WEBVTT - Facebook, Twitter and Google Under Senate Microscope on Russia, De Vynck Says

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa A. Bramowitz. Each day

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for you and your money, whether you're at the grocery

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>store or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>L Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Now for more details about how technology companies have been

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>embroiled in the Russian meddling in the US election, I

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>want to bring in Garrett. Garrett Davincy is our technology

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.599
<v Speaker 1>reporter in Washington, d C. Today, Uh joining us now.

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 1>You can follow Garrett on Twitter at Garrett d h

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Garrett mentioning Twitter. Let's begin their Twitter has identified and

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>removed about accounts that were linked to something called the

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Internet Research Agency. Uh. Maybe just use that as a

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>jumping off point to explain what is it that's being

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>investigated and what do we know so far about social

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>media and collusion with Russian actors and um, the U

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>S election in November. So yeah, we have three hearings

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>over the next two days, one today to tomorrow, and

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>in all three of them, representatives of Twitter, Google, and

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Facebook will face questions from lawmakers. You mentioned Twitter, You

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the ira A, the Internet Research Agency, So that

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>is the shadowy organization that has been linked to the

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Kremlin that you know, the public has known about for

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>several years now, you know, dating back to even but

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>all this information that the tech companies have disclosed, they

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>disclosed the whole new raft of information last night Twitter

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>mentioning those accounts. As you mentioned Facebook talking about UM

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>on six million Americans may have seen content that was

0:01:56.000 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>generated or shared by Russian linked actors. Now those numbers

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>are both bigger than what had been disclosed up into

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>this point. And we just saw Senator Mark Warner, who

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>is the top Democrat Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>who will be interviewing these UM companies tomorrow, saying, you know,

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>in the scrum to reporters at Congress, just now that

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, all this information that's been released kind of

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>shows to him that maybe the story is going to

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>keep getting bigger than what we know right now. He said,

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, they disclosed a certain amount earlier, and now

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>they're disclosing more. He called um you know, the attempts

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>by the tech companies that kind of get ahead of

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the story is just incremental changes. So you know, the

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 1>tech companies are really up for for sort of a

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>real grilling from lawmakers today and tomorrow. Garrett. You know,

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>we think about President Trump's administration as being anti regulation

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>or at least pro deregulation. What's the appetite right now

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to increase regulation around the tech companies? Relating to uh,

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>some of this investigation into Russia's interference in the election.

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're seeing, you know, the Democrats, in part

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.079
<v Speaker 1>to Killer have a put forward a bill sponsored by

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>two Democrats as well as Republican Senator John McCain. So

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>there is some bipartisan efforting there to sort of regulate

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the advertising on online um, you know, social networks such

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>as these, and kind of bring the standards that we

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>have for radio and television up to the level on

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the online up to the level we have

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>for these other mediums. A lot of other senators and

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>congress people have sort of expressed, you know, they're not

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>so sure. They they want to kind of see how

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>these hearings go before they take a stand, and that's

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.239
<v Speaker 1>really one of the things that that's up for debate here.

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>We have some people in Congress saying, you know, this

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>is the bill that we need to regulate advertising on

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>these systems, make sure that um users of the social

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:46.119
<v Speaker 1>networks know when something is political, when it's and who

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>it's been funded by and other people. Not so sure yet?

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>What's the cost benefit analysis is something like this, Garrett,

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>not to the companies, but to the nefarious agents that

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>were placing these ads. I mean, it's relative the inexpensive

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to put these ads and this kind of content up online. Correct.

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>It's another question that we will be you know, hearing

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people talking about and debating in the

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>next couple of days, which is, if you have a

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>small amount of money and you know, a consorted, concerted

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>group of people trying to use that money to buy

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>advertisements and then sharing it organically as well, how much

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>impact can you really have? I mean, the amount of

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>money that was involved one hundred thousand dollars that Facebook

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>has been able to find. You know, we were not

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>sure there could be more but one dollars. I mean,

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a drop in the bucket for the amount

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of money that has spent on these platforms every day.

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>On Google it was significantly even less than that, So

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's hard to know exactly how much of

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>an impact these Russian trolls so to speak, actually had

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>on the election. Garrett, I'm sure you've read through the testimony,

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>because these big tech giants have released pre released some

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 1>of what they're going to say. Can you give us

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a flavor of the approach that they're taking. The approach

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that they're taking is to kind of, you know, try

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to show that they're being transparent and say, you know,

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>their Facebook's general counsel, who will be testifying, you know,

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>use very strong language. He said it was, you know,

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>an affront to democracy that this kind of thing has happened,

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>that they're very upset about it, that they really want

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to work with lawmakers to change it. But what they

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>also want to do is make sure that, you know,

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:24.479
<v Speaker 1>the regulations aren't too strict and don't go too far

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>for them that may inhibit them to actually do their business.

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, one thing that came out this morning, the

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Internet Um lobbying group that represents these these three companies

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and a few other ones, said, you know, we need

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>these laws if they are to come forward, to apply generally,

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 1>not to just carve out our three companies because we're

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 1>the biggest names in this fight. Garrett Devinc, thank you

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Garrett Devinc is a technology

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 1>reporter for Bloomberg News. He's in Washington, d C. Today

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>because that is where the action is at, with Facebook, Twitter,

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and Google all heading to Congress to talk about what

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>they're doing, uh to counter false news, fake news, as

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 1>well as UH perhaps uh international agents trying to interfere

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>with US elections. Will be following that throughout the day.

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 1>The testimony is in the afternoon, and we will bring

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that live to you on Bloomberg Television. Now, want to

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>visit with the Noah Felmanoah is the Felix Frankfurt Professor

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of Law of Harvard University. Is also a Bloomberg of

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>You columnist, and he is also the author of a

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>new book on James Madison, on the president of the

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 1>Presidency of James Madison. The book is entitled The Three

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Lives of James Madison, Genius, Partisan and President. No thank

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you very much for being with us. Um. You know,

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>before we get into James Madison, let's talk about just

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>something a little bit more, uh, sort of immediate, and

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>this is the indictments that were handed down by Robert

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Mueller on yesterday for Paul Manafort and Mr Gates and

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and just the ongoing investigation. What do you make of this?

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Where do you think this all leads? And and why

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>is this is starting with an indictment of Manafort. It's

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 1>started with Manaphort because he is vulnerable if the allegations

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>in the indictment are true. He's exposed himself to up

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to eighty years in prison by essentially lobbying for foreign governments,

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>not telling anybody about it, keeping the money overseas, not

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>paying taxes on it, and then laundering it to pay

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>for things like renovations on his Hampton's house. So he's

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a weak link. And since he was for some period

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>of time, for some months, charement of the campaign, it's

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a logical thing from a prosecutor's perspective. You start with

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the weak link. Where it's going. We still don't know

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>enough to be certain. It's very clear that the Russians

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>were trying to make contacts all over the Trump campaign,

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and the guilty plea of George Papadopoulos offers ample evidence

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of that. U The question is was there collusion back?

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, did the Trump campaign do anything going back,

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's really much too soon to know that. We

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>don't yet have direct evidence that that did happen, um,

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>And that's what the investigation is going to turn on.

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>If they can find that, it will look like a

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>success from Aller, and if not, like a success for

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the president. You know, No, I want to pick up

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>on that point because you really highlighted that in your

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>column that certainly President Trump seems to view this as

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:29.239
<v Speaker 1>a who wins and who loses type of UH investigation

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>were as arguably Robert Muller views this as trying to

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>find out what happened and the truth. And I'm wondering

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>how important is it to sort of see it through

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>President Trump's lens in in order to figure out whether

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>this will be effective? And even if Trump is impeached,

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people think that he will not get

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>expelled from office because the Senate won't convict him. You know,

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>like anything where there are two perspectives, it's really important

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to see it from both directions. And so from from

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>mother's perspective, you know, his career as a public servant

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>comes to fruition whether he gets the president or not.

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, he is going to try to find out

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:07.559
<v Speaker 1>what actually happened and provide evidence. And that's how prosecutors

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>typically are are brought up to see things. But from

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 1>the president's perspective, and really this is the perspective it's

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>most relevant to our polity as a nation. The question

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>is does he go down or not? You know, does

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>he end up in history as as Nixon, or did

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the end up in history as Bill Clinton bruised and

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>battered but nevertheless acquitted by the Senate. And so I

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's hard, you know, for an elected official not

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to see things in those terms. No, as far as

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the role of the special prosecutor goes in this, is

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 1>there any possibility that the prosecutor will be wrong in

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>going after certain people in the sense that we focus

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>on the president, but maybe it had nothing to do

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>with decisions made by Donald Trump. You know, prosecutors are

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a human believe it or not, and they make mistakes too.

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>In the case of Manaford, assuming that the allegations are

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 1>are true, and there's no reason really to doubt that

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>at this stage, the prosecu will will pick up some

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 1>scalps of people who are criminals and have done things

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>wrong um and should probably be punished for that, but

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:11.719
<v Speaker 1>who may not ultimately lead back to the big investigation,

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and that for the prosecut that's the kind of mistake

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that you're talking about. I think it's where you go

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>after somebody, you try to flip them and they've done

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>nothing to tell and that may be true, and that

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>happens to prosecutors um and then you know, the bad

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:24.599
<v Speaker 1>luck is to the people who committed the crimes in

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the first place and made themselves vulnerable to being charged

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and might otherwise never have been charged. Do you think

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the Attorney General Jeff Sessions is at risk here? I

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't heard anything thus far suggesting that he is personally

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 1>at risk, especially because the key meeting in which the

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>President apparently pushed Comey was one in which Sessions wasn't present. So,

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think Sessions looks bad around this, but

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't yet have any indication that he himself is

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>directly in the line fire. You know. I just also

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>want to follow up in this whole winner versus loser

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of way that President Trump seems to be viewing this.

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there is another aspect to this. We're gonna

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>get elections midterm elections next year, and there is a

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>good chance that should this escalate based on the popularity

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>rankings of President Trump yesterday, that this could definitely impede

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the Republican's position in Senate, in Congress more broadly. What

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>what do you? What do you? What's your take on that? Well,

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you're absolutely right that in principle, if the President's popularity

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>goes down even further, that should have a gravitational pull

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>on other Republican candidates. It is, however, really important to

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 1>remember that the first midterm elections in any presidential term

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:42.199
<v Speaker 1>almost always result in a significant loss of seats for

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the president's party. You know what happened to build Contentent,

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>happened to Barack Obama. It's it's quite normal, and so

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be some pull regardless. Um, the question

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:53.559
<v Speaker 1>is will that be very disproportionate? And if you look

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>at the way the districts are designed, it's not certain

0:11:56.760 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that Trump's unpopularity will pull down repub into that much

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>further in many House races, because many House districts are

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 1>gerrymandered such that they're overwhelmingly Democrats or overwhelmingly Republican, and

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the base may not care. No, just quickly and in

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>your book, The Three Lives of James Madison, Genius, Partisan

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and President. Would you say that James Madison is one

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>of the first presidents to really understand the power public

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>opinion and what was then the media. Yeah. Absolutely, It

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 1>was in um It was in John Adams's presidency that

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>he and Jefferson decided they needed to start a newspaper

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of their own, essentially a republican newspaper to go against

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the federalist newspaper that was being run by Alexander Hamilton's

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and they wrote very explicitly about this. In fact, Madison

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>wrote a very famous essay called public Opinion where he

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 1>basically said, you know, we didn't think it was going

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to work this way under the Constitution. We thought that,

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, everyone would do his own research. But now

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>we understand that the media affects the way people think,

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and so if you want to actually ensure that the

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Constitution is followed, it's not enough to rely on the

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>government officials. He was thinking of the Adams administration actually

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>have to rely on the media to inform the people.

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Sounds fascinating. A new book, The Three Lives of James Madison, Genious, Partisan,

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and President, by Noah Feldman, who just joined us. Felix Frankfurter,

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>professor of law at Harvard University, also able recue columnist.

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. Just last week, more than voters in Lombardy,

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that's the home to Italy's financial capital Milan, and the

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Veneto region around Venice, they voted yes in a non

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>binding referendum to somehow access more autonomy from the state

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of Italy. Here to help us understand exactly what's going

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>on is Roberto Maroni. He is the president of the

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>region of Lombardy and he is also a former Interior

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Minister of the Italian Republic in the Roberta Lomoni, President,

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for being with us. What can

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you describe for people the difference between the referendum that

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:08.719
<v Speaker 1>was held in Italy about autonomy in these two regions

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:12.599
<v Speaker 1>and the referendum the balloting that went on in Catalonia.

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a very simple. The referendum in Catalonia was something

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>against the Spanish constitution. What we did in Lombardi and

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Vnito is something too uh to make the Italian constitutes

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to apply the Italian constitution, in particular reform of the

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>constitution which took place sixteen years ago. The reform was

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>we the regions can ask for more powers, more competences

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and more money. In these last sixteen years, no regions

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>got new competencens, new powers. Why because the Italian government

0:14:56.120 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>was always against giving money and competency. That's why we

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 1>did the referendum. It's a non binding referendum, yes, but

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>from a political viewpoint, this gave me power. More than

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>three million Lomber people went to vote, and this is

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the difference in any negotiating, tough negotiation with the government.

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>President Maroni, can you just take a step back and explain,

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>is it a coincidence that we're seeing these independence or

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>autonomy movements in the economic capitals of a number of

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>European regions, Because the Catalonia region is also the economic

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>capital of Spain, much like Lombardy. I don't think it's

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a coincidence. The problem is that Europe is not working.

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>The governance of Europe from a political viewpoint, is not working.

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a sum of individual member states. Each of them

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>is working as individual member states. We have nothing such

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>as the US system federal system, and this uh is

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>means that many important regions such as Catalonia Lombardi and

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Ventito want Europe to change. I think, I hope that

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>what is happening in Europe is hurt by the European Union,

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the European commissioned, the European Parliament, because we need to

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>change the governance of Europe from a europe from a

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>political viewpoint. This is the signal I think people has

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>done with our referendum and also in Catalonia. What would

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you like to see changed? Because I believe that one

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of the points during the referendum was that the two

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>regions account for about thirty percent of the economic output

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of Italy, that includes industrial, agricultural services, finance and so on.

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you want more of the tax money to day

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:04.719
<v Speaker 1>in northern Italy rather than go to places in southern

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Italy and Sicily, Yes, exactly. We pay a lot of taxes. Uh.

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>If you the difference between what we pay in taxes

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and what we get back from the state from the

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>government is a huge amount of taxes is fifty four

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>billion euros per year. The difference I want at least

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:33.400
<v Speaker 1>half of this amount, twenty seven billion euros. So we'll

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>let me to lower the level of taxation for companies,

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 1>to increase investments from abroad and to put Lombardy on

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the top of the regions in Europe. I'm trying to understand.

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 1>You were saying Europe is not working. The European Union

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>is not working, and so that's why the economic powerhouses

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>in Europe are sort of putting their foot down. What

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>would you like to see on a European Union level

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:06.640
<v Speaker 1>that would make it work? What we call the Europe

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Regions, not of twenty eight twenty nine eight

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>member states. We have ten million people. We would be

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the sixth country in Europe um, but we don't count.

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>We as Lombardy region don't have any power to interfere

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 1>with European decisions. That's why we want to Europe to

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>move from what is now twenty eight member states into

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the Europe of the Region's taken into account, then Lombardy,

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Catalonia and regions are something special. That's our our vision,

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:54.439
<v Speaker 1>President Modony, and that that's highly radical. That's basically saying,

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>break up Italy, break up Spain. It's not about them,

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it's Lombardy and it's got a lot. Is that you're

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 1>asking for We are asking in uh uh were What

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 1>we want is that Lombardi event of the regions, the

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>power the powerful regions in Europe can be taken into

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>account more than what is now. We don't have nothing

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:29.199
<v Speaker 1>against Italy. Of course, our ferendum was inside the nation

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Italian nation. But I think that it will be useful

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>or so for Italy and the regions in the South.

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>If if Lombardi is more has more money and more

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>competencence and power have So it seems to be that

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>there's this conflict between the political unity, let's say of

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Italy or even in Spain, with the economic and financial reality,

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 1>which is this is all about money. Right, your rich region,

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>you don't want that money to go to regions that

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>have less money. Yet I don't want money to go

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to the Italian government because they don't use our money

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.919
<v Speaker 1>the right way. I am willing to give money to

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the regions directly to the regions of the South in

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a bit to be relationship. This is what is useful

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>for the South. This is my vision. And now we

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>are trying to uh with the government to find a solution,

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a common solution, not against the government, not against Italy,

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>but for the help of the original of the South.

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 1>Robert to Maroni thank you so much for being with us.

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>President of the Region of Lombardy, which is his presidency

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.439
<v Speaker 1>is based in Milan in Italy, but he's joining us

0:20:45.440 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in our Bloomberg eleven three studios in New York focused

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>on fixed income is brought to by PIMCO for investors

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>who demand more than the markets deliver. All investments contain

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:10.679
<v Speaker 1>risk and may lose value. Consult your investment professional before investing,

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>well before we do anything where we go on, check

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>in with Simon Ballard. Here's our global credit strategist for

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News based in London. Simon, always a pleasure. I'm

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>going to give you a choice here. This is, you know,

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>the trifecta. You get to talk either about inflation or

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>deflation in the Eurozone, Italy and what the effects of

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 1>quantitative easing have had on the economy or not. And

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the alternative for Germany, the Nationalist party that won seats

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>in the Bundestag calling for a lawsuit to question quantitative

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 1>eything from the ECB. Which one of those, uh, do

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to kick off? Whichever one we pick, we're

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>all gonna We're gonna come back to inflation. I think, indeed,

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>go for it the all the lack of inflation, and

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the and and the fact that the you know, the

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 1>e c B. Here we are four years into into

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 1>quantitative easing and they're still trying to chase that two

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>percent close to target that that they're wanting. So um,

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, be it bit directly in Germany, Beard in Italy.

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, the lack of inflation is what's keeping monetary

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>policy accommodative um at these sort of levels, which is

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:15.360
<v Speaker 1>continuing to fuel equities higher and risk assets generally sort

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 1>of keeping the keeping the flames going. Simon, when you

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 1>talk to band fund managers, are they basically asleep? Are

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>they basically I don't care, just put it on an

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>autopilot by everything. I don't care. There's nothing that could

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>shake this until they see a catalyst, until they feel

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 1>there's a catalyst for change. Then yes, to a certain extent,

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>there is that, although you do sense that they're becoming

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more how should I put it, a

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit more discerning in their approach to risk. And

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>we've seen you know, a couple of high yield deals recently,

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 1>sub investment grade deals having a little bit more of

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>investor push back. There was a deal from from Shop Direct.

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Last week, um It had an fr entranch. Investors came

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>back said the risks, the covenants associated with the name

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 1>were a little bit too much for them to stomach,

0:22:57.800 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>so they pulled back and they cut the fr entranch

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>end floating floating rate notes, right, I apologize as a

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>floating rate notes. So they went with a fixed rate

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 1>coupon trance. The yield on that was had had to

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 1>be pushed back from seven to seven and three quarter

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>percent may not seem a huge amount, but in the

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 1>context of a have a multi hundred billion dollar hundred

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:19.439
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion pounds transaction, it is. It just shows that

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 1>investors have become a little bit more concerned about the

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 1>underlying credit fundamental So they're not just chasing yield in

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>this environment. They are looking at the you know, the

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:29.199
<v Speaker 1>the risk reward that they potentially will be left holding

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>if and when inflation starts pick up, if and when

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>yields start to to to rise more significantly. Simon, is

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>there any clear understanding as to why it would cost

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>twice as much to borrow money from the UH from

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the markets in France and it does in Germany? Looking

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>at ten year yields. I mean basically there you're just

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 1>going to look at the fundamental risks. And while France

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>has improved significantly or did improve significantly with Mr Macron

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>being voted into the into the into the Lias Palace,

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, a couple of question marks have started to

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:05.120
<v Speaker 1>come in his the Macron rally. Just as we had

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the Trump rally that faded, the Macron rally has faded

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:10.919
<v Speaker 1>to a certain extent. So you've got a greater degree

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of social security costs and and basically weaker economic growth

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 1>within the within the thing. But does that really affect

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>people's opinion when it comes to the ability of the

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>French government to repay its debts. I mean they're going

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to repay them in Euros, as is Germany, as is Italy,

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Spain and so on. Doesn't someone say, gee, this just

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make any sense for so long that Spain, you know,

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the tenure at one four seven, the US is at

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>two three seven, and we don't have anybody yet that's

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to secede. No, absolutely, and to a certain extent,

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>if you look at your the level of absolute European

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 1>yields versus the U s, you'd argue that from a

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 1>fundamental perspective, you want to buy in the US all

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>day long because of the you know, the improving story

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>um and and the higher yields there in the US.

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the day, European investors are sort

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of obliged to hold European or euro denominated assets UM.

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:00.200
<v Speaker 1>And the longer that the ECB continues to sort of

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:03.439
<v Speaker 1>pump prime the economy with quantity divis ng UM, you know,

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the lower those or certainly those low level of yields

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:10.159
<v Speaker 1>will will persist. Simon. We did get results out of

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 1>BNP Pariba today that showed declines in their debt trading revenues.

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>This kind of follows what we've been seeing. Uh and

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you are just shot a proprietary trading group in London. Um,

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>there has been a market deterioration in volumes a relative

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 1>to the same period last year. How does this play

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>into the calculus at all? Well, again, you know what

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>we've seen here is a reiteration across the banking section

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and across many industries. Should we say of the challenging

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>market conditions that the traders and investors face um and

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you know the numbers that we had from

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>BNP while equities we were fairly buoyant. On the fixed

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>income side, you know, margins continue to be to be pressed.

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 1>And until we start to see the CB getting into

0:25:56.119 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of rate tightening, into into interest rate raising mode um,

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>then margins in the financial sector we're going to remain

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>going to squeezed. I'm just wondering on a broader market perspective,

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the fact that volumes have been coming down, that people

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't had conviction, does that matter? Are people caring about

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:16.640
<v Speaker 1>bond market liquidity anymore? People don't don't care about bond

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>market liquidity at the moment. They're quite happy to just hold,

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>but they will do when the market reverses and they're

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 1>trying to look for a bid. Well that makes that

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. Any comments about the Alternative for Germany

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Party and their call for a lawsuit questioning ANCLA Merkel's

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>reliance on the ECB, Yeah, you know again, I guess

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the a f D and generally, you know,

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the populist rising that we've seen across Europe, the protectionist

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 1>type of rhetoric that we've seen coming into politics over

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the course of I guess the last couple of years

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 1>now um. It's really just helped take the headlines away

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>from from Spain and Catalonia um as Pogumo ends up

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>in in Belgium. But again I think it just underscores

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 1>the the the the problems of a cross the Eurozone

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 1>um at the moment um in terms of each individual

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>nation wanting to ensure that it has its own economic

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 1>growth and solid foundations for future, for future improvements. Simon Ballard,

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. Simon Ballard is

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a global credit strategist for Bloomberg. Coming to us from London.

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:32.880
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo.

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:39.639
<v Speaker 1>It's one before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.