaccinated and

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>unvaccinated workers. What did she mean? You know, if you're

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>in a workplace and you're going to go through the

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>process of separating these workers, you know that that's quite

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:43.360
<v Speaker 1>a culture shift, just from you know, legal considerations aside.

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>That's a huge culture shift to say, Okay, you're on

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>the unvaccinated shifts, have a great work day. Um, I

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>think that is. That's sort of what was um, what

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 1>was implied. But I should also say that a number

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of experts pointed out that, you know, dividing workers wouldn't

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 1>really be feasible and also might not make sense from

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a health and safety standpoint, because workers who are fully

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated and not wearing masks are already at a low

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>risk of infection, and you know, mixing them in with

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 1>unvaccinated workers who are wearing masks wouldn't necessarily increase infection risks.

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>That's at least what the health and safety experts told us.

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 1>So page did most of the lawyers you spoke to

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 1>think that you could separate workers, but it just wasn't

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a good idea to do that, correct exactly. That was

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of the takeaways the idea that legally you're permitted

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to do it. Employee employers are asking about how they

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:43.159
<v Speaker 1>can do it and if they should do it, and

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>lawyers are essentially saying, yes, you can do it, but

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>it's probably not a great idea one about OSHA. Has

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>OSHA released any new guidance since the CDC came out

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>with the with the guidance that people who were vaccinated

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 1>can basically go mask less in most places. OSHA has

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 1>said that, um, that employers should essentially follow the new

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>CDC mask guidance, So they have kind of responded after

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 1>the new CDC guidance was released, but um, it was

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.919
<v Speaker 1>just sort of an advice to say that, um, you know,

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>they'll be updating their materials on their website and to

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>for employers to check back essentially. And you spoke to

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Debbie Berkowitz, the National Employment Law Projects, Workers Safety and

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Health Program Director, and she said, in some settings, there's

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>really no way to segregate workers. Absolutely, So there are

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can imagine that there are workplaces where

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 1>this could be an option, for example, if you're in

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>an office building or sort of a corporate setting. But

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>there are also places where this just isn't feasible at all.

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:51.360
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, kind of silly to imagine. If you're

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in a grocery store for example, um, you know, trying

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to separate your vaccinated from your unvaccinated workers, or if

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you're in a factory setting or in a warehouse for examples,

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>just the idea of segregating he folks is is not

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>really feasible. So now some states are passing their own

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>rules about this, and they seem to fall into two camps.

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 1>So some are considering approving employers requiring proof of vaccinations

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>before workers can stop wearing a face mask. Tell us

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>about those states and what they're thinking about doing. Yes,

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 1>So there are a number of states that have sort

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of weighed in on this since um, you know, since

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the CDC really it's it's guidance, so um, the Oregon

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Occupational Safety UM Agency has weighed in, and and California

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>has weighed in as well. So Oregon, for example, issued

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>some guidance that said that employers must verify that a

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:50.479
<v Speaker 1>worker is fully vaccinated before having them you know, giving

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>them the opportunity to remove face coverings and sort of

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 1>ignore social distancing requirements. But um, you know, to flip

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:02.400
<v Speaker 1>over to California, California is saying that, UM, I should

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>say they're proposing because it hasn't been fully approved yet.

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>UM that employer has must have documentation to show that

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a worker has been vaccinated before sort of permitting them

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to relax UM masking and social distancing requirements. So that changed.

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>The California change hasn't yet been fully approved. But those

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 1>are sort of two examples of states weighing in on

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 1>the issue, and other states are passing laws that do

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the opposite, that limit employer's ability to set workplace policies

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>based on whether or not a worker is vaccinated or

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>not vaccinated. Yes, so, for example on UM earlier this

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>month May in on May seven, montanas Um implemented a

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>law that banned employers from making hiring decisions or setting

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>rules based on vaccination status. Are there just a few

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>states doing this addressing this issue at this point in time?

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 1>Are a few states that we you know, as we

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of mentioned, that have weighed in on the issue, UM,

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:07.199
<v Speaker 1>but we can't be sure of who else might weigh in,

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 1>especially since the cd C guidance is still relatively new.

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for being on the Bloomberg Laws Show page. That's

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Law, Labor Unemployment Reporter Paid Smith and that's it

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 1>for the edition of the Bloomberg Law Show. Remember you

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>can always at the latest legal news on our Bloomberg

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Law Podcast. You can find them on Apple Podcast, Spotify

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and at www dot Bloomberg dot com slash podcast slash Law.

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm June Grossow. Thanks so much for listening. Please turn

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:37.120
<v Speaker 1>into The Bloomberg Law Show every weeknight at ten pm

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Eastern idear on Bloomberg Radio.